ABC Press Release and Allocation

DearColumbiaCommunity,
The Activities Board at Columbia (ABC) has received concerns regarding potential bias intheABC.Asan
organization, the Activities Board at Columbia strives to deliver fair decisions regarding both space and
funding for our 165+ student groups. The boardtakesthisjobextremelyseriouslyandspends hundredsof
hours each year discussing and debating topics such as what the most efficient uses of student life fees
are. DuetohowseriouslythetreatmentofstudentgroupsistakenbyABC,theboardtakesconcernsabout
bias in decision making extremely seriously. It is absolutely unacceptable for any student group to be
treated differently for any reason including identity, mission, demographic, or activity. All decisions that
occur regarding groups are made with efficient use of resources and fairness tothebroadercommunityin
mind. The ABC takes care to expose any conflict of interests during discussions and requires individuals
thatareincapableofmakingobjectivedecisionstoabstainfromvoting.
With this, recent allegations that cultural organizations governed by the Activities Board at Columbia
(specifically in the Black,Latinx,andNativeAmerican category)aretreatedunfairlyordifferentlythanother
organizations was and continues to be very serious. Through an email sent by a representative on the
Activities Board at Columbia,concernsofskewed decisionmaking duetobiasagainstculturalorganization
werebroughtforth.
In an effort to further understand andinvestigatethisissue,theABCheldaforumlastWednesday(11/18),

in place of the regularly scheduled board meeting, to discuss these concerns. Many community members
attended and expressed larger structural concerns as well as possiblesolutions.TheABClistenedintently
as leaders throughout the community expressed concerns. Many of the points made centered around a
feeling that the Activities Board at Columbia lacks sensitivity and understandingwhendealingwithcultural
organizations. The board has made a point to internalize the issues brought up and active measures are
being taken to ensure that our community never has to feel as though ABC does not fully appreciate the
purposeandmissionoftheirorganization.
Concretemeasuresinclude:
Sensitivitytrainingfortheentireboard
Openingupseatsintheboardroomforculturaladvocates
Adjusting the Activities Board at Columbias informal and official decision frameworks to
increasethefocusonculturalactivity
Institutingmoreconcreteandtransparentconstitutionalexamination
Conversationsthatthishasopenedup1 (*indicatesaconstitutionalchangeisrequired):
Separation of the Black, Latinx, and Native American category into 3 distinct categories with
onerepresentativeforeach*
Creationofaculturalcosponsorshipfund
Increasedgroupagencyovercategoryplacement
Manyofthesestillneedtobevotedonbyourrepresentativesaswellasourcommunity
membersinthecaseconstitutionalchanges.
1
Discretionaryfundingsforrepresentatives
In additiontobothcontinuingthe conversationsstartedatthisforumandtheactivestepsmentionedabove,
the Activities Board at Columbia has reviewed data applicable to its current structure2. This investigation
focused on observing bias in decisions made by the ABC. Funding decisions were used as a proxy for
decisionsasawhole3.
The main sources used for the analysis were allocation decision data from the past three years and
cosponsorship data from the past two. Cosponsorship data from last year was focused on sinceonlytwo
cosponsorshipshavebeenapprovedsofarthisyear.
Figure1:Cosponsorshipsfromthe20142015academicyear
Figure2:Allocationnumbersfromthe20152016academicyear
Inalargestructuralchange,theABCshiftedtoadirectdemocracy3yearsago.Datafromperiodsbefore
thiswasnottakenintoaccount.
3
Thesefundingdecisionscomeoutofmultipledecisionsanddiscussionsovertheyear.Ifthereisbiasin
decisionmakingitwouldmostlikelyshowupinfundingdecisions.
2013AllocationDecisions
Category
%Increases
%Decreases
%Nochange
Black,Latinx,Native 55.56%
American
0.00%
44.44%
AllCulturalGroups
44.44%
0.00%
55.56%
AllABCGroups
38.13%
8.75%
53.13%
Category
%Increases
%Decreases
%Nochange
Black,Latinx,Native
American
41.67%
25.00%
33.33%
AllCulturalGroups
25.00%
30.00%
45.00%
AllABCGroups
31.25%
26.25%
42.50%
Category
%Increases
%Decreases
%Nochange
Black,Latinx,Native
American
69.23%
15.38%
15.38%
AllCulturalGroups
62.50%
20.00%
17.50%
AllABCGroups
45.00%
26.88%
28.13%
Based on this information, there appears to be little evidence of any bias with regards to cultural
organizations in termsofdecisions reached andpassedbytheActivitiesBoardatColumbia.Discrepancies
in funding are to be expected, as some groups are more established than others or happen to hold more
programming simply due to how their organization hasevolvedovertime.However,thedistributionoftotal
allocation numbers, cosponsorships decisions, and the frequency/magnitude of allocation increases and
decreases all fail to provide substantial evidence for claims ofbiasdecisionmakingbytheActivitiesBoard
atColumbia.
The initial correspondence which prompted this investigationincludedexamplesmeanttoimplybiaswithin

the ABC boardroom. Further analysis showed that these examples were misrepresented or taken out of
context. ABC takes concerns of bias very seriously, and after further investigation and conversations with
bothcommunitymembersandboardmembers,theaforementionedclaimsappeartohavelittlevalidity.
Concurrently, this concernhasbroughtaboutanotherinvestigationintothevoice thatculturalorganizations

have ontheboard.Throughmanyconversationswithpastrepresentativesaswellascommunitymembers,
there appears to beinadequaterepresentationofculturalorganizationsontheActivitiesBoardatColumbia
specifically in the Black, Latinx, and Native American category. Multiple individuals have beenspokento
and it appears that the organization of the board room has made it difficult to bring up concerns. As
mentioned above, it is unacceptable even in the face of equality in decisions to have inequality in the
volumeofyourorganizationsvoiceforanyreason.
The ABC is working actively,asmentionedabove,tocombatthisissueandensurethattheboardroomisa

safeplaceforpeopletovoiceconcernsoruncomfortabilityifeitheroccurs.
The Activities Board at Columbia looks forwardtoensurethehighestlevelofobjectivityandunderstanding

in all decisions moving forward. If any community members have any other concerns please feel free to
reachouttotheexecutiveboardat
ABC@columbia.edu
.
Respectfully,
TheActivitiesBoardatColumbia
Sorted by Category
Academic
Project Number
Club Name
AG002312
Mock Trial
AG002322
Political Science Students Association
AG002340
Sign Language Club
AG002365
Society of International Undergraduates
AG002366
Neuroscience Society
AG002407
Pre-Law Society
AG002561
Quiz Bowl
Notes
Votes
Practice on campus, go off, they get 23K, rep proposes to cut allocation by 4K (24%
decrease), they requested it kept constant, she has talked to each of these groups,
higher registration cost per head (can't change), hotels + cars when they go, say they
need to be in the same place to prepare, they are resistent to being more efficient with
it - the only way to change spending habits is to make huge cuts. The most money per
person as any group per person, they have two traveling teams of 8-10 people, they also
have LSAT events. Some of the problems -how mock trial works - they can't stay with
people on campus (because not at a campus - most conferences are held at
courthouses) - it isn't offered to live on campus, wouldn't stay in hotel deal (find cheaper
hotel far away), only fly away to one tournament (only do if they ahve the money) usually in california. pay for just the flight back, they could be more efficient - between
4-6 people in a room, they will go to courthouse at 6:30 am, then stay away for rounds,
coaches (corporate lawyers, public defenders), mock trial has not done as well this year
(other teams live in the same house as mock trial).It is impossible for them to stay at
nearest college because hosted at a college - at debate that's how it works, not
necessarily institutionalized - 4-6 per hotel room seems a little luxurious if you consider
how many people. you frequently have to prep the night before. as student leaders - is it
worth it? the argument boils down to us making a value judgement - money that could
be going to somewhere else because they need this money to go to what they do. it's
less about specific groups - more about a community in general - a community with
groups like mock trials. two principles that are at odds. learned to appreciate smaller
groups - put in so much of their time, their is also a difference in activity - it's not as if an
exact dollar amount is putting time in - it's the nature of activity. how much are
members paying in to be part of the team. $4500 including that one flight. are they
trying to fundraise? tournament - get twenty teams to come - because of 50/50 travel,
we would need revenue to balance out allocation. can't get corporate sponsorships. less
tournaments? could they go - it's hard to determine a way to generate more revenue.
they should be put under pressure to do it - they need to build reputation on the circuits
- specific. combination of the two - not qualifying for first semester (invitational), the
way you get teams to go to your own tournaments is to go to theirs - wouldn't see
california teams otherwise (case setup), circuit limits how many tournament can hold.
next year talk about the cosponsorships and grants, (need to tell them to request more).
-$2000 This $4500 is cutting, rationale - something needs to force them to save money.
Even if something is the right thing to do - we need to use same precedent/principle.
Assume that it would cripple them, this would still be the right thing to do.
A:0 O: 3 Y: 9
Started with $250 - cut for $125. They have done a ton of programming, and arguably
there are new events. But they get so much linking from their department which also
determines what kind of events that they hold. Publicity is very important for events,
internal concerns, voting week, when they came in for cosponsorships - david is
graduating. after that meeting, they haven't done much. board is quite strong
A: 1 O: 1 Y: 10
As a board, they haven't really taken the initiative. They're a great group, but the only
events they hold are lessons - they came for sponsorship so they could pay. ODS should
be paying for it under the fact that deaf initiatives, should pursue as permanent funding,
wanted to hold more info sessions. They did apply to cosponsorships and we didn't give
it to them, but they are doing well (growing membership). There are many things they
could do but they aren't doing. This would be for extra food. They want to do non lesson
event
A: 1 UNANIMOUS
Confused, they used to spend a lot of money on tshirts for world cup event - can't spend
it on tshirts, soccer screenings, lerner during the day, soccer in europe during the day,
no actual allocation packet, they'll doing like nothing, starting as a joke and now its semi
real. Cut their desired current allocation by $500 for the tshirts and their world cup
event and also for given more time this year - they may have been able to use the
money more efficiently, give them more breathing room, fluctuate in that programming
+ apply to cosponsorships
A: 1 UNANIMOUS
Recommend $1100 - their events are pretty well attended: research fair - invite labs in
neuroscience and psychology, freshmen actually get positions from it, the event is
growing a lot - they do a lot more publicity than other comporable groups, so there is a
question of efficiency of funds. asked for a lot more - brain week (not super great tabling + giveaways), all that came from zuckerman institute, want them to have more
events for neuroscience. Can work with them for funding. Need more money for
research fair - there are many groups that do great events but we need to stick to our
principles. haven't proved that they'll use efficiently.
O: 3 A: 0 Y:9
Have $710, want $970. Applied for/holding more events, panels and judgeships and the
such. They are doing what a club that supports an academic subject should be doing.
Only ended up spending $80 for menthorship program, so they could finish the year.
A: 0 Y:10 O: 2
Practice on campus, then go off campus. large group, conflict of interest, rep likes quiz
bowl (she is in it), more thrifty when they travel, rep recommend for $500 more - 13%
increase. They also successfully applied for cosponsorships once, got CIF this year for
buzzer sets, cut in 2012-2013 because they weren't doing very well. They've improved -they place better at all of the tournaments they go to - they fundraise so they have
enough to pay for the 50% that ABC can't. They asked for $6500 because they host 3
tournaments on campus, and are going to several outside tournaments but it is hard to
devote that much to tournaments, need to know the amount of money that one
tournament nets. 2 tournaments a semester is fine, 3 tournaments is too much. $500
increase accounts for more tournaments and more people going to tournaments
(question of how many)
A:2 Y: 7 O: 3
Group
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2014-2015 Budget
2015-2016 Budget
Current
Change
Change Type
Acade
$18,495
$18,495
$18,495 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl
$14,000
($4,495) Decrease
Acade
$250
$250
$125 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl
$189
$64 Increase*
Acade
$814
$855
$1,197
$342 Increase*
Acade
$1,911
$2,006
$2,006 Please contact Kaz For the 2015-16 ac
$1,506
($500) Decrease
Acade
$834
$834
$834
Acade
$710
$710
$932
$222 Increase*
Acade
$3,895
$3,700
$4,127
$427 Increase*
$0 No change
Sorted by Category
AG002564
AG002595
AG002603
AG002615
Practice on campus, go off, second largest allocation (7071), higher registration cost per
head (can't change). Recommend less flying tournaments, public transit in location,
stingy when going there, staying with people on campus, how selective are they. They
go to worlds but they get it out of revenue. They want to move to british parliamentary
Parliamentary Debate
debate. Recommend 0% change.
they're a good group, oldest group on campus, they hold debates and tea parties and
host sorgam (paid for out of gatbsy). Ask for a decrease because all money on food Philolexian Society
they can spend more efficiently. they're a great group, tighening their budget.
Chandler Society for Undergraduate Chemistr Make so much money from selling notebooks. 0 is fine.
Model Congress
No packet, they're not requesting for growth
A: 0 UNANIMOUS Acade
$6,428
$7,071
$7,071
($0) No change
A: 0 Y: 7 O: 5
Acade
$1,621
$321
$550
$1,702
$337
$550

$337 N/A
N/A
$2,244
$0
$550
$541 Increase*
($337) Decrease
$0 No change
Black, Latino, and Native American

Project Number
Club Name
AG002339
Student Organization of Latinos
AG002384
African Students Association
AG002420
Por Colombia
AG002446
Organization of Latin American Students
AG002545
ChicanX Caucus
AG002546
Black Students Organization
AG002547
Caribbean Students Association
AG002551
AG002612
Haitian Students Association

Native American Council
Notes
Votes
They have requested extra funds for 300+ for a recurring, successful event of Latino
Graduation
They hosted solid programming this year and can apply for grants next year if they want
to expand and demonstrate need for extra funding.
They didn't spend all of their amount of allocation - mostly used for food - but they got a
significant amount of money from JCCC for their conference which will also be held the
next year. They are requesting money for a non-recurring banner, so we will taper down
their increase to include conference fees (covered by JCCC) and reflect their lessened
need for allocation this year.
They were trying to host a conference this year and have worked with brazilian speakers
and students and there has been minimal contact. Money is sufficient for next year's
conference.
They program really well, recommending $4000 which accounts for various grants they
have obtained and used well - $200 for live at lerner, $250 in kraft
They applied for JCCC because of extra costs which they didn't account for for one of
their recurring events; even though they also sought out other funds (MGC, etc.), they
were still not able to cover all of their funds. They used their JCCC funds efficiently and
showed that they needed their money.
They do on and off-campus programming and get over $2750 in grant to complete their
programming.
Spent all of their allocation on culture fair with food and festitivities held late in the
spring semester. They spend money responsibly otherwise and meet regularly.
Support for native graduation, increase by amount of cosponsorship for powwow
A:0 UNANIMOUS
Group
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2014-2015 Budget
2015-2016 Budget
Current
Black,
$3,029
$3,029
$3,284
A: 0 UNANIMOUS Black,
$1,782
$1,960
$1,960
Change
Change Type
$255 Increase*
$0 No change
A: 1 Y: 10 O: 1
Black,
$0
$500
$1,028
$384 Increase*
A: 0 Y: 11 O:1
Black,
$505
$505
$505
$5 Increase*
$3,750
$3,863
$4,246
$383 Increase*
$5,451
$5,451
$6,366
$915 Increase*
$2,071
$2,278
$5,147
$2,869 Increase*
A: 1 Y: 11
A: 2 Y: 9 0: 1
$1,256
$535
$1,256
$589

$1,334
$1,682
$381 Increase*
$255 Increase*
Black,
Black,
Dance
Project Number
Club Name
AG002323
AG002335
Raw Elementz
Taal
AG002393
Bhangra
AG002402
Sabor
AG002405
Raas
AG002441
Bellydancing Troupe
AG002443
Onyx Dance Troupe
Notes
Votes
Basically have been responsive, had a successful year, their showcase is this upcoming
weekend, recommended $100 for increase because they want, but no external funding A: 0 UNANIMOUS
No allocation increase, solid programming,
A: 2 UNANIMOUS
Asking for $1000 increase, recommending a decrease to $3000. Bhangra only went to 1
competition this year, they forgot to put it on their budget, didn't get revenue, didn't
really do any events, they applied to CIF for costumes (didn't get it), ended up spending
money from allocations for costumes, have yet to see. Budgeted $500 for bheights for
next year, forgot it happened. Want to do two competitions, what they usually do
(shouldn't cut them just based on that). $1000 for travel/hotel for extra competitions.
The issues with banghra is that they wait until the last minute to book things which is an
increase in amount of money. Most of the competitions they are applying to - they really
won't host people, competitions every single year.
A: 3 Y: 8 O: 2
Reached out for cosponsorship for releve, gave them half of what they asked for - two
shows, want to make one of their shows two nights, they should cut down on a lot of
their food spending, more of their budget is on food, host a lot of events on sabor +
saboralumni - that budget needs to be revised for next year especially if they wanted to
do things. They didn't have money for costumes but they waste money.
A: 2 Y:8 O: 2
Last week, travel expenses. Travleed to two competitions (will stay consistent next year
as well), don't need money for shirts and the such. Want to apply to more competitions.
Raising more revenue (hosted a Raas showcase in the past), should increase their
allocation. Solid board structure, they applied to us for travel expenses, CIF for
costumes. They work hard to not overspend, applied to us for travel fund, main increase
to plan the event. We can talk to them next year about abc cosponsorships for more
competitions
A: 3 Y: 9 O: 2
Right now $550, asking for $1000, rep recommend $800 -- want to go to NY - Cairo RAQs
festival. They have to pay $300 money for the festival, this will allow them to insert
themselves in the greater new york area. $200 increases. They haven't applied to funds
for this specfic festival.
A: 0 0: 1 Y: 11
Hip hop group, host a show every year, $525 for next year, asked for $900, expected
budget is $525 - don't anticipate no new events
A: 0 O: 1 Y: 11
Group
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2014-2015 Budget
2015-2016 Budget
Current
Change
Change Type
Dance
Dance
$506
$250
$455
$625

$637
$980
$182 Increase*
$280 Increase*
Dance
$3,775
$3,963
$4,200
$247 Increase*
Dance
$642
$706
$1,226
$434 Increase*
Dance
$1,893
$2,082
$2,082 http://tinyurl.com http://tinyurl.com
$2,915
$833 Increase*
Dance
$275
$550
$550
$0 No change
Dance
$525
$525
$525
$0 No change
Sorted by Category
AG002445
AG002489
Ballet Collaborative
Lions Dance
AG002506
Dhoom
AG002647
Orchesis
AG002836
AG002853
CU Generation
Venom Step
Recommend for $1000 increase, for the past years they have been increasing tech costs,
like $10000 more, they've been really proactive about reaching out to other funds - one
their showcases was downtown. Should be accessible to columbia so it's not good.
Should support them in a way - should give them at least $1000 and they are really great
about trying to lower costs. Increased them last for a similar reason, but it's still
persistent. Really really trying to get money, every since two years,
Programming does not indicate any request for funds
Probation, Conflict of Interest, they function, they do a showcase/year, they go to at
least 2 competitions, they applied to a bunch of competitions (the only real cost that
they had), cosponsorships that they had are from last year's showcase. Competitions
that they applied to - only applied to ones that weren't feasible. Literally could not travel
to them, should apply to competitions that you know that you can go to. They got into
one that they're going to in early may, but may not go to that. Decrease to $500. Really
have been having a lot of trouble with their board = probation.
THEY ARE GREAT, takes everyone they need. Applied to funds? Apply to the mama
project, why would they need this? They need the money to expand the length of their
tech costs - they haven't applied to us yet. Totally successful, but haven't applied to
funding.
Unresponsive and allocation normally goes to the purchase of clothing that is kept by
members - this is against spending guidelines. What they use from their allocation is 0,
not punishing them for a last year, but if they want to do something then they'll need to
apply for cosponsorships,
NO PACKET
A: 1 Y: 10 O: 1
A: 1 Y:11 O: 0
Dance
Dance
$614
$250
$1,229
$0

$0 The template does No change - we ar
$2,773
$0
$1,082 Increase*
$0 No change
A: 2 Y: 9 O: 1
Dance
$600
$600
$840
$195 Increase*
A: 1 O: 2 Y: 10
Dance
$493
$542
$835
$258 Increase*
A: 0 Y: 9 O: 4
N/A
Dance
Dance
$0
$0
$500
$0

$150 N/A
N/A
$0
$0
($400) Decrease
($150) Decrease
East Asian
Project Number
Club Name
AG002541
Asian American Alliance
AG002587
Japan Society
AG002593
AG002597
Hong Kong Students and Scholars Society

