Professional Documents
Culture Documents
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
American Marketing Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Journal of International Marketing.
http://www.jstor.org
The
Role
Successful
and Taiwan
in Developing
of Marketing
in South
New
Products
new products
is an important
activity for firms in the
Developing
While
marketing
plays an impor
competitive
marketplace.
global,
new
tant role in the process
of developing
few studies
products,
new
in
in East
role
have examined
marketing's
developing
products
on comparing marketing's
Asia. This research focuses
contribution
Korea
ABSTRACT
in South Korean
to the new product
and Tai
process
development
wanese
Korea
and
Taiwan
South
have
firms.
rapidly
expanding
on foreign
In addition,
economies
that depend
heavily
exchange.
these two countries
have successfully
themselves
transformed
from
to producing
labor-intensive
low-value,
mainly
producing
goods
that require significant
high-technology
products
In this article, a model
and proficiency.
of the in
and
resources,
skills, activities,
among marketing
terrelationships
new product
is developed
and tested using data on
performance
new products
372 recently
and 306 re
South Korean
developed
new
Taiwanese
The results generally
products.
cently developed
were found
the model,
support
though some interesting
differences
It was found
that merely
the two countries.
between
possessing
many
high-value,
savvy
marketing
resources
is not a key to new product
of marketing
large quantities
re
success.
the marketing
skills derived from marketing
Rather,
are
sources and the proficiency
in conducting
activities
marketing
new products
in South Ko
developing
important
for successfully
rean and Taiwanese
firms.
been
conducted
in several
countries
concurrently."
X. Michael
Mitzi M. Montoya-Weiss
Jeffrey B. Schmidt
Submitted:
April,
Revised
Song
September
February 26,1997
1996
30,1996
? Journal of International
Marketing
Vol. 5, No. 3, 1997, pp. 47-69
ISSN 1069-031X
47
Era: South
Korea
and Taiwan.
similarities.
countries
Both
have
their
international
strong
tremen
experienced
orientation.
of organiza
to explain
these
two
or to document
mance
and
economic,
social
nations'
to economic
paths
their respective
structures.
perfor
underlying
political,
intent
is to gain
the
Rather,
suc
findings
are
There
Emergent Global
and
Competitors
Marketers
resources,
marketing
new
product
methods,
results,
and
skills,
proficiency
performance.
and discussion
Fi
of
presented.
several
important
reasons
for focusing
research
ef
was
ranked
economic
market
Euromoney
rea and
first
value
rate
were
ranked
of return
second
growth
rates
in these
on
of macro
investment
by
financial magazine.
Taiwan
in terms
all countries
among
and
two
and
third
economic
countries
in the world
performance.
since
the mid
aggressive
exporting
For
strategies.
example,
exports
year since 1965 (Soo 1987). With a little over 1 percent of the
world's population between them, South Korea and Taiwan
each produce more manufactured
exports than all of Latin
America combined and, with Hong Kong and Singapore, pro
ex
duce over half of all developing
country manufactured
ports [Euromoney 1988).
Perhaps even more impressive, both countries have emerged
as formidable global marketers by having successfully
trans
formed themselves from producing mainly low-value, labor
to producing
intensive
many
goods
high-technology
products that require significant marketing savvy and profi
ciency. The U.S. market has been a primary target formuch of
South
U.S.
Korea's
Taiwan's
and
as top export
markets.
exporting
efforts.
Conversely,
Recently,
named
government
South
Korea,
and Taiwan
are
increasingly
intertwined.
practices.
to be
The proposed model and corresponding
hypotheses
tested in this study are presented in Figure 1. In order to ex
in the NPD process, three mar
amine the role of marketing
characteristics
of
the firm were considered: (1)
keting-related
the adequacy of available marketing resources, (2) the ade
in
skills, and (3) proficiency
quacy of available marketing
NPD
activities
the
process.
conducting marketing
during
These three interrelated facets of marketing reflect (1) what
marketing assets the firm owns, (2)what marketing capabili
ties the firm possesses, and (3) how competently the firm ex
ecutes specific marketing tasks in NPD. While a broad array
of factors are associated with new product success (Montoya
Weiss and Calantone 1994), the objective is to narrow the fo
cus and carefully
in
the role of marketing
investigate
new
successful
developing
product
Proposed Model
and Hypotheses
products.
performance.
