NDTFADjune 08

ISO/IEC 17025 Field Application Document
Non-destructive Testing
Supplementary requirements for accreditation
June 2008
Non-destructive Testing Field Application Document Supplementary requirements for accreditation
Contents
SECTION 1
Introduction
SECTION 2
Accreditation procedures
SECTION 3

(including the application of ISO/IEC 17025 clauses in NDT)
10
Annex 3.1
Annex 3.2
Annex 3.3
Annex 3.4
Annex 3.5
Annex 3.6
Radiographic testing technical requirements

Ultrasonic testing technical requirements
Magnetic particle testing technical requirements
Penetrant testing technical requirements
Visual inspection technical requirements
Eddy current testing technical requirements
23
25
26
27
28
29
SECTION 4
Guidance on equipment calibration, instrument setting and

performance checking intervals in NDT
31
SECTION 5
Classes of test
32
SECTION 6
NDT work site policy
34
SECTION 7
References
40
Section 1
Introduction
Scope
The general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are described in AS
ISO/IEC 17025: 2005 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories
hereafter referred to as 'ISO/IEC 17025'. These requirements are designed to apply to all types of testing
and calibration and therefore often need to be interpreted with respect to the type of calibration or testing
concerned, and the techniques involved.
This Field Application Document (FAD) provides an explanation of ISO/IEC 17025 for facilities accredited or
seeking accreditation in the field of Non-destructive Testing (NDT). It also includes a description of the NATA
accreditation procedures applied in this field. Non-destructive Testing facilities must comply with this
document, all relevant clauses of ISO/IEC 17025, the NATA Rules and relevant statutory requirements.
Changes or additions to accreditation requirements or policies may be issued from time to time in the form of
Technical or Policy Circulars which shall supersede any previous requirements where indicated. The FAD
must therefore be read in conjunction with all of these references and are included in the NATA Accreditation
Requirements (NAR).
The contents of the NAR are:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
About NATA and Accreditation

AS ISO/IEC 17025:2005 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration
laboratories
ISO/IEC 17025 Field Application Document Non-destructive Testing, Supplementary requirements
for accreditation
NATA Rules
Current Policy/Technical Circulars (where relevant)
Technical Notes are also available to assist facilities in relation to particular technical issues. They are
intended to provide guidance and therefore do not contain requirements for accreditation, unless specifically
indicated in the FAD. Copies may be obtained from NATA offices or from our website.
June 2008
Page 2 of 41
A copy of the NATA Accreditation Requirements must be readily available to staff working in a NATA
accredited or applicant facility.
Applicability
These accreditation criteria are applicable to all Non-destructive Testing facilities, irrespective of size, range
of testing or number of personnel. It should however be noted that it is not possible to set rigid requirements
for all aspects of a facilitys operation. Some flexibility is necessary so that each facilitys unique situation can
be considered. The acceptability (or otherwise) of certain practices can therefore only be determined by
assessment. Information on the assessment process is contained in Section 2.
ISO/IEC 17025 Field Application Documents are also available for NATAs other accreditation fields, as
listed below. Please contact one of our offices or visit our website to obtain copies if these are of interest.
Biological Testing
Chemical Testing
Construction Materials Testing
Forensic Science
Information and Communications Technology Testing
Measurement Science and Technology

Mechanical Testing
Medical Testing
Veterinary Testing
The ISO/IEC 17025 Field Application Document for the RANZCR/NATA Medical Imaging program is also
available from NATAs website.
Administration
The Associations accreditation activities in the field of Non-destructive Testing are administered, under the
Boards direction, by the Non-destructive Testing Accreditation Advisory Committee. The current NATA
Rules outline the functions of the Board and the Accreditation Advisory Committee.
Terminology and presentation

The clause numbers in this document follow those of ISO/IEC 17025 but since not all clauses require
interpretation the numbering may not be continuous. It is recognised that not all testing or calibration
activities are performed in a 'laboratory'. Accordingly, the expression 'facility' is used throughout this
document.
The words 'shall' and 'must' are used interchangeably throughout this document and describe mandatory
criteria for accreditation. The word 'should' is used where guidance is provided but does not preclude other
acceptable practices. Where a smaller size font has been used this indicates matters of an advisory or
informative nature.
Any references to the NATA Rules, Fee Schedule, Technical Notes etc imply the current version of such
documents.
Where the words 'policy' and 'procedure' are used in ISO/IEC 17025 it is possible that one document may
meet the requirements of the standard. This will be determined at assessment.
References to 'him' also imply 'her' where this is the case.
The following abbreviations are used in this document:
AAC
ACFM
AINDT
ANSI
APLAC
AS
ASME
ASNT
ASTM
BS
CIPM
IAF
IEC
ILAC
June 2008
Accreditation Advisory Committee

Alternating Current Field Measurement
Australian Institute for Non-destructive Testing
American National Standards Institute
Asia Pacific Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation
Australian Standard
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
American Society for Non-destructive Testing
American Society for Testing and Materials
British Standard
International Committee for Weights and Measures
International Accreditation Forum
International Electrotechnical Commission
International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation
Page 3 of 41
ISO
JAS-ANZ
MRA
NAR
NATA
NDT
NMI
RANZCR
RT
UT
WTIA
International Organization for Standardization

Joint Accreditation System of Australia and New Zealand
Mutual Recognition Agreement
NATA Accreditation Requirements
National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia
Non-destructive Testing
National Measurement Institute
Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists
Radiographic Testing
Ultrasonic Testing
Welding Technology Institute of Australia
Legislation
It is the responsibility of each facility to ensure that it complies with all relevant legislation. Legislative
requirements may take precedence over or provide additional criteria to those detailed in this document. It is
also strongly recommended that facilities hold copies of relevant legislation.
Safety
NATA does not define mandatory safety measures but does draw attention to any unsafe practices that are
observed in the course of an assessment. Facilities are however encouraged to apply the relevant sections
of AS 2243 Safety in laboratories. When clauses related to safety are written into test methods covered by
the accreditation these must be observed.
Section 2
Accreditation procedures
The following information is provided to assist facilities seeking accreditation or extensions to accreditation or
signatory approval(s). General information is also provided with regard to NATAs policies and procedures.
It should be noted that there are some differences between the fields in regard to the order in which these
steps are followed. Hence, this section may vary from other ISO/IEC 17025 Field Application Documents
which reflects relevant but different emphases in the different calibration and testing fields, or limitations that
have been placed on the NATA process by outside influences, such as joint programs, regulatory or
industry-specific requirements.
Where an organisation may require accreditation in a number of different fields, every attempt is made to
harmonise and coordinate accreditation activities. Corporate accreditation is available in defined
circumstances to assist this process. A Policy Circular is available explaining this process and can be
obtained from our offices or the NATA website.
There may also be a need to vary the steps detailed below in the case of applications from overseas
facilities. Once again, every attempt is made to ensure the accreditation process is carried out in the most
efficient and effective way for all parties concerned.
Where applications or accreditations are required that include non-laboratory NATA accreditation activities
(such as the Reference Material Producers Accreditation Program, Proficiency Testing Scheme Providers
Accreditation or Inspection Accreditation) every effort is also made to appropriately coordinate activities.
Clause 1.6 of ISO/IEC 17025 states that facilities that comply with ISO/IEC 17025 meet the 'principles of ISO
9001'. Facilities interested in making a statement regarding this issue for their customers should refer to the
Joint ISO-ILAC-IAF Communiqu on the Management Systems Requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005
available from the Publications International documents section of the NATA website.
In conducting assessments, however, NATA cannot accept a facilitys ISO 9000 certification as the sole
statement of compliance with the management requirements of ISO/IEC 17025. ISO 9001:2000 is an
outcome based standard and has fewer requirements for documented procedures and records. It is also
necessary to consider how the system is applied at a technical level. Therefore the management system
requirements of ISO/IEC 17025 will still be assessed in these situations.
Fees for services

The various parts of the process where charges are levied are indicated. Specific information on charges can
be obtained from our current Fee Schedule, from NATA staff or by consulting our website.
June 2008
Page 4 of 41
Preliminary steps
When seeking accreditation, facility staff should familiarise themselves with the NATA Accreditation
Requirements (NAR). The NAR can be obtained following discussion with NATA field technical staff, or from
our website, and will attract a fee to cover the cost of the accreditation requirements package and postage.
Application for accreditation

Applications for accreditation may be made by any legally identifiable organisation and must be made on the
prescribed application form. This form will be provided at an appropriate time with regard to the intended
time of application. The application must be accompanied by the current application fee.
Advisory visit
An informal review of a facility can be undertaken by a NATA field technical staff (lead assessor) to explain
the significant requirements that relate to accreditation. It should however be remembered that the NATA
lead assessor, while an experienced scientist or engineer, is not a technical assessor. The aim is to ensure
that the facility is ready for accreditation, although the formal assessment is the process whereby
accreditation requirements will be identified.
Advisory visits may be conducted either prior to, or after, an application has been made. The most
appropriate timing for such a visit will be a matter for negotiation between the facility and the relevant field
technical staff. A fee will be levied for this service.
Following the visit, a written report is provided which summarises the key points of discussion.
While an advisory visit is not mandatory it is strongly recommended that applicant facilities avail themselves
of this service. There are of course cases in which facilities have good knowledge of NATA through existing
contacts or accreditations. In such cases, the merits of an advisory visit should still be discussed with
relevant field technical staff.
Prior to an advisory visit being conducted the facility will be asked to provide a copy of its quality manual and
associated documentation for review. NATA technical staff will advise exactly what information is required for
this review. This activity is known as 'document review' and is described below.
Document review
The facility will be asked to submit a copy of their proposed scope of accreditation, current management
system documentation, calibration and/or test procedures and information on staff and the facilities so that a
document review can be undertaken.
The document review is most often carried out by the NATA field staff who will be involved in the assessment
of the facility.
The document review provides a comparison of the facilitys documentation and procedures with the
accreditation requirements as detailed in the NAR. The NATA lead assessor also makes note of particular
references within the facilitys documented system that require review at the assessment or areas that
appear to require further explanation or investigation. Written feedback will be given. Depending on the
extent of the action required the facility may be asked to provide further information prior to the assessment
or this information will be sought at the assessment.
A fee will be levied for the document review.
The role of the authorised representative

The authorised representative is the person nominated by the facility to be its representative in all matters
relating to the application or accreditation and is the facilitys recognised official contact with NATA.
Nomination is made in the appropriate place on the application form or when changes are required
thereafter, on the Nomination of New Authorised Representative form available for this purpose.
The rights and legal obligations of the authorised representative are detailed in the NATA Rules. At a
practical level, the authorised representative is normally a senior staff member who is in a position to make
decisions regarding the facilitys accreditation and to effectively communicate with colleagues. The
authorised representative may also choose to direct NATA to other facility staff with whom relevant issues
may be discussed.
June 2008
Page 5 of 41
The authorised representative is required to notify NATA within 14 days if:
the name or ownership of the facility changes;

changes in duties or departures of key staff (including approved signatories) occur; or
significant changes occur to the functions or accommodation of the facility.
Assessment
Compliance of an applicant with accreditation requirements is determined primarily by an on-site
assessment.
The objective of an assessment is to establish whether the facility can competently perform the activities for
which accreditation has been sought. The NATA assessment team is required to investigate the operation of
the facility against the criteria detailed in the NAR and to report their findings to both the facility seeking
accreditation and the relevant Accreditation Advisory Committee (AAC).
The assessment team is comprised of at least one NATA lead assessor and one or more specialist volunteer
technical assessors. Review of the management system is essentially conducted by the NATA lead assessor
whilst the volunteer assessors concentrate on the technical activities undertaken by the facility. The size of
the assessment team is dependent upon the areas that must be covered in the course of the assessment.
Assessments will generally take at least one working day and may extend over a number of days depending
on the range of activities to be covered. Technical assessors are chosen according to their specialist
knowledge and are matched as closely to the activities of the facility as is possible. Consideration is given to
possible concerns about conflicts of interest in selecting assessors.
Facility staff will be called upon to discuss, with the technical assessors, technical issues relating to tests that
are carried out by the facility or are in progress. NATA may also request prior to the assessment, or in the
course of the assessment, that particular procedures or tests be demonstrated. Occasionally, such
discussion may be hypothetical. Facilities undergoing an assessment should expect all areas for which
accreditation is sought to be covered in some way.
An exit interview or meeting is held at the conclusion of the assessment at which the assessment findings
are presented by the NATA lead assessor. It is the prerogative of the facility to decide which of their staff
should attend this meeting. Generally, the authorised representative would be expected to attend as well as
relevant senior staff. The purpose of the exit meeting is to allow frank and open discussion about the findings
of the assessment. Facilities are strongly encouraged to clarify issues they consider may have been
misunderstood by the assessment team and to seek clarification about assessment findings where this may
be necessary.
An interim report is usually left on the day. This report is reviewed and a final report is issued. Where
necessary, the report will detail the action required by the facility to allow accreditation to be recommended.
In these cases the facility will be asked to provide NATA with the necessary evidence that action has been
taken as claimed. Occasionally, the AAC may direct that a further visit by a NATA lead assessor or another
assessment be carried out. There are a number of reasons for this, including concerns about the
competence of the facility, the inability to assess certain aspects of the facility during the visit because of a
lack of availability of key facility staff, or to review the effective implementation of the corrective action taken
as the result of the assessment. The same procedures for assessment will be followed but may concentrate
on only the area(s) found to be deficient. Charges will be levied for such visits.
Granting accreditation
NATAs Chief Executive grants accreditation following a recommendation by the AAC. This recommendation
is made when the facility has met all the requirements for accreditation. The authorised representative is
formally advised of the granting of the accreditation and issued with a certificate of accreditation and the
scope of accreditation.
Scope of accreditation
Accreditation is described by classes and sub-classes of test. The collective expression or extent of a
facilitys accreditation, is known as its 'scope of accreditation'. These classes and sub-classes are fixed
descriptors, free text being used to qualify or amplify the scope as necessary. Where the scope of testing of
a facility cannot be adequately described by existing descriptors, the Accreditation Advisory Committee may
from time to time establish new classes and/or sub-classes of test. A copy of the classes of test available in
the field of Non-destructive Testing is provided in Section 5 of this document. Classes of test are however
revised from time to time so for the most current version please contact a NATA office or visit our website.
June 2008
Page 6 of 41
Applications for accreditation may be made for one or more classes of test, or for one or more subclasses
within a class of test.
The scopes of accreditation of all NATA accredited facilities are available on NATAs website.
Variations to scope of accreditation

