Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GEOTECHNICAL AND
HYDROGEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS
SUITE 300 - 788 COPPING STREET
NORTH VANCOUVER, B.C.
CANADA - V7M 3G6
TEL: (604) 986-8551 / FAX: (604) 985-7286
www.piteau.com
Prepared by
PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.
PROJECT 3375
APRIL 2015
i.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd. has reviewed the Trans Mountain Expansion Projects
submission to the National Energy Board with respect to groundwater issues affecting the
Shxwwhmel and Peters First Nations. Their respective Reserves, Ohamil I.R. 1 and
Peters I.R. 1 and 2, are located on the eastern bank of the Fraser River, between Chilliwack and
Hope, BC, and within the footprint of the proposed corridor of the Trans Mountain Expansion
Project. These communities rely on groundwater as their sole water supply.
The scope of work involved a review of the National Energy Board submission as well as
compilation and assessment of data from the provincial well and aquifer database, Piteau
Associates Engineering reports and file, Aboriginal and Northern Development Canada records,
First Nation Health Authority water quality database, and data from Shxwwhmel and Peters
First Nations.
A pipeline leak or rupture has a low probability of occurring and a potentially high consequence to
an underlying aquifer. The consequences of a leak or rupture will depend strongly on the
response time and the specific actions taken during the response. Petroleum hydrocarbon
released from the pipeline would migrate downward due to gravity, with a portion retained in the
pore space of the unsaturated zone. According to Trans Mountain Expansion Project, the
petroleum hydrocarbon is comprised solely of light non-aqueous phase liquids, which float on top
of water and do not mix with water. If petroleum hydrocarbon reached the water table it would
form a pool on the water table. A small proportion of the petroleum hydrocarbon would dissolve
in the groundwater, forming a dissolved plume of toxic compounds that would migrate along the
groundwater flow direction. Once a plume of petroleum hydrocarbon has developed in the
aquifer, it can be very difficult to remediate.
ii.
Ohamil I.R. 1 overlies the Harrison Lake Aquifer No. 3, a highly vulnerable and moderately
productive sand and gravel aquifer. The Shxwwhmel community is supplied by two drilled
wells west of the proposed pipeline corridor. Results from water quality samples collected from
1997 to 2015 fall within the Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality, with the exception of
0.2% of E. coli results and 12% of total coliform results. The well water is not treated prior to
distribution. The water supply wells have a high vulnerability to a pipeline leak based on the
unconfined nature of the aquifer and the proposed pipeline corridor bisecting the aquifer and
intersecting the interpreted range of five-year well capture zones.
Peters I.R. 1 and 2 are situated approximately 5 km downstream of Ohamil I.R. 1. The 12
individual water supply wells are located in the footprint of the same Aquifer No. 3 that underlies
the Shxwwhmel First Nation. While a summary of water quality data was not available,
historical coliform exceedances have required boil water advisories for the community in the past.
The current pipeline configuration appears to be outside of the eastern boundary of the aquifer,
which decreases the risk of impact in the case of a leak or rupture.
Mitigative design characteristics that should be considered for the Trans Mountain Expansion
Project are increased pipeline wall thickness and/or double walled pipe, leak detection system,
minimizing the response time to a detected leak, and routing the pipeline around the groundwater
aquifers. The Trans Mountain Expansion Project submission to the National Energy Board did
not consider the potential effects to groundwater quality in the case of a leak or rupture, and the
area of groundwater related concern is considered to be an unreasonably narrow zone
surrounding the pipeline corridor. In addition to the mitigative design characteristics to be
considered, the response plan should be revisited to incorporate an automatic hydrogeological
investigation in the event of a leak, and a spill response scenario for a groundwater aquifer.
Specifics of a compensation plan for the Reserves in response to a leak should be clarified. The
absence of dense non-aqueous phase liquids content in the petroleum hydrocarbon should be
confirmed again.
CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1.2 SCOPE
1
1
1
3. BASELINE CONDITIONS
3.1 DATA COMPILATION
3.2 OHAMIL I.R. 1
3.2.1 Aquifer Characterization
3.2.2 Well Locations and Operation
3.2.3 Aquifer Water Quality
3.2.4 Vulnerability to a Pipeline Leak
3.3 Peters I.R. 1 and 2
3.3.1 Aquifer Characterization
3.3.2 Well Locations and Operation
3.3.3 Aquifer Water Quality
3.3.4 Vulnerability to a Pipeline Leak
6
6
6
6
7
8
8
9
9
10
10
11
12
12
13
17
18
6. LIMITATIONS
19
7. REFERENCES
20
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
Well Logs
Water Quality Database for Ohamil I.R. 1
TABLES
Table I
Table II
Table III
Table IV
FIGURES
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Residual Oil Saturation at the Pipeline Oil Spill Site near Bemidji, Minnesota
Fig. 3
Regional Plan
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
1.
1. INTRODUCTION
Compilation of data from the provincial well and aquifer database, Piteau and Aboriginal
and Northern Development Canada (AANDC) records, First Nation Health Authority
2.
(FNHA) water quality database, the Shxwwhmel and Peters First Nations, and online
mapping sources;
This report discusses the potential groundwater impacts that could result from a pipeline leak or
rupture, reviews the current knowledge of groundwater conditions for the Shxwwhmel and
Peters First Nations, and provides specific guidance to the First Nations on issues to follow up on
the TMEP submission.
3.
The risk to groundwater associated with a pipeline leak or rupture is characterized by its low
probability of occurrence and potentially high consequence if it does. The following paragraphs
provide an overview of how a leak or rupture in a buried pipeline could impact the groundwater
supply aquifer underlying the Ohamil I.R. 1 and Peters I.R. 1 and 2, which for the purpose of this
report are collectively referred to as the Reserve lands.
A sand and gravel groundwater aquifer, such as the aquifer underlying the Reserve lands, can be
broadly divided into an unsaturated zone and a saturated zone. The unsaturated zone is above
the water table and the pore spaces are only partly filled with water. In contrast, the saturated
zone is below the water table and the pore spaces are completely filled with water. These two
broad zones within an aquifer are relevant to understanding the mechanisms of potential
groundwater impacts of a pipeline leak.
The pipeline will likely carry several types of petroleum hydrocarbon (PHC) compounds ranging
from crude oil (including diluted bitumen) to refined products such as gasoline and diesel fuels.
Each of these mixtures contains many thousands of individual molecules including alkanes,
naphthalenes, aromatics, and aliphatics. Virtually all of these have very low solubility in water,
and a specific gravity of less than 1. When released into the environment, PHCs are collectively
described as light non-aqueous phase liquids (LNAPLs). Because the pipeline may carry diluted
bitumen (dilbit), some of the PHC compounds present may be denser than water, and would
tend to sink through water. These types of compounds are referred to as dense non-aqueous
phase liquids (DNAPLs). The difference between LNAPLs and DNAPLs is relevant because of
the difference in potential impact and in their ultimate fate in the aquifer. However, the proportion
of DNAPL in the pipeline is expected to be inconsequential.
The pipeline is typically buried above the water table in the unsaturated zone. When the
Ohamil I.R. 1 community wells were installed in 1997, the depth to water was 3.1 to 3.5m below
ground level (m-bgl). Water levels from the Provincial water well database indicate similar depths
to water along the pipeline right-of-way. Therefore, the pipeline will be buried quite close to the
water table. If the pipeline leaks or ruptures, the leaked hydrocarbon products will migrate
downward through the unsaturated zone under the influence of gravity. As the hydrocarbons
4.
migrate downwards, a portion will be retained in the pores of the unsaturated zone. Because the
aquifer materials typically include finer layers that consist of silts and/or fine sands within the
coarser sands and gravels, the hydrocarbons will tend to spread out along these layers and form
thin pools on top of these layers as they migrate downward (Fig. 1). If enough hydrocarbon spills,
not all of it can be retained in the pores of the unsaturated zone and the LNAPL portion of the
hydrocarbons will form a pool on the water table. This pool on the water table is also called an
LNAPL pancake. Volatile and semi-volatile components of the residual LNAPL in the
unsaturated zone combined with the LNAPL pancake will partition to the vapour phase resulting
in a vapour plume within the unsaturated zone in proximity to the point of release. In addition, a
small amount of the lighter molecules in the LNAPL pancake will dissolve into groundwater
migrating through and past the LNAPL, leading to the formation of plumes of dissolved PHC.
This is mostly a concern with respect to mono-cyclic aromatic compounds, which include
benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylenes (BTEX), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
(PAH) compounds, such as naphthalene, which are amongst the lightest and more soluble
molecules present in petroleum hydrocarbon, and have the greatest toxicity. Some of the lighter
aliphatic molecules are also considered to have toxic effects.
The behaviour of DNAPLs is similar to LNAPLs until they reach the water table. Unlike
LNAPLs, the DNAPLs will continue to sink through the saturated zone until they have been
retained in the available pore space or until they reach a very low-permeability layer, thus
allowing a thicker dissolved plume to develop. In the case of the Reserve lands, this
impermeable layer is currently assumed to be the bedrock because no laterally extensive, lowpermeability layers are currently identified. Until Trans Mountain responds to the Peters First
Nation Information Request, the DNAPL content of hydrocarbons in the pipeline is unknown.
The residual LNAPL in the unsaturated zone and the LNAPL pancake will tend to maintain a
relatively stable location. However, the dissolved plume emanating from the LNAPL pancake will
tend to migrate in the direction of groundwater flow. Therefore, knowledge of the groundwaterflow direction is required to understand the migration direction of the plume. Water level
measurements and surveyed casing elevations at several wells are required to deduce the
groundwater flow direction. Because these aquifers are immediately adjacent to the Fraser River,
the groundwater-flow direction probably varies depending on the location. For example, the
groundwater flow direction close to the river may be approximately parallel to the river whereas
5.
the flow direction close to the pipeline may be generally from the pipeline toward the river. The
groundwater flow direction may also vary depending on the season. For example, when the river
is high during the spring, the flow direction may tend to loop from the river into the aquifer and out
into the river again. In any case, the data currently available on the Reserve lands are currently
insufficient to understand the location-dependent and time-dependent groundwater flow
directions.
Plumes of dissolved hydrocarbons molecules generally migrate slowly, partly because
groundwater itself moves quite slowly, and also due to biogeochemical processes, which tend to
retard the rate of migration, and degrade dissolved hydrocarbons at the leading edge of the
plume. A typical groundwater velocity in a sand and gravel aquifer could range from about 5 to
500 m/yr, depending on the slope of the water table and the permeability of the sand and gravel.
The risk to a groundwater supply well from a pipeline leak or rupture is likely not immediate (on
the scale of days) unless the well is very close to the leak. The aforementioned biogeochemical
processes may also limit the ultimate length of the plume. Nevertheless, groundwater systems
are characteristically uncertain and neither of these facts can be assumed to prevent
contamination of a well.
Petroleum hydrocarbons can be very difficult to remediate once they have entered an aquifer.
Depending on the size of the spill, the contamination could potentially be permanent. For
example, an oil pipeline ruptured in a glacial outwash aquifer near Bemidji, Minnesota in 1979
(Fig. 2). An estimated 1.7 million litres of oil was spilled and an estimated 0.4 million litres of oil
remained after the cleanup was completed. Even though the spill occurred 35 years ago,
considerable quantities of oil remain in the ground and the dissolved plume persists despite five
years of pump-and-skim remediation and ongoing natural degradation (Essaid et al., 2011). This
spill was quite large but it illustrates that cleanup and remediation can be challenging.