Taiwanese American Students Association
AG002609
Chinese Students Club
AG002610
Korean Students Association
AG002705
Global China Connection
Notes
Increase requested for rising tech and facilities costs, hold more events than any other
group in the category (11) and growing - 10% increase, already have a large allocation,
successfully applied to ABC co-sponsorship for $200 but were denied JCCC cosponsorship, Kraft, OMA and Gatsby (for unknown reasons), paid 3,500 for
cultureSHOCK outside designers and performers when Heritage months were denied for
paying so much money for outside performers - important for drawing in attendees,
used co-sponsorship money to expand a program so they will receive that money in an
increase
Satellite group Taiko ($300 requested just for them), get outstide sponsorships from
corporations, but want more tents to attract vendors as now they only have two (for
Matsuri), not very financially responsible and pour most of their allocation into one
event, student groups can no longer use tents not supplied by Columbia though they
used to own their own, now increased rental costs, Matsuri not charged event - could
raise revenue. IF an event is so expensive, needs to be sustainable
Good programming with a small budget and requesting an increase, co-sponsored one
event with another cultural group, never spend money on publicity, not necessarily a
small budget though - money requested for publicity and co-sponsoring to build the
cultural community
Good programming, but did not apply for any external funding
Rising tech costs, want money for year-round storage space - not a good reason for
allocation increase, you can apply for storage, ABC has storage over the summer, but
they have not gotten an increase in 3 years, have applied to a lot of external funding,
use alot of tech for their events (ex: Nightmarket), however, not that much Chinese
culture in their events (noted by ABC Rep who is a AAA member), ABC money not given
for events that have not yet been held and proven successful, clearly rising tech costs
and they have a demonstrated need for increase from applying for external funding to
support these tech costs, 400 dollars gained through external funding this year for tech
costs
Very financiallly responsive and communicative this year (though previously not), didn't
apply to new funding, same programming as the previous year
Hold pre-professional events, undergrad/grad conference (no money spent or earned)
where they helped, pannels, no money spent this year but trying to hold new events
next year including another conference (JCCC next year) - ABC does not give money for
events that have not been held and proven successful, self-proclaimed do not know how
to use their allocation, 0 dollars with a note that they will apply for co-sponsorships next
year and ABC will be lenient
Votes
Group
A: 3 Y:8 O: 2
East A
$3,097
$3,097
$6,307
$3,024 Increase*
A: 1 Y: 11 O: 1
East A
$2,529
$2,782
$4,246
$1,464 Increase*
UNANIMOUS
East A
A: 0 UNANIMOUS East A
$888
$1,396
$933
$1,536

$1,037
$2,150
$76 Increase*
$614 Increase*
A: 2 Y: 10 O: 2
East A
$4,892
$4,892
$7,185
$2,293 Increase*
A: 2 N: 4 Y:
East A
$6,329
$6,329
$8,245
$2,355 Increase*
A:1 Y: 10 O: 1
East A
$0
$500
$0
($500) Decrease
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2014-2015 Budget
2015-2016 Budget
Current
Change
Change Type
Engineering
Project Number
AG002319
AG002320
Club Name
Biomedical Engineering Society

Society of Automotive Engineers
Notes
Votes
They didn't apply for any grants even though they get department They get department
funding and they are doing okay, they previously had received a cut but are pretty
active.
A: 1 O: 1 Y:9
Consistent programming
A: 1 O: 1 Y:15
Group
Engine
Engine
2012-2013
$561
$13,125
2013-2014
$140
$13,781
2014-2015
2014-2015 Budget
2015-2016 Budget

Current
$356
$13,913
Change
Change Type
$0 No change
$0 Decrease
Sorted by Category
AG002379
AG002395
AG002503
AG002583
AG002585
AG002586
AG002618
AG002618
They are a very strong group with a serious general body that puts in hours for the club they consistently serve 60 - 100 people every week. They don't apply to internal grants,
but they get a lot of outside funding and grants. They are concerned that getting outside
funding makes it look commercial, though they reasonably spend their money, but they
don't have a demonstrated need for more money based on what they currently bring in.
Giving them more money could incentivize them to reach out more to the non-CS
community on campus, but they haven't made enough strides in terms of applying to
Columbia specific funds, and though it is from corporate sponsorships, they currently
Application Development Initiative
have money to host their events.
A: 2 O: 4 Y:6
They have a lot of institutional memory and are very organized in terms of logistics. They
applied for one co-sponsorship but don't do much on campus - most of their
Engineers Without Borders
programming lies outside of the community.
A: 5 Y: 10 O: 1
CUINFORMS
They have done limited programming in the past year.
A: 3 Y: 8 O: 1
American Society of Civil Engineers
They have their steel bridge project and have applied to additional funds for that.
A: 2 UNANIMOUS
They have applied for all of the funding they could and received CIF and JCCC and have
Institute of Electronics and Electrical Engineer done a solid job to demonstrate.
A: 2 UNANIMOUS
They did not seek additional funding, but have held solid programming with their
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
current allocation.
A: 2 UNANIMOUS
They spend their money on travel to a competition in Phoenix and bulding a plane and
taking it to competitions (in addition to bearing shipping costs). They aren't doing
anything new necessarily and serve a niche community and should look at alternate
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astrona ways to get their materials as well.
A: 2 UNANIMOUS
They spend their money on travel to a competition in Phoenix and bulding a plane and
taking it to competitions (in addition to bearing shipping costs). They aren't doing
anything new necessarily and serve a niche community and should look at alternate
American Institute of Chemical Engineers
ways to get their materials as well.
A: 2 UNANIMOUS
Engine
$525
$525
$2,910
$0 No change
Engine
Engine
Engine
$6,468
$0
$751
$6,468
$0
$826

$6,000
$0
$1,886
$0 No change
$0 No change
$656 Increase*
Engine
$880
$968
$1,693
$646 Increase*
Engine
$788
$788
$722
$0 No change
Engine
$4,233
$4,445
$4,445
$0 No change
Engine
$594
$642
$4,445
$3,678 Increase*
European and Middle Eastern

Project Number
Club Name
AG002334
Armenian Club
AG002364
Turkish Students Association
AG002419
Polish Club
AG002474
Hellas
AG002567
AG002576
Ukrainian Students Society

Russian International Association
AG002584
French Cultural Society
AG002611
Iranian Students Association
AG002628
AG002840
Turath
Tatar Club
AG002893
Germanic Cultural Society
Notes
Votes
Good, consistent
Growing really quickly, around 15 people each year, new board started to hold more
events that attract international students, now mostly about turkish culture. More
appealing to people to columbia. Ridiculous allocation request, speaker series, new
board, consistently organizing well, low profile people, continue doing that, applied for
kraft fund, holding service events, increase but not sure if $550-$1000 is too much.
Global Center possibly withdrew funding.
Underutilization of budget, external funding, and excess funds indicate need for
decrease
Packet, contacted advisors, request $250, PROBATION. Rep wants to $0, had originally
motioned for derecognition. $0 and then $250 through cosponsorships, no
communication
Board problems, speaker series, they have been the same, programmed the same,
consistent about programming, not requesting increase
Good, consistent
Non-existent this year, problem in their board, contacted about $80 and $100 event only spent $180 out of money. Recommending 30% cut, still can program well, also have
revenue. Otherwise too harsh, not wasting money. 30% is ideal for just a bad year, not
automatically cut but they didn't explain the unspent allocation, etc. Most of the people
at the event, weren't there, quality of event was less. Non-existent because board
problems, now they are better.
These were on top of things, recommended 1000, applied to turath (kraft film series),
growing events, make revenue too, good users of money. They are really successful, but
they also had people coming though they hadn't applied to stuff. Except for $300,
haven't really applied to grants/co-sponsorships, rising costs because more people
coming. JCCC too and chaplain fund (no $ received for application). Why didn't they get
it? They didn't apply to us. They are successful
Best club (award), applied to a lot of things, turkish club/iranian students club, lots of
different cosponsorships, strong board, on top of things. Improving their board structure
and everything. They requested $1289 for next year. They have a satellite group, some
spending will go to that. $765 right now. Lots of recurring events, repeat the film series.
With this extra money, additional crowds coming in more people coming to each of their
events.
No programming
One of the best clubs, newly recognized last year, allocation of $500, event called
christmas market (very cute), making unofficial events, they also best new group award,
applied to cosponsorships
Group
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2014-2015 Budget
2015-2016 Budget
Current
Change
Change Type
UNANIMOUS
Europ
$0
$0
$420
$120 Increase*
A: 1 O: 1 Y: 12
Europ
$500
$550
$720
$170 Increase*
A: 0 O:4 Y: 11
Europ
$813
$813
$490
($241) Decrease
A: 0 Y: 13
Europ
$310
$310
$250 to be charged: con Welcome Party: $
$0
($250) Decrease
A: 0 O: 2 Y: 13
A: 0 Y: 12 O:1
Europ
Europ
$400
$1,975
$400
$1,975
$360 N/A
N/A
$360
$1,975
A: 0 Y:10 N: 4
Europ
$1,476
$1,476
$1,000
($476) Decrease
A: 1 Y:7 N: 5
Europ
$680
$714
$787
$107 Increase*
A: 1 Y:9 N: 3
UNANIMOUS
Europ
Europ
$768
$0
$807
$0

$0 N/A
N/A
$1,651
$0
A: 2 UNANIMOUS Europ
$0
$0
$500 We only had one e We plan on spendi
$713
$0 No change
$0 No change
$833 Increase*
$0 No change
$213 Increase*
Media
Project Number
AG002317
Club Name
Film Production
Votes
Group
This club couldn't remember whether they bought a camera. Encouraged to apply for
CIF, applied for and successfully got the grant. With the amount that JCCC granted,
filmmakers go on and off campus to make their own films and showcase them to
columbia community. Right now they can only support a limited number of filmmakers,
only 10 (hence the increase). They work with off campus film companies (script reviews). A:0 Y:13 O:2
Notes
Media
2012-2013
$1,665
2013-2014
$1,665
2014-2015
2014-2015 Budget
2015-2016 Budget
Current
$0
Change
Change Type
($1,665) Decrease
Sorted by Category
AG002344
AG002418
CU Records
National Undergraduate Film Festival
AG002434
AG002473
Artist Society
Photography Society
AG002548
Columbia Television (CTV)
AG002549
Science Fiction Society
AG002568
Ferris Reel Film Society
AG002626
Sounds of China
Didn't contact rep until this semester because they didn't update contact information,
meeting with vp, wants to revamp CU records, music records aren't a thing anymore. VP
has been the point person if student performers want to perform on campus. Biggest
event - deantini's playlist (deantini's favorite playlist) this is a really
interesting/innovative idea. $5000 requested is too much.Rep only recommend
increasing to $500. Didn't seek external funding, haven't been able to get into contact
with them. They've already planned everything out for an event. Don't want to give
extra money because they haven't been consistent + no external funding. let's readdress
next year
A: 2 UNANIMOUS
NO PACKET
N/A
Consistent programming, weekly sketches, free and open to general public, pretty well
attended. They apply to gatsby grant every year because several hundred dollars for art
supplies, they still need money to buy stuff. They also received abc cosponsorships.
Requested $1830 because they use the money.
Y: UNANIMOUS
Diversified amount of things, strong programming
a: 1 UNANIMOUS
Not a functioning group up until 2 months ago, not good before then, accused past
members of stealing things. However, because of that their advisor hasn't allowed them
to spend any more for the past few years. Did succesfully apply for capital investment
fund - their board this year has been strong, despire not being allowed to spend any
more. Skit videos, used by admissions office to welcome class of 2019. They only have
$2700 right now. No increase, no decrease because they had a bad board and they were
limited in their spending and still have been doing pretty good programming. Actively
sought out capital fund.
A: 0 Y:14 O: 1
Wasteful spending observed, had $500 left of allocation with no rationale, no eaf sent to
ABC for giving $600 to a speaker, they have, one or more times, used a false EAF
number. Cut. No access to budget. $750 + probation
A: 0 Y: 14 O:
Really reaches out, programming is really good, this year they have a lot of events (Suits
+ bill nye), they try to do better things because they want people to go to. costs are
going up - they never reached out about cosponsorships even though rep asked about it.
Relying on cosponsorships from other communities. Requested $6000, screening rights
are more expensive. Do they ever apply to anything outside, student clubs, etc? The
level at which their events are, want to hold them more often (they have had to cut back
on more movies). Didn't like this group because they picked their own movies. As a
group themselves they have been doing well, lots of attendence.
A: 3 Y: 10 O: 2
Whenever rep talks to them in person, they are not willing to apply for cosponsorships
(they just dont' want to), but they put increase. Just keep it the same. Why no decrease?
Decrease to $500 - with the $500, the bulk of their programming is still tech heavy (they
need to do tech regardless), food is secondary. Decrease the amount of food in their
budget they only have $80 of tech. They do other things like the radioshow. List of
groups to watch. (Next $500 on karaoke??)
A: 0 Y:11 O:4
Media
Media
$250
$2,154
$250
$2,154

$0 N/A
N/A
$200
$0
$0 No change
$0 No change
Media
Media
$1,624
$1,067
$1,786
$1,120

$1,824
$0
$37 Increase*
($1,120) Decrease
Media
$5,418
$2,709
$2,709 Our only expendit https://docs.googl
$3,791
$1,082 Increase*
Media
$1,323
$1,257
$750
($444) Decrease
Media
$3,375
$4,050
$6,829
$2,537 Increase*
Media
$592
$592
$700
$108 Increase*
Musical
Project Number
Club Name
AG002321
AG002333
AG002374
New Music
Bach Society
Non-Sequitur
AG002387
Classical Performers
AG002562
Glee Club
AG002590
Metrotones
AG002600
AG002607
AG002613
Gospel Choir
Notes and Keys
Clefhangers
AG002623
AG002632
Kingsmen
Wind Ensemble
AG002666
Uptown Vocal
AG002852
SHARP
AG002901
CU Society of Hip Hop
Notes
Votes
Defunct
They had a fine year, got an increase last year
Did well at their level of funding, did not request an increase
Used $100 for board bonding from allocation, will need money to co-sponsor group
applying to NGR next cycle - not in allocation packet,
Packet submitted late, in conversations at the beginning of fall semester with advisers
and Glee club
Did not apply for external funding, requested increase to pay someone to film their
concerts, not very communicative and spend less than their allocation, no tech costs for
C555, 521 needed (-100 for filming spent this year unnecessarily), underspending
Cut last year for not submitting an allocation packet, but scaled up their programming
and applied to a lot of external funding (ABC + JCCC) for bigger venues and incresed
programming, revenue from concerts
Solid programming, concerts have been good, fill c555
Used money well but did not apply for outside funding
All of the money spent this year was for events that were not on campus, all for travel.
Cut to $500, last year they spent on stuff on campus, don't want to hurt them too much.
Generate money off campus. They don't do enough campus, no EAFs, etc.
No increase requested
Rep's fave group to work with, asked for an increase, but its going mostly towards travel
that they don't even do it every year. Shouldn't get recurring allocation for travel
Did not apply for outside funding, solid group, 250 budgeted for Senior gifts, receive less
than comparable groups, used all allocation halfway through the year
Recognized two semesters ago, started spending last semester, mostly hold events in
the malcom x lounge, rap and freestyle workshops. granted $400 after being recognized,
majority of it for buying equipment but now done buying equipment (CIF), club banner,
only really spent $100 on programming itself. Request for $500 for next year, want to
give them a decrease, hold more frequent cyphers, lenient for new group
Group
N/A
Music
A: 2 UNANIMOUS Music
UNANIMOUS
Music
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2014-2015 Budget
2015-2016 Budget
Current
Change
Change Type
$597
$1,856
$1,061
$597
$1,948
$1,061
$0 N/A
N/A
$1,061 N/A
https://docs.googl
$0
$2,897
$1,061
$992
($100) Decrease
$0
($635) Decrease
($100) Decrease
A: 0 Y: 9 O: 3
Music
$993
$1,092
N/A
Music
$605
$635
$635 N/A
UNANIMOUS
Music
$621
$621
$521
UNANIMOUS
Music
UNANIMOUS
Music
$591
$1,238
$971
$650
$1,238
$971

$944
$1,114
$971
A: 0 Y:11 O: 1
Music
$683
$3,125
$683
$3,125

$500
$4,375
UNANIMOUS
Music
$1,418
$1,418
$1,167
UNANIMOUS
Music
$500
$550
$0
A: 1 Y: 11 O: 1
Music
$0
$0
$400
N/A
$0 No change
$828 Increase*
$0 No change
$326 Increase*
($0) No change
$0 No change
($183) Decrease
$1,250 Increase*
$0 No change
($583) Decrease
$0 No change
Sorted by Category
AG002938
CU Sur
AG002978
Vivace Chamber Singers
Very solid group, as a new group they have doen a good job finding new programming,
getting new showcase, applied to cosponsorships (JCCC because new event), still have
plans to scale up and recommending an increase to 900. They have been solid about
communicating and they have their new board elected (came and talked to them). Some
kind of increase. Applied to a different things, filled C555 for event and want to have it in
Roone. It is rare for an a capella group to have things in Roone. What is it specifically
going to? Applied for $300 from JCCC but didn't get it, they want to travel a lot. Because
of ticket revenues, they have solid programming.
A: 2 Y:8 O: 2
Next year planning to spent $270: $170 on two concerts + $100 for music. They have
been fine - solid. A lot of spending on food and publicity.
UNANIMOUS
Music
$0
$0
$670
$170 Increase*
Music
$0
$0
$300 N/A
$100
($200) Decrease
N/A
Performance
Project Number
Club Name
AG002311
Black Theater Ensemble
AG002425
AG002554
CU Players
Fruit Paunch
AG002592
Musical Theater Society
AG002614
Performing Arts League
AG002644
AG002650
AG002921
Varsity Show
Kings Crown Shakespeare Troupe
Wushu
AG002922
AG002404
Voltage
Chowdah
Notes
Votes
They applied to a lot of outside funding (though they didn't succeed) and did not end up
getting the rights to their fall show which hindered them. They focus on outreach and
collaboration and are accessible, but have been slightly lax in programming so should
strive to amp it up for the future.
A: 3 O: 0 Y: 9
They use outside funding to enhance their programming and do well - they asked for no
change and are good with their current level of funding.
UNANIMOUS
No contact or packet.
UNANIMOUS
They have been increasing the quality of their programming and interest from the
community (RENT sold out in 10 minutes) and they have had to add an extra show. They
host showcases and other events as well - demonstrated they spend well, apply for
grants and enhance community..
UNANIMOUS
They are the governing board for performing arts groups and have been constantly
adding groups. They host programming well for the performing arts intergroup.
A: 1 UNANIMOUS
They have been stagnant at their allocation for the past 3 years, despite having a bigger
set each year. They have a successful revenue model (Tickets + Alumni Donations +
Grants and have had to move big lead up events (such as preview) to the Diana Event
Oval instead of Havana Central. Clearly they spend well, program well and have been
suffering from lack of funds.
A: 1 Y:10 O: 1
They programming really well and attract large crowds to their audiences.
A: 1 UNANIMOUS
$11K last year, gets more money from department. lots of interboard conflict.
A: 1 O: 0 Y: 11
wants to spend increased allocation on more drums and other equipment, not a
recurring cost for allocation, apply to outside funding for one-time infusion UNANIMOUS
No change
No anything, no purchases, no money needed
A: 1 UNANIMOUS
Group
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2014-2015 Budget
2015-2016 Budget
Current
Change
Change Type
Perfor
$1,246
$1,495
$1,000
($558) Decrease
Perfor
Perfor
$1,491
$567
$1,566
$510

$408 N/A
N/A
$2,192
$0
$626 Increase*
($408) Decrease
Perfor
$6,955
$6,955
$10,530
$3,157 Increase*
Perfor
$2,150
$2,364
$2,587
$81 Increase*
Perfor
Perfor
Perfor
$21,000
$4,635
$0
$21,000
$5,098
$0
$21,000 Full Budget: https: Full Budget: https:

$23,557
$7,137
$820
$2,557 Increase*
$2,039 Increase*
$570 Increase*
Perfor
Perfor
$0
$0
$0
$0

$0
$0
$0
($500) Decrease
$0 No change
Pre-Professional
Project Number Club Name
AG002328
Organization of Rising Entrepreneurs (CORE)
AG002377
AG002383
AG002385
AG002424
AG002486
AG002544
Womens Business Society

American Medical Students Association
Hispanic Scholarship Fund
Multicultural Business Association
Columbia Association of Pre-Dental Students
Charles Drew Pre-Med Society
AG002559
Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers
AG002577
Society of Women Engineers
Notes
Last year requested 36K, allocated 4000-8000K only ended up giving them 1620. They
did a good job, despite not as good as last year, still better than others. They went to
Paris/London - that was out of their own pocket. Get money from other places, they
apply for grants and additional funding, other clubs with huge operating budgets as well.
They would put it to a better use than any one else. They are center of entreprenuership
community - so many people. Services a lot of people on campus, on a resource that
doesn't exist elsewhere. Having a big effect. See value in giving groups more money,
gives them incentive to keep some of their programming here and get people more
involved that wouldn't. Their programming would be different if they didn't get as much
ABC funding, less inclusive. The quality of some of their stuff was less, they would have
hosted more events, got things from columbia entreprenuership, not sustained
throughout because they were in need. The allocation increase would definitely go to
more events. Revenue not listed on some of their stuff. What about external funding?
What were they able to do with their external funding? How effective and efficient they
used their money? They have a monopoly in terms of entreprenuership. Generally, they
are the only thing. They are the one primarily serving that community and far-reaching.
3800 - based on their budget. A: 1 O: 1 Y: 13
No increase requested, used money mostly for printing and they get most of their
money in outside sponsorships which also could cover the small ammount they do get
and their current allocaiton could go to another (smaller) group where the money could
be really impactful, do they actually need the money or just use it because they have it?
They use their money responsibly - dialogue needed - could they get it from somewhere
else? could co-sponsor them if necessary, use their ABC money for events on campus
and corporate sponsorships for the conference
Did not request an increase, solid programming
Did not apply for external funding
NO PACKET
Did not apply for outside funding
Predominantly use their money for regional and national conference (they pay using half
of allocation), requesting 4500, they are requesting more because of a conference in
baltimore. This isn't necessarily recurring, etc.
Applied unsuccessfully to one source of external funding, sent 22 members to LA for job
interviewing - no increase
Votes
Group 2012-2013
2013-2014
A: 1 Y: 13 O: 1
Pre-Pr
$213
$300
A:1 Y:8 O:7 (Presid

