You are on page 1of 3

2662 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

10 / Friday, January 14, 2005 / Notices

Frequency: Quarterly. —Roadmap plan, next steps, and notice of permits issued under the
Total Responses: 212. assignments. Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978.
Average Time Per Response: 5,180 It is imperative that the meeting be This is the required notice.
hours. held on this date to accommodate the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Estimated Total Burden Hours: scheduling priorities of the key Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office,
1,098,240 hours. participants. Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755,
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): National Science Foundation, 4201
Dated: January 7, 2005.
$0. Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
Total Burden Cost (operating/ P. Diane Rausch,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
maintenance): $0. Advisory Committee Management Officer,
National Aeronautics and Space December 7, 2003, the National Science
Comments submitted in response to Foundation published a notice in the
Administration.
this notice will be summarized and/or Federal Register of a Waste
included in the request for Office of [FR Doc. 05–763 Filed 1–13–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
Management permit application
Management and Budget approval of the received. A Waste Management permit
information collection request; they also was issued on January 7, 2005 to the
will become a matter of public record. following applicant: Steve Brooks, Pole
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of SPACE ADMINISTRATION to Pole; Permit No.: 2005 WM–005.
January 2005.
[Notice: 05–003] Nadene G. Kennedy,
Cathy Kazanowski,
Permit Officer.
Chief, Division of Management Systems,
Alternative Fuel Vehicle Acquisitions; [FR Doc. 05–815 Filed 1–13–05; 8:45 am]
Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Notice of Availability BILLING CODE 7555–01–M
[FR Doc. 05–805 Filed 1–13–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–24–P AGENCY: National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of availability of NASA’s
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND annual report on its alternative fuel COMMISSION
SPACE ADMINISTRATION vehicle (AFV) acquisitions for fiscal [NUREG–1600]
[Notice (05–002)]
year 2004.
NRC Enforcement Policy; Extension of
SUMMARY: Under the Energy Policy Act Enforcement Discretion of Interim
NASA Search for Earth-Like Planets
of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 13211–13219) as Policy
Strategic Roadmap Committee;
amended by the Energy Conservation
Meeting AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
Reauthorization Act of 1998 (Pub. L.
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and 105–388), and Executive Order 13149 Commission.
Space Administration (NASA). (April 2000), ‘‘Greening the Government ACTION: Policy statement: revision.
ACTION: Notice of meeting. Through Federal Fleet and
SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory
Transportation Efficiency,’’ NASA’s
Commission (NRC) is revising its
SUMMARY: In accordance with the annual AFV reports are available on the
General Statement of Policy and
Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public following NASA Web site:
Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions
Law 92–463, as amended, the National www.hq.nasa.gov/office/codej/codejlg/
(NUREG–1600) (Enforcement Policy or
Aeronautics and Space Administration afv.htm.
Policy) to extend the interim
announces a forthcoming meeting of the ADDRESSES: Logistics Management enforcement policy regarding
NASA Search for Earth-Like Planets Division, NASA Headquarters, 300 E enforcement discretion for certain issues
Strategic Roadmap Committee. Street SW., Washington, DC 20546– involving fire protection programs at
DATES: Tuesday, February 15, 2005, 8 0001. operating nuclear power plants.
a.m. to 5 p.m., Wednesday, February 16, DATES: This revision is effective January
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
2005, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Mountain 14, 2005. Comments on this revision to
Standard Time. William Gookin, (202) 358–2306, or
william.e.gookin@nasa.gov. the Enforcement Policy may be
ADDRESSES: Westward Look Hotel, 245 submitted on or before February 14,
E. Ina Road, Tucson, AZ 85704. Jeffrey E. Sutton, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Assistant Administrator for Infrastructure,
Management and Headquarters Operations. ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
Eric Smith, Science Mission Directorate, to: Michael T. Lesar, Chief, Rules and
National Aeronautics and Space [FR Doc. 05–848 Filed 1–13–05; 8:45 am]
Directives Branch, Division of
Administration, Washington, DC 20546, BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
Administrative Services, Office of
(202) 358–2439. Administration, Mail Stop: T6D59, U.S.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
meeting will be open to the public up NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Washington, DC 20555–0001. Hand
to the capacity of the room. Attendees deliver comments to: 11555 Rockville
will be requested to sign a register. Notice of Permits Issued Under the
Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978 Pike, Rockville, Maryland, between 7:30
The agenda for the meeting includes a.m. and 4:15 p.m., Federal workdays.
the following topics: AGENCY: National Science Foundation. Copies of comments received may be
—Overview of strategic roadmap ACTION: Notice of permits issued under examined at the NRC Public Document
process and products. the Antarctic Conservation of 1978, Room, Room O1F21, 11555 Rockville
—Relationship to capabilities roadmaps. Public Law 95–541. Pike, Rockville, MD. You may also e-
—Legacy roadmap. mail comments to nrcrep@nrc.gov.
—Key science questions and future SUMMARY: The National Science The NRC maintains the current
missions. Foundation (NSF) is required to publish Enforcement Policy on its Web site at

