Joaquin Irwin Foy Sovereign Derp

Case 1:15-cv-01869-NLH Document 1 Filed 03/12/15 Page 1 of 61 PageID: 1
AO 242 ( 12/11) Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C.
2241
UNITEJt,1~~(ES DIS1~fC;[ f;;91URT
ABDULLAH PROPHET HAKIYM JOAQUIN

for the
FOY AL-MAHDI THE 12TH. IMAM OF IRAf,1
ISA AL-MEHDI(AL-MftHDI )AKA-Joaquin IrHin
11 EC EI VE
Fov[BIRTH NAME)and CLAIRE AGNES MAN-)
GAN-FOY(MRS~)PND ENTIRE FOY FAMILY

)
U S .. U. N. STATE DEPA:::TI<~::~~ IND ETC )
MAR 12 2015
Petitioner
v.
TR~
SUP~?-~ICH
MEMBERS OF THE ILLU- )
MINATI (BILD~E.
\C, 's GROUP); HOLL
)
1::::1 B.R.JETT,E~' l'L. ~?D=;:;?:OB/'.MA&BIDIT:)
?(~adz~'of'warden a';Icltrthtffi;tY~~~tnrHii~i:rit bfs&~Jne}J1%hJrJ
1.
2.
(a) Name of institution:
(b) Address:
AT 8:30
M
WILLIAM T. WALSH CLERK
Case No.
(Supplied by Clerk of Court)
AO 242 ( 12111) Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.SC. 2241
Decision or Action You Are Challenging
5.
What are you challenging in this petition:

0 How your sentence is being carried out, calculated, or credited by prison or parole authorities (for example,
revocation or calculation of good time credits)
0 Pretrial detention
0 Immigration detention
ODetainer
OThe validity of your conviction or sentence as imposed (for example, sentence beyond the statutory
maximum or improperly calculated under the sentencing guidelines)
0 Disciplinary proceedings
0 Other (explain):
6.
Provide more information about the decision or action you are challenging:
(a) Name and location of the agency or court:
(b) Docket number, case number, or opinion number:
(c) Decision or action you are challenging (for disciplinary proceedings, specifY the penalties imposed):
(d) Date of the decision or action:

Your Earlier Challenges of the Decision or Action
7.
First appeal
Did you appeal the decision, file a grievance, or seek an administrative remedy?
OYes
ONo
(a) lf"Yes," provide:

( l) Name of the authority, agency, or court:
(2) Date of filing:
(3) Docket number, case number, or opinion number:
(4) Result:
( 5) Date of result:
(6) Issues raised:
Page3of 10
AO 242 ( 12/11) Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S C.
s 2241
(b) If you answered "No," explain why you did not appeal:
8.
Second appeal
After the first appeal, did you file a second appeal to a higher authority, agency, or court?
OYes
ONo
(a) If "Yes," provide:
(1) Name of the authority, agency, or court:

(2) Date of filing:
(4) Result:
(5) Date of result:
(6) Issues raised:
(b) If you answered "No," explain why you did not file a second appeal:
9.
Third appeal
After the second appeal, did you file a third appeal to a higher authority, agency, or court?
OYes
ONo
(a) If "Yes," provide:

(1) Name of the authority, agency, or court:
(2) Date of filing:

(4) Result:
(5) Date of result:
(6) Issues raised:
Page 4 of 10
II
Kc'PtLJ:J//e ANS.
The Contmtental
united States of America
NAME
TERRITORY (VENUE)
CAPITAL
<'
I
I
!I l.l
IJ
CREATED BY
CITIZENRY
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
",<,LAA
-.
Legislative democracy
A union of 50 independent sovereign

States, not including the District of
Columbia, territories or enclaves.
The District of Columbia and all the

territories and enclaves (American
Samoa, Guam, Midway Islands, Puerto
Rico, Wake Island, etc.)
The union of the United States is

the only country in the world with
no national capital within its venue .
Each sovereign State has its
own capital.
Since June 1800, a "City of Washington"

sits in the federal District of Columbia,
which is exempt from all State influence
and jurisdiction. The city is ruled by a
federal Commission appointed by the
President. It has no local legislature;
the only legislative authority is Congress.
It is the meeting place of Congress and
is the seat of federal administration.
"We the People," free Preamble

sovereign Citizens .
Article I, Section 8, clause 17 of the

U.S. Constitution.
Each State governs its own

citizenry, made up of free Preamble
persons: "We the People ... and
our Posterity."
The citizens of the District of Columbia,

all the territories, enclaves and
possessions, and all naturalized citizens
(XIVth Amendment, Section 1).
President
President
A Congress of the Republic consisting A Congress of the Legislative Democracy

of representatives from the citizenry -the same persons
CONGRESS'
JURISDICTION
The States only, not the citizenry of The citizenry of DC, the territories,
the States except under some form of enclaves, and possessions, naturalized
citizens, and those who put themselves
Commercial Agreement.
under the rule of federal regions.
JUDICIAL
JURISDICTION
Law, equity (Article Ill courts) and

admiralty.
:.:.;-r: :GmlEB
Real-mooey,-OOsed--Ofl-SUbstan,...
gold and silver (Article I, Section 10,
clause 1).
n:::ink
credit: Federal Reserve Notes (scrip),
non-redeemable in gold or silver
[equitable paper involving Commercial
Agreements under negotiable instrument
law-later codified as Uniform
Commercial Code (UCC)].
Many in the U.S. Constitution
None, except what are called

Unconscionable Agreements under UCC .
FLAG
Stars and stripes without yellow

fringe .
Stars and stripes with yellow fringe.
STATE ABBREVIATIONS
Ala., Alas., Ariz., Cal., Colo., etc.

(with or without "zip" codes)
AL, AK, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, MT,
SC, TX, etc. (with or without "zip" codes)
CURRENCY
Jj~OCV'Afs =.'5rx:/Al/sft;-r,--,
The Federal United States
TYPE OF GOVERNMENT Constitutional Republic
THE TWO UNITED STATES
LIMITATIONS
Colorable admiralty (called statutory),

Article I legislative courts.
..
- --fn-n~\/ -,,---,; n:::l~An nn
UNITED
U.S.GOVERMENT
AMERIKKKA]GENERAL
ASSEMBLY,
Case NATIONS[AND
1:15-cv-01869-NLH
Document 1 OF
Filed
03/12/15 Page 5 of 61
PageID: 5 ECONOMIC
COUNCIL,INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, THE WORLD HEALTHORGANIZATION(**
~clE wHO),
INTERNATIONAL SECRETARIAT, HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION(GENEVA),INTERNATION
AL -LAWYERS COMMISSION, U.N:SIXTH COMMITTEE, I.L.O.
wo~~D INTELLECTUAL ORGANIZATION(W.I.P.O.),UNESCO
'/(UNITED NATIONSEDUCATIONAL-SCIENTIFIC-CULTURA
ORGANIZATION, INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
BOTH I.C.C. AND I.C.J. ARE IN AY THE HAGUE=NE
THERLANDS, INTERNATIONAL POLICE(INTERPOL IN L
ONS,FRANCE), AMNESTY ITERNATIONAL(H.Q.'S IN
LONDON,ENGLAND),UNITE~~NATIONS SECURITY COUNC
/~ SCOTLAND YARD(U.K.)SCOTLAND, UNITED STATES SU
PREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES AMERIC~, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS AMERICA,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'S DISTRICT COURTS(THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OFAPPEALS-UNITED
STATES EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS AND ALL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS=USA
ALL UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATIONS(APPROXIMATELY OVER SIXTY SOMEUNITED NATIONS OR
.G.,~~-~Z A J_!_<?.~-~1-:_:_:_:...:~_._:_:_:_.:_:_:_:_-_ :_.:. .:_.:..:._:._:.:_.:_:_.:_:_:_.:_-__:_:_~_:_:_:_.~-=-~..:..: _.:._: _:_:_~-~--__:_..:.!'_:__:._:_:__-__~:_:__-___~_: __ ':_~~
~IAL
ABDULLAH PROPHET HAKIYM JOAQUIN .FOY*A~-~~HDI ( MU~~AMMAD ALI FOY AL-MAHDI) ( CLASSACT
ION WRIT OF WORLD HABEAS CORPUS AND INTERNAT~IONAL*LAWSUIT, AND THIS IS A WRIT OF
WORLD HABEAS CORPUS(THE LEGAL-POLITICAL-HUMAN RIGHTS-PRISONERS RIGHTS-MEDICAL-RE
LIGIOUS RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL-FREEDOMS)(ETC)UNDER ALL INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL LAWS;UNITED NATIONS GENOCIDE CONVENTtON, U.N.GENEVA CONVENTIONFOR ALL POLITIAROUND THE ENTIRE WORLDHE
ACCORDS,HUMAN-CIV~_POLITI
CALR
- .... - RSAL
DECL
RIGH.
WOMENAT I
OF R
DEGR
llIGH
CRIM
TERN
INTER
,IN-ILDRE
N~-5-
REMB
CHIT.,'
SEE
FOY 1'1L-- ~~~.. !ID r

POPE PRANCI~-
~ls
.~~!~D
ANOTHER ANTI-CHnTcmtn~ T~T

i:~. '- .... ~ .1.
~ JJ r~u u -_,,.i..,,
c....i
'~~n
!
.c~J.11 J..,...
DEVIL WCR~HI~rF.n
AND JOE DIDEN AN
KERRY AND HILAUY
CLINTON AND THE!~
SAME SEX MARRIAG
IN FLAGRANT
OP
HOI.. Y
v19r_,
BIBl~E
AN"
homosexu.aJ.s and
H01'WSZXUALITT*!
is forbidden an
A.N ABOMn:ATION
:'JCOK OP RCMlH:'S
'
'
NO. __ _
'
'
THE PEOPLE OF .NEW JERS.~Y
EX REL. Prophet
H.J.
STATE
Foy,et al.
on.beha/fof.Joa~uin .Irwin Foy
(AKA)Foy Al-Mahdi Forerunner
fory~esus c.hrist The Messiahv.
EN - BANC. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE.
AD SUB-
JICIENDUM AND AD TESTIFICANDUM[TO DULY APPEAR IN COURTS AND NO ABSENTIA)

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS UNDER TiTLE 28
u.s.c.SECTIONS=l651-165l(a)UNDER THE
ALL WRITS ACT:TITLE 28 U.S.C.SEC.2241
Hon.Warden B.R.Jettllet al.,.
(a)(c) (3) ( S)PRETRIAL DETAINEE AND ARPres.Barack Obama,et al.(Joe

RESTEE INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY:
~iden=~yine):Hillary and B i l l TITLE 18 USC SEC.4247(h)Bogus Commit~
C.l in ton= Bubba Boy: Pope Francis
Men t=DEMAND. UNC.ONDITIONAL RELEASE. ETC
The New World Order of s atan-( IN THiHR PERSONAL AND OFFI.CIAL CtAPACITIES)
IlluminatPJtTJTibNaJ!01f(!Jrit.At5mfa as Respond_ents.
OF HABEAS CORPUS
AS PRESENTED BY AFFIDAViT OF
STATE OFN.E_W
.JERSEY
CA:l'IQEN -~COUNTY. CAMDEN.
t,P r o Ph et H J Foy .; am a sovereign, sui juris, free~an, a follower

of Yahshua the Messiah in the laws of The Almighty Supreme Creator,
Yahvah first anc;f foremost and the laws of man when they are nof in conflict
(Leviticus 18:3,4). Pursuant to Matthew 5:33-37 and.James 5:12t Jet my ,
yea be yea, and my nay be nay, as supported by your Federal Public Law
97-280, 96 Stat. 1211. I have personal knowledge of the matters stated
hereinf am ewer the age of majority, and hereby asseverate 1,.mdersta.nding
.the liabilities presented in your Briscoe v LaHue, 460 US 325.
l,Mr .Joaquin r. Eo.y . , IN GOOD FAITH do hereb'l and herein petjtion

this court for the Great Writ of Habeas Corpus, as a matter of right, as
declared in your Constitution since 122s-26----:.- is unlawfully
deprived Ofh is= liberty by 1:.l.us.... ILLEGALL..Y-OPER.A.TING._GQV-T Of sa tan--~
ugon the mere__specu.lation of ~n~a~d misdemeanor accusations since
ALL U.G.IJpaptbqri-tjes&Il 1 j c.j t 1 awis not committed, imprisoned,
detainsd, confined or restrained .by virtue of the final judgment or
a
'
.
J
deeree of any competent tribunal of civil or criminal jurisdiction, nor

by virtue of pn execution issued upon. such judgment or decree, in
this sui qeneris matter of substance over form.
PREVIEW
A. FAILURE TO MEET 4TH & 5TH AMENDMENT REQUIREMENTS
B. HELD BEYOND LEGAL LIMIT PRE TRIAL
C. OFFICERS OF THE COURT HAVE DENIED DUE PROCESS
D. OFFICERS OF THE COURT CONSPIRED TO COMMIT FELONIES
1) Pursuant to equal footing doctrine and the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure
Article 11.13 "The word 'applicant', as used in this chapter, refers to the
person for whose relief the Writ is asked, though the petition may be signed and
. . presented by any other person," and Article 11.12 "Either the party for
whose_ . relief the Writ is intended, or any person fgr him,

may present a petition to the proper autborj'ty for the
pufpose of obtaining relief."
2) Pursuant to equal footing doctrine and the Texas Code of
Criminal Procedure Article 11 . 15 the Writ of Habeas Corpus

shall be granted without delay by the judge or court
receiving the Petition; furthermore in this case failure to
take action within seventy-two hours may be Quite
appropriately deemed a
DENIAL BY DERELICTION OF DUTY.

3) Pursuant to equal footing doctrine and the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure
Article 11.43 no presumption of guilt arises from the mere fact that a
criminal accusation has been made before a competent authority.
4) Pursuant to equal footing doctrine and the Texas Code of

Criminal Procedure Article 11 .24b_y_~L-1tfrtlt%
'is entitled to
I
the Writ of Habeas Corpus since there was not sufficient

cause for reQuiring incarceration instead of bail and/or the
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABFAS CORPUS
Page2of 11
..
'
5) -. Pursuant .to equal footing doctrine and the. Texas Code of

Criminal Procedure Article 11.40 the judge or court before whom a
person is brought by Writ of Habeas Corpus shall examine the Writ
and the papers attached to it; and if no legal cause be. shown for
the imprisonment or restraint, or if it appear that the imprisonment
or restraint though at first legal, cannot for any cause be lawfully
prolonged,
the victim shall be discharged.
IGNORANCE OF THE LAW

IS NO EXCUSE
6)
Habeas corpus is necessary to address the issues
including but not limited to the following:
AGGRAVATED KIDNAPPING
UNDER COLOR OF LAW
BY DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS
?)MR.ii~ F0l--)ns DENIED PUE PBQCESS OE. _LAW AND
UNLAW
LY INCARCERATED AND HELD BEYOND THE LEGAL
LIMIT PRIOR
TRIAL considering that acting as a revenue
ro
under color of law, totally absent

reasonable belief sufficient to rise above mere, unwarranted
suspicion, the paramilitary a~tack officer of the court,
acting as a _ROAD NAZI, failed and neglected to meet the
requirements of the 1st, 4th, 5th, 9th, and 14th Amendments
to the Constitution for the United States of America;
enhancement terrorist
indeed, the only lawful evidence before the court is that

the parasitic, predatory, non-productive government armed
thug who instigated this event has created a FELONY
breach of fiduciary duty pursuant to the oath he is required
PEfITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

)
..
'
to -. have taken and furthermore is acting in collusion with

others in a.;clever scheme to overthrow the Constitution for
the United states o'f. America in the nature of sedition and
TREASON!ll Where was the Fourth -Amendment . warrant and
affidavit for the Seizure Of Mr;-~c.a9u.:Ln ~oJNhSn willf~lly- submitted
submitted to the armed attack on TH.KY HAD, A-wARRANT=NoT DEFECTIVE
ON ITS FACE AND ARREST WARRA~T WAS ACCURATE-PROPER AND APPROPRIATE
FOR Foy's ARREST BUT ARRESTING FEDERAL POLICEMAN NEVER READ MIRANDA RI8) Absent just compensation, via felony breach of GHTs wERE
dUt Y, Mr _f 9.Y ' s_ BJ..CJ Pt.s =prlVa

t e prope rtY f"tngerprtntS
.
NEVER
f I"d UClary
AD TO REMr .
and photographs have been demanded by force Of arms and Foy ~ ! 1111
imminent threat of physical violence, Mr .....F-oy. s ...c.iv.iJ.:-..rights Mahdi
and due process have been violated and Mr~. F~yCH;st~ 9 ejSARBITRARIL
unlawfully held; raising the question; "What statute is it
that you rely upon for summary pre-trial punishment in lieu
-
of due process?"
9) Absent proper natural heath care, HEAL;H c~R~ ;~: health
iS jeopardized and His~= Very life iS endangered, ~ ~ S_- ~ - ~ightS
and due process have been violated .and lhe is ~nlawfuHy
held.
1O) Absent Probable cause Evidentiary Hearing wtthin 48
hours pursuant to- Riverside vp Mclaughlin, 500 U.S.. 44,
Joag_~in r .. Foy ~s=rights and due process have been violated
and-11_~is unlawfully held.
11 ) Absent timely trial as per your own Code of Criminal

Procedure,FoY"' Af-Ma~d_i 's;._==rights and due process have been
violated and=H~-~~ is unlawfully held.
It is too late for any bond or trial now that - due
process has been DENIED, and once due process is denied
12)
All jurisdiction ceases as per your var; own 5 USC

556(d), 557, 706 wherefore any alleged jurisdiction has
..
'
already been .voided by the denial of due process witnessed,

documented} and evidenced by the lack of orobable cause
.
"
hearing and overw!ielming
litany of abuse~,/f,#,h?"";--_,ef"~)
HAS ALREADY SUFFERED WHEREFORE

MUST BE RELEASED FORTHWITHll
CAVEAT
13) If you are determined to execute a man in any case,
there is no occasion for a trial; the world yields no respect
to courts that are merely organized to convict."
Robert H. Jackson, United States Prosecutor at Nuremberg
14) "An avidity to punish is always dangerous to liberty. tt leads