UNANIMOUS
UNANIMOUS
UNANIMOUS
N/A
A:1 UNANIMOUS
Pre-Pr
Pre-Pr
Pre-Pr
Pre-Pr
Pre-Pr
Pre-Pr
$387
$1,972
$400
$943
$330
$1,015
A: 2 O: 1 Y: 9
Pre-Pr
A:0 Y:13 O:1
Pre-Pr
2014-2015 2014-2015 Budget 2015-2016 Budget Current
Change
Change Type
$3,478
$1,858 Increase*
$387
$1,709
$420
$990
$330
$1,117
$387
$1,760
$400
$977
$0
$1,184
https://docs.googl
https://docs.googl
https://docs.googl
https://docs.googl
N/A
https://docs.googl
$0
$1,760
$560
$900
$0
$1,184
($387)
$0
$160
($77)
$0
($0)
$3,599
$3,599
$3,815
$0 No change
$3,560
$3,560
$3,560
($0) No change
https://docs.googl
https://docs.googl
https://docs.googl
https://docs.googl
N/A
https://docs.googl
Decrease
No change
Increase*
Decrease
No change
No change
Sorted by Category
AG002581
National Society of Black Engineers
AG002606
AG002661
Economics Society
Columbia China Law Business Association
AG002704
AG002707
CU Financial Engineering
CFIG
AG002903
AG002920
Columbia Undergraduate Consulting Club

Columbia Sports Business Society
AG002939
AG002952
CQBS
CIBD
Two big conferences (this year one in Anaheim the cost of which came 1/2 from
allocation), spent less than 3000 dollars and did not go to a conference, suggest more
people are going to want to go next year but we cannot fund that with recurring
allocation
Did not apply for external funding, unexpectedly found 2000 dollars in revenue in their
account and spent it well this year, really strong events and many of them
stagnating
Did not apply for outside funding, increase requested for publicity, but does not seem
necessary or very effective, publicity could come from co-sponsorship
Did not apply for outside funding but good group
increase requested for rising tech and facilities costs, hold more events than any other
group in the category (11) and growing - 10% increase, already have a large allocation,
successfully applied to ABC co-sponsorship for $200 but were denied JCCC cosponsorship, Kraft, OMA and Gatsby (for unknown reasons), paid 3,500 for
cultureSHOCK outside designers and performers when Heritage months were denied for
paying so much money for outside performers - important for drawing in attendees,
used co-sponsorship money to expand a program so they will receive that money in an
increase (AAA description)
New group, had a few good events, going with Rep recommendation
Recently recognized, have not spent money (since it did not go to their account yet), but
programmed anyway
Programmed sustainable events, well-attended, external funding obtained
A: 0 Y: 8 O: 6
Pre-Pr
$5,996
$6,296
$5,000
A: 1 UNANIMOUS Pre-Pr
A: 1 UNANIMOUS Pre-Pr
$1,477
$935
$1,403
$982

$1,486
$786
($1,296) Decrease
$83 Increase*
($0) No change
A:2 UNANIMOUS
UNANIMOUS
Pre-Pr
Pre-Pr -
$0
$300
$300

$300
$550
$0 No change
$220 Increase*
UNANIMOUS
UNANIMOUS
Pre-Pr
Pre-Pr
$0
$0
$0
$0

$500
$100
$0 No change
$100 Increase*
UNANIMOUS
UNANIMOUS
Pre-Pr
Pre-Pr
$0
$0
$0
$0

$300
$300
$0 No change
$300 Increase*
Publication
Project Number
Club Name
AG001241
AG002314
IPA
Gadfly
AG002336
Blue and White
AG002345
Undergraduate Law Review
AG002388
AG002394
Africa-Diaspora Literary Society

Journal of Literary Criticism
AG002406
Science Review
AG002414
AG002423
AG002488
AG002555
Birch
Undergraduate Science Journal
Columbia East Asia Review
Jester of Columbia
AG002588
AG002594
Columbia Review
Federalist Paper
AG002605
Architecture Society
AG002801
AG002839
Helvidius (Journal of Politics and Society)

The Columbia Precipice
Notes
Votes
Thinking of changing vision, they received $500 last year to continue to revamp
Bad packet, should get same amount as now - so they can prove sustainability.
They have a campus niche and and there is a same number of spending. There is a 10%
cut accross the board for printing.
They want courses, more writers, and more printing. Can't buy a banner every year for
events. Thave overlap with some events with pre-law society and mock trial, but their
events are good for revenue. They have fundraisers. Didn't apply for cosponsorships
They received $0 last year, requested $1934 (over 100% increase), their niche is a 1,
their rep communication is a 3 (long monthly updates). Either given them $734 or full
amount, could print at kinkos or they could go to a printer. They haven't applied to
funds for prints. They received a grant for IRAAS - for $1500. How many hits have they
had? Are they reaching people with their stuff? Have they applied to JCCC or F@CU?
They used outside funding. They have access to that for next year. Same eboard confident in their ability. $1500 in outside funding - they have proved. They can spend
$1934 pretty well. Can possibly mellow out again - we have seen groups who have
cycled a lot. We can't solidify a recurring allocation of so much money just because of
one good year given their rocky history and issues with sustainability. Even if they
haven't gotten JCCC, they have gotten cosponsorships and IRAAS. We don't only want
them to apply to JCCC - there are other things. Why apply for more funds you don't
need? They can supplement what we give them. Keep them on probation watch list and
watch for volatility.
NO PACKET
They got JCCC, they do a lot of stuff, give someone to prospective students, want to try
more events. Budget can't include all of these things
Personal money and sponsorships from department (not from us), do we give them an
increase even though? Until the department stops giving them money, they don't need
extra money. They requested $5000 from department but got about half. JCCC for tech
costs? Performance - dancer/musicians. Is that necessary for a publication? More pages
than ADLS, so they need to pay more. Current allocation is 2650. We generally want to
move publications to the digital mindset. Working with some of them and said to move
to digital - in meetings for allocations, said we're going to decrease printing costs for
allocations accross the board. Should we cut it so they have a small number for
institutional memory. Should we cut how many they should print? They also distribute
it. Percentage decrease for all publications. We don't know about readership. Anything
below 9% is fine -- pressure publications to print less. The dollar amount for 1 journal is
10-11. EAch publication has different types of readership. 1K minimum to print - it
varies. MOTION FOR 10% OF PRINTING
NO PACKET
Work with Harvard University Press. Receive grants from $515, should apply for gatsby
Changes to publication spending guideline -10%
They want the same amount and operate in the same niche as other. They have a nice
budget, they were paying out of pocket for stuff.
Requesting same, they used a bad printing company.
GBB recognized. Requested 1986 - have a good niche and communicate well. Got
Gatsby, worried won't get next year. Finals + midterms -- snacks to them. you can most
likely get gatsby, can allocation. Double check this is the ABC + GBB amount
They have okay communication and niche, and they can't get some amount from
outside, only ABC is able to provide . There is a cut for groups.
Defunct
Group
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2014-2015 Budget
2015-2016 Budget
Current
Change
Change Type
A: 2 UNANIMOUS Public
Y: 9 O:8 A: 0
Public
$0
$1,330
$0
$1,330

$1,000 I do not have this This will be worke
$400
$0
($100) Decrease
($1,000) Decrease
$10,700
$9,630
$9,245
($1,027) Decrease
$640
$768
$790
$22 Increase*
A: 0 Y: 10 O: 5
N/A
Public
Public
$400
$150
$400
$150
$135 N/A
N/A
$626
$0
$626 Increase*
($135) Decrease
A: 2 Y: 12 O:1
Public
$2,549
$2,549
$3,815
$665 Increase*
Y: 13 O: 2 A: 0
N/A
A:2 UNANIMOUS
A: 2 UNANIMOUS
Public
Public
Public
Public
$2,896
$490
$388
$3,103
$2,896
$539
$388
$3,103
$2,650
$359
$515
$2,603
https://docs.googl
N/A
https://docs.googl
https://docs.googl
$2,385
$0
$515
$2,343
($265)
($359)
$0
($260)
A:0 UNANIMOUS Public

$3,878
$5,068
$3,878
$5,068

$3,141
$4,561
($349) Decrease
($507) Decrease
$1,467
$954
$1,640
A: 2 Y: 12 O: 0
N/A
$6,742
$0
$7,214
$500

$0 N/A
N/A
$5,106
$0
Public
Public
https://docs.googl
N/A
https://docs.googl
https://docs.googl
Decrease
Decrease
No change
Decrease
$710 Increase*
($1,394) Decrease
$0 No change
Sorted by Category
AG002864
Double Exposure
AG002888
EAT
AG002977
The Culinarian
Received gatsby, want to do next year with a speaker, without pizza. Can apply to JCCC
for new event, don't pay for pizza out of pocket
Recognized last year, all for food, go out to restaurants to review them, you could get
comped by the restaurant. They have $400 pocket change - printing through stash
money. $400 (is their own money, shouldn't count). This is not recurring, so this is from
their freshman year. Can't slash them to $100 if they are spending $500. How many do
they need to print on a yearly basis? We could subsidize printing and transportation.
They have readership and printing. We recognized culinarian because they were so
shitty - because eat was defunct. Printing + Website + 10% cut to printing
A: 0 O:2 Y: 14
Public
Received $100 - how did they spend? Their account was created, requested $485 - want
to change from NYC thing to columbia - there is a Columbia focus for their group.
$0
$0
$1,638
($22) Decrease
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
($500) Decrease
$200 We have not spen https://docs.googl
$300
$100 Increase*
South Asian, Southeast Asian and Pacific Islander

Project Number
Club Name
AG002354
Club Bangla
AG002397
AG002408
Vietnamese Students Association

South East Asian League
AG002409
AG002556
Malama Hawaii
Thai Sabai
Notes
Votes
Current allocation 2131 which was a slight increase, they increased a lot, had a really
good event, applied for 7 external sources of funding - succcessful in getting money from
all of them. With that in place, stronger board than before - because now they have
strong structure for next year as well. They have longevity in the group so this recurring
increase should be good for a while.
A: 2 Y: 12 O: 2
No packet, only spent $100 for tabling (all they spent), one bad board shouldn't hurt a
group forever. This group should be on probation for next year. When we cut them
down, they can build back up. Has this club been active previously too? No
communication from them.
A: 0 Y: 11 O:4
$706 dollars, last year they don't apply to any external funding. They program well
A: 0 O:2 Y: 12
They are small but they have had one major event for the past few years (luau). Last
year for the event, they brought 1 main dish ($500 of allocation) for food for the event,
but because they couldn't afford anything else, they spent out of pocket to buy
ingredient to cook their own stuff. Only 1 place in brooklyn that does actual hawaiin
food, this year they can't cook themselves but they still can only afford that one dish.
They are pivoting and not doing this event. What they are doing instead is lei day - no
food, but they will teach people how to use fresh flowers to make a lei. They are using
another group's space for it. They are going to use the leftover money for costumes,
which they are going to use down the line. They are active throughout the year
performing at other groups cultural shows (have been making contumes by hand).
Planning to buy 3 costumes. Very fiscally conservative. VERY. Next year, they are
scraping luau all together and because they want to do it properly or not at all. Next
year, instead they will be doing smaller events including lei day. The last few years, was
1 event a year, and now they are doing 4-5 smaller events. Next year, they are budgeting
for the luau and lei day and costumes (even though they are also buying some this year).
Shouldn't be getting a recurring allocation for a one time event (550 + 500 infusion one
time for costumes)
A: 1 Y: 9 N: 5
No increase, have been doing well,
A: 1 UNANIMOUS
Wants allocation over $4500 - they asked for ABC cosponsorship for increase tech costs
for the second time in a row, their tech costs have increased by $1000. They need help
from us in funding that - used cosponsorships both years. Got JCCC and PnP, applied to
GBB and Gatsby as well. They applied to every external funding because don't get
enough money from us. Pretty successful in endeavors. Main endeavor (Tamasha) is
stagnant because saturation of awesome. Increasing allocation for such a big allocation
group by a little is useless/gets lost because they need a lot of money for a noticable %
increase. It is problematic to give a group such a big increase, but that's necessary. Now
for two years we've given them co-sponsorships, it is a recurring costs, need to be built
into the recurring funding. Looking to do a whole number of different types of
programming. New programming (penn masala, brought in speakers, brought in political
sphere of south asian culture), expand in that sphere. Can now apply for external
fundings for new events too. Deliberations - for all of these big events that people have,
everyeone will always apply for funding.
Group
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2014-2015 Budget
2015-2016 Budget
Current
Change
Change Type
South
$2,191
$2,301
$3,240
$1,109 Increase*
South
South
$621
$1,344
$621
$1,412
$621 N/A
N/A
$490
$706
($131) Decrease
$0 No change
South
South
$985
$517
$985
$517

$770
$517
($89) Decrease
$0 No change
South
$3,186
$3,504
$5,311
Amount of money that is spent on mixers with other groups? The amount of money per
person is good and doing intergroup mixers is good. Good part of community, does good
things for umbrella group.
AG002563
Club Zamana
Revenue for Tamasha - $1000?? 700 students, $5/students, a little bit of corporate
sponsorships ($400-$500). They don't have huge revenue, publicity cost is very large - in
the past it's been a huge issue, this year less so because they spent almost all of their
publicity out of revenue. Budget includes allocation and revenue spending - very
important for them in selling out though. Too much of an increasing, more comfortable
with 10% thing though their programming has expanded. They have a lot of little things
that they didn't include in the budget. Fall political conference/spring scale will be the
same. Apply to the funds to increase programming in other ways (only once per year for
JCCC), now it's been two years. This group won't be wasting money. Smaller events?
Night Market, etc. Collaborate with everyone - everyone co-sponsors tamasha so they
get involved with all of the other groups (these aren't new). Increase is NOT for the new
events (fall conference, political conference), but it's so they can hold their old
programming and then use JCCC/extra sponsorships for new events because they use all
of these resources for their old programming - which is causing them to stagnate. Their
irresponsible spending is only publicity, gotten better in the past, it helps and it is from
their revenue. Hype events are included in publicity also part of the Tamasha
programming that week.
A: 5, Y: 10, N: 0
$1,807 Increase*
Sorted by Category
AG002596
Liga Filipina
AG002642
Organization of Pakistani Students
AG002662
Singapore Students Association
Not super communicative, don't spend very well - asked for a huge increase. Now
throwing their huge event, 2 events this year ($700 last semester, $50 in matsuri and
$770 for new event), first event was a great event, dropped off for a while,
programming well for second event. Don't deserve a cut yet, they are keeping their
current proposal, but large ratio of allocation to membership. Groups can be good
without being communicative to ABC rep. Could cut for sub-par allocation packets.
Y: 11 O: 4 N:0
OPS - allocation of 2041, allocation increase to 7900 requested. Very successful group,
they have applied to external funding but not enough. In the future, next year, etc.
would deserve an increase in allocation but the only problem is that they don't apply
enough to external funding. $600 requested for new event, didn't apply to JCCC.
Recommended no increase at all. They do well but don't look for external funding. If
they want to do other huge scale events, then they'll be fine or apply to external
funding. We just really want them to apply for external sources to get more funding and
to know what things are recurring (right now random large scale events that aren't
necessarily recurring). Next year, look for more recurring events/funding before
increasing allocation.
A: 2 Y: 12 O: 2
They have 470, requested 850. Recommends $100 increase because they have done
what they need to do for increase. Threw new event this year, they applied to JCCC, the
event went really well, they want it to be recurring since it was so successful. Only
happened once so increase allocation to $850 is too much, giving them $100 instead of
$300 from JCCC will allow them to budget into their event and give them leeway to
apply for more grants, etc. Can't give them entire $300 - kind of conservative but this
group has had ups and down. This year is the first year it is directly outlined that grants
are helpful for JCCC. Reasonably speaking, we can't fiscally give all of the groups the
entire money they get from all of their grants. One of the ways we market the
cosponsorships to councils - in addition to helping JCCC we can fund them a second time
(to keep trying hard they can still go to the abc cosponsorship while they get up to their
entire increase). We increase their allocation by some amount but still want to make
them have one more check. Still need to look for external funding.
UNANIMOUS
South
$1,546
$1,546
$2,164
$618 Increase*
South
$1,855
$2,041
$2,857
$816 Increase*
South
$470
$470
$555
$85 Increase*
Special Interest
Project Number
Club Name
AG002330
Culinary Society
AG002373
AG002375
Chess Club
Hapa Club
AG002399
US Milvets of CU
AG002572
Conversio Virium
AG002602
Nightline
AG002663
Anime Club
AG002686
AG002756
AG002865
Columbia Esports
Games Club
Femsex
AG002900
Smash Bros. Club
Notes
Votes
Solid programming that attracts a lot of people (example: cake competition) and are fine
with their current level of spending.
They represent Columbia very well in National competitions and spend a lot of money
on travel (between ABC AND JCCC), and they bring national grandmasters for
presentations in order to widen their audience to the Columbia community - there is a
good mix of things for the public and internal travel - and increase would be used
equally for these two aspects which have demonstrated need due to applying for grants.
Defunct
They spend large sums of money that they fundraise and accumulate from corporations
(40K raised for their annual ball among other initiatives to raise money), and extra
money would be used for a recurring conference that would bring MilVets together
accross the board. They historically are organized well internally, spend well, host good
programming and provide for their community. They have used all of their money and
have exhausted outside funding but are still expanding.
They can beef up their outreach and expansion of their community and will look into
more co-sponsorships. They hosted a conference and got presenters to present, mostly
from their revenue - they got extra free presenters that they had originally budgeted for
paying for and spend the rest out of revenue.
They spend a lot of money on publicity, training (recertification) and calls. For
confidentiality, we only communicate with one person. They are an essential function to
the community but we should examine who grants their funding moving forward.
There is a little bit of struggles in terms of when they get screening rights and how long
they are extended for - so they have a differeing need for allocation every year, but last
year was when they didn't spend all of their allocation because of it. If this continues to
be an issue in the future then we will need to address it.
Had a lot of trouble in beginning of year, didn't have an allocation, applied for JCCC
(supplies) - got $350. They don't need much money, want to have more advertising, did
a lot of study breaks and projected food costs. They'll have events where they do
viewing parties and things.
They buy new games every year during black Friday sales snd host solid programming.
Defunt
They are a new group (with no initial allocation) but have been communicative and want
money for recurring supplies. Because consoles, etc. aren't recurring, they won't be in
allocation, but money will be given for the natural updating necessary for
consoles/games, etc.
Group
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2014-2015 Budget
2015-2016 Budget
Current
Change
Change Type
A: 1 UNANIMOUS Specia
$2,248
$2,136
$2,138
A: 1 Y: 9 O: 2
N/A
Specia
Specia
$2,113
$492
$2,113
$400

$400 N/A
N/A
$3,218
$0
$852 Increase*
($400) Decrease
A: 2 Y: 8 O: 2
Specia
$2,008
$4,016
$8,705
$1,705 Increase*
A: 1 Y:10 O: 1
Specia
$862
$862
$516
$1,739
$3,273
$3,920
$1,120 Increase*
A:2 Y: 9 O: 1
Specia
$1,358
$1,426
$1,320
($106) Decrease
A: 2 O:1 Y: 9
Specia
N/A
Specia
$0
$250
$0
$0
$250
$80
$80 N/A
N/A
$250
$250
$0
$250 Increase*
$0 No change
($80) Decrease
$0
$0
$0 N/A ($0 Allocation https://docs.googl
$100
$100 Increase*
A:2 O: 1 Y: 9
Specia
($0) No change
$0 No change
New Groups
Project Number
AG002979
Club Name
Brazilian Society
Ethio-Eritrean Students
Notes
They organize through OLAS and don't have personal expenditures on recurring items.
Their allocation should be what we voted on at NGR, new group
Votes
Group
New Group
New Group
Black,
Black,
2012-2013
$0
$0
2013-2014
$0
$0
2014-2015
2014-2015 Budget
2015-2016 Budget
$100 No expenditures fr Budget increase d

$0 N/A
N/A
Current
$0
$400
Change
Change Type
($100) Decrease
$400 Increase*
Sorted by Category
Bachata Dance Social

