You are on page 1of 94

PITEAU ASSOCIATES

GEOTECHNICAL AND
HYDROGEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS
SUITE 300 - 788 COPPING STREET
NORTH VANCOUVER, B.C.
CANADA - V7M 3G6
TEL: (604) 986-8551 / FAX: (604) 985-7286

www.piteau.com

GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON


REVIEW OF TRANS MOUNTAIN PIPELINE
EXPANSION PROJECT
GROUNDWATER ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH
OHAMIL I.R. 1 AND PETERS I.R. 1 AND 2
NEAR HOPE
BRITISH COLUMBIA

Prepared by
PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

PROJECT 3375

APRIL 2015

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

i.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd. has reviewed the Trans Mountain Expansion Projects
submission to the National Energy Board with respect to groundwater issues affecting the
Shxwwhmel and Peters First Nations. Their respective Reserves, Ohamil I.R. 1 and
Peters I.R. 1 and 2, are located on the eastern bank of the Fraser River, between Chilliwack and
Hope, BC, and within the footprint of the proposed corridor of the Trans Mountain Expansion
Project. These communities rely on groundwater as their sole water supply.
The scope of work involved a review of the National Energy Board submission as well as
compilation and assessment of data from the provincial well and aquifer database, Piteau
Associates Engineering reports and file, Aboriginal and Northern Development Canada records,
First Nation Health Authority water quality database, and data from Shxwwhmel and Peters
First Nations.
A pipeline leak or rupture has a low probability of occurring and a potentially high consequence to
an underlying aquifer. The consequences of a leak or rupture will depend strongly on the
response time and the specific actions taken during the response. Petroleum hydrocarbon
released from the pipeline would migrate downward due to gravity, with a portion retained in the
pore space of the unsaturated zone. According to Trans Mountain Expansion Project, the
petroleum hydrocarbon is comprised solely of light non-aqueous phase liquids, which float on top
of water and do not mix with water. If petroleum hydrocarbon reached the water table it would
form a pool on the water table. A small proportion of the petroleum hydrocarbon would dissolve
in the groundwater, forming a dissolved plume of toxic compounds that would migrate along the
groundwater flow direction. Once a plume of petroleum hydrocarbon has developed in the
aquifer, it can be very difficult to remediate.

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

ii.

Ohamil I.R. 1 overlies the Harrison Lake Aquifer No. 3, a highly vulnerable and moderately
productive sand and gravel aquifer. The Shxwwhmel community is supplied by two drilled
wells west of the proposed pipeline corridor. Results from water quality samples collected from
1997 to 2015 fall within the Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality, with the exception of
0.2% of E. coli results and 12% of total coliform results. The well water is not treated prior to
distribution. The water supply wells have a high vulnerability to a pipeline leak based on the
unconfined nature of the aquifer and the proposed pipeline corridor bisecting the aquifer and
intersecting the interpreted range of five-year well capture zones.
Peters I.R. 1 and 2 are situated approximately 5 km downstream of Ohamil I.R. 1. The 12
individual water supply wells are located in the footprint of the same Aquifer No. 3 that underlies
the Shxwwhmel First Nation. While a summary of water quality data was not available,
historical coliform exceedances have required boil water advisories for the community in the past.
The current pipeline configuration appears to be outside of the eastern boundary of the aquifer,
which decreases the risk of impact in the case of a leak or rupture.
Mitigative design characteristics that should be considered for the Trans Mountain Expansion
Project are increased pipeline wall thickness and/or double walled pipe, leak detection system,
minimizing the response time to a detected leak, and routing the pipeline around the groundwater
aquifers. The Trans Mountain Expansion Project submission to the National Energy Board did
not consider the potential effects to groundwater quality in the case of a leak or rupture, and the
area of groundwater related concern is considered to be an unreasonably narrow zone
surrounding the pipeline corridor. In addition to the mitigative design characteristics to be
considered, the response plan should be revisited to incorporate an automatic hydrogeological
investigation in the event of a leak, and a spill response scenario for a groundwater aquifer.
Specifics of a compensation plan for the Reserves in response to a leak should be clarified. The
absence of dense non-aqueous phase liquids content in the petroleum hydrocarbon should be
confirmed again.

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1.2 SCOPE

1
1
1

2. POTENTIAL GROUNDWATER IMPACTS OF A PIPELINE LEAK

3. BASELINE CONDITIONS
3.1 DATA COMPILATION
3.2 OHAMIL I.R. 1
3.2.1 Aquifer Characterization
3.2.2 Well Locations and Operation
3.2.3 Aquifer Water Quality
3.2.4 Vulnerability to a Pipeline Leak
3.3 Peters I.R. 1 and 2
3.3.1 Aquifer Characterization
3.3.2 Well Locations and Operation
3.3.3 Aquifer Water Quality
3.3.4 Vulnerability to a Pipeline Leak

6
6
6
6
7
8
8
9
9
10
10
11

4. REVIEW OF TRANS MOUNTAIN SUBMISSION


4.1 MITIGATIVE DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS RELEVANT TO GROUNDWATER
4.2 KEY ISSUES TO ADDRESS FROM TRANS MOUNTAIN SUBMISSION
4.3 ISSUES TRACKING TABLE

12
12
13
17

5. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

18

6. LIMITATIONS

19

7. REFERENCES

20

APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B

Well Logs
Water Quality Database for Ohamil I.R. 1

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

TABLES

Table I

Summary of Wells at Ohamil I.R. 1

Table II

Shxwwhmel Water Quality Summary Table

Table III

Summary of Wells at Peters I.R. 1 and 2

Table IV

Issues Tracking Table

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

FIGURES

Fig. 1

Fate of LNAPL in a Groundwater Aquifer

Fig. 2

Residual Oil Saturation at the Pipeline Oil Spill Site near Bemidji, Minnesota

Fig. 3

Regional Plan

Fig. 4

Ohamil I.R. 1 Site Plan

Fig. 5

Cross Section A-A through Ohamil I.R. 1

Fig. 6

Peters I.R. 1 Site Plan

Fig. 7

Section B-B through Peters I.R. 1

Fig. 8

Aquifer Underlying Ohamil I.R. 1

Fig. 9

Aquifer Underlying Peters I.R. 1 and 2

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

1.

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION


The Trans Mountain pipeline originates in Edmonton, Alberta and terminates in Burnaby, BC,
and carries a range of crude oil and petroleum products. An expansion project for this pipeline
(The Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion Project or TMEP) is currently under review by the
National Energy Board (NEB). This project includes the installation of new pipeline segments,
reactivation of existing lines, expansion of existing terminals and addition of new power lines.
When completed, the project will result in two continuous pipelines from Edmonton to Burnaby.
One of the new pipeline segments will be constructed from near Kamloops BC, past Hope BC
and through the Fraser Valley to Burnaby. Ohamil I.R. 1 (Shxwwhmel) and Peters I.R. 1 and 2
(Peters) are two reserves located on the eastern bank of the Fraser River, between Chilliwack
and Hope, BC, and within the footprint of the proposed corridor of the TMEP. Both of these
communities rely on groundwater as their sole water supply.
1.2 SCOPE
Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd. (Piteau) has been retained by Gowling Lafleur Henderson
LLP (Gowlings) to review the TMEP NEB Submission specific to groundwater issues associated
with Ohamil I.R. 1 and Peters I.R. 1 and 2. The scope of work includes a review of the relevant
hydrogeological information and assessment in the NEB submission, as well as additional
characterization of the aquifer(s) which underlie the subject reserves. The following tasks were
completed as part of this work:

Compilation of data from the provincial well and aquifer database, Piteau and Aboriginal
and Northern Development Canada (AANDC) records, First Nation Health Authority

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

2.

(FNHA) water quality database, the Shxwwhmel and Peters First Nations, and online
mapping sources;

Review of interpreted aquifer parameters and capture zones;

Review of the TMEP NEB Submission; and

Preparation of this report.

This report discusses the potential groundwater impacts that could result from a pipeline leak or
rupture, reviews the current knowledge of groundwater conditions for the Shxwwhmel and
Peters First Nations, and provides specific guidance to the First Nations on issues to follow up on
the TMEP submission.

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

3.

2. POTENTIAL GROUNDWATER IMPACTS OF A PIPELINE LEAK

The risk to groundwater associated with a pipeline leak or rupture is characterized by its low
probability of occurrence and potentially high consequence if it does. The following paragraphs
provide an overview of how a leak or rupture in a buried pipeline could impact the groundwater
supply aquifer underlying the Ohamil I.R. 1 and Peters I.R. 1 and 2, which for the purpose of this
report are collectively referred to as the Reserve lands.
A sand and gravel groundwater aquifer, such as the aquifer underlying the Reserve lands, can be
broadly divided into an unsaturated zone and a saturated zone. The unsaturated zone is above
the water table and the pore spaces are only partly filled with water. In contrast, the saturated
zone is below the water table and the pore spaces are completely filled with water. These two
broad zones within an aquifer are relevant to understanding the mechanisms of potential
groundwater impacts of a pipeline leak.
The pipeline will likely carry several types of petroleum hydrocarbon (PHC) compounds ranging
from crude oil (including diluted bitumen) to refined products such as gasoline and diesel fuels.
Each of these mixtures contains many thousands of individual molecules including alkanes,
naphthalenes, aromatics, and aliphatics. Virtually all of these have very low solubility in water,
and a specific gravity of less than 1. When released into the environment, PHCs are collectively
described as light non-aqueous phase liquids (LNAPLs). Because the pipeline may carry diluted
bitumen (dilbit), some of the PHC compounds present may be denser than water, and would
tend to sink through water. These types of compounds are referred to as dense non-aqueous
phase liquids (DNAPLs). The difference between LNAPLs and DNAPLs is relevant because of
the difference in potential impact and in their ultimate fate in the aquifer. However, the proportion
of DNAPL in the pipeline is expected to be inconsequential.
The pipeline is typically buried above the water table in the unsaturated zone. When the
Ohamil I.R. 1 community wells were installed in 1997, the depth to water was 3.1 to 3.5m below
ground level (m-bgl). Water levels from the Provincial water well database indicate similar depths
to water along the pipeline right-of-way. Therefore, the pipeline will be buried quite close to the
water table. If the pipeline leaks or ruptures, the leaked hydrocarbon products will migrate
downward through the unsaturated zone under the influence of gravity. As the hydrocarbons

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

4.

migrate downwards, a portion will be retained in the pores of the unsaturated zone. Because the
aquifer materials typically include finer layers that consist of silts and/or fine sands within the
coarser sands and gravels, the hydrocarbons will tend to spread out along these layers and form
thin pools on top of these layers as they migrate downward (Fig. 1). If enough hydrocarbon spills,
not all of it can be retained in the pores of the unsaturated zone and the LNAPL portion of the
hydrocarbons will form a pool on the water table. This pool on the water table is also called an
LNAPL pancake. Volatile and semi-volatile components of the residual LNAPL in the
unsaturated zone combined with the LNAPL pancake will partition to the vapour phase resulting
in a vapour plume within the unsaturated zone in proximity to the point of release. In addition, a
small amount of the lighter molecules in the LNAPL pancake will dissolve into groundwater
migrating through and past the LNAPL, leading to the formation of plumes of dissolved PHC.
This is mostly a concern with respect to mono-cyclic aromatic compounds, which include
benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylenes (BTEX), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
(PAH) compounds, such as naphthalene, which are amongst the lightest and more soluble
molecules present in petroleum hydrocarbon, and have the greatest toxicity. Some of the lighter
aliphatic molecules are also considered to have toxic effects.
The behaviour of DNAPLs is similar to LNAPLs until they reach the water table. Unlike
LNAPLs, the DNAPLs will continue to sink through the saturated zone until they have been
retained in the available pore space or until they reach a very low-permeability layer, thus
allowing a thicker dissolved plume to develop. In the case of the Reserve lands, this
impermeable layer is currently assumed to be the bedrock because no laterally extensive, lowpermeability layers are currently identified. Until Trans Mountain responds to the Peters First
Nation Information Request, the DNAPL content of hydrocarbons in the pipeline is unknown.
The residual LNAPL in the unsaturated zone and the LNAPL pancake will tend to maintain a
relatively stable location. However, the dissolved plume emanating from the LNAPL pancake will
tend to migrate in the direction of groundwater flow. Therefore, knowledge of the groundwaterflow direction is required to understand the migration direction of the plume. Water level
measurements and surveyed casing elevations at several wells are required to deduce the
groundwater flow direction. Because these aquifers are immediately adjacent to the Fraser River,
the groundwater-flow direction probably varies depending on the location. For example, the
groundwater flow direction close to the river may be approximately parallel to the river whereas

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

5.

the flow direction close to the pipeline may be generally from the pipeline toward the river. The
groundwater flow direction may also vary depending on the season. For example, when the river
is high during the spring, the flow direction may tend to loop from the river into the aquifer and out
into the river again. In any case, the data currently available on the Reserve lands are currently
insufficient to understand the location-dependent and time-dependent groundwater flow
directions.
Plumes of dissolved hydrocarbons molecules generally migrate slowly, partly because
groundwater itself moves quite slowly, and also due to biogeochemical processes, which tend to
retard the rate of migration, and degrade dissolved hydrocarbons at the leading edge of the
plume. A typical groundwater velocity in a sand and gravel aquifer could range from about 5 to
500 m/yr, depending on the slope of the water table and the permeability of the sand and gravel.
The risk to a groundwater supply well from a pipeline leak or rupture is likely not immediate (on
the scale of days) unless the well is very close to the leak. The aforementioned biogeochemical
processes may also limit the ultimate length of the plume. Nevertheless, groundwater systems
are characteristically uncertain and neither of these facts can be assumed to prevent
contamination of a well.
Petroleum hydrocarbons can be very difficult to remediate once they have entered an aquifer.
Depending on the size of the spill, the contamination could potentially be permanent. For
example, an oil pipeline ruptured in a glacial outwash aquifer near Bemidji, Minnesota in 1979
(Fig. 2). An estimated 1.7 million litres of oil was spilled and an estimated 0.4 million litres of oil
remained after the cleanup was completed. Even though the spill occurred 35 years ago,
considerable quantities of oil remain in the ground and the dissolved plume persists despite five
years of pump-and-skim remediation and ongoing natural degradation (Essaid et al., 2011). This
spill was quite large but it illustrates that cleanup and remediation can be challenging.

