You are on page 1of 24

The Role of Marketing in Developing Successful New Products in South Korea and Taiwan

Author(s): X. Michael Song, Mitzi M. Montoya-Weiss and Jeffrey B. Schmidt


Source: Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 5, No. 3 (1997), pp. 47-69
Published by: American Marketing Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25048693 .
Accessed: 25/01/2014 07:34
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

American Marketing Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Journal of International Marketing.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

The

Role

Successful
and Taiwan

in Developing
of Marketing
in South
New
Products

new products
is an important
activity for firms in the
Developing
While
marketing
plays an impor
competitive
marketplace.
global,
new
tant role in the process
of developing
few studies
products,
new
in
in East
role
have examined
marketing's
developing
products
on comparing marketing's
Asia. This research focuses
contribution

Korea

ABSTRACT

in South Korean
to the new product
and Tai
process
development
wanese
Korea
and
Taiwan
South
have
firms.
rapidly
expanding
on foreign
In addition,
economies
that depend
heavily
exchange.
these two countries
have successfully
themselves
transformed
from
to producing
labor-intensive
low-value,
mainly
producing
goods
that require significant
high-technology
products
In this article, a model
and proficiency.
of the in
and
resources,
skills, activities,
among marketing
terrelationships
new product
is developed
and tested using data on
performance
new products
372 recently
and 306 re
South Korean
developed
new
Taiwanese
The results generally
products.
cently developed
were found
the model,
support
though some interesting
differences
It was found
that merely
the two countries.
between
possessing

many

high-value,
savvy
marketing

resources
is not a key to new product
of marketing
large quantities
re
success.
the marketing
skills derived from marketing
Rather,
are
sources and the proficiency
in conducting
activities
marketing
new products
in South Ko
developing
important
for successfully
rean and Taiwanese
firms.

The process of developing new products is a critical endeavor


in today's globally competitive
environment
because new
products are vital for long-term survival and viability. How
new products is risky since new product
ever, developing
can
cost
failures
hundreds of millions of dollars. The failure
rate of new products remains high. With few exceptions (e.g.,
Calantone, Schmidt, and Song 1996), past research on the de
terminants of new product success has focused primarily on a
and Calantone [1994] for a
single country (seeMontoya-Weiss
As
noted
and
Kleinschmidt
review).
(1993, p.91),
by Cooper
"although there are hints that product development practices
and success factors transcend national borders, few studies
have

been

conducted

in several

countries

concurrently."

X. Michael

Mitzi M. Montoya-Weiss

Jeffrey B. Schmidt

Submitted:

April,

Revised

In the new product development


(NPD) process, and particu
an
in
international context, marketing plays a central role
larly
in effectively and efficiently translating market information

Song

September
February 26,1997

1996
30,1996

? Journal of International
Marketing
Vol. 5, No. 3, 1997, pp. 47-69
ISSN 1069-031X

47

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

into product concepts and then positioning the product offer


ings in the target market. No published study has examined
the role of marketing in the NPD process in multiple, newly
countries of East Asia. This study examines
industrialized
in developing
role
successful new products in
marketing's
two of the most successful economies to emerge in the Post
war

Era: South

Korea

and Taiwan.

At a certain level of generality,


hibit

similarities.

South Korea and Taiwan ex

countries

Both

have

their

international

strong

tremen

experienced

dous growth over the past three decades,

due in large part to


In terms

orientation.

of organiza

tional enterprise and political economy, however, these two


countries are strikingly divergent. Accounting
for South
Korea's and Taiwan's individual economic performance has
become a topic of significant research interest and attention
(cf., Field [1995] for a review). This article looks atmarketing
practices relative to NPD at the project level. The objective is
not

to explain

these

two

or to document

mance

and

economic,

social

nations'

to economic

paths

their respective
structures.

perfor

underlying

political,

intent

is to gain

the

Rather,

an understanding of the role of marketing in developing


cessful new products in South Korea and Taiwan.

suc

This study explores the role of marketing in NPD using data


collected on 372 recently developed South Korean new prod
ucts and 306 recently developed Taiwanese new products.
The article is organized as follows. First, motivation
for
NPD
in
Korean
South
and
Taiwanese
is
firms
pre
studying
are
sented. Drawing on past research findings, hypotheses
developed centering on the relationships among the follow
ing factors: marketing
in marketing
activities,
data
collection
nally,
are

findings

are

There

Emergent Global
and
Competitors
Marketers

resources,

marketing
new
product
methods,
results,
and

skills,

proficiency

performance.
and discussion

Fi
of

presented.

several

important

reasons

for focusing

research

ef

forts on South Korea and Taiwan. Both countries have estab


as important players
in the global
lished themselves
are
Korea
Taiwan
South
and
economy.
among the top 13
in the world (Field 1995). In 1988, Tai
ranking economies
wan

was

ranked

economic

market

Euromoney
rea and

first
value

rate

were

ranked

of return

second

(behind Japan), in terms of projected


Annual

growth

rates

in these

on

of macro

investment

by

In the same study, South Ko

financial magazine.

Taiwan

in terms

all countries

among
and

two

and

third

economic
countries

in the world

performance.
since

the mid

1960s have averaged over 8 percent, and well over 10 percent


for peak years (Field 1995). Much of this growth has resulted
from

aggressive

exporting

For

strategies.

example,

exports

from South Korea have grown by an average of 20 percent per


48 X. Michael

Song, Mitzi M. Montoya-Weiss,

and Jeffrey B. Schmidt

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

year since 1965 (Soo 1987). With a little over 1 percent of the
world's population between them, South Korea and Taiwan
each produce more manufactured
exports than all of Latin
America combined and, with Hong Kong and Singapore, pro
ex
duce over half of all developing
country manufactured
ports [Euromoney 1988).
Perhaps even more impressive, both countries have emerged
as formidable global marketers by having successfully
trans
formed themselves from producing mainly low-value, labor
to producing
intensive
many
goods
high-technology
products that require significant marketing savvy and profi
ciency. The U.S. market has been a primary target formuch of
South

U.S.

Korea's

Taiwan's

and

firms depend heavily

as top export

markets.

exporting

efforts.

Conversely,

on both South Korea and Taiwan


the U.S.

Recently,

named

government

South Korea and Taiwan among 10 key countries that are


emerging markets for U.S. goods. The served markets of the
U.S.,

South

Korea,

and Taiwan

are

increasingly

intertwined.

All of this suggests that South Korean and Taiwanese firms


are highly adept and aggressively competitive in their respec
tive marketing and NPD capabilities. It is expected that these
two countries have important insights to offer in terms of
marketing

practices.

to be
The proposed model and corresponding
hypotheses
tested in this study are presented in Figure 1. In order to ex
in the NPD process, three mar
amine the role of marketing
characteristics
of
the firm were considered: (1)
keting-related
the adequacy of available marketing resources, (2) the ade
in
skills, and (3) proficiency
quacy of available marketing
NPD
activities
the
process.
conducting marketing
during
These three interrelated facets of marketing reflect (1) what
marketing assets the firm owns, (2)what marketing capabili
ties the firm possesses, and (3) how competently the firm ex
ecutes specific marketing tasks in NPD. While a broad array
of factors are associated with new product success (Montoya
Weiss and Calantone 1994), the objective is to narrow the fo
cus and carefully
in
the role of marketing
investigate
new

successful

developing

The proposed model


the partial mediating
on new

product

Proposed Model
and Hypotheses

products.

offers a view of NPD that emphasizes


effect of marketing activity proficiency

performance.

