Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Design Variables
Variables:
Room
oo d
dimension
e so a
and
d geo
geometry
e y
Number and configuration of speakers
Listening positions
Dedicated low frequency surface treatment
Equalization
Design Process
Using the maximum and minimum room dimensions
to determine optimal dimensional ratios, using
Room Sizer
Using allowable speaker and listener locations,
optimize locations for speakers and listener, using
Room Optimizer
Minimize SBIR and maximally excite modes: optimally
placed multiple in-phase subs
Minimize
Mi i i SBIR and
d minimally
i i ll excite
it modes:
d
optimally
ti ll
placed multiple in-phase subs
Apply
pp y low frequency
q
yp
passive absorption
p
at optimal
p
positions in desired frequency bands
Use parametric digital equalization as needed
Dimensioning Comparison
Characteristic
Rigid Rectangle
Room Sizer
Metric
Algorithm
Absorption
Modal Weighting
Modal Overlap
Room Volume
Perception
Constraints
c
f =
2
nx n y nz
+ +
Lx L y Lz
2
FFT {E (t , r , r0 ) = Rn2,i
nx
ny
n z i=1
1
}
d n2,i
Rectangular Descriptions
Th
The rectangular
l room iis a special
i l case where
h
the
h
image model is an exact solution to the wave
equation and can be used for all frequencies in a
5
Modal Summation
perfectly reflecting room
An ( r , r0 )
4
p( r , ) = 2
2
(
nx n y nz
n j 2 n n )
3
Image Model
2
1
FFT {E (t , r , r0 ) = R
2 }
d n ,i
n x n y n z i=1
2
n ,i
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
Time (s)
0.04
Choose room
dimensions
randomly
More Accurate
Modal
Calculator
Calculate
modal
response
Calculate
figure of
merit
Standard
Deviation of the
Modal Response
Minimum in
figure of
merit?
Yes
End
Change
room
dimensions
No
Intelligent Search
Engine
Performance Index
N
= ( L p ,n mf n + c) 2
n =1
100
Best fit line
90
Leve
el (dB)
80
70
(Lp,n - fn)
60
50
40
0
40
80
120
f (Hz)
160
200
Bolt Comparison
110
Level ((dB)
100
90
80
70
60
0
50
100
150
Frequency (Hz)
Worst found
Optimised
Bolt 2:3:5
200
Room Sizer
Non-rectangular Study
15
19
Rectangular room
Skew room
14
24
7
6
5
4
Immunity to change
3
2
1
0
15
'0
"
15
'5
15 "
'1
0"
16
'3
"
16
'8
"
17
'1
"
17
'6
17 "
'1
1"
18
'4
"
18
'9
"
19
'2
"
19
'7
"
20
'0
"
20
'5
20 "
'1
0"
21
'3
"
21
'8
"
22
'1
"
22
'6
22 "
'1
1"
23
'4
"
23
'9
"
Stan
ndard Deviattion
Figure of merit
standard deviation 20-200Hz
Nice Start!
This is a nice start. We now know all of the modes that the
room can support.
However,
However the speakers will unfortunately not be in one
corner and the listener in the opposite diagonal corner!
The speaker positions will determine which modes are
excited and the listening position will determine which
modes are heard.
We now have to take into consideration the following:
The positions of the sub-woofers
The position of the listeners
We
e have
a e two
o cchoices:
o ces
Optimally activate the modes with the subs (Room Optimizer) for a
given listening position
Nullify
y all modes with the subs and listener p
placement for wide area
uniformity (Null-mode placement) as suggested by Todd Welti and
Floyd Toole
Listener placement
determines which
modes are heard
Abscissa identifies L,
W and H mode null
positions in the room
and their frequency
Speaker Placement
When a speaker is placed
2 into the room, the
f th order
fourth
d mode
d iis nott
energized
When a speaker is placed
3 from the side wall, the
second order mode at 81
Hz is not energized
When a subwoofer is
placed 5 above the floor
the first order mode at 57
Hz is not energized
Listener Placement
Wh
When a lilistener
t
iis placed
l
d7
or 12 into the room the
fourth order mode at 119
Hz is not heard
When a listener sits in the
middle of room width, the
odd order modes are
inaudible
When a listener is placed
near the mid height
position, the odd order
modes are inaudible
When the listener is at the
rooms centroid, only even
order modes are heard!