Marketing
resources
and
skills
are modeled
as antecedent drivers of marketing activity pro
as direct determinants of new product per
as
well
ficiency,
formance. The integrative model postulates that new product
performance
sources
is a consequence
deployed
of the marketing
in the conduct
skills
of marketing-related
and
re
NPD
activities.
in Developing
The Role of Marketing
Taiwan
and
Korea
South
Successful
New
Products
in
49
The Role
New Product
Figure
of Marketing
1.
in
Development
f
f
Marketing
Resources
Synergy
^""""^^^m
^*^^?^^
*^^^^
^#S.
He ?
H
1
\MMV
[ NewProduct\
M
f \Vnc- MAct??n8
Performance
M\
Proficiency
Marketing
f
V
^^/^H
^**^*^
Synergy
^0^^00^^^5
1 illustrates
Figure
the four constructs.
ties-based
NPD,
is a consequence
the hypothesized
Consistent
with
among
interrelationships
on capabili
past research
it is hypothesized
that superior
performance
resources
in
and
of relative
the
superiority
activities
execution
of marketing
Proficient
both).
resources
and
ordinated
utilization
of marketing
ate superior
customer
value
(Song
and Parry
resources
1993).
the relationship
and marketing
into
aggregated
skills.
a
These
broad
be
two
con
single
typically
and Klein
(e.g., Cooper
synergy"
"marketing
in
industrialized
schmidt
1987,
However,
1993).
newly
and development
the acquisition
of resources
of
countries,
am
can be
to
NPD.
is
barriers
The
skills
difficulty
significant
man
societies
for cultural
for insular
reasons,
where,
plified
or
not
to
notion
be
amenable
the
of
may
agement
buying
struct
called
outsourcing
agement's
necessary
preference
In order
internally.
fects of marketing
tors
resources
and
marketing
resources
be to develop
may
to carefully
this
investigate
resources
to marketing
activity
are examined.
performance
and
skills
it is expected
that marketing
and
of marketing
execution
velopment
and
Man
skills
link, the ef
as distinct
contribu
and
proficiency
First,
skills.
new
resources
enable
skills
in NPD.
product
the de
Market
50X. Michael
The
storehouse
of marketing
resources
possessed
by
Hi:The
Second,
past
research
has
shown
that firms
must
ad
possess
H2:The
activities.
level of marketing
skills synergy
with
of proficiency
the
level
positively
H3:The
is associated
of marketing
activities.
marketing
resources
and
skills
and new
product
per
skills
has
an
marketing
advantage
when
in Developing
The Role of Marketing
South Korea and Taiwan
it launches
Successful
New
new
Products
in
51
in the marketplace
(Calantone and di Benedetto
products
1988; Song and Parry 1996, 1997a,b). Not only will the firm
be more
of executing
capable
the necessary
resources
activi
marketing
provide
leverage for
and
position
superior competitive
achieving
performance
1988; Song and Parry 1997a,b).
(Day 1994; Day and Wensley
This suggests that firms must have a certain level of pre-ex
isting, relevant marketing expertise if the NPD targets are to
be reached. From this, it is expected that the synergy between
existing marketing resources and skills and the new product
will enhance new product performance. Stated formally:
ties, but
these
and skills
H4:The
H5:The
level of marketing
skills synergy is associated
new product performance.
with
the
of
level
positively
to the omission
In particular,
has
extensive
shown
new
that many
fail
product
or poor execution
of spe
past research
Finally,
ures are attributable
has
research
shown
activ
research,
market
preliminary
assessment,
and
initial
marketing
Canada,
China,
the following
and
the U.S.
and
new
in
product
performance
Consistent
with
past research,
is hypothesized:
H6:The
Research
Methods
Overall
Design
52 X. Michael
Korean
consisted
firms
was
project-level
collected.
of a multistage
combination
overall
research
of extensive
and
de
case
underlying
performance
and
and
South
and new
con
Korean
in NPD
compare
mar
synergy,
activity proficiency,
in a Taiwanese
resources
of marketing
Korea.