men to stretch, to misinterpret, and to misapply even the best of
laws. He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even
his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes
a precedent that will reach to himself." Thomas Paine
15) CONSIDER WJTH EXTREME CAUTION THE WORD OF OUR
HEAVENLY FATHER SINCE THERE IS NO ESCAPE WHATSOEVER FROM
HIS LAW AND JUDGMENT:
16) "When the righteous are in authority, the peop1e rejoice; but
when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn." Proverbs 29:2
17) "Shall the throne of iniquity have fellowship with thee, which
frameth mischief by a law?" Psalm 94:20
18) "And said to the judges, Take heed what ye do: for ye judge
not for man, but for Yahvah who is with you in the judgment.
Wherefore now let the fear of Yahvah be upon you, take heed and
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
Page 5of 11
..
'
doit: fdr there is, no iniquity with .. Yahvah our Eloheim, nor respect
of persons, rf>r taking of gifts.. " II Chronicles 19:6 & 7.
'
CONCLUSION
~ ~)
T ~ rE
T~~~
~~~fo.\rBJ\llElO>
rr
lC (9 ~\Jl : C ij lE ~'~ (C lE 9
lLJJ~~[EA~ONArBllE~
~\NJ [Q)
QJ~[l)[EfR{M~~\lHE~
CtCD~~f~[l)lEfMtCfE
PU~l~rC
[EJIT~fE~~rElY
rr
A[BS1.0JllDllElY
~N
T~~ [E
JlDSl~iClE
20)Mr-.Joaquin FoyiS not a danger tOH-imsel-L=nOr tO the SOCiety at

large and any further restraint of liberty would be a crime against
the people of this state and a dire threat to their freedom.Foy has been
deemed NON-DANGEROUS TO HIMSELF OR TO PERSONS OR THEIR PROPERTIES!!
21) This is my first application for a w.rit of Habeas Corpus and no
application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus has previously been made by
me in relation to this case. SEVERAL WRITS H~VE BEEN RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED AND FOY HAS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY NOT BEEN HEARD ON ANY ONE WRI
T2Q~ o,vE~ 30-~RITS OF HABEAp CORPUS MQTIO~SfAND. PETITIONS NOT ONCE.
ZJ t 1s reaa11y apparent tnat unreg1sterea ore1gn agents assume
they can arbitrarily and capriciously determine the v~lue of another
living soul's time1 however, when the matter invoivessPiEs-TRAIT~s
the unregistered foreign agents have no concept of what the actual
value- is; indeed, all th~ resources of all the unregistered foreign
agents in ~~~~s5~~~:r&g~~~B~Igrpuld not purchase a. single
nanosecond from Our Heavenly Father, wherefore they need to
reconsider their actions and make restitution. SEE vroL .oF oATHs oF oFF
ICES BY UNDERMINING THE MORAL GOVERNMENT OF ALMIGHTY-GOD[YAHVAH=ADO
NA l =) E. L0 AH - AJ:, LAH TA.I I AL A= J EH 0 V~ H=ETC - TE T~AGRAM MA TON - DI 0 S-tiO M. .- I~~~.- ETC
2j tlN.ALJTI:JoRITIEs cusuN) =~mp1oyees may nave excuses sue as, -we
have always done it like this" OR "I am only doing what I was told to
do", an excuse which failed to work very weH at the Nuremberg
Trials. The seriousness of the matter is best stated in the Bible.
The Bible is the "WORD OF GOD" as per Federal Public Law 97-280,
PEilTIONFORWRITOFHABEASCORPUS
Page6of 11
'.
:
'
,,
'""fl,,rt/- CJ'-r1sT~~
.
96Stat. 1211, so according to the "WORD OF GOD';'iliiiiiiiiiliil

suffered an bxodus 21 :16 MANSTEALING EVENT and the punishment
is DEATH!! Judge EdiiJ:t Jones of the U"S~ Court of Appeals for the
Fifth Circuit, told the Federalist Society of the Harvard Law School
on February 28, 2003 "The first 1 00 years of American lawyers
were trained on Blackstonet who wrote that: 'The law of nature

dictated by God himself is binding in all counties and at all times; no
human laws are of any validity if contrary to this; and such of them
as are valid derive all force and all their authority from this original..'
The Framers created a government of limited power with this
understanding of the rule of law - that it was dependent on
transcendent religious obligation." The Gideon Society assures us of
DUE PROCESS, PUBLIC NOTICE and OPPORTUNITY, furthermore those
involved in the MANSTEALING are trained, educated, paid and sworn
to know the law. Wherefore I see no excuse for the unlawful
conduct and I require the names, job descriptions, bond information,
the underwriters' address and subpoena addresses of each and
every participant from policy maker and police (policy enforcers) to

jailers. Notice that the tuberculosis and. staphylococcus aureus
epidemics arising from the prisons and jails makes it plain and clear
that the environment a reckless endangerment to life in the nature
of attempted murder.
Is the "WORD OF GOD" adequate for NA_T_roNAL -ANo -r-N~ERNATroNAL

employees QB would the employees make a public declaration that
they- know- better than GOD ALMIGHTY!!??
Forgiveness may be
available where there is repentance, wherefore I am praying for the
employees because God's Law is just like gravity, it works whether
you believe in it or notll
24)
25) According to the Declaration of Independence, we

hold these truths to be self-evident, that all ~en are
created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with
certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life,
Page7of11
Liberty
and
rights,
Governments
the
pursuit
of happiness.
are
instituted
That
to secure
among
men,
these
deriving
their just powers fro~ the consent of -~e governed."
26)
.. CITY
However,
OF
the
employees
PHLLADELPH-IAllPAare
governmental
of EAs_TE_RN
incompetent
DisTRicT_ couRTPAand
to
act
as
authority,
because they obviously do not

the purpose of government is to _ secure
understand that
the rights of men rather than to negate them.
RELIEF AND REMEDY DEMANDED

27) Wherefore,-your petitioner demands that a Writ of Habeas
Corpus be granted instanter and issued to inquire into the restraint
upon the liberty of Joaquin .r. Fp~he Writ being directed to the said
DISHONORABLE JUDGE ~pLLAK-eDU-AJ:tOC) -c. RO~~rhm~nning him to bring
MAGI-STRATE J{1DGE"" ~nn::os-p-. 'HART-MAG .. PATR~sl:-U~nR. . . . '
any and all evidence and documentation_ before the Court at the
time and place therein to be specified, to provide a written answer
with return thereof as to why the said F-oy Al{MaliaiiS restrained of
liberty and should not be released; to the end that upon said
execution of said Writ that the complete discharge from custody will
be effected and the said u'0-a<Juin- I :Fo9'18Y be properly restored to
HIS =liberty.=JUSTICE=FREEDOM-EQUALITY OF THIS TRAVESTY-CHARADE-HYPOCRISYGRAND RELIGIOUS-POLITICAL SCAM AND SHAMl}MERE FARCICAL COMEDY AND FLAGRANT
MOCKERY OF STATE-UNITED STTAES-AND UNITED NATIONS FREEDOM-JUSTICE-EQUALITY!
28) Sanctions for any party responsible for unnecessary delay in

hearing this matter and furthermore, time and costs related to this
action, pursuant to equal footing doctrine and Texas Code of
Criminal Procedure Article 11.50; at the rate customary for a
licensed attorney since a workman is worthy of his hire.
29) The return of any and all fingerprints, photographs, and

information sheets and/or data storage to expunge the record of
this travesty, and 1 00 dollars U.S. per fingerprint card, photograph,
or information sheet, per party, per day until ALL are returned.
Page8of 11
,._
. ,,
-.
30)
Return of any and all property seized absent Fourth
Amendment warrant ci~d affidavit in existence at the time of the
perfidious attack by force of arms, including but
not
limited to the
car and contents.

31 ). l am not an expert in the law however l do know right from wrongtt lf there
is any human being damaged by any statements herein, if he wiH inform me by
facts I will sincerely make every effort to amend my ways. I hereby and herein
reserve the right to amend and make amendment to this document as
necessary in order that the truth may be ascertained and proceedings justly
determined.. If the parties given notice by means of this document have
information that would controvert and overcome this Affidavit, please advise
me IN WRITTEN AFADAVIT FORM within thirty (30) days from receipt hereof
providing me with your counteraffidavit, proving with. particularly by stating all
requisite actual evidentiary fact and all requisite actual law, and not merely the
ultimate facts or conclusions of law, that this Affidavit Statement is

substantially and materially false sufficiently to change materially my status and
factual declarations. Your silence stands as consent to, and tacit approval of,
the factual declarations herein being established as fact as a matter of law.
May the wiil of our Heavenly Father Yahvah, through the power and authority of
the blood of His SonYahshua be done on Earth as it is in Heaven.
Reserving ALL Natural God-Given

Birthrights, Waiving None, Ever,
Unalienable
28USC1746
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
America that the foregoing is true and correct. 28 USC 1746
Signed on this the nineteenth day of the eighth month in the year of our Lord
and Savior two thousand eight.
as in U.S. v. Fox, 766 F.Supp. 569,

a winning case that was cited at 18 USCA 1546(a),
a missionary in a Matthew 25 mission
clo 903-541 ..2482
PEITfIONFORWRlTOFHABEASCORPUS
Page9of 11

.
_ - . ----~~ ~u.1..awn.1..1..us:1\PSYCHE}HIX TR~ WITH FALSEHOOD TO BRINGJ
,~ '.~fA ~"BOUT THE APPEARANCE OF. A MENTAL IL~SS-DEFECT-MENTAL DISEASE-ETC!
~
Cll
....
f;
-c-~lPETII'IONER{MR.cl'oaquin r..Foy~:;..)ET
: I :5
~
INCARCERATED NOW FOR APPROXIMATELY TEN YEARS-NON-STOPN FLAGRANT VIO-
~- : ~ LATION ciF
~ P :a
el
=
AL . HAS WRONGFULLY BEEN UNDULY
BOTH SPEEDY TRIAL ACT AND PSYCHE. EVALUATION UNDER TITLE 18
..
u.s.c~ 424l(d) WHICH STATES, BY PSY.CHIATRI_C AND PSYCHOLOGICAL AMERI~ ~
~ g CAN LAW{S) llOT.ro,EXCEED FOOR-MOJlTllS.PSYCBE-EVALUATIOJl AND THE SP-~

5 ! _EEDY TRIAL ACT STATES HOT. ro. EXCEED. 10..oAYs Foa PB1'.ITI0NER(Fov-->
~ 5 -~
J:
TRIAL~ ~
TO BE BROUGHT_ TO THE GR.AND ,rolY AND GIVEN A FAST AND SPEEDY JORY
~ iriS AND U.S .JUDICIAL A.NDu.,s.PEN:O~OGICALAUTHO_R.I'frIE~(U.S..COUR1$
AND PRISON~-~
=
fli . -CiRCllMV&/"{.ft ~~ -v.0Jd'ft~1l.C/.fMllenfi fllG;:PK.cceduv11/ We?i<oceSSA ~
'en ~ AUTKORITIES)ARE G IL'ftlO~T'fiIS PETITIONER'S PROC'E'DURAL DUE PROCES;..{ANDS~
:i:
: E . EQU1L PROTECTION cr..AusEs. .AND CIVIL-HUMAN RIGHTS.

u. s. AUTHORITIES ARE : 5:
. ..
.
n r;i
i o ~ IN PLAGRANT ViOLATION OF THE INITIAL PSYCHE COMMITME~T WHICH WAS VALID g: ~i
i ~= ONLY UP TO A PERIOD OF FOUR MONTHS(UNDER TITLE 18 U.S.C.~i 424l(d)JAND g~1
~ ~
'..:sml~ '
~f:d
<
8
.. _
_-"
fi
i:c.!
pt.~g
NOT TO EXCEED A FOUR MONTH PSYCHE EVALUATION AND CONTINUED COMMITMENT

.
'
IS IN' VIOLATION OF MY(FOY-'-S)DUE PROCESS RIGHT{ CLA~SE)AND EQUAL
. ~
PROTEC-~
_.!-
o.
~ ~=
TION UNDER U.S . v . BAKER, 807 F2d. 1317---TITLE 18 USCA 424l(d)(l)
-~i; FOR SUCH REASONABLE PERIOD OF TIME, "NOT.TO .. EXCEED.FOUR.MONTHS". SEE . . ~
~~ , S~EEDY-~_IAL,-ACT UNDER, TITL~ 18 U.S.C.A . i~ 3161-3162,.. THE DIS.TRICT COURT~
~ b_ ' LACK~D ,AUTHO.RITY
r..e .
e'G
:J
TO ORDER MR . FOY~ (PETITIONER )COMMITMENT FOR. A SECOND

I iJ:; ,
AND THiRD TIME OVER A PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY~YEARS BECAUSE ITS~
~!
:8 . TOTO.RY. AUTHOBITY. TO. Do. so. ~IRED.
t:=~
nm. UDEASONABLY. LENGTH. PSYCHE. EVAtu,,.. ~
; ~ TION. Plll?IOD. MADE- THE. COMMITMENT - PROCEEDING- UNLAWFUL- .AND. D'NWAHRANTED. TllE
,...,.
'..
.~ =
~~
. ~ OVER.ALL. LENG~R- OF - CONFINEMENT. UNLAWFULLY- DEPRIVED .(FDY}.~.OF. DUE- .P!?OCESS !

.
'
'
'
SEE SPEED,Y TRIAL ACT WAS STRICTLY.LIMITED .AND ARRESTEE AND
'
DETAINEE(FOY~)
WAS ENTITLED TO A PBO.MPT DETENTION HEARING AND THE MAXIMUM LENGTH OF PRE-~
.
"
'
TRIAL DETEHION WAS LI:MIT~D BY THE .".~INGENT.TIME.LIHITATIONS_OF.THE.SP~~
'
' .
EEDY TRIAL.ACT." SEE U.S . v . JONES, 56 _F.3d. 581 (5TH.CIR.1995)(AN OPEN

.
'
.'
=
=
~
ENDED CONTINUATION(CONTINUANCE)VIOLATED THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT); FIERRO-v. ~
.JOHNSON-, 197 F.3d. 147, 151 n.6 {5TlI.CIR.1999)(FRAUD ON THE COURT IS~ ~i
BASIS FOR FILING A MOTION UNDER RULE 60(b)OF
THE
7\ AEDPA GATE
y
FED.R.CIV.P DESPITE ~~ 4
KEEPING PROVISIONS). TITE. U. S .GOVERNMENT IS. CONSPiiUNG" !

SEE: ILLEGAL FORCE MEDICATIONTNt: TC A 1'T .,......
U'l'ft8
----
=
I
DEFENDANT(FOY AL-MA..ijD!)WAS IN.i\DMISSABLE HEARSAY); TiilS NEXT CASE FOY _ftliREADY Ii.fill R-4.ISED
THE C!'1'-ATATION(CITE)IN TIIB COURTS DURHJG 1'.Pd!i Y:Efo.J.1S OF 2011-2012. BEFORE A1ID WAS NO LONGER GOOD( REVERS.:.~) FOY CITED. THIS NEXT CASE mrrLE IT WAS STILL VALID rn THE LAW BOOKS=
=U.S.
v. FULt'iER, 108 F3d. 1486 lST.crn. 197)(ALLOWING TESTIMONY ABOUT BOMBING OF
BuILJ?I.NG WAS P~ICIAL); U.S.
v.
FEDERAL
SUMNER~ 119 F3d. 658 (BTB .. CIR., 1997)("Wlk....l'f Difil'LNDANT

APPENDIX E: NEW WORlD ORDER
New World Order
APPENDIXE
Robison, 1798
Club of Rome Report
PROOFS
OF JI.
CONSPIRACY
REGIONALIZED AND ADAPTIVE MODEL

OF THE GLOBAL WORLD SYSTEM
AGAINST ALL fHE
RELIGIONS AND GOVERNMENTS

01"
EU R 0
Report on the Progress in the
P E,
CARRIED ON
STRA TEGY FOR SURVIVAL PROJECT
IN THE SECRET MEETINGS
of the
OF
Club of Rome
FREE MASONS, ILLUMINATI,

AND
.READING SOCIETIES.
{COLLECTED FROM GOOD AUTHORITIES,\
By
JO
H N
~- 0
Mihajlo Mesarovic and Eduard Pestel, Directors
B I S 0 N, (A. M.
PROFESSOR OF NATURAL PHILOSOPHY, AND SECRETARY TO THI

ROYAL 30C.1ETY OF liDINBURGH.
Nam tua res agitur paritt cum proximus ard.zt. l
CONFIDENTIAL
The THIRD EDITION.

!. '1'o
which is added a
PosTSCRIPT'
September 17, 1973
PHI LA DELPH IA:

l'Jl.IKTED FOR T. DOBSON, No. 41, SOUTH SE CON P
STREIT, AND W. COBBET, No.
NORTH
;r.5,
SECOND
STIU,t:T.
1798.
*TOP SECRET**
TOP SECRET**
449

450 BEHOLD A PALE HORSE
William Cooper
APPENDIXE
New World Order
451
l. Motivation and Objectives

The world problematique formulated by the CLUB OF ROME is not only global in
nature, involving factors traditionally considered as unrelated, but also points to the
crisis situations which are developing in spite of the noblest of intentions and, indeed,
as their corollary. To point out the problematique and the spectrum of critical and
traumatic situations it entails is not enough; the acceptance of the reality of the
problematique MUST BE FOLLOWED BY CHANGES IF THE CONCERN IS NOT
TO REMAIN PURELY ACADEMIC. It is necessary, therefore, to present the issues
within the problematique in specific and relevant terms which requires regional
interpretation of the global issues. Furthermore, a basis should be provided for the
resolution of conflicts (inevitably accompanying the problematique-type situations)
through cooperation rather than confrontation. These factors have provided the
motivation for initiation of the Strategy for Survival project which calls for the
construction of a regionalized and adaptive model of the total world system with the
following specific objectives:
(I) TO ENABLE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SCENARIOS FOR THE
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE WORLD SYSTEM which represent visions of
the world future stemming from different cultures and value systems and reflecting
hopes and fears in different regions of the world.
(ii) To develop a planning and options-assessment tool for long-range issues, and
thereby TO PROVIDE A BASIS FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION by cooperation
rather than confrontation.
2. Basic Structure of the Model
The basic characteristics of the model are:
(i) THE WORLD SYSTEM IS REPRESENTED in terms of interacting regions with
provisions made to investigate any individual country or subregion in the context of
regional and global-development. Presently the world system is represented BY TEN
REGIONS: NORTH AMERICA, WESTERN EUROPE, EASTERN EUROPE,
JAPAN, REST OF DEVELOPED WORLD, LATIN AMERICA, MIDDLE EAST,
HEST OF AFRICA, SOUTH AND SOUTH EAST ASIA, AND CHINA.
(ii) In order to be able to deal with the complex of factors involved in problematique
in a way which is sound, credible and systematic, a hierarchical structure has been
adopted for the model in which each level in the hierarchy represents the evolution of
the world system within a context defined by a given set of laws and principles.
Specifically, the levels involved are:
GEO-PHYSICAL, ECOLOGICAL, TECHNOLOGICAL (MAN-MADE ENERGY
AND MASS TRANSFERS), ECONOMIC, INSTITUTIONAL, SOCIOPOLITICAL, VALUE-CULTURAL AND HUMAN-BIOLOGICAL. Such an
approach enables an optimal use of confirmed scientific knowledge and available data.
(iii) An adequate view of the conditions in which the problematique is emerging and
under which the solutions must be found require the recognition of the purposive
aspects of the human community and adaptiveness of human beings. The model of the
world system will have, therefore, two parts:
(I) the so-called causal part, representing dynamical processes which follow historical
patterns of development and (2) the so-called goal-seeking part which represents
purposive changes under new conditions. The goal - seeking part in turn includes two
4. A FOOD PRODUCTION AND ARABLE LAND USE MODEL HAS BEEN

CONSTRUCTED which allows the assessment of a number of food related issues
including: the need and availability of phosphorus required for intensive agriculture,
AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF TIMING AND MAGNITUDES OF NATURAL
DISASTERS SUCH AS DROUGHT, CROP FAILURE DUE TO DISEASE, ETC.
TOP SECRET
TOP SECRET
levels: the decision-making or actions level and the norms level; the former represents
the purposive response of the system while the latter represents the values and norms
which constrain and condition such a response.
3. Progress in the Model Construction
The construction of the model as described in Sec. 2 and with the objectives as
specified in Sec. 1 is certainly a rather complex task and the research is organized to
proceed in parallel in several directions. The overall assessment of the model status is
the following:
The model has been developed up to the stage where it can be used for policy analysis
related to a number of critical issues, such as: energy resources utilization and
technology assessment; food demand and production; population growth and the
affect of timing of birth control programs; reduction of inequities in regional economic
developments; depletion dynamics of certain resources, particularly oil reserves;
phosphorus use as fertilizer; regional unemployment; constraints on growth due to
labor, energy or export limitation, etc.
Specific developments which enable use of the model as described above include the
-- 1
following:
1. A COMPUTER MODEL OF THE WORLD ECONOMIC SYSTEM HAS
BEEN DEVELOPED AND VALIDA TED BY AN EXTENS:VE SET OF DATA. The
model has two levels - macro and micro. On the MACRO LEVEL the model of each
region INCLUDES THE GROSS REGIONAL PRODUCT, TOTAL IMPORTS AND
EXPORTS, CAPITAL AND LABOR PRODUCTIVITY AND VARIOUS
COMPONENTS OF FINAL DEMAND SUCH AS PUBLIC CONSUMPTION,
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE, AND TOTAL INVESTMENT. ON THE
MICRO LEVEL EIGHT PRODUCTION SECTORS ARE RECOGNIZED:
AGRICULTURE MANUFACTURING, FOOD PROCESSING, ENERGY,
MINING, SERVICES, BANKING AND TRADE, AND RESIDENTIAL
CONSTRUCTION. The input-output framework is used for the intermediate
demands. A FULL SCALE MICRO TRADE MATRIX ALSO HAS BEEN
DEVELOPED.
2. A WORLD POPULATION MODEL HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN TERMS
OF THE SAME REGIONS AS THE ECONOMIC MODEL. The model has been
validated by the data available. In each region the population structure is represented in
terms of four age groups with appropriate delays which make possible assessment of
population momentum and assessment of the effectiveness of implementation of
various population control measures.
3. AN ENERGY MODEL HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED which gives for each
region the consumption and production of energy and interregional exchange of energy
resources as a function of economic factors. Energy is treated both in composite terms
and in reference to individual energy sources, namely solid fuel, liquid fuel, nuclear,
gas and hydro.
Case 1:15-cv-01869-NLH
Document
1 Filed New
03/12/15
Page 20 of 61 PageID: 20
APPENDIXE
William Cooper
World Order
5. A MAJOR CONCERN IN THE APPLICATION OF THE COMPUTER

MODEL is its proper utilization so as to avoid dependence on the deterministic aspects
of model operation. In order to avoid this an interactive method of computer
simulation analysis has been developed. THE METHOD REPRESENTS A
SYMBIOSIS OF MAN AND COMPUTER IN WHICH THE COMPUTER
PROVIDES THE LOGICAL AND NUMERICAL CAPABILITY WHILE MAN
PHOVIDES THE VALUES, INTUITION AND EXPERIENCE. The method utilizes
an option s11ecification and selection program which enables the policy analyst or
decision-maher to evaluate alternative options on various levels of the decision process,
i.e., with respect to goals, strategies, tactical and implementational factors. SPECIAL
ATTENTION IS PAID TO THE NORM CHANGING PROCESSES.
4. Progress in Application
THE MODEL HAS BEEN USED both for the assessment of alternative scenarios
for future regional and global developments (under different regional conditions) as
well as in the interactive mode selection of policy options (specifically for the energy
crises issues in developed regio~s).
OUR EFFORTS IN THE IMMEDIATE FUTURE WILL BE CONCENTRATED
ON 'FURTHER USE OF THE ALREADY DEVELOPED MODEL. THE PLANS
INCLUDE EMPHASIS IN THE FOLLOWING THREE DIRECTIONS:
(i) Assessment in the changes over time of the span of options available to solve some
major crisis problems.
(ii) IMPLEMENTATION of the regional models in different parts of the world and
their connection via a satellite communication network for the purpose of joi11t
assessment of the long term global future by teams from the various regions.
(iii) Implementation of the vision for the future outlined by leaders from an
underdeveloped region in order TO ASSESS with the model EXISTING OBSTACLES
453
'KINGDOMS' : CLUB OF ROME'S TEN GLOBAL GROUPS

GROUP 1: North America
Canada
United States of America
GROUP 2: Western Europe

Andorra
Austria
Belgium
Denmark
Federal Republic of Germany
Finland
France
Great Britain
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Malta
Monaco
Netherlands
Norway
Portugal
San Marino
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
Yugoslavia
GROUP 3: Japan
AND THE MEAl';is WHEREBY THE VISION MIGHT BECOME REALITY.
GROUP 4: Rest of the Developed Market Economies
TOP SECRET**
Australia
Israel
New Zealand
Oceania
South Africa
Tasmania
GROUP 5: Eastern Europe

Albania
Bulgaria
Czechoslovakia
German Democratic Republic
Hungary
Poland
Rumania
Soviet Union
TOP SECRET
Document 1 Filed 03/12/15 Page 21 of 61 PageID: 21
William Cooper
APPENDIXE
GROUP 6: Latin America

Argentina
Barbados
Bolivia
Brazil
British Honduras
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cuba
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
El Salvador
French Guiana
Guatemala
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Jamaica
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Surinam
Trinidad and Tobago
Uruguay
Venezuela
GROUP 7: North Africa and the Middle East

Adu Dhabi
Aden
Algeria
Bahrain
Cyprus
Dubai
Egypt
Iran
Iraq
Jordan
Kuwait
Lebanon
Libya
Masqat-Oman
Morocco
Qatar
Saudi-Arabia
Syria
Trucial Oman
Tunisia
Yemen
455
New World Order
Niger
Nigeria
Portuguese Guinea
Republic of Congo
Reunion
Rhodesia
Rwanda
Senegal
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
South West Africa

Spanish Guinea
Spanish Sahara
Sudan
Tanzania
Togo
Uganda
Upper Volta
Zaire
Zambia
GROUP 9: South and Southeast Asia

Afghanistan
Bangladesh
Burma
Cambodia
Ceylon
India
Indonesia
Laos
- - 1
Malaysia
Nepal
Pakistan
Philippines
South Korea
South Vietnam
Taiwan
Thailand
GROUP 10: Centrally Planned Asia

Mongolia
North Korea
North Vietnam
People's Republic of China
GROUP 8: Main Africa

Angola
Burundi
Ca bind a
Cameroon
Central African Republic
Chad
Dahomey
Ethiopia
French Somali Coast
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Ivory Coast
Kenya
Liberia
Malagasy Republic
Malawi
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mozambique
**TOP SECRET**
****TOP SECRET
William Cooper,
;.'.i
456 BEHOLDAPALEHORSE
APPENDIXE
New World Order
457
:J
"
:;
<O
Q.
~
0
3
::i::
m
0
c:
llJ
,..
David Ben-Gurion - when prime minister of

Israel forecast world rule from Jerusalem.
::u
s::
l.ook
e,.,--~.~
~~
:: ;~,.'!'; .
.:J.
'.;.,s_.'. .:'.\-.'..:..
''t~~)c.
;:;:,f._ :<,
T~~,l~f-
. . TOPS E CRET....
~lagazine,
January Hi, 1962
:,,
!;
'(
David Ben-Gurion (Prime Minister of Israel): ."The image

of lhe world in 1987 as traced in my imagination: The
Cold War will be a lhing of the past. Internal pressure of
the constantly growing intelligentsia in Russia for more
freedom and the pressure of the masses for raising their
living standards may lead to a gradual democratization
of the Soviet Union. On the other hand, the increasing
influence of the workers and farmers, and the rising
political importance of men of science', may transform
the Uniled States into a welfare.state with a planned
economy. Weslem and Eastem Europe will become a
federation of autonomous states having a Socialist and
democratic regime. With the exception of the USSR as a
federatejl Eurasian stale, aU other continents will be.
come ui\ited in a world alliance at whose disposal will be
an intemational police force. All armies will be
abolished, and there \viii be no more wars. In Jerusalem,
the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a
Shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all
continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of
Mankind, lo settle all controversies among the f~derated
continents, as prophesied by Isaiah. Higher education
will be the right of every person in the world. A piU to
prevent pregnancy will slow down the explosive natural
increase in China and India. And by 1987, the avenge
_li!e-span of man will reach I 00 years."
.. .. TO p
SECRET.,
;~
!-~~!"

William Cooper
APPENDIXE
New World Order
459
~L'LlL'!'_!L!L!UL'!'
From 1972 to 1974, I was stationed at Clark Air Base, Philippines. 'ouring
that time, when it appeared that then President Richard M. Nixon might be
impeached by Congress, the Base Conunander received a message from the Chief
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Washington, D.C. This message was, at least
in part, reprinted in our daily base information publication, THE DAILY
BULLETIN. The portion published in THE DAILY BULLETIN stated that any messages
received by any base personnel directly from the White House, Washington, D.c.
were to be reported directly to the Base Conunander inunediately. Additionally,
the contents of these messages were to be ignored unless they were countersigned by the Chief of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and issued through the Base
Conunander's Office. I discussed this item with several of the people with
whom I worked at the time. The people I can remember are:
St;f f; sergeant David Kasper
Staff Sergeant Leah Aasen
Mr. Conrado Barrera (Civilian Employee)
Ms. Mercedes Grepo (Civilian Employee)
I recall that the reason this article was so interesting was that some of us
were trying to determine whether we believed that President Nixon would resign
rather than face possible impeachment. This was a very popular topic on the
base among people with whom I associated. Since no orders from the White House
were ever received, as far as I know, nothing more ever came of it.
I hereby declare that I make this statement freely without any reservations
and that it is the entire account of this incident according to my memory and
belief.
I make this statement and declare that it is a true account under the
penalty of perjury.
~.q~
Military exchange
-rk 4d-v 10/s/tb
TheAssoclaledPess
Gen. Colin L Powell, lefl, chairman ol the US Joint

Chiels ot Slall, shakes hands Wednesday with his
counlepart, Gen. Mikhail A. Moiseyev, Soviet lirst
San Francisco before traveling to San Diego on

Thursday, where they announced an agreement to
extend until 1992 a military exchange program
deputy minister ol defense. The two were honored in
between the lwo nations
TOP SECRET**
<:o\l'C\'1.0
~"::,\.~"""'~
~ ~'/\~"'= \O\-l-~\<\~
****TOP SECRET****
~'~
<1
:I'.I
In other words, it means imprisonment Soviet style presented in what
''"-""-"'""U like a nice idea. A LABOR CAMP WHERE MEN AND WOMEN
/~RE VVORKED TO DEATH IS ONLY THAT AND NOTHING MORE OR
LESS, NO MATIER WHAT THEY CALL IT OR HOW ATTRACTIVE
THEY MAKE IT SOUND.
:,
Prisons going into business to produce products on an economic basis
CHAPTERS
G=tn only serve to DESTROY THE LAST REMNANTS OF SMALL BUSit

NEE~S.
'Iht E frrw is 3~6 pages of very small print. I am sure tlzat as carefully as I read'
1 stJU nmst heme missed many other terrible clauses. Congressmen have
Uec::x kvwwu fo deny knowledge of this law and some have stated that it does
1wt 3:tlsl becm!Jse they me terrified of the public finding out what t11ey have
l~o::2e. 11.Jhen I first warned the nation about this legislation on talk radio
t!(;i/::JSE- lhe country, the Government pulled all copies not already in public
;~rJiiE,fo" 'Ihe Government states that t11ere are no copies available and there
,via twt be any copies available. THIS ACT IS TOO LARGE TO INCLUDE IN
THIS BOOK. You will find it in your library, though, exactly as I have stated
~d: ihe beginning of this chapter. Please look it up yourself to verify t11at
0
ARE THE SHEEP

READY TO SHEAR?
{-yuJeuJ real.
SOURCES
Public Law 100-690.
OKLAHOMA
U.S. Code Congressional and Administrative News, Vol. 3, 1988, with amend~
ment and voting information in the Congressional Quarterly Almanac Vol.
xuv, 1988.
i --
H.B. 1750
TEST CASE
FOR THE POLICE STATE
****TOP SECRE"t
****TOP SECRET****

160
BEHOLD A PALE HORSE
William Cooper
OKLAHOMA
H.B. 1750
'rhe Police State's Test Case

Gary North recently wrote about one of the scariest pieces of socialistic
.
police-state legislation to arrive on the scene to date.
"On January 1, 1991, a new, 96-page state law goes into effect: H.B.
1750, passed last year [1989]." It requires all Oklahoma residents to declare
everything they own to the tax collector, everything: guns, coins, art collections, furniture, business equipment, bank accounts, household furniture,
etc. Forms will be distributed through banks. Any taxpayer who refuses to
fill out the form and submit it to the tax assessor by March 15 - the ides of
March - will be visited by an assessor. He will ask permission to enter the
home or place of business. If this request is denied, he will be issued a
search warrant. Any property not previously listed, or undervalued, will
be assessed a penalty of up to 20% of its market value. This will make '
renters into property taxpayers and make life easy for the gun grabbers.
What are the investment implications of this? Invest in a good gun
and be standing on your porch with gun in hand when they pay you a visit.
It is clear where the tax collectors are headed next. Oklahoma will be a
test case. If they can pull this one off, the other states will follow. Big
Brother wants to know all and to tax all. Eventually the New World Order
will eliminate all private property, "redistribute the wealth," and this inventory will tell them how much exists and exactly where it is stored. Of
course, the Oklahoma tax assessor will share its information with other
federal and state agencies.
Will they get away with this blatant disregard for civil and constitutional rights? That is exactly the reason for the law, to find out if it will meet
with strong or violent opposition. If the citizens of Oklahoma lie down and1
allow this to happen, then you can bet everyone else in the nation is going
to be subjected to the same or a similar law.
It is time to stand up with a weapon and scream, ''ENOUGH!" It is
time to draw the line. It is time to make decisions and carry them out. It is
time to resist at any and all cost. The penalty for failing to do so is slavery.
IT IS NOT TIME FOR REBELLION. IT IS TIME FOR RESTORATION.
THE CONSTITUTION MUST BE AGAIN, AS IT ONCE WAS, THE
SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. FEDERALISM IS TREASON. STAND
UP AND FIGHT.
"
****TOP SECRET****
Chapter Eight
Are the Sheep Ready to Shear?
El
161
SOURCES
H.B 1750, legislation of the Oklahoma State House of Representatives, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 1989.
North, Gary, "Big Brother Wants to See It All in Oklahoma," The McAlvany
Intelligence Adviso1~ July 1990.
---~--------______;,,~--~==-=~=
Case 1:15-cv-01869-NLH Document 1 Filed 03/12/15 Page 26 of 61 PageID:1 26
William Cooper
APPENDIX D: AIDS
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
APPROPRIATIONS FOR 1970
UNITED STATES SENATE LIBkARY
,lliC\~JilDD~ijU~Dj~(fiiiJfiiriiii~
HEARINGS
~~:~;~::~'11l1l.fP:.~~~~~~!~~,~~:~~'!.~~:~
BEFORE A
SUBCOMMI'liEE OF THE
COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS
CODED MICROCHIPS lmplanled In every pnr-
F"lflST SESSION
son In lhe counlry would lie all ol us lnlo a mas
~~y c~;~~~~~ 81~1~1p~aon~~ 0~r:~~ha;~~~~c!o;: aal~
rc.idyunderwaywhethcryoullkeltornoll
~.~{~fJ]~ j{~~~
fransmitters
SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEPARTMENT OF' DE:F'ENSE
GEORGE H.MAHON, Texas. Clmirmnn

ROBERT L. f". SIKES, f"lorlda
JAM LE !l'. WHITTEN, M ISSl"lppl
GEORGE V{. ANOREWS,,Albma
DANIE:L J. F'LOOD. P.nn7hanla
JOHN M. SLACK. Woe Virginia
JOSEPH 'P. ~DDABBO, Nw York
F'RANK E. EVANS, .C'o'loudA 1
l;drovcstoi;:dhols
li~!li}!
IPI, .\lll.'llUltw, ll,11111 111 .. , .. -., Jaw" tl411u111 ('11111 \11111111. 1 .. 0111 ~111lu.
RolEll.T F"on1'c. Stoll A uhl1uih
1
'.~~:d~f~1~~i~:~:;' !N~~sle;p-diet i~eep-; you -;i;J;- a~ake

tvc:rylhln(
aboul
ye>u
couldbemnt.aintdinone
~:J1d ~c:r~~~!:1~d~c~
eovemmealcompultr.
~Asiy 10Yernment ctn
cywillknowwhatanypcr.
e-0nh11doneandi1doin1
11t11nytime."
Qlh.r IOU~I MY the
tiny lsanamitteu un be
iujededpainlculy from 1
tiny
run in hum11n1 wilh
out them even kno ... 1ni:it

'
1eh nationwi,1 ...
lhition"proi;-ram
. II the1ovc:rn11w11l
IF YOU T~INK lhera jusl

aren'I enough' hours In lhe
day, you c::an now gel added
lime - thanks lo a revolu 4
tionary ,1ew sleep method
thal halps people stay up

nearly all night.
1
.,.~,~.'5~:~ 1~~1 :!dtit~ ~~11:! ~~

1lte
Entrepreneur'1 Guide
tu
Sleep R11ducli11n" by skep man

Pf~:::b~a[i::t:her Renj:imin
hour a(
Plumb RMh only
slc1p ea<h ni.:ht 11nd ha a fi:w
V,
GLNARD p, LIPSCOMB C"allfor.la

WILLIAM E. MINSHALL. Oho
.:CHN J. iHiVOES,'Ari:sona
CLEN',.. R. DAVIS. W15eC'n5in
tirichatnapidurinelheday.
He H)'a thot throurh MicroSomnl11 he hopes lQ inlro~uce
ehortsleepHasa(eviobletuol
(or people touae in jncreuina:
prvductivily."
Writes
The ruean:her cut ud mut
oul J hi1 diel, 1111h l111e cooey
1weet1, UlkH daily nups 11fld
~~~::n ::~i!i1~;!~i~~f11u:t
mr
tleut..1tuR"likllhi!ans,rice
andtofo,tnddonli,.;htuercisca
llkc:walkinc11ndyoi;a
Buiduhi1pr..Crib11ddietm.nd
dl't11 while c.itchinl' ooly a lew
~~{l!::~:~~,~:n!:~!;~~!i~ ::s~~~~=i~~:S~~" h!b~~