VerDate jul<14>2003 14:36 Jan 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14JAN1.SGM 14JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 10 / Friday, January 14, 2005 / Notices 2663

http://www.nrc.gov, select ‘‘What We element) would remain in effect until Paperwork Reduction Act
Do, Enforcement,’’ then ‘‘Enforcement January 15, 2007.
This policy statement does not
Policy.’’ By letter dated July 7, 2004, the contain new or amended information
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) (ADAMS collection requirements subject to the
Sunil Weerakkody, Office of Nuclear Accession ML042010132) requested that Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear NRC extend the deadline for the letter U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) Existing
Regulatory Commission, Washington, of intent from January 16, 2005, to requirements were approved by the
DC 20555–0001, (301) 415–2870, e-mail December 31, 2005. According to the Office of Management and Budget
(SDW1@nrc.gov) or Renée Pedersen, NEI letter, the primary basis for this (OMB), approval number 3150–0136.
Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear request is to accommodate the licensee The approved information collection
Regulatory Commission, Washington, planning and budgeting for transition to requirements contained in this policy
DC 20555–0001, (301) 415–2742, e-mail 10 CFR 50.48(c). statement appear in Section VII.C.
(RMP@nrc.gov). The NRC considered NEI’s request in Public Protection Notification
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June light of possible safety implications, the
16, 2004, the NRC published in the NRC’s regulatory philosophy to provide The NRC may not conduct or sponsor,
Federal Register a final rule amending incentives for licensees to move to risk- and a person is not required to respond
10 CFR 50.48 (69 FR 33536). This rule informed, performance-based fire to, collection of information unless it
became effective on July 16, 2004, and protection requirements, and the NRC’s displays a currently valid OMB control
allows licensees to adopt 10 CFR need to put long standing fire protection number.
50.48(c), a voluntary risk-informed, issues on a closure path. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
performance-based alternative to current When the NRC issued the interim Fairness Act
fire protection requirements. The NRC enforcement discretion policy, the NRC
In accordance with the Small
concurrently revised its Enforcement chose to limit the time allowed to
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Policy (69 FR 33684) to provide interim submit a letter of intent to 6 months for
Fairness Act of 1996, the NRC had
enforcement discretion during a existing noncompliances because the
determined that this action is not a
‘‘transition’’ period. The interim NRC wanted to prevent undue delays in
major rule and has verified this
enforcement discretion policy includes either restoring compliance to 10 CFR
determination with the Office of
provisions to address (1) 50.48(b) or establishing compliance to
Information and Regulatory Affairs of
noncompliances identified during the 10 CFR 50.48(c). The NRC did not
OMB.
licensee’s transition process and, (2) consider the challenges imposed on the
existing identified noncompliances. licensees in budgeting and planning. Accordingly, the proposed revision to
After receiving NEI’s request to extend the NRC Enforcement Policy reads as
In accordance with the current
the time allowed for the letter of intent follows:
Enforcement Policy, for noncompliances
identified as part of the transition to 10 by one year, the NRC reevaluated General Statement of Policy and
CFR 50.48(c), the enforcement potential safety concerns associated Procedure for NRC Enforcement
discretion period begins upon the with a one year extension to existing Actions
receipt of a letter of intent from the noncompliances. The NRC concludes
* * * * *
licensee stating its intention to adopt 10 that granting NEI’s request does not
CFR 50.48(c) and it would remain in adversely affect public health and safety Interim Enforcement Policies
effect for up to two years. Furthermore, because: * * * * *
when the licensee submits a license • Enforcement discretion does not
amendment request to complete the apply to the risk-significant issues, Interim Enforcement Policy Regarding
transition to 10 CFR 50.48(c), the which under the Reactor Oversight Enforcement Discretion for Certain Fire
enforcement discretion will continue Process would be evaluated as Red; Protection Issues (10 CFR 50.48)
until the NRC completes its review of • Enforcement discretion does not * * * * *
the license amendment request. apply to issues that would be
The second element of the interim B. Existing Identified Noncompliances
categorized as Severity Level I;
enforcement discretion policy provides * * * * *
enforcement discretion for licensees • The licensee is required to adopt In addition, licensees may have
who wish to take advantage of the new compensatory measures until existing identified noncompliances that
rule to resolve existing noncompliances. compliance is either restored to 10 CFR could reasonably be corrected under 10
One of the criteria that must be met to 50.48(b) or achieved per 10 CFR CFR 50.48(c). For these
exercise this discretion is that the 50.48(c), and noncompliances, the NRC is providing
licensee must submit a letter of intent to • Licensees potentially would be enforcement discretion for the
adopt 10 CFR 50.48(c) within 6 months identifying and addressing implementation of corrective actions
of the effective date of the final rule. improvements to existing programs. until the licensee has transitioned to 10
Therefore, the current deadline for the In addition to allowing licensees time CFR 50.48(c) provided that the
letter of intent to allow discretion for for budgeting and planning to adopt 10 noncompliances meet all of the
existing noncompliances is January 16, CFR 50.48(c), this extension will also following criteria:
2005. allow licensees to consider the draft (1) The licensee has entered the
As a result, if a licensee submits a Regulatory Guide (RG) and the noncompliance into its corrective action
letter of intent on or before January 16, probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) and program and implemented appropriate
2005, (in order to meet the second fire modeling tools in their decision. compensatory measures,
discretion element) the enforcement This RG and the PRA were issued for (2) The noncompliance is not
discretion for noncompliances public comment in October 2004. The associated with a finding that the
identified during the licensee’s fire modeling tools will be issued for Reactor Oversight Process Significance
transition process (the first discretion public comment in Summer 2005. Determination Process would evaluate