AG002973
AG002974
AG002975
New Group
With no money, they'll be generating $50. Because no amount of money/access this
year, confused. Recognizing that we recognized them for before/during NGR because no
Society for the Advancement of Underreprese access to things.
Gave no money this year, wants $1000, get $13,500 in corporate cosponsorships. Their
budget says that they need to spend about $14000. Mainly their $13K - $11K is
conference and $2K for annual networking thing. The rest is study breaks, tech
workshops, etc. They want to expand and have more - they're new. Didn't apply for
cosponsorships, mostly spent money on food. Most pre-professional groups are like
that. They can apply to ABC next year for a cosponsorship - if we don't know what
Women in Computer Science
they're going to do with it in practice. Professor lectures.
Gosh Yarn It
New Group
Student Union for Sustainable Development New Group
10
New Group
Dance
$0
$0
$0 N/A
N/A
$0
A: 0 Y: 14 N:1
Media
$0
$0
$0 N/A
https://docs.googl
$500
A: 1 Y: 9 O: 2
New Group
New Group
Pre-Pr
Specia
Specia
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 N/A
N/A
$0 N/A
N/A
$0
$0
$0
$0 No change
$500 Increase*
$0 No change
$0 No change
$0 No change
Raw Data
Project Number Club Name
AG002312 Mock Trial
AG002322 Political Science Students Association
AG002340 Sign Language Club
AG002365 Society of International Undergraduates
Notes
Votes Group
Practice on campus, go off, they get 23K, rep proposes to cut

allocation by 4K (24% decrease), they requested it kept constant,
she has talked to each of these groups, higher registration cost
per head (can't change), hotels + cars when they go, say they
need to be in the same place to prepare, they are resistent to
being more efficient with it - the only way to change spending
habits is to make huge cuts. The most money per person as any
group per person, they have two traveling teams of 8-10 people,
they also have LSAT events. Some of the problems -how mock
trial works - they can't stay with people on campus (because not
at a campus - most conferences are held at courthouses) - it isn't
offered to live on campus, wouldn't stay in hotel deal (find
cheaper hotel far away), only fly away to one tournament (only
do if they ahve the money) - usually in california. pay for just the
flight back, they could be more efficient - between 4-6 people in
a room, they will go to courthouse at 6:30 am, then stay away for
rounds, coaches (corporate lawyers, public defenders), mock trial
has not done as well this year (other teams live in the same
house as mock trial).It is impossible for them to stay at nearest
college because hosted at a college - at debate that's how it
works, not necessarily institutionalized - 4-6 per hotel room
seems a little luxurious if you consider how many people. you
frequently have to prep the night before. as student leaders - is it
worth it? the argument boils down to us making a value
judgement - money that could be going to somewhere else
because they need this money to go to what they do. it's less
about specific groups - more about a community in general - a
community with groups like mock trials. two principles that are
at odds. learned to appreciate smaller groups - put in so much of
their time, their is also a difference in activity - it's not as if an
exact dollar amount is putting time in - it's the nature of activity.
how much are members paying in to be part of the team. $4500
including that one flight. are they trying to fundraise?
tournament - get twenty teams to come - because of 50/50
travel, we would need revenue to balance out allocation. can't
get corporate sponsorships. less tournaments? could they go it's hard to determine a way to generate more revenue. they
should be put under pressure to do it - they need to build
reputation on the circuits - specific. combination of the two - not
qualifying for first semester (invitational), the way you get teams
to go to your own tournaments is to go to theirs - wouldn't see
california teams otherwise (case setup), circuit limits how many
tournament can hold. next year talk about the cosponsorships
and grants, (need to tell them to request more). -$2000 This
$4500 is cutting, rationale - something needs to force them to
save money. Even if something is the right thing to do - we need
to use same precedent/principle. Assume that it would cripple
them, this would still be the right thing to do.
A:0 O:
Started with $250 - cut for $125. They have done a ton of
programming, and arguably there are new events. But they get
so much linking from their department which also determines
what kind of events that they hold. Publicity is very important for
events, internal concerns, voting week, when they came in for
cosponsorships - david is graduating. after that meeting, they
haven't done much. board is quite strong
A: 1 O
As a board, they haven't really taken the initiative. They're a
great group, but the only events they hold are lessons - they
came for sponsorship so they could pay. ODS should be paying
for it under the fact that deaf initiatives, should pursue as
permanent funding, wanted to hold more info sessions. They did
apply to cosponsorships and we didn't give it to them, but they
are doing well (growing membership). There are many things
they could do but they aren't doing. This would be for extra food.
They want to do non lesson event
A: 1 U
Confused, they used to spend a lot of money on tshirts for world
cup event - can't spend it on tshirts, soccer screenings, lerner
during the day, soccer in europe during the day, no actual
allocation packet, they'll doing like nothing, starting as a joke and
now its semi real. Cut their desired current allocation by $500 for
the tshirts and their world cup event and also for given more
time this year - they may have been able to use the money more
efficiently, give them more breathing room, fluctuate in that
programming + apply to cosponsorships
A: 1 U
11
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2014-2015 Budget
2015-2016 Budget
Current
Change
Change Type
$14,000 ($4,495.00) Decrease
13
Acade
$18,495
$18,495
Acade
$250
$250
$189
$63.92 Increase*
Acade
$814
$855
$1,197
$341.80 Increase*
Acade
$1,911
$2,006
$2,006 Please contact Kaz For the 2015-16 ac
$1,506
($499.55) Decrease
Raw Data
AG002366 Neuroscience Society
AG002407 Pre-Law Society
AG002561 Quiz Bowl
AG002564 Parliamentary Debate
AG002595 Philolexian Society

AG002603 Chandler Society for Undergraduate Chemistry
AG002615 Model Congress
AG002339 Student Organization of Latinos
AG002384 African Students Association
AG002420 Por Colombia

AG002446 Organization of Latin American Students
AG002545 ChicanX Caucus
AG002546 Black Students Organization

AG002547 Caribbean Students Association
AG002551 Haitian Students Association
AG002612 Native American Council
Recommend $1100 - their events are pretty well attended:

research fair - invite labs in neuroscience and psychology,
freshmen actually get positions from it, the event is growing a lot
- they do a lot more publicity than other comporable groups, so
there is a question of efficiency of funds. asked for a lot more brain week (not super great - tabling + giveaways), all that came
from zuckerman institute, want them to have more events for
neuroscience. Can work with them for funding. Need more
money for research fair - there are many groups that do great
events but we need to stick to our principles. haven't proved that
they'll use efficiently.
O: 3 A
Have $710, want $970. Applied for/holding more events, panels
and judgeships and the such. They are doing what a club that
supports an academic subject should be doing. Only ended up
spending $80 for menthorship program, so they could finish the
year.
A: 0 Y:
Practice on campus, then go off campus. large group, conflict of
interest, rep likes quiz bowl (she is in it), more thrifty when they
travel, rep recommend for $500 more - 13% increase. They also
successfully applied for cosponsorships once, got CIF this year for
buzzer sets, cut in 2012-2013 because they weren't doing very
well. They've improved -- they place better at all of the
tournaments they go to - they fundraise so they have enough to
pay for the 50% that ABC can't. They asked for $6500 because
they host 3 tournaments on campus, and are going to several
outside tournaments but it is hard to devote that much to
tournaments, need to know the amount of money that one
tournament nets. 2 tournaments a semester is fine, 3
tournaments is too much. $500 increase accounts for more
tournaments and more people going to tournaments (question
of how many)
A:2 Y:
Practice on campus, go off, second largest allocation (7071),
higher registration cost per head (can't change). Recommend
less flying tournaments, public transit in location, stingy when
going there, staying with people on campus, how selective are
they. They go to worlds but they get it out of revenue. They want
to move to british parliamentary debate. Recommend 0%
change.
A: 0 U
they're a good group, oldest group on campus, they hold debates
and tea parties and host sorgam (paid for out of gatbsy). Ask for
a decrease because all money on food - they can spend more
efficiently. they're a great group, tighening their budget.
A: 1 U
Make so much money from selling notebooks. 0 is fine.
A: 1 U
No packet, they're not requesting for growth
A: 0 Y:
They have requested extra funds for 300+ for a recurring,
successful event of Latino Graduation
A:0 U
They hosted solid programming this year and can apply for
grants next year if they want to expand and demonstrate need
for extra funding.
A: 0 U
They didn't spend all of their amount of allocation - mostly used
for food - but they got a significant amount of money from JCCC
for their conference which will also be held the next year. They
are requesting money for a non-recurring banner, so we will
taper down their increase to include conference fees (covered by
JCCC) and reflect their lessened need for allocation this year.
A: 1 Y:
They were trying to host a conference this year and have worked
with brazilian speakers and students and there has been minimal
contact. Money is sufficient for next year's conference.
A: 0 Y:
They program really well, recommending $4000 which accounts
for various grants they have obtained and used well - $200 for
live at lerner, $250 in kraft
A: 2 U
They applied for JCCC because of extra costs which they didn't
account for for one of their recurring events; even though they
also sought out other funds (MGC, etc.), they were still not able
to cover all of their funds. They used their JCCC funds efficiently
and showed that they needed their money.
A: 1 U
They do on and off-campus programming and get over $2750 in
grant to complete their programming.
A: 2 U
Spent all of their allocation on culture fair with food and
festitivities held late in the spring semester. They spend money
responsibly otherwise and meet regularly.
A: 1 Y:
Support for native graduation, increase by amount of
cosponsorship for powwow
A: 2 Y:
12
Acade
$834
$834
$834
$0.15 No change
Acade
$710
$710
$932
$221.59 Increase*
Acade
$3,895
$3,700
$4,127
$426.56 Increase*
Acade
$6,428
$7,071
$7,071
($0.35) No change
Acade
Acade
Acade
$1,621
$321
$550
$1,702
$337
$550

$337 N/A
N/A
$2,244
$0
$550
$540.58 Increase*
($337.00) Decrease
$0.00 No change
9
10
11
Black,
$3,029
$3,029
$3,284
$254.85 Increase*
14
Black,
$1,782
$1,960
$1,960
Black,
$0
$500
$1,028
$383.52 Increase*
16
Black,
$505
$505
$505
$4.90 Increase*
17
Black,
$3,750
$3,863
$4,246
$383.14 Increase*
18
Black,
$5,451
$5,451
$6,366
$914.89 Increase*
19
Black,
$2,071
$2,278
$5,147
$2,868.84 Increase*
20
Black,
$1,256
$1,256
$1,334
$381.20 Increase*
21
Black,
$535
$589
$1,682
$255.19 Increase*
22
$0.08 No change
15
Raw Data
AG002323 Raw Elementz

AG002335 Taal
AG002393 Bhangra
AG002402 Sabor
AG002405 Raas
AG002441 Bellydancing Troupe

AG002443 Onyx Dance Troupe
AG002445 Ballet Collaborative

AG002489 Lions Dance
AG002506 Dhoom
AG002647 Orchesis
AG002836 CU Generation
AG002853 Venom Step
Basically have been responsive, had a successful year, their

showcase is this upcoming weekend, recommended $100 for
increase because they want, but no external funding
No allocation increase, solid programming,
Asking for $1000 increase, recommending a decrease to $3000.
Bhangra only went to 1 competition this year, they forgot to put
it on their budget, didn't get revenue, didn't really do any events,
they applied to CIF for costumes (didn't get it), ended up
spending money from allocations for costumes, have yet to see.
Budgeted $500 for bheights for next year, forgot it happened.
Want to do two competitions, what they usually do (shouldn't
cut them just based on that). $1000 for travel/hotel for extra
competitions. The issues with banghra is that they wait until the
last minute to book things which is an increase in amount of
money. Most of the competitions they are applying to - they
really won't host people, competitions every single year.
Reached out for cosponsorship for releve, gave them half of
what they asked for - two shows, want to make one of their
shows two nights, they should cut down on a lot of their food
spending, more of their budget is on food, host a lot of events on
sabor + saboralumni - that budget needs to be revised for next
year especially if they wanted to do things. They didn't have
money for costumes but they waste money.
Last week, travel expenses. Travleed to two competitions (will
stay consistent next year as well), don't need money for shirts
and the such. Want to apply to more competitions. Raising more
revenue (hosted a Raas showcase in the past), should increase
their allocation. Solid board structure, they applied to us for
travel expenses, CIF for costumes. They work hard to not
overspend, applied to us for travel fund, main increase to plan
the event. We can talk to them next year about abc
cosponsorships for more competitions
Right now $550, asking for $1000, rep recommend $800 -- want
to go to NY - Cairo RAQs festival. They have to pay $300 money
for the festival, this will allow them to insert themselves in the
greater new york area. $200 increases. They haven't applied to
funds for this specfic festival.
Hip hop group, host a show every year, $525 for next year, asked
for $900, expected budget is $525 - don't anticipate no new
events
Recommend for $1000 increase, for the past years they have
been increasing tech costs, like $10000 more, they've been really
proactive about reaching out to other funds - one their
showcases was downtown. Should be accessible to columbia so
it's not good. Should support them in a way - should give them at
least $1000 and they are really great about trying to lower costs.
Increased them last for a similar reason, but it's still persistent.
Really really trying to get money, every since two years,
Programming does not indicate any request for funds
Probation, Conflict of Interest, they function, they do a
showcase/year, they go to at least 2 competitions, they applied
to a bunch of competitions (the only real cost that they had),
cosponsorships that they had are from last year's showcase.
Competitions that they applied to - only applied to ones that
weren't feasible. Literally could not travel to them, should apply
to competitions that you know that you can go to. They got into
one that they're going to in early may, but may not go to that.
Decrease to $500. Really have been having a lot of trouble with
their board = probation.
THEY ARE GREAT, takes everyone they need. Applied to funds?
Apply to the mama project, why would they need this? They
need the money to expand the length of their tech costs - they
haven't applied to us yet. Totally successful, but haven't applied
to funding.
Unresponsive and allocation normally goes to the purchase of
clothing that is kept by members - this is against spending
guidelines. What they use from their allocation is 0, not
punishing them for a last year, but if they want to do something
then they'll need to apply for cosponsorships,
NO PACKET
13
A: 0 U Dance
A: 2 U Dance
$506
$250
$455
$625

$637
$980
$182.00 Increase*
$280.00 Increase*
25
26
A: 3 Y: Dance
$3,775
$3,963
$4,200
$246.75 Increase*
27
A: 2 Y: Dance
$642
$706
$1,226
$433.59 Increase*
28
A: 3 Y: Dance
$1,893
$2,082
$2,082 http://tinyurl.com http://tinyurl.com
$2,915
$833.07 Increase*
29
A: 0 0: Dance
$275
$550
$550
$0.00 No change
30
A: 0 O Dance
$525
$525
$525
$0.00 No change
31
A: 1 Y: Dance
A: 1 Y: Dance
$614
$250
$1,229
$0

$0 The template does No change - we ar
$2,773
$0
$1,082.44 Increase*
$0.00 No change
32
33
A: 2 Y: Dance
$600
$600
$840
$195.00 Increase*
34
A: 1 O Dance
$493
$542
$835
$257.99 Increase*
35
A: 0 Y: Dance
N/A Dance
$0
$0
$500
$0

$150 N/A
N/A
$0
$0
($400.00) Decrease
($150.00) Decrease
36
37
Raw Data
AG002541 Asian American Alliance
AG002587 Japan Society
AG002593 Hong Kong Students and Scholars Society

AG002597 Taiwanese American Students Association
AG002609 Chinese Students Club

AG002610 Korean Students Association
AG002705 Global China Connection

AG002319 Biomedical Engineering Society
AG002320 Society of Automotive Engineers
AG002379 Application Development Initiative
AG002395 Engineers Without Borders

AG002503 CUINFORMS
AG002583 American Society of Civil Engineers
AG002585 Institute of Electronics and Electrical Engineers
AG002586 American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Increase requested for rising tech and facilities costs, hold more
events than any other group in the category (11) and growing 10% increase, already have a large allocation, successfully
applied to ABC co-sponsorship for $200 but were denied JCCC
co-sponsorship, Kraft, OMA and Gatsby (for unknown reasons),
paid 3,500 for cultureSHOCK outside designers and performers
when Heritage months were denied for paying so much money
for outside performers - important for drawing in attendees,
used co-sponsorship money to expand a program so they will
receive that money in an increase
Satellite group Taiko ($300 requested just for them), get outstide
sponsorships from corporations, but want more tents to attract
vendors as now they only have two (for Matsuri), not very
financially responsible and pour most of their allocation into one
event, student groups can no longer use tents not supplied by
Columbia though they used to own their own, now increased
rental costs, Matsuri not charged event - could raise revenue. IF
an event is so expensive, needs to be sustainable
Good programming with a small budget and requesting an
increase, co-sponsored one event with another cultural group,
never spend money on publicity, not necessarily a small budget
though - money requested for publicity and co-sponsoring to
build the cultural community
Good programming, but did not apply for any external funding
Rising tech costs, want money for year-round storage space - not
a good reason for allocation increase, you can apply for storage,
ABC has storage over the summer, but they have not gotten an
increase in 3 years, have applied to a lot of external funding, use
alot of tech for their events (ex: Nightmarket), however, not that
much Chinese culture in their events (noted by ABC Rep who is a
AAA member), ABC money not given for events that have not yet
been held and proven successful, clearly rising tech costs and
they have a demonstrated need for increase from applying for
external funding to support these tech costs, 400 dollars gained
through external funding this year for tech costs
Very financiallly responsive and communicative this year (though
previously not), didn't apply to new funding, same programming
as the previous year
Hold pre-professional events, undergrad/grad conference (no
money spent or earned) where they helped, pannels, no money
spent this year but trying to hold new events next year including
another conference (JCCC next year) - ABC does not give money
for events that have not been held and proven successful, selfproclaimed do not know how to use their allocation, 0 dollars
with a note that they will apply for co-sponsorships next year
and ABC will be lenient
They didn't apply for any grants even though they get
department They get department funding and they are doing
okay, they previously had received a cut but are pretty active.
Consistent programming
They are a very strong group with a serious general body that
puts in hours for the club - they consistently serve 60 - 100
people every week. They don't apply to internal grants, but they
get a lot of outside funding and grants. They are concerned that
getting outside funding makes it look commercial, though they
reasonably spend their money, but they don't have a
demonstrated need for more money based on what they
currently bring in. Giving them more money could incentivize
them to reach out more to the non-CS community on campus,
but they haven't made enough strides in terms of applying to
Columbia specific funds, and though it is from corporate
sponsorships, they currently have money to host their events.
They have a lot of institutional memory and are very organized in
terms of logistics. They applied for one co-sponsorship but don't
do much on campus - most of their programming lies outside of
the community.
They have done limited programming in the past year.
They have their steel bridge project and have applied to
additional funds for that.
They have applied for all of the funding they could and received
CIF and JCCC and have done a solid job to demonstrate.
They did not seek additional funding, but have held solid
programming with their current allocation.
14
A: 3 Y: East A
$3,097
$3,097
$6,307
$3,024.11 Increase*
40
A: 1 Y: East A
$2,529
$2,782
$4,246
$1,463.98 Increase*
41
UNAN East A
A: 0 U East A
$888
$1,396
$933
$1,536

$1,037
$2,150
$75.88 Increase*
$614.40 Increase*
42
43
A: 2 Y: East A
$4,892
$4,892
$7,185
$2,293.41 Increase*
44
A: 2 N East A
$6,329
$6,329
$8,245
$2,355.31 Increase*
45
A:1 Y: East A
$0
$500
$0
($500.00) Decrease
46
A: 1 O Engine
A: 1 O Engine
$561
$13,125
$140
$13,781

$356
$13,913
$0.14 No change
($0.50) Decrease
49
50
A: 2 O Engine
$525
$525
$2,910
$0.00 No change
51
A: 5 Y: Engine
A: 3 Y: Engine
$6,468
$0
$6,468
$0

$6,000
$0
$0.00 No change
$0.00 No change
52
53
A: 2 U Engine
$751
$826
$1,886
$655.81 Increase*
54
A: 2 U Engine
$880
$968
$1,693
$646.05 Increase*
55
A: 2 U Engine
$788
$788
$722
$0.00 No change
56
Raw Data
AG002618 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
AG002618 American Institute of Chemical Engineers

AG002334 Armenian Club
AG002364 Turkish Students Association

AG002419 Polish Club
AG002474 Hellas
AG002567 Ukrainian Students Society
AG002576 Russian International Association
AG002584 French Cultural Society
AG002611 Iranian Students Association
AG002628 Turath
AG002840 Tatar Club
AG002893 Germanic Cultural Society
AG002317 Film Production
AG002344 CU Records
They spend their money on travel to a competition in Phoenix

and bulding a plane and taking it to competitions (in addition to
bearing shipping costs). They aren't doing anything new
necessarily and serve a niche community and should look at
alternate ways to get their materials as well.
They spend their money on travel to a competition in Phoenix
and bulding a plane and taking it to competitions (in addition to
bearing shipping costs). They aren't doing anything new
necessarily and serve a niche community and should look at
alternate ways to get their materials as well.
Good, consistent
Growing really quickly, around 15 people each year, new board
started to hold more events that attract international students,
now mostly about turkish culture. More appealing to people to
columbia. Ridiculous allocation request, speaker series, new
board, consistently organizing well, low profile people, continue
doing that, applied for kraft fund, holding service events,
increase but not sure if $550-$1000 is too much. Global Center
possibly withdrew funding.
Underutilization of budget, external funding, and excess funds
indicate need for decrease
Packet, contacted advisors, request $250, PROBATION. Rep
wants to $0, had originally motioned for derecognition. $0 and
then $250 through cosponsorships, no communication
Board problems, speaker series, they have been the same,
programmed the same, consistent about programming, not
requesting increase
Good, consistent
Non-existent this year, problem in their board, contacted about
$80 and $100 event - only spent $180 out of money.
Recommending 30% cut, still can program well, also have
revenue. Otherwise too harsh, not wasting money. 30% is ideal
for just a bad year, not automatically cut but they didn't explain
the unspent allocation, etc. Most of the people at the event,
weren't there, quality of event was less. Non-existent because
board problems, now they are better.
These were on top of things, recommended 1000, applied to
turath (kraft film series), growing events, make revenue too,
good users of money. They are really successful, but they also
had people coming though they hadn't applied to stuff. Except
for $300, haven't really applied to grants/co-sponsorships, rising
costs because more people coming. JCCC too and chaplain fund
(no $ received for application). Why didn't they get it? They
didn't apply to us. They are successful
Best club (award), applied to a lot of things, turkish club/iranian
students club, lots of different cosponsorships, strong board, on
top of things. Improving their board structure and everything.
They requested $1289 for next year. They have a satellite group,
some spending will go to that. $765 right now. Lots of recurring
events, repeat the film series. With this extra money, additional
crowds coming in more people coming to each of their events.
No programming
One of the best clubs, newly recognized last year, allocation of
$500, event called christmas market (very cute), making
unofficial events, they also best new group award, applied to
cosponsorships
This club couldn't remember whether they bought a camera.
Encouraged to apply for CIF, applied for and successfully got the
grant. With the amount that JCCC granted, filmmakers go on and
off campus to make their own films and showcase them to
columbia community. Right now they can only support a limited
number of filmmakers, only 10 (hence the increase). They work
with off campus film companies (script reviews).
Didn't contact rep until this semester because they didn't update
contact information, meeting with vp, wants to revamp CU
records, music records aren't a thing anymore. VP has been the
point person if student performers want to perform on campus.
Biggest event - deantini's playlist (deantini's favorite playlist) this
is a really interesting/innovative idea. $5000 requested is too
much.Rep only recommend increasing to $500. Didn't seek
external funding, haven't been able to get into contact with
them. They've already planned everything out for an event.
Don't want to give extra money because they haven't been
consistent + no external funding. let's readdress next year
15
A: 2 U Engine
$4,233
$4,445
$4,445
A: 2 U Engine
UNAN Europ
$594
$0
$642
$0