6.
3. BASELINE CONDITIONS
Alfred James and Dean Jones (water system operator) from Shxwwhmel First Nation
Mark Turner, an Environmental Health Officer from First Nation Health Authority (FNHA)
for water quality records
The following paragraphs discuss the site-specific groundwater conditions for the Reserve lands.
3.2 OHAMIL I.R. 1
3.2.1 Aquifer Characterization
Ohamil I.R. 1 lies entirely within the footprint of the Harrison Lake Aquifer No. 3 as
mapped in the Aquifer Classification Database maintained by the BC Ministry of
Environment (BC MOE) (Figs. 3 and 4). This sand and gravel aquifer is comprised of
Fraser River Sediments and extends along the eastern side of the Fraser River Valley,
bounded by the Fraser River to the west and the bedrock valley wall to the east (Fig. 5).
The aquifer is classified as highly vulnerable with a moderate productivity and a low level
of development compared to the aquifers productivity. No water quality or quantity
concerns were identified in the Aquifer Classification Database (BCGOV, 2015).
The mapped aquifer lithology is confirmed with drill logs from wells drilled at Ohamil I.R. 1.
All five well logs show a shallow layer of top soil and overbank sediments ranging from
0.6 to 2.1m, followed by sand, sand and gravel or gravel to the final well depths of 12.5 to
25.0m (Table I and Appendix A).
7.
8.
Ohamil I.R. 1 were identified, and decommissioned in accordance with the groundwater
protection regulation. The drilling information and status of the five recorded wells are
summarized in Table I, and all records of well drilling and decommissioning from the well
resources database (BC MOE, 2015) are included in Appendix A.
3.2.3 Aquifer Water Quality
Groundwater from the Ohamil I.R. 1 community system is not treated or chlorinated prior
to distribution. Water quality records for basic potability are available from the time of
installation in December 1997, and from the FNHA for samples collected from the
distribution system in March 2002, June 2004, January and December 2007,
September 2009 and October 2011. Additional sampling was completed for volatiles in
December 1997, March 2002 and December 2007. Water samples collected from various
locations in the distribution system have been analyzed for total and Escherichia coliforms
(total and E. coli) at least once per month. Initial water quality sampling characterized
water from both wells as moderately hard water with moderate mineralization, with all
analyzed water quality parameters meeting their respective Guidelines for Canadian
Drinking Water Quality (GCDWQ). All results for volatiles are below the detection limit.
Exceedances of E. coli have been rare, with three positive results out of 1217 samples,
occurring once each in 2005, 2010 and 2012. The four fecal coliform results were <1, and
of the 1229 total coliform results, 148 (12%) had exceedances. Other than the
aforementioned coliform exceedances, no water quality exceedances were reported by
the FNHA. Water quality data provided by the FNHA for the Ohamil I.R. 1 community
system is summarized in Table II, and the full water quality data report is provided in
Appendix B.
3.2.4 Vulnerability to a Pipeline Leak
A range of approximate five-year well capture zones interpreted for a hydrogeological
assessment prior to well construction (Piteau, 1996) are included on Fig. 3. These well
capture zones reflect the possible range in natural groundwater flow direction and were
developed based on a well yield of 1.3 L/s, aquifer thickness of 20m, hydraulic
conductivity of 10-4 m/s, and hydraulic gradient of 0.005 m/m. These parameters result in
a groundwater flow velocity of about 0.2 m/day. The capture zones were intended to
provide an area within which development should be restricted. The proposed pipeline
9.
corridor runs adjacent to the Trans-Canada Highway through the middle of Ohamil I.R. 1
bisecting the aquifer and intersecting the interpreted range of five-year well capture zones.
Furthermore, the aquifer is unconfined and classified as highly vulnerable in the provincial
aquifer database. Therefore, this aquifer, and the water supply wells within the aquifer,
have a high vulnerability to a pipeline leak.
3.3 PETERS I.R. 1 AND 2
3.3.1 Aquifer Characterization
Peters I.R. 1 is situated on a sand and gravel point bar deposited by the Fraser River.
Peters I.R. 2 is located on a mid-channel deposit separated from Peters I.R. 1 by an
ephemeral side channel of the Fraser River, while Peters I.R. 1A is located on the eastern
valley wall (Fig. 6). Peters I.R. 1 overlies the southern end of the mapped Harrison Lake
Aquifer No. 3 described in Section 3.1.1. As described above, this aquifer is classified as
highly vulnerable, with a moderate productivity and a low level of development compared
to the aquifers productivity.
Lithology from seven of nine well logs obtained from the BC MOE Wells Database confirm
the sand and gravel lithology within the mapped aquifer (Table III and Appendix A). Three
of the logs also show up to 2.1m of silt, sand and silt, or dirt and clay above the sand and
gravel, which is logged to a maximum depth of 24.7m. The exact locations of the two
wells that did not encounter sand and gravel (WTN 32113, 64763) are not known but
according to the BC MOE Wells Database, they are located within the boundary of
Peters I.R. 1. These wells encountered clay or till above bedrock, and are likely located
close to the valley wall.
Water levels measured in water wells servicing the Bill Peters and Frank Peters
residences in September 1989 were 5.4m and 6.2m, respectively (Piteau, 1990). Water
levels recorded by drillers at the time of drilling range from 5.2 to 7.9 m-bgl in the wells
encountering sand and gravel (Table III and Fig. 7). More recent water level records are
not available.
10.
11.
In 2002, Novatec reported that coliform exceedances (>70% of seven samples in 1999)
for the entire First Nation community were noted in reports from Health Canada, and the
community had relied on bottled water for drinking water. One sample was collected in
2000 and three in 2001. Results for these follow-up samples are unavailable as of the
date of this report. In a March 31, 2000 letter from Health Canada to the Peters First
Nation, an alternative water source, such as water coolers, was recommended as an
interim measure due to the variability in bacteriological sample results (Novatec, 2002).
During the February 19, 2002 site inspection by Dr. Troy Vassos, P.Eng., of Novatec, it
was noted that water quality along the south shore of the Fraser River can affect g/w
quality in the sandy soils, and that the top end of the reserve had problems with water
quality, which move through the community. Also, the Single Home System was
supplied by a well located within a cattle pasture (Novatec, 2002).
Other than the coliform exceedances, Novatec noted in 2002 that available water
chemistry collected every two or three years met the GCDWQ. However, it was noted in
2002 that the Band has complained of odour, oily film and colour (periodic) problems
(Novatec, 2002).
No further water quality data were available from the FNHA as of the date of this report,
although Peters Councillor Victoria Peters indicated that boil water advisories have been
issued intermittently for the community (personal communication, Feb. 27, 2015).
3.3.4 Vulnerability to a Pipeline Leak
The current version of the pipeline alignment appears to be just east of the eastern
boundary of the aquifer, which decreases the risk of impact if the pipeline leaks or
ruptures. The aquifer itself is classified with high vulnerability. In the case of water
contamination, the emergency plan is to use a telephone or travel door-to-door to notify
residents of hazards (Novatec, 2002).
12.
communication protocol between the pipeline monitor and the response team;
13.
Routing
Routing the pipeline around rather than through the groundwater aquifers will reduce the risk to
groundwater supplies. Similar to pipe thickness, choosing a route around an aquifer may increase
costs but warrants consideration because of the potentially high impact of a pipeline leak.
4.2 KEY ISSUES TO ADDRESS FROM TRANS MOUNTAIN SUBMISSION
Potential effects on groundwater
Many aquifers along the pipeline alignment through the Fraser Valley have been described as
highly vulnerableto possible contamination from an accident or malfunction (Section 4.3.4 of
groundwater technical report in Volume 5C). The aquifers listed included Aquifer #3, which
underlies the Reserve lands. TMEP has promised to evaluate the need for additional mitigation
measures in the Fraser Valley such as valve spacing, deeper burial or thicker-walled pipe during
detailed engineering (p. 7-76 of Volume 7). The outcome of this evaluation should be verified.
Nevertheless, the specific potential effects of the pipeline on groundwater that were identified in
the Trans Mountain submission (for example, Section 3.1 of Volume 5C, Table 5.1-1 of
Volume 5C) did not include the potential impact of a pipeline leak or rupture on groundwater
quality. The probability of a leak or rupture is very low but the potential consequences are very
high. Therefore, this potential effect should be specifically addressed.
Area of groundwater related concern
A narrow corridor on either side of the pipeline alignment has been delineated in the groundwater
technical report (Volume 5C) with red hatching, and is referenced as area of groundwater related
concern (Figs. 8 and 9). This narrow corridor seems unreasonably small when considering the
potential for groundwater impacts to the highly vulnerable unconfined aquifer which extends to
the Fraser River. This corridor does not seem to consider the potential development and
migration of a dissolved plume that could result from a pipeline leak, nor rapid movement of a
larger spill along natural and constructed surface channels, and through culverts constructed to
convey runoff across the highway corridor. The significance of this area of groundwater related
concern and how it pertains to the groundwater risk assessment should be clarified. An
appropriately sized shaped area of groundwater related concern would be based on the proximity
of groundwater wells, groundwater flow directions, and groundwater flow velocities.
14.
The groundwater technical report also presented the criteria for Study Area Boundaries
(Section 3.3 of Volume 5C), which are described as follows:
The groundwater quantity and quality assessment discusses water quality and
quantity within the Water Quality and Quantity LSA and the Aquatics RSA. The
Water Quality and Quantity LSA is the area generally extending 100 m up-gradient
of the centre of the proposed pipeline corridor to a minimum of 300 m downgradient of the centre of the proposed pipeline corridor, as well as within 300 m of
the proposed pipeline corridor, facility or HDD entrance in potentially vulnerable
aquifer areas in hydraulic connection with the Footprint and in consideration of
surface water drainage patterns along the pipeline corridor.
The significance of the study area boundary is not clear because it does not seem to have been
considered in the groundwater technical report itself when assessing groundwater wells in
proximity to the pipeline alignment. The significance of the study area boundary, especially
compared with the area of groundwater related concern, should be clarified. For example:
Would this boundary be applicable to a groundwater study that would be conducted in the
event of a pipeline leak or does it apply only to the pre-construction characterization?
Does this boundary define the wells that will be characterized prior to pipeline
construction?
What rationale would be used to extend the down-gradient extent past the 300m minimum?
15.
presented. Such a review would be expected to be readily available from a company with a
commitment to pipeline safety. This review would include at the least the following aspects of
each leak:
location;
estimated volume of hydrocarbon that spilled and the basis for that estimate.
The Trans Mountain response to Shxwwhmel FN IR No. 2 (Exhibit B317-30, Filing Number
A4H9CB) indicated that at least one of the pipelines would be operated with slack line flow at
least part of the time. This type of pipeline operation can limit the effectiveness of leak detection
systems. Further clarification on the resolution of the leak detection system and estimates of
potential volumes that could leak without detection, and/or in the interval between detection and
intervention, is required.
Response time
If a spill occurs, a faster response time will reduce the potential effect on groundwater quality.
The response time to the Reserve lands should be clarified.