!:!~r;n!/~~c~~dlliJ~t
'm~;,;~ ~:=~t'::! :~r. Plumb n71 his
n;xt
hi1.
Plumb Hys bi1 br11nd of leep
1"tmpoln,rlly utgned
PART 5
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION
Department of the Army
Statement of Director, Advanced Research Project Agency
Statement of Director, Defense Research and Engineering
prol'f11rbQRm11kelhort1lerptn
o~t or ~lffpaholles w~ 1pend
;d:r:;:1:r~~=~::~1~,f:;~:~!f;~; h~:1 i~~::r~~~~~:::~to::
Printed (or the use or the C_ommltlep on Appropriallons
~~~Jfa1~g~~~:~::;;; ~:J~~s:~~;~~;:~t.:.;~~~
;u1it Th11mi11 Edi.on worked won-
;/_lj /Soqn
- Ir.EH O'HARA
U.S. OOVERNMl!:HT PRINTINO OFFICE

30-.UI
WASHINGTON: 1981
UNITED STATES SENATE LIBRARY
****TOP SECRET****
*TOP SECRET
6~
~
AO 242 ( 12/11) Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241
(b) If you answered "No," explain why you did not file a third appeal:
I 0.
Motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255

In this petition, are you~h
l. e~~ging the validity of your conviction or sentence as imposed?
13Yes..
No
If "Yes," answer the fo owing:

(a)
Have you already filed a
motjm under 28 U.S.C. 2255 that challenged this conviction or sentence?
iefNo
13 Yes.
If "Yes," provide:
(I) Name of court:

----.---~~~~--J~~~~~~-"<-~~~~--,<--~~---~~~~--<--~-
( 2) Case number:
(3) Date of filing:
(4) Result:
(5) Date of result:
(6) Issues raised:
/
(b)
Have you ever filed a motion in a United States Court of Appea
under 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(3)(A),
;::;ermission to file~or successive Section 2255 motion to challenge this conviction or
If "Yes," provide:
(I) Name of court:
(2) Case number:

(3) Date of filing:
(4) Result:
(5) Date of result:
(6) Issues raised:
Page 5 of 10
Explain why the remedy under 28 U.S.C. 2255 is inadequate or ineffective to challenge your
(c)
11.
Appeals of immigration proceedings

Does this case concec:Pn
i
tion proceedings?
~
No
If "Yes," pro
(b)
Date you were taken into immigration custody:~

Date of the removal or reinstatement order:
(c)
Did you file an appeal
(a)
aOYe~..
zt K
wi~h
the \ ard of lmmigralon A~eals'T-No
7-
/-V:-\7-
--~ -4--(\- _
~T-/
If "Yes," provide:
(1) Date of filing:
(2) Case number:
(3) Result:
(4) Date of result:
(5) Issues raised:
1-fl '{cs --
Page 6 of 10
<
AO 242 ( 12/11) Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 US.C.
*2241
(4) Result:........_,
~~~~~~~~~~~~--~~~~~-
( 5)
(6) Issues raised:
12.
Other appeals
Other than the appeals you listed above, have you filed any other petition, application, or motion about the issues
raised in this petition?
OYes
ONo
If "Yes," provide:
(a) Kind of petition, motion, or application:
(b) Name of the authority, agency, or court:
(c) Date of filing:
(d) Docket number, case number, or opinion number:
(e) Result:
(f) Date of result:
(g) Issues raised:
Grounds for Your Challenge in This Petition
13.
State every ground (reason) that supports your claim that you are being held in violation of the Constitution,
laws, or treaties of the United States. Attach additional pages if you have more than four grounds. State the
facts supporting each ground.
Page 7 of 10
(a) Supporting facts (Be brief Do not cite cases or law.):
(b) Did you present Ground One in all appeals that were available to you?
OYes
ONo
GROUND TWO:
(a) Supporting facts
(b) Did you present Ground Two in all appeals that were available to you?
OYes
ONo
GROUND THREE:
(b) Did you present Ground T

OYes
ONo
Page 8 of 10
AO 242 ( 12/11) Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U S.C. 2241
GROUND FOUR:
'
(a) Supporting facts (Be brief Do not c~te cases or law.):
(b) Did you present Ground Four in all appeals that were available to you?
OYes
14.
ONo
If there are any grounds that you did not present in all appeals that were available to you, explain why you did
not:
Request for Relief

15. State exactly what you want the court to do:
Page 9 of 10
B.A.R. TERRORIS.TS
Lawyers, cursed at Luke 11 :45-54, are responsible for turning the law into an
inland piracy and racketeering scheme in order to put victims of the public foql
system into slavery. B.A.R. terrorists are responsible for murder, torture, and
general mayhem and anyone who would deny that is divorced from reality,
having failed to consider the reality of 46 f~milies devastated at Tulia, Texas as
800 years of prison time was given to innocent people, 80 families devastated
in Dallas with the fake drug cases, 270 innocent people arrested in the K-Mart
parking lot at Houston because they fitted the profile, they had one head, two
arms, and two legs just like drag racers, unfortunately they were just K-Mart
shoppersJI Shyster shenanigans are responsible for countless thousands of
people going to prison, indeed PBS showed 1 30 men exonerated by DNA
evidence AFTER serving over 1500 years of prison time. What about the
innocent people who have been executed, see the cover of "In Spite of
Innocence" -regarding 400+ Americans wrongfully convicted of capital crimes,
isn't that MURDER ARRANGED BY B.A.R. TERRORISTS?f? I do not even recall
any trial for the Branch Davidian children at Waco, prior to execution. Isn't it
remar:kable that the lying sack of garbage known as Rockwall County District
Attorney Ray Sumrow was honored in 2001 as the State Bar's prosecutor of
the year, given that he committed perjury, pressured his employees to lie and
tampered with evidence. It is plain and clear that this terrorism is the
responsibility of B.A.R. TERRORISTS that are associated with the MIDDLE
TEMPLE OF THE CROWN;-l~<JTERPOt, the INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, and
the UNITED NATIONS, which are foreign powers clearly known to be involved in
murderl! The New York Times best seller "The Confessions of an Economic
Hitman" by John Perkins admits to murder, "Economic hitmen are highly paid
professionals who cheat countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars.
Their tools include fraudulent financial reports, rigged elections, payoffs,
extortion, sex, and murder." Also "Race Against Evil" by David R. Bannon, an
INTERPOL:-. agent. "'""""<INTERPOL,, operating in some 1 80 countries, had 1000
agents, each one of whom had murdered between 100 and 200 people, while
1NTERPot itself cannot be sued in any court on the planet and is answerable to
no national government whatsoever, basicalfy a MURDER INC. organization
funded with over $30,000,000 annually by B.A.R. TERRORISTS dominating Congress. Prosecutors and judges who should know better despite
ne get t'ough on crime policy has placed thousands of innocent people in

prison by providing monetary incentives absent restraint. The Justice
Department figures regarding incarceration per 1 00,000 of population are over
600% higher here than Canada or China, so does this mean that Americans are
genetically predisposed to be criminals and the cure is to step across the
border into Canada, however if you step back here you are automatically
genetically predisposed to be a criminal again?? Consider the reality of Ernest
Willis, framed by the prosecutor and spending seventeen years on death row,
set free two days prior to executionrl 1 24 men were exonerated and released
from death row in Texas alone, which raises the question "How many innocent
people are still on death row nationwide?" The system is putting 900 a week
into prison as a business, however the system can be fixed by simply referring
to the "Owner's Manual". The Bible at Deuteronomy 19: 1 5-21 tells us that if
judges and prosecutors were stripped of their so-called immunity and suffered
the consequences of attacking, or attempting to murder the innocent, then the
evil would be eliminated. Just one prosecutor being executed for a case such
as Ernest Willis would save thousands of innocent people and clean up the
entire system real fast .
. Furthermore, the mental incompetents operating the inland piracy scheme
who would have us believe that they are running a justice system are unable to
justify the drowning of inmates at New Orleans following the Katrina storm;
people were executed by drowning due to the mere speculation of class C
misdemeanors like "no seat belt" or other offenses alleged by ROAD NAZIS and
B.A.R. TERRORISTS.
"ff a false witness rise up against any man to testify against him that which is
wrong; Then both the men, between whom the controversy is, shall stand
before the Lord, before the priests and judges, which shall be in those days;
And the judges shall make diligent inquisition: and, behold, if the witness be a
false witness, and hath testified falsely against his brother; Then shall ye do
unto him as he had thought to have done unto his brother: so shalt thou put
the evil away from among you. And those which remain shall hear, and fear,
and shall henceforth commit no more any such evil among you. And thine eye
shall not pity; but life shall go for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for
hand, foot for foot."
Deuteronomy 19: 1 6-21

'
EVEN THOUGH t-EGALLY.;..MAoE; MAY BE ABROGATED FOR CAtTSE .QUOTING IBID,P.115: "A PRECEDENT.FOR THUS _ABROGATING A TREATY MADE.BY. THE
AtW. t;Ut;li TH~AT~!;:;,
u.s-..
AS
PRESID~NT AND.AP~ROVED BY ~HESENATE(.S.)MAY~E.FOUNP AS FAR BACK

