Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/ces
Abstract
Computational uid dynamics (CFD) simulations of dilute gassolid ow through a curved 90 duct bend were performed. Non-uniform
sized glass spheres with a mean diameter of 77 m were used as the dispersed phase. The curved bend is square-sectioned (150 mm 150 mm)
and has a turning radius of 1.5D (D = duct hydraulic diameter). Turbulent ow quantities for Re = 100, 000 were calculated based on a
differential Reynolds stress model. The solids mass loading considered is 0.00206 and hence justies the application of one-way coupling
between gas and particles. A Lagrangian particle-tracking algorithm which takes into account the effect of shear-slip lift (SSL) force on particles
and particle-wall interactions (PWIs) has been utilised to predict velocities of the dispersed phase. The predictions were compared against the
experimental data measured using LaserDoppler Anemometry (LDA). The study found that the predicted gas ow eld has a strong inuence
over the predicted particle velocities. PWI model considerably affects the prediction of particle velocity and distribution of particles at the
inner duct wall within the bend. Inclusion of the SSL force also helps the distribution of the particle tracks towards the duct centre in the
vertical duct downstream of the bend. Within the bend, particle velocities near the inner wall have been grossly over-predicted in the simulation,
especially at mid-bend. The present study thus highlights the importance of the predicted gas ow eld, SSL force and particle-wall collisions
to Lagrangian particle tracking.
2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Multiphase ow; Mathematical modelling; Simulation; Penumatic conveying; LDA; Turbulence
1. Introduction
Elbows and bends are commonly used in pneumatic conveying systems to change ow direction so as to transport the suspended material to the desired delivery point within a limited
space. In the case of coal-red power plants that operate
on a continuous supply of pulverised coal to furnaces, maldistribution of pulverised fuel often occurs as coal particles
are pneumatically transported from the mill through ducts
consisting of numerous bends and straight sections.
Apart from the duct geometry, the coal pulverisation process
is also a strong contributor to mal-distribution of the pulverised
fuel. Field measurements at a lignite-red power plant carried
out to support this study found that, depending on factors such
Corresponding author. Tel.: +61 3 95458687; fax: +61 3 95628919.
as feed size and mill speed, the fuel pulverisation process produces coal particles ranging between 10 and 1000 m in size.
Fig. 1 shows a typical coal particle size distribution measured
at the mill outlet of a lignite-red power station (McIntosh and
Borthwick, 1984). The extreme non-uniformity in particle size
combined with a centrifugal effect arising from the duct bend
are believed to lead to the formation of a stratied gassolid
ow, known as a particle rope, downstream of the elbow even
at a low solids mass loading, L < 0.1. This invariably creates
difculties for the plant operators to monitor and control the
pulverised fuel supply to individual burners, and hence to maintain an optimal combustion condition inside the furnace.
There are a large number of documented studies, both numerical and experimental, on particle roping in dust conveying
systems with solids mass loading L > 0.3, but most of them
focus on particles with a size distribution that is either heavily
skewed towards the lower end of the size range (Yilmaz and
2069
2070
Re =
f Ub D
Rep =
f UT d p
(1)
,
(2)
2071
Fig. 2. Experimental ow system: (a) schematic diagram; (b) duct geometry and ow coordinate system.
p dp2
p
; p =
;
f
18
Ub2
,
Fr =
Dg
St =
f =
D
,
Ub
(3)
(4)
2072
Table 1
Flow and dynamic similarity parameters
Laboratory rig
Flow parameters
D (m)
(kg m1 s1 )
f (kg m3 )
p (kg m3 )
L
dp (m)
UT (m s1 )
Ub (m s1 )
Re
4
(min.)
1.21 103
Power station
0.15
1.8 105
1.18
2500
0.00206
77
(mean)
0.36
10.0
1.0 105
1.82
3.05
8.24
80.9
Lf
(6)
+1
160
(max.)