Accredited facilities may request variations to their scope of accreditation. NATA technical staff will provide
direction on the information required, the process that will be followed, and the charges that will be levied.
Significant variations will require an assessment.
Extensions to the scope of a facilitys accreditation may be accommodated at the same time as a scheduled
routine reassessment but only where review of the additional activity(ies) will not compromise the purpose of
the reassessment (which is to review the existing scope of accreditation to determine ongoing compliance
with the accreditation requirements). Adequate notice by the facility must also be provided in order for the
variation to be considered. Variations to the scope of accreditation must be supported by relevant
documentation in advance of the assessment. The NATA lead assessor will advise of the relevant
information required. Fees will be charged for extensions to the scope of accreditation conducted during a
routine reassessment where additional effort is necessary (eg. additional time and/or technical assessors are
required).
Requests for variations to the scope of accreditation outside routine reassessments will also be considered.
A fee will be charged for such visits.
Approved signatories
NATA grants formal approval to facility staff to sign test reports or calibration certificates for work covered by
the scope of accreditation. (The various forms of endorsement and the conditions for their use are detailed in
the NATA Rules.) Such personnel are known as 'approved signatories' and their capability to undertake this
role is determined at assessment.
Approved signatories assume responsibility for the technical validity and accuracy of all information
contained in test reports or calibration certificates.
Individuals may be approved as signatories for all or part of the facilitys scope of accreditation. Signatory
approval is not a personal qualification and is not transferable from one facility to another without approval
having being granted at each facility.
Staff nominated for signatory approval must have and demonstrate a sound knowledge of:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
the principles of the calibrations, measurements and/or tests they perform or supervise;
the standards or specifications for which accreditation is sought or held;
the facilitys management system;
ISO/IEC 17025, NATA Rules, the FAD and pertinent NATA Technical and Policy Circulars;
measurement ranges and the estimation of the uncertainties of measurement associated with the tests
or calibrations for which the facility is accredited or seeking accreditation (where relevant to the
accreditation).
Approved signatories shall hold a position within the organisation which provides authority over the
calibration and/or testing activities and where necessary, results to be rejected when they consider them to
be inadequate. Individuals may be approved as signatories for all or part of the facilitys scope of
accreditation.
Approved signatories in the field of NDT are required to be appropriately qualified. Qualification requirements
are detailed in Section 3.
Approved signatories in the field of NDT are able to delegate their approval to NDT operators provided that
specific criteria have been met. The criteria are detailed in Section 3. Written approval from NATA must be
received before delegation is commenced.
Signatory approval is available to consultants to the facility provided that they have the knowledge necessary
to allow them to be approved as signatories and have authority over testing, as already defined. Consultants
June 2008
Page 7 of 41
must also hold a written contract or agreement with the facility in which their role and authority in the facility
is clearly defined and that they agree to hold confidential information relating to clients of the facility. The
agreement must further indicate that the facility is responsible for work performed by the consultant including
acceptance of the indemnity responsibilities detailed in NATA Rules.
A facility must have approved signatories to cover the complete range of its scope of accreditation. The
accreditation will be suspended for any parts for which an approved signatory is no longer available.
It is expected that all signatories (and other reporting officers formally designated/approved as such by
NATA) will be present at every reassessment for review of that approval. In cases where only a partial
reassessment of the facility is conducted, individuals need only be present for the assessment of those areas
of the facility relevant to their signatory approval. Authorised representatives should therefore ensure the
availability of all such individuals when assessment arrangements are being discussed with NATA.
It is recognised that there will be occasions when signatories will not be able to be present at a given
reassessment due to unforeseen circumstances. Signatories not present at a reassessment are noted as
such in the Approved Signatories section of the assessment report. Any signatory not present at an
assessment must be present at the next assessment of the facility (which covers the area(s) relevant to the
approval). Signatories not present for two consecutive assessments will have their signatory approval
withdrawn.
Signatory approval can be reinstated following a signatory interview for which the facility will be charged or at
the next scheduled reassessment.
Signatory interviews
NATA also undertakes specific signatory interviews of proposed new signatories or extensions to existing
approvals either as part of a reassessment or as a separate activity. Fees may be charged for interviews for
new signatories or extensions conducted during a routine reassessment (see Variations to scope of
accreditation) where additional effort is necessary (eg. additional time and/or technical assessors are
required). Fees will be charged where signatory interviews are conducted as a separate activity.
Adequate notice of requests for signatory interviews must be provided by the facility.
Proficiency testing or competency audits

Each applicant or accredited facility is required to participate in appropriate proficiency testing or equivalent
activities. Competency audits using known value artifacts are considered a form of proficiency testing.
Participation in proficiency testing may be required, as follows:
a)
b)
c)
d)
prior to gaining accreditation with NATA;

when requesting significant extensions or variations to the scope of accreditation;
when requesting additional signatory approvals (where relevant).
as identified by the Accreditation Advisory Committee.
Facilities are encouraged to participate in as broad a range of such activities as practicable and available,
but ideally at least once every two years for each major area of test or measurement. NATAs Test Specimen
Audit Policy (Technical Circular 5) can be viewed at our website.
After accreditation
NATA accredited facilties must continue to comply with all accreditation requirements detailed in the NAR. In
order to ensure continued compliance with these requirements, routine visits to facilities are scheduled.
Generally the assessment cycle is three years which includes a surveillance visit at 18 months followed by a
reassessment at 36 months.
Shorter intervals to a facility may also be specified by the Accreditation Advisory Committee. Such intervals
will be determined on the significance of issues identified during any visit to a facility and any doubt over the
facilitys continuing compliance with the accreditation requirements.
Reassessments follow the same processes as the initial assessment. The scope of review covers all of the
facilitys technical activities, however only selected elements of the management system against the
accreditation requirements detailed in the NAR.
June 2008
Page 8 of 41
Surveillance visits are conducted by a NATA lead assessor and involves review of the management system
in full (including a document review) and selected technical elements against the accreditation requirements
detailed in the NAR. Extensions to the scope of accreditation and/or signatories will normally not be
considered as such visits do not include technical assessors.
The annual membership fees payable by accredited facilities generally cover the costs of reassessments
and surveillance visits. Extensions to the scope of accreditation and/or signatories requested as part of a
scheduled reassessment will only be accommodated where such requests do not compromise the purpose
of the reassessment (see Variations to scope of accreditation). Fees will be charged where additional
resources and time are required to accommodate the request as part of a scheduled reassessment. NATA
technical staff will provide further information.
Requests for variations to the scope of accreditation outside routine reassessments will also be considered.
A fee will be charged for such visits.
Between visits, accredited facilities are required to participate in relevant proficiency testing activities.
Facilities performance and response to proficiency testing results will be reviewed at reassessments and
surveillance visits.
Unscheduled visits may be conducted to investigate a complaint that casts doubt over the facilitys
continuing compliance with the accreditation requirements. They may also be conducted to investigate
unsatisfactory performance in proficiency testing program(s). At such visits, specific activities may be
targeted for review rather than the entire facility operation.
Facilities must respond to reassessment and surveillance visit findings by the nominated response date,
otherwise the status of their accreditation will be reviewed.
Non-compliance with accreditation requirements

In accordance with the NATA Rules, non-compliance with the accreditation requirements may lead to the
accreditation status of a facility being suspended or cancelled.
In these circumstances the facility is not able to issue endorsed reports or claim to be accredited for those
services affected by the change in status. The NATA Rules define the reasons, processes and the appeals
mechanisms that will be followed.
Provision of information on scope of accreditation and approved signatories

Details of a facilitys scope of accreditation are posted on the NATA website once accreditation has been
granted and are also made available to inquirers. The names of approved signatories will also be provided
on request.
Confidentiality
All information provided by a facility in connection with an inquiry or an application for accreditation, and all
information obtained in connection with an assessment, is treated as confidential by NATA staff, technical
assessors, Committee and Board members. All such personnel are made aware of this requirement and
have signed confidentiality agreements.
Privacy
NATA respects and upholds the rights of individuals to privacy protection under the National Privacy
Principles contained in the Privacy Amendment (Private Sector) Act 2000. A copy of NATAs Privacy Policy
can be obtained from the NATA website (www.nata.asn.au) or by contacting one of the NATA offices. This
policy describes how NATA manages the personal information we hold.
The following is a summary of the personal information collected from individuals in applicant and accredited
facilities and the disclosure of that information.
Authorised representative
The authorised representative is an accredited facilitys official contact with NATA. The personal information
collected will include name; position; business address, business telephone, mobile phone and fax numbers;
e-mail address. Credit card details may also be held for those purchasing NATA services.
June 2008
Page 9 of 41
This information may be used to:
administer and manage your accreditation;

seek feedback from you on ways to improve NATAs services;
provide you information on NATAs activities and services.
The information may also be made available to enquirers requiring the services of NATA accredited facilities.
Personal information may be disclosed to organisations outside NATA. Such organisations may include:
government and regulatory authorities and other organisations, as required or authorised by law
and/or with which NATA has a Memorandum of Understanding or similar formal agreement;
accreditation bodies with which NATA has a Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA);
professional advisers including accountants, auditors and lawyers;
credit providers;
outsourced service providers managing NATA services.
Facility contact
Recognising that the authorised representative is not necessarily the most appropriate person to answer day
to day and technical queries regarding an accredited facilitys activities, NATA provides facilities the
opportunity to nominate a person to deal with technical and other enquiries. (This person can, however, also
be the authorised representative.)
The personal information collected will include name; position; business address, business telephone,
mobile phone and fax numbers; e-mail address. This information may be given to enquirers and is included
in the on-line Directory.
Facility personnel
The personal information collected on personnel of the applicant or accredited facility may include name,
position, professional, technical or other relevant qualifications, membership of professional associations,
employment history.
This information is used for the conduct of the assessment, reporting on the assessment and the process of
granting/continuing accreditation. It may be disclosed to NATA staff members, assessors, assessment
observers and NATA committee members, all of whom have signed confidentiality agreements. It may also
be disclosed to agencies to which NATA has a legal obligation or with which NATA has a formal agreement.
Disclosure of personal information by applicant and accredited facilities at assessments
In order for NATA to determine compliance with some accreditation criteria, it will be necessary to sight
personal information at assessments. Examples might include personal information held in training records,
complaints records, lists of approved suppliers etc. It is the responsibility of the facility to ensure that, in
accordance with The Commonwealth Privacy Act 1988, National Privacy Principle 1.3(d), it has appropriate
arrangements in place to advise individuals that personal information collected may be disclosed to NATA.
Section 3
This section provides interpretation of the application of ISO/IEC 17025 for NDT facilities, together with the
supplementary requirements applicant and accredited facilities must comply with.
Annexes 3.1 to 3.6 cover additional test method specific requirements.
The requirements for accreditation for routine work sites, major work sites and independent work sites are
stated in the NDT work site policy (refer to Section 6).
The clause numbers in this section follow those of ISO/IEC 17025 eg. 5.4.1 refers to ISO/IEC 17025
Subclause 5.4.1. Since all clauses/subclauses do not require interpretation, the numbering is not continuous.
June 2008
Page 10 of 41
Management requirements
4.1
Organisation
4.1.3 Testing performed away from the base facility, whether in a temporary facility, mobile facility or
field/on-site operation shall comply with NATAs criteria for accreditation.
4.1.4 For facility staff who may also have production or marketing-related responsibilities, clear policies
must be available to define how impartiality is assured for their testing responsibilities.
4.1.5 The ratio of supervisory to other staff shall be such that adequate supervision is maintained at all
times. Particular care shall be taken to ensure adequate supervision of testing performed at routine and
major construction work sites.
4.2
Management system
4.2.1 Quality documentation must include or reference approved signatories, scope of accreditation and
the policy on the use of the NATA endorsement.
4.5
Subcontracting of tests and calibration

