South West Solar Power Plant Project (1MW)

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03
CDM Executive Board
CLEA DEVELOPMET MECHAISM

PROJECT DESIG DOCUMET FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD)
Version 03 - in effect as of: 22 December 2006
COTETS
A.
General description of the small scale project activity
B.
Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology
C.
Duration of the project activity / crediting period
D.
Environmental impacts
E.
Stakeholders comments
Annexes
Annex 1: Contact information on participants in the proposed small scale project activity
Annex 2: Information regarding public funding
Annex 3: Baseline information
Annex 4: Monitoring Information
CDM Executive Board
Revision history of this document
Version
Number
01
02
Date
Description and reason of revision
21 January
2003
8 July 2005
Initial adoption
03
22 December
2006
The Board agreed to revise the CDM SSC PDD to reflect

guidance and clarifications provided by the Board since
version 01 of this document.
As a consequence, the guidelines for completing CDM SSC
PDD have been revised accordingly to version 2. The latest
version can be found at
<http://cdm.unfccc.int/Reference/Documents>.
The Board agreed to revise the CDM project design
document for small-scale activities (CDM-SSC-PDD), taking
into account CDM-PDD and CDM-NM.
CDM Executive Board
SECTIO A. General description of small-scale project activity

A.1
Title of the small-scale project activity:
South West Solar Power Plant Project

Version 04
27 Nov 2008
A.2.
Description of the small-scale project activity:
Purpose and technology of the project activity

South West Solar Power Plant Project (1MW) is a grid-connected photovoltaic power plant which is to be
installed in Sunchang, Jeollabuk-do, south western area of Republic of Korea.
The type of technology being employed in this project is photovoltaic power generation technology and the
solar power energy is a renewable energy releasing no greenhouse gases. Generated electricity from the
project will displace the electricity from existing grid from fossil fuel based power plants. Expected
emission reductions of the project activities will reach 770tCO2e (tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent)
annually.
The project will generate 1,209MWh/year of electric power and all the electricity will be connected and
transmitted to the Korea Power Gird. So through the project 1,209 MWh will be generated annually and
about 770 tCO2e /year of GHG emission reduction will be realized on average during the credit period.
Also currently in Korea, they make efforts to reduce fossil fuel usage in various ways and have great
concerns about the renewable energies including solar power energy.
Under this situation the proposed solar power project is expected to contribute to decrease the usage of
electricity by fossil fuel based power plants. In 2006, those fossil fuel based power plants take 59.47% of
electricity generation in Korea according to KEPCO. (KEPCO: Korea Electric Power Company2.
Contribution to sustainable development
The proposed project will contribute to sustainable development such as acquaintance of advanced
technological experiences and maintenance know-how, creation of job opportunities of the country.
As the main PV generation facilities being used in the project are imported from Japan (Solar cells:
Mitsubishi Electronic, Inverters: Meidensha), the proposed project may serve to develop and distribute the
advanced renewable energy technologies for installation and maintenance to the host country.
More specifically the proposed project contributes to sustainable development in the following ways:
Social / Technological aspects
Korea Electric Power Statistics (KEPCO in brief. 30 June 2007, http://www.kepco.co.kr)
CDM Executive Board
The proposed project can diversify sources of electric generation and be one of the model cases as a
PV power plant that utilizes solar energy. And it will take effect on development of related
technologies in the country.
By transfer of the advanced solar power technology, the project will contribute to build
infrastructure through technical cooperation, construction & operation of the plant with expanding
localized lines and developing domestic solar power generation industry.
The project activities can contribute to Low carbon- Green growth Society based on the local
energy industry development.
Economical aspects
- The proposed project will create job opportunities directly or indirectly through construction and
operation of the plant.
- The proposed project will create some venues from CERs by promotion of the project as a CDM
project.
- CERs from the proposed project may contribute to activate Korean Carbon Market.
Environmental and National aspects
- The photovoltaic power plant replaces coal-fired power plants and contributes to reduce GHG
emissions of the nation.
- The plant will contribute toward improvement of air quality and better living conditions of the
country by reducing air pollution.
- By installation of the renewable energy plant and implementation as an international CDM project,
the project may contribute to build up positive images of the province of which clear and
environmentally friendly surroundings, which may improve the living condition of the residents.
- The proposed project will contribute to reduce air pollutants. It replaces electricity generated by
fossil fuel in the grid and thus prevents discharge of the pollutants such as greenhouse gas, particles,
SOx and NOx etc.
The proposed project can be a driving force to promote GHGs related market in Korea can contribute
sustainable development of Korea.
A.3.
Project participants:
<Table 1> Project participants
ame of Party involved(*)

((host) indicates a host Party)
Republic of Korea (Host)

Japan
Private and/or public

entity(ies)project participants
(*)(as applicable)
Kindly indicate if the Party

involved wishes to be
considered as project
participant (Yes/o)
Korea Carbon Finance, Inc.
No
Eurus Energy Japan Corporation
No
CDM Executive Board
(*) In accordance with the CDM modalities and procedures, at the time of making the CDM-PDD
public at the stage of validation, a Party involved may or may not have provided its approval. At the
time of requesting registration, the approval by the Party(ies) involved is required.
A.4.
Technical description of the small-scale project activity:

A.4.1. Location of the small-scale project activity:
A.4.1.1.
Republic of Korea
Host Party(ies):
A.4.1.2.
Region/State/Province etc.:
A.4.1.3.
City/Town/Community etc:
Jeollabuk-Do
Sunchang-gun
A.4.1.4.
Details of physical location, including information allowing the unique
identification of this small-scale project activity :
The project site is located in #148, Changdeok-ri, Paldeok-myeun, Sunchang-gun, Jeollabuk-do, South
West of Korea and the site locations approximate coordinates are east longitude of 127. 05 and north
latitude of 35.22.
<Figure 1> The location of South West Solar Power Plant
CDM Executive Board
<Figure 2> The site of South West Solar Power Plant
A.4.2. Type and category(ies) and technology/measure of the small-scale project activity:
CDM Executive Board
This project is a small-scale CDM project activity and according to the Appendix B of the simplified
modalities and procedures for small-scale CDM project activities of UNFCCC, type and category of the
project can be confirmed as follows;
Type
: I Renewable Energy Projects
Category : I .D Grid connected renewable electricity generation (Version 13)
The proposed project is to build up a photovoltaic power plant with 1MW of installed capacity.
Poly- crystalline silicon solar cells (PV-AD180MF5) are chosen and utilized for the proposed project and
total 5,568 pieces of module (SPR-220) are supplied with each 180W of maximum output power and 13%
of efficiency.
The solar cell module is connected to a junction box and linked to an inverter. The number of gridconnected inverters used in the project activities is four with each 300V of rated output and the efficiency
is more than 94%. And there is equipped 3-phase watching system with current control to observe the
important parameters such as voltage, frequency of the grid.
Though the efficiency of solar PV plant depends on insolations and other seasonal causes, usually the
utilization rate of the proposed project is 13.9% and the output is 1,209 MWh/year.
And the generated electricity from the plant is connected to the KEPCO(Korea electric power co., Ltd),
electric poles on the ground which are located near the project site, Changdeok-ri, Paldeok-myeun,
Sunchang-gun.
<Table 2> Technology description

Item
Solar cells
Inverter
Type
Technology standards
Type
Capacity
Maximum output power
Number of Module
Efficiency
Type
Rated voltage
Output
Control method
Node form
Number of units
Efficiency
PV-AD180MF5
993.6 kW
180W
5,568 pieces
13 %
Gird connected
DC 300V
250kW
Current control (PWM)
3-phase, 3-wire
4 units
More than 94 %
CDM Executive Board
A.4.3
Estimated amount of emission reductions over the chosen crediting period:

<Table 3> Annual estimation of emission reductions
Year 1
Annual estimation of emission reductions

in tonnes of CO2 e
770
Year 2
770
Year 3
770
Year 4
770
Year 5
770
Year 6
770
Year 7
770
Year 8
770
Year 9
770
Year 10
770
Total estimated reductions (tonnes of tCO2 e)
7,700
Total number of crediting years

Annual average over the crediting period of
estimated reductions (tonnes of tCO2 e)
10
Year
770
Estimated emission reduction in the 10years of crediting period is 7,700 tCO2e as presented in table A.3.
A.4.4. Public funding of the small-scale project activity:
The investor of the South West Solar Power Plant is Eurus Energy Japan and there is no public funding for
the project.
A.4.5. Confirmation that the small-scale project activity is not a debundled component of a
large scale project activity:
According to paragraph 2 in Appendix C of the simplified modalities and procedures for small-scale
CDM project activities, if the small scale CDM project which met following conditions is registered or
submitted for the registration, the proposed project is deemed to be a fragmentation of a large project
activity into smaller parts.
The project activity is a solar power CDM project with about 1MW(993.6KW) of capacity and it delivers
the generated electricity to the grid. And as those items below regard debundling dont be applied to the
proposed project thus it is not a fragmentation of any large project.
With the same project participants
In the same project category and technology/measure
Registered within the previous 2 years
CDM Executive Board
Whose project boundary is within 1 km of the project boundary of the proposed small-scale activity at
the closest point.
SECTIO B. Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology

B.1.
Title and reference of the approved baseline and monitoring methodology applied to the
small-scale project activity:
Project Type
: Renewable Energy Projects
Project Category: D Grid connected renewable electricity generation (Version13)
Reference: Appendix B of the simplified modalities and procedures for small-scale CDM project activities
(UNFCCC)
Further information for the methodology can be found at
http://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/SSCmethodologies/approved.html
According to AMS I.D(version 13) , baseline emission factor is calculated by Tool to calculate the
emission factor for an electricity system (ver 01). Baseline emission factor is calculated by combined
margin (CM), which is weighted average of operating margin (OM) and build margin (BM).
The additionality of the project activity shall be demonstrated and assessed using latest version of the
Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality, version 05(EB39) agreed by the CDM
Executive Board, which is available on the UNFCCC CDM website.
http://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/PAmethodologies/AdditionalityTools/Additionality_tool.pdf
B.2
Justification of the choice of the project category:
The approved methodology for Simplified modalities and procedures for small-scale CDM project
activities- AMS.I.D is applicable to renewable energy projects whose output capacity is up to 15MW and
the produced electricity is delivered to the grid.
The South West Solar Power Plant:
generates about 1MW(993.6KW) of electricity by solar energy, one of renewable energies,
supplies the grid with the electricity produced
The electric output of the project is about 1MW (993.6KW), which is under 15MW and the generated
electricity delivered to the grid. And also the proposed project corresponds to a renewable energy project
as a solar power generation.
Therefore the methodology AMS.I.D is applicable to the proposed project.
B.3.
Description of the project boundary:
Based on AMS.I.D, project boundary encompasses the physical, geographical site of the renewable
CDM Executive Board
generation source.
The electricity produced by this project will be delivered to the grid system and replace the electricity
generated by fossil fuel in the grid therefore, according to ACM0002(version07), the spatial extent of the
project boundary includes the project site and all power plants connected physically to the electricity
system that the CDM project power plant is connected to.
In Korea, Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO) represents the grid system, therefore, the boundary
of the project could be identified as KEPCO and the proposed project site.
B.4.
Description of baseline and its development:
The baseline scenario of the Project is the continued operation of the existing power plants in the grid
system and the addition of new generation sources. The project activity involves a construction of a zero
emission power source. Thus, the emission reductions are equal to the baseline emissions.
In accordance with the small scale methodology AMS-I.D. (version 13), baseline emissions are equal
to power generated by the project activity and delivered to the grid, multiplied by the baseline emission
factor.
According to the small scale methodology AMS-I.D, there are two options for baseline emission factor
calculation:
(a) A combined margin (CM), consisting of the combination of operating margin
(OM) and build margin (BM) according to the procedures prescribed in the Tool to calculate the
emission factor for an electricity system. OR
(b) The weighted average emissions (in kg CO2e/kWh) of the current generation mix.
The data of the year in which project generation occurs must be used.
For the proposed project, Option (a) was chosen to calculate the baseline emissions factor.
Further details are presented in B.6.
B.5.
Description of how the anthropogenic emissions of GHG by sources are reduced below those
that would have occurred in the absence of the registered small-scale CDM project activity:
The proposed project is to build 1MW(993.6KW) of solar power plant so that it falls into a small scale
CDM project as a renewable energy project under 15MW of capacity and the generated electricity
delivered to the grid.
Thus the type and category of project meet the Attachment A of the Appendix B of the simplified
modalities and procedures for small-scale CDM project activities
For this reason, a barrier analysis is carried out in accordance with the Appendix B of the simplified
modalities and procedures for small-scale CDM project activities to demonstrate and assess additionality.
According to the Attachment A, project participants shall provide an explanation to show that the project
activity would not have occurred anyway due to at least one of the following barriers:
(a) Investment barrier: a financially more viable alternative to the project activity would have led to
higher emissions;
10
CDM Executive Board
(b) Technological barrier: a less technologically advanced alternative to the project activity involves
lower risks due to the performance uncertainty or low market share of the new technology adopted
for the project activity and so would have led to higher emissions;
(c) Barrier due to prevailing practice: prevailing practice or existing regulatory or policy requirements
would have led to implementation of a technology with higher emissions;
(d) Other barriers: without the project activity, for another specific reason identified by the project
participant, such as institutional barriers or limited information, managerial resources,
organizational capacity, financial resources, or capacity to absorb new technologies, emissions
would have been higher.
In this proposed project, the investment barrier analysis is carried out to assess additionality and most
recent version of Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality(version 04) is applied to the
investment analysis(a).
As the generated electricity from the project is sold and supplied to the grid, the benchmark analysis
(Option III) is applied to the proposed project activity among the options.
IRR is used as a financial indicator for benchmark analysis of the project activity. For the project activity,
about 88% of capital requirement was raised from a Japanese bank.
They got a loan from the bank with conditions of 3 months CD rate + and the latest average interest rate
for 6 months (from 2007.Sept.1st~2008.Feb.28) was 5.9%. (Source of the CD rates:
http://www.ksdabond.or.kr)
And the project can be considered being financially feasible only when the expected venues from the
project are higher than the interest rate of the loan issued from the bank. Therefore, 5.9 % of interest rate
was applied as a bench mark for Project IRR of the investment analysis.
Key factors of the projects financial viability in calculating financial indicators are the estimated prices of
electricity, investment costs including construction costs, operation costs and maintenance costs, and
interest rates of the loan raised by SWSPCO etc.
<Table B.1>
Items
Annual generated electricity
Electricity sales price
O&M Cost
Depreciation
Total Investment
- Equity
- Loan
Interest on Term Loans
The term of redemption
Value
1,209 MWh
85.96 Won/KWh
1.4% of Investment cost
20 years
6,812 Million Won
812 Million Won
6,000 Million Won
5.9 %
- 3 months CD rate + 0.4%
( 3 months CD rate during
2007.Sept.1st~2008.Feb.28 is 5.5%)
The data used for the investment analysis of the project was offered by KPX (Korea Power Exchange).
11
CDM Executive Board
To calculate returns on sales of the generated electric power, SMP (System Marginal Price) of solar power
generation was used. And the recent official price data on the solar power generation provided by KPX is
presented below. (http://epsis.kpx.or.kr/)
Year
SMP (Won/kwh)
2005
2006
2007
63.80
82.11
85.96
For the project activities, the average SMP data of the latest year (2007.1.1~2007.12.31) was used.
IRR and NPV analysis came out as followings and more information for the analysis would be presented
separately.
<Table B.2> IRR and PV analysis
With CERs
Without CER
IRR
< 0%
10
20
< 0%
< 0%
PV (Million
-6,339
-6,222
-6,104
Won)
1. Purchased Electricity : 85.96 won ( Average SMP of during the year)
(2007.1.1~2007.12.31)
2. Duration of operation : 20 years
3. Further details will be presented to DOE.
As the table shows, project IRR is lower then 0 and it is much lower than 5.9 %, the average interest rate
of the loan from the bank. So the proposed project is not financially attractive or feasible.
Sensitivity analysis was performed on following indicators which have significant effects on the
investment analysis of the proposed project.
- Total Investments
- Electricity Sales Price
- Operation & Maintenance Cost
As the economical structure & condition of Korea is relatively stable, above indicators dont fluctuate
much widely, thus their fluctuations rise up normally within the range of 10%.
In Korea, the average of the economic growth rates during the 5 years (2001~2005) is 4.5% and that of the
inflation rate during same period is 3.4%. ( http://www.kosis.kr/ )
Also, for more conservative analysis, sensitivity analysis on those Electricity Sales Price was performed
more widely in the range of 20% as it affected much by electric demand & supply and market conditions
of the country.
According to the sensitive analysis, the results come out as below.
<Table B.3> Results of Sensitivity analysis
12
CDM Executive Board
Parameter
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
+5%
+10%
+15%
+20%
Total Investment
< 0%
< 0%
< 0%
< 0%
< 0%
Electricity Sales
Revenue
< 0%
< 0%
< 0%
< 0%
< 0%
< 0%
< 0%
< 0%
< 0%
< 0%
< 0%
< 0%
< 0%
< 0%
O&M Cost
Range
As shown above table, sensitivity analysis result shows that according to the fluctuations of Total
investment ( -10% ~ +10%), Electricity Sales Price( -20% ~ +20%) and O&M Cost ( -10% ~ +10%),
Project IRRs become < 0% in all cases.
Therefore, according to the sensitivity analysis results, Project IRR of the proposed project is < 0%, which
is much lower than the benchmark 5.9%, interest rate of the loan the from bank.
So those results confirm that the project is not financially attractive or viable. And in case of a photovoltaic
power plant, the output depends on the weather or plenty of sunshine and such kind of unstable factors
could be a barrier for investment on the project.
Meanwhile, the table <Table B.2> indicates that the IRRs and NPV increase as the CER revenues increase;
this implies that the expected revenues by selling CERs have an effect on the enforcement of the proposed
project, as they improve the economic benefits.
Prior Consideration of CDM
Start date of South West Solar Power Plant Project is 25/01/2008, which is the contract date for
construction of the South West Solar Power Plant, when the implementation of the project activity began.
This is earlier than the contract date of DOE validation (03/06/2008).
But before DOE validation, the project participant (Eurus Energy Japan) signed a Joint Development
Agreement for the proposed project with Gijeon wintech(which is an engineering company for
photovoltaic power plant) on 29/11/2007, which is earlier than the start date of the project(25/01/2008).
And in the Article 17 of the Agreement, there was a provision for distribution and ownership of those
benefits of CERs from CDM project. 2)
This means that the project developer (Eurus Energy Japan) seriously considered incentives from CDM
before their decision to proceed with the project.
Additionally, the Korean government established Act on the Promotion of the Development, Use and
Diffusion of New and Renewable Energy(revised in 27/09/2006. No 7998 ) to encourage usage of the
renewable energies and to develop those energy sources in Korea since 2002.
This law is intended to improve the profitability and promote investment on renewable energy projects
through preferential treatments for the electricity prices because in Korea, investing on those renewable
energy projects is not much activated due to the high cost and low returns of those kinds of projects.
(The law first established in 2002 to promote the diffusion of renewable energy. And according to decision
of 22nd CDM EB meeting, it need not be taken into account in developing a baseline scenario. Therefore
the law is not considered in this baseline calculation.)
2)
Article 17, < Benefits from CERs>, Joint Development Agreement by Eurus Energy Japan and Gijeon Wintech
13
CDM Executive Board
However, because of these financial difficulties, the portion of power generation from renewable energy
sources held only 0.17% of its whole national power generation 652,479MWh in 2006 in Korea.3)
B.6.
Emission reductions:
B.6.1. Explanation of methodological choices:
Emission reductions can be calculated by multiplying of the generated electricity and emission factor as
below.
Baseline emissions (BEy) of the proposed project are as follows.
BEy =EGy* EFy = 1,209MWh x 0.6365 tCO2e/MWh = 770 tCO2e/ year
Emission reductions of the proposed project are same with the emissions from electricity generation in
fossil fuel fired power plants that are displaced due to the project activity.
Emission reductions are calculated as follows:
ER y = BE y PE y LE y
Where:
ERy = Emission reductions in year y (t CO2e/yr).
BEy = Baseline emissions in year y (t CO2e/yr).
PEy = Project emissions in year y (t CO2/yr).
LEy = Leakage emissions in year y (t CO2/yr).
1. Baseline Emission Calculation
According to ACM0002(version 7) , baseline emission factor is calculated by Tool to calculate the
emission factor for an electricity system (ver 01). Baseline emission factor is calculated by combined
margin (CM), which is weighted average of operating margin (OM) and build margin (BM).
Baseline emissions will be calculated as following 6 steps.
STEP 1. Identify the relevant electric power system.
STEP 2. Select an operating margin (OM) method.
STEP 3. Calculate the operating margin emission factor according to the selected method.
STEP 4. Identify the cohort of power units to be included in the build margin (BM).
STEP 5. Calculate the build margin emission factor.
STEP 6. Calculate the combined margin (CM) emissions factor.
STEP 1. Identify the relevant electric power system

The electricity from the project activities is connected to KEPCO grid, which is the only one in Korea and
so relevant electric power system is KEPCO grid.
3)
Korea Electric Power Statistics (30 May 2007)
14
CDM Executive Board
<Figure 4> The transmission map of Korea
Step 2. Select an Operating Margin (OM) Method

The calculation of the Operating Margin emission factor (EFOM,y) is based on one of the four following
methods:
(a) Simple OM, or
(b) Simple adjusted OM, or
(c) Dispatch Data Analysis OM, or
(d) Average OM
Among the above options, simple OM method can be used where low cost/must run resources constitute
less than 50% of total grid generation in average of the five most recent years.
During 5 years(2003~2007), average low-cost/must run generation holds 41.88 % of total KPX grid
generation. ( See Annex 3 )4) . Thus the Simple OM method is employed in order to calculate OM emission
factor.
Simple OM emission factor (EFOM,simple,y) is calculated using a 3-year generation-weighted average(ex-ante)
of all generating power plants serving the system, based on the most recent data available at the time of
submission of the PDD.
STEP 3. Calculate the operating margin emission factor according to the selected method.
4)
As the anthracite was used as must-run resource, it was excluded from the set of plants for calculating Operating
margin. And the bituminous coal was included in OM calculation.
15
CDM Executive Board
According to the Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system (Version 01), the
Simple OM emission factor is calculated as the generation-weighted average emissions per electricity
unit (tCO2/MWh) of all generating power plants serving the system, not including low-operating cost and
must-run power plants based on the three following options:
Based on data on fuel consumption and net electricity generation of each power plant / unit (Option
A), or
Based on data on net electricity generation, the average efficiency of each power unit and the fuel
type(s) used in each power unit (Option B), or
Based on data on the total net electricity generation of all power plants serving the system and the
fuel types and total fuel consumption of the project electricity system (Option C)
Based on data on fuel consumption and net electricity generation of each power plant/unit is available in
Korea. So the proposed project can employ Option A.
Where Option A is used, the simple OM emission factor is calculated as follows:
EFgrid,OMsimple,y = Simple operating margin CO2 emission factor in year y (tCO2/MWh)

FC i,m,y
= Amount of fossil fuel type i consumed by power plant / unit m in year y
CVi,y
= Net calorific value (energy content) of fossil fuel type i in year y(GJ / mass or volume
unit). If gross calorific values are provided by the data sources used, the gross calorific
value (GCV) of the fuel can be used.
EF CO2 ,i,y
= CO2 emission factor of fossil fuel type i in year y (tCO2/GJ). IPCC default values at the
lower limit of the uncertainty at a 95% confidence interval as provided in Table 1.4 of
Chapter 1 of Vol. 2 (Energy) of the 2006 IPCC Guidelines on National GHG
Inventories
EGm,y
= Net electricity generated and delivered to the grid by power plant / unit m in year y
(MWh)
= All power plants / units serving the grid in year y except low-cost / must-run power
m
plants / units
i
y
= All fossil fuel types combusted in power plant / unit m in year y

= Either the three most recent years for which data is available at the time of
submission of the CDM-PDD to the DOE for validation (ex ante option) or the
applicable year during monitoring (ex post option), following the guidance on data
vintage in step 2
For the proposed project, GCVi provided by official data source of Korea is used. IPCC default value is
used as CO2 emission factor of fuel. Simple OM factor during 3 years (2005~2007) is 0.7337 tCO2/MWh
and this value is fixed along the credit period.
The detailed baseline information used in the calculation is presented in Annex 3.
16
CDM Executive Board
STEP 4. Identify the cohort of power units to be included in the build margin
According to Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system (Version 01), the sample
group of power units m used to calculate the build margin consists of either:
(a) The set of five power units that have been built most recently, or
(b) The set of power capacity additions in the electricity system that comprise 20% of the system
generation (in MWh) and that have been built most recently.
In the project, as the annual generation of the power plants capacity additions in the electricity system
that comprise 20% of the system generation (in MWh) and that have been built most recently was
76,081,608 MWh on 2007 and the annual generation of the five power plants that have been built most
recently of 2007 was 34MWh. Therefore, the former is lager figure than the latter, Option b is selected
between the two options proposed by the methodology.
The detailed data used in the calculation are presented in Annex 3.
Also according to Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system (Version 01), the BM
emission factor is fixed during the credit period of the project activity.
As a general guidance, a power unit is considered to have been built at the date when it started to supply
electricity to the grid. Power plant registered as CDM project activities should be excluded from the
sample group m. However, if group of power units, not registered as CDM project activity, identified for
estimating the build margin emission factor includes power unit(s) that is(are) built more than 10 years ago
then, power unit(s) that is (are) built more than 10 years ago from the group should be excluded and
grid connected power projects registered as CDM project activities, which are dispatched by dispatching
authority to the electricity system should be included. Besides capacity additions from retrofits of power
plants were not included in the calculation of the build margin emission factor.
In calculation of BM emission factor of the proposed project, these details were considered.
According to Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system (Version 01), in terms of
vintage of data, project participants can choose between one of the two options (Option 1 and Option 2).
And here, option 1 was chosen for the proposed project.
As the developers of the project chose Option 1 to calculate BM emission factor, the emission factor wont
be updated annually. Instead, it will be calculated ex-ante based on the most recent information for the first
crediting period and be fixed and used during the crediting period.
STEP 5. Calculate the build margin emission factor

According to the Tool to calculate the emission factors for electricity system (Version 01), the
build margin emissions factor is the generation-weighted average emission factor (tCO2/MWh) of
all power units m during the most recent year y for which power generation data is available,
calculate as follows:
17
CDM Executive Board
Where:
EFgrid,BM,y = Build margin CO2 emission factor in year y (t CO2/MWh)
EG m,y
= Net quantity of electricity generated and delivered to the grid by power unit m
in year y (MWh)
EFEL,m,y
= CO2 emission factor of power unit m in year y (t CO2/MWh)
= Power units included in the build margin
m
=
Most recent historical year for which power generation data is available
y
The CO2 emission factor of each power unit m (EFEL,m,y) should be determined as per the guidance in step
3 (a) for the simple OM, using options B1, B2 or B3, using for y the most recent historical year for which
power generation data is available, and using for m the power units included in the build margin.
For the proposed project step 3 (a) Simple OM, option 1 is chosen.
For BM emission factor, EFEL,m,y was calculated by multiplying FCi, m,y (electricity consumption) by
GCVi,y * EF CO2 , i,y and divide it by power generation of each plant.
And then EFEL,m,y was multiplied by power generation of each plant and finally it was divided by total
power generation.( 2006 IPCC Guidelines on National GHG Inventories Table 1.2, Table 1.4)
BM emission factor is 0.3449 tCO2/MWh. And further information on calculation for BM emission factor
is shown in Annex 3.
STEP 6. Calculate the combined emission factor

