The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child

History
Began with the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of the Child (1959).
Since, there has been several treaties to contextualize the Convention and its importance.
Adopted by UN in its current form in 1989 and opened for signature.
Currently, 194 member states have ratified.
Background
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child is the most ratified document
in the UN's history.
Sets out the civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights of children.
All U.N. states (countries) of the United Nations, except the United States and Somalia,
have ratified it.
The United Nations General Assembly agreed to adopt the Convention into international
law as an advisory resolution on November 20, 1989; it came into force on September 2,
1990.
Who is a child?
Generally defined as any human being under the age of 18 unless a different age of majority is
recognized by a country's law (Some as late as 25).
Summary
The CRC has 54 articles
It protects the rights of children and young people up to 18 years (some countries up to
25 years) of age across the world.
Articles 1-41 (each outlining a Right) set out how children and young people should be
treated.
The other 13 articles are all about how governments and adults should work together to
make sure children and young people can access and enjoy their Rights.
4 Main Principles
1. Non-discrimination
2. The Right to Life, Survival and Development
3. The Views of the Child
4. Best Interests of the Child
Categories of Rights under the CRC
I. Survival and development rights
Protection of rights
Parental guidance
Survival and development
Registration, name, nationality, care
Preservation of identity
Separation from parents
Family reunification
Freedom of thought, conscience and religion
1|Page

Parental responsibilities; state assistance

Children deprived of family environment
Refugee children
Children with disabilities
Health and health services
Review of treatment in care
Social security
Adequate standard of living
Right to education
Goals of education
Children of minorities/indigenous groups
Leisure, play and culture
Knowledge of rights

II. Protection Rights

Protection of rights
Kidnapping
Protection from all forms of violence
Children deprived of family environment
Adoption
Refugee children
Child labour
Drug abuse
Sexual exploitation
Abduction, sale and trafficking
Other forms of exploitation
Detention and punishment
War and armed conflicts
Rehabilitation of child victims
Juvenile justice
Respect for superior national standards
III. Participation rights
Protection of rights
Respect for the views of the child
Freedom of expression
Freedom of thought, conscience and religion
Freedom of association
Right to privacy
Access to information; mass media
Enforcement of the Convention
1. Countries sign the CRC.
2. Countries ratify the CRC.
3. Countries rights widely known.
4. Committee on the Rights of the Child.
2|Page

5. Committee reviews reports submitted by States Parties two years after ratification, and
every 5 years thereafter.
6. States Parties make rights widely known.
7. Committee proposes special studies etc. to be undertaken in the countries.
8. All countries help each other implement the Convention.

3|Page

Articles 4-14
Article 4 Implementation of Rights in the Convention
States Parties shall undertake all appropriate legislative, administrative, and other
measures for the implementation of the rights recognized in the present Convention. With
regard to economic, social and cultural rights, States Parties shall undertake such measures
to the maximum extent of their available resources and, where needed, within the
framework of international co-operation.
The article conveys that each States Parties including the Philippines must undertake
legislative, administrative, and other measures for the implementation of the rights stated in the
convention. Furthermore, the article emphasizes the economic, social and cultural rights of children
should also be regarded as important. However, the committee took account of the reality regarding
the capacity of the States Parties to undertake measures on such rights.
In the Philippines, the laws implemented specifically implementing the rights of children are:
1.
2.
3.
4.

Presidential Decree No. 603 The Child and Youth Welfare Code
Republic Act No. 9262 Anti-Violence Against Women and Their Children Act of 2004
Republic Act No. 10630 Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006
Republic Act No. 7610 Special Protection of Children Against Abuse, Exploitation and
Discrimination Act
5. Republic Act No. 8369 Family Courts Act of 1997
6. Republic Act No. 7658 An Act Prohibiting the Employment of Children Below 15
Years of Age in Public and Private Undertakings, Amending for this Purpose Section 12,
Article VIII of Republic Act 7610

4|Page

Article 5 Parental Guidance and the Childs Evolving Capacities

States Parties shall respect the responsibilities, rights and duties of parents or, where
applicable, the members of the extended family or community as provided for by local
custom, legal guardians or other persons legally responsible for the child, to provide, in a
manner consistent with the evolving capacities of the child, appropriate direction and
guidance in the exercise by the child of the rights recognized in the present Convention.
Article 5 and Article 18 provides a framework for the relationship between the child, his or
her parents and family, and the State. In no sense is the Convention anti-family, nor does it pit
children against their parents. On the contrary, the Preamble upholds the family as the fundamental
group of society and the natural environment for the growth and well-being of all its members and
particularly children.
Thus, States Parties are required to use their best endeavours to ensure recognition of the
principle that both parents have common responsibilities for the upbringing and development of the
child: Parents or, as the case may be, legal guardians, have the primary responsibility for the
upbringing and development of the child. The best interests of the child will be their basic
concern.
The Family Code shows the responsibilities and rights of parents or others as provided for
by law, particularly, Article 209 and 220 which state that:
Art. 209. Pursuant to the natural right and duty of parents over the person and property of
their unemancipated children, parental authority and responsibility shall include the caring for and
rearing them for civic consciousness and efficiency and the development of their moral, mental and
physical character and well-being. (n)
Art. 220. The parents and those exercising parental authority shall have with the respect to
their unemancipated children on wards the following rights and duties:
(1) To keep them in their company, to support, educate and instruct them by right precept
and good example, and to provide for their upbringing in keeping with their means;
(2) To give them love and affection, advice and counsel, companionship and understanding;
(3) To provide them with moral and spiritual guidance, inculcate in them honesty, integrity,
self-discipline, self-reliance, industry and thrift, stimulate their interest in civic affairs, and inspire in
them compliance with the duties of citizenship;
(4) To furnish them with good and wholesome educational materials, supervise their
activities, recreation and association with others, protect them from bad company, and prevent them
from acquiring habits detrimental to their health, studies and morals;
(5) To represent them in all matters affecting their interests;
(6) To demand from them respect and obedience;
(7) To impose discipline on them as may be required under the circumstances; and
(8) To perform such other duties as are imposed by law upon parents and guardians. (316a)
5|Page

Article 6 Childs Right to Life and Maximum Survival and Development

1. States Parties recognize that every child has the inherent right to life.
2. States Parties shall ensure to the maximum extent possible the survival and
development of the child.
In fact, the right to life is upheld as a universal human rights principle in article 3 of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of
person
Article 6 guarantees the childs fundamental right to life, upheld as a universal human rights
principle in other instruments, and to survival and development to the maximum extent possible.
In the Philippines, Republic Act No. 7610 also known as Special Protection of Children Against
Abuse, Exploitation and Discrimination Act provides the protection for children. There is also
Republic Act No. 9262 also known as Anti-Violence Against Women and Their Children Act of
2004.
The article also shows the key role of parents and the family for child development and the
States obligation to support them. Protection from violence and exploitation is also vital to
maximum survival and development. The Committee on the Rights of the Child has proposed
that article 6 should be reflected in domestic legislation. The Family Code further provides that
parents or legal guardians have the duty and responsibility to support their children.
Some issues concerning Article 6:
With regards to abortion, the Convention leaves individual States to decide for themselves
the conflicting rights and interests involved in issues such as abortion and family planning. The
Committee recommends that the State Party review its legislation concerning abortion, with a view
to guaranteeing the best interests of child victims of rape and incest.
Early marriage, threatens the rights of both the child-mother and the new child to life and
to maximum survival and development. In the Philippines, one must be of legal age in order to
marry.
With regards to death penalty, Convention on the Rights of the Child prohibits capital
punishment for offences committed by persons below eighteen years of age. This is reflected in
Republic Act No. 10630 known as Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006

6|Page

Article 7 Birth Registration, Name, Nationality and Right to know and be cared for by
Parents
1. The child shall be registered immediately after birth and shall have the right from
birth to a name, the right to acquire a nationality and. as far as possible, the right to know
and be cared for by his or her parents. 2. States Parties shall ensure the implementation of
these rights in accordance with their national law and their obligations under the relevant
international instruments in this field, in particular where the child would otherwise be
stateless.
In the Committees opinion, this provision should be interpreted as being closely linked to
the provision concerning the right to special measures of protection and it is designed to promote
recognition of the childs legal personality.
Article 7 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child also contains a new right the
right of the child to know and be cared for by his or her parents. The right is qualified by the words
as far as possible. It may not be possible to identify parents, and even when they are known, it
may not be in the childs best interests to be cared for by them. Article 7 should be read in
conjunction with article 8 (preservation of identity, including nationality, name and family relations),
article 9 (separation from parents), article 10 (family reunification) and article 20 (continuity in
upbringing of children deprived of their family environment).
Registration is the States first official acknowledgement of the childs existence; it
represents recognition of each childs individual importance to the State and of the childs status
under the law. Where children are not registered, they are likely to be less visible, and sometimes less
valued. Children who are not registered often belong to groups who suffer from other forms of
discrimination.
Although the Convention does not specify what must be registered, other rights (to name and
nationality, to know parentage, family and identity) imply that registration ought, as a minimum, to
include:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

the childs name at birth,

the childs sex,
the childs date of birth,
where the child was born,
the parents names and addresses,
the parents nationality status.

With regard to meaning of parent in the Article: a reasonable assumption is that, as far as
the childs right to know his or her parents is concerned, the definition of parents includes genetic
parents (for medical reasons alone this knowledge is of increasing importance to the child) and birth
parents, that is the mother who gave birth and the father who claimed paternity through partnership
with the mother at the time of birth (or whatever the social definition of father is within the culture:
the point being that such social definitions are important to children in terms of their identity). In
addition, a third category, the childs psychological parents those who cared for the child for
significant periods during infancy and childhood should also logically be included since these
persons too are intimately bound up in childrens identity and thus their rights under article 8.

7|Page

Article 8 Preservation of Identity

1. States Parties undertake to respect the right of the child to preserve his or her identity,
including nationality, name and family relations as recognized by law without unlawful
interference.
2. Where a child is illegally deprived of some or all of the elements of his or her identity,
States Parties shall provide appropriate assistance and protection, with a view to reestablishing speedily his or her identity.
Three elements of Identity: Nationality, Name and Family Relations
A. Nationality
The Committee is concerned that in some instances, children can be deprived of their
citizenship in situations where one of their parents loses his/her citizenship.
The Committee recommends that no child be deprived of his/her citizenship on any
ground, regardless of the status of his/her parent(s).
B. Name (Regarding Surname)
Providing for the right to have a name is of special importance in the case of children born
out of wedlock (Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 17, 1989, HRI/
GEN/1/Rev.8, para. 7, p. 185).
C. Family Relations
The concept of childrens identity has tended to focus on the childs immediate family, but
it is increasingly recognized that children have a remarkable capacity to embrace multiple
relationships. Children who live in a different country from that of one or both of their parents may
not be able to preserve their identity, as expressed by their family relations. Those countries that
maintain long waiting lists for immigrant or emigrant children to be granted permission to join their
parents should ensure that such cases are dealt with speedily and with a presumption in favour of
the child being allowed to join their parents (see articles 9, 10 and 22).
Note: Preserve is meant for the enforcement of detailed record-keeping and preservation
of records

8|Page

Article 9 Separation from Parents

1. States Parties shall ensure that a child shall not be separated from his or her parents
against their will, except when competent authorities subject to judicial review determine, in
accordance with applicable law and procedures, that such separation is necessary for the
best interests of the child. Such determination may be necessary in a particular case such as
one involving abuse or neglect of the child by the parents, or one where the parents are
living separately and a decision must be made as to the child's place of residence.
2. In any proceedings pursuant to paragraph 1 of the present article, all interested parties
shall be given an opportunity to participate in the proceedings and make their views known.
3. States Parties shall respect the right of the child who is separated from one or both
parents to maintain personal relations and direct contact with both parents on a regular
basis, except if it is contrary to the child's best interests.
4. Where such separation results from any action initiated by a State Party, such as the
detention, imprisonment, exile, deportation or death (including death arising from any
cause while the person is in the custody of the State) of one or both parents or of the child,
that State Party shall, upon request, provide the parents, the child or, if appropriate, another
member of the family with the essential information concerning the whereabouts of the
absent member(s) of the family unless the provision of the information would be
detrimental to the well-being of the child. States Parties shall further ensure that the
submission of such a request shall of itself entail no adverse consequences for the person(s)
concerned.
Article 9 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child enshrines two essential principles of
childrens rights: first, that children should not be separated from their parents unless it is necessary
for their best interests and, second, that all procedures to separate children from parents on that
ground must be fair. It also affirms childrens rights to maintain relations and contact with both
parents, and places a duty on the State to inform parent and child of the whereabouts of either if the
State has caused their separation (for example by deportation or imprisonment).
The words against their will refer either to the parents will or to the parents and childs
will together; the grammar makes clear that it does not mean the childs will alone. And, in one
sense, the right of children to parental care is inevitably subject to the will of parents. Infants have
no power or ability to choose their caregivers. They are dependent on their family, community and
the State to make that choice for them. Moreover, even if young children were in a position to
choose their parents, they could not force them to act as parents against their will. The State can
seek to force parents to financially maintain their children, but it cannot compel parents to care for
them appropriately.
Unnecessary Separation from Parents include:
A. State Care
The Committee is concerned about the insufficient support for disadvantaged families and
the fact that, as a result, children are often unnecessarily separated from their parents The
Committee recommends that the State Party provide adequate support to disadvantaged families,
9|Page