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

6.

3. BASELINE CONDITIONS

3.1 DATA COMPILATION


Groundwater data that were relevant to this review were compiled from the following sources:

Provincial well database

Provincial aquifer database

Victoria Peters of Peters First Nation

Alfred James and Dean Jones (water system operator) from Shxwwhmel First Nation

Mark Turner, an Environmental Health Officer from First Nation Health Authority (FNHA)
for water quality records

Water supply and aquifer conditions from consulting reports

The following paragraphs discuss the site-specific groundwater conditions for the Reserve lands.
3.2 OHAMIL I.R. 1
3.2.1 Aquifer Characterization
Ohamil I.R. 1 lies entirely within the footprint of the Harrison Lake Aquifer No. 3 as
mapped in the Aquifer Classification Database maintained by the BC Ministry of
Environment (BC MOE) (Figs. 3 and 4). This sand and gravel aquifer is comprised of
Fraser River Sediments and extends along the eastern side of the Fraser River Valley,
bounded by the Fraser River to the west and the bedrock valley wall to the east (Fig. 5).
The aquifer is classified as highly vulnerable with a moderate productivity and a low level
of development compared to the aquifers productivity. No water quality or quantity
concerns were identified in the Aquifer Classification Database (BCGOV, 2015).
The mapped aquifer lithology is confirmed with drill logs from wells drilled at Ohamil I.R. 1.
All five well logs show a shallow layer of top soil and overbank sediments ranging from
0.6 to 2.1m, followed by sand, sand and gravel or gravel to the final well depths of 12.5 to
25.0m (Table I and Appendix A).

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

7.

3.2.2 Well Locations and Operation


The Ohamil I.R. 1 community groundwater supply system is serviced by two 200mm
diameter wells drilled in 1997. The wells, PW97-1 and PW97-1, are located 12m apart
and approximately 35m east of the St. Elmo Road centreline, opposite the access road to
the cemetery (Fig. 4). On December 8, 1997, the well depths were 24.4 and 24.99m,
respectively, with static water levels of 3.08 and 3.53 m-bgl (Piteau, 1998). Well logs are
included in Appendix A.
Pumping tests at the two wells shortly after drilling indicated the wells had encountered a
productive aquifer suitable for community water well operation. Well PW97-1 was tested
at rates of 2.95, 5.29 and 15.15 L/s for 30, 22.5 and 310 minutes, respectively. Recovery
after the 15.15 L/s step of the test occurred within one minute of shutting off the pump,
and the calculated specific capacity for the well, determined by extrapolating the
drawdown measured during the last step of the test to one year, was 4.70 L/s/m. PW97-2
was tested at rates of 6.14, 11.36 and 15.15 L/s for steps of 85, 200 and 1190 minutes,
respectively. Initial recovery was quick, but a residual drawdown of about 3% of total
drawdown remained 49 minutes after pump shutoff. This residual was attributed to a
change in the Fraser River level or aquifer water level. The one-year specific capacity
extrapolated from the final step was 7.93 L/s/m. Although the wells had estimated
sustainable safe yields in excess of 20 L/s, it was recommended to limit their pumping rate
to below 15.1 L/s (Piteau, 1998). The wells were commissioned in the summer of 1999
(Urban Systems Ltd., 1999), and the system has been operated and maintained by
Dean Jones of Shxwwhmel First Nation since that time.
In 1998, the 20-year projected water supply requirements for Ohamil I.R. 1 were a
maximum daily flow of about 4 L/s, and a peak hourly flow of about 6.7 L/s. No water
levels or pumping records are available since the system was commissioned. However,
the system is functioning adequately, according to the water system operator, Dean Jones
(personal communication, Feb. 24, 2015).
The Wells Database maintained by the BC MOE identifies a total of five wells on the
Ohamil I.R. 1 property. Of these, two are for PW97-1 and PW97-2 (WTN 76210 and
76211), two are the former community water supply wells (WTN 66017 and 76083), and
the last is an unknown water supply well drilled in 1980. In 2008, six abandoned wells at

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

8.

Ohamil I.R. 1 were identified, and decommissioned in accordance with the groundwater
protection regulation. The drilling information and status of the five recorded wells are
summarized in Table I, and all records of well drilling and decommissioning from the well
resources database (BC MOE, 2015) are included in Appendix A.
3.2.3 Aquifer Water Quality
Groundwater from the Ohamil I.R. 1 community system is not treated or chlorinated prior
to distribution. Water quality records for basic potability are available from the time of
installation in December 1997, and from the FNHA for samples collected from the
distribution system in March 2002, June 2004, January and December 2007,
September 2009 and October 2011. Additional sampling was completed for volatiles in
December 1997, March 2002 and December 2007. Water samples collected from various
locations in the distribution system have been analyzed for total and Escherichia coliforms
(total and E. coli) at least once per month. Initial water quality sampling characterized
water from both wells as moderately hard water with moderate mineralization, with all
analyzed water quality parameters meeting their respective Guidelines for Canadian
Drinking Water Quality (GCDWQ). All results for volatiles are below the detection limit.
Exceedances of E. coli have been rare, with three positive results out of 1217 samples,
occurring once each in 2005, 2010 and 2012. The four fecal coliform results were <1, and
of the 1229 total coliform results, 148 (12%) had exceedances. Other than the
aforementioned coliform exceedances, no water quality exceedances were reported by
the FNHA. Water quality data provided by the FNHA for the Ohamil I.R. 1 community
system is summarized in Table II, and the full water quality data report is provided in
Appendix B.
3.2.4 Vulnerability to a Pipeline Leak
A range of approximate five-year well capture zones interpreted for a hydrogeological
assessment prior to well construction (Piteau, 1996) are included on Fig. 3. These well
capture zones reflect the possible range in natural groundwater flow direction and were
developed based on a well yield of 1.3 L/s, aquifer thickness of 20m, hydraulic
conductivity of 10-4 m/s, and hydraulic gradient of 0.005 m/m. These parameters result in
a groundwater flow velocity of about 0.2 m/day. The capture zones were intended to
provide an area within which development should be restricted. The proposed pipeline

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

9.

corridor runs adjacent to the Trans-Canada Highway through the middle of Ohamil I.R. 1
bisecting the aquifer and intersecting the interpreted range of five-year well capture zones.
Furthermore, the aquifer is unconfined and classified as highly vulnerable in the provincial
aquifer database. Therefore, this aquifer, and the water supply wells within the aquifer,
have a high vulnerability to a pipeline leak.
3.3 PETERS I.R. 1 AND 2
3.3.1 Aquifer Characterization
Peters I.R. 1 is situated on a sand and gravel point bar deposited by the Fraser River.
Peters I.R. 2 is located on a mid-channel deposit separated from Peters I.R. 1 by an
ephemeral side channel of the Fraser River, while Peters I.R. 1A is located on the eastern
valley wall (Fig. 6). Peters I.R. 1 overlies the southern end of the mapped Harrison Lake
Aquifer No. 3 described in Section 3.1.1. As described above, this aquifer is classified as
highly vulnerable, with a moderate productivity and a low level of development compared
to the aquifers productivity.
Lithology from seven of nine well logs obtained from the BC MOE Wells Database confirm
the sand and gravel lithology within the mapped aquifer (Table III and Appendix A). Three
of the logs also show up to 2.1m of silt, sand and silt, or dirt and clay above the sand and
gravel, which is logged to a maximum depth of 24.7m. The exact locations of the two
wells that did not encounter sand and gravel (WTN 32113, 64763) are not known but
according to the BC MOE Wells Database, they are located within the boundary of
Peters I.R. 1. These wells encountered clay or till above bedrock, and are likely located
close to the valley wall.
Water levels measured in water wells servicing the Bill Peters and Frank Peters
residences in September 1989 were 5.4m and 6.2m, respectively (Piteau, 1990). Water
levels recorded by drillers at the time of drilling range from 5.2 to 7.9 m-bgl in the wells
encountering sand and gravel (Table III and Fig. 7). More recent water level records are
not available.

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

10.

3.3.2 Well Locations and Operation


The 14 residences on the Peters Reserve are supplied by groundwater from 12 individual
wells. Peters Councillor Victoria Peters confirmed that 12 wells were operating in the
community as of year 2015 (personal communication, Feb. 27, 2015). The seven wells
with sand and gravel lithology summarized in Table III are likely included in the
12 operating wells. They range from 12.2 to 24.7m deep and are all completed in the
sand and gravel aquifer. Estimated drillers well yields, where available, range from
30 to 75 USgpm.
In 2002, a water and wastewater assessment study was completed for the Peters
Reserve (Novatec, 2002). At that time, the community water supply for the Peters
Reserve consisted of three water supply systems. The first 3 Home System was built in
1970, and served three homes and possibly the First Nation Office in 2002. The second
Community Hall and One Home system was constructed in 1980 to supply the
Community Hall and one home, and the third Single Home System was constructed in
1980 for one home. No formal use records were available for any of the systems at the
time of the Novatec report.
The locations of the water wells from the BC MOE Wells Database are plotted on Figs. 6
and 7, along with the approximate locations of the three wells from Novatec (2002). The
locations reported in the database do not necessarily match the true location in the field,
and it is possible that Wells 29801, 29811 and/or 32113 could represent one or more of
the wells in the Novatec report.
No records of pumping are available for the wells on Peters I.R. 1. There are no records
of wells on either Peters I.R. 1A or Peters I.R. 2.
3.3.3 Aquifer Water Quality
No water quality or quantity concerns were identified by the Aquifer Classification
Database (BCGOV, 2015). The groundwater supply in the Peters Reserve is not treated
(Novatec, 2002 and personal communication with Victoria Peters).

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

11.

In 2002, Novatec reported that coliform exceedances (>70% of seven samples in 1999)
for the entire First Nation community were noted in reports from Health Canada, and the
community had relied on bottled water for drinking water. One sample was collected in
2000 and three in 2001. Results for these follow-up samples are unavailable as of the
date of this report. In a March 31, 2000 letter from Health Canada to the Peters First
Nation, an alternative water source, such as water coolers, was recommended as an
interim measure due to the variability in bacteriological sample results (Novatec, 2002).
During the February 19, 2002 site inspection by Dr. Troy Vassos, P.Eng., of Novatec, it
was noted that water quality along the south shore of the Fraser River can affect g/w
quality in the sandy soils, and that the top end of the reserve had problems with water
quality, which move through the community. Also, the Single Home System was
supplied by a well located within a cattle pasture (Novatec, 2002).
Other than the coliform exceedances, Novatec noted in 2002 that available water
chemistry collected every two or three years met the GCDWQ. However, it was noted in
2002 that the Band has complained of odour, oily film and colour (periodic) problems
(Novatec, 2002).
No further water quality data were available from the FNHA as of the date of this report,
although Peters Councillor Victoria Peters indicated that boil water advisories have been
issued intermittently for the community (personal communication, Feb. 27, 2015).
3.3.4 Vulnerability to a Pipeline Leak
The current version of the pipeline alignment appears to be just east of the eastern
boundary of the aquifer, which decreases the risk of impact if the pipeline leaks or
ruptures. The aquifer itself is classified with high vulnerability. In the case of water
contamination, the emergency plan is to use a telephone or travel door-to-door to notify
residents of hazards (Novatec, 2002).

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

12.

4. REVIEW OF TRANS MOUNTAIN SUBMISSION

4.1 MITIGATIVE DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS RELEVANT TO GROUNDWATER


Although a pipeline can potentially contaminate a groundwater supply if it leaks or ruptures,
several mitigative measures can be implemented to decrease the risk and extent of
contamination. The following paragraphs describe key mitigation measures that can be
incorporated into the system.
Pipeline wall thickness and/or double walled pipe
When a pipeline is installed in a groundwater aquifer, increasing the wall thickness or installing a
double walled pipe would reduce the risk of leaks. The cost of this type of pipe is higher than a
regular pipe but deserves consideration considering that a pipeline leak in an aquifer could
contaminate the drinking water for an extended period.
Leak detection
The leak detection system is a critical component of the pipeline design because a small amount
of PHC can contaminate a relatively large volume of groundwater. A leak detection system that
can effectively detect small leaks and provide timely identification of larger leaks will minimize the
potential volume of a PHC spill.
Response time
Response to a detected leak is a critical component of the design because a groundwater supply
can be effectively contaminated by a relatively small volume of hydrocarbon for an extensive
period of time (several decades). The response time will be shaped by the following factors:

communication protocol between the pipeline monitor and the response team;

the location and level of readiness of the response team;

the qualifications of the response team; and

the type of equipment that is on stand-by.

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

13.

Routing
Routing the pipeline around rather than through the groundwater aquifers will reduce the risk to
groundwater supplies. Similar to pipe thickness, choosing a route around an aquifer may increase
costs but warrants consideration because of the potentially high impact of a pipeline leak.
4.2 KEY ISSUES TO ADDRESS FROM TRANS MOUNTAIN SUBMISSION
Potential effects on groundwater
Many aquifers along the pipeline alignment through the Fraser Valley have been described as
highly vulnerableto possible contamination from an accident or malfunction (Section 4.3.4 of
groundwater technical report in Volume 5C). The aquifers listed included Aquifer #3, which
underlies the Reserve lands. TMEP has promised to evaluate the need for additional mitigation
measures in the Fraser Valley such as valve spacing, deeper burial or thicker-walled pipe during
detailed engineering (p. 7-76 of Volume 7). The outcome of this evaluation should be verified.
Nevertheless, the specific potential effects of the pipeline on groundwater that were identified in
the Trans Mountain submission (for example, Section 3.1 of Volume 5C, Table 5.1-1 of
Volume 5C) did not include the potential impact of a pipeline leak or rupture on groundwater
quality. The probability of a leak or rupture is very low but the potential consequences are very
high. Therefore, this potential effect should be specifically addressed.
Area of groundwater related concern
A narrow corridor on either side of the pipeline alignment has been delineated in the groundwater
technical report (Volume 5C) with red hatching, and is referenced as area of groundwater related
concern (Figs. 8 and 9). This narrow corridor seems unreasonably small when considering the
potential for groundwater impacts to the highly vulnerable unconfined aquifer which extends to
the Fraser River. This corridor does not seem to consider the potential development and
migration of a dissolved plume that could result from a pipeline leak, nor rapid movement of a
larger spill along natural and constructed surface channels, and through culverts constructed to
convey runoff across the highway corridor. The significance of this area of groundwater related
concern and how it pertains to the groundwater risk assessment should be clarified. An
appropriately sized shaped area of groundwater related concern would be based on the proximity
of groundwater wells, groundwater flow directions, and groundwater flow velocities.

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

14.

The groundwater technical report also presented the criteria for Study Area Boundaries
(Section 3.3 of Volume 5C), which are described as follows:
The groundwater quantity and quality assessment discusses water quality and
quantity within the Water Quality and Quantity LSA and the Aquatics RSA. The
Water Quality and Quantity LSA is the area generally extending 100 m up-gradient
of the centre of the proposed pipeline corridor to a minimum of 300 m downgradient of the centre of the proposed pipeline corridor, as well as within 300 m of
the proposed pipeline corridor, facility or HDD entrance in potentially vulnerable
aquifer areas in hydraulic connection with the Footprint and in consideration of
surface water drainage patterns along the pipeline corridor.
The significance of the study area boundary is not clear because it does not seem to have been
considered in the groundwater technical report itself when assessing groundwater wells in
proximity to the pipeline alignment. The significance of the study area boundary, especially
compared with the area of groundwater related concern, should be clarified. For example:

Would this boundary be applicable to a groundwater study that would be conducted in the
event of a pipeline leak or does it apply only to the pre-construction characterization?

Does this boundary define the wells that will be characterized prior to pipeline
construction?

What rationale would be used to extend the down-gradient extent past the 300m minimum?

Pipeline wall thickness and/or double-walled pipe


Trans Mountain promised to consider increased wall thickness in their response to
Shxwwhmel First Nation Information Request No. 2 (Shxwwhmel FN IR No. 2). The
outcome of this consideration should be verified with respect to the conclusion and the underlying
rationale.
Leak detection
The efficacy of leak detection systems in pipelines is not clear in the submission or in the
response to Information Requests (IRs), including its ability to detect small leaks that may be
significant in terms of potential for groundwater contamination. To gain an appreciation of the
efficacy of leak detection systems, a review of all leaks in the Kinder Morgan network should be

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

15.

presented. Such a review would be expected to be readily available from a company with a
commitment to pipeline safety. This review would include at the least the following aspects of
each leak:

location;

characteristics of hydrocarbon product in the pipeline;

description of leak detection system;

the estimated sensitivity of the leak detection system;

date and time when the leak was detected;

estimated date and time when leak actually occurred; and

estimated volume of hydrocarbon that spilled and the basis for that estimate.

The Trans Mountain response to Shxwwhmel FN IR No. 2 (Exhibit B317-30, Filing Number
A4H9CB) indicated that at least one of the pipelines would be operated with slack line flow at
least part of the time. This type of pipeline operation can limit the effectiveness of leak detection
systems. Further clarification on the resolution of the leak detection system and estimates of
potential volumes that could leak without detection, and/or in the interval between detection and
intervention, is required.
Response time
If a spill occurs, a faster response time will reduce the potential effect on groundwater quality.
The response time to the Reserve lands should be clarified.
Quality of response plan
The response plan to minimize the effects on groundwater quality requires aspects that are
distinct from land-surface spills and water spills. These aspects include the following:

contractors experienced in containing and cleaning up sub-surface spills;

contractors experienced with installing instrumentation appropriate for characterizing the


extent of NAPL phase and dissolved phase contamination; and

a description of the action plan for characterizing, containing and cleaning up a pipeline
leak or rupture.

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

16.

The Trans Mountain Response to Shxwwhmel FN IR No. 2 (Exhibit B317-30, Filing Number
A4H9CB) indicated that a hydrogeological investigation would be completed if groundwater
impacts are suspected. However, considering that the pipeline is buried over a vulnerable
aquifer, groundwater impacts should automatically be suspected and a hydrogeological
investigation conducted, if the pipeline leaks. Some clarity is required on this issue, including the
specifics of the hydrogeological investigation such as (but not limited to): monitoring well locations
relative to the leak for determining groundwater flow directions and for characterizing the spill;
and well screen completion intervals to characterize the vertical distribution of any contamination.
The Trans Mountain Response to Shxwwhmel FN IR No. 2 also indicated that the principle of
net environmental benefit would be applied to any site remediation plan that would be
developed in response to a spill. At least one example of this approach from a Kinder Morgan
spill, preferably in a groundwater aquifer, is recommended to allow the Shxwwhmel and
Peters First Nations to assess whether the track record of Kinder Morgan meets their standard of
performance.
The Trans Mountain Response to Shxwwhmel FN IR No. 2 also indicated that Aboriginal groups
will be invited to participate in Unified Command, which is the overall management approach for
developing emergency response. Participation in Unified Command is recommended.
In the original submission, Trans Mountain included a series of spill scenarios at a series of
specific locations along the pipeline alignment, which suggests that spill response is being dealt
with systematically and considering all conditions. However, none of the spill response scenarios
included a leak or rupture within a groundwater aquifer. Considering that the pipeline is routed
through groundwater aquifers that supply drinking water throughout the Fraser Valley, this
omission suggests that the risk of groundwater contamination is taken lightly. The Shxwwhmel
and Peters First Nations should request that a spill response scenario be developed for leaks and
ruptures within a groundwater aquifer.
Compensation plan
In the event of a pipeline leak, a compensation plan should be in place for providing drinking
water that specifies the conditions that would be required, if any, before an alternate water supply
would be provided. The Trans Mountain Response to Shxwwhmel FN IR No. 2 indicated that

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

17.

a safe water supply would be provided during the period that a drinking water advisory is in
place. The specifics of this promise should be clarified. For example, if a leak occurred within
one of the Reserves, would Trans Mountain wait until a drinking water advisory was issued or
would a drinking water supply be provided at the time the leak occurred?
Proportion of DNAPL in the hydrocarbon mixture
Trans Mountain indicated that the PHCs in the pipeline would be comprised of only LNAPLs,
which would float on the water table (response to Peters IR2, Exhibit B317-30, Filing Number
A4H9CB). If the PHCs in the pipeline include any DNAPL, the risks to groundwater are higher
because DNAPL would tend to sink below the water table instead of floating on the top as an
LNAPL would. The resulting dissolved plume would extend to greater depth.
4.3 ISSUES TRACKING TABLE
A comprehensive list of issues has been compiled in an Issues Tracking Table (Table IV).

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

18.

5. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The proposed Trans Mountain Expansion Project would result in an additional pipeline through
the groundwater supply aquifers of the Reserve lands. These aquifers are classified as high
vulnerability and comprise the sole drinking water supply for the two Reserves.
The probability of a pipeline leak is very low but the potential impacts are high and could persist
for many decades. While the current submission deals with several risks related to groundwater,
it appears to deal inadequately with or almost ignore the potential effect of a pipeline leak on
groundwater quality. Key issues for Trans Mountain to address relating to groundwater at the
Shxwwhmel and Peters First Nations include the following:

demonstrate that the potential effects of a pipeline leak on groundwater quality are being
addressed realistically;

define the area of groundwater related concern and provide the rationale for how this
area was delineated;

demonstrate the efficacy of the leak detection system;

provide specifics on response time and response plan;

list specific conditions under which safe drinking water would be supplied in the event of a
pipeline leak; and

indicate the proportion of DNAPL being carried in the pipeline, if any.

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

19.

6. LIMITATIONS

The assessment reported herein has been conducted using a standard of care consistent with
that expected of scientific and engineering professionals undertaking similar work under similar
conditions in Canada. No warranty is expressed or implied.

In conducting this assessment, Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd. has relied on information
provided by others. While we believe the data to be representative of site conditions, we do not
accept responsibility for their accuracy or completeness.
This report is comprised of text, tables, figures and appendices, and all components must be read
and interpreted in the context of the whole report. This report has been prepared for the sole use
of Gowlings and Shxwwhmel and Peters First Nations, and no representation of any kind is
made to any other party.
Respectfully submitted,
PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

Jennifer Mancer, P.Eng.

Hugh McCreadie, P.Eng.

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

7. REFERENCES

BCGOV, 2015. BC GOV ENV Water Protection and Sustainability Branch. Ground Water
Aquifers shapefile, revised February 2015. Available at
http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wsd/plan_protect_sustain/groundwater/aquifers/index.html.
British Columbia Ministry of Environment (BC MOE). WELLS Ground Water Wells and Aquifer
Database. Accessed March 2015. Available at
http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wsd/data_searches/wells/
Essaid, H.I., Bekins, Barbara A., Herkelrath, William N., Delin, Geoffrey N., 2011. Crude Oil at
the Bemidji Site: 25 Years of Monitoring, Modeling and Understanding. Groundwater
Vol. 49, No. 5, pp. 706-726. September-October.
Jones, Dean, and James, Alfred from Shxwwhmel First Nation. Phone call on February 24,
2015.
Novatec Consultants Inc., 2002. Assessment Study of Water and Wastewater Systems and
Associated Water Management Practices at Peters Band. Report prepared for Indian
and Northern Affairs Canada BC Region, June.
Peters, Victoria from Peters First Nation. Phone call on February 27, 2015.
Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd., 1990. Hydrogeological Assessment for Ground Disposal of
Septic Tank Effluent, Peters I.R. No. 1 Near Hope, British Columbia. Report prepared for
Indian and Northern Affairs, Vancouver, British Columbia, June, 5 p.
Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd., 1996. Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Assessment for
Proposed Development Ohamil I.R. #1. Report prepared for Urban Systems Ltd. and
Ohamil Indian Band, June, 22 p.
Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd., 1998. Shxwwhmel First Nation Water System Production
Wells PW97-1 and PW97-2 Construction and Testing Program Results, Ohamil I.R. No.
1, Hope, British Columbia. Report prepared for Urban Systems Ltd., January 13, 13 p.
Urban Systems Ltd., 1999. Completion Report and Operation and Maintenance Manual for
Shxwwhmel First Nation Community Water System Upgrade CPMS #2114. Report
prepared for Shxwwhmel First Nation, September.

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

TABLES

TABLE I
SUMMARY OF WELLS AT OHAMIL I.R. 1

5-Jun-80

12.8

20-Jul-84

22.3

11.3

12.5

18-May-90

13.7

12.23

13.4

18-Nov-97

24.4

22.9

24.4

Operational

19-Nov-97

25.0

23.5

25.0

Decommissioned
Decommissioned
Decommissioned
Decommissioned
Decommissioned
Decommissioned

13-Nov-08
13-Nov-08
13-Nov-08
13-Nov-08
13-Nov-08
13-Nov-08

6.7
7.3

45248

M Clemens

66017

M Clemens

PW-1

76083

Ohamil Indian Band

PW-2

76210

Ohamil Indian Band

PW97-1

Assumed
decommissioned
Assumed
decommissioned
Assumed
decommissioned
Operational

76211

Ohamil Indian Band

PW97-2

95096
95097
95098
95099
95100
95102

Shxwwhmel First Nations


Shxwwhmel First Nations
Shxwwhmel First Nations
Shxwwhmel First Nations
Shxwwhmel First Nations
Shxwwhmel First Nations

Screen
Bottom Diameter
Depth (inches)
(m)

Date Drilled or
Decommissioned

Owner

Well ID

Screen
Top
Depth
(m)

Well
Depth
(m)

Well
Tag
Number

Well Status 2

Lithology

Lithology
Depth
Intervals (m)

Topsoil
Gravel
Silty Topsoil
Sand and Gravel
Topsoil
Gravel
Topsoil
Sand
Sand, Gravel, Binder
Sand and Gravel
Topsoil
Sand
Sand, Gravel, Binder
Sand and Gravel

0 to 0.9
0.9 to 12.8
0 to 2.1
2.1 to 12.5
0 to 0.9
0.9 to 13.7
0 to 0.6
0.6 to 2.7
2.7 to 7.9
7.9 to 24.4
0 to 0.6
0.6 to 3.4
0 to 7.6
0 to 25

Static
Drillers Well
Water
Yield
Level (m
Estimate
below
(USgpm)
ground)
4.0

50

3.0

50

3.7

150

3.7

150

3.7

150

9.8

H:\Project\3375\Report\Tables\[Well Record Summary.xlsx]Shxwowhamel

Notes:

1. Information compiled from well logs from BC Wells Database and Piteau, 1996 and 1998 (Appendix A). Known well locations shown on Fig. 6.
2. The six decommissioning records for Ohamil I.R. 1 wells in 2008 are included with Appendix A. It is unclear which wells have been decommissioned.
3. 0.3m (1 ft) bail bottom assumed for screen depths of PW-2.

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

1 of 3

TABLE II
SHXWWHMEL WATER QUALITY SUMMARY TABLE
Parameter
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol
2,3,4,6 + 2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
2,3,4-Trichlorophenol
2,3,5-Trichlorophenol
2,3,6-Trichlorophenol
2,3-Dichlorophenol
2,4 + 2,5-Dichlorophenol
2,4 + 3,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,5-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
2-Chlorophenol
3,4,5-Trichlorophenol
3,5-Dichlorophenol
3-Chlorophenol
4-Chlorophenol
Alkalinity (phenolphthalein, as CaCO3)
Alkalinity (total, as CaCO3)
Aluminum (total)
Ammonia (total, as N)
Antimony (total)
Arsenic (total)
Barium (total)
Benzene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Bicarbonate (as HCO3)
Boron (total)
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Cadmium (total)
Calcium (total)
Carbon tetrachloride
Carbonate (as CO3)
Chloride
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chromium (total)
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene

# detects

# samples
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
2
6
6
6
3
2
1
6
3
3
6
6
3
1
6
1
3
1
6
1
1

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

# non-detects
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
3
6
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
6
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0

# exceedances
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
2
6
3
0
3
2
0
4
3
3
6
0
3
1
0
1
3
1
6
1
1

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

2 of 3

TABLE II
SHXWWHMEL WATER QUALITY SUMMARY TABLE
Parameter
Cobalt (total)
Colour
Conductivity
Conductivity % difference
Conductivity (computed)
Copper (total)
Cyanide (SAD) + Thiocyanate
Cyanide (total)
Dibromochloromethane
Dichloromethane
Escherichia coli / E. coli (counts)
Escherichia coli / E. coli (MPN / PA)
Ethylbenzene
Ethylene dibromide / EDB
Fecal Coliforms (counts)
Fluoride
Gross alpha particle activity
Gross beta particle activity
Hardness (total, as CaCO3)
Hydroxide (as OH)
Ion balance
Iron (total)
Langelier Index
Lead (total)
Lead-210
m- + p- Xylene
Magnesium (total)
Manganese (total)
Mercury (total)
Methyl bromide
Methyl tert-butyl ether / MTBE
Molybdenum (total)
Monochlorobenzene
Nickel (total)
Nitrate (as N)
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N)
Nitrite (as N)
o-Xylene
Pentachlorophenol / PCP
pH
Polonium-210
Potassium (total)
Radium-226
Radium-228
Saturation pH
Selenium (total)
Silver (total)
Sodium (total)
Styrene
Sulphate
Sulphide (total, as H2S)
Sulphide (total, as S)
Tetrachloroethylene / PCE

# samples

# detects

2
6
6
1
1
6
1
1
3
3
3
1214
3
1
4
6
1
1
6
1
1
6
1
6
1
3
6
6
6
1
1
1
3
1
6
2
6
3
2
6
1
6
1
1
1
6
1
6
1
6
1
1
3
PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

# non-detects
0
1
6
1
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
6
0
1
6
0
1
2
1
1
0
0
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
2
0
0
0
6
0
6
1
0
1
0
0
6
0
6
0
0
0

2
5
0
0
0
1
1
1
3
3
3
1210
3
1
4
0
1
0
0
1
0
4
0
5
1
3
0
5
6
1
1
1
3
1
0
0
6
3
2
0
1
0
0
1
0
6
1
0
1
0
1
1
3

# exceedances
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

3 of 3

TABLE II
SHXWWHMEL WATER QUALITY SUMMARY TABLE
Parameter
Tin (total)
Titanium (total)
Toluene
Total Anions
Total Cations
Total Coliforms (counts)
Total Coliforms (MPN / PA)
Total Dissolved Solids / TDS
Total Dissolved Solids / TDS (% difference)
Total Dissolved Solids / TDS (computed)
Total Organic Carbon / TOC
Total Solids
Total Suspended Solids / TSS
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethylene / TCE
Trichlorofluoromethane
Turbidity
Uranium (total)
Vanadium (total)
Vinyl chloride
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons / VPH
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons C6-C10
Xylenes (total)
Zinc (total)

# samples
1
1
3
1
1
6
1223
6
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
3
3
6
6
2
3
1
1
1
6

# detects
0
0
0
1
1
0
150
6
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
2
0
0
0
0
0
2

# non-detects
1
1
3
0
0
6
1073
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
1
3
3
0
4
2
3
1
1
1
4

# exceedances
0
0
0
0
0
0
148
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

H:\Project\3375\Report\Appendices\Appendix B - Water Quality\[Shxwowhamel_WQ with summary table.xls]Summary Table

Note: Water quality data provided by the First Nation Health Authority. Full report in Appendix B.

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

TABLE III
SUMMARY OF WELLS AT PETERS I.R. 1 AND 2
Owner

Date
Drilled

Well
Depth
(m)

Diameter
(inches)

29801

Clifford Peters

9-Feb-74

22.3

29811

Frank Peters Ind Aff

14-Feb-74

22.6

32113

R W Peters

24-Feb-75

61.0

64763

Walker Orvil

16-Sep-83

27.1

64764
73306

Peters Indian Reserve


Peters Indian Reserve

5-Oct-83
10-Oct-86

12.2
24.7

73307

Peters Indian Reserve

10-Oct-84

24.7

73308

Peters Indian Reserve

10-Oct-84

24.7

Peters Band

6-Oct-08

23.2

Well Tag
Number

94174

Lithology

Lithology Depth
Intervals (m)

Silt
Sand and Gravel
Sand and Little Gravel
Sand and Silt
Sand and Gravel
Boulders
Sand and Gravel
Dirt
Clay
Bedrock
Shale Till
Fine Sand
Shale Boulders
*Missing Lithology
Bedrock
Sand and Gravel
Sand
Sand and Gravel
Gravel
Sand
Sand and Gravel
Gravel WB
Sand
Sand and Gravel
Dirt and Clay

0 to 2.1
2.1 to 16.2
16.2 to 22.3
0 to 1.8
1.8 to 3
3 to 4
4 to 22.6
0 to 18.6
18.6 to 23.5
23.5 to 61
0 to 12.8
12.8 to 16.8
16.8 to 24.4
24.4 to 26.5
26.5 to 27.1
0 to 12.2
0 to 2.7
2.7 to 18
18 to 24.7
0 to 12.2
12.2 to 18
18 to 24.7
0 to 2.4
2.4 to 17.7
0 to 1.2

Sand and Gravel

Static
Water
Level
(m)2
5.5

Drillers Well
Yield Estimate
(USgpm)2
30

5.2

30

14.0

0
5.5

0
0

7.9

75

1.2 to 23.2
H:\Project\3375\Report\Tables\[Well Record Summary.xlsx]Peters

Notes:

1. Well logs from BC Wells Database included as Appendix A. Well Locations from BC Wells Database shown on Fig. 6.
2. Static water level depths and driller's well yield estimate included verbatim from well log. "0" may mean that this value was not measured.
3. Well with Well Tag Number 94174 drilled in 2008 is the only well with a screen interval listed on the well log. It is screened from 21.9 to 23.2m below ground.

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

1 of 4

TABLE IV
ISSUES TRACKING TABLE
Question

Volume

Annex

Section

5A - ESA,
Biophysical

5.3.3 Groundwater Quality


and Quantity

5A - ESA,
Biophysical

5.3.3.4 Hope to Burnaby


Segment

Page

Figure

Table

Information Request

5-59

5.3-13 Description of
Potential GroundwaterRelated Issues Along the
Proposed Pipeline Corridor

Table 5.3-13 describes several types of groundwater issues that are expected along the
pipeline corridor. The list of potential issues does not include groundwater contamination due to
an oil leak from the pipeline. Please explain why this potential issue was not included in this
table.

5-72

5.3-22 Potential
Groundwater-Related
Issues in the Hope to
Burnaby Segment

RK 1057.6 listed in this table corresponds to wells that are on band land. The potential
groundwater-related issue in the table was "Two wells within the proposed pipeline corridor,
somewhat confined, no particular concerns." Please clarify the meaning and significance of "no
particular concerns."

7.9-1 Management
Systems and Programs
Required under the NEB
OPR

Considering the potentially high consequence of an oil pipeline leak, the response to a leak is a
critical component of mitigating the potential effects of a pipeline on the groundwater supply.
Please provide the following documents:
- KMC Emergency Response Plan
- KMC Incident Command System
- KMC Canadian Integrity Management Program

5A - ESA,
Biophysical

7.9.3 Potential Effects and


Mitigation Measures

5A - ESA,
Biophysical

7.9.3 Potential Effects and


Mitigation Measures

7.9-2 Potential Effects,


Although it's a rare occurrence, a pipeline leak during operations is probably the biggest risk to
Mitigation Measures and
groundwater supplies during operations but does not seem to be included in this table. Please
Residual Effects of
explain why a pipeline leak is not included in this table.
Accidents and Malfunctions

5A - ESA,
Biophysical

7.9.5 Significance
Evaluation of Potential
Residual Effects

7.9-3 Significance
Although it's a rare occurrence, a pipeline leak during operations is probably the biggest risk to
Evaluation of Potential
groundwater supplies during operations but does not seem to be included in this table. Please
Residual Effects of
explain why a pipeline leak is not included in this table.
Accidents and Malfunctions

5A - ESA,
Biophysical

7.11.1.3 Water Quality


and Quantity

5A - ESA,
Biophysical

5A - ESA,
Biophysical

7.11.1.3 Water Quality


and Quantity

Appendix 7.1

A pipeline leak is unlikely to occur but the effects of such a leak on groundwater quality could
potentially be very severe. Therefore, an evaluation of the combined effects of the Project on
the groundwater quality indicator seems warranted. Please provide a detailed rationale for
omitting this evaluation simply because the effects were deemed unlikely to occur.

7-552

The potential for groundwater contamination has low probability but potentially very high
consequence. Considering the potentially high consequence, an evaluation of combined effects
seems necessary. Please provide a detailed rationale for excluding an evaluation of potential
groundwater quality effects.

7-553

7.11.1-3 Significance
Evaluation of the Project on
Water Quality and Water
Quantity

7A.1-1

Appendix 7.1 Summary of


Please provide the reasoning for excluding management plans of the Bands in the
Land and Resource Use
Environmental Effects Assessment.
Management Plans

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

TABLE IV
ISSUES TRACKING TABLE

2 of 4

TABLE IV
ISSUES TRACKING TABLE
Question

Volume

Annex

Section

Page

5C Groundwater
Technical Report

Figure

Table

Information Request

Sheets 145
to 147

The water wells indicated on Sheets 145 to 147 indicate "Water Level or Total Depth less than
20m." Please confirm whether this means whether only wells less than 20m deep or with water
levels less than 20m deep were considered in this study. If so, please clarify the reasoning for
limiting the wells in this way considering that a plume of contaminated groundwater could result
from a pipeline leak and considering that pumping wells will have a tendency to attract the
plume to the well intake. Please also clarify whether the dilbit in the pipeline can be
categorically classified as a light non-aqueous phase liquid or whether hydrocarbon
components within the pipeline could be classified as a dense non-aqueous phase liquid.
Dense non-aqueous phase liquids have a tendency to sink below the water table.

Sheets 145
to 147

A band of red hatching, less than 100m in width, was used to delineate the "Area of
groundwater related concern" on the map sheets. Considering that an oil leak has the potential
to contaminate groundwater wells at greater distances, please explain why the area of
groundwater related concern was limited to such a narrow band.

10

5C Groundwater
Technical Report

11

5C Groundwater
Technical Report

3.1 Project Interactions


and Identification of
Potential Effects

3-1

Paragraph 2: Potential concerns with groundwater have been limited to groundwater within a
few meters of surface. Please provide a specific depth that has been used for considering
potential groundwater issues, and also a rationale for this depth based on oil leaks that have
occurred in groundwater aquifers.

12

5C Groundwater
Technical Report

3.1 Project Interactions


and Identification of
Potential Effects

3-1

Paragraph 4: Is any blasting expected in the area of Peters Reserve?

13

5C Groundwater
Technical Report

3.1 Project Interactions


and Identification of
Potential Effects

3-2

3.2-1 Assessment
Indicators and
Measurement Endpoints

Please elaborate on what is meant by and the significance of "shallow groundwater with existing
contamination?"

14

5C Groundwater
Technical Report

3.3 Study Area


Boundaries

Boundaries of the "Water Quality and Quantity LSA": The study area boundaries were defined
as 100m up-gradient and a minimum of 300m down-gradient of center of corridor, and within
300m of proposed corridor. Please describe the minimum instrumentation that would be used
to determine the direction of the groundwater gradient, both vertical and lateral. Also, if 300m is
the minimum down-gradient distance, please provide the rationale that will be used to settle on
the actual down-gradient extent of the Study Area.

15

5C Groundwater
Technical Report

3.3 Study Area


Boundaries

Since the Study Area boundary is based on the groundwater flow direction, please provide the
current interpretation of the groundwater flow directions on the Peters Reserve and the
supporting data for this interpretation.

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

TABLE IV
ISSUES TRACKING TABLE

3 of 4

TABLE IV
ISSUES TRACKING TABLE
Question

Volume

16

5C Groundwater
Technical Report

17

5C Groundwater
Technical Report

3.6 Field Data Collection

18

7 Risk
Assessment

4.0 Emergency
Preparedness and
Response

7-21

Please list the actions that would be taken to protect the groundwater resource during an
emergency response.

19

7 Risk
Assessment

4.0 Emergency
Preparedness and
Response

7-21

Please provide the list of drilling contractors and remediation contractors that Kinder Morgan
has pre-qualified for responding to oil leaks that occur in groundwater supply aquifers. Please
also provide the criteria that were used for pre-qualifying these contractors.

