Professional Documents
Culture Documents
History of Photography
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/thph20
To cite this article: Natalia Majluf (2000) Photographers in Andean visual culture, History of Photography, 24:2, 91-100, DOI:
10.1080/03087298.2000.10443375
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03087298.2000.10443375
Natalia Majluf
91
Natalia Majluf
photographing ports on the Pacific coast and various sites around
Lake Titicaca Basin? A few years later, in 1859, the Lima studio of
the French photographer Felix Carbillet announced a collection of
stereoscopic views of Peru. John Adams, a North American
photographer active in Lima between 1851 and 1866 and later in
Chile, also photographed throughout the country. 8 Although other
documentary references can be cited, not many photographs from
this early period survive and few have ever been identified.
None of these independent photographic enterprises attained
any significant commercial success. Travelling through the interior
of Peru was difficult, costly, and involved a great deal of risk, and
the small Lima market was not sufficient to sustain the photographers' investment. The absence of broader discourses and
frameworks for the appreciation of landscape further limited the
possibilities of marketing such views and, consequently, local
studios rarely listed them in their newspaper advertisements.
Unlike Europe or North America, where photographic views
coexisted with a rich and diverse tradition of pictorial and literary
discourses, and where landscape had an established presence in
panorama views or the printing industry, the consumption of
landscape imagery was not generalized in the Andean region.
Thus, once the novelty of representing distant places had been
exhausted, local photographers abandoned these ambitious projects
and devoted themselves to the more profitable business of cartede-visite portraits.
The emergence of the photographic landscape view in
the Andean region would be supported mostly by specific
commissions, which derived from the rise of projects for scientific
exploration and capitalist expansion. The manner in which nature
came to be framed and conceived in these projects depended on the
way entrepreneurs were defining new economic and social
enterprises and new understandings of the relation between a nation
and its territories.
Peru remained a largely rural nation after Independence in 1821;
but the state - politically and economically centred in Lima lost substantial regional control. Lacking the bureaucratic structure
of its Colonial predecessor, the weakness of the republican
government created a wide gap between urban centres and the rural
sector. The commercial routes that had activated a dynamic
exchange between urban and rural areas during the Colonial period
were seriously disrupted. Major cities in the highlands such as
Cuzco and Huarnanga entered a period of serious economic
decline. This situation did not change significantly with Peru's
econornic affiuence during the 'guano era', which allowed the
consolidation of the Creole state at mid-century. Economic activity
continued to be centred on the cafital of Lima, extending mainly
north and south along Peru's coast.
This geographic distribution of political power and economic
resources defmed a new national order, whose social and cultural
implications would leave a profound mark on the development of
modern Peru. Urban elites, centred increasingly on the coast, were
separated, socially, culturally, and economically, from the Andean
highlands. The concentration of bourgeois and cosmopolitan
society, based around the growing commercial exchange of Lima,
created the image of the capital as a source of 'civilization', the
point of origin for the dissemination of knowledge and resources.
This special sociopolitical division informed a new
understanding of the nation's space. Modernity and progress,
radiating from the capital, would have to surmount the neglected
highlands in order to reach the Amazon, perceived then as an
unexplored but potentially rich territory. This itinerary of progress
came to outline an imaginary and highly simplified territorial map,
creating the ideological construct of the 'three natural regions', a
tripartite division of the nation that has dominated geographical
thought until the present. Benjamin Orlove has shown that this
ideological construct could be transposed onto a conventionalized
graphic representation, dividing the national territory into three
parallel bands: the thin coastal strip on the west, the Andean
highlands in the middle, and the Amazon Basin to the east. As
92
', .. ,'
~~;;\
. _..~...~., t"~~:~~:n:
~ ~1:'.::
. :."
93
Natalia Majluf
..
.'\':
\
,,
_, ;~~Jjt~~f!fA
:-
~"'<i:[~'
;.
.~
:-:.
95
Natalia Majluf
96
''
,7;:'''
97
Natalia Majluf
Figure 11. Anonymous photographer, Equestrian portrait, c. 18751890, oil on canvas, 49 x 69cm. Private collection, Lima.
Even our painters of walls would not know to conceive a
genuine inspiration, one that was at least sincerely felt. Call on
any one of them to paint the devise of a ldmbo [an inn or
hostelry for muleteers and travellers of the Sierr.1); of.one of
those tambos in the suburbs or on the outskirts of'Lima, and. he
will trace a nice ... European landscape. The stranger arriving
/Tom the Sierra or returning there, must filrcibly accept that
this panorama is the emblem of his itinerary; and the overseas
guest who is about to set out on a journey to the interior, will
believe that alpine landscapes await him, with peoples and
towns that seem animated and full of intelligence. This is to
paint wishes .... There is as much local truth in this fresco, as
in the IOVt of.firtplace, the long winter soirees, the town bell and the
smoke from the chimneys that appear in our literature! 33
Arona's enumeration of literary tropes derived from the sentimental
rhetoric of European Romantic writers reveals his exasperation at
the absurdity of invoking images that were irrelevant to a local
reality.
Painters of the Andean region resisted the local landscape, even
when their subjects seemed to require its presence. The origin of an
anonymous equestrian portrait of a rural landowner, painted during
the last quarter of the nineteenth century, can only be established as
Peruvian through the presence of the traditional silver adornments
of the bridle and stim1ps (figure 11). There is nothing in the
background that refers to the Andean landscape. The landowner's
property is not represented here, and the European-looking
cottages with smokestacks (as Arona would certainly have observed)
evoke only foreigrl pictorial conventions, ready-made models of a
standardized 'landscape' ideal.