1.1
20
(5%)
0.0155
11.5
13.2
0.0124
0.063
1.76
1.95 105
0.78
1400
0.1
80
(50%)
0.224
28.6
2.0 106
0.716
1.701
6.88
21.1
410
(95%)
2.32
38.1
44.7
notations below
jUi
= 0,
dxi
(7)
jUi Uj
jUj
jUi
jP
j
ui uj ,
=
+
+
dxj
jxi
jxj
jxj
jxi
(8)
j
=
jxk
2
k2
+ Cs
3
jui uj
jxl
2
+ Gij ij + ij ,
3
2
t j
j
jUk
+
+ C1 Gkk C2
=
,
dxk
jxk
jxl
k
k
Gij = ui uk
jUj
jUi
uj uk
,
jxk
jxk
(9)
(10)
(11)
where Ui and ui are, respectively, mean and uctuating velocities; ui uj denotes the Reynolds stress tensor; Gij is the turbulence production term; ij is the modelled pressurestrain
correlation given by Speziale et al. (1991). Model constants Cs ,
C1 , C2 , and
, respectively, have the following values: 0.22,
1.45, 1.83, and 1.375. This approach is known as differential
Reynolds stress modelling (DRSM).
3.1. Gas ow
4. Particle tracks
Steady-state, isothermal gas ow properties and turbulence quantities are calculated numerically by solving a set
of governing partial differential equations (PDE) using a
commercial CFD software ANSYS CFX-10. The Reynoldsaveraged NavierStokes equations and the Reynolds stress
transport equations considered are written in Cartesian tensor
dup
= FD + Fg + Fpg + FA + Fsl ,
dt
dxp
= up ,
dt
with uf = U
r =
+ u
(15)
24
fD .
Rep
Fg = m p 1
f
p
g,
(17)
f dup
1
FA = m p
,
2
p dt
(18)
Fpg = 41 dp3 P .
(19)
3
d Csl ((uf up ) f ),
8 p f
(23)
Assuming that all force components, except the drag, are constant during a time step t, Eq. (12) can be integrated analytically to yield
Res
;
Rep
(13)
18fD
= 0.5
(14)
p dp2
f dp2 |f |
(12)
Res =
2073
f = uf .
up = uf + (up0 uf )et/r +
(24)
r
(1 et/r )
mp
(25)
(26)
Eqs. (25) and (26) were solved within a given cell in the particle
tracking calculations.
In order to solve the instantaneous particle velocity and
location using the integrated equations of particle motion,
Eqs. (25) and (26), for every particle track in the ow domain,
the instantaneous uid velocity has to be specied at all particle locations. This is made possible through the application
of a classical stochastic approach of Gosman and Ioannides
(1981), which estimates uctuating gas velocity components
on the basis of isotropic turbulence. Subsequent particle track
integration which takes into account the turbulent dispersion
effect was thus carried out.
5. Particle-wall interactions
The present simulation adopts a modied version of the PWI
model of Matsumoto and Saito (1970). The base-case model
allows the particles to either slide along the wall surface when
the angle of incidence is small, or rebound away from the wall
after impact. However, it is based on the assumption of a constant restitution coefcient and dynamic friction, both of which
are sensitive to a range of parameters, such as incidence angle
and wall material, as found in published experimental investigations of Frank et al. (1993), Sommerfeld and Huber (1999).
For the present numerical calculation that involves collisions
between the glass spheres and the Perspex duct walls, particle
velocity components as well as particle angle of incidence are
dened in Fig. 4. Impact test data for glass beads on Plexiglass
(20)
where
4.1126
f (Rep , Res ),
Csl =
Res
(21)
1/2
(1 0.3314 )
e(0.1Rep ) + 0.33141/2 , Rep 40,
f (Rep , Res ) =
Rep 40,
0.0524(Rep )1/2 ,
(22)
Fig. 4. Denition of velocities before and after impact and particle angle of
incidence.