South
served
only
as a starting
point
for measurement
develop
ment.
new
developing
measures
as necessary.
constructs
and/or
cally,
iterative
procedure
was
used
to develop
constructs and to
items that reflect the hypothesized
multiple
ensure the validity of the measurement
scales. The existing re
search on NPD and designed scales was reviewed to measure
each construct. These scales were refined through in-depth
case
studies
and
focus
group
interviews
with
Taiwanese
and
from
and business
engineering
schools.
team members
also were
conducted.
of
the
constructs,
concepts,
measures,
and
sam
Successful
New
Products
in
53
instrument
containing
was
questions
and
open-ended
semi-structured
used.
those
of conceptual
These
discussions
permitted
across
of constructs
equivalence
an assessment
the
coun
two
these
lar manner
were
team members
Second,
are expressed
and behaviors
concepts
across
the two countries.
to discuss
asked
in a simi
two most
the
resources,
skills,
or not
whether
activ
and
the model
to which
the
and
concepts
team members
Third,
serve
behaviors
the
same
shown
com
items
piled from the literature review and earlier case study inter
views.
teams
The
were
asked
to assess
extent
the
to which
an assessment
permitted
the constructs,
of
scheme
classification
of
or the extent
the category
equiva
the measure
to which
across
be used
could
countries
Overall,
reasons.
lence
They
cross-national
the case
study
21 months
Survey
Development
of construct
equiva
and
equivalence),
category
and was
of NPD
for two
important
appropriate
processes.
of
Completion
processes
development
found to be extremely
for a
took
expensive.
corresponding
measurement
to a panel of academic
54X. Michael
and
functional,
(conceptual,
they indicated
Instrument
facilitated
an assessment
items
was
submitted
then
business
submitted
to a second
of academicians.
panel
make
meanings
translation
the
were
not
method
was
accurate
and that the question
a
two
altered,
parallel-translation/double
was
to translate
used
the questionnaire
translation
revealed
considerable
When discrepancies
by amajority of the
ness of the selected
sulting with selected
in both
Korean
South
across
consistency
translators.
firms.
from
U.S.
well-regarded
business
as well
schools
as
Twenty
companies
on
of 16 researchers
were
country
team. All
research
in each
the
to
assigned
researchers
wanese
usable
responses
were
received
on
306
Tai
in Developing
The Role of Marketing
South Korea and Taiwan
Successful
New
Products
in
55
Measures
and Analysis
Measures
and
construct,
Please
Measurement
Table
and Construct
Characteristics
1.
actually
item means
the
and
standard
the answer
circle
were
during
that best represents your judgment about each aspect on "how things
the development
of mis project" rather than on "how things ought to be."
I. The following
process. During
steps are frequently
parts of a new product development
the development
activities
under
of this project, how well was each of the following
taken? Please
indicate how well or adequately
each activity
in
your firm undertook
to how you think it should have been done?
this product development
process?relative
=
by circling a number from 0 to 10 on the scale to the right of each statement. Here: 0
10 s done excellently;
done very poorly or mistakenly
omitted altogether;
and numbers
between
0 and
Marketing
10 indicate
Activities
various
degrees
of adequacy.
Proficiency
TAIWAN
Mean
S.D.
2.70
5.24
2.39
2.91
4.37
2.56
2.70
5.44
2.40
Selecting customers
market acceptance.
3.13
5.12
2.92
5.36
2.88
Determining
and trends.
marketing
Conducting
a detailed
potential,
customer
process,
Mean
KOREA
S.D.
purchase
characteristics
4.65
study of market
preferences,
etc.
