As computers are being used more and more in education, there will be soon no role for

teachers in the classroom.

There is no doubt that education and the learning process has changed since the introduction of
computers: The search for information has become easier and amusing, and connectivity has
expedited the data availability. Though experts systems have made computers more intelligent, they
have not yet become a substitute of the human interaction in the learning process. In my opinion what
can be expected is a change of the teachers role, but not their disappearance from the classroom.
Nobody can argue that the acquisition of knowledge is more fun and easier with computers. The mere
activity of touching and exploring this device constitutes an enjoyable task for a child. This,
accompanied by the relaxing attitude and software interactivity, usually contributes to a better
grasping of new knowledge. At a higher educational level the availability of digital books, simulators
and other academic materials provide the student with an ever accessible source of information, that
otherwise would not be at hand.
But, besides the increasing complexity and behavior of intelligent software, which is usually embedded
in the academic digital material, the need for human interaction in the learning process will always be
present, at least in the foreseeable future. There is the necessity for a human being to be able to
determine what the specifics needs of each individual are. The expertise of a teacher in how to explain
and adapt complex concepts to different individuals can hardly be mimicked by a computer, no matter
how sophisticated its software is.
As computers are becoming a common tool for teaching, teachers should be more aware of their role
as guides in the acquisition of knowledge rather than transmitters of facts. They have to be open
minded to the changes that are taking places, keep updated and serve as problem solvers in the
learning process, thus allowing students to discover the fact for themselves.
To summarize, in my personal view, teachers play and will continue to play an important role in the
classroom, especially at the primary level. No matter how complex computers become, there will be
no replacement for the human interaction, but in the way haw thisinteraction takes place.
When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is
pointless to try and keep them alive.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this
opinion?
Nowadays, technological advances and their rapid and wide applications are having a significant
impact on a nations traditional skills and ways of life. Some argue that such impact is so extraordinary
that it would make conventional skills and life styles obsolete. However, I believe they would continue
to thrive by providing alternatives to modern ways of life, and innovative ideas for modern
technologies.
First of all, traditional skills and ways of life are becoming an alternative solution to the problems
caused by mainstreamed ways of life which are greatly influenced by modern technologies. For
instance, a cozy restaurant where traditional, home-brewed beer is served, offers another experience
to people who are bored with branded beers that have the same flavor and come out of mass
production with new technologies. It is in such a venue where traditional skills are preserved, people
become relaxed and educated. Providing diversity and thus enriching modern ways of life, such
traditional skills and ways of life would continue to have their place.

Furthermore, conventional skills provide innovative ideas to the development of modern technologies.
For example, sparkled by how the word Love is traditionally knitted into a sweater by some ethnic
minority women in some parts of Asia, some business managers from textile industry have developed
some production lines by applying the traditional skills to Computer-Aided Designs (CAD). The
products have boosted the companies sales which in turn have increased their investment in
preserving traditional skills for further developing their technologies.
To conclude, traditional skills and life styles are increasingly becoming a useful alternative to the
homogeneity brought by global applications of modern technologies. However, the evolution of
technologies is a selection process, whereby some would become obsolete, but there is no doubt that
some would thrive when their roles are appreciated.
Popular events like the Football World Cup and other international sporting occasions are
essential in easing international tension and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way.
Every four years, the whole world stops to watch international sporting events such as the Olympics
and the Football World Cup in which athletes show their best performance to make their country
proud. These sporting occasions have proved to be helpful in easing international tension in difficult
times when powerful leaders were trying to control the worlds economy and other governments were
fighting over the land.
The Olympic Games are one of the best examples which prove how sporting events can bring nations
together, at least temporarily. From the ancient History, when Greeks and Romans would interrupt
battles to participate in the games, to the more recent international disputes, when athletes from
Palestine and Israel would forget their differences, compete peacefully and even embrace each other
after an event. Moreover, these popular events have called the worlds attention to the terrible
consequences of wars; thus some leaders have tried to reach agreements to end their disputes and
live peacefully.
Similarly, international sporting events show benefits in some developing countries which live in a daily
internal civil war. For example, Brazil has a high rate of unemployment, lack of education, hunger,
crime, poverty and corruption which leads to an immense embarrassment of being Brazilian and a low
self-esteem. However, when the Football World Cup starts, the Brazilian squad, which is considered the
best team in the world, provokes an amazing feeling of pride in their country. Most people seem to
forget all their problems and even the criminal activity decreases. They paint roads with the national
colors, wear the Brazilian team shirts and buy national flags. Moreover, the competition brings families
and neighbors together and even rival gangs watch the games and celebrate peacefully.
In conclusion, popular sporting events play an important role in decreasing international tensions and
liberating patriotic feelings as history has shown.
Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer
nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for
helping the poorer nations in such areas.
Todays world has been divided into developing and industrialised countries which the main difference
between them is the amount of money that governments apply in important sectors such as
education, health and commerce. Most of the poorer nations are buried in debts as a result of their
unbalanced finances which are reflect in afailed health care, an unstructured education system and a
weak international trade. This vicious cycle will continue indefinitely unless wealthier nations show

interest in minimizing the worldwide economic differences, as well as taking more responsibility for
assisting less fortunate countries.
Most of the African countries live in sub-human conditions because of the extreme poverty, upheaval,
hunger, disease, unemployment, lack of education and both inexperienced and corrupt
administrations. The devastating consequences of the AIDS epidemic in those countries could improve
if the infected population were to receive free drugs to control the disease, have access to health
professionals and get information on how to prevent its spread. But this can only be achieved through
international help programs in which leaders of the worlds richest countries donate medicine and also
send doctors and nurses to treat and educate those in need.
Moreover, most of the poor countries rely on selling agricultural products and raw materials to rich
nations and buying industrialized products from them resulting in a huge financial deficit.
Consequently, they borrow a significant amount of money from the World Bank to try to improve their
broken economies, but sometimes the money disappears with no significant changes and they cannot
even pay the interest to the bank. Regarding this issue, last year the G8, which is comprised of
leaders of the eight richest nations, decided to forgive billions of dollars worth of debt owed by the
worlds poorest nations. In addition, they developed adequate loan programs to financially assist those
countries.
In conclusion, leaders of the industrialised countries play an indispensable role in assisting developing
nations in dealing with essential areas such as health, education and trade. Also, their aid is the key to
breaking the vicious cycle, which results in poverty and death.
As computers are being used more and more in education, there will be soon no role for
teachers in the classroom.
There have been immense advances in technology in most aspects of peoples lives, especially in the
field of education. Nowadays, an increasing number of students rely on computers for research and to
produce a perfect paper for school purposes. Others have decided to leave the original way of learning
and to get knowledge through online schools. These changes in the learning process have brought a
special concern regarding the possible decrease of importance of teachers in the classroom.
Some people believe the role of teachers started to fade because computers have been helping some
students to progress in their studies quicker compared to studies in an original classroom. For
example, in the same classroom, students have different intellectual capacities, thus some would be
tied to a slow advance in their studies because of others incapability of understanding. In this way,
pupils could progress in their acquisition of knowledge at their own pace using computers instead of
learning from teachers.
However, the presence of a teacher is essential for students because the human contact influences
them in positive ways. Firstly, students realize that they are not dealing with a machine but with a
human being who deserves attention and respect. They also learn the importance of studying in a
group and respect for other students, which helps them improve their social skills.
Moreover, teachers are required in the learning process because they acknowledge some students
deficiencies and help them to solve their problems by repeating the same explanation, giving extra
exercises or even suggesting a private tutor. Hence, students can have a better chance of avoiding a
failure in a subject.

In conclusion, the role for teachers in the learning process is still very important and it will continue to
be such in the future because no machine can replace the human interaction and its consequences.
Financial education should be a mandatory component of the school program. To what
extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is an obvious fact that financial aspects are a major part of the daily life, as an adult and even as a
young individual. Each and every one of us has to make financial decisions concerning recreation,
health, education and more. The question is whether to start with financial education as part of school
program or to postpone it for a later stage in life.
To begin with, being able to understand the value of money, the way the economic system works and
to interpret financial news and its implications is a virtue. Without this virtue, an individual, even a
young one, might suffer to some extent. For an example, a child who doesnt understand the concept
of money might find it more difficult toexcept choosing only one present out of more possible ones.
In addition, many adults are lacking capability of financial analysis. Quite often, the reason can be the
lack of sound foundations or insecurity when it comes to financial terms and concepts. Starting from
an early age, building a strong background, can very likely prevent such situation.
However, financial education necessarily involves quantifying and setting prices and value for services
and goods. It can easily turn young people into cynical human beings who lack emotion. Furthermore,
a tendency to self-concentration and egoism might rise when one start measuring everything from a
profit-making perspective.
In conclusion, financial education has both pros and cons. In my opinion, the advantages are more
significant than the disadvantages, making financial education an advisable component of the school
program. The disadvantages should be thought of as a certain price that young people have to pay
due to the characteristics of the world that we live in.
Even though globalization affects the worlds economies in a very positive way, its negative
side should not be forgotten. Discuss.
Globalization is such a commonly used term in the twentieth century. It simply means that the world
has become integrated economically, socially, politically and culturally through the advances of
technology, transportation and communication. It is undeniable that globalization has resulted in both
positive and negative effects which must be addressed accordingly.
To begin with, globalization has contributed to the worlds economies in many beneficial ways. The
advances in science and technology have allowed businesses to easily cross over territorial boundary
lines. Consequently, companies tend to become more productive and competitive thereby raising the
quality of goods, services and the worlds living standard.
Secondly, several companies from the more developed countries have already ventured to establish
foreign operations or branches to take advantage of the low cost of labor in the poorer countries. This
kind of business activity will provide more influx of cash or investment funds into the less developed
countries.
However, one cannot deny the negative effects which have derived from globalization. One crucial
social aspect is the risk and danger of epidemic diseases which can easily be spread as the

transportation becomes easier and faster in todays advanced society. This is evidenced in the recent
birds flu disease which has infected most Asian countries over a short period of time.
As large corporations invest or take over many offshore businesses, a modern form of colonization will
also evolve which may pose certain power pressure on the local governments of the less developed
countries. Unemployment rates in the more developed regions such as Europe may also escalate as
corporations choose to outsource to the cheaper work force from Asian countries.
In conclusion. I like to reiterate that globalization is inevitable and we must urge individuals,
companies and governments to use a more balanced approach by taking the appropriate steps to deal
with matters relating to the financial or economic gains verses the social, political or ecological
concerns of the world.
In some countries children have very strict rules of behavior, in other countries they are
allowed to do almost anything they like. To what extent should children have to follow
rules?
The extent to which children have to follow rules is in itself a very complex issue, since children across
the world grow up in very different cultures. In India for example, children are expected to be very
submissive to their parents as well as other adults around them. This, however, is not the case with
the Western countries of the world where children follow the motto Thou shalt do what thou wilt as
promoted by celebrities and rock stars. I believe that following strict rules has both advantages as well
as serious drawbacks as discussed below.
Firstly, strict rules of behavior create responsible and respectful children who in turn mature into
respectful adults. This forms a stable society which is virtually free from negative trends such as
prostitution and drug abuse. Secondly, if children do not follow strict rules of behavior, they may get
out of hand and become work-shy and indolent. This may then create a burden on the society since
the government has to find ways to cater for these social ills.
However, forcing children to follow strict rules of behavior doesnt always yield positive results as
discussed above, most of the time it backfires and works against society. For example, teenagers are
more likely to do the opposite of what theyre told to do simply because they want to be independent.
Children should also have rights to exercise their free will and develop their own pattern of behaviors.
Imposing strict rules may simply destroy the individuality of children.
At the end of the day, it is clear that children should be guided by rules, but these rules should not be
imposed on them because as human beings, they need to have room to develop their own traits of
character and adopt a behavioral pattern of their own.
Even though globalization affects the worlds economies in a positive way, its negative side
should not be forgotten. Discuss.
In the present age, globalization is playing an increasingly important role in our lives. But in the
meantime whether it is a blessing or a curse has sparked a heated debate. Some people argue that
globalization has a fundamentally beneficial influence on our lives, while many others contend that it
has a detrimental effect as well.
A convincing argument can be made about globalization not only playing a pivotal role in the
development of technology and economy, but also promoting the cultural exchange between different

countries. To start with, it is the globalization that impelled many corporate to become international
groups, thereby making a contribution to the local technology and employment. Specifically, when a
multinational group establish a factory in a developing country, the new equipment, the new
management skills and the job vacancies are all in the best interest of the local society. Moreover,
people worldwide can get to know each other better through globalization. It is easy to see that more
and more Hollywood blockbusters show cultures different from American, some recent examples are
Kungfu Panda and The Mummy.
Admittedly, the profit driven side of globalization has severely affected young people. Today, in the
metropolises in different countries, it is very common to see teenagers wearing NIKE T-shirts and
Adidas footwear, playing Hip-Hop music on Apple iPods and eating at KFC. The culture that took a
thousand years to form just seems similar in these cities; it seems as though you can only distinguish
them by their language. Meanwhile, in some developing countries, sweat workshops are always a
concerning issue. For instance, reports show that some teenagers employed by NIKEs contractors
work in smelly factories over 14 hours a day, but are only paid fifty cents per hour.
To sum up, I would concede that globalization does come with some adverse effects. Despite that fact,
benefits created by it far outweigh the disadvantages. Overall, I am convinced that we should further
promote globalization and meanwhile the local government should take measures to combat culture
assimilation and sweat workshops.
In many countries children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. Some people regard
this as completely wrong, while others consider it a valuable work experience, important
for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion?
The issue of whether or not children should be engaged in some paid work has sparked a heated
debate. While some argue that having some employment experience is conducive to a childs learning
and development, I contend that it would bring harm to the childs heathand learning.
First of all, a workplace designed for adults is normally shortage ofchild-friendly facilities. Desks and
chairs are too high for a child; the light switches are installed on the walls unreachable by children;
also emergency training and facilities such as phones are only provided to adults. Furthermore,
various hazards such as polluted air and chemical fumes are still produced in factories and farms.
Undoubtedly young people would suffer in such workplaces.
Also, children would find it frustrating when they are not properly inducted before starting a job. A
child working in a cement factory would feel a setback when he could not get immediate support while
struggling with the procedures of recording different raw materials that is required by the job. Further,
without sufficient support, a childs misunderstanding or inappropriately communicating with adults
would only disappoint him and prevents him from active learning and interacting with other people.
To conclude, a childs paid employment experience would lead to a negative impact on their health and
active learning. However, recognizing the importance of childrens learning and their awareness of
responsibility, it is advisable to encourage them to be involved in some volunteering opportunities
where they can meaningfully learn and interact with other people with sufficient care and support in
place for such jobs.
Some people think that spending a lot on holding wedding parties, birthday parties and
other celebrations is just a waste of money. Others, however, think that these are
necessary for individuals and the society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Throwing parties can be expensive. While some people do not find these fancy parties worth what they
cost, others believe parties are important to both individuals and the society.
People choose to throw parties for a number of reasons. For starters, parties can make better teams.
Project kick-off parties are good opportunities to break the ice and help team members to know each
other better. Victory parties create a sense of success and belonging. Companies do not see parties
as wastes of money and allocate budget to support such events. Moreover, parties often leave good
memories. From our own experiences, we all have happy memories of our birthday parties when we
were little. Every family has great photos took on family parties in their album. In addition, contrary to
what some people believe that spending on parties is a waste of social resources, parties actually
create value, either by employing people in the party planning business or by offering people better
party experiences.
The popularity of parties, however, causes some tension in the society. Parties are hard on introverted
people who find themselves uncomfortable in parties. This is a clinic symptom which psychologists
call it social anxiety disorder. There are other ways to celebrate important events that may have
greater value for their cost. For instance, companies could send out gifts after successful projects and
parents could take their children on family trips to celebrate birthdays.
In my opinion, while a party is a form of social event that brings many benefits to individuals and the
society, other choices should also be considered, either to cut spending or to relieve the stress of
those who are not fond of parties.

Public libraries should only provide books and should not waste their limited resources on
expensive high-tech media such as software, videos or DVDs. Do you agree or disagree?
With the proliferation of high-tech media, some people hold that the public libraries would be rendered
obsolete if they do not offer software, videos or DVDs to their users while other assert its only a waste
of limited resources and the libraries should offer books only.
High-tech media is, in many ways, indeed superior to the books in terms of entertainment, attraction,
and functionality. For instance, videos and DVDs function as a visual means to assist people to have a
first-hand experience even though those people have not physically visited or seen the objects which
are introduced in the books. Also, despite the audio-visual equipment would be prohibitive to install,
the capital cost would be lowered by appealing to a sizable number of users.
More importantly, software could assist the library goers to access the Internet to update their
knowledge on a daily basis; in contrast, books typically take multiple months to be published, which in
turn rendertheir contents outdated to some extent. In addition, upon learning that the computer
literacy has become an essential skill recently, public libraries should take on the responsibility to
educate its users how to operate a computer.
Furthermore, it is a common practice for most public libraries to share their resources via the Internet.
In this way, even if one book of interest cannot be found in one library, the borrower still could locate
the book from other libraries and then request the librarians to transfer the book to that particular
library.

In conclusion, public libraries would benefit in multiple ways if they areequipped with the high-tech
media.
Modern children are suffering from the diseases that were once considered to be meant for
adults only. Obesity is a major disease prevalent among children. What are its causes and
what solutions can be offered?
Nowadays, the increasing rate of overweight children and adults is a worldwide health issue. Obesity is
a major problem which is increasing day by day in school going children. There are various reasons
behind it. This essay will discuss the causes of obesity and offer some solutions.
The first cause of obesity is junk food. It is often seen that mostly children are fond of burgers, pizzas,
noodles and coke. These types of foods are easily available to them in school canteens. Children love
to purchase chips, chocholates, - ice-cream for lunch. Moreover, in this modern era, parents are
working and they do not have time to cook at home. Parents often buy dinner for their children
instead of preparing food at home. This calorie-rich diet is making children obese. This problem can be
solved by teaching children to cook healthy foods for themselves and banning junk foods and fizzy
drinks in schools. This diet can be replaced by milk, juice and fruits for lunch.
The second cause of obesity is sedentry life style. It is true that the use of computers and television is
increasing in children. They spend most of their time watching television or playing video games on a
computer. This technological advancement has reduced the level of physical activity in this specific age
group. This issue can be resolved by encouraging children to do physical exercises. Parents can take
their children to park to encourage playing with friends. Furthermore, schools can add sports in their
curriculum to maintain physical fitness in their students.
To sum up, it is clear that main causes of obesity are unhealthy eating and not enough physical
activities. This ailment can be prevented and treated by healthy eating habbits and physical exercises.
Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities,
while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying
together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
Some people contend that mixed ability classes are more beneficial for childrens development than
streaming them on the basis of judgement about their academic abilities. However, from my
perspective, I disagree with this contention.
Admittedly, mixed ability classes provide a better environment for childrens all-round development. In
such classes, children with different abilities study together and in turn they can learn from one
another. From example, a student, who is good at academic study but weak in dancing or painting,
can learn how to dance or paint form his peers. In this sense, mixed ability classes allow students to
develop their abilities in different subjects instead of only academic abilities.
Despite the argument above, I believe streaming students brings more benefits to teachers and
students. As for teachers, separating children with better academic abilities from others facilitates
effective teaching. This practice helps teachers to control their students more conveniently and easily.
Compared with mixed ability in which teacher should consider students differences when they are
using teaching methodologies, streaming makes this situation simpler. To be more specific, students
are at the same level of academic ability in a class, and in turn teachers can use the same

methodologies for them all. In this way, the narrower the spread of ability in the class, the more
convenient the teaching can be.
On top of this, steaming enables students to learn in an effective way. According to students different
abilities, they are taught in different ways that are more suitable for them. In the top streams,
students use more difficult materials, therefore, they can learn more. In sharp contrast, teachers can
explain the material more slowly to those in bottom streams. Under this circumstance, students with
different academic abilities can study effectively and efficiently.
In the final analysis, mixed ability classes are beneficial for students versatile development, but in my
opinion, segregating students based on different academic ability is better for both teachers and
students.
Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this
happening, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem?
It is true that some criminals commit crimes again after they have been punished. While there are
several reasons for this alarming trend, some effective measures can be taken by governments to
tackle this problem.
There are two main reasons for re-offenders. Firstly, the prison system can make the situation worse.
Criminals put together in prison and they make friends with other offenders. While they are locked up
in prison, they do not have much to do there, and they would exchange information about what they
have done before they came to the prison or they may plan crimes with other inmates. Secondly,
offenders often do not have any other means of earning money. They are poor, uneducated and
lacking skills needed to maintain a job. Also, a criminal record makes finding a job difficult as people
usually avoid hiring ex-convict.
To solve this problem, governments should focus on rehabilitation of criminals rather than punishment.
Above all, prisons need vocational training which makes inmates to prepare for life outside the prison.
They can learn practical skills such as computer programming, car maintenance and graphic design. In
this way, they can be hired for a position that requires this certain knowledge and skills. Community
service is another way to reform offenders. Rather than being locked up in prison with other inmates,
offenders can help society and become useful to their local community, and these activities would
eliminate the negative influence that prisons can have.
In conclusion, it is true the re-offenders are one of the problems in our community; it can be solved by
focusing rehabilitation rather than punishment itself.
When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is
pointless to try and keep them alive.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this
opinion?
Nowadays, technological advances and their rapid and wide applications are having a significant
impact on a nations traditional skills and ways of life. Some argue that such impact is so extraordinary
that it would make conventional skills and life styles obsolete. However, I believe they would continue
to thrive by providing alternatives to modern ways of life, and innovative ideas for modern
technologies.

First of all, traditional skills and ways of life are becoming an alternative solution to the problems
caused by mainstreamed ways of life which are greatly influenced by modern technologies. For
instance, a cozy restaurant where traditional, home-brewed beer is served, offers another experience
to people who are bored with branded beers that have the same flavor and come out of mass
production with new technologies. It is in such a venue where traditional skills are preserved, people
become relaxed and educated. Providing diversity and thus enriching modern ways of life, such
traditional skills and ways of life would continue to have their place.
Furthermore, conventional skills provide innovative ideas to the development of modern technologies.
For example, sparkled by how the word Love is traditionally knitted into a sweater by some ethnic
minority women in some parts of Asia, some business managers from textile industry have developed
some production lines by applying the traditional skills to Computer-Aided Designs (CAD). The
products have boosted the companies sales which in turn have increased their investment in
preserving traditional skills for further developing their technologies.
To conclude, traditional skills and life styles are increasingly becoming a useful alternative to the
homogeneity brought by global applications of modern technologies. However, the evolution of
technologies is a selection process, whereby some would become obsolete, but there is no doubt that
some would thrive when their roles are appreciated.

Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory

part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving
the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has long been a priority of educational authorities to widen and improve the overall experience
of pupils. To that end, a recent suggestion has been made that children should be involved in
community service tasks such as charity work or neighbourhood improvement as a mandatory part
of their schooling. While this could be seen as a waste of school time, there are clear benefits
which can not be ignored.
It could be argued that children today do not spend enough time learning, and that compulsory
extra-curricular activities would only further decrease study time. Although community work is
important, homework and self-study time would have a more direct benefit on the education and
exam results of a child, in turn providing the opportunity for academic advancement to university.
Alternatively, this time could be spent on physical exercise and team sports as a way of
combatting the increase in free time activities which promote laziness, such as computer-based
gaming or chatting. Moreover, neighbourhood tasks should be being undertaken by council
employees, rather than being forced upon the younger members of a community. These issues
could therefore form a valid argument against the incorporation of such activities in to school
curricula.
However, the importance of children learning social values through experiencing and contributing
to community spirit should not be ignored. Charity work would teach them to support one another
in later life, and any activity related to improvement would teach them the importance of

contribution to ones own local area, thereby simultaneously discouraging anti-social or criminal
behaviour. Furthermore, becoming involved in mentoring younger children would arguably
promote a stronger sense of team spirit than merely engaging in competitive sport with age-group
segregation. Therefore, it would be an excellent idea to consider some kind of monitored social
activity to encourage personal growth in teenage pupils.
In conclusion, while it is understandable that the idea of community service may cause concern
due to a perceived lack of educating, I strongly believe that these activities would teach children
at high school level to be more rounded as individuals, as well as better able to positively
contribute to society in later life.

People attend colleges or universities for many different

reasons (for example: new experiences, career preparation,
increased knowledge etc.). Why do you think people attend
colleges or universities?
You should give reasons for your answer using your own ideas and experience.

Write at least 250 words.

Model Answer 1:
People mainly get enrolled in a college or university to achieve the necessary education and degree they
require to get a job or to build a career. Having a good career is one of the main reasons people spending their
time in colleges or universities but there are other reasons as well. The current society and educational
structure is far different than it had been a century back when a self-educated person could gain a good career
and parents could arrange private tutors to ensure their childrens education. But in todays world colleges and
universities are the authority to declare a person to have necessary education to be ready for the job sector
and without the certification from colleges and universities it is almost impossible for someone to claim a good
job.

People are going to colleges and universities because this is the most common way of getting education and
they have no alternatives like the people of past century had. Most people are learning in colleges and
universities and getting themselves ready for the future. The sole purpose of a college or university is to ensure
the proper theoretical and moral education to build the ideal citizens the country needs and this is system which
is unquestionably accepted by the society and people. People who do not have plan to use their certificate to
get a job either because they have other career plans or may be blessed with inherited fortune. They go to
these educational institutes to learn the values, ideas, knowledge and education they require to be good
human. In fact education is a border line between a savage and a good man and this is another reason the

society has adopted the idea of education for all and the colleges and universities are the places to get this
education in the current age.