The same disregard for the representation of a native landscape
is evident in the painted backdrops of nineteenth-cenn1ry studio
photographs, which became, in effect, one of the main sites for
the encounter between painting and photography. Vague and
undefined, the generic landscapes that served as settings for the
portraits of the urban middle classes were rarely recognizable in
terms of location. Devoid of any kind of specificity which would
allow a regional identification, these placeless landscapes signalled
only the elegance of the setting, an insinuation of refmement that
evoked the bourgeois expectations of both photographer and sitter.
As a backdrop, the landscape becomes no more than a prop, on the
same level as the mahogany tables or the richly ornamented
pedestals that studio photographers used to create a context for
their subjects. The self-sufficient space of the photographic studio,
its privileged social confinement, allows the presence of the
landscape backdrop only as a sigrlal element of'culture'.
The conventions of the nineteenth-century studio backdrop
were to be maintained by Lima photographers only until the first
two decades of the twentieth century; in the provinces, however,
its use would be prolonged. In Cusco,Juan Manuel Figueroa Aznar
98
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Notes
I. I would like to thank Jorge Villacorta for his helpful comments and
Daniel Buck for his willingness to share his knowledge of Bolivian
8.
99
Natalia Majltif
9. Paul Gootenberg, 'Population and Edmicity in Early Republican Peru:
Some Revisions', Latin American Research Rtview 26:3 (Summer 1991),
109-57.
10. Benjamin S. Orlove, 'Putting Race in its Place: Order in Colonial and
Postcolonial Peruvian Geography', Social Research 60:2 (Summer 1993),
316-21.
11. I cannot explore here the large corpus of photographs relating to the
exploration of the Amazon, which still demands exhaustive study. I have
recently seen an album of views of the Chanchamayo region in a private
coUection that I have been unable to study or photograph adequately,
but which could possibly be related to the activity of Cuzco photographer Bernardo Puente de Ia Vega.
12. Mariano Felipe Paz Soldan, Atlas gtograjico del Pern, Paris: Fermin Didot
Hermanos 1865,5, 66.
13. In 1862 a newspaper advertisement announced Garreaud's return from
'a trip to the interior'. See 'Retratos', HI Comtrrio, 22 October 1!:162.
Save for Paz Soldan's publication of engravings after his photographs,
there are no further references to this trip.
14. Mariano Felipe and Mateo Paz Soldan, Geografo del Pern, Paris: Fermin
Didot 1862,4900:
15. Walt Stewart, Henry Mrigg5, Yan~ Pizano, Washington, DC 1946, 85.
16. Bush appears to have remained in Peru only long enough to conclude
his commission, returning to the United States shortly after. See
Manthorne, Tropical Rmai5sarra, 178.
17. Joel Snyder, 'Territorial photography', in Landscape and POIWr, ed. W. J.
T. MitcheU, 175-201.
18. The photographs, taken by Cachoirs and Emilio Chaigneau, were
published in Rt5riia histOrica del femxarril mtrr Santiago y Valparal5o,
Santiago: lmprenta del Ferrocarril 1863. See Rodriguez ViUegas,
'Historia de Ia fotografia en Chile', 222.
19. On Pease's activities in Lima and his specific railroad commission see
Keith McElroy, 'Benjamin Franklin Pea.'IC. An American Photographer
in Lima, Peru', History of Photography 3:3 Quly 1979), 195-209.
20. Pease had apparently madt'" vit'"Ws ofother railroad projects, as the catalogue
entry for the exhibition of1872 clearly states that he had exhibited ftfi:een
vit'"WS 'of the roads and constructions of the various railroads of Peru'
(emphasis added). See Francisco A. Fuentes, ed., Catalogo de Ia Exposidlm
Nacionaldt 1872. Edici/ml!ficial, Lima.lmprentadel Estado 1872,93.
21. The album, tided on the cover 'Rccuerdos dd Peru Ferro Carril de Ia
Oroya/E. Courret Fot. Lima', contains 49 views of the Central Line,
collection of ENAFER, Lima. The photographs could only have been
made after 1875, when the line to Chicla wa~ completed, and prior to
1877, when the French traveUer Charles Wiener acquired a number of
these views during his stay in Peru. Wiener later used some of these
photographs to serve as iUustrations to his travel account, Pbou tt Bolivie.
Rtdt dt voyagt, Paris: Librairie Hachette 1880.
22. After his departure from Lima, Richardson is known to have been
active in the Southern cities of lquique and Tacna between at least
1880 and 1889. See Rodriguez Viilegas, 'Historia de Ia fotografia en
Chile', 306. As McElroy suggests, his departure was probably
encouraged by the discovery of rich nitrate fields in the South, 'The
History of Photography in Peru in the Nineteenth-Century 18391876', 716-17.
23. Keith McElroy identified the negative plate numbers appearing in copies
belonging to the Gildemeister Album Museo de Arte de Lima with
those appearing in views he attributed to Villroy Richardson. See 'The
History of Photography in Peru .. .', 174. I thank Keith McElroy for
helping me with this complex issue at a time when the ENAFER
albums were unavailable for study. The issue of the attribution of the
photographs of the Central Line is even more complicated. An albwn
tided 'Vistas del Peru' containing 271 views, in the coUection of the
100
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.