Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/261080786
READS
235
4 AUTHORS, INCLUDING:
A. Bentounsi
Hind Djeghloud
University of Constantine 1
62 PUBLICATIONS 90 CITATIONS
20 PUBLICATIONS 44 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
I.
INTRODUCTION
a. Aligned position
b. Unaligned position
Fig. 2. Extreme positions for a basic SRM.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Material properties
&different coefficients
Calculating Loop
Stator
Geometric parameters of the prototype
Fig. 4. Plan of the different steps of pre-design.
Current (i)
III.
Rotor
Torque
B.
Geometric Parameters of the Prototype
The studied motor has salient poles both on the rotor
(Nr=4poles) and the stator (Ns=6 poles). The field winding is
on the stator while the rotor is made of steel lamination
without conductors or permanent magnets.
The SRM geometric parameters are calculated using
Matlab*.m file based on the approach developed in [1,2].
These parameters are used to model the considered prototype
with finite elements in order to extract its magnetic
characteristics. These characteristics are used for constructing
several look-up tables that will be inserted inside a
MATLAB/Simulink model.
The preliminary design process is based on mechanical
specifications data to determine various geometrical
parameters (length, diameters, and width of the teeth ) such
as in Table I. This will introduce us to simulate the prototype
using FEMM software. The main steps of pre-design are
summarized in the flowchart of Fig. 4.
TABLE I.
Parameter
Number of stator poles
Number of rotor poles
Number of turns
Clearance
Rotor bore diameter
Outer diameter
Air-gap length
Shaft diameter
Start (data)
Geometry and physical properties
Add materials
Boundaries conditions
Mesh operation
Results
Fig. 5. Flowchart of finite elements simulation by FEMM.
GEOMETRIC PARAMETERS
Value
6
4
359
8 mm
0.1142 m
0.2284 m
0.25 mm
0.04 m
Flux linkages [W b]
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
1.2
1
F lux lin k a g e s [ W b]
5
Excitation [A]
10
0.8
0.6
0.2
5
Excitation [A]
Linear Model
10
25
A.
0.4
Half-numerical results
Numerical results
IV.
T orq ue [N *m ]
20
15
10
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
position [deg]
0.35
0.3
inductance[H]
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
position []
0.7854
0.6981
40
35
0.6109
30
30
courant(A)
25
0.5236
0.4363
20
10
20
0.3491
0.2618
0.1745
0.0873
0
0
0.8
15
10
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
C u rren t [ A ]
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.4
0.9
0.8
position()
0.7
0.6
0.5
flux(Wb)
4
3
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
time[s]
0.05
0.06
0.07
couple(N.m)
0.5236
30
0.08
0.3491
0.2618
10
25
0.4363
20
20
0.0873
0.6109
0.6981
0.7854
10
0.1745
15
9
8
10
7
6
0.4
5
4
5
3
0.35
2
1
0
0.3
0.7
0.8
in du c tan c e(H )
courant(A)
0.25
0.5
0.6
0.4
0.1
0.2
0.3
position()
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
temps(s)
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
T orqu e [N *m ]
2.5
1.5
0.5
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
time[s]
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
3.5
total torque(N.m )
2.5
1.5
0.5
0.02
0.04
0.06
time(s)
0.08
0.1
0.12
2
Couple(N.m)
B.
Non-Linear Model
In a previous investigation, our 6/4 SRM was modeled by a
finite elements analysis (FEM) providing us with its different
magnetic data for the realization of the look-up tables [8].
These data were delivered in a matrix form, where each
2.5
1.5
0.5
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
temps(s)
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
[7]
3
2.5
couple(N.m)
[8]
1.5
0.5
-0.5
0.025
0.05
0.075
temps(s)
0.1
0.125
0.15
10
c ourant (A )
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
temps(s)
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
CONCLUSION