Some people go to universities to get further education to enhance their horizon or to improve their job position
& salary. Others go to the colleges and universities to let the world know that they are education. Funny this
may seems, but many people simply consider the higher education as the status they require to get higher in
the society. Colleges and Universities nowadays offer specialized courses like technical courses or creative
courses and many people attend those courses simply because of their pure interests on these subjects or to
gain the knowledge they need.

In my opinion, getting education, learning new things, experiencing diverse cultures and customs, getting
prepared for the future career, improving job position, subject matter interests and social status are the main
reasons for people to attend colleges and universities.

(Approximately 440 words)

Alternative Answer 2:
A University offers highest level of education as well as valuable degree required for the students to build their
careers. University degrees are essential for the job market, to be versed in a specialized field or to be
prepared for the further educations. People attend colleges or universities for lots of different reasons. In my
opinion three most common reasons for people to join a college or a university are to prepare for a prospective
career, to have new experiences, and to increase their knowledge. But there are some other reasons like
improving the current job position, to be specialized in a specific subject, to earn a degree to join a job or run a
business etc.
Career preparation is probably the primary and most important reason for people to attend colleges and
universities. A college or university degree gives more opportunity to have a full-time and stable job. In
comparison a university degree holder is offered a better job that pays better than others. The job market is
very competitive now a day compared to any other time in past. Careers such as telecommunication,
information technologies etc. need many new employees. At colleges and universities, students can learn new
skills for these careers and increase their opportunities for the future. In the whole academic years, the
students learn not only the theory but also practical aspects for their future job needs. The universities prepare
a structured and coherent syllabus for the students and without these experience and knowledge it is almost
impossible for anyone to make himself prepared for the job and the knowledge he/she required for the specified
job position.

Students also go to colleges or universities to have new experiences. For many, it is their first time away from

home and they have to live among strangers. At colleges, they meet new people from many different places,
races and cultures. They can see what life is from a different perspective. They can learn to live on their own
and take care of them without having their family always nearby. The students have lots of opportunities to face
the real-life situations while staying at a college or university. They learn to face the harsh situation, learn to
treat the superiors, learn how to work to gain a desired aspiration, learn to work as a team member and many
more. In short, colleges and universities offers so many different experiences that a student cannot get from
anywhere else.

At colleges and universities, students have the opportunity to increase their knowledge about technology, art,
history, about themselves and outer world which are impossible to achieve staying outside the campus. As they
decide what they want to study, pursue their studies, and interact with their classmates, they learn a lot about
themselves. They also, of course, have the opportunity to learn about many subjects in their classes. In
addition to the skills and knowledge related to their career, college students also have the chance to take
classes in other areas. For many, this will be their last chance to study different subjects. Colleges offer much
more than career preparation. They offer the opportunity to have new experiences and to learn many kinds of
things.

Many job holders, housewives even businessmen get themselves admitted into universities or colleges for a
diploma courses. These courses are essential in many different perspectives, like: to learn a new technology
(for example: Computer related diplomas), to train up for a new career (for example: photography courses), or
to make them ready for more challenging jobs (for example: MBA in Agriculture). I think all these are major
reasons why people attend colleges and universities.

(Approximately 600 words)

(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers. You should be able to pick up the main points from this essay and
organize in your own style)

Answers Submitted by IELTS Candidates:

Sample Answer 3:
Every human being with an ambitious of getting higher knowledge requires attending colleges or universities.
The main reason of attending universities or colleges may differ man to man. Someone may aspire to achieve
greater knowledge, someone may just want to earn a certificate or someone might attribute it as a step towards
career development.

Whatever the reason people refer to attend universities - I would like to elaborate it as a step which is
necessary for career development to grasp a required level of knowledge. I believe more or less people attend
universities or colleges to gain knowledge. In university level people scatters in different groups for different
subject areas of studies. Someone selects science someone selects arts. Every human being has their own
selection base to get their assumed knowledge which is mandatory to accomplish their ultimate goal in career
development. University or college provides a new level of experience which develops self-actualization and
confidence in human being as we know the proverb, knowledge is power". Knowledge gives us strength and
endows with skills that mold our future for betterment. People usually select their career path before entering
university or college courses, for example an aspirant doctor selects medical subject as university course and
therefore they join medical college.

Similarly a future entrepreneur joins business school to study business in university level. I would like to
elaborate before enrolling in universities or colleges we decide our future goal. Once our future goal is set we
thrive to achieve it. I would like to illustrate whatever the reason people may attributes with university selection,
it is always refers to achieving new experience, knowledge or a process to start a career. Well, it is sometime
different for few people who has different ambitions but studying different subject matter unrelated to their
goals. People attend universities and colleges for further education to ensure their job promotions. There are
no alternatives to the colleges and universities to get higher degrees and thus people attend there to get the
education they need to secure jobs. Interest is a subject is another reason people go to the higher educational
institutes.

Sometime few people attend universities as a tradition which has been referred as mandatory by society or
family. A mere certificate is enough for them rather a means of gaining greater knowledge. Though, it is a rare
case which represent a niche segment but as a whole we human being usually attend university or college as a
hope of achieving greater understanding, new skill so that we can construct a good career in future. At the end
it is essential to pronounce that whatever the reason we believe behind attending universities or colleges
maximum people take it as a step towards a better future to educate ourselves with knowledge.

(Approximately 460 words)

(Submitted by Ariyana Ahmed)

Model Answer 4:
College education is a highly revered benchmark around the world. In many countries, without a college level
degree, a citizen is not considered eligible for state jobs. People attend colleges for many reasons but career
preparation is the most important goal among them.

Most students enroll in colleges for bright career prospects and they study professional and job oriented
courses. If achieved successfully with threshold scores, these courses increase industrial employability of
learners by training them with the skills industries need. For example, many companies organize direct campus
selection programs in colleges, offering professional courses, to hire ready to utilize resources with rewarding
salary packages. To add to this, in many cases, based on education, employees get different remuneration for
the exact same job, and college education degrees play pivotal roles in accelerating promotion processes too.

On the other hand, in addition to scintillating future career opportunities, university education also offers many
new experiences. These experiences include migration to new countries, befriending new people, working
while studying, and, most importantly, learning to adjust with people. If we take a look at foreign students data
across Europe, it is eminent that around 20 % students in Universities are from Asian countries. These
experiences burgeon adaptability skills to pursuers and help in turning future paradigm citizens.

Some people also attend higher university courses to enhance knowledge. Students under this section mostly
pursue challenging master and doctorate degrees in their fields. Most of these learners turn researchers and
help the progress of the world. Some governments offer enticing whooping packages to the best minds to
convince latter to select this study stream.

Finally, considering all reasons to attend colleges or universities, it is clear that the paramount reason is career
growth. However, 'gaining new experiences' and 'enhancing knowledge' are also prodigious reasons.

(Approximately 398 words)

(Submitted by Rahul)

Sample Answer 5:
All the human beings are of different nature and similarly their interests are not the same. A few love to sing
while others like to listen the music. Same way people attend the colleges and universities have different
respective prospective or purposes. Mainly people go to such places for their better career which dramatically
affect their future life, to gain the knowledge and to be a good human being, while some attend colleges for
enjoyment and to get rid of their homes. But I feel that Colleges and universities should be regarded as a place
of worship which give us sense of good living, spread knowledge and enlighten our life from darkness.
First of all, if we discuss about rich parent's youngsters, most of them come to the colleges for their time pass
and making ruckus in college. All the day they make havoc everywhere. Study is just a trivial matter for them.
They have no worries about money wastage or future scope. Hence such students get enrolled in colleges for
their own willingness to fulfil their ambitions of entertainment etc., but it never means that all are alike. If we
look on other side of the coin, there are some students who are even not able to fill their college fee due to lack

of sources but they are dedicated to learn and work hard. They want to study hard to become a successful
person. Such students attend the colleges and universities for studying mainly, because they just focus on their
motto of life. Enjoyment and other activities are meager to them.

Secondly , another type of students are their which we can say in middle class family students which can be of
mixed behavioural response regarding admission in colleges as either for making friends , fun and study also.
By participating in different college events they can fill their life with enthusiasm and charm, because they are
totally not focused for only study or totally for enjoyment. Hence they are involved in overall college or
university atmosphere.

On the behalf of above, it did not mean that these particular types of students are liable strictly to respective
activities in colleges but majority of them are in such manner. In the end we can conclude that colleges and
universities are for social and individual wellbeing of all. They help to build our character. Every student can get
the characters of bonhomie, candid behaviour, bright future and spreading life by proper studying sincerely and
and overall body growth by participating in extra co-curricular activities of college.

(Approximately 410 words)

(Submitted by Gurwinder)

Sample Answer 6:
A complete consideration of people's views about whether to attend colleges or universities is difficult to
present because they are so varied. Some would believe that continuing their education is a brilliant way of
obtaining the best of both worlds gaining new acquaintances and securing a higher level of education, which
might in the future, pave the way to a better job. I have developed my own perspectives as well. There are 3
reasons why I'm convinced that people decide to attend colleges.

One absolutely cardinal reason is the fact that universities offer an opportunity to intensify knowledge in a
particular field of your interest. On the contrast, high school educations tend to focus more on a board but
relatively shallow understanding of various subjects. Thus, the option of gaining expertise universities offer is
certain to catch the eyes of students.

The second reason is rooted in the fact that humans are social animals. Therefore, when surrounded by a
group of friends all applying for admission to colleges, one might feel the impulsive urge to join. It is
considerably hard to be persistence in one's own beliefs and perspectives.

Equally essential to the previous two reasons concerning why people choose to continue their education is that

a college degree is no longer considered to be "higher education", but rather "basic education". In this day and
age, numerous companies regard bachelor degrees as the most basic and foremost requirement. When
education level determines the chances of acquiring a job, it leaves you little choice but to keep on studying.

By way of conclusion, whatever your choice may be, it is essential to think through all aspects before making a
final decision.

(Approximately 280 words)

(Submitted by Kelly Ke)

Model Answer 7:
People attend colleges and universities for various reasons such as gaining more knowledge and enhancing
their skills. In the universities people learn many new ways to learn things and improve their talent. Students
after completing their schooling or under graduate courses opt for higher education in universities because of
various circumstances around them.

Firstly, they prefer education in reputed universities in order to achieve their goals and dreams in life. People try
to do their higher education for their career enhancement such as for promotions in the company they work.
Usually persons with high level of knowledge in any field will be paid more than the other people with limited
skills. This is also a major reason for a person to prefer higher education. For instance in the case of an
Information Technology professional a person with higher level of knowledge and skill in designing a software
will be paid more than a person who tests the developed product.

In addition to that people pursue their education in universities in various other countries for the sake of
exposing to the new environment, culture, customs and learn how to mingle with people. This scenario is
generally seen in students trying to do their business degree. Students come know about the new trends
across the world and learn how to deal with various kinds of businesses and improve the economy of their
country. Moreover, learning the ways of interacting with the people is a good sign of a healthy society. On the
other hand people not only attend the universities for gaining knowledge and improving their job position but
also out of their immense interest in a particular field and curiosity to invent new things in that specific field.

In my point of view I think people attend universities and colleges for the purpose of gaining more knowledge,
experiencing various cultures and customs, improving their job position and their intense desire and passion
towards a particular field.

(Approximately 325 words)

(Submitted by Pushyahass Reddy)

Sample Answer 8:
Certain people think they attend colleges/universities to gain knowledge where as some other people think to
prepare for their career. Another set of people prefer to attend college to get new experiences.

Universities dictate the society with the values present in education .some people prefer to attend college to
gain knowledge and apply their knowledge in their day to day life .These people choose university to increase
their knowledge only which is useful to the society and they are least bothered about the jobs or job market.
Universities should produce knowledge based professional but not job seekers. People who got sufficient
knowledge can overcome any issue in their daily life as well as career. My friend, sham came out of Hindu
university with sufficient knowledge never worried about career. He can easily transoms from one field to
another with his vast knowledge what he gained from university.

There is other side of the coin always. Some people prefer to attend universities to increase their career
chances as they are so much interested in good profitable career. And companies also prefer certain
universities only to recruit for their openings. I selected Nehru University to do my post graduate in computers
to attract top IT giants and it really worked for me. Some other set of people choose universities to get new
experiences and enhance their knowledge or to get suitable job for them. Ram, one of my state ministers
choose university to get experience in student politics and got successes in main politics also.

In conclusion, I prefer to attend college to gain knowledge and not only career or experience only. People who
gained knowledge in their core area always get successes in any other area.

(Approximately 285 words)

(Submitted by Nirmala Pagolu)

Model Answer 9:
Universities and colleges always play an important role in the wellbeing of individual as well as the wellbeing of
family and the whole nation. However there are different type and status of people who are attending colleges
and universities for different purposes.

Each university and collage has an ultimate goal is to convert knowledge and experiences from past generation
to present generation, and preparation a good citizens for the society. A well-educated individual and nation can
face any challenges of the world.

People going universities and colleges are getting different experience for life in a good way and socially
accepted ways. They meet students from different cultural, religious, race, color and languages; in addition they
can get information from all people they have met in their student life. And they are getting new knowledge and
information from teachers and books.

And in practical life they implement this knowledge and experience for the betterment of nation. Beside this
peoples attend colleges and universities getting a degree which enable them to spend prosperous, future and
save their future getting ruined. Without college or university degree it is impossible to get a good job in any
reputable organization.

My opinion is also the same the main purpose people attending colleges or university is gaining knowledge and
experience which enable them to lead a successful life, make them sound and mature who can take a right
decision for themselves.

[by Maher Ali]

Sample Answer 10:

Its true to say that people take admission in college and universities for higher education with different
intentions. Over all, it depends on the economical and social status of countries. According to my point of view,
in todays world most of the people get higher education to earn money, especially the residents of
underdeveloped or third world countries like Pakistan. In this essay I will elaborate my view with reasons and
examples.

First, if we see in low income countries like Pakistan, where life is striving for the basic needs like foods and
shelters, most of the youths of Pakistan take admission in subjects like M.B.A, Information Technology and
other science subjects for better scope of having better careers and earning good money. Their basic needs for
survival outweigh other ethnic values of education. Very few students take interest in arts and other non
technical education.

While somehow in the west or developed countries where government ensures basic needs of the people,
have a different reasons for people to attend colleges and universities. Most of students in west still follow the
true meanings and reason of education. They take admission in universities to increase their skills, knowledge
and characters. That is the reason of progress in research and development. On the balance, I must say that
humans of all over the globe have lost the true meanings of education except in very countries in the west. Man

has increased the needs and demands for more comfort or for other reasons, but, it is the economical situation
of nations which defines the trend of education move towards money or moreover towards aesthetics.

On the balance, I must say that people of all over the globe attend the schools and universities to increase their
scope to earn the better income. We have lost the true meanings of education. Lust for money has taken over
the thrust and great values of knowledge. It is one of the proofs that now the world rarely produces the great
characters like Rumi and Newton.

[by Humairah Farooq]

Model Answer 11:

"From here, light and sacred draughts." The motto of Cambridge University tells people a university is the
place where enlightenment and precious knowledge is awarded. Since the establishment of the first university,
it has been great honour to be accepted. Today, universities and colleges are much more accessible and
therefore, more people prefer to receive a higher education. Several reasons are presented in this essay.

First of all, a large proportion of people study there for the purpose of a degree, which is beneficial, or even
necessary for job application. With a higher degree, applicants are more likely to find a better position.
However, with increasing number of students pouring in, the quality of education may be reduced, particularly
by students with little eagerness for study.

Acquiring knowledge appears to be the main reason for most students. A university or college is believed to be
the most ideal place to learn meaningful or useful knowledge. Through libraries, knowledge and ideas of people
all around the world can be shared. On the other hand, teaching standard is much superior to high schools.
Thanks to these abundant resources, a student can dive into the ocean of knowledge freely.

Nonetheless, the real essence of a university is not knowledge itself, but the methodology of learning. When we
scrutinise the synopsis of any programmes, those structures seem to be similar, which without any exceptions,
direct to the ability to learn. Perhaps this is the reason why companies have preference on a higher degree.
Good ability of learning accompanies one with his whole life. Hence, studying in a university is undoubtedly a
precious experience.

After the analysis above, it turns out that the reasons of receiving higher education are tightly bound to each
other. An opportunity of secondary or tertiary education is advantageous in every aspect. Consequently,
numerous people are attending universities and colleges.

[by JIFANG ZHANG]

Sample Answer 12:

In schools we are completing our primary and secondary education. Colleges or Universities are there to
provide third stage of our education level. Only few people getting opportunity to attend to their third level of
education. The reason why people attend to colleges or universities may differ among person to person.

Some people attend to colleges after leaving from school is to improve their skills such as vocational
qualifications. This is a kind of career preparation for their life. They will learn new skills and new knowledge on
vocational trainings such as, dress makings, carpentry, welding, aluminium fittings, auto mobile, phone
repairing, electrical and electronics are some technical training provided in some colleges.

Some are attending to Universities to follow degree or diploma in education, agriculture, medicine, engineering,
bio chemistry and etc. These are to shape their future career by increased knowledge on particular field. Many
of these courses are teach as full time in government organizations and part time in many private
organizations. Nowadays education became a competition, since many are attending to universities and
colleges. Each person need to obtain a degree or diploma has become an essential element to find a good job.
The educational qualification is the base to provide many good jobs in reputed firms and in higher positions.
Therefore, many people attend to these places to improve their educational qualifications to get a good job.
Other than this, educated people earn higher salary than uneducated people. Nowadays money became as a
life. To live a comfortable life, people try to improve their educational qualifications in order to find well paid
positions.

Educated people become prestigious position in the society. Others follow educated peoples value, rules and
standards. People wanted to respect by others. Therefore, they need to get graduation, post-graduation,
Masters degree, Honor, Doctorate and etc. Mentioning their educational qualifications behind their name is a
prestige for many people. Therefore, some people attend to Universities or Colleges, to improve their prestige.
Some want to spend the time productively. If a bachelor need to spend the weekend, could be spend with their
friends. Some bachelors attend to weekend classes to complete a degree before they engage in important
responsibilities in life.

Therefore, why people attend to colleges or universities may give many answers as per the need of the people.
There may be one reason or many reasons behind the fact why they do this.

[by Niro]

Sample Answer 13:

To face the period of development, as people, we have to make competition with others to get what we want
and what we need. One thing that people can do is try to get high education. Nowadays people try to develop
their ability in collages or university. In reality attending in university will help us to become great people in the
future. There are two reasons why people have to attend collages or university, such as to reach the desired
level and to satisfy their life.

Firstly, becoming a success person is a dream to all the people in this world. To reach our desire, definitely we
will have to do something. We should make a sacrifice so that it happens. Better education, Better Life, is a
motivation quote and will help us to build our spirit. People will have huge opportunity if they have good
education. In my experience there are some of my uncles who have great job because they have higher
education and degree. In reality all companies need people who have high qualification related to their
education to join their company.

Secondly, in life people need something that will make them satisfied. Satisfying in life is an important thing in
peoples life, which can make them happy. Having high qualification in education and having good job will make
people useful for others. For instance, a child in a family when becomes a success person, s/he can make the
parents proud and can give them happiness. They can also go to some tourism destinations for vacation or buy
a house or invest for future, and so on.

In conclusion, attending in college or university is important because it will help us to face the period of
development, to face how beautiful the world is, and most significantly: we can make people proud of us.

[ by Keith Francis Ratumbuisang ]

Sample Answer 14:

In recent times it has become a wide spread trend that colleges or universities are not just about education and
teaching, but it has become a much broader concept in comparison to older times. People nowadays consider
attending colleges or universities for many different reasons and it is quite common that people consider
attending colleges or universities as a general trend, though there are many other reasons behind this.

Over the years education has changed and evolved itself to the changing trends and viewpoints of people and
so has the concept of students of education and places where education is offered namely colleges and
universities. Student's these days not only look for the quality of education offered but their view varies from
facilities offered, the extra-curricular activities offered and the type of student culture that exist within the
college. A student joining a college these days not only plan on just graduating out but also assess his options

or scope to improve his other talents, thus he plans on nurturing them and improving it further. For example,
one of my friends recently joined for MBA in one college but the final deciding factor over other college's was,
the sports facilities offered to him at his present college. Earlier times it was just about the quality of education
offered and nothing else.

By this I conclude by saying, by changing times the system in place gets modified or adaptive to the view points
of the students which lies not just on educational perspective but for other reasons too.

[ by - Abhijith Radhakrishnan ]

Sample Answer 15:

A college is a place where learning processes take place and go beyond the stereotypic academic learning
experience. People attend colleges or universities for a lot of reasons which range from academic, social and
other personal reasons. In my opinion, one should not limit his/ her college days to just learning academics and
should take the opportunity to learn whatever good knowledge comes his/ her way.

First and foremost, a college or university is meant to increase a person in academic knowledge. For example,
a student who gets admitted into a university to study medicine should first of all learn about the different
diseases and know how to treat them appropriately. As such, a person learns how to be a good doctor.

Secondly, a college or university prepares one for the career an individual is going to face in the near future. It
teaches what to expect in a persons line of study. For instance, while I was a medical student in the university
we were educated on the career prospects of a medical doctor, the various places we could work and what
would be expected of us when we eventually get there. In addition, an individual mingles with the different
people from different social strata, ethnicities, localities and race while in the university.

Therefore, you get to learn about different cultures and values. For instance, my roommate in the university
was a Sudanese. I learnt about different Sudanese dishes and also picked up a few Arabic words from him.

In conclusion, the university is not only a place for academics. You get prepared for the career ahead and also
learn some social values and cultures. One should be able to utilise the few years in the university to pick up as
much relevant knowledge as possible.

[ by - Abdurrahim Zakari ]
Sample Answer 16:
College and university play an integral part in student's life for various personal and professional reasons.

Whether it can the continuation of higher studies to get a desired job or for creating a network with friends at
social level through college life, it is important to get admitted in these institutions.

College life offers kind of experience where people continue their career prospects upon a particular field where
there are diversified list of options to choose from. Nowadays, as compared with earlier years we have more
options because of which there has been a surge in competition level as well. For instance, for a commerce
background student there were limited options like being chartered accountant or company secretary etc.
Whereas today we have lot more options including these to sustain at fast pace world.

As students we make ourselves much more matured through this phase of life. Students at their college level
want to experience a fun part as well like making new friends, bunking classes, pulling each others leg and etc.
It is a kind of life which people want to experience before they get into adult phase of their life. For example,
most students tend to make their girlfriends at the college. Whether it can be their craze or kind of peer
pressure to have one as they cannot resist themselves when they see others are having one.

Not only this, people even get jealous of their pals when find a beautiful woman with someone else and wish
they could also have one. Thirdly, college life brings us plethora of new experiences during this phase of life. It
is during this period we learn how to balance our life both on professional and personal front as well. We also
learn how to accept our failures and work on it. In addition to this, we try to find a hidden talent in terms of
career perspective as well.

To sum up, college life plays a significant role towards the building up of next phase of life. As it focuses on
career prospects, increased knowledge and various factors to look on, it is important for each individual to
spend time in a college or university.
[ by - Walia ]
Sample Answer 17:
Certain people think they attend colleges/universities to gain knowledge where as some other people think to
prepare for their career. Another set of people prefer to attend college to get new experiences.

Universities dictate the society with the values present in education. Some people prefer to attend college to
gain knowledge and apply their knowledge in their day to day life .These people choose university to increase
their knowledge only which is useful to the society and they are least bothered about the jobs or job market.
Universities should produce knowledge based professional but not job seekers. People who got sufficient
knowledge can overcome any issue in their daily life as well as career. My friend, sham came out of Hindu
university with sufficient knowledge never worried about career. He can easily transoms from one field to
another with his vast knowledge what he gained from university.

There is other side of the coin always. Some people prefer to attend universities to increase their career
chances as they are so much interested in good profitable career. And companies also prefer certain
universities only to recruit for their openings. I selected Nehru University to do my post graduate in computers
to attract top IT giants and it really worked for me. Some other set of people choose universities to get new
experiences and enhance their knowledge or to get suitable job for them. Ram, one of my state ministers
choose university to get experience in student politics and got successes in main politics also.

In conclusion, I prefer to attend college to gain knowledge and not only career or experience only. People who
gained knowledge in their core area always get successes in any other area.
[ by - Jayesh Joseph ]
Sample Answer 18:
Education is an inevitable part of human being in this modern era, the main reason for this is to gain a better
job. The focus of this essay is to scrutinize some reasons of attending college or universities in the following
paragraphs.

First and foremost, the primary reason is that to get a better career. In order to be employed one should be
academically qualified, as the unemployment is increasing the demand for job is also increasing hence the
more qualified and experienced you are, the higher chance you get to be settled with a better job. The second
reason is that to gain more knowledge vocationally. Attaining knowledge is vital for a better productive and
quality work. For example engineer has to attend college or university in order to study the basics and logic
behind the subject scientific theories.

On the other side, drawback of attending college or university is that education is considered as a status in the
society from the olden days. Thus people who are not skillful will go to universities in order to get higher
positions. For example pupil who is not skillful select to learn medicine to become doctors by paying millions of
donation to get respect in the society. One of the other reasons is that education in universities changed as a
routines steps taken by younger generation as a part of life. Thus the need for education is often forgotten by
students during their studies and wont give attention in it

To conclude, main aim attending college is to gain knowledge and get into safe career. People attending
college is for a better cause mostly but like the other side of a coin there can be wrong intention also which can
be managed.

Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this

change improved the way people live?
Give reasons for your answer using your own ideas and experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Model

Answer

1:

Food is one of the fundamental needs of human lives, and from the ancient period till this ultra-modern techtime people have invented different ways to prepare and customize foods. The customs and ways people
prepare foods and present to others vary depending on the race, culture and country. But the most fundamental
need of preparing foods is to fulfil the very basic human need: hunger. Preparing foods was very cumbersome
in earlier ages but with the advancement of human knowledge and technology, men have created many
devices and made many new ways of easily making foods. The number of restaurants and fast-food shops are
ever increasing and that have omitted the need to prepare the food at all. The advanced technology like rice
cooker, meal cooker and easy availability of ingredients nowadays help people to prepare food in no time and
that

has

improved

the

way

of

peoples

lifestyle.

People now spend less time preparing foods and can utilize this time in other tasks like professional tasks,
reading, entertainment and spending time with family and friends. Thus people get more productive and social
because

of

the

increased

time

they

have.

Quick food has become very popular which omits the needs of cooking and professionals, students and
business person are having those foods in their lunch time. This is a significance improvement of saving time
and using it more productively. Though the fast foods have some health issues, the ever increasing popularity
of it shows the needs to have more time in our busy life and saving this time from the allotted time from
cooking. The cooking machines help the housewives to prepare the foods easily and they do not have to spend
time in a hot kitchen to prepare food. This is leap towards a modern life where foods can be prepared virtually
anywhere

and

in

few

minutes.

In summary, the improved way of cooking helps people nowadays to save time and cook in a more convenient
place. This help them to spend time in more important things and lead a life without much hassle.
(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers.)

Model Answer 2:
Most of the food items that were hard to prepare and restricted to experienced chefs are now easily available
off the shelf or are made easy to prepare with modern recipes. But like any other thing, this also has its

advantages and disadvantages.

Firstly, most of these foods are high in saturated fats and eventually leads to obesity. They cannot become
substitute to our staple diet that is still not so easy to prepare due to nature of its cooking methods. For
example, for most of the Indians, the staple diet includes combination of Indian breads, pulses and curries. It is
not possible to make it much easier even using modern equipment or methods. Secondly, most of the easy to
prepare food items either have very little shelf life or they need to be kept frozen (or both). Thus they cannot
match the nutrition of freshly prepared traditional home food.

Having said that, these easy to prepare food items are a boon to students or other people, who stay away from
home. They are definitely better that eating in restaurants or street food. Although not as good as home food,
they definitely purpose the purpose to get home like food. Also, most of these food items come with handy
instructions and pre-mixed ingredients. With simple instructions, anybody can cook most of the recipes now.
This has life easier for many across the globe.

With advent of easy availability of raw ingredients, it has not become much easier to cook recipes at home that
was previous possible to cherish in high end restaurants. For instance, the Italian pastas, which requires many
types of sauces, is now easy to prepare at home and all these sauces are now just a call away from a local
grocery shop.

In conclusion, this is a much welcomed and positive change and it has definitely improved our lives.

(Submitted by Vikram Soni)

Model Answer 3:
Over the past decade, the food industry had tremendous growth and improvements. This, together with
technological advancements, has made it much easier to prepare food and cook at home.

Ready-made meals bought frozen or canned form the shops is a great life saver for those who work, since all
that is needed is to defrost or open the can and enjoy. Although this is a method of preserving all the goodness,
but freshly prepared food is definitely better for health. Many of the vitamins and minerals may be lost during
the freezing or canning process.

Technology on the other hand has speeded up the food preparation process. Kitchen aid tools such as electric
choppers and grinders reduce the entire work load and the food can be prepared at the blink of an eye. Not
only it requires less effort compared to the past, but it also saves time, which can be put to other tasks.

The other technological advancement that has helped with food preparation is microwave ovens. This device
benefits from short waves that can penetrate food easily and thus cook or warm the food very quickly. In spite
of being a huge advancement and saving on time and energy, long term studies and scientific evidence are not
supporting the use of such devices and they are being blamed for at least minor risks if used on a long term
daily basis.

In conclusion, the process of food preparation has become much easier nowadays and this has had both
positive and negative effects on our lives. Every individual should consider wisely how to prepare their food to
ensure good health.

(Submitted by Narges Mahmoudi)

Model Answer 4:
Food is one of the fundamental needs for the people. People are slowly increasing passion towards the taste of
the food and some people are becoming crazy about the food .These people always require different tastes
and invent new and easy methods to prepare food. This new inventions always change the lifestyle and let us
discuss how it made the difference in our life.

Old is gold always. Certain people do not want to miss the raw taste and use the new machinery like mixers or
grinders. They want to prepare in old style without machinery and grasp complete taste of food. Still my
grandfather never uses machinery and enjoys the raw taste.

There is other side of coin always. Now a days, people are becoming busy and don't have time to spend much
for cooking food. So they started inventing new methods which made cooking easy. People invented new
machinery like gas stoves, induction stoves, cookers, mixers and many more. All these inventions changed
people's lifestyle. It saved people's time and people started investing time in other activities .And these new
inventions also produced good taste and different varieties and caused dramatic change in lifestyle. I always
use all possible machinery to prepare tasty food for my family. And especially in restaurants, chefs use latest
technology to prepare tasty food and this has changed the lifestyle too. Nowadays people can get food with
whatever calories they want in their daily life

In Conclusion, I prefer to prepare tasty food in easy methods using latest machinery.

(Submitted by Kumar)

Model Answer 5:
Compared with people in the past, we concern far less on the preparation of food today, thanks to the
development of agriculture and scientific technology. A fair amount of beneficial influence is occurring to us
consequently.

The first to be benefited is travellers. It has been much probable for one to carry out the plan of a trip or
expedition to remote areas. As a matter of fact, a diversity types of food are designed for outdoor trips, for
example, compressed biscuit. Without worrying about starving, a man can push it to the limit wherever he
would like to go -- Mount Everest or South Pole.

For most common people, it has been realistic to put their energy mainly on other aspects, work or interest,
rather than what to have for meals. Some prefer working all the time in order to earn as much money as they
can. Others develop their interests or hobbies like sports, music instruments, or photographing. Whatever
people choose to spend time on, they feel their lives are satisfying and fulfilling.

Attitude toward life matures as well. Humans are no longer bothered with preparation of food. Our focus now is
to improve the standard of life: how to make things more effective? Thus, numerous significant achievements
have taken place recently in every subject. Sciences and technologies, arts and humanities are swiftly striding
forward, and still accelerating. Therefore, without concerning about food preparation, the pattern of human
evolvement changes fundamentally.

To conclude, the benefits to both individuals and the whole human race is clearly demonstrated. And I believe
that food preparation will account for even less in our life in the future.

(Submitted by Jifang Zhang)

Model Answer 6:
Advancement in the technology, such as microwave woven and rice cooker, has provided efficient options for
cooking food. This has reduced the overall time required for cookery. Thus it is believed that this has enhanced
the lifestyle of the human being's to a greater extent. In this essay, we will analyse how this methods allow
people to spend their spare time practicing their hobbies and provide healthy food options for the young people.

To begin with, availability of new methodologies have minimized the cooking period making it possible for them
to utilise this span for enjoying the skills of their interest. For instance, using rice cooker usually takes half the
time when compared to the conventional gas cooking. This example clearly shows that the individuals who

prefer this cooker will manage to get some extra idle time for them. Thus, it is obvious that this moment can be
efficiently used for improving their expertise as well as for the relaxing purpose.

In addition, students can cook food for themselves with the aid of these advance innovations and hence, they
can feed on the healthy home-made food. A good illustration for this is the utilisation of microwave by the
bachelors who have to stay away from the family for study or work purpose. Usage of this microwave enables
them to cook food quickly since very few steps are involved in microwave cooking and thereby, they do not
need to depend on restaurants for food. As a consequence, health of these young people is maintained since
they will intake less amount of artificial food.

From the above examples, the benefits of easy methodologies for preparation of the culinary are difficult to
debunk. It is thus hoped that more development will take place in regards to cooking which will ease the life of
the masses in the foreseeable future.

(Submitted by Aqeela)

Model Answer 7:
Unlike earlier times, cooking as a process has become compact and facile today. Now the question is, has this
affected our lifestyle? Or is it unbiased? Gone are those days when mother used to spend hours in hot kitchen
to cook nutritious food for her family members. Fast food being the buzzword for today, all find little or no time
to cook for themselves and family. As a result, processed or easy to cook foods flood the market these days.
However, this has brought some dramatic changes to the quality of our lifestyles, though with a few health
concerns as discussed below.

In this era of globalization, where work and time dictates your day, seldom does one find time to cook a full
course lunch or dinner. Since both parents work urban world witness more and more children thriving on fast
foods like burger, sandwich etc. It is natural that parents are not getting enough time to cook more ethnic food
for them; instead they work more to earn more, thus improving their lifestyle. People find more time to spend
with family than before. An exemplification would be that of a busy office lady late from work, prepares easy
cook meal for dinner and prefers to spend time from kitchen with children. The improvement in the system
would be a stronger family bonding! Likewise, a student finds these easy foods a real boon during their hostel
days when both time and skill to cook are scanty.

Travelers are other category who admires easy to prepare meals, as cooking during a picnic or a business tour
would be cumbersome. This also facilitates more family picnics and outing together. A quick breakfast like an
egg sandwich would be the best buy for a viva student on that given exam day! So would be it for a working

mother on an office meeting day! So it is a matter of fact, that the new trend in food preparation has had an
impact on our lifestyle. It has helped us to improve our quality of life.

Now turning on the coin, does these fast foods or easy to cook meals pose a health threat? Many studies show
a steep climb in the number of cancerous patients in United States in recent years. One main factor considered
responsible for this is the frozen and fast foods. The burgers and sandwiches come with a hand full of issues
that can deprive you health wise. Majority of fast foods are prepared in oil with saturated fats that can cause
problems to your body systemic circulation. Consumed on a daily basis, it can lead you to cardiac problems
even.

To conclude I would say that though it comes with a few health concerns, easy to cook trend has definitely
improvised our quality of life. Now much depends on our conscientious to use fast foods only when it is an
absolute necessity- for example on a busy day at office!

Many people believe that women make better parents than

men and that is why they have the greater role in raising
children in most societies. Others claim that men are just as
good as women at parenting.
Write an essay expressing your point of view.
Give reasons for your answers and provide relevant example and experience you might have.
Model Answer 1: (Neutral Argument)
Parental responsibilities and roles are very important for the parents to make their children prepared for the
future. The way a father or mother treats a child affects greatly for his/her future growth both mentally and
physically. If parents fail to take great care of their children, then those children might go astray and will claim
their parents for their misfortune. Every mother and father loves his/her children more than anything in this
world and they expect them to be great persons and well established in future. Throughout the human history,
mothers mainly take care of the children and do most of the works for the children. On the contrary men are
mainly busy outside the home to earn the living for the whole family.

This is not to say that men are not of importance in children caring and they do not know their kids. They are
most necessary if children are to appreciate fully the roles of both sexes. But women have proven themselves
superior parents as a result of their condition, their less aggressive natures and their generally better
communication skills with kids. Men remains busy at their works and have to stay outside the home most of the
time, but women have lots of spare times to share with their children. From the time they are little girls, females
learn about nurturing. First with dolls and later perhaps with younger brothers and sisters; girls are given the

role of career. Girls see their mothers in the same roles and so it is natural that they identify this as a female
activity. Boys, in contrast, learn competitive roles far removed from what it means to nurture. While boys may
dream of adventures, girls' conditioning means they tend to see the future in terms of raising families. Girls also
appear to be less aggressive than boys. In adulthood, it is men, not women, who prove to be the aggressors in
crime and in war. Obviously, in raising children, a more patient, gentle manner is preferable than a more
aggressive one. Although there certainly exists gentlemen and aggressive women, by and large, females are
less likely to resort to violence in attempting to solve problems.

But if we consider that all women are good for their children and men can not raise a kid properly then perhaps
it would be a partial judgment. Is not there any family where mother has died or not present and it's the father
who takes care of kids as well as does jobs outside? Certainly there are lots. In third world countries, fathers
are comparatively more educated than the mothers and the take care of the kids ' education greatly. A kid
needs the affection and caring of both father and mother.

(Approximately 597 words)

(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers.)

Answers Submitted by IELTS Candidates

Sample Answer 2: (Women make better parents)

Mother and father both play a crucial role in the upbringing of children. Some people assert that women triumph
over men to make better parents. To irony this, other claim that men are as good as women. This is very
perplexing for anyone to choose one. According to me women make better parents.

In support of my point of view, mother is one of the first persons who gets attached with child from the birth.
Child spends most of the times, it`s childhood with mother. So child is more influenced by mother. Secondly,
mother is the only person who takes care of child like feeding, bathing etc. Thus, mother occupies most of the
child`s time. This make strong bond between them. When child become little older and starts to go school,
mother takes care of child`s study like homework, study, projects. By this, mother plays a crucial role in child`s
education. In addition, child learns moral values which are main ingredients to become good human from the
mother only.

In our society, usually we find that women spend most of the time at home and men are only breadwinners. In
this type of situation the person who can spend chunk of the time on child for its nourishment is women. Thus,
women can keep her eyes on every small activity of child. Apart from that, owing to closer relationship child

shares it`s emotions and problems with mother first. Thus, mother knows her child better than anyone.

On the flip side, to maintain the status of men, they argue that men are as good as women. In spite of spending
less time towards the child a man earn for his child. Father makes future of the child financially secure. As
financial security is an important as building child`s personality.

To put in a nutshell, both women and men are equally important. But in our society women are superior to men
in better parenting as they rear child very well.

(Approximately 328 words)

(This model answer was submitted to us by Dhruvita Bhatt )

Model Answer 3: (Both men and women have equal role)

In order to be a great human being in future, a child should be raised with great moral standards at home. The
topic whether women or men get a major role in raising the children is a huge debate nowadays. I think both of
the parents share equal credit in raising kids. Lets ponder on the advantages on both sides.

Primarily, women are often treated as great care takers and also the one for great future of the kids. Children
spend major chunk of their time with their moms. So, women get to teach kids on how to be a better person in
the society and also on how to be a great human being. She provides nutritious foods for the children which
helps them to be a healthy person. Children learn about how to take care of others form their moms because
mothers always take good care of their children. This instills a great sense of responsibility in the children.

Secondarily, men (father) are termed as their ideal person for children. Men always struggle so much in order
to win bread for the family. This struggle teaches kids to study better with a dream to help the family financially
in future. Fathers are often a source of inspiration for children on how to be a strong and better person in life.
This helps them to grow as better and responsible citizens in future.

After looking at advantages from both sides of the argument, I conclude that both men and women share equal
proportion in raising the children. Even if the proportion is not balanced, there will be huge impact on the
children. So both father and mothers hold a major role in the family.

(Approximately 285 words)

(This model answer was submitted to us by Abhi Keerthan )

Sample Answer 4: (Both men and women have equal role)

Parenting is an extremely important factor for the proper upbringing of a child. While some people are of the
opinion that women make better parents, others think that men can also be effective in parenting. I believe that
there cannot be conclusions drawn in a generic sense relating to the gender Men or Women. What matters
most is the one who has the qualities of being a good parent; this can be either a male or female.

Women by virtue of having more patience, tend to handle children better during their infancy, when patience is
an important factor. Ensuring a balanced and nutritious diet for a child is again done better by women. For
example, women are in a better position to understand what the child needs take in the Lunch box for school.
Further, studies have indicated that imbibing the morals, values and ethics into a child during their growing up
years is done better by mothers.

Men's contribution to a child's development is found to be more effective when it comes to imbibing discipline.
This becomes important as the child's time management becomes a key to his overall behavioral traits and
personality. For example, ensuring the child wakes up in time, spends the right amount of time on studies,
indoor and outdoor games can be better enforced by a father. Studies also indicate that children who get
addicted to one particular activity, for example, say computer games, tend to grow up as loners and whose
ability to interact socially becomes limited. Men tend to have better ability to control these activities in growing
children.

To conclude, it will be incorrect to draw a general inference that women make better parents than men. No two
individuals are the same and everyone possesses their unique strengths. If that strength coincides with the
quality required for effective parenting, they could make good parents regardless of whether they are men or
women.

(Approximately 320 words)

(This model answer was submitted to us by Rajesh )

Model Answer 5: (Women make better parents than men)

Raising children is definitely a very challenging task for the parents. Children need great care and support as
well as enough time to be devoted to them daily to educate them with good manners. In most of the societies,
this is the female role. In other societies however, it may be the father who has taken over this task or both
parents contribute equally.

In the majority of the societies since men do the outdoor tasks and are employed, the women spend most of
their time at home and part of their task is raising the children. Being available all the time is necessary for
parenting. A father who is working outside all day is probably not very suitable for this.

On top of this, women tend to be more affectionate and caring by nature than men. A parent needs to be kind,
passionate and patient especially during early childhood, periods of sickness and so on.

On the other hand, children feel more comfortable and close to their mothers. Often, children go to their mother
when there is any problem arising or for help. This is most probably because the very first person that an infant
sees is the mother. All the breast feeding and cuddling leads to development of affection and love between the
mother and the infant, and this is seen to persist all the way to adulthood. Hence, children prefer their mother to
be parenting them.

In conclusion, I believe that women make better parents than men, because of their inherent nature and the
love and affection they have for children.

(Approximately 264 words)

(This model answer was submitted to us by Narges Mahmoudi )

Sample Answer 6: (Both men and women have equal role)

Many people believe women make better parents than men since dawn of time. Throughout the history, women
have a great role in raising children in many societies and some other people claim men make good parents
than women. The issue whether or not women make better parents than men is always a debatable issue.
Strong arguments are there from both the sides and let us discuss in a detailed way.

Firstly, children are always attached to mother and fell free to reach out for anything. An instance illustrating this
in action is almost all of my friends are attached to my mother rather than father. It is obvious from this that
mother has a greater role in children brought up. In addition to this, Mother is a good role model for their
children and kids always try to follow them and by nature mother can become better parent than father. For
example, every children share their happiness or sorrow to the mother first. This makes clear women make
better parents than men.

There is some other sides of the coin. Currently, both men and women are working in all families and children
are attached equally. For example, kids of my friends are attached equally to both father and mother. This
clearly shows that men also make better parents. In addition to that, men started sharing the responsibility of
children and children also slowly reaching to father also. So it has proven than men also better parents than

women.

Thus it is recommended that men or women make good parents and take responsibility of children. It is better
to share the responsibilities as much as sharing love.

(Approximately 276 words)

(This model answer was submitted to us by jacob kumar)

Sample Answer 7: (Both men and women have equal role)

When it comes to parenthood, females always had a predominating role to their male counterparts. Some
opine that both rub their shoulders as parents. This has been a topic, wrangling over many years. In my
opinion, equality being the buzzword of the day, both parents play vital role in raising their child irrespective of
genders.

From the time of antiquity, both females and males where parted on their parenthood skills. The custom
showcased women sitting back at home looking after children, while men were responsible for earnings. The
people at that time believed that females were better in raising children than males. The male domineering
society applauded and encouraged such irrational thinking. But now, people are coming out of such yokes of
irrational thinking and henceforth a notable change in situation is being witnessed.

In the present day, where equality rules, there is less emphasis on gender differences on parenthood
responsibilities. Considering a mediocre family, where both parents work, both share all household duties, there
does not even arise a question of not sharing parenthood. An ideal exemplification would be my own case,
where my wife and myself share responsibilities when it comes to raising our daughter. We switch duties
according to our office schedules and no difference on gender exists ever. This would be the case of mass,
where nuclear family prevails, with no room for gender inequality.

To conclude, I would like to mention that parenthood is not weighed on ones gender rather it is measured on
one's dedication and care. So no matter what gender you belong to, you should be assiduous and provide the
best possible environment for your children to blossom. It becomes ideal, when both parents compete out of
caring in upbringing their child.

(Approximately 290 words)

( Written by - Vineeth V. )

Cricket has become more popular than the national sports in

the sub-continental countries.
What do you think are the reasons behind this?
Model Answer:
Cricket, traditionally an English sport, is becoming increasingly popular in other parts of the world like Australia,
South Africa, Indian Continents etc. But the popularity is evidently the highest among the countries of the IndoPak sub-continent, for reasons that are historical, anthropological, geographical, and even commercial. There
are more than 200 crore audiences of cricket only in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Srilanka and they are
certainly the highest part of cricket fans than another part of the world.
The game of Cricket came to South-Asia in the hands of the English colonists centuries ago and has seeped
into the hearts of the people here while the cricketers of here have won over the hearts of the English. This
inter-continental love-affair perhaps has made the south-Asians elope with the Bat and Ball from their national
and ethnical sports. Also, World Cup wins in the 80s and 90s, and phenomenal performers like Hanif
Mohammed of the 50s and Sachin Tendulkar of late, all have made Cricket more psychologically ethnical than
the native sports of this region. Mother Nature had her hand in it too. Cricket is compared with religion in
country like India. Even when the war-conflict hot the air of India and Pakistan, the stadium tied the friendship
these two countries.

Some opine that South-Asians are natural cricketers. It has indeed been proven that the sub-continent players
are more adaptive to the physiological demands of Cricket compared to how they get naturalized to other
international sports e.g. Football, Basketball etc. Also, the climatic conditions here are relatively more suitable
for playing cricket compared to the climates of many other parts of the globe. Not to forget, the virtually
uncountable population of this region that continually fuels the ever-sprouting 11-member teams needed to
stage only half of a Cricket game and supplies the hundreds of millions of spectators to cheer the players.
Altogether, it is like a match made in heaven, divine enough to surpass any hereditary bond.

Commerce plays its own amazingly profitable part too. Cricket enthusiasts of here have become the primary
consumer base of many global enterprises who mass-charm the sub-continent customers through
extravagantly sponsored tournaments. ICC, the governing body of world Cricket, also cajoles the people here
because of their financial utility and cossets them from their sporting heredity. The national sport of the Indian
sub-continent is only official and in practice they are not popular at all. The kids play cricket in the fields,
streets, rain harvesting fields and even in terrace of the building. The show a little interest in other national
sports and thus how the appeal of those games are reducing.

Regardless of where it came from, the most certain conclusion to be made here is that Cricket is to stay and
sustain in the nourishment of the South-Asian pandemonium and will indefinitely reign over the people here like
the God-sent hero who conquers not only the matter but also the nativity.

(Approximately 487 words)

N.B: You should be able to pick up different points from this essay and organize your answer in your own style.
(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers.)

Alternative answer:
Cricket, without any double, is the most popular game in sub-continent countries like India, Srilanka,
Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nepal and this popularity is so bulging that many nations in this part of the world know
better about cricket than they do about their national games. Strange it might seems, but it is a fact that less
than 10% people are interested in their national game while more than 90% people consider cricket as their
passion in those countries. There are several reasons for that and among them historical, anthropological,
colonial, political, commercial and geographical reasons are most substantial reasons for this.

Cricket was introduced to this sub-continent by the English and because of their colonies in this part of the
Asia, people politically got interested in this game. Like many other things that people adopted from the
English, cricket was no exception. Later this became a popular game because people easily accepted it as an
exciting sport and started participating in this game. Because of geographical reason, people started doing
better in this game and they found them to be good at a sport which is widely accepted.

More than 180 crore people inhabit in this part of the world and that made it a commercially hot spot for
spreading the game and ICC found it to be a great part for increasing the popularity of the game. Among the 10
test playing nations, 4 nations are from this sub-continent and it is natural that people would prefer a game that
they participate in world cup level.

Apart from the political, commercial and colonial reason, people of this part are naturally good at this sport and
the world has seen many great players who came from this part. The mass media also contributed to make this
game popular and there are several sports channels in this region that exclusively broadcast cricket all day
long.
It is inevitable that people would participate in sports that they are good at, enjoy and has international renown
and thats why the national and traditional games which is scarcely known to the rest of the world have lost
their popularity while the cricket has acclaimed its own rights to the people of this sub-continent area.

(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers.)

Answer 3:
There is a very famous adage in India, "If Cricket is religion, then Sachin is the god". That is a stature of a
cricketer in India. Admittedly, Cricket is more popular than the national sports in the subcontinent, be it India,
Pakistan or Sri Lanka. Almost entire subcontinent came to standstill in April 2011 during the India & Sri Lanka
World cup final match. High TRP's of TV channel during cricketing season are evident.

I think the main reason for the popularity of this sport is good performance of the team. All the subcontinent
teams are among the top playing teams and have won world cup at least once (except Bangladesh). Prior to
India winning 1983 world cup, Hockey was more famous as India's hockey team performed well and but after
winning the world cup, people started following cricket too and since then owning to good performance, cricket
became popular in India. People would hate to see their team losing all the time and would stop following the
game. Many Subcontinent players are among the best in the worlds and have several records in their kitty. For
Instance, when we go to foreign country and people asks, where are you from? When I say "India", their first
reaction is, "Oh! Thats where Sachin is from". That instantly makes me proud.

Another reason of popularity is, Cricketers get more media attention, and they get good endorsements and are
constantly in public eye. As compared to other sportsmen, Cricketer earns better and have high standard of
living. Everyone wants to become professional cricket player and get all the benefits that they receive. In earlier
days, if you are not part of international team, your career is finished; earlier opportunities were very less but
now with the IPL, many players are getting chances to play in front to larger audience and show their talent.
With the increase in opportunities, even parents are now encouraging their children to take cricket as their full
time career, this leads to better engagement of people towards the game.

In a nutshell, I think, people will love any sport, if it entertains them, make them feel proud.

[by - Preeti]

Sample Answer 4:
Cricket is a gentlemens game and it is originated in the United Kingdom. Although it is England's national
game but people here in India and from other subcontinent countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh
follow this sport from the core of their hearts. How valued is this sport in sub-continent when compared to the
national sport can be ascertained from a recent newspaper article where a contrasting comparison is being
done among the prize money received by man of the match of a cricket match and a hockey match. The

difference is humongous, Rs 5 Lac in case of cricket and a meager sum of Rs 20,000 for the national sport.

The popularity of cricket in sub-continent can be linked to team's performance in this sport, apart from this sport
sub-continent teams do not have any presence in world arena. For instance popular sports like football,
basketball, golf and even hockey which are our national sport but we haven't won a world cup ever since the
legendary Mr. Dhyan chand have left this sport. So fan tends to support their team only when the team is
performing well, where they can have their idols to imitate.

The second reason I can make out pertains to long time back when British ruled the sub-continent for around
200 years. At that point of time the sub-continent doesn't have its own identity. We have taken a lot of
inspiration from that era e.g. our legal system, infrastructure design and even the sport of cricket. Even in those
days British used to play cricket, it was then considered a sport of elite class and from there people from subcontinent develops a liking of this sport.

Even though after declaration of independence India adopted its own constitution, laws but influence of British
era is quite evidently visible. And the same is true for our national game as well, we declared hockey as our
national sports but citizen of our country still have inclination toward cricket more than any other sport.

[by - Bhupender ]

To solve the ever-increasing environmental hazards

throughout the world, the best way is to increase the price of
fuel.
What is your opinion on the above assumption?

You should write at least 250 words.

Model Answer 1: (Agreement)
Environmental or natural hazards are the result of physical processes that affect humans and environment
every day and harmful for both in short and long run. As the use of fuel increases to keep up with modern
demands and increased population, the world is becoming more vulnerable to environmental hazards and
disasters. Floods, earthquakes, severe thunderstorms, toxic or oil spills immediately come to mind when
comprehending this issue, implying that all these things are inherently hazardous.
One of the most effective solutions to these environmental hazards is to raise the price of fuel. The use of
petroleum and gasoline can release toxic chemicals into our atmosphere. These chemicals escape into the air
during refilling, from the gasoline tank and carburetor during normal operation, and from engine exhaust.

Transportation sources account for about 30-50% of all harmful emissions into the atmosphere. The
industrialization is another reason for the omission of harmful chemicals too.

Smog is another environmental hazard. It causes human respiratory stress, and damages many plants,
significantly reducing farm crop yields and the health of trees and other vegetation. Burning gasoline emits
significant quantities of a wide range of harmful gases into the atmosphere. For example, carbon monoxide is a
poisonous gas produced by incomplete combustion. Carbon dioxide, a normal product of burning fuel, is nontoxic, but contributes to the greenhouse effect, which is also known as global warming and it is probably the
most dangerous threat for the human existence.

Raising the price of fuel would mean that people would use less petroleum and gasoline. They would find other
alternative means of transport to save money, which would mean using less high-priced fuel for everyday
purposes. For example, cycling is a healthy activity and it saves the earth too. Also, for a long journey, people
could try to find friends together for car-pooling. Car-pooling saves a lot of fuel and would save a lot of money
too. But other things should be considered to reduce the use of these dangerous fuels. Government should
implement strict rules of using car, for instance no less than 4 persons should be allowed to drive a single car.
The price should be increased in a thoughtful way because if the price is so high it will hamper the average
people's life leading. There are so many people yet use public transportation for movement and the increased
price will make their life miserable. The prices of many necessary daily ingredients also increase with the price
of fuel.

Many environmental hazards like smog and global warming are increasing around the world due to the
excessive use of petroleum and gasoline in our daily lives. Raising the price of fuel could make all the
difference to the environment. It would force people to use petrol in a more responsible way and use it less,
and therefore be the most effective solution to the problem of ever-increasing environmental hazards though it
might have some side effects but those can be controlled by the proper initiatives by the Government.

(Approximately 501 words)

(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers.)

N.B: You should be able to pick up different points from this essay and organize your answer in your own style.

Model Answer 2: (Disagreement)

There are several reasons that are causing the environmental harms and this has become an urgent issue to
discuss and bring a solution about. The number of ever increasing cars is one of the reasons that leads to

affect the environment negatively and there are some assumptions that increasing the fuel price would solve
this problem. But the reality would be different, and increased fuel price will cause lots of other problems while
it would contribute very little to reduce the environmental pollutions and hazards. So this cant be the best
solution in any way.

First of all, the maximum numbers of cars are owned by the rich people and fuel price would not restrain them
from using the cars. The price of fuel in fact increased significantly over the past 12 years and that has done
nothing to reduce the car usages. On the contrary the number of cars running in the roads has increased more
than expected. Besides, the fuel price determines the market prices of other daily necessary products and
increasing the price would only bring misery to the low and medium earning class population. Electronic
wastages, industries, household electrical devices, deforestation, chemical wastages, unthoughtful activity of
people are causing more damage to the mother earth than the gas omission by the cars. We should focus on
those aspects as well before increasing the price of fuel just based on an assumption.

The main idea of increasing the fuel price is to reduce the number of cars running in the street and to restrain
the car owners from using the cars less. But that would prove to be a ridiculous solution specially when car
owners are mostly high earning class and they would not bother about the fuel price.

The best solution to address this utmost concerning issue is to introduce an environment friendly energy source
like solar energy system, to improve the public transportation system & train system so that people mostly use
these systems instead of always using their own cars, increasing the awareness of the people so that they do
not directly contribute to harm the environment, and making strict rules so that deforestation, chemical
wastages and other harmful ways of environmental pollutions get reduced.

(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers.)

Model Answer 3: (Disagreement)

Increasing the price of oil is one of the main strategies elaborated in order to act against the worsening of
habitat condition. Nonetheless, such a solution could be not enough to stop the phenomenon.

The idea of raising prices of environmentally risky goods is not a recent hypothesis. It is a namen (named)
Pigovian tax, and it aims to reduce the use of such goods. It really affects consumption, balancing the
advantage of using a certain product with the disadvantage of a growing cost to obtain it. Consequently,
consumers tent to move toward less expensive goods. This tendency is advantageous because the State
doesn't need to deal with enterprises: the loss of clients means a consequent interest in enterprises toward

green energy. Market works as a stabilyzer, more than an element damaging the environment. Therefore, this
policy can be advantageous.

On the other hand, disadvantages are more influential than positive effects. Firstly, the effectiveness of the
Pigovian tax lies on the ability of actors in finding a good to be used as a substitute. What if a country invested
many resources in road transport? What if a State can rely on massive oil reserves? In short, such a choice
must consider both the existence of alternative sources and the historical industrial evolution of the country.
Moreover, the importance of such an asset as the one of energy makes the use of incentives and changing in
prices an unreliable and dangerous tool. It could create too many damages for an excessively unpredictable
policy.

All this considered, many doubts remain about the hypothesis of using prices as a lever to modify the way how
people behave when dealing with energy and petrol. Some positive consequences are certainly undeniable, but
risks are still higher than expected benefits. Consequently, betting on alternative solution would be desirable.

Answer Submitted by IELTS Students (Francesco Finucci)

Model Answer 4: (Disagreement)

It is an irrefutable fact that to diagnose the ways for saving the environment is one the serious matters among
the countries. Many nations are finding the solutions to this ugly growth. As it has been heard that to increase
the price of fuel can be proved effective solution. However, I do not endorse this observation.

While spotlighting to the above aspect, I can explicitly say that this prediction can have adverse impact on
society. Being price of fuel at the peak, the fairs get heavily increased. With that the peoples' life would
probably get more miserable. This practice will contribute to worsen the situation of poor people. For
verification, it is illustrated that there are millions of people in the world, who go to their work by public
transportation. It has been proved both in developing and developed countries, whenever the price of oil
increases; the fairs of public transportation do not take enough time to reach at climax.

Furthermore, there is no full proof surety that after raising the price of fuel, the car owners would abandon
driving their vehicles. The dramatic increase in the folks' income has witnessed that the societies are richer
than past. If they can afford to buy a car then expenditures of oils are not beyond their approach. For instance,
in both developing and developed countries, the total number of car holder has increased markedly.

Fuel is not used to run cars only. It is also used to run industries and machines. So increasing prices of it would

hurt the industrial productions as well. By increasing fuel price Government would be in a great dilemma and
would not be able to control the price of the daily commodity. The increased price of the fuel would only make
problem to the poor people while rich people who mostly own cars would find a way to buy it. The main concern
is the pollution prevention not the fuel price. There are other ways of doing so rather than increasing the fuel
price. Increasing fuel price would create some international crisis and nations who produce fuel would get
benefits from that while the poor nations would struggle.

All things are considered, the obvious conclusion to be drawn is that increment in costing of fuel is not an
exceptional measure to reduce the environment hazards rather it is a reactionary work. There are many other
solutions that can be applied. Like government should prompt eco-friendly vehicles and public transport by
hand-overing them with extraordinary facilities. It should also make the people aware of menace of pollutions.

(Submitted by Jaspartap Singh)

Model Answer 5: (Disagreement)

The requirement and consumption of fuel have increased manifolds to meet the demands of world population
for industrial growth, power needs and transportation purposes etc. The demand for fuel is only going to
increase in the coming years as projected and forecasted by the energy experts. Many governments are taking
various measures to curb the demand of this commodity due to heavy cost involved in import etc.

While some people believe that increasing the cost of the fuel would save the environment from more
damages, others opine that that would only create more misery to the poor people.

Besides the financial constraints for many governments a general but very important issue that needs to be
addressed on war footing basis is the environmental hazards associated with massive use of this commodity
that are not only harmful to the mother earth but also pose great dangers to the human health. This dangers
include toxic affluent dumped into sea which can destroy sea-life, pollutants released in air causing air pollution
which can effect agriculture, ozone layer etc. Human beings can suffer problems from breathing to some life
threatening diseases as cancer etc.

So what option do we have? Perhaps one of the options but not the best one is to increase the cost of fuel
which will have its own negative effects in the countries where poverty level and inflation is already high and
the public miseries will increase. A better option might be to conserve the consumption of fuel by promoting
energy conservation and creating a national policy suggesting various measures.

I would like to end my subject on the note that each country has to prepare a line of action by keeping the
interest of its people and economy in mind.

Compare the advantages and disadvantages of three of the

following as media for communicating information. State
which three you consider the most effective.

Comic
Books
Radio
Television
Film
Theater

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or
experience.

You should write at least 250 words.

Model Answer 1:
In our daily life, we communicate information through lots of different media like: internet, television, radio,
books, cell phone, film etc. We are living in such a time when information is one of the most important issues
and the information technologies as well as the communication media greatly influence our lives. The rapidgrowing websites and TV channels are many of few little examples how media are spreading to make
information easily accessible. All the media for information interchange have advantages and disadvantages
and not all can attract all types of audiences. Comics, books, radios, televisions, film and theater are all very
powerful media for communicating information. In my opinion books, televisions and film among those
aforementioned six media are most effective.

Books are the witness of history and the main source from which we gain knowledge. From very ancient period
till now books are working as the light-house for our society. In our early age, we gather most of our knowledge,
skills from books. It opens new horizons in front of us. The writer writes down their experiences, imaginations,
knowledge, explanation etc. about each and every issue of our lives. Books are the long lasting protocol to
make a bridge among writers and readers.

However, all are not happy to read books. They expect something easier and more vivid. Music, radios, films
etc. are more appealing to them. Television is another powerful media. Watching television is a part of our daily
lives. Most of the people who have a TV set, watch programs, news etc. with apt attention. It is a strong
medium for Government and other organizations to send their messages to the mass population. Program

representatives also broad cast the people's view and opinions about different controversial issues in TV
programs. However, this medium has lots of demerits and bad impacts. Government and politically biased
organizations often send negative and misleading news. Again young people watch different satellite channels
and try to adopt the alien culture which is really harmful for the culture and tradition of a country.

Films are audio-visual representation and can catch the attention of people from different geographical
locations, races and cultures. A good film can shape someone's morality and doctrine and the film-makers with
their huge amount of money, are so careful to make their films realistic and eye-absorbing. Every film has a
direct or potential message or moral. On the contrary, some films also bring a wrong message to us. For
example, protagonists are always smoking in the films and it seems that smoking is a good and smart habit. It
causes many younger people imitate them smoking.

In conclusion, I would like to some up that books, televisions and films are the most powerful and effective
medias for communicating information.

(Approximately 459 words)

(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers.)

Model Answer 2:
Communication media plays a vital role in todays world. It enables us to stay informed of the happenings in the
entire world, provides access to real time information, and entertains us. There are different kinds of media in
use today, namely comics, books, radio, television, film, theatre etc. Of these the most effective are television,
radio and books.

Television, or TV for short, is an electronic device that enables us to see and listen at the same time to an act
that has been recorded. These can be replayed any number of times. News on a TV enables us to view the
current events occurring in different parts of the world. Video of an event can be telecasted live as it happens
through remote satellite links. A TV can also be a source of education and entertainment. Educational
channels, such as Discovery channel, telecast several interesting programs on topics such as wildlife or solar
system. Other channels, such as Star movies, telecast movies throughout the day.

A radio is an electronic device that uses microwave communication to send and receive information. Unlike a
TV, a radio cannot display an image or a video, and the communication is limited to voice only. Typically, a
radio is used for access information such as news and live traffic updates. The information is conveyed on fixed

bands of microwave frequency called channels. A user can set the frequency of the radio to access a particular
channel.

Books are the one of the oldest kind of communication medium. A book typically consists of several page made
from wood pulp bound together. A book is typically identified by a title and an author, and optionally an ISBN
number which identifies a book uniquely. A book usually contains a material on a given topic, divided by subtopics in form of chapters. Books are often classified by genre, which is a theme in which the topic can be
classified. Examples of genres include fiction, non-fiction, science fiction, mystery etc.

Of all the communication media available today, television, radio and books are the most important and
effective ones. These are also the most commonly used media in the world today, and are responsible for
binding the world together.

(Answer by Pankaj Kohli)

Some people think that cities are the best places to live.
Others prefer to live in a rural area. Compare the advantages
and disadvantages of living in the city to living in the country
side.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
Model Answer 1:
The places where people live affects greatly in their lifestyles and living places is one of the very basic needs
for people. People opine differently while choosing the living places. Some prefer and argue that city is the best
place to live at since it provides so many advantages over the rural area, but other think that villages are the
best places to live a good life. Both places have advantages and disadvantages.
It is true that a city offers so many opportunities and advantages those are absent in a country side. For
instance, the modern transportation and communication systems are better in any city compared to a village. In
a city people have access to many different transportation systems and have latest technologies to
communicate; like cellular phones, internet, fax etc. Moreover when a new technology arrives at the country it
is first introduced in the city area and usually 2/3 years later to the village. Secondly, cities provide better
security to it's inhabitants like the mobile police patrols, special forces, community polices, security guards,
traffic-polices etc. But in the village the number of security force persons are too low compared to the over all
population. Moreover, cities provide better treatment, hospitals, qualified doctors, better educational institutes,
and amusement parks etc which are really inevitable to lead a better life. In many cases those facilities are
absent or rare in a village. In my opinion the reason for why most people trend to live in a city is the vast

opportunities of jobs. Most of the corporate offices, industries, factories, government offices, garments and
manufacturing industries are either situated in a city or close to the city. People have much more employment
opportunities in a city than a village. On the contrary, people living in a village, are often forced to do a job that
is not suitable at all for him since the job opportunity is so narrow there. Again, schools or colleges are not
equipped with better environment, labs, teachers and that's why students in a village might not get better
education he/she deserves. If we consider the entertainment facilities in a city then citizens of a city has so
many options like theater, park, art gallery, museum, amusement parks, libraries etc. But people in the villages
have only TV or books and very little facilities to spend leisure time.

On the other hand, Villages offer many invaluable advantages those are completely absent in the cities. First of
all, someone living in a village can get fresh air and water. There is no intense pollution with smoke, Carbon-DIoxide, Carbon-mono-oxide, Nitrous-Oxide and people living in a village are less prone to suffer diseases like
asthma, bronchitis etc. City can provide security against visible foes but it causes people to face some invisible
and dangerous enemies like toxic and polluted air, water and environment. Secondly, people of villages live
much nearer to the nature and breathe in the fresh air, as well as eat fresh foods, vegetables, fruits collected
directly from the garden. On the contrary vegetables, foods, fruits in the cities are normally stored and mixed
with preservatives and can cause serious harms to the health. The living cost in a country side is much lesser
than that of a city. The density of population in a village is much less than a city and village people are
naturally grow up their personal relationship among all people and live like a real community and take care of
each other. While in the city people do not know even who live in the next door and personal relationship in
community is rare.

In my case, I prefer to live in the city. I feel relaxed and comfortable staying at my own city. There are lots of
facilities I can't deny are presented in my city and those are the invaluable part of my lifestyle. Moreover I like to
lead a busy and challenging life and want to be connected with the world. I enjoy visiting country side but get
bored there if I stay more than 2/3 days because all of my necessary stuffs to lead my as usual life are absent
there.

(Approximately 694 words)

(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers.)

Model Answer 2:
Whether cities are better than rural area or visa-versa is a contentious question, it depends on one's choice, as
to, what they prefer. Both cities and rural areas have their pros and cons. Rural area have quaint environment
whereas there is always something fascinating about big cities.

Cities generally have better infrastructure, education system and advance health care facilities. You get to meet
people from all walks of life, learn to coexist with people from different ethnicity, race, caste and culture; hence
you become more tolerant, open minded and start respecting each other differences. Whereas, country side
people are less tolerant, caste system still prevails and the powers lies with certain group of people. If you see,
today in India, Love marriages /inter caste marriages are very common in cities, whereas people are being
murdered in the name of honour in rural areas. Gender inequality is very evident in rural area, where women
are being restricted only to household chores, and do not have much say in decision making, but in cities both
are treated equally. It is not uncommon to see people migrating to cities for better jobs, better education.

People in the cities are always under tremendous pressure and stress, they always have to be up to date with
technologies and hence there is no time to relax. Recently studies have shown surge in number of cases of
heart attacks, which is due to increase in stress level. People in cities are constantly exposed to high level of
pollution, adulterated food and chemically grown vegetables, which adversely affects their health, owing to
which the average life of people living is cities is less than people living in rural area. Increased cases of
obesity, suicides, diabetes is also resulting of stress and unhealthy living. Rural areas on other hand have no or
very less pollution, pure food item and less stress, people have more time for themselves and their families.

To sum up, I think both cities and rural areas have their own charm. Cities have more busy and hectic life but
have better facilities, rural area on the contrary have more relaxed, laid back lifestyle but lacks in up to date
technologies like computers and international standard of healthcare and education system.
(Approximately 374 words)
[ by - Preeti]

Model Answer 3:
Many people consider living in cities and they think that this is more advantageous while other group prefer live
in countryside as they find it as a better alternative. Living in a city and in an urban area both has their
advantages and disadvantages.
First of all, living in a city is very stressful as the life is very busy and competitive there. Cities have lot more
vehicles, industries and a large population and that pollutes the environment which is very harmful for the
health. It is particularly tough for low earning people as the expenses in living in a city is always higher. People
suffer from many health problems that live in city and especially they suffer a lot in the old ages. Recently I
have read a book and this book reveals some surprising facts about living in a city. I was pretty surprised to find
that ''people who live in country sides have more life expectancy than live in an urban area.''

On the other hand, city life offers numerous facilities and opportunities compared to the living in urban area. For
instance, job opportunity and to run small businesses have better prospects in a city than in countryside.
People can easily find a new job in case s/he loses a job and there are many other earning prospects in a city
that could not be found in a village. For economically solvent people, city offers many social and entertainment
facilities like Cineplex, sports event in stadiums, amusement parks, museum etc. Opposite to this, rural areas
do not offer many opportunities for social life and lacks the entertainment facilities. Also, people cant purchase
everything they need from a village market and markets are very rare in most of the urban areas. Regarding
this, I would like to mention my own experience that I had few days back. I went to a rural area called Tillo and I
had my cell phone damaged there. I could not find any phone servicing center there and I had to o to the city to
have it repaired.

In conclusion, both the cities and rural areas have their advantages and disadvantages.

(Approximately 358 words)

Model Answer 4:
Our earth is home to around six billion people living all around the globe, many of them are urbanites and other
ruralites. One line of thought of society states that its beneficial to live in urban areas, however others stand
opposite to it. But this thought is gyrated by many reasons.
The urban society provides great means of basic amenities necessary for living life. We can find lot schools
and other education institutions in cities where the tiny tots make their future and turn into better future civilians.
On the contrary side the students from villages come to the cities to have education. Health facilities are also
found in abundance in urban areas. People from rural area whenever have any serious health issues rush to
the urban areas to avail these facilities. Apart from this the vast amount of transports facilities have made life
immensely easy to live in urban areas. On the flipside the villagers have great difficulty in transport as proper
means are not present and if present the roads are not proper to run them as they are never properly sanitized.
The facilities of shopping malls and supermarkets have helped to gain access to necessary items under one
roof easily decreasing our time utility.

However, if take a glance at rural society, we will be able to find lush green fields, fresh air and pure
environment which is highly polluted in the cities. The villagers have healthy lifestyle which is very scant in
urban areas. People of rural areas are more socialized where as that of urban areas are mammon worshippers,
always running to make both ends meet. Parents of urban society have very less time due to which they are
slowly drifted in oblivion, whereas the children of rural society share a great bond with their parents. Crime rate
is far less in rural parts as compared to urban where crime is found in every nook and corner of the society.

At last keeping in mind all the above said points we can conclude that living in any part has both benefits and
drawbacks however, its totally subjective choice that which society cater our needs better.

(Approximately 360 words)

[ by - Amarveer]

Model Answer 5:
In modern society some people like to live in city area and few enjoy an open countryside to live. There are
some blessings and drawbacks in both sites. Many people of todays society are of the opinion that living in
cities is better than living in rural area while others oppose this concept but my inclination is toward the formers.

On one hand it is believed that city life has significantly various advantages in contrast to rural life. The most
vital point for the demand which can initially be mentioned is that all services are easily reachable in city area.
Such as most of the major educational institute, hospital, bank all are generally situated in city area. So city
dwellers can get these services within sort period rather than who lives in villages. For example we used to stay
in villages but when we were in grade six our parents sent us to town for better education. Whats more city
people can enjoy their life with different amusing activities called as theater, cultural activities and visit nice
restaurant. But in village there is no such place where villagers can animate their free time so life is so boring. A
further point is that there are a lot of working opportunities in commercial area. To clarify this matter people can
find any suitable job in factory, hotel, restaurant, shopping mall and run their livelihood, besides also enhance
the economic growth of any countries.

On the other hand there are some negative sides to live in town and have some positive points to live in
country side. What can be cited first regarding this is city life are more stressful due to its busy atmosphere and
noisy heavy traffics while country side is peaceful place to live because of its quiet and calm environment,
villagers can breathe in open air and enjoy the tranquility of the environment.

In a nutshell taking all the aforementioned pros and cons into account I personally admire to live in town.

(Approximately 334 words)

[ by - Monowara]

Model Answer 6:
Peoples have different opinions while choosing their living place. Some people think that villages are better

place to live, while other think cities are preferred candidate to choose for living. In my opinion that there are
several reasons to believe that city are best place to live, because they provides comfortable life.
First of all city provides better education and career prospects .The renowned and excellent schools are built in
the cities because most of the population live in cities. These schools employ the qualified teachers to provide
education to the children. A child who gets education in a city is considered the better one because of his broad
range of experience and deep knowledge. The government and private businessman build universities and
colleges in the city to improve the learning and skills in students. Various laboratories use the advanced
appliances instruments that aid the students in higher education especially in research and this facility is mostly
available in city area. I have learned to operate IR spectrophotometers from Punjab University which is situated
in Chandigarh City and cities are mostly the hub of education.

Moreover, city provides better prospects of life. The shops, malls are built in city to attract customers from large
area. The important home appliances like fan, refrigerator, car etc. are available in cities at reasonable cost.
Government offices are built in cities. Living in cities can help avoiding the dwellers to travel from village to city
to do important official works. City also provides sources of entertainment. Many festivals, carnivals are
organized in the cities. Even peoples from the rural area come to city to watch their favorite movies in Cinema
Hall and Theatres. Sports stadium, training centers are located in cities. City life offers too many facilities that
are absent in rural lives.

The most important thing is that, the city provides better medical services. Best hospitals, medical centers are
built in big towns so that majority of people can have medical facilities. In these centers expert doctors,
specialist like neurosurgeons, heart surgeon works to treat peoples. These medical centers not only use
advance machines & instruments but also offer operation theaters for different types of operations for critical
diseases. Cities are safe on health ground, and have well planned sanitation to avoid spreading epidemic.
Cities have lifesaving medical centers.

In summation, it is clear that city is the better place to live. The city not only provides good education and civil
life but also provides best medical facilities.

By punishing murderers with the death penalty, society is

also guilt of committing murder. Therefore, life in prison is a
better punishment for murderers.
[b

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

y - Tersem]

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or
experience.
Model Answer 1: (Mixed opinion)
The issue whether the murderers should be punished with death penalty or not is a controversial one. Many
people support the death penalty as a capital punishment and think that this is a vital way to establish peace
and law in the world but there are lots of opinions against it. I support the death penalty for murderers if it's
really necessary for prevailing peace but if there is any alternative way to give the criminals a chance to
remorse and lead a civilized life again, and then they should be given it.
In today's society, life is very violent and if we read the newspapers and watch news, we find lots of murder
crimes almost daily. There are many mentally-ill people committing crimes and almost nothing will stop them.
These types of psychopathic murders commit murders even sometimes for personal pleasure. We have
interviewed captured criminals who say, "I was going to kill him, but I knew that I could get the death penalty if I
did. So I just left him there." Obviously, having the death penalty saves lives and that makes a positive
difference to society. Death penalty is also useful to send the message to rest of the people that no matter who
you are, if you commit a murder you are going to be hang till death or going to sit in an electric chair. This fear
is helpful to reduce the homicide in many counties. If a criminal murder s someone, and then gets the death
penalty, that isn't society's fault. Everyone knows about the death penalty as a punishment for murder. So, the
person who murders is really killing himself at the same time he is killing his victim. The murderer has made the
choice to die. It is important to remember that the death penalty is used only for people who have committed
very serious crimes. For example, a woman shot a police officer when she was trying to escape from jail. She
was already a convicted criminal when she committed murder, and she deserves the death penalty.

In many countries, crimes become so severe that the law enforcers can't control the situation and capital
punishment becomes a part of the law practice but there are many cases where a man/woman kills another
one to protect him or herself. It's not uncommon when a girl kills a rapist to save her dignity and before
pronouncing the death penalty the reason must be considered. Even if a single innocent person gets the death
penalty that will make the judicial system questionable.

People need to accept responsibility for their actions. Punishing murderers with the death penalty is one way
that society can help people to realize the consequences of their decisions.

Approximately 457 words)

(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers. You should be able to pick up the main points from this essay and
organize in your own style)

Model Answer 2: (Agreement)

Punishment is the weapon which society uses to limit and reduce murders actions. Punishment type and
toughness is different according to type of crime or action. The most serious crime, which is killing a person
with previous planning, leads the murderer to death penalty after making sure that he/she is the killer through
clear proofs. This essay tackles and discuss two contrast opinions. First party believes that death penalty is
essential and fair enough for killers. Whereas others see that it is fighting badness by badness and that does
not generate good and balanced society.
First group of people who are pro penalty death, have their own logical reasons for their opinion. They say that
nothing is equal to life but life itself. So any other form of punishment will not be sufficient or fair. Body is like
unique private property and if somebody causes damage to it or destroys it, he/she must have the same
damage or lose it totally. In addition to that making penalty extremely harsh is considered as effective alarm or
red light to who may think about committing crimes. Therefore the main aim of penalty will be achieved by
reducing crime rates especially killing crimes which have bad-results without sufficient compensate.

On the other hand, there are many people who believe that death penalty is not the best punishment they say
that death of criminal or murder will not make the victim return to life. So it is not perfect compensate for
victims relatives. Although it seems that by killing murder the balance of society will be return, some experts
believe that it will raise violence in the society. As a result, they recommend that life in prison sentence is better.
That penalty makes killer think always about his crime. It is also lifelong mental punishment when he/she finds
other prisons finish their sentences while he/she stash for the rest of his/her life.

Finally, I agree with the first party because of the same reason which I have mentioned previously. Also that
opinion fits my religious belief as Muslim.

(Approximately 348 words)

[ by - Mahmoud ]

Model Answer 3: (Agreement)

In the recent years, there has been a vast increase on the number of people committing manslaughter. It is a
widespread belief that people who commit murders should only be punished by death penalty. However, some
people are of the opinion that death penalty should be eradicated and life in prison should assume its place.

Apropos of the statement, I am in part accordance with it.

It is inarguable that when someone commits an act of manslaughter, the said person must be punished at all
costs. However, I believe death penalty is not a permanent solution because by condemning murderers to
death, society is also taking part in murders. Despite the well-known saying that goes "an eye for an eye",
punishing murder with another murder still remains by no means justifiable.

On the flip side, I also believe that prison does not serve as an appropriate solution as it is too lenient a
punishment for murderers. Furthermore, when murderers are put in the same cells, studies show that it gives
rise to more crimes, as they are likely to plot another murder together. Also taking into account that in this
developing country, society is most certainly not going to employ people with the background of having been
locked in a prison, people who commit murders will most likely commit other crimes owing to the unpalatable
fact that they need money to survive in this world.

As such, I believe a more appropriate solution will be for government to utilize prison as a means of learning
and honing skills which could be useful for life after prison. It goes without saying that murderers should without
a doubt take responsibility for their crimes, and I believe that can be done by giving them some sort of voluntary
works as a lifetime punishment.

To sum up, punishing murders with death penalty is unjustifiable and life in prison might not serve as a
permanent solution. Instead, government should make prison a place to repent and a means of learning new
skills for murderers that could be useful for life after prison.
(Approximately 347 words)

[ by - Jaclyn ]

Model Answer 4: (Agreement)

In today's modern world, we are constantly bombarded with the issue of death penalty which leads the public
to assert that it should be replaced with life-long sentence in prison as they believed that society as a whole is
committing murder by punishing murderers with death penalty. Personally, I strongly agree with this statement.
There are several points to support this statement. To begin, life in prison plays the same role as death penalty
by giving the would-be offenders a deterrent. The main purpose of punishment is to warn others about the
possible negative impacts of committing murder, thus, life in prison is proven to be useful and effective in
deterring the would-be murderers from committing murder. Besides, life-long sentence in prison will not break
their relatives' or friends' hearts. It is because they are still able to visit the murderers in jail. In addition, the

murderers in jail can be rehabilitated and realise what they had done previously are unacceptable which may
eventually cause them to change their attitudes and behaviours.

Moreover, the main reason of punishing murders with the realty penalty is to prevent them from re-offend which
can also be avoided by life in prison. The society will be peaceful and people can live in serenity as long as the
murderers are sentenced into the jail all their lifetime. By doing so, they have no opportunity to re-offend and,
thus, will not cause any harmful effects to the citizens. Furthermore, death penalty is considered to be a cruel
and cold-blooded act as every human being may make mistakes sometimes and so they should be punished
using other ways like life in prison.

In conclusion, I am strongly agree with the statement that life in prison is a better punishment for murderers as
it will achieve the same result as death penalty. I believe the murder rate will definitely be lowered with this
punishment in our nation in the near future and our country will continue to prosper and flourish in the decades
to come.

(Approximately 337 words)

[ by - Lee Wing Qeen ]

Some people say that computers have made life easier and
more convenient. Other people say that computers have
made life more complex and stressful.
What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
You should write at least 250 words.
Model Answer 1:
Some people say that the invention of computers is one of the greatest humankind's inventions. However, other
people think that computers make their life more stressful. I agree with those people who think that computers
brought many benefits and play a very important role in our modern life.

First of all, every company nowadays uses a computer to store its data and make different kinds of operations.
It is very difficult to imagine life without computers. A company would have to store millions of papers and
documents. Moreover, a customer would have to wait hours to check his balance or get a piece of information
about his transactions at his bank, while an employee was looking trough those papers. Another important
aspect of this is that people are able to type all their information, make corrections, print or send documents
using computers. It makes life much easier. One can spend the rest of the time watching TV with his family or
working on something new.

We use computers every day sometimes even not knowing it. When we go to a store and use our credit cards
many computers process our information and perform transactions. When we need to get some cash we use
money access machines that are computerized too.

Second of all, computers provided a great means of communication - the Internet. I think it is the easiest and
cheapest way to get in touch with relatives, friends, business colleagues, etc. Nowadays the world becomes
smaller and smaller. When I was a little girl, I could not imagine that it would be possible to communicate with
people from all around the world in so easy way. A person can get latest news, become friends with someone
from another country, find his old friends, ask for a piece of advice, etc.

Finally, in addition to these practical benefits people can shop without leaving their house. They just use an
Internet access, a computer and their cards to make a payment. It is kind of difficult to imagine that a few years
ago people had to spend their time in lines buying tickets. Now, a person can choose a destination, company,
date and time and get tickets delivered to his door. I think it is amazing.

To sum up, I believe that computers made our lives easier. They change our attitude towards life. I think with
the invention of computers people became closer and friendlier.
(Approximately 404 words)

(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers.You should be able to pick up the main points from this essay and
organize in your own style)

Model Answer 2:
At present computer is one of the most essential parts of our daily life. Many people of today's society are of
the opinion that computer is the blessings of modern science which makes our life more comfortable and handy
while others oppose this concept but my inclination is toward the formers.

On one hand it is argued that due to more dependence on computer now life is more tensed and complicated.
The most vital point for the demand which can initially be mentioned is that excessive technology based recent
life. For example modern school education systems are mainly computer based so student has no opportunity
to learn mathematical skill even small subtraction and addition they cannot count without computer. Besides
Children are too much addicted to computer games rather than other outdoor activities and finally our future
generation are becoming more machine dependent and physically disable and it results seems like in near
future horror science fiction will be true. A further point is that computer hard disk crash and virus is like a

natural disaster and makes our life literally impossible.

On the other hand there are quite plausible reasons how computer is becoming the part and parcel of our
everyday life. What can be cited first regarding this is due to communication and information technology now
World is in our hand. Anyone can reach any corner of world within in a second. There are so many way to
communicate with each other such as email, online chatting, voice mail, video chat etc. To clarify this matter
from home any one takes part in job interview, conference or any online class. He/she does not need to go their
physically but in digital world it is possible. What's more online marketing, banking etc. make our life more
convenient so we can enjoy strong personal relationship. Last but not least any business and official work can
be accomplishes efficiently because of electronic data management for instance electronic file is easily stored
and maintained rather than paper document.

In a nutshell taking all the aforementioned pros and cons into account I personally opine that computer is the
most wonderful gift of our life.
(Approximately 360 words)

[by - Monowara]

Model Answer 3:
With the advent of technology and computers, our lives have totally changed. Today, we see computers being
used in every sphere of life; be it, at offices to store massive data; be it, at colleges to help researches or by
housewives to learn new recipes. Though admittedly, use of computers can also be done in negative ways, but
I think there are more pros than cons, and computers have certainly made lives easier of everyone.

With computers, access to information has become very easy. It is immensely helping financial institutions,
police department and big businesses to store and use data for constructive purposes. In earlier days, all the
business transactional data was in form of files and managing these files and searching for information was a
cumbersome task. Computers have also helped students in great way. Now, instead of going to teachers, they
can browse for information online. They can find multiple research papers and discussion forum online. For
instance, when I was studying for MBA, I finished my secondary research on internet and read about 100
online books to complete my thesis. I could study at my own pace and in comfortable home environment.

Another area where computers have helped us is in communication field. It enables us to keep in touch with
our loved once by means of internet chats, video calls like skype, VOIP, social networking sites and various
applications. Though, I agree, we can contact each other by phone also, but phone calls are quiet expensive
especially international calls, but now we can contact out family and friends; and often see them without

spending extra penny. Emails have revolutionized the business communication world and aptly made them
formal mode of communication and documentation.

But, in my views, the most significant use of computers have been applied in field of scientific researches like
building satellites, thermal power plants and in defence operation. We can now predict weather and natural
calamities and hence take precautionary steps to save human lives. Computers have successfully forecasted
cyclones like Katrina, Praline, Tsunami etc. and timely evacuation were made to save thousands of human
lives. Similarly, computers also play vital roles in the military operations; where most of the weapons are
controlled by computers and hence helps in safe guarding the country.

In a nutshell, computers have become crucial part of our lives. It is rightly said that the world is constantly
shrinking and everyone is getting close to each other by use of computers.
(Approximately 412 words)

[by - Preeti]

Model Answer 4:
"The advent of computers has defined a new age in technology and revolution." As rightly said, things have
changed from past and will certainly change in future. One of the biggest credits goes to computers. This
simple looking box has unlimited capabilities which are yet to be unfolded and used for. From entertainment to
work, computer covers every prospect of human life.

Today an average child would want a computer at any cost. From a child to an old man, each has his/her own
need to have a computer. Since the advent of these machines, innovation and remodeling has led to reduction
in its size from occupation of a large hall by a single machine to a machine that stands on a small table or fits in
a bag and during all these changes, the processing and speed has never failed to improve. With computers
around life has been easier than ever. For an example, numerous calculations can be done in a click; we can
socialize with people all over the world, share the latest news, and develop projects ranging from art to complex
engineering. From monitoring, diagnosing to operations, health uses help of the computers. We depend on
computers for passing idle time. A person born in this age might not be able to survive without a computer.

But even with these advantages and benefits, computers also bring some disadvantages. As all works have
started to be saved in soft copy in computers, securing those data has become more difficult. Leakage of
confidential information is always at stake. Even through a normal man's eyes, at home misuse of computers
and information it holds can cause just but waste of time. Time numerous social sites and applications deviate
a human from his daily tasks into the virtual world. Games pull young children into pressing buttons of their

controllers and spending hours a day at home instead of enjoying physical games outside.

Therefore, it has its pros and cons; all that counts is how we use it.

(Approximately 335 words)

[by - Mishra]

Model Answer 5:
Over the last 50 years, to use of computer technology has been increasing in modern society. Almost
everything is done with a help of a computer. It became a common part of everyday life. Some people think that
the computers have made our life more comfortable, but others have a negative attitude. In my opinion, there
are many benefits of using computers. This argument will be proven by looking at how the computer
contributes to our society.

One of the main advantages of computers is that we get information via the internet. It has made around the
world. For example, it is conveniently to sit at home and do research on the internet with your computer. Your
computer is open 24 hours a day, unlike a library or office. You can get the latest news right and get it more
quickly and conveniently. This example makes it clear that it is possible to get almost any kind of information
from anywhere.

In addition to this, many people do their jobs with the help of computer technology. For instance, an airplane is
a form of transportation that our lives are now faster than past. This transportation is realized by computer
technology. It helps to control sky roads. It also uses by architects for design their buildings. As my example
shows, computers have positive effects on human life.

To sum up, we are living in the computer age. We can now do our tasks more easily. Thus, computers have
made life easier and convenient.
(Approximately 252 words)

[by - Sirojiddin]

Model Answer 6:
In this century, computers are considered as the most revolutionary invention for the development of human
beings. However, there are some people concerned about the complexity and stressfulness that come along

with the computer using. Personally, I am in favor of the view that the high-tech products bring people more
convenience and much easier life.
Granted, the unhealthy use of computers like indulgence in computer games and the illegal use like hackers
and cyber crimes make the living surroundings more complex and even stressful. Nevertheless, no garden
without weed, it is the computers that enhance our communication, facilitate daily work and study, and lower
the living cost.

When it comes to the benefits computers bring about, at least three obvious aspects should be mentioned.
Firstly, as a way of telecommunication, no one can deny that computers enhance the interaction between
people. Specifically, compared with traditional letters and telegraphs, emails and online chatting allow overseas
students contact with their parents in a more timely and easy manner without considering the geographic
limitations. Secondly, proper using of computers improves the efficiency of both work and study since the
internet helps to get access to numerous information and knowledge that no professionals or teachers could
provide during their whole lifetime. Lastly, from the perspective of family budgets, PCs contribute largely to
lower the living cost and improve the life quality. The main reason given for this is that after checking and
comparing prices online, the users can always choose the most economical products.

To conclude, although computers exert some undesirable effects on the society, they are still the undeniable
contributor to make daily life easier and more convenient.

[by - Jessie Jia]

Model Answer 7:
Computers have many advantages. Firstly computers help in effective communication and it makes our
communication easier. Internet and e-mail saves our time. For example with the introduction of internet and email we do not have to wait days and months to get a reply. Secondly, it increases our interaction with our
friends and colleagues. Moreover we can keep in touch with our old friends even though staying in different
poles of the world. For instance, I could talk with my childhood friend using Skype yesterday. Furthermore,
computers made our everyday life more convenient. We can do e-shopping by sitting at home. Additionally
computers refresh our knowledge. All the information is available on the finger tip. We get all updated news
online. Previously we had to wait for the next day to get news papers. Even e-books and magazines are
available online which reduces work load and time.
On the other hand, there are significant disadvantages of computers. Overuse of computer causes strain on
eyes which leads to poor eye sight. Again one of the reasons for obesity and back pain is overuse of computer.
In fact, computers reduce the family relationships. Parents cannot mingle with their children. Even they are not
able to arrange leisure time with their family. Probably, modern inventions like internet and e-mail play a vital

role in family disruption as family members interact less with each other. Computers have made the human
beings lazy as everything is available in seconds. In this era peoples reading habit is declined remarkably with
all these new inventions which in turn cause a lose in worlds literature.

In conclusion, though computers are beneficial to the human community, there are several demerits also. So in
my opinion, computers have made our life more complex and stressful.

[by - Synu Jacob]

Model Answer 8:
I feel computers have made life easier and more convenient. All the manual work will be replaced when the
computers are used and accessing the information is also faster. Below are some of the examples to support
my point of view.

In older days, Type writers were used effectively to print the contents on the paper. But, if more copies of the
same data was needed, one has to type as many pages as needed. But In computers, typing once is required.
The data could be transferred to a device and any number of copies could be printed. This reduces manual
effort that was put using type writers,

In any government company, the documents were maintained in papers filed and recorded manually. This
makes complex to search or access a particular document. In case of Fire or any disasters, the information will
be lost or destroyed. Now a days this process is being computerised and it is more secured than having it in
papers. This makes searching also faster and multiple backups can be taken to secure the data more.

Now a days I feel 75% of the banking is computerised and most of the transactions are online which could be
done from home itself. This is safer than a manual transactions. This also reduces the work of going to bank.
Getting the corresponding forms, filling them, and crediting or debiting the money.

Some people do not have proper knowledge on how to access the data through computers or they may be
workaholic and not concentrating on any other things in life than computers and hence they may feel
computers have made their life more complex and stressful.
[by - Sumathi]

Model Answer 9:
Some people think that computers made our life easier and comfortable, while other believe that computer has
more disadvantages than advantages. This essay will discuss both sides of this issue.

The most important advantage of computers is that they made our life easier, how, you may ask?

For instance: you can buy whatever you want by clicking only a one button (online shopping). Furthermore,
currently people are working at home due to computer technologies. In addition to this, it helps us to
communicate with our relatives which are abroad. Finally it made our life more interesting, you can download or
set up your favourite games and play them whenever you want.

Not only in daily life but also at work, computers are playing the big role. People just have to control and
computer will do other job. In big factories, almost all jobs are done by computers and employees just have to
check it. Not only factories can be an example of usefulness of computers, in banks your property is also
secured by computers, which makes life of bankers more convenient.

But there are certain disadvantages of computers. Aforesaid computer games are caused computer addiction
among children. For instance: a lot of schoolboys aren't gone to school because of computers. They simply
can't come off from it; they just can't live without computer anymore. Moreover not only addiction but also a bad
vision is caused by computer. A lot of time people are spent in front of the computer, which is really hurts their
eyes.

Not only illness can be said about the bad side of computers, above-named banks also not secured from so
called "phishing", hackers simply are stealing money from the banks, by just breaking or finding the necessary
codes for this. Also in factories computers are doing a lot of things but only one hitch in one sector and it will
stop whole factory.

In conclusion, in my view, computers are very important part of our life, but we should be very careful about
using them appropriately.

[by - Akmal Sharipov]

Model Answer 10:

The first computer was invented in 1822 by Charles Babbage, and it was used for basic arithmetic calculation.
For some people computer made their life easier. For other humans computer made lifestyle more stressful.
The way I see is that, the computer makes easy the kind of job like accountant and engineer. And it also makes
life more colorful. On the other hand computer is more dangerous for youngsters. Nowadays, computers have

a lot of games about war and zombies. Doctors think that, the games like this can change their mind to bad
side.
At first, computers make people happy, but other side, computer can change teenagers mind with the way of
games or internet. Secondly, sitting at computer too much can be damage to human's eyesight. But for this
inventors created the glasses against worsening eyesight. Thirdly, it can do people slothful, for instance, if
workers play games at working time in order to working hard.

However, every minus there is plus. The major advantage is that, with computer you can do reach to points
easily. For example, if you work on some projects, you can do lightly videos with computer helps. Next positive
side is improving knowledge by computer, like reading and solving the critical issues. Looking thirdly at positive
side, you can save some documents or pictures which is valuable for you.

Taking everything into account, I believe that in near future by computers you can do almost everything.
Nevertheless, in today's world, working on computers can do works easier. Despite working easy, it can
seriously give harm to your health.

[by - Sherzod Djuraev]

Modern technology is creating a single world culture.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Model Answer 1:
Man, through the ages, has undergone many changes from the time when he depicted a herd of mammoths on
the walls of the cave to these days when he can chart with someone on the other side of the globe. Modern
technology is rapidly changing the world's living standards that results in creating a single world culture. New
technologies including Internet, television, electronic media, means of transportation, etc has a great impact on
creating a similar culture all around the globe. Bellow I will list my reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, Internet and e-mail have changed the way people communicate to each other. Internet brought
many benefits. It is a new means of communication, a fast access to information and news. People
communicate with each other, share their ideas, happiness and difficulties. We have a great opportunity to find
out more about countries and their history.

Second of all, the modern means of transportation allows people to move from one place to another very
quickly. A few centuries ago it was impossible to imagine waking up in one country and falling asleep in
another.

Finally, as a result of all mentioned above the boundaries between countries, their traditions and customs are
erased. Many people migrate during their lives. Some of them are looking for a better place to live, others want
to get new experience and knowledge or just pleasure. So, many families are created between people from
different countries. Traditions fuse and evolve into other ones or just vanish.

To sup up, modern technology has a great impact on the way people live now. It is creating a new single world
culture where traditions and distances are no longer of that importance.
(Approximately 286 words)

Model Answer 2:
In today's world, the use of technology is ever increasing. People in all over the world share the same
information. I totally agree that contemporary technology is creating a single world culture. It is now much
easier to communicate with people who are far away. Modern transportation, TV and also internet are bringing
to people closer together.
Firstly, almost every family has their private TV. It is connected with satellite. TV programs can be received
anywhere in the world. Now people in every part of the world can watch all the same TV programs. When
people see the same news and entertainment programs, they contribute for the development of a single world
culture.
Secondly, if we look at the internet, people have access to information and news from all over the world. They
can communicate easily with people who are far away and exchange information each other. When people
share the information on the internet, they become under the same cultural influence. They move toward the
creation of a single world culture.

Thirdly, as regards modern transportation, a trip to a foreign country becomes easily. Now people from all
different places are more together than before. They can see how people in other countries dress, eat and
spend their free time. Moreover, they can adopt some of customs. This also causes for the developing of a
single world culture.

In conclusion, these types of communication technology have brought people from all over the world closer
together. People these days have more opportunities to share ideas and information. In this way they are
coming under the same cultural influence. So, a single world culture is being created.

(Approximately 276 words)

[ by - Sirojiddin]

Model Answer 3:
At the present time modern technology has created a mono-cultural world. Due to the internet, rapid
communication facility, improved transportation facility, TV, satellite channels etc. people are sharing similar
information and the modern technology has made it possible to access data very easily. People all over the
world are using similar technology, accessing same websites, watching same movies and following same
fashion styles. As a consequence the tradition, life style and way of life all over the world are getting similar.
Therefore, people are widely accepting cultures, fashions and trends of other countries and sometimes
forgetting their own cultures. I partially disagree with the rubric above and it'll be shown in the following essay.
Currently, almost in every home has their own TV and the same data are shown on it. Channels all over the
world are broadcasting programs and people are accessing more international channels than their national
channels. For instance, when I was younger I used to watch one TV show and amazingly, my friend from
another country also watched it every day. Another example can be, when there is any international sports
event, people all over the world are watching it at the same time. It's obvious from my example that it doesn't
matter where you are living; the mass media is the same in every country. Thus, the influence of TV and the
internet is quite enormous in creating a single culture. Yet, this is partial as many people around the world are
still struggling to earn their daily breads and the technological facilities are inaccessible to them.

However, the opinion of human beings shouldn't rely on only the mass media. People should limit themselves
from the technology that we have nowadays. Because the consequences aren't just going to come in
psychological way but in a physical way as well we should be very wary of this. For example, while individual is
working in front of the computer his body is adjusting itself, because in chair the whole mass of person lays on
his back and in the near future it can cause fatal diseases such as: numbness or even paralysis. This example
clearly shows that the mass media is impacting on people only partially but not entirely. The modern technology
has made our life easier and more convenient and yet there exist many demerits that we cant deny.

After analyzing both benefits and drawbacks of modern technology, I've concluded that the modern technology
has indeed reduced the distance and gap among nations but the difference still persist.

(Approximately 422 words)

[ by - Akmal Sharipov]

Children should never be educated at home by their parents.

Do you agree or disagree?

Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this.

You should write at least 250 words. Give reasons for your answer.
Model Answer 1:
Nobody can say with confidence that children should be taught at home or at any children's institutions. There
are many different children and every one demand of education suitable only for him.

But for most of children the best way of learning the life is being in the children's institutions. Nobody would
argue that contacts between children of the same age are very important for bringing your child up. Such a
contact is very important for playing, entertaining and learning living with other people. The harmonious living
with other people, to my mind, is the first task for any man. Lack of this harmony sets problems and troubles.

The children need space to run and make noise, to jump and cry. Do you or your neighbours allow these
actions for your child? If you live in town, it is difficult to find a safe place to play. Kindergartens give such a
possibility. They give space, a lot of toys and constructions for physical exercises. So, if you have bad living
conditions, the kindergarten is the best way for you. But if you have a large family with many children and
enough space, you may keep your child at home. You should be sure that the child feels, dressed and
comfortable. His brothers and sisters give him necessary contacts. It's noticed long ago that children in big
families are much more easy-tempered and calm. They are located in more harmonic world than others.

Sometimes differences in age put troubles in contacts between children in large families. Then it is better for
child to be sent to the kindergarten (school). But if quarrels don't last for a long time, everything is all right. In
general, quarrels develop ability to cooperate with people. They develop a personal initiative and force setting
the balance. In such a way the child gets lessons of life. Oddly, the quarrels often take place in kindergartens
and schools and we shouldn't fear it.

Side by side with quarrels parents often are afraid of colds which happen in kindergartens more frequently.
Parents prefer keeping the child at home. But for a healthy child odd cold (if illness occurs, it goes its normal
course) can't make big harm to the child. And if the child is adaptable to the conditions of public places earlier it
would be better for him in future.

In general, I am a follower of the theory of keeping children in adapted places such as good kindergartens. But
keeping children in such a place can't replace family and home. Only together they make harmonic and
beautiful union.
(Approximately 431 words)

(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers.You should be able to pick up the main points from this essay and
organize in your own style)

Model Answer 2:
At the present time children have the choice where he wants to study at school or at home. Thus, a lot of
children are taught at home and never go to the school. Its believed that parents should stop this kind of
curriculum and give the children to the normal school. I strongly agree with the rubric above, because of
parents wont be worried about the safety of their child and why dont study at home if it gives good results?
Firstly, parents in charge of their child and they know what is necessary for their kid. Therefore, some parents
prefer to teach their kid themselves rather than giving them to the school. Parents always worried about
surrounding of their child, because nowadays environment influencing on children very strongly. But when
children at home, they will be sure that no one pressuring on their child.

Secondly, schools arent always giving results that parents are expecting. Thus, parents decided take it on their
hands and teach children by themselves. Parents always will control their student and i cant say that school
can do it either. Due to constant supervision of parents, child will study hard even if he doesnt want to.

To conclude, in my opinion, home education is good way to develop the knowledge of child. It also helps to
parents to control their kid and keep him away from the bad influence of surrounding. In addition to this, only
parents will be responsible for results of their child in entrance examination of universities.

[ by - Akmal Sharipov]

Model Answer 3:
Education is a vital part of everybodys life. It is particularly crucial of young children, as it is the time when they
imbibe new learnings and habits. Whether, home teaching is better than school teaching, is a contentious
issue. But as far as I am concerned, school teaching is better for children and they should not be taught at
home buy their parents.
First and foremost, school teaches children to co-exist with other children; children are no longer in comfortable
home environment,
They learn to share things, respect each others difference and make friends. Their overall personality develops
when they meet new people. We have often noticed that when a child starts going to kindergarten, they start
learning quickly and start speaking more as compared to the time they spent at home.

Secondly, schools have professionally qualified teachers. They have in-depth knowledge of the subject they
teach. Moreover, children learn discipline when they go to the school; there is a fix timetable to be followed,
which as per my views, is not possible at home. Apart from academics, schools also encourage students to
take part in sports, art, drama etc. There are events like annual day celebration, sports day etc which cannot be
replicated at home.

School also helps children to cope up with peer pressure and healthy competition that prevails in school.
Sometimes, children perform better when there is competition. For instance, when I was in school, we use to
have chart displayed in each class room, with the names of top 10 performers in exams; this really inspired me
every time to study more and get good rank, So that my name appears on that chart. Due to this my
performance improved drastically.

Admittedly, there are few children who cannot handle school and study pressure, some children get bullied at
school which lowers their confidence level, but this could happen at any phase of life, be it in office or outside
work place. School life prepares children to take these challenges head on.

In a nutshell, young age is the foundation of ones life; as it is rightly said, Children are like soft clay, and you
can mould them in any shape you want. If you want them to inculcate attributes like compassion,
independence, sharing, discipline etc. children should be sent to school.

Children should never be educated at home by their parents.

Do you agree or disagree?

Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this.

You should write at least 250 words. Give reasons for your answer.
Model Answer 1:
Nobody can say with confidence that children should be taught at home or at any children's institutions. There
are many different children and every one demand of education suitable only for him.

But for most of children the best way of learning the life is being in the children's institutions. Nobody would
argue that contacts between children of the same age are very important for bringing your child up. Such a
contact is very important for playing, entertaining and learning living with other people. The harmonious living
with other people, to my mind, is the first task for any man. Lack of this harmony sets problems and troubles.

The children need space to run and make noise, to jump and cry. Do you or your neighbours allow these
actions for your child? If you live in town, it is difficult to find a safe place to play. Kindergartens give such a
possibility. They give space, a lot of toys and constructions for physical exercises. So, if you have bad living
conditions, the kindergarten is the best way for you. But if you have a large family with many children and
enough space, you may keep your child at home. You should be sure that the child feels, dressed and
comfortable. His brothers and sisters give him necessary contacts. It's noticed long ago that children in big
families are much more easy-tempered and calm. They are located in more harmonic world than others.

Sometimes differences in age put troubles in contacts between children in large families. Then it is better for
child to be sent to the kindergarten (school). But if quarrels don't last for a long time, everything is all right. In
general, quarrels develop ability to cooperate with people. They develop a personal initiative and force setting
the balance. In such a way the child gets lessons of life. Oddly, the quarrels often take place in kindergartens
and schools and we shouldn't fear it.

Side by side with quarrels parents often are afraid of colds which happen in kindergartens more frequently.
Parents prefer keeping the child at home. But for a healthy child odd cold (if illness occurs, it goes its normal
course) can't make big harm to the child. And if the child is adaptable to the conditions of public places earlier it
would be better for him in future.

In general, I am a follower of the theory of keeping children in adapted places such as good kindergartens. But
keeping children in such a place can't replace family and home. Only together they make harmonic and
beautiful union.
(Approximately 431 words)

(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers.You should be able to pick up the main points from this essay and
organize in your own style)

Model Answer 2:
At the present time children have the choice where he wants to study at school or at home. Thus, a lot of
children are taught at home and never go to the school. Its believed that parents should stop this kind of
curriculum and give the children to the normal school. I strongly agree with the rubric above, because of
parents wont be worried about the safety of their child and why dont study at home if it gives good results?
Firstly, parents in charge of their child and they know what is necessary for their kid. Therefore, some parents
prefer to teach their kid themselves rather than giving them to the school. Parents always worried about

surrounding of their child, because nowadays environment influencing on children very strongly. But when
children at home, they will be sure that no one pressuring on their child.

Secondly, schools arent always giving results that parents are expecting. Thus, parents decided take it on their
hands and teach children by themselves. Parents always will control their student and i cant say that school
can do it either. Due to constant supervision of parents, child will study hard even if he doesnt want to.

To conclude, in my opinion, home education is good way to develop the knowledge of child. It also helps to
parents to control their kid and keep him away from the bad influence of surrounding. In addition to this, only
parents will be responsible for results of their child in entrance examination of universities.

[ by - Akmal Sharipov]

Model Answer 3:
Education is a vital part of everybodys life. It is particularly crucial of young children, as it is the time when they
imbibe new learnings and habits. Whether, home teaching is better than school teaching, is a contentious
issue. But as far as I am concerned, school teaching is better for children and they should not be taught at
home buy their parents.
First and foremost, school teaches children to co-exist with other children; children are no longer in comfortable
home environment,
They learn to share things, respect each others difference and make friends. Their overall personality develops
when they meet new people. We have often noticed that when a child starts going to kindergarten, they start
learning quickly and start speaking more as compared to the time they spent at home.

Secondly, schools have professionally qualified teachers. They have in-depth knowledge of the subject they
teach. Moreover, children learn discipline when they go to the school; there is a fix timetable to be followed,
which as per my views, is not possible at home. Apart from academics, schools also encourage students to
take part in sports, art, drama etc. There are events like annual day celebration, sports day etc which cannot be
replicated at home.

School also helps children to cope up with peer pressure and healthy competition that prevails in school.
Sometimes, children perform better when there is competition. For instance, when I was in school, we use to
have chart displayed in each class room, with the names of top 10 performers in exams; this really inspired me
every time to study more and get good rank, So that my name appears on that chart. Due to this my
performance improved drastically.

Admittedly, there are few children who cannot handle school and study pressure, some children get bullied at
school which lowers their confidence level, but this could happen at any phase of life, be it in office or outside
work place. School life prepares children to take these challenges head on.

In a nutshell, young age is the foundation of ones life; as it is rightly said, Children are like soft clay, and you
can mould them in any shape you want. If you want them to inculcate attributes like compassion,
independence, sharing, discipline etc. children should be sent to school.

[ by - Preeti]

It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a

big city.
Do you agree or disagree?
Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay.

You should write at least 250 words.

Model Answer 1:
Some people believe that it is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. However, other
people think that a big city gives more opportunities and it is good for the long run. Personally, for several
reasons I think that it is better for children's health to grow up in the country.

First of all, it is very important for a child to grow up in a healthy environment. Children need fresh air, not
polluted by the huge amount of cars and factories of the modern city. In the country they can spend more time
exercising and walking with their friends. Scientists say that now children spend the same amount of time
watching TV as they do at school. Probably, the possibility to join their friends for a play will change this
proportion. Another important aspect of this is that parents will have more time to spend with their children as a
result of eliminating traffic jams and decreasing driving time as a whole.

From the other side, children have some advantages living in a big city. For example, they have more
opportunities to choose from what they want to do. They can choose to attend ballet school, school of art,
gymnastics, etc. For the long run, it is good for them. They will be better prepared for a live in a "real world" and
they will have more chances to make a good career and succeed. Moreover, a big city usually has many
entertaining centers with movie theatres and play stations. When I was a child I liked to go to the movie theatre
with my parents to watch a premiere.

One more reason to choose a big city for a child is that a city provides better live conditions and services such
as medical, dental, etc. My friend lived in the country for a while and one time he and his family had to drive a
couple of hours to the nearest medical center when his child got a heavy cough.

To summarize, I agree with those people who want to raise their children in a city. The plenty of opportunities
offered by a city helps children to find what they really like and be the best at it. Moreover, despite the air
pollution, children get a better medical service that is good for their health.
( Approximately 394 words)

(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers.You should be able to pick up the main points from this essay and
organize in your own style)
Model Answer 2:
Bringing up young generation in a big city is not as good as countryside. I partially disagree with this statement.
In my view, cities are the best place to grow up children and to live. However, cities have some drawbacks
which will be discussed in this essay.

Many people opt to live in large cities rather than countryside, because they prefer to live in metropolitan area
than remote areas. Such a good benefit is an employment. People, who are living in a city can easily get job in
different types of professions.

Another reason is the easy availability of transportation services, large complex network maps of buses and
trains covering almost all surrounding suburbs of city, which can save a lot of valuable time spent by traveling
with own vehicle, which is more convenient and economical when your children go to school. And you will know
where they are.

However, the cost of living in a city is usually much higher than in countryside. Inhabitants of cities have to pay
higher prices for housing, transport, and even food. Moreover, the big cities have some social problems such
as high crime and poverty rates in comparison with countryside. Furthermore, the air quality in cities is often
poor, due to pollution from traffic, and the streets and public transport systems are usually overcrowded. As a
result, city life can be unhealthy and stressful to our children.

After analyzing the essay, we can conclude that, those points are the important factors when considering living
either in urban or rural area. Apart from those, entertainment facilities, well developed infrastructure and living
with latest trends are other reasons for living in cities.
[ by - Ice]

Model Answer 3:
Today children predominantly live in villages and in the countryside, but many others live in big cities. This can
be seen in terms of their family, hobbies, interests, and undoubtedly, lifestyle. It is believed that rural children
are more skillful than children who live in big cities. This will be proven by analyzing of children's lifestyle in both
countryside and big city in this essay.

Firstly, it is well-known fact that living in isolated villages can improve children's health, and therefore, their
physical development. For instance, if children constantly do house-working and gardening, they will be
healthy. This example clearly shows that working hard improves not only health, but also diversifies lifestyle.
From this it can be conclude that living in villages accelerates physical developing and improves skills which
they need in future life.

Secondly, there is no doubt to say that rural children can adapt and develop in big cities, which are saturated by
variety of places. For example, they can visit and feel sense of ethnic places, restaurants, stadiums, despite
adapting. It is obvious when looking at the example that rural children slowly adapt for boiling city lifestyle.
Thus, it would be better to live near big cities.

After analyzing the areas of both lifestyles, it can be concluded that rural children are healthier than children of
big cities. As has been shown, skills of rural children based on house-working, albeit village is not an ideal
place to develop life skills. It is predicted that children will live in villages in the future.
[ by - Mama]

Model Answer 4:
At the present time people say that children should be grown in the countryside rather than in the big city. I
totally disagree with this rubric, because in big cities the quality of education and medicine are better compared
with rural areas and huge occupation choice makes the city more convenient place in nourish of the child.
Firstly, children should be educated by qualified teacher but the countryside can't create that kind of condition
for education and a large number of their teachers didn't even end up the university education. Good education
is the earnest of success in the future. But not only from education depends the bright future of the children, it
also depends from medicine.

Aforesaid medicine, one of the main necessary things in raising of children. Without vaccines young children
might get ill or even die from fatal disease. To prevent this, in cities almost every month child is gone through
medicine check and necessary injections are done to him.

In addition to this, currently the development of big cities strongly differs from development of rural areas and
it's another reason to grow children in big cities. Better conditions for children in job selection, they can choose
every career they want, for example to be a pilot, they can realize their dream in the city, but in a lot of
countryside the airports don't exist.

In conclusion, countryside is not the best place to raise children and big cities either. But, in my view
nourishment of children should take place in the city due to high education and medicine level and the big
choice in job selection.

[ by - Akmal Sharipov]

Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the

world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension
rather than understanding between people from different
cultures.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Model Answer 1:
Today the world is more connected than any time before and people from all over the countries can arrive to
their destination within 24 hours. However, while this possibility permits to millions of individuals to encounter
different cultures every year, the phenomenon of the international tourism brings also conflicts between people
with different habits and costumes.

To begin, tourism creates isolation more than integration: in fact tourists prefer to look at different places,
costumes and habits like sitting in front of the television screen, watching a documentary, more than sharing
time with the indigenous population. Furthermore, tourists don't respect foreign habits and cultures, often
because they don't understand it. For example they throw the litter on the ground, or even worse they don't
respect their hosts religion.

Nevertheless, the effects of international tourism are not all negative. Sometimes tourists fall in love with people
and places they visit and decide to live in there, acting like mediators between cultures and enhancing
integration. It's the case of lots of tourist guides that decided to move abroad and enjoy a different life style and
culture, trying to share their feelings with visitors. Also speaking the language of the place we visit can help us
understand people from different cultures.

In addition, the large amount of money around the tourism business contrasts the tendency of some countries
to close their border to foreign people. This can lead to a better comprehension of these cultures and so to

integration.

In conclusion, the biggest industry in the world have to feel the need of changes in the way tourism is
structured, so it could became a mean of integration and reciprocal understanding more than create tensions
between cultures.
(Approximately 283 words)
[ by - Luca]
Model Answer 2:
The growth of tourism and the numbers of people traveling to other countries for their vacations has led to
debate as to whether this is beneficial. I believe that there are many problems which arise out of the tourist
industry, and will examine these in detail.

Many people argue that travel broadens the mind. However, this statement does not fully hold water. I would
argue that spending a few weeks in another country is not long enough to gain a proper understanding of an
alien culture. A foreigner visiting Britain might be met with the traditional British reserve, and mistakenly
conclude that the British are unfriendly. Furthermore, some people are unwilling to open their minds. A Western
traveler to an Arab country is unlikely to consider that the veiling of women is acceptable.

Being a tourist in a foreign country brings with it problems that can lead to dislike of the native people. Firstly, a
foreigner is vulnerable, and is often ripped off by locals. Secondly, the language barrier can lead to
misunderstandings. Thirdly, tourists are often hassled to buy goods, which can ruin a holiday. When I went to
Bali, people tried to sell me something every five minutes, and this totally spoils my sunbathing.

Local people also often end up disliking foreigners. Visitors may mistakenly act contrary to local norms, or they
may just be plain offensive, as many drunken British holidaymakers must seem to the Spanish. Global tourism
can lead to hostility from the native people, who may feel their traditional way of life is under threat. Additionally,
the relative wealth of the foreign visitors can cause envy and resentment.

In conclusion, I would say that I largely agree with the argument that global tourism creates misunderstanding
between people from different cultures, and that the differences are often a cause for conflict rather than
celebration.
(Approximately 309 words)

(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers.You should be able to pick up the main points from this essay and
organize in your own style)

Model Answer 3:
When peoples discuss about the impact of international tourism they have different opinion. Some people think
that this harm the international understanding, while others believe it is helpful to increase international
understanding. In my view, there are many reasons to think that this will improve international understanding in
the peoples different cultures.

First of all, it helps in spreading of culture. In the world every country has its own distinct society and cultures.
For example an Italian person can better understand the Asians by visiting any Asian nation and come to know
how young people respect their elders in their society. A good cultural values which are absent from one's own
society can be adapted from other societies. Moreover, International tourism aids in learning foreign languages.
Learning new language enrich one's knowledge and experience. I am an Indian student and want to get
admitted to Harvard University in PhD. Course. Thus Ill have to enrol in English language courses with my
studies. This will a valuable experience and will provides me chances to learn a new language and thus the
cultures and history associated with it.

Finally, Tourism provides the real experience of things and History. We have seen many things in TV, internet
and movies, but a visit to that place makes us closer to that thing. I have seen Zebras in discovery channel
videos and would like to visit the central African forest reserve to examine and discover more about this animal.
Through a person can get the practical reality and this will possible with the help of African peoples and their
government.

In sum it is clear that tourism is important to people of different cultures. The above discussion shows that, it
not only provides one the opportunity to know about other cultures, languages, history but also enhance the
possibility to learn and experience the first hand experience many realities.
(Approximately 313 words)

[ by - Tersem Bhadwal]

Model Answer 4:
Nowadays international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates
tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures.
This evident situation has become the result of great migration among people all over the world. Since the
second half of the 20th century people from different countries began to explore the distant countries and
various places around the world and it is getting more and more popular to travel a lot and discover unknown
lands these days. International tourism has its advantages as well as disadvantages. If to speak about

advantages they are quite obvious- people have a lot of amazing opportunities to know the world inside out, to
see and feel the bright colours of wild nature, traditions and customs of different cultures belonging to Asia,
Europe, Australia and Africa. International tourists invest the development of economical and financial sphere of
the countries they visit. Also they help to support local people from unemployment - especially in small and
poor countries, giving them chance to survive.

People are getting closer and friendlier to each other despite all differences they have. From other hand people
got tired of endless tourist streams flowing into their country every year. They want to have a rest and live their
ordinary life as they used to live before a foreign invasion. Some countries are very close and private, their
culture and traditions are very strict and strange for the most of tourists. Manner of behavior, dress and many
others which were brought and shown by foreigners irritates, makes local people angry and unfriendly and not
ready to accept and communicate well. For instance white tourists in some parts of Africa are really under
serious danger in the streets and poor districts of many towns and cities because of the white dominance and
oppression in the past. Rich tourists in developing countries are the source of displeasure, aggression,
misunderstanding and tension from native people.

To sum up I would like to say that the future of international tourism completely depends on people themselves
and their correct and acceptable behavior in overseas countries. Itwont cause much tension and
misunderstanding but trust, respect and friendly attitude to each other. But nevertheless when different cultures
meet, they always have a lot of things to compare, accept, value or argue about.

(Approximately 386 words)

[ by - Moon]

Model Answer 5:
In recent times, the role of tourism industry in the world economy cannot be neglected. Tourism industry has
emerged as one of the biggest industry in the world, providing jobs to millions. Often it is said, that world is
becoming smaller, and I believe it is because of this frequent international travel. I do not agree that
international tourism creates tension; in fact it brings different culture together.

When person travels from one country to another, they learn about each others culture, cuisine and habits.
People become more tolerant towards each others differences. International tourism helps people in
experiencing the natural beauty which could not be found in their country. I believe, due to increased
international travel, people have subdued. For instance, countries like Maldives, Thailand, India (Goa) etc.
thrives on tourism and we can clearly notice the difference between the peoples attitude towards each other in
these places as compared to others. People are friendlier, understanding and accommodating. They are ready

to change themselves easily to cater to new demands of tourist. Another good example would be Dubai, which
is part of UAE but is very different than any other emirates. It is because of international tourism that Dubai is
more tolerant and modern and developed.

The biggest pros of international tourism are, we can learn a lot from different countries. For instance, if you go
to Singapore, you cannot help but notice how effective their public transport systems are; and how stringently
all the rules are followed. Similarly, many tourists come to India to seek spiritual guidance and to learn yoga,
which they might not get in their country.

In a nutshell, I think, international travel alleviates tension between the two nations rather than creating. In
todays economy, when every country is interdependent for trade and business, international travel helps
people from different countries to understand each other and exist in harmony.
(Approximately 314 words)
[ by - Prashant Dixit]

Companies should encourage employees who work in a high

position to leave at the age of 55 in order to give opportunities
to the new generation.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Model Answer 1:
I totally disagree with the idea of high-level employees leaving at the age of 55 to make room for the upcoming
generation. While it is true that the energy level and fresh ideas of youth can rejuvenate a company, the steady
hand of experience can still best guide a company in most cases.

In English there is a saying, You cant teach an old dog new tricks. In the fast-paced world of business,
bolstered by even faster hi-tech innovations, a younger more pliant mind would seem to be able to adapt with
greater flexibility, while such an environment might boggle an older more set-in-its-ways mind. Take, for
example, Microsofts Bill Gates, whose energy and brilliant insights as a youth helped him to pioneer new
territory in the computer software world and establish a digital empire. Now as a more mature CEO, this king of
the computer mountain is constantly on the verge of being knocked down by upcoming digerati
entrepreneurs. However, it is now the experience he has accumulated as an older man which keeps him on
top. So, combining the vigor and innovation of younger workers with the experience of older workers would
seem to be the winning hand in the world of business.

The assertion is to give opportunities to the younger generation. If everyone retires at 55, there will be smaller
pool of experience at the company. So, who will show them the ropes of the trade? It would be as if we lopped

off the last few chapters of a textbook. On this point the argument would seem to be built on false
presumptions.

And think of all the other problems retirement at 55 would create. With life expectancy in many advanced
nations at 70-plus years, how would the state along with private enterprises be able to support their retirement
pensions? The economic repercussions of such an idea could be great.

Besides, the Western form of capitalism is built on competition and merit and not seniority according to age,
and democracy is built on equality for all regardless of ones age, so the argument clearly goes against these
two pillars of Western society.

Granted, my counter-arguments are perhaps as simplistic as the original assertion itself, but without qualifying
the assertion with greater supporting evidence or background information, both sides can be argued.
Nevertheless, even after thoroughly considering the argument, I believe I would still adhere to my viewpoint
that the assertion lacks merit for the aforementioned reasons. Besides, when I am 55 I do not fancy the idea of
being put out to pasture. I think I will still be full of vitality and have a desire to work, so I hope my workplace will
view me as a treasure house of valuable experience to pass along to the next generation and keep me on until
I am at least 65 if not older.
(Approximately 478 words)

(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers.You should be able to pick up the main points from this essay and
organize in your own style)

Model Answer 2:
Unemployment is one of the leading problems in many overpopulated countries. Owing to this, few companies
offer voluntary retirement services to the staff members above the age of 55. I strongly agree with the given
statement.

Offering positions for younger generation has major benefits. Firstly, the young people work faster, stronger
than the elders, who are weaker and slower at work. Just as, the companies which are based on labour work
require stronger and healthy labourers. Secondly, they are competitive and creative work sectors which enable
the projects to grow at a faster pace. Such as in IT companies most of the employees are under 55. Lastly, the
selection of new personnel can reduce problem of unemployment to some extent.

However on the other hand, it is argued that older generation should be allowed to extend their services. They
have experiences in particular kinds of work, in which the new staff may lack knowledge and proper
experiences. For instance many businesses require experience in particular field to compete with the
opponents and they prefer experienced and aged people. Next, it could be insensible to terminate honest and
worthy members. Therefore most of them would like to continue with the old workers. Finally, they serve as
best resource of knowledge and skills, which is essential for the community survival.

Overall, it is clear that elderly contributes a lot to the companies. However they cannot be extended to work for
longer times. Therefore I believe that older generation needs to be replaced by the youth.

(Approximately 253 words)

[ by - Mohana]

Model Answer 3:
There is a widespread belief that modern society should replace workers in the large institutions who already
became 55. Some people are in favour of this viewpoint while many others oppose this idea. Some crucial
arguments will be covered in this essay.

To begin, people over the age of 55 tend to get tired and exhausted extremely fast, therefore it can affect on
quality of work they yield. Not only employees would feel exhaustion, but performance quality would also be
significantly decreased. Moreover, advances in technology can engender some misunderstandings among
workers. Commonly the majority of employees aged 55 and more can not domesticate new program on
computer or modern technological terms. In order to teach employees these aspects companies have to
contribute money and waste a lot of time.

Nevertheless, workers, who have been working for decades on company, have enough experience to deal with
hard responsibilities. Moreover, managers can easily rely on employees, who work on the same company for
sufficient time. In addition, qualified worker aged 55 plus are more dutiful than inexperienced worker who has
just joined the organization. For instance, my mother does not confide important documents to young workers
at work. Not only because of inexperience but also due to the fact that unskilled employees sometimes do not
understand the importance of some assignments, they perform poorly. In profession like law, teaching,
research people with decades experiences many times outperform the younger people unlike the technological
fields. In these area people should not be replaced as soon as they reach the age 55 since there are still many
contribution those aged people can give.

To sum up, according to above mentioned arguments I strongly disagree that new generation could alter
employees aged 55 and more. Young society should try to work harder in order to achieve goals by
themselves.

(Approximately 305 words)

[ by - Alima Imanbayeva]

Model Answer 4:
Whether senior employees who are over 55 year old should be encouraged to take a retirement or not has
aroused a contentious issue among concerning people. Despite the argument of some advocators that senior
workers should be retired, it is my personal perspective that they are by no means inessential. The reasons for
it are twofold.
Initially, senior employees, with their working experience, are necessary to strengthen the thriving development
of companies. Indeed, on the ground of undergoing many years commitment in career, people cultivate and
deepen their understanding about specific field such as market segment, marketing strategies and competitions
of the organizations they work for. Meanwhile, the young who may perform innovative and dynamic working
style, however, are seen deficiencies of truly experience and need to seek for judicious advice from the elder. In
other word, sacking such experiencing people may put companies in jeopardies. Lets take Samsung electronic
corporation as a typical example, no sooner did the company dismiss their contract with senior generations to
replace by younger ones, than they witness a considerable deterioration in their competitiveness.

Further and even more significantly, a soon retirement causes several social problems. Firstly, the sooner
citizens take retirement, the bigger tax burden to existing worker. Irrefutably, when inhabitants are no longer
working, they demand for social welfare to survive, resulting in more major expenditure from governments
spending. Additionally, these days, thanks to the development of sciences and technologies, senior people
could reduce pressure by applying modern methodologies to work. Besides, with better nutrition, employees at
age of 55 are strong enough to be in charge of their positions.

By the way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my opinion that organizations should continue hiring senior
employees since it takes both companies stabilization and social concern into consideration. Only by cooperating between experience of the old with creativity of the young, do organization and society keep stable
development.

(Approximately 317 words)

[ by - ng Nguyn]

Model Answer 5:
It is in favour of the company to inspire the old employees to retire who are still working at higher position at the
age of 55.That will benefit the company as well as the employee. In my view, there are several reasons for
which the old employee should take retirement at age 55.
First of all fresh talents will improve the production. Young employees are energetic and fast. They are
inexperienced but they are capable of doing work with more dedication. Even some are so fast that they can do
many tasks at once. Due to increases in technological usages and complexity companies are required for
persons who have good skills and talents to run the company according to market demands. In my making
company analytical calculation is done in excel sheet instead on paper and it is proven that young people are
better in computing and other technologies compared to the aged people.

Moreover, it will improve cooperation in the work places. Employees have developed good relationships with
higher authority due to prolonged years of working together, so they avoid working or do little and always seek
favours of their boss. This is a hurdle in work place and it keeps away other loyal and hardworking people to
progress. This will be ended by hiring new young employees at higher posts. The junior employees will more
supportive and the young supervisors and management will readily coordinate him. At my son's school a newly
appointed teacher got the award of best teacher within two years and it shows the necessity of young workers
at work places.

Finally, it is respectable for the employees over 55 years old to retire timely. With the increase of age, mind will
not remain as efficient and sharp. Employees start making mistakes and lag behind in their assigned tasks
when they get old and as a result higher managements force them to retire. The person also becomes the
victim of fellow employees and junior workers jokes like slug doing work with speed" etc.

Finally, it is clear that company should make places for young peoples and encourage old people to retire. This
will not only increase company's production and cooperation but also will save respect for the old employee.

(Approximately 317 words)

[ by - Tersem Bhadwal]

Model Answer 6:
Nowadays, many companies encourage old employees to retire to make up room for the young ones. The
above point is certainly true; this essay will contain some reasons that support my suggestion.

First of all, the new generation has multiple advantages that outweigh the old generation, because the world we
live in currently is based on the fast, frequently-generated technology. The new generation is more adapted to
become updated with the modern releases of it. They master advanced technology and have greater energy to
exploit than senior employees due to many aspects including the physical strength of each party. Plus they are
more capable of rejuvenating their concepts as they are gaining experience. Moreover, young employees
would have the opportunity, just like the older ones had theirs once in the past, to show off their skills to their
boss. Eventually, by allowing younger employee to become more involved in a beneficial way in their
community, the spread of corruption would decrease gradually. As a result, the society will witness a great deal
of sustainable economical production in the country.

Undeniably, old employees must have left an influential impact on today's trade. And their achievements that
had been accomplished in the workforce force should be appreciated after they retire. Therefore, responsible
organizations should work on arranging educational centres and beneficial events for the retired senior citizens.
They would fulfill their free time usefully and efficiently, like pursuing in their personal hobbies.

At last, our community is based on a mixture of various age parties. For each period of time, each party obtains
heir right to possess an effective role in the society. However, commercial and big companies prefer young
employee because they infuse the work atmosphere with lots of young blood.

(Approximately 290 words)

[ by - Lama Al]

Model Answer 7:
Nowadays, there is a hot debate going on the topic whether the executive workers should retire at the age of
55 years or not. Though the senior citizens are respected by the society, in my opinion, we should give
opportunities to the youngsters.
First of all, unemployment and overpopulation are some of the leading problems that the world faces in this era.
When employers allow its employees to work after 55 years of age, it is in turn increases the unemployment.
Because of overpopulation, many well educated young people are wandering jobless. As a result of this, social
evils like theft, crime, terrorism have raised in the recent few decades. Second of all, new generations are
more productive and energetic. They can work enthusiastically and with greater aspirations. Moreover the
companies will get better output from their younger workers as they are mentally and physically strong. Thirdly,
young people have new ideas and technical skills. Young people are not only adaptable but also flexible with
their work. Even they can work longer time and shift duties. As middle aged people are healthy there will be

less absence from the work. In India, Government has made a law that those who work in the public sector
must leave the job at the age of 55 years. This provides more opportunity for the new comers in that country.

On the other hand, experience makes a man and overall society perfect. An experienced man might have gone
through many hurdles and know how to handle the situation smoothly which a new employee often lacks.
Another thing: a senior employee holding a higher position is financially well settled and most of his family
responsibilities like childrens education, marriage has got over. Furthermore, most of the countries have
pension scheme for their senior citizens after their retirement. Lastly, senior people are unfit to work due to
ageing and ill health.

Even though senior employees have more experience, in my view companies should encourage them to leave
at the age of 55 in order to provide opportunities to the young generation.

(Approximately 345 words)

[ by - Synu Jacob]

Model Answer 8:
Although the young work force usually has the enthusiastic spirit and always keen for making changes, but I
disagree with giving the higher positions for the younger stuff.
It is kind of common sense that the more you work the more you learn and the more your experience
accumulates, and letting go of older people at an early age like 55 is such a waste of valuable asset which is:
experience.
I strongly support the idea of giving the young workers second-in-command posts or apprenticing positions
where they can watch and learn from experienced stuff and they might also be given an advisory role so we
can mingle the expertise with enthusiasm.

On the contrary, I strongly believe that companies should give the experienced stuff stimulations to stay in
order to harness their experience. On one hand, some may argue that retiring at the age of 55 will give the
chance to the younger employees, but on the other hand, this will have many disadvantages: since leaving the
work when being able to is a waste of capabilities, not to mention all the moneys that will be paid for social
security in return of no work aside from leaving the job at 55 when taking into consideration the life expectancy
in most of the developed countries which is in average 75 years is considerably low.

For the young people assuming high positions is regarded as a high risk, since they usually lack the experience
and the knowhow to handle the pressure these positions usually have.

In conclusion, companies should tap both the experience of the old stuff and the keen-spirited young through
working side by side.

(Approximately 276 words)

[ by - Ahmed Swidan]

Model Answer 9:
Nowadays, many organizations are still dominating by older employees. Some managers are ages 50s and
above and still managing big companies even they feel some health problems. For this instance, other people
believe that companies should require employee who work in a high rank to have early retirement at the age of
55 to give way to the younger generation.

In my opinion, I strongly agree that the person with high level in an establishment should give up work at the
age of 55 in order to provide opportunities to younger people. Because new generations are more aggressive
and brave to try and experiment variety of solutions to problems and discover new projects to contribute to the
success of an industry, they always become the de facto for the success of a company. Young people are also
more physically fit and less vulnerable to some illnesses, unlike to those who are old. Having a good health in
managing business has a significant value in order to be productive and maximize the working hours of an
employee. Furthermore younger people are easy to jive on which is a good characteristic of a leader to
promote harmonious relationships in an organizations.

However, old manager, although they are very experienced and competent in a running a business, are easily
fatigue and cannot handle long time period of work that may results in decrease productions and output. They
are also more prone to develop diseases related to age that may interfere and delay meetings and
transactions. Moreover their decision making are also old fashioned and afraid to discover something new and
stick only in one baseline which may declined the improvement and popularity of a company.

In conclusion, institution should urge people who work in a high level to stop working at the age of 55 in order
to give chance to the succeeding generation.
(Approximately 311 words)

[ by - Princess Maidas]

Model Answer 10:

Nowadays the discussion about whether the businesses are supposed to prescribe the retirement age at fifty-

five to offer more job vacancies for younger generation has become a controversy. Some believe that is a
perfect attempt to support the young, others claim that this is not the case.

Admittedly, encouraging the workers to retire at age of fifty-five to release the positions for younger job seekers
has some merits. Firstly, fresh graduates are likely to bring a number of practical and applicable ideas to meet
the current needs of the organization. This is because they have been instilled and imparted the most updated
knowledge and skills at universities. Secondly, having a larger proportion of young adults could enhance the
working effectiveness and efficiency. Compared with aged staffs, younger employees are often physically
stronger and energetic which enables them to carry out heavy workload to meet the deadline.

However, sacrificing the senior members to save the young workers poses several negative influences. From
personal level, it fosters a sense of unfairness between the older and younger generations. It is undeniable that
every person within the business enterprise has the rights to precede their work as long as they are capable of
doing it, disregard the age and physical capacity. From social perspective, massively forcing the early
retirement would be one of financial burden to the local government. For example, sufficient pension payments
and regular medical care should be given and arranged for the senior citizens after they have been imposed to
terminate their employment permanently.

In conclusion, even though the introduction of the early retirement has some benefits, it is convincing that it
would generate a sense of discrimination among different age groups and increase the government financial
pressure accordingly.
(Approximately 288 words)

[ by - Ice]
Model Answer 11:
While there are grounds to argue that it would benefit society and young people themselves, if companies
choose youngsters for higher positions instead of their senior most staff, it can equally be argued that this
would be an infringement on highly positioned older peoples rights as they are forced to retire from their jobs.
Therefore, I do not completely favour the view that the older generation must fall back from their job positions
for the new ones.
One argument in favour of selecting youngsters to the tertiary level is that it would benefit society. It is certainly
true that there is a shortage of labour in many fields, and if young people get this positions more easily, then
the staggering percentage of workforce can be allotted, and which, in turn, reduces the unemployment issues
up to an extent. In addition, young brains work more efficiently, and whereupon, organisations bring in
remarkable profits. For instance, although there are middle-aged employees in IT fields, most of the IT fields
managements are likely to pick out young and proficient talents in order to achieve better results.

There is also, however, strong counter-arguments for appointing youngsters to management level positions and
encouraging early retirement of top most employees. One significant reason is that the older people who are
highly experienced will play a vital role in companies; this is due to the fact that the necessary skills for top level
positions such as leadership skills could only be developed through firsthand knowledge, which could only be
improved by the years of service. Besides, sending them away from their current positions are morally wrong
because each and every company is obliged to have some commitments towards their workforce.

To put it in a nutshell, despite having real merits on both sides of the argument, I believe, the moral part against
forcing older generation to retire early slightly outweigh the benefits of younger generation. Hence, in my
opinion, youngsters should get the experience thoroughly before attempting to acquire higher positions.

(Approximately 234 words)

[ by - Syama Stephen]

Our have decided to give several hours of your time each

month to improve the community where you live. What is one
thing you will do to improve your community? Why?
Use specific reasons and details to explain your choice.
Model Answer 1:
I think the question what would I do if I had a chance to improve my community is difficult. I have in my mind
many things, the improvement of which will make our community better place to live but they all require the
participation of many people and, moreover, they require investments, which I can not provide. For example,
my community is quite noisy. We have the huge mall just in front of our community, so traffic jams are very
common for this place. I think that the construction of a few pass-by roads will benefit all people who live here
as well as people who drive by every day.

Unfortunately, the question is what I can do for my community giving a few hours of my time every month. I
think I can not do much, but I still can help someone in my community. For example, I can baby-sit. I know a
couple of families with little children, who can not afford to spend much money on the baby-sitter. One of these
families is a single mom with a little girl. Julia, this is her name, is a waitress in a restaurant. She is a great
person and we became close friends. So, sometimes I offer her help with her child when she has to work in the
evenings. Another family has two funny little twins. One time their parents asked me to babysit their children
because they had to attend an unexpected presentation.

I think this kind of help brings many benefits to my community. First of all, people become friendlier. For

example, those families, which I mentioned above, became friends after I introduced them to each other.
Second of all, people get to know each other and feel more secure in their houses and apartments. Finally, I
am ready to help those people because I am sure that they will help me too. One time I lost the keys from my
car and Julia offered me her car for a while.

To sum up, I believe that baby-sitting is a great way to help my community in many aspects.
(Approximately 353 words)

(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers.You should be able to pick up the main points from this essay and
organize in your own style)

Model Answer 2:
Historically humans have dwelled in a community which sets them apart from the other species on earth.
Communities have existed in different forms and can be the epicenter for any grown civilization. Any community
is made up of individuals who contribute towards the growth and well-being of the overall community. Since I
am an integral part of my community, I equally share the ownership and duty towards my community. I have
decided to spend few hours every month to contribute towards building up fitness facility in my community.

I consider Fitness as a very important aspect of an individuals life. It doesnt have a very high priority in our
day-to-day life due to our busy work schedule and thus it always take a back seat in terms of our daily itinerary.
To quote the famous saying, A healthy mind in a healthy body, exercising is the best way to keep our body
and mind healthy. Besides keeping us healthy, we can bring freshness in our daily routine by exercising every
day. Having fitness equipment in the community just a few footsteps away can have very motivating results.
People can exercise at their convenience without spending unnecessary time on commute.

Another reason to setup fitness equipment in the community is the affordability. Not every family can afford the
Gyms and fitness centers. Since these commercial fitness centers charge a lot of fees, fitness at times, is
perceived as a luxury commodity, thus depriving the people of the best of the class equipment. But, in this
world of technology, world class equipment with best design are available at low prices too. To give an
example, Singapore government has deployed fitness equipment at every 100 meters for their Housing
Development Board Units. Thus, the success of Singapore can be repeated in my society.

To conclude, I consider fitness as a daily need and not a once in a blue moon activity. Having fitness in
community is the best way to push ourselves to the treadmill every day. I recommend having fitness in the
community to enjoy the benefits of a healthy body.

People have different job expectations for jobs. Some people

prefer to do the same job for the same company, whereas
others prefer to change jobs frequently.
Write about the advantages and disadvantages of each viewpoint?

Model Answer 1:
In the modern workplace there is no longer the attitude that a job is for life. Nowadays, many people take the
option to change jobs, while others prefer not to. In my essay, I will explore the good and bad points of the
above attitudes.

One of the main benefits of staying in one job is security. Changing employer often means a period of
instability, where one may have to think about moving house, or temporarily losing a steady source of income.
Staying in one job means these problems are avoided.

Another benefit of not changing occupation is that one is able to gain a lot of experience and expertise in his
specific profession, thus enhancing job security. Ones company may recognize their loyalty and reward their
service. On the other hand, those who often change jobs may be seen as unreliable, lacking in experience and
employers might be reluctant to hire and invest training in them.

However, there are arguments in favor of changing job frequently. One is that a worker improves his employ
ability. Working in several different jobs often means that the individual has more skills. Such people are seen
as more dynamic and versatile.

Another benefit of changing jobs frequently is that one never gets stuck in a rut. From my own experience, I got
bored when I spent too long in a job. Following this, the quality of my work would suffer. I also believe that
employers generally dont tend to greatly reward loyalty or commitment. Increased wages and promotion are
often easier to attain by changing jobs.

Overall, it can be said that the disadvantages of changing jobs are the advantages of staying put, and vice
versa... In my opinion, I feel that changing jobs every once in a while is of more benefit.
(Approximately 299 words)
(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers.)

Model Answer 2:
People have many expectations from their jobs. Jobs are usually done by people to fulfill their needs and also
for self-satisfactions and for gaining skills. Employees look for promotions and salary hikes whenever they think
they deserve it. To obtain this some people prefer to change jobs frequently while others continue with one job
in the same company. This is a typical question nowadays. I strongly believe that both situations have pros and
cons.

Firstly, if people endure in the same company in the same job, then they gain a lot of experience which is
counted to offer promotion ultimately and that results in salary hike. Moreover for this scenario responsibility
increases, it provides security and also shows loyalty to company. So, company recognizes the employee as a
trust worthy person and offers many benefits including foreign job promotions. On the other hand, continuing
job in the same company for a longer time is a slow process of career growth. Same work throughout the
career is also a tedious one to many people.

Secondly, switching from one job to other jobs will bring challenging environment whether they continue in
same company or other. While doing this, they get chances of having new social relations, gain different job
skills. By continuous change new picture come to screen; so, ultimately the person will be fresher to the new
job. But if the transferring takes place with the same job among various companies lead to quick career growth.
In general more people are interested to do this process. The one big advantage is salary hikes will be more.

Finally, I strongly opine that continuous change in job provides quick career growth. While staying in a single
job in the same company avoids personal problems like shifting house, children's education growth, adjusting
to new environment etc.

Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or

destroy them and replace them with modern buildings?
What is your view point on this issue?
Model Answer 1:
Some people think that old, historic buildings are no need for the city and they should be destroyed and
replaced with modern ones. However, other people believe that historic buildings must be preserved in order to
know and remember our past. For several reasons that I will mention bellow I agree with those people who
want to preserve old, historical buildings.

First of all, by preserving historical buildings we pass our history to our future generations. I think that out
children should know their history, learn from it and respect it. People need to know their traditions and
customs, which are priceless and irreplaceable. Our history is our knowledge and power. From my opinion we

need to preserve and restore historical buildings. By destroying them we show our disrespect to our forefathers
and their traditions.

Second of all, by preserving historical buildings a city can attract many travelers. Welcoming tourists a city can
get many benefits including money, which can be spent on preserving historical buildings as well as on
improving roads and facilities. Every city has its own tradition and history which is reflected through the art and
cretion of the building mostly. Destroying those heritage means destroying the old value and history.

Also, many tourists mean a lot of new business opportunities. Another important aspect of this is that
businessmen will be willing to build new recreational centers, hotels, movie theaters, shopping centers to make
a city more attractive for travelers. In addition to those practical benefits, many people will have the opportunity
to get a job. All this is good for the economy of the city.

To sum up, I believe that preserving old, historical buildings can bring only benefits to a city and all humankind.
(Approximately 289 words)
(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers.)

Model Answer 2:
Modernization has resulted in rapid expansion of cities, which has left its heritage and culture behind. Day by
day new commercial complexes and other buildings are coming up in the place of older buildings. Sometimes
historically significant buildings have been demolished to build new structures. This has stirred into an
interesting debate on whether the historic buildings should become prey of modernization or not.
Firstly, conserving historical building is a means of transferring ancestral legacy to the future generations.
These are a great means for our children to learn about our culture and heritage, also such monuments often
give insight into our ancestor's lifestyle. Knowing our history and giving respect to it is very much important to
advocate patriotism in young people.
Secondly, such buildings will attract more tourists, hence tourism industry will grow. This brings more money,
thus improves the lives of people over there. Same money could be used to preserve and renovate such
buildings. Additionally, city becomes well known among other parts and this increases chances of getting more
funds and investments.

Finally, increased tourism means increased income. To cater to the increasing number of tourists new hotels,
resorts and better facilities have to be built. Apart from bringing more money, it increases employment
opportunities too.

In my opinion by preserving such buildings would greatly benefit to the economy and also teaches future
generations about their history, culture and traditions. Furthermore it significantly contributes to infrastructure
developments and modernization, at the same time allows saving the cultural beauty.

(Approximately 251 words)

(by- Santosh)

Model Answer 3:
It is believed that old, historic buildings are not useful to the community and they occupy space in an already
premium location. Take Colosseum of Rome for example, the building occupies a lot of space in the middle of
city but it has more advantages that compensates for the loss of premium due to land cost. It can be argued
that the contemporary buildings have more advantages than disadvantages by analyzing the impact due to
culture and revenue from tourism in these buildings.
The rich cultural and heritage of our ancestors can only be passed down to the future generations through such
structures. The structure is an evidence of history and portrays itself to provide a comparison of lifestyle
evolution since the recorded history. As an illustration, Eiffel tower standing tall in the centre of the city was built
about a century ago. It clearly is not having any useful money generating purpose apart from tourism. However,
the future generations can take it as a proof for existence of scholars who could build skyscrapers which could
last several centuries without use of modern technology and equipment. The pride of owning such engineering
marvel is priceless.

Secondly, the governments spending to preserve this building is benefitted multiple folds through the revenue
generating by touring individuals. The revenue generated from Tirupathi temple for instance, accounts for
second largest revenue generating source after tax revenue in case of Andhra Pradesh. Hence, it can be
clearly seen that the amount of effort and time invested by city governments could fetch a very attractive return
over investment than building modern structures.

On the other hand, due to migration of people from country-side and due to population expansion within cities,
there is a huge demand for real estate space. There is increasing pressure on local governments to demolish
heritage buildings due to inefficient usage of space inside them. For instance, Singapore which has a total area
of 27 km2 cannot afford to have a large colosseum. These days though, local bodies are coming up with
innovative ideas like moving an entire building by fitting wheels under them. Such techniques can be used
instead of destroying the culture and revenue from them.

In short, preserving a historic building within a city proves to be a highly valuable proposition than replacing
them with modern buildings. Hence it is recommended to city officials for looking into every possible alternative
than demolishing the historic monuments.

(Approximately 432 words)

(by- Vasudevan)

Model Answer 4:
Past and future have to be a part of every city's characteristics; this is what makes cities different and diverse.
Thats how we get attracted to one city and feels bored at another. Walking in the streets alone should give us
an idea of the history of the city or how technologically advanced it is. So, I think it is a critical task and an
influencing one on the inhabitants of the city to decide what historical buildings to keep and what to replace with
modern iconic ones. This balance can keep the soul of a city and still hold a place on the race of development.

On another hand, I think it is crucial to keep a significant amount of any city's historical buildings as it teaches
people about their past and how did they developed, it grows a sense of loyalty and patriotism; it increases the
feeling of ownership and in return preservation. In general these impacts positively on society and on the
message any visitor leaves with after a visit.

Here comes to mind how the city of Munich in Germany rebuilt and still most of the historical buildings
destroyed during the world war two, it is an accurate imitation of the original destroyed building using archived
photos and old blue prints, this shows how significant history is to their culture and way of life.

In brief, it's not the buildings that are preserved, it's the history, the stories behind those buildings and the
people spent parts of their lives on those buildings, preserving all this will never happen unless there are still
remains of their past presence and those buildings stands as a witness and a living proof of this existence.

Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy

things that we really do not need. Others say that
advertisements tell us about new products that may improve
our lives.
Which view point do you agree with?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or
experience.

Model Answer 1:
The purpose of advertising is to tell the consumer about any new product or service or any new promotion on
the existing product and service. We need it so we can make good decisions when we go shopping. Advertising
tells us when new and improved products become available and lets us know which ones have the best price.

Through advertising we learn about new products. For example, many grocery stores now sell prepackaged
lunches. These are very convenient for busy parents. They can give these lunches to their children to take to
school. Busy parents dont have time to look at every item on the store shelf, so without advertising they might
not know about such a convenient new product.

Even products we are familiar with may be improved, and advertising lets us know about this. Most people use
cell phones, but new types of cell phone service become available all the time. There are different plans that
give you more hours to talk on the phone, you can send text messages and photos, and next week probably
some even newer type of service will be available. By watching advertisements on TV it is easy to find out
about new improvements to all kinds of products.

Advertisements keep us informed about prices. Prices change all the time, but everyone can look at the ads in
the newspaper and see what the latest prices are. Advertisements also inform us about sales. In fact, some
people buy the newspaper only in order to check the prices and plan their weekly shopping.

Advertisements improve our lives by keeping us informed about the latest products developments and the best
prices. Advertisements serve a useful purpose.
(Approximately 281 words)
(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers.)

Alternative Answer 2:
I think that everyone can divide all advertising products and services into useless ones and useful ones. It is
like looking through an information desk when you pay attention to those messages that interest you. Take me
for example.
I do not like jewelry. It does not mean I do not have it at all, I have a couple of inexpensive rings as gifts from
my parents. I just think, people pay too much attention to this stuff. I believe it is the result of mass advertising.
Every day when I am watching TV, listening to the radio or reading the paper I notice many ads about getting
an expensive ring, chain, necklace or ear-rings. From my point of view these kinds of advertising contaminate
people's minds. In this case you are encouraged to buy things you do not really need. They make you believe
you need such products in order to succeed or be happy.

