International Journal of Mathematics and

Computer Applications Research (IJMCAR)

ISSN(P): 2249-6955; ISSN(E): 2249-8060
Vol. 5, Issue 4, Aug 2015, 65-78
TJPRC Pvt. Ltd.

ABOUT THE DECOMPOSITION OF PSEUDO-ADDITIVE MEASURES

DHURATA VALERA
Aleksandr Xhuvani University, NSF, MD, Elbasan, Albania

ABSTRACT
A new perspective about the treatment of the decomposition of the pseudo-additive measures is given in this
article. With the contribution of parameterized nonlinear functions some decompositions of the pseudo-additive measures
are expressed by the nonlinear and pseudo-nonlinear functional equations. These presentations have shown links between
pseudo-additive measures and their modifications by

transform, so the

decomposition of pseudo-additive

measures is given as a modified form of decomposition of pseudo-additive measures. Also are shown some relationships
between the decompositions treatments of pseudo-additive measures from different authors.

KEYWORDS: Pseudo-Additive Measure, Decomposition, Transform,

Decomposition

1. INTRODUCTION

This

treatments
(called

function by

for

decomposition

of

functions and denote by

pseudo-additive

measures

in general and then

are

motivated

by the

role

of

for special case) [1]as modified

of some special functions that are solutions for some important functional equations [1], [2].

The classes of some functional equations and their pseudo-functional equations with the solutions respectively are
presented in [1]. Further investigated for this classes and their solution are shown in [13]. Also by the parameterized
nonlinear continuous function presented in [14], the classes of functional equations and their solutions are studied using the
composition of functions and

as a further development of

In section 2 are recalled the definition of

parameterized nonlinear continuous function !

in cases of $!

applications

[3], [9].

[1], the special modification for measure

[13] and definition of

"

and probability , for the

[14] with the

&' , $! &' . The parameterized nonlinear functions and their modifications by

to the pseudo-nonlinear functions are treated also with Webers theory. Some cases in accordance with

Webers theory are presentet in section 3. That will serve us as a reasonable basis for further treatments in section 4 of the
decomposition for some type of the pseudo-additive measures using nonlinear functional equations. The definition for
)#

"

of pseudo-additive measure as modified by

, has led to the expression of the

decomposition of the pseudo-additive measures by pseudo-nonlinear functional equations. This section summarizes the
rezults considered in this paper and are concluded in section 5 with some key relations between decomposition and
)#

"

for one or different types of the decompositions of the pseudo-additive measures [5], [6], [7],

[11],[12], [17].

www.tjprc.org

editor@tjprc.org

66

Dhurata Valera

2. PRELIMINARIES AND NOTATIONS

Definition 2.1: Let
of

pseudo-arithmetical

78 $

&,

78 $+&;is

be a function on* , +, *, +,and the function be a generator ofthe consistent system

operations{,,,}.

said to be

The

78 $

78

9 : $5&;<for

every5

corresponding to the function [1].

Definition 2.2: Let be a function on* , +, *, +,and the function be a generatorof theconsistent system
$5, ?& =

of pseudo-arithmetical operations {,,,}.The function given by

:

by $5& =

function given

&,

78 $+&;is

said to be

: A ,0, +* and the function

consistent system of pseudo-arithmetical operations{,,,}. The function

everyD {

78 $D &,
8 ,

78 $D

F &}

is said to be $ &

function [13].
Definition 2.4: Let

9 : $5&, $?&;<for every5, ?

corresponding to the function [13].

be a set function$ &

Definition 2.3: Let

78

be a induced probability measure$

given by

# function :

$D& =

function $

78 $D &,
8 ,

78 $D

F &}is

said to be

& [13],[19],[21].

#) "

+ +

on G(perhaps with some undefined values [18]). The composite function

$5, ?& = :$ I&$5, ?&; = :

Application 2.6: For the function = ! we can apply

Parameterized nonlinear continuous functions!: G 5 G G,

!$O,&$QR ,QS ,QT,QU & $5, ?& =

5?+

5+

?+

9 : $D&;<for

be extended

fromGtoG 5 G, for $5, ?& =

I ;$5, ?&[14].The composition of functions is not

commutative, but associative.

later in this paper) defined in the form bellow [14]:

78

#function: ;corresponding to the set

Definition 2.5: Let and be two continuous functions : G G, I: G 5 G Gand let # #

$ I&$5, ?& is written as:

9 : $D&;<for

be a generator of the

consistent system of pseudo-arithmetical operations{,,,}.The function given by $D& =

everyD {

78

;corresponding to the set

&and the function

be a generator ofthe

8,

L,

M,

where ! is the
N

G, (which we will take into account

N.