Quality of response plan
The response plan to minimize the effects on groundwater quality requires aspects that are
distinct from land-surface spills and water spills. These aspects include the following:
a description of the action plan for characterizing, containing and cleaning up a pipeline
leak or rupture.
16.
The Trans Mountain Response to Shxwwhmel FN IR No. 2 (Exhibit B317-30, Filing Number
A4H9CB) indicated that a hydrogeological investigation would be completed if groundwater
impacts are suspected. However, considering that the pipeline is buried over a vulnerable
aquifer, groundwater impacts should automatically be suspected and a hydrogeological
investigation conducted, if the pipeline leaks. Some clarity is required on this issue, including the
specifics of the hydrogeological investigation such as (but not limited to): monitoring well locations
relative to the leak for determining groundwater flow directions and for characterizing the spill;
and well screen completion intervals to characterize the vertical distribution of any contamination.
The Trans Mountain Response to Shxwwhmel FN IR No. 2 also indicated that the principle of
net environmental benefit would be applied to any site remediation plan that would be
developed in response to a spill. At least one example of this approach from a Kinder Morgan
spill, preferably in a groundwater aquifer, is recommended to allow the Shxwwhmel and
Peters First Nations to assess whether the track record of Kinder Morgan meets their standard of
performance.
The Trans Mountain Response to Shxwwhmel FN IR No. 2 also indicated that Aboriginal groups
will be invited to participate in Unified Command, which is the overall management approach for
developing emergency response. Participation in Unified Command is recommended.
In the original submission, Trans Mountain included a series of spill scenarios at a series of
specific locations along the pipeline alignment, which suggests that spill response is being dealt
with systematically and considering all conditions. However, none of the spill response scenarios
included a leak or rupture within a groundwater aquifer. Considering that the pipeline is routed
through groundwater aquifers that supply drinking water throughout the Fraser Valley, this
omission suggests that the risk of groundwater contamination is taken lightly. The Shxwwhmel
and Peters First Nations should request that a spill response scenario be developed for leaks and
ruptures within a groundwater aquifer.
Compensation plan
In the event of a pipeline leak, a compensation plan should be in place for providing drinking
water that specifies the conditions that would be required, if any, before an alternate water supply
would be provided. The Trans Mountain Response to Shxwwhmel FN IR No. 2 indicated that
17.
a safe water supply would be provided during the period that a drinking water advisory is in
place. The specifics of this promise should be clarified. For example, if a leak occurred within
one of the Reserves, would Trans Mountain wait until a drinking water advisory was issued or
would a drinking water supply be provided at the time the leak occurred?
Proportion of DNAPL in the hydrocarbon mixture
Trans Mountain indicated that the PHCs in the pipeline would be comprised of only LNAPLs,
which would float on the water table (response to Peters IR2, Exhibit B317-30, Filing Number
A4H9CB). If the PHCs in the pipeline include any DNAPL, the risks to groundwater are higher
because DNAPL would tend to sink below the water table instead of floating on the top as an
LNAPL would. The resulting dissolved plume would extend to greater depth.
4.3 ISSUES TRACKING TABLE
A comprehensive list of issues has been compiled in an Issues Tracking Table (Table IV).
18.
The proposed Trans Mountain Expansion Project would result in an additional pipeline through
the groundwater supply aquifers of the Reserve lands. These aquifers are classified as high
vulnerability and comprise the sole drinking water supply for the two Reserves.
The probability of a pipeline leak is very low but the potential impacts are high and could persist
for many decades. While the current submission deals with several risks related to groundwater,
it appears to deal inadequately with or almost ignore the potential effect of a pipeline leak on
groundwater quality. Key issues for Trans Mountain to address relating to groundwater at the
Shxwwhmel and Peters First Nations include the following:
demonstrate that the potential effects of a pipeline leak on groundwater quality are being
addressed realistically;
define the area of groundwater related concern and provide the rationale for how this
area was delineated;
list specific conditions under which safe drinking water would be supplied in the event of a
pipeline leak; and
19.
6. LIMITATIONS
The assessment reported herein has been conducted using a standard of care consistent with
that expected of scientific and engineering professionals undertaking similar work under similar
conditions in Canada. No warranty is expressed or implied.
In conducting this assessment, Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd. has relied on information
provided by others. While we believe the data to be representative of site conditions, we do not
accept responsibility for their accuracy or completeness.
This report is comprised of text, tables, figures and appendices, and all components must be read
and interpreted in the context of the whole report. This report has been prepared for the sole use
of Gowlings and Shxwwhmel and Peters First Nations, and no representation of any kind is
made to any other party.
Respectfully submitted,
PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.
7. REFERENCES
BCGOV, 2015. BC GOV ENV Water Protection and Sustainability Branch. Ground Water
Aquifers shapefile, revised February 2015. Available at
http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wsd/plan_protect_sustain/groundwater/aquifers/index.html.
British Columbia Ministry of Environment (BC MOE). WELLS Ground Water Wells and Aquifer
Database. Accessed March 2015. Available at
http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wsd/data_searches/wells/
Essaid, H.I., Bekins, Barbara A., Herkelrath, William N., Delin, Geoffrey N., 2011. Crude Oil at
the Bemidji Site: 25 Years of Monitoring, Modeling and Understanding. Groundwater
Vol. 49, No. 5, pp. 706-726. September-October.
Jones, Dean, and James, Alfred from Shxwwhmel First Nation. Phone call on February 24,
2015.
Novatec Consultants Inc., 2002. Assessment Study of Water and Wastewater Systems and
Associated Water Management Practices at Peters Band. Report prepared for Indian
and Northern Affairs Canada BC Region, June.
Peters, Victoria from Peters First Nation. Phone call on February 27, 2015.
Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd., 1990. Hydrogeological Assessment for Ground Disposal of
Septic Tank Effluent, Peters I.R. No. 1 Near Hope, British Columbia. Report prepared for
Indian and Northern Affairs, Vancouver, British Columbia, June, 5 p.
Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd., 1996. Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Assessment for
Proposed Development Ohamil I.R. #1. Report prepared for Urban Systems Ltd. and
Ohamil Indian Band, June, 22 p.
Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd., 1998. Shxwwhmel First Nation Water System Production
Wells PW97-1 and PW97-2 Construction and Testing Program Results, Ohamil I.R. No.
1, Hope, British Columbia. Report prepared for Urban Systems Ltd., January 13, 13 p.
Urban Systems Ltd., 1999. Completion Report and Operation and Maintenance Manual for
Shxwwhmel First Nation Community Water System Upgrade CPMS #2114. Report
prepared for Shxwwhmel First Nation, September.
TABLES
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF WELLS AT OHAMIL I.R. 1
5-Jun-80
12.8
20-Jul-84
22.3
11.3
12.5
18-May-90
13.7
12.23
13.4
18-Nov-97
24.4
22.9
24.4
Operational
19-Nov-97
25.0
23.5
25.0
Decommissioned
Decommissioned
Decommissioned
Decommissioned
Decommissioned
Decommissioned
13-Nov-08
13-Nov-08
13-Nov-08
13-Nov-08
13-Nov-08
13-Nov-08
6.7
7.3
45248
M Clemens
66017
M Clemens
PW-1
76083
PW-2
76210
PW97-1
Assumed
decommissioned
Assumed
decommissioned
Assumed
decommissioned
Operational
76211
PW97-2
95096
95097
95098
95099
95100
95102
Screen
Bottom Diameter
Depth (inches)
(m)
Date Drilled or
Decommissioned
Owner
Well ID
Screen
Top
Depth
(m)
Well
Depth
(m)
Well
Tag
Number
Well Status 2
Lithology
Lithology
Depth
Intervals (m)
Topsoil
Gravel
Silty Topsoil
Sand and Gravel
Topsoil
Gravel
Topsoil
Sand
Sand, Gravel, Binder
Sand and Gravel
Topsoil
Sand
Sand, Gravel, Binder
Sand and Gravel
0 to 0.9
0.9 to 12.8
0 to 2.1
2.1 to 12.5
0 to 0.9
0.9 to 13.7
0 to 0.6
0.6 to 2.7
2.7 to 7.9
7.9 to 24.4
0 to 0.6
0.6 to 3.4
0 to 7.6
0 to 25
Static
Drillers Well
Water
Yield
Level (m
Estimate
below
(USgpm)
ground)
4.0
50
3.0
50
3.7
150
3.7
150
3.7
150
9.8
Notes:
1. Information compiled from well logs from BC Wells Database and Piteau, 1996 and 1998 (Appendix A). Known well locations shown on Fig. 6.
2. The six decommissioning records for Ohamil I.R. 1 wells in 2008 are included with Appendix A. It is unclear which wells have been decommissioned.
3. 0.3m (1 ft) bail bottom assumed for screen depths of PW-2.
1 of 3
TABLE II
SHXWWHMEL WATER QUALITY SUMMARY TABLE
Parameter
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol
2,3,4,6 + 2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
2,3,4-Trichlorophenol
2,3,5-Trichlorophenol
2,3,6-Trichlorophenol
2,3-Dichlorophenol
2,4 + 2,5-Dichlorophenol
2,4 + 3,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,5-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
2-Chlorophenol
3,4,5-Trichlorophenol
3,5-Dichlorophenol
3-Chlorophenol
4-Chlorophenol
Alkalinity (phenolphthalein, as CaCO3)
Alkalinity (total, as CaCO3)
Aluminum (total)
Ammonia (total, as N)
Antimony (total)
Arsenic (total)
Barium (total)
Benzene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Bicarbonate (as HCO3)
Boron (total)
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Cadmium (total)
Calcium (total)
Carbon tetrachloride
Carbonate (as CO3)
Chloride
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chromium (total)
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
# detects
# samples
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
2
6
6
6
3
2
1
6
3
3
6
6
3
1
6
1
3
1
6
1
1
# non-detects
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
3
6
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
6
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
# exceedances
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
2
6
3
0
3
2
0
4
3
3
6
0
3
1
0
1
3
1
6
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 of 3
TABLE II
SHXWWHMEL WATER QUALITY SUMMARY TABLE
Parameter
Cobalt (total)
Colour
Conductivity
Conductivity % difference
Conductivity (computed)
Copper (total)
Cyanide (SAD) + Thiocyanate
Cyanide (total)
Dibromochloromethane
Dichloromethane
Escherichia coli / E. coli (counts)
Escherichia coli / E. coli (MPN / PA)
Ethylbenzene
Ethylene dibromide / EDB
Fecal Coliforms (counts)
Fluoride
Gross alpha particle activity
Gross beta particle activity
Hardness (total, as CaCO3)
Hydroxide (as OH)
Ion balance
Iron (total)
Langelier Index
Lead (total)
Lead-210
m- + p- Xylene
Magnesium (total)
Manganese (total)
Mercury (total)
Methyl bromide
Methyl tert-butyl ether / MTBE
Molybdenum (total)
Monochlorobenzene
Nickel (total)
Nitrate (as N)
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N)
Nitrite (as N)
o-Xylene
Pentachlorophenol / PCP
pH
Polonium-210
Potassium (total)
Radium-226
Radium-228
Saturation pH
Selenium (total)
Silver (total)
Sodium (total)
Styrene
Sulphate
Sulphide (total, as H2S)
Sulphide (total, as S)
Tetrachloroethylene / PCE
# samples
# detects
2
6
6
1
1
6
1
1
3
3
3
1214
3
1
4
6
1
1
6
1
1
6
1
6
1
3
6
6
6
1
1
1
3
1
6
2
6
3
2
6
1
6
1
1
1
6
1
6
1
6
1
1
3
PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.