(Subcontracting of NDT)
4.5.1 This clause applies in those cases where a facility is required to subcontract part of its normal
service (eg. due to temporary incapacity, excess workload) or where a facility subcontracts due to the need
for further expertise and the results of the subcontracted service(s) are incorporated into the facilitys test
reports (refer also to 5.10.6 of ISO/IEC 17025).
A competent subcontractor is defined as an appropriately accredited NATA facility or a facility accredited by
one of NATAs mutual recognition partners.
4.5.4 The accreditation status of subcontractors should be regularly reviewed by the facility to ensure
currency.
Information on accreditation status and scope of accreditation may be found at NATAs website or by
contacting one of NATAs offices.
4.12
Preventive action
4.12.1 Preventive action is a proactive process to identify improvement opportunities, rather than a reaction
to the identification of problems or complaints. Total quality management tools such as brainstorming,
flowcharting, Pareto charts etc may assist this process. Consideration should also be given to providing staff
with a formal mechanism for contributing suggestions for improvement.
4.13
Control of records
4.13.1 All records must include the identity of the person making the record.
4.13.1.2
Unless otherwise prescribed by legislation or contractual obligation, retention times will not be
less than three years or, in the case of equipment records, the maximum recalibration interval of equipment
(whichever is the longer period).
4.13.2.1
The records system must include a copy of each report or certificate that contains work covered
by the scope of accreditation, or must allow one to be reproduced, including details such as the endorsement
(if applicable) and identification of the person who authorised the report.
The records system must include the following where applicable:
i)
test item identification;
ii)
test document identification;
iii)
date and place of test;
iv)
identity of the test method;
v)
any departures from the test method;
vi)
identity of the test equipment;
vi)
application code/specification;
vii)
original test observations and calculations, including description, size and location of discontinuities;
viii) any areas not able to be inspected;
June 2008
Page 11 of 41
ix)
x)
xi)
any repairs undertaken and areas retested;

identity of the person performing the test;
any other information specified in the test method, other contractual documents or relevant statutory
regulations.
Additional record requirements applicable to individual test methods are included in Annexes 3.1 3.6.
4.13.2.3
In addition to the requirements of this sub-clause, alterations to data must include the date the
change was made.
4.14
Internal audits
4.14.1 The internal audit schedule needs to cover, over a twelve-month period, the management and
technical requirements of ISO/IEC 17025.
Persons exercising technical management responsibility shall ensure that on-site technical audits are
conducted to confirm that staff are following procedures (refer to 5.9 below).
4.15
Management reviews
4.15.1 The effectiveness of the management system shall be reviewed by management at least once per
year.
Technical requirements
5.2
Personnel
5.2.1 For those facilities which train their own personnel, a program of tasks and skills to be satisfactorily
completed shall be documented.
ISO 9712/AS 3998 details specific training and experience requirements for the various levels of
responsibility. For testing personnel, there are also a range of human factors such as concentration,
attention to detail, persistence in evaluating and interpreting findings, including use of alternative NDT
methods which can affect the quality of testing work and which are to a greater or lesser extent controllable
through the provision of appropriate training. This can involve training personnel to recognise situations and
conditions which could have an adverse effect on the testing and to take appropriate mitigation measures.
All testing personnel shall satisfy the following requirements for vision at intervals not exceeding one year.
(These requirements are extracted from ISO 9712/AS 3998.)
i)
ii)
Near-vision acuity shall permit reading a minimum of Times Roman N4.5 or equivalent letters at not
less than 30 cm with one or both eyes, either corrected or uncorrected; and
Colour vision shall be such that the candidate can distinguish and differentiate the colours used in the
NDT method concerned. Colour vision need only be assessed once.
Note: Most optometrists will perform a complete colour blindness test. If this is the case, then colour vision should be
normal as shown by the ability to correctly read the numerals on the plates of the Ishihara Test for Colour Blindness with
no more than three errors. NDT operators who fail the Ishihara test should be referred to an optometrist for individual
assessment of their colour vision to establish if the defective colour vision would impede the recognition of features
delineated by colour differences.
Testing personnel must also take any precautions necessary to ensure satisfactory visual acuity at the time
of undertaking any NDT work.
Companies wishing to perform vision tests in-house shall provide a written procedure and hold the
appropriate charts.
Qualifications for testing personnel
Personnel performing non-destructive tests shall hold qualifications as specified by the client plus any
additional qualifications specified in the contract, application standard or test method. Qualifications held
must be current.
Where ISO 9712/AS 3998 qualifications are specified then the minimum level of qualification is considered to
be Level 2 for all testing where the procedures do not explicitly detail the test parameters to be used. Such
June 2008
Page 12 of 41
tests include those where testing personnel are working to the general requirements of a standard method
(eg. AS 2207) and is responsible for choosing test parameters (eg. probe frequency, beam angle, etc).
Where a qualification is not specified then acceptable qualifications are as follows:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
Australian qualification standards for NDT personnel, eg. AS 3998, AS 3669, AS 4635, at the
appropriate qualification level or international equivalent.
AINDT qualifications which pre-date AS 3998 based qualifications Technician/Technologist
Qualifications issued under a recognised certification framework which is administered by the NDT
facility and has been reviewed and recognised by NATA.
Other qualifications acceptable to the NDT facilitys customer. This would apply to a contract which
included the right of the NDT facilitys client to determine acceptability of operator qualifications. This
would not apply, for example, to organisations testing their own product.
Qualifications held must be current. A system for monitoring the expiry dates of qualifications/certifications
shall be implemented.
Testing personnel performing testing under the direct supervision of a qualified operator at the job site need
not hold qualifications, however, the list of personnel on the job record must indicate that a qualified person
was present.
The supervisor is responsible for all testing performed. The supervisor must be on-the-job with the
unqualified personnel, and must exercise supervision to the extent that he or she:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
is in a position to rectify any errors or omissions in the technique(s) being used;

is able to evaluate the unqualified persons understanding and compliance of the technical aspects
associated with the testing;
is satisfied that a third party would have confidence that the work undertaken by unqualified personnel
is being performed correctly;
is satisfied that all work site rules and occupational health and safety requirements are in place and
are being observed.
If permitted by the application standard, test method, customer or contract, ISO 9712/AS 3998 Level 1
qualification may be acceptable for tests of a repetitive routine nature if the test procedures specify all testing
parameters and define the circumstances in which the testing personnel shall seek assistance or advice.
These procedures shall be documented and readily available to testing personnel.
Level 1 certification is not appropriate where testing personnel are working to the general requirements of a
method and are responsible for choosing test parameters.
Level 1 certification is also not appropriate for ultrasonic thickness testing if it involves characterisation of
material loss using angle probes. AS 4635 certification in corrosion mapping is acceptable for such testing
provided it is permitted by the application standard, test method, customer or contract.
Where a preliminary scanning technique is used in conjunction with another NDT method (eg. in testing
storage tank floors), evidence of the scanning operators training in the scanning technique must be
available. Testing personnel involved in the evaluation of the findings of the preliminary scanning using
another NDT method must hold relevant qualifications in the NDT method(s) used.
Qualifications are not mandatory for personnel performing only radiographic exposures and processing,
however, it is strongly recommended that these personnel are similarly qualified to those performing
interpretation of radiographs. In any case, such personnel must have demonstrated competence in
performing radiographic exposure and processing. Similarly, qualifications are not mandatory for operators
performing only initial scanning (eg., ultrasonic) in conjunction with offsite interpretation of the resulting
traces by an appropriately qualified person.
Approved signatories and delegated signatories
a)
Assessment of Approved Signatories
The qualifications and experience of proposed signatories will be reviewed at assessment taking into
account factors including:
June 2008
Page 13 of 41
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
vii)
the range of non-destructive testing equipment held by the facility;

the number of tests for which accreditation is sought;
the technical complexity of the tests involved;
the frequency with which specific tests are conducted - particularly those tests that are judged to be
highly operator dependent;
the ongoing contact that proposed signatories maintain with the development of test methods and
adoption of new test methods within the facility;
the implementation of the facilitys management system; and
the proposed signatorys knowledge of technical control procedures.
Refer to Section 2 Approved Signatories earlier in this document for general information regarding signatory
approval.
b)
Requirements for approved signatories
Personnel nominated as an approved signatory shall have:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
vii)
viii)
ix)
x)
sound knowledge of, and experience in the use of, applicable non-destructive testing techniques;
knowledge of relevant materials, manufacturing processes and service conditions;
experience and ability in the interpretation of data from relevant non-destructive tests;
experience in the use of relevant codes and standards, and the ability to prescribe suitable procedures
in the absence of appropriate codes and standards;
the ability to prepare routine and critical reports;
the ability to control the quality of performance of non-destructive tests;
the authority and time to provide effective control of the non-destructive testing operations that they
supervise;
detailed knowledge of the company management system;
detailed knowledge of the NATAs requirements;
qualifications as detailed below
c)
Approved signatory qualifications
Approved signatories shall possess current ISO 9712/AS 3998 Level 3 certification issued by a national
certification body, an AINDT Technologist qualification or equivalent qualification in each NDT method for
which they exercise control. Tertiary qualifications in NDT, metallurgy, materials science or engineering
would be acceptable provided that there is evidence of adequate training and experience (eg. in accordance
with ISO 9712/AS 3998 requirements) in each method for which they exercise control, together with
satisfactory completion of Level 2 practical examinations in accordance with ISO 9712/AS 3998 or equivalent
in those methods.
Provision is made for a reduced level of qualification where control is only exercised over a restricted range
of routine non-destructive testing. In such cases, an approved signatory shall possess, as a minimum, a
current, Level 2 ISO 9712/AS 3998 certification issued by a national certification body, an AINDT Technician
qualification or equivalent qualification in each NDT method for which they exercise control. This provision
for a reduced level of qualification may apply to some persons exercising technical control in manufacturing
organisations which conduct in-house testing of their manufactured items. However, it would normally not
apply in the case of a facility offering a public testing service due to the more extensive range of products
which may be presented for testing.
Where a specific qualification (ie. ISO 9712/AS 3998) is specified for signatories and /or testing personnel
(eg. by a customer, contract, application standard or test method), then persons performing these NDT
activities must each hold this qualification, regardless of their signatory status.
The American Society for Non-destructive Testing (ASNT) specifies requirements for several
qualification/certification schemes. One of these is an employer-based program administered in accordance
with ASNT Recommended Practice No.SNT-TC-1A. However, Level 3 certification under an SNT-TC-1A
scheme does not meet the qualification requirements for NATA signatory approval. Level 3 certification
issued under an in-house scheme by a person that has been independently certified to Level 3 in each
relevant method to ISO 9712/AS 3998 or an equivalent standard, may be acceptable in some circumstances.
Each application will be evaluated for compliance with NATAs qualification requirements for signatory
approval.
June 2008
Page 14 of 41
d)
Delegation of signatory approval
Approved signatories are able to delegate their approval to personnel who they supervise. The facilitys
procedure for signatory delegation must be documented. Written approval from NATA must be received
before delegation is commenced.
Signatory delegation will apply only to tests classified within the non-destructive classes of test (refer to
Section 5) in the facilitys scope of accreditation. Delegation is not applicable to other tests eg. mechanical
tests, which may be included within a facilitys scope of NDT accreditation for convenience.
e)
Delegated signatory qualifications
A delegated signatory, as a minimum, shall possess a current, relevant ISO 9712/ AS 3998 Level 2
certification issued by a national certification body, an AINDT Technician qualification or equivalent
qualification for each NDT method that they perform. Delegation based on AS 4635 certification is allowable
but is to be restricted to the specific area of testing which the qualification covers.
A person holding a Level 1 certification can be a delegated signatory only if the facilitys records of signatory
delegation for that person unambiguously reflect the limitations for operators working to Level 1 certification
described under below (records of signatory delegation) and that these limitations are adhered to in practice.
Note that where a specific qualification (ie. ISO 9712/ AS 3998) is specified for testing personnel (eg. by a
customer, contract, application standard or test method), then persons performing these tests must each
hold this qualification regardless of their signatory status. Qualifications must be current.
A delegated signatory must have satisfactorily completed an NDT competency audit for each relevant NDT
method (and ultrasonic weld testing if this is to be included in the delegation) prior to delegation approval.
f)
Records of signatory delegation
The approved signatory must determine whether the records available are sufficient to substantiate a
proposed delegates competency for the requested tests or whether additional information and/or training is
required. The following records are necessary to support a request for consideration of any individual as a
delegated signatory:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
records as per list under Personnel Records;

assessment of ability to prepare clear and concise test reports;
assessment of knowledge of responsibilities of a delegated signatory;
name and signature indicating supervisors verification of the above information (supervisor may be
the same person as the approved signatory).
In the event of a delegation request being accepted, a record of the approval process must include the
following information:
i)
iii)
iii)
a record of review by the approved signatory of the information submitted in support of the request;
categories of testing for which delegation approval is granted, including any limitations;
date(s) of delegation approval together with the signature of the approved signatory.
The process described above for approving a delegated signatory also applies in the case of requested
extensions to existing delegations. In such cases, the records system must ensure that substantiating
documentation for each separate request is retained and that the various delegation dates for the separate
areas of test coverage are detailed unambiguously.
In cases where delegation is withdrawn, for example, following the departure of an employee from the
company, a record of the date the delegation ceased must also be kept.
In order to provide proper accountability in regard to approved signatories, NATAs policy is that signatory
delegations are nullified if the approved signatory who authorised those delegations leaves the accredited
facility.
5.2.5 Personnel records
The following records are to be available for testing personnel and must be retained for the duration of
employment and for at least three years after cessation of employment:
i)
copies of qualification/certification certificates and identification cards;
June 2008
Page 15 of 41
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
vii)
viii)
ix)
x)
xi)
current visual acuity;