Submitting products
for in-use testing.
3.55
for testing
4.66
to customers
5.08
3.16
4.74
2.63
5.03
2.40
2.93
2.76
3.79
2.95
3.54
2.89
3.54
2.83
4.69
2.57
4.38
2.65
4.91
2.52
56 X. Michael
deviations.
suc
this selected
extent does each statement
listed helow correctly describe
or disagreement
indicate your degree of agreement
by circling
cessful project? Please
a number from Oto 10 on the scale to the right of each statement Here: 0 * strongly dis
?
0 and 10 indicate various degrees of
agree; 10
strongly agree; and numbers between
or disagreement
agreement
II. 7b what
TAIWAN
Synerqy (Reliability:
MAW WN?flESQW?ES
Taiwan
a*.82,
South Korea
sales
company's
more
force
Mean
a^.95)
resources
resources
were
S.D.
4.46
2.81
4.70
2.33
5.28
2.46
4.70
2.32
5.68
2.43
4.49
2.39
4.95
2.48
4.19
2.32
advertising/promotion
more
than
for
adequate
this project.
Skills
Marketing
Mean
were
resources were
Our company's distribution
more than adequate for this project.
Our company's
KOREA
S.D.
research resources
for this project.
than adequate
Synergy
TAIWAN
(Reliability:
KOREA
S.D.
Mean
S.D.
4.34
2.79
4.70
2.34
4.96
2.70
4.76
2.35
5.61
2.63
4.46
2.41
skills
Our company's advertising/promotion
were more than adequate for this project.
5.11
2.58
4.69
2.31
Taiwan
a=.81,
South
Korea
company's
than adequate
sales
force
Mean
a=.94)
research skills
for this project.
skills
were
more
can be measured
product performance
what you know today, how successful
criteria.
ing the following
III. New
from
New Product
Taiwan
a=.94,
Table 1 (continued)
Performance
South
Korea
in a number
this selected
(Reliability:
a=.96)
indicate,
of ways. Please
was or has been us
product
TAIWAN
Mean
S.D.
KOREA
Mean
S.D.
3.76
3.19
3.52
3.07
3.91
2.74
3.59
2.73
3.50
2.92
3.20
2.86
in Developing
The Role of Marketing
South Korea and Taiwan
Successful
New
Products
in
57
include
resources
and
distribution,
in marketing
sales
research,
For example,
advertising/promotion.
product.
activities,
marketing
including:
mar
determining
customer
and
and
marketing
introducing
test marketing
programs;
developing
commercialization
and
and
plans;
launching
the product
mance
suggests
of new
of measures
variety
the profit-based
1993),
in this study.
the focus
product
perfor
was
of the new product
performance
success
The new product's
relative
in
The model
Analysis
and Results
in Figure
(3SLS)
squares
regression
1 was
tested using
analysis,
equations.
When
three-stage
least
for estimat
procedure
the equations
dependent
tion
as independent
appear
are
inter
variables
equations,
then
serious
biases
may
result
from
using
variables
in more
1988; Zellner
The
set of hypothesized
were
into
translated
sis was
across
the
(1) SKILLS
three
3SLS
equations.
of the relationships
because
employed
variables
of three
in Figure
shown
relationships
a system
analy
the
among
equations.
+ e2;
+ ?2 (RESOURCE)
+ ?3 (SKILLS*)
(2)ACTIVITIES= ?o(2)
+ ?6
+ ?5 (SKILLS*)
(3) PROFITS = ?^ + ?4 (RESOURCE)
(ACTIVITIES*) + e3,
where,
SKILLS
marketing
=
RESOURCE
marketing
ACTIVITIES = marketing
= estimated
?i
struct
for con
parameter
i,
term for equation
intercept
= disturbance
e?
= indicates
activities proficiency,
coefficient
= estimated
?0(j)
skills synergy,
resources synergy,
term
system
for equation
determined
j,
j,
value.
earlier
tions
in subsequent
equa
gression
(R2SKorea=.83,
R2TaiWan=-46)
that a very
indicate
that
the model
explains
suggests
Overall,
some
the results
is significant
substantially
more
important
differences
across
in at least
of the vari
one
of the
two
data.
countries.
relationship
countries.
