Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s10912-013-9226-8
Abstract This essay looks to the omission of aging queer bodies from new medical
technologies of sex. We extend the Foucauldian space of the clinic to the mediascape, a
space not only of representations but where the imagination is conditioned and different
worlds dreamed into being. We specifically examine the relationship between aging queers
and the marketing of technologies of sexual function. We highlight the ways queers are
excluded from the spaces of the clinic, specifically the heternormative sexual scripts that
organize biomedical care. Finally, using recent zombie theory, we gesture toward both the
constraints and possibilities of queer inclusion within the discourses and practices that aim to
reanimate sexual function. We suggest that zombies usefully frame extant articulations of
aging queers with sex and the dangerous lure of medical treatments that promise revitalized,
but normative, sexual function at the cost of other, perhaps queerer intimacies.
Keywords Aging . Human sexuality . LGBTQ health . Zombie theory
In Western cultures, aging bodies are missing bodies, subject to stigma and forms of social
exclusion (Casper and Moore 2009). Yet the invisibility of aging bodies is rapidly changing, as
diverse biopolitical actorsfrom politicians to social activists and most especially medical
enterprisestake a focused interest in the economic power an increasingly aging population
wields. A key site for such interest is in those practices and organs normatively associated with
life, with reproduction and sex. Treatments for an array of sexual disorders have become more
available and visible; they have also generated new medical treatment subfields and enormous
profits for pharmaceutical companies. Older sexual bodies are big business.i
For older people, sexual dysfunction treatments promise to reanimate their bodies and
lives. This reanimation calls forth the uncanny life of the zombie. Zombie theory, which cuts
across disciplines like computer science, philosophy, and cultural studies, usefully frames
S. McGlotten (*) : L. J. Moore
Purchase College, SUNY, Purchase, NY, USA
e-mail: Shaka.McGlotten@purchase.edu
L. J. Moore
e-mail: lisa-jean.moore@purchase.edu
262
the limits of consciousness and embodiment, limits acutely experienced by older people and
reproduced in images of them as doddering, shambling shadows of their former selves.
Treatments for sexual dysfunction promise a vital expansion of intimacies,
supporting their spontaneous expression and buttressing their durable forms. With
these drugs and treatments, older people can have sex whenever they want; they
can come back to life. But how do biomedical fixes specifically address the needs of
aging queer bodies? Aging LGBT populations face challenges distinct from their
straight counterpartsthey tend to suffer from higher rates of chronic illnesses,
disabilities, and mental illness (Fredriksen-Goldsen et al. 2011). In addition, trans
persons must navigate the social and economic costs of hormone therapy and surgery.
Gay men continue to suffer the highest rate of infection of HIV. Lesbian womens
specific sexual health needs go under-examined because their sexual health is almost
exclusively linked to reproduction. These health issues are tied to and exacerbated by
isolation, stigma, overt discrimination and the dearth of culturally competent service
providers equipped to meet their specific needs.
Our essay looks to the omission of aging queer bodies from new medical technologies of
sex. We extend the Foucauldian space of the clinic to the mediascape (Appadurai 1991), a
space not only of representations but also where the imagination is conditioned and different
worlds dreamed into being. In the mediascape, multi-million dollar advertising campaigns
focusing largely on erectile dysfunction, for example, exclude aging gay men. Ads addressing the specific needs of women, including vaginal dryness, are almost entirely absent.
Here we speculate about the relationship between aging queers and the marketing of
technologies of sexual function. We highlight the ways queers are excluded from the spaces
of the clinic, specifically the heternormative sexual scripts that organize biomedical care.
Finally, using recent zombie theory, we gesture toward both the constraints and possibilities
of queer inclusion within the discourses and practices that aim to reanimate sexual function.
We suggest that zombies usefully frame extant articulations of aging queers with sex and the
dangerous lure of medical treatments that promise revitalized, but normative, sexual function
at the cost of other, perhaps queerer intimacies.
263
dominant configurations of sex and sexual identity. Old bodies cant reproduce, and they
cant always have sex in ways that are recognized as sex.
Although our culture celebrates youthfulness, equating it with sexual desirability, many
older people remain sexually active, challenging assumptions that sex is the purview of the
young. In a 2007 study, more than half of those 6574 and a quarter of those 7585 reported
sexual activity (Lindau et al. 2007). Still, many older people report sexual dysfunction, and
while they often find it difficult to speak about sex with their physicians, they nonetheless
draw on a panoply of treatments (Lindau et al. 2007). Unsurprisingly, older gays and
lesbians also continue to have sex. More than half of aging LGBT people have been sexually
active in the last year (Fredriksen-Goldsen et al. 2011).
264
265
light flashes on. Someone is awaiting his arrival and looking forward the benefits of the blue
pill he has taken on his way home. But we never see that someone. That someone could be a
man.