JULY 7TH.
1789, ~EN U.-S.CONGRES"S PAss~o, -'.AN ACT TO DECLARE.THE ~REATIES HERETOFORE CON-
CJ:.,UOiD WITH .FRANCE NO LONGER. 9BLIGATORY ON THE UNITEQ STAT:ES BECAUSE THEY HAVE-
BF;EN REPEATEO~Y VI-OLATED.. ON. T~ PART. 9F THE FRENCH -GOVER~E~. ". SO JU[AT .ABODT
ALL t'.BE" VIOLATIONS _OP ~ TREATI~~ OR A~B;B~~. ~DB J;JY TBE JJSS~. Qlcif .uo1:1r~
ATES ~. tnJY.T~D NATIONS? THE USA IS V~STLY .OUTVOTED IN nrrs .Mon.gr ACCREGATIOlt
C~LE~ ?:HE. UNITE~ llATI.ONs.- EVEN AS -~RI~AN -TAXPAYEIS FOOT. MOST.. oF 7BE ;BILLS~ .
tiBJCB C<?NS~I~ES u.s.CON~TI~IONAJ,LY POR!IJ?~BN. CONFISCATION OF. tBE CITIZENS:.
HONEY( ~ROPEBTY)WITBOUT JUST COMPENSAT-I.ON -~EFO;RE . THIS rs .MQELY coMMtnirsrrc
CONFrscArION
. "
.
.
.. .
.
. .
. ..
.
.
.
.
A 7REATYHAm.~=:PPmi.suANT-. TO TJIE,--u.s . coNsTrroTroN"==BECOMBs'A p!lt OF nm

~- -L~D, ~- Sll()ULp .~E HONORE.I>; ::pUT IT DOB$. NOT .B~COMB_ S11P12 .. OR.
~EDUCE
Uv oir.
rAa .PRE._
OVER 01 surE~SED!; mE u.s .c()~STI~IO~. 1r IS WOT T:llB ~LAW .01

STANDIG .4LONE. AND NO THEA.Tl OR. EXECUTIVE GHEEMEBT I~ BIBDINGoif .7111
llADE =ny -THE r.RESIDQT(OBAMA)ALONE(AS B'.AS BED DORE)Wim TJIB. ADVICE. AND
OF nm ~-s . SEN.ATE, .. NOR ~r. IT VIQLATES ~ u.s.~ON~T~TDTION!..
~-Tro
)HSIDBNT(N~ Hl~~Wu>Mm
THE. LAND'
U.S.A. :IF
CONSENT
.
~:Bur
THE
U.S.SERATE . HAD A
wrm & FOREIGN
PoWER(SUCJJ. /iS TBE UNITED NATIOBS)WBICB: IilFIINGES UPON OR A11HOGATES 1.IGBTS GIJARAN'
!-E~D. TO. CITIZENS OF TllE u.s.A. mmn. ~ .u~s.C.OliS~ITDTIOB AMDI~A, ~ U,S.Sl)PRE
Hg: COURT CAN DECLUE SUCH. TREATY UNCONSTITUTIONAL, VOID, AND OF NO EFFECT. OF
.
CO~SE J 1'BI "PRESENT SUPREME co~.T. BEING COMPOSED OP. POLITICAL RADICALS RATlllR
-rtIAlf JUDICIAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW EXPERTS, IS NOT LIKELY TO DO SO BY PUBLIC OPIB
i OB
AND DEMAND!
BE ANS~ED IS THIS:_ t;JNDD WBIC~ FORM OF GOVIJliMENT DO THE PEOPl.E

STATES PREFER TO. L1;M11ESTLY ~- WE CADO'l OPERATE UW.BR l!OfB . .
71m..QUESTION TO
<IF. ~ ..
1::.!:!
i!lB UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION .AMERI;(:.4JJ.1l .TJIE. DllITID. wAU.ORS ..CDJl,TBl---AlfD THEIR
lli!l. TREATY -AND u~~PDTIC1Plff0N.. ACT o:r 1945?. SEE BBICICEI AHD'DMD11 IF IT IS
LATE TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT llINSTATING OUI U.S.CONSTJTDTION, TJIBN WHY NOT
rtfST .ACCBPT THE TRAITOROUS U.lf.Cllil7Bl-TIEATY WITHOUT MORE ADO? wny DIDN'T TJIE
"EB.IC.AN RBVOLUTIO~rs~s THINK . IT TOO LATE OR TOO DIFP'ICULt TO -DEPEND THEIR LIBEP.lfj
r-oo
,.-ND-IF THE B'~GiitY-INTELLI.GENT FRAMERS OF THE U.S.CONs.rrrtJTJON .WERE WELJ

-'- -: :AWARE OF THE DEi\TBTRAP~INCORPORA~ED IN ARTICLE VI, "'WBY THEN DID THEY SO
FR~ IT? DID THEY NOT EXPECT PATRIOTS, RATHER ~ TllASONI.STS AS OUR
BLECrED OFFICIALS, . TO HONOR AND. ENFORCE THE. SPIRIT~ LETTER, AND INTENT
.~F Tifl!:UNITED STATES CONSTI1'UTION .AMERICA?.
.
THE_tJ.s_.coNsTr~rou DiERIC!SBOutD~BE Tn
LAw or TBE LA?m(ONCE
THE -U.S.PRESil)ENT. MR.OBAMA AHD 1).S.SENATB JOINTLY RESCIND. TBE SIGNIBG
O.F_.TBE r.REATY AND U.N... PAHTICIPATION. ACT ot t.'945) . TING
INTO._TllE
suPlmm.
us.
AND
~VE BBBN.DO:RI LEGALLY(BY TJIB. PRBSIDINT

.u~s-.~ENATE)., BUT.nm ACT IS.~~-'- ]JECAUSE .IT- I_S ~CONSTj~~ONAL.~BD~
tnlITED NATIONS MAY :SEEM. TO
T~ ~ITBD' STATES CONSTITUTION JS n. SUP~EHE . ~w; ~lF TDE. UND~ M;t RENOWN
ED JD G8NUINE AMERICAN. COliSTI~Io41a BXP~TS(SUCB" AS nro~s H.C~OLEY, .
-~D'O}US;;'fAS9N NQBTON, ANI) 11.ARRY ATWOOJ>,_ T() NAME ~~AL)B'AVE --~~WAYS.. HELD:
.TJIAT Alf!Tll~IG .. ~r Cmn'RA~s., PIHlBl~S., ~R PBVD~S lira tr.S~COWST.ITUTION IS NUL~ AN:D VOID -~AND OP-'-'.NO . J;!:~FEcr. : . .
. . . .
:
...
nr~li 7n u~s..PJESI.DDTC.OBAMA}AND OR. u.s.s-A~E-B'AS AUTllOBITY
on
POtlER.
ro ~C~GE~ _D"IM~N'ISH;, oi("DESTROY Tim u.s.C()J~'lI~IOH. "BY t1~PATIOR.-".TJ..;.

U.TY, OR OT~WJSE.:.'OBLY.A. CONSTI~IONAL ~DMDT C.ANt4~Ll: CilANGE I'1
Tnr THE JLtmrruT1csuPn-~ICH DDI~ vo~SmPeERf; .A1ID .:nma8011tc ~trCrFDu
. Alnf TRYING. TO .UNDERMINE- .THE MORAL. GOvDNHE!f.[' of .ALHIGBTf-GoD[ALW. TA' ALA;_

.&no,A_I...:YABWElr-JEROVAH~ETC. '].
.That The Secret U.S.~overoment I$ CONSPilliNG!.
riU:f .!MEilitnAN ~ti~RS cultri. OF 'nuso?i i.n. SBDITIOR. Alls C0--0,llSPI~IllG

.om
.AND t;O~CQLLABQA.TING(IN. C~O()TS' TOGE$.!co~o-rs IB:.Ri;s ~- w.AB. CRIMJNA.LS. WB()M HAVE. NO DIPLOMATIC OR QU.1..IF.I-BD .~ITI.Es110M- NATIONAL: AND
. .I~--~Ai'i()NAL .PROSECUTION .AND ARE AGAIBST. BOTH .TSE .AM.D:tCU
nr.rniiAT.tOI
'At.: . c~-9~0L~ PEQPLJ(ctr.rzos Bo ~()BLD. POPULACE]~ ARl.-.~;tL~o~:vtotAT_IJ
_.THE NDJOO~~~Bl.G :PRDiC;EP~Es Alm U.N.liORE!JB~G .. DI~~ ~- ~:s IS .No .QUA:LIFI~Ell
:un .
11~1r :tJ;r;.r,o~Trc nDimrITY Fon ~on Jm~H VI~~TBS. _I~~~roil~ LAW($)As ::eQ7
.. TBE . _I.LLUMIBA.TI AND PREEM.ASONIC ORDERS HAVE AND ARE DOI,c:so UBTIL.:TB'IS: VERY
~ . MOMDT.f '. . :.
. .
..: . . ..
~ocToii,s o:r H-.-~.,.~P.-~sPilmGriiLo-ms~ont ilE 11urG riUT.11-.wrm

ro: BRl-NG. ABOm.nm APPUJiUCE' OP- .A !ilmTAt ILWss~MENTAL 'DE)'JCT-.
_: tlui Psrcs
. FALSIBOOP
MENTAL
.nrs~s1{tmAT.
1m
-~ ~m.c
THAT'ISJ!.
.. .
..
. .
. WE .AHJmICAJJS.MtisT
W~LDCBliTIJIE)ON ROTtCE TB'A.r li'B.ARE 011c1 MOR~
BON'ORIBG OUR OWN u.s.CONSTITQTI.011 AS TD
~ll OF'lllE LAJID, AllD\:JmI.;
~T.ATIN~ll .TO ITS P'OBMI~ PROPER ~RIME -POSITI-~AS ~L~AS. RECLAIMING . UR.
SOVDEIG"7Y AS . AN .INDEPENDENT -~EPUB~IC. IN ACCOR~~CE ~ITH O~ .DE~~ION
OF IifDEPENDENCE, 'illERE' IS !~NO SUBTlTUTE'' FOK AMERICAN -'INDEPEm.~CE. MARY
MEN AND- '-WOMEN. HAVE .DIED AND ."WORMS DAVE. EATEN .THEM". FO~ A FAR- LESSEa ~US!;!
. GET THE:U~S . mrr .OF.THE U:.N.,.AND. THE CO~T ~o St1BVERSIVE UNI1'.ED NATIONS
.OUT-.GJBTHE U.S.A.!.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
wi TD
SDPB5
i'HAT WE P~ISONERS OF CONSCIEN,CE ARE- PRISONERS OF A Tl.AVESTY, C~IADE,

. ID:POCRISY '.AND FLAGRANT MOCKERY OF A. _GR~D 1ELIGIOUSPOLJ;TICAL SHAK ..
:ANll.SGAM .AND .MERE : FARCICAL .-cOMEDY oF -STATEUNITED,. STA'i'ESAND U~l"tTED.
.NATIONS FREEDOM,_ JDS.TICE, AND. EQUALITY
TRl!ASOr~; IN:. HIGH,

1?
... A~. ~~. ~: . ~.
.1r T.;Ln~.no~
.
..
.
- ......
------------- ......_._. . 4------ - -- ...,.. ___ -
~-----
-----------..------ ---. -
'l~C3 .Uhlted~att~ins.Treatr
~,~~-
The United Natio~s Partieipation Actt~.

!~.:~:.~
.The: $everell~ty: of'tne Umted Siates:' of Jhneiic.4~

At t11e conclusion of the Con.9titutional Convention
in September 1787, Benjamin Franklin was asked,
'1li\That ha?Je you wro11ght?"
... ;:;
~,. wrJs e~ "'r.:'i
11
He answered,
a Republic, if you can keep it."
... n..~..t...... .
P.S. FEDERAL JUDGES ARE FLAGRANTLi GUILTY OF ILLEGAL FORUM SHOPPTNG! JUDGES GUILTY
OF AIDING AND ABETTING FOREIGN POWERS AND GTVING AID AND ~OMFORT TO OUR ENEMIES!
CERTAIN FEDERAL JUDGES AND FOREIGN SPIES CHANGING THE u.s.CONSTITUTION AND u.s.DE. CLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE BY USURPATION!

:;
,;
....... 11
'
:-r;.'.;i:,"
u
c.(.i"~
.l
' nf 7
A. miwrricfilnm Legal System Is Cmrrupt Beyon.d

JR(.~~ognitlion, Judge TeHs Harvard Law School
By Gemltlille Ilaw!cins
Murch 7, 2003
The American legal system
h:H heen corrupted almost
heyontl recog.nition, Judge
~dith Jones of the U.S.
Comt of Appeals for the
Jliflh Circuit, told the
Federalist
Society
She :mid that the question of

whii:t is mon1Hy right is
rnutinely sacrificed to what
ss ~HilHicul1j' expedient. The
dmngi~ lrns come because
kg8l
philmrnphy
\rns
tks~ended to nihilism.
Accor,ling to the jmlge, the first contemporary threat to the mle of law
comes from witbin the legal system itself.
.Judge Edith Il. .Jones of thf: U.S.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth
Circuit ta lies to members of Ilu'Vard
Law School's Federalist Society.
.Tones sahl that tbe question of what
is 1nora1ly right is routinely
saciificed to what is politically
expedient.
"The integrity of hl'W, its religious roots, its transcendent quality are
di-;appc:u-ing. ! s~.H'i' lhe movie 'Chicago' with Ilich:uiJ Ge1e the oilier
tlrQ' That's the way the pnhlic thinks about lawyers," she toM the
-;tmlent!i.
"The first 100 years of American lawyers were trained on Illaclcstone,

w!w wrote that: 'The law of n:ature .. dictated hy God himself . is
hinding .. in all counties and at all times; no human laws are of any
valid it) if contrary to this; and such of them as are valid derive all force
:rnd all their :rnthority ... from this originat' The Framers created a
government of limited power with this understanding of the rule ofJawtlrnt it was dependent on transcendent religious obligation," saicl .Tones.
She said th~tt the business about all of the Founding Fathers being deists
"This is not a prescription for intolerance or narrow sectarianism," she

continued, "for unalienable rights were given by God to all our fellow
citizens. Ilaving lost sight of the moral and religious foundations of the
rule of law, we are vulnerable to the destrnction of our freedom, omr
equality before the law aml our self-respect. It is my fervent hope that
tl1is new century will experience a revival of the original understanding
of the rule of law and its raots.
"The answer is a recovery of moral principle, the sine qua non of an
orderly society. Post 9/11, many events have been clarified. It is hard to
remain a moral relativist when your own people are being lcilled. 11
of
H:.u-vard Law School on

f<dmrnry 28.
'./
l'nr.P. 2 of 7
is "jnst wrong," or "way o''erbl_own." She says they believed in "faith

and reason," and this did not le~ul to intolerance.
Alexb de Tocqueville, author of Democracy in Ame .. ica an<l one of the

first writers to observe the United States from the outside looking-in,
"desc1ihed lawyers as a nah1ral aristocracy in America," Jones told tlae
students. "The intellechtal basis of their profession and the study of law
based on venerable precedents bred in them habits of order and a taste
for formalities and predictability." As Tocqueville saw it, "These
qualities enabled attorneys to staml apart from the passions of the
majority. Lawyers were respectetl hy the citizens and able to guide them
and moderate the public's whims. Lawyers were essential to tempering
the potential tyranny .of the majority.
"Some lawyers may stiU perceive our profession in this flattering light,
hut to judge from polls and the tenor of lawyer jokes, I doubt the public
shares Tocqneville's vie\Vanymore, and it is hard for us to do so.
"The legal aristocracy have shed their professional independence for
the temptations and materialism associate<) with becoming businessmen.
Because law has become a self-avowed business, pressure mounts to give
clients the atlvice they want to hear, to pander to the clients' goal
tllrough deft manipulation of the law While the business mentality
produces certain benefits, lilce occasional competition to charge clients
lower fees, other adverse effects include advertising aml shameless selfpromotion. The legal system .has also been wounded by lawyers who
tlaemselves no longer respect the rule of law, u-
....
-- .. __,_.... .......:--..---.... ---- --~
~#
e:::;,-
~
\....../
..;.
.1
-~
~\..r- -- ... ..
~ panel.
Presi ent, t rnn writes. up...hls.
The Illegal process began In report and recommendations
Hl94 after ~ February meeting and the judge adopts It y.ilthout
In which the judges agreed review.
ltl. - l\fay I June 1009 THE 11.AfERlCAN'S BULLETIN
to let Chief Judge Dufresne
A review or the Re(lorts
handle pro se writs .according and
Recommendatlpns
In
l:o documents filed with the most courts reveals that the
1
Supreme Cmut.
district judges always adopt
The
Gretna
Pollce the Magl~trate's Repo1 t and
usually
Department's . Investigation Recommendations,
painted an unflattering 0 cwu~ without review, particularly In
M
as how Chief Judge Dufresi1
pro se pleadings.
.
handled the Incident.

In essence, the Magistrate
In his police report, Detective Judge Is 9ct1ng as a cllsgulsed
f\lcharcl nuss said that the Article lil judge and Is
chief judge 'appeared to be lmpers.matlng an Article III
evasive with specific answers' judge, not only a criminal act
lo questions about Peterson's hut also a violation of the First
employment; . that Dufresne and fifth Amendments to the
withheld a suicide note for Constitution.
hours berore turnlna It over
to police; and that Dufrense EDITOR COMMENT; What,
suggested that he be present we are to expect something
FJlJ\UD OISCOVEllE:O IN
when detectives questioned else? I-las not the cancer or
APPELLATE COURTS
1. Any, pro se filing Is
corruption reached every level
Peterson's secretary~
a11lomallcally
stamped
as
Wrote Pelersoo: 'Who's (sic) of government today7
has Iona ueen maintained Denied. Not only Is ti 1e evidence
Integrity Is really In question
. thcit llie cmu ts of lhe United
Ill" &
when you have convenlenlly
States do not read the peti- now available for the Fifth
Circuit,
hut
an
organization
of
Ignored your duty to revl!!W pro
tions before them, parllcularly
se criminal writ applications so
wl1en they are filed pro se or writ writers In the Austin, TX
area has obtained evidence
you can reduce your worl<toad,
unrepresented.
of the same
present a false picture of the
proi::eclureln
c~urt's worldpad, and charge
the United
large sums for work you
States
haven't clone."
District - :
The evidence In the fifth
Court for the circuit
now
creates
an
Morthern ; .Inference that judges, both
District ' district and appellate,
of
Texas, ' <lo not read pro si: nllngs.
D a I I a s I
T.hls happens In three ways:
Division.
T h I s
procedure
violates
b 0 . t h
the
First
IS lll~l t~W IEYillOHC
n~ f1ramm~t ~ Tl1at feilerai
w;;uict~rea~t ~lp-the~foeii;-a-ii,1.
to
niDtlhla1ttm111g ilammm~Hant's
Pa11Rf~uon'H'?.
.'~ 1/.
"[t
Times
Picayune,
October 26; 2008,
Sunday,
cllsclosed the fraud In Lhe fifth
Circuit Court of Appeals.

Jn the article:, entitled the
Amendment
right of access to the court
and the Fifth Amendment right
of D4e Process .
2. Filings are rpul:lnely- given
to a clerk for review,. who then
reviews the filings and mal<es
his recommendations to the
district court. juclge, who,
without any rev_lew, orwllhou~
proper review, aulomallcally
Jefferson Report, the 1~aper

disclosed l:hat one of the clerks
of the Fiflh Circuit committed
'suicide In his office last year,
and his farewell' noles revealed
1
an illegal ind hnrnoral practice
In which appellate judges
pleaclina.
.
syst~matiq1Jly
l\:J11qred and
Many clerks are just 'ouf"of
rejected 1mmlreds of al1peals
law school and.do nut have the
.~Cfo~~~~-t~S.--~ who
a~l\~.~L ex1Ierle1'rce-tt'rp.rop'erly review
~1 19en~i!~1~ ~!'Wh~e~a~l~!~J"u~~
Jerrold
Peterson
was
55
when he l<illecl himself MCI\' 21,

-- 2007.
.
~.
Though he <trlrnitted ll\at he
::i_ had suffered from depression
\. for years, Peterson's notes
r--.. said that he could no longer
~ live with hlmsell' after rejecting
'-...,) appeal after apfleill and

handinq them over to Chief
Judge Edward Dufresne, Jr.,
for his sionatun~.

The law requires that pro se
writ appllcnllons-appeals filed

lly peop.le wllhnu\: allorneys l>e 1e::v6e\Ned bv a
Ufferl-l1u-hJft
..........j).'1:-
criminal pleadings.
A petillone1 is entltlecl to .
review from an Article III
judge.
The
violates the
FirstAmendment right of access
to the court ani:I the Fifth

l\mendment right of Due
Process.
3. The]udgesendsthepleacllng
to a
Magisb'a.te Judge fcir a
repqrt rmd rec.ommenclatlons.

The Mngistrate Judge, who).f
ju~lge
and I not- appointed hy lfle/ \
Is not
a11
-0a-rnci(" oi;[ij na arill i 115
il~i,,
11mn1cHat1mCournd1:s iu~
That foct Is now proven.