Marketing

resources

and

skills

are modeled
as antecedent drivers of marketing activity pro
as direct determinants of new product per
as
well
ficiency,
formance. The integrative model postulates that new product
performance

sources

is a consequence

deployed

of the marketing

in the conduct

skills

of marketing-related

and

re

NPD

activities.

in Developing
The Role of Marketing
Taiwan
and
Korea
South

Successful

New

Products

in

49

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

The Role
New Product

Figure
of Marketing

1.
in

Development

f
f

Marketing
Resources

Synergy

^""""^^^m
^*^^?^^

*^^^^

^#S.

He ?
H
1
\MMV
[ NewProduct\
M
f \Vnc- MAct??n8
Performance
M\
Proficiency
Marketing

f
V

^^/^H

^**^*^

Synergy

^0^^00^^^5

1 illustrates
Figure
the four constructs.
ties-based

NPD,
is a consequence

the hypothesized
Consistent
with

among
interrelationships
on capabili
past research
it is hypothesized
that superior
performance
resources
in
and
of relative
the
superiority

in the NPD process (Aaker 1989; Calantone


skills deployed
and di Benedetto 1988; Calantone, Schmidt, and Song 1996;
resources
and
and Parry
1994; Song
1997a,b).
Day
Superior
to en
investments
the pattern
of a firm's past
skills
reflect
a firm's ability
hance
and they represent
competitive
position,
more
or
customers
to produce
better
(or
satisfy
efficiently
co
requires
to cre
skills

activities
execution
of marketing
Proficient
both).
resources
and
ordinated
utilization
of marketing
ate superior

customer

value

(Song

and Parry

Past research on NPD has not considered


tween marketing
are
constructs

resources

1993).

the relationship

and marketing
into
aggregated

skills.
a

These
broad

be
two
con

single
typically
and Klein
(e.g., Cooper
synergy"
"marketing
in
industrialized
schmidt
1987,
However,
1993).
newly
and development
the acquisition
of resources
of
countries,
am
can be
to
NPD.
is
barriers
The
skills
difficulty
significant
man
societies
for cultural
for insular
reasons,
where,
plified
or
not
to
notion
be
amenable
the
of
may
agement
buying
struct

called

outsourcing
agement's

necessary
preference
In order

internally.
fects of marketing
tors

resources
and
marketing
resources
be to develop
may
to carefully
this
investigate
resources

to marketing
activity
are examined.
performance

and

skills

it is expected
that marketing
and
of marketing
execution
velopment

and

Man
skills

link, the ef
as distinct
contribu
and

proficiency

First,

skills.

new

resources

enable

skills

in NPD.

product

the de
Market

ing resources allow firms to build marketing skills much like


a builder gains proficiency by using the tools in his/her tool
box.

50X. Michael

The

storehouse

of marketing

Song, Mitzi M. Montoya-Weiss,

resources

possessed

by

and Jeffrey B. Schmidt

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

firm can be taken to indicate areas of strategic importance


It ismanagement's
task and responsibility
and concentration.
to determine how best to improve and exploit its resources
(Day 1994; Hunt and Morgan 1995). From this, it is suggested
resource availability and suitability for any
that marketing
choices and
given NPD project constrain a project manager's
or
to
skills.
Stated
apply specific marketing
capacity
develop
formally:
level of marketing resources synergy is associated
positively with the level of marketing skills synergy.

Hi:The

Second,

past

research

has

shown

that firms

must

ad

possess

equate marketing resources and skills in order to successfully


1988;
(Calantone and di Benedetto
develop new products
and
Schmidt,
Calantone,
Song 1996; Cooper and Klein
schmidt 1987; Song and Parry 1997a,b). Drawing on the
firm's existing marketing resources and skills simplifies the
of the necessary
links to the new product.
establishment
team to draw the neces
These links allow the development
to
inferences
and
make
critical marketing deci
sary
insights
sions concerning the new product. Thus, it is suggested that
greater marketing resource and skill synergy with project re
quirements reduces the need for significant reinterpretation
or restructuring of existing marketing knowledge and exper
tise. As a result, the likelihood of proficient execution of mar
keting activity should increase with increasing marketing
resources and skill synergy. Stated formally:
level of marketing resources synergy is associated
of marketing
positively with the level of proficiency

H2:The

activities.

level of marketing
skills synergy
with
of proficiency
the
level
positively

H3:The

is associated
of marketing

activities.

Third, possessing critical marketing resources and skills does


not guarantee proficiency inmarketing development activities
(Calantone and di Benedetto 1988; Calantone, Schmidt, and
Song 1996). This suggests that marketing activity proficiency
the relationship
partially, rather than completely, meditates
between

marketing

resources

and

skills

and new

product

per

formance. Partial mediation


implies that marketing resource
as
well as indirect effects on new
and skill synergy has direct
product performance. Thus, in addition to the indirect effects
of marketing resources and skills on new product performance
and H3), it is
(i.e., through marketing activity proficiency?H2
resource
and
skill
that
synergy will also
marketing
expected
new
directly impact
product performance.
A firm with well-developed
marketing

skills

has

an

marketing
advantage

resources and proven

when

in Developing
The Role of Marketing
South Korea and Taiwan

it launches

Successful

New

new

Products

in

51

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

in the marketplace
(Calantone and di Benedetto
products
1988; Song and Parry 1996, 1997a,b). Not only will the firm
be more

of executing

capable

the necessary

resources

activi

marketing

provide
leverage for
and
position
superior competitive
achieving
performance
1988; Song and Parry 1997a,b).
(Day 1994; Day and Wensley
This suggests that firms must have a certain level of pre-ex
isting, relevant marketing expertise if the NPD targets are to
be reached. From this, it is expected that the synergy between
existing marketing resources and skills and the new product
will enhance new product performance. Stated formally:
ties, but

these

and skills

level of marketing resources synergy is associated


positively with the level of new product performance.

H4:The

H5:The

level of marketing
skills synergy is associated
new product performance.
with
the
of
level
positively

to the omission

cific NPD activities

(Cooper 1986; Sanchez

In particular,

has

extensive

shown

new
that many
fail
product
or poor execution
of spe

past research
Finally,
ures are attributable

has

research

shown

and Elola 1991).


marketing

activ

ity proficiency to be positively associated with new product


success
1988; Calantone,
(Calantone and Di Benedetto
1987;
Schmidt, and Song 1996; Cooper and Kleinschmidt
and
Schmidt
The
1995).
Song
Parry 1996, 1997a,b;
positive
link between marketing activity proficiency and new product
success has been found to be quite stable in a variety of cul
tural contexts. For example, Parry and Song (1994) found
market

research,

market

preliminary

assessment,

and

initial

screening activities to be highly correlated with new product


success in Chinese firms. Parry and Song (1994) suggested
is one of the most important de
that marketing proficiency
terminants of new product success
in Chinese
firms. In
Spain, Sanchez and Elola (1991) found preliminary market
assessment and marketing research activities to be among the
most critical activities for new product success. In Japanese
firms, Song and Parry (1996) found a strong (indirect) rela
and new
activity proficiency
tionship between marketing
and
Song
product performance. Finally, Calantone, Schmidt,
(1996) found a strong association between the proficiency of
activities

marketing
Canada,

China,

the following

and
the U.S.

and

new

in
product
performance
Consistent
with
past research,

is hypothesized:

level of marketing activity proficiency is associated


positively with the level of new product performance.

