Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Keywords: Timber floors, serviceability limit state of vibration, finite element modelling.
INTRODUCTION
because
and
timber
These
of
must
its
be
sensibility to
used
water
carefully.
NUMERICAL MODELS
were
modelled
as
(ii)
(iii)
frame
one
with
three
different
beam
sections
node: x, y, z, x, y and z.
distributed
load
allowed
the
(c)
(b)
(a)
Section [m ]
Beam (a)
Beam (b)
Beam (c)
Sheathing
0,075x0,15
0,10x0,20
0,15x0,25
0,10x0,02
Ix [m ]
Iy [m ]
-5
-5
5,39 x 10
-4
1,36 x 10
-4
3,28 x 10
-8
6,94 x 10
9,32 x 10
-4
1,23 x 10
-4
2,22 x 10
-6
1,67 x 10
A [m ]
J [m ]
0,0150
0,0240
0,0420
0,0010
8,49 x 10
-4
2,67 x 10
-4
7,82 x 10
-7
1,33 x 10
-5
SERVICEABILITY LIMIT
STATE
OF
VIBRATION
These
be considered.
The
first
frequencies
considered
higher
applied
floors
be
in a special investigation.
two
should
satisfying
requirements
to
than
have
8
natural
Hz,
Annex.
these
(1)
second
requirement
(2)
limits
the
structure.
stiffness
Nm /m.
of
the
floor
about
an
axis
(3)
independent
of
the
Beams sections [m ]
0,075x0,15
4
Ix [m ]
5,39 x 10
A [m ]
2
m [kg/m ]
2
-5
0,10x0,20
1,36 x 10
-4
0,15x0,25
3,28 x 10
0,01875
0,02800
0,04650
19,00
26,60
39,27
8,62 x 10
2,04 x 10
-4
4,37 x 10
l x b [m ]
3,0 x 3,0
4,0 x 5,0
5,0 x 5,0
Sheathing
4
-6
Ix [m ]
3,33 x 10
4,00 x 10
Beams sections [m ]
0,075x0,15 0,10x0,20
0,15x0,25
37,17
48,36
58,24
20,91
27,20
32,76
13,38
17,41
20,97
of its mass.
natural
edges, respectively.
frequencies
obtained
with
the
Beams sections [m ]
l x b [m ]
3,0 x 3,0
4,0 x 5,0
5,0 x 5,0
0,075x0,15
0,10x0,20
0,15x0,25
41,86
23,42
16,40
51,61
29,01
19,91
59,36
33,61
22,29
st
Beams sections [m ]
l x b [m ]
3,0 x 3,0
4,0 x 5,0
5,0 x 5,0
nd
vibration modes.
0,075x0,15
0,10x0,20
0,15x0,25
37,51
21,04
13,47
48,59
27,28
17,48
58,29
32,81
21,02
previously
made,
about
the
st
1 mode
1 mode
increase
of
the
beams
cross
section
nd
mode
nd
mode
(b)
st
st
expected.
respectively.
Static displacement
Beams sections [m ]
l x b [m ]
3,0 x 3,0
4,0 x 5,0
5,0 x 5,0
0,075x0,15
0,437
0,716
1,051
0,10x0,20
0,256
0,416
0,602
0,15x0,25
0,154
0,274
0,411
Beams sections [m ]
l x b [m ]
3,0 x 3,0
4,0 x 5,0
5,0 x 5,0
0,075x0,15
0,443
0,728
1,129
0,10x0,20
0,257
0,417
0,621
0,15x0,25
0,154
0,274
0,413
expression (4).
Beams sections [m ]
2
l x b [m ]
3,0 x 3,0
4,0 x 5,0
5,0 x 5,0
0,075x0,15
0,457
1,084
2,117
0,10x0,20
0,193
0,457
0,894
0,15x0,25
0,090
0,214
0,418
frequencies
up
to
40Hz
(n40),
given
in
{[(
]( )
(6)
by
the
product
between
its
(n40). The floors referred in the code are lightweight floors, which mean that the presence of
Beams sections [m ]
l x b [m ]
3,0 x 3,0
4,0 x 5,0
5,0 x 5,0
(5)
2,42
0,01994
n40
v
n40
v
6,12
0,02807
6,43
0,02523
6,17
0,02241
6,84
0,02082
6,02
0,01628
7,33
0,01624
Depending
on
the
intervals
between
direction
stiffness
((EI)b)
and
numerical results.
vibration properties.
It was expected that the velocity value would
Table 10 Results obtained with the model for
four supported edges (v, in m/s, and n40)
Beams sections [m ]
2
l x b [m ]
3,0 x 3,0
4,0 x 5,0
5,0 x 5,0
0
0,02290
3
0,02287
3
0
0,02015
2
0,01979
3
0
0,01623
3
0,01540
4
0,02277
0,01987
0,01547
Beams sections [m ]
2
l x b [m ]
3,0 x 3,0
4,0 x 5,0
5,0 x 5,0
1
0,02289
4
0,02285
5
0,02293
0
0,02016
4
0,01978
5
0,01980
floor
0
0,01623
4
0,01541
6
0,01546
dimensions.
The
opposite
situation
Verification
of
the
serviceability
Beams sections [m ]
2
l x b [m ]
3,0 x 3,0
4,0 x 5,0
5,0 x 5,0
0,65
0,28
0,13
b
a
508,3
1,55
0,65
0,31
b
a
91,6
3,02
184,4
1,28
456,8
0,60
70,0
108,6
183,7
Beams sections [m ]
2
l x b [m ]
3,0 x 3,0
a
b
0,62
662,2
0,37
1031,7
0,22
25336,3
4,0 x 5,0
a
b
1,02
138,9
0,59
251,0
0,39
536,8
5,0 x 5,0
a
b
1,50
92,2
0,86
133,3
0,59
213,7
Beams sections [m ]
2
l x b [m ]
3,0 x 3,0
4,0 x 5,0
5,0 x 5,0
0,63
0,37
0,22
b
a
421,7
1,04
1986,8
0,60
19519,1
0,39
b
a
119,8
1,61
220,2
0,89
498,0
0,59
78,5
115,9
196,2
CONCLUSIONS
The goal of this paper was to study the
methodology defined by Eurocode 5 for the
verification of the serviceability limit state of
vibration and the main factors affecting it.
150
140
130
120
110
b 100
90
80
70
60
50
Model 4
supports
Model 2
supports
a [mm/kN]
good
results
when
developing
dynamic
frequency
is
considered
stiffness.
value
most conditioning.
determination.
Another
difficulty
is
an
for
building code.
parameters
a and
b.
However,
the
unified
procedure
to
assess
the
REFERENCES
ADINA R&D, Inc. 2001. ADINA User Interface. Report ARD 01-6. Watertown, MA, USA : s.n., 2001.
Clough, Ray W. and Penzien, Joseph. 1995. Dynamics of Structures. Computeres & Structures, Inc. Berkeley,
CA USA : s.n., 1995.
Cruz, Margarida W. 2013. Estados Limites de Utilizao de Pavimentos de Madeira. Vibraes e Conforto.
Instituto Superior Tcnico - Universidade Tcnica de Lisboa, Lisboa : s.n., 2013.
EN 1995-1-1:2004. Design of Timber Strutures - Part 1-1: General - Common rules and rules for buildings.
Hu, Lin J, Chui, Ying H and Onysko, Donald M. 2001. Vibration serviceability of timber floors in residential
construction. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials. 3: 228-237, 2001.
10