For the composition of the two our functions W and f we can write [14]:

$5, ?& = $! &$5, ?& = !$ $5&, $?&& = !$O,&$QR ,QS,QT ,QU& $ $5&, $?&&.

For these functions we can compute the composite function for two cases !and! ,respectively as follows:

$5, ?& = :$ !&$5, ?&; = 9 :!$5, ?&;< =

78

X Y 9

78

$5, ?& = :$! &$5, ?&; = 9!: $5, ?&;< =

78

X! Y 9

78

9! $5, ?&< = :

Impact Factor (JCC): 4.6257

! ;$5, ?&.

:!$ $5&, $?&&;<Z[ =

: $ $5&, $?&&;<Z[ =

NAAS Rating: 3.80

67

About the Decomposition of Pseudo-Additive Measures

= ! 9 $5, ?&< = :!

;$5, ?& = ! 9 $5&,

$?&<.

Also, by the definition of the function ! we have the explicit form of the nonlinear functional equation:
$O,&$QR ,QS ,QT ,QU &

When the

$ $5&, $?&& =

$5& $?& +

$,&9 ]R $QR &, ]R $QS &, ]R $QT &, ]R $QU &<

3.

8&

$?& +

$,&9 ]R $QR &, ]R $QS &, ]R $QT &, ]R $QU &<

'

78 $

$5& +

N.

is applied for = ! is taken the form of as [14]:

9!$O,&$QR ,QS,QT ,QU& $ $5&, $?&&< =

$5&

$?&

THE PARAMETERIZED

: $5&,

78 $

L&

$?&; =

$5&

NONLINEAR

78 $

M&

: $5&,

$?&

$?&;.

78 $

N &.

FUNCTIONS AND SOME CASES TREATED

WITHWEBERS THEORY
By Webers Theory [7], [5], [8], [10], 15] we can write the functional equation in the form bellow [14]:
$,&$QR ,QS ,QT ,QU &

: $5&,
8

Special cases 3.1:

$?&; =

=1

$5&

$?&

!$O,&$8,8,8,8& $ $5&, $?&& = $5& $?& + $5& + $?& + 1

$,&$8,8,8,8&

$ $5&, $?&& =

Special cases 3.2: $5& = $5&,

$?& = $?&,

78

: $?&; =

!$O,&$QR ,QS,QT ,QU & $ $5&, $?&& =

$5&
78

78 $

8&

5?

By Webers Theory:
Special cases 3.3.
$,&$8,8,8,8&

78 $

L&

$5& $?& +
$5, ?& =

78 $

$5, ?& =

=1

M&
8

$5& +

5?

$5, ?& = 5 ? 5 ? 1

9!$O,&$8,8,8,8& $ $5&, $?&&< =

$,&$8,8,8,8&

78

$5, ?& = 5 ? 5 ? 1.

Application 3.5.For the function = !

www.tjprc.org

9 :

78

$?&

$?& 1

$?& +

78 $

Application 3.4.Modification of special cases!$O,&$8,8,8,8& , by

78

$5&

$5& = 5 = 5,

$?& = ? = ?

$,&$QR ,QS ,QT ,QU &

$5&

: $5&; =

$,&9 ]R $QR &, ]R $QS &, ]R $QT &, ]R $QU &<

$?&

N&

and

:$ $5& $?&&; + $5& + $?& + 1;<

we can apply _

#) [14].

[14]:
editor@tjprc.org

68

Dhurata Valera

&$D, `&; = :!$ $D&,

:$!
=

78

X! Y 9

78

$`&&; = 9!: $D, `&;< =

: $ $D&, $`&&;<Z[ = ! 9

$D, `&< = :!

;$D, `& = ! 9

Application 3.6. For the function = ! we can apply _

$D&,

$`&<

[14]:

:$! &$D, `&; = :!$ $D&, $`&&; = 9!: $D, `&;< =

=

78

X! Y 9

By applying

78

: $ $D&, $`&&;<Z[ = ! 9 $D, `&< = :!