Successful
However,
New
Products
in
activities
keting
new
product
There
performance.
are
across countries:
three basic differences
(1) the mediating
role of marketing activities, (2) the relationship between mar
keting resources and new product performance, and (3) the
mean rating levels for the three dependent
constructs. For
Taiwanese firms, the results indicate thatmarketing activities
re
role between marketing
play a significant mediating
wan =
and skills
and new
(?2
performance
product
resources
do not directly
af
.32, ?g1^011 = .25), and marketing
= -.07,
fect new
Con
n.s.).
(?4%iwan
product
performance
are not a
in South Korean
activities
firms, marketing
versely,
sources
significant mediator
skills
and new
.31, both
negative
-.42). The
of the relationships
between
Korea=
.10, ?3s
a
significant
Korea=
on new product
(?4s
performance
on some possi
that follows
elaborates
(?2SKorea
product
performance
resources
and marketing
have
n.s.),
direct
effect
discussion
ble explanations
resources,
Figure 2.
on New
Effects
Marketing
Product Performance:
Parameter Esti
Standardized
mates
from 3SLS
Regression
Analysis
*
Significant
at the p=.01
level or better;
t-statistics
60 X. Michael
ratings
on
the marketing
that Taiwanese
resources
are in parentheses.
(Ho: parameters)
project managers'
and
skills
measures
are systematically
higher than their Korean counterparts.
This indicates that Taiwanese project managers perceive a
better match between the resources and skills available and
That is, Taiwanese project man
the project requirements.
agers perceive higher levels of marketing resource and skill
synergy (i.e., marketing resources and skills are highly ade
quate given project requirements). Note that, given the nature
this cannot be taken tomean that Taiwanese
of the measures,
firms
possess
greater
Table
1 also
indicates
resources
that Korean
managers
in conducting
level of proficiency
Taiwanese
The
managers.
skills.
and
activities
marketing
in mean
difference
a greater
perceive
than
activ
marketing
ity proficiency ratings may stem from the fact that the Korean
firms aremuch larger in scale on average than Taiwanese firms
(Field 1995; Hamilton 1991). As a result, the Korean firms may
have more (though not necessarily better matched) slack re
sources and capabilities
readily available for executing the
to Taiwanese
activities.
That
is, relative
marketing
resources
have
slack
Korean
firms may
various
firms,
on conducting
spend more
in-house
customer
and
and
ing marketing
case
studies
detailed market
test marketing
commercialization
studies, executing
and
programs,
that Taiwanese
suggested
to
available
develop
these
plans. Conversely,
on
firms
focus more
the objective
resources
of marketing
on marketing
skills
Korea?
g7^ (2) the effect of the proficiency
?^s.
tivities
on new
product
formance
[fa1"
*=
(?e1*
performance
(?j1^?11
of marketing
811=
.38, ?6s
.78,
ac
Korea=
we
note
that
product
differences
than
performance
in Taiwanese
firms.
were
uncovered.
In particular,
Hypotheses
in Developing
The Role of Marketing
Taiwan
and
Korea
South
Successful
to be as
on new
New
Discussion
Products
in
61
Cross-National
Similarities
successful
that
are
consistent
with
con
research
past
and Taiwanese
product
managers
perceive
the follow
new
with
associated
product
performance.
The results and case studies suggest that both South Korean
and Taiwanese firms work very hard to apply their available
resources to develop expanded marketing
skills
marketing
The
and
capabilities.
resource
keting
once
fore,
mar
perspective
concerning
is long-term
oriented.