An article in Lhe New Orleans
wo~d~:
begin to get the. peepleused fellow- Slallnlst!:>-are-proposi1 l!J

to It. for now, they'll take reinstating slavery.
smaller steps, mce reinstating
the "Depriving the People of
!;ee 'SLA\fli'.ltY'
the Means of Resistance Act"
of 2009--also .known as the
Coutiuued on Pugc\2 l
Article HI
-~~
. ),'1
Until You Know ~

The Ways. Of God! ~~
. Learn whp you are, where you are from, why 1.}/
n
..,U,
YI
H
you are here, and where you are goin9. Learn

who the enemies of our God ancl our race are.
The l<ey to understanding your Bible and all
history, pas~. present and future, js the IsraelIdentity truth that Is now sweeping the entire
patriotic movement.
II
\~~
. For a FREE Doctrinal Statement of Beliefs Y.f

defining this'am~zing truth, plus Christian Iden- . a
tity bool< and tape lists, write:

II
1f~htub.ont :Ilben~itp. Jllliniutrie:iS

.
P.O. Box 1021,
Hamson, Arkansas 72602 US/\
. Visit our webslle atwww.l<inn1d~ntitv.com

41(
-:-4(--.(-- ~
1v~
0
--~11
Case
1:15-cv-01869-NLH Document 1 Filed 03/12/15 Page 40 of 61 PageID: 40
. ~--tl. ,iir;1-14. '
v .
. lt.r~IMl\.i.)
b.~
r-~
~.,:.i,_:..;.;;~i'~.i..ii"..li:~~~l~
.;~;~;t:.~riJ11~~~t~~\~l
'ii
i:
1'.
NEw WoRLn 01rnE1t
174
lF~
:)
On June 26, 1945, President Harry Truman signed the new United
Nations Charter. On December 14, 1946, the U.N. accepted a gift of $8.6
million from John D. Rockefeller, Jr., lo buy the eighteen acres of land
along the East River in New York City upon which their current
building sits. The next year, the U.S. Congress approved a $65 million
interest-free loan to finance the construction of the U.N. buildings.
As banker James Warburg, the son of Council on Foreign Relations'
founder Paul Warburg, confidently told the United States Senate on
February"17, 1950: "\/\/e shall have world government whether or not we
like it. The only question is, whetl1erworld government will. be achieved
by conquest or consent."49
~;i
~~
;::i,
1:~
~~
~1:t,
~\
~~
.FO~URTEEN
~.
:;.
t'
.;i.
THE PRESENT
,(.
v
"
'!>
~-
.i;.
")
'lJ
~1
v.~
,, t
'
~~[,
,\}''.
l~
~:11
.!1.~J
~f-~
~~8:~(
f~
-1
l\~
~
bl
~\
~'.;
~~
}~
~~.
t,u
,;.~i
.!
Although World War II ended in 1945 with the American public

thoroughly tired of hostilities, conquest by force of arms did not. The
Soviet Communists not only swept up half of Europe, but went after a
substantial part of the rest of the world as well, many times under the .
banner of their newly created United Nations. With Roosevelt's stamp
of approval, and Truman's tacit approval, Communism made great
strides on many fronts. Obviously, Communists thought their New
World Order was within relatively easy grasp if only they could move
quickly enough before America woke up to the deception.
Few Americans had the political sophistication to see through the
sham. Foremost among those who did was the brilliant American
general George S. Patton, who at one point announced that he was fully
prepared to drive his Third Army straight to the heart of Moscow to rout
out the Bolsheviks. Unfortunately, General Patton died prematurely in
1945 in a freak automobile accident in Germany.
In 1950, a Republican Senator from Wisconsin, Joseph McCarthy,
made allegations that the State Department was harboring Communists. President Truman, a Democrat, and Secretary of State Dean
Acheson denied McCarthy's charges, but many Americans believed
they were true.
By 1953, when General Dwight D. Eisenhower became president,
McCarthy accused his administration of treason. By 1954, nationally
televised hearings were underway to air the accusations. During these
hearings, McCarthy, also claimed that there was a deep-penetration
Soviet spy network at work in America .
~: "'I '
Case ,1:15-cv-01869-NLH
l=,t
'~
h.
. l
J~:
--~--..--"-'-'-~...-_:. ... :..~ ......,.. .,,.,,.,.,......,,.._~~~~~~
,~f
'.'i
.' 1
'i
,;.-i
1''
''l
. 1
'l
('..J
:.\!
;~. ~i
".1
.,,
'.
ell
<;._I
'i
f;\1
:: .:1
')J
~ .:_l'j'
.,
.1 )
.1"
~ :~
Fj
~-
4J
!
j~
1~
~
~~
II
~,~.~1.
~~
~~I
NEw 'VORLn 01wrn
176
FouRTEEN-T1m PRESENT
177
As we have seen, calling the CFR's machinations a spy network is

hardly appropriate. Some are probably spies in the traditional sense.
Many are deluded idealists. But to view it in traditional terms of nation
against nation is to play the game the way those who are the reC1l
enemies of America want it played. In 1966, CC1rroll Quigley of Georgetown University explained:
Golitsin, Yuri Nosenko, and Michal Goleniewski-have stated they

believe there are high level spies working in U.S. intelligence. Despite
these serious charges, there has never been an outside investigation of
subversion in the CIA. One was attempted in the mid-1950s, but the
vice-president of the United States, Richard M. Nixon, led the fight to
prevent it. 6
There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international

network which operates, to some extent, in the way the
radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which
we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to
cooperating with the Communists, oranyothergroups,and frequently
does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have
studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the
early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret records. 1
There are still many who perpetuate the theory that there is a deepcover spy planted somewhere within our intelligence machinery-the
"CIA mole" theory. The idea is that if we could somehow root this
single, high-level mole out, then all our troubles would be over.
This same theory is prevalent in Great Britain where the general
consensus is that if only the last spy in the infamous Kim Philby spy ring
could be caught, then the UK would finally be secure from the Communist
onslaught. This is the basis for a best-selling book Spy Catcher, by Peter
Wright, former assistant director of Britain's agency for counterintelligence.
Ang~9phile
Quigley apologized for the fact that although the members of these
secret societies controlled Communism in the U.S., they were really
"gracious and cultured gentlemen" who admittedly had made a mistake bringing Soviet Communism into a position of such dominance in
world affairs, but still had nothing but the best of intentions for the
world:
\;;.
It was this group of people, whose weal th and influence so exceed eel
their experience and understanding, who provided much of the
framework of influence which the Communist sympathizers ... [used]
in the United States in the 1930s. It must be recognized that the power
that these energetic Left-wingers exercised was never their own
power or Communist power but was ultimately the power of the
international financial coterie. 2
THE CJ.A. MOLE THEORY

Roosevelt's left-leaning tendencies even influenced the American
intelligence community. At the start of World War II, Roosevelt put
General William (Wild Bill) Donovan in command of the nation's first
full-fledged organization for intelligence and secret operations, the
Office of Strategic Services, or OSS.
Donovan saw nothing particularly wrong with Communists. It is
now known that Donovan, instead of screening out members of the
Communist Party, actually recruited OSS personnel directly from
Communist ranks. 3 When the FBI provided General Donovan with
evidence that some of his OSS personnel were members of the Communist Party, he replied, "I know they're Communists. That's why I hired
them." 4
After World War II, the OSS became the CIA. Since that time, the
Soviets have been very successful at stealing U.S. secrets. The head of
the CIA, General Walter Bedell Smith, stated publicly in 1952 that he
was sure there were Communist agents working inside the CIA. 5
1n fact, no less than three high-level Soviet KGB defeclors--Anatoli
Although the book is a very interesting account of Wright's relentless

pursuit of this ring of spies, it seems a bit naive when you look at the
history of the "world revolution" movement. Interestingly, Mr. Wright
admits that he is not a Mason. He states therefore, that he was not privy
to the real secrets of the great spy rings of post-war Britain. 7
OTTO OTEPKA & CASTRO
Counterintelligence-the business of detecting spies-has been on

a long, dismal slide ever since. When John F. Kennedy was President,
for example, Otto Otepka was the Chief Security Evaluator for the State
Department. Shortly after the election in 1960, Otepka was called into
a meeting with Secretary of State Dean Rusk and Attorney General
Robert Kennedy and was asked whether it would be possible for Walt
Whitman Rostow to be employed by the State Department without a
background security investigation.
Otepka replied that he could not issue a clearance for Rostow because
he had already been investigated by the CIA and the Air Force, and that
both had denied him a clearance. Bobby Kennedy was upset and told
Otepka that "those Air Force generals who did this are a bunch of
jerks." 8
Shortly after this 1960 meeting, Rostow was appointed by President
Kennedy to be his special assistant for National Security Affairs. In
1963, Otepka was called to testify before the Senate Internal Security
Subcommittee concerning William Wieland, who had been a State
Department officer in charge of Cuban affairs. Wieland had played a
key role in sh.-i.ping the disastrous policy that allowed Fidel Castro to
seize power from right-wing dictator Fulgencio Batista.
Otcpka hod discovered that Wieland, at the time of obtziini1w
.. ,
It.~
~.i
:~(
I
~!:-._
... .
>.~~~nr::' ,:::t~ i~l~,~~I
NEW WORLD ORDER
_._
lI
II
178
1
.. ___
,;...........q m = ..
FOURTEEN-Tim PRESENT
179
;~
:t
:~
i~:l~;/
~
I\_.~:~--
..j
~~'.
i~
~.
~;~~
~-
1:'-
~~-
"~
..._:.;
:~J
~~
~).,l
:J'.j'
:1
t:~- ~Jl,;.
.~:
,l}i
iV
~\'.
,~ ~I
~~tl1
~- c1l:x_-.'~
..
-~~-
.. ~
"l'
~i
:~
{j~
P~r
.)i\~
~r
..\I.<~
~~I
~,Mi
employn1ent in the State Department, had concealed information about

his past, including an unresolved allegation that he had been connected
with the Cuban Communist Party many years before. Otepka also
discovered that Wieland had concealed evidence that Castro was a
Communist. Otepka described the attitudes of some at the State Department:
There \vas just a preponderance of evidence showing that Fidel
Castro Was a Communist. Yet, \iVilliam Wieland was advising his
superiors ... that there was no evidence that Castro was a Communist,
and that we should seek an accommodation with Castro, and get rid
of. .. Batista.
When all of this was brought out in my evaluation report, I found
out that Wieland had his supporters upstairs who immediately came
to his rescue, who didn't want these facts to come out.9
Otto Otepka was immediately reassigned, and the State Department
tried to force his resignation. He was moved to a small office and given
the tedious task of indexing the Congressional Record. In the end, Otepka
was vindicated, but conditions at the State DepartII}ent did not change.
William Wieland was promoted, and Otto Otepka never again served
as Security Evahiator and in fact, the job itself was abolished. 10
Allowing Fidel Castro to transform Cuba into the first Soviet military
foothold in the Western Hemisphere was the greatest outrage of the
Eisenhower administration.
In 1957, when Castro was fighting a guerrilla war against military
dictator Fulgencio Batista, he promised the Cuban people freedom. Ne7.o
York Times journalist Herbert L. Matthews, a CFR member, depicted
Castro as the George Washington of Cuba in a series of articles. The
media portrait painters repeated the same refrains they had used less
than a decade earlier on Chiang Kai-shek. Batista was depicted as a
corrupt tyrant, while Castro, according to Matthews, was "a man of
ideals" with "strong ideas of liberty, democracy; social justice." 11
However, to the newspaper's credit, it also published,in 1979,a letter
fron1 former U.S. Ambassador to Cuba Earl E.T. Smith in which Smith
stated:
Castro could not have seized power in Cuba without the aid of the
United States. American government agencies and the United States
press played a major role in bringing Castro to power ....The State
Department consistently intervened ... to bring about the downfall
of... Batista, thereby making it possible for Pidel ~astro to take over the
Government of Cuba.12
After being asked to abdicate by President Eisenhmver, Batista left
office on December 31, 1958. The next year, Castro, the new leader of
Cuba, spoke to the CFR members in New York at their headquarters at
Pratt House. Within three years, he had Soviet missiles pointed at the
I TC' A
Ti
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM

As important and sensational as these political revelations are, the
advocates of the New World Order have also been busy fighting equally
important battles within the borders of the United States. Key to their
long-range plans is the remaking of the American educational system.
Since religion, especially Christianity,. is anathema to their plans,
references to it have been removed from American public education qn
the grounds that religion must not be forced upon children. In the place
of Christianity, however, the time-worn "religion of reason" of the
secret societies, now known generally as "humanism," has been
inserted. Piece by piece, the nation's educators are being convinced to
teach a system that grows ever closer to the agenda set forth by
Weishaupt and Marx.
Why highlight the religious aspect? Because that is the crux of the
issue. If a man can be brought to accept atheism-that there is noGodthen the need for morality totally disappears. Why should we be moral
if there is no God to bring us to account for our actions in this life or the
next?
Once this philosophical underpinning for morality is broken down,
men can be convinced to justify any action because to them, the ends do
justify any means. This is why the most effective opposition to Communism has been the Church. Certainly, that is the way Marxists view it.
Karl Marx wrote, "We make war against all prevailing ideas of religion,
of the state, of country, of patriotism. The idea of God is the keynote of
a perverted civilization. It must be destroyed." 14 Lenin also proclaimed
Atheism to be an integral part of Communism. 15
Professor Paul Vitz of New York University has studied how
traditional American values have been eliminated from American
textbooks:
Studies make it abundantly clear that public school textbooks
commonly exclude the history, heritage, beliefs, and values of millions
of. Americans. Those who believe in the traditional family are not
represented. Those who believe in free enterprise are not represented.
Those whose politics are conservative are almost unrepresented.
Above all, those who are committed to their religious tradition-at the
very least as an important part of the historical record--are not
represented. 16
However, such was certainly not the case in years past. In eighteenth
century America, The New England P~imer and McGuffey's Eclectic Reader
we.re the backbone of grammar school education. Even in that day, the
latter sold 120 million copies. The Christian orientation of both these
volumes was clear. McGuffey said in his Eclectic Reader, "The Ten
Commandments and the teachings ofJesus Christ are not only basic but
plenary." 17
Case' 1:15-cv-01869-NLH
t. '31, '
, .. ,it1
'
.-~.-...:... . . ,J...-----L..-'.o.'.Ji.k'lll------
(
l
11
~l
!'
'
"
l.
.1
.;~
.J
'1
;i
~,
:j
~-~
'l
,.!
\-!
!'-'
,-:
:I~
1."'
t''
'~
1'
.,
~'
.~
l~
~
..1
.
,_;.:~
I
~
~
~
~~I
180
NEW \Vcrnu> 01rn1m
Dr. W.P. Shofstall, state superintendent for public schools in Arizona

in 1973 said, "The Atheists have, for all practical purposes, taken over
public education in this country. I cannot help but remember the words
of the Scripture which says: The fool hath s.aid in his heart, There is no
God." 18
Seizing the educational system of a nation is nothing new. Masonry
began similar work a century ago in Italy. On April 20, 1884, Pope Leo
XIII sent out an Encyclical Letter on Freemasonry to all "brethren, all
Pa triarches';Prima tes, Archbishops, and Dis hops of the Catholic world."
A portion of the letter read:
Masonry also attempts to control the education of youth, and mold
it to its own godless pattern. So the Church is allowed no share in
education, and in n1any places Masonry has succeeded in placing it
entirely in the hands of laymen, and has banished from moral teaching
all mention of man's duties to God. 19
REWRITING U.S. HISTORY

In America, the task of Masonry to redefine the values which would
be taught to the next generation was prodigious_indeed, requiring a
huge investment. The plan operated for many years, however, before
being discoveretl.
In 1954, a special Congressional Committee investigated the interlocking web of tax-exempt foundations to see what impact their grants
were having on the American psyche. The Committee stumbled onto
the fact that some of these groups had embarked upon a gigantic project
to re\.vrite American history and incorporate it into new school textbooks.
Norman Dodd, the Co1nmittee's Research Director, found in the
archives of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace the following remarkable statement of purpose:
The only way to maintain control of the population was to obtain
control of education in the U.S. They realized this was a prodigious
task so they approached the Rockefeller Foundation with the suggestion that they go in tandurn and that portion of education which could
be considered as domestically oriented be taken over by the Rockefeller
Foundation and that portion which was oriented to International
matters be taken over be the Carnegie Endowment.20
The Rockefeller Foundation agreed to take on the domestic portion

of the task. The purpose of all this interest in history, was of course, to
rewrite it. Dodd explained:

They decided that the success of this program lay in an alteration in
the mClnner in which American history was to be presented. They then
approached four of the then rnost-prominent historians - such as
Mary and Charles Beard - with the suggestion that they alter the
manner in which they were accustomed to presenting the subject.

They [werel turned down flat, so ... they decide they !had] to build a
FOURTEEN-Tim PRESENT
181
coterie of historians of their own selection:21
The Guggenheim Foundation agreed to award fellowships to historians recommended by the Carnegie Endowment. Gradually, through
the 1920s, they assembled a group of twenty promising young academics,
and took them to London. There they briefed them on what was
expected of them when they became professors of American history.
That twenty were the nucleus of what was eventually to become the
American Historical Association. 22
In 1928, the American Historical Association was granted $400,000
by the Carnegie Endowment to write a seven-volume study on the
direction the nation was to take. The thrust of these books, according to
Dodd, was that "the future of this country belongs to collectivism and
humanism." 23
Dodd concluded from his study that these tax-exempt foundations

- by virtue of the fact that they pay for these studies- lay at the heart
of a group determined to destroy the United States. 24
These educational changes were applied very gradually, so as not to
alarm the general American populace, but they have been documented.
This, in tandum with state and federal court decisions in the later half
of the twentieth century, has proven very effective at achieving this
goal. Masonry is still very active in the area of education. An excellent
. book on the subject is Paul A. Fisher's Behind the Lodge Door.
Perhaps the greatest advantage the forces of the New World Order
possess is that they know they are at war. America, at best, only suspects
it. How the New World Order will be manifested in the next century
cannot be predicted, but one thing is clear: secret societies will continue
to masquerade as benign, humanitarian organizations and to attack
critics who penetrate their disguise.
Although Freemasonry has been reduced to a level ofless importance
in the twentieth century than it held in the seventeenth, eighteenth, and
nineteenth centuries, it is still far from benign.
Anglo-American Masons are outraged by the implication that there
is anything nefarious about their modern-day organization. They claim
that Anglo-American Freemasonry, as currently constituted, was not
founded until 1717, when four lodges united under the Grand Lodge of
Englarid. This may well be the case, and the British were merely trying
to divest themselves of the debaucheries of Continental Masonry.
But why then, if they were trying to divest themselves of their past,
did they keep the blood oaths, secret handshakes, passwords, symbolisn1, and even the name of their parent craft? In fact, it is difficult for the
student to see just what was changed, other than the half-heartPd
inclusion of the 13ibleand a few references to God who they prefer to call
lhP "(:;rp;i~ /\rrhit,.,rt "f tho T Tn;Hor''"'
11
~~--~:--~ ~-~--l''-'J:. -
,.
Case
.
.1:15-cv-01869-NLH
ti.i'f 'I
1~ )i;,f\JI,
::~n.;-~;1J 11~t~~Im~~1_::
.
t'
. t
v'C~
\~
_________ .. .... .
182
".1t'
. ~ i~-.:..:.:..-1~.:. ,. :.;;'{-= . t.~. : -~. !.:t....w.:u. ... ~ . . . -~~..:~ ... ~:.1 ..,!,.l..;..;.o'-L_~t.L.~~i11,"~
NEw
WORLD
FolJRTEEN-THE PRESENT
Onnrn
183
"....
"l
that their ultimate goals have changed \.Vhen little else has.
Those of us who criticize, however, must remember to never paint
the rr1embers of these organizations with too broad a brush. fortunately, there are very few completely evil men in this world. The vast
n-1ojority of members in these groups are merely deceived. Their minds
can be changed when presented with the truth. It's important to
reIT1ember that the people best Jble of helping defeJt the machinations
of the secr~t societies are its members.
_ll
;!
..
.'_t,
\\
I'.
.~
...
;r
~.!
....
'~f
~-.
~F
1(
if
'f'
:.;'IO:.,:
_.. ~~
~4.~
'
~:i_ ~
t;i
..,,_
f
~~r
?..
~y~~
;;~-~
f~
l!'
.0.~
1.1.
~
~
~
~I~
~
~
~
~
~
lit
~h
-.~.
~~
NIXON REVISITED
The theory that President Nixon did not deserve the image of the
conservative anti-Communist he so carefully cultivated in the media
has been outlined in chapter one. In light of the preceding material, this
n1ay not be as implausible a theory as it may have initially appeared to
be.
Nixon, like Truman, was not part of theCFRinsidercrowd at the start
of his political life. But like Eisenhower and Marshall before him, he too
enjoyed a meteoric rise to power. He went from small-town lawyer in
1946 to vice-president-elect of the United States 1952.
Nixon was propelled into a California congressional seat when the
ten-yeJr Democratic incumbent, Jerry Voorhis, had the courage to
introduce a bill calling for the elimination of the Federnl Reserve
Systen1, and then denounced deficit spending in his book, Out of Debt,
Out of Danger. According to Voorhis, in October 1945, a representative
for a large New York financial house flew to California to help assemble
support for Nixon. Voorhis was vilified by this emissary as "one of the
most dangerous men in Washington" thanks to his stand on the Federal
Reserve and deficit spending. 25
Nixon won the congressional seat in 1946. In 1947, he introduced a
remarkable piece of legislation which called for the United Nations to
be able to enact, interpret, and enforce world law to prevent war. 26
In 1950, in a campaign so dirty that it gave him his nickname "Tricky
Dick," Nixon won a seat in the U.S. Senate. Once there, he did play a
n1inor role in exposing Alger Hiss as a Soviet spy, but exaggerated his
role significantly, thereby creating an anti-Communist image which he
later parlayed into the vice-presidential nomination on the Eisenhower
ticket in 1952.
Many traditional Republicans were looking to support Senator Robert
Taft of Ohio, son of the former President, who was considering running
with General MacArthur in the V .P. slot. General 1V1acArthur had
rocketed to stardom due to his criticism of Truman's conduct of the
Korean War, and had subsequently been fired by Truman. This action,
however, was s6 unpopular that Truman did not seek reelection.
Dernncratic contender Senotor Adlai E. Stevenson was easily defeated
in
by Eisenhower and Nixon, who then served as vice-president for eight

