I.

As stipulated in our contracts, every independent service provider is to render labor for a prescribed 8
hours every workday, & is therefore entitled to an 8-hours worth of wages every work-day. Exceptions to
this provision of give-&-take are limited to specific situations, consented by both independent service
provider & administration, of an increase or decrease in the number of the consenting independent service
providers work hours/days, & this increase or decrease in the number of the consenting independent
service providers work hours/days must ergo reflect, as is also stipulated in our contracts, a corollary
change in the consenting independent service providers wagese.g. 9 hours of labor = 8 hours plus an
hours overtime worth of wages; 7 hours of labor = 8-minus-1 hours worth of wages.

Simply: the measure of labor-time rendered must be parallel to the measure of wages received. This has
been prescribed & consented in each independent service providers service contract.

Ergo to mandate an independent service provider for whatever reason/excuse to arrive at the workplace at
least 15 minutes before his/her shift without compensation corollary to the increase in his/her labor-time,
&, moreover, to sanction an independent service provider should he/she fail to observe this mandateby
way (1) of a decrease in his/her salary, of not a deduction reflecting the amount of time by which the
independent service provider was late, but of, automatically, a 30-minutes worth deduction at least, &
(2) of an infliction of 1/3 an absence in his/her company recordgoes against what has been prescribed
& consented in each independent service providers service contract, because, with the 15-minute
mandate, the measure of labor-time rendered is far from parallel to the measure of wages received.

II.

The disgust is threefold: (1) towards an unjustified decrease in wages qua time, & vice versa, consequent
to the administrations self-proclaimed decrease in hours of tenderable labor while even such a
justification as "no work, no pay yields its absurdity: the 30-minute break within 8 mutually-consented
paid work-hours could easily be used as substitute for the missed English lesson at 14:00; (2) towards
the administrations excessively paranoid mistrust (read: oppression) in its independent service providers,
apparent in the formers arbitrary (read: capricious) (dis)regard for, &/or retraction of, its own business &
managerial systems, which are/were, presumably, contemplated to be adequate foundational measures
& conditions qua pertinent, professional boundaries (e.g./i.e. definition of roles, of job responsibilities,
etc.) laid out for each independent service provider, priming them to fulfill effectively & efficiently

his/her position within the company, the articulation & realization of which having gained legal severity
in their capacity as provisions ratified in service contracts consented if not merely acquiesced by each
independent service provider, & (3) a disgust for the want of justice when the administration itself is
violating its own stipulations: as far as can be reasonably observed, it is the administration itself that is
passing onto its independent service providers its own costs/causes of failure, if not complete lack of
rigor, in dealing effectively with the issue, common as it is among organizations, business in nature or
otherwise, of tardiness and all its implications.

III.

I.
As stipulated in our contracts, every employee is to render labor for a prescribed 8
hours every workday, & is therefore entitled to an 8-hours worth of wages every
work-day. Exceptions to this provision of give-and-take are limited to special
situations, consented by both employee and administration, of an increase or
decrease in the number of the consenting employees workhours/days, & this
increase or decrease in the number of the consenting employees workhours/days
must ergo reflect, as is also stipulated in our contracts, a corollary change in the
consenting employees wagese.g. 9 hours of labor = 9 hours worth of wages; 7
hours of labor = 7 hours worth of wages.
Simply, the measure of labor-time rendered must be parallel to the measure of
wages received. This has been prescribed and consented in our employment
contracts.
Ergo to mandate an employee for whatever reason/excuse to arrive at the
workplace at least 15 minutes before his/her shift without a corollary compensation
to the increase in his/her labor-time, &, moreover, to punish an employee should
he/she fail to observe this mandate with (1) a decrease in his/her salary of not a
deduction reflecting the amount of time by which the employee was late, but
automatically of a 30-minutes worth deduction, & (2) an infliction of 1/3 an absence
in his/her record goes against what has been prescribed and consented in our
employment contracts, because, with the 15-minute mandate, the measure of
labor-time rendered is far from parallel to the measure of wages received.

II.
The disgust is fourfold: (1) of an unjustified decrease in wages (before citing no
work, no pay, recall the paid 30 minute break within the 8-hour labor-time which
could easily become a substitute for the missed English lesson at 1400 due to
tardiness); (2) of an excessive mistrust towards employees; (3) of the arbitrary &,

this being the most severe perhaps, (3) towards the want for justice when the
company is violating its own stipulations, which are bound, besides prescribed and
consented, by and within the law.