including counselling and educational services, and ensure that separation of children from their
parents only takes place if necessary, in their best interest and on precise legal grounds.
B. Abandoned, runaway or unaccompanied children living or working on the streets.
Parents in extreme circumstances of poverty, violence or armed conflict may abandon their
children or children and parents may simply lose contact with each other as a result of the pressure
of such events; sometimes children leave home for the streets because of violence or exploitation by
their parents.
C. Children in hospitals
Parents may not be allowed to visit or, where appropriate, remain with their children in
hospital. Again, this form of separation, more common in industrialized than developing countries,
is maintained primarily for the convenience of the staff, although the medical needs of the child
patient may be cited. In fact, it is now generally recognized that childrens recovery is greatly aided
by having parents with them in hospital. Though hospital practice is usually controlled by medical
staff and hospital managers, the State has a role in encouraging child-friendly hospitals.
D. Parents in Prisons
The imprisonment of parents, particularly of mothers of dependent young children, is
deeply problematic, because the child is being punished along with the parent.
E. Armed Conflict
The separation of parents and children may arise during armed conflict (article 38) or when
they have become refugees (article 22). The consequences of civil war or economic breakdown can
be devastating to the family unit.

http://www.child-encyclopedia.com/divorce-and-separation/according-experts/howparents-can-help-children-cope-separationdivorce
Research has shown that negative short-term consequences for children after divorce
include decreased academic achievement, poor psychological adjustment, social and emotional
adjustment, and negative self concept. Pedro-Caroll, PhD (2011)
Long-term consequences include poorer sense of well-being, lower socioeconomic status,
poorer physical health, weaker emotional ties to their own parents particularly their fathers and a
higher risk of divorce in their own marriage. Pedro-Caroll, PhD (2011)

10 | P a g e

Article 10 Entering or Leaving Countries for Family Reunification

1. In accordance with the obligation of States Parties under article 9, paragraph 1,
applications by a child or his or her parents to enter or leave a State Party for the purpose of
family reunification shall be dealt with by States Parties in a positive, humane and
expeditious manner. States Parties shall further ensure that the submission of such a request
shall entail no adverse consequences for the applicants and for the members of their family.
2. A child whose parents reside in different States shall have the right to maintain on a
regular basis, save in exceptional circumstances personal relations and direct contacts with
both parents. Towards that end and in accordance with the obligation of States Parties
under article 9, paragraph 1, States Parties shall respect the right of the child and his or her
parents to leave any country, including their own, and to enter their own country. The right
to leave any country shall be subject only to such restrictions as are prescribed by law and
which are necessary to protect the national security, public order (ordre public), public
health or morals or the rights and freedoms of others and are consistent with the other rights
recognized in the present Convention.

11 | P a g e

Article 11 Illicit transfer and non-return of children abroad

1. States Parties shall take measures to combat the illicit transfer and non-return of children
abroad.
2. To this end, States Parties shall promote the conclusion of bilateral or multilateral
agreements or accession to existing agreements.
The difference between illicit transfer and non-return of children abroad (Art. 11) and
abduction (Art. 35)
Broadly speaking, the distinction is, first, that article 11 applies to children taken for
personal rather than financial gain, usually parents or other relatives, whereas sale and
trafficking has a commercial or sexual motive. Second, article 11 is exclusively focused on children
who are taken out of their country, whereas article 35 is not.
Example: One of the parents may abduct his child preventing the child from having access
to the parent with whom the child used to live or with whom the child had direct and regular
contacts and personal relations.