15
VIRTUAL IMAGE
(3,3,14)
-5
-10
-15
-20
VIRTUAL IMAGE
(
(3,-3,3)
)
-25
VIRTUAL IMAGE
(-3,3,3)
WALL
FLOOR
VIRTUAL IMAGE
(3 3 3)
(3,3,-3)
Frequency, Hz
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
0
100
CEILING
Energy, dB
Room Optimizer
SIMPLEX SEARCH
ENGINE FOR NEW
TRIAL LOCATIONS
E
Energy
CURRENT LOCATIONS
IF ERROR
IS LESS THAN
TOLERANCE THEN END,
ELSE TRY NEW
LOCATION
Time
Level (dB)
Level (dB)
IMPULSE RESPONSE
F
Frequency
F
Frequency
SPEAKER BOUNDARY
INTERFERENCE
MODAL RESPONSE
CALCULATE
COMBINED STANDARD
DEVIATION ERROR
li
listener
4
source
3
0
0.01
listener
source
0.02
0.03
Time (s)
0.04
100
( Lp, nf Lp ) 2
80
Level (dB))
nf =1
i =
90
N 1
70
(Lp,n - fn)
60
50
= w s + (1 w) l
40
0
40
80
120
160
f (Hz)
100
90
90
80
Level (dB
L
Level (dB
L
80
70
70
60
60
Best case
Worst case
Best case
Worst case
50
50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Frequency (Hz)
50
100
150
200
Frequency (Hz)
250
300
200
Room/Speaker Interface
To optimize the room/speaker interface you need to
simultaneously optimize the following
L, W, H (rectangular room +/- 2 feet)
Sn(x,y,z) location of each speaker
Ln(x,y,z) location of each listener
P
Prediction
di ti Al
Algorithm:
ith Image
I
model
d l is
i a perfect
f t solution
l ti off the
th
wave equation for a elastically reflecting rectangular room
Metric: Simultaneously minimize the modal frequency
response and
d th
the speaker
k b
boundary
d
iinterference
t f
response
Optimization Algorithm: Downhill Simplex or Genetic
Algorithm
We
W ffound
d iit practical
i l to di
divide
id this
hi program iinto the
h room
dimensioning optimization and speaker/listener location
optimization
rr
p(r|r0) =
n x ny y n z n x ny y0 n z
cos z cos x 0 cos
cos z 0
cos x cos
2r
2 L L L L L L
k k
x
z
x
z
y
y
nx =ny =nz = n
Qs
i
LxLyLzxyz
n y
nx
nz
2
+
k nr =
+
L
Lx
Lz
y
2
C U R R EN T LO C AT IO N S
Genetic
Algorithm
Energgy
E N G I N E Engine
FOR NEW
Search
T R IA L L O C A T IO N S
IF E R R O R
IS L E S S T H A N
TO LERAN CE TH EN END ,
E LSE TR Y N EW
LO C ATIO N
T im e
IM P U L S E R E S P O N S E
100
Best fit line
Level (dB)
80
F r e q u e n cy
F re q u e n c y
SP EA K E R B O U ND AR Y
IN T E R F E R E N C E
M O D A LResponse
R ES PO N SE
Modal
SBIR
Level (dB)
Level (dB)
90
70
(Lp,n - fn)
60
50
CALCULATE
C O M B IN E D S T A N D A R D
D E V IA T IO N E R R O R
Fitness Metric
40
0
40
80
120
f (Hz)
160
200
Genetic Algorithm
A genetic
ti algorithm
l ith mimics
i i th
the
process of evolution that occurs in
biology, wherein the variables, namely
th coordinates
the
di t off th
the speakers,
k
listeners and room dimensions
comprise the genes
The genes are simply a set of numbers
which describe the room
A population of individuals (surround
configurations) is randomly formed,
and the traits of each room are
determined by their genes
Offspring are produces with traits of
their parent rooms and mutation is
introduced to allow features not present
in the initial room population
Gene 2 = Length2,
Width2, Height2, Sn2(x),
Sn2(y) Sn2(z)
Sn2(y),
Sn2(z), Ln2(x)
Ln2(x),
Ln2(y), Ln2(z), etc.
