Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tontiwachwuthikul et al.
US 7,910,078 B2
(54)
C07D 211/02
C07D 211/00
C07D 295/00
(75)
(2006.01)
(2006.01)
(2006.01)
(52)
(58)
546/248, 564/503
73
( )
'
fR
Not1ce:
4,101,633 A
_
4,112,050 A
9/1978
4,112,051 A
4,112,052 A
4,372,925 A
5,209,914 A
SaItOrl et a1.
2/1983 Cornelisse
4,705,673 A *
(21)
3,347,621 A
)
_
(*)
11/1987
(Contmued)
(22) Filed:
(65)
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
(51)
(Commued)
Int. Cl.
B01D 53/14
or
Firm * GoWling
La?eur
(2006.01)
(57)
C013 1 7/16
C01B 31/20
C01 C 3/00
C07C 215/00
(200601)
(2006.01)
2006 01
(
' )
(200601)
(200601)
(200601)
(200601)
C0 7D 265/32
(200601)
C0 7D 295/08
C07D 295/10
(2006.01)
(2006.01)
B01D 53/56
B01D 53/04
B01D 53/58
ABSTRACT
CO2
Flow I
nleter
meter
i><l
Valve
Fume hood
Flow
IE Condenser
El
m:
Temp
gauge
Gas disperser
Heating
soil
0 water
Saturation cell
solution
Reactor
Water
Bath
US 7,910,078 B2
Page 2
US. PATENT DOCUMENTS
5,277,885 A *
5,348,714 A *
5,366,709 A *
1/1994
. 423/228
5,378,442 A
5,609,840 A
5,700,437 A
5,736,115 A
5,750,083 A
5,876,488 A *
3/1999
6,051,161 A
6,117,404 A
6,165,432 A
6,500,397 B1
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
U.S. Appl. No. 60/893,926, ?led Mar. 9, 2007, Tontiwachwuthikul et
al.
* cited by examiner
US. Patent
Sheet 1 015
US 7,910,078 B2
FIGURE 1
dryCOZ +N2
/O\
Fl
A
NZ
A
meter
Vent to
Fume hood
l><l
Valve
me e
CO mg:- l>'Q-
Flow
}
Flow
tr
[5] Condenser
T
[ l 1
'1
A
0 water
2)Pm
solution
Saturation cell
Reactor
7100"
W ater
Bath
Temp
gauge
Gas disperser
US. Patent
Sheet 2 015
US 7,910,078 B2
FIGURE 2
iA?a9t5m8xva
w4268
u
0O
:-i T
._.
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
4im f.813om cw C
1.1
US. Patent
Sheet 3 015
US 7,910,078 B2
FIGURE 3
g 100 v
80 ~
2
2
6O
P.
E
+ MBA at 40 c
40 _
+ MBA at 80 c
mi------- Sample 8 at 40 C
9-1
A Sample 8 at 80 C
20 -
+ Sample 9 at 40c
<>~ Sample 9 at 80 C
O
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
4!
1.2
US. Patent
Sheet 4 0f 5
US 7,910,078 B2
FIGURE 4
0.7 -
CO(Lalom2iodnleg)
0.5 -
0.3
0.1
40
50
60
Temperature (C)
70
80
90
US. Patent
Sheet 5 015
US 7,910,078 B2
FIGURE 5
L2(COo/mad0oilng
Temperature (C)
US 7,910,078 B2
1
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED
APPLICATIONS
20
dered amines for use in removing acid gases from liquid and
gas streams. A neW class of amines, in particular sterically
hindered amines, has thus been introduced as commercially
attractive amines. These hindered amines can be either pri
mary such as 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP), or sec
25
30
35
40
emitted from industrial gas streams and for storing the recov
US 7,9l0,078 B2
4
3
necessarily present the most optimum scenario for the pro
cess. Further, since the amines Which are required for formu
lation are typically those that are commercially available, the
MEA,
4-propylamino-2-butanol
and 4-(ethyl-methyl
amino)-2-butanol at 40 C. and 80 C.