# non-detects
0
1
6
1
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
6
0
1
6
0
1
2
1
1
0
0
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
2
0
0
0
6
0
6
1
0
1
0
0
6
0
6
0
0
0
2
5
0
0
0
1
1
1
3
3
3
1210
3
1
4
0
1
0
0
1
0
4
0
5
1
3
0
5
6
1
1
1
3
1
0
0
6
3
2
0
1
0
0
1
0
6
1
0
1
0
1
1
3
# exceedances
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3 of 3
TABLE II
SHXWWHMEL WATER QUALITY SUMMARY TABLE
Parameter
Tin (total)
Titanium (total)
Toluene
Total Anions
Total Cations
Total Coliforms (counts)
Total Coliforms (MPN / PA)
Total Dissolved Solids / TDS
Total Dissolved Solids / TDS (% difference)
Total Dissolved Solids / TDS (computed)
Total Organic Carbon / TOC
Total Solids
Total Suspended Solids / TSS
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethylene / TCE
Trichlorofluoromethane
Turbidity
Uranium (total)
Vanadium (total)
Vinyl chloride
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons / VPH
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons C6-C10
Xylenes (total)
Zinc (total)
# samples
1
1
3
1
1
6
1223
6
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
3
3
6
6
2
3
1
1
1
6
# detects
0
0
0
1
1
0
150
6
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
# non-detects
1
1
3
0
0
6
1073
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
1
3
3
0
4
2
3
1
1
1
4
# exceedances
0
0
0
0
0
0
148
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: Water quality data provided by the First Nation Health Authority. Full report in Appendix B.
TABLE III
SUMMARY OF WELLS AT PETERS I.R. 1 AND 2
Owner
Date
Drilled
Well
Depth
(m)
Diameter
(inches)
29801
Clifford Peters
9-Feb-74
22.3
29811
14-Feb-74
22.6
32113
R W Peters
24-Feb-75
61.0
64763
Walker Orvil
16-Sep-83
27.1
64764
73306
5-Oct-83
10-Oct-86
12.2
24.7
73307
10-Oct-84
24.7
73308
10-Oct-84
24.7
Peters Band
6-Oct-08
23.2
Well Tag
Number
94174
Lithology
Lithology Depth
Intervals (m)
Silt
Sand and Gravel
Sand and Little Gravel
Sand and Silt
Sand and Gravel
Boulders
Sand and Gravel
Dirt
Clay
Bedrock
Shale Till
Fine Sand
Shale Boulders
*Missing Lithology
Bedrock
Sand and Gravel
Sand
Sand and Gravel
Gravel
Sand
Sand and Gravel
Gravel WB
Sand
Sand and Gravel
Dirt and Clay
0 to 2.1
2.1 to 16.2
16.2 to 22.3
0 to 1.8
1.8 to 3
3 to 4
4 to 22.6
0 to 18.6
18.6 to 23.5
23.5 to 61
0 to 12.8
12.8 to 16.8
16.8 to 24.4
24.4 to 26.5
26.5 to 27.1
0 to 12.2
0 to 2.7
2.7 to 18
18 to 24.7
0 to 12.2
12.2 to 18
18 to 24.7
0 to 2.4
2.4 to 17.7
0 to 1.2
Static
Water
Level
(m)2
5.5
Drillers Well
Yield Estimate
(USgpm)2
30
5.2
30
14.0
0
5.5
0
0
7.9
75
1.2 to 23.2
H:\Project\3375\Report\Tables\[Well Record Summary.xlsx]Peters
Notes:
1. Well logs from BC Wells Database included as Appendix A. Well Locations from BC Wells Database shown on Fig. 6.
2. Static water level depths and driller's well yield estimate included verbatim from well log. "0" may mean that this value was not measured.
3. Well with Well Tag Number 94174 drilled in 2008 is the only well with a screen interval listed on the well log. It is screened from 21.9 to 23.2m below ground.
1 of 4
TABLE IV
ISSUES TRACKING TABLE
Question
Volume
Annex
Section
5A - ESA,
Biophysical
5A - ESA,
Biophysical
Page
Figure
Table
Information Request
5-59
5.3-13 Description of
Potential GroundwaterRelated Issues Along the
Proposed Pipeline Corridor
Table 5.3-13 describes several types of groundwater issues that are expected along the
pipeline corridor. The list of potential issues does not include groundwater contamination due to
an oil leak from the pipeline. Please explain why this potential issue was not included in this
table.
5-72
5.3-22 Potential
Groundwater-Related
Issues in the Hope to
Burnaby Segment
RK 1057.6 listed in this table corresponds to wells that are on band land. The potential
groundwater-related issue in the table was "Two wells within the proposed pipeline corridor,
somewhat confined, no particular concerns." Please clarify the meaning and significance of "no
particular concerns."
7.9-1 Management
Systems and Programs
Required under the NEB
OPR
Considering the potentially high consequence of an oil pipeline leak, the response to a leak is a
critical component of mitigating the potential effects of a pipeline on the groundwater supply.
Please provide the following documents:
- KMC Emergency Response Plan
- KMC Incident Command System
- KMC Canadian Integrity Management Program
5A - ESA,
Biophysical
5A - ESA,
Biophysical
5A - ESA,
Biophysical
7.9.5 Significance
Evaluation of Potential
Residual Effects
7.9-3 Significance
Although it's a rare occurrence, a pipeline leak during operations is probably the biggest risk to
Evaluation of Potential
groundwater supplies during operations but does not seem to be included in this table. Please
Residual Effects of
explain why a pipeline leak is not included in this table.
Accidents and Malfunctions
5A - ESA,
Biophysical
5A - ESA,
Biophysical
5A - ESA,
Biophysical
Appendix 7.1
A pipeline leak is unlikely to occur but the effects of such a leak on groundwater quality could
potentially be very severe. Therefore, an evaluation of the combined effects of the Project on
the groundwater quality indicator seems warranted. Please provide a detailed rationale for
omitting this evaluation simply because the effects were deemed unlikely to occur.
7-552
The potential for groundwater contamination has low probability but potentially very high
consequence. Considering the potentially high consequence, an evaluation of combined effects
seems necessary. Please provide a detailed rationale for excluding an evaluation of potential
groundwater quality effects.
7-553
7.11.1-3 Significance
Evaluation of the Project on
Water Quality and Water
Quantity
7A.1-1
TABLE IV
ISSUES TRACKING TABLE
2 of 4
TABLE IV
ISSUES TRACKING TABLE
Question
Volume
Annex
Section
Page
5C Groundwater
Technical Report
Figure
Table
Information Request
Sheets 145
to 147
The water wells indicated on Sheets 145 to 147 indicate "Water Level or Total Depth less than
20m." Please confirm whether this means whether only wells less than 20m deep or with water
levels less than 20m deep were considered in this study. If so, please clarify the reasoning for
limiting the wells in this way considering that a plume of contaminated groundwater could result
from a pipeline leak and considering that pumping wells will have a tendency to attract the
plume to the well intake. Please also clarify whether the dilbit in the pipeline can be
categorically classified as a light non-aqueous phase liquid or whether hydrocarbon
components within the pipeline could be classified as a dense non-aqueous phase liquid.
Dense non-aqueous phase liquids have a tendency to sink below the water table.
Sheets 145
to 147
A band of red hatching, less than 100m in width, was used to delineate the "Area of
groundwater related concern" on the map sheets. Considering that an oil leak has the potential
to contaminate groundwater wells at greater distances, please explain why the area of
groundwater related concern was limited to such a narrow band.
10
5C Groundwater
Technical Report
11
5C Groundwater
Technical Report
3-1
Paragraph 2: Potential concerns with groundwater have been limited to groundwater within a
few meters of surface. Please provide a specific depth that has been used for considering
potential groundwater issues, and also a rationale for this depth based on oil leaks that have
occurred in groundwater aquifers.
12
5C Groundwater
Technical Report
3-1
13
5C Groundwater
Technical Report
3-2
3.2-1 Assessment
Indicators and
Measurement Endpoints
Please elaborate on what is meant by and the significance of "shallow groundwater with existing
contamination?"
14
5C Groundwater
Technical Report
Boundaries of the "Water Quality and Quantity LSA": The study area boundaries were defined
as 100m up-gradient and a minimum of 300m down-gradient of center of corridor, and within
300m of proposed corridor. Please describe the minimum instrumentation that would be used
to determine the direction of the groundwater gradient, both vertical and lateral. Also, if 300m is
the minimum down-gradient distance, please provide the rationale that will be used to settle on
the actual down-gradient extent of the Study Area.
15
5C Groundwater
Technical Report
Since the Study Area boundary is based on the groundwater flow direction, please provide the
current interpretation of the groundwater flow directions on the Peters Reserve and the
supporting data for this interpretation.
TABLE IV
ISSUES TRACKING TABLE
3 of 4
TABLE IV
ISSUES TRACKING TABLE
Question
Volume
16
5C Groundwater
Technical Report
17
5C Groundwater
Technical Report
18
7 Risk
Assessment
4.0 Emergency
Preparedness and
Response
7-21
Please list the actions that would be taken to protect the groundwater resource during an
emergency response.
19
7 Risk
Assessment
4.0 Emergency
Preparedness and
Response
7-21
Please provide the list of drilling contractors and remediation contractors that Kinder Morgan
has pre-qualified for responding to oil leaks that occur in groundwater supply aquifers. Please
also provide the criteria that were used for pre-qualifying these contractors.
20
7 Risk
Assessment
7-34
21
22
23
24
7 Risk
Assessment
7 Risk
Assessment
Annex
Section
Page
Figure
Table
Please describe the site-specific data that will be collected on Peters Band lands to document
existing conditions.
Only one well, which was located at RK 1062, was noted in the vicinity of the Peters Reserve.
3.6-1 Collected Field Data Please describe the reasons for not visiting the wells on the Peters Reserve to document salient
information such as location, depth, use, average pumping rate, etc.
4.5.1 Location of Internal Please provide a list of equipment that would be on stand-by at the Hope location, that is
Response Equipment
specific to protecting the groundwater supply in the event of a pipeline leak.
Three mass loss mechanisms are cited: dissolution in water, evaporation and biodegradation.
The solubility of hydrocarbons in water is quite low and the rate of biodegradation is quite low.
Please provide a set of example calculations that illustrates the expected mass loss of a
plausible scenario of an oil spill on land.
7-68
If oil sinks downward through the unsaturated zone and eventually reaches the water table, a
plume of contamination will develop within the groundwater and this plume will tend to migrate
along the prevailing groundwater flow direction. However, the development of such a
groundwater plume is not mentioned in this discussion of an oil spill to land and therefore the
description of the fate of a hydrocarbon release seems incomplete. Please complete the
description of the fate of a hydrocarbon release to land.
7 Risk
Assessment
7 Risk
Assessment
Information Request
7-74
Volatilization is cited as a mass loss mechanism of an oil spill but it seems that the proportion of
"heavy" components in the pipeline is much higher than the proportion of volatile components.