;$D, `& = ! 9 $D&,

$`&<.

transform in the above composite function, we find a path address to the decompositon of

pseudo-additive measures. So, consequently it can be expanded the study in the pseudo-functional analysis and pseudoadditive measures theory.
Some special parameterized nonlinear and pseudo-nonlinear functions are presented below in APPENDIX 1.

4.

THE FUNCTIONAL EQUATIONS AND THEIR ' !abcdefag

FOR SOME TYPE OF THE

DECOMPOSITIONS OF PSEUDO-ADDITIVE MEASURES

4.1 The Sugenos Decomposition of Special Form of $+&h ijbdkaj

M. Sugeno in 1974 [5] suggested the concept of fuzzy measures (an extension of the probability measure and
more flexible), considered monotone measures instead of additive and defined fuzzy integral with respect to fuzzy
measure for these more general situations with many applications in the theory of fuzzy sets founded by Zadeh [4]. Author
suggested the measures
$D&

: A ,01*which can decompose in the following manner,

$`&, for D ` = o and

$o& = 0 and

$p& = 1.

$D& +

$`& + m

By using the composition of ! parameterized nonlinear function with set function m, we take the following

propositions.

Proposition 4.1.1: TheSugenos decomposition of $+&h

`& = !$O,&$q,8,8,r& : $D&,

$`&;, where the values of parameters are

Proposition 4.1.2: The Sugenos decomposition of $+&h

bellow

$D `& =

!$O,&$q,8,8,r& : $D&,

$`&; = !$O,&$q,r,r,r& : $D&,

= m,
#

# satisfies the functional equation

= 1,

= 0.

$D

#satisfies the nonlinear functional equation

$`&; + !$O,&$r,8,8,r& : $D&,

$`&;

Easily, we can verify that the propositions 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 are equivalent.
!$O,&$q,8,8,r& : $D&,

$`&; = m

$D&

$`& +

$D& +

For the parameterized nonlinear function t is written:

!$O,&$q,8,8,r& : $D&,

$`&; = !$O,&$q,r,r,r& : $D&,

$`&

$`&; + !$O,&$r,8,8,r& : $D&,

$`&;.

So, we can get

Impact Factor (JCC): 4.6257

NAAS Rating: 3.80

69

About the Decomposition of Pseudo-Additive Measures

$D `& = !$O,&$q,r,r,r& : $D&,

$`&; + !$O,&$r,8,8,r& : $D&,

When m tends to 0 then we have:!$O,&$q,8,8,r& : $D&,

For the limit of $+&h v

Y

$+&h v

)#

# )#
) w

"

$`&; stu !$O,&$r,8,8,r& : $D&,

qr

"

4.2 Modified of the Sugenos Measure by ' xabcdefag

and !
Y

$+&h v

for $+&q v

We can apply

. So, we compute the

# )#
) w

"

Proposition 4.2.1: The

$D `& =

equation:

78 $m&

Proposition 4.2.2: The

Z =X

'

"

]R $q&

)#

"

)#

"

$D&

)#

$`&

$`&;.

$`&;.

when m tends to 0 is taken [5], [7]:

Z stu Y
qr

)#

$+& )#
) w

"

"

Z.

by using the definition of ! ,

function and use note by symbols of

# )#
) w
#

"

,
[.

,
as:

function satisfies the pseudo-linear functional

$D&

$`&.

function satisfies the pseudo-linear functional

equation:
!

$,&: ]R $q&,8,8,r;

=!

$,&: ]R $q&,r,r,r;

$D&,

$D&,

$`&< =

$`&< !$,&$r,8,8,r& 9

and for summary form we use the equation:

$D `& = !

$D&,

$`&<.

$,&: ]R $q&,8,8,r;

$D&,

$`&<.

Easily, we can verify that the propositions 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 are equivalent.
!

$,&: ]R $q&,8,8,r;

$,&: ]R $q&,8,8,r;

=!

$,&: ]R $q&,r,r,r;

$D `& = !