OH
(I)
20
R1
R2/
25
wherein
or
unit mole and to permit the separation of CO2 and the recov
ery of the absorbing solution With a loW amount of heat
energy.
Accordingly, the present invention includes a method for
butanol.
In a further embodiment the liquid absorbent further com
prises a solvent.
OH
R1
R2/
50
60 stream.
draWings in Which:
evaluating the performance of amino alcohols on CO2 absorp
tion capacity, also referred to as CO2 solubility (Lee, J. I.,
Otto, F. D. and Mather, A. E., Equilibrium betWeen Carbon
Dioxide and Aqueous Monoethanolamine Solutions, J.
wherein
R1 and R2 are independently selected from H and C 1_ l0alkyl,
or
(I)
45
US 7,910,078 B2
6
5
ated, the alkyl group may contain 1 to 3 double bonds suitably
1-2 double bonds. Suitably the alkyl group is saturated
It is another embodiment of the invention that the amino
alcohols of the formula I include those in which R1 and R2 are
linked to form a 5 to 10-membered carbocyclic ring system.
alcohol is 4-(ethyl-methyl-amino)-2-butanol.
alcohol is 4-(diethylamino)-2-butanol.
In another embodiment of the invention, the amino alcohol
is 4-(piperidino)-2-butanol.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, the amino
alcohol is 4-propylamino-2-butanol.
In another embodiment of the invention, the amino alcohol
is 4-isopropylamino-2-butanol.
20
methanol or ethanol.
40
Example 1
50
55
bent and thereby, removal of CO2 from the gas stream com
prise contacting the gas stream With the liquid absorbent at a
1)
60
NH
liquid absorbent.
OH
N /\N/\)\
Me
2) NaBH4
65
Methyl vinyl ketone (65 mL, 0.71 mol) Was added drop
absorbent.
US 7,910,078 B2
7
3H, 1:62 HZ), 1.20-1.56 (m, 2H), 2.41-2.94 (m, 3H), 3.75
3.92 (m, 1H) (NH and OH not observed).
ice Water. Sodium boron hydride (26 g, 0.68 mol) Was added
slowly. Cooling Was removed after the addition Was com
pleted in 1 h. The stirring Was continued at room temperature
for 3 h, at Which time 30 mL of saturated sodium chloride Was
added and the mixture Was stirred for additional 1 h. The color
of the solution turned from green dark into Wine red. The
formed solid Was ?ltered off through Buchuel funnel, and
Washed With dichloromethane. The organic layer Was sepa
rated and the aqueous layer Was extracted With dichlo
Example 4
Synthesis of the amino alcohol
4-(piperidino)-2-butanol (4)
10
OH
20
Example 2
25
1H).
Example 5
4-(morpholino)-2-butanol (2)4Comparative
Example
30
Me
2) NaBH4
0y
Comparative Example
35
40
anhydrous ethanol (90 mL) Was heated at re?ux for 1 day. The
solvent Was removed under reduced pressure. The remaining
material Was cooled in an ice Water bath and treated With an
Example 3
Synthesis of the amino alcohol
4-(isopropylamino)-2-butanol (3)
55
60
(CH3)
Expansion of the protocol in Example 1 to 4-(isopropy
cm_l; 1H NMR, 6 (200 MHZ, CDCl3): 0.85 (d, 6H), 1.04 (d,
65
US 7,910,078 B2
10
tional distillation to give the amino alcohol 1-diethylamino
2-methyl-3-pentanol (32.0 g, 64%) as a colorless oil: bp 105
Example 7
Synthesis of the amino alcohol
(7)4Comparative Example
20
Example 6
Synthesis of the amino alcohol
1. cnzo, MeZNH-HCI
25
2. NaBH4
(6)iComparative Example
OH
30
1. cnzo, EtZNH-HCI
2. NaBH4
and acetic acid (0.5 mL) in anhydrous ethanol (50 mL) Was
mL) Was heated at re?ux for 1 day. The solvent Was removed
the pH Was >10. The mixture Was ?ltered through a short pad
of CeliteTM and Washed With diethyl ether. The mixture Was
50
55
mol) in ethanol (70 mL), NaBH4 (35 g, 0.93 mol) Was sloWly
in ethanol (50 mL), NaBH4 (12 g, 0.32 mol) Was added sloWly
65
extracted With diethyl ether (x3) and the organic extracts Were
dried With Na2SO4, ?ltered and concentrated. The remaining
material Was puri?ed by fractional distillation to give the
US 7,910,078 B2
11
12
-continued
2.42 (dt, 1:29, 12.0 HZ, 1H), 2.22 (s, 6H), 1.46-1.57 (m, 1H),
1.36-1.44 (m, 1H), 0.85 (s, 9H); l3CNMR(CDCl3, 125 MHZ)
6 81.4 (CH), 59.4 (CH2), 44.9 (CH3), 34.3 (C), 26.3 (CH2),
25.4 (CH3).