According to the tool to calculate the emission factor for electricity system (Ver01), the combined
emissions factor is calculated as follows:
EFgrid, CM, y = EFgrid, OM, y * wOM + EFgrid, BM, y * wBM
Where:
EFgrid,BM,y = Build margin CO2 emission factor in year y (tCO2/MWh)
EFgrid,OM,y = Operating margin CO2 emission factor in year y (tCO2/MWh)
wOM = Weighting of operating margin emissions factor (75% for solar power project)
wBM = Weighting of build margin emissions factor (25% for solar power project)
EFgrid,CM,y= 0.7337*0.75+0.3449*0.25 = 0.6365 (tCO2e/MWh)
Calculate the baseline emissions (BEy)
Therefore, baseline emissions can be calculated as below:
BEy =EGy* EFy
B.6.2. Data and parameters that are available at validation:
18
CDM Executive Board
(Copy this table for each data and parameter)

Data / Parameter:
Fi ,m, y
Data unit:
Mass: Bituminous, LNG

Volume: Heavy oil, Diesel
Fuel consumption
i : bituminous, heavy oil, diesel, LNG
m: sample group consisting of power plant capacity additions that comprises
20% of system generation and that have been built most recently.
y: 2007
2007 STATISTICS OF ELECTRIC POWER IN KOREA
-
Description:
Source of data
Measurement
procedures (if any)
Any comment:
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data used:
Value applied:
Justification of the
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
and procedures
actually applied :
Any comment:
GCVi
kcal/ mass or volume unit
Gross calorific value of fuel
i : bituminous, heavy oil, diesel oil, LNG
According to Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system,
the gross calorific value (GCV) of the fuel can be used, if gross calorific values
are provided by the data sources used. Thus, as the GCV of fuel can be
provided, GCV of fuel was used in this project.
Data / Parameter:
EFCO 2,i
Data unit:
Description:
tCO2 /GJ
CO2 emission factor of fuel i
i : bituminous, heavy oil, diesel oil, LNG
Revised 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

Value applied:
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
and procedures
actually applied :
Any comment:
Data / Parameter:
Emission factor will be fixed during the credit period of the project.
EGm,y
19
CDM Executive Board
Data unit:
Description:
MWh
Net electricity generated and delivered to the grid by power plant/unit m,j,k or n
in year y or hour h

Value applied:
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
and procedures
actually applied :
Any comment:
B.6.3
1,209 MWh
Ex-ante calculation of emission reductions:
Emission reductions are calculated as follows:

ER y = BE y PE y LE y
Where:
ER y =
BE y =
PE y =
LE y =
Emission reductions in year y (t CO2e/yr).

Baseline emissions in year y (t CO2e/yr).
Project emissions in year y (t CO2/yr).
Leakage emissions in year y (t CO2/yr).
As mentioned above, since project emissions(PEy) and leakage (Ly) are zero, emission reductions(ERy)
are same with the baseline emissions(BEy), as follows:
ER y = EFgrid EG y
The project is expected to generate around 1,209MWh per year, as shown in the below.
Installed Capacity
Annual hour
Utilization rate
Electricity Generation
:
:
:
:
993.6 KW
8,760 hr/year
13.9 %
1,209 MWh/year
As mentioned above, the emission factor of the grid is determined by using the methodology ACM0002
(version07) as a combined margin emission factor, consisting of the combination of the OM and the BM
factors.
As shown in Annex 3, the OM emission factor results to be 0.7337 tCO2/MWh and the BM emission factor
0.3449 tCO2/MWh. Thus, emission factor of the grid (EFgrid) is:
EFgrid,CMy= 0.7337*0.75+0.3449*0.25 = 0.6365 (tCO2e/MWh)
Thus, the annual emission reduction results to be:
20
CDM Executive Board
ER y = EFgrid EG y
= 0.6365 t CO2/MWh 1,209 MWh/year = 770 tCO2/year
B.6.4
Summary of the ex-ante estimation of emission reductions:

<Table 7> Summary of the ex-ante estimation of emission reductions
B.7
Year
Estimation of
project activity
emissions
(tCO2 e)
Estimation of
baseline emissions
(tCO2 e)
Estimation of
leakage
(tCO2 e)
Estimation of
overall emission
reductions
(tCO2 e)
Year 1
770
770
Year 2
770
770
Year 3
770
770
Year 4
770
770
Year 5
770
770
Year 6
770
770
Year 7
770
770
Year 8
770
770
Year 9
770
770
Year 10
770
770
Total (tCO2e)
7,700
7,700
Application of a monitoring methodology and description of the monitoring plan:
B.7.1 Data and parameters monitored:

(Copy this table for each data and parameter)
Data / Parameter:
Data unit:
Description:
Source of data to be used:
EGy
MWh
Net electricity supplied to the grid by the project
Measured by meters.
Value of data applied for 1,209 MWh

the purpose of calculating
expected emission
reductions in section B.6
Description of
Hourly measurement and monthly recording.
100% of data will be monitored and archived.
measurement methods
and procedures to be
applied:
21
CDM Executive Board
QA/QC procedures to be
applied:
The Measurement will be in compliance with the National Guidelines and

requirement of the KPX(Korea Power Exchange) for accuracy and reliability.
Any comment:
The calibration will be carried out according to relevant national standards and
regulations by authorized organization.
Double checked by receipt of sales.
- QA/QC procedure is prepared
- The allowable error of the data : within 0.5%
Monitored data will be kept for two years after the crediting period.
The amount of electricity consumed in the plant and electricity transmission to
a grid will be measured.
Also the received electricity as a driving force for starting the operation and in
emergencies will be measured by electric power meter. EGy means a net
amount of electricity transmitted to the grid excluding electricity consumed in
the plant and received from grid.
And the amount of electricity consumed in the plant and received from the
gird will be deducted from the emission reduction of the proposed project
according to the monitoring.
B.7.2
Description of the monitoring plan:
As the project supplies electricity generated by renewable energy to the grid, emission reduction quantity
depends on the units of energy generated from the solar power plant and exported to the grid. According to
the monitoring methodology of AMS I.D., the methodology covers monitoring of units exported and the
other parameters affecting the quantity of power export and CO2 emissions thereof. The data will be
compiled in a manner amenable to third party audit and deliverable to the DOE for validation and
certification purposes.
The net emission reductions will result from the units of power supplied to the grid. And not only the
electric transmission but also electric consumption used in the plant during night will be measured through
receiving instruments.
Monitoring plan is setting up the series of monitoring works on GHG emission reduction of the proposed
project.
Monitoring plan includes followings.
- Establishing and keeping the appropriate and transparent monitoring system for the generated
electricity from the project
- Measuring instrument management, maintenance and quality control.
- Role and demands of the person in charge of monitoring
- Dada management and storage system
- Preparations and coping with the third parties audit
1. Monitoring Organization
The generated electricity supplied to the KEPCO grid is the main data to be monitored.
22
CDM Executive Board
Project owner of the proposed project is Eurus Energy Japan. The project owner designates
SPC (South West Solar Power Co.,) as the CDM Project Manager, who takes charge of
monitoring of reduction, collecting and keeping of the data, QA/QC and audit etc.
Then the project owner undertake supervising and managing of the SPC.
And there are two sections under the South West Solar Power Co., : monitoring section and auditor section.
Monitoring section manager will undertake monitoring, gathering and storage required according to the
monitoring plan. And the gathered information is recorded and sent to the CDM project manager and
auditor section monthly.
Also auditor section manager will audit the monitoring sections work and proceed QA/QC process
according to the monitoring plan.
CDM project manager will take the responsibility for entire compliance of the monitoring plan including
confirmation of monitoring plan, emission reduction and report.
Following figure describes the operational structure to perform the monitoring plan.
: General duty of whole

management, construction
and maintenance
EURUS ENERGY JAPAN
(Project Owner)
South
SouthWest
WestSolar
SolarPower
PowerCo.,
Co.,Ltd
Ltd
South
West
Solar
Power
South West Solar PowerPlant
Plant
Monitoring Section
- Monitoring
- Information gathering
- Data Storage
- General management of
electricity, civil engineering
: - CDM Project Manager

- Practical operation and
management of Project
Audit Section
Audit of monitoring work
- QA/QC process
Person in charge : Mr. Narita Nobuhisa
Person in charge : Mr. Narita Nobuhisa
2. Monitoring Equipment
Electricity meters for measuring the amount of electricity shall be set up transparently in accordance
with the Korean law Law regarding measurement and Act on operation of electricity market,
and they shall be sealed after confirmation on the correct set up of the meters by Korea Power Exchange.
The meters shall be investigated according to Act on operation of electricity market by certificated
examination standard.
And calibration regarding sealing of the meters shall be performed regularly every two years after the
installation.
The proposed project will be maintained in accordance with the process defined on the Law regarding
measurement and Act on operation of electricity market.
23
CDM Executive Board
3. Data Collection and Management

The amount of electricity transmitted to the grid shall be measured automatically by the established
meters as described above. The measured variables are simultaneously transferred to central control
system of the South West Solar power plant.
The measured amount of electricity shall be collected hourly, daily and monthly and shall be archived in
electronic way.
Additionally, according to Act on operation of electricity market, KPX shall keep and maintenance the
transmitted data from the electricity meters of the proposed project in its data base.
And the measured amount of electricity shall be compared with those of KPX to ensure quality of the data.
If the two variables compared are different, the electricity meters and other equipment shall be checked if
they are working properly by internal investigation and procedures regulated in the related laws. Then the
results will be reported to the CDM project manager for appropriate follow-up measures.
Even after the internal investigation and procedures in related laws, if the reason why those two variables
are different is not found, then data stored in the electricity meters of the plant will be used in the first
place according to Act on operation of electricity market
Collected data record for monitoring will be archived electronically at least for 2 years after the crediting
period (10years) to which the records pertain.
Southwest solar power plant is an unmanned one, thus at present it is operated automatically with remote
control. And the persons in charge of monitoring and electricity safety shall be trained regularly according
to the related regulations,
B.8
Date of completion of the application of the baseline and monitoring methodology and the
name of the responsible person(s)/entity(ies)
Date of completion of the methodology application: The application of the baseline study and monitoring
methodology of the Project was completed on 11/04/2008.
RCC Co., Ltd.
Pohang TechnoPark 601, Venture 1st building
Gigok-dong 601, Nam-gu, Pohang-si, Gyeongbuk 790-834, Korea.
Responsible person : Kim Jung a (Ms). Assistant Manager
e-mail: cdm2006@rcc-posco.co.kr , Telephone : 054-223-2300
SECTIO C. Duration of the project activity / crediting period

C.1
Duration of the project activity:

C.1.1. Starting date of the project activity:
The starting date of the project activity is 25/01/2008
24
CDM Executive Board
The starting date chosen is the date when the contract for construction of the plant was signed, and is
therefore the date when the implementation of the project activity begins.
C.1.2. Expected operational lifetime of the project activity:

20 years
Choice of the crediting period and related information:
C.2
C.2.1. Renewable crediting period

C.2.1.1.
Starting date of the first crediting period:
C.2.1.2.
Length of the first crediting period:
Not applicable
Not applicable
C.2.2. Fixed crediting period:
C.2.2.1.
Starting date:
01/05/2009 or registration date whatever is later
C.2.2.2.
Length:
10 years
SECTIO D. Environmental impacts
D.1.
If required by the host Party, documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts of
the project activity:
As the area of the site comes 28, 724m2, therefore according to Article 25, paragraph 2 of Framework Act
on Environmental Policy and its enforcement decree(Article 7, paragraph 1) of Korea, the Preliminary
Environmental Assessment (PEA) was performed. It was performed by an environmental impact
assessment agency, Koentec., Ltd (President Chanyoong Bak) and PEA report for the project was
published in Oct. 2007
The PEA report covers the sectors of natural environment, residential environment, social/economical
environment, etc as follows.
-
Air environment
Water environment
Land environment
Natural & ecological environment
Residential environment
Social/economical environment
: Weather, Air quality