induction training in the facilitys management system;
assessment of knowledge of relevant test method requirements;
assessment of ability to prepare clear and concise test records;
details of the NDT operators knowledge of relevant standards and specifications;
external and in-house training1;
hours of supervised participation in testing1;
duration (hours) of testing experience in individual methods1,2;
categories of testing for which approval is granted to carry out unsupervised work3;
NDT competency audits.
Note 1: May not be required for those methods for which qualifications are held.
Note 2: AINDT has log books available to record training, experience and other relevant details.
Note 3: Including sector details (castings, forgings, welds) for volumetric methods and relevant weld configurations in
the case of ultrasonic weld testing.
5.4
Test and calibration methods and method validation (NDT Methods)
5.4.1 NATA requires that a test method be sufficiently detailed to enable a test to be duplicated if
necessary. When a method is developed or technically revised (refer to 5.4.3 and 5.4.5 below), the
responsibility for its approval would normally be vested in an approved signatory or other AS 3998/ISO 9712
Level 3 qualified person.
A specific procedure may well be necessary for a product category, in order to detail the specific
requirements applicable to that category. As a guide, a documented procedure is required when:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
There is no Australian Standard, or equivalent, for the test method (eg. alternating current field
measurement (ACFM)).
The method standard lists alternatives (eg. AS 2207 has alternative criteria for items such as scanning
positions, evaluation criteria and sizing methods). Notwithstanding, a specific procedure for each weld
configuration may not be necessary. For example, a generic procedure covering double penetration
butt welds in various plate thicknesses would be acceptable.
If the customer requires a specific procedure.
If the standard is prescriptive, facility methods may simply define the equipment to be used and the
procedure to be applied to the article in question. Generic procedures applicable to specific products
(eg. butt welds, fillet welds, castings, shafts etc.) would be acceptable.
5.4.2 Where condition assessment activity is undertaken using techniques covered by the scope of
accreditation, test procedures selected must be capable of defect detection and evaluation at a threshold
which is consistent with methods typically used for compliance testing of similar products. An exception to
this requirement is where testing is carried out to an accredited screening technique (used to provide an
indicative assessment of equipment condition), although reporting in such cases must indicate that the
detection threshold reflects only defect screening capability.
If a client requests an NDT company to perform testing to the clients in-house requirements, these not being
of a standard equivalent to the requirements used for compliance testing of similar products, then
acceptance of such work requests is not appropriate as it could diminish confidence in the integrity of the
accredited testing services (refer ISO/IEC 17025, Clause 4.1.5d). Any such testing will not be recognised by
NATA and is considered to breach NATAs accreditation requirements. Any organisation performing such
work must ensure that the specific procedure(s) proposed is excluded from the scope of accreditation. It is
acknowledged, however, that an arrangement by which a client directly contracts NDT testing personnel
and/or test equipment from an NDT company to support in-house testing in accordance with the clients
internal systems/procedures, and where the client has sole responsibility for all testing work and test records
produced, does not fall within the NDT companys scope of accreditation.
5.4.3 Accreditation for draft Standards is not available. Facilities may, however, seek accreditation for
methods developed in-house if they are appropriately documented and validated.
5.4.5 Method validation is required to be considered where aspects of methods developed by the facility
do not closely reflect a recognised published standard. For example, method validation may need to be
June 2008
Page 16 of 41
addressed where a method has been developed for detecting a nominated discontinuity or discontinuities in
a particular product and/or environment, such as for an in-service test designed to detect the development
of a specific defect in a particular location.
Validation data must be retained and available for review at each assessment of the facility.
5.4.6 There are qualitative and quantitative components of uncertainty in NDT. The qualitative
components involve uncertainty of detection and the uncertainty of classification. The influence of these is
typically of far greater significance than is associated with the uncertainty of measurement. Such is the
nature of the application of non-destructive testing methods that they are recognised as tests which have a
degree of subjectivity such as to preclude application of uncertainty by a formal modeling and mathematical
approach. There are many factors which vary from test to test and which contribute to the uncertainty of
detection, uncertainty of classification and uncertainty of measurement. As a result, non-destructive tests are
considered to be qualitative, or at best semi-quantitative, notwithstanding that numerical values are
frequently reported.
Facility staff should consider uncertainty of detection, classification and measurement in any review or new
validation/verification carried out in relation to the testing methods. Consideration must at least be given to
the key components that will contribute to the estimation of the uncertainty of test results.
Due to the nature of non-destructive testing, facilities should place particular emphasis on awareness by
operators of issues relating to the probability of discontinuity detection in conjunction with the avoidance of
false calls.
In relation to uncertainty of measurement in non-destructive testing, formal estimation and reporting of
measurement uncertainty is not required for qualitative or semi-quantitative tests, or for tests in which
qualitative components are the major components of uncertainty. However, facilities will need to estimate the
uncertainty of measurement for any tests considered to be quantitative and which do not comply with
ISO/IEC 17025, sub-clause 5.4.6.2, Note 2.
While it is not normally possible to quantify uncertainty in NDT, it is possible to identify those factors which
contribute to uncertainty, to rank these based on importance and then take action to control them as far as is
possible.
The influence of factors contributing to uncertainty in NDT may be minimised by actions and processes such
as:
i)
Use of correctly standardised equipment and performing periodic equipment performance checks;.
ii)
Testing being performed by certified or qualified NDT operators;
iii)
Testing to well established standards;
iv)
Using complementary techniques in cases of difficult or unusual applications;
v)
Use of a specialised technique specifically applicable to the application for which it is being used;
vi)
Process controls such as periodic processing of objects containing known discontinuities;
vii)
Testing in environmental conditions which are conducive to the testing operation (this is recognised as
being frequently unobtainable);
viii) Comprehensive training of staff;
ix)
A rigorous NDT competency audit program;
x)
An in-depth understanding of the object under test (composition, modes of deterioration etc).
Australian Standard non-destructive test methods incorporate comprehensive provisions and measures to
ensure, as far as possible, that sources contributing to the uncertainty associated with the qualitative
components of the test are controlled so that a reliable test result may be obtained.
5.6
Measurement traceability
Requirements relating to instrument setting and equipment performance checks for NDT are detailed
in Annexes 3.1 to 3.6 for each specific test method.
As detailed under sub-clause 5.4.6 above, NDT techniques are typically qualitative or semi-quantitative and
therefore formal calibration in order to establish traceability to the national measurement system is not
generally applicable. However, should formal calibration be required, the following requirements will apply.
June 2008
Page 17 of 41
Equipment that has a significant effect on the reported results and associated uncertainties of measurement
(including, where relevant, instruments used for monitoring critical environmental conditions) shall be
calibrated by (one or more) of the following:
NATA accredited calibration facilities and the results reported on a NATA endorsed document;
Australias National Measurement Institute (NMI);
Calibration facilities accredited by one of NATAs Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA) partners
and the results reported on an endorsed document;
The national metrology institutes that are signatories to the CIPM MRA.
Note: In the case of the last option, the calibration must actually be carried out by the national metrology institute.
Unendorsed reports from organisations claiming traceability to a national metrology institute or those bearing only an ISO
9000 series certification endorsement, are not acceptable. NATA can provide information on the endorsements used by
its MRA partners.
5.6.2.2 Unless otherwise noted, the checks detailed in Annexes 3.1 to 3.6 listing the equipment performance
checks relevant to the NDT method shall be recorded. Some application codes require equipment checks to
be undertaken more frequently than detailed in the relevant Annex. The more stringent requirement shall be
met.
As detailed under sub-clause 5.4.6 above, NDT techniques are typically qualitative or semi-quantitative and
therefore formal calibration in order to establish traceability to the national measurement system is not
generally applicable. However, should formal calibration be required, the following requirements will apply.
Reference standards and equipment shall be calibrated over the range and to the appropriate level of
accuracy specified in relevant test methods.
A facility performing its own calibrations may also be subject to proficiency testing and technical assessment
to ensure that all the relevant requirements of ISO/IEC 17025 are met for these activities (eg. adequately
documented procedures, procedures to estimate the uncertainty of measurement, complete records of
calibration data). Please refer to NATA Policy Circular 12 NATA Requirements for the Performance of
Calibrations In-house for additional information.
5.9
Assuring the quality of test and calibration results

(Assuring the quality of NDT results)
The quality of the results obtained by a non-destructive testing facility can be assured by a hierarchy of
process quality control activities as follows:
a)
Independent auditing of facility competency
This involves participation at least every 2 years in independent or externally conducted NDT competency
audits, in selected NDT methods, using validated test specimens.
Detailed requirements for these audits are contained in NATA Technical Circular 5 Test Specimen Audit
Policy Non-destructive Testing, available on NATAs web site www.nata.asn.au.
b)
NDT competency audits for testing personnel
This involves auditing the competency of all testing personnel initially, and then 5-yearly for each NDT
method performed, in accordance with the facilitys in-house NDT competency audit program. Audits are
performed using one or more test specimens with known characteristics (test plates, radiographs etc.) under
controlled conditions. See below for further details.
c)
Routine technical control evaluation for selected jobs
Routine technical control evaluations are conducted to ensure the adequacy of the facilitys technical control
over day-to-day testing activities. Each evaluation involves a technical review of a selected job and must
include witnessing of testing performed under typical test conditions. See below for further details.
NDT competency audits for testing personnel

An NDT competency audit program must be established to meet the following requirements.
a)
A schedule of audits shall be maintained by the facility which ensures that:
i)
an initial audit in each major method is conducted prior to approving any personnel to carry out
unsupervised testing in the method. In addition, for ultrasonic weld testing, completion of an
June 2008
Page 18 of 41
ii)
ultrasonic weld competency audit is required for personnel before being permitted to perform an
ultrasonic examination of a weld.
follow-up auditing is conducted for all personnel, in each method that they perform, at least
once every five (5) years.
Participation in a practical examination for an external program based on ISO 9712/AS 3998 (eg. AINDT
practical examinations) is considered to represent a satisfactory NDT competency audit in the particular
method.
Note: The scope of work undertaken by the facility will determine the extent of the program as varied work requires more
diverse operator competency audits than routine/repetitive work.
b)
c)
Specific personnel must be identified as having responsibility for the following aspects of the NDT
competency audit program:
i)
audit scheduling;
ii)
selection of test specimen for each audit;
iii)
provision of test instructions;
iv)
assessment of test results.
Test specimens (eg. test plates, radiographs etc) suitable for NDT competency audits must be
provided.
Records of validation of the specimen characteristics shall be available. In the absence of validated test
specimens, for example, where facilities are not large enough to establish an effective in-house NDT
competency audit program, or are involved in areas of testing for which it is impractical to provide a library
of test specimens, alternative arrangements may be considered. In such cases, items available for testing in
the normal course of the facilitys operations may be tested by the candidate to be audited, under
supervision, and then subsequently re-tested by a person specifically authorised by the facility for this
purpose.
Where test specimens are maintained by the facility, a register of specimens shall be available which
includes the following information:
i)
test specimen identification;
ii)
test specimen description;
iii)
material type;
iv)
applicable test method (eg. RT, UT);
v)
date obtained;
vi)
detailed sketches showing location and type of discontinuities present;
vii)
data sheet for each test piece detailing the pass/fail criteria.
Note: Test specimens can be obtained from some NDT suppliers. They can also be manufactured or shared between
facilities.
There must be measures in place to ensure test specimen security and to prevent unauthorised access to
test specimens and associated records.
d)
e)
f)
The instructions to be given to personnel prior to performing an NDT competency audit shall include:
i)
NDT procedure to be used;
ii)
the method(s) used to determine and verify the size and location of any discontinuity present in
the test specimen;
iii)
recording requirements;
iv)
reporting requirements;
v)
acceptance criteria;
v)
time limitations.
Guidelines for assessing test results and test records shall be documented and records of the
assessments shall be kept.
The facility shall ensure that any deficiencies identified from NDT competency audits are managed in
accordance with the relevant clauses of ISO/IEC 17025.
Routine technical control evaluations

A routine technical control evaluation program must be established to meet the following requirements.
June 2008
Page 19 of 41
a)
b)
Evaluations must be sufficient to provide confidence in the facilitys technical control over the day-today testing operations. As a minimum, the selection of jobs for technical control evaluation must
ensure that:
i)
each major method is subject to a routine technical control evaluation every year;
ii)
at least one job performed by each person approved to conduct unsupervised testing is subject
to routine technical control evaluation every year.
Specific personnel must be identified as having responsibility for the following aspects of the routine
technical control evaluation program:
i)
selection of jobs to be evaluated;
ii)
conducting evaluations;
iii)
review of the outcomes of the evaluations.
Personnel conducting technical control evaluations shall be qualified and experienced in the particular test
method being evaluated. In addition they shall have undergone specific training in the facilitys technical
control evaluation procedures.
Note: External personnel may be engaged to perform technical control evaluations provided these personnel are suitably
qualified and experienced.
c)
Routine technical control evaluations shall encompass all aspects of the selected testing activity
including:
i)
review of job instructions issued to the testing personnel;
ii)
availability at the job site of test standards and/or facility/client test procedures and relevant
specifications;
iii)
suitability and condition of test equipment;
iv)
review of on-site instrument set-up and/or equipment performance checking;
v)
observation of the performance of the test(s), including the time taken;
vi)
review of completed worksheets and/or reports;
Records of the evaluation (including all aspects detailed above) must be maintained.
An example of a suitable records sheet for technical control evaluations is provided below.
On-site / technical evaluation form (example)
Aspect to be evaluated on-site
Requirement/comment Acceptable/
Unacceptable
Has the work been allocated to an appropriate NDT

operator? (ie. trained, qualified, competent)
Evaluate equipment taken to test site
Has the performance of all equipment been checked
and is the equipment suitable for the task being
performed?( eg. ultrasonics: blocks, probes, leads,
instrument setting and performance checking records)
Evaluate paperwork taken to test site
Were job instructions adequate?
Were any customer-specified requirements conveyed?
Is the current standard being used?
Is the current internal test procedure in use?
Are the current/relevant acceptance criteria being
used?
Is the current worksheet (test record) being used?
Is the current reporting format being used? (ie. if
handwritten report to be issued).
Has all relevant information been obtained to perform
the test in accordance with the standard/customers
request?
Evaluate technique of NDT operator
Does the NDT operator conduct the test in accordance
with the internal company procedure/standard?
What was the item/area tested?
June 2008
Page 20 of 41
Aspect to be evaluated on-site
Requirement/comment Acceptable/
Unacceptable
How long did it take to perform the test?