Please provide an estimate of percentage mass loss assuming that all volatile components
evaporate. Please also provide a set of calculations that accounts for reduced volatilization
rates of the portion of the oil spill that is underground.
7-76
Oil movement is described as follows: "Oil in or on soil may move downward under gravity "
Considering the conditions in proximity to the Peters Reserve and except for the possible
presence of fine-grained horizons in the sub-surface, is there any reason the oil would not
move downward under gravity?
TABLE IV
ISSUES TRACKING TABLE
4 of 4
TABLE IV
ISSUES TRACKING TABLE
Question
Volume
Annex
Section
Page
Figure
Table
Information Request
25
7 Risk
Assessment
7-76
Deeper burial of the pipeline is being considered as a mitigation measure to reduce the
potential for environmental effects of a pipeline leak. Deeper burial would reduce the risk of
puncture by excavators, for example. However, deeper burial also places the pipeline closer to
the water table and makes the pipeline more difficult to access in the event of a leak. Please
discuss the rationale being used to assess whether deeper burial would increase or decrease
the risk of groundwater contamination.
26
7 Risk
Assessment
7-89
The description of potential human health effects is quite general. Please provide a list of
chemicals that would likely occur in a groundwater supply under a plausible pipeline-leak
scenario, and describe the likely health effects if this groundwater supply was consumed.
27
7 Risk
Assessment
7-93
None of the hypothetical pipeline spill scenarios included an area where the pipeline was within
a groundwater supply aquifer. Please explain why a hypothetical spill within an aquifer was not
considered.
28
7 Risk
Assessment
3-4
The submission indicates that remediation of a spill would be based on a Net Environmental
Benefits Analysis. Does this mean that Trans Mountain is not committing itself to returning the
groundwater to drinking water quality in the unlikely event that groundwater becomes
contaminated by an oil-pipeline leak?
29
7 Risk
Assessment
The following eco-systems are included in the discussion of response to land-based spills:
agricultural lands, forested areas, and wetlands. Please explain why groundwater aquifers are
not explicitly addressed considering that a large portion of the pipeline is buried in groundwatersupply aquifers.
FR 7-1 - Qualitative
Ecological Risk
Assessment of
Pipeline Spills
According to the submission, a land-based spill would be considered to be recovered once the
site meets relevant soil quality guidelines. Meeting the soil quality guidelines does not
necessarily result in concentrations of contaminants of concern in groundwater meeting relevant
drinking water protective standards or guidelines, or provide assurance that an existing or future
groundwater supply will not be adversely affected. Please explain why the groundwater quality
is not being considered when determining the remediation endpoint in the unlikely event that a
groundwater resource is affected by a spill? Please also specify the document that represents
the "relevant soil quality guidelines" referenced in the submission (paragraph 1 of Section 3.5
on page 3-7).
30
7 Risk
Assessment
3-7
H:\Project\3375\Report\Tables\[IssuesTrackingTable.xlsx]Table IV
TABLE IV
ISSUES TRACKING TABLE
FIGURES
Ground Surface
Pipeline
Fine-Grained Layer
Vapour Plume
Unsaturated Zone
Dissolved Plume
PREPARED SOLELY FOR THE USE OF OUR CLIENT AND NO REPRESENTATION OF ANY KIND IS MADE TO OTHER
PARTIES WITH WHICH PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD. HAS NOT ENTERED INTO A CONTRACT.
FATE OF LNAPL
IN A GROUNDWATER AQUIFER
DATE:
HMcC
APPROVED:
HM
MAR 15
FIG:
BY:
DATE:
HM
APPROVED:
HM
MAR 15
FIG:
H:\Project\3375\ArcGIS\ArcMaps\Report\Fig3_RegionalPlan.mxd
600000
605000
Ro
ad
e
Non
To Hope
Road
Proposed Pipeline Corridor
Aquifer 3 IIIA (11)
Reserve Boundary
OHAMIL 1
PETERS 1
PETERS 1A
PETERS 2
No
ne
r Ri
ver
5465000
Ro
Lai
a
dla
w R d
oad
El
St
LEGEND
Georg
e
Road
m
o
5465000
Fra
se
Lo
ug
he
ed
Hig
hw
a
No
ne
None
Lorenzetti
Road
Hu
ek
re
C
r
te
McKay Road
T
Norans
ne -Ca
na
da
Hi
gh
wa
Dent Road
Dyk
Roa e
d
Peters
R oad
Fancher
Road
e
on
To Chilliwack
600000
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo,
and the GIS User Community
605000
Note:
Proposed Pipeline Corridor (TMEP V10 Study Corridor) provided by Kinder Morgan on October 7, 2014,
which is different from an earlier version of the alignment shown on Figs. 8 and 9.
500
PREPARED SOLELY FOR THE USE OF OUR CLIENT AND NO REPRESENTATION OF ANY KIND IS MADE TO OTHER
PARTIES WITH WHICH PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD. HAS NOT ENTERED INTO A CONTRACT.
1,500
SCALE: 1:40,000
2,000 m
REGIONAL PLAN
PITEAU ASSOCIATES
GEOTECHNICAL AND HYDROGEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS
BY:
JM
APPROVED:
HM
DATE:
MAR 15
FIG:
602000
A
A
ph
y
Ro
ad
on
Lo
ug
he
ed
Hig
hw
a
La
ne
Bu
R lge
oa r
d
Hicks Road Mu
r
5467500
601500
5467000
601000
Legend
5467000
5467500
600500
An
de
rs
H:\Project\3375\ArcGIS\ArcMaps\Report\Fig4_ShxwowhamelPlan.mxd
600000
PW97-1
5465500
PW-1
(abandoned)
oa
d
600500
601000
5465000
SCALE: 1:15,000
600000
Lai
d la
wR
an
ad
a
Tr
an
sC
5465000
A'
Hi
gh
wa
5465500
Fra
se
PW97-2
A PW-2
(abandoned)
5466500
r Ri
ver
5466000
St Elmo Ro
ad
5466500
5466000
Road
No
ne
602000
Notes:
1. Proposed Pipeline Corridor (TMEP V10 Study Corridor) provided by Kinder Morgan on October 7, 2014, which is different
from an earlier version of the alignment shown on Figs. 8 and 9.
2. Well locations from BC MOE Wells Database not shown due to incorrect coordinates.
3. Well coordinates on this plan are based on Fig. 3 from Piteau, 1996 and Fig. 1 from Piteau, 1998.
4. Locations of an additional six decommissioned wells unconfirmed and not shown on this plan.
5. Range of estimated capture zones is approximate and not necessarily applicable to current conditions.
PREPARED SOLELY FOR THE USE OF OUR CLIENT AND NO REPRESENTATION OF ANY KIND IS MADE TO
OTHER PARTIES WITH WHICH PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD. HAS NOT ENTERED INTO A CONTRACT.
PITEAU ASSOCIATES
GEOTECHNICAL AND HYDROGEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS
BY:
JM
APPROVED:
HM
DATE:
MAR 15
FIG:
599000
H:\Project\3375\ArcGIS\ArcMaps\Report\Fig6_PetersPlan.mxd
LEGEND
5463000
598000
5463000
597000
PETERS 1
PETERS 1A
PETERS 2
River Boundary
Road
A
94174
5462000
64764 64763
73306
73307
73308
5462000
29811
Reserve Boundary
29801
A
A
5461000
B'
597000
598000
5461000
32113
Notes:
1. Proposed Pipeline Corridor (TMEP V10 Study Corridor)
provided by Kinder Morgan on October 7, 2014,
and is different from an earlier version of the alignment
shown on Figs.8 and 9.
2. Water Well locations are from BC MOE Wells Database,
and do not necessarily match locations in the field.
Well logs included in Appendix A.
3. 2002 operating well locations from Fig. 1 of Novatec, 2002.
599000
200
400
600
SCALE: 1:20,000
800 m
PREPARED SOLELY FOR THE USE OF OUR CLIENT AND NO REPRESENTATION OF ANY KIND IS MADE TO OTHER
PARTIES WITH WHICH PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD. HAS NOT ENTERED INTO A CONTRACT.