VerDate jul<14>2003 14:36 Jan 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14JAN1.SGM 14JAN1
2664 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 10 / Friday, January 14, 2005 / Notices

as Red, or it would not be categorized The NRC provides reasonable Bulletin on Peer Review and
at Severity Level I, accommodation to individuals with Information Quality,’’ published in the
(3) The licensee submits a letter of disabilities where appropriate. If you Federal Register on September 15, 2003.
intent by December 31, 2005, stating its need a reasonable accommodation to OMB received 187 public comments
intent to transition to 10 CFR 50.48(c). participate in these public meetings, or during the comment period (available at
After December 31, 2005, as need this meeting notice or the http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
addressed in (3) above, this enforcement transcript or other information from the inforeg/2003iq/iq_list.html). In addition,
discretion for implementation of public meetings in another format (e.g. to improve the draft Bulletin, OMB
corrective actions for existing identified braille, large print), please notify the encouraged federal agencies to sponsor
noncompliances will not be available NRC’s Disability Program Coordinator, a public workshop at the National
and the requirements of 10 CFR 50.48(b) August Spector, at (301) 415–7080, Academy of Sciences (NAS). The NAS
(and any other requirements in fire TDD: (301) 415–2100, or by e-mail at workshop (November 18, 2003, at the
protection license conditions) will be aks@nrc.gov. Determinations on National Academies in Washington, DC)
enforced in accordance with normal requests for reasonable accommodation attracted several hundred participants,
enforcement practices. will be made on a case-by-case basis. including leaders in the scientific
Dated at Rockville, MD, this 11th day of * * * * * community (available at http://
January, 2005. This notice is distributed by mail to www7.nationalacademies.org/stl/
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. several hundred subscribers; if you no STL_Peer_Review_Agenda.html). OMB
Annette L. Vietti-Cook, longer wish to receive it, or would like also participated in outreach activities
Secretary of the Commission. to be added to the distribution, please with major scientific organizations and
[FR Doc. 05–887 Filed 1–13–05; 8:45 am] contact the Office of the Secretary, societies that had expressed specific
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
Washington, DC 20555 (301) 415–1969). interest in the draft Bulletin. A formal
In addition, distribution of this meeting interagency review of the draft Bulletin,
notice over the Internet system is resulting in detailed comments from
NUCLEAR REGULATORY available. If you are interested in numerous Federal departments and
COMMISSION receiving this Commission meeting agencies, was undertaken in
schedule electronically, please send an collaboration with the White House
Sunshine Act Meeting Notice electronic message to dkw@nrc.gov. Office of Science and Technology
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Dated: January 11, 2005. Policy. In light of the substantial interest
Commission. Dave Gamberoni, in the Bulletin, including a wide range
Office of the Secretary. of constructive criticisms of the initial
DATE: Week of January 17, 2005. draft, OMB decided to issue a revised
[FR Doc. 05–890 Filed 1–12–05; 9:32 am]
PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference draft for further comment. This revised