While ED ads abound, we were unable to find televisual ads specifically addressing
vaginal dryness treatments. Post-menopausal women suffering from sexual dysfunction are
difficult to find within the mediascape. While there are vaginal estrogens available for
treatment of vaginal atrophy and dryness, we are not aware of any popular media representations of Estring or Vagifem, two of the treatments. There are no readily available video
clips from Superbowl commercials or klatches on The View. Instead, the use of testimonials
on websites and online forums coalesce into a sly marketers dream of user ratings deployed
for intimate persuasion. One product, Replens, is available over the counter and trickles into
womens consciousness through the more concealed networks of feminine communication.
These real testimonials are accompanied by images of modelsattractive white women in
their late 40s50s who recline in self-satisfied poses with the tag line: Discover long-lasting
relief of vaginal dryness with Replens (http://www.replens.com/Main/Default.aspx).
Clearly part of the heterosexual script of sexual satisfaction, many women specifically
signal their male partners as also appreciating the newly moistened vagina in online
testimonials.
Love your products!! It literally made my marriage better. HAD severe problem with
vaginal dryness. Thank you for Replens.
I love your products and tell all my female friends how much I have been helped by
using these products. I encourage my friends to not hesitate to buy your products in the
event they ever experience the need. I wish I had known about Replens years ago!
Using your products has greatly helped my husband and I.
Thank you.
Fascinatingly, this limited focus is exclusively about the vagina literally dwarfing the
clitoris as integral to sexual pleasure. Clitoral aging is invisible in the popular mediascapes
of aging sexual bodies. Vaginas are understood as receptacles and keeping them moist is a
phallic prerogative that undergirds lifelong heteronormative performances. The absence of
significant images of aging womens sexual health speaks, we believe, both to the ways that
ED is privileged in a culture that values mens over womens pleasure and health, as well as
to the simple fact that big pharma has not yet effectively monetized this particular dysfunction (especially when lube does so well). In the few materials we did find, industry infomercials, the women describing their experiences and treatments are explicitly identified
as heterosexual. Aging lesbians are, however, having sex, penetrative and otherwise, as well
as no doubt being treated for vaginal atrophy. However, aging lesbians are largely invisible
in the medical gaze of advertising. And they do not fare much better in a more paradigmatic
site of the clinic, the doctors office.
266
care outside the LGBT community (Fredriksen-Goldsen et al. 2011). In the doctors office,
what does an older queer adult find? Those with economic, social, and cultural capital find a
service provider there to answer questions and provide care. But how equipped are doctors
with the cultural competencies necessary to address aging queer populations? Given the
heteronormative character of American social institutions, doctors often assume their patients are straight, unless they self-disclose. But for those without such forms of capital,
especially racial minorities for whom relationships with doctors and healthcare systems are
particularly fraught, disclosure may be especially difficult. Yet absent this information,
doctors may miss particular risk factors or caregiving options.
Then theres sexual activity. Although many aging queer adults have sex, do they discuss
the sex they have with their doctors? As we outline above, LGBT populations face health
disparities that might shape sexual dysfunction diagnoses and treatments. If queer folks
dont disclose to their doctors, however, and if doctors presume their elderly patients are
straight (just as many of the treatments options outlined above do), then how well will their
needs be met? How does sexual dysfunction articulate with the particular contours of aging
queer socialitywith loneliness and isolation, with risk factors related to HIV transmission,
or incidences of breast and ovarian cancer? How equipped are doctors to address the specific
structures of sexual opportunity gay men possess, or to extended chosen families of lesbians,
or of the legal or insurance challenges transgender people face? We cannot answer all of
these questions here. What we wish to emphasize are the ways aging queer bodies are
missing within both the distributed clinic in the mediated public sphere and the ways the
burden of disclosing their sexual identity falls largely on them within the space of the
doctors office, a space that is rarely welcoming to queer differences.
267
promises to reanimate those organs and activities that mass culture and medical discourses
alike would have us believe are most central to our being. Treating that which makes us
legible as living beings further normalizes us and raises the probability of more biomedical
intervention. Put differently, if queers are to be seen and treated for sexual dysfunction, they
must capitulate to a pharma fix that is engineered for different users. In becoming medicalized, these queers through their penises and vaginas are able to be useful again, but only in
the standard limited heteronormative ways of fashioning an active sex life, that is, one in
which hard cocks go into wet vaginas.
The zombie metaphor is powerfully ambivalent. On the one hand, it evokes the ways that
medical treatments of all aging bodies might produce mindless rutting automatons: ever
ready, ageless hard penises fucking pink, wet, tight pussiesconsuming drugs and other
bodies with disregard for less dominant, and potentially dominating, forms of intimacy. On
the other hand, zombie theory also suggests some of the extant and emergent potential of
queer socialities (McGlotten 2011). Queers are already like zombies: our desires are
organized around bad objects, we spread by contagion (imagined or real), and we form an
array of improper intimacies (from anonymous sex among men, to the complex affective
entanglements of some lesbian communities). We are also, like zombies, abjected in and
through our desires and vulnerable embodiments. Sometimes this abjection is the result of
homophobic violence, but other times, we choose to embrace our difference and its
destructive potential (Dean 2009; Edelman 2004).