H6:The

Research

Methods

Overall

Design
52 X. Michael

To test the hypotheses,


South
sign

Korean
consisted

firms

was

project-level
collected.

of a multistage

data from Taiwanese


The

combination

Song, Mitzi M. Montoya-Weiss,

overall

research

of extensive

and
de
case

and Jeffrey B. Schmidt

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

studies and survey research. The primary objectives of the re


search design were: (1) to develop measures that capture the
constructs

underlying

keting skills synergy, marketing


product

performance
and

and

South

and new
con

Korean

in NPD

the role of marketing

compare

mar

synergy,

activity proficiency,

in a Taiwanese

text; and (2) to directly


in Taiwan

resources

of marketing

Korea.

South

Care was taken to avoid applying an American bias to the re


search. Recognizing
that international research requires an
"inside-out" approach in order to develop valid and reliable
measures of appropriate constructs, the North American liter
ature

served

only

as a starting

point

for measurement

develop

Following Douglas and Craig (1983), the focus was on


ascertaining the "comparability" of data collected in different
cultural contexts. To this end, the research was designed with
the intent of establishing equivalent measures for the study of
the role of marketing in Taiwanese and South Korean NPD and

ment.

new

developing

measures

as necessary.

constructs

and/or

To develop valid and reliable measures, Churchill's (1979) par


new measures was adopted. Specifi
adigm for developing
a multi-phase

cally,

iterative

procedure

was

used

to develop

constructs and to
items that reflect the hypothesized
multiple
ensure the validity of the measurement
scales. The existing re
search on NPD and designed scales was reviewed to measure
each construct. These scales were refined through in-depth
case

studies

and

focus

group

interviews

with

Taiwanese

and

South Korean NPD teams, follow-up interviews with individ


ual team members, and consultation with a panel of academic
"experts"

from

and business

engineering

schools.

To lay the groundwork for the research and to develop appro


priate measures, 36 in-depth case studies and focus group in
firms were
terviews with NPD teams at multi-national
conducted. Each NPD team had developed at least four new
products in the five years preceding the interview and was
a new product at the time of the interview. The
developing
average group interview lasted three hours, though some ran
as long as five hours. Multiple
follow-up interviews with in
dividual

team members

also were

Case Studies and Focus


Group Interviews

conducted.

The objectives of the case studies and focus group interviews


were as follows: (1) to select appropriate research methodolo
gies; (2) to develop sampling and survey administration tech
niques and procedures; (3) to establish the content validity of
the concepts and the hypothesized
relationships among the
constructs;
(5) to establish
(4) to develop new measures;
equivalence

of

the

constructs,

concepts,

measures,

and

sam

ples; and (6) to assess the possibility of cultural bias and re


sponse format bias (Douglas and Craig 1983). An interview
in Developing
The Role of Marketing
South Korea and Taiwan

Successful

New

Products

in

53

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

instrument

containing

was

questions

and

open-ended

semi-structured

used.

First, team members were asked their opinions regarding im


portant issues in cross-functional
integration during their
firm's NPD process. This part of the interview was designed
to elicit salient constructs and team member definitions
of
constructs.

those

of conceptual

These

discussions

permitted
across
of constructs

equivalence

an assessment
the

coun

two

tries. Conceptual equivalence concerns the degree to which


the concepts or behaviors described in the theoretical model
occur in the Taiwanese
and South Korean NPD processes
and
1997a,
b). The focus was on whether
Parry 1996,
(Song
or not

these

lar manner

were

team members

Second,

are expressed

and behaviors
concepts
across
the two countries.

to discuss

asked

in a simi

two most

the

recent NPD projects. With those experiences/cases


in mind,
team members were shown a theoretical model that linked
to marketing
performance
project
were
ities.
Informants
then asked

resources,

skills,
or not

whether

activ

and

the model

adequately described their experiences and how they would


the model. These discussions
permitted an assess
modify
ment of the functional equivalence of constructs, or the de
gree

to which

the

and

concepts

function from country to country


were

team members

Third,

serve

behaviors

the

same

(Douglas and Craig 1983).


a list of scale

shown

com

items

piled from the literature review and earlier case study inter
views.

teams

The

were

asked

to assess

extent

the

to which

each item measured the construct itwas intended tomeasure


and to suggest possible modifications
and additions. These
discussions
lence
ment

an assessment

permitted
the constructs,

of

scheme

classification

of

or the extent

the category
equiva
the measure

to which

across

be used

could

countries

(Douglas and Craig 1983).


the focus group interviews were

Overall,
reasons.
lence

They

cross-national
the case

study

21 months

Survey
Development

of construct

equiva
and
equivalence),

category

that the final scales were


comparison
and measurement

and was

of NPD

for two

important

appropriate

processes.

of

Completion
processes

development

found to be extremely

for a
took

expensive.

the first round of focus group interviews,


After completing
the recommendations
of Churchill (1979) were followed and
were
subsets that
unique and possessed "different shades of
were identified. A list of constructs
to
informants
meaning"
and

corresponding

measurement

to a panel of academic
54X. Michael

and

functional,

(conceptual,

they indicated

Instrument

facilitated

an assessment

items

was

submitted

"experts" from prominent

Song, Mitzi M. Montoya-Weiss,

then

business

and Jeffrey B. Schmidt

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

and engineering schools. The panel members were asked to


critically evaluate each item for clarity, specificity, and repre
sentativeness. In addition, suggestions for additional measures
were solicited. After careful evaluation of the results, the final
items were

submitted

to a second

of academicians.

panel

On the basis of the feedback from these two panels of "ex


perts" and a second round of group interviews, a draft ques
tionnaire was prepared that included the items judged to have
and face validity with the constructs. To
high consistency
sure

make

meanings
translation

the
were

not

method

was

accurate
and that the question
a
two
altered,
parallel-translation/double
was
to translate
used
the questionnaire

translation

and South Korean samples (see Douglas


for the Taiwanese
of the resulting question
and Craig 1983). A comparison
naires

revealed

considerable

When discrepancies
by amajority of the
ness of the selected
sulting with selected
in both

Korean

South

across

consistency

translators.

could not be resolved, phrasing favored


translators was selected. The appropriate
translation was further confirmed by con
participants in the case-study interviews
and Taiwanese

firms.

The final stage of measurement


development consisted of two
the
pretests of
resulting questionnaires. The first pretest was
conducted
South Korean and Taiwanese
by interviewing
graduates

from

U.S.

well-regarded

business

as well

schools

as

executives who had been involved in multiple NPD projects.


The second pretest was conducted using all the participants
of the case studies involving the South Korean and Taiwanese
NPD teams described earlier. These respondents were asked
to complete the questionnaire
for a recently developed pro
reflected a few
ject. The final version of the questionnaire
in
modifications
the
pretests.
suggested by participants

Our sampling frame in South Korea and Taiwan consisted of


a random sample of 500 firms listed in the World Business
Directory that met the criteria of developing and commercial
izing at least four new physical (non-service) products since
1991.
each

Twenty
companies
on
of 16 researchers

were
country
team. All
research

in each
the

Sample Design and


Survey Administration

to

assigned
researchers

were instructed to follow the same data collection protocol.