2074
5/7,
(27)
The effect of wall roughness is introduced through a semiempirical approach that modies the smooth-wall incident
angle 1 with a random component characterising the presence
of a rough wall
1 = 1 + ,
(28)
Table 2
Modelled particle size distribution and a discrete representation of the particulate ow by particle tracks
i
dp,i (m)
Vol.%
Particle vol. ow
rate (m3 /s)
Ni
Particle vol. ow
rate per track (m3 /s)
i (1/s)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
5
18
30
45
57
65
76
89
103
125
140
152
2.001E 5
5.202E 5
3.112E 3
2.905E 1
3.260
10.35
38.10
34.03
9.982
2.500
1.000
4.887E 1
4.416E 14
1.148E 13
6.868E 12
6.411E 10
7.196E 9
2.284E 8
8.409E 8
7.510E 8
2.203E 8
5.518E 9
2.207E 9
1.079E 9
8000
8000
8000
8000
8000
8000
8000
8000
8000
8000
8000
8000
5.520E 18
1.435E 17
8.585E 16
8.014E 14
8.994E 13
2.855E 12
1.051E 11
9.387E 12
2.754E 12
6.897E 13
2.759E 13
1.348E 13
8.434E 2
4.700E 3
6.073E 2
1.680
9.276
19.85
45.73
25.43
4.813
6.744E 1
1.920E 1
7.332E 2
100.0
2.207E 7
96 000
Total
2075
Fig. 5. Mean longitudinal gas velocity proles within the bend ( prediction; data).
2076
Fig. 6. Mean longitudinal gas velocity proles in the vertical duct ( prediction; data).
Fig. 7. Mean longitudinal gas velocity proles along the outer wall, 1 mm
from the surface.
2077
2078
Fig. 8. Mean transverse gas velocity proles within the bend ( prediction; data).
particle velocity proles were obtained from the data collection process as outlined previously and they are compared
against the measured proles in Figs. 12 and 13. This case
will be referred to as the baseline simulation in the following
discussions.
Compared to the measured proles, the baseline simulation
has over-predicted longitudinal particle velocities at the outer
wall within the bend (Fig. 12) and up to 3D downstream of the
bend (Fig. 13). This is partly attributable to an over-prediction
2079
Fig. 9. Mean transverse gas velocity proles in the vertical duct ( prediction; data).
This has led us to believe that the coarse particles have already
separated from the carrier uid and they are moving under the
inuence of their own inertia as well as particle-wall collisions
in the simulation. This subsequently implies that particle size
distribution also affects the prediction of particle velocity in the
outer wall region of the duct bend.
Away from the outer wall, the predicted values follow the
measured velocity proles with a maximum error of 20%
towards the inner wall, except at
= 75 where large discrepancies between the measured and predicted particle velocities
are found at r > 0.8 (Fig. 12). With reference to Fig. 14, this
arises from a small group of ne particles possessing negative
longitudinal velocities and is a direct result of a recirculation
zone in the predicted gas ow eld at
= 90 (see Fig. 5).
The ne particles that have been entrained by the recirculating gas ow at
= 90 are thrown back towards
= 75 .
2080
Fig. 10. Turbulence intensity ( u u /Ub ) proles within the bend ( prediction; data).
correctly capture the transverse particle motion on the vertical centre-plane of the duct bend (Fig. 15). Both the experimental measurement and the calculation suggest a thin layer
of particles having very small transverse velocity components
at r < 0.2 between
= 45 and 75 . This phenomenon arises
as some of the particles are moving towards the outer wall and
some are moving (rebounding) away from the wall within the
2081
Fig. 11. Turbulence intensity ( u u /Ub ) proles in the vertical duct ( prediction; data).
2082
Fig. 12. Mean longitudinal particle velocity proles within the bend ( baseline prediction; prediction considering SSL and PWI models; data).