10
Example 8
4-propylamino-2-butanol (8)
0.85 mol), freshly distilled methyl vinyl ketone (76 mL, 0.93
mol) Was added. After the addition Was completed in 1 hour,
cooling Was removed and the reaction mixture Was stirred at
room temperature for 3 hours. It Was then diluted With 50 mL
of methanol and cooled in an ice-Water bath. Sodium boron
O
l. neat amine
2. NaBH4, MeOH
MN/V
H
25
Was added dropWise (82 mL, 1.0 mol) over 2 hours. After the
35
40
(tq, 1:25, 6.5 HZ, 1H), 2.59 (ddd, 1:40, 110,125 HZ, 1H),
2.45 (ddd, J:7.0, 12.0, 14.5 HZ, 1H), 2.40 (dt, 1:45, 12.0 HZ,
1H), 2.25 (dq, 1:70, 12.5 HZ, 1H), 2.15 (s, 3H), 1.46-1.55 (m,
1H), 1.35-1.42 (m, 1H), 1.06 (d, 1:65 HZ, 3H), 0.98 (t, 1:70
HZ, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCI3, 125 MHZ) 6 69.9 (CH), 57.0
(CH2), 51.7 (CH2), 41.5 (CH3), 34.1 (CH2), 23.7 (CH3), 12.4
(CH3).
Example 10
Evaluation of the Performance of Amino Alcohols
(1) IO (9)
45
(i) Apparatus:
50
1:35, 11.0, 12.0 HZ, 1H), 2.50-2.60 (m, 1H), 2.40-2.48 (m,
1H), 1.38-1.54 (m, 4 H), 1.09 (d, 1:65 HZ, 3H), 0.85 (t, 1:75
HZ, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCI3, 125 MHZ) 669.9 (CH), 51.7
(CH2), 49.1 (CH2), 36.9 (CH2), 23.8 (CH3), 23.2 (CH2), 12.0
(CH3)
Vol. 26, pp. 541-549, 1976). Both the cell and the reactor Were
immersed in a constant temperature Water bath (Cole
55
Example 9
4-(ethyl-methyl-amino)-2-butanol (9)
(ii) Materials:
The solvents evaluated Were MEA at 99+% purity (ob
v1
l. N-ethylmethylamine
2. NaBH4, MeOH
65
US 7,910,078 B2
13
14
The solvent Was fed into the system (FIG. 1) and the gases
Were introduced to the process through ?oW meters (Cole
Parrner :0.15%/ C. full scale accuracy) at the desired partial
pressure. A gas mixture saturated With moisture content in the
40% loWer for synthetic amino alcohols (8) and (9), respec
tively). HoWever, synthetic amino alcohol (3) has a higher
CO2 absorption capacity than MEA at this higher tempera
tion. The Wetted gas mixture Was then bubbled through the
amine test solution and eventually exhausted. The gas Was
sent to the condenser before being vented to the fume hood.
