Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Although Ericsson‟s model is a useful starting point, it fails to address the human aspects of player
development. In recent years, Jean Cote, Joseph Baker, and Bruce Abernathy expanded on Ericsson‟s
work to offer a more balanced approach to developing athletes. In this approach, early specialization is
discouraged and player enjoyment is considered an important consideration, especially at younger ages.
Coaches are encouraged to help athletes progress through developmental stages rather than direct them
toward deliberate practice at an early age. The model outlines three stages of development. In the first
stage, called “Sampling,” athletes try a variety of sports to develop motor skills while having fun.
Typically, this stage lasts from around age 6 to age 12. The next stage, called “Specializing,” typically
lasts from around age 13 to age 15. In this stage, athletes are still having fun but their focus narrows to
one or two sports. The final stage, called “Investment,” is marked by a commitment to achieving an elite
level of performance in a single activity. It usually starts around the age of 16 and continues throughout a
player‟s involvement in the activity. Unlike Ericsson‟s model, Cote and colleagues suggest that play has a
beneficial role for athletic
development. Progression through
the stages is marked by decreasing
levels of play and increasing
levels of practice. Whereas
Ericsson‟s demands deliberate
practice for improvement, Cote
and colleagues argue that play is an important step toward expertise. Unlike deliberate practice, play is
done for its own sake and is enjoyable. It isn‟t taken too seriously and the focus is on the performance
instead of the eventual payoff. Cote believes that play lays the groundwork for the motivation needed to
one day pursue practice seriously.
Take-Home Messages: Tips for Youth Coaches
Ericsson attempted to identify the path to expertise. Recently, researcher Joseph Baker has interviewed
elite athletes and discovered the paths to expertise are far more varied than Ericsson first suggested. Cote
and colleagues have attempted to amend Ericsson‟s work to include these findings. What is important is
what all of these efforts can teach us about designing programs that are most likely to help young players
develop as athletes and people. The best concepts from both research efforts can be combined into a list
of tips for designing athletic programs for young athletes. Ideally, keeping these tips in mind will help
coaches develop well-adjusted players and well-adjusted individuals.
References:
Cote, J., Baker, J., & Abernathy, B. (2003). From play to practice: A developmental framework for the
acquisition of expertise in team sports. In Janet L. Starkes & K. Anders Ericsson (Eds.), Expert
performance in sports: Advances in research on sport expertise, pp. 89-114.
Ericsson, K.A. (2003). Development of elite performance and deliberate practice: An update from the
perspective of the expert performance approach. In Janet L. Starkes & K. Anders Ericsson (Eds.), Expert
performance in sports: Advances in research on sport expertise, pp. 49-84.
Ericsson, K.A., Krampe, R.T., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the
acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363-406.
Leite, N., Baker, J., & Sampaio, J. (2009). Paths to expertise in Portuguese national team athletes. Journal
of Sports Science and Medicine, 8, 560-566.
Lynch, J. (2001). Creative coaching: New ways to maximize athlete and team potential in sports.
Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Picture Credits: