It was a short article I wrote about a few scientific papers reported on the work of Iacoboni,

Mirror Neurons, based on the discovery of Rizzolatti. Collaboration sought to acquire these
papers. At that time, the team with which collaborated behavioral psychotherapy was
leaving and looking for other options.
Then my assumptions were: If changing certain assumptions therapists, could alter the way
they were linked to the child. The theory of mind, supported by Baron Cohen, was the area
within cognitive psychology, which more accurately realized what was happening on the
autistic thought. But following the discovery of mirror neurons, it had to revise concepts
such as imitation. There was emerging so called "Theory of Simulation".
The main criticism of the cognitive behavioral methods had been that forced the child to
imitate the therapist. But the "reciprocal imitation" and neuroscience experiments with
biofeedback is proposed to get in tune with the autistic child showing a mirror of itself,
because the real difficulty assumed that autism is imitate own initiative, departing abruptly
from its own inertia, but once it started the rhythm by mutual imitation was possible to
continue by playing, dancing, etc. So would biofeedback but through computer simulations.
This information imitation deficits in autistic children already existed but was ignored. The
prevailing model was the theory of mind to understand the main "cause" of autism.
According to which children have a brain module that helps build hypotheses about the
thinking of others. Proponents mirror neuron model are not opposed to the existence of
that module, but argue that it is the opposite: they are imitation deficits that generate
further deficits in the "theory of mind". Anyway, my involvement in these issues was very
brief, and I could not really make a successful collaboration from my place of 'technical'. I
do not know what it is currently investigating autism or what are the prevailing hypothesis.
Structuralism thinks the world this way, and proposes this methodology. So how it
corresponds to say modes. Well, it is working with the binary, with contrasts ... but in
contrast to another way of seeing the world.
Even within the structuralism 'the' structuralism, the Barthes, etc .. they would open
{The importance of this work for the social sciences will be given to the following: if the
meeting between computers and humans, as well as the encounter between two men, two

minds, can be given to fight or to be Migun. One dominates the other, dominates when it
serves, because it inhibits posicilibda that the other thinks. If lascomp occupying advancing
human llslugares previously performed, the study of this advance is essential. There are
two ways of saying the man as priority or the priority techn ... cost.
The first to study this, are facing losprimeros cybernetics. From this confrontation a man
cut, not cuestina .. details sugiran after an implementation that I could emerge. Or ..social
delhombre.
In technical lapreunta not incorporated the question is a humanol be.
Analyze the written bill gates.
Analyze hci, where he talks about discards and puts it as a great philosopher
Most human doctors proposed medical school because they deal with patients who are
human. Technicians place them prostheses people, technological prostheses that people
will use for a long time. In its design concept is included a conception of man only as a user.
{}
Voloshinov read all ideological discourse, and that's what makes a job well of thesis,
antithesis and synthesis, but hey, he writes from there. That is good, and that's what is not
explored how to say in relation to the place of ...
These are things to think and are opening doors for us interested in these issues.