The process Was operated under atmospheric pressure.
To ensure that equilibrium Was reached, the system Was
kept in operation for 8-10 hours. Then, the liquid sample Was
taken to analyZe for CO2 loading. The presence of CO2 Was
evaluated many times, for Which the sample Was taken every
features of synthetic amino alcohols (1), (3), (4), (8) and (9) is
the high absorption capacity that arises from the unique rela
tive positions of the amino and hydroxyl groups in the mol
one or tWo hours until the CO2 loading Was constant or until
20
30
appended claims.
lated.
35
temperatures for synthetic amino alcohol (1), (4), (5) and (7).
40
TABLE 1
3
15 and 100
40, 60 and 80
Temperature ( C.)
TABLE 2
Solubilities of MBA and the synthetic amino alcohols (1) to (9) at
conditions close to the absorption and stripping columns.
CO2 loading
at 25 C.
(mole
Concentration of
CO2/mole
Sample
Condition
Sample (mole/L)
amine)
MBA
15 kPa CO2 at 40 C.
100 kPa CO at 40 C.
2.97
2.97
0.609
0.693
0.490
HO/\/ NH2
2.97
3.00
2.97
0.621
0.379
0.586
Comment
US 7,910,078 B2
15
16
TABLE 2-c0ntinued
CO2 loading
at 25 C.
(mole
Sample
Concentration of
COZ/mole
Sample (mole/L)
amine)
Comment
15 kPa CO2 at 40 C.
2.78
0.826
Phase separation
2.99
0.962
at high
15 kPa CO2 at 60 C.
0.637
temperature
0.013
0.840
0.016
Condition
\
N
J
OH
15 kPa CO2 at 80 C.
100 kPa CO2 at 80 C.
OH
/\)\
0.437
0.006
0.724
0.008
4.80
0.000
0.000
15 kPa CO2 at 40 C.
No absorption
(\N
V
H
15 kPa CO2 at 40 C.
2.72
0.836
Solid at room
2.83
0.919
temperature
15 kPa CO2
100 kPa CO2
15 kPa CO2
100 kPa CO2
3.00
N/A
2.03
2.19
0.698
N/A
0.650
0.781
OH
OH
at 60 C.
at 60 C.
at 80 C.
at 80 C.
15 kPa CO2 at 40 C.
100 kPa CO2 at 40 C.
15 kPa CO2 at 60 C.
OH
15 kPa CO2 at 25 C.
0.747
0.020
0.947
0.593
0.015
0.807
0.019
0.497
0.040
0.735
0.089
0.398
0.033
0.703
15 kPa CO2 at 40 C.
100 kPa CO2 at 40 C.
15 kPa CO2 at 55 C.
100 kPa CO2 at 55 C.
OH
/\N
15 kPa CO2 at 40 C.
100 kPa CO2 at 40 C.
0.243
0.021
0.566
0.037
0.223
0.011
0.545
0.013
2.97
2.93
0.000
0.000
Phase Separation
No absorption
US 7,910,078 B2
17
TABLE 2-c0ntinued
Solubilities of MBA and the synthetic amino alcohols (1) to (9) at
CO2 loading
at 25 C.
(mole
Sample
OH
\
N
Concentration of
COZ/mole
Condition
Sample (mole/L)
amine)
Comment
15 kPa CO2 at 25 C.
100 kPa CO2 at 25 C.
2.83
2.90
0.361
0.772
15 kPa CO2 at 40 C.
100 kPa CO2 at 40 C.
2.87
2.93
0.195
0.403
0.116
0.000
Phase separation
at high
temperature
2.87
0.264
2.91
3.00
2.92
0.681
0.849
0.541
OH
15 kPa CO2 at 40 C.
100 kPa CO2 at 40 C.
15 kPa CO2 at 60 C.
\/\N
2.96
0.729
15 kPa CO2 at 80 C.
100 kPa CO2 at 80 C.
2.31
2.89
0.396
0.565
15 kPa CO2 at 40 C.