Was this time in line with expectations?
*Were applicable safety procedures followed?
*Were any additional contract requirements followed?
Evaluate records and final report at base facility
Did the NDT operator hold an appropriate
qualification/certification? Check against standard,
specification and/or NATA requirements.
Does the NDT operator have a current vision test
record?
Were sketches, terminology, technique and technical
details satisfactory?
Does the worksheet and report comply with
requirements (including any client-specified
requirements)?
Was the worksheet and report legible?
Follow up action required?
Method audited (eg. class of test):
Location of evaluation:
Evaluation conducted by:
NDT operator being evaluated:
Date evaluation conducted:
* Not mandatory NATA requirements. However, these aspects could be evaluated at the same time to enhance company
quality assurance activities.
d)
5.10
The facility shall ensure that any deficiencies identified from technical control evaluations are
managed in accordance with the relevant clauses of ISO/IEC 17025
Reporting the results
5.10.1 General
Simplified reports
A simplified reporting format may be used where the customer has provided written agreement to do so. A
simplified report must make unambiguous reference to an identifiable document such as the worksheet for
the test. This document must contain all additional information specified in either the test method and
NATAs Accreditation Requirements. Similarly, where an NDT facility is contracted to provide test data in a
prescribed format (ie. directly entered into the customers asset integrity system) all additional information
specified in either the test method and NATAs Accreditation Requirements must be accessible.
As a minimum, a simplified report must include the following items:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
Identification of the test item;

Area(s) tested;
Test method identification, and any deviations from the method;
Test result(s);
Test restrictions (if applicable).
5.10.2 Test reports

Test report content
The name in which accreditation is held, the relevant accreditation number of the facility and the date of
issue of the test report must be included in the test report.
When a batch or consignment is sampled test results may be extended to the batches or consignments from
which they are drawn.
June 2008
Page 21 of 41
In instances where results of tests not covered by the scope of accreditation are included on test reports, the
notation 'NATA accreditation does not cover the performance of this service' shall be applied.
A test report may include results reported by another accredited facility within its scope of accreditation
provided that it includes the following information from the original document:
i)
ii)
identification of the accredited facility by the name in which accreditation is held and the accreditation
number;
test report identification.
Accredited facilities are encouraged to apply the NATA endorsement to reports for tests and related services
covered by their accreditation. In addition, the NATA endorsement may need to be applied due to customer
request, legislation, regulation or contract requirements.
Additional details relating to the appropriate forms of endorsement and the reproduction of endorsed reports
are provided in the relevant schedule of the NATA Rules.
The inclusion of certification body marks (ie. logos or emblems) on test and calibration reports is a
contravention of clause G.3.5.8 of JAS-ANZ Procedure No. 10 General Requirements for Bodies Operating
Assessment and Certification/Registration of Quality Systems.
Unendorsed reports
Where unendorsed reports are issued for testing covered by the scope of accreditation, the testing, including
the reports, must meet the accreditation requirements outlined in this document. Reports shall be signed by
an approved signatory or delegated signatory for the tests reported.
An accredited facility must issue unendorsed documents reporting results for work outside its scope of
accreditation. Such documents must not include the NATA emblem, reference to the accreditation or any
other reference to NATA. Refer to NATAs Rules for details of the circumstances under which unendorsed
reports must be issued.
Work on tests outside the scope of accreditation and the associated unendorsed reports, must avoid any
conflict with the proper interests of the customer or the general public and avoid bringing NATA into
disrepute.
Preliminary/on-site reports
Some customers require an immediate report of the results of non-destructive testing examinations.
Irrevocable decisions may be made on the basis of these on-site reports. Therefore, the on-site report shall
meet all requirements for recording and reporting. This includes the requirements of the relevant code or
standard and NATAs requirements.
If the client requires an on-site report from the NDT operator immediately on completion of a job, or at stages
during the job, the job shall be allocated to an NDT operator who holds, or has been delegated, signatory
approval for the relevant tests. If written information about test results is conveyed to a customer but it is not
in the form of a test report, it shall be signed by an approved signatory or delegated signatory.
The final report must make reference to any interim information (eg. site report) which was provided.
Asset inspection reports
Where NDT results are included as one component of an overall asset inspection report, the overall report
may only be endorsed if it contains an explicit identification of the components which are outside the facilitys
scope of accreditation.
5.10.3 Test reports
Reporting in circumstances of non-compliance with accreditation requirements
Where mandatory testing requirements, such as the requirement for operators to hold appropriate
qualifications, have not been met for a particular test within a facilitys scope of accreditation, the report must
include a statement which makes clear that NATAs requirements have not been met or that certain aspects
of the test method have not been followed. This applies regardless of whether or not the report is NATAendorsed. Deviations from NATAs requirements should only apply due to unavoidable circumstances.
June 2008
Page 22 of 41
The above type of non-compliance is different from the routine test restrictions/limitations (eg. access
limitations) which might apply to an individual job and which can be reported as test restrictions rather than
as test non-compliances.
Statements of Compliance
A compliance statement can only be made when the requirements of the test method and test specification
have been satisfied. Reports which include compliance statements shall indicate those sections or clauses of
the test specification to which the compliance statement relates.
5.10.5 Opinions and interpretations
NATAs policy is that written authority from NATA must be obtained before an interpretation or expression of
opinion is able to be included in a test document.
However, it is recognised that non-destructive testing reports typically contain interpretations and statements
of opinion. These interpretations and opinions are based on the test data obtained and are commensurate
with the qualifications, training and experience of the NDT personnel involved in the test. Discontinuity
identification in ultrasonic testing, reporting of a crack in surface methods testing, reporting to product
application code criteria, third party checking of NDT results and interpreting results to documented client
criteria are typical examples of such interpretations and opinions.
Predictive opinions such as crack propagation rates, residual life estimates etc shall not be included in test
documents.
Recommendations with regard to test intervals may not be included on test documents unless the facility has
sought and received written authority from the NATA. A submission to include test intervals on reports shall
include:
a)
b)
c)
d)
the training, qualifications and experience of non-destructive testing personnel involved;

the specific industry sector to which the test interval would apply;
any regulatory authority approvals;
the procedures which detail how the test interval would be derived.
Note: Appropriate qualifications would be in metallurgy, mechanical engineering and/or fracture mechanics together with
relevant experience.
5.10.7 Electronic transmission of results

Test reports may be electronically issued (including from a site other than the accredited facility) provided
that the reports have been appropriately approved. The adequacy of such arrangements will be reviewed at
assessment.
Before issuing electronically generated reports, the facility must institute its own internal controls over the
electronic generation, access, storage and back-up of documentation as well as program controls such as
password protection or the use of 'pdf' format etc. If the report is to be accessed from the facilitys website by
the customer there must be an appropriate control in place to ensure that the report can only be downloaded
in a protected format.
There must also be controls to ensure that any information normally included on letterhead paper is included
in the electronically transmitted version and appears in any hard copy printed by the recipient. Flexible
pagination to accommodate formatting changes when printed by the recipient may also be required.
Annex 3.1:
Radiographic testing technical requirements
Facilities may seek accreditation for only the exposure and processing of radiographs, or for only the
interpretation of radiographs that have been taken and processed by another facility.
Where a facility performs interpretation of radiographs taken and processed by another facility:
i)
ii)
The interpreter shall be provided with a copy of the job record and the exposure and processing
details;
The radiographic technique and the quality of the radiographs shall comply with the requirements of
the relevant standard;
June 2008
Page 23 of 41
iii)
iv)
v)
Adequate radiographic viewing equipment capable of viewing the maximum density allowed by the
relevant specification/industry standard and test method standards;
The report covering the interpretation shall identify the facility which produced the radiographs;
Radiographs shall remain the property of the facility responsible for taking and processing.
Technical records
In addition to the items listed in Section 3 under sub-clause 4.13.2.1, where standards do not specify the
recording and reporting requirements, records for each job shall provide information on at least the following:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
vii)
viii)
source details;
source-to-film distance;
screen details;
IQI details and sensitivity achieved;
film type;
film density achieved;
exposure details;
processing details.
Radiographs (film or digital) shall be retained for a minimum of three years. The method of storage should
facilitate easy retrieval of radiographs. Adequate storage facilities shall be provided for unexposed and
exposed film to prevent degradation.
Radiographic films remain the property of the facility as they are a primary test record. The testing service
may lend the original radiographs to the customer, provided that:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
the testing service has rights of access to, and recall of, the radiographs;
the customer agrees, in writing, to provide suitable storage facilities;
the loan is recorded on the test report issued to the customer or other suitable record;
acknowledgment of receipt of the radiographs and agreement to provide suitable storage facilities is
forwarded to the facility by the customer (eg. document transmittal form).
Where there are contractual arrangements that are not in accordance with the above requirements for
retention of radiographs, it is the responsibility of the facility to advise NATA and to seek approval of any
alternative arrangements.
Equipment
X-ray equipment and radioactive sources shall be suitable for the materials to be examined. They should
cover the expected thickness range and the shape, nature and location of items likely to be submitted for
examination.
Required accessories such as image quality indicators and intensifying screens shall be provided. Their
condition shall also be monitored and they shall be replaced when necessary. Reference density standards
or a densitometer shall be available for measurement of film density.
Procedures shall be followed which ensure satisfactory processing . As such, darkroom procedures are to be
documented and include specific details of processing variables (eg. strength and temperature of developer,
time of development and amount of chemicals to be added). Bath temperature checks shall be undertaken.
Facilities shall be available for viewing radiographs under optimum conditions of illumination. Viewing
facilities shall be located where testing personnel are free from interruptions.
Note: When measuring the brightness of film viewers, facilities should be careful to ensure that the correct parameter Luminance - is being measured. Not all facilities possess a luminance meter. Most NDT facilities possess an illuminance
meter, which measures lux. It is possible to use an illuminance meter to measure viewer brightness, provided that certain
conditions are met. Some facilities possess an illuminance meter which has a luminance measurement adaptor as an
accessory and this may be used to measure radiographic viewer brightness.
June 2008
Page 24 of 41
Equipment performance checks

Item of equipment
Maximum period between

successive checks
Automatic processor
Dependent on use
Certified reference density 5 years from calibration
strip
date, unless otherwise
specified
Densitometer
12 months
Manual processor
Viewer
Dependent on use
12 months
X-ray panel
Initial
Procedures and comments

Process test check strip and check density.
Shall be stored away from light and shall not be in
general use to avoid damage such as scratches
Using a certified reference density strip. Acceptance
criteria: 0.2 H &D units
Process test check strip and check density
Measure amount of light coming through a certified
reference density strip (density of 3 or above) with a
light meter. The luminance measurement shall be not
less than 30 cd/m2. (lux. = cd/m2 under ideal
conditions)
Statement of conformance of kV, mA readings from
manufacturer. Where damage has occurred or
inaccuracy is evident, rechecking is necessary.
Checking of film interpretation

The extent of check viewing required is dependent on the type of work being undertaken, but must be
sufficient to provide on-going evidence of a satisfactory radiographic viewing process.
As a guide, this assurance is unlikely to be achieved if the extent of check viewing is less than 2% for well
controlled, repetitive work whilst for non-routine testing the extent may require to be greater than 20%, the
percentage check viewed being dependent on the nature of the work.
Annex 3.2:
Ultrasonic testing technical requirements
Technical records
In addition to the items listed in Section 3 under Sub-clause 4.13.2.1, where standards do not specify the
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
viii)
scanning sensitivity;
evaluation sensitivity;
surface preparation;
scanning positions;
sizing method;
couplant;
instrument setting and performance check records.
Equipment
Ultrasonic equipment appropriate to each application shall be available.
The facility shall ensure that the range of probes, reference blocks (eg. carbon steel, austenitic steel,
aluminium), standards, etc held by the facility covers the scope of accreditation.

