Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lehigh Preserve
Fritz Laboratory Reports
1980
This Technical Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Civil and Environmental Engineering at Lehigh Preserve. It has been accepted
for inclusion in Fritz Laboratory Reports by an authorized administrator of Lehigh Preserve. For more information, please contact
preserve@lehigh.edu.
D
A Com pari .son with.
' ~
Allowlible Stress Des1qn li
and
Pla.st,c
,i
~~
De.si~r:>
~~;
: !
.
i
I
i
StZpt 1980
.
.
i'
.'
Report
371. bv
FUNCTIONAL RE.QUIREME.NTS
suPPORT LOAD
Fig. 1.
PROVIDE STIFFNESS
ECONOMICAL REQUIREMENTS
""''
n::::
Steps. in Destqn
1. Function
Z. . Structure and Loadinq
3. Loadinq Conditions
4. Preliminary Desiqn
5. Analysis
6.
7.
Fig. 2.
.
-~---
---
-----
Selection
of Section
:
'
..
--------
-- ----
-----------------------------
------
3'71.1
Fig. 3.
'
:: ;:
,.
.;.
. -:
~ :.i :
...
. ::
,.'
frR
<
'-
:::
..
.:: ....
<~Q
.,<.
.
.
,l
!.
.
..
:' ::
Fig. 4.
'
::: ~ : : ) : ~ . : :
. [ :~ . :
The LRFD formulation is simple: The load factor times the load
effect must be less than the resistance factor times the resistance
of the member. (The format shown in the second line of the
formulation :l.s typical of that which appears in research papers.)
..
: : ; :.
DEAD LOAD
LIVE
LOAD
Long Term
Short Term
Extraordinary
COMBINATIONS
---------------------------
Fig. 5.
I
I
I
-- --
--------
PLASTIC LIMIT
STABILITY
LIMIT
ELASTIC LIMIT
FATIGUE.
FRACTURE
DEFLECTION
(VIBRATION)
,L-Ry
I
!!lllli!I!IIIIJ
I
I
I
I-~
-------------
Fig. 6.
----------
Fig. 7.
The load deflection curves and load bars of Fig. 6 are simplistic.
Actually there is uncertainty. This figure shows an example of
uncertainty in the loading function fl.
-------
Fig. 8.
..
-------- --
--
---------------
----------
~R
pp
I
I
I
I
FD
L
fe L ~ ~R
-.
(yQ~cpR)
---------------------------
Fig. 9.
.; ::
1.0
LOAD
psf
.. :::
p
Per
~ ;. :
:~:::
t----'--.-.-.-~------"'---..,
.~ !~ ..
.. ~----------------~
..
.. .
: . ~------,.-------....J
::
. . ~ :: ~ j :
:1
0.
I
j.
NO.
I
: . i
Fig. 10.
,------,'
I
I
I
I
.
,''
! .Po.
Rs
.!
Rs
Ps
I
Load
ASD
PD
LRFD
D.ef lection
Fig. 11.
APPROXIMATIONS IN ANALYSIS
APPROXIMATIONS IN DESIGN
,
STREss CONCENTRATIONS AND RESIDUALS
VARIATION IN PROPERTIES
VARIATION IN DIMENSIONS
WORKMANSHIP
LOCATION
VARIATION IN LOAD-- TYPE.
coMB INATION OF LOADS
INTENDED USE
----
Fig. 12.
--
--------
-- -
..
---
I :'
. ::
.I~~ : :
'::
!: ::
load Factor
Tension
Ft : 0. 60fy
1.67
Bending
Fb
1.70
0. 66Fy
z
. Compresslon Fa
r ,_ (Kh)
2
_2_ + 3(Kf;r)
. (Kf!r)
Bc;
c:
oc,
3
Fig. 13.
------------------------ .-
IY
L67 -l.9Z
----------------
.
-------.
3 '7 I
3 }\ '
1.3
GRAVITY
PLUS LATERAL
TENSION
MEMBERS
1.7
SHORT COLUMNS
BEAMS
PLASTIC DESIGN
1.9
LONG COLUMNS
2.2
LOAD
RIVETS
BOLTS
WELDS
SHEAR CONNECTORS
-----------------
Fig. 14.