$4,445
$420
A: 1 O Europ
$500
$550
A: 0 O Europ
$813
$813
A: 0 Y: Europ
$310
$310
A: 0 O Europ
A: 0 Y: Europ
$400
$1,975
A: 0 Y: Europ
($0.05) No change
57
$3,677.95 Increase*
$120.00 Increase*
58
61
$720
$170.45 Increase*
62
$490
($241.00) Decrease
63
$250 to be charged: con Welcome Party: $
$0
($250.00) Decrease
64
$400
$1,975
$360 N/A
N/A
$360
$1,975
$1,476
$1,476
$1,000
($476.00) Decrease
67
A: 1 Y: Europ
$680
$714
$787
$107.24 Increase*
68
A: 1 Y: Europ
UNAN Europ
$768
$0
$807
$0

$0 N/A
N/A
$1,651
$0
$832.92 Increase*
$0.00 No change
69
70
A: 2 U Europ
$0
$0
$500 We only had one e We plan on spendi
$713
$213.07 Increase*
71
A:0 Y: Media
$1,665
$1,665
$0 ($1,665.00) Decrease
74
A: 2 U Media
$250
$250
$200
$0.00 No change
$0.00 No change
$0.00 No change
65
66
75
Raw Data
AG002418 National Undergraduate Film Festival
AG002434 Artist Society

AG002473 Photography Society
AG002548 Columbia Television (CTV)
AG002549 Science Fiction Society
AG002568 Ferris Reel Film Society
AG002626
AG002321
AG002333
AG002374
Sounds of China
New Music
Bach Society
Non-Sequitur
AG002387 Classical Performers

AG002562 Glee Club
AG002590 Metrotones
AG002600 Gospel Choir

AG002607 Notes and Keys
AG002613 Clefhangers
AG002623 Kingsmen
AG002632 Wind Ensemble
AG002666 Uptown Vocal
AG002852 SHARP
NO PACKET
Consistent programming, weekly sketches, free and open to
general public, pretty well attended. They apply to gatsby grant
every year because several hundred dollars for art supplies, they
still need money to buy stuff. They also received abc
cosponsorships. Requested $1830 because they use the money.
Diversified amount of things, strong programming
Not a functioning group up until 2 months ago, not good before
then, accused past members of stealing things. However,
because of that their advisor hasn't allowed them to spend any
more for the past few years. Did succesfully apply for capital
investment fund - their board this year has been strong, despire
not being allowed to spend any more. Skit videos, used by
admissions office to welcome class of 2019. They only have
$2700 right now. No increase, no decrease because they had a
bad board and they were limited in their spending and still have
been doing pretty good programming. Actively sought out capital
fund.
Wasteful spending observed, had $500 left of allocation with no
rationale, no eaf sent to ABC for giving $600 to a speaker, they
have, one or more times, used a false EAF number. Cut. No
access to budget. $750 + probation
Really reaches out, programming is really good, this year they
have a lot of events (Suits + bill nye), they try to do better things
because they want people to go to. costs are going up - they
never reached out about cosponsorships even though rep asked
about it. Relying on cosponsorships from other communities.
Requested $6000, screening rights are more expensive. Do they
ever apply to anything outside, student clubs, etc? The level at
which their events are, want to hold them more often (they have
had to cut back on more movies). Didn't like this group because
they picked their own movies. As a group themselves they have
been doing well, lots of attendence.
Whenever rep talks to them in person, they are not willing to
apply for cosponsorships (they just dont' want to), but they put
increase. Just keep it the same. Why no decrease? Decrease to
$500 - with the $500, the bulk of their programming is still tech
heavy (they need to do tech regardless), food is secondary.
Decrease the amount of food in their budget they only have $80
of tech. They do other things like the radioshow. List of groups to
watch. (Next $500 on karaoke??)
Defunct
They had a fine year, got an increase last year
Did well at their level of funding, did not request an increase
Used $100 for board bonding from allocation, will need money
to co-sponsor group applying to NGR next cycle - not in
allocation packet,
Packet submitted late, in conversations at the beginning of fall
semester with advisers and Glee club
Did not apply for external funding, requested increase to pay
someone to film their concerts, not very communicative and
spend less than their allocation, no tech costs for C555, 521
needed (-100 for filming spent this year unnecessarily),
underspending
Cut last year for not submitting an allocation packet, but scaled
up their programming and applied to a lot of external funding
(ABC + JCCC) for bigger venues and incresed programming,
revenue from concerts
Solid programming, concerts have been good, fill c555
Used money well but did not apply for outside funding
All of the money spent this year was for events that were not on
campus, all for travel. Cut to $500, last year they spent on stuff
on campus, don't want to hurt them too much. Generate money
off campus. They don't do enough campus, no EAFs, etc.
Rep's fave group to work with, asked for an increase, but its
going mostly towards travel that they don't even do it every
year. Shouldn't get recurring allocation for travel
Did not apply for outside funding, solid group, 250 budgeted for
Senior gifts, receive less than comparable groups, used all
allocation halfway through the year
16
N/A
Media
$2,154
$2,154
$0 N/A
Y: UN Media
a: 1 U Media
$1,624
$1,067
$1,786
$1,120

$1,824
$37.37 Increase*
$0 ($1,120.00) Decrease
77
78
A: 0 Y: Media
$5,418
$2,709
$2,709 Our only expendit https://docs.googl
$3,791
$1,082.20 Increase*
79
A: 0 Y: Media
$1,323
$1,257
$750
($444.00) Decrease
80
A: 3 Y: Media
$3,375
$4,050
$6,829
$2,537.47 Increase*
81
A: 0 Y:
N/A
A: 2 U
UNAN
Media
Music
Music
Music
$592
$597
$1,856
$1,061
$592
$597
$1,948
$1,061
$592
$0
$2,069
$1,061
https://docs.googl
N/A
https://docs.googl
https://docs.googl
$700
$0
$2,897
$1,061
A: 0 Y: Music
$993
$1,092
$992
($100.00) Decrease
88
N/A
Music
$605
$635
$635 N/A
$0
($635.00) Decrease
89
UNAN Music
$621
$621
$521
($100.00) Decrease
90
UNAN Music
A: 2 U Music
UNAN Music
$591
$1,238
$971
$650
$1,238
$971

$944
$1,114
$971
A: 2 U Music
A: 0 Y: Music
$683
$3,125
$683
$3,125

$500
$4,375
UNAN Music
$1,418
$1,418
$1,167
UNAN Music
$500
$550
$0
https://docs.googl
N/A
https://docs.googl
N/A
N/A
N/A
$0
$0.00 No change
$108.00
$0.00
$828.10
$0.00
Increase*
No change
Increase*
No change
$325.51 Increase*
($0.03) No change
$0.25 No change
($183.00) Decrease
$1,250.00 Increase*
$0.00 No change
($583.00) Decrease
76
82
85
86
87
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
Raw Data
AG002901 CU Society of Hip Hop
AG002938 CU Sur
AG002978 Vivace Chamber Singers
AG002311 Black Theater Ensemble

AG002425 CU Players
AG002554 Fruit Paunch
AG002592 Musical Theater Society

AG002614 Performing Arts League
AG002644 Varsity Show

AG002650 Kings Crown Shakespeare Troupe
AG002921 Wushu
AG002922 Voltage
AG002404 Chowdah
AG002328 Organization of Rising Entrepreneurs (CORE)
Recognized two semesters ago, started spending last semester,

mostly hold events in the malcom x lounge, rap and freestyle
workshops. granted $400 after being recognized, majority of it
for buying equipment but now done buying equipment (CIF),
club banner, only really spent $100 on programming itself.
Request for $500 for next year, want to give them a decrease,
hold more frequent cyphers, lenient for new group
Very solid group, as a new group they have doen a good job
finding new programming, getting new showcase, applied to
cosponsorships (JCCC because new event), still have plans to
scale up and recommending an increase to 900. They have been
solid about communicating and they have their new board
elected (came and talked to them). Some kind of increase.
Applied to a different things, filled C555 for event and want to
have it in Roone. It is rare for an a capella group to have things in
Roone. What is it specifically going to? Applied for $300 from
JCCC but didn't get it, they want to travel a lot. Because of ticket
revenues, they have solid programming.
Next year planning to spent $270: $170 on two concerts + $100
for music. They have been fine - solid. A lot of spending on food
and publicity.
They applied to a lot of outside funding (though they didn't
succeed) and did not end up getting the rights to their fall show
which hindered them. They focus on outreach and collaboration
and are accessible, but have been slightly lax in programming so
should strive to amp it up for the future.
They use outside funding to enhance their programming and do
well - they asked for no change and are good with their current
level of funding.
No contact or packet.
They have been increasing the quality of their programming and
interest from the community (RENT sold out in 10 minutes) and
they have had to add an extra show. They host showcases and
other events as well - demonstrated they spend well, apply for
grants and enhance community..
They are the governing board for performing arts groups and
have been constantly adding groups. They host programming
well for the performing arts intergroup.
They have been stagnant at their allocation for the past 3 years,
despite having a bigger set each year. They have a successful
revenue model (Tickets + Alumni Donations + Grants and have
had to move big lead up events (such as preview) to the Diana
Event Oval instead of Havana Central. Clearly they spend well,
program well and have been suffering from lack of funds.
They programming really well and attract large crowds to their
audiences.
$11K last year, gets more money from department. lots of
interboard conflict.
wants to spend increased allocation on more drums and other
equipment, not a recurring cost for allocation, apply to outside
funding for one-time infusion UNANIMOUS No change
No anything, no purchases, no money needed
Last year requested 36K, allocated 4000-8000K only ended up
giving them 1620. They did a good job, despite not as good as
last year, still better than others. They went to Paris/London that was out of their own pocket. Get money from other places,
they apply for grants and additional funding, other clubs with
huge operating budgets as well. They would put it to a better use
than any one else. They are center of entreprenuership
community - so many people. Services a lot of people on
campus, on a resource that doesn't exist elsewhere. Having a big
effect. See value in giving groups more money, gives them
incentive to keep some of their programming here and get
people more involved that wouldn't. Their programming would
be different if they didn't get as much ABC funding, less inclusive.
The quality of some of their stuff was less, they would have
hosted more events, got things from columbia entreprenuership,
not sustained throughout because they were in need. The
allocation increase would definitely go to more events. Revenue
not listed on some of their stuff. What about external funding?
What were they able to do with their external funding? How
effective and efficient they used their money? They have a
monopoly in terms of entreprenuership. Generally, they are the
only thing. They are the one primarily serving that community
and far-reaching. 3800 - based on their budget. A: 1 O: 1 Y: 13
17
A: 1 Y: Music
$0
$0
$400
A: 2 Y: Music
$0
$0
$670
$170.45 Increase*
99
UNAN Music
$0
$0
$300 N/A
$100
($200.00) Decrease
10
A: 3 O Perfor
$1,246
$1,495
$1,000
($558.03) Decrease
10
UNAN Perfor
UNAN Perfor
$1,491
$567
$1,566
$510

$408 N/A
N/A
$2,192
$0
$626.19 Increase*
($408.00) Decrease
10
10
UNAN Perfor
$6,955
$6,955
$10,530
$3,156.64 Increase*
10
A: 1 U Perfor
$2,150
$2,364
$2,587
$81.02 Increase*
10
A: 1 Y: Perfor
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000 Full Budget: https: Full Budget: https:
$23,557
$2,556.81 Increase*
10
A: 1 U Perfor
$4,635
$5,098
$7,137
$2,039.44 Increase*
10
A: 1 O Perfor
$0
$0
$820
$569.60 Increase*
11
Perfor
A: 1 U Perfor
$0
$0
$0
$0

$0
$0
$0
($500.00) Decrease
$0.00 No change
11
11
A: 1 Y: Pre-Pr
$213
$300
$3,478
$1,857.95 Increase*
11
N/A
$0.00 No change
98
Raw Data
AG002377
AG002383
AG002385
AG002424
AG002486
AG002544
Womens Business Society

American Medical Students Association
Hispanic Scholarship Fund
Multicultural Business Association
Columbia Association of Pre-Dental Students
Charles Drew Pre-Med Society
AG002559 Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers

AG002577 Society of Women Engineers
AG002581 National Society of Black Engineers

AG002606 Economics Society
AG002661 Columbia China Law Business Association
AG002704 CU Financial Engineering
AG002707 CFIG
AG002903 Columbia Undergraduate Consulting Club

AG002920 Columbia Sports Business Society
AG002939 CQBS
AG002952 CIBD
AG001241 IPA
AG002314 Gadfly
AG002336 Blue and White
AG002345 Undergraduate Law Review
No increase requested, used money mostly for printing and they

get most of their money in outside sponsorships which also could
cover the small ammount they do get and their current
allocaiton could go to another (smaller) group where the money
could be really impactful, do they actually need the money or
just use it because they have it? They use their money
responsibly - dialogue needed - could they get it from
somewhere else? could co-sponsor them if necessary, use their
ABC money for events on campus and corporate sponsorships
for the conference
A:1 Y: Pre-Pr
Did not request an increase, solid programming
UNAN Pre-Pr
Did not apply for external funding
UNAN Pre-Pr
UNAN Pre-Pr
NO PACKET
N/A Pre-Pr
Did not apply for outside funding
A:1 U Pre-Pr
Predominantly use their money for regional and national
conference (they pay using half of allocation), requesting 4500,
they are requesting more because of a conference in baltimore.
This isn't necessarily recurring, etc.
A: 2 O Pre-Pr
Applied unsuccessfully to one source of external funding, sent 22
members to LA for job interviewing - no increase
A:0 Y: Pre-Pr
Two big conferences (this year one in Anaheim the cost of which
came 1/2 from allocation), spent less than 3000 dollars and did
not go to a conference, suggest more people are going to want
to go next year but we cannot fund that with recurring allocation A: 0 Y: Pre-Pr
Did not apply for external funding, unexpectedly found 2000
dollars in revenue in their account and spent it well this year,
really strong events and many of them
A: 1 U Pre-Pr
stagnating
A: 1 U Pre-Pr
Did not apply for outside funding, increase requested for
publicity, but does not seem necessary or very effective, publicity
could come from co-sponsorship
A:2 U Pre-Pr
Did not apply for outside funding but good group
UNAN Pre-Pr increase requested for rising tech and facilities costs, hold more
events than any other group in the category (11) and growing 10% increase, already have a large allocation, successfully
applied to ABC co-sponsorship for $200 but were denied JCCC
co-sponsorship, Kraft, OMA and Gatsby (for unknown reasons),
paid 3,500 for cultureSHOCK outside designers and performers
when Heritage months were denied for paying so much money
for outside performers - important for drawing in attendees,
used co-sponsorship money to expand a program so they will
receive that money in an increase (AAA description)
UNAN Pre-Pr
New group, had a few good events, going with Rep
recommendation
UNAN Pre-Pr
Recently recognized, have not spent money (since it did not go to
their account yet), but programmed anyway
UNAN Pre-Pr
Programmed sustainable events, well-attended, external funding
obtained
UNAN Pre-Pr
Thinking of changing vision, they received $500 last year to
continue to revamp
A: 2 U Public
Bad packet, should get same amount as now - so they can prove
sustainability.
Y: 9 O: Public
They have a campus niche and and there is a same number of
spending. There is a 10% cut accross the board for printing.
A: 2 U Public
They want courses, more writers, and more printing. Can't buy a
banner every year for events. Thave overlap with some events
with pre-law society and mock trial, but their events are good for
revenue. They have fundraisers. Didn't apply for cosponsorships A: 1 U Public
18
$387
$1,972
$400
$943
$330
$1,015
$387
$1,709
$420
$990
$330
$1,117
$387
$1,760
$400
$977
$0
$1,184
https://docs.googl
https://docs.googl
https://docs.googl
https://docs.googl
N/A
https://docs.googl
https://docs.googl
https://docs.googl
https://docs.googl
https://docs.googl
N/A
https://docs.googl
$0
$1,760
$560
$900
$0
$1,184
$3,599
$3,599
$3,560
$3,560
$5,996
Decrease
No change
Increase*
Decrease
No change
No change
11
11
11
11
12
12
$3,815
$0.00 No change
12
$3,560
($0.05) No change
12
$6,296
$5,000 ($1,295.69) Decrease
12
$1,477
$935
$1,403
$982

$1,486
$786
$82.66 Increase*
($0.38) No change
12
12
$0
$300
$300

$300
$550
$0.00 No change
$220.00 Increase*
12
12
$0
$0
$500
$0.00 No change
12
$0
$0
$100
$0
$0
$300
$0
$0
$300
$300.00 Increase*
13
$0
$0
$400
($100.00) Decrease
13
$1,330
$1,330
$1,000 I do not have this This will be worke
$0 ($1,000.00) Decrease
13
$10,700
$9,630
$9,245 ($1,027.20) Decrease
13
$640
$768
$790
($387.00)
$0.00
$160.00
($77.00)
$0.00
($0.03)
$100.00 Increase*
$0.00 No change
$21.57 Increase*
13
13
13
Raw Data
AG002388 Africa-Diaspora Literary Society

AG002394 Journal of Literary Criticism
AG002406 Science Review
AG002414 Birch
AG002423 Undergraduate Science Journal
AG002488 Columbia East Asia Review
AG002555 Jester of Columbia
AG002588 Columbia Review
AG002594 Federalist Paper
AG002605 Architecture Society

AG002801 Helvidius (Journal of Politics and Society)
AG002839 The Columbia Precipice
AG002864 Double Exposure
AG002888 EAT
AG002977 The Culinarian
They received $0 last year, requested $1934 (over 100%

increase), their niche is a 1, their rep communication is a 3 (long
monthly updates). Either given them $734 or full amount, could
print at kinkos or they could go to a printer. They haven't applied
to funds for prints. They received a grant for IRAAS - for $1500.
How many hits have they had? Are they reaching people with
their stuff? Have they applied to JCCC or F@CU? They used
outside funding. They have access to that for next year. Same
eboard - confident in their ability. $1500 in outside funding - they
have proved. They can spend $1934 pretty well. Can possibly
mellow out again - we have seen groups who have cycled a lot.
We can't solidify a recurring allocation of so much money just
because of one good year given their rocky history and issues
with sustainability. Even if they haven't gotten JCCC, they have
gotten cosponsorships and IRAAS. We don't only want them to
apply to JCCC - there are other things. Why apply for more funds
you don't need? They can supplement what we give them. Keep
them on probation watch list and watch for volatility.
A: 0 Y:
NO PACKET
N/A
They got JCCC, they do a lot of stuff, give someone to prospective
students, want to try more events. Budget can't include all of
these things
A: 2 Y:
Personal money and sponsorships from department (not from
us), do we give them an increase even though? Until the
department stops giving them money, they don't need extra
money. They requested $5000 from department but got about
half. JCCC for tech costs? Performance - dancer/musicians. Is that
necessary for a publication? More pages than ADLS, so they need
to pay more. Current allocation is 2650. We generally want to
move publications to the digital mindset. Working with some of
them and said to move to digital - in meetings for allocations,
said we're going to decrease printing costs for allocations accross
the board. Should we cut it so they have a small number for
institutional memory. Should we cut how many they should
print? They also distribute it. Percentage decrease for all
publications. We don't know about readership. Anything below
9% is fine -- pressure publications to print less. The dollar
amount for 1 journal is 10-11. EAch publication has different
types of readership. 1K minimum to print - it varies. MOTION
FOR 10% OF PRINTING
Y: 13
NO PACKET
N/A
Work with Harvard University Press. Receive grants from $515,
should apply for gatsby
A:2 U
Changes to publication spending guideline -10%
A: 2 U
They want the same amount and operate in the same niche as
other. They have a nice budget, they were paying out of pocket
for stuff.
A:0 U
Requesting same, they used a bad printing company.
A: 1 U
GBB recognized. Requested 1986 - have a good niche and
communicate well. Got Gatsby, worried won't get next year.
Finals + midterms -- snacks to them. you can most likely get
gatsby, can allocation. Double check this is the ABC + GBB
amount
A: 1 U
They have okay communication and niche, and they can't get
some amount from outside, only ABC is able to provide . There is
a cut for groups.
A: 2 Y:
Defunct
N/A
Received gatsby, want to do next year with a speaker, without
pizza. Can apply to JCCC for new event, don't pay for pizza out of
pocket
A: 0 U
Recognized last year, all for food, go out to restaurants to review
them, you could get comped by the restaurant. They have $400
pocket change - printing through stash money. $400 (is their own
money, shouldn't count). This is not recurring, so this is from
their freshman year. Can't slash them to $100 if they are
spending $500. How many do they need to print on a yearly
basis? We could subsidize printing and transportation. They have
readership and printing. We recognized culinarian because they
were so shitty - because eat was defunct. Printing + Website +
10% cut to printing
A: 0 O
Received $100 - how did they spend? Their account was created,
requested $485 - want to change from NYC thing to columbia there is a Columbia focus for their group.
A: 2 U
19
Public
Public
$400
$150
$400
$150
$135 N/A
N/A
$626
$0
$625.57 Increase*
($135.00) Decrease
13
14
Public
$2,549
$2,549
$3,815
$665.36 Increase*
14
Public
Public
$2,896
$490
$2,896
$539

$359 N/A
N/A
$2,385
$0
($265.00) Decrease
($359.00) Decrease
14
14
Public
Public
$388
$3,103
$388
$3,103