Item of equipment
Standardisation/reference
blocks
June 2008
Maximum period between Procedures and comments

successive checks
Prior to initial use
A statement of compliance to AS 2083 or other
applicable specification, supplied by the
manufacturer will be acceptable. For blocks being
manufactured in-house, compliance with the
relevant specification must be established and
documented. For all blocks, dimensions shall be
verified using appropriate measuring equipment.
Page 25 of 41
Item of equipment
Digital thickness meters
Ultrasonic units
overall system gain
horizontal linearity
vertical linearity
Probes
probe index, beam angle
and beam alignment
beam profile
resolution
dead zone

successive checks
The measuring equipment to be used will be
dependent on the accuracy specified.
2 years
Visual check on conditions.
Before use
Using a range of thicknesses (eg. AS 2083 block
No. 7).
12 months
Records to be kept of 12 monthly checks.
As per AS 2083 or internationally recognised
standards.
Prior to initial use and after As per AS 2083 or internationally recognised
overhaul
standards.
12 months (see note)
Recorded as per AS 2083 or documented
procedure. Manufacturer/service agents may
conduct these checks.
12 months (see note)
Recorded as per AS 2083 or documented
procedure. Manufacturer/service agents may
conduct these checks.
As per AS 2083 or internationally recognised
standards.
Before use/daily
Checks to be carried out on-site and records are not
required to be kept.
1 month
Where beam profile sizing methods are specified.
3 months
As required by relevant code or 2.5 wavelengths
where not specified.
Check new equipment and after any overhaul.
Not applicable
Area of interest shall be outside dead zone.
Note : For digital flaw detectors, the period between successive checks may be extended beyond these intervals if
there is demonstrated history of stable linearity performance for these units.
Annex 3.3:
Magnetic particle testing technical requirements
Technical records
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
surface condition of test specimen;

test media;
current source and strength;
method of magnetisation;
type of permanent record (if used);
method of surface preparation.

Item of equipment
AC electromagnet (yoke)
Maximum period
between successive
checks
6 months
DC electromagnet
Permanent magnet
6 months
1 month
1 month
June 2008

AS 1171, ASME V or BS 6072 requirements as
applicable. eg. Lifting power of at least 4.5 kg
(10 lb) at pole spacing between 75mm and 300mm
(AS 1171) The test mass shall be initially verified.
As for permanent magnets.
AS 1171, ASME V or BS 6072 requirements as
applicable. eg. Lifting power of at least 18 kg (40 lb)
at maximum pole spacing. The test mass shall be
initially verified.
Where pole spacing is less than or equal to 75 mm,
the magnet shall be capable of lifting not less than
0.24 kg per millimetre of pole spacing. (BS 6072).
Page 26 of 41
Item of equipment
Bench equipment
White light meter
Black light
Black light meter
Maximum period
between successive
checks
12 months
AS 1171 or ASME V or BS 6072 requirements as

applicable.
Intervals to be sufficient to May be checked in-house using a reference meter
demonstrate stability of the retained for this purpose only*.
light meter
Weekly for equipment in
10 W/m2 at a distance of 380 mm.
full time use, otherwise
intervals to be sufficient to 1 W/m2 = 0.1 mW/cm2
ensure achievement of
light output requirements
light meter
* requirements for illumination conditions are indicative in the sense that a minimum threshold only is set, however, the
influence of additional errors introduced by the use of transfer standards needs to be considered
Sensitivity
Surface coatings reduce the sensitivity of magnetic particle testing. In extreme cases, the reduction of
sensitivity may completely negate the effectiveness of the test. For this reason, magnetic particle testing over
a surface coating (other than correctly applied white contrast coating) is not covered by a facilitys scope of
accreditation, and a report must not be issued unless it specifies a test procedure which is specifically
excluded from the facilitys scope of accreditation (refer Section 5.4.2 above).
Annex 3.4:
Penetrant testing technical requirements
Technical records
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
testing media;
method of surface preparation;
contact time of penetrant;
development time;
emulsification time (where applicable).
Equipment
Penetrant materials used for an individual job must be from the same manufacturer and must be compatible.
Equipment performance checks: Penetrant testing equipment
Item of equipment
White light meter
Black light
Black light meter

successive checks
light meter.
Weekly for equipment in full 10 W/m2 at a distance of 380 mm
time use, otherwise
intervals to be sufficient to 1 W/m2 = 0.1 mW/cm2
ensure achievement of light
output requirements.
light meter.
* Requirements for illumination conditions are indicative in the sense that a minimum threshold only is set, however, the
influence of additional errors introduced by the use of transfer standards needs to be considered.
June 2008
Page 27 of 41
Annex 3.5:
Visual inspection technical requirements
The conditions which must be satisfied for accreditation of visual inspection are as follows:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
iv)
Visual inspection is offered as an adjunct to an overall NDT testing service and so the facility must
hold accreditation for NDT methods;
The inspection covers only metallic items;
The item(s) to be inspected must be able to be classified under class 6.91, 'Visual inspection of
materials, not including in-service inspection', or class 6.92 'Visual inspection of items in-service,
supplementary to NDT, not including structures or assemblies';
For in-service items (visual inspection under class 6.92) accreditation is only offered for inspections
performed in conjunction with other NDT - in-service visual inspection of items as a stand-alone
activity is offered only under NATAs Inspection Accreditation Program;
Inspection activity may include determination of the absence or presence of specified visible material
defects, however, inspections to determine the serviceability of an item based on aspects other than
the integrity of the materials (such as compliance with safety codes), is not covered under an NDT
accreditation. Inspecting to determine the overall 'fitness for purpose' for inspected items is offered
under NATAs Inspection Accreditation Program;
Visual inspection accreditation is offered for inspection of specific components only, therefore if an
inspected item is constructed from various components, the inspection must separately specify the
presence or absence of material defects for each of the individual components inspected (ie. specific
welds, rolled items, cast items etc).
There must be a written procedure for the visual inspection. The specific inspection technique(s) used
must be documented and acceptance/rejection criteria must be referenced if compliance statements
are to be made.
The accreditation criteria for the NATA Inspection Accreditation Program are based on ISO/IEC 17020
General criteria for the operation of various types of bodies performing inspection. Further information can be
obtained from the Manager, Inspection.
Technical records
recording requirements, records for each job shall provide information on at least the following:
i)
ii)
nature of the inspection;

conditions at time of inspection including lighting, access limitations (eg. component location,
component geometry) and surface condition.
Personnel
Visual examinations shall be performed by personnel who hold an appropriate qualification, together with
relevant experience, as follows:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
trade certificate in welding/boilermaking or relevant industrial field; or

certificate of technology in relevant area; or
a current AINDT certification, or equivalent, in one NDT method; or
welding inspection certificate recognised by the Welding Technology Institute of Australia (WTIA).
Test methods
Guidance for the conduct of visual inspection can be found in AS 3978 Non-destructive testing - Visual
inspection of metal products and components. Various ASTM standards and specific standards such as
MSS SP-55 can also provide assistance.
Equipment
All equipment used in visual testing shall be checked for serviceability before being placed in service.
Periodic checks for damage and wear shall also be undertaken. Records of these checks shall be
maintained.
June 2008
Page 28 of 41
The following equipment should be available. However, depending on the inspection to be undertaken some
equipment may not be necessary.
Torch/flashlight
Low-power magnifying equipment
Surface feature modelling equipment and materials eg. surface profile devices, cold setting resins
Straight edge
Rule or measuring tape
Protractor
Callipers (internal, external or vernier)
Depth, height or pit gauge
Reference samples or photographs
Surface comparators
Cleaning equipment
Mirror
Photographic equipment
Auxiliary light sources
Remote viewing equipment (Resolution shall be at least equivalent to that obtainable by direct visual
examination)
Lighting conditions during visual inspection must be in accordance with the requirements of AS 3978. An
appropriate light source providing an adequate intensity and direction of illumination shall be available for
poorly lit areas.
Equipment performance checks: Visual inspection equipment
Item of equipment
Pit gauge
Replicates
Steel tapes and rulers
Straight edges
Templates
Welding gauges
Annex 3.6:

successive checks
Initial
Check for significant errors before being placed in
service.
Before use/daily
Zero check.
Periodic checks
For damage and wear.
Initial
service.
Periodic checks
Initial
service.
Periodic checks
Initial
service.
Periodic checks
Initial
service.
Periodic checks
Initial
service.
Periodic checks
Eddy current testing technical requirements
Technical records
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
evaluation sensitivity settings (eg. frequency, dB, filters used, mixing);

surface condition;
scanning technique and (if applicable) scanning speed;
sensitivity used (eg. reference block identification, defect type/size etc).
June 2008
Page 29 of 41
Equipment
Eddy current testing equipment of the appropriate sensitivity and resolution for each application shall be
available.
The range of instruments, probes, reference blocks, standards etc held by the facility shall cover the scope
of accreditation.
When working to a particular standard the instrument setting and performance checking requirements of that
standard shall be met. If using a procedure other than a published standard, setting and checking shall be
carried out using reference materials appropriate to the discontinuity or feature sought. Records of all
checks shall be kept.
Reference standards shall have similar characteristics to the material under test. A log of all reference
standards, including verification of notches or defects, metal composition, heat treatment etc shall be kept.
Conductivity standards shall be accompanied by a certificate which verifies their conductivity value.
Equipment performance checks: Eddy current testing equipment
Item of equipment
Standardisation/reference
blocks
Conductivity Standards

successive checks
There are no Australian or International Standards
which specify blocks other than the blocks whose
details are described in AS 4544. These blocks are
recommended for use for the detection of fine
surface cracks. Other than these blocks, there is no
uniformity of size or shape of artifacts.
Yearly
Before use
Instruments
Initial
Before and during use
Yearly
June 2008
For blocks being manufactured in-house,

compliance with the relevant specification must be
established and documented. For all blocks,
dimensions including slots, notches or other
features shall be verified using appropriate
measuring equipment. The measuring equipment to
be used will be dependent on the accuracy
specified. Material type (using a recognised
classification system) to be recorded as well as heat
treatment (if applicable).
Visual check on condition.
Conductivity to be established where required for
compliance with Standards for conductivity testing.
Where there is a possibility that conductivity may
have changed due to environmental condition (eg.
elevated temperature).
Check equipment startup routine (if applicable).
Check that limits of all controls are as per
manufacturers instructions.
Check security and condition of all controls and
connections.
Check and record response using the
standardisation block. This can be used as a datum
for subsequent performance checks.
Check gain linearity (phase analysis instruments
only).
Standardize the equipment prior to use and check at
periodic intervals throughout the test. Battery
condition checks and sensitivity checks shall be
performed at intervals and at the completion of the
test.
As for initial, plus compare performance using the
same probe/standardisation standard and
instrument settings used for the initial performance
check.
Page 30 of 41
Item of equipment
Probes

successive checks
Before use
Visual inspection of condition of the contact area of
the sensing coil, leads and connectors.
Check that the probe response using the inspection
reference item satisfies the inspection procedure
requirements.
Section 4
Guidance on equipment calibration, instrument setting and
performance checking intervals in NDT
This section provides guidance on equipment calibration, instrument setting requirements and the
requirements for performance checks of equipment. As detailed in Section 3 under sub-clause 5.4.6, NDT
techniques are typically qualitative or semi-quantitative and therefore formal calibration in order to establish
traceability to the national measurement system is not generally applicable. However, performance checking
of NDT equipment is integral to many NDT methods.
Calibration an operation that, under specified conditions, in a first step, establishes a relation between the
quantity values with measurement uncertainties provided by measurement standards and corresponding
indications with associated measurement uncertainties and, in a second step, uses this information to
establish a relation for obtaining a measurement result from an indication (ISO/IEC Guide 99 (2007) 2.39).
'Check' is a measurement of at least one point in a range of a measuring instrument or system or material
against a known value to confirm that it has not deviated significantly from its original known value. It is also
an examination of the condition of an artefact to determine that it has not been adversely affected by
constant use.
In the case of NDT, checks typically involve either checks of equipment performance or verifying instrument
settings (which will often be job-specific). The normal periods between such checks for NDT equipment have
been given in Annexes 3.1 to 3.6 for each NDT method. It must be stressed that these periods are generally
considered to be the maxima appropriate in each case based on the assumption that:
the equipment is of good quality, of proven adequate stability and is properly housed and used;
the facility has both the equipment capability and staff expertise to perform the requisite in-house
checks.
Reduced intervals between checks are required when the equipment operates under conditions likely to
adversely affect test results. If there is evidence of physical damage or if there is any suspicion of damage,
the equipment must be rechecked immediately and thereafter at reduced intervals until it is shown that
stability has not been impaired.
Reduced intervals between checks may also be required in particular testing applications or with particular
equipment configurations.
Facilities are invited to develop their own programs that optimise the expense of checking against the
assurance of measuring equipment accuracy. This may lead to extensions of the intervals between complete
performance checking by external services.
NATA will consider submissions for the extension of checking intervals based on factors such as:
history of stability;
frequency of use;
accuracy required;
ability of staff to perform in-house checks; and
successful participation in competency testing programs.
In recognising that costs of checking performed by an external agency are often considerable, NATA
encourages facilities to take this process further by developing facility equipment assurance programs.
These programs move the emphasis from a dominant reliance on demonstration of equipment conformance
at the time of checking to a greater contribution from more frequent checks against measurement devices or
June 2008
Page 31 of 41
reference materials, as well as cross-checks against similar systems and the checking of particular critical
features.
Equipment checking programs should cover:
commissioning of new equipment (including initial checking and checks after installation);
operational checking (checking during use with reference standards or reference materials);
periodic checking (interim but more extensive checking);
scheduled maintenance by in-house or specialist contractors.
Section 5
Classes of test
Accreditation in the field of Non-destructive Testing is described by classes and sub-classes of test.
These classes and sub-classes are fixed descriptors, free text being used to qualify or amplify terms as
necessary. Where the scope of testing of a facility cannot be adequately described by existing descriptors,
the Accreditation Advisory Committee may from time to time establish new classes and/or sub-classes of
test.
Applications for accreditation may be made for one or more classes of test, or for one or more subclasses
within a class of test.
Classes of test are revised from time to time. For the most current version please contact a NATA office or
visit our website.
Accreditation for inspection activities is covered by NATAs inspection accreditation program and the criteria
for accreditation is based on ISO/IEC 17020 General criteria for the operation of various types of bodies
performing inspection.
Classes of test
6.01
Radiographic testing (film)