Queers are already the living deadwe do not reproduce by genital means but nonetheless shape social life, even if through the fear of a menacing homosexual horde. (The fear of
a queer planet looks a lot like the fear of a zombie planet.) Aging queers acutely conjure the
death-in life of queerness. What liveliness they once possessed, a sense of vital difference
organized in and through their deviant sex, has dissipated and, according to normative
medical models, they can only aspire to but never achieve the reanimation medical fixes for
sexual dysfunction promise their straight counterparts. It seems to us that all old sex
becomes queer sex.
But zombies and aging queers also provide theoretical traction for rethinking individual
agency and collective socialities. After all, not having a coherent self might not be such a bad
thing; and checking out of mundane desires for success or skinniness or youth represents a
sort of freedom. Zombies, like some of our forgetful elders, are obligated to nothing other
than their own immediate needs, like hunger.
Older queers have contributed to a vast repertoire of forms of belonging and collectivity.
On a collective level, aging queers also represent an as yet largely inchoate force. Whether or
not they answer the reanimating call of the new medical technologies of sex, they invite us to
consider the powerful capacities of a queerness not yoked to normative demands to
reproduce, or to get hard, or to stay wet. They remind us that inventing intimacies is part
of their living legacy.
Note
i.
As life expectancies change over time and age cohort ranks swell due to variable birth
rates, the notion of an older body cannot be firmly fixed to a chronological age.
Furthermore, different cultural groups conceived of as cohesive clusters such as gay
men, lesbians, or understood as intersectional groups such as black gay men, or Latina
lesbians, have different aggregate life expectancies and shared cultural norms about what
it means to be older. So whereas someone might be considered older at the age of 50,
268
other intra-group evaluations might see older as over 65. We primarily mean to refer to
older sexual bodies as those who are determined to be open for diagnosis and medical
interventiontypically over 55 years of age.
Acknowledgements Thanks to Mary Kosut, Matthew Immergut, Lara Rodriguez, Monica Casper, and
Paisley Currah for their helpful comments.
References
Appadurai, Arjun. 1991. Global Ethnoscapes: Notes and Queries for a Transnational Anthropology. In
Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present, edited by Richard G. Fox, 191210. Santa Fe: School
of American Research Press.
Boluk, Stephanie and Wylie Lenz, editors. 2011. Generation Zombie: Essays on the Living Dead in Modern
Culture. Jefferson, NC: McFarland Press.
Braun, Virginia. 2010. Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery: A Critical Review of Current Knowledge and
Contemporary Debates. Journal of Womens Health 19: 13931407.
Casper, Monica J. and Lisa Jean Moore. 2009. Missing Bodies: The Politics of Visibility. New York: New York
University Press.
Dean, Tim. 2009. Unlimited Intimacy: Reflections on the Subculture of Barebacking. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Deleuze, Gilles and Felix Gauttari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by
Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Edelman, Lee. 2004. No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham: Duke University Press.
Fredriksen-Goldsen, Karen I., Hyun-Jun Kim, Charles Emlet, Anna Muraco, Elena A. Erosheva, Charles P. HoyEllis, Jayn Godlsen, Heidi Petry. 2011. The Aging and Health Report: Disparities and Resilience among
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Older Adults. Seattle: Institute for Multigenerational Health.
Joyce, Kelly and Meika Loe. 2010. Technogenarians: Studying Health and Illness Through an Aging, Science,
and Technology Lens. Walden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Katz, Stephen. 2011. Hold On!: Falling, Embodiment and the Materiality of Old Age. In Corpus: An
Interdisciplinary Reader on Bodies and Knowledge, 187206. New York: Palgrave.
Lauro, Sarah Juliet and Karen Embry. 2008. The Zombie Manifesto: The Nonhuman Condition in the Era of
Advanced Capitalism. boundary 2 35: 85108.
Lindau, Stacy Tessler, L. Philip Schumm, Edward O. Laumann, Wendy Levinson, Colm A. OMuircheartaigh,
and Linda J. Waite. 2007. A Study of Sexuality and Health Among Older Adults in the United States.
New England Journal of Medicine 357: 762774.
Loe, Meika. 2004. The Rise of Viagra: How The Little Blue Pill Changed Sex in America. New York: New
York University Press.
Mbembe, Achille. 2003. Necropolitics. Translated by Libby Meintjes. Public Culture 15:1140.
McGlotten, Shaka. 2011. Dead and Live Life: Zombies, Queers, and Online Sociality. In Generation
Zombie: Essays on the Living Dead in Modern Culture, edited by Stephanie Boluk and Wylie Lenz,
182193. Jefferson, NC: McFarland Press.