$515
$2,343
$0.00 No change
($260.30) Decrease
14
14
Public
Public
$3,878
$5,068
$3,878
$5,068

$3,141
$4,561
($349.23) Decrease
($506.95) Decrease
14
14
Public
$1,467
$954
$1,640
$709.94 Increase*
14
Public
Public
$6,742
$0
$7,214
$500

$0 N/A
N/A
$5,106 ($1,394.00) Decrease

$0
$0.00 No change
14
15
Public
$0
$0
$1,638
($22.00) Decrease
15
Public
$0
$0
$0
($500.00) Decrease
15
Public
$0
$0
$200 We have not spen https://docs.googl
$300
$100.00 Increase*
15
Raw Data
AG002354 Club Bangla
AG002397 Vietnamese Students Association

AG002408 South East Asian League
AG002409 Malama Hawaii

AG002556 Thai Sabai
Current allocation 2131 which was a slight increase, they

increased a lot, had a really good event, applied for 7 external
sources of funding - succcessful in getting money from all of
them. With that in place, stronger board than before - because
now they have strong structure for next year as well. They have
longevity in the group so this recurring increase should be good
for a while.
No packet, only spent $100 for tabling (all they spent), one bad
board shouldn't hurt a group forever. This group should be on
probation for next year. When we cut them down, they can build
back up. Has this club been active previously too? No
communication from them.
$706 dollars, last year they don't apply to any external funding.
They program well
They are small but they have had one major event for the past
few years (luau). Last year for the event, they brought 1 main
dish ($500 of allocation) for food for the event, but because they
couldn't afford anything else, they spent out of pocket to buy
ingredient to cook their own stuff. Only 1 place in brooklyn that
does actual hawaiin food, this year they can't cook themselves
but they still can only afford that one dish. They are pivoting and
not doing this event. What they are doing instead is lei day - no
food, but they will teach people how to use fresh flowers to
make a lei. They are using another group's space for it. They are
going to use the leftover money for costumes, which they are
going to use down the line. They are active throughout the year
performing at other groups cultural shows (have been making
contumes by hand). Planning to buy 3 costumes. Very fiscally
conservative. VERY. Next year, they are scraping luau all together
and because they want to do it properly or not at all. Next year,
instead they will be doing smaller events including lei day. The
last few years, was 1 event a year, and now they are doing 4-5
smaller events. Next year, they are budgeting for the luau and lei
day and costumes (even though they are also buying some this
year). Shouldn't be getting a recurring allocation for a one time
event (550 + 500 infusion one time for costumes)
No increase, have been doing well,
20
A: 2 Y: South
$2,191
$2,301
$621 N/A
N/A
$3,240
$1,108.94 Increase*
15
$490
($131.00) Decrease
15
A: 0 Y: South
$621
$621
A: 0 O South
$1,344
$1,412
$706
($0.03) No change
15
A: 1 Y: South
A: 1 U South
$985
$517
$985
$517

$770
$517
($89.36) Decrease
$0.00 No change
15
16
Raw Data
Wants allocation over $4500 - they asked for ABC cosponsorship

for increase tech costs for the second time in a row, their tech
costs have increased by $1000. They need help from us in
funding that - used cosponsorships both years. Got JCCC and
PnP, applied to GBB and Gatsby as well. They applied to every
external funding because don't get enough money from us.
Pretty successful in endeavors. Main endeavor (Tamasha) is
stagnant because saturation of awesome. Increasing allocation
for such a big allocation group by a little is useless/gets lost
because they need a lot of money for a noticable % increase. It is
problematic to give a group such a big increase, but that's
necessary. Now for two years we've given them co-sponsorships,
it is a recurring costs, need to be built into the recurring funding.
Looking to do a whole number of different types of
programming. New programming (penn masala, brought in
speakers, brought in political sphere of south asian culture),
expand in that sphere. Can now apply for external fundings for
new events too. Deliberations - for all of these big events that
people have, everyeone will always apply for funding.
Amount of money that is spent on mixers with other groups? The
amount of money per person is good and doing intergroup
mixers is good. Good part of community, does good things for
umbrella group.
AG002563 Club Zamana
AG002596 Liga Filipina
AG002642 Organization of Pakistani Students
Revenue for Tamasha - $1000?? 700 students, $5/students, a

little bit of corporate sponsorships ($400-$500). They don't have
huge revenue, publicity cost is very large - in the past it's been a
huge issue, this year less so because they spent almost all of
their publicity out of revenue. Budget includes allocation and
revenue spending - very important for them in selling out
though. Too much of an increasing, more comfortable with 10%
thing though their programming has expanded. They have a lot
of little things that they didn't include in the budget. Fall political
conference/spring scale will be the same. Apply to the funds to
increase programming in other ways (only once per year for
JCCC), now it's been two years. This group won't be wasting
money. Smaller events? Night Market, etc. Collaborate with
everyone - everyone co-sponsors tamasha so they get involved
with all of the other groups (these aren't new). Increase is NOT
for the new events (fall conference, political conference), but it's
so they can hold their old programming and then use JCCC/extra
sponsorships for new events because they use all of these
resources for their old programming - which is causing them to
stagnate. Their irresponsible spending is only publicity, gotten
better in the past, it helps and it is from their revenue. Hype
events are included in publicity also part of the Tamasha
programming that week.
A: 5, Y South
Not super communicative, don't spend very well - asked for a
huge increase. Now throwing their huge event, 2 events this year
($700 last semester, $50 in matsuri and $770 for new event), first
event was a great event, dropped off for a while, programming
well for second event. Don't deserve a cut yet, they are keeping
their current proposal, but large ratio of allocation to
membership. Groups can be good without being communicative
to ABC rep. Could cut for sub-par allocation packets.
Y: 11 South
OPS - allocation of 2041, allocation increase to 7900 requested.
Very successful group, they have applied to external funding but
not enough. In the future, next year, etc. would deserve an
increase in allocation but the only problem is that they don't
apply enough to external funding. $600 requested for new event,
didn't apply to JCCC. Recommended no increase at all. They do
well but don't look for external funding. If they want to do other
huge scale events, then they'll be fine or apply to external
funding. We just really want them to apply for external sources
to get more funding and to know what things are recurring (right
now random large scale events that aren't necessarily recurring).
Next year, look for more recurring events/funding before
increasing allocation.
A: 2 Y: South
21
$3,186
$3,504
$5,311
$1,807.44 Increase*
16
$1,546
$1,546
$2,164
$618.40 Increase*
16
$1,855
$2,041
$2,857
$816.38 Increase*
16
Raw Data
AG002662 Singapore Students Association

AG002330 Culinary Society
AG002373 Chess Club

AG002375 Hapa Club
AG002399 US Milvets of CU
AG002572 Conversio Virium
AG002602 Nightline
AG002663 Anime Club
AG002686 Columbia Esports

AG002756 Games Club
AG002865 Femsex
AG002900 Smash Bros. Club

AG002979 Brazilian Society
Ethio-Eritrean Students
Bachata Dance Social
AG002973 Society for the Advancement of Underrepresented Filmmakers
They have 470, requested 850. Recommends $100 increase

because they have done what they need to do for increase.
Threw new event this year, they applied to JCCC, the event went
really well, they want it to be recurring since it was so successful.
Only happened once so increase allocation to $850 is too much,
giving them $100 instead of $300 from JCCC will allow them to
budget into their event and give them leeway to apply for more
grants, etc. Can't give them entire $300 - kind of conservative but
this group has had ups and down. This year is the first year it is
directly outlined that grants are helpful for JCCC. Reasonably
speaking, we can't fiscally give all of the groups the entire money
they get from all of their grants. One of the ways we market the
cosponsorships to councils - in addition to helping JCCC we can
fund them a second time (to keep trying hard they can still go to
the abc cosponsorship while they get up to their entire increase).
We increase their allocation by some amount but still want to
make them have one more check. Still need to look for external
funding.
UNAN
Solid programming that attracts a lot of people (example: cake
competition) and are fine with their current level of spending.
A: 1 U
They represent Columbia very well in National competitions and
spend a lot of money on travel (between ABC AND JCCC), and
they bring national grandmasters for presentations in order to
widen their audience to the Columbia community - there is a
good mix of things for the public and internal travel - and
increase would be used equally for these two aspects which have
demonstrated need due to applying for grants.
A: 1 Y:
Defunct
N/A
They spend large sums of money that they fundraise and
accumulate from corporations (40K raised for their annual ball
among other initiatives to raise money), and extra money would
be used for a recurring conference that would bring MilVets
together accross the board. They historically are organized well
internally, spend well, host good programming and provide for
their community. They have used all of their money and have
exhausted outside funding but are still expanding.
A: 2 Y:
They can beef up their outreach and expansion of their
community and will look into more co-sponsorships. They hosted
a conference and got presenters to present, mostly from their
revenue - they got extra free presenters that they had originally
budgeted for paying for and spend the rest out of revenue.
A: 1 Y:
They spend a lot of money on publicity, training (recertification)
and calls. For confidentiality, we only communicate with one
person. They are an essential function to the community but we
should examine who grants their funding moving forward.
A: 3 U
There is a little bit of struggles in terms of when they get
screening rights and how long they are extended for - so they
have a differeing need for allocation every year, but last year was
when they didn't spend all of their allocation because of it. If this
continues to be an issue in the future then we will need to
address it.
A:2 Y:
Had a lot of trouble in beginning of year, didn't have an
allocation, applied for JCCC (supplies) - got $350. They don't
need much money, want to have more advertising, did a lot of
study breaks and projected food costs. They'll have events where
they do viewing parties and things.
A: 2 O
They buy new games every year during black Friday sales snd
host solid programming.
A: 2 U
Defunt
N/A
They are a new group (with no initial allocation) but have been
communicative and want money for recurring supplies. Because
consoles, etc. aren't recurring, they won't be in allocation, but
money will be given for the natural updating necessary for
consoles/games, etc.
A:2 O:
They organize through OLAS and don't have personal
expenditures on recurring items.
New
Their allocation should be what we voted on at NGR, new group New
New Group
New
With no money, they'll be generating $50. Because no amount of
money/access this year, confused. Recognizing that we
recognized them for before/during NGR because no access to
things.
A: 0 Y:
22
$470
$470
$555
Specia
$2,248
$2,136
$2,138
Specia
Specia
$2,113
$492
$2,113
$400

$400 N/A
N/A
$3,218
$0
$851.96 Increase*
($400.00) Decrease
16
16
Specia
$2,008
$4,016
$8,705
$1,704.54 Increase*
17
Specia
$862
$862
$516
Specia
$1,739
$3,273
$3,920
$1,120.00 Increase*
17
Specia
$1,358
$1,426
$1,320
($106.00) Decrease
17
Specia
$0
$0
$250
$250.00 Increase*
17
Specia
Specia
$250
$0
$250
$80

$80 N/A
N/A
$250
$0
$0.00 No change
($80.00) Decrease
17
17
Specia
$0
$0
$0 N/A ($0 Allocation https://docs.googl
$100
$100.00 Increase*
17
Black,
Black,
Dance
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$100 No expenditures fr Budget increase d

$0 N/A
N/A
$0 N/A
N/A
$0
$400
$0
($100.00) Decrease
$400.00 Increase*
$0.00 No change
18
18
18
Media
$0
$0
$500
$500.00 Increase*
18
South
$0 N/A
https://docs.googl
$85.26 Increase*
16
($0.07) No change
16
$0.00 No change
17
Raw Data
AG002974 Women in Computer Science

AG002975 Gosh Yarn It
Student Union for Sustainable Development
Gave no money this year, wants $1000, get $13,500 in corporate

cosponsorships. Their budget says that they need to spend about
$14000. Mainly their $13K - $11K is conference and $2K for
annual networking thing. The rest is study breaks, tech
workshops, etc. They want to expand and have more - they're
new. Didn't apply for cosponsorships, mostly spent money on
food. Most pre-professional groups are like that. They can apply
to ABC next year for a cosponsorship - if we don't know what
they're going to do with it in practice. Professor lectures.
A: 1 Y: Pre-Pr
New Group
New Specia
New Group
New Specia
23
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 N/A
N/A
$0 N/A
N/A
$0
$0
$0
$0.00 No change
$0.00 No change
$0.00 No change
18
18
18
A ocat on Packets
Project ID Number
AG002322
AG002340
AG002365
AG002366
AG002407
AG002561
AG002564
AG002595
AG002603
AG002615
AG002312
AG002339
AG002384
AG002420
AG002446
AG002545
AG002546
AG002547
AG002551
AG002612
AG002979
AG002546
AG002323
AG002335
AG002393
AG002402
AG002405
AG002441
AG002443
AG002445
AG002489
AG002506
AG002647
AG002836
AG002541
AG002587
AG002593
AG002597
AG002609
AG002610
AG002705
AG002319
AG002320
AG002379
AG002395
AG002503
AG002583
AG002585
AG002586
AG002618
AG002618
AG002334
AG002364
AG002419
AG002474
AG002567
Name of Person Submitting Allocation Packet

Sehoon Choi
Ariela Weinberger
Azar Khosrowshahi
Jeremy Sherman
Ashley Youn-Jae Lee
Aidan Mehigan
Zhiyuan "Larry" He
Tess Cersonsky
Rienzi Gokea
James Macksoud
Alexander Tin
Kelvin Rojas
Cosmas Sibindi
Jaime Castro
Gabriel Crivorot
Martin Perez Colon
Betty Tesfaye
Chanique Vassell
Pieter Kennel Clerger
Devin Etcitty
Augusto Ghiotto
Iris Chijioke
Kevin Chen
Radhika Gupta
Ishaan Kolluri
Helen Chen
Akul Arora
Bridget Neal
Tori Van Amson
Alyssa Hubbard
Hannah Liu
Piyushi Bishnoi
Rachel Shafran
James Kim
Brandon Chin
Linda Wang
Yoon Ji Han
Sean Liu
Raymond Li
Philip Lee
John Yang
Andrea Ortuno
Kevin Chen
Samantha Wiener
Madison Cox
Chloe Shih
Hao Pham
Robert Viramontes
Alex Pan
EbunOluwa Andrew
Xavier Alvarado
Aram Balian
Yaman Turkmen
Bart Zelajtys
Joanna Koronios
Zoryana Melesh
Position of Person Submitting Allocation Packet

Treasurer
Treasurer
President
Treasurer
Treasurer
President
VP Finance
Treasurer
Treasurer
President
Treasurer
Treasurer
Treasurer
Treasurer
President
Co-Chair
Treasurer
Treasurer
Treasurer
Treasurer
President
Treasurer
Treasurer
President
Treasurer
Captain
Treasurer
Treasurer
Treasurer
Treasurer
Treasurer
Treasurer
Treasurer
Treasurer
Treasurer
Treasurer
President
Treasurer
Treasurer
Treasurer
Treasurer
Treasurer
Treasurer
Secretary
Treasurer
Webmaster/Incoming President
President
Treasurer '14-'15, '15-'16
Treasurer
Treasurer
Vice President
Treasurer
President
president
President
Presiden
Email of Person Submitting Allocation Packet Group Category? Approximate number of general body members Approximate number of active weekly members Number CC Students Number SEAS Students Number GS Students Number Barnard Students Number Graduate Students
sc3649@columbia.edu
Academic (Rep: Vic
400
20
15
0
0
5
0
ayw2112@barnard.edu
Academic (Rep: Vic
35
15
10
0
5
10
10
ack2151@columbia.edu
Academic (Rep: Vic
200
18
12
3
0
3
0
jds2238@columbia.edu
Academic (Rep: Vic
300
20
180
60
10
50
0
yl3109@columbia.edu
Academic (Rep: Vic
600
200
420
80
40
30
30
atm2139@columbia.edu
Academic (Rep: Vic
40
20
25
10
0
3
2
zh2194@columbia.edu
Academic (Rep: Vic
80
40
49
6
1
24
0
tec2120@columbia.edu
Academic (Rep: Vic
65
25
25
5
5
25
5
rpg2113@columbia.edu
Academic (Rep: Vic
15
10
8
1
0
1
0
jam2286@columbia.edu
Academic (Rep: Vic
10
10
3
0
2
5
0
aat2157@columbia.edu
Academic (Rep: Vic
17
17
12
0
1
3
1
kr2426@columbia.edu
Black, Latino, and
60
13
9
2
0
2
0
cs3201@columbia.edu
Black, Latino, and
250
60
150
50
10
40
0
jic2118@columbia.edu
Black, Latino, and
20
8
4
3
0
1
0
gc2495@columbia.edu
Black, Latino, and
25
10
15
5
1
4
0
mlp2176@columbia.edu
Black, Latino, and
60
35
40
10
5
5
0
bt2378@columbia.edu
Black, Latino, and
40
20
23
10
1
4
2
ccv2113@columbia.edu
Black, Latino, and
50
20
30
12
1
7
0
pieterkclerger@gmail.com
Black, Latino, and
10
6
4
0
1
1
0
dce2108@columbia.edu
Black, Latino, and
33
12
23
5
1
3
5
ag3310@columbia.edu
Black, Latino, and
47
10
21
7
4
5
10
icc2112@columbia.edu
Black, Latino, and
160
65
80
20
0
60
0
kc2852@columbia.edu
Dance (Rep: Sahi T
23
23
11
6
0
5
1
rg2815@columbia.edu
Dance (Rep: Sahi T
12
8
5
0
0
3
0
isk2108@columbia.edu
Dance (Rep: Sahi T
0
12
7
3
0
3
0
hmc2148@columbia.edu
Dance (Rep: Sahi T N/A; about 30 non-members attend each public Team size is approximately 40 members.
23
5
2
7
1
aa3467@columbia.edu
Dance (Rep: Sahi T
18
18
1
12
0
4
1
bjn2118@columbia.edu
Dance (Rep: Sahi T
16
16
4
3
0
7
2
vtv2103@columbia.edu
Dance (Rep: Sahi T
20
20
8
3
0
9
0
columbia.ballet.collaborative@gmail.com
Dance (Rep: Sahi T
36
36
15
3
7
9
2
hsl2134@columbia.edu
Dance (Rep: Sahi T
15
10
5
5
0
0
0
pb2543@columbia.edu
Dance (Rep: Sahi T
13
12
4
4
0
2
3
res2182@columbia.edu
Dance (Rep: Sahi T
200
200
90
10
8
90
2
jyk2132@columbia.edu
Dance (Rep: Sahi T
23
23
8
11
0
4
0
bc2619@columbia.edu
East Asian (Rep: So
1427
50
25
21
1
3
0
lw2548
East Asian (Rep: So
500
28
20
3
1
4
0
yh2634@columbia.edu
East Asian (Rep: So
620
16
12
1
2
1
0
sean.liu@columbia.edu
East Asian (Rep: So
50
26
15
8
0
-56
0
rql2103@columbia.edu
East Asian (Rep: So
570
150
250
100
50
100
20
pjl2122@columbia.edu
East Asian (Rep: So
400
21
11
7
0
3
0
jyy2125@columbia.edu
East Asian (Rep: So
29
29
22
4
2
1
0
aio2108@columbia.edu
Engineering (Rep: J
120
16
1
115
2
2
0
board@columbiafsae.org
Engineering (Rep: J
60
40
9
43
2
2
4
srw2168@columbia.edu
Engineering (Rep: J
1000
100
25
52
10
8
5
mec2246@columbia.edu
Engineering (Rep: J
1,300
70
2
63
1
2
2
cs3327@columbia.edu
Engineering (Rep: J 128 Members
8 Members
0
128
0
0
60
hsp2109@columbia.edu
Engineering (Rep: J
200
50
15
185
0
0
40
rsv2111@columbia.edu
Engineering (Rep: J
120
20
0
20
0
0
0
aqp2000@columbia.edu
Engineering (Rep: J
150
6
0
150
0
0
0
eoa2108@columbia.edu
Engineering (Rep: J
50
30
0
50
0
0
0
xa2111@columbia.edu
Engineering (Rep: J
20
10
2
17
0
0
1
asb2205@columbia.edu
European and Mid
40
30
20
5
5
5
5
yt2412@columbia.edu
European and Mid
137
16
35
47
0
28
27
bsz2103@columbia.edu
European and Mid
50
50
5
5
20
5
15
jk3436@columbia.edu
European and Mid
35
10
20
5
2
8
0
President's Name
David Hyungoo Kan
Jennifer Zhu
Azar Khosrowshahi
Nayan Lamba
Sahng-Ah Yoo
Aidan Mehigan
Rishab Guha
Caleb Loschiavo
Bryan Kudisch
James Macksoud
Alexandra Carolina
Jasmin E. Feliciano
John Kotey
Andrew Jorquera
Gabriel Crivorot
Lucia Hernandez
Gelila Zenebe Bekel
Kachenta Descartes
AJ Morquette
Julian Noisecat
Augusto Ghiotto
Alexis Yeboh-Kodie
Jason Yang
Anagha Nagaraj
Chris Kim
Christian Rivera
Kripa Bhagat and Sh
Caspia Schwartz
Teresitta Velez
Audrey Crabtree-Ha
Yanrong Wo
Shruti Parikh
Cara Lachtrupp
Vicky Tong
Albert Pan
Millie Nishikawa
Yoon Ji Han
Tiffany Bair
Amy Li
Grace Kim
Binsong Zhao
Christine Chen
Matthew Sheridan
Dina Lamdany
Sidney Perkins
George Gu
Hao Pham
Shanny Li
Matan Markind
Annie Tan
Mitchell Leoung
Haik Ter-Nersesyan
Yaman Turkmen
Bart Zelajtys
Joanna Koronios
President's Email
dhk2134@columbi
jpz2108@columbia
ack2151@columbia
nl2426@columbia.
sy2482@columbia.
atm2139@columbi
rg2748@columbia.
calebeloschiavo@g
bkj2147@columbia
jam2286@columbi
acv2117@columbia
jef2152@columbia.
jkk2128@columbia
aj2513@columbia.
gc2495@columbia.
lh2607@barnard.e
gzb2102@columbi
kkd2119@columbi
ajm2220@columbi
jbn2114@columbia
ag3310@columbia.
apy2103@columbi
jiy2104@columbia.
nagaraj.anagha@g
ckk2114@columbia
cdr2128@columbia
kb2577@barnard.e
cjs2194@barnard.e
tdv2102@columbia
atc2126@columbia
yw2513@columbia
ssp2153@barnard.
cll2161@barnard.e
vyt2102@columbia
ap3110@columbia.
man2153@columbi
yh2634@columbia.
tb2511@columbia.
amyli6543@gmail.c
gyk2107@columbi
bz2207@columbia.
cc3376@columbia.
mas2405@columbi
dtl2117@columbia.
sjp2188@columbia
zg2190@columbia.
hsp2109@columbi
sl3369@columbia.e
mjm2291@columbi
at2762@columbia.
mrl2151@columbi
het2113@columbia
yt2412@columbia.
bsz2103@columbia
jk3436@columbia.
Vice President's Name