ALLOWABLE STRESS
PLASTIC
DESIGN
DESIGN
P.u - -
P. - ---
INHERENT
FY
MARGIN
OF
SAFETY
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Deflection
Deflection
---------------------------
Fig. 15.
'~
,(!":
::: :::
F=
~l
Mp
y
Q'"d s
Ma
Pa
a-., -- 0. 66 (J"'i
Pp
z- . f
S.
Fig. 16.
The
~a1cu1ation
..!!
LIZ
'1
_)
'7/
t/
!~n:
:
:::.
Q.R
~------------
I
Q
0
Fig. 17.
"
? Il
I
~~;
Tj[:
Pn
<
.) /I lr
Pfz
P.-Q.
Fig. 18.
Pfl <
Pfz
Variability
Fig. 19.
1m11m l.l\~mmm1
klormal
Event
Mean
En
Uo~
Fig. 20.
Nomina\
(hand book)
ol Occurrences
l.
R.
Rm
Fig. 21.
::
Rm
fTR
T
RmGm
. - -
Qrn
(JQ.
Q
Saf~ty Marqin:
R.-&
0
Fig. 22.
f!
. :3, ..-,, . II
'
R-Q
RI
Fig. 23.
See on
I ; "~
.~.
. :.
- -:-:::
'''T
- 3/1 _I,?J
:::
R-Q
II"'J
UQ
Fig. 24.
The
ol:,
::
..
R
lnQ
Fig. 25.
m m
be express~d in terms of logar1thmic functions of R and Q.
.: ':.
Connections
Beams
f3 = 3. 0
f: 4.5
3.0 cr
4.5 cr
0
Fig. 26.
,~~----
Rm
Rn
"Related"
to t5
0
Fig. 27.
. :. :
:::
...
:~.
Fig.
28.
: ,. . , ,, : i.ri:!!!Hlln\l11lT!n :l:!~ill 1 -:i :::1: 1::::: :r:m:::::! :!:! ::: ::1::.:: ~::: ::l 11:::
B is
shown
1: :: . : 1:1 1:! ::,.:: : : :~,: :1, .:: T1:: 1:: 1: r :! 1:r::.: m.::: : ' : : : ,
-Yf-.(t3
I\
,.::::
<
F.L
t
Fig. 29.
--
Load Combinations
Load Factors
;1.4
l.2
1.6
0.5
1.2
I.Z
I.Z
'.2.
I.Z
.
0.5
0.5
- 0.9
- 0.~
I.6
1.6
A possible
~et
! -
0.6
I ,3
t5'
O.Z
:t5
-
;1.5 . !
(. 3
---------:----~---'---------------------
Fig. 30.
I I
- - - 'i~~- .. -~ ..1-~----I
LRFD.
;1
:::
II
-rr-~
r:-T
~ lj ~
H1l
Resistance Factor&
Limit State
Element
Tension Member .
Beam
Bolt
I shape
Other
6roove
Fillet
Fig. 31.
..
.:
0.9
YiQid
Fracture
.8
.9
Bendinq (Mp.M,r)
Shear (Vp.Vcr.)
Co{umn
Weld
Fr ()
mmml" u11l
.9
Stability
Stability
. ,8
Fracture
.9
.8
.s
Shear Fracture
Shear Fracture
.7
These have been
, r '~@ mmrm:
..
:-
:;
...
P: ZIf( 0:9
l: ll
fo Q1> + FL QL
1'
fL:.
Qo: Mo
QL: ML
, o~<1oKrz)
Fig. 32.
.
'
'
::
'
fr lln
f0 : L2
l.Z M0 + I. 6 ML
<CJlzol<
12.)
12
<
-
.(
FR. = 0.~
Rn:
t!y 'i
<fy'l:.
0.9(36)
I,
zo'
-PL4
(.6 .
- 0.9
(..
II
II
64.0
6Z. z 59 9
59. 6 .
60
46.7
cost
Save
40
,
zo
0
Ot\.
All
liv~
different designs:
3
62.2 in. ,
Evidently the
deal to do with
load