: Water quality
: Land utilization, Topography, Geology
: Fauna, and Flora, Scenery
: Noise, Vibration, Recreation
: Traffic, Cultural treasure
The conclusion of the report showed that there isnt any significant environmental impact and influence on
25
CDM Executive Board
the social/economical environment and on other ones of the project is insignificant and also expected
damage against ecosystem is little if any.
D.2.
If environmental impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host
Party, please provide conclusions and all references to support documentation of an environmental
impact assessment undertaken in accordance with the procedures as required by the host Party:
N.A
SECTIO E. Stakeholders comments
E.1.
Brief description how comments by local stakeholders have been invited and compiled:
The project developer made a presentation meeting and generated publicity through news media to collect
regional stakeholders opinions of the proposed project.
The presentation meeting was hold at the private meeting room in Deokcheon-ri community center to
collect comments from stakeholders such as the related persons in the region and townsmen on 14th
Dec.2007. The opinions were collected while the project was given permission.
Also the project participants informed the residents of the status and the need of the project and announced
the project in public though website of Eurus-Enegy and KBS News directly and indirectly.
Pictures of the presentation meeting at Deokcheon-ri and articles regarding the proposed project are shown
as follows.
<Figure 5> Presentation : Deokcheon-ri community centre (14th Dec/07)
< Figure 6 > Announcement of the project: KBS News (interview), website of Eurus-Energy
26
CDM Executive Board
E.2.
Summary of the comments received:
The building site of the project is located on a hillside near small farmlands and it is remote far from
villages. Therefore there is no objection or argument from the residents of the villages in that area,
including closest village, Taechon.
At the presentation, though some issues were raised on the project about reflection of modules, occupation
and usage of roads for construction work and waterways and landslide of the site against the flood
especially in summer. However regarding these matters, the project developer provided full circle
explanations and promised proper follow up measures to the attendants and got their understanding at the
meeting.
Also regarding benefits from the project especially for the region, project developers focused on the
significance of the project and environmental benefits of the whole country rather than on the benefits of
the local area. And the developers obtained their understating and amicable approval.
Meanwhile, regarding the announcement of the project, there were no questions or opinions received on
the proposed project. And no comment was raised against the public announcement of the proposed CDM
project.
E.3.
Report on how due account was taken of any comments received:
For those comments received at the presentation, SWSPCO stretched a net over the slide side for erosion
control, planted the grass on the site and made waterways for flood. In spite of these measures, if flood
damage would happen due to the proposed project, in that case, they promised the residents to compensate
the damages in written form.
27
CDM Executive Board
Annex 1
COTACT IFORMATIO O PARTICIPATS I THE PROJECT ACTIVITY
Organization:
Street/P.O.Box:
Building:
City:
State/Region:
Postfix/ZIP:
Country:
Telephone:
FAX:
E-Mail:
URL:
Represented by:
Title:
Salutation:
Last Name:
Middle Name:
First Name:
Department:
Mobile:
Direct FAX:
Direct Tel:
Personal E-Mail:
Eurus Energy Japan Corporation

11-30, Akasaka 1-Chome, Minato-ku,
Akasaka 1-Chome Center B/D 5F
Tokyo
Tokyo
107-0052
Japan
81-3-5561-6243
81-3-5561-6247
masaru.akiyoshi@eurus-energy.com
http://www.eurus-energy.com/
Organization:
Street/P.O.Box:
Building:
City:
State/Region:
Postfix/ZIP:
Country:
Telephone:
FAX:
E-Mail:
URL:
Represented by:
Title:
Salutation:
Last Name:
Middle Name:
First Name:
Korea Carbon Finance, Inc.

51-5, Banpo-dong, Seocho-gu,
Daekyeong B/D 3F
Seoul
Seoul
137-040
Korea
82-2-595-7776
82-2-595-7736
skyoon@kcf.co.kr
http://www.kcf.co.kr
General Manager
Mr.
Akiyoshi
Masaru
----
Researcher
Ms
Yoon
Seok-Kyung
28
CDM Executive Board
Department:
Mobile:
Direct FAX:
Direct Tel:
Personal E-Mail:
----
29
CDM Executive Board
Annex 2
IFORMATIO REGARDIG PUBLIC FUDIG
This project will not receive any public funding.
30
CDM Executive Board
Annex 3
BASELIE IFORMATIO
Simple OM calculation
The simple OM method can be used where low cost/must run resources constitute less than 50% of total
grid generation in average of the five most recent years.
< Generation of power plants groups (MWh, Gross)>
Low cost/must run
year
Hydro Coal (Anthracite)
Nuclear
Alternative*
2003
6,886,983
6,959,937 129,671,763
0
2004
5,861,434
5,787,070 130,714,816
350,183
2005
5,188,888
5,789,778 146,779,023
404,101
2006
5,218,621
5,709,388 148,748,887
511,223
2007
5,042,462
6,061,545 142,937,164
830,824
Average of five
recent years
5,639,678
6,061,544
139,770,331
419,266
Subtotal
143,518,683
142,713,503
158,161,790
160,188,119
154,871,995
Total grid
Low cost/
generation must run ratio
322,451,697
44.51%
342,147,967
41.71%
364,639,331
43.37%
381,180,709
42.02%
403,124,501
38.42%
151,890,818
362,708,841
41.88%
*Alternative: Geothermal, Wind, Low-cost biomass, Solar, LFG

Source: 2007 Statistics of Electric Power in Korea, KEPCO, 2008.05.
Carbon Emission Factor

CO2 Emission Factor of fossil fuel type i (unit: tCO2/GJ) (EFCO2,i,y)
Bituminous coal
Heavy Oil
Diesel Oil
LG
*Source:: IPCC 2006
0.089500
0.075500
0.072600
0.054300
IPCC default values at the lower limit of the uncertainty at a 95% confidence interval as provided in table
1.4 of Chapter 1 of Vol. 2 of 2006 IPCC Guidances
Simple OM for the proposed project activity
`
Net Generation
(EGm,y) (MWh)
CO2 emission
(tCO2/yr )
Operating Margin
2005
195,044,936
142,807,535
0.7322
2006
206,605,295
149,156,959
0.7219
2007
222,874,144
166,278,435
0.7461
Sub total
624,524,375
458,242,929
Average (2005-2007)
EFgrid,OMsimple,y =
0.7337 tCO 2 /MWh
i,mFCi,m,y*CVi,y*EFCO2,i,y = 142,807,535 + 149,156,959 + 166,278,435

mEGm,y = 195,044,936 + 206,605,295 + 222,874,144
31
= 0.7337 tCO2/MWh
CDM Executive Board
Operating Margin for 2007(continued)
Power plant (m)

Commissioning
Honam
Capacity
(MW)
Fuel (i) Type
1985.03
#1
Coal-thermal
1984.12
500,000 #2
Coal-thermal
Samchonpo
1983.08
#1
Coal-thermal
1984.02
#2
Coal-thermal
1993.04
#3
Coal-thermal
1994.03
#4
Coal-thermal
1997.07
#5
Coal-thermal
1998.01 3,240,000 #6
Coal-thermal
Yongheng
2004.07
#1
Coal-thermal
2004.11 1,600,000 #2
Coal-thermal
1983.12 .
#3
Coal-thermal
Boryeong
1984.09
#1
Coal-thermal
1993.04
#2
Coal-thermal
1993.06
#3
Coal-thermal
1993.12
#4
Coal-thermal
1994.04
#5
Coal-thermal
1995.06 3,000,000 #6
Coal-thermal
Taean
1995.06
#1
Coal-thermal
1995.12
#2
Coal-thermal
1997.03
#3
Coal-thermal
1997.07
#4
Coal-thermal
2001.10
#5
Coal-thermal
2002.05
#6
Coal-thermal
1997.07
#7
Coal-thermal
1997.11 4,000,000 #8
Coal-thermal
Hadong
1998.07
#1
Coal-thermal
1999.03
#2
Coal-thermal
2000.07
#3
Coal-thermal
2001.07
#4
Coal-thermal
2000.07
#5
Coal-thermal
2001.07 3,000,000 #6
Coal-thermal
*, **, ***: 2007Statistics of Electric Power in Korea, KEPCO, 2008.5.
*Net
Generation
(EGm,y)
(MWh)
1,855,554
1,625,399
3,974,202
3,839,080
3,652,769
3,811,371
4,147,957
4,185,213
2,986,382
1,172,450
320,502
3,604,642
4,120,511
4,214,892
3,438,773
4,162,530
3,817,024
4,055,394
3,796,670
4,039,811
3,504,214
3,523,988
4,036,733
3,868,817
2,528,587
4,140,667
3,681,670
3,727,907
4,115,014
3,905,190
4,158,792
**Fuel consumption (FCi,m,y)

Bituminous Heavy oil Diesel Oil
coal (ton)
(kl)
(kl)
866,853
846,931
1,631,706
1,804,695
1,755,374
1,543,140
1,850,764
1,714,320
1,902,557
2,296,289
119,883
1,466,761
1,655,488
1,648,008
1,347,303
1,629,904
1,490,809
1,524,391
1,434,221
1,521,349
1,320,380
1,342,358
1,535,931
1,430,171
919,055
1,582,726
1,396,830
1,424,033
1,572,409
1,486,776
1,585,307
889
811
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
281
262
296
384
434
677
315
619
3,320
1,779
3,964
811
169
187
646
195
387
410
374
350
422
676
491
2,321
3,636
178
637
375
292
452
109
***Calorific value (energy content)

LNG
(ton)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diesel LNG
Bituminou
Heavy oil
Oil (kcal/kg
s coal
coal (kJ/kg) (kJ/l)
(kJ/l)
(kcal/l)
)
(kcal/l)
(kcal/kg)
5,459
9,801 8,944
0
22,856 41,035
37,447
5,463
9,801 8,940
0
22,872 41,035
37,430
5,837
0 8,814
0
24,438
0
36,902
5,828
0 8,814
0
24,401
0
36,902
5,816
0 8,788
0
24,350
0
36,794
5,831
0 8,788
0
24,413
0
36,794
5,122
0 9,000
0
21,445
0
37,681
5,120
0 9,000
0
21,436
0
37,681
6,047
0 8,832
0
25,318
0
36,978
6,041
0 8,902
0
25,292
0
37,271
6,129
0 8,292
0
25,661
0
34,717
5,809
0 8,943
0
24,321
0
37,443
5,805
0 8,943
0
24,304
0
37,443
5,809
0 9,111
0
24,321
0
38,146
5,804
0 9,414
0
24,300
0
39,415
5,811
0 9,111
0
24,329
0
38,146
5,808
0 9,111
0
24,317
0
38,146
6,035
0 8,604
0
25,267
0
36,023
6,035
0 8,828
0
25,267
0
36,961
6,036
0 8,829
0
25,272
0
36,965
6,028
0 8,382
0
25,238
0
35,094
5,985
0 8,801
0
25,058
0
36,848
5,995
0 8,786
0
25,100
0
36,785
6,018
0 8,467
0
25,196
0
35,450
6,023
0 7,638
0
25,217
0
31,979
5,944
0 8,939
0
24,886
0
37,426
5,942
0 8,901
0
24,878
0
37,267
5,923
0 8,914
0
24,798
0
37,321
5,935
0 8,967
0
24,849
0
37,543
5,950
0 8,939
0
24,911
0
37,426
5,937
0 8,942
0
24,857
0
37,438
32
FCi,m,y * CVi,y * EFCO2,i,y
Calorific value (energy content) (CVi,y)
i FCi,m,y *
CVi,y * EFCO2,i,y
LNG Bituminous Heavy oil Diesel Oil
LNG (tCO2)
(tCO2)
(tCO2)
(kJ/kg) coal (tCO2) (tCO2)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,773,225
1,733,742
3,568,920
3,941,201
3,825,598
3,371,736
3,552,187
3,289,024
4,311,048
5,198,052
275,329
3,192,758
3,601,086
3,587,286
2,930,205
3,549,099
3,244,545
3,447,299
3,243,386
3,440,989
2,982,479
3,010,494
3,450,374
3,225,116
2,074,243
3,525,249
3,110,151
3,160,582
3,496,967
3,314,880
3,526,839
2,754
2,513
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
764
712
793
1,029
1,159
1,808
862
1,693
8,913
4,814
9,991
2,205
459
518
1,849
540
1,072
1,072
1,004
939
1,075
1,808
1,311
5,973
8,442
484
1,723
1,016
796
1,228
296
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,776,743
1,736,967
3,569,713
3,942,230
3,826,757
3,373,545
3,553,049
3,290,718
4,319,961
5,202,866
285,320
3,194,962
3,601,546
3,587,803
2,932,053
3,549,639
3,245,617
3,448,371
3,244,389
3,441,929
2,983,554
3,012,302
3,451,685
3,231,090
2,082,684
3,525,733
3,111,874
3,161,598
3,497,763
3,316,108
3,527,136
CDM Executive Board
Power plant (m)

Commissioning
Dangjin
Capacity
(MW)
Fuel (i) Type
1996.06
#1
Coal-thermal
1999.12
#2
Coal-thermal
2000.09
#3
Coal-thermal
2001.03
#4
Coal-thermal
2005.10
#5
Coal-thermal
2006.04
#6
Coal-thermal
2007.06
#7
Coal-thermal
1970.12 4,000,000 #8 Heavy oil-thermal
Ulsan
1971.03
#1 Heavy oil-thermal
1973.07
1979.12
1980.09
1981.01
1972.12 1,800,000 #6 Heavy oil-thermal
Youngnam
1970.12
1975.06
400,000 #2 Heavy oil-thermal
Yosu
1977.07
1980.04
Pyongtaek
1980.06
1983.05
1983.08
1,400,000 #4 Heavy oil-thermal
Namjeju
2006.09
1982.12
2000.03
2000.12
Jeju
.
1971.04
#2
Gas-thermal
1969.04
150,000 #3
Gas-thermal
Seoul
1971.04
137,500 #4
Gas-thermal
1969.04
250,000 #5
Gas-thermal
*, **, ***: 2007Statistics of Electric Power in Korea, KEPCO, 2008.5.
*Net
Generation
(EGm,y)
(MWh)
3,986,103
3,595,927
4,010,715
4,009,178
3,443,482
3,497,359
2,904,680
1,297,925
406,685
407,321
458,584
1,418,034
1,540,400
899,604
688,935
474,475
497,053
1,071,405
1,147,515
1,553,162
1,502,099
1,095,986
0
0
484,459
500,222
3,019
280,454
396,186
357,572
962,861

coal (ton)
(kl)
(kl)
1,512,904
1,358,316
1,516,065
1,519,231
1,279,796
1,281,318
1,059,612
467807
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
107,844
108,381
120,571
341,170
370,712
216,409
174,082
122,249
121,572
257,420
269,284
359,870
349,841
255,443
0
0
124,559
127,900
1,049
70122
98846
0
0