After extensive conversations with the identified managers,
projects were selected from each
recently commercialized
participating firm. The selected projects satisfied the follow
ing criteria: each was introduced after 1991 and was typical
of the NPD projects undertaken by the company during that
time. For each selected project, the project manager was
asked to complete a questionnaire
requesting historical data
of the project. After multiple
letters and phone
follow-up
calls/faxes,

wanese

usable

responses

were

received

on

306

Tai

projects and 372 South Korean projects.

in Developing
The Role of Marketing
South Korea and Taiwan

Successful

New

Products

in

55

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Measures

of interest to this study were measured with


scales. The items for each construct came from a
multiple-item
sources.
of
While many items were developed specifi
variety
items
for
this
comparative
study, other measurement
cally
were derived and adapted from existing validated scales. Re
spondents answered all questions using 0 to 10 Likert-type
scales (anchored by 0, "strongly disagree" and 10, "strongly
agree"). Table 1 reports a detailed description of the measure
ment items used in this study, the reliability of the composite
The constructs

and Analysis
Measures

and

construct,

Please

Measurement

Table
and Construct
Characteristics

1.

actually

item means

the

and

standard

the answer

circle
were

during

that best represents your judgment about each aspect on "how things
the development
of mis project" rather than on "how things ought to be."

I. The following
process. During
steps are frequently
parts of a new product development
the development
activities
under
of this project, how well was each of the following
taken? Please
indicate how well or adequately
each activity
in
your firm undertook
to how you think it should have been done?
this product development
process?relative
=
by circling a number from 0 to 10 on the scale to the right of each statement. Here: 0
10 s done excellently;
done very poorly or mistakenly
omitted altogether;
and numbers
between

0 and

Marketing

10 indicate

Activities

various

degrees

of adequacy.

Proficiency

TAIWAN

(Reliability: Taiwan a=.89, South Korea a=.86)

Mean

S.D.

2.70

5.24

2.39

2.91

4.37

2.56

Appraising competitors and their products?


both existing and potential.
5.16

2.70

5.44

2.40

Selecting customers
market acceptance.

3.13

5.12

2.92

5.36

2.88

Determining
and trends.

marketing

Conducting

a detailed

potential,

customer

process,

Mean

KOREA

S.D.

purchase

characteristics
4.65
study of market

preferences,

etc.

Submitting products
for in-use testing.

3.55

for testing
4.66
to customers
5.08

3.16

Specifying activities and tentative plans


of the product commercialization
phase.

4.74

2.63

5.03

2.40

Executing test marketing programs in line


with the plans for commercialization.

2.93

2.76

3.79

2.95

3.54

2.89

3.54

2.83

4.69

2.57

4.38

2.65

4.91

2.52

Interpreting the findings from in-house and


customer trials, test markets, and trade surveys.
Completing

the final plans formarketing.

Launching and introducing the product


into the marketplace?selling,
promoting
4.68
and distributing.
2.96

56 X. Michael

deviations.

Song, Mitzi M. Montoya-Weiss,

and Jeffrey B. Schmidt

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

suc
this selected
extent does each statement
listed helow correctly describe
or disagreement
indicate your degree of agreement
by circling
cessful project? Please
a number from Oto 10 on the scale to the right of each statement Here: 0 * strongly dis
?
0 and 10 indicate various degrees of
agree; 10
strongly agree; and numbers between
or disagreement
agreement

II. 7b what

TAIWAN

Synerqy (Reliability:
MAW WN?flESQW?ES
Taiwan

a*.82,

South Korea

Our company's marketing


were more than adequate
Our

sales

company's

more

force

Mean

a^.95)

resources

resources

were

S.D.

4.46

2.81

4.70

2.33

5.28

2.46

4.70

2.32

5.68

2.43

4.49

2.39

4.95

2.48

4.19

2.32

advertising/promotion
more

than

for

adequate

this project.

Skills

Marketing

Mean

were

resources were
Our company's distribution
more than adequate for this project.
Our company's

KOREA

S.D.

research resources
for this project.

for this project.

than adequate

Synergy

TAIWAN

(Reliability:

KOREA

S.D.

Mean

S.D.

4.34

2.79

4.70

2.34

for this project.

4.96

2.70

4.76

2.35

skills were more


Our company's distribution
than adequate for this project.

5.61

2.63

4.46

2.41

skills
Our company's advertising/promotion
were more than adequate for this project.

5.11

2.58

4.69

2.31

Taiwan

a=.81,

South

Korea

Our company's marketing


were more than adequate
Our

company's

than adequate

sales

force

Mean

a=.94)

research skills
for this project.
skills

were

more

can be measured
product performance
what you know today, how successful
criteria.
ing the following

III. New

from

New Product
Taiwan

a=.94,

Table 1 (continued)

Performance
South

Korea

in a number
this selected

(Reliability:
a=.96)

indicate,
of ways. Please
was or has been us

product

TAIWAN
Mean

S.D.

KOREA
Mean

S.D.

Relative to your firm's other new products,


how successful was this product in terms of
=
profits: (0 Far less than our other new
= Far exceeded our other
10
products;
new products.)

3.76

3.19

3.52

3.07

Relative to competing products, how


successful was this product in terms of
=
profits: (0 Far less than our other new
=
products; 10 Far exceeded our other
new products.)

3.91

2.74

3.59

2.73

other new products.)

3.50

2.92

3.20

2.86

in Developing
The Role of Marketing
South Korea and Taiwan

Successful

to your firm's objectives for this


how
successful was this product
product,
in terms of profits: (0 = Far less than our
other new products; 10 = Far exceeded our
Relative

New

Products

in

57

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Marketing Resources Synergy refers to the adequacy of the


marketing assets possessed by a firm. More specifically, how
well did the available marketing resources fit with the project
requirements? The focus here is not on the magnitude of mar
keting resources, but rather on the appropriateness of the re
sources given the project needs. Broad categories of marketing
resources
force,

include

resources
and

distribution,

in marketing

sales
research,
For example,

advertising/promotion.

sales force resources might refer to the number of salespeople


that a company has on its payroll while distribution resources
refer to the number of channels a company has established.
Marketing Skills Synergy refers to the adequacy of the spe
cific marketing capabilities of the firm. Marketing capabili
ties are complex bundles of experience and knowledge
that
enable firms to coordinate activities and make use of their as
sets (Day 1994). Of particular importance is how well a firm's
marketing capabilities and expertise match the requirements
of the new

product.

Proficiency ofMarketing Activities refers to how well market


ing-related activities are conducted during a particular NPD
project. Successful NPD entails the proficient execution of
numerous

activities,

marketing

including:

mar

determining

keting characteristics and trends; conducting detailed market


studies; assessing competitors and their products; executing
in-house

customer

and
and

marketing

introducing

test marketing
programs;
developing
commercialization
and
and
plans;
launching

into the marketplace.

the product

New Product Performance


reflects the level of success
achieved by a new product in the marketplace. While past re
search

mance

suggests

of new

of measures

variety

(cf., Cooper and Kleinschmidt

the profit-based
1993),
in this study.
the focus

product

perfor

1987; Griffin and Page

was
of the new product
performance
success
The new product's
relative
in

terms of profits was assessed, as compared to (1) the firm's


other new products,
and (3) the
(2) competing products,
firm's profit objectives for the new product.

The model
Analysis

and Results

in Figure

(3SLS)

squares

regression

1 was

tested using

analysis,

ing parameters in linear models


cialty of 3SLS is in estimating
several

equations.

When

three-stage

least

for estimat

procedure

by least squares. The spe


in systems of
parameters
in a system

the equations

dependent

such that the dependent

tion

as independent

appear

are

inter

variables from one equa


in other

variables

equations,

then

ordinary least squares (OLS) estimates can be inconsistent.