12 | P a g e

Article 12 Respect for the views of the child

1. States Parties shall assure to the child who is capable of forming his or her own views the
right to express those views freely in all matters affecting the child, the views of the child
being given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child.
2. For this purpose, the child shall in particular be provided the opportunity to be heard in
any judicial and administrative proceedings affecting the child, either directly, or through a
representative or an appropriate body, in a manner consistent with the procedural rules of
national law.
The Committee on the Rights of the Child asserted xxx that article 12 is a general principle
of fundamental importance, relevant to all aspects of implementation of the Convention on the
Rights of the Child and to the interpretation of all other articles.
Paragraph 1 requires States to assure:
that any child capable of forming a view has the right to express views freely in all matters affecting
him or her;
that the childs views are given due weight in accordance with
age and maturity.
Paragraph 2 specifically provides the child with the right to be heard and have his or her
views given due weight in any judicial and administrative proceedings affecting him or her. This
covers a very wide range of court hearings and also formal decision-making affecting the child in, for
example, education, health, planning, the environment and so on.
Article 12, together with the childs right to freedom of expression (article 13), and other
civil rights to freedom of thought, conscience and religion (article 14), and freedom of association
(article 15) underline childrens status as individuals with fundamental human rights, and views and
feelings of their own
In essence it affirms that the child is a fully fledged person having the right to express views
in all matters affecting him or her, and having those views heard and given due weight. Thus the
child has the right to participate in the decision-making process affecting his or her life, as well as to
influence decisions taken in his or her regard...
Article 12 does not set any lower age limit on childrens rights to express views freely.
A shift away from traditional beliefs that regard early childhood mainly as a period for the
socialization of the immature human being towards mature adult status is required. The Convention
requires that children, including the very youngest children, be respected as persons in their own
right. Young children should be recognized as active members of families, communities and
societies, with their own concerns, interests and points of view.
They have been regarded as undeveloped, lacking even basic capacities for understanding,
communicating and making choices. They have been powerless within their families, and often
voiceless and invisible within society. The Committee wishes to emphasize that article 12 applies
both to younger and to older children. As holders of rights, even the youngest children are entitled
13 | P a g e

to express their views, which should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity
of the child (art. 12.1). Young children are acutely sensitive to their surroundings and very rapidly
acquire understanding of the people, places and routines in their lives, along with awareness of their
own unique identity.
Note: Maturity is undefined; it implies the ability to understand and assess the implications
of the matter in question. This in turn places obligations on the decision makers to give the child
sufficient information.

14 | P a g e

Article 13 Childs right to freedom of expression

1. The child shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to
seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either
orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of the childs
choice.
2. The exercise of this right may be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be
such as are provided by law and are necessary:
(a) For respect of the rights or reputations of others; or
(b) For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre public), or of public
health or morals.
Art. 13(1)
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, in its article 19, guarantees: Everyone has the
right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without
interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers. Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights contains similar
wording.
The prevailing reality was however, and to a certain extent still is, that children, in view of
their evolving maturity, are in practice not recognized as having the necessary capacity or
competence to exercise them. In other words, traditional social attitudes regarding the role of
children appear to make it difficult to accept children fully as the subjects of rights.
Art. 13(2)
The Committee is concerned about the limitations on the exercise of the right to freedom
of expression by children. The Committee notes with concern the violent incidents during a peaceful
student demonstration against a rise in bus fares, which took place in the village of Benque Viejo del
Carmen on 24 April 2002, and the reported disproportionate use of force by the police authorities.
The Committee is concerned at reports of incidents of threats and violence by vigilante
groups, such as Ansari-Hezbollah, directed at persons seeking to exercise or to promote the exercise
of these rights.

15 | P a g e

Article 14 Childs right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion

1. States Parties shall respect the right of the child to freedom of thought, conscience and
religion.
2. States Parties shall respect the rights and duties of the parents and, when applicable, legal
guardians to provide direction to the child in the exercise of his or her right in a manner
consistent with the evolving capacities of the child.
3. Freedom to manifest ones religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as
are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health or morals, or
the fundamental rights and freedoms of others.
A. Freedom of thought
- There are no restrictions for the exercise of this right. However, direction of parents is required n
the exercise of this right.
- The children may impart the information they receive and may not be compelled to reveal their
thoughts.
B. Freedom of conscience
- There are no restrictions for the exercise of this right. However, direction of parents is required n
the exercise of this right.
- Issues of conscience might arise, for example, concerning diet, such as vegetarianism, or
environmental issues. One issue of conscience on which there are various human rights
recommendations, but no explicit mention in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, or in the Convention, is that of conscientious
objection to military service.
C. Freedom of religion
- The exercise of this right is limited by Art. 14 (3)
- Freedom to believe is absolute but freedom to manifest it is limited. Such limitations are only those
which are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health or morals, or
the fundamental rights and freedoms of others.

16 | P a g e