LNG
(ton)
269
0
543
0
119
0
342
0
1,038
0
878
0
6,681
0
4,873
0
406
0
483
0
576
0
3,525
0
4,711
0
3,021
0
1,232
0
796
0
332
0
367
0
114
3,316
140
6,339
157
4,874
117
4047
0
0
0
0
225
0
341
0
4
0
112
0
34
0
1 75,080
1 206,908
Diesel LNG
Bituminou
Heavy oil
Oil (kcal/kg
s coal
coal (kJ/kg) (kJ/l)
(kJ/l)
(kcal/l)
)
(kcal/l)
(kcal/kg)
5,958
0 9,063
0
24,945
0
37,945
5,961
0 9,059
0
24,958
0
37,928
5,955
0 9,070
0
24,932
0
37,974
5,956
0 9,090
0
24,937
0
38,058
6,014
0 9,074
0
25,179
0
37,991
6,039
0 9,066
0
25,284
0
37,958
6,026
0 9,075
0
25,230
0
37,995
6,044
0 9,048
0
25,305
0
37,882
0
9,908 9,120
0
0 41,483
38,184
0
9,916 9,120
0
0 41,516
38,184
0
9,853 9,120
0
0 41,253
38,184
0
10,008 9,120
0
0 41,901
38,184
0
10,011 9,120
0
0 41,914
38,184
0
10,002 9,120
0
0 41,876
38,184
0
10,150 8,844
0
0 42,496
37,028
0
10,150 8,846
0
0 42,496
37,036
0
9,962 8,808
0
0 41,709
36,877
0
9,960 8,811
0
0 41,701
36,890
0
9,942 8,983 12,945
0 41,625
37,610
0
9,946 8,979 12,947
0 41,642
37,593
0
9,944 8,966 12,945
0 41,634
37,539
0
9,958 8,965 12,946
0 41,692
37,535
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,907 8,632
0
0 41,479
36,140
0
9,905 8,963
0
0 41,470
37,526
0
9,908 8,903
0
0 41,483
37,275
0
9,916 8,323
0
0 41,516
34,847
0
9,914 8,937
0
0 41,508
37,417
0
0 7,801 13,030
0
0
32,661
0
0 9,070 13,030
0
0
37,974
33
i FCi,m,y *
CVi,y * EFCO2,i,y
LNG (tCO2)
(tCO2)
(tCO2)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
54,198
54,206
54,198
54,202
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
54,554
54,554
3,377,669
3,034,067
3,383,022
3,390,656
2,884,094
2,899,527
2,392,661
1,059,489
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
337,762
339,718
375,526
1,079,313
1,173,122
684,213
558,533
392,230
382,833
810,459
846,279
1,131,418
1,099,666
804,073
0
0
390,073
400,455
3,285
219,796
309,768
0
0
741
1,495
328
945
2,863
2,420
18,429
13,402
1,125
1,339
1,597
9,772
13,060
8,375
3,312
2,140
889
983
311
382
428
319
0
0
590
929
11
283
92
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,759
18,658
14,344
11,911
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
222,408
612,920
3,378,410
3,035,562
3,383,350
3,391,601
2,886,957
2,901,947
2,411,091
1,072,891
338,888
341,057
377,123
1,089,084
1,186,182
692,588
561,845
394,370
383,722
811,441
856,349
1,150,459
1,114,438
816,303
0
0
390,664
401,384
3,296
220,079
309,861
222,411
612,923
CDM Executive Board
Operating Margin for 2007
Power plant (m)
Commissioning
Incheon
Namjeju D/P
Jeju G/T
Jeju D/P
Pyongtaek C/C
Ilsan C/C
Bundang C/C
Ulsan C/C
Seoincheon C/C
Shinincheon C/C
Boryeong C/C
IncheonvC/C
Busan C/C
Hallim C/C
GS Anyang C/C
GS Bucheon C/C
POSCO Power
GS EPS Bugog
Yulchon C/C
1970.05
1974.12
1978.06
1978.12
1992.02
1977.12
2005.07
1994.06
1996.03
1997.03
1997.08
1992.11
1997.07
2002.08
2005.06
2004.03
1997.07
1993.09
1993.11
2002.01
2001.04
2005.07
Capacity
(MW)
Fuel (i) Type
*Net
Generation
(EGm,y)
(MWh)
148,821
#1
Gas-thermal
500,000 #2
Gas-thermal
157,042
#3
Gas-thermal
205,530
95,143
650,000 #4
Gas-thermal
40,000
Internal combustion
164,390
Internal combustion
1,294
165,000
Internal combustion
235,626
40,000
480,000
Combined cycle
909,449
900,000
Combined cycle
3,506,350
900,000
Combined cycle
3,741,296
1,200,000
Combined cycle
4,383,453
1,800,000
Combined cycle
10,895,505
1,800,000
Combined cycle
12,533,994
1,800,000
Combined cycle
7,839,371
503,539
Combined cycle
3,696,784
1,800,000
Combined cycle
11,616,221
105,000
Combined cycle
61,752
450,000
Combined cycle
1,615,090
450,000
Combined cycle
1,523,068
1,800,000
Combined cycle
3,788,598
500,750
Combined cycle
2,767,811
525,500
Combined cycle
2,083,451
mEGm,y= 222,874,144

coal (ton)
(kl)
(kl)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
35,297
0
49,613
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
354
201
238
850
0
67
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
17,753
0
0
0
0
0

LNG
(ton)
30,402
31,528
41,270
18,892
0
0
0
151,414
635,260
660,899
649,494
1,495,687
1,761,001
1,121,251
494,690
1,552,997
0
289,384
269,651
660,445
371,586
292,336
Bituminou
Diesel LNG
Heavy oil
s coal
Oil (kcal/kg
(kcal/l)
coal (kJ/kg) (kJ/l)
(kJ/l)
(kcal/kg)
(kcal/l)
)
0
0
0 13,030
0
0
0
0
0
0 13,033
0
0
0
0
0 8,962 13,034
0
0
37,522
0
0 8,929 13,034
0
0
37,384
0
9,915 8,761
0
0 41,512
36,681
0
0 8,892
0
0
0
37,229
0
9,890
0
0
0 41,407
0
0
0 8,950 13,044
0
0
37,472
0
0
0 13,028
0
0
0
0
0 9,175 13,031
0
0
38,414
0
0
0 12,900
0
0
0
0
0
0 13,043
0
0
0
0
0
0 13,039
0
0
0
0
0
0 13,039
0
0
0
0
0
0 13,029
0
0
0
0
0
0 13,030
0
0
0
0
0 8,982
0
0
0
37,606
0
0
0 13,046
0
0
0
0
0
0 13,220
0
0
0
0
0
0 13,063
0
0
0
0
0
0 13,038
0
0
0
0
0
0 13,036
0
0
0
i FCi,m,y *
CVi,y * EFCO2,i,y
(tCO2)
LNG (tCO2)
(tCO2)
54,554
54,567
54,571
54,571
0
0
0
54,613
54,546
54,558
54,010
54,608
54,592
54,592
54,550
54,554
0
54,621
55,349
54,692
54,587
54,579
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
90,059
90,059
0
0
93,416
93,416
0
964
122,291
123,255
0
546
55,981
56,526
110,627
634
0
111,260
0
2,297
0
2,297
155,103
0
0
155,103
0
182
449,013
449,195
0
0 1,881,531
1,881,531
0
8 1,957,920
1,957,928
0
0 1,904,789
1,904,789
0
0 4,435,068
4,435,068
0
0 5,220,185
5,220,185
0
0 3,323,756
3,323,756
0
0 1,465,299
1,465,299
0
0 4,600,416
4,600,416
0
48,469
0
48,469
0
0
858,290
858,290
0
0
810,430
810,430
0
0 1,961,379
1,961,379
0
0 1,101,418
1,101,418
0
0
866,381
866,381
i,m FCi,m,yCVi,yEFCO2,i,y= 166,278,435
*, **, ***: 2007 Statistics of Electric Power in Korea, KEPCO, 2008.5.
EFgrid,OMsimple,y=i,mFCi,m,y*CVi,y*EFCO2,i,y / mEGm,y=
34
0.7461
CDM Executive Board
Plant (m)
Honam
Fuel (i) Type
*Net
Generation
(EGm,y)
(MWh)

coal (ton)
(kl)
(kl)
#1
Coal-thermal
1,622,639
781,139
1,113
#2
Coal-thermal
1,782,016
859,736
1,251
Samchonpo #1
Coal-thermal
4,161,219 1,696,271
0
#2
Coal-thermal
3,703,880 1,508,082
0
#3
Coal-thermal
3,779,585 1,519,385
0
#4
Coal-thermal
3,816,997 1,521,263
0
#5
Coal-thermal
3,761,205 1,665,339
0
4,065,091 1,770,348
0
#6
Coal-thermal
Yongheng #1
Coal-thermal
5,337,432 2,004,193
0
#2
Coal-thermal
5,727,937 2,129,118
0
Boryeong
#1
Coal-thermal
3,988,848 1,638,140
0
#2
Coal-thermal
3,423,101 1,389,425
0
#3
Coal-thermal
3,409,486 1,323,779
0
#4
Coal-thermal
4,133,946 1,610,928
0
3,364,148 1,296,455
0
#5
Coal-thermal
#6
Coal-thermal
3,987,488 1,553,273
0
Taean
#1
Coal-thermal
3,556,797 1,354,832
0
#2
Coal-thermal
4,035,753 1,532,209
0
#3
Coal-thermal
3,528,613 1,338,967
0
#4
Coal-thermal
4,069,820 1,548,909
0
#5
Coal-thermal
4,013,235 1,542,775
0
3,381,867 1,294,577
0
#6
Coal-thermal
#7
Coal-thermal
159,677
61,910
0
Hadong
#1
Coal-thermal
3,607,063 1,373,049
0
#2
Coal-thermal
4,068,036 1,543,074
0
#3
Coal-thermal
4,079,158 1,549,094
0
#4
Coal-thermal
3,631,374 1,376,612
0
#5
Coal-thermal
4,092,625 1,554,524
0
3,610,222 1,371,801
0
#6
Coal-thermal
279
359
860
1,362
457
1,818
977
428
2,548
2,545
306
1,137
514
82
541
518
514
162
575
133
544
1,113
4,799
515
293
153
796
242
690
Bituminou
Bitumino
Heavy
Diesel
Heavy oil Diesel Oil LNG
s coal
us coal
oil (kJ/l) Oil (kJ/l)
(kcal/l) (kcal/l) (kcal/kg)
(kJ/kg)
(kcal/kg)
LNG
(ton)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,436
5,407
5,937
5,942
5,858
5,861
5,236
5,255
6,072
6,086
5,768
5,766
5,845
5,824
5,845
5,834
5,982
5,978
5,983
5,979
5,934
5,960
5,965
5,969
5,959
5,958
5,969
5,963
5,967
9,809
9,823
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
35
8,917
8,870
8,814
8,814
8,814
8,803
9,000
9,000
8,891
8,899
8,855
8,943
8,943
8,943
8,749
8,749
8,749
8,371
8,649
8,665
8,665
8,665
8,558
8,838
8,928
8,928
8,825
8,911
8,901
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22,759
22,638
24,857
24,878
24,526
24,539
21,922
22,002
25,422
25,481
24,149
24,141
24,472
24,384
24,472
24,426
25,045
25,029
25,050
25,033
24,844
24,953
24,974
24,991
24,949
24,945
24,991
24,966
24,983
41,068
41,127
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
37,334
37,137
36,902
36,902
36,902
36,856
37,681
37,681
37,225
37,258
37,074
37,443
37,443
37,443
36,630
36,630
36,630
35,048
36,212
36,279
36,279
36,279
35,831
37,003
37,380
37,380
36,949
37,309
37,267
LNG
(kJ/kg)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
i FCi,m,y *
CVi,y *
EFCO2,i,y
(tCO2)

(tCO2)
coal (tCO2) (tCO2)
1,591,157
1,741,914
3,773,701
3,357,862
3,335,204
3,341,037
3,267,439
3,486,074
4,560,123
4,855,533
3,540,638
3,002,030
2,899,381
3,515,627
2,839,535
3,395,623
3,036,946
3,432,252
3,001,886
3,470,242
3,430,484
2,891,208
138,381
3,071,092
3,445,604
3,458,466
3,079,062
3,473,502
3,067,273
3,451
3,884
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
756
968
2,304
3,649
1,224
4,865
2,673
1,171
6,886
6,884
824
3,091
1,397
223
1,439
1,378
1,367
412
1,512
350
1,433
2,931
12,484
1,384
795
415
2,135
655
1,867
LNG
(tCO2)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,595,364
1,746,766
3,776,005
3,361,511
3,336,429
3,345,901
3,270,112
3,487,245
4,567,009
4,862,417
3,541,462
3,005,121
2,900,778
3,515,850
2,840,974
3,397,001
3,038,313
3,432,664
3,003,397
3,470,592
3,431,917
2,894,140
150,865
3,072,476
3,446,399
3,458,881
3,081,197
3,474,157
3,069,140
CDM Executive Board
Plant (m)
Dangjin
Fuel (i) Type
*Net
Generation
(EGm,y)
(MWh)

coal (ton)
(kl)
(kl)
#1
Coal-thermal
3,598,820 1,380,527
0
#2
Coal-thermal
4,115,891 1,570,077
0
3,666,490 1,402,916
0
#3
Coal-thermal
3,610,984 1,386,317
0
#4
Coal-thermal
#5
Coal-thermal
3,946,931 1,456,458
0
3,392,395 1,216,582
0
#6
Coal-thermal
1,474
1008
0
#7
Coal-thermal
Ulsan
275,016
0 72,243
306,668
0 80,187
376,132
0 96,459
1,511,557
0 360,919
1,583,846
0 375,985
1,589,838
0 378,331
359,205
0 107,090
Youngnam #1 Heavy oil-thermal
323,595
0 95,127
403,547
0 99,129
Yosu
906,849
0 215,957
1,123,948
0 261,458
Pyongtaek #1 Heavy oil-thermal
1,198,620
0 277,025
1,304,568
0 303,858
1,052,228
0 245,602
Namjeju
34,448
0 11,406
28,686
0
9,772
179,033
0 46,504
24,748
0
8,603
Jeju
462,023
0 113679
479,676
0 117464
306,558
0
0
Seoul
#4
Gas-thermal
#5
Gas-thermal
685,011
0
0