That is, if the equations are statistically estimated one at a
time,

serious

biases

than one equation


58X. Michael

may

result

from

using

variables

(Calantone and Di Benedetto

Song, Mitzi M. Montoya-Weiss,

in more

1988; Zellner

and Jeffrey B. Schmidt

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

1962). The 3SLS estimation


approach provides
and efficient parameter estimates of models incor
porating reciprocal causation and interdependent error terms
(Intriligator 1987).
and Theil
consistent

The

set of hypothesized

were

into

translated

sis was

across

the

(1) SKILLS

three

3SLS

equations.

of the relationships

because

employed

variables

of three

in Figure

shown

relationships

a system

analy

the

among

equations.

fcu + ?a (RESOURCE) + et;

+ e2;
+ ?2 (RESOURCE)
+ ?3 (SKILLS*)
(2)ACTIVITIES= ?o(2)
+ ?6
+ ?5 (SKILLS*)
(3) PROFITS = ?^ + ?4 (RESOURCE)
(ACTIVITIES*) + e3,

where,

SKILLS

marketing
=
RESOURCE
marketing
ACTIVITIES = marketing
= estimated

?i

struct

for con

parameter

i,
term for equation

intercept

= disturbance
e?
= indicates

activities proficiency,
coefficient

= estimated

?0(j)

skills synergy,
resources synergy,

term
system

for equation
determined

j,

j,
value.

It is important to note that equations (2) and (3) are estimated


by regressing the dependent variable on the raw data for the
(or exogenous) variables, and on the residuals
independent
for the interdependent
(or endogenous) variables from the rel
evant prior equation (Zellner and Theill 1962). Thus, the val
ues used for the endogenous
variables
(i.e., the jointly
as
variables
that
appear
dependent
dependent variables in
are system
determined
equations)
raw data.
rather than using

earlier
tions

in subsequent

equa

Figure 2 graphically presents the 3SLS estimation results for


the Taiwanese and South Korean samples. All of the paths are
significant at the p-s0.05 level unless otherwise indicated by
n.s. (not significant). The standardized beta coefficient esti
mates and respective significance levels are reported for each
relationship. The system weighted R2 for the re
hypothesized
models

gression

(R2SKorea=.83,

R2TaiWan=-46)

that a very

indicate

large percentage of the variance in the data is explained for


such a parsimonious model.
Interestingly, the R2 also indi
cates

that

the model

explains

ance in the South Korean


This

suggests

Overall,

some

the results

is significant

substantially

more

important

differences

across

indicate each hypothesized

in at least

of the vari

data than in the Taiwanese

one

of the

two

The Role of Marketing


in Developing
South Korea and Taiwan

data.

countries.

relationship

countries.

Successful

However,

New

Products

in

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

there are distinct patterns of results for South Korean versus


Taiwanese firms in terms of the interrelated effects of market
of mar
ing resources, marketing skills, and the proficiency
on

activities

keting

new

product

There

performance.

are

across countries:
three basic differences
(1) the mediating
role of marketing activities, (2) the relationship between mar
keting resources and new product performance, and (3) the
mean rating levels for the three dependent
constructs. For
Taiwanese firms, the results indicate thatmarketing activities
re
role between marketing
play a significant mediating

wan =
and skills
and new
(?2
performance
product
resources
do not directly
af
.32, ?g1^011 = .25), and marketing
= -.07,
fect new
Con
n.s.).
(?4%iwan
product
performance
are not a
in South Korean
activities
firms, marketing
versely,
sources

significant mediator
skills

and new

.31, both
negative
-.42). The

of the relationships

between

Korea=
.10, ?3s
a
significant
Korea=
on new product
(?4s
performance
on some possi
that follows
elaborates

(?2SKorea
product
performance
resources
and marketing
have

n.s.),
direct

effect

discussion

ble explanations

resources,

for these differences.

Figure 2.
on New
Effects
Marketing
Product Performance:
Parameter Esti
Standardized
mates
from 3SLS
Regression

Analysis

*
Significant

at the p=.01

level or better;

t-statistics

Finally, Table 1 indicates


mean

60 X. Michael

ratings

on

the marketing

that Taiwanese
resources

Song, Mitzi M. Montoya-Weiss,

are in parentheses.

(Ho: parameters)

project managers'
and

skills

measures

and Jeffrey B. Schmidt

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

are systematically
higher than their Korean counterparts.
This indicates that Taiwanese project managers perceive a
better match between the resources and skills available and
That is, Taiwanese project man
the project requirements.
agers perceive higher levels of marketing resource and skill
synergy (i.e., marketing resources and skills are highly ade
quate given project requirements). Note that, given the nature
this cannot be taken tomean that Taiwanese
of the measures,
firms

possess

greater

Table

1 also

indicates

resources
that Korean

managers

in conducting

level of proficiency
Taiwanese

The

managers.

skills.

and

activities

marketing
in mean

difference

a greater

perceive

than
activ

marketing

ity proficiency ratings may stem from the fact that the Korean
firms aremuch larger in scale on average than Taiwanese firms
(Field 1995; Hamilton 1991). As a result, the Korean firms may
have more (though not necessarily better matched) slack re
sources and capabilities
readily available for executing the
to Taiwanese

activities.
That
is, relative
marketing
resources
have
slack
Korean
firms may

various
firms,

on conducting

spend more
in-house

customer

and

and

ing marketing
case
studies

detailed market

test marketing
commercialization

studies, executing
and

programs,

that Taiwanese

suggested

to

available

develop
these
plans. Conversely,
on
firms
focus more

capitalizing on their capabilities and skills with


of building quality products at lower costs.

the objective

In spite of these differences, there are also important similari


ties across South Korean and Taiwanese firms. Specifically,
three of the six paths are significant and in the hypothesized
direction for both South Korean and Taiwanese firms: (1) the
effect

resources

of marketing

on marketing

skills

Korea?
g7^ (2) the effect of the proficiency
?^s.
tivities

on new

product

formance

[fa1"

*=

(?e1*

performance

.49), and (3) the effect of marketing


.33, P5S-KowB=

(?j1^?11

of marketing

811=

.38, ?6s

.78,

ac
Korea=

skills on new product per


.54). However,

we

note

that

of the effects for these three paths are stronger


the magnitudes
in South Korean firms than in Taiwanese firms. This system
atic difference, in concert with the difference in the model R2,
suggests that, in South Korean firms, marketing generally is
perceived to have a stronger influence (positive and negative)
on new

product

In sum, the hypotheses


teresting

differences

than

performance

in Taiwanese

firms.

were generally supported and some in

were

uncovered.

In particular,

Hypotheses

1,5, and 6 were

supported by both the Korean and Taiwanese


samples. Hypotheses 2 and 3were supported by the Taiwanese
sample only, and Hypothesis 4 was supported by neither.

The results allow the validity


sessed directly by examining

of the proposed model


the effects of marketing

in Developing
The Role of Marketing
Taiwan
and
Korea
South

Successful

to be as
on new

New

Discussion

Products

in

61

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

product performance in South Korean and Taiwanese firms.


The findings facilitate understanding
of the relative impor
tance of each predictor variable within each country, which
allows examination of the differential effects that marketing
plays in the NPD process.