2083
Fig. 13. Mean longitudinal particle velocity proles in the vertical duct ( baseline prediction; prediction considering SSL and PWI models; data).
2084
Fig. 15. Mean transverse particle velocity proles within the bend ( baseline prediction; prediction considering SSL and PWI models; data).
2085
Fig. 16. Mean transverse particle velocity proles in the vertical duct ( baseline prediction; prediction considering SSL and PWI models; data).
process inside the bend. Universally applying a lower restitution coefcient to replace the particle-wall collision model
did not cause a further reduction in particle velocity between
= 15 and 45 where particle-wall collisions are expected to
be the most frequent. Therefore, particle-wall collision is not
the dominating mechanism through which the particles lose
their momentum.
Although we are not able to directly verify the location and
size of particle rope in the duct with the measured data, a higher
concentration of particle tracks in the outer wall layer between
= 0 and s/D = 1.0 (Fig. 17) does suggest the presence of
a particle rope inside the duct. It is thus very likely that the
2086
Fig. 17. Normalised distribution of particle tracks within a 5.0 mm layer next to the walls ( baseline prediction; prediction considering SSL and PWI
models).
Fig. 18. Streamwise variation of mean longitudinal particle velocities along the outer wall, 1.5 mm from the surface.
model constants
drag coefcient
particle diameter, m
hydraulic diameter of the duct, m
E
En
Et
F
Fr
fD
G
g
k
L
m
m
Ni
n
R
Re
Res
S
St
s, r
u
u
u , v
U
U, V
Ub
UT
restitution coefcient
restitution coefcient normal to a surface
restitution coefcient tangential to a surface
force vector, N
Froude number
SchillerNaumann drag correlation
turbulence production, kg m2 s2
gravity vector, m s2
turbulence kinetic energy, m2 s2
solids mass loading = m
p /m
f
mass, kg
mass ow rate, kg s1
number of particle tracks allocated to size fraction i
number of particle tracks
duct turning radius
duct Reynolds number
particle Reynolds number based on uid rotation
inter-particle distance, m
particle Stokes number
curvilinear coordinate system on the duct
plane of symmetry; r = 0 at
outer wall; r = 1 at inner wall, m
instantaneous velocity vector, m s1
uctuating velocity vector, m s1
uctuating longitudinal andtransverse
velocity components, m s1
mean gas velocity vector, m s1
mean longitudinal and transverse
velocity components, m s1
bulk gas velocity, m s1
particle terminal velocity, m s1
Greek letters
p
1
ij
0
d
f
Subscripts
A
D
added mass
drag
f
g
i
i, j, k
p
pg
sl
1
2
2087
uid
gravity
size fraction index
tensor index
partic
pressure gradient
slip-shear lift
pre-impact state
post-impact state
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the nancial and other
support received for this research from the Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) for Clean Power from Lignite, which is
established and supported under the Australian Governments
Cooperative Research Centres program.
References
Akilli, H., Levy, E.K., Sahin, B., 2001. Gassolid ow behaviour in a
horizontal pipe after vertical-to-horizontal elbow. Powder Technology 116,
4352.
Barth, T.J., Jesperson, D.C., 1989. The design and application of upwind
schemes on unstructured meshes. AIAA Paper 89-0366.
Bilirgen, H., Levy, E.K., 2001. Mixing and dispersion of particle ropes in
lean phase pneumatic conveying. Powder Technology 119, 134152.
Boothroyd, R.G., 1971. Flowing Gassolids Suspensions. Chapman & Hall,
London.
Borger, G.G., 1973. The optimisation of wind tunnel contractions for the
subsonic range. Ph.D. Thesis, Ruhr University, Germany.
Choi, Y.D., Iacovides, H., Launder, B.E., 1989. Numerical computation of
turbulent ow in a square-sectioned 180 deg bend. Journal of Fluids
Engineering 111, 5968.
Ciccone, A.D., Kawall, J.G., Keffer, J.F., 1990. Flow visualization/digital
image analysis of saltating particle motion. Experiments in Fluids 9,
6573.
Fan, L.S., Zhu, C., 1998. Principles of GasSolid Flows. Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, pp. 87110.
Fan, J., Zhang, X., Cheng, L., Cen, K., 1997. Numerical simulation and
experimental study of two-phase ow in a vertical pipe. Aerosol Science
and Technology 27, 281292.
Frank, TH., Schade, F.-P., Petrak, D., 1993. Numerical simulation and
experimental investigation of a gassolid two-phase ow in a horizontal
channel. International Journal of Multiphase Flow 19 (1), 187198.
Gibson, M.M., 1978. An algebraic stress and heat-ux model for turbulent
shear ow with streamline curvature. International Journal of Heat and
Mass Transfer 21, 16091617.
Gibson, M.M., Jones, W.P., Younis, B.A., 1981. Calculation of turbulent
boundary layers on curved surfaces. Physics of Fluids 24 (3), 386395.
Giddings, D., Aroussi, A., Pickering, S.J., Mozaffari, E., 2004. A 1/4 scale test
facility for PF transport in power station pipelines. Fuel 83, 21952204.
Gosman, A.D., Ioannides, E., 1981. Aspects of computer simulation of liquidfuelled combustors. AIAA Paper No. 81-0323.
Huber, N., Sommereld, M., 1994. Characterization of the cross-sectional
particle concentration distribution in pneumatic conveying systems. Powder
Technology 79, 191210.
Kuan, B., 2005. CFD simulation of dilute gassolid two-phase ows with
different solid size distributions in a curved 90 duct bend. Australia
& New Zealand Industrial and Applied Mathematics Journal 46 (E),
C744C763.
Kussin, J., Sommerfeld, M., 2002. Experimental studies on particle behaviour
and turbulence modication in horizontal channel ow with different wall
roughness. Experiments in Fluids 33, 143159.
2088
Lan, S., Sommerfeld, M., Kussin, J., 2002. Experimental studies and
modelling of four-way coupling in particle-laden horizontal channel ow.
International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 23, 647656.
Levy, A., Mason, D.J., 1998. The effect of a bend on the particle cross-section
concentration and segregation in pneumatic conveying systems. Powder
Technology 98, 95103.
Luo, J., Lakshminarayana, B., 1996. Analysis of streamline curvature effects
on wall-bounded turbulent ows. Third International Symposium on
Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Measurements, Crete, Greece, May
1996.
Matsumoto, S., Saito, S., 1970. Monte Carlo simulation of horizontal
pneumatic conveying based on the rough wall model. Journal of Chemical
Engineering of Japan 3 (1), 223230.
McIntosh, M.J., Borthwick, I.R., 1984. Investigation of the grinding process
in an EVT millDevelopment of a process model, Report No. ND/84/003,
State Electricity Commission of Victoria, Australia.
Mei, R., 1992. An approximate expression for the shear lift force on a spherical
particle at nite Reynolds number. International Journal of Multiphase
Flow 18 (1), 145147.
Nallasamy, M., 1987. Turbulence models and their applications to the
prediction of internal ows: a review. Computers & Fluids 15 (2),
151194.
Patel, V.C., Sotiropoulos, F., 1997. Longitudinal curvature effects in turbulent
boundary layers. Progress in Aerospace Science 33, 170.
Richmond, M.C., Patel, V.C., 1991. Convex and concave surface curvature
effects in wall-bounded turbulent ows. AIAA Journal 29 (6), 895902.
Rodi, W., Scheuerer, G., 1983. Calculation of curved shear layers with twoequation turbulence models. Physics of Fluids 26, 1422.
Shih, T.H., Liou, W.W., Shabbir, A., Yang, Z., Zhu, J., 1995. A new k . eddy
viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent ows. Computers
Fluids 24 (3), 227238.