For the

$D&,

$D&,

$D&,

$`&< =

$`&< =

$,&: ]R $q&,r,r,r;

)#

"

78 $m&

$D&

$`&< !$,&$r,8,8,r& 9

$D&,

$D&,

$`&

$D&

$`&<

$`&< !$,&$r,8,8,r& 9

$D&,

$`&

$`&<.

function using the Webers theory [5], [7], [17] can write the

nonlinear functional equations:

$D `& = !$,&$q,8,8,r& 9

$D `& = !$,&$q,8,8,r& 9

$,&$q,8,8,r&

www.tjprc.org

$D&,

$D&,
$D&,

$`&<

$`&< = m

$`&< = !$,&$q,r,r,r& 9

$D&,

$D&

$`&

$D&

$`&< !$,&$r,8,8,r& 9

$`&

$D&,

$`&<

editor@tjprc.org

70

Dhurata Valera

$D `& = !$,&$q,r,r,r& 9

$D&,

$`&< !$,&$r,8,8,r& 9

When m tends to 0, we have [5], [7]:

!

$,&: ]R $q&,8,8,r;
$,&$q,8,8,r&

$D&,

$D&,

$`&< stu !$,&$r,8,8,r& 9

qr

$`&< stu !$,&$r,8,8,r& 9

So, the Sugenos decomposition of $+&h

Y

$+&h v

# )#
) w

$+&h v

# )#
) w

#
#

"

"

Also, the limit of Sugenos decomposition of '

X

]R $q&

q, y

$D&,

qr

# )#
) w
#

"

$D&,

$D&,

$`&<,

$`&<.

can be modified by
$ 7z{&

Z |}}}~ X
$ 7z{&

Z |}}}~ X

] $h&

]R $q&

h, v

and q,

and get the relations below.

# )#
) w
#

"

# )#
"
) w
#

,
[.

,
[,

respectivelywhen m tends to 0 is [5], [7], [17]:

d )#
,
[ stu Y
qr
) w

)#
,
[ stu Y
qr
) w

# )#
"
) w
#

$`&<

"

"

,
Z.

,
Z,

4.3 The Webers Decomposition of Pseudo-Additive Measure

S. Weber [7] traced out a theory for decomposable measures m, given by three Archimedean cases S, NSA, NSP
t-norms and t-conorms. (The S, NSA-cases can be considered as generalizations of Lebesgue`s measure theory) [7], [8],
[17], . Author suggested to look at measures
$D `& =

$D&

: A ,01*which can decompose in the following manner ,

$`& , D ` = o

by means of so called t-conorm , : ,0,1* x ,0,1* ,01*,and

$o& = 0 and

$p& = 1.

We consider for our pseudo-operation , the Archimedean cases for = = , and we write the
decomposition of measure as:
$D `& =

$D&

$`&

Proposition 4.3.1: The decomposition of pseudo-additive measure m by Weberis expressed as

$D `& = !$,&$r,8,8,r& : $D&,
of P,9 $D& =

78 $D&;<.

$`&; = !$,&$r,8,8,r& 9 :

78 $D&;,

78 $`&;<Where

is

Prof. Using the definition of Webers , we explicate the form of parameterized functions ! :

$,&$r,8,8,r&

: $D&,

$`&; = !$,&$r,8,r,r&
: $D&,
'

$`&; !$,&$r,r,8,r&
: $D&,
'

By the definition 2.5 this nonlinear functional equation must be written as

and ! [14]:

Impact Factor (JCC): 4.6257

$`&;
"

(1)
#

for two

NAAS Rating: 3.80

71

About the Decomposition of Pseudo-Additive Measures

$D `& = !$,&$r,8,8,r& 9 $D&,

9 $D&,

$,&$r,8,8,r&

$`&<

$`&< = !$,&$r,8,r,r& 9 $D&,

$`&< !$,&$r,r,8,r& 9 $D&,

We have two problems to solve:

1.

The

2.

To find on which set function f is implemented the

should be a modified measure ( & of a set function f by the

.
$D& =

have to write that $D& =

So, by the definition 2.1 of

$`&<

78

9 : $D&;<.

Following the equivalent conversions:

: $D&; =
:

78 $D&;

9 $D&< = : $D&;,

9 :

78 $D&;<

= $D&,

$D& =

We get for the ,the expression:

$D& =

78 $D&;

Now, we can write the equation.1 in the form:

78 $D&;,

= !$O,&$r,8,r,r& 9 :
By using

$,&$r,8,8,r&

$,&$r,8,8,r&

= !'
!

78 $`&;<

9 :

78 $D&;,

9 :

: $D&,
9 :

78 $D&;,

78 $D&;

+ !$O,&$r,r,8,r& 9 :

78 $`&;<

78 $D&;,

$ 7z{&

|}}}~

!$O,&$r,8,8,r& 9 :

78 $`&;<

!'