That
is,
are used,
are
There
they
depleted.
as a
to develop
is viewed
skills
dominant
utilization
resources
marketing
resources
expending
low-cost,
high-quality,
rather
products
than
on market
to directly
success.
product
These findings
sult from
new
increase
responses
profit-maximizing
similarities
to market
re
opportuni
and
culture
state
specific.
business
policies,
For
example,
is structured
persistent
cultural
in both
South
and moderated
norms,
and
Ko
by
ongo
investments,
idiosyncratic
sociocultural
norms
and
val
It is suggested
Taiwanese
organizations
in NPD. While
practices
and Taiwanese
the Korean
are similar,
cultures
Cross-National
of the explana
part
aspects of
their manifes
and Taiwanese
It is proposed
man
resource
the processes
serve
the explanations
firms,
and Taiwanese
resource
and
as a
only
and differences.
allocation
firms' hu
have
policies
differences
and
reward
The
systems.
results
and
the available
resource
human
a well-matched
talent?as
asset
in terms of market
pool
or as an inci
(Taiwan)
dental potential
the
(South Korea). In addition,
liability
resource allocation policies of South Korean and Taiwanese
firms appear to have substantial impact on where marketing
resources
are
and
expended
Korean
and
for what
The
purpose.
greater
Taiwanese
firms
concerns
re
between
whether
mar
new
It is suggested
wanese
differences
product
success.
sociocultural
in human
characteristics
resource
South Korean
underlie
practices
and
the
resource
and Tai
apparent
alloca
incentive
and market-orientation
have
been
the dri
in Developing
The Role of Marketing
South Korea and Taiwan
Successful
New
Products
in
63
Differences
the Confucian
conformist
attributes
of the top-down
struc
command
and
managers
tendencies
Strong
con
toward
It also
managers.
to encourage
tends
a preference
for
systems.
research
these
and
case
studies
indicate
that
Taiwanese
firms exhibit a higher level of entrepreneurial
to Korean firms. Importantly, the strength of the
relative
spirit
and
patriarchal
entrepreneurial values manifest themselves in
the relationship between individual job performance and eco
nomic reward. In South Korea there is a less direct pay/per
formance link and more reliance on seniority-based
systems
of reward, whereas in Taiwan the entrepreneurial
spirit has
created a stronger and more direct pay/performance
link. This
difference has potentially important implications concerning
how firms motivate and develop human resources and skills
throughout the NPD process.
South Korea. Two interesting results regarding South Korean
firms merit further discussion. First, the proficiency of mar
keting activities does not mediate the relationships between
resources
marketing
and
new
product
because
performance
be because
may
Korean
in hiring/firing
flexibility
necessary
expertise
managers
project
for conducting
less
perceive
talent and
activities.
the marketing
appears to be a weaker link between
and
of
the
and
the marketing
knowledge
expertise
employees
tasks the new product manager must accomplish
through
There
them.
As
such,
the available
nificant predictors
resources
marketing
of proficiency
inmarketing
are not
sig
activities.
This
may
be because
64 X. Michael
patriarchal,
seniority
pecuniary
linked to performance
system
dominates.
are not
rewards
in Korean
This
can
act
as a counterproductive
force against the Korean project man
to
mobilize marketing skills. Thus, since the
ager's attempts
new
Korean
manager
product
not
may
have
author
complete
considerable
period,
was
emphasis
on educational
placed
vated
level
of "screening,"
and
"credentialism,"
"social
can undermine
evaluations
performance
managerial
authority
a new
product
be hindrances
The
found between
negative
relationship
and new product
supports
performance
view
manager
may
to successful
NPD.
resources
marketing
this viewpoint.
Consistent with the case studies, the results suggest that suc
cessful Korean firms direct available marketing resources to
ward building skills and capabilities rather than toward more
traditional marketing
expenditures
(advertising, extensive
results
that focusing mar
indicate
The
marketing research).
on
new
resources
improving
keting
directly
product success
has
case
The
consequences.
negative
studies
that
suggest
this
resource
ceptable
allocation.
managers
perceive
resources
and
ing
Taiwan.
