Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Title
Abstract/Summary
Introduction
Aims
Theory
Apparatus
Methodology/Procedure
Results
Calculations
Discussion
Conclusion
Recommendations
Reference / Appendix
TOTAL MARKS
Remarks:
Checked by:
--------------------------Date:
ABSTRACT
Marks
The purpose of this experiment is to investigate the validity of Bernoullis equation when
applied to a steady flow of water in tapered duct and the flow rate of steady flow rates are
measured too based on the Bernoullis theorem by relating the pressure, velocity and elevation in
a moving fluid. Meanwhile, the compressibility and viscosity (internal friction) of which are
negligible and the flow where the flow is in steady or laminar. FM 24 Bernoullis Apparatus is
used for this experiment. The experiment was conducted in order to find out the time taken to
collect 3L of water, the volumetric flow rates of the water, the pressure difference at all
manometer tube at different cross section. From the 0.003 m 3 of water, the time to collect them is
recorded based on the different flow rate for each experiment.
The combination of venture meter with the manometer tube and hydraulic bench were
used in this experiment. The water is fed up during the experiment through a hose connector and
the flow rate can be adjusted at the flow regulator valve at the outlet of the test section. The flow
measurement can be showed by the venture and the discharge coefficient can be determined by
the results which the reading of each manometer tubes increase when the pressure difference
increase. From the reading of height can be calculated from the data by using the Bernoullis
equation to find the velocity of the moving fluid.
The reading of the pressure level and velocity of the tube A to F is recorded. From the
Bernoullis theorem, the relationship between the pressure and the velocity is where the pressure
is inversely proportional to velocity. Bernoullis principle tells us that the fluid flows more
quickly through the narrow area, the pressure decreases rather than increases. Thus, it proves the
validity of Bernoullis theorem.
INTRODUCTION
1) Venturi
The venture meter is made of transparent acrylic with the following specifications:
Throat diameter
: 16 mm
Upstream diameter : 26 mm
Designed flow rate : 20 L/mins
2) Manometer
There are eight manometer tubes: each length 320 mm for static pressure and total head
measuring along the venture meter.
The manometer tubes are connected to an air bleed screw for air release as well as tubes
pressurization.
3) Baseboard
The baseboard is epoxy coated and designed with four height adjustable stands to level
the venture meter.
4) Discharge valve
One discharge valve is installed at the venture discharge section for flow rate control.
5) Connections
Hose connections are installed at both inlet and outlet.
6) Hydraulic Bench
Sump tank
Volumetric tank
Centrifugal pump
: 120 L
: 100 L
: 0.37 kW, 50 L/mins
AIMS
For this experiment, one of the aims is to investigate the validity of Bernoullis equation
when applied to the steady flow of the water in a tapered duct. Then it is also to measure the flow
rates and both static and total pressure heads in a rigid convergent/divergent tube of known
geometry for a range of steady flow rates.
THEORY
h =h+
v2
where; h 1=h2
g
[ ( )]
2 g ( h1h5 )
1
A5
A1
d 21
where ; A=
4
Velocity measurement
The velocity of the flow is measured by measuring the volume of the flow, V, over a time period,
t. Thus gives the rate of volume flow (m3/s), which in turn gives the velocity of the flow through
a defined area.
v=
Q
A
Continuity equation
For an incompressible fluid, conservation of mass requires that volume is also conserved.
A 1 V 1=A 2 V 2
APPARATUS
1) Manometer Tubes
2) Test Section
3) Water Inlet
4) Unions
5) Air Bleed Screw
6) Discharge Valve
7) Gland Nut
8) Hypodermic Probe
9) Adjustable Feet
PROCEDURE
Gradually, the bench valve is opened to fill the test rig with water. Air bubble is
removed from the tube to allow an accurate reading.
6) In order to bleed air pressure tapping point and manometers both the bench valve and rig
flow control valve are closed. The air bleed screw is opened and the cap from the water
adjacent air valve is removed.
7) A length of small-bore tubing from the air valve is connected to the volumetric tank.
8) The bench valve is opened and allowed to flow through the manometer to purge all air
from them.
9) Then, the air bleed screw is tightened where the bench valve and test rig flow control
valve are partly opened.
10) Next, the air bleed is opened slightly to allow air to enter the top of the manometers. The
screw is re-tightened when the manometer reach a convenient height.
Q av
V
=
iC
9) The velocity, ViC is calculated using the continuity equation where;
Ai
10) The differences between two velocities are calculated.
RESULTS
Volume (L)
Average Time (s)
3L
26.35 s
Using Continuity
h* =
Section
hH
(mm)
166
hi
(mm)
161
V iB= 2 g ( hhi )
Equation
Q
D i 2
V iC = av
Ai =
Ai
4
(m/s)
(m2)
(m/s)
4
5.3093 10
0.21453
0.3132
Difference
ViB - ViC
(m/s)
0.09867
166
159
0.3706
3.6644 10
0.31083
0.05977
165
145
0.6264
0.05990
164
153
0.4646
0.10205
163
155
0.3706
0.07097
162
157
0.3132
0.09867
Table 1
Volume (L)
Average Time (s)
3L
14.66 s
Using Continuity
h* = hH
hi
(mm)
(mm)
Difference
equation
Ai =
V iB= 2 g ( hhi )
(m/s)
D i
4
V iC =
(m/s)
Q av
A i VIb VIc
(m/s)
178
166
0.4852
(m )
4
5.3093 100.38536
180
159
0.6419
3.6644 100.55835
177
105
1.1885
2.0106 101.01766
174
138
0.8404
3.1416 100.65126
173
145
0.7412
3.8013 100.53824
172
154
0.5943
4
4
5.3093 100.38536
0.09984
0.08355
0.17089
0.18914
0.20296
0.20894
Table 2
Volume (L)
Average Time (s)
Cross
3L
8.6 s
Section
h* = hH
hi
(mm)
(mm)
V iB= 2 g ( hhi )
(m/s)
Using Continuity
equation
Ai =
V iC =
(m/s)
Difference
Q avViB - ViC
A i (m/s)
D i 2
4
194
220
0.7142
(m2)
4
5.309 10 0.657
179
223
0.9291
3.664 10 0.952
56
220
1.7938
2.011 10 1.734
133
214
1.2606
3.142 10 1.110
152
212
1.0850
3.801 10 0.917
171
210
4
4
5.310 10 0.657
0.8747
0.0572
- 0.0229
0.0598
0.1506
0.1680
0.2177
Table 3
CALCULATIONS
Area, A =
Area A
D2
4
( 26 X 103 )
4
= 5.310 10
Area B
Area C
( 21.6 X 103 )
4
m2
Area D
= 3.664 10
4
= 2.011 10
m2
4
4
( 16 X 103 )
m2
( 20 X 103 )
4
= 3.142 10 m2
Area E
( 22 X 103 )
Area F
4
= 3.801 10 m2
( 26 X 103 )
4
4
= 5.310 10
m2
Calculation: Result 1
2 g ( h h i)
V iB =
1000
A:
V iB=
2 X 9.81 ( 166161 )
1000
= 0.3132 m/s
Difference
V iC =
Q av
Ai
V iC =
1.139 104
4
5.3093 10
= 0.21453 m/s
= ViB - ViC
= 0.3132 0.21453
= 0.09867 m/s
B:
V iC =
2 X 9.81 ( 166159 )
V iB=
1000
= 0.31083 m/s
= 0.3706 m/s
Difference
= ViB - ViC
= 0.3706 0.31083
1.139 104
3.6644 104
C:
V iB=
2 X 9.81 ( 165145 )
1000
= 0.05977 m/s
= 0.6264 m/s
V iC =
1.139 104
2.0106 104
= 0.5665 m/s
Difference
= ViB - ViC
= 0.6264 0.5665
= 0.0599 m/s
D:
2 X 9.81 ( 164153 )
V iB=
1000
= 0.4646 m/s
Difference
V iC =
1.139 104
3.1416 104
= 0.36255 m/s
= ViB - ViC
= 0.4646 0.36255
= 0.10205 m/s
E:
2 X 9.81 ( 163156 )
V iB=
1000
= 0.3706 m/s
Difference
= ViB - ViC
= 0.3706 0.29963
= 0.07097 m/s
F:
V iB=
2 X 9.81 ( 162157 )
1000
= 0.3132 m/s
4
V iC =
1.139 10
4
5.3093 10
= 0.21453 m
Difference
= ViB - ViC
= 0.3132 0.21453
= 0.09867 m/s
V iC =
1.139 104
3.8013 104
= 0.29963 m/s
Calculation: Result 2
2 g ( h h i)
V iB =
1000
A:
2 X 9.81 ( 178166 )
V iB=
1000
Q av
Ai
V iC =
2.046 104
4
5.3093 10
= 0.38536 m/s
= 0.4852 m/s
Difference
V iC =
= ViB - ViC
= 0.4852 0.38536
= 0.09984 m/s
B:
V iB=
V iC =
2 X 9.81 ( 180159 )
1000
2.046 104
3.6644 104
= 0.55835 m/s
= 0.6419 m/s
Difference
= ViB - ViC
= 0.6419 0.55835
C:
V iB=
2 X 9.81 ( 177105 )
1000
= 0.08355 m/s
= 1.1885 m/s
= 1.0176 m/s
V iC =
Difference
2.046 104
4
2.0106 10
= ViB - ViC
= 0.8404 m/s
= 1.1885 1.0176
= 0.17089 m/s
V iC =
2.046 10
4
3.1416 10
= 0.65126 m/s
D:
V iB=
Difference
2 X 9.81 ( 174138 )
1000
= ViB - ViC
= 0.8404 0.65126
= 0.18914 m/s
E:
V iB=
2 X 9.81 ( 173145 )
1000
= 0.7412 m/s
Difference
= ViB - ViC
= 0.7412 0.53824
= 0.20296 m/s
F:
V iB=
2 X 9.81 ( 172154 )
1000
V iC =
2.046 104
3.8013 104
= 0.53824 m/s
= 0.5943 m/s
V iC =
Difference
= 0.38536 m/s
2.046 104
5.3093 104
= ViB - ViC
= 0.5943 0.38536
= 0.20894 m/s
Calculation: Result 3
2 g ( h h i)
V iB =
1000
A:
V iB=
2 X 9.81 ( 220194 )
1000
V iC =
3 . 488 104
V iC =
5.309 104
= 0.7142 m/s
Difference
Q av
Ai
= ViB - ViC
= 0.7142 0.6570
= 0.6570 m
= 0.0572 m/s
B:
V iB=
2 X 9.81 ( 223179 )
1000
V iC =
= 0.9291 m/s
Difference
3 . 488 104
3.664 104
= 0.9520 m/s
= ViB - ViC
= 0.9291 0.9520
= - 0.0229 m/s
C:
V iB =
2 X 9.81 ( 22056 )
1000
= 1.7938 m/s
V iC =
3 . 488 104
2.011 104
= 1.7340 m/s
Difference
= ViB - ViC
= 1.7938 1.7340
= 0.0598
= 1.2606 m/s
3 . 488 104
V iC =
3.142104
D:
V iB=
Difference
2 X 9.81 ( 214133 )
1000
= 1.110 m/s
= ViB - ViC
= 1.2606 1.110
= 0.1506
E:
V iB=
2 X 9.81 ( 212152 )
1000
3 . 488 104
V iC =
4
3.80110
= 0.917 m/s
= 1.0850 m/s
Difference
= ViB - ViC
= 1.0850 0.9170
= 0.168 m/s
F:
V iB=
2 X 9.81 ( 210171 )
1000
= 0.8747 m/s
V iC =
3 . 488 104
5.309 104
= 0.657 m/s
Difference
= ViB - ViC
= 0.8747 0.6570
= 0.2177
DISCUSSION
As we know, this experiment was being conducted based on the objective to investigate
the validity of the Bernoullis equation when applied to the steady flow of water in a tapered
duct. Since the volume passing through at the given length of pipe during a given period of time
will be the same, the value of pressure will decrease. From the Bernoullis principle, it states that
the slower the rate of flow, the higher the pressure and the fastest the rate flow the lower the
pressure.
The pressure, velocity and elevation are related to the Bernoullis theorem and it is valid
in a steady, incompressible flow where net frictional forces are negligible. The equation was
obtained when the Eulers equation was integrated along the streamline for a constant density for
incompressible fluid. The constant of integration (called the Bernoullis constant)
varies from one streamline to another but remains constant along a
streamline in steady, frictionless, incompressible flow. Despite its simplicity,
it had been proven to be a very powerful tool for fluid mechanics. Bernoullis
equation states that the sum of the kinetic energy (velocity head), the
pressure energy (static head) and Potential energy (elevation head) per unit
weight of the fluid at any point remains constant provided the flow were
steady and frictionless and the fluid used is incompressible. The energy is
assumed as it is added to nor taken away by some external agency.
From the data recorded, we can conclude that the velocity of water decrease as the water
flow rate decrease. This is because the diameter of the tube is affected the differences in velocity.
The bigger the diameter of the tube, the differences in velocity will bigger too. The flow rate of
the differences flow of each tube are also different. From the data, in the flow rate of 1.139 x 10 -4
m3/s at the section F the difference in velocity is 0.09867 m/s. Meanwhile for the 2.046 x 10 -4
m3/s the difference in velocity is 0.20894 m/s. Thus, for the 3.488 x 10-4 m3/s it is 0.2177 m/s.
From the results, we knew that the wider the area for the fluid to flow to the narrower
area, the higher the velocity of flowing fluid. This shown in the results where the velocity of
water flow in the tapered duct increases as the duct are decreases. So we can analysis that, the
difference velocity increases as the pressure difference increases. There was must be a parallax
error and zero error while taking a reading. The observer must have not read the level of static
head properly. Thus, the eyes are not perpendicular to the water level on the manometer.
Lastly, it can be concluded that the Bernoullis equation was valid when applied to steady
flow of water in tapered duct and absolute velocity values increase along the same channel.
Although the experiment proof that the Bernoullis equation was valid for
both flow but the values obtain might be slightly differ from the actual value.
CONCLUSION
As for the conclusion, we can concluded that the Bernoullis equation is
valid for convergent and divergent flow as both of it does obey the equation.
For both flow, as the pressure difference increase, the time taken for 3L
water collected increases and the flow rates of the water will also increase.
The results show the reading of the manometer tubes increases when the
pressure difference increases. Thus, the velocity for the same channel
increases, the total head pressure will also increase for both convergent and
divergent flows. Bernoullis theorem has several applications in everyday lives. Example,
Bernoullis equation can be used to find unknown pressure of the streamlines. All the flow rates
and both static and total pressure head in a rigid convergent and divergent are managed to be
calculated. The experiment was successfully conducted.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1) The experiment is repeated several times to get an accurate result.
2) The eye of observes should be placed parallel to the scale of manometer to get an
accurate reading.
3) Make sure the bubbles in the manometer are completely removed by adjusting the bleed
screw.
4) The valve should be control slowly so that the pressure difference can be maintained.
5) The time keeper must be alert with the rising of water volume to avoid error and must be
only a person who taking the time.
6) The leakage of water in the instrument must be avoided.
REFERENCES
1) Fluid Mechanics for Chemical Engineers, Prentice Hall
2) Lab Manual: Bernoullis Theorem demonstration Unit.
3) Bernoulli experiment, 27 August 2010 at
http://www.scribd.com/doc/23125607/Bernoulli- Experiment
4) Bernoulli Lab Report, 27 August
2010,athttp://www.scribd.com/doc/23106099/Bernoulli- Lab-Report
APPENDICES