LNG
(ton)
966
0
161
0
433
0
1,549
0
745
0
3,051
0
505
0
605
0
469
0
518
0
3,729
0
3,678
0
3,694
0
1,016
0
1,494
0
281
0
291
0
141
3,997
166
5,687
134
3,891
103
3473
17
0
14
0
2,509
0
23
0
64
0
67
0
1 69,383
1 152,891
Bitumino
Bituminou
Heavy
Diesel
us coal
s coal
(kcal/kg)
(kJ/kg)
5,882
5,906
5,886
5,875
6,046
6,120
5,818
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,915
9,923
9,919
10,030
10,033
10,035
10,138
10,110
9,963
9,954
9,707
9,719
9,747
9,693
9,908
9,908
9,898
9,870
9,952
9,953
36
8,975
8,978
9,007
9,015
8,955
8,895
8,984
9,120
9,120
9,120
9,120
9,120
9,120
8,845
8,862
8,798
8,796
8,943
8,943
8,949
8,949
8,974
8,952
8,938
8,873
8,973
8,973
9,070
9,070
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12,941
12,941
12,859
12,963
0
0
0
0
0
0
13,018
12,882
24,627
24,727
24,644
24,597
25,313
25,623
24,359
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
41,512
41,546
41,529
41,994
42,006
42,015
42,446
42,329
41,713
41,675
40,641
40,692
40,809
40,583
41,483
41,483
41,441
41,324
41,667
41,671
0
0
37,577
37,589
37,711
37,744
37,493
37,242
37,614
38,184
38,184
38,184
38,184
38,184
38,184
37,032
37,103
36,835
36,827
37,443
37,443
37,468
37,468
37,572
37,480
37,422
37,149
37,568
37,568
37,974
37,974
LNG
(kJ/kg)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
54,181
54,181
53,838
54,273
0
0
0
0
0
0
54,504
53,934

(tCO2)
coal (tCO2) (tCO2)
3,042,812
0
3,474,719
0
3,094,263
0
3,051,938
0
3,299,676
0
2,789,961
0
2,198
0
0
226,421
0
251,522
0
302,440
0 1,144,300
0 1,192,423
0 1,200,103
0
343,187
0
304,007
0
312,191
0
679,507
0
802,262
0
851,079
0
936,205
0
752,522
0
35,723
0
30,605
0
145,501
0
26,841
0
357,618
0
369,563
0
0
0
0
2,635
439
1,185
4,245
2,028
8,249
1,379
1,677
1,300
1,436
10,337
10,196
10,240
2,732
4,024
751
778
383
451
365
280
46
38
6,816
62
175
183
3
3
LNG
(tCO2)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11,759
16,731
11,375
10,235
0
0
0
0
0
0
205,343
447,762
i FCi,m,y *
CVi,y *
EFCO2,i,y
(tCO2)
3,045,448
3,475,158
3,095,448
3,056,182
3,301,704
2,798,210
3,577
228,099
252,822
303,876
1,154,637
1,202,619
1,210,343
345,918
308,032
312,942
680,285
814,404
868,261
947,944
763,037
35,769
30,644
152,318
26,903
357,793
369,745
205,346
447,765
CDM Executive Board
Plant (m)
Fuel (i) Type
*Net
Generation
(EGm,y)
(MWh)
32,932
Gas-thermal
24,366
Gas-thermal
Gas-thermal
78,669
Internal combustion
62,414
Namjeju D/P
Internal combustion
239,690
Jeju G/T
Internal combustion
15,986
Jeju D/P
Pyongtaek C/C
Combined cycle
252,764
Ilsan C/C
Combined cycle
497,441
Bundang C/C
Combined cycle
3,038,165
Ulsan C/C
Combined cycle
4,059,300
Seoincheon C/C Combined cycle
3,608,435
Shinincheon C/C Combined cycle
8,726,521
Boryeong C/C
Combined cycle
11,797,500
Incheon C/C
Combined cycle
7,089,662
Busan C/C
Combined cycle
3,648,288
Hallim C/C
Combined cycle
10,455,401
GS Anyang C/C Combined cycle
175,356
GS Bucheon C/C Combined cycle
1,286,480
POSCO Power
Combined cycle
1,241,795
GS EPS Bugog
Combined cycle
2,338,128
2,911,683
Yulchon C/C
Combined cycle
2,276,276
mEGm,y= 206,605,295
Incheon
#1
#2
#4

coal (ton)
(kl)
(kl)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
51347
0
52907
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

LNG
(ton)
0
6,945
0
5,223
311 15,426
311
12454
111
0
8264
0
0
0
45
84,054
1384 556,504
0 720,381
0 536,196
1066 1,199,196
0 1,641,038
0 998,683
0 484,606
0 1396417
48475
0
0 230,969
215 225,713
0 408,018
0 389,811
0 315,132
Bitumino
Bituminou
Heavy
Diesel
us coal
s coal
(kcal/kg)
(kJ/kg)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10,246
0
9,617
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8,982
8,981
8,907
8,792
0
8,950
8,989
0
0
9,200
0
0
0
0
8,954
0
10,927
0
0
0
13,036
13,028
13,018
13,024
0
0
0
13,030
13,017
13,025
12,646
13,025
13,025
13,034
12,998
13,017
0
13,028
13,013
13,031
13,030
13,376
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
42,898
0
40,264
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
37,606
37,602
37,292
36,810
0
37,472
37,635
0
0
38,519
0
0
0
0
37,489
0
45,749
0
0
0
LNG
(kJ/kg)
54,579
54,546
54,504
54,529
0
0
0
54,554
54,500
54,533
52,946
54,533
54,533
54,571
54,420
54,500
0
54,546
54,483
54,558
54,554
56,003

(tCO2)
coal (tCO2) (tCO2)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LNG
(tCO2)
i FCi,m,y *
CVi,y *
EFCO2,i,y
(tCO2)
0
0
20,583
20,583
0
0
15,470
15,470
0
849
45,654
46,503
0
849
36,875
37,724
166,302
301
0
166,603
0
22,085
0
22,085
160,836
0
0
160,836
0
122
248,992
249,114
0
3,782 1,646,877
1,650,659
0
0 2,133,153
2,133,153
0
0 1,541,554
1,541,554
0
2,981 3,550,994
3,553,975
0
0 4,859,353
4,859,353
0
0 2,959,289
2,959,289
0
0 1,432,014
1,432,014
0
0 4,132,454
4,132,454
0 131,933
0
131,933
0
0
684,090
684,090
0
714
667,753
668,467
0
0 1,208,757
1,208,757
0
0 1,154,730
1,154,730
0
0
958,299
958,299
i,m FCi,m,y * CVi,y * EFCO2,i,y = 149,156,959
37
0.7219
CDM Executive Board
Plant (m)
Honam
Fuel (i) Type
*Net
Generation
(EGm,y)
(MWh)

Bituminous
coal (ton)
Heavy
oil
(kl)
#1
Coal-thermal
1,787,715
870,214
961
1,875,790
912,497
338
#2
Coal-thermal
Samchonpo #1
Coal-thermal
3,810,079 1,534,223
0
4,323,618 1,731,265
0
#2
Coal-thermal
#3
Coal-thermal
4,343,666 1,723,152
0
#4
Coal-thermal
4,112,297 1,632,334
0
3,542,728 1,516,654
0
#5
Coal-thermal
3,643,969 1,546,663
0
#6
Coal-thermal
Yongheng #1
Coal-thermal
5,623,299 2,081,972
0
4,658,862 1,761,395
0
#2
Coal-thermal
Boryeong
#1
Coal-thermal
3,547,140 1,440,343
0
3,433,608 1,388,532
0
#2
Coal-thermal
#3
Coal-thermal
4,124,745 1,589,150
0
3,698,705 1,421,343
0
#4
Coal-thermal
#5
Coal-thermal
4,121,314 1,587,999
0
#6
Coal-thermal
3,283,477 1,260,305
0
3,992,112 1,508,570
0
Taean
#1
Coal-thermal
#2
Coal-thermal
3,484,251 1,323,078
0
#3
Coal-thermal
3,957,054 1,494,175
0
3,653,534 1,383,297
0
#4
Coal-thermal
#5
Coal-thermal
3,744,413 1,411,398
0
#6
Coal-thermal
3,999,847 1,504,962
0
3,997,914 1,513,930
0
Hadong
#1
Coal-thermal
#2
Coal-thermal
3,732,583 1,410,099
0
3,769,077 1,422,196
0
#3
Coal-thermal
#4
Coal-thermal
3,989,315 1,511,054
0
3,553,901 1,345,648
0
#5
Coal-thermal
#6
Coal-thermal
4,037,763 1,520,774
0
Diesel
Oil
(kl)
278
185
1,220
626
377
1,029
1,415
1,001
4,541
2,903
761
551
90
603
156
627
621
395
650
365
742
417
284
792
472
567
614
331
Bituminou
Bituminou
Heavy Diesel Oil LNG Bituminous Heavy oil
s coal
s coal
(tCO2)
(kcal/l)
(kcal/l) (kcal/kg)
oil (kJ/l)
(kJ/l)
(kJ/kg) coal (tCO2)
(kcal/kg)
(kJ/kg)
LNG
(ton)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,392
5,376
5,913
5,924
5,897
5,898
5,347
5,376
6,131
6,053
5,830
5,816
5,882
5,890
5,882
5,901
6,000
6,009
6,007
5,999
6,032
6,017
6,003
5,997
5,998
5,999
5,995
5,995
9,835
9,854
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8,809
8,804
8,841
8,883
9,000
8,943
8,614
9,000
8,935
8,947
8,943
8,943
8,740
8,748
8,749
8,749
8,692
8,684
8,676
8,705
8,676
8,691
8,940
8,928
8,982
8,938
8,975
8,928
38
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22,575
22,508
24,757
24,803
24,690
24,694
22,387
22,508
25,669
25,343
24,409
24,350
24,627
24,660
24,627
24,706
25,121
25,158
25,150
25,117
25,255
25,192
25,133
25,108
25,112
25,117
25,100
25,100
41,177
41,257
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
36,882
36,861
37,015
37,191
37,681
37,443
36,065
37,681
37,409
37,459
37,443
37,443
36,593
36,626
36,630
36,630
36,392
36,358
36,325
36,446
36,325
36,387
37,430
37,380
37,606
37,422
37,577
37,380
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,758,252
1,838,214
3,399,395
3,843,119
3,807,676
3,607,606
3,038,799
3,115,733
4,783,122
3,995,146
3,146,587
3,026,116
3,502,637
3,137,036
3,500,100
2,786,805
3,391,735
2,979,154
3,363,290
3,109,564
3,190,187
3,393,210
3,405,488
3,168,757
3,196,474
3,396,754
3,022,915
3,416,325
2,988
1,053
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diesel
Oil
(tCO2)
744
495
3,279
1,690
1,031
2,797
3,705
2,738
12,333
7,895
2,069
1,498
239
1,603
415
1,667
1,641
1,043
1,714
966
1,957
1,102
772
2,149
1,289
1,540
1,675
898
i FCi,m,y *
CVi,y * EFCO2,i,y
(tCO2)
LNG
(tCO2)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,761,984
1,839,761
3,402,673
3,844,809
3,808,707
3,610,403
3,042,504
3,118,471
4,795,455
4,003,041
3,148,656
3,027,614
3,502,876
3,138,639
3,500,515
2,788,472
3,393,376
2,980,196
3,365,004
3,110,530
3,192,143
3,394,312
3,406,260
3,170,906
3,197,763
3,398,294
3,024,590
3,417,223
CDM Executive Board
Plant (m)
Dangjin
Fuel (i) Type
*Net
Generation
(EGm,y)
(MWh)