20

7 Risk
Assessment

4.5.1 Internal Response


Equipment (Emergency
Preparedness and
Response)

7-34

21

22

23

24

7 Risk
Assessment

7 Risk
Assessment

Annex

Section

Page

Figure

Table

Please describe the site-specific data that will be collected on Peters Band lands to document
existing conditions.

3.4 Existing Conditions

5.3.1 Fate of Hydrocarbon


Releases, Release to Land

Only one well, which was located at RK 1062, was noted in the vicinity of the Peters Reserve.
3.6-1 Collected Field Data Please describe the reasons for not visiting the wells on the Peters Reserve to document salient
information such as location, depth, use, average pumping rate, etc.

4.5.1 Location of Internal Please provide a list of equipment that would be on stand-by at the Hope location, that is
Response Equipment
specific to protecting the groundwater supply in the event of a pipeline leak.
Three mass loss mechanisms are cited: dissolution in water, evaporation and biodegradation.
The solubility of hydrocarbons in water is quite low and the rate of biodegradation is quite low.
Please provide a set of example calculations that illustrates the expected mass loss of a
plausible scenario of an oil spill on land.

7-68

If oil sinks downward through the unsaturated zone and eventually reaches the water table, a
plume of contamination will develop within the groundwater and this plume will tend to migrate
along the prevailing groundwater flow direction. However, the development of such a
groundwater plume is not mentioned in this discussion of an oil spill to land and therefore the
description of the fate of a hydrocarbon release seems incomplete. Please complete the
description of the fate of a hydrocarbon release to land.

5.3.1 Fate of Hydrocarbon


Releases, Release to Land

7 Risk
Assessment

6.1 Transport and Fate

7 Risk
Assessment

6.2.2.1 Soil and


Groundwater
(Environmental Effects)

Information Request

7-74

Volatilization is cited as a mass loss mechanism of an oil spill but it seems that the proportion of
"heavy" components in the pipeline is much higher than the proportion of volatile components.
Please provide an estimate of percentage mass loss assuming that all volatile components
evaporate. Please also provide a set of calculations that accounts for reduced volatilization
rates of the portion of the oil spill that is underground.

7-76

Oil movement is described as follows: "Oil in or on soil may move downward under gravity "
Considering the conditions in proximity to the Peters Reserve and except for the possible
presence of fine-grained horizons in the sub-surface, is there any reason the oil would not
move downward under gravity?

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

TABLE IV
ISSUES TRACKING TABLE

4 of 4

TABLE IV
ISSUES TRACKING TABLE
Question

Volume

Annex

Section

Page

Figure

Table

Information Request

25

7 Risk
Assessment

6.2.2.1 Soil and


Groundwater
(Environmental Effects)

7-76

Deeper burial of the pipeline is being considered as a mitigation measure to reduce the
potential for environmental effects of a pipeline leak. Deeper burial would reduce the risk of
puncture by excavators, for example. However, deeper burial also places the pipeline closer to
the water table and makes the pipeline more difficult to access in the event of a leak. Please
discuss the rationale being used to assess whether deeper burial would increase or decrease
the risk of groundwater contamination.

26

7 Risk
Assessment

6.3.2 Human Health


(Environmental Effects)

7-89

The description of potential human health effects is quite general. Please provide a list of
chemicals that would likely occur in a groundwater supply under a plausible pipeline-leak
scenario, and describe the likely health effects if this groundwater supply was consumed.

27

7 Risk
Assessment

7.0 Hypothetical Pipeline


Spill Scenarios

7-93

None of the hypothetical pipeline spill scenarios included an area where the pipeline was within
a groundwater supply aquifer. Please explain why a hypothetical spill within an aquifer was not
considered.

28

7 Risk
Assessment

FR 7-1 - Qualitative 3.3 Net Environmental


Benefits Analysis (Pipeline
Ecological Risk
Spills in the Terrestrial
Assessment of
Environment)
Pipeline Spills

3-4

The submission indicates that remediation of a spill would be based on a Net Environmental
Benefits Analysis. Does this mean that Trans Mountain is not committing itself to returning the
groundwater to drinking water quality in the unlikely event that groundwater becomes
contaminated by an oil-pipeline leak?

29

7 Risk
Assessment

3.4 Response and


FR 7-1 - Qualitative
Mitigation for Land-Based
Ecological Risk
3-5 to 3-7
Spills (Pipeline Spills in the
Assessment of
Terrestrial Environment)
Pipeline Spills

The following eco-systems are included in the discussion of response to land-based spills:
agricultural lands, forested areas, and wetlands. Please explain why groundwater aquifers are
not explicitly addressed considering that a large portion of the pipeline is buried in groundwatersupply aquifers.

FR 7-1 - Qualitative
Ecological Risk
Assessment of
Pipeline Spills

According to the submission, a land-based spill would be considered to be recovered once the
site meets relevant soil quality guidelines. Meeting the soil quality guidelines does not
necessarily result in concentrations of contaminants of concern in groundwater meeting relevant
drinking water protective standards or guidelines, or provide assurance that an existing or future
groundwater supply will not be adversely affected. Please explain why the groundwater quality
is not being considered when determining the remediation endpoint in the unlikely event that a
groundwater resource is affected by a spill? Please also specify the document that represents
the "relevant soil quality guidelines" referenced in the submission (paragraph 1 of Section 3.5
on page 3-7).

30

7 Risk
Assessment

3.5 Summary of LandBased Spills

3-7

H:\Project\3375\Report\Tables\[IssuesTrackingTable.xlsx]Table IV

PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD.

TABLE IV
ISSUES TRACKING TABLE

FIGURES

H:\Project\3375\Report\Figures\[Trans Mountain Figures.xlsx]Fig 1

Ground Surface

Pipeline

Fine-Grained Layer

Petroleum Hydrocarbons (LNAPL)

Vapour Plume

Unsaturated Zone
Dissolved Plume

Average Groundwater Flow Direction


Saturated Zone

Preferential migration along coarse layers

PREPARED SOLELY FOR THE USE OF OUR CLIENT AND NO REPRESENTATION OF ANY KIND IS MADE TO OTHER
PARTIES WITH WHICH PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD. HAS NOT ENTERED INTO A CONTRACT.

OHAMIL I.R. 1 AND PETERS 1.R. 1 AND 2


GROUNDWATER REVIEW OF TRANS
MOUNTAIN PIPELINE EXPANSION PROJECT
BY:

FATE OF LNAPL
IN A GROUNDWATER AQUIFER

DATE:

HMcC
APPROVED:

HM

MAR 15
FIG:

H:\Project\3375\Report\Figures\[Trans Mountain Figures.xlsx]Fig 2

Oil saturation distribution


in the aquifer at the south
oil pool, ten years after
the spill.

Oil saturation distribution


in the aquifer at the north
oil pool, 11 years after
the spill.

Oil saturation and


percent grain size smaller
than 0.1 mm at borehole
9016 showing the
influence of fine-grained
layers on oil-phase
distribution

From Figure 3 of Essaid et al, 2011


PREPARED SOLELY FOR THE USE OF OUR CLIENT AND NOT REPRESENTATION OF ANY KIND IS MADE TO OTHER
PARTIES WITH WHICH PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD. HAS NOT ENTERED INTO A CONTRACT.

OHAMIL I.R. 1 AND PETERS 1.R. 1 AND 2


GROUNDWATER REVIEW OF TRANS
MOUNTAIN PIPELINE EXPANSION PROJECT

RESIDUAL OIL SATURATION AT THE PIPELINE


OIL SPILL SITE NEAR BEMIDJI, MINNESOTA

BY:

DATE:

HM
APPROVED:

HM

MAR 15
FIG:

H:\Project\3375\ArcGIS\ArcMaps\Report\Fig3_RegionalPlan.mxd

600000

605000

Ro

ad

e
Non

To Hope

Road
Proposed Pipeline Corridor
Aquifer 3 IIIA (11)

Reserve Boundary
OHAMIL 1
PETERS 1
PETERS 1A
PETERS 2

No
ne

r Ri
ver

5465000

Ro
Lai
a
dla
w R d
oad

El
St

LEGEND

Georg
e
Road

m
o

5465000

Fra
se

Lo
ug
he
ed

Hig

hw
a

No
ne

None

Lorenzetti
Road

Hu

ek
re
C
r
te

McKay Road

T
Norans
ne -Ca
na
da
Hi
gh
wa

Dent Road

Dyk
Roa e
d

Peters

R oad

Fancher
Road

e
on

To Chilliwack
600000

Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo,
and the GIS User Community
605000

Note:
Proposed Pipeline Corridor (TMEP V10 Study Corridor) provided by Kinder Morgan on October 7, 2014,
which is different from an earlier version of the alignment shown on Figs. 8 and 9.

500

PREPARED SOLELY FOR THE USE OF OUR CLIENT AND NO REPRESENTATION OF ANY KIND IS MADE TO OTHER
PARTIES WITH WHICH PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD. HAS NOT ENTERED INTO A CONTRACT.

OHAMIL I.R. 1 AND PETERS I.R. 1 AND 2


GROUNDWATER REVIEW OF TRANS
MOUNTAIN PIPELINE EXPANSION PROJECT
1,000

1,500

SCALE: 1:40,000

2,000 m

REGIONAL PLAN

PITEAU ASSOCIATES
GEOTECHNICAL AND HYDROGEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS
BY:

JM

APPROVED:

HM

DATE:

MAR 15

FIG:

602000

A
A

Former water supply well

Operating water supply well

Interpreted Possible Range of


Groundwater Flow Direction
(Piteau, 1996)
50m Contour

Possible Range of Estimated 5 Year


Well Capture Zone (Piteau, 1996)

ph
y

Ro
ad

on

Lo
ug
he
ed

Hig

hw
a

La
ne

Bu
R lge
oa r
d

High Vulnerability Groundwater Aquifer


River

Hicks Road Mu
r

5467500

601500

5467000

601000

Legend

5467000

5467500

600500

An
de
rs

H:\Project\3375\ArcGIS\ArcMaps\Report\Fig4_ShxwowhamelPlan.mxd

600000

PW97-1

5465500

PW-1
(abandoned)

oa
d

600500

601000

Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX,


Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User
Community
601500

5465000

SCALE: 1:15,000
600000

Lai
d la
wR

an
ad
a

100 200 300 400 m

Tr
an
sC

5465000

A'

Hi
gh
wa

5465500

Fra
se

PW97-2

A PW-2
(abandoned)

5466500

r Ri
ver

5466000

St Elmo Ro
ad

5466500

Ohamil I.R. 1 Reserve Boundary

5466000

Road

No
ne

Proposed Pipeline Corridor

602000

Notes:
1. Proposed Pipeline Corridor (TMEP V10 Study Corridor) provided by Kinder Morgan on October 7, 2014, which is different
from an earlier version of the alignment shown on Figs. 8 and 9.
2. Well locations from BC MOE Wells Database not shown due to incorrect coordinates.
3. Well coordinates on this plan are based on Fig. 3 from Piteau, 1996 and Fig. 1 from Piteau, 1998.
4. Locations of an additional six decommissioned wells unconfirmed and not shown on this plan.
5. Range of estimated capture zones is approximate and not necessarily applicable to current conditions.

PREPARED SOLELY FOR THE USE OF OUR CLIENT AND NO REPRESENTATION OF ANY KIND IS MADE TO
OTHER PARTIES WITH WHICH PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD. HAS NOT ENTERED INTO A CONTRACT.

OHAMIL I.R. 1 AND PETERS I.R. 1 AND 2


GROUNDWATER REVIEW OF TRANS
MOUNTAIN PIPELINE EXPANSION PROJECT

PITEAU ASSOCIATES
GEOTECHNICAL AND HYDROGEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS
BY:

OHAMIL I.R. 1 SITE PLAN

JM

APPROVED:

HM

DATE:

MAR 15

FIG:

599000

H:\Project\3375\ArcGIS\ArcMaps\Report\Fig6_PetersPlan.mxd

LEGEND

Water Well with Well Tag Number (Note 2)

5463000

598000

5463000

597000

PETERS 1
PETERS 1A
PETERS 2
River Boundary
Road

A
94174

5462000

64764 64763
73306
73307
73308

5462000

29811

High Vulnerability Groundwater Aquifer


Proposed Pipeline Corridor

Reserve Boundary

29801

Approximate locations of 2002 operating wells (Note 3)

A
A

5461000

B'

597000

598000

Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA,


USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo,
and the GIS User Community

5461000

32113

Notes:
1. Proposed Pipeline Corridor (TMEP V10 Study Corridor)
provided by Kinder Morgan on October 7, 2014,
and is different from an earlier version of the alignment
shown on Figs.8 and 9.
2. Water Well locations are from BC MOE Wells Database,
and do not necessarily match locations in the field.
Well logs included in Appendix A.
3. 2002 operating well locations from Fig. 1 of Novatec, 2002.

599000

OHAMIL I.R. 1 AND PETERS I.R. 1 AND 2


GROUNDWATER REVIEW OF TRANS
MOUNTAIN PIPELINE EXPANSION PROJECT
0

200

400

600

SCALE: 1:20,000

800 m

PREPARED SOLELY FOR THE USE OF OUR CLIENT AND NO REPRESENTATION OF ANY KIND IS MADE TO OTHER
PARTIES WITH WHICH PITEAU ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING LTD. HAS NOT ENTERED INTO A CONTRACT.