years.
In 1961, after losing the presidential race to John Kennedy, Nixon
joined the Council on Foreign Relations. He dropped his membership
in 1965 to run for governor of California against Pat Brown, when that
membership became a hot political issue in the race. After losing this
race, n10st observers mistakenly thought Richard Nixon was washed
up.
But not so. He moved in next door to Nelson Rockefeller in his
apartment building at 810 Fifth Avenue in New York. Nixon took a
prestigious job in a law firm working under Rockefeller's personal
attorney, John Mitchell. In 1967, the CFR signaled that Nixon had its
support in the upcoming 1968 elections by allowing him to publish an
article in the October 1967 edition of its journal Foreign Affairs. Nixon
wrote that after Vietnam, Asia needed "to evolve regional approaches ... to
the evolution of a new world order." 27
Syndicated columinist Roscoe Drummond noted in 1969: "The most
significant political fact of the hour is now so evident it can't be seriously
disputed: President Richard M. Nixon is a 'secret liberal."' 28
Once elected, Nixon set a new record; he appointed 110 CFR members
to government posts. In addition, he appointed Henry Kissinger, "the
Council's most influential member," as his national security advisor
because Nelson Rockefeller said he was "the smartest guy available." 29
By 1970, Kissinger stood accused of having been a Soviet agent by the
highest-ranking Polish agent ever to defect to the West, Michal
Goleniewski. The CIA was made aware of these charges by British
counterintelligence,- but CIA counterintelligence chief James Jesus
Angleton never pursued the accusations, and even tried to discredit
Goleniewski as not being a genuine defector. 30 Angleton later died
mysteriously in a boating accident. Some believe, however, that he
merely faked his death and actually defected to the Soviet Union. In
their 1989 book Widows, William R. Corson, Susan B. Trento, and Joseph
J. Trento claimed:
No follow-up investigation of Kissinger was done. Angleton
discredited the Goleniewski report with the FBI. No one seemed
willing to order an investigation into the President's National Security
Adviser at a time when Kissinger seemed to be gaining Nixon's totJ!
confidence. 31
In 197'7, the most important American "mole" inside the Soviet
government had been compromised, and CIA counterintelligence expert
Leonard V. McCoy was assigned the task of investigating it by CIA
director Admiral Stansfield Turner. During this investigation, McCoy,
the number-two man in CIA counterintelligence, discovered that Henry
Kissinger, then out of government, had been advising Soviet Arnbassa-
Case
1:15-cv-01869-NLH Document 1 Filed 03/12/15 Page 45 of 61 PageID: 45
. ;;.'lf'i~\f.lL_,
jfr! r11~11
i
~(
\'
_ _ _........_... ........,
........... _.......
~ 'i~'~? ~~f
dor Anatoly Dobrynin on how to deal with the new Carter administra32
tion in the ongoing SALT II negotiations.
McCoy was shocked. "The idea that a former Secretary of State and
National Security Adviser would meet alone, as a private citizen, with
the Soviet Ambassador to discuss negotiating techniques seemed almost
beyond belief to McCoy." 33 He later revealed to CIA analyst David S.
Sullivan that "the only way to describe Kissinger's actions ... was treason."34 1'..1cc;oy' s report to Admiral Turner was sent on to the White
House.
for his efforts, McCoy was dragged in front of Admiral Turner and
his deputy, frank Carlucci. He was summarily reduced one civil service
35
grade, effectively putting an end to his CIA career. Incidentally,
Admiral Turner was widely considered by both McCoy and other
intelligence professionals to be a pompous amateur. Carlucci, who was
later to become Secretary of Defense under President Reagan, is widely
considered by professionals in the field to be nothing more than a
consummate bureaucrat, and therefore a poor choice for any defense/
intelligence.role. McCoy, on the other hand is still.widely respected in
intelligence circles. 36
I.'
e,
~
'
t;
~
I>
~~
~~
~
/.I
f1
~'l
-ti
~
~~~'-"
w
t-1.
""'
'1
>)
riw
1{:
}:
.i-
~
~j
~
j::
"'
\~
i_._.;l,1.
~~
~i;
r~~
~_-,
..
r.,!(!._
~
1~1
~ -
".1&.)
'i-
~~
:~~
~i~
~--"----
NEW Wonw OnoER
184
ib
FIFTEEN
THE CONSTITUTIONAL ASSAULT
&ik""il.!.iWieW'ZT"'AiF?BWl
------~-w
Though surprisingly few people are aware of it, one of the greatest
dangers to American freedoms is the threat of a constitutional convention, and tax-exempt foundations have sponsored the attempt several
times this century.
There are only two ways of changing the U.S. Constitution: (1) By a
two-thirds vote of both houses of Congress, or (2) If two-thirds of the
state legislatures pass resolutions for a constitutional convention.
After the resignation of President Nixon in August, 1974, the push
began to have two-thirds of the state legislatures pass resolutions
asking Congress to call a constitutional convention, as stipulated in
Article Five of the U.S. Constitution. In 1975 the first six states did so. 1
Only four years later, a total of thirty of the necessary thirty-four
states passed resolutions calling for a constitutional convention, but
getting the last four states proved to be difficult. By 1983, the total stood
at thirty-two of the needed thirty-four. Since then, three states have
rescinded their calls for a convention, but there is confusion over
whether these withdrawals will be ignored or considered legally valid.
Legal scholars differ over whether there is a time 1imit restricting
these resolutions. Some say the resol\1tions of the first six states to
approve a Con-Con call will run out in 1991. Others say_ they are
operative in perpetuity unless rescinded. Opponents fear that it is just
a matter of time before the overwhelming financial, organizational, and
political pmver of the Con-Con proponents convinces the additional
states to pass Con-Con resolutions.
Caset:!1!rn.l.\f:!!i
1:15-cv-01869-NLH
.;.
('
~.J-- ~
: i~.~!~'.il~.'
,.J~"' , ..
..,,L}
,.,._,,;,;.
_.;;.\.-t~--
&'
Kr+'
~---
NEW WORLD ORDER
FwrnEN-T1rn CONSTITUTIONAL AssAULT
Although the battle rages every year in the remaining eighteen state
legislZl tu res which have yet to issue, calls, details of the Con-Con battle
rarely appear in the media.
Even the legislators are frequently confused. Proponents of the ConCon always fraudulently claim that the convention will be limited to a
single issue. Of the thirty-two states which have passed Con-Con
"budget" resolutions, however, twenty of them have also issued calls
for a convention to consider a Right-To-Life amendment. You certainly
can't have it both ways. Whatever the issue, all the legislators are
incorrectly told that the entire Constitution would not be opened for
mCtssive change.
Former Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Warren I3urger, is
outs po ken in his criticism of the Con-Con. In a January 30, 1987 speech
in Detroit, he said, "There is no way to put a muzzle on a constitutional
convention." 2
Less than nine months after the thirty-second state called for a ConCon, former Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird was concerned enough
to write an article in the Washington Post in which he outlined the
dangers of a constitutional convention:
Ther~ i~no certainty that our nation would survive a modern-day
in other words, is being made surreptitiously, as if it cannot withstand

the scrutiny and discussion of a concerned and intelligent citizenry. 6
186
"
~~
~~'.~
,;
_-;i-
-~
h?
.ii
A.
convention with its basic structures intact and its citizen's traditional
rights retained. The convening of a federal constitutional convention
would be an act fraught with danger and recklessness ... there is little
or no historical or constitutional guidance as to its proper powers and
scope. 3
~
?!,~
}~
Those who think a Con-Con could be restricted to just one issue,

would do well to consider Secretary Laird's analysis:
.:..~,
l!
1{
The only precedent we have for a constitutional convention took

place in Philadelphia in 1787.Thatconvention,itmustberemembered,
4
broke every legal restraint designed to limit its power and agenda.
~,
The Dean of the William and Mary Law School, former U.S. Senator
William B. Spong, Jr. wrote in 1987:
:t:.
~~
~.
~~
~.;:
\.i
~{;
..
~-
i-,
':'\
11'...
~
i~
It is doubtful that a modern convention could be limited to a single

issue. There is no guarantee that, once the delegates are convened,
Pandora's box would not be opened by groups concerned with a
single interest, placing at risk all of the language of our Constitution,
including the Bill of Rights. 5
It must be pointed out that most state legislatures who have voted for
a Con-Con have done so with the best intentions, but with little thought
for the larger issues at hand. According to Laird:
Ironically, while a constitutional convention could totally alter our
way of life, the petitions for a convention ... haveoften been acted upon
hastily at the state legislature level in a cavalier manner. Over one-half
of the states calling for a convention have done so without the benefit
of public hearings, debate orrecorded vote. This momentous decision,
187
Why a Con-Con? The idea is not new. President Woodrow Wilson's

closest advisor, Colonel House, thought the U.S. Constitution was the
product of eighteenth-century minds, and was so thoroughly outdated
that it should be "scrapped and rewritten." 7
In 1947, two prominent CFR members, Norman Cousins and James
P. Warburg, formed something called the United World Federalists to
try to merge the U.S. into the United Nations. Ronald Reagan was
associated with the United World Federalists before he became a
conservative in the early 1960s.8 This group actually got twenty-seven
state legislatures to pass resolutions demanding a Con-Con to "expedite and insure" U.S. participation in a world government. By the end
of 1950, however, most states had repealed the resolutions once the
consequences of a Con-Con became clear.
In 1954, Senator William Jenner warned that the Con-Con idea was
not dead, but only sleeping:
We have operating within our government and political system,
another body representing another form of government, a bureaucratic
elite which believes our Constitution is outmoded and is sure that it is
the winning side ... All the strange developments in foreign policy
agreements may be traced to this group who are going to make us over
to suit their pleasure. 9
. In 1974, tl:ie same year that President Nixon resigned his Presidency,
Rexford Guy Tugwell, one of the "academic liberals" from the old FDR
"brain trust" of the 1930s published a book called The Emerging
Constit11tion. It claimed that our old Constitution was too cumbersome
and needed drastic change. Itproposedsomethingcalleda "Constitution
for the Newstates of America." The Newstates Constitution proposed
to replace the fifty states with between ten and twenty regional Newstates
"which would not be states at all but rather subservient departments of
the national government. The government would be empowered to
abridge freedom of expression, communication, movement and assembly in a 'declared emergency.' " 10
In other words, the Bill of Rights would be discarded. In addition,
private ownership of guns would be prohibited and "the bearing of
arms or the possession of lethal weapons shall be confined to the police,
members of the armed forces, and those licensed under law." Freedom
of religion would no longer be considered a "right," but a revokable
"privilege."
In addition, the Newstates Constitution would have given the president of the Newstates of America a nine-year term, and allow him to
appoint most of the 100 Senators to lifetime terms. The House of
Representatives would have 100 members elected at-large as a single
~--
A~--~~
....
l:i\
I
"tf'~if.
~I,
. :1~~\~L
. '
._
I
188
FWl'EEN-THE CONSTITUTIONAL ASSAULT
NEW 'V 01n.n 01wirn

11
ticket with the president and vice-president (for nine-year terms).

In the 1970s the Ford Foundation spent $25 million over ten years to
produce and promote the N ewsta tes Cons ti tu ti on. In late 1975, something
called the World Affairs Council sponsored the preparation of a neh'
founding document which was called "A Declaration Of
INTERdependence." Written by CFR member Henry SteeleCornsrnager,
it was meant to replace the Declaration of Independence in time for it's
200th birthday at a ceremony in Philadelphia in 1976. The declaration
includes the following:
Two centuries ago our forefathers brought forth a new nation; now
we must join with others to bring forth a new world ordcr. .. To
establish a new world order of compassion, peace, justice and security,
it is essential that mankind free itself from the limitations of national
prejudice and acknowledge that...all people are part of one global
community.
We call upon all nations to strengthen and to sustain the United

Nations and its specialized agencies, and other institutions of world
order ... that we may preside over a reign of law that will not only end
wars but end as well that mind_less violence whic~ terrorizes our society
even in times of peace. 12
This was signed by more than 100 U.S. Senators and Congressmen,
including Senator Charles Mathias, also a member of both CCS and the
CFR; Senator Alan Cranston, CFR; and Senator Clairborne Pell, CFR.
Also signing were House members Paul Simon, Patricia Schroeder,
Louis Stokes, Edward Boland, and Les Aspin. 13
After the Declaration of INTERdepenclence became a subject of
controversy, many withdrew their support. But we shouldn't be too
hard on those who did support it. The world is emerging as a global
electronic community, and as the years go by the pressure to blurr all
national distinctions will grow increasingly great in response to worldwide environmental concerns,such as the destruction of the ozone layer
of the earth's atmosphere.
The error in logic, though, is subtle and worth repeating. As predicted
in biblical prophesy, once the power vested in nations is transferred 'to
a single worldly authority, we can be sure that the reign of the Antichrist
will begin. Without a system of checks and balances, no earthly authority
is "corruption-proof."
Since 1975, as many as forty draft versions of the revised constitution
have been prepared. 14 By 1984, a more toned-down version was
presented by a group known as the Committee on the Constitutional
System (CCS). This has been the group anticipating the results of the
Con-Con drive, spearheaded by with the National Taxpayer's
Association since 1980. The CCS proposal includes the following:
.. Permit the President to dissolve Congress (when he thinks Congress
is intractable')
189
Eliminate the 22nd Amendment which limits a President to two

terms.
Reduce the cost of Presidential and Congressional elections by
holding them at irregular intervals so that the date would not be
known very far in advance. 15
The true intentions of this group, however may be revealed by one of

its board members, James MacGregor Burns, a professor and historian
who in 198'1 wrote the following analysis of the situation for CCS
members:
Let us face reality. The framers [of the Constih1tion] have simply
been too shrewd for us. They have outwitted U$. They designed
separate instih1tions that cannot be unified by mechanical linkages,
frail bridges, [orl tinkering. If we are to turn the founders upside
down ... \ve must directly confront the Constitutional structure they
erected. 16
What are they after? Basically, they want power centralized. They
would like to see the concept of the separation of powers as manifested
in the current Constitution eliminated in the future. Certainly, once
power was centralized, the federal government would be more streamlined, just as would world affairs under an empowerf!d United Nations,
but the result would be dictatorship in either scenario.
Regardless of the level at which it exists-from personal relations, to
the realm of the international-unchecked power leads inevitably to
tyranny. According to professor Alexander DeConde, this was the
feeling of second U.S. President John Adams, who asserted that "the
idea of government by a single legislative assembly ... was the framework of despotism." 17
The separation of powers concept is that the judicial, the executive,
and the legislative branches of the federal government are separate yet
equal, and therefore it is difficult to bring to a state of dictatorship. The
U.S. Constitution even separates the Congress into two bodies. The
debate over the utility of the separation of powers is, of course, nothing
new. It has raged throughout the history of the United States. To John
Adams, a government without checks and balances was unworkable
and, according to professor DeConde, "the first step toward anarchy."
On the other hand, to Thomas Jefferson, the concept of separation of
powers was like having "a red rag waved before an enraged bull." 18
Realizing that the separation of powers concept will be difficult to
eliminate, the planners of the New World Order have only two options:
A Con-Con, where the changes can be done in wholesale fashion; or a
gradual approach where changes are made slowly enough so that no
effective opposition to them can form. Henry Hazlitt, a chief Con-Con
proponent and advisor to the National Taxpayer's Union, addressed
this vexing problem in his 1974 book A New Constitution Now:
The very minimum change necessary, if our Constitution is to have

~:;.!\.~ li
i~
'.!~rt-'
.
'
ij i~; .,
~-.........--J~....
~~l~-......_....~
.. :s::.~(.: ,;~*~l!(t~~il
.......
(-
190
NEW WORLD OIWE.R
<rny real flexibility .. .is a change from our present method of
constitutional amendment itself. ... Conceivably Congress could frame

a lengthy amendment providing for a parliamentary form of
government and subn1it it to the state legislatures or to "conventions"
In the present prescribed manner. But the advantages of approaching
this goal by t\.VO or more steps, rather than by one, seem to ITte of
determining in-iportance. 19
Of course, under the parlian1entary form of government, once in
l
,l
power tl'IE~;party can 1~eign supreme. Though it has worked well in Great
Britain, it certainly didn't work so well in 1930s Germany where it
ollowed Hitler to create one of the most evil dictatorships the world has
ever known.
Who is behind all this? The CCS hos a prestigious membership roster,
with about one-third of their directors also being CFR IT1embers. The
group is chaired by C. Douglas Dillon, former Secretary of the Treasury
and a powerful Wall Street figure; Lloyd N. Cutler, former counsel to
President Jimmy Carter; and Senator Nancy Kassebaum. Other members include former Defense Secretary Robert McNamara, Senator
Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Senator Charles Mathjas, Senator J. William
Fullbright, representatives from the Brookings Institute, the Rockefeller
20
l::;-oundation, and the Woodrow Wilson Center.
vVhy these powerful men and women want to radically alter our way
of government is for them alone to answer. It is clear, however, that the
forces of radical Constitutional change certainly appear to be waiting in
the wings as soon as the doors of the constitutional convention swing
open.
Melvin Laird wrote in a Washington Post article in 1984:
The concept that a constitutional convention would be harmless is
not conservative, moder<lte or liberal philosophy. That concept is
profoundly radical, born either of naivete or the opportunistic thought
that the ends justifies the means.
I
\
iii
States still to ratify a call for a Constitutional Convention as of early

1990 are California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine,
Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Ohio,
Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, and West Virginia.
All others have already done so. Every year that these state legislatures
meet, the well-paid, pro-Con-Con lobbyists are there. And every year,
ordinary citizens are there to oppose them, and they have been remarkably successful.
In 1989, the State of Nevada also rescinded its call for a Con-Con, but
went much further than Florida or Alabama. Nevada actually had its
1979 call "expunged" fron-1 the record of proceedings as if it never
existed, saying the legislature was initially led to vote for the Con-Con
on the basis of a frC1udulcnt representation that the convention would
FwrnEN-T1m
CoNsTrruT10NAL AssAuLT
19i
be limited to a single issue. 21 The vote by the Nevada Assembly to

rescind its call for a constitutional convention was unanimous.
Even though no state has passed a Con-Con resolution since 1983, the
issue doesn't seem to go away. According to Con-Con observer Marshall
Peters:
You would think something as damning as the Nevada expungement would stop the Con-Con movement right in its tracks, but they
just keep marching straight ahead. Some of these people are making
a living trying to get Con-Con passed, and as long as they are being
paid by whoever is paying them, the fight will continue. 22
If your state has already passed a resolution calling for a Con-Con;

start a petition to have your state legislator introduce a resolution to
have it withdrawn. You will be surprised that most state legislators
have little or no knowledge of the resolution, and will, in most cases, be
quite anxious to jump on the issue once the simple facts are explained
to them.
If your state has not passed a Con-Con resolution, find out who is
heading up the organization to stop it in your state. If the organization
has not been started, start it yourself. If your state has passed a Con-Con
resolution, work to have your state legislature rescind its call, as Florida
did in the spring of 1988. Basic information packets are available by
writing to: Joan Collins, Coordinator, 5737 Corporate Way, West Palm
Beach, FL 33Li07.
IN CONCLUSION
So what has been accomplished? We started out with the Nixon Coup
of 1973. It is not yet known exactly what the scope of coup-planning was