Cross-National

Similarities

The similarities found in the results across South Korean and


Taiwanese firms suggest evidence of universal principles of
NPD

successful

that

are

consistent

with

con

research

past

is that there are


ducted in other countries. The implication
critical success factors and interrelationships
that transcend
national borders. According to the results of the study, South
Korean

and Taiwanese

product

managers

perceive

the follow

ing three effects of marketing in the NPD process: (1)market


ing resources are positively associated with marketing skills,
(2) the proficiency of marketing activities is positively associ
ated with new product performance, and (3)marketing skills
are positively

new

with

associated

product

performance.

The results and case studies suggest that both South Korean
and Taiwanese firms work very hard to apply their available
resources to develop expanded marketing
skills
marketing
The

and

capabilities.
resource
keting
once
fore,

mar
perspective
concerning
is long-term
oriented.
That
is,
are used,
are
There
they
depleted.
as a
to develop
is viewed
skills

dominant

utilization
resources

marketing

resources

expending

valuable activity because of the potential long-term payoff in


terms of future NPD marketing capabilities. The case studies
suggest that South Korean and Taiwanese firms alike focus
on developing
resource utilization
and skill development
niche

low-cost,

high-quality,

rather

products

than

on market

ing expenses like advertising or distribution channel design.


Thus, South Korean and Taiwanese firms try to conduct the
"right" marketing activities with the best matched skill set in
order

to directly

success.

product

suggest that the cross-national

These findings
sult from

new

increase

responses

profit-maximizing

similarities

to market

re

opportuni

ties in NPD. This implies that the market demands certain


universal practices in NPD in order to effectively compete in
the global marketplace. At the same time, however, the results
suggest that NPD practices and processes are somewhat idio
syncratic

and

culture

rea and Taiwan,


pervasive

state

specific.

business

policies,

For

example,

is structured

persistent

cultural

in both

South

and moderated
norms,

and

Ko

by
ongo

ing social and political relationships (Field 1995). Thus, while


responses to market opportunities may be
profit-maximizing
the predominant stimuli behind marketing-related
decisions
and

investments,

idiosyncratic

sociocultural

norms

and

val

ues mold specific marketing practices and NPD processes. In


in the
the role of marketing
hopes of better understanding
62X. Michael

Song, Mitzi M. Montoya-Weiss,

and Jeffrey B. Schmidt

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

NPD process, relevant differential sociocultural characteristics


of South Korea and Taiwan are examined and how these dif
ferences may impact firm-level NPD practices is considered.

It is suggested
Taiwanese

that certain cultural attributes of Korean and


are an important

organizations

tion underlying marketing

in NPD. While

practices

and Taiwanese

the Korean

are similar,

cultures

Cross-National

of the explana

part

aspects of

their manifes

tations have led to important differences in managerial prac


tices. The following sections attempt to develop rationale as
to why the paths in the model differ between the two coun
tries. A combination of macro-level
cultural concepts and the
case study results are used to explain the firm-level differ
ences found. Because there is little research on NPD in South
Korean

and Taiwanese

It is proposed
man

resource

the processes

that South Korean


practices

serve

the explanations

firms,

first step in understanding

and Taiwanese

resource

and

as a

only

and differences.

allocation

firms' hu
have

policies

impacted the role of marketing in the NPD process. The find


re
the differential
effects of marketing
ings concerning
sources and marketing
skills may well be consequences
of
in incentive

differences

and

reward

The

systems.

results

and

case studies suggest that a key difference between South Ko


rean and Taiwanese firms is in how the new product manager
views
ing

the available

resource

human

a well-matched

talent?as

asset

in terms of market
pool
or as an inci
(Taiwan)

dental potential
the
(South Korea). In addition,
liability
resource allocation policies of South Korean and Taiwanese
firms appear to have substantial impact on where marketing
resources

are

and

expended

sults and case studies


South

Korean

and

for what

The

purpose.

greater

suggest that a key difference

Taiwanese

firms

concerns

re

between

whether

mar

keting resources are directed more toward building general


or more toward very pro
skills and capabilities
marketing
ject-specific marketing expenses with the intent of achieving
near-term

new

It is suggested
wanese
differences

product

success.

that three important

sociocultural
in human

characteristics
resource

South Korean
underlie

practices

and

the
resource

and Tai
apparent
alloca

tion policies: (1) the generally accepted principle of central


ized authority, (2) patriarchal and conformist values, and (3)
the level of entrepreneurial spirit among employees. First, in
both South Korea and Taiwan, centralized authority was a
fundamental
of rapid eco
(and determinant)
prerequisite
nomic growth in the post-war period (Applebaum and Hen
derson 1992; Field 1995). The important distinction between
the role of central authority in South Korea and Taiwan is that
economic

incentive

and market-orientation

have

been

the dri

ving forces of growth in Taiwan, whereas

stronger control and

in Developing
The Role of Marketing
South Korea and Taiwan

Successful

New

Products

in

63

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Differences

regulation have been the driving forces in South Korea. This


difference has potentially important implications concerning
the provision and allocation of marketing resources for NPD,
which are discussed in the following sections.
In both societies,
cal and

the Confucian

conformist

attributes

heritage reinforces hierarchi

of the top-down

struc

command

ture because it stresses a strong loyalty toward the "group"


in concert
(the family, the company, and/or the workgroup),
with respect for age and hierarchical position. The strength of
the patriarchal values exhibited within the firm contribute to
the level of entrepreneurial spirit evident among new product
team members.

and

managers

tendencies

Strong

con

toward

formity and low levels of entrepreneurial spirit can inhibit ac


ceptance of younger, qualified managers and make it difficult
to resolve certain problems since it inhibits any challenge to
older

It also

managers.

to encourage

tends

a preference

for

egalitarianism at the group level and present barriers for the


development of individual performance reward and incentive
Past

systems.

research

these

and

case

studies

indicate

that

Taiwanese
firms exhibit a higher level of entrepreneurial
to Korean firms. Importantly, the strength of the
relative
spirit
and
patriarchal
entrepreneurial values manifest themselves in
the relationship between individual job performance and eco
nomic reward. In South Korea there is a less direct pay/per
formance link and more reliance on seniority-based
systems
of reward, whereas in Taiwan the entrepreneurial
spirit has
created a stronger and more direct pay/performance
link. This
difference has potentially important implications concerning
how firms motivate and develop human resources and skills
throughout the NPD process.
South Korea. Two interesting results regarding South Korean
firms merit further discussion. First, the proficiency of mar
keting activities does not mediate the relationships between
resources

marketing

and

new

product

because

performance

the available marketing resources may be only fortuitously re


lated to the marketing activities required for successful NPD.
This

be because

may

Korean

in hiring/firing

flexibility

necessary

expertise

managers

project

for conducting

less

perceive

the requisite marketing


the marketing

talent and
activities.

the marketing
appears to be a weaker link between
and
of
the
and
the marketing
knowledge
expertise
employees
tasks the new product manager must accomplish
through

There

them.

As

such,

the available

nificant predictors

resources

marketing

of proficiency

inmarketing

are not

sig

activities.

Second, the proficiency of marketing activities does not medi


ate the relationship between marketing skills and new product
performance.