PITEAU ASSOCIATES
GEOTECHNICAL AND HYDROGEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS
BY:

PETERS I.R. 1 SITE PLAN

JM

APPROVED:

HM

DATE:

MAR 15

FIG:

APPENDIX A
WELL LOGS

SHXWWHMEL FIRST NATION

3/10/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1980060500:00:00
WellTagNumber:45248

Owner:MCLEMENS

Address:58800STELMORD

Area:LAIDLAW

WELLLOCATION:
LandDistrict
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:1
Township:4Section:Range:27
IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:
Quarter:
Island:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):Well:1

ClassofWell:
SubclassofWell:
OrientationofWell:
StatusofWell:New
WellUse:
ObservationWellNumber:
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
Diameter:6.0inches
Casingdriveshoe:
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Driller:
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
WherePlateAttached:

PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:50(Driller'sEstimate)
DevelopmentMethod:
PumpTestInfoFlag:
ArtesianFlow:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
StaticLevel:13feet

WATERQUALITY:
Character:
Colour:
Odour:
WellDisinfected:N
EMSID:
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
SiteInfo(SEAM):

WaterUtility:
WaterSupplySystemName:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:
1/2

3/10/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

WellDepth:42feet

Elevation:0feet(ASL)

SURFACESEAL:

FinalCasingStickUp:inches

Flag:

WellCapType:

Material:

BedrockDepth:feet

Method:

LithologyInfoFlag:

Depth(ft):0feet

FileInfoFlag:

Thickness(in):

SieveInfoFlag:

LinerfromTo:feet

ScreenInfoFlag:

WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:

SiteInfoDetails:

ReasonForClosure:

OtherInfoFlag:

MethodofClosure:

OtherInfoDetails:

ClosureSealantMaterial:
ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:

Screenfrom
0
0
0
0

tofeet
0
0
0
0

Type

SlotSize
0
0
0
0

Casingfrom
0

tofeet
0

Diameter
0

Material
null

DriveShoe
null

GENERALREMARKS:

LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to3Ft.topsoil
From3to42Ft.gravel

ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

2/2

3/10/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:
WellTagNumber:66017

Driller:

Owner:CLEMENSM

WellIdentificationPlateNumber:

PlateAttachedBy:

Address:58800STALMORD

WherePlateAttached:

Area:LAIDLAW

PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:

WellYield:0(Driller'sEstimate)

WELLLOCATION:

DevelopmentMethod:

LandDistrict

PumpTestInfoFlag:Y

DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:

ArtesianFlow:

Township:27Section:Range:

ArtesianPressure(ft):

IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:

StaticLevel:12feet

Quarter:

Island:

WATERQUALITY:

BCGSNumber(NAD83):Well:11

Character:

Colour:

ClassofWell:

Odour:

SubclassofWell:

WellDisinfected:N

OrientationofWell:

EMSID:

StatusofWell:New

WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N

WellUse:

FieldChemistryInfoFlag:

ObservationWellNumber:

SiteInfo(SEAM):

ObservationWellStatus:

ConstructionMethod:

WaterUtility:

Diameter:0.0inches

WaterSupplySystemName:

Casingdriveshoe:

WaterSupplySystemWellName:

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

1/2

3/10/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

WellDepth:42feet

Elevation:0feet(ASL)

SURFACESEAL:

FinalCasingStickUp:inches

Flag:N

WellCapType:

Material:

BedrockDepth:feet

Method:

LithologyInfoFlag:N

Depth(ft):

FileInfoFlag:N

Thickness(in):

SieveInfoFlag:N

ScreenInfoFlag:N

WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:

ReasonForClosure:

SiteInfoDetails:

MethodofClosure:

OtherInfoFlag:

ClosureSealantMaterial:

OtherInfoDetails:

ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:

Screenfrom

tofeet

Type

SlotSize

Casingfrom

tofeet

Diameter

Material

DriveShoe

GENERALREMARKS:
CASINGPUMPTESTRATE50GPM,

LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to42Ft.GRAVEL

ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

2/2

3/10/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1990051800:00:00
WellTagNumber:76083

Driller:

Owner:OHAMILINDIANBAND

WellIdentificationPlateNumber:

PlateAttachedBy:

Address:STALMOROAD

WherePlateAttached:

Area:HOPE

PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:

WellYield:150(Driller'sEstimate)

WELLLOCATION:

DevelopmentMethod:

LandDistrict

PumpTestInfoFlag:N

DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:

ArtesianFlow:

Township:Section:Range:

ArtesianPressure(ft):

IndianReserve:IR1OHAMILMeridian:Block: StaticLevel:12feet
Quarter:

Island:

WATERQUALITY:

BCGSNumber(NAD83):Well:3

Character:

Colour:

ClassofWell:

Odour:

SubclassofWell:

WellDisinfected:N

OrientationofWell:

EMSID:

StatusofWell:New

WaterChemistryInfoFlag:

WellUse:

FieldChemistryInfoFlag:

ObservationWellNumber:

SiteInfo(SEAM):

ObservationWellStatus:

ConstructionMethod:

WaterUtility:

Diameter:6inches

WaterSupplySystemName:

Casingdriveshoe:

WaterSupplySystemWellName:

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

1/2

3/10/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

WellDepth:45feet

Elevation:0feet(ASL)

SURFACESEAL:

FinalCasingStickUp:inches

Flag:N

WellCapType:

Material:

BedrockDepth:feet

Method:

LithologyInfoFlag:N

Depth(ft):

FileInfoFlag:N

Thickness(in):

SieveInfoFlag:N

ScreenInfoFlag:Y

WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:

ReasonForClosure:

SiteInfoDetails:

MethodofClosure:

OtherInfoFlag:

ClosureSealantMaterial:

OtherInfoDetails:

ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:

Screenfrom
null
0
0

tofeet
null
0
0

Type

SlotSize
50
0
0

Casingfrom
null

tofeet
null

Diameter
0

Material
null

DriveShoe
null

GENERALREMARKS:
STALMORDHOPEBC

LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to3Ft.TOPSOIL
From3to45Ft.SAND&GRAVEL

ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

2/2

3ft

45ft

3/10/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1997111800:00:00
WellTagNumber:76210

Driller:

Owner:OHAMILINDIANBAND

WellIdentificationPlateNumber:

PlateAttachedBy:

Address:STELMOROAD

WherePlateAttached:

Area:HOPE

PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:

WellYield:150(Driller'sEstimate)

WELLLOCATION:

DevelopmentMethod:

LandDistrict

PumpTestInfoFlag:N

DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:

ArtesianFlow:

Township:Section:Range:

ArtesianPressure(ft):

IndianReserve:IR1Meridian:Block:

StaticLevel:12feet

Quarter:

Island:

WATERQUALITY:

BCGSNumber(NAD83):Well:5

Character:

Colour:

ClassofWell:

Odour:

SubclassofWell:

WellDisinfected:N

OrientationofWell:

EMSID:

StatusofWell:New

WaterChemistryInfoFlag:

WellUse:

FieldChemistryInfoFlag:

ObservationWellNumber:

SiteInfo(SEAM):

ObservationWellStatus:

ConstructionMethod:

WaterUtility:

Diameter:8inches

WaterSupplySystemName:

Casingdriveshoe:

WaterSupplySystemWellName:

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

1/2

3/10/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

WellDepth:80feet

Elevation:0feet(ASL)

SURFACESEAL:

FinalCasingStickUp:inches

Flag:N

WellCapType:

Material:

BedrockDepth:feet

Method:

LithologyInfoFlag:N

Depth(ft):

FileInfoFlag:N

Thickness(in):

SieveInfoFlag:N

ScreenInfoFlag:Y

WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:

ReasonForClosure:

SiteInfoDetails:

MethodofClosure:

OtherInfoFlag:

ClosureSealantMaterial:

OtherInfoDetails:

ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:

Screenfrom
null
0
0

tofeet
null
0
0

Type

SlotSize
150
0
0

Casingfrom
null

tofeet
null

Diameter
0

Material
null

DriveShoe
null

GENERALREMARKS:
STALMORDHOPEBC

LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to2Ft.TOPSOIL
From2to9Ft.SAND
From9to26Ft.SAND&GRAVEL&BINDER
From26to80Ft.SAND&GRAVEL

ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

2/2

3/10/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1997111900:00:00
WellTagNumber:76211

Driller:

Owner:OHAMILINDIANBAND

WellIdentificationPlateNumber:

PlateAttachedBy:

Address:STALMORD

WherePlateAttached:

Area:HOPEBC

PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:

WellYield:150(Driller'sEstimate)

WELLLOCATION:

DevelopmentMethod:

LandDistrict

PumpTestInfoFlag:N

DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:

ArtesianFlow:

Township:Section:Range:

ArtesianPressure(ft):

IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:

StaticLevel:12feet

Quarter:

Island:

WATERQUALITY:

BCGSNumber(NAD83):Well:1

Character:

Colour:

ClassofWell:

Odour:

SubclassofWell:

WellDisinfected:N

OrientationofWell:

EMSID:

StatusofWell:New

WaterChemistryInfoFlag:

WellUse:

FieldChemistryInfoFlag:

ObservationWellNumber:

SiteInfo(SEAM):

ObservationWellStatus:

ConstructionMethod:

WaterUtility:

Diameter:8inches

WaterSupplySystemName:

Casingdriveshoe:

WaterSupplySystemWellName:

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

1/2

3/10/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

WellDepth:82feet

Elevation:0feet(ASL)

SURFACESEAL:

FinalCasingStickUp:inches

Flag:N

WellCapType:

Material:

BedrockDepth:feet

Method:

LithologyInfoFlag:N

Depth(ft):

FileInfoFlag:N

Thickness(in):

SieveInfoFlag:N

ScreenInfoFlag:Y

WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:

ReasonForClosure:

SiteInfoDetails:

MethodofClosure:

OtherInfoFlag:

ClosureSealantMaterial:

OtherInfoDetails:

ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:

Screenfrom
null
0
0

tofeet
null
0
0

Type

SlotSize
150
0
0

Casingfrom
null

tofeet
null

Diameter
0

Material
null

DriveShoe
null

GENERALREMARKS:
STALMORDHOPEBC

LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to2Ft.TOPSOIL
From2to11Ft.SAND
From11to25Ft.SAND&GRAVEL&BINDER
From25to82Ft.SAND&GRAVEL

ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

2/2

3/10/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:2008111300:00:00
WellTagNumber:95096

Owner:SHXWOWHAMELFIRSTNATIONS

Address:58700STELMOROAD

Area:HOPE

WELLLOCATION:
LandDistrict
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:8
Township:Section:Range:
IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:
Quarter:
Island:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):Well:6

ClassofWell:Watersupply
SubclassofWell:
OrientationofWell:Vertical
StatusofWell:Closure
WellUse:
ObservationWellNumber:
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
Diameter:inches
Casingdriveshoe:N
WellDepth:22feet
Elevation:feet(ASL)
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
WellCapType:
BedrockDepth:feet
LithologyInfoFlag:N
FileInfoFlag:N
SieveInfoFlag:N
ScreenInfoFlag:N
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Driller:
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
WherePlateAttached:

PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:(Driller'sEstimate)
DevelopmentMethod:
PumpTestInfoFlag:N
ArtesianFlow:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
StaticLevel:

WATERQUALITY:
Character:
Colour:
Odour:
WellDisinfected:N
EMSID:
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
SiteInfo(SEAM):

WaterUtility:
WaterSupplySystemName:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:

SURFACESEAL:
Flag:N
Material:
Method:
Depth(ft):
Thickness(in):
LinerfromTo:feet

1/2

3/10/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:

SiteInfoDetails:

ReasonForClosure:HOKKEDUPTOCOMMUNITYWATER

OtherInfoFlag:

MethodofClosure:Poured

OtherInfoDetails:

ClosureSealantMaterial:BENTONITE
ClosureBackfillMaterial:SANDYGRAVEL
DetailsofClosure:CUTCASING2FEETBELOWGRADE.FILLEDENTIREWELLWITHBENTONITE.

Screenfrom

tofeet

Type

SlotSize

Casingfrom
null

tofeet
null

Diameter
3

Material
null

DriveShoe
N

GENERALREMARKS:
WELLCLOSEDBYBILLTUYTELFORAJPUMPS

LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:

ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

2/2

3/10/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:2008111300:00:00
WellTagNumber:95097

Owner:SHXWOWHAMELFIRSTNATIONS

Address:58700STELMOROAD

Area:HOPE

WELLLOCATION:
LandDistrict
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:7
Township:Section:Range:
IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:
Quarter:
Island:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):Well:7

ClassofWell:Watersupply
SubclassofWell:
OrientationofWell:Vertical
StatusofWell:Closure
WellUse:
ObservationWellNumber:
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
Diameter:inches
Casingdriveshoe:N
WellDepth:24feet
Elevation:feet(ASL)
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
WellCapType:
BedrockDepth:feet
LithologyInfoFlag:N
FileInfoFlag:N
SieveInfoFlag:N
ScreenInfoFlag:N
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Driller:
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
WherePlateAttached:

PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:(Driller'sEstimate)
DevelopmentMethod:
PumpTestInfoFlag:N
ArtesianFlow:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
StaticLevel:

WATERQUALITY:
Character:
Colour:
Odour:
WellDisinfected:N
EMSID:
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
SiteInfo(SEAM):

WaterUtility:
WaterSupplySystemName:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:

SURFACESEAL:
Flag:N
Material:
Method:
Depth(ft):
Thickness(in):
LinerfromTo:feet

1/2

3/10/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:

SiteInfoDetails:

ReasonForClosure:HOOKEDUPTOCOMMUNITYWATER

OtherInfoFlag:

MethodofClosure:Poured

OtherInfoDetails:

ClosureSealantMaterial:BENTONITE
ClosureBackfillMaterial:SANDYGRAVEL
DetailsofClosure:CUTCASING4FEETBELOWGRADE.FILLEDENTIREWELLWITHBENTONITE.

Screenfrom

tofeet

Type

SlotSize

Casingfrom
null

tofeet
null

Diameter
2

Material
null

DriveShoe
N

GENERALREMARKS:
WELLCLOSEDBYBILLTUYTELFORAJPUMPS.

LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:

ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

2/2

3/10/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:2008111300:00:00
WellTagNumber:95098

Owner:SHXWOWHAMELFIRSTNATIONS

Address:58700STELMOROAD

Area:HOPE

WELLLOCATION:
LandDistrict
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:6
Township:Section:Range:
IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:
Quarter:
Island:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):Well:8

ClassofWell:Watersupply
SubclassofWell:
OrientationofWell:Vertical
StatusofWell:Closure
WellUse:
ObservationWellNumber:
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
Diameter:inches
Casingdriveshoe:N
WellDepth:feet
Elevation:feet(ASL)
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
WellCapType:
BedrockDepth:feet
LithologyInfoFlag:N
FileInfoFlag:N
SieveInfoFlag:N
ScreenInfoFlag:N
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Driller:
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
WherePlateAttached:

PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:(Driller'sEstimate)
DevelopmentMethod:
PumpTestInfoFlag:N
ArtesianFlow:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
StaticLevel:

WATERQUALITY:
Character:
Colour:
Odour:
WellDisinfected:N
EMSID:
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
SiteInfo(SEAM):

WaterUtility:
WaterSupplySystemName:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:

SURFACESEAL:
Flag:N
Material:
Method:
Depth(ft):
Thickness(in):
LinerfromTo:feet

1/2

3/10/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:

SiteInfoDetails:

ReasonForClosure:HOOKEDUPTOCOMMUNITYWATER

OtherInfoFlag:

MethodofClosure:Poured

OtherInfoDetails:

ClosureSealantMaterial:BENTONITE
ClosureBackfillMaterial:SANDYGRAVEL
DetailsofClosure:CUTCASING2FEETBELOWGRADE.FILLEDENTIREDWELLWITHBENTONITE.

Screenfrom

tofeet

Type

SlotSize

Casingfrom
null

tofeet
null

Diameter
3

Material
null

DriveShoe
N

GENERALREMARKS:
WELLCLOSEDBYBILLTUYTELFORAJPUMPS

LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:

ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

2/2

3/10/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:2008111300:00:00
WellTagNumber:95099

Owner:SHXWOWHAMELFIRSTNATIONS

Address:58700STELMOROAD

Area:HOPE

WELLLOCATION:
LandDistrict
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:5
Township:Section:Range:
IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:
Quarter:
Island:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):Well:9

ClassofWell:Watersupply
SubclassofWell:
OrientationofWell:Vertical
StatusofWell:Closure
WellUse:
ObservationWellNumber:
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
Diameter:inches
Casingdriveshoe:N
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Driller:
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
WherePlateAttached:

PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:(Driller'sEstimate)
DevelopmentMethod:
PumpTestInfoFlag:N
ArtesianFlow:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
StaticLevel:

WATERQUALITY:
Character:
Colour:
Odour:
WellDisinfected:N
EMSID:
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
SiteInfo(SEAM):

WaterUtility:
WaterSupplySystemName:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:
1/2

3/10/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

WellDepth:32feet

Elevation:feet(ASL)

SURFACESEAL:

FinalCasingStickUp:inches

Flag:N

WellCapType:

Material:

BedrockDepth:feet

Method:

LithologyInfoFlag:N

Depth(ft):

FileInfoFlag:N

Thickness(in):

SieveInfoFlag:N

LinerfromTo:feet

ScreenInfoFlag:N

WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:

SiteInfoDetails:

ReasonForClosure:HOOKEDUPTOCOMMUNITYWATER

OtherInfoFlag:

MethodofClosure:Poured

OtherInfoDetails:

ClosureSealantMaterial:BENTONITE
ClosureBackfillMaterial:SANDYGRAVEL
DetailsofClosure:CUTCASING2FEETBELOWGRADE

Screenfrom

tofeet

Type

SlotSize

Casingfrom
null

tofeet
null

Diameter
6

Material
null

DriveShoe
N

GENERALREMARKS:
WELLCLOSEDBYBILLTUYTELFORAJPUMPS

LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From2to6Ft.BENTONITE
From6to10Ft.GRAVEL
From10to14Ft.BENTONITE
From14to29Ft.GRAVEL
From29to32Ft.BENTONITE

ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

2/2

3/10/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:2008111300:00:00

WellTagNumber:95100

Driller:

WellIdentificationPlateNumber:

Owner:SHXWOWHAMELFIRSTNATIONS

PlateAttachedBy:

WherePlateAttached:

Address:58700STELMOROAD

PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:

Area:HOPE

WellYield:(Driller'sEstimate)

DevelopmentMethod:

WELLLOCATION:

PumpTestInfoFlag:N

LandDistrict

ArtesianFlow:

DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:4

ArtesianPressure(ft):

Township:Section:Range:
IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:
Quarter:
Island:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):Well:10

ClassofWell:Watersupply
SubclassofWell:
OrientationofWell:Vertical
StatusofWell:Closure
WellUse:
ObservationWellNumber:
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
Diameter:inches
Casingdriveshoe:N
WellDepth:feet
Elevation:feet(ASL)
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
WellCapType:
BedrockDepth:feet
LithologyInfoFlag:N
FileInfoFlag:N
SieveInfoFlag:N
ScreenInfoFlag:N

SiteInfoDetails:
OtherInfoFlag:
OtherInfoDetails:

StaticLevel:

WATERQUALITY:
Character:
Colour:
Odour:
WellDisinfected:N
EMSID:
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
SiteInfo(SEAM):

WaterUtility:
WaterSupplySystemName:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:

SURFACESEAL:
Flag:N
Material:
Method:
Depth(ft):
Thickness(in):
LinerfromTo:feet

WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:
ReasonForClosure:HOOKEDUPTOCOMMUNITYWATER
MethodofClosure:Poured
ClosureSealantMaterial:BENTONITE
ClosureBackfillMaterial:SANDYGRAVEL

DetailsofClosure:CYTCASING3.5FEETBELOWGRADE.FILLEDTOP6"WITHBENTONITE.REMAINDEROFWELLALREADYFILLEDWITHCONCR
Screenfrom

tofeet

Type

SlotSize

Casingfrom
null

tofeet
null

Diameter
6

Material
null

DriveShoe
N

GENERALREMARKS:
WELLCLOSEDBYBILLTUYTELFORAJPUMPS

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

1/2

3/10/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From3.5to4Ft.BENTONITE
From4toFt.CONCRETE

ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

2/2

3/10/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:2008111300:00:00
WellTagNumber:95102

Owner:SHXWOWHAMELFIRSTNATIONS

Address:58700STELMOROAD

Area:HOPE

WELLLOCATION:
LandDistrict
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:2
Township:Section:Range:
IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:
Quarter:
Island:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):Well:12

ClassofWell:Watersupply
SubclassofWell:
OrientationofWell:Vertical
StatusofWell:Closure
WellUse:
ObservationWellNumber:
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
Diameter:inches
Casingdriveshoe:N
WellDepth:feet
Elevation:feet(ASL)
FinalCasingStickUp:inches
WellCapType:
BedrockDepth:feet
LithologyInfoFlag:N
FileInfoFlag:N
SieveInfoFlag:N
ScreenInfoFlag:N
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Driller:
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:
PlateAttachedBy:
WherePlateAttached:

PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:(Driller'sEstimate)
DevelopmentMethod:
PumpTestInfoFlag:N
ArtesianFlow:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
StaticLevel:

WATERQUALITY:
Character:
Colour:
Odour:
WellDisinfected:N
EMSID:
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
SiteInfo(SEAM):

WaterUtility:
WaterSupplySystemName:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:

SURFACESEAL:
Flag:N
Material:
Method:
Depth(ft):
Thickness(in):
LinerfromTo:feet

1/2

3/10/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:

SiteInfoDetails:

ReasonForClosure:HOOKEDUPTOCOMMUNITYWATER

OtherInfoFlag:

MethodofClosure:Poured

OtherInfoDetails:

ClosureSealantMaterial:BENTONITE
ClosureBackfillMaterial:SANDYGRAVEL
DetailsofClosure:CUTCASING2FEETBELOWGRADE.WELLALREADYFILLEDWITHCONCRETE.

Screenfrom

tofeet

Type

SlotSize

Casingfrom
null

tofeet
null

Diameter
6

Material
null

DriveShoe
N

GENERALREMARKS:
WELLCLOSEDBYBILLTUYTELFORAJPUMPS

LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:

ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

2/2

PETERS FIRST NATION

3/4/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1974020900:00:00
WellTagNumber:29801

Driller:M.S.A.WaterDrilling

Owner:CLIFFORDPETERS

WellIdentificationPlateNumber:

PlateAttachedBy:

Address:

WherePlateAttached:

Area:LAIDLAW

PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:

WellYield:30(Driller'sEstimate)GallonsperMinute(U.S./Imperial)

WELLLOCATION:

DevelopmentMethod:

YALE(YDYD)LandDistrict

PumpTestInfoFlag:

DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:

ArtesianFlow:

Township:Section:Range:

ArtesianPressure(ft):

IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:

StaticLevel:18feet

Quarter:

Island:

WATERQUALITY:

BCGSNumber(NAD83):092H032212Well:2 Character:

Colour:

ClassofWell:

Odour:

SubclassofWell:

WellDisinfected:N

OrientationofWell:

EMSID:

StatusofWell:New

WaterChemistryInfoFlag:

WellUse:UnknownWellUse

FieldChemistryInfoFlag:

ObservationWellNumber:

SiteInfo(SEAM):

ObservationWellStatus:

ConstructionMethod:Drilled

WaterUtility:

Diameter:6.0inches

WaterSupplySystemName:

Casingdriveshoe:

WaterSupplySystemWellName:

WellDepth:73feet

Elevation:0feet(ASL)

SURFACESEAL:

FinalCasingStickUp:inches

Flag:

WellCapType:

Material:

BedrockDepth:feet

Method:

LithologyInfoFlag:

Depth(ft):

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

1/2

3/4/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

FileInfoFlag:

Thickness(in):

SieveInfoFlag:

ScreenInfoFlag:

WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:

ReasonForClosure:

SiteInfoDetails:

MethodofClosure:

OtherInfoFlag:

ClosureSealantMaterial:

OtherInfoDetails:

ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:

Screenfrom

tofeet

Type

SlotSize

Casingfrom

tofeet

Diameter

Material

DriveShoe

GENERALREMARKS:

LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to7Ft.Silt
From7to53Ft.Sandandgravel
From53to73Ft.Sandandlittlegravel

ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

2/2

3/4/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1974021400:00:00
WellTagNumber:29811

Driller:M.S.A.WaterDrilling

Owner:FRANKPETERSINDAFF

WellIdentificationPlateNumber:

PlateAttachedBy:

Address:

WherePlateAttached:

Area:LAIDLAW

PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:

WellYield:30(Driller'sEstimate)GallonsperMinute(U.S./Imperial)

WELLLOCATION:

DevelopmentMethod:

YALE(YDYD)LandDistrict

PumpTestInfoFlag:

DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:

ArtesianFlow:

Township:Section:Range:

ArtesianPressure(ft):

IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:

StaticLevel:17feet

Quarter:

Island:

WATERQUALITY:

BCGSNumber(NAD83):092H032212Well:1 Character:

Colour:

ClassofWell:

Odour:

SubclassofWell:

WellDisinfected:N

OrientationofWell:

EMSID:

StatusofWell:New

WaterChemistryInfoFlag:

WellUse:UnknownWellUse

FieldChemistryInfoFlag:

ObservationWellNumber:

SiteInfo(SEAM):

ObservationWellStatus:

ConstructionMethod:Drilled

WaterUtility:

Diameter:6.0inches

WaterSupplySystemName:

Casingdriveshoe:

WaterSupplySystemWellName:

WellDepth:74feet

Elevation:0feet(ASL)

SURFACESEAL:

FinalCasingStickUp:inches

Flag:

WellCapType:

Material:

BedrockDepth:feet

Method:

LithologyInfoFlag:

Depth(ft):

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

1/2

3/4/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

FileInfoFlag:

Thickness(in):

SieveInfoFlag:

ScreenInfoFlag:

WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:

ReasonForClosure:

SiteInfoDetails:

MethodofClosure:

OtherInfoFlag:

ClosureSealantMaterial:

OtherInfoDetails:

ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:

Screenfrom

tofeet

Type

SlotSize

Casingfrom

tofeet

Diameter

Material

DriveShoe

GENERALREMARKS:

LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to6Ft.Siltandsand
From6to10Ft.Sandandgravel
From10to13Ft.Boulders
From13to74Ft.Sandandgravel

ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

2/2

3/4/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1975022400:00:00
WellTagNumber:32113

Driller:A.&H.Construction

Owner:RWPETERS

WellIdentificationPlateNumber:

PlateAttachedBy:

Address:PETERSRD

WherePlateAttached:

Area:

PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:

WellYield:4(Driller'sEstimate)GallonsperMinute(U.S./Imperial)

WELLLOCATION:

DevelopmentMethod:

YALE(YDYD)LandDistrict

PumpTestInfoFlag:

DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:

ArtesianFlow:

Township:Section:12Range:

ArtesianPressure(ft):

IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:

StaticLevel:46feet

Quarter:

Island:

WATERQUALITY:

BCGSNumber(NAD83):092H022434Well:1 Character:

Colour:

ClassofWell:

Odour:

SubclassofWell:

WellDisinfected:N

OrientationofWell:

EMSID:

StatusofWell:New

WaterChemistryInfoFlag:

WellUse:UnknownWellUse

FieldChemistryInfoFlag:

ObservationWellNumber:

SiteInfo(SEAM):

ObservationWellStatus:

ConstructionMethod:UnknownConstru

WaterUtility:

Diameter:6.0inches

WaterSupplySystemName:

Casingdriveshoe:

WaterSupplySystemWellName:

WellDepth:200feet

Elevation:0feet(ASL)