Taiwanese
it would
Moreover,
to presume
such
control.
negative
new
product
NPD
unac
socially
Korean
Thus,
between
relationship
success.
managers'
be
perceptions
project
market
concerning
product
Consistent
performance.
with
the case
studies,
resources.
Since
resource
centrally
development
and
in the organization,
in Developing
The Role of Marketing
South Korea and Taiwan
Successful
alloca
product
New
Products
in
65
managers
sion
of
a significant
do not perceive
resources
new
and
product
link between
provi
re
The
performance.
over
the course
of the project.
were
education
fundamental
government
prerequisites
the Nationalist
growth. However,
took
a less
of
and determi
authoritarian
position
rela
tive to business,
and instead functioned as an assistant to
business by collaborating with firms to upgrade technical
resources
and management
and Henderson
(Applebaum
1992; Hwang 1991). Thus, relative to Korea, authority struc
tures are less formal in Taiwanese
firms. The case studies
that
suggest
in Taiwanese
top management
firms
assumes
As a re
pool and new product
project
requirements.
to Korean managers,
these results
indicate
that
sult, contrary
new
Taiwanese
not
do
managers
product
perceive
marketing
resources
to be negatively
to new
related
product
perfor
mance.
new
Taiwanese
focus
their
Rather,
managers
product
resources
on
available
the
marketing
enhancing
proficiency
of marketing
activities
in the development
process.
activities.
Because
resources
the marketing
product
perceives
a significant
pro
authority are
the Taiwanese
link
re
between
activities
because
the Taiwanese
product
manager
is able to motivate
the utilization
of employee capabilities.
Since capitalism in Taiwan appeals strongly to Chinese Con
fucianism's heavy emphasis on individual achievement and
dedication
(Silin 1976), there is a stronger link between per
formance
conformist
and
economic
values
reward.
also motivate
As
in Korea,
patriarchal
Taiwanese
employees
and
to re
has legitimate
and
manager
and direct
the marketing
motivate,
to re
authority
activities.
However,
social
a result,
nature
of Taiwanese
resource
marketing
Taiwanese
new
for niche
development
or distribution
vertising
was developed
to new
activities
and
skills,
on
than
product
extensive
ad
channel development.
rather
on
capitalize
in low-cost, high-quality
markets
good
requirements.
project
managers
product
their competence
building
and
create
firms
re
linking marketing
product
Conclusion
performance.
The model was tested using 372 new products from South
Korean firms and 306 new products from Taiwanese firms. In
in both countries.
general, findings supported the hypotheses
were
across
Three important similarities
found
South Korean
and Taiwanese
firms.
First,
resource
marketing
does
synergy
not directly
increase the level of new product success.
Rather, marketing resource synergy aids in the development
of appropriate marketing skills. Second, marketing skill syn
ergy is important for new product success. Third, proficiency
in marketing
activities
Consequently,
South
new
enhances
Korean
product
Taiwanese
and
performance.
are ad
firms
vised
resources
ties.
possessing
Simply
marketing
success.
the odds of new product
uncovered
tivities mediate
on new
between
resources
In Korean
performance.
ac
firms, marketing
product
increase
In Taiwanese
research.
not
will
firms,
and skills
marketing
resources
in human
differences
whether
practices
motivate,
direct
concerning
to
the marketing
activities.
It is
a manager's
ability
to manipulate
project-re
resources.
Future
tries
research
as the
region
focus
on NPD
of the world
contains
should
in Developing
The Role of Marketing
South Korea and Taiwan
in other
Asian
global
comparative
technology
management
quarter
Successful
New
study
of
and innovation
practices.
Financial
support provided
by Marketing
Science Institute Research Compe
tition Awards,
Eastman Kodak
Hewlett-Packard
Company,
coun
one
about
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
of
Products
in
67
Com
Inc. is
the world's
The Authors
Montoya-Weiss
tant professor
of business
the samples
is assis
at North
Carolina
at
University
Raleigh.
State
is assistant
Jeffrey B. Schmidt
and inter
professor of marketing
national
business
at Kansas
markets.