Last Gene
Room Optimizer
Automatically optimizes the locations of the
p
, listener and acoustical surface
loudspeakers,
treatment
Multichannel SBIR
Multichannel Modal
Nullify Modes
Nullify all modes with the subs and listener
placement for wide area uniformity (Null-mode
placement) as suggested by Todd Welti and
Floyd Toole
Speaker
placement
determines
which modes
are energized
Listener
placement
determines
which modes
are heard
1st and 3rd order modes are cancelled by placement at positive and negative parts
off the
th respective
ti modes.
d
The
Th second
d order
d mode
d is
i nott energized,
i d because
b
the
th
sub is positioned at a null.
4 Subs at Positions
__
__
+
+
+
__
L1 & L3 cancelled
+
+
L2 not energized
Uniform LF F/B
W1 & W3 cancelled
W2 not energized
Uniform LF across
console
H1 not heard
No Modal Excitation
(4) Speakers at:
100
(1/4L, 1/4W, 0.75')
(1/4L, 3/4W, 0.75')
(3/4L,
95 1/4W, 0.75')
(3/4L, 3/4W, 0.75')
g mode
Onlyy 4th length
90
remains and first-order
height mode
(
(4,0,0)
)
(0,0,1)
Level, dB
B
85
Moving Listener to
center of the room
(L/2, W/2, H/2),
removes the first
g
order Floor/Ceiling
mode
80
75
70
6
65
60
0
20
40
60
80
100
Frequency, Hz
4 Speakers @ 1/4
All Modes
120
Summary
Equalization
Absorption Measurements
Random Incidence Rev Room Test: ISO 354
20 eigenfrequencies in 1/3-octave band: sample on floor as per ISO.
For 200 m3 lower freq limit 100-125 Hz 1/3- octave
5-20
5 20 eigenfrequencies
i
f
i iin 1/3
1/3-octave
t
band:
b d sample
l iin corner
<5 eigenfrequencies in 1/3-octave band:
Sine wave excitation of each eigenfrequency separately
T-Room
Room (Nocke) 3x4x5 m room with low frequency limit of roughly 30 Hz
T
[i]
-10
-20
[i]
[ii]
-4
[ii]
-30
-8
-40
50
100
150
ms
50
100
150
ms
Diffusors
Microphones
Loudspeakers
Binary Modex
1.000
0.900
0.800
Absorptio
on Coefficient
0.700
0.600
0.500
0.400
0.300
0.200
0.100
0.000
100
125
160
200
250
315
400
500
630
800
Frequency, Hz
1000
1250
1600
2000
2500
3150
4000
5000
300
Frequencyy, Hz
250
200
150
100
50
0
10
100
1000
Volume m3
10000
T-Room 3 x 4 x 5m
Microphone
Position
Mode
(X,Y,Z)
1
1
2
3
4
5
4
1
6
7
8
1,0,0
0,1,0
110
1,1,0
0,0,1
1,0,1
2,0,0
0,1,1
111
1,1,1
2,1,0
0,2,0
2,0,1
Frequency(Hz)
Frequency
(Hz)
Measured
34
42
541
54.1
56.9
66.1
67.6
70.8
784
78.4
79.9
84
88.5
Calculated
33.6
41.6
537
53.7
56.8
66
67.2
70.5
781
78.1
79.2
83.7
88
3
8
4
5
6
7
2
effff
V 1 1
= 55.3
cS T2 T1
p( x1 )
p ( x2 )
e
e
ik 1
ikx
ik 1
ikx
Re
Reikx2
ikx2
ikx1
ikx 2
e
Se
R=
ik 2
ikx
ik 1
ikx
Se e
=1 R
Modex Study
c
0.5
d
For d= 200 mm
(7 87) the
(7.87)
th upper
frequency is 850 Hz.