Bituminous
coal (ton)
Heavy
oil
(kl)
#1
Coal-thermal
3,797,307 1,438,702
0
3,798,078 1,437,473
0
#2
Coal-thermal
#3
Coal-thermal
4,081,017 1,549,041
0
#4
Coal-thermal
4,079,557 1,544,010
0
1,318,670
499714
0
#5
Coal-thermal
#6
Coal-thermal
96,365
38671
0
262,393
0 70,183
Ulsan
255,812
0 67,296
200,518
0 53,085
1,549,091
0 375,417
1,500,935
0 363,992
1,454,644
0 352,776
Youngnam #1 Heavy oil-thermal
1,022,470
0 359,910
531,006
0 190,085
430,310
0 106,919
Yosu
904,597
0 218,356
1,258,662
0 293,214
Pyongtaek #1 Heavy oil-thermal
1,376,342
0 321,188
1,321,167
0 308,042
1,338,204
0 311,245
Namjeju
44,602
0 14,628
44,654
0 15,031
Jeju
36,266
0 12,564
532,700
0 129,516
502,189
0 122,866
Seoul
#4
Gas-thermal
207,498
0
0
#5
Gas-thermal
444,324
0
0
Diesel
Oil
(kl)
637
632
141
134
5,701
1,779
750
585
662
1,971
1,676
1,708
844
584
434
346
118
140
132
138
15
12
12
0
48
0
1
LNG
(ton)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,553
2,641
1784
2047
0
0
0
0
0
49143
108761
Bituminou
Bituminou
s coal
s coal
(tCO2)
(kcal/l)
(kcal/l) (kcal/kg)
oil (kJ/l)
(kJ/l)
(kJ/kg) coal (tCO2)
(kcal/kg)
(kJ/kg)
5,962
5,962
5,935
5,941
6,115
6,221
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,900
9,903
9,908
10,001
9,993
9,979
7,482
7,729
9,960
9,944
9,903
9,905
9,907
9,909
9,878
9,879
9,932
9,929
9,925
0
0
39
8,834
8,915
8,844
8,828
8,904
11,095
9,116
9,113
9,119
9,122
9,122
9,118
8,942
8,943
8,887
8,886
8,943
8,961
8,949
8,949
9,318
9,307
8,885
0
8,938
0
9,070
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12,898
12,872
12,942
12,893
0
0
0
0
0
13,002
13,008
24,962
24,962
24,849
24,874
25,602
26,046
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
41,449
41,462
41,483
41,872
41,839
41,780
31,326
32,360
41,701
41,634
41,462
41,470
41,479
41,487
41,357
41,361
41,583
41,571
41,554
0
0
36,986
37,325
37,028
36,961
37,279
46,453
38,167
38,154
38,179
38,192
38,192
38,175
37,438
37,443
37,208
37,204
37,443
37,518
37,468
37,468
39,013
38,967
37,200
0
37,422
0
37,974
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
54,001
53,892
54,186
53,980
0
0
0
0
0
54,437
54,462
3,214,164
3,211,419
3,444,997
3,437,280
1,145,047
90,147
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
219,632
210,662
166,260
1,186,825
1,149,786
1,112,795
851,218
464,409
336,623
686,365
917,869
1,005,641
964,676
974,903
45,675
46,939
39,445
406,498
385,471
0
0
Diesel
Oil
(tCO2)
LNG
(tCO2)
1,710
1,713
379
360
15,430
6,000
2,078
1,620
1,835
5,465
4,647
4,734
2,294
1,588
1,172
935
321
381
359
375
42
34
32
0
130
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10,418
7,729
5,249
6,000
0
0
0
0
0
145,263
321,637
i FCi,m,y *
CVi,y * EFCO2,i,y
(tCO2)
3,215,875
3,213,131
3,445,376
3,437,640
1,160,476
96,147
221,711
212,282
168,095
1,192,290
1,154,433
1,117,529
853,512
465,996
337,795
687,300
928,608
1,013,751
970,284
981,278
45,718
46,973
39,478
406,498
385,601
145,263
321,640
CDM Executive Board
Plant (m)
Incheon
Fuel (i) Type
#1
Gas-thermal
#2
Gas-thermal
#3
Gas-thermal
#4
Gas-thermal
Namjeju D/P
Internal combustion
Jeju G/T
Internal combustion
Jeju D/P
Internal combustion
Pyongtaek C/C
Combined cycle
Ilsan C/C
Combined cycle
Bundang C/C
Combined cycle
Ulsan C/C
Combined cycle
Seoincheon C/C
Combined cycle
Shinincheon C/C Combined cycle
Boryeong C/C
Combined cycle
Incheon C/C
Combined cycle
Busan C/C
Combined cycle
Hallim C/C
Combined cycle
GS Anyang C/C
Combined cycle
GS Bucheon C/C Combined cycle
POSCO Power
Combined cycle
GS EPS Bugog
Combined cycle
Yulchon C/C
Combined cycle
*Net
Generation
(EGm,y)
(MWh)
16,450
37,727
-130
29,202
268,073
5,069
151,759
659,932
2,873,958
3,742,073
3,131,075
7,001,031
10,543,280
8,221,926
2,055,016
9,076,327
100,346
1,433,978
1,404,160
2,571,095
2,189,808
1,300,627

Bituminous
coal (ton)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Heavy
oil
(kl)
Diesel
Oil
(kl)
LNG
(ton)
0
0
4,365
0
0
8,505
0
372
746
0
400
6,620
56727
37
0
0 2,869
0
31808
72
0
0
1 110,953
0
0 533,188
0
0 671,994
0
0 470,131
0
335 989,645
0
0 1,458,815
0
0 1,161,510
0
0 281,813
0
0 1,211,117
0 29,686
0
0
0 261,202
0
0 261,705
0
0 445,253
0
0 297,976
0
159 194,534
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,877
0
9,932
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8,964
8,954
8,975
8,919
8,954
8,950
0
0
0
9,200
0
0
0
0
8,973
0
0
0
0
10,930
mEGm,y= 195,044,936
13,032
13,025
13,030
13,026
0
0
0
13,030
13,011
13,025
12,750
13,009
13,013
13,030
13,012
13,000
0
13,025
13,003
13,024
13,756
13,023
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
i FCi,m,y *
CVi,y * EFCO2,i,y
(tCO2)
Diesel
Oil
(tCO2)
LNG
(tCO2)
0
0
1,014
1,089
101
7,778
196
3
0
0
0
937
0
0
0
0
80,967
0
0
0
0
528
12,932
25,185
2,210
19,604
0
0
0
328,674
1,577,150
1,989,872
1,362,734
2,926,883
4,315,784
3,440,721
833,656
3,579,410
0
773,457
773,638
1,318,358
931,870
575,955
12,932
25,185
3,223
20,693
177,211
7,778
100,058
328,677
1,577,150
1,989,872
1,362,734
2,927,820
4,315,784
3,440,721
833,656
3,579,410
80,967
773,457
773,638
1,318,358
931,870
576,483
i,m FCi,m,y * CVi,y * EFCO2,i,y =
142,807,535
0.7322
Bituminou
Bituminou
s coal
s coal
(tCO2)
oil (kJ/l)
(kJ/l)
(kJ/kg) coal (tCO2)
(kcal/l)
(kcal/l) (kcal/kg)
(kJ/kg)
(kcal/kg)
0
0
0
0
41,353
0
41,583
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
37,530
37,489
37,577
37,342
37,489
37,472
0
0
0
38,519
0
0
0
0
37,568
0
0
0
0
45,762
54,562
54,533
54,554
54,537
0
0
0
54,554
54,474
54,533
53,382
54,466
54,483
54,554
54,479
54,428
0
54,533
54,441
54,529
57,594
54,525
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
177,110
0
99,862
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
40
CDM Executive Board

Plant/unit information
Power plant (m)
Commissioning
Honam
Samchonpo
Capacity
(MW)
Boryeong
Taean
Hadong
Commissioning
Capacity
(MW)
Plant
factor(%)
Commissioning
Plant
factor(%)
Fuel (i) Type
#1
80.09
Coal-thermal
1996.06
#1
86.02
Coal-thermal
#2
87.87
83.98
Coal-thermal
1999.12
2000.09
#2
#3
98.21
87.44
Coal-thermal
Coal-thermal
1983.08
#1
90.53
Coal-thermal
2001.03
#4
86.23
Coal-thermal
1970.05
#1
1.57
Gas-thermal
1984.02
1993.04
#2
#3
80.43
81.46
Coal-thermal
Coal-thermal
2005.10
2006.04
#5
#6
94.74
92.40
Coal-thermal
Coal-thermal
1974.12
1978.06
#2
#3
1.15
2.92
Gas-thermal
Gas-thermal
1994.03
1997.07
#4
#5
81.84
89.36
Coal-thermal
Coal-thermal
2007.06
2007.12
#7
#8
.
.
Coal-thermal
Coal-thermal
1978.12
Total
#4
2.33
2.07
Gas-thermal
1,150
#6
96.67
Coal-thermal
#1
#2
16.90
18.66
Total
2004.07
3,240
Total
3,000
88.84
#4
27.32
Gas-thermal
250
387.5
#5
32.89
30.91
Gas-thermal
Namjeju D/P
1992.02
40
71.72
Internal combustion
Jeju G/T
Jeju D/P
1977.12
2005.07
165
40
3.42
76.68
Internal combustion
Internal combustion
#1
#2
85.75
Coal-thermal
1973.07
#3
23.04
Heavy oil-thermal
Pyongtaek C/C
1994.06
480
12.00
Combined cycle
1983.12
Total
#3
.
83.10
Coal-thermal
1979.12
1980.09
#4
#5
46.01
48.15
Heavy oil-thermal
Heavy oil-thermal
Ilsan C/C
Bundang C/C
1996.03
1997.03
900
900
39.11
52.17
Combined cycle
Combined cycle
#1
#2
96.93
81.69
Coal-thermal
Coal-thermal
1981.01
Total
#6
48.36
38.18
Heavy oil-thermal
Ulsan C/C
Seoincheon C/C
1997.08
1992.11
1,200
1,800
34.82
55.99
Combined cycle
Combined cycle
1972.12
#1
21.96
Heavy oil-thermal
Shinincheon C/C
1997.07
1,800
77.23
Combined cycle
1970.12
Total
#2
19.81
20.88
Heavy oil-thermal
Heavy oil-thermal
Boryeong C/C
Incheon C/C
2002.08
2005.06
1,800
503.5
45.80
84.47
Combined cycle
Combined cycle
#1
#2
24.10
33.40
Heavy oil-thermal
Heavy oil-thermal
Busan C/C
Hallim C/C
2004.03
1997.07
1,800
105
67.73
19.41
Combined cycle
Combined cycle
1983.12
1984.09
1993.04
#3
81.45
Coal-thermal
1993.06
1993.12
#4
#5
98.63
80.25
Coal-thermal
Coal-thermal
1994.04
Total
#6
95.27
89.04
Coal-thermal
3,000
Youngnam
1,800
400
Yosu
1975.06
1977.07
GS Anyang C/C
1993.09
450
33.22
Combined cycle
Pyongtaek
1980.04
1980.06
#1
#2
38.19
40.53
Heavy oil-thermal
Heavy oil-thermal
GS Bucheon C/C
POSCO Power
1993.11
2002.01
450
1,800
32.21
15.18
Combined cycle
Combined cycle
1995.06
#1
85.21
Coal-thermal
1995.12
1997.03
#2
#3
96.29
84.18
Coal-thermal
Coal-thermal
1997.07
#4
97.33
Coal-thermal
1983.05
#3
44.16
Heavy oil-thermal
GS EPS Bugog
2001.04
500.7
67.38
Combined cycle
2001.10
#5
96.44
Coal-thermal
1983.08
#4
35.84
Heavy oil-thermal
Yulchon C/C
2005.07
525.5
50.70
Combined cycle
2002.05
2007.02
#6
#7
81.30
.
Coal-thermal
Coal-thermal
Total
1991.11
1,400
10
#1
39.68
46.23
Heavy oil-thermal
2007.08
Total
#8
.
90.12
Coal-thermal
1992.2
2006.09
10
100
#2
#3
39.04
28.96
Heavy oil-thermal
Heavy oil-thermal
1997.07
#1
86.41
Coal-thermal
2007.03
100
#4
1997.11
1998.07
#2
#3
96.95
97.30
Coal-thermal
Coal-thermal
Total
1982.12
100
10
1999.03
2000.07
#4
#5
86.64
97.78
Coal-thermal
Coal-thermal
75
75
86.33
Coal-thermal
3,000
2001.07
Total
#6
3,000
Total
200
328.6
Heavy oil-thermal
Heavy oil-thermal
137.5
2004.11
Coal-thermal
1970.12
1971.03
Incheon
1971.04
1969.04
Total
86.48
80.45
1,600
Ulsan
Seoul
Capacity
(MW)
1985.03
500
Dangjin
Power plant (m)

Fuel (i) Type
1984.12
Total
1998.01
Yongheng
Plant
factor(%)
Power plant (m)
Fuel (i)
Type
Namjeju
Jeju
2000.03
2000.12
Total
528.6
29.88
Heavy oil-thermal
#1
33.80
30.80
Heavy oil-thermal
#2
#3
75.30
78.03
Heavy oil-thermal
Heavy oil-thermal
1,690
73.80
91.90
41
CDM Executive Board
Build Margin (BM) calculation

For the calculation of the Build Margin emission factor ( EFBM , y ), the sample group m is selected
according to Option 1.
2007 Net Generation (MWh)
Grid total
386,510,193
34
76,081,608
Sample group m - five plants

Sample group m - 20% plants
Percentage
100.00%
0.00%
19.68%
Remark
Selected
Carbon Emission Factor

CO2 Emission Factor of fossil fuel type i (unit: tCO2/GJ) (EFCO2,i,y)
Bituminous coal
Heavy Oil
Diesel Oil
LNG
*Source:: IPCC 2006
0.089500
0.075500
0.072600
0.054300
IPCC default values at the lower limit of the uncertainty at a 95% confidence interval as provided in table
1.4 of Chapter 1 of Vol. 2 of 2006 IPCC Guidances
BM for the proposed project activity

Build margin for 2007: 0.3449 tCO2/MWh
EF BM = 0.3449 tCO2/MWh
42
CDM Executive Board
Build Margin for 2007(continued)
Plant (m)
Hanbit Sungsan the second solar 2007.12