$,&$r,r,8,r&

$`&; = !$,&$r,8,r,r&
: $D&,
'
:

78 $`&;<

So, the modifications carried out by

:

78 $D&;,

78 $`&;<

78 $D&;,

=
:

78 $`&;<.

, we continue the transformation of nonlinear functional equations as:

$,&$r,8,r,r&

$,&$r,8,8,r&

!$O,&$r,8,8,r& 9 :

$D&,

78 $D&;,

78 $`&;<

=!

78 $D&;,

78 $`&;<,

$`&; !$,&$r,r,8,r&
: $D&,
'

$,&$r,8,8,r&

: $D&,

$`&;.

$`&;,

, provide the following crossings [13]:

$ 7z{& $,&$r,8,8,r&

|}}}~ !

9 :

: $D&,

$`&;.

Proposition 4.3.2: The decomposition of pseudo-additive measure m by Webersatisfies the pseudo-nonlinear

functional equation bellow
!

$,&$r,8,8,r&

: $D&,

$`&; = !$,&$r,8,r,r&
: $D&,
'

$`&; !$,&$r,r,8,r&
: $D&,
'

$`&;.

Proposition 4.3.3: The decomposition of pseudo-additive measure m by Webersatisfies the pseudo-nonlinear

functional equation bellow

www.tjprc.org

editor@tjprc.org

72

Dhurata Valera

$,&$r,8,8,r&

= !'

$,&$r,8,r,r&

Where m is
)#

"

78 $D&;,

9 :

78 $D&;,

9 :

78 $`&;<

78 $`&;<

!'

$,&$r,r,8,r&

of P, 9 $D& =

78 $D&;<.

9 :

78 $D&;,

78 $`&;<,

78 $D&,

$+&

Proposition 4.3.4: The decomposition of pseudo-additive measure m by Weberis the

for disjoint sets.

Easily, we can verify that the propositions 4.3.1, 4.3.2, 4.3.3 and 4.3.4 are equivalent.
So, we get the results:
Y
Y
Y

$+& )#

"
) w

#+# )#
) w

"

#+# )#
) w

Z |}}}~ Y

"

#+# )#
) w

78 $D&, $ 7z{&

D,

D,

Z=Y
Z=Y

d )#

$+& )#

"

"
) w

D,

78 $D&,

"
) w

78 $D&,

Z,

Z,

Z .

4.4 Relations between Sugenos and Webers Decomposition of Pseudo-Additive Measure

Summarizing findings of the above statements may list the some relationship between Sugenos [5], [17] and
Webers decomposition of pseudo-additive measure [7] treated in sections 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3, we have:
X
X
X
X
X
X

]R $q&

q, y

]R $q&

q, y

]R $q&

q, y

# )#
.
) w
#

)#
) w

".
#

# )#
.
) w
#

)#
) w

# )#
.
) w
#

)#
) w

".
#

78 $D&,

[=Y

78 $D&,

[=Y

78 $D&,
78 $D&,

$+&h )#
.
) w

$+&h )#
.
) w

[= X

[=Y

78 $D&,
78 $D&,

]R $q&

q, y

# )#
.
) w
#

[ stu Y
qr

[ stu Y
qr

)#
) w

Impact Factor (JCC): 4.6257

78 $D&,
78 $D&,

[ stu Y
qr

[ stu Y
qr

]R $q&

q, y

So, we get the results:

X

#
#

y #
) w

# )#
) w
#

)#
) w

)#
) w

78 $D&,

78 $D&,

)#
#

#+# )#
.
) w
#

#+# )#
.
) w
#

Z
.

D,

D,
D,

D,

Z.
D,
D,

Z,

Z.

NAAS Rating: 3.80

73

About the Decomposition of Pseudo-Additive Measures

4.5 The Paps Decomposition of Pseudo-Additive Measure

E. Pap had made investigations of decomposable measures [11], [12] based on special and defined on

[a,b] ,, +*. Author applied a special pseudo-addition ( strict-which by Aczel`s theorem itselves has a stricly
monotone generator ) and pseudo- multiplication to the building up of
Let (X, A,

& be a - measure space. Let

algebra of subsets of X.
A set function

$D `& =

idempotent),

A )#

[3].

be a fixed - measure. Let X be a non-empty set and let Abe a

$& = 0 (if is not

: A , , +*O will be called a - decomposable measure if there hold

$D&

"

+#

$`&, for D, ` A such that D ` = o.

measure mis - decomposable if

sequence $D &F of pairwise disjoints sets from A.