IIm pedance
2
1
0
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
-11
-2
-3
146 Hz Resonance
-4
-5
Frequency, Hz
real(impedance)
imaginary(impedance)
260
280
300
Absorption Coefficient
1
0.9
Absorption Coefficient
0.8
0.7
06
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0
50
100
150
Frequency, Hz
Membrane 2" Cavity Depth
200
250
300
Anechoic Wedges
Wedge vs ASA_BCA_CPA
Optimal Placement
Porous absorbers are most efficient when
placed at the maximum particle velocity
position for a given frequency, namely
wavelength
Maximum
M i
efficiency
ffi i
achieved
hi
d spaced
d ffrom a
boundary
Acoustic Absorbers
Helmholtz Resonators
=2a
D
Perforated sheet
Porous absorbent
t
d
Rigid backing
S0
b
S
d
Cylindrical holes
Slits ((slotted
slotted panel)
panel )
A)
Porous
material
Panel
B)
Fabric
(resistance)
Panel
C)
Microperf.
panell
Surface Impedance
z1 = rm + j[m c cot(kd )]
The resistance or real
term, which is associated
with energy loss
Resonant Frequency
At resonance, the imaginary term goes to zero
w m = 2p fm = rc cot(kd )
The cavity size is much smaller than the acoustic wavelength, i.e.
kd<<1, so that cot(kd)1/kd
c
f =
2p
r
md
8n
t r D 2t
t + 2d a +
1 + =
2
w
2a p a
The last term in the equation is due to the boundary layer effect, and
is the kinematic viscosity of air. This last term is often not significant
unless the hole size is small, say sub-millimetre in diameter.
is the end correction factor (not allowing for mutual interaction),
which to a first approximation is usually taken as 0.85 and derived by
considering the radiation impedance of a baffled piston
piston. Other more
accurate formulations exist.
c
2
md
c
2
2 '
D t
2
a
c
2
S
Vt '
2a
D
=
2a
D
c
f =
2
t' d
a
D
Acoustical Properties
Slotted/Unsealed
Slotted/Sealed
Absorption Coefficient
Unslotted/Unsealed Unslotted/Sealed
Transmission Loss
Hybrid LF Diffsorber
Empty Tube
1
A b s o r p t io n C o e f f ic ie n t
0.8
0.6
0.4
Empty Tub
0.2
0
0
50
100
150
-0.2
Frequency, Hz
200
250
300
Helmholtz Study
1
0.9
A b s o r p tio n C o e ffic ie n t
08
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
Frequency, Hz
Flat Panel 12" Cavity A
300
Absorption Mechanism
When surface perforations are
the same size as a boundary
l
layer
off air.
i
Viscous Losses
Incident Sound
Microperforated
p
Panel
0.5 mm diameter holes
Air Ca
avity
Reflected Sound
Glass
Microperforated Absorbers
rD
m=
2
pa
8n
t
t + 2d a +
1 +
w
2a
The last term in the equation is due to the boundary layer effect
effect, and
is the kinematic viscosity of air (1.8 x E-5 Kg/ms). This last term is
often not significant unless the hole size is small, say sub-millimetre
in diameter
diameter.
The end correction is increased by the boundary layer effect and
resonant frequency is reduced due to an increase in acoustic mass .
Losses
zh =
2wrh
rh z 1
j1.7wr
ra
+ - j rc cot(
t(kd ) +
2e
e
e
Microperforated Options
F
Foil:
il 0
0.1
1 mm
Panel: 2 mm 15 mm
Sh
Sheet:
t 1 mm
Honeycomb: 19 mm
Effect of Layers/Backing
Deamp Microslit
Theory
For an infinitely long slit:
Z = j t = j
0 t
k b
tan( )
2
1
k b
2
y
x
where
0
k =
j
12 t
1 t b 2 02 2
6
Z 2 +
+ j 0t
b
700
T.E. Vigrana and O.K.. Pettersenb, a Acoustic Group, NTNU Dept. Electronics and
Telecommunications;b SINTEF-ICT, Trondheim, Forum Acusticum 2005
Theory II
t
b
B
d
Z i = [ Z + j 0 (2t ) ] j Z 0 cot d
c0
1
Absorption Data
ta
d
Rigid
g backingg
c
f =
2
md
60
f =
md
1.21 kg / m3
340 m / s
Absorption
efficiency
decreases with
frequency,
because the
impedance of
the porous
material moves
further from the
characteristic
impedance of
air at low
frequencies.