This

may

be because

always clearly and directly


firms?a

64 X. Michael

patriarchal,

seniority

pecuniary

linked to performance
system

Song, Mitzi M. Montoya-Weiss,

dominates.

are not

rewards

in Korean
This

can

act

and Jeffrey B. Schmidt

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

as a counterproductive
force against the Korean project man
to
mobilize marketing skills. Thus, since the
ager's attempts
new

Korean

manager

product

not

may

have

author

complete

ity to provide formal incentives to his personnel, he may not


perceive the existing marketing skill base as directly impact
ing the proficient execution of marketing activities.
re
These two findings concerning
the effects of marketing
sources and marketing skills may well be consequences of the
South Korean firms' incentive systems. Importantly, it has been
suggested that the lack of a neutral, unbiased incentive system
in South Korean firms was one of the fundamental catalysts of
the Korean economic transition (Lee 1995). Briefly, in the post
war

considerable

period,

was

emphasis

on educational

placed

in order to create a pool of educated and readily


development
trainable labor force. Over time, the status of education ele
to the

vated

level

of "screening,"

and

"credentialism,"

"social

(Choo 1990). As a result, it has been suggested that


compensation depends more on formal education and senior
ity in Korean firms (Kon 1987). Reduced importance of job
ization"

can undermine

evaluations

performance

managerial

authority

and limit the Korean manager's ability tomotivate employees.


Thus, if resources are officially defined as "higher educated,
long-tenured
employees,"
to really
these
"resources"

a new

product
be hindrances

The

found between
negative
relationship
and new product
supports
performance

view
manager
may
to successful
NPD.
resources
marketing
this viewpoint.

Consistent with the case studies, the results suggest that suc
cessful Korean firms direct available marketing resources to
ward building skills and capabilities rather than toward more
traditional marketing
expenditures
(advertising, extensive
results
that focusing mar
indicate
The
marketing research).
on
new
resources
improving
keting
directly
product success
has

case

The

consequences.

negative

studies

that

suggest

this

may be due to the centralized control of resources in the typ


ical Korean firm. That is, the Korean project manager does
not perceive himself as being in complete control of market
ing

resource

ceptable

allocation.

managers
perceive
resources
and
ing
Taiwan.

Taiwanese

it would

Moreover,

to presume

such

control.

negative

new

product

NPD

unac

socially

Korean

Thus,

between

relationship
success.

managers'

be

perceptions

project
market

concerning

the provision of marketing resources mirrors the centralized


the results indicate a
authority in that country. Specifically,
between
nonsignificant
marketing resources and
relationship
new

product

Consistent

performance.

with

the case

studies,

this finding suggests that Taiwanese product managers are of


ten not preoccupied with the acquisition or development
of
marketing

resources.

Since

tion is controlled more

resource

centrally

development

and

in the organization,

in Developing
The Role of Marketing
South Korea and Taiwan

Successful

alloca

product
New

Products

in

65

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

managers
sion

of

a significant

do not perceive
resources

new

and

product

link between

provi
re

The

performance.

sources themselves are not important; what counts is what


the Taiwanese new product manager is able to do with the re
sources

over

the course

of the project.

As in South Korea, state intervention


mass

were

education

fundamental

nants of rapid economic


in Taiwan

government

and rapid diffusion

prerequisites

the Nationalist

growth. However,

took

a less

of

and determi

authoritarian

position

rela

tive to business,
and instead functioned as an assistant to
business by collaborating with firms to upgrade technical
resources
and management
and Henderson
(Applebaum
1992; Hwang 1991). Thus, relative to Korea, authority struc
tures are less formal in Taiwanese
firms. The case studies
that

suggest

in Taiwanese

top management

firms

assumes

for much of the functional expertise


primary responsibility
development.
Coupled with a pervasive and powerful na
tionalistic spirit, the highly aggressive entrepreneurial drive
of Taiwanese firms has created a strong link between the re
source

As a re
pool and new product
project
requirements.
to Korean managers,
these results
indicate
that
sult, contrary
new
Taiwanese
not
do
managers
product
perceive
marketing
resources
to be negatively
to new
related
product
perfor
mance.
new
Taiwanese
focus
their
Rather,
managers
product
resources
on
available
the
marketing
enhancing
proficiency

of marketing

activities

in the development

process.

The Taiwanese new product manager


is charged with the
resources and skills made
task of utilizing
the marketing
available to him/her to proficiently
execute the necessary
marketing

activities.

Because

resources

the marketing

vided by the central resource management


properly matched to the project requirements,
manager

product

perceives

a significant

pro

authority are
the Taiwanese

link

re

between

source availability and proficiency


in marketing activities.
are
Furthermore, marketing skills
significant determinants of
marketing

activities

because

the Taiwanese

product

manager

is able to motivate
the utilization
of employee capabilities.
Since capitalism in Taiwan appeals strongly to Chinese Con
fucianism's heavy emphasis on individual achievement and
dedication
(Silin 1976), there is a stronger link between per
formance
conformist

and

economic

values

reward.

also motivate

spect new product managers

As

in Korea,
patriarchal
Taiwanese
employees

and
to re

and their authority.

In sum, marketing skills and activities are directly linked to


the proficient execution of marketing activities because the
Taiwanese
ward,

has legitimate
and
manager
and direct
the marketing
motivate,

to re
authority
activities.
However,

social

since the typical Taiwanese firm centrally controls resource


development and allocation, the project manager does not di
rectly control the availability of resources and therefore does
66X. Michael

Song, Mitzi M. Montoya-Weiss,

and Jeffrey B. Schmidt

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

not perceive a link between marketing resources and perfor


mance. These results suggest that the highly market-directed,
entrepreneurial
match
between
As

a result,

nature

of Taiwanese
resource

marketing
Taiwanese

new

for niche

development

or distribution

vertising

was developed
to new

activities

and

skills,

on

than

product

extensive

ad

channel development.

In this article a model


sources,

rather

on

capitalize

in low-cost, high-quality

markets

good

requirements.

project

managers

product

their competence

building

and

create

firms

re

linking marketing
product

Conclusion

performance.

The model was tested using 372 new products from South
Korean firms and 306 new products from Taiwanese firms. In
in both countries.
general, findings supported the hypotheses
were
across
Three important similarities
found
South Korean
and Taiwanese

firms.

First,

resource

marketing

does

synergy

not directly
increase the level of new product success.
Rather, marketing resource synergy aids in the development
of appropriate marketing skills. Second, marketing skill syn
ergy is important for new product success. Third, proficiency
in marketing

activities

Consequently,

South

new

enhances
Korean

product
Taiwanese

and

performance.
are ad
firms

to develop marketing skills and capabilities in order to


activi
proficiently perform critical marketing development

vised

resources

ties.

possessing
Simply
marketing
success.
the odds of new product

One major difference


in this

uncovered

tivities mediate
on new

between

resources

In Korean

performance.

ac

firms, marketing

the effects of marketing

product

increase

South Korea and Taiwan was

In Taiwanese

research.

not

will

firms,

and skills
marketing

skills and marketing activities directly impact new product


performance. It is argued that this difference stems from cul
tural
reward,

resources

in human

differences

whether

practices

or not the new product manager


and

motivate,

direct

concerning

to

has the authority

the marketing

activities.

It is

also suggested that the tendency toward centrally controlled


resources in both South Korean and Taiwanese firms would
likely
impact
lated marketing

a manager's

ability

to manipulate

project-re

resources.

to the literature in several ways.


contributes
of
and NPD in South Korea and
Understanding
marketing
Taiwan is increased. Both of these countries have grown at
tremendous rates over the past three decades. Yet few studies
have systematically
examined the successful NPD practices
of these emerging economic juggernauts. In this study, the lit
erature is extended by comparing the role of marketing in the
NPD process in South Korea and Taiwan.
This research

Future
tries

research
as the

region

focus

on NPD

of the world

contains

should

in Developing
The Role of Marketing
South Korea and Taiwan

in other

Asian

The authors thank the JIM Special


Issue Editor, David K. Tse, and two
anonymous JIM reviewers for their
on earlier
comments
thoughtful
drafts of this article. This article is
based on GLOBALTECH, an inter
national

global

comparative

technology

management

quarter

Successful

New

study

of

and innovation

practices.