PITEAU ASSOCIATES
GEOTECHNICAL AND HYDROGEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS
BY:
JM
APPROVED:
HM
DATE:
MAR 15
FIG:
APPENDIX A
WELL LOGS
3/10/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1980060500:00:00
WellTagNumber:45248
Owner:MCLEMENS
Address:58800STELMORD
Area:LAIDLAW
WELLLOCATION:
LandDistrict
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:1
Township:4Section:Range:27
IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:
Quarter:
Island:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):Well:1
ClassofWell:
SubclassofWell:
OrientationofWell:
StatusofWell:New
WellUse:
ObservationWellNumber:
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
Diameter:6.0inches
Casingdriveshoe:
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Driller:
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
WherePlateAttached:
PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:50(Driller'sEstimate)
DevelopmentMethod:
PumpTestInfoFlag:
ArtesianFlow:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
StaticLevel:13feet
WATERQUALITY:
Character:
Colour:
Odour:
WellDisinfected:N
EMSID:
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
SiteInfo(SEAM):
WaterUtility:
WaterSupplySystemName:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:
1/2
3/10/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
WellDepth:42feet
Elevation:0feet(ASL)
SURFACESEAL:
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
Flag:
WellCapType:
Material:
BedrockDepth:feet
Method:
LithologyInfoFlag:
Depth(ft):0feet
FileInfoFlag:
Thickness(in):
SieveInfoFlag:
LinerfromTo:feet
ScreenInfoFlag:
WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:
SiteInfoDetails:
ReasonForClosure:
OtherInfoFlag:
MethodofClosure:
OtherInfoDetails:
ClosureSealantMaterial:
ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:
Screenfrom
0
0
0
0
tofeet
0
0
0
0
Type
SlotSize
0
0
0
0
Casingfrom
0
tofeet
0
Diameter
0
Material
null
DriveShoe
null
GENERALREMARKS:
LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to3Ft.topsoil
From3to42Ft.gravel
ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
2/2
3/10/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:
WellTagNumber:66017
Driller:
Owner:CLEMENSM
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
Address:58800STALMORD
WherePlateAttached:
Area:LAIDLAW
PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:0(Driller'sEstimate)
WELLLOCATION:
DevelopmentMethod:
LandDistrict
PumpTestInfoFlag:Y
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:
ArtesianFlow:
Township:27Section:Range:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:
StaticLevel:12feet
Quarter:
Island:
WATERQUALITY:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):Well:11
Character:
Colour:
ClassofWell:
Odour:
SubclassofWell:
WellDisinfected:N
OrientationofWell:
EMSID:
StatusofWell:New
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N
WellUse:
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
ObservationWellNumber:
SiteInfo(SEAM):
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
WaterUtility:
Diameter:0.0inches
WaterSupplySystemName:
Casingdriveshoe:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
1/2
3/10/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
WellDepth:42feet
Elevation:0feet(ASL)
SURFACESEAL:
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
Flag:N
WellCapType:
Material:
BedrockDepth:feet
Method:
LithologyInfoFlag:N
Depth(ft):
FileInfoFlag:N
Thickness(in):
SieveInfoFlag:N
ScreenInfoFlag:N
WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:
ReasonForClosure:
SiteInfoDetails:
MethodofClosure:
OtherInfoFlag:
ClosureSealantMaterial:
OtherInfoDetails:
ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:
Screenfrom
tofeet
Type
SlotSize
Casingfrom
tofeet
Diameter
Material
DriveShoe
GENERALREMARKS:
CASINGPUMPTESTRATE50GPM,
LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to42Ft.GRAVEL
ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
2/2
3/10/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1990051800:00:00
WellTagNumber:76083
Driller:
Owner:OHAMILINDIANBAND
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
Address:STALMOROAD
WherePlateAttached:
Area:HOPE
PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:150(Driller'sEstimate)
WELLLOCATION:
DevelopmentMethod:
LandDistrict
PumpTestInfoFlag:N
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:
ArtesianFlow:
Township:Section:Range:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
IndianReserve:IR1OHAMILMeridian:Block: StaticLevel:12feet
Quarter:
Island:
WATERQUALITY:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):Well:3
Character:
Colour:
ClassofWell:
Odour:
SubclassofWell:
WellDisinfected:N
OrientationofWell:
EMSID:
StatusofWell:New
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:
WellUse:
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
ObservationWellNumber:
SiteInfo(SEAM):
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
WaterUtility:
Diameter:6inches
WaterSupplySystemName:
Casingdriveshoe:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
1/2
3/10/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
WellDepth:45feet
Elevation:0feet(ASL)
SURFACESEAL:
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
Flag:N
WellCapType:
Material:
BedrockDepth:feet
Method:
LithologyInfoFlag:N
Depth(ft):
FileInfoFlag:N
Thickness(in):
SieveInfoFlag:N
ScreenInfoFlag:Y
WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:
ReasonForClosure:
SiteInfoDetails:
MethodofClosure:
OtherInfoFlag:
ClosureSealantMaterial:
OtherInfoDetails:
ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:
Screenfrom
null
0
0
tofeet
null
0
0
Type
SlotSize
50
0
0
Casingfrom
null
tofeet
null
Diameter
0
Material
null
DriveShoe
null
GENERALREMARKS:
STALMORDHOPEBC
LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to3Ft.TOPSOIL
From3to45Ft.SAND&GRAVEL
ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
2/2
3ft
45ft
3/10/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1997111800:00:00
WellTagNumber:76210
Driller:
Owner:OHAMILINDIANBAND
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
Address:STELMOROAD
WherePlateAttached:
Area:HOPE
PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:150(Driller'sEstimate)
WELLLOCATION:
DevelopmentMethod:
LandDistrict
PumpTestInfoFlag:N
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:
ArtesianFlow:
Township:Section:Range:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
IndianReserve:IR1Meridian:Block:
StaticLevel:12feet
Quarter:
Island:
WATERQUALITY:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):Well:5
Character:
Colour:
ClassofWell:
Odour:
SubclassofWell:
WellDisinfected:N
OrientationofWell:
EMSID:
StatusofWell:New
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:
WellUse:
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
ObservationWellNumber:
SiteInfo(SEAM):
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
WaterUtility:
Diameter:8inches
WaterSupplySystemName:
Casingdriveshoe:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
1/2
3/10/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
WellDepth:80feet
Elevation:0feet(ASL)
SURFACESEAL:
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
Flag:N
WellCapType:
Material:
BedrockDepth:feet
Method:
LithologyInfoFlag:N
Depth(ft):
FileInfoFlag:N
Thickness(in):
SieveInfoFlag:N
ScreenInfoFlag:Y
WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:
ReasonForClosure:
SiteInfoDetails:
MethodofClosure:
OtherInfoFlag:
ClosureSealantMaterial:
OtherInfoDetails:
ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:
Screenfrom
null
0
0
tofeet
null
0
0
Type
SlotSize
150
0
0
Casingfrom
null
tofeet
null
Diameter
0
Material
null
DriveShoe
null
GENERALREMARKS:
STALMORDHOPEBC
LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to2Ft.TOPSOIL
From2to9Ft.SAND
From9to26Ft.SAND&GRAVEL&BINDER
From26to80Ft.SAND&GRAVEL
ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
2/2
3/10/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1997111900:00:00
WellTagNumber:76211
Driller:
Owner:OHAMILINDIANBAND
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
Address:STALMORD
WherePlateAttached:
Area:HOPEBC
PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:150(Driller'sEstimate)
WELLLOCATION:
DevelopmentMethod:
LandDistrict
PumpTestInfoFlag:N
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:
ArtesianFlow:
Township:Section:Range:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:
StaticLevel:12feet
Quarter:
Island:
WATERQUALITY:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):Well:1
Character:
Colour:
ClassofWell:
Odour:
SubclassofWell:
WellDisinfected:N
OrientationofWell:
EMSID:
StatusofWell:New
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:
WellUse:
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
ObservationWellNumber:
SiteInfo(SEAM):
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
WaterUtility:
Diameter:8inches
WaterSupplySystemName:
Casingdriveshoe:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
1/2
3/10/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
WellDepth:82feet
Elevation:0feet(ASL)
SURFACESEAL:
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
Flag:N
WellCapType:
Material:
BedrockDepth:feet
Method:
LithologyInfoFlag:N
Depth(ft):
FileInfoFlag:N
Thickness(in):
SieveInfoFlag:N
ScreenInfoFlag:Y
WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:
ReasonForClosure:
SiteInfoDetails:
MethodofClosure:
OtherInfoFlag:
ClosureSealantMaterial:
OtherInfoDetails:
ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:
Screenfrom
null
0
0
tofeet
null
0
0
Type
SlotSize
150
0
0
Casingfrom
null
tofeet
null
Diameter
0
Material
null
DriveShoe
null
GENERALREMARKS:
STALMORDHOPEBC
LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to2Ft.TOPSOIL
From2to11Ft.SAND
From11to25Ft.SAND&GRAVEL&BINDER
From25to82Ft.SAND&GRAVEL
ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
2/2
3/10/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:2008111300:00:00
WellTagNumber:95096
Owner:SHXWOWHAMELFIRSTNATIONS
Address:58700STELMOROAD
Area:HOPE
WELLLOCATION:
LandDistrict
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:8
Township:Section:Range:
IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:
Quarter:
Island:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):Well:6
ClassofWell:Watersupply
SubclassofWell:
OrientationofWell:Vertical
StatusofWell:Closure
WellUse:
ObservationWellNumber:
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
Diameter:inches
Casingdriveshoe:N
WellDepth:22feet
Elevation:feet(ASL)
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
WellCapType:
BedrockDepth:feet
LithologyInfoFlag:N
FileInfoFlag:N
SieveInfoFlag:N
ScreenInfoFlag:N
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Driller:
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
WherePlateAttached:
PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:(Driller'sEstimate)
DevelopmentMethod:
PumpTestInfoFlag:N
ArtesianFlow:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
StaticLevel:
WATERQUALITY:
Character:
Colour:
Odour:
WellDisinfected:N
EMSID:
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
SiteInfo(SEAM):
WaterUtility:
WaterSupplySystemName:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:
SURFACESEAL:
Flag:N
Material:
Method:
Depth(ft):
Thickness(in):
LinerfromTo:feet
1/2
3/10/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:
SiteInfoDetails:
ReasonForClosure:HOKKEDUPTOCOMMUNITYWATER
OtherInfoFlag:
MethodofClosure:Poured
OtherInfoDetails:
ClosureSealantMaterial:BENTONITE
ClosureBackfillMaterial:SANDYGRAVEL
DetailsofClosure:CUTCASING2FEETBELOWGRADE.FILLEDENTIREWELLWITHBENTONITE.
Screenfrom
tofeet
Type
SlotSize
Casingfrom
null
tofeet
null
Diameter
3
Material
null
DriveShoe
N
GENERALREMARKS:
WELLCLOSEDBYBILLTUYTELFORAJPUMPS
LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
2/2
3/10/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:2008111300:00:00
WellTagNumber:95097
Owner:SHXWOWHAMELFIRSTNATIONS
Address:58700STELMOROAD
Area:HOPE
WELLLOCATION:
LandDistrict
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:7
Township:Section:Range:
IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:
Quarter:
Island:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):Well:7
ClassofWell:Watersupply
SubclassofWell:
OrientationofWell:Vertical
StatusofWell:Closure
WellUse:
ObservationWellNumber:
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
Diameter:inches
Casingdriveshoe:N
WellDepth:24feet
Elevation:feet(ASL)
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
WellCapType:
BedrockDepth:feet
LithologyInfoFlag:N
FileInfoFlag:N
SieveInfoFlag:N
ScreenInfoFlag:N
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Driller:
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
WherePlateAttached:
PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:(Driller'sEstimate)
DevelopmentMethod:
PumpTestInfoFlag:N
ArtesianFlow:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
StaticLevel:
WATERQUALITY:
Character:
Colour:
Odour:
WellDisinfected:N
EMSID:
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
SiteInfo(SEAM):
WaterUtility:
WaterSupplySystemName:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:
SURFACESEAL:
Flag:N
Material:
Method:
Depth(ft):
Thickness(in):
LinerfromTo:feet
1/2
3/10/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:
SiteInfoDetails:
ReasonForClosure:HOOKEDUPTOCOMMUNITYWATER
OtherInfoFlag:
MethodofClosure:Poured
OtherInfoDetails:
ClosureSealantMaterial:BENTONITE
ClosureBackfillMaterial:SANDYGRAVEL
DetailsofClosure:CUTCASING4FEETBELOWGRADE.FILLEDENTIREWELLWITHBENTONITE.
Screenfrom
tofeet
Type
SlotSize
Casingfrom
null
tofeet
null
Diameter
2
Material
null
DriveShoe
N
GENERALREMARKS:
WELLCLOSEDBYBILLTUYTELFORAJPUMPS.
LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
2/2
3/10/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:2008111300:00:00
WellTagNumber:95098
Owner:SHXWOWHAMELFIRSTNATIONS
Address:58700STELMOROAD
Area:HOPE
WELLLOCATION:
LandDistrict
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:6
Township:Section:Range:
IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:
Quarter:
Island:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):Well:8
ClassofWell:Watersupply
SubclassofWell:
OrientationofWell:Vertical
StatusofWell:Closure
WellUse:
ObservationWellNumber:
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
Diameter:inches
Casingdriveshoe:N
WellDepth:feet
Elevation:feet(ASL)
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
WellCapType:
BedrockDepth:feet
LithologyInfoFlag:N
FileInfoFlag:N
SieveInfoFlag:N
ScreenInfoFlag:N
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Driller:
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
WherePlateAttached:
PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:(Driller'sEstimate)
DevelopmentMethod:
PumpTestInfoFlag:N
ArtesianFlow:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
StaticLevel:
WATERQUALITY:
Character:
Colour:
Odour:
WellDisinfected:N
EMSID:
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
SiteInfo(SEAM):
WaterUtility:
WaterSupplySystemName:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:
SURFACESEAL:
Flag:N
Material:
Method:
Depth(ft):
Thickness(in):
LinerfromTo:feet
1/2
3/10/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:
SiteInfoDetails:
ReasonForClosure:HOOKEDUPTOCOMMUNITYWATER
OtherInfoFlag:
MethodofClosure:Poured
OtherInfoDetails:
ClosureSealantMaterial:BENTONITE
ClosureBackfillMaterial:SANDYGRAVEL
DetailsofClosure:CUTCASING2FEETBELOWGRADE.FILLEDENTIREDWELLWITHBENTONITE.