2" Cavity
0.9
4"
6"
0.8
6"+Damp
8"
10"
Abs
sorption Coefficie
ent
0.7
0.6
0.5
04
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
40
60
80
100
120
Frequency, Hz
140
160
180
Plate Resonators
High Pass
Broadband
Plate Resonators
Mechanisms
Steel Plate
Pistonic Resonance
P f Metal
Perf
M t l
Diffraction
High Pass Broadband
Plate Parameters
steel density
melamine density
c in m/s
E steel, Pa
Kg/m3
Poissons ratio
Kg/m3
E melamine, Pa
melamine L, m W, m T, m
n
2.06E+11
7850
0.3
9.5
1.00E+06 324.44284
1
1.5 0.001 1
0 0025 2
0.0025
3
4
m
1
2
3
4
Performance
16
1.6
oefficient
Absorption Co
1.4
Broadband
1.2
1
0.8
06
0.6
0.4
Plate
0.2
0
50
160
500
Frequency, Hz
1600
5000
In-wall installation
Reve
erberation tim
me [s]
08
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0
32
63
125
250
500
1000
2000
4000
Frequenzcy [Hz]
no Absorber
with Absorber
8000
Conclusion
Much time has been devoted to dimensional ratios,
however, however this is less important that the
optimal position of the low frequency speakers and
the listener (s).
Uniform
U if
llow ffrequency response up tto 80 H
Hz can b
be
achieved by using multiple in-phase subs
The
Th mostt effective
ff ti low
l
frequency
f
absorbers
b b
are
metal plate resonators and membrane absorbers
Diligent use of parametric equalization of low
frequency peaks is effective in fine tuning the room
response
Ray Tracing
Image Model
S1
1
d
R1
d
S
R2
Diffractal
1
0.9
A b s o r p t io n C o e f f ic ie n t
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
01
0.1
0
0
50
100
150
Frequency, Hz
Diffractal 12" Cavity
200
250
300
Table of Contents
How to optimize rectangular room dimensions and
speaker/listener positions
Low Frequency Surface Treatments
Proof of Performance Testing
Rev Room
Impedance Tube
T-Room
In-situ
Designs
Wedges
Helmholtz Resonators
Tuned Damped Membranes
Broadband Metal Resonators
Microperforated/slotted panels
Room Modes
Time/Frequency Equivalence
100
Level (dB
B)
90
80
70
60
50
40
0
40
80
120
f (Hz)
Modal decomposition
Image source
Measured
BEM Predictions
Helmholtz-Kirchhoff prediction not restricted to rectangular rooms
G ( R, q)
P( q)
P ( R ) = Ps (Q , R ) + ( P( q)
G ( R, q )
) Sq
n( q)
n( q)
q
ikrQR
e
Ps =
4 rQR
ikr
e Rq
G ( R, q ) =
4 rRq
1 (1)
G ( R, q) = H 0 ( krRq )
4i
Non-Rectangular Rooms
We begin by comparing the Boundary Element
Method calculation with the Modal Decomposition
approach used in Room Optimizer
130
120
Level, dB
110
100
Lam's model
BEM
90
80
70
60
0
20
40
60
80
100
Frequency, Hz
120
140
160
180
200
Level
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
0
50
100
150
200
Frequency, Hz
19'0"
19'1"
19'2"
19'3"
19'4"
19'5"
250
Level, dB
L
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
0
50
100
150
200
Frequency, Hz
19'0"
20'0"
21'0"
22'0"
23'0"
24'0"
250