Furthermore,
were
in nature,
cross-sectional
covering
a broad
manage
ment
in international
success
experienced
X. Michael
Mitzi
is rapidly growing,
population,
State
University.
Aaker,
References
D.A.
"Managing
Assets
Competitive
Advantage."
ter 1989): 91-106.
and Skills:
California
The Key
Management
to a Sustainable
Review
(Win
in the
Calantone,
of New
G.A.
Churchill,
"A Paradigm
for Developing
Journal of Marketing
Better
Constructs."
Marketing
ruary 1979): 64-73.
Choo,
H.
"The Educational
Basis
New
Measures
of
16 (Feb
Research,
Korean
Economic
Devel
and South Ko
In The Economic
opment."
rea: A Parallel
of South
Factors
Market
with Lessons,
York: Praeger, 1990.
of Japan
Development
edited by C.H. Lee and I. Yamazawa.
"An Investigation
into the
R.G., and E.J. Kleinschmidt.
and
Product Process:
Deficiencies,
Steps,
Impact." Journal
3 (March 1986): 71-85.
Innovation Management
of Product
Cooper,
New
_.
of Product
_.
in the
the Winners
"Major New Products, What Distinguishes
Innovation
Product
Chemical
Management
Industry." Journal of
10 (March 1993): 90-111.
of Market-Driven
Day, G.S. "The Capabilities
58 (October 1994): 37-52.
nal of Marketing
Day, G.S., and R. Wensley.
Diagnosing
Competitive
(April 1988): 1-20.
Organizations."
A Framework
"Assessing
Advantage:
Journal
Superiority."
of Marketing
68 X. Michael
Research.
Jour
for
52
En
"Asia Outlooks."
PLC
Euromoney.
romoney
Edited
Publications
and
Field,
K.J. Enterprise
Ithaca, NY: Cornell
(March
the State
by Garry Evans.
1988): 32-61.
London:
in South
and
Taiwan.
1995.
Press,
University
Korea
University
Eu
and Economic
Centre
Kong:
Prod
Inno
in
Development
of Asian
Studies,
1991.
Kong,
"The Comparative
Hunt, S.D., and R.M. Morgan.
Advantage
Theory
59 (April 1995): 1-15.
of Competition."
Journal of Marketing
Y. Dolly. The Rise of a New
Hwang,
war Taiwan. New York: Greenwood
K.S.
Power:
Post
1991.
Press,
M.D. Econometric
Models,
Intriligator,
tions. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice
Kon,
Economic
World
Techniques
Hall, 1978.
and Applica
in South
In Doing Business
and Employment."
39-49.
A.M.
New
York:
Nichols
Pub
Whitehill,
by
1987.
Company,
"Labour
edited
Korea,
lishing
Innovation
Lessons
of New
and R.J. Calantone.
"Determinants
A Review
and Meta-Analysis."
Journal of
11 (November
1994): 397-417.
Management
"Identifying
Innovation
"Product
New
Product
Management
Innovation
Innovation
Management
Success
in
11 (January
Management
8 (March
Deter
Activities
Schmidt,
Jeffrey B. "New Product Myopia: Which
and Industrial Marketing
mine Success?"
10,
Journal of Business
no. 1 (1995): 23-33.
and Values: The Organization
Silin, R.H. Leadership
of Large-Scale
MA: Harvard
Taiwanese
University
Cambridge,
Enterprises.
Press, 1976.
Song, X.M., and M.E.
ese High-Technology
Parry, "R&D-Marketing
Firms: Hypotheses
in Japan
Integration
Evi
and Empirical
_.
From
Product
Winners
New
Japanese
Separates
13
Innovation
Product
Journal of
Management
(Septem
ber 1996): 422-39.
"What
Losers?"
_.
"The Determinants
Journal
_.
of Marketing
New Product
of Japanese
34 (February 1997a):
Research
Successes."
64-76.
"A Cross-National
opment
Process:
in Developing
The Role of Marketing
South Korea and Taiwan
Successful
New
Products
in