at that time. Surely those brazen enough to consider such a plot were
surprised and embarrassed by the swift and negative reaction by the
military officers and government officials who helped expose it at the
time. Memoirs of several of the principals, such as Alexander Haig, are
due out in the near future. Eventually the whole truth will be known,
and hopefully, this book will have helped to stimulate it.
Regardless, this book has offered a highly probable hypothesis that the coup-planning was merely one option being explored in the
century-old plans of secret societies to wrench the Constitution from the
citizens of the United States. As long as this Constitution is in place as
is, their plans for their New World Order are much more difficult to
achieve.
Until the dawn of the twentieth century, this plan for a New World
Order was centered in Masonry, then Illuminated Masonry, but with
the advent of the Round Table Groups (which still exist today), and their
American brethren, the Council on Foreign Relations, the torch has
been passed from century to century. 23
1
Case
1:15-cv-01869-NLH
i : ";~'j
~11rJteii~t-""- . .c:
_. . . . . . .,~-~.-.~ ,,,.i;t[llf~~ ~:22i"
.,
Ji.._.._~
192
i'
'.~1
FIFTEEN-'flIE CONSTITUTIONAL ASSAULT
NEW WORLD ORDER
This book has shown the following:

1. There has been an elite group hidden within secret societies for
thousands of years whose primary goal is to create a world governn1ent which they call the New World Order. This group tries to
convince mankind that world government is necessary for world
peace, but in reality, a single world government can only lead to
world dictatorship. This group was probably responsible forcoupplanning
during the Nixon
administration.
)
.
2. The elite of the secret societies financed Communism and has
used it ever since to help further their goals. Their influence in
world events has been very significant, yet previously little-known.
3. Dy keeping the Soviet Union strong, this group has cost America trillions of dollars and tens of millions of lives. Just as President
Roosevelt did in the 1940s with Lend-Lease, this group will again
try to persuade the American taxpayer to pump billions of dollars
into the ailing Soviet economy. The United States would be wise to
consider its course of action very carefully ..
4. This group operates on a number of fronts. They not o_nly try
to controljnternational events but the domestic policies of nations,
including their econ0111ic, educational, and religious policies. Their
power is multiplied because they have at least substantial influence
on the news media.
5. In order to function, this group has developed methods to
deceive normally good men. Don't be too quick to condemn these
good men. Just because your neighbor is a Mason, or even a
member of the prestigious CFR, that doesn't mean he is evil. Yes,
most, if not all the time, a CFR member has bought the concept of
the New \!Vorlcl Order, but most of them just don't understand that
world government by definition must culminate in world dictatorship. To lump them all together, however, and call them all conspirators only afienates potential friends, and magnifies the strength
of the enemy.
6. This group thrives under an illusion of invincibility. Although
they are rich and powerful, they constantly make mistakes. They
are not invulnerable. They do not control everything. After all, we
are still able to debate these questions openly. The average person
can have an effect.
7. Finally, be prepared to deal with this issue permanently. The
New World Order is not going away. Until Jesus returns, we will
have to face it, and we will have to teach our children how to do so.
The future will be a minefield of political trickery and spiritual deception. We have to resign ourselves as individuals, and asa nation,
to oppose the New World Order as long as we can.
193
Merely knowing about this "Great Plan" of the secret societieswhat it is, who is behind it, and what they are after in today's worldempowers us and weakens the enemy. Like all creatures of darkness,
they do not function well in the light of public scrutiny:
Porwe wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities,
against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world,
against spiritual wickedness in high places.
Therefore, take up the full armor of God, that you may be able to
resist in the evil day, and having done everything, to stand firm.
Stand firm therefore, having girded your loins with truth, and
having put on the breastplate of righteousness,
and having shod your feet with the preparation of the gospel of
peace;
in addition to all, taking up the shield of faith with which you will
be able to extinguish all the flaming missiles of the evil one.
And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which
is the \Vord of God.
.i
Eph. 6:12-17

IN ROYAL vs.SETTLE(1959 . . . IN THE U.S.EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT APPEALS)AND
MARTIN v.
SETTLE(1961 ... IN THE U.S.EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT APPEALS) ,SUCH
COMMITMENT IS ONE OF A TEMPORARY CHARACTER.
THAT SAID COMMITMENT IS ONLY
A TEMPORARY ONE AND PETITIONER CANNOT BE DETAINED THEREUNDER FOR AN IN.DEFINITE AND UNREASONABLE PERIOD OF TIME.[192 F.SUPP.
WOOD v.
179](cf.)GREEN-
UNITED STATES,8TH.CIR.,219 F.2d 376.THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED BY
THE COURT THAT PETITIONER BE NOW RETURNED TO HIS COMMITTING COURT FOR
FURTHER PROCEEDINGS AS MAY BE DEEMED PROPER BY THAT COURT,
THE CHARGES BEING DISMISSED AGAINST HIM,
313 OF THE CODE,
SUPRA.
IN LIGHT OF
AND THE PROVISIONS cf
CHAPTER**~~
THE RESPONDENT IS DIRECTED TO RELEASE PETITIONER
FROM HIS CUSTODY TO THE U.S.MARSHAL FOR THIS DISTRICT OF SAINT PAUL(MN.),
TO THE U.S.MARSHAL's[DEPUTIES]OF CAMDEN,
COUNTY,NEW JERSEY,
AT A TIME AND
PLACE SUITABLE FOR SUCH DELIVERY, WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
WILLARD J.
R.O.
SPRINGFIELD,
SETTLE,
WARDEN,
U.S.MED.CENTER,
MARTIN,PETITIONER vs.
MO.,RESPONDENT,
DR.
U.S.
DISTiICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI,WESTERN DIVISION 192

F.SUPP.
156;
1961
U.S.
DIST. LEXIS 3097.
No. 13141 M.i\R.
21,
1961.
IT IS
ORDERED(ACCORDING WITH THESE VIEWS,)THAT PETITIONER(FOY)BE RETURNED TO HIS

COMMITTING COURT.
ETC.
4246,
4247,
and 4248,
TITLE 18
u.s.c.A.~RESPONDENT
IS DIRECTED TO RELEASE PETITIONER FROM HIS CUSTODY TO*U.S.MARSHAL DISPATCH

TO NEW JERSEY(CAMDEN COUNTY)AND TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL*OR HIS(ERIC H.HOLDER
OR ELECT U.S.ATTORNEY GENERAL LADY MS. LORETTA LYNCH)DUE TO FACT THAT HE(FOY
IS COMPETENT-SANE-LUCID-COHERENT-STABLE AND NORMAL MINDED PERSON . . . AND NOW
TO STAND TRIAL OR UNTIL THE CHARGES AGAINST HIM ARE DISPOSED OF ACCORDING
TO LAW[FOY's CRIMINAL CHARGES HAVE BEEN DISMISSED AGAINST HIM SINCE
12-19-
2005]AND NO ONE IS TESTIFYING AHAINST HIM AND INDIVIDUAL HAS NEVER APPEARED IN COURT ONE*TIME SINCE BEGINNING OF CASE
NO OTHER CASES HAVE BEEN LODGED AGAINST MR.
IN JOHNSON v.
SETTLE,
D.c.w.D.
D.C.W.D.M0.,1959,192 F.SUPP.
M0.1960,
176;
10-1-2003.
FOY.
(192 F.SUPP.
158].
CHIEF JUDGE(HON.)MR.RIDGE
184 :F.:SUPP.103; ROYAL v.
SETTLE,
THE COMMITTING COURT HAS THE POWER OF DE-
TERMINATION OF ACCUSED'S COMPETENTCY,
AND THAT DUTY CANNOT BE DISCHARGED
WITH THE ACCUSED(NO LONGER) IN ABSENTIA.
GUNTHER v.
U.S. ,1954,
and ET CETERA!
William Cooper
238 BEHOLD AP ALE HORSE
Chapter 13
TREASON IN HIGJH
----; PLACES
The United Nations Treaty
and
The United Nations Participation Act
vs.
The Sovereignty of the United States of America
At tl1e co11cfosio11 of tlie Co11stitutio11al Co11ve11tiot1
iti September 1787, Beuja~ttitt Fra11kli11 was asked,

"Wliat liave yo11 wrougllt?"
l'
Ile a11swered1
" ... a Republic, if you can keep it."
TOP SECRET
TOP SECRE'J.' ****
William Cooper
Thirteen
Case 1:15-cv-01869-NLH Chapter
Document
1 Filed
Page 52 of 61
Treason 03/12/15
in High Places
241 PageID: 52
The United States Constitution
would not have ratified the Charter except that the American delegation
had a right to VETO if our interests were tlueatened by action of other
members.
Article VI
All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under
this Constitution, as under the Confederation.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be
made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made,
. under the AuU1orily of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the
Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in
the Constitution or Laws of any State to U1e Contrary notwitl15tanding.
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers,
boU1 of the United Stales and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath
or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever
be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under U1e
United States.
HAVE WE ALREADY JOINED A ONE-WORLD

GOVERNMENT?
. .
U.S. Sovereignty- Fact or Fiction?

The Executive, Judicial and Legislative Branches of U1e U.S. Government have followed U1e policy that the United Nations Treaty approved
under ilie U .N. Participation Act of 1945 in behalf of U1e United. States of
America by Harry S. Trwnan and U1e United States Senate, whi?1 treaty
supersedes the United States Constitution under the terms of Article VI of
the United Slates Constitution.
.
.
.
The Council of Foreign Relations created U1e Uruted Nations. Their
member agents, Alger Hiss and Leo Pasvolsky did U1e paperwork, but the
honors went to a special committee appointed by President Roosevelt to
draw ilie first draft of the Charter.
The members of ilie Committee were: Sumner Wells, Isaiah Bowman,
Hamilton Fish Armstrong, Benjamin Cohen, and Oark Eichelberger- all
members of U1e Cow1cil on Foreign Relations and members of a secret
Order of the Quest called U1e JASON Society.
.
.
The Charter was rushed through U1e U.S. Senate w1iliout prmted
copies lo guide U1e Senators: it was EXPLAINED lo them by Russian-born
revolutionary Leo Pasvolsky.
'
The Charter conferred no real power on the General Assembly; all the
power was in U1e Security Council where the VETO was. The Senate
Included in Utls Charter was and is ARTICLE 25: "Member nations

agree lo ACCEPT and CARRY OUT U1e decisions of the Secmity Council in
accordance wiU1 ilie PRESENT CHARTER."
No restrictions, no reservations. 111is is ALL of Article 25. Note the
word "present," indicaling tl1at Uu~re might be OTHER charters. The
VETO was a hindrance to World Govenunent - it had to be circumvented.
In 1950 the General Assembly, without any legal auU1ority, met and
adopted what they named U1e "UNITING FOR PEACE" RESOLUTION.
Tltls, greatly expanded since that lime, permitted THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY to EXERCISE THE POWERS OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL. I
bet you didn't know Umt. 111e Govenunent of the United Stales recognizes
U1e illegally amended Charter as the "law of the world,'; overriding our
Constitution. 111e General Assembly has for years been making U1e law of
U1e world by RATIFYING RESOLUTIONS BY A 2/3 MAJORffY VOTE.
When the Resolution is ratified it is sent down to the CHIEF EXECUrIVE
OF THE MEMBER STATE and the EXECUTIVE IS OBLIGED TO ACCEPT
AND CARRY OUT U1e provisions in the resolution.
The govenunenls concerned must IGNORE, ABOLISH, REVISE AND
RESCIND LAWS in their territories wltlcl1 conflict with the resolutions of
: U1e General Assembly, and to PASS OTHER LAWS WHICH WILL PUT
THESE RESOLUTIONS INTO FORCE. "One man, one vote" comes
through Resolution No. 1760.
There are more than 2000 of iliese resolutions now in effect. THEY
A~ THE LA~ OF THE LAND. Our civil rights laws (the ex-post facto
sections of wluch come from U1e Nuremberg Resolutions), our agricultural
laws, our health and welfare laws, our labor laws, our foreign aid laws all come from resolutions of the General Assembly or treaties of the U.N.
ratified by our Senate.
Any law passed in your slate will be rescinded or abolished if it is in
conflict wiU1 resolutions of the General Assembly.
I can tell you, with no reservations whatsoever, iliat all of the intelllgence organizations of the United States work directly for the United
Nations in concert with the Secret Government toward the sole purpose of
the destruction of the sovereignty of the United States of America and the
bringing about of the one-world government. The auU10rity cited for their
~ , efforts is ARTICLE VI of the Constitution, the United Nations liec1ty, anu
~; '. U1e U.N. Participation Act of 1945 signed by Harry S. Truman with the
advice and consent of the U.S. Senate.
fl ;
-------.-.-:-.-:*-::T::-::0:-::P:-:S:::-:E;;--:;C~R~E~T;-;*;-;*-;*;--;*_...._ _ _ _ _ " ; ~: li-------:::-:-7""':::-.:::-;::-.:::-:::-:::-:::-::::-:::-=:--:-:--:-:-------": V~

**** T 0 P S E CRE T
-[*l
Chapter Thirteen 1 Filed

Treason
in High PlacesPage 53 of 61
243
Document
03/12/15
PageID: 53
William Cooper
This should help you Wlderstand how our laws are being made and
who is making U1em! ASK YOUR SENATORS, CONGRESSMEN AND
STATE LEGlSLATORSIFTHEY ARE AWARE OF THESE FACTS.
The following statement was made by Mr. Carl B. Rix of Milwaukee,
former president of the American Bar Association, before a Senate subcommittee whid1 was hearing testimony on the proposed Bricker Amendment.
It was entered into the House Record by Hon. Lawrence H. Smith, Wisconsin, on May 11, 1955.
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD (page A3220>

Statement of Carl B. Rix, Milwaukee, Wisconsin:
I appear in favor of the amendments.
Congress is no longer bound by its constitutional system of delegated
powers. Its only test is under the obligatory power to promote human
rights in these fields of endeavor: Civil, political, economic, social and
cultural. These are found in Articles 55 and 56 of the Charter of the United
Nations, a ratifit.xl and approved treaty. They are being promoted in all
parts of the world by U1e United Nations.
Congress may now legislate as an wtinhibited body with no shackles
of delegated powers under the Constitution. Our entire system of a
govermnent of delegated powers of Congress has been changed to a system of undelegated powers witl10ut amendment by U1e people of the
United States.
The autl1ority for these statements is found in a volwne entitled Co11stit11tio11 of the United States of America, Annotated, issued in 1953, prepared
under the direction of U1e Judiciary Committee of the Senate of U1e Uiuted
States and under the chainnanship of Prof. Edward S. Corwin of Princeton,
aided by the legal staff of lhe Library of Congress. Tilis is the conclusion on
page 427 of the A1111otatio11s: ''In a word, the treaty power cannot purport
lo amend the Constitution by adding to U1e list of Congress' enumerated
powers, but having acted, the consequence will often be that it has
provided Congress with an opportmtity to enact measures which, independently of a treaty, Congress could not pass, and U1e only question that
can be raised as to such measures will be whether they are 'necessary and
proper' measures for U1e carrying of the treaty in question into operation."
It will be noted that one of the principal cases cited is tl1at of the
Migratory Bird case.
These conclusions are those also of a committee of the New York State .
Bar Association, of whim former Attorney General Mitchell and Mr. John
W. Davis were prominent members.
Now, for some practical illustration of new-found powers under
TOP SECRET
treaties of what Congress may do:

1. It may enact a comprehensive educalion bill, providing for education in any State whkh does not provide it. In fact, it may take over all
public education now provided by States and mmlicipalities.
2. It may enact a prohibition act without an amendment of the Constitution.
3. It may enact a mtiform divorce act.
4. It may take over all social and welfare services rendered by or
Uuuugh the States or U1eir agencies.
5. It may take over all commerce, all utility rates and service, all labor.
The list may be multiplied extensively at your will.
TI1e new lest of constitulionality will apply to all legislation by Congress since 1945, wllid1 deals with any of the five fields of endeavor. Any
judge deciding on U1e validity of legislation must have two books before
him- one, U1e Constitution of U1e United States, and U1e 0U1er, U1e Charter
of the United Nations. , If he does not find authority for U1e act in the
Constitution, he will find it in the 01arter. That is U1e exact situation in
which Justice Holmes found himself and the other members of the
Supreme Court when they decided the Migratory Bird case. 111e authority
was not fow1d in the Constitution - it was found in the treaty with Great
Britain.
The question to be answered is this: Under wllid1 form of government
do the people of tl1e United States prefer to live? Manifestly, we CaJU1ot
operate linder botl1.
Senators, U1e people of U1e U11ited States have given up U1eir sons; tl1ey
have given up billions of U1eir substance. They should not be the only
Nation in U1e world to give up their fom1 of government - the wonder of
the world - lo discharge their obligations to U1e people of the world.
11lE BRICKER AMENDMENT, WHICH WOULD IIAVE CHANGED TlllS,
WAS NOT PASSED.
A LE1TER TO TIIE EDffOR

Borger, Texas News Herald
Sunday, November 11, 1962
Dear Mr. Newby:
Replying to your letter Oct. 12th, also CHALLENGE for November,
1961: quoting Patrick Henry on treaties. In U1e first place Patrick Henry
was and is NO AUTHORITY on eitl1er treaties or U1e Constitution, and he
opposed it, IF it is too late to do anything about reinstating our Constitu-
TOP SECRET
Chapter Tliirteen 1 Filed

Document
03/12/15
PageID: 54
Treason
in High Places Page 54 of 61
245
William Cooper
the United Nations, or any other foreign powe1~ as you envision by your
language, without laying himself open lo the charge of TREASON under
ARTICLE Ill, Section 3 of the Constitution. Just ordinary common sense is
required to know Uuit our alleged Treaty wiU1 U1e U.N. and acceptance of
the all-inclusive tenns of its Charter by our Presidents (begimling wiU1
FDR, who comlived with Stalin at Yalta for U1e setting up of the U.N. in the
USA) and our Senate, is a violation of their saaed oath of office as per
ARTICLE Ill, Section 2 of the Constitution.
Sud1a1reaty makes a mockery of any genuine allegiance to OUR Flag
and Constitution. A genuine American, Abraham Lincoln, said, "Worse
Um1 traitors-in-arms are U1e men who, pretending loyalty lo U1e Flag, feast
and fatten on the misfortunes of the nation." Think of any TRUTH more
applicable to the present time?
A nwnber of our officials, inducfu1g former Secretary of Stale Dean
Acheson, U1e late John Foster Dulles, and members of our present oneworld Kennedy entourage go along with U1e statement Urnt the USA now
has NO "domestic" affairs: U1ere has been a melding of our domestic and
foreign affairs! (Meld means to merge.)
Kalanga Province in the Congo U10ught she had some private affairs
and rights, but the U.N. soon disillusioned her. Quote from 5.L. 'fribime for
September 14, 1961: "U.N. Soldiers Take Over in Katanga. U.N. troops
seized Katanga's capital, Elisabethville, in a brisk batlle Wednesday, and
the Congo's central goverrnnent proclaimed the return of U1at secessionist
: province.". There is no doubt that the President of U1e USA and Senate have
surrendered certain of our rights and Sovereignty to the U.N., and plan still
more.
Any informed American is aware Umt ARTICLE IV, Section 4, of the
Constitution automatically cancels out any allegiance to the U.N. and its
alien one-world Internationalism, the antithesis of Constitutional
Americanism founded on Washington's "NO foreign entanglements."
:And Umt said republican representative form of government is the exact
opposite of the U.N. Charter's Soviet-initiated modifications, restrictions,
:and nrservations in its various "Conventions" which would nullify our Bill
of Rights. Stalin, his protege, Alger Hiss, and Russian Communist Pasvolsky figured largely in the writing of the U.N. Charter.
To assume that a heterogeneous body composed of appointed repre'sentatives of foreign governments (some from crude cannibalistic so-called
"States" and others, from virulently atheistic Conununist States)- whid1
,Governments DO NOT REPRESENT ''We the American People" - could
"exercise dictation and control over U.S. is monstrous in the extreme. Law. folly or constitutionally, U1ey may not enforce any provisions of the U.N.
lion, then why not just accept the traitorous U.N. Charter-Treaty without.
more ado? Why didn't the American Revolutionists think it too late or too
difficult to defend their Liberty? And IF the highly-intelligent framers of
the Constitution "were well aware of the deatl1trap incorporated in ARTICLE VI," why then did they so frame it? Did they not expect PATRIOfS,
rather than Treasonists as our elected officials, to HONOR AND ENFORCE
the spirit, letter, and intent of the Constitution?
I note you say that according to a law dictionary, U1e terms "legal" and
"lawful" are almost one and U1e same. Agreed! "Almost," but not quite. I
believe U1ere is a fine point of difference. Taking us into the U.N. may
SEEM to have been done legally (by U1e President and Senate), but U1e act
is still unlawful, because it is unconstitutional, and U1e CONSTITUTION IS
THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. All renowned and genuine Constitutional experts (sud1 as Thos. M. Cooley, Thos. Jas. Norton, and Harry
Atwood, to name several) have always held that anything whid1 contravenes, diminishes, or perverts the Constitution is null and void and of
no effect.
Neither the President or Senate has authority or power to change,
diminish, or destroy the Constitution "by usurpation," treaty, or otherwise:
only a Constitutional Amendment can lawfully change it.
The Constitution is a contract that WE THE PEOPLE of the USA made
wiU1 one another, which sets up the machinery of government to carry out
this contract - mainly for the purpose of PROTECTING INDIVIDUAL