Taein gangjin solar
2007.12
Suni gangjin solar
2007.12
Korea yeongcheon solar
2007.12
Solar yungam solar
2007.12
Changwhan yeongduk solar
2007.12
Samsung jindo solar
2007.12
Dangjin #8
2007.12
SP solar yonggwang
2007.11
Dongyang energy sinan
2007.11
Ef yungam solar
2007.11
Dongwon gangjin solar
2007.11
Solec yonggwang solar
2007.11
Solar jungeub solar
2007.11
Sinbuk yungam solar
2007.11
Hyein haenam solar
2007.11
Samlangjin solar
2007.11
Hyosung daegi-wind power
2007.11
Wuriyungam solar
2007.08
Hwasung solar
2007.08
Yeongju the first solar
2007.08
Muan solar
2007.08
Jangheung solar
2007.08
Gomun
2007.08
Gunsan-wind power
2007.08
Taean #8
2007.08
Dangjin #7
2007.06
Younggwang solar park
2007.06
Yungam solar
2007.06
Wonjungsu
2007.05
Baekgok
2007.05
Damyang
2007.05
Fuel (i) type
Solar
Solar
Solar
Solar
Solar
Solar
Solar
Coal-thermal
Solar
Solar
Solar
Solar
Solar
Solar
Solar
Solar
Solar
Wind
Solar
Solar
Solar
Solar
Solar
Hydro
Wind
Coal-thermal
Coal-thermal
Solar
Solar
Hydro
Hydro
Hydro
*Net
Generation
(EGm,y)
(MWh)
0
6
11
17
0
5
9
1,297,925
38
268
40
214
120
92
178
364
646
42
267
309
230
622
125
2,996
7,958
2,528,587
2,904,680
853
770
1,321
1,001
1,771

coal (ton)
(kl)
(kl)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
467,807
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
919,055
1,059,612
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,873
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,636
6,681
0
0
0
0
0

LNG
(ton)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bituminous Heavy Diesel

LNG
Bituminous Heavy oil Diesel Oil LNG Bituminous Heavy oil Diesel Oil
coal
oil
Oil
(kcal/kg
(tCO2)
coal (kJ/kg) (kJ/l)
(kJ/l)
(kcal/kg) (kcal/l) (kcal/l)
)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,044
0
9,048
0
25,305
0
37,882
0 1,059,489
0
13,402
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,023
0
7,638
0
25,217
0
31,979
0 2,074,243
0
8,442
6,026
0
9,075
0
25,230
0
37,995
0 2,392,661
0
18,429
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
43
EGm,y*
EFEL,m,y
(tCO2)
LNG
(tCO2)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,072,891
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,082,684
2,411,091
0
0
0
0
0
CDM Executive Board
Plant (m)
Namjeju #4
Fuel (i) type
2007.03
Jeonju-resource recovery facility 2007.02

Munkyung solar
2007.02
Seoul Marin(Suncheon)
2007.02
Mirae energy
2007.02
Seomjingang
2007.02
Hapcheon
2007.02
Taean #7
2007.02
Cheongsong pumping #2
2006.12
Bundang fuel cell

Namhae solar
Hanlajeunggong solar
Enepark
Yongheng solar
2006.10
2006.10
2006.10
2006.09
2006.09
2006.09
Namjeju #3
2006.09
Yangyang pumping #4
2006.08
Hadongho
2006.06
Yangyang pumping #3
2006.06
Goheung Solar
Jangseong
2006.06
2006.05
Yangyang pumping #2
2006.04
Dangjin #6
Sinchang-wind power
2006.04
2006.03
Yangyang pumping #1
2006.02
Suncheon solar
Samcheonpo solar
Dangjin #5
Taean solar
2005.12
2005.12
2005.11
2005.10
Incheon C/C
2005.07
Jeju D/P
2005.07
Heavy oilthermal
Waste heat
Solar
Solar
Solar
Hydro
Hydro
Coal-thermal
Hydropumping
Fuel cell
Solar
Solar
Solar
Solar
Hydropumping
Heavy oilthermal
Hydropumping
Hydro
Hydropumping
Solar
Hydro
Hydropumping
Coal-thermal
Wind
Hydropumping
Solar
Solar
Coal-thermal
Solar
Combined
cycle
Internal
combustion
*Net
Generation
(EGm,y)
(MWh)

coal (ton)
(kl)
(kl)
LNG
Bituminous Heavy Diesel
Bituminous Heavy oil Diesel Oil LNG
(kcal/kg
Oil
oil
coal
coal (kJ/kg) (kJ/l)
(kJ/l)
(kJ/kg)
)
LNG
(ton)

coal (tCO2) (tCO2)
(tCO2)
EGm,y*
EFEL,m,y
(tCO2)
LNG
(tCO2)
500,222
127,900
341
9,905
8,963
41,470
37,526
400,455
929
401,384
13,059
2,563
1,223
165
126,208
6,777
3,868,817
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,430,171
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,321
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,018
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8,467
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25,196
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
35,450
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,225,116
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,973
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,231,090
145,042
1,959
1,462
1,292
416
1,214
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
164,069
484,459
124,559
225
9,907
8,632
41,479
36,140
390,073
590
390,664
91,270
1,832
56,495
1,233
648
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
103,698
3,497,359
3,572
1,281,318
0
0
0
878
0
0
0
6,039
0
0
0
9,066
0
0
0
25,284
0
0
0
37,958
0
0
0
2,899,527
0
0
0
2,420
0
0
0
2,901,947
0
106,973
1,259
131
3,443,482
118
0
0
1,279,796
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,038
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,014
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,074
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25,179
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
37,991
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,884,094
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,863
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,886,957
0
3,696,784
494,690
13,029
54,550
1,465,299
1,465,299
235,626
49,613
9,890
41,407
155,103
155,103
44
CDM Executive Board
Plant (m)
Fuel (i) type
Daegok
Donghwa
Ulchin #6
Hanrye LFG
Busan bio-gas
Yongdam
Maebongsan-wind power
Daegwanryung-wind power
Yongheng #2
Gunsan-wind power
New solar energy
Ulchin #5
Yongheng #1
2005.07
2005.07
2005.04
2005.04
2005.03
2004.12
2004.12
2004.12
2004.11
2004.11
2004.11
2004.07
2004.07
Yulchon C/C
2004.07
Busan C/C
2004.03
Hankyung-wind power
Chunsang
Cheongju LFG
Wunjeong LFG
Daejon Geumgodong
Hoicheon ENC
Muju
Seohee-ENC(Sanggok)
Sangwon ENC
Yonggwang #6
Taean #6
2004.03
2004.02
2004.02
2003.12
2003.06
2003.05
2003.04
2003.04
2003.03
2002.12
2002.05
Hydro
Hydro
Nuclear
LFG
Biogas
Hydro
Wind
Wind
Coal-thermal
Wind
Solar
Nuclear
Caol-thermal
Combined
cycle
Combined
cycle
Wind
Hydro
LFG
LFG
LFG
LFG
Hydro
LFG
LFG
Nuclear
Coal-thermal
mEGm,y=
*Net
Generation
(EGm,y)
(MWh)

coal (ton)
(kl)
(kl)

LNG
(ton)
Bituminous Heavy Diesel LNG

Bituminous Heavy oil Diesel Oil LNG Bituminous Heavy oil Diesel Oil
(kcal/kg
Oil
oil
coal
(tCO2)
coal (kJ/kg) (kJ/l)
(kJ/l)
)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,041
0
8,902
0
25,292
0
37,271
0 5,198,052
0
4,814
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,047
0
8,832
0
25,318
0
36,978
0 4,311,048
0
8,913
1,278
2,481
7,911,305
5,102
1,551
24,928
11,058
4,288
6,081,490
7,958
224
8,025,928
5,020,901
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,296,289
0
0
0
1,902,557
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,779
0
0
0
3,320
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,083,451
292,336
13,036
54,579
11,616,221
1,552,997
13,030
54,554
18,416
240
5,808
11,415
9,160
2,826
637
25,341
2,752
7,859,224
4,036,733
76,081,608
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,535,931
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
491
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,995
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8,786
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25,100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
36,785
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 3,450,374
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,202,866
0
0
0
4,319,961
866,381
866,381
4,600,416
4,600,416
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,311
0
3,451,685
m EGm,y * EFEL,m,y = 26,241,278
EFgrid,BM,,y=mEGm,y * EFEL,m,y/mEGm,y= 0.3449
45
EGm,y*
EFEL,m,y
(tCO2)
LNG
(tCO2)
CDM Executive Board
Plant/unit information (continued)

Plant (m)
Commissioning
Hanbit Sungsan the second solar
2007.12
Plant (m)
Capacity
(MW)
0.6
Fuel (i) type
Plant
factor(%)
Commissioning
.
Solar
Taean #8
Taein gangjin solar
2007.12
0.47
Solar
Dangjin #7
Sun-I gangjin solar
2007.12
0.487
Solar
Younggwang solar park
2007.08
Fuel (i) type
Capacity
Plant
(MW)
factor(%)
500
Coal-thermal
500
Coal-thermal
2007.06
1.25
Solar
Korea yeongcheon solar
2007.12
Solar
Yungam solar
2007.06
0.5
Solar Yungam solar
2007.12
1.125
Solar
Wonjungsu
2007.05
0.6
42.86
Hydro
Changwhan yeongduk solar
2007.12
Solar
Baekgok
2007.05
0.43
45.33
Hydro
Damyang
2007.05
1.27
Hydro
Namjeju #4
2007.03
100
Heavy oil-thermal
Samsung jindo solar
2007.12
Solar
Dangjin #8
2007.12
500
Coal-thermal
Solar
SP solar yonggwang
2007.11
0.45
Solar
Jeonju-resource recovery facility
2007.02
Waste heat
Dongyang energy sinan
2007.11
Solar
Munkyung solar
2007.02
2.2
Solar
Ef yungam solar
2007.11
0.3
Solar
Seoul Marin(Suncheon)
2007.02
Solar
Dongwon gangjin solar
2007.11
Solar
Mirae energy
2007.02
1.85
Solar
Solec yonggwang solar
2007.11
Solar
Seomjingang
2007.02
Hydro
Solar jungeub solar
2007.11
0.3
Solar
Hapcheon
2007.02
1.2
Hydro
Sinbuk yungam solar
2007.11
0.583
Solar
Taean #7
2007.02
500
Coal-thermal
Hyein haenam solar
2007.11
Solar
2006.12
0.3
3.78
Hydro-pumping
Samlangjin solar
2007.11
Solar
Bundang fuel cell
2006.10
0.25
42.47
Fuel cell
Hyosung daegi-wind power
2007.11
2.75
..
Wind
Namhae solar
2006.10
Solar
Wuriyungam solar
2007.08
0.539
Solar
Hanlajeunggong solar
2006.10
Solar
Hwasung solar
2007.08
..
Solar
Enepark
2006.09
0.3
Solar
Yeongju the first solar
2007.08
0.493
Solar
Yongheng solar
2006.09
8.27
Solar
Muan solar
2007.08
Solar
2006.09
0.3
0.48
Hydro-pumping
Jangheung solar
2007.08
0.2
Solar
Namjeju #3
2006.09
0.1
28.96
Heavy oil-thermal
Gomun
2007.08
1.5
Hydro
Yangyang pumping #4
2006.08
0.25
6.47
Hydro-pumping
Gunsan-wind power
2007.08
7.9
Wind
Hadongho
2006.06
0.825
30.29
Hydro
46
CDM Executive Board
Plant/unit information
Plant (m)
Commissioning
Yangyang pumping #3
2006.06
Plant (m)
Capacity
( MW)
0.25
Fuel (i) type
Plant
factor(%)
Commissioning
7.04
Hydro-pumping
.
Daegwanryung-wind power
Fuel (i) type
Capacity
Plant
(MW)
factor(%)
2004.12
2.64
Goheung Solar
2006.06
0.8
Solar
Yongheng #2
2004.11
800
Jangseong
2006.05
1.22
7.59
Hydro
Gunsan-wind power
2004.11
Wind
Yangyang pumping #2
2006.04
0.25
5.67
Hydro-pumping
New solar energy
2004.11
0.2
Solar
Dangjin #6
2006.04
500
92.40
Sinchang-wind power
2006.03
1.7
Yangyang pumping #1
2006.02
0.25
Suncheon solar
2005.12
0.85
Solar
Samcheonpo solar
2005.12
0.1
13.00
Solar
Dangjin #5
2005.11
500
94.74
Coal-thermal
Coal-thermal
.
5.60
.
80.45
Wind
Coal-thermal
Ulchin #5
2004.07
1,000
90.56
Nuclear
Wind
Yongheng #1
2004.07
800
85.75
Caol-thermal
Hydro-pumping
Yulchon C/C
2004.07
525.5
50.70
Combined cycle
Busan C/C
2004.03
1,800
67.72
Combined cycle
Hankyung-wind power
2004.03
33.57
Wind
Chunsang
2004.02
0.25
8.34
Hydro
Taean solar
2005.10
0.12
12.11
Solar
Cheongju LFG
2004.02
LFG
Incheon C/C
2005.07
503.5
84.47
Combined cycle
Wunjeong LFG
2005.07
3.18
LFG
Jeju D/P
2005.07
40
Daejon Geumgodong
2003.06
3.46
LFG
Daegok
2005.07
0.3
68.14
Hydro
Hoicheon ENC
2003.05
Donghwa
2005.07
27.78
Hydro
Muju
2003.04
0.4
Ulchin #6
2005.04
1,000
85.21
Hanrye LFG
2005.04
0.92
Busan bio-gas
2005.03
2.1
Yongdam
2004.12
4.1
Maebongsan-wind power
2004.12
4.25
76.68 Internal combustion
Nuclear
Seohee-ENC(Sanggok)
2003.04
LFG
2003.03
LFG
Biogas
Yonggwang #6
2002.12
1,000
91.82
Nuclear
Hydro
Taean #6
2002.05
500
81.30
Coal-thermal
Wind
LFG
LFG
Hydro
Sangwon ENC
.
68.50
.
15.83
47
CDM Executive Board
Annex 4
MOITORIG IFORMATIO
Please refer to section B.7
-----
48

South West Solar Power Plant Project (1MW)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

South West Solar Power Plant Project (1MW)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

CLEA DEVELOPMET MECHAISM

General description of the small scale project activity

Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology

Duration of the project activity / crediting period

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

Revision history of this document

Description and reason of revision

The Board agreed to revise the CDM SSC PDD to reflect

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

SECTIO A. General description of small-scale project activity

Title of the small-scale project activity: