Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HEADLOSS
ESTIMATION
Mekanika Fluida 1
HST
Hagen-Poiseuille
128LQ
hf
gD 4
Darcy-Weisbach
32 LV
L V2
f
2
gD
D 2g
64 64
f
VD Re
-1 on log-log plot
Slope of ___
IsIncreases
__________ of pressure
independent
L V2
hf f
D 2g
L V2
hf f
D 2g
Re f
1
2 log
f
2.51
Karman, 1930)
f
Re f
3.7
(Colebrook)
Moody Diagram
0.1
D
f Cp
l
0.05
0.04
0.03
friction factor
0.02
0.015
0.01
0.008
0.006
0.004
laminar
0.002
0.001
0.0008
0.0004
0.0002
0.0001
0.00005
0.01
1E+03
smooth
1E+04
1E+05
1E+06
Re
1E+07
1E+08
Swamee-Jain
1976
0.25
limitations
5.74
log 3.7 D Re0.9
/D < 2 x 10-2
3
Re >3 x 10
computer or calculator
use
1.25 LQ
D 0.66
ghf
2
no f
1.78
ghf
3/ 2
D
4.75
5.2 0.04
L
Q
ghf
9.4
Swamee-Jain gets an f
The challenge that S-J solved was deriving explicit
LV
hf f
D 2g
8 LQ
hf f 2
g D5
0.25
5.74
log 3.7 D Re0.9
3.7
f
Re f
8 LQ 2
hf f 2
g D5
1
2.51
D
4 log
f
Re f
3.7
1 1 8 LQ
f hf 2 g D 5
4Q
Re
D
4Q
Re f
D
hf
2 g D5
8 LQ 2
1 2 ghf D 3
Re f
hf g
8
f 2 5
D
LQ 2
10
1 8 LQ 2
4 log
2
5
hf g D
3.7 D
1
2.51
2 ghf D 3
log
3.7 D
1
2.51
2 ghf D 3
L Q
ghf D 5 / 2
Q
D5 / 2
2
ghf
log
2.51
L
3.7 D
L
3
2 ghf D
11
Swamee D?
1.25 Q Q
D 0.66
8 LQ 2
hf f 2
g D5
1/ 5
Q
D 0.66
1/ 4
5/ 4 Q
1/ 5 0.04
Q Q
2
Q g g
1/ 4
1/ 5 1/ 25
Q
2
Q g
1/ 5
1/
5
2
2 1/ 4
2 1/ 5
Q
Q 5/ 4 Q
Q g
g
8 g
1/ 5
1/
4
1/
5
64 5/ 4 Q 2
Q2
f 2
Q g
2
8
Q
D5 f 2
g
64 Q 2
D f 2
8g
5
1/ 5
Q 64
D
f 2
8 g
2
1 5/ 4 Q
f
4 4
g
1/ 4
1/ 5 1/ 5
Q
2
Q g
12
Pipe Roughness
pipe material
glass, drawn brass, copper
commercial steel or wrought iron
asphalted cast iron
galvanized iron
cast iron
concrete
rivet steel
corrugated metal
PVC
13
Solution Techniques
find
g
D
D
log 3.7 D Re0.9
find flow rate given (head, D, L, type of pipe)
Q
D5 / 2
2
find
ghf
log
2.51
L
3.7 D
L
3
2 ghf D
LQ
1.25
D 0.66
gh
4.75
5.2 0.04
L
Q
ghf
9.4
14
range of data
RLQ n
hf =
Dm
C = Hazen-Williams coefficient
15
Head loss:
Hazen-Williams Coefficient
C
150
140
130
120
110
100
95
60-80
Condition
PVC
Extremely smooth, straight pipes; asbestos
cement
Very smooth pipes; concrete; new cast iron
Wood stave; new welded steel
Vitrified clay; new riveted steel
Cast iron after years of use
Riveted steel after years of use
Old pipes in bad condition
Hazen-Williams
vs
Darcy-Weisbach
1.852
16
10.675L Q
hf 4.8704
D
C
SI units
8 LQ 2
hf f 2
g D5
preferred
range
of gathered data.
Hazen-Williams cant be extended to other fluids without
further experimentation.
17
Minor Losses
Most minor losses can not be obtained analytically, so
High Re
C p = f (geometry, Re)
Cp
2 ghl
V2
hl C p
V2
2g
V2
hl = K
2g
18
V12
p2
V22
z1 1
Hp
z2 2
H t hl
1
2g
2
2g
p1
p1 p2
hl
V22 V12
hl
2g
p1 p2
V12 V22
2g
z1 = z2
What is p1 - p2?
19
A1
M1 M 2 W Fp Fp Fss
1
M 1x M 2 x Fp Fp
1x
M 1x V12 A1
M 2 x V22 A2
V12 A1 V22 A2 p1 A2 p2 A2
p1 p2
V V
2
2
2
1
A1
A2
20
Energy
V12 V22
Mass
2g
2
2 A1
V2 V1
p1 p2
A2
Momentum
hl
p1 p2
V22 V12
V2
V1
V1 V2
hl
2g
V V
2g
2
1
2
2
V
A1
hl
1
2g
A2
2
1
A1 V2
A2
V1
A1
K 1
A2
21
Contraction
EGL
V22
hc K c
2g
HGL
Expansion!!!
V1
V2
vena contracta
22
Entrance Losses
reentrant
Ke 0.04
V2
he Ke
2g
23
position
The complex flow path through
valves often results in high head
loss
What is the maximum value that Kv
can have? _____
V
hv K v
2g
24
V12
p2
V22
z1 1
Hp
z2 2
H t hl
1
2g
2
2g
p1
Example
cs
1
valve
D=40 cm
L=1000 m
Find the discharge, Q.
D=20 cm
L=500 m
100 m
cs2
V22
100m =
+ hl
2g
Use S-J on small pipe
25
Non-Circular Conduits:
Hydraulic Radius Concept
A is cross sectional area
P is wetted perimeter
LV2
hf = f
D 2g
p 2
A 4D
D
Rh = =
=
P pD
4
For a pipe
D = 4 Rh
L V2
hf = f
4 Rh 2 g
26
GENERAL
CONSIDERATION
HGL-EGL DRAWING
V12 p1
V22 p2
1
z1 hL 2
z2
2g
2g
EGL
V2 p
V2
z HGL
2g
2g
etc.)
EGL slopes in the direction of flow
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Example (1)
34
Example (2)
35
Example (3)