Jordan Beth Freisleben
Tova Rohatiner
Nika Madyoon
Jacoby Shelton
Kate Lee
Jonathan Xu
Adele Zhang
Bella Pori
Greg Cleaveland
Ava Reid
Nicholas Ryan Zurawski
Aida Duarte
Natan Kibret
Alejandra Castao
Karina Montenegro
Martin Perez Colon
Ezra Belew Teferra
Sashani Rose
Dan Louis
Danielle Lucero
Gabriel Crivorot
Justina Walker
Mora Grehl
Radhika Gupta
Akshaya Nataraj
Stephen Babendreier
n/a
Alexandra Duvall
America Garza
Gretchen Schmid
N/A
Shirin Dey
Bridget Jamison
Daniel Garcia
Bou Lee
Frank Zhong and Yumiko
Christie Ho (Internal); Ed
Nathan Kung
Denny Jin
Justin Hahn
Xu Xiao
Elizabeth Dente
Julia Di
Chris Yan
Robert Viramontes
Samuel Sharpe
Katherina Barguil
Jeffrey Tao
Turki Alrashed
Yunying Zhang
Xavier Alvarado
Souren Papazian
Pelin Celiker
Agnieszka Janusz
Ourania Yancolpoulos
Vice President's Email

jbf2140@columbia.edu
tr2365@barnard.edu
nam2176@columbia.ed
jas2361@columbia.edu
joohyun0908@gmail.co
jtx2000@columbia.edu
adz2106@barnard.edu
imp2108@barnard.edu
gtc2108@columbia.edu
asr2164@barnard,edu
nrz2102@columbia.edu
ad2913@barnard.edu
nfk2105@columbia.edu
amc2358@columbia.ed
km2549@columbia.edu
mlp2176@columbia.ed
ebt2112@columbia.edu
sar2198@barnard.edu
dcl2128
ddl2127@columbia.edu
gc2495@columbia.edu
jnw2116@barnard.edu
mmg2180@barnard.ed
rg2815@columbia.edu
amn2172@barnard.edu
smb2224@columbia.ed
n/a
ad3002@columbia.edu
arg2188@barnard.edu
gls2129@columbia.edu
N/A
sad2166@columbia.edu
blj2120@barnard.edu
dvg2108@columbia.edu
byl2104@columbia.edu
fwz2101@columbia.edu
cch2164@columbia.edu
njk2125@columbia.edu
dj2345@columbia.edu
jhh2165@columbia.edu
xx2167@columbia.edu
eld2146@columbia.edu
jd3171@columbia.edu
cy2300@columbia.edu
rsv2111@columbia.edu
sbs2193@columbia.edu
kb2600@columbia.edu
jat2164@columbia.edu
taa2126@columbia.edu
yz2425@columbia.edu
xa2111@columbia.edu
ssp2155@columbia.edu
pc2627@columbia.edu
aj2633@columbia.edu
osy200@columbia.edu
Treasurer's Name
Sehoon Choi
Ariela Weinberger
Kazuma Costello
Jeremy Sherman
Alice Cho
Shreyas Vissapraga
Zhiyuan "Larry" He
Tess Cersonsky
Rienzi Gokea
Jasmine Chen
Alexander Akira Tin
Kelvin Rojas
Cosmas Sibindi
Jaime Castro
Augusto Ghiotto
Diego Delgado
Betty Tesfaye
Chanique Vassell
Pieter Kennel Clerg
Devin Etcitty
Ariella Hohl
Iris Chijioke
Kevin Chen
Kavya Shivashankar
Ishaan Kolluri
Igor Kuwonu
Akul Arora
Bridget Neal
Victoria Van Amson
Alyssa Hubbard
Hannah Liu
Piyushi Bishnoi
Rachel Shafran
James Kim
Andy Zhang
Linda Wang
Jonathan Li
Sean Liu
Will Guo
Philip Lee
John Yang
Andrea Ortuno
Kevin Chen
Nate Brennnard
Madison Cox
Shikhar Kumar
Noureen Nanjee
Robert Viramontes
Bruce Lee
EbunOluwa Andrew
Richard Zheng
Aram Balian
Duru Kahyaoglu
Bart Zelajtys
Anthony Barsamian
Treasurer's Email
sc3649@columbia.
ayw2112@barnard
kac2232@columbia
jds2238@columbia
jc3071@columbia.
sv2421@columbia.
zh2194@columbia.
tec2120@columbia
rpg2113@columbia
jc4130@barnard.e
aat2157@columbia
kr2426@columbia.
cs3201@columbia.
jic2118@columbia.
ag3310@columbia.
dd2705@columbia.
bt2378@columbia.
ccv2113@columbia
pieterkclerger@gm
dce2108@columbi
h2144@columbia.e
icc2112@columbia.
kc2852@columbia.
ks3114@columbia.
isk2108@columbia.
yik2102@columbia
aa3467@columbia.
bjn2118@columbia
vtv2103@columbia
aph2133@columbi
hsl2134@columbia
pb2543@columbia.
res2182@columbia
jyk2132@columbia
asz2111@columbia
lw2548@columbia.
jrl2177@columbia.
sean.liu@columbia.
wyg2102@columbi
pjl2122@columbia.
jyy2125@columbia
aio2108@columbia
kxc2103@columbia
nsb2142@columbi
mec2246@columbi
sk3105@columbia.
nan2130@columbi
rsv2111@columbia
bl2526@columbia.
eoa2108@columbi
rz2232@columbia.
asb2205@columbi
dk2565@columbia.
bsz2103@columbia
ab3265@columbia.
Secretary's Name
Jessica Dawn Swan
Yonina Frim
Darius Khosrowsha
Danielle Goldman
Megan Kincaid
Wilton Rao
Aranya Ram
Tara Coury
Jonnell Small
Kiley Cappetta
Scott Michael Turtu
Elodia Caballero
Akosua Bekoe
Daniela Lopez
Andrea Pacheco
Maria Fernanda Ma
Natan Feleke Kibret
Carolyn Peters
Dan Louis
Elan Pochedley
Renata Rogers Cast
Amber Ferrell
Desha Dike
Sahi Thapi
Tanvi Bhaskar
Andrea Leonard
Kanika Verma
Nayla Kidd
Alex Braslavsky
Shoshana Rosenfiel
Vincent Song
Meghana Noonavat
Yulie Landan
N/A
Justin Chiang
Mariko Kanai
Daisy Cheng
Julia Lai
Chris Li
Wendy Choi
Karen Cai
Kathleen Fan
Shoshana Levine
Dan Schlosser
Natalia Jacobowitz
Chloe Tsz Ting Ngu
Imer del Cid
Mun Shin Chik
Patricio Torres
James Zhang
Jeff Hancock
Svetlana Bagdasaro
Saygin Yildirim
Agnieszka Janusz
Christina LaGamma
Secretary's Email Other Officer's Name Other Officer's Email Have you elected your new executive board?
jds2240@columbia Caitlin Ruth Carey
crc2168@columbia.ed No, I understand that my funds will not be tran
Yes, I have entered the information below.
No, I understand that my funds will not be tran
dg2731@columbia N/A
N/A
ar3317@columbia. Christopher Lucarelli
cml2173@columbia.ed No, I understand that my funds will not be tran
smt2168@columbi N/A
N/A
esc2179@columbi Crystal Espinoza
ce2317@columbia.edu No, I understand that my funds will not be tran
aab2224@columbi Rowa El-tohami
rowa.k.eltohami@gma No, I understand that my funds will not be tran
mfm2172@columb Yes, I have entered the information below.
nfk2105@columbi Nohamin Dawit Ayele nda2108@columbia.e Yes, I have entered the information below.
cap2217@columbi Evy Exime
ee2280@columbia.edu No, I understand that my funds will not be tran
dcl2128
af2673@columbia. Paula Francis
ppf2105@barnard.edu No, I understand that my funds will not be tran
did2109@columbi Alixx Lucas
arl2182@columbia.ed No, I understand that my funds will not be tran
st2852@columbia. Nisha Iyer - VP
nli2105@barnard.edu Yes, I have entered the information below.
tb2552@columbia. Kunal Kamath
kak2211@columbia.ed No, I understand that my funds will not be tran
ajl2207@barnard.e Captains: Helen Chen a hmc2148@columbia.e Yes, I have entered the information below.
kv2253@columbia. Harsha Vemuri, Nina K hv2169@columbia.edu No, I understand that my funds will not be tran
nck2120@columbi Aleksandra Kurzydlows akk2149@barnard.edu No, I understand that my funds will not be tran
ab3895@columbia Nicole Hines
nbh2114@barnard.ed No, I understand that my funds will not be tran
mn2692@columbi Rhea Padalkar
rmp2175@columbia.e No, I understand that my funds will not be tran
N/A
mwc2131@colum Madeline Kim
msk2207@barnard.ed Yes, I have entered the information below.
sc3512@columbia. VP Internal
xl2415@barnard.edu No, I understand that my funds will not be tran
kgf2112@columbi Ritish Patnaik
rp2616@columbia.edu No, I understand that my funds will not be tran
sjl2191@barnard.e Erik Elbieh
eme2142@columbia.e Yes, I have entered the information below.
ctn2108@columbi Sean Charnowski Curra scc2166@columbia.ed No, I understand that my funds will not be tran
ijd2104@columbia Yoojin Kim (Event Coor yk2549@columbia.edu Yes, I have entered the information below.
mc3549@columbia Serena Shah-Simpson ss4354@columbia.edu Yes, I have entered the information below.
jjz2121@columbia. William Li
wl2375@columbia.edu Yes, I have entered the information below.
sb3538@columbia. Stepan Atamian
sga2120@columbia.ed No, I understand that my funds will not be tran
christinalagamma9 Stephanie Gergoudis scg2124@columbia.ed No, I understand that my funds will not be tran
President Name
N/A
Jennifer Zhu
N/A
N/A
Genevieve Antono
NA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Lucia Hernandez
Natan Feleke Kibr
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Radhika Gupta
N/A
Christian Rivera
n/a
N/A
NA
N/A
Hannah Liu
N/A
N/A
N/A
Anna Fu
N/A
Yoon Ji Han
N/A
Aini Sun
Jamie Song
N/A
N/A
Armando Doming
Dan Schlosser
Sidney Perkins
Chloe Shih
Frank Fang
Jeffrey Tao
Turki Alrashed
Linh Lai
N/A
n/a
Yaman Turkmen
Bart Zelajtys
Ourania Yancopou
President Email
N/A
jpz2108@columbi
N/A
N/A
ga2368@columbi
NA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
lh2607@barnard.
nfk2105@columb
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
rg2815@columbi
N/A
cdr2128@columb
n/a
N/A
NA
N/A
hsl2134@columbi
N/A
N/A
N/A
aif2107@columbi
N/A
yh2634@columbi
N/A
as4509@columbi
js4390@columbia
N/A
N/A
aad2177@colum
drs2161@columb
sjp2188@columbi
cs3327@columbi
ff2288@columbia
jat2164@columbi
taa2126@columb
htl2112@columbi
N/A
n/a
yt2412@columbi
bsz2103@columb
osy2000@columb
Vice President Name

N/A
Tova Rohatiner
N/A
N/A
Megan Kincaid, Korey
NA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Martin Perez Colon
Nohamin Dawit Ayele
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Nisha Iyer
N/A
Stephen Babendreier
n/a
N/A
NA
N/A
Vincent Song
N/A
N/A
N/A
Anna Chen
N/A
Christie Ho (Internal);
N/A
Rebecca Ren
Madeline Kim
N/A
N/A
Gwen Archambault
Samantha Wiener
Robert Viramontes
TBA
Idris Sardharwala (VP E
Serena Shah-Simpson
Jefferson Hancock
Akul Arora
N/A
n/a
Pelin Celiker
Agnieszka Janusz
N/A
Vice President Email

N/A
tr2365@barnard.edu
N/A
N/A
mak2245@columbia.e
NA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
mlp2176@columbia.e
nda2108@columbia.e
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
nli2105@barnard.edu
N/A
smb2224@columbia.e
n/a
N/A
NA
N/A
vs2538@columbia.edu
N/A
N/A
N/A
ac3803@columbia.edu
N/A
cch2164@columbia.ed
N/A
rcr2132@columbia.ed
msk2207@barnard.ed
N/A
N/A
gea2110@columbia.ed
srw2168@columbia.e
rsv2111@columbia.ed
TBA
ims2136@columbia.ed
ss4354@columbia.edu
jfh2137@columbia.ed
aa3467@columbia.ed
N/A
n/a
pc2627@columbia.ed
aj2633@columbia.edu
N/A
Treasurer Name
N/A
Ariela Weinberger
N/A
N/A
Ashley Youn-Jae L
NA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Diego Delgado
Betty Tesfaye
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Smriti Kanangat
N/A
Igor Kuwonu
n/a
N/A
NA
N/A
Natalie Chee
N/A
N/A
N/A
Brandon Chin
N/A
Jonathan Li
N/A
Raymond Li
Philip Lee
N/A
N/A
Patrick Lin
Eunice Korkor
Madison Cox
TBA
Sophia Yamas
Robert Viramonte
Alex Pan
Aditya Balaji
N/A
n/a
Duru Kahyaoglu
Bart Zelajtys
N/A
Treasurer Email
N/A
ayw2112@barnar
N/A
N/A
yl3109@columbia
NA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
dd2705@columbi
bt2378@columbi
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
sk3974@columbi
N/A
yik2102@columbi
n/a
N/A
NA
N/A
nhc2113@columb
N/A
N/A
N/A
bc2619@columbi
N/A
jrl2177@columbi
N/A
rql2103@columbi
pjl2122@columbi
N/A
N/A
pjl2124@columbi
eek2138@columb
mec2246@colum
TBA
sy2576@columbi
rsv2111@columbi
aqp2000@colum
ab3760@columbi
N/A
n/a
dk2565@columbi
bsz2103@columb
N/A
Secretary Name
N/A
Yonina Frim
N/A
N/A
NA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Eden T Geressu
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Ambika Mookerje
N/A
Andrea Leonard
n/a
N/A
NA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Madeleine Gao
N/A
Daisy Cheng
N/A
Jeff Niu
Hanna Koo
N/A
N/A
Shoshana Levine
Mathew Piccollela
Natalia Jacobowit
TBA
Stephanie Susana
Hayley Ekle
Patricio Torres
Kyle Misquitta
N/A
n/a
Saygin Yildirim
agnieszka janusz
N/A
Secretary Email
N/A
N/A
N/A
NA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
abm2170@barna
N/A
ajl2207@barnard
n/a
N/A
NA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
mag2273@colum
N/A
N/A
bk2565@columbi
N/A
N/A
sjl2191@barnard.
mjp2220@colum
TBA
ssb2165@columb
hne2101@colum
kkm2134@colum
N/A
n/a
N/A
Other Officer Name
Other Officer Email What are the main events or types of events that your gro What new events or goals, if any, did you have for the 201 How were the above events achieved or what obstacles di
PSSA has had three types of evnets: 1. Speaker Panels with As a group that was inactive last year, our goal for the club An obstacle that we faced this year was that because we di
Sign Language instruction classes. A certified Sign Language Our goals were to have more social events, such as sign lan Sometimes our instructor was unable to make it to class, so
Study breaks - involving performances by international stud Our main new event goal was to have more football screeni We encountered serious obstacles with regards to both go
Every year we host the CNS Research Fair, Brain Awareness This year, for the first time we began to do faculty dinners, Our events went very well throughout the year. We had th
Every year, Columbia Pre-Law Society provides student wh Our goal for the 2014-2015 academic year was Efficiency a We increased efficiency of our weekly meetings by reorgani
Our main activity is competing in a variety of local tournam As described above, we have a new series of trivia nights. T The trivia nights were assigned to specific club members, w
1. Annual College Tournament We hold an annual college t Given that we are primarily a competitive group, the most i 1. Funding Challenges Our debate team is severely underfu
Every week we hold our weekly debate/meeting, at which The murder mystery parties were new, and they went reall At the beginning of the semester, the financials were excep
We host outreach chemistry programs in the fall such as tri We did not have any new goals or events. We brainstorme N/A
Our group hosts a conference every spring for high school s We increased the scale of our conference, so that was god, We encountered a minor obstacle with our high school con
As CUMT is primarily focused on forming, training, and field Our primary goal this year was to qualify two competitive t Unfortunately, we fell short of these goals this year. While
Banquets, cultural showcases, discussions, constituency me This year we aimed to restructure our organization to bette We held extra weekly meetings aside from our general wee
N/A
N/A
We host a number of events. Our biggest event is Afropolit We successfully introduced the movie screenings which we The biggest obstacle we encountered was lack of commitm
We host mainly study breaks and cultural bonding events. The events above were a direct result of effective and effici The events above were a direct result of effective and effici
Portuguese and Spanish conversation nights, dinners with p This month, OLAS, along with the newly-formed Brazilian S Due to the sheer size of BrazUsc, we have had a core team
Chicanx Caucus hosts many events a semester in addition t We are hoping to be able to send more students to the ECC Our biggest obstacle is just fundraising to pay for transport
Abenezer Mezgebu A ama2252@columbia. - cultural show participation - study break - gallery and cult Our goal was to be a recognized club as well as increase the We were able to achieve our goals for the past school year
Weekly gbody meetings Study break Caribbean trivia nights This year we wanted to be able to open our alternative spri The main obstacle was funding. We raised enough money t
Every two weeks we as a club meet and discuss a particular Our new event for this year is called Mch. At this event t This event was achieved by coordinating with out Barnard a
N/A
N/A
In October, the Native American Council holds a counter-ev We implemented a discussion series in the spring semester The events were successful because of the tenacity of our s
We usually host events which features lectures in the most Our main goal was to finalize the recognition process as we Obstacles were what we found the most. For our speakers l
N/A
N/A
Every year our group hosts a variety of community based e This school year, the BSO held its first annual Homecoming The aforementioned events were achieved in large part du
N/A
N/A
Every year, Raw Elementz hosts Rawcus, our annual dance We hoped to diminish the size of our team by being more s We diminished the size of our group by being more selectiv
Sahi Thapi - PR
st2852@columbia.ed Taals programming can be divided into 3 different types: This year, we wanted to go to more competitions that we h Naach Nation is Taals largest event every year. This was th
N/A
N/A
We host Bhangra in the Heights, an annual cultural competi We attempted to bring more teams outside NYC for Bhangr With a large turnover for the team, many of our members
Captains: Helen Chen hmc2148@columbia. Sabors largest event is its annual Fall Show. The Fall Show, 1) One of the very first goals for the new board of 2014 was 1) Updating Sabors image has been a process of several ch
Columbia Raas was established in the fall of 2003 to celebr 1. In the last two years, we realized the value of maintainin Our biggest obstacles in our on and off-campus performanc
N/A
N/A
CU Bellydance hosts two main annual events, one in the fall CU Bellydance's newest goal was the reformation of our we Attempting to run two weekly classes in the fall semester, a
NA
NA
We host a showcase every spring, one free dance class that Our new goal was to teach a dance class to children free of They were achieved with careful planning and creative way
CBC hosts three public events each academic year: a works Although CBC held the same number and type of events as The largest obstacle to achieving the above events was the
N/A
N/A
We hold weekly dance practices twice a week. Since we are We planned to get more involved with group administratio Having e-board members take on more personal initiatives
We host an annual Bollywood showcase usually in collabor We wanted to host more dance classes, so students could l Some of the obstacles we encountered were being able to
Each academic year Orchesis holds two large showcases, o For the 2014-2015 academic year, we restructured our audi Instead of having two three-hour audition slots as we have
Dance workshops, dance performances and showcases, stu Our main goal was to raise CU Gen awareness on campus i Creating the CU Gen instagram helped raise our media pres
Jack Chen
jjc2246@columbia.ed cultureSHOCK (annual performance showcase with a focus One of our main goals for this academic year was to refocu The largest obstacles we encountered occurred during the
Each year, Columbia Japan Society (CJS) hosts a variety of st CJS fulfilled several new goals this year. Firstly, CJS aimed t This year, CJS encountered a number of obstacles. Several
HKSSS mainly hosts events centered around promoting Hon The central goal of HKSSS is to promote awareness of Hong We achieved these goals by keeping most of the events tha
study breaks, showcases, cultural nights, political/educatio recruit at least 10 new members to the board (yes), form cl We really focused our efforts in the first semester on re-cre
Our main three events are Night Market, an open air marke A new event we had was our Bobagrams sale. With Bobagr For Bobagrams, we reached out to TeaMagic and obtained
William Chung
wc2513@columbia.e Our usual event repertoire includes study breaks, cultural f KSAs primary goals for this year were to increase our organ In order to expand our Gajok Mentorship Program, we pr
N/A
N/A
- Panels - Conference - Delegation visits
New Event: a coherent China-focused conference that all re Initiatives: bringing in new speakers, coordinating with CBS
N/A
N/A
Riverside Chat & Dinner: Description: This months Riversi Previously, our executive board was unsuccessful in holding The biggest obstacle was the insufficient funds. Funding th
Sydney Sherman
ss4771@columbia.ed The primary goal of the Society of Automotive Engineers is In last year's allocation packet, we shared our goals with th The biggest the challenge we encounter this year was the l
Brian Zeng
bz2231@columbia.ed ADI is focused on learning and teaching technology-related One of the big initiatives we took on this year is expanding One of the obstacles for ADI Labs was ensuring we had eno
Of course, it is obvious that Engineers Without Borders con The three programs of EWB-CU -- Ghana, Morocco, and Ug We were able to achieve the monthly meetings by turning
Career Panel Speaker Series (many of them) Departm CU INFORMS was entirely inactive right before this year. O 1. Our recruiting process to find an executive board took ab
Jacklyn Mae Uniza (Ev jmu2109@columbia. As a pre-professional organization for civil engineers, we ha One of the major goals that ASCE has for this year is to incr The events above are achieved through close communicati
Harrison Liew
hl2670@columbia.ed Every year, IEEE works to bring a variety of technology-focu For the 2014-2015 school year, the main new goal for IEEE MAKECU ran into several problems this year, chiefly with fu
Company info sessions, mentorship events, engineering bas - Reached out to companies to bring them in, whereas befo - Reaching out to companies was difficult - overcame this o
Ryan Brenner
rkb2122@columbia.e Study breaks General body meetings Brooklyn Brewery Tou New goals for the 2014-2015 year that we fulfilled included The above goals were achieved by increasing the number o
N/A
N/A
AIAA Design Build Fly Competion, Construction and design Earlier introduction to practical construction and design as We split into groups early in the semester. Some of the obs
Panel Discussion, Cultural Nights, and Social Events
Our goals included greater group cohesion, as well as more There were few obstacles in achieving our goals/events. Ou
As the Columbia Turkish Students, we mainly host speaker For the 2014-2015 academic year, we have planned and ho Most of the events above were organized smoothly. The m
Movie screenings, NYC marathon volunteering, career work We want to continue organizing movie screening, that wer Our allocation is fairly small, about a thousand but the bigg
We host coffee or greek food study breaks, as well as raise We had multiple hiccups when we took over, as our advisor It was very frustrating for us as we were quite lost in the lo
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
24
How has your group changed from the previous year? What are things your group would like to do for the 2015-2 Any comments, feedback, etc.?
Our group has changed from the previous year in that Our first goal is maintain the level of activity we have had t While we receive funding from t
We have a new executive board and are working on ex
Our group has not changed significantly from the previ - Continue holding study breaks - Hold and event with the C Our biggest obstacle this year wa
This year we started publicizing our events with color fl All of our events are really geared towards fostering interes I think that ABC has done a great
The 2014-2015 Board of the Pre-Law Society was a very
Since the arrival on campus of Victoria in 2011-2012 an Our campus-focused initiatives, like the trivia nights and bu An addendum about future plans
1. Increased membership We had more first-years try 1. Increase Membership If funding allows, we hope to cont Our key reasons for requesting m
We've grown to be more committed, and the members
We came together a lot more since last year. In the pre
This year we have experienced no change in our memb
Thanks to the combined hard work of our coaching staf As always, we remain committed to recapturing the Nation I wish at least one system (either
Our newest addition includes an external relations com Given the new structure of the organization, we plan to soli We appreciate the effective com
Our group as a whole has changed a lot led by changes
This year we saw a reasonable increase in the size of ou
This year, we have worked more with other groups, an As a result of our intense, year-long work on BrazUsc, we h The ABC events this year were an
Our group decided to change its name to Chicanx Cauc -We want to send more people to the ECCSF conference -W Just one comment on our E-Boar
Over the past three semesters, our group has grown fro In order to foster a sense of communal unity, we plan to pr We, as a young student group, ar
Our group is pretty constant. The only thing notably diff Our group's vision is to continue to be a space for Columbia I love my ABC rep! Always swift
Our group has changed in that we have increased effort
With the transition of leadership from year to year, me The Native American Council aims to create an atmosphere ABC has been very transparent w
I believe we increased the number of members, attracti We would like to have an event every three weeks with an i UEM is a poorly built resource fo
Our organization has grown significantly in its intra-boa Our group would love to see our Homecoming Step Show b It is possible that there may be s
Last year, we faced difficulty in preparing for Rawcus, s
Internally, we have streamlined a lot of processes and c
In terms of number of people, we have not changed. O Currently, our team is at an active 12. Our desire is to expa N/A
The team has once again grown in size. With many seni Sabor has been striving for two years now to have more th Sahi has been an incredible point
1. Significant improvements in choreography style and 1. We recently applied for an ABC co-sponsorship for fundi We would like to thank the ABC f
In addition to the class syllabus, our organization of lea
We lost a lot of seniors which was a challenge however We would like to all attend a dance class together at broad We really appreciate all the reso
This year CBC has grown and expanded in various ways. The main goal for the 2015-2016 year is to continue to be a I think student groups would real
Membership has increased slightly, we added on a seco Our group would like to increase our members and work o I do appreciate ABC making the a
Our group has changed in membership as we no longer We would like to apply to more competitions, especially m We wanted to add at the end of t
In addition to revising our audition process to be more i
The group has definitely grown bigger from last year sin
This year, we implemented a special committee system This coming year, we plan to further diversify our program The pre-calendaring process is a
This year, CJS has improved its interactions with other s
We had a greater diversity in group membership this ye As a whole, HKSSS would like to increase the club's presenc One thing that HKSSS found diffic
more distributed workload amongst the whole board, College is a gateway between childhood and adulthood tha ABC is great, we love Sophie. Ple
We have worked towards increased transparency betw
Our board dynamic always changes slightly from year-t Our primary goals for next year is to improve the quality of We really appreciate the new init
More communications with other related East Asian clu Providing insight to relevant Chinese industries that contras None, now that the website is be
The structure of the board has been our greatest impro
The biggest change in our group has been its size. With The long term goal of this team is to create a race car that Each year, members of our team
This year we have worked on making people feel welco We hope to continue to engage new students and make AD We have really appreciated the t
The past year has seen a shift in tone among the leader In the long term, EWB-CU is hoping to spend more time gai Given the current structure of ac
Since there was almost no activity last year, our group c Our board brainstormed quality and meaningful events tha Please communicate with us mor
Compared to last year, our club had hosted more event
Our group has changed in that were trying to add prog IEEE would really like to maintain the kinds of successful pr One thing to note is that the MA
- Grown enormously; started out with having just a boa - Bring in more companies at more strategic times (ie not d We're looking to grow our group
Our group has increased in size/membership (about do The ChemE car is AICHE's "pet project" with the sole goal to One suggestion I have about the
We are trying to improve our retention rate of member
We've had an influx of undergraduate students.
We hope to have more social events for the club to further ABC was fantastic...keep it up!
Our group is mainly operating in a similar way to last ye
We have reached out to a lot of new members, from CC Well, we want to continue doing the same projects but we The process of spending money f
We have incorporated more interesting social events a We would definitely like to be able to attend more cultural We will definitely make sure that
Allocation Received for the 2014-2015 Academic Year