SURFACESEAL:

FinalCasingStickUp:inches

Flag:

WellCapType:

Material:

BedrockDepth:77feet

Method:

LithologyInfoFlag:

Depth(ft):

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

1/2

3/4/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

FileInfoFlag:

Thickness(in):

SieveInfoFlag:

ScreenInfoFlag:

WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:

ReasonForClosure:

SiteInfoDetails:

MethodofClosure:

OtherInfoFlag:

ClosureSealantMaterial:

OtherInfoDetails:

ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:

Screenfrom

tofeet

Type

SlotSize

Casingfrom

tofeet

Diameter

Material

DriveShoe

GENERALREMARKS:

LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to61Ft.Dirt
From61to77Ft.Clay
From77to200Ft.Bedrock

ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

2/2

3/4/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1983091600:00:00
WellTagNumber:64763

Driller:A.&H.Construction

Owner:WALKERORVIL

WellIdentificationPlateNumber:

PlateAttachedBy:

Address:PETERSRESERVE

WherePlateAttached:

Area:LAIDLAW

PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:

WellYield:0(Driller'sEstimate)

WELLLOCATION:

DevelopmentMethod:

YALE(YDYD)LandDistrict

PumpTestInfoFlag:N

DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:

ArtesianFlow:

Township:Section:Range:

ArtesianPressure(ft):

IndianReserve:1Meridian:Block:

StaticLevel:0feet

Quarter:

Island:

WATERQUALITY:

BCGSNumber(NAD83):092H032221Well:4

Character:

Colour:

ClassofWell:

Odour:

SubclassofWell:

WellDisinfected:N

OrientationofWell:

EMSID:

StatusofWell:New

WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N

WellUse:

FieldChemistryInfoFlag:

ObservationWellNumber:

SiteInfo(SEAM):

ObservationWellStatus:

ConstructionMethod:

WaterUtility:

Diameter:6.0inches

WaterSupplySystemName:

Casingdriveshoe:

WaterSupplySystemWellName:

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

1/2

3/4/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

WellDepth:89feet

Elevation:0feet(ASL)

SURFACESEAL:

FinalCasingStickUp:inches

Flag:N

WellCapType:

Material:

BedrockDepth:feet

Method:

LithologyInfoFlag:N

Depth(ft):

FileInfoFlag:N

Thickness(in):

SieveInfoFlag:N

ScreenInfoFlag:N

WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:

ReasonForClosure:

SiteInfoDetails:

MethodofClosure:

OtherInfoFlag:

ClosureSealantMaterial:

OtherInfoDetails:

ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:

Screenfrom

tofeet

Type

SlotSize

Casingfrom

tofeet

Diameter

Material

DriveShoe

GENERALREMARKS:
CASING0.0TO85.8,

LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to42Ft.SHALETILL
From87to89Ft.BEDROCK
From55to80Ft.SHALEBOULDERS
From42to55Ft.SANDFINE

ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

2/2

3/4/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1983100500:00:00
WellTagNumber:64764

Driller:A.&H.Construction

Owner:PETERSINDIANRESERV

WellIdentificationPlateNumber:

PlateAttachedBy:

Address:

WherePlateAttached:

Area:LAIDLAW

PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:

WellYield:0(Driller'sEstimate)

WELLLOCATION:

DevelopmentMethod:

LandDistrict

PumpTestInfoFlag:N

DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:

ArtesianFlow:

Township:Section:Range:

ArtesianPressure(ft):

IndianReserve:1Meridian:Block:

StaticLevel:0feet

Quarter:

Island:

WATERQUALITY:

BCGSNumber(NAD83):092H032221Well:5

Character:

Colour:

ClassofWell:

Odour:

SubclassofWell:

WellDisinfected:N

OrientationofWell:

EMSID:

StatusofWell:New

WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N

WellUse:

FieldChemistryInfoFlag:

ObservationWellNumber:

SiteInfo(SEAM):

ObservationWellStatus:

ConstructionMethod:

WaterUtility:

Diameter:6.0inches

WaterSupplySystemName:

Casingdriveshoe:

WaterSupplySystemWellName:

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

1/2

3/4/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

WellDepth:40feet

Elevation:0feet(ASL)

SURFACESEAL:

FinalCasingStickUp:inches

Flag:N

WellCapType:

Material:

BedrockDepth:feet

Method:

LithologyInfoFlag:N

Depth(ft):

FileInfoFlag:N

Thickness(in):

SieveInfoFlag:N

ScreenInfoFlag:N

WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:

ReasonForClosure:

SiteInfoDetails:

MethodofClosure:

OtherInfoFlag:

ClosureSealantMaterial:

OtherInfoDetails:

ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:

Screenfrom

tofeet

Type

SlotSize

Casingfrom

tofeet

Diameter

Material

DriveShoe

GENERALREMARKS:
CASING

LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to40Ft.SAND&GRAVEL

ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

2/2

3/4/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1986101000:00:00
WellTagNumber:73306

Driller:A.&H.Construction

Owner:PETERSINDIANRESERV

WellIdentificationPlateNumber:

PlateAttachedBy:

Address:

WherePlateAttached:

Area:HOPE

PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:

WellYield:0(Driller'sEstimate)

WELLLOCATION:

DevelopmentMethod:

YALE(YDYD)LandDistrict

PumpTestInfoFlag:N

DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:

ArtesianFlow:

Township:Section:Range:

ArtesianPressure(ft):

IndianReserve:1Meridian:Block:

StaticLevel:18feet

Quarter:

Island:

WATERQUALITY:

BCGSNumber(NAD83):092H032221Well:1

Character:

Colour:

ClassofWell:

Odour:

SubclassofWell:

WellDisinfected:N

OrientationofWell:

EMSID:

StatusofWell:New

WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N

WellUse:

FieldChemistryInfoFlag:

ObservationWellNumber:

SiteInfo(SEAM):

ObservationWellStatus:

ConstructionMethod:

WaterUtility:

Diameter:0.0inches

WaterSupplySystemName:

Casingdriveshoe:

WaterSupplySystemWellName:

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

1/2

3/4/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

WellDepth:81feet

Elevation:0feet(ASL)

SURFACESEAL:

FinalCasingStickUp:inches

Flag:N

WellCapType:

Material:

BedrockDepth:feet

Method:

LithologyInfoFlag:N

Depth(ft):

FileInfoFlag:N

Thickness(in):

SieveInfoFlag:N

ScreenInfoFlag:N

WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:

ReasonForClosure:

SiteInfoDetails:

MethodofClosure:

OtherInfoFlag:

ClosureSealantMaterial:

OtherInfoDetails:

ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:

Screenfrom

tofeet

Type

SlotSize

Casingfrom

tofeet

Diameter

Material

DriveShoe

GENERALREMARKS:
CASING

LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to9Ft.SAND
From59to81Ft.GRAVEL
From9to59Ft.SAND&GRAVEL

ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

2/2

3/4/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1984101000:00:00
WellTagNumber:73307

Driller:A.&H.Construction

Owner:PETERSINDIANRESERV

WellIdentificationPlateNumber:

PlateAttachedBy:

Address:

WherePlateAttached:

Area:

PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:

WellYield:0(Driller'sEstimate)

WELLLOCATION:

DevelopmentMethod:

YALE(YDYD)LandDistrict

PumpTestInfoFlag:N

DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:

ArtesianFlow:

Township:Section:Range:

ArtesianPressure(ft):

IndianReserve:1Meridian:Block:

StaticLevel:0feet

Quarter:

Island:

WATERQUALITY:

BCGSNumber(NAD83):092H032221Well:2

Character:

Colour:

ClassofWell:

Odour:

SubclassofWell:

WellDisinfected:N

OrientationofWell:

EMSID:

StatusofWell:New

WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N

WellUse:

FieldChemistryInfoFlag:

ObservationWellNumber:

SiteInfo(SEAM):

ObservationWellStatus:

ConstructionMethod:

WaterUtility:

Diameter:0.0inches

WaterSupplySystemName:

Casingdriveshoe:

WaterSupplySystemWellName:

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

1/2

3/4/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

WellDepth:81feet

Elevation:0feet(ASL)

SURFACESEAL:

FinalCasingStickUp:inches

Flag:N

WellCapType:

Material:

BedrockDepth:feet

Method:

LithologyInfoFlag:N

Depth(ft):

FileInfoFlag:N

Thickness(in):

SieveInfoFlag:N

ScreenInfoFlag:N

WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:

ReasonForClosure:

SiteInfoDetails:

MethodofClosure:

OtherInfoFlag:

ClosureSealantMaterial:

OtherInfoDetails:

ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:

Screenfrom

tofeet

Type

SlotSize

Casingfrom

tofeet

Diameter

Material

DriveShoe

GENERALREMARKS:
CASING

LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to40Ft.SAND
From59to81Ft.GRAVELWB
From40to59Ft.SAND&GRAVEL

ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

2/2

3/4/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:1984101000:00:00
WellTagNumber:73308

Driller:A.&H.Construction

Owner:PETERSINDIANRESERV

WellIdentificationPlateNumber:

PlateAttachedBy:

Address:

WherePlateAttached:

Area:

PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:

WellYield:0(Driller'sEstimate)

WELLLOCATION:

DevelopmentMethod:

YALE(YDYD)LandDistrict

PumpTestInfoFlag:N

DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:

ArtesianFlow:

Township:Section:Range:

ArtesianPressure(ft):

IndianReserve:1Meridian:Block:

StaticLevel:0feet

Quarter:

Island:

WATERQUALITY:

BCGSNumber(NAD83):092H032221Well:3

Character:

Colour:

ClassofWell:

Odour:

SubclassofWell:

WellDisinfected:N

OrientationofWell:

EMSID:

StatusofWell:New

WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N

WellUse:

FieldChemistryInfoFlag:

ObservationWellNumber:

SiteInfo(SEAM):

ObservationWellStatus:

ConstructionMethod:

WaterUtility:

Diameter:0.0inches

WaterSupplySystemName:

Casingdriveshoe:

WaterSupplySystemWellName:

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

1/2

3/4/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

WellDepth:81feet

Elevation:0feet(ASL)

SURFACESEAL:

FinalCasingStickUp:inches

Flag:N

WellCapType:

Material:

BedrockDepth:feet

Method:

LithologyInfoFlag:N

Depth(ft):

FileInfoFlag:N

Thickness(in):

SieveInfoFlag:N

ScreenInfoFlag:N

WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:

ReasonForClosure:

SiteInfoDetails:

MethodofClosure:

OtherInfoFlag:

ClosureSealantMaterial:

OtherInfoDetails:

ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:

Screenfrom

tofeet

Type

SlotSize

Casingfrom

tofeet

Diameter

Material

DriveShoe

GENERALREMARKS:
CASINGSTAINLESSSTEEL,

LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From8to58Ft.SAND&GRAVEL
From0to8Ft.SAND

ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

2/2

3/4/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Report1DetailedWellRecord
ConstructionDate:2008100600:00:00
WellTagNumber:94174

Owner:PETERSBAND

Address:16800PETERSROAD

Area:LAIDLAW

WELLLOCATION:
LandDistrict
DistrictLot:Plan:Lot:
Township:Section:Range:
IndianReserve:Meridian:Block:
Quarter:
Island:
BCGSNumber(NAD83):092H032212Well:3

ClassofWell:Watersupply
SubclassofWell:Domestic
OrientationofWell:Vertical
StatusofWell:New
WellUse:PrivateDomestic
ObservationWellNumber:
ObservationWellStatus:
ConstructionMethod:
Diameter:inches
Casingdriveshoe:NY
WellDepth:76feet
Elevation:52feet(ASL)
FinalCasingStickUp:30inches
WellCapType:
BedrockDepth:feet
LithologyInfoFlag:N
https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

Driller:A.&H.DrillingLtd.
WellIdentificationPlateNumber:29810
PlateAttachedBy:BILLMCIVOR
WherePlateAttached:

PRODUCTIONDATAATTIMEOFDRILLING:
WellYield:75(Driller'sEstimate)GallonsperMinute(U.S./Imperial)
DevelopmentMethod:
PumpTestInfoFlag:N
ArtesianFlow:
ArtesianPressure(ft):
StaticLevel:26feet

WATERQUALITY:
Character:
Colour:
Odour:
WellDisinfected:N
EMSID:
WaterChemistryInfoFlag:N
FieldChemistryInfoFlag:
SiteInfo(SEAM):

WaterUtility:
WaterSupplySystemName:
WaterSupplySystemWellName:

SURFACESEAL:
Flag:N
Material:Bentoniteclay
Method:
Depth(ft):15feet
1/2

3/4/2015

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

FileInfoFlag:N

Thickness(in):2inches

SieveInfoFlag:N

LinerfromTo:feet

ScreenInfoFlag:N

WELLCLOSUREINFORMATION:

SiteInfoDetails:

ReasonForClosure:

OtherInfoFlag:

MethodofClosure:

OtherInfoDetails:

ClosureSealantMaterial:
ClosureBackfillMaterial:
DetailsofClosure:

Screenfrom
71
72

tofeet
72
76

Type

SlotSize
null
35

Casingfrom
0
0

tofeet
76
15

Diameter
6
10

Material
Steel
Steel

DriveShoe
Y
N

GENERALREMARKS:

LITHOLOGYINFORMATION:
From0to4Ft.DIRT/CLAY
From4to76Ft.GRAVELANDSAND

ReturntoMain
ReturntoSearchOptions
ReturntoSearchCriteria
InformationDisclaimer
TheProvincedisclaimsallresponsibilityfortheaccuracyofinformationprovided.
Informationprovidedshouldnotbeusedasabasisformakingfinancialoranyother
commitments.

https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wells/wellsreport1.do

2/2

APPENDIX B
WATER QUALITY DATABASE FOR OHAMIL I.R. 1

You might also like