RIGHTS as well as STATE RIGHTS, AGAINST THE POWERS OF
GOVERNMENT: and no public official has a right to override the .
provisions of that contract. To quote Thos. Jas. Norton's Constitution of tlie
United States, Its Application, etc., "A law of Congress to be one of the
supreme laws must be 'made in pursuance U1ereof' and not in conflict witl1
U1e Constitution. When not made in pursuance thereof it is of course
unconstitutional and of no effect." And U1e same would similarly apply to
a wonderful decision rendered by the Supreme Court or an unlawful
Treaty.
And from Norton's Undermining the Constitution, which quotes
Alexander Hamilton in No. 33 of The Federalist: "It will not, I presume,
have escaped observation that it expressly confines the supremacy to laws
made pursuant to the Constitution" (emphasis by Hamilton). And from
page 21, 'The General Goverrnnent can claim no powers whid1 are not ,
granted to it by the Constitution, and the powers actually granted must be
such as are expressly given, or given by necessary implication."
Anyone with the preswned intelligence to be President of U1e USA
must know that he cannot lawfully make any such far-readling treaty with :.
'r.
TOP SECRET*
'
TOP SECRET*
Chapter Thirteen
Treason
William Cooper
247
Document 1 Filed
03/12/15
PageID: 55
Charter against us, or take any action whatever affecting the Sovereign
Rights of American Citizens.
Further, the United Nations is not a lawful govenunent in the accepted

sense of the term and is not a proper body with which to make a treaty.
Actually, U1e U.N. has NO valid binding treaty-making power- except as
the subversive one-worlders try to make it so. Quoting Norton's Constitution of tile United States, at page 14: "A treaty is a written contract between
two governments (not a motley assembly of unstable tribes, or enslaved
peoples calling themselves a 'government') respecting matters of mutual
wellare, such as peace, tl1e acquisition of territory, tl1e defining of boundaries, the needs of trade, rights of citizenship ..." etc.
And such treaties, even though '1egally made," MAY be abrogated for
cause. Quoting ibid, p. 115: "A precedent for thus abrogating a treaty made
by U1e President and approved by the Senate may be found as far back as
July 7, 1789, when Congress passed 'An Act to Declare the Treaties
heretofore concluded with France no longer obligatory on the United States
because U1ey have been repeatedly violated on the part of the French
government."' So what about all the violations of the treaties or agreements made by the USSR, which dominates the U.N.? The USA is vastly
outvoted in this motley aggregation called the United Nations, even as
American taxpayers foot most of the bills, which constitutes Constitutionally forbidden confiscation of the citizens' money (property) without just
compensation therefore. This is merely communistic confiscation.
A Treaty made "pursuant to the Constitution" becomes A PART of the
LAW OF THE LAND, and should be honored; but it does NOT l:ecorne
"Supreme" or take precedence over nor supersede U1e Constitution. It is
NOT the "Law of the Land" standing alone. And NO Treaty or Executive
Agreement is binding on the USA if made by the President alone (as has
been done) with the advice and consent of the Senate, nor if it violates the
Constitution.
Actually, ARTICLE VI, instead of setting 1reaties on high or being a
"deaUt trap," is a statement of Ule SUPREMACY OF THE CONS11TUTION and of the NATIONAL GOVERNMENT. Lawful Treaties are a part
of, but subordinate to, the Constitution for the simple stated provision
therein that ALL laws and treaties must be made "in pursuance thereof."
Can the "creature" (or a part) become greater than its CREATOR, or
the whole??? Some American common sense isnecessary in all this blaU1er
about tl1e supremacy of treaties, which is promulgated largely by the
one-worlders to discredit or diminish tile Constitution so tl1ey can achieve
their own ends.
The language and intent of the Constitution and of ARTICLE VI is
*TOP SECRET
clear and fortlU"ight, and does not admit, in good faith, of any other interpretation. But sadly enough, it is well known that many of our highest
judiciary and elected officials - in Ulis era of TREASON, not Reason - do
not act in good faith nor in "pursuance of the Constitution."
WiU1 reference to fourth paragraph your letter Oct. 12th, J\.fr. Newby,
that the "making of treaties is witl1out limitation, exception or reservation"
and that "no treaty has ever been declared unconstitutional or invalidated
or repealed by tile Courts or Congress in the history of tl1is nation," I tllink
that the foregoing invalidates your statement.
And as to ARTICLE VI being a "deathtrap" over which the Constitution gives no control or remedy otl\er U1an its explicit language in VI
regarding U1e law and treaties: has it occurred to you Urnt the Supreme
Court has power and authority to rule on tl1e constitutionality of treaties
the same as on tl1e constitutionality of any other law - treaties being
merely "part of the Law of the Land"? ARTICLE III, Section 2 explicitly
states: "The Judicial power shall extend to all cases, in Law and Equity,
arising under tllis Constitution, U1e Laws of U1e United States, and treaties
made, or which shall be made, under U1eir auU10rity." 1b quote Norton's
Constitutio11 of tire U11ited States, page 137: "When a case arises in a State
court and involves a question of the Constitution, or an Act of Congress, or
of a treaty, it is the duty of the court to follow and enforce the National
[Constitutional] law; for the Constitution explicitly and emphatically requires that the 'judges in every State shall be bound thereby, anything in
the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwitllStanding."'
Any time tltat the President and Senate make a treaty with a foreign
power (such as the U.N.) which infringes upon or abrogates rights guaranteed to citizens of the USA under tl1e Constitution, the Supreme Court can
declare such treaty unconstitutional, void, and of no effect. Of course, U1e
present Supreme Court, being composed of political radicals rather Utan
judicial Constitutional experts, is not likely to take such action - unless
forced to do so by public opinion and demand.
And so, wiU1 reference to your statement in printed CHALLENGE for
November, 1961, lo U1e effect that, "under ARTICLE II, Section 2, clause 2
of the CollStitution ... such treaty (as with tile U.N.) can be made without
restdction, limitation, exception or reservation irrespective of U1e fact tlmt
it contravenes, violates, infringes or alienates every article of the Constitution. All Umt is necessary is for U1e President and Senate to ratify ANY
treaty and it is in force." The above article and clause likewise does not
stand alone, but must be construed in the light of tl1e entire Constitution.
YOUR inte1pretation is not only to make idiots of the Founding Fathers
and Framers of tl1e Co1lStituUon, but lo say that regardless of U1e solemn
TOP SECRET
248 UEHOLD A PALE HORSE
. ~
William Cooper
'
Tllirteen
Case 1:15-cv-01869-NLH Clu1pter
Document
1 Filed
Treason03/12/15
249PageID: 56
~~
Presidential oath of allegiance required by ARTICLE III, Section 2a, regardless of U1e SUPREME SOVEREIGNIY of the U.S. Constitution, and in
violation of the explicit language contained in ARTICLE VI, i.e., "THIS
CONSTITUTION, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in
pursuance thereof; and all treaties ... under the authority of the United
States...," as well as all authoritative rulings by genuine Constitutional
authorities to the effect that anything which contravenes the Constitution
of ilie USA is null and void, including any such acts by U1e Congress;
despite all of the foregoing. I reiterate that YOUR interpretation would
claim that there is absolutely NO constitutional safeguard for the American
People against TREASONOUS treaties (which "gives aid and comfort to
our enemies" as per ARTICLE III, Section 3).
YOUR interpretation would give complete IMMUNITY to the
maker... of such treaties and would constitute "changing ilie Constitution
by usurpation" in violation of the intent, spirlt, AND letter of the Constitution as a whole.
The President obviously is NOT a "free agent" by virtue of ARTICLE
II, Section 2, clause 2, to make any sort of treaty he would like, but is
BOUND DOWN by the chains of the entire Constitution. Nothing else
makes any sense. His treaty-making acts are subject to review by the
Courts.
True, we SHOULD DEMAND rescinding of the action by both Senate
and Harry S. Truman in signing the U.N. Participation Act of 1945 in behalf
of the USA. This would put the World on notice that we were once more
HONORING OUR OWN CONSTITUTION (CHARTER OF FREEDOM)
AS TI-lE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND, AND REINSTATING IT TO ITS
FORMER PROPER SUPREME POSITION: as well as reclaiming our
Sovereignty as an Independent Republic in accordance with our Declaration of Independence.
There is not nor ever will be any true Peace, Freedom, Safety or
Security for the American People mtder the alien U.N. Charter.
There is "NO SUBSTITUTE" for American Independence. Many men
have died and "worms have eaten U1em" for a far lesser Cause.
And so, Mr. Newby, you and I do have one primary objective in view:
GET THE U.S. OUT OF THE U.N., AND THE SUBVERSIVE U.N. OUT OF
THE USA!
,]
I guess that just about covers the U.N. Charter vs. U.S. sovereiguty hoax. No
one should ever be 1ible fo bullshit you 011 this issue ag11i11. Your job 11ow is to
make sure your Co11sres,;me11 and Se11ators are educated 011 tliis issue.
GETTO WORK-NOW!
Most sincerely yours,

Marilyn R. Allen
TOP SECRET
*TOP SECRET*
':i
-==--=-=-==-=--:.:'1'-A..T--1~..t;-G.Q~~..._.:;.w: :'9-.!.?,":{~3---~i=rFh3--3-M7i:~ ..Oi'f:n~"&~o. -crt~"I1m~~
"- KLATt
PARTICIPATION ACT OF 1945---BY THE LATE U.SoPRESIDENT
. MAN A.ND
TFTt". fJ.
--.C::.-Sf:i'IHT'li'(
ED THE U.S.CONSTITUTION
~
~-
~,
illHi..TJ
V\t'":til"''N
- .. ~---;
......... ~_, v....
cp~z-1':!.ilJ,~.1.Z'-F--1\C
'-'- .. L.:J
~ARRY
i....i'2~~l...,
~-L'~ ei u:-~~.
i<T-AW
!.':v -~u
............
0
..~=
S TRU-l,.7-frj"v-'.Jn.!..
AND RIGHTS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE OVER TO

THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND LATER THg UNITED NATIONS .
SECURITY COUNCIL---THUS MAkING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE INTERNATIONAL
CITIZENS OF THE UNITED NATIONS AND NO LONGER CITIZENS OF THE ILLEGALLY OPERATING U.S.GOVERNMENT. ~HIS UNtTED NATIONS TREATY AND u.N.
- PARTICIPATION ACT OF 1945-~=WAS RATIFIED(MADE INTO LAW BY THE USA)
AND. ANYTHING ENACTED UNDER, DONE UNDER~ OR PERFORMED UNDER. AMERIKKKA.N

'LAW r.s NULL AND VOID' NULLIFIED' ILLICIT' IJ:T..EGITIMAT.E, INVALID~ AND:
LEGALJ3 pw.An nN .a 'R "R nu r 'T';F..E ~:&&i..P...S?:~-(-..H~ .~GK OBAf".fA-.---~'1 ~i:ra==ttCE.
PRF.STDEr.1~'tBID!i'l\T.'
\ rrtrti' T1 ~ C't',...,t>.,..,rM C' ..... ..,_TT"l",..,r,i '~r.,.., - ..... ---~- -----~"' .
- ~ 1.yJ!,1VflL~'-'.l!.,
~'1----t-;---"=o- "''""''-:o..""' .. 1'....'.. w.t.nu.. '-'L_p fLL~ i::.t..;,;L..KA.i:... bUL.1..C.f':z.,lJ
OF'INVESTIGATION(FBI), THE CENTRAL INTELLIGE~CE AGENCY(CIA), THE U.S.
MARSHALL(AND. QE~UTY MAR.SHALLS'.), TH~ N.S .A . , D. I.A.' HOMELAND SECURITY,
ALL FEDERAL AND ST.ATE JUDGES~ ALL DOC.TORS, AMERIGAN ATTORNEYS 1 NURS.~S,,
WARDENS, 'CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, SCHOOL TEACHERS, ARRESTS, DETENTIO~S~
PROBATIONS, MARRIAGES, :E:'AROLES, DEGREES, CHA_PLAINS, SENATE, HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES,,ALL COURTS AND JUDGES, MAGISTRATES~ PSYCHlATRISTS;
:;i,-.,':':'I
.!
PSYCHOLOGISTS, LANDLORD AND TENANT AGaEEMENTS, NORTH AMERICAN FREE.
... - -
TRADE AGREEMENT( NAFTA) ; : FOLlCE AND DETECT IVES, CREDIT CARDS, AND ANY THING .DONE UNDER AMER!C?~N LAW IS NULL A.ND. VO.ID~ UNTIL PRESIDENT OB..4.11t4..
4 I Nt.! uP4 i<.U'l'H 'rH'Fi'
Af\in 'i'Uli' .rr c: C'ti'l'...iA'i"''t"'l .Tr-.."r'a~Tu\~~ ....... _FN-~~D_,~r;r
l.-n~7f
'.LG t>~l.-............... ~~ -_.\QO:CJ.l.!..:...s./l\Lt:lG-~~\ .LrL\.~
~-'-"'""
....., '-"
'..;;/
._.
u
UNITED NATIONS TREATY AND UNITED i~ATIONS PAR.TIGIPATION ACT OF 1945~-- .
WHICH WAs DONE UND.ER THE P.RESIDENT TRUMAN ADMINISTRATION) (HARRY S TRU-.
MAN AND THE THEN U.S. SENATE COMMITTED TREASON HIGH' .AND SEDITION AND ETC
IN 1935---PRES;I:D~NT FRP.i,~KLIN D. ROOSEVELT CAL~IN ALL THE FEDERAL. JUDGE
AND INFORMED THEM OF THE FACT THAT.THIS COUNTRY WAS BANKRUPT AND THAT
THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS HAD D.ULY INFO.RMED HIM OF THIS SAD FACT AND
THAT FROM THEN ON THA.T ALL FEDERAL JUDGES WERE TO .PRETEND THAT: THIS
J,...,J
.....
U.S.A. COUNTRY. WAS PROCEEDING UNDER THE U.-S.CONSTITUTION-.;.-~7HEN IN

.ALL REAL1TY AND ACTUALITY THIS COUNTRY WAS PROCEEDING UNDER THE u.c;c.
(UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE) AND THAT ALL JUDGES MUST HIDE THIS ,FACT AND "
TO KEEP THE P'UBLIC FROM KNOwING THE TRUTH OF THIS MATTER" A PRECE.DENT
FOR THUS .ABROGATING A TREATY MADE BY THE .PRESIDENT AND APPROVED BY .THE
SENATE MAY BE FOUND. AS FAR BACK AS JULY 7 ;.17.89,. WB;EN CONGRESS PASSED
'AN ACT.TO DECLARE THE TREATIES HERETOFORE CONCLUDED WITH FRANCE NO
LONGER: OBLIGATORY. ON THE UNITED STATES BECAUSE TImy EAVE BEEN VIOLATED
(REPEATEDLY)ON THE PART OF THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT!" SO WHAT. ABOUT 'Tt1E
ALL THE VIOLATIONS OF THE TREATIES OR AGREEMENTS MADE~BY THE USSR, WHIC
DOMINATES THE U.N.! THE USA IS.GREATLY(VASTLY)OUTVOTED INTHIS MOTLEY .

AGGREGATION CALLED THE UN1TEb NATIONS,EVEN AS AMERICAN TAXPAYERS FOT.:
MOST OF THE BILLS' WHICH CONSTITUTES CONSTITUTIONALLY FORBIDDEN CONFrs'.-Z.
CATION OF C~.TIZENS,. MONEY(PROPERTY)WITHOUT JUST 80MPENSATION THEREFOtf'E~

I~ r1ERELY COMMUNISTIC CONFISCATION. THAT 'UNTIL THE PRESIDENT MR.
OB...li..M..t\., AND U.S. SENATE RESCIND(TAKE BACK THE SIGNING OF)THE SIGNIN'G OF
BOTH THE UN~TED.NATIONS TREATY AND U.N.PARTICIPATION ACT OF 1945--~ALL
U SLAW AND U.S. AUTHORITIES ARE 'ILLEGAL AND FRAUD.ULENTLY OPERATING
THIS
UNDER BOGUS(PHONEY BOLOGNA)AMERIKKKAN LAW WHICH IS NOT RECOGNISED BY

. THE UNITED NATIONS(U.N. ONLY REtOGNISES INTERNATIONAL LAWS). TRbE, WE
SHOULD DEMAND RESCINDING OF THE ACTION BY BOTH U.S.SENA~E AND HARRY S
TRUMAN IN SIGNING THE U.N.TREATY AND U.N.PARTiCIPATION ACT OF 1945--IN BEHALF OF THE U.S.A. THIS .WOULD PUT THE WORLD ON NOTICE THAT WE
WER~ ~NCE MORE HONORING OUR OWN U.S.CONSTITUTION(CHARTER OFFREEDOM) .
AS LH~ SUPREME LAW OF THE ,LAND' AND REINSTATING IT TO
I .,
1 '\
rrs
FORMER PRQ;;.
PER SUPREME POSITION:AS WELL AS RECLAIMING OUR SOVEREIGNTY AS AN IN.DEPENDENT REPUBLIC

ACCORDANCE
WITH
OUR DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE.
A
..
,,,.
rr
"
,/"\

f
"'
'
AO 242 ( 12/11) Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S C 9 2241
Declaration Under Penalty Of Perjury

If you are incarcerated, on what date did you place this petition in the prison mail system:
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am the petitioner, I have read this petition or had it read to me, and the
information in this petition is true and correct. I understand that a false statement of a material fact may serve as the basis
for prosecution for perjury.
Signature of Attorney or other authorized person,
if any
Page 10 of 10
\
'f
~ '
. .,
NO.
~.
'
THE PEOPLE OF -NEW JERS~Y--

EX REL Pro ph et Foy A1 - Mahdi ,
on behalf of; Joaquin I. Foy et a.
FORERUNNER OF JESUS CHRIST THE
MESS~H OF A~MIGTYGOD(SWT)
HON )...WARDEN JETT ET AL.j,..
S~ORT FORM HERE)
1
;..
ORDER GRANTING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Upon reading the petition filed by Mr. Joaquin Irwin Fo9" behalf
of J-~~qu- in i. Foy duly signed and verified by NOTARY P~BLIC LADY.
Whereby it appears that the sakJ ~oa-~ in I . Foy I~ illegally and
unlawfully restrain.ed of
liberty by VNITED .N-ATio~s AND.._u ...s--GovT .11
Jo~gu_in I.Foyll-==~,==and stating wherein the alleged illegality ,and
unlawfulness exists, from whid. it a~.ear that a Writ of
Habeas Corpus ought to issue;
Cf~-~=---=-I
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that a Writ of Habeas Corpus be

issued
by the county clerk under seal of the FEDERAL JU-DGE

CAMD-EN~~=ourt in N~w Je-rsey. Feds~==directed to the said FEDERAL
JUDGE IN,,cA~I!~N ,.NEW JERSEY STATE='===5hertff,- as stated above,
commanding him to have the body of FOY AL-1MAHDibefore the
uNI-TED sTATEs -FEDERAL c0uRT oJ Court, on the _l_jT~=:day of
NEW JERSEY .._._._., at 9-A. M. o'clock 9.:.i.:l'l .M, of that day, to do and
21
5
(e4c'e2&e wtiat shall then and there be, considered concerning the
said l'RisoNER------and have proper return, according to law,
endorsed upon the writ.

SIGNED this
J.Z'1
JUDGE PRESIDING
SHELLEY s. HAAG
t>TARY PlJl.IC ..-so1~

... CQINnilliat\ &Piii Jiil. 31. 2017
PEl'ITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPU
~_,-..__..
_ _,_10of11
..
'
NO.
.
'
THE PEOPLE OF
EX REL:
on behalf of~
;;J-oj fl{ ///21 ,rflf/:;r1

v
.
-;1~ I{et.J fi! JRI! 0.A.C/M
'I
efe-,
,;
r.,!
'
___ COURT
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

To_____
Witness,
_ , clerk of the -. --- -
~L$~
Greeting:.
You are commanded to have the body of ___ ____ ___ , alleged
to be restrained by you; by whatsoever name the -said
shall be called or charged, before the
- Court, at the courthouse in said county on the _ _
day of
.
~, at
o'clock _
M., and state in
writing under oath the truth or not that the said t ____ _ __
is
restrained of liberty by you and what ,authority or for what
cause she is restrained on the return of the writ hereof and
attach a copy of the writ or warrant, if a_ny, by virtue of which
in custody; And hereof you are not to fail under
you hold
the heavy penalties denounced by law against those who
disobey this Writ and to submit to and receive all those things
which shall then and there be considered concerning the said
~,
the seal thereof hereto affixed at

9'6 day of -Js'-r\u..:0--,,1-\._~ C)o 15
.....---_._-">
" n r r .
_'_----1 '
(seal)
~- .-f~,~)) ---lC
,_>
Court, and
this
wg
\
Clerk
by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Deputy
PEI'fl10N FOR WRIT OF HABFAS CORPUS
Page 11of11
CERTIFICATE OF SZRVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that a
I
was placed in the prison l:gal mail box at
61/tf, c-Poc//t~i~;
/~#r
for delivery by Llnit2d States Mail, ~irst-class post9ge

prepaid, this
cJ_ K:'
day of
::;-__eg,
20/;s-:
and
/"''
was properly addressed to the following:
Respectfully submitted,
Name:
:ff
Addr:
s ~7()~-- '/!tJO
Case 1:15-cv-01869-NLH Document 1-1 Filed 03/12/15 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 62
(__ {; (.;;f I/
~l/f ;f /"(,
RECE\VED
MAR \ 2 /0\5
f':I 8:30M
WILLIAM T. WALSH CLERK
~;::_-,-------------
:> 77218-079<=>
Clerk Mitchell H C
400 - Cooper ST ohen
Camden NJ 081
u
't d '
02-1570
ni e States
/11/f I
. '-.
,...
..
'
"..,

Joaquin Irwin Foy Sovereign Derp

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Joaquin Irwin Foy Sovereign Derp

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Case 1:15-cv-01869-NLH Document 1 Filed 03/12/15 Page 1 of 61 PageID: 1

AO 242 ( 12/11) Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C.

UNITEJt,1~~(ES DIS1~fC;[ f;;91URT

ABDULLAH PROPHET HAKIYM JOAQUIN

Fov[BIRTH NAME)and CLAIRE AGNES MAN-)

GAN-FOY(MRS~)PND ENTIRE FOY FAMILY

MEMBERS OF THE ILLU- )

?(~adz~'of'warden a';Icltrthtffi;tY~~~tnrHii~i:rit bfs&~Jne}J1%hJrJ

Case 1:15-cv-01869-NLH Document 1 Filed 03/12/15 Page 2 of 61 PageID: 2

Decision or Action You Are Challenging

What are you challenging in this petition:

(d) Date of the decision or action:

(a) lf"Yes," provide:

Case 1:15-cv-01869-NLH Document 1 Filed 03/12/15 Page 3 of 61 PageID: 3

AO 242 ( 12/11) Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S C.

(a) If "Yes," provide:

(1) Name of the authority, agency, or court:

(a) If "Yes," provide:

(2) Date of filing:

Case 1:15-cv-01869-NLH Document 1 Filed 03/12/15 Page 4 of 61 PageID: 4

A union of 50 independent sovereign

The District of Columbia and all the

The union of the United States is

Since June 1800, a "City of Washington"

"We the People," free Preamble

Article I, Section 8, clause 17 of the

Each State governs its own

The citizens of the District of Columbia,

A Congress of the Republic consisting A Congress of the Legislative Democracy

Law, equity (Article Ill courts) and

Many in the U.S. Constitution

None, except what are called

Stars and stripes without yellow

Stars and stripes with yellow fringe.

Ala., Alas., Ariz., Cal., Colo., etc.

The Federal United States

TYPE OF GOVERNMENT Constitutional Republic

THE TWO UNITED STATES

Colorable admiralty (called statutory),

- --fn-n~\/ -,,---,; n:::l~An nn

FOY 1'1L-- ~~~.. !ID r

ANOTHER ANTI-CHnTcmtn~ T~T

Case 1:15-cv-01869-NLH Document 1 Filed 03/12/15 Page 6 of 61 PageID: 6

THE PEOPLE OF .NEW JERS.~Y

on.beha/fof.Joa~uin .Irwin Foy

(AKA)Foy Al-Mahdi Forerunner

fory~esus c.hrist The Messiahv.

EN - BANC. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE.

JICIENDUM AND AD TESTIFICANDUM[TO DULY APPEAR IN COURTS AND NO ABSENTIA)

Hon.Warden B.R.Jettllet al.,.

(a)(c) (3) ( S)PRETRIAL DETAINEE AND ARPres.Barack Obama,et al.(Joe

CA:l'IQEN -~COUNTY. CAMDEN.

t,P r o Ph et H J Foy .; am a sovereign, sui juris, free~an, a follower

.the liabilities presented in your Briscoe v LaHue, 460 US 325.

l,Mr .Joaquin r. Eo.y . , IN GOOD FAITH do hereb'l and herein petjtion

Case 1:15-cv-01869-NLH Document 1 Filed 03/12/15 Page 7 of 61 PageID: 7

deeree of any competent tribunal of civil or criminal jurisdiction, nor

whose_ . relief the Writ is intended, or any person fgr him,

Criminal Procedure Article 11 . 15 the Writ of Habeas Corpus

DENIAL BY DERELICTION OF DUTY.

4) Pursuant to equal footing doctrine and the Texas Code of

the Writ of Habeas Corpus since there was not sufficient

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABFAS CORPUS

Case 1:15-cv-01869-NLH Document 1 Filed 03/12/15 Page 8 of 61 PageID: 8