.01
Welded joints
.02
Castings
.03
Wrought products
.04
Components, composite products and assemblies
6.02
Radiographic testing (digital) using specified equipment types

.01
Welded joints
.02
Castings
.03
Wrought products
.04
Components, composite products and assemblies
6.03
Radiographic determination of wall thickness

.01
Wall thickness and profile radiography
.02
Corrosion pitting
6.31
Ultrasonic examination of ferritic steels and irons

.01
Rolled products
.02
Welded joints
.03
Castings
.04
Forgings
6.32
Ultrasonic examination of aluminium alloys

.01
Rolled products
.02
Welded joints
.03
Castings
.04
Forgings
.05
Extruded products
6.33
Ultrasonic examination of austenitic steels

.01
Rolled products
.02
Welded joints
June 2008
Page 32 of 41
.03
.04
Castings
Forgings
6.34
Ultrasonic examination of clad steels

.11
Welded joints in clad and overlaid steels
6.39
Ultrasonic examination of other specified metals
6.49
Ultrasonic examination of specified non-metals
6.51
Ultrasonic thickness testing

.01
Material thickness - spot or grid measurements only
.02
Material profiling including assessment and characterisation of material loss
6.52
Ultrasonic examination of bonded metals

.01
Machine bearings
.02
Welded hard facings
.03
Friction welded components
.99
Other specified components
6.56
Specialist ultrasonic testing

.01
Time of flight diffraction
.02
Multi-channel ultrasonic processing using specified equipment types
.03
Phased array using specified equipment types
.04
Guided wave using specified equipment types
.05
Internal rotary inspection system using specified equipment types
.99
Other
6.61
Magnetic particle testing

.01
Magnetic flow method AC magnetization
.02
Current flow method
.03
Coil method
.04
Magnetic flow method DC magnetization using specified in-house methods
6.71
Penetrant testing
.01
Water washable method
.02
Solvent removable method
.03
Post emulsifiable method
6.81
Electromagnetic testing
.11
Surface flaw detection using high frequency eddy current
.12
Coating thickness measurement
.13
Sorting of materials by conductivity
.21
Sub-surface flaw detection using low frequency eddy current
.41
Remote field tube testing
.51
Eddy current tube testing
.61
Alternating current field measurement
.62
Wire rope testing
.99
Other specified tests
6.86
Underwater testing using specified techniques
6.91
Visual inspection of materials, not including in-service inspection

.01
Rolled products
.02
Welded joints
.03
Castings
.04
Forgings
.99
Other specified products
6.92
Visual inspection of items in-service, supplementary to NDT, not including structures or assemblies
.01
Specified rolled products
.02
Specified welded joints
.03
Specified castings
.04
Specified forgings
.99
Other specified products
June 2008
Page 33 of 41
6.97
Leak testing using differential pressure box
6.98
Condition assessment performed for preliminary indication of in-service degradation

.01
Detection of material loss using magnetic flux leakage scanning
.02
Detection of material loss using low frequency eddy current scanning
.03
Detection of material loss using pulsed eddy current scanning
.06
Detection of material loss by pulsed radiography
.07
Detection of material loss by radiography using a low intensity source
.10
Detection of material degradation by assessment under stimulus using acoustic emission for
specified items
.20
Equipment condition monitoring fault detection by thermographic imaging
.30
Equipment condition monitoring fault detection by off-line vibration analysis
.80
Underwater condition assessment using specified indicative techniques
.99
6.99
Note regarding Class 6.92: Visual inspection which is either not supplementary to NDT or is the inspection of
structures and assemblies is able to be accredited by a separate Inspection accreditation.
Section 6
NDT Work site policy
6.0
NDT work sites
6.0.1 General
In non-destructive testing, the majority of public testing carried out is performed away from the accredited
facility. NATA has made specific provision to cater for facilities which operate in this manner. The categories
of recognised work sites are detailed in this section and the specific policies which apply to each are covered
in Sections 6.1 to 6.3.
6.0.2 Ad-hoc work
This policy applies to testing performed for all jobs or projects within the scope of accreditation of the NDT
facility other than ad-hoc work, sometimes known as 'jobbing work', which is defined as follows. Ad-hoc work
is a series of individual jobs, which may or may not be subject to a contract, where the work is performed on
a call-out basis from the accredited facilitys base site following separate work requests. Such work is not
considered to constitute a distinct work site and so does not fall under the requirements of this policy but is
considered to form part of the day-day work of the accredited base site.
6.0.3 Types of work sites
The following NDT work site decision-making chart summarises the process for determining the type of work
site.
There are three types of work sites which can be established by NDT facilities, as follows.
a)
b)
c)
NDT performed at a work site which is located away from an accredited base facility and where the
primary control over operations is provided locally at the site. Accreditation requirements for these
sites are detailed in Section 6.1 Requirements for accreditation independent work sites'
NDT performed on a job or project, at a specific location, where the primary control over operations is
provided by the accredited base facility and where the work does not constitute a major construction
project. Accreditation requirements for this testing are detailed in Section 6.2 'Requirements for
accreditation routine work sites'
NDT performed on a major construction project, where primary control over operations is provided by
the accredited base facility. Accreditation requirements for this testing are detailed in Section 6.3
'Requirements for accreditation major construction work sites'.
June 2008
Page 34 of 41
N D T w o rk site d ecisio n -m akin g ch art
Ne w w ork site
Is the re
loca l ope ra tiona l
control ? *
Ye s
Inde pe nde nt w ork

site (S e ction 6.1)
No
M a jor construction
w ork site (S e ction 6.3)
Ye s
Is the site a m a jor

construction site ? #
Applica tio n for

inde pe nde nt
a ccre dita tion
re quire d
No
Forw a rd NA TA W ork S ite
A dvice to NATA
(5 w orking da ys)
Is it
jobbing w ork controlle d
by the a ccre dite d
ba se fa cility?
Ye s
No
NATA surve illa nce
progra m
Forw a rd A pplication
for NA TA
A ccreditation form
Routine w ork site

(S e ction 6.2)
W ill the site ope ra te

for > 6 m onths?
No
No notifica tion to
NATA re qu ire d
Ye s
Forw a rd NA TA W ork S ite
A dvice to NATA
NATA surve illa nce

progra m
* Fac tors in determ ining prim ary c ontrol over operations are lis ted in S ec tion 6.1.1
# Cons truc tion projec t with total value > $50 M where m etal fabric ation is a m ains tream ac tivity .
June 2008
Page 35 of 41
6.0.4 Overseas projects

This policy is applicable to all locations where work is undertaken by a NATA accredited facility. Australianbased NATA accredited facilities operating fixed-term work sites (normally no longer than twelve months) on
projects overseas requiring NATA accreditation must notify NATA of these sites using the NATA Work Site
Advice form. All costs associated with any overseas visit will be chargeable to the facility.
For long-term or permanent overseas facilities the following will apply:
For facilities which are permanently located in countries in which an accreditation scheme operating
an NDT program under a MRA with NATA or in which the accreditation body is a member of an
International or Regional accreditation body, (eg. ILAC or APLAC) accreditation with that countrys
accreditation body is recommended.
For other countries, NATA is prepared to offer site-specific accreditation. All accreditation costs will
be borne by the applicant.
6.1
Requirements for accreditation independent work sites
6.1.1 Scope
The provisions of this section apply where NDT accreditation coverage is sought for a worksite where the
primary control over operations is provided locally. Such worksites are classified as independent work sites
and are characterised by the incorporation of a majority of the following operational arrangements:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
vii)
viii)
ix)
Locally available next-level-up technical support for hands-on testing staff;

Local storage of records;
Local review and acceptance of incoming work requests;
Local work facilities for staff (eg. dedicated site hut);
Local testing facilities (ie. suitable for performing testing other than field testing, eg. radiography bay);
Local administration functions (eg. maintaining personnel records, timekeeping, invoicing etc);
Local responsibility for issuing test reports;
Locally available approved signatories and/or delegated signatories regularly operating at the site.
Locally based technician(s) who, on an on-going basis, spend the majority of their working hours at
the work site.
Notwithstanding the above, a work site which provides a co-ordination function for more than one project or
location, such as handling of incoming work requests for multiple clients and/or work locations would
normally qualify and the facility as an independent work site.
Likewise for a work site where one or more NDT operators are working full time and staffing arrangements
are such that there is no provision for routine interaction between the site staff and staff normally based at
the accredited base facility (eg. where staff from the accredited base provide a relieving shift only for work
intervals when the regular work site staff are absent).
6.1.2 Notification
An independent work site must seek independent accreditation. An application for NATA accreditation will be
required for any work site operation functioning as an independent facility.
NATA reserves the right to require a facility to formally withdraw any endorsed reports which are issued by
an independent work site that has not achieved accreditation and that the customer be advised that the
testing is not covered by the scope of accreditation.
6.2
Requirements for accreditation routine work sites
6.2.1 Scope
The provisions of this section apply to NDT performed within the scope of accreditation of a currently
accredited facility at a specific work site located away from the accredited base site and which does not meet
the criteria for either an independent work site or a major construction work site. Refer also to Section 6.0.3
for details of the exclusion covering ad-hoc testing.
The criteria for major construction sites are listed in Section 6.3. Any site meeting the criteria for a major
construction work site cannot be classified as a routine work site.
June 2008
Page 36 of 41
The distinction between a routine work site and an independent work site is based on the criteria listed in
Section 6.1.1 above. Any site meeting the criteria for an independent work site cannot be classified as a
routine work site.
6.2.2 Work site control
Where the primary control over the work site operations (determined according to the criteria for evaluating
the independence of a work site in Section 6.1.1) is provided locally, then the site cannot be classified as a
routine work site and the provisions of Section 6.1.1 will apply.
Where it can be demonstrated according to the criteria in Section 6.1.1 that the primary control over the
worksite operations is provided by the accredited base facility, then the effectiveness of the following specific
management and technical aspects must be ensured for all routine work sites:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
vii)
viii)
ix)
x)
xi)
xii)
Management system which incorporates requirements applicable to work site activity;