BILLING CODE 7590–01–M
Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, draft was published in the Federal
Maryland. Register on April 28, 2004, and solicited
STATUS: Public. a second round of public comment. The
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND revised draft stimulated a much smaller
ADDITIONAL MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
BUDGET number of comments (57) (available at:
Week of January 17, 2005 http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
Final Information Quality Bulletin for
Tuesday, January 18, 2005 Peer Review inforeg/peer2004/list_peer2004.html).
9:55 a.m. Affirmation Session (Public OMB’s response to the additional
AGENCY: Office of Management and criticisms, suggestions, and refinements
Meeting) (Tentative).
Budget, Executive Office of the offered for consideration is available at:
a. System Energy Resources Inc. President. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
(Early Site Permit for Grand Gulf
ACTION: Final bulletin. inforeg/peer2004/peer_response.pdf.
Nuclear Site), Docket Number 52–009,
The final Bulletin includes refinements
Appeal by National Association for the SUMMARY: On December 16, 2004, the that strike a balance among the diverse
Advancement of Colored People— Office of Management and Budget perspectives expressed during the
Claiborne County, Mississippi Branch, (OMB), in consultation with the Office comment period. Part I of the
Nuclear Information Service, Public of Science and Technology Policy SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION below
Citizen, and Mississippi Chapter of the (OSTP), issued its Final Information provides background. Part II provides
Sierra Club from LBP–04–19. Quality Bulletin for Peer Review to the
(Tentative). the text of the final Bulletin.
heads of departments and agencies
b. Louisiana Energy Services, L.P. (available at http:// DATES: The requirements of this
(National Enrichment Facility) www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/ Bulletin, with the exception of those in
(Tentative). fy2005/m05–03.html). This new Section V (Peer Review Planning), apply
*The schedule for Commission guidance is designed to realize the to information disseminated on or after
meetings is subject to change on short benefits of meaningful peer review of June 16, 2005. However, they do not
notice. To verify the status of meetings the most important science apply to information for which an
call (recording)—(301) 415–1292. disseminated by the Federal agency has already provided a draft
Contact person for more information: Government. It is part of an ongoing report and an associated charge to peer
Dave Gamberoni, (301) 415–1651. effort to improve the quality, objectivity, reviewers. The requirements in Section
* * * * * utility, and integrity of information V regarding ‘‘highly influential
The NRC Commission Meeting disseminated by the Federal scientific assessments’’ are effective
Schedule can be found on the Internet Government to the public. This final June 16, 2005. The requirements in
at: http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/ bulletin has benefited from an extensive Section V regarding ‘‘influential
policy-making/schedule.html. stakeholder process. OMB originally scientific information’’ are effective
* * * * * requested comment on its ‘‘Proposed December 16, 2005.

VerDate jul<14>2003 14:36 Jan 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14JAN1.SGM 14JAN1

You might also like