From the other side, I think that advertisements of the new detergents with up-to-date formulas to help you
maintain your cloth in perfect conditions, the new cars with some extra futures that make your traveling more
comfortable and sports goods that make your life healthier may help you to improve your life.

Recently my husband and I saw an ad on the Internet about a very interesting and inexpensive vocation to
Japan for a week. Is not it awesome? We like traveling. So now we are planning to find out more about it and,
may be, make reservations. I belief that without advertisements we would be unaware about plenty of
opportunities that may make your life happier, easier and less stressful.

My point is that every person has his own scale of values. So if he is vegetarian he will consider an ad about
meat products useless for him.

(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers.)

Sample Answer 3:
In a literal sense, Advertising is an art of showcasing a product to its future consumers. When a company or a
person advertise a product he is conveying how the product would benefit the consumer with its unique and
best features. Since the Inception of consumer markets merchants have been using Advertising and marketing
to sell their product and increase their reach to maximum consumers. I am in absolute discord with the
statement that Advertising insists people to buy things they do not need. In my view, Advertising is a key tool in
the market mechanism and can benefit customers and ultimately merchants in several ways like spreading
awareness, increasing competition, discourage monopoly and help the overall economy.
Advertising has helped and is continuing to help spread the right information and makes a consumer cognizant
of what is available in the market. It helps drive the competition upwards benefitting the end customer by
getting varied options to choose. For example when 'Colgate' came into market as the first toothpaste,
consumers did not have any other option other than Colgate until other companies like 'Close-up' started
advertising their product. This resulted in boost in competition which ultimately slashed the prices of the
product. Thus, Advertising plays a very important role in engaging the end customer such that the buyer gets
the best worth of what he is spending. While a consumer is the end target and beneficiary of any product
produced by a merchant, a consumer is also the best judge of the decisions he takes in terms of what he wants
to buy. In my opinion it is inappropriate to blame the advertising for an increased consumer spending. To curb
the unnecessary spending both people and government have to work collectively. People need to be wary of
their spending and pay heed to their finances by managing them smartly. Government can play their part in
authorizing and monitoring the right content to be published to the public. Hence, right and smart advertising
can help nation and its population in a great deal by exploiting the benefits of advertising.

To summarize, barring a few disadvantages Advertising can be used as a tool to enhance the growth of an
economy by increasing the spending, bringing the right products to the consumer, boosting the competition.
Even Government can use smart adverts to make people aware of managing their finances and increase
financial literacy. All in all I would recommend healthier advertising to benefit the consumer, merchant and
ultimately the world economy.

(Submitted by Deep Kagda)

Sample Answer 4:
I agree with the view point, that advertising anchorages us to buy things that we really do not need. Another
word for advertisement is a tool of marketing strategy. To introduce their product or services or to promote
their product or services this advertisement will highly useful.
If we never seen an advertisement and first time seeing that product in the market we never want to buy. That
is, we do not like to just try. If we already seen that product in the advertisement, we may want to buy and see
how it works. That is by see an advertisement again and again we indirectly familiar to that product before buy
and use. To make us familiar with the product we could watch many products have continuous advertisement
again and again.

In the advertisement, they show only the advantages of the product. That is an advantage for the marketers,
but disadvantage for the customers. While the marketing people encourage us to buy the things, we need to
identify the its disadvantages only after experienced.

Some products are really essential for our life. Some are not essential. But may use. Example of we may
experience to a detergent powder. Since telecasted several advertisement on a new detergent powder, we will
try out that detergent also once. This is the insisting part of advertisements on customers mind.

Each customer is different. All are not same. Same product will not convince all the public. Some products
targets children: kinder joy, chocolates, toys, cartoon products and etc. Even though parents well know about
this product is not good for their children, but they insisted to buy the products by the children after seen the
advertisement in television. Finally I would conclude, that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really
do not need.

(Submitted by Niro Devi)

Television has destroyed communication among friends and

family.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or
experience.
Model Answer 1:
The invention of television is undoubtedly one of humankind's greatest inventions. It is a way of communication
among people of one country and different countries and nations. People watch TV to find out about the latest
news, weather, sports, etc. It is a great way to learn new and extend one's range of interests. Scientists say
that children spend the same amount of hours in front of TV as they do in school. I think that this can be said
about many grown people too. Also, television is a great means of eliminating stress and tension. One can
relax and leave one's troubles behind lying on one's favorite sofa and watching a comedy. However, some
people believe that television has destroyed communication among friends and family.

Personally, I do not agree with this statement. A couple centuries ago people spent their time gambling,
reading, gossiping or playing chess. I do not think that television is a cause of destroyed communication among
family members and friends. First of all, if members of a family have common interests and they want to make
each other happy they will always find many ways to spend their time together and be close. Otherwise, if
people avoid each other and they do not have anything to share with each other they will find television a great
way to escape from this miserable existence. I believe that many people chose family and their friends over
some soap operas or a movie.

Second of all, I think that television can be a great resource of subjects to discuss. Many people watch different
educational programs to find out more about their environment, nature, wild life animals, economic situations,
etc. So, when they gather with their friends they discuss important issues and arque with each other in looking
for the truth.

My husband and I often watch the news channel to keep abreast of the latest news. After that we always
discuss some issues we concerned about. Also, we like to watch a TV show "the funniest animals". We like this
program because it makes us laugh. I can not imagine how these programs can prevent our communication
and be harmful to our relations.

To summarize, I would like to add that if people want to communicate with each other they will find a way to do
it. Otherwise, if television were not existent, people would find other escapes and reasons not to be with each
other such as drugs, gambling, etc.
(Approximately 413 words)
(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers.)

Model Answer 2:
Some people believe that the existence of television bring negative effects to the communities. It is reported
that television is one of the main reasons for the miscommunication problem between families, relatives and
friends. I personally disagree with the statement, since it is not the televisions fault, but mainly due the
irresponsible act of the individuals themselves, and the following paragraphs will explain it in more details.
For a number of reasons, television brings a lot of benefits for many individuals and societies. Firstly,
televisions provide lots of crucial information which are certainly useful for many communities. For example, it
is common that news on television inform about the economic and political conditions of a particular country.
This crucial information is definitely important for investors, financial analyst or bankers in making short and
long term investment. Secondly, television also provides educative shows which are truly beneficial for the
communities, specifically for students and scholars. Some of the shows are National Geographic Channel,
Discovery or Animal planets which educate the public regarding to the wildlife and natural sciences.

On the other hand, some people are addicted to television and have spent large portion of their personal time
in front of the television and ignore their main duties as a member of a family or part of certain communities. I
personally think that these kinds of problems are not due to the existence of the television, but due to the
individuals themselves who are not capable and responsible in managing their times. It is also noticed that
some people are not being wise in utilizing their smart phones which certainly exaggerate the issues.

In conclusion, I strongly disagree that television have cause some serious problems for individuals in terms of
communication among families and friends, as it is the mistake of the individuals themselves who are not being
responsible in organizing their time.

(Approximately 311 words)

(This model answer was written by Darwin Lesmana .)

Model Answer 3:
In today's world, television is ever increasing. It is one of the most important things in human life. Almost
everybody is using the benefits of television. Some people believe that television has demolished
communication among friends and family. In my opinion, however, the opposite is true. Television can increase
communication. We see news and other information on TV which gives us things to discuss with our friends
and family. Moreover, it also helps us to understand each other.
Television programs give us things to think and talk about. These days it is possible to hear news every time we
turn on the television. We hear about things happening all around the world. Everybody has opinions about

these things and everybody wants to discuss their opinions with other people. So, TV news and information
programs encourage us to discuss our ideas with our friends and family.

Now people in every part of the world have access to the same TV programs. When you go to a new city to
work, study, or take a vocation, you will already have something in common with the people there. When you
meet new people, you will be familiar with at least some of the same TV programs. This gives you something to
talk about.

Most people use TV as a way of entertainment. People who play sports usually like to watch sports on TV.
People who like to cook watch cooking shows. If your friends and family watch some of the same programs as
you watch, they can learn more about things that interest you. This is a form of communication that helps
people to create mutual understanding among them.

In conclusion, these types of communication technology have brought people from all over the world closer
together.

(Approximately 293 words)

(This model answer was written by Sirojiddin.)

The number of overweight children in developed countries is

increasing. Some people think this is due to problems such as
the growing number of fast food outlets. Others believe that
parents are to blame for not looking after their children's
health.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with these views?
Model Answer 1:
There is plenty of evidence to suggest that children are overweight and the situation is getting worse, according
to the medical experts. I feel there are a number of reasons for this.

Some people blame the fact that we are surrounded by shops selling unhealthy, fatty foods such as chips and
fried chicken, at low prices. This has created a whole generation of adults who have never cooked a meal for
themselves. If there were fewer of these restaurants, then children would not be tempted to buy take-away
food.

There is another argument that blames the parents for allowing their children to become overweight. I tend to

agree with this view, because good eating habits begin early in life, long before children start to visit fast food
outlets. If children are given chips, ice creams and chocolate rather than nourishing food, or are always allowed
to choose what they eat, they will go for the sweet and salty foods every time, and this will carry on throughout
their lives. Parents decide what to buy and let their children to eat and many parent knowing and feeling that
their kids are overweight let them eat high calorie contained foods like fast foods. If parents try to make their
kids understand that those type of fast foods are not good for their health and draw a restriction on how much
their kids are allowed to eat then the problem can be solved partially.
There is a third factor, however, which contributes to the situation. Children these days take very little exercise.
They do not walk to school. When they get home, they sit in front of the television or their computers and play
video games. Not only is this an unhealthy pastime, it also gives them time to eat more junk food. What they
need is to go outside and play active games or sport.

The two views discussed play an equal role in contributing to the problem, but I think we have to encourage
young people to be more active, as well as steering them away from fast food outlets and bad eating habits.
We need to have a balanced approach.

(Approximately 360 words)

(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers.)
Alternative Answer 2:
Increasing number of overweight children in developing nations is a major problem which is always open for a
debate. This is a topical question nowadays. Regarding this issue, some people think that problem is due to
rise in number of fast food centers while others point out that parents are responsible for lacking care on
children's health. I strongly opine that food habits are completely transformed which need to be rectified
immediately.

On one hand, different types of foreign dishes are spread throughout the world. As children are more interested
in these foods, they choose them without knowing cons about them. Consequently, a developing country
cannot deny the entry of foreign trade which effects economy of nation. The ingredients used to prepare an
item in the fast food outlets are of low quality but rich in fat contents and other elements which effect child's
health. factors behind increasing demand for fast food centers in low cost, instant availability of food and finally
feasible in distance as grew in number, which are in every corner of street.

On the other hand, parents are more blamed due to this problem. There are many factors relevant to this. In
this challenging world, both parents are willing to have job to adopt posh lifestyle and also to show their status.
Consequently, there vision on the child's food habit plunged to low level thus result in unhealthy food habits.

Other reasons like hormonal imbalance or gene transfer from parents to children result in obesity. In this urban
life families prefer to late parties, restaurant foods etc. These new interests devastated healthy food habits.

Finally, in short consumption of fast foods should be reduced gradually simultaneously parents ought to pay
more concentration on children habits and also force them to do exercises which keep body it.
(Approximately 300 words)
(This model answer has been submitted by Kalyan Chakravarthy.)
Alternative Answer 3:
All around the world the living standards are becoming higher and all more similar to western society. This
changing in the everyday life brings also its contradictions and drawbacks, like the dramatic increasing in the
number of overweight people. This problem is even more worrying if we consider the number of overweight
children, which causes will be treated in this essay.

One of the reasons lots of people think is the cause of such a problem is the exponentially growing number of
fast food outlets in developed countries. Fast foods originally were places where to eat a meal in few times, but
now have become also the easiest and cheapest solution to have lunch all over the world. Consequently
millions of families prefer to eat in fast foods where the food is appealing, thanks to the huge work on
advertisements, and the cost is reasonable. Therefore, parents bring their children to the fast food outlets,
where food isn't organic at all and the dimensions of a meal are completely over-proportioned.

However, parents are responsible for their children's diet and have to look after them in order to avoid they
become overweight or even obese. Parents have to find time to prepare healthy food for children, for example
fresh vegetables or meat, that don't require more than half an hour of cooking. Moreover, parents have to free
their children's diet from sweets, exchanging them with fresh fruit.

In conclusion, both fast foods and lack of parental control are causes of the increasing number of overweight
children. Consequently, a change in familiar eating habits and in fast food outlets menus could prevent the risk
of a future world wide spread obesity problem.
(Approximately 280 words)
(This model answer has been submitted by Luca Brotto.)

Alternative Answer 4:
I strongly believe that both components mentioned: the growing of fast food counters along with parent's
attention deficit over their children health could be blamed for the causes of overweight young people.
In term of fast food counter, it should not be solely pointed as the contribution factor toward this matter. The
increment of cow milk consumption in toddlers, in a change for breastfeeding milk, is also in charge guilty.

Several research conducted on this, had proven, that obesity is common among baby who were given cow milk
instead of being breastfed. Fast food, on the other hand, contains high fats and unsaturated fatty acids, which
are hazardous for well being not only for children but also for grown up people. Whereas parents lack of
attention on their children eating habits, must also taken seriously. They must be acknowledged the importance
of introducing nutritious meals to children. Children under five years of age, for instance, is best given high
protein contains food, which accounts for brain development and boosting their cognitive ability. And as for
obesity, one must be alerted on it impact on children health status for it had been recognized as one of the
major factors resulting in cardiovascular disease, diabetes and stroke.

In conclusion to this essay, parent's knowledge in healthy life style and early introduction to the children must
given more emphasis to help anticipating the increase numbers of overweight young people. And in addition,
government along with society must also hold full responsibility on the children well being in general. It might be
necessary in the future to create a policy controlling fast food outlets opening.

(Approximately 271 words)

(This model answer has been submitted by Nuke Amadeus.)

Sample Answer 5:
It is true that the problems of obesity children in advance countries have grown rapidly in the past recent years.
A group of people believe that it is due to the increasing number of fast food restaurants in the areas, while
another group thinks that it is due to the parents mistakes, as they have given fewer attentions to the children
these days. Although the growing numbers of fast food outlets do affect the problem, but I also agree that the
lack attentions of the parents also give significant impact on the obesity cases.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that the significant growths of fast food outlets have truly affected the case of
overweight problem in children. In most public places such as in theme parks or shopping malls, fast food
outlets restaurant definitely exist, and they offer various kinds of things which attract the children. For instance,
Mc Donald regularly gives additional bonus such as toys for the childrens meal package. As more and more
children are attracted to visit the fast food outlets, the existence of the outlets have grown rapidly nowadays
and they have outnumbered the healthy ones. As a consequence of the increasing trend, the children have
more option of outlets that they can select, and the probabilities of the children in consuming the foods are
getting higher.

On the other hand, I do believe that parents are also responsible for the problem as well. In the modern days,
the roles of wives have changed, as most of them have become career women these days. Since they are
focused with their careers, they have less time in doing the household activities, which include preparing meals
for their children. Instead of cooking healthy foods, they prefer to give meal allowance to their children, which is

more practical and efficient. As a result, many of the children purchased their meal in fast food restaurants, and
they have become overweight.

In conclusion, although the increasing populations of fast food restaurants have given some contribution to the
problem of overweight children, I do believe that the lack attentions of parents also play a significant role as
well.

(Approximately 359 words)

(This model answer has been submitted by Darwin.)

Sample Answer 6:
It is true that there is a growing trend in obesity children in industrialized nations in recent years. While this
issue is being pointed at the wide spread fast food restaurants, I would argue that parents should take full
responsible for growing a healthy child.
To begin with, the expanding of convenient food stores may not be the cause of overweight children. Although
some of the foods served in these restaurants may contain high saturated fat items, there are other factors that
could also result in gaining weight as well. Firstly, if children consumed excessive amount of unhealthy snacks,
sugary soda drinks, or prepackaged foods, they could also become obsessed. Secondly, even if the family did
visit the fast food outlets for meals, parents could still substitute unhealthy items with a healthier menu, such as
having French fries replaced with vegetables or salad.

In addition, parents certainly play a vital role in providing a healthy diet for their children. With the invention of
the Internet, it is possible to obtain information of food ingredients, daily nutrient proportion needed in each food
category and healthy recipes within minutes. Therefore, learning about how to prepare nutrient meals have
never been easier. I believe supplying healthy snacks for children during school days and preparing a healthy
balanced meal in the evening in routine could lead to a healthy body.

However, we must not be forgotten that ensuring children to have adequate amount of physical exercises is
also a critical contributor to their good health.
In conclusion, I believe that parents should be the ones who play a crucial role in up bringing their children in a
healthy environment.

(Approximately 275 words)

(This model answer was written by Stacey.)
Sample Answer 7:
In today's world, fast food is one of the main problems of all countries. Fast food causes many health problems

including the overweight issue. The proportion of eating fast food among young people is growing year by year
and this is why the overweight issue is getting worse over time.
It is believed that increasing the number of fast food outlets such as McDonalds is creating the health problem.
As these cafes and fast food outlets are convenient and near to our home or work place, they have become
part of our life in spite of their harmfulness. Children who eat from those fast food shops do not know what is
good and what is bad for their health. Nowadays even parents are consuming these foods even after knowing
they are not beneficial for our health. This problem does not only create the overweight, besides this, it can
cause heart attack and other health problems.

Busy parents cannot to take care of their children and cant maintain a balance diet for them. It is common
opinion for the working class parents and that is why children eat more and more fast food without control and
become fattier. Moreover, parents are grown-up enough to know what is healthy and what is unhealthy for their
kids. That is why parents should help their children to make a right decision on the way of eating food. Some
people think that, parents with kids can always go to restaurants where hygienic dishes are served.

As far as I am concerned, parents are more blameworthy than fast food outlets. Parents want to do their best
and make their childrens lives more colorful and sound. And they should not work all day, and it would be
better if parent can arrange more time for their kids. Also in my opinion parents should cook delicious foods at
home, teach their kids about balance diet, ask them to avoid harmful foods and inspire them to do some
exercise.

Children should be required to help with household tasks as

soon as they are able to do so.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Model Answer 1:
The issue about whether children should help with household tasks as soon as they are able to do so is open
for debate. Some people say that children should devote more time for playing with their friends, watching TV
and studying. However, other people believe that children should help their parents with household tasks.
Personally, for several reasons, which I will explain bellow, I adhere to the latter point of view.

First of all, I think that every child should have his or her own responsibilities. When I was a child my parents
taught me how to make breakfast in the morning. So, I woke up, went to the kitchen and prepared a couple of
toasts for breakfast. It was easy and I enjoyed doing it because I liked the way my parents thanked me and I
felt that they were proud of me. Also, my mom always wanted me to know how to cook, clean and iron my

cloth. Thanks to the learning, nowadays, when my maid can not come to my house I handle all household tasks
myself.

Second of all, performing household tasks teaches children to value the job of people who did it. When I was a
child I did not imagine that cleaning house could be so time and energy consuming. So, when I began to do
some of the household tasks by myself I began to respect the job of others and tried to collect all my toys after
my playing with them.

Finally, doing household tasks teaches children to arrange their time. In addition to those practical benefits,
help from children allows parents to have more spare time for their personal lives and for the children. A family
can have more time to spend with each other talking, watching movies or just enjoying the beautiful moments.

To sum up, I think that children should help their parents with household tasks. Doing household tasks helps
them to grow into independent, self-confident, and attentive persons who respect their parents.
(Approximately 334 words)
(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers.)

Model Answer 2:
As time goes by, parents have less and less time to spend at home with their children because of their working
pressure & schedules. Lots of people think that it should be better to teach their children to do house works, so
they could do household tasks more rapidly and especially together and can prepare for the upcoming days. I
think that is right to teach children to do house works and I will discuss this topic through the next paragraphs.

The reason why children should learn how to do household tasks is that it will become extremely useful to them
in the future. In fact, learning to do the house works will prepare children to adult life. Furthermore, the fact that
children can contribute to household tasks is a concrete help for their parents and a reason of pride.

Parents should firstly teach to their children to complete easy tasks such as removing dust or washing their
toys. Secondly, children could give some help with gardening or take care of pets, which are tasks that require
interest and more attention. Finally, young boys and girls could use also the hoover or the dish washer. The
most important aspect of teaching how to do house works is to make them easy-to-do and even amusing if
possible.
To conclude, people who don't believe that their children are able to do household tasks are completely wrong
and have to change their mind even if they hadn't been required to do house works when they were children
too.

[ by - Luca Brotto]

Model Answer 3:
Learning and education is an important part of a childs life. Children learn a lot from their surroundings. The
parents are the first guides and mentors of their children.
Involving the children in household tasks is a vital part of their learning. When the kids are old enough to be
able to help in such tasks, they should be made to do so. Children can be asked to help their mother in
cooking, cleaning the house, organizing their wardrobes, setting the dining table for lunch and dinner, putting
the things in order at home. These are small tasks, but in doing so, the children learn a lot.

These small chores inculcate a feeling of responsibility in children. For example, my two year old is always
instructed to put her toys back in the bucket whenever she is done playing. Now, she does not need to be told
that either, because she knows that its her responsibility to put her things back in order when she is done with
them. This sense of responsibility also makes a child more confident. The child also learns to help people
around. It develops a caring attitude towards other people. It also helps children to develop habit of doing
things together with their peers. The child gets disciplined when he is used to organizing his room and
wardrobe.

In short, in order to make the children a useful part of community, we should involve them in such activities.
This will not only groom their personalities but also set example for others to follow.

[ by - Javeria Khaleeq]

Model Answer 4:
Since the dawn of time children helped to do home tasks, but nowadays this situation has been changed and
all housework are done by elders. People believe that children must help to do housework, due to the
responsibility that they might earn and school themselves to work in group. I totally agree with the rubric above
and it will be proven in the following essay.
Firstly, house works aren't purposed only for one person, it should be divided. For instance, if mom would wash
clothes, daughter should run the vacuum cleaner, while son throws away garbage. In this case, people in family
will learn how to work in group and realize if they will do housework together it would be much easier than do it
alone. It's obvious from my example that, as more people involved in cleaning of the house as faster it would
be done.

Another advantage of "little helpers" is that, by giving them tasks you accidentally teaching them to
responsibility. For example, if children help in household, they will use to do tasks in time and in the near future

it'll be huge advantage for them. Because, in today's life punctual people are more reliable and accepted in
high positions, it is always a good idea to grow up children in this fashion.

In conclusion, in my view, even if our society is changing behavior of young generation, we have to teach them
to help us in household and by doing them, they actually will learn what is the responsibility and how difficult to
be in charge of something.

[ by - Akmal Sharipov]

Would you prefer to live in a traditional house or in a modern

apartment building?
Use specific reasons and details to support your choice.
Model Answer 1:
If I was asked where I would I prefer to live in a traditional house or in a modern apartment building, I think, I
would hesitate to answer. This question, from my point of view, is a controversial one. In the following
paragraphs I will analyze both these options and present my view.
From the one side, living in a modern apartment building brings many benefits. First of all, it is cheaper then
living in a traditional house and paying different kinds of fees I am not familiar with. For instance, my friend,
who recently bought a new house for his family, said me that it is much easier to live in an apartment and I tend
to believe him when I see his bills. So, living in an apartment will definitely help me to save some money.
Second of all, since I live alone I do not need a big house with many rooms. I just need a bedroom and a living
room where I can take my guests and have my work place. Another important benefit of living in an apartment
is that I will not have to buy much cumbersome furniture in order to furnish all rooms.

However, living in a modern apartment building can have a few disadvantages too. Firstly, it can be noisy and,
secondly, I will not have any privacy outside my apartment, for example, in a pool or gym.

From the other side, living in a traditional house has some advantages too. For example, I can have my own
pool, gym and a garden where I can relax and be alone. However, living in a house is usually more expensive
and requires more time to maintain a house. For instance, I will most likely have to hire someone to mow my
lawn and clean my pool not to mention all household tasks inside the house.

In conclusion, I think at this moment I would prefer to live in an apartment. It can help me save some money
and allows me to spend more time studying because I will not have to do many household tasks.

(Approximately 352 words)

(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one
example out of many possible answers.)

Model Answer 2:
Times have changed and so has the way people live. Due to changes in lifestyle and advancement in
technologies, people have started leaving many of their traditions. Some people still prefer to live in a traditional
house, others, however, are attracted towards modern houses. I would love to live in a modern apartment, for
several reasons that I will mention below.
On the one hand, those who prefer living in the traditional houses are the one who faces lots of issues with
routine living. One of the great disadvantages of the traditional house is that, it is impossible to use our favorite
electronic goods. So these people lose the chances to get interaction with the latest technologies. The
maintenance costs of these houses are comparatively very high.

On the other hand, modern apartment offers security in different forms. So the robbers cannot break in easily.
This is the exact place where people can enjoy most of the latest technologies. Apartment life teaches us good
manners, scheduled work and cleanliness in a better way. Also we can get exposure to a lot of people from
different communities. For example, a friend of mine who shifted from a traditional house and now living in an
apartment got the opportunity to mix with people from different states and also over time she became good with
technologies.

To conclude, the strong current of technological advancement has indeed eroded some traditions of our nation,
which includes traditional houses. Nevertheless, both of them are mutually incompatible. The only way we can
preserve our tradition which reflects our origin and roots by modern apartments, which should be build in the
form of our traditional houses.