Consistency between any site-specific documents and the corporate system requirements;
Clear authorities and responsibilities for the work site staff including reporting structure (and defined
organisational relationships where multiple entities are involved);
Appropriate processes for review and acceptance of incoming work;
Provision for suitable on-site and off-site technical support as required;
Effective supervision by the accredited base facility of site testing activities - if an on-site supervisor is
appointed then the appointment should be a person normally located at the accredited base facility
when not deployed to work sites;
Inclusion of the work site within the companys program for site technical control evaluations;
Effective application of the NDT competency audit program for on-site personnel;
Effective implementation of the equipment management system at the work site performance
checking, servicing, storage, control etc;
Effective monitoring of site personnel requirements including training, visual acuity, qualifications
Appropriate storage of testing records;
Inclusion of the work site within the companys management system audit program and/or
management review process to the extent appropriate for the scale of the site operation.
It should be noted that it is possible for a routine work site to evolve into an independent work site over time.
In such instances, maintenance of technical control throughout the process of evolution is a key issue. It may
be necessary for the existing technical control systems to overlap for a time with the systems designed to
enable the site to operate independently. The site may not operate independently of the base facility in
regard to NATA accreditation until the process of accreditation for the independent work site is completed
(refer Section 6.1).
6.2.3 Notification
While no specific notification to NATA is required for routine work sites extending less than 6 months, a
completed NATA Work Site Advice form (available to download from the Publications - Field Update section
of NATAs website www.nata.asn.au) is to be submitted at the commencement of any routine work site which
is expected to extend beyond 6 months or as soon as it becomes apparent that a work site will extend
beyond 6 months.
If notification requirements are not met, NATA reserves the right to require that any reports issued be
withdrawn, and the customer advised that the testing is not covered by the facilitys scope of accreditation.
Completion of the NATA Work Site Advice form allows the facility to indicate that appropriate management
and technical controls are in place between the base facility and its satellite operation(s).
Following review of the information provided, NATA will provide acknowledgment to the facility.
If surveillance outside the normal assessment program is necessary to address any issue arising from the
information provided on the NATA Work Site Advice form, NATA reserves the right to charge for this
surveillance. Charges will be levied at the hourly rate applicable at the time of notification.
6.2.4 NATA assessment program
In order to construct a meaningful assessment program, NATA needs to maintain awareness of work sites
relating to any part of the scope of an accredited facilitys operations. Therefore, information will be
June 2008
Page 37 of 41
periodically sought by NATA in regard to current on-going testing locations and based on this information, a
site visit program may be established, depending on the complexity of the work site activities. The site visit
program will normally be implemented in conjunction with NATAs scheduled reassessment activity. If this
reassessment program includes one or more visits to an offshore installation in Australian waters, transport
costs for such visits are to be borne by the facility and it is recommended that contractual provision be made
by the facility with offshore customers for such expenses.
Apart from the scheduled reassessment program, NATA reserves the right to conduct surveillance of any
work site which has extended beyond six months. If a decision is made to conduct such surveillance, then
fees will be charged at the applicable hourly rate, with travelling and accommodation etc expenses charged
at cost.
If, at assessment, it becomes evident that there is a lack of control between the base facility and its site(s)
such that NATA deems additional site assessment is required, the facility will be liable for all costs
associated with the additional assessment activity. Any sites which are found to be operating independently
will be required to meet the provisions listed in Section 6.1.
6.3
Requirements for accreditation major construction work sites
6.3.1 Scope
The provisions of this section apply to NDT performed on a major construction project where the site NDT is
under the control of a currently accredited base facility. A major construction work site is one in which:
i)
ii)
iii)
metal fabrication is a mainstream activity for the construction project;

the value of the construction performed by the NDT companys client is greater than $50M; and
the NDT company is the principal NDT contractor engaged by their client for the particular project.
This Section does not apply to construction worksites where the NDT personnel involved travel to and from
the worksite on a daily or substantially daily basis. The requirements of Section 6.2 Routine Work Sites
apply to such sites.
The distinction between a major construction work site and an independent work site is based on the criteria
listed in Section 6.1 above. Any site meeting the criteria for an independent work site cannot be classified as
a major construction work site.
6.3.2 Tendering for major construction projects
It is recognised that the costs incurred by NDT facilities in NATA assessment visits, particularly to some sites
may be high and involve the cooperation of the asset owner and the construction contractor. A means by
which these may be accommodated is by making allowance for on-site NATA audit visits during the
tendering process for construction work and by bringing this to the attention of customers at this time.
Stating the NATA assessment obligations up-front to the customer of an NDT facility ensures that the
customer is made aware of the possibility of additional costs pertaining to assessments. (Refer to Section
6.3.6).
6.3.3 Acceptance of tender requirements for NDT facilities
To enable NATA to meet the above audit obligations, an NDT organisation which has been awarded a
contract for testing on major construction is required to advise the NATA, using the NATA Work Site Advice
form, within five working days of being notified of acceptance of tender.
Failure to comply with these notification requirements will mean that timely assessment of the project by
NATA may not be achieved and therefore the testing conducted at such work sites will not be recognised by
NATA. Endorsed reports for testing associated with such sites are not permitted to be issued without first
notifying NATA in the manner prescribed above.
Notification of testing on a major construction project to NATA is a requirement which is additional to the
requirements for accreditation of the base facility (ie. testing on a major construction work site is not
automatically covered by the base facilitys scope of accreditation).
If notification requirements are not met, NATA reserves the right to require that any reports for work covered
by the scope of accreditation be withdrawn and that the customer be advised that the testing is not covered
by the facilitys scope of accreditation.
June 2008
Page 38 of 41
6.3.4 Work site control

Where the primary control over the work site operations (determined according to the criteria for evaluating
the independence of a work site in Section 6.1.1) is provided locally then the site cannot be classified as a
major construction work site and the provisions of Section 6.1 will apply.
Where it can be demonstrated according to the criteria in Section 6.1.1 that the primary control over the
worksite is provided by the accredited base facility, then the effectiveness of the following specific
management and technical aspects must be ensured for a major construction work site:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
vii)
viii)
ix)
x)
xi)
xii)
Management system which incorporates requirements applicable to work site activity;

Consistency between any site-specific documents and the corporate system requirements;
Clear authorities and responsibilities for the work site staff including reporting structure (and defined
organisational relationships where multiple entities are involved);
Appropriate processes for review and acceptance of incoming work;
Provision for suitable on-site and off-site technical support as required;
Effective supervision by the accredited base facility of site testing activities - if an on-site supervisor is
appointed then the appointment should be a person normally located at the accredited base facility
when not deployed to work sites;
Inclusion of the work site within the companys program for site technical control evaluations;
Effective application of the NDT competency audit program for on-site personnel;
Effective implementation of the equipment management system at the work site performance
checking, servicing, storage, control etc;
Effective monitoring of site personnel requirements including training, visual acuity, qualifications
Appropriate storage of testing records;
Inclusion of the work site within the companys management system audit program and/or
management review process to the extent appropriate for the scale of the site operation.
It is possible for a major construction work site to evolve into an independent work site. In such instances,
maintenance of technical control throughout the process of evolution is a key issue. It may be necessary for
existing technical control systems to overlap for a time with the systems designed to enable the site to
operate independently. The site may not operate independently of the base facility in regard to NATA
accreditation until the process of accreditation for the independent work site is completed (refer Section 6.1).
6.3.5 Notification
For each project, notification involves submission to NATA of a NATA Work Site Advice form (available to
download from the Publications - Field Update section of the NATAs website, www.nata.asn.au).
Completion of the NATA Work Site Advice form allows the facility to indicate that appropriate management
and technical controls are in place between the base facility and its satellite operation(s).
Following review of the information provided, NATA will provide acknowledgment to the facility and advise of
surveillance arrangements.
Endorsed reports are not permitted to be issued covering testing performed prior to the date of submission of
the above notification form (and NATA will require any reports issued inadvertently under such
circumstances to be withdrawn).
Facilities are encouraged to develop their systems and procedures well in advance of undertaking work for
which this policy would apply.
Section 6.2.2 provides specific advice on the management and technical controls which must be in place
before submitting a NATA Work Site Advice form.
6.3.6 NATA assessment program
Following receipt of the Work Site Advice form, NATA will evaluate the extent to which similar projects
involving the NDT facility have recently been assessed, together with the results of these assessments.
Based on this information, NATA may determine that an on-site surveillance visit is warranted for the project,
although an off-site assessment of aspects such as staff qualifications and test procedures may be
considered adequate. Before committing to any on-site assessment, NATA will also seek the advice of the
asset owner in regard to matters such as the third party technical control measures already in place for the
project. After consideration of all information available, NATA will advise the NDT facility of any surveillance
June 2008
Page 39 of 41
requirements. If an on-site visit is to be conducted it will be arranged through the NDT facility unless there
are specific difficulties in obtaining site access.
It is intended that surveillance be undertaken as early as practicable in the course of each project.
Fees will be charged at the published hourly rate, with travelling and accommodation etc expenses charged
at cost. Facilities are encouraged to build surveillance expenses into their pricing for such contracts.
Facilities should be aware that an assessment may not be possible where the testing will be of a duration
less than four weeks. This does not affect the obligation of the facility to advise NATA upon notification of
acceptance of tender (refer to Notification above).
If, during any surveillance, it becomes evident that there is a lack of control between the facility and its site(s)
such that NATA deems additional site assessment is required, the facility will be liable for all costs
associated with the additional assessment activity.
Section 7
References
Reference is made in the body of this document to the following publications.
Standards
ANSI/ASNT
ASNT Standard for Qualification and CP-189 Certification of Nondestructive Testing

Personnel
AS 1171
Non-destructive testing - Magnetic particle testing of ferromagnetic products, components

and structures
AS 2062
Non-destructive testing - Penetrant testing of products and components
AS 2083
Calibration blocks and their methods of use in ultrasonic testing
AS 2207
Non-destructive testing - Ultrasonic testing of fusion welded joints in carbon and low alloy
steel
AS 2243
Safety in laboratories
AS 2452
Non-destructive testing - Determination of thickness - Part 3 Use of ultrasonic testing
AS 3669
Non-destructive testing - Qualification and approval of personnel - Aerospace
AS 3978
Non-destructive testing - Visual inspection of metal products and components
AS 3998
Non-destructive testing - Qualification and certification of personnel
AS 4544
Non-destructive testing Eddy current testing for the detection of surface flaws
Ferromagnetic and non-ferromagnetic metallic products
AS 4635
Non-destructive testing Qualification of personnel for limited applications of nondestructive testing
ASME V
ASME Boiler & pressure vessel code - Nondestructive examination
BS 6072
Method for magnetic particle flaw detection
ISO 9000
Quality management systems Fundamentals and vocabulary
ISO 9001
Quality management systems - Requirements
ISO 9712
Non-destructive testing - Qualification and certification of personnel
ISO 20807
Non-destructive testing Qualification of personnel for limited applications of nondestructive testing
ISO/IEC 17020 General criteria for the operation of various types of bodies performing inspection
ISO/IEC 17025 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories
MSS SP-55
June 2008
Quality standard for steel castings for valves, flanges and fittings and other piping
components Visual method
Page 40 of 41
Other references
ASNT Recommended Practice, No. SNT-TC-1A
Guidance documents covering the implementation of specific accreditation requirements are also available
from the ILAC (www.ilac.org) and APLAC (www.ianz.govt.nz/aplac) websites.
NATA Policy Circular 12 NATA Requirements for the Performance of Calibrations In-house
NATA Technical Circular 5 Test Specimen Audit Policy Non-destructive Testing
NATA Rules
June 2008
Page 41 of 41

NDTFADjune 08

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

NDTFADjune 08

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ISO/IEC 17025 Field Application Document

Supplementary requirements for accreditation

Non-destructive Testing Field Application Document Supplementary requirements for accreditation

Supplementary requirements for accreditation

Radiographic testing technical requirements

Guidance on equipment calibration, instrument setting and

NDT work site policy

About NATA and Accreditation

Non-destructive Testing Field Application Document Supplementary requirements for accreditation

Measurement Science and Technology

Terminology and presentation

Accreditation Advisory Committee

Non-destructive Testing Field Application Document Supplementary requirements for accreditation

International Organization for Standardization

Fees for services

Non-destructive Testing Field Application Document Supplementary requirements for accreditation

Application for accreditation

The role of the authorised representative

Non-destructive Testing Field Application Document Supplementary requirements for accreditation

The authorised representative is required to notify NATA within 14 days if:

the name or ownership of the facility changes;

Non-destructive Testing Field Application Document Supplementary requirements for accreditation

Variations to scope of accreditation

Non-destructive Testing Field Application Document Supplementary requirements for accreditation

Proficiency testing or competency audits

prior to gaining accreditation with NATA;

Non-destructive Testing Field Application Document Supplementary requirements for accreditation

Non-compliance with accreditation requirements

Provision of information on scope of accreditation and approved signatories

Non-destructive Testing Field Application Document Supplementary requirements for accreditation

This information may be used to:

administer and manage your accreditation;

Non-destructive Testing Field Application Document Supplementary requirements for accreditation

Subcontracting of tests and calibration

Non-destructive Testing Field Application Document Supplementary requirements for accreditation

any repairs undertaken and areas retested;

Non-destructive Testing Field Application Document Supplementary requirements for accreditation

is in a position to rectify any errors or omissions in the technique(s) being used;

Non-destructive Testing Field Application Document Supplementary requirements for accreditation

the range of non-destructive testing equipment held by the facility;

Non-destructive Testing Field Application Document Supplementary requirements for accreditation

records as per list under Personnel Records;

copies of qualification/certification certificates and identification cards;

Non-destructive Testing Field Application Document Supplementary requirements for accreditation

current visual acuity;

Test and calibration methods and method validation (NDT Methods)

Non-destructive Testing Field Application Document Supplementary requirements for accreditation

Non-destructive Testing Field Application Document Supplementary requirements for accreditation

Assuring the quality of test and calibration results

NDT competency audits for testing personnel

Non-destructive Testing Field Application Document Supplementary requirements for accreditation

Routine technical control evaluations

Non-destructive Testing Field Application Document Supplementary requirements for accreditation

Has the work been allocated to an appropriate NDT

Non-destructive Testing Field Application Document Supplementary requirements for accreditation

Aspect to be evaluated on-site

How long did it take to perform the test?

Reporting the results

Identification of the test item;

5.10.2 Test reports

Non-destructive Testing Field Application Document Supplementary requirements for accreditation

Non-destructive Testing Field Application Document Supplementary requirements for accreditation

the training, qualifications and experience of non-destructive testing personnel involved;