100 kPa CO2 at 40 C.
15 kPa CO2 at 60 C.
2.91
2.97
2.91
0.695
0.948
0.323
2.81
2.79
0.889
0.115
2.88
0.352
OH
/\N
I
9
TABLE 3
Absorption capacity difference of synthetic amino alcohols compared
With MEA.
CO2
loading
Absorption
Capacity
at 25 C.
Difference
(mole
(mole
COZ/mole COZ/mole
Sample
Condition
amine)
amine)
% Difference
MBA
15 kPa CO2 at 40 C.
100 kPa CO2 at 40 C.
0.609
0.693
N/A
N/A
15 kPa CO2 at 60 C.
0.490
0.621
0.379
0.586
NH2
HO/\/
\
N
15 kPa c02 at 40 c.
0.826
0.217
35.63
0.962
0.637
0.269
0.147
38.82
30.00
0.840
0.279
35.27
15 kPa c02 at 80 c.
100 kPa c02 at 80 c.
0.437
0.724
0.058
0.138
15.30
23.55
15 kPa c02 at 40 c.
0.836
0.227
37.27
0.919
0.226
32.61
15 kPa c02
100 kPa c02
15 kPa c02
100 kPa c02
0.698
N/A
0.650
0.781
0.208
N/A
0.271
0.195
42.45
N/A
71.50
33.28
OH
OH
at
at
at
at
60
60
80
80
c.
c.
c.
c.
US 7,910,078 B2
19
20
TABLE 3-continued
Absorption capacity difference of synthetic amino alcohols compared
with MEA.
CO2
loading
Absorption
Capacity
at 25 C.
Difference
(mole
(mole
COZ/mole COZ/mole
Sample
Condition
amine)
amine)
C.
C.
C.
C.
C.
C.
0.747
0.947
0.593
0.807
0.497
0.735
0.138
0.254
0.103
0.246
0.118
0.149
22.66
36.65
21.02
29.95
31.13
25.43
15 kPa CO2 at 40 C.
100 kPa CO2 at 40 C.
0.681
0.849
0.072
0.156
11.82
22.51
0.051
10.41
OH
15 kPa CO2
100 kPa CO2
15 kPa CO2
100 kPa CO2
15 kPa CO2
100 kPa CO2
at 40
at 40
at 60
at 60
at 80
at 80
% Difference
4
OH
\/\N
H
OH
/\N
I
0.729
0.108
15 kPa CO2 at 80 C.
100 kPa CO2 at 80 C.
0.396
0.565
0.017
0.021
17.39
4.49
3.58
15 kPa CO2 at 40 C.
100 kPa CO2 at 40 C.
15 kPa CO2 at 60 C.
0.695
0.948
0.323
0.086
0.255
0.167
14.12
36.80
34.08
0.889
0.115
0.268
0.264
43.16
69.66
0.352
0.234
39.93
9
*negative value () means the Absorption is lower than MEA.
We claim:
9. The method according to claim 1, wherein the amino
alcohol is 4-propylamino-2-butanol.
1. A method for removing carbon dioxide (CO2) from a gas
stream comprising contacting the gas stream with a liquid 35
10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the amino
absorbent consisting essentially of an aqueous solvent and an
alcohol is 4-(ethyl-methyl-amino)2-butanol.
amino alcohol of the formula I:
11. The method according claim 1, wherein the aqueous
solvent solubiliZes the amino alcohol and is an absorbent for
40 CO2
OH
(I)
12. The method according to claim 1, wherein the aqueous
solvent is selected from water, a short-chain alcohol and
R1\ M
2/N
R
combinations thereof.
13. The method according to claim 12, wherein the aque
45 ous solvent is deionized water.
C l_1Oalkyl, or
R1 and R2 are linked to form a 5 to 12-membered carbocy- 50 thereby, removal of CO2 from the gas stream comprise con
gas stream.
alcohol is 4-(piperidino)-2-butanol.
CO2.
US 7,910,078 B2
21
22