Screenfrom
tofeet
Type
SlotSize
Casingfrom
null
tofeet
null
Diameter
3
Material
null
DriveShoe
N
GENERALREMARKS:
WELLCLOSEDBYBILLTUYTELFORAJPUMPS
LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
2/2
3/10/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:2008111300:00:00
WellTagNumber:95099
Owner:SHXWOWHAMELFIRSTNATIONS
Address:58700STELMOROAD
Area:HOPE
WELLLOCATION:
LandDistrict
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:5
Township:Section:Range:
IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:
Quarter:
Island:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):Well:9
ClassofWell:Watersupply
SubclassofWell:
OrientationofWell:Vertical
StatusofWell:Closure
WellUse:
ObservationWellNumber:
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
Diameter:inches
Casingdriveshoe:N
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Driller:
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
WherePlateAttached:
PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:(Driller'sEstimate)
DevelopmentMethod:
PumpTestInfoFlag:N
ArtesianFlow:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
StaticLevel:
WATERQUALITY:
Character:
Colour:
Odour:
WellDisinfected:N
EMSID:
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
SiteInfo(SEAM):
WaterUtility:
WaterSupplySystemName:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:
1/2
3/10/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
WellDepth:32feet
Elevation:feet(ASL)
SURFACESEAL:
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
Flag:N
WellCapType:
Material:
BedrockDepth:feet
Method:
LithologyInfoFlag:N
Depth(ft):
FileInfoFlag:N
Thickness(in):
SieveInfoFlag:N
LinerfromTo:feet
ScreenInfoFlag:N
WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:
SiteInfoDetails:
ReasonForClosure:HOOKEDUPTOCOMMUNITYWATER
OtherInfoFlag:
MethodofClosure:Poured
OtherInfoDetails:
ClosureSealantMaterial:BENTONITE
ClosureBackfillMaterial:SANDYGRAVEL
DetailsofClosure:CUTCASING2FEETBELOWGRADE
Screenfrom
tofeet
Type
SlotSize
Casingfrom
null
tofeet
null
Diameter
6
Material
null
DriveShoe
N
GENERALREMARKS:
WELLCLOSEDBYBILLTUYTELFORAJPUMPS
LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From2to6Ft.BENTONITE
From6to10Ft.GRAVEL
From10to14Ft.BENTONITE
From14to29Ft.GRAVEL
From29to32Ft.BENTONITE
ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
2/2
3/10/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:2008111300:00:00
WellTagNumber:95100
Driller:
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
Owner:SHXWOWHAMELFIRSTNATIONS
PlateAttachedBy:
WherePlateAttached:
Address:58700STELMOROAD
PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
Area:HOPE
WellYield:(Driller'sEstimate)
DevelopmentMethod:
WELLLOCATION:
PumpTestInfoFlag:N
LandDistrict
ArtesianFlow:
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:4
ArtesianPressure(ft):
Township:Section:Range:
IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:
Quarter:
Island:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):Well:10
ClassofWell:Watersupply
SubclassofWell:
OrientationofWell:Vertical
StatusofWell:Closure
WellUse:
ObservationWellNumber:
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
Diameter:inches
Casingdriveshoe:N
WellDepth:feet
Elevation:feet(ASL)
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
WellCapType:
BedrockDepth:feet
LithologyInfoFlag:N
FileInfoFlag:N
SieveInfoFlag:N
ScreenInfoFlag:N
SiteInfoDetails:
OtherInfoFlag:
OtherInfoDetails:
StaticLevel:
WATERQUALITY:
Character:
Colour:
Odour:
WellDisinfected:N
EMSID:
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
SiteInfo(SEAM):
WaterUtility:
WaterSupplySystemName:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:
SURFACESEAL:
Flag:N
Material:
Method:
Depth(ft):
Thickness(in):
LinerfromTo:feet
WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:
ReasonForClosure:HOOKEDUPTOCOMMUNITYWATER
MethodofClosure:Poured
ClosureSealantMaterial:BENTONITE
ClosureBackfillMaterial:SANDYGRAVEL
DetailsofClosure:CYTCASING3.5FEETBELOWGRADE.FILLEDTOP6"WITHBENTONITE.REMAINDEROFWELLALREADYFILLEDWITHCONCR
Screenfrom
tofeet
Type
SlotSize
Casingfrom
null
tofeet
null
Diameter
6
Material
null
DriveShoe
N
GENERALREMARKS:
WELLCLOSEDBYBILLTUYTELFORAJPUMPS
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
1/2
3/10/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From3.5to4Ft.BENTONITE
From4toFt.CONCRETE
ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
2/2
3/10/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:2008111300:00:00
WellTagNumber:95102
Owner:SHXWOWHAMELFIRSTNATIONS
Address:58700STELMOROAD
Area:HOPE
WELLLOCATION:
LandDistrict
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:2
Township:Section:Range:
IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:
Quarter:
Island:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):Well:12
ClassofWell:Watersupply
SubclassofWell:
OrientationofWell:Vertical
StatusofWell:Closure
WellUse:
ObservationWellNumber:
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
Diameter:inches
Casingdriveshoe:N
WellDepth:feet
Elevation:feet(ASL)
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
WellCapType:
BedrockDepth:feet
LithologyInfoFlag:N
FileInfoFlag:N
SieveInfoFlag:N
ScreenInfoFlag:N
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Driller:
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
WherePlateAttached:
PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:(Driller'sEstimate)
DevelopmentMethod:
PumpTestInfoFlag:N
ArtesianFlow:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
StaticLevel:
WATERQUALITY:
Character:
Colour:
Odour:
WellDisinfected:N
EMSID:
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
SiteInfo(SEAM):
WaterUtility:
WaterSupplySystemName:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:
SURFACESEAL:
Flag:N
Material:
Method:
Depth(ft):
Thickness(in):
LinerfromTo:feet
1/2
3/10/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:
SiteInfoDetails:
ReasonForClosure:HOOKEDUPTOCOMMUNITYWATER
OtherInfoFlag:
MethodofClosure:Poured
OtherInfoDetails:
ClosureSealantMaterial:BENTONITE
ClosureBackfillMaterial:SANDYGRAVEL
DetailsofClosure:CUTCASING2FEETBELOWGRADE.WELLALREADYFILLEDWITHCONCRETE.
Screenfrom
tofeet
Type
SlotSize
Casingfrom
null
tofeet
null
Diameter
6
Material
null
DriveShoe
N
GENERALREMARKS:
WELLCLOSEDBYBILLTUYTELFORAJPUMPS
LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
2/2
3/4/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1974020900:00:00
WellTagNumber:29801
Driller:M.S.A.WaterDrilling
Owner:CLIFFORDPETERS
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
Address:
WherePlateAttached:
Area:LAIDLAW
PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:30(Driller'sEstimate)GallonsperMinute(U.S./Imperial)
WELLLOCATION:
DevelopmentMethod:
YALE(YDYD)LandDistrict
PumpTestInfoFlag:
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:
ArtesianFlow:
Township:Section:Range:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:
StaticLevel:18feet
Quarter:
Island:
WATERQUALITY:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):092H032212Well:2 Character:
Colour:
ClassofWell:
Odour:
SubclassofWell:
WellDisinfected:N
OrientationofWell:
EMSID:
StatusofWell:New
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:
WellUse:UnknownWellUse
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
ObservationWellNumber:
SiteInfo(SEAM):
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:Drilled
WaterUtility:
Diameter:6.0inches
WaterSupplySystemName:
Casingdriveshoe:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:
WellDepth:73feet
Elevation:0feet(ASL)
SURFACESEAL:
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
Flag:
WellCapType:
Material:
BedrockDepth:feet
Method:
LithologyInfoFlag:
Depth(ft):
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
1/2
3/4/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
FileInfoFlag:
Thickness(in):
SieveInfoFlag:
ScreenInfoFlag:
WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:
ReasonForClosure:
SiteInfoDetails:
MethodofClosure:
OtherInfoFlag:
ClosureSealantMaterial:
OtherInfoDetails:
ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:
Screenfrom
tofeet
Type
SlotSize
Casingfrom
tofeet
Diameter
Material
DriveShoe
GENERALREMARKS:
LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to7Ft.Silt
From7to53Ft.Sandandgravel
From53to73Ft.Sandandlittlegravel
ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
2/2
3/4/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1974021400:00:00
WellTagNumber:29811
Driller:M.S.A.WaterDrilling
Owner:FRANKPETERSINDAFF
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
Address:
WherePlateAttached:
Area:LAIDLAW
PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:30(Driller'sEstimate)GallonsperMinute(U.S./Imperial)
WELLLOCATION:
DevelopmentMethod:
YALE(YDYD)LandDistrict
PumpTestInfoFlag:
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:
ArtesianFlow:
Township:Section:Range:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:
StaticLevel:17feet
Quarter:
Island:
WATERQUALITY:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):092H032212Well:1 Character:
Colour:
ClassofWell:
Odour:
SubclassofWell:
WellDisinfected:N
OrientationofWell:
EMSID:
StatusofWell:New
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:
WellUse:UnknownWellUse
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
ObservationWellNumber:
SiteInfo(SEAM):
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:Drilled
WaterUtility:
Diameter:6.0inches
WaterSupplySystemName:
Casingdriveshoe:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:
WellDepth:74feet
Elevation:0feet(ASL)
SURFACESEAL:
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
Flag:
WellCapType:
Material:
BedrockDepth:feet
Method:
LithologyInfoFlag:
Depth(ft):
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
1/2
3/4/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
FileInfoFlag:
Thickness(in):
SieveInfoFlag:
ScreenInfoFlag:
WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:
ReasonForClosure:
SiteInfoDetails:
MethodofClosure:
OtherInfoFlag:
ClosureSealantMaterial:
OtherInfoDetails:
ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:
Screenfrom
tofeet
Type
SlotSize
Casingfrom
tofeet
Diameter
Material
DriveShoe
GENERALREMARKS:
LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to6Ft.Siltandsand
From6to10Ft.Sandandgravel
From10to13Ft.Boulders
From13to74Ft.Sandandgravel
ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
2/2
3/4/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1975022400:00:00
WellTagNumber:32113
Driller:A.&H.Construction
Owner:RWPETERS
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
Address:PETERSRD
WherePlateAttached:
Area:
PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:4(Driller'sEstimate)GallonsperMinute(U.S./Imperial)
WELLLOCATION:
DevelopmentMethod:
YALE(YDYD)LandDistrict
PumpTestInfoFlag:
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:
ArtesianFlow:
Township:Section:12Range:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:
StaticLevel:46feet
Quarter:
Island:
WATERQUALITY:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):092H022434Well:1 Character:
Colour:
ClassofWell:
Odour:
SubclassofWell:
WellDisinfected:N
OrientationofWell:
EMSID:
StatusofWell:New
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:
WellUse:UnknownWellUse
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
ObservationWellNumber:
SiteInfo(SEAM):
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:UnknownConstru
WaterUtility:
Diameter:6.0inches
WaterSupplySystemName:
Casingdriveshoe:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:
WellDepth:200feet
Elevation:0feet(ASL)
SURFACESEAL:
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
Flag:
WellCapType:
Material:
BedrockDepth:77feet
Method:
LithologyInfoFlag:
Depth(ft):
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
1/2
3/4/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
FileInfoFlag:
Thickness(in):
SieveInfoFlag:
ScreenInfoFlag:
WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:
ReasonForClosure:
SiteInfoDetails:
MethodofClosure:
OtherInfoFlag:
ClosureSealantMaterial:
OtherInfoDetails:
ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:
Screenfrom
tofeet
Type
SlotSize
Casingfrom
tofeet
Diameter
Material
DriveShoe
GENERALREMARKS:
LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to61Ft.Dirt
From61to77Ft.Clay
From77to200Ft.Bedrock
ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
2/2
3/4/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1983091600:00:00
WellTagNumber:64763
Driller:A.&H.Construction
Owner:WALKERORVIL
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
Address:PETERSRESERVE
WherePlateAttached:
Area:LAIDLAW
PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:0(Driller'sEstimate)
WELLLOCATION:
DevelopmentMethod:
YALE(YDYD)LandDistrict
PumpTestInfoFlag:N
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:
ArtesianFlow:
Township:Section:Range:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
IndianReserve:1Meridian:Block:
StaticLevel:0feet
Quarter:
Island:
WATERQUALITY:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):092H032221Well:4
Character:
Colour:
ClassofWell:
Odour:
SubclassofWell:
WellDisinfected:N
OrientationofWell:
EMSID:
StatusofWell:New
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N
WellUse:
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
ObservationWellNumber:
SiteInfo(SEAM):
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
WaterUtility:
Diameter:6.0inches
WaterSupplySystemName:
Casingdriveshoe:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
1/2
3/4/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
WellDepth:89feet
Elevation:0feet(ASL)
SURFACESEAL:
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
Flag:N
WellCapType:
Material:
BedrockDepth:feet
Method:
LithologyInfoFlag:N
Depth(ft):
FileInfoFlag:N
Thickness(in):
SieveInfoFlag:N
ScreenInfoFlag:N
WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:
ReasonForClosure:
SiteInfoDetails:
MethodofClosure:
OtherInfoFlag:
ClosureSealantMaterial:
OtherInfoDetails:
ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:
Screenfrom
tofeet
Type
SlotSize
Casingfrom
tofeet
Diameter
Material
DriveShoe
GENERALREMARKS:
CASING0.0TO85.8,
LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to42Ft.SHALETILL
From87to89Ft.BEDROCK
From55to80Ft.SHALEBOULDERS
From42to55Ft.SANDFINE
ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
2/2
3/4/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1983100500:00:00
WellTagNumber:64764
Driller:A.&H.Construction
Owner:PETERSINDIANRESERV
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
Address:
WherePlateAttached:
Area:LAIDLAW
PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:0(Driller'sEstimate)
WELLLOCATION:
DevelopmentMethod:
LandDistrict
PumpTestInfoFlag:N
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:
ArtesianFlow:
Township:Section:Range:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
IndianReserve:1Meridian:Block:
StaticLevel:0feet
Quarter:
Island:
WATERQUALITY:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):092H032221Well:5
Character:
Colour:
ClassofWell:
Odour:
SubclassofWell:
WellDisinfected:N
OrientationofWell:
EMSID:
StatusofWell:New
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N
WellUse:
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
ObservationWellNumber:
SiteInfo(SEAM):
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
WaterUtility:
Diameter:6.0inches
WaterSupplySystemName:
Casingdriveshoe:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
1/2
3/4/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
WellDepth:40feet
Elevation:0feet(ASL)
SURFACESEAL:
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
Flag:N
WellCapType:
Material:
BedrockDepth:feet
Method:
LithologyInfoFlag:N
Depth(ft):
FileInfoFlag:N
Thickness(in):
SieveInfoFlag:N
ScreenInfoFlag:N
WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:
ReasonForClosure:
SiteInfoDetails:
MethodofClosure:
OtherInfoFlag:
ClosureSealantMaterial:
OtherInfoDetails:
ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:
Screenfrom
tofeet
Type
SlotSize
Casingfrom
tofeet
Diameter
Material
DriveShoe
GENERALREMARKS:
CASING
LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to40Ft.SAND&GRAVEL
ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
2/2
3/4/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1986101000:00:00
WellTagNumber:73306
Driller:A.&H.Construction
Owner:PETERSINDIANRESERV
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
Address:
WherePlateAttached:
Area:HOPE
PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:0(Driller'sEstimate)
WELLLOCATION:
DevelopmentMethod:
YALE(YDYD)LandDistrict
PumpTestInfoFlag:N
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:
ArtesianFlow:
Township:Section:Range:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
IndianReserve:1Meridian:Block:
StaticLevel:18feet
Quarter:
Island:
WATERQUALITY:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):092H032221Well:1
Character:
Colour:
ClassofWell:
Odour:
SubclassofWell:
WellDisinfected:N
OrientationofWell:
EMSID:
StatusofWell:New
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N
WellUse:
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
ObservationWellNumber:
SiteInfo(SEAM):
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
WaterUtility:
Diameter:0.0inches
WaterSupplySystemName:
Casingdriveshoe:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
1/2
3/4/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
WellDepth:81feet
Elevation:0feet(ASL)
SURFACESEAL:
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
Flag:N
WellCapType:
Material:
BedrockDepth:feet
Method:
LithologyInfoFlag:N
Depth(ft):
FileInfoFlag:N
Thickness(in):
SieveInfoFlag:N
ScreenInfoFlag:N
WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:
ReasonForClosure:
SiteInfoDetails:
MethodofClosure:
OtherInfoFlag:
ClosureSealantMaterial:
OtherInfoDetails:
ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:
Screenfrom
tofeet
Type
SlotSize
Casingfrom
tofeet
Diameter
Material
DriveShoe
GENERALREMARKS:
CASING
LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to9Ft.SAND
From59to81Ft.GRAVEL
From9to59Ft.SAND&GRAVEL
ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
2/2
3/4/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1984101000:00:00
WellTagNumber:73307
Driller:A.&H.Construction
Owner:PETERSINDIANRESERV
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
Address:
WherePlateAttached:
Area:
PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:0(Driller'sEstimate)
WELLLOCATION:
DevelopmentMethod:
YALE(YDYD)LandDistrict
PumpTestInfoFlag:N
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:
ArtesianFlow:
Township:Section:Range:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
IndianReserve:1Meridian:Block:
StaticLevel:0feet
Quarter:
Island:
WATERQUALITY:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):092H032221Well:2
Character:
Colour:
ClassofWell:
Odour:
SubclassofWell:
WellDisinfected:N
OrientationofWell:
EMSID:
StatusofWell:New
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N
WellUse:
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
ObservationWellNumber:
SiteInfo(SEAM):
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
WaterUtility:
Diameter:0.0inches
WaterSupplySystemName:
Casingdriveshoe:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
1/2
3/4/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
WellDepth:81feet
Elevation:0feet(ASL)
SURFACESEAL:
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
Flag:N
WellCapType:
Material:
BedrockDepth:feet
Method:
LithologyInfoFlag:N
Depth(ft):
FileInfoFlag:N
Thickness(in):
SieveInfoFlag:N
ScreenInfoFlag:N
WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:
ReasonForClosure:
SiteInfoDetails:
MethodofClosure:
OtherInfoFlag:
ClosureSealantMaterial:
OtherInfoDetails:
ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:
Screenfrom
tofeet
Type
SlotSize
Casingfrom
tofeet
Diameter
Material
DriveShoe
GENERALREMARKS:
CASING
LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to40Ft.SAND
From59to81Ft.GRAVELWB
From40to59Ft.SAND&GRAVEL
ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
2/2
3/4/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1984101000:00:00
WellTagNumber:73308
Driller:A.&H.Construction
Owner:PETERSINDIANRESERV
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
Address:
WherePlateAttached:
Area:
PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:0(Driller'sEstimate)
WELLLOCATION:
DevelopmentMethod:
YALE(YDYD)LandDistrict
PumpTestInfoFlag:N
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:
ArtesianFlow:
Township:Section:Range:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
IndianReserve:1Meridian:Block:
StaticLevel:0feet
Quarter:
Island:
WATERQUALITY:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):092H032221Well:3
Character:
Colour:
ClassofWell:
Odour:
SubclassofWell:
WellDisinfected:N
OrientationofWell:
EMSID:
StatusofWell:New
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N
WellUse:
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
ObservationWellNumber:
SiteInfo(SEAM):
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
WaterUtility:
Diameter:0.0inches
WaterSupplySystemName:
Casingdriveshoe:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
1/2
3/4/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
WellDepth:81feet
Elevation:0feet(ASL)
SURFACESEAL:
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
Flag:N
WellCapType:
Material:
BedrockDepth:feet
Method:
LithologyInfoFlag:N
Depth(ft):
FileInfoFlag:N
Thickness(in):
SieveInfoFlag:N
ScreenInfoFlag:N
WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:
ReasonForClosure:
SiteInfoDetails:
MethodofClosure:
OtherInfoFlag:
ClosureSealantMaterial:
OtherInfoDetails:
ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:
Screenfrom
tofeet
Type
SlotSize
Casingfrom
tofeet
Diameter
Material
DriveShoe
GENERALREMARKS:
CASINGSTAINLESSSTEEL,
LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From8to58Ft.SAND&GRAVEL
From0to8Ft.SAND
ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
2/2
3/4/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:2008100600:00:00
WellTagNumber:94174
Owner:PETERSBAND
Address:16800PETERSROAD
Area:LAIDLAW
WELLLOCATION:
LandDistrict
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:
Township:Section:Range:
IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:
Quarter:
Island:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):092H032212Well:3
ClassofWell:Watersupply
SubclassofWell:Domestic
OrientationofWell:Vertical
StatusofWell:New
WellUse:PrivateDomestic
ObservationWellNumber:
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
Diameter:inches
Casingdriveshoe:NY
WellDepth:76feet
Elevation:52feet(ASL)
FinalCasingStickUp:30inches
WellCapType:
BedrockDepth:feet
LithologyInfoFlag:N
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
Driller:A.&H.DrillingLtd.
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:29810
PlateAttachedBy:BILLMCIVOR
WherePlateAttached:
PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:75(Driller'sEstimate)GallonsperMinute(U.S./Imperial)
DevelopmentMethod:
PumpTestInfoFlag:N
ArtesianFlow:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
StaticLevel:26feet
WATERQUALITY:
Character:
Colour:
Odour:
WellDisinfected:N
EMSID:
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
SiteInfo(SEAM):
WaterUtility:
WaterSupplySystemName:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:
SURFACESEAL:
Flag:N
Material:Bentoniteclay
Method:
Depth(ft):15feet
1/2
3/4/2015
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
FileInfoFlag:N
Thickness(in):2inches
SieveInfoFlag:N
LinerfromTo:feet
ScreenInfoFlag:N
WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:
SiteInfoDetails:
ReasonForClosure:
OtherInfoFlag:
MethodofClosure:
OtherInfoDetails:
ClosureSealantMaterial:
ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:
Screenfrom
71
72
tofeet
72
76
Type
SlotSize
null
35
Casingfrom
0
0
tofeet
76
15
Diameter
6
10
Material
Steel
Steel
DriveShoe
Y
N
GENERALREMARKS:
LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to4Ft.DIRT/CLAY
From4to76Ft.GRAVELANDSAND
ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do
2/2
APPENDIX B
WATER QUALITY DATABASE FOR OHAMIL I.R. 1