Financial

support provided
by Marketing
Science Institute Research Compe
tition Awards,
Eastman Kodak
Hewlett-Packard

Company,

pany, and Arthur D. Little


gratefully acknowledged.

coun

one

about

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

of

Products

in

67

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Com

Inc. is

the world's

The Authors

Montoya-Weiss
tant professor
of business

the samples

is assis

at North
Carolina
at
University
Raleigh.

State

is assistant
Jeffrey B. Schmidt
and inter
professor of marketing
national

business

at Kansas

markets.

Furthermore,

were

in nature,

cross-sectional

covering

a broad

industries and prod


range of South Korean and Taiwanese
ucts. While the highly representative nature of the samples
in the findings, there is op
should increase the confidence
more
for
future
research. For example,
portunity
finely grained
given that both South Korea and Taiwan export awide range of

manage

ment

in international

and has generally

this study's model could be expanded to included additional


factors that impact new product performance (e.g., technical
resources, skills, and activities). It is important to note that

Song is associate pro


at Michigan
fessor of marketing
State University.
M.

success

experienced

X. Michael

Mitzi

is rapidly growing,

population,

product types (high/low-value, high/low-technological


sophis
tication), itmay be useful to address the effects of product or
industry type on marketing practices and new product out
comes. There is a need for future research to explore the pos
sibility of additional moderator variables.

State

University.

Aaker,

References

D.A.

"Managing

Assets

Competitive
Advantage."
ter 1989): 91-106.

and Skills:
California

The Key
Management

to a Sustainable
Review
(Win

States and Development


R.P., and J.Henderson.
Applebaum,
Asian Pacific Rim. Newbury
Park, CA: Sage, 1992.

in the

"An Integrative Model


of the
Calantone,
R.J., and CA. di Benedetto.
New Product Development
Process."
Innova
Product
Journal of
5 (September
tion Management
1988): 201-15.
and X.M. Song. "Controllable
R.J., J.B. Schmidt,
A
Cross-National
Product Success:
Comparison."
15, no. 4 (1996): 341-58.
ing Science

Calantone,
of New

G.A.

Churchill,

"A Paradigm
for Developing
Journal of Marketing

Better

Constructs."
Marketing
ruary 1979): 64-73.
Choo,

H.

"The Educational

Basis

New

Measures
of
16 (Feb

Research,

Korean

Economic

Devel

and South Ko

In The Economic

opment."
rea: A Parallel

of South

Factors
Market

with Lessons,
York: Praeger, 1990.

of Japan
Development
edited by C.H. Lee and I. Yamazawa.

"An Investigation
into the
R.G., and E.J. Kleinschmidt.
and
Product Process:
Deficiencies,
Steps,
Impact." Journal
3 (March 1986): 71-85.
Innovation Management
of Product

Cooper,
New

_.

"New Products: What Separates Winners


from Losers?" Journal
4 (September
Innovation Management
1987): 169-84.

of Product
_.

in the
the Winners
"Major New Products, What Distinguishes
Innovation
Product
Chemical
Management
Industry." Journal of
10 (March 1993): 90-111.
of Market-Driven
Day, G.S. "The Capabilities
58 (October 1994): 37-52.
nal of Marketing
Day, G.S., and R. Wensley.
Diagnosing
Competitive
(April 1988): 1-20.

Organizations."

A Framework
"Assessing
Advantage:
Journal
Superiority."
of Marketing

S., and C.S. Craig. International


Douglas,
Marketing
1983.
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall,
glewood

68 X. Michael

Song, Mitzi M. Montoya-Weiss,

Research.

Jour
for
52

En

and Jeffrey B. Schmidt

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

"Asia Outlooks."
PLC

Euromoney.
romoney

Edited

Publications

and

Field,

K.J. Enterprise
Ithaca, NY: Cornell

(March

the State

by Garry Evans.
1988): 32-61.

London:

in South

and

Taiwan.

1995.

Press,

University

Korea

Griffin, A., and A.L. Page. "An Interim Report of Measuring


uct Development
Success
and Failure."
Journal of Product
10 (September
vation Management
1993): 291-308.
G.G. Business
Networks
Hamilton,
East and Southeast
Asia. Hong
of Hong

University

Eu

and Economic
Centre

Kong:

Prod
Inno

in
Development
of Asian
Studies,

1991.

Kong,

"The Comparative
Hunt, S.D., and R.M. Morgan.
Advantage
Theory
59 (April 1995): 1-15.
of Competition."
Journal of Marketing
Y. Dolly. The Rise of a New
Hwang,
war Taiwan. New York: Greenwood

K.S.

Power:

Post

1991.

Press,

M.D. Econometric
Models,
Intriligator,
tions. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice
Kon,

Economic

World

Techniques
Hall, 1978.

and Applica

in South
In Doing Business
and Employment."
39-49.
A.M.
New
York:
Nichols
Pub
Whitehill,
by
1987.
Company,
"Labour

edited

Korea,
lishing

Lee, C.H. The Economic


Transformation
of South Korea:
Transition
Economies.
Paris:
the
OECD, 1995
for
M.M.,
Montoya-Weiss,
Product
Performance:
Product

Innovation

Lessons

of New
and R.J. Calantone.
"Determinants
A Review
and Meta-Analysis."
Journal of
11 (November
1994): 397-417.
Management

and X.M. Song.


Parry, M.E.,
China." Journal of Product
1994): 15-30.

"Identifying
Innovation

and L.N. Elola.


A.M.,
Sanchez,
in Spain." Journal of Product
1991): 49-56.

"Product

New

Product

Management
Innovation

Innovation

Management

Success
in
11 (January

Management
8 (March

Deter
Activities
Schmidt,
Jeffrey B. "New Product Myopia: Which
and Industrial Marketing
mine Success?"
10,
Journal of Business
no. 1 (1995): 23-33.
and Values: The Organization
Silin, R.H. Leadership
of Large-Scale
MA: Harvard
Taiwanese
University
Cambridge,
Enterprises.
Press, 1976.
Song, X.M., and M.E.
ese High-Technology

Parry, "R&D-Marketing
Firms: Hypotheses

in Japan
Integration
Evi
and Empirical

dence." Journal of theAcademy ofMarketing Science 21 (Spring


1993): 125-33.

_.

From
Product
Winners
New
Japanese
Separates
13
Innovation
Product
Journal of
Management
(Septem
ber 1996): 422-39.
"What

Losers?"

_.

"The Determinants
Journal

_.

of Marketing

New Product
of Japanese
34 (February 1997a):

Research

Successes."
64-76.

Study of New Product Devel


Comparative
States." Journal of Market
and
the
United
Japan

"A Cross-National
opment

Process:

ing 61 (April 1997b): 1-16.


In Doing Business
Soo, K.C. "TYade Policy."
26-38. Worcester:
A.M. Whitehill,
Billings

in Developing
The Role of Marketing
South Korea and Taiwan

in South Korea, edited by


& Sons Limited,
1987.

Successful

New

Products

in

This content downloaded from 132.170.219.53 on Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:34:59 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

You might also like