125
$855
2006
$834.00
$710
3700
7071
1702
$337
550
18495
$3,028.97
1960
644
$500
$3,863
200 (for the spring semester)
2877.63 + 911 = 3788.63
$953
1427
100
5031
455
700
3,953.25
$792
$2915.19 (2082.19 ABC +833 GBB)
$550
525
1691
0
675
$600
600
$3282.82 (ABC), $4595.95 (ABC + GBB)
2782
$961
1536
4892
$5,889.51 (ABC) + $2,356 (GBB) = $8,245.51
500
356
$13,913
$2,910
6,000
$0
$1,230.51
1047
$722
$767
$4,445
$300
550
800
250
Allocation Requested for the 2015-2016 Academic Year

1000
$1,200
2000
$2,250
$970
6500
11071
1702
337
$700
23035
$4,500
2732
1450
$1,000
$4,500
1500
4200
$1,500
2100
2000
8924.16
700
980 - this is the same as $700 for ABC this year and $280
4,953.25
$1,000
$4,915.19
$1,000
900
$8,856
$0
$750
$800
600
$5,055.55
4000
$1,800
2000
8000 (6000 ABC, 2000 GBB)
$8,700 (+5%)
500
825
16000
$10,000
14,000
$2,700
$2,000
1805
$2,000
$2,700
4840
$300
1500
2000
250
Are you requesting an allocation increase for the 2015-201 Did you apply to any grants or seek additional funding duri How will this allocation change affect your group?
Yes
The club applied to an ABC co-sponsorship of $125 to help The allocation will help the club maintain the curren
Yes
Yes, we received $500 from the Office of Disabilities Service This will allow us to host more events outside of sig
No
No
N/A
Yes
Yes, we got $500 from the Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior We have already spent $1,337, which does not inclu
Yes
We applied to GS Student Life Allocations, ABC Co-Sponsor The increase in allocation will specifically go to our
Yes
CIF: $494 for new buzzer systems ABC co-sponsorship: $80 Our current allocation level predates my time at Col
Yes
N/A
If we are given an increase of $4000 as requested,
No
Yes, we applied for the Gatsby Grant (from Columbia Arts I Not asking for a change
No
No
It will not change much. We will use it to help buy s
Yes
NO
We plan to continue to hosting our major conferenc
Yes
No.
Our largest concern this year, and in the years going
Yes
Live at Lerner ($250), CAA Co-sponsorship ($1500), ABC Co- This allocation change is for Latino Graduation expe
Yes
This past year we applied for the Kraft fund. We attempted Our political roundtables have been limited in their i
Yes
JCCC: $687
We will have more resources and be able to organiz
Yes
Yes. We obtained $15,000 from BRASA, an organization tha Given that we intend to host events of the same siz
Yes
Yes, we got the Live@Lerner Grant for $200, which we use This change in allocation will allow us to send our m
Yes
N/A
Ethio-Eritrean Student Association is requesting this
Yes
1250 from Columbia's Alternative Break Program 1500 fro This increase would help us to be able to send more
Yes
No
The extra allocation money will towards our increas
Yes
In order to finance our annual powwow we had to look to We are requesting $2500 in funds. We hope to solid
Yes
Yes, the president and provost fund for BrazUSC. Denied. We will be able to host more cultural and informati
Yes
We applied to the JCCC during the fall semester for financia The allocation increase will specifically go towards f
Yes
No
In our pursuit of a bigger and more expansive Rawc
No
Gatsby Grant - $450
As usual, the majority of our budget will be focused
Yes
We applied to the JCCC Fund in the hopes that we could ge We are expanding the size of our group, and hope t
Yes
During the Fall of 2014, we applied for the Gatsby Fund, as This allocation change would greatly serve in aiding
Yes
1. We successfully received $1300 for new costumes throu The increase of $2000 in allocation requests stems f
Yes
Yes, CU Bellydance applied for Gatsby funding and Live at L The increase in allocation will allow for CU Bellydan
Yes
No we did not
Having more money will help us pay for the additio
Yes
Gatsby Grant of $1500 for Costumes and PR costs and Bala The allocation change given to CBC will allow for CB
No
No
N/A
Yes
No
An increase in our allocation would allow Dhoom to
Yes
We received $750 to pay for tech costs for this year's MaM By increasing our allocation, we will be able to pay f
No
No.
The allocation will give us enough money to buy CU
Yes
$200 from ABC Co-Sponsorship
As a three pronged club (political, service, and social
Yes
Yes. CJS applied for the Gatsby Arts Initiative Fund, P&P Fu We are requesting this allocation change to improv
Yes
Yes, we applied to the Kraft Family Fund for additional fund With the allocation, we will work to better our existi
Yes
No
We have the people, talent, and passion to do bigge
Yes
JCCC: $1000 for an extra tent due to inclement weather for This allocation change will go towards mainly 1) ne
Yes
KSA applied for the ABC Co-Sponsorship for our KSA Cultur This year, KSA made a conscious effort to reduce pri
No
None.
N/A
Yes
The Biomedical Engineering Department gave us partial-fun An Allocation increase will allow BMES to hold more
Yes
Capital Investment Fund: We were not qualified to apply fo It should come as no surprise that a race car is a ver
Yes
We co-sponsored an event with SEBS, $30 for a grant for a For the 2015-2016 Academic Year we hope to focus
Yes
EWB-CU has applied for external funding in a number of wa This change in allocation will allow EWB-CU to focus
Yes
We attempted to, but we didnt receive allocations from A Some of the allocation will be going towards our Eb
Yes
Dean's Travel Fund: approximately $1,200 to pay for registr The majority of this increased allocation will go into
Yes
JCCC: Awarded $1750, Spent $1582.50 for MAKECU Hackat We are requesting this allocation increase in order t
Yes
No
We want to grow the group a lot and part of growin
Yes
Yes, we applied to the SEAS Dean Fund this year and receiv Although our travel plans this year were subsidized
Yes
MECE Department:$2500.00. We requested this amount fr It will allow us to buy more materials. As we grow in
No
Gatsby Grant - unsuccessful
no allocation change
Yes
Yes, we have applied for ABC Co-Sponsorship to fund a part As we have pointed out throughout this Allocation P
Yes
We will reach out to the organizations we co-operate with f We want to be more recognizable European Group
No
No
this allocation will help our group organize events a
Please attach a link for the budget for your expenditures f

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OOaXnCQ9XDpt
https://docs.google.com/a/barnard.edu/spreadsheets/d/1
Please contact Kazuma Costello for this information. As far
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1NfHOjVmavzL9E
https://docs.google.com/a/columbia.edu/spreadsheets/d/
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19I8IctrD59S7nX
I am copying the link although it is not complete, but it will
N/A
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1njquOTfkUhDkH
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TgdS58hTzUvP1
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1SVIY96oMsp7p0
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13---HDpCe6SgX
No expenditures from our club yet. Everything was organiz
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19Rt_M2Rumz03
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XnrOG2pCYPOO
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ysPSzh6mYD4zi
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1oYtu9s2tqGLOsz
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ugkm5silF6Zrgfi
http://tinyurl.comhy2nue
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IcIkSiwssb7SAK
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/11G6WfOcR2knp
The template doesn't really match our needs as a group be
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wRU3oL4bmUc
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RY4WQWbVMZ
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cy9MGVy9lf55t
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XPLZRfoGtF2JO
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16WhBl60IttXnw
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WnN88AGIch0L
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MV_5WYM7BCi
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OND1HDr3Clr9
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1BZ2m8I8OR23fx
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qZzvIELscbujELq
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qJb5FX9heukaI1
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lbikZyToyZLNLd
to be charged: conference tech charges for may 2, 2015: ex
Please attach a link for your expected budget for your exp For dually recognized groups: where you would you like yo For dually recognized groups: what proportion of allocatio I understand that I will need to update my contact informa
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17j4fxKowexzhITf I am not a dually recognized student group
N/A
Yes
https://docs.google.com/a/barnard.edu/spreadsheets/d/1 ABC Account
all in ABC
Yes
For the 2015-16 academic year, we plan to spend our budg I am not sure if we are dually recognized
N/a
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mtxEz1sVGDaV I am not a dually recognized student group
N/A
Yes
https://docs.google.com/a/columbia.edu/spreadsheets/d/ I am not a dually recognized student group
N/A
I have already updated my contact information
NA
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19I8IctrD59S7nX ABC Account
All in ABC
Yes
Again, not completed yet but will be https://docs.google.c ABC Account
all in ABC
Yes
N/A
I am not a dually recognized student group
N/A
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cyO5aF45cvuW I am not a dually recognized student group
N/A
Yes
N/A
Yes
N/A
Yes
https://docs.google.com/a/columbia.edu/spreadsheets/d/ ABC Account
All in ABC
Yes
N/A
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pQzXynxex6sY9 I am not a dually recognized student group
N/A
Yes
N/A
Yes
N/A
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ySbzOwjbrDOja ABC Account
1/10 GBB, 9/10 ABC
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1duuvFSWKmxT5 I am not a dually recognized student group
N/A
Yes
N/A
Yes
Budget increase due to the reasons explained above.
I am not a dually recognized student group
N/A
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Ya3nezjoB7qXk ABC Account
N/A
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1G4dDAJdUu28Rl ABC Account
all in ABC
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17LpJrFTeeTFkDc ABC Account
All in ABC
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bCCJW6qGoDiB ABC Account
N/A
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OtRYRT09HAcv ABC Account
2/3 ABC and 1/3 GBB
http://tinyurl.com/o6848cg
GBB Account
All in GBB
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pZEE3RZ9BhSfr I am not a dually recognized student group
N/A
Yes
NA
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1SAI4PQKJ6bXCs I am not a dually recognized student group
N/A
Yes
No change - we are not requesting any allocation from ABC ABC Account
N/A
Yes
all in ABC
Yes
all in ABC
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kxdEuqAq-uSDc ABC Account
N/A
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1psbjtdORVftyZK ABC Account
1/4 GBB, 3/4 in ABC
all in ABC
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RY4WQWbVMZ I am not a dually recognized student group
N/A
Yes
all in ABC
Yes
2/3 ABC, 1/3 GBB
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1o8KNqvlDfndZH ABC Account
All in ABC Account
Yes
N/A
Yes
N/A
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RHFTzINjvbF9k I am not a dually recognized student group
N/A
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yuqAKrF5eHv9u I am not a dually recognized student group
N/A
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/172RtF7EHEzHG I am not a dually recognized student group
N/A
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LkzdGxKGHbxxX ABC Account
N/A
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15NgKnpORw_Tn ABC Account
N/A
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1m59vrSgIL7rE4 I am not a dually recognized student group
N/A
Yes
N/A
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qZzvIELscbujELq I am not a dually recognized student group
N/A
Yes
N/A
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1iJwWjsd0Nt6xC I am not a dually recognized student group
n/a
Yes
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1JbL5H0oFwI-iP7i I am not a dually recognized student group
N/A
N/A
Welcome Party: $30 Study Breaks : 3 x 50 = $150 conferenc I am not a dually recognized student group
n/a
Yes
I understand that my ABC rep is available to meet to discu

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
I understand that this packet and its contents will be made

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
This allocation packet is correct to my knowledge.

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
If you would like to add any additional documents, please Please write your uni as a digital signature.
N/A
sc3649
n/a
ayw2112
N/a
ack2151
N/A
jds2238
yl3109
NA
atm2139
N/A
zh2194
N/A
tec2120
N/A
rpg2113
no
jam2286
No, thank you.
aat2157
N/A
kr2426
N/A
cs3201
n/a
jic2118
N/A
gc2495
N/A
mlp2176
N/A
bt2378
no
ccv2113
N/A
pkc2112
N/A
dce2108
na
ag3310
N/A
icc2112
N/A
kc2852
N/A
rg2815
NA
isk2108
N/A
hmc2148
n/a
aa3467
N/A
bjn2118
na
vtv2103
N/A
aph2133
N/A
hsl2134
N/A
pb2543
N/A
res2182
N/A
jyk2132
bc2619
No
lw2548
N/A
yh2634
N/A
sl3497
N/A
rql2103
N/A
pjl2122
N/A
jyy2125
aio2108
http://files.kevinchen.co/gif/chickens-break-up-fight.gif
kxc2103
https://docs.google.com/a/adicu.com/spreadsheets/d/1M srw2168
N/A
mec2246
N/A
cs3327
N/A
hsp2109
N/A
rsv2111
N/A
aqp2000
n/a
eoa2108
N/A
xa2111
n/a
asb2205
N/A
yt2412
N/A
bsz2103
n/a
jk3436
Board Email Alias
rawelementz@colu
taal@columbia.edu
bhangra@columbia
cubellydance@gma
onyxdancetroupe@
columbia.ballet.coll
cudhoom@gmail.co
columbiaorchesis@

ABC Press Release and Allocation

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

ABC Press Release and Allocation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DearColumbiaCommunity,

In an effort to further understand andinvestigatethisissue,theABCheldaforumlastWednesday(11/18),

The initial correspondence which prompted this investigationincludedexamplesmeanttoimplybiaswithin

Concurrently, this concernhasbroughtaboutanotherinvestigationintothevoice thatculturalorganizations

The ABC is working actively,asmentionedabove,tocombatthisissueandensurethattheboardroomisa

The Activities Board at Columbia looks forwardtoensurethehighestlevelofobjectivityandunderstanding

Political Science Students Association

Sign Language Club

Society of International Undergraduates

$18,495 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$125 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$855 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$2,006 Please contact Kaz For the 2015-16 ac

$834 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$710 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$3,700 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$7,071 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$1,703 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

Black, Latino, and Native American

Student Organization of Latinos

African Students Association

Organization of Latin American Students

Black Students Organization

Caribbean Students Association

Haitian Students Association

$3,029 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$1,960 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$644 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$500 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$3,863 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$5,451 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$2,278 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$953 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

Onyx Dance Troupe

$455 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$3,953 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$792 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$2,082 http://tinyurl.com http://tinyurl.com

$550 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$525 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$1,691 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$645 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$577 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$400 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

Asian American Alliance

Hong Kong Students and Scholars Society

Chinese Students Club

Korean Students Association

Global China Connection

$3,283 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$2,782 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$961 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$4,892 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$5,890 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$500 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

Biomedical Engineering Society

$356 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$2,910 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$6,000 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$1,047 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$722 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$4,445 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

$767 https://docs.googl https://docs.googl

European and Middle Eastern