The set function

$D & hold for any

:8 D ; = 8

: A ,0,1* will be called a d - decomposable measure m whend is a continuous

Archimedean t-conorm so, $D `& =

From

$D& d

[3], [9] and definition of !

$`&, for D, ` A such that D ` = o,

[14] can be expressed

$D&

$& = 0.

$`& and can get the

proposition as bellow.
Proposition 4.5.1: The decomposition of pseudo-additive measure m by Papis expressed by
$D `& = !$,&$r,8,8,r& : $D&,
of P, 9 $D& =

78 $D&;<.

By using the explicit form of!

!$O,&$r,8,r,r& : $D&,
78

$,&$r,8,8,r&

78 $D&;,

78 $`&;<,

Where

is

, we get the pseudo-nonlinear functional equation bellow:

$`&; !$O,&$r,r,8,r& : $D&,

$`&; =

78

Y!$O,&$r,8,8,r& 9 : $D&;, : $`&;<Z

Y!$O,&$r,8,r,r& 9 : $D&;, : $`&;< + !$O,&$r,r,8,r& 9 : $D&;, : $`&;<Z =

78

Y!$O,&$r,8,8,r& 9 : $D&;, : $`&;<Z.

By the definition 2.5 for

!'

$,&$r,8,r,r&

$`&; = !$,&$r,8,8,r& 9 :

78

$O,&$r,8,8,r&

But, from the

!'

: $D&,

$,&$r,8,8,r&

: $D&,

"

, the nonlinear functional equation can be written as [14]:

$`&; !$,&$r,r,8,r&
: $D&,
'

9 : $D&;, : $`&;<Z

$`&; =

of!we have:
$`&; =

78

Y!$O,&$r,8,8,r& 9 : $D&;, : $`&;<Z,

And take the pseudo-nonlinear functional equation bellow,

!'

$,&$r,8,r,r&

www.tjprc.org

: $D&,

$`&; !$,&$r,r,8,r&
: $D&,
'

$`&; = !$,&$r,8,8,r&
: $D&,
'

$`&;.
editor@tjprc.org

74

Dhurata Valera

Using the result of proposition 4.3.1 for the above nonlinear functional equation, are formulated two propositions.
Proposition 4.5.2: The decomposition of

pseudo-additive measure m by Papsatisfies the pseudo-nonlinear

functional equation bellow

!'

$,&$r,8,r,r&

: $D&,

$`&; !$,&$r,r,8,r&
: $D&,
'

Where m is a modified measure by

$`&; = !$,&$r,8,8,r&
: $D&,
'

$`&;,

Proposition 4.5.3: The decomposition of pseudo-additive measure m by Papsatisfies the pseudo-nonlinear

functional equation bellow
!

$,&$r,8,r,r&

=!

9 :

$,&$r,8,8,r&

9 :

78 $D&;,

Where m is

78 $D&;,

78 $`&;<

78 $`&;<,

of P, 9 $D& =

$,&$r,r,8,r&

78 $D&;,

9 :

78 $`&;<

78 $D&;<.

Easily, we can verify that the Propositions 4.5.1, 4.5.2 and 4.5.3 are equivalent.
So, we get the results for the Paps decomposition of the
Y

$+& )#

"
) w

" )#
) w

"

78 $D&, $ 7z{&

Z |}}}~ Y

D,

Z=Y

Z.iecanova suggested the concept of #

$D `&

$D `& =

# and
$D&

$`&.

" )#
) w

)#

4.6 decomposition of pseudo-additive measure

generations of Shilkrets ))

"
) w

"

D,

78 $D&,

Z,

Z.

# [6], [20]. Notion of - measure arose as a common

# measure [16],

In the same manner as is applied in the above sections, we get the some propositions for decomposition.

Proposition 4.6.1: The decomposition of pseudo-additive measure m byiecanova is expressed by

!

$,&$r,8,8,r&

Where m is

: $D&,

$`&; = !$,&$r,8,8,r& 9 :
of P, 9 $D& =

78 $D&;,

78 $D&;<.

78 $`&;<

Proposition 4.6.2: The decomposition of pseudo-additive measure m byiecanova is expressed by

$,&$r,8,8r&

Where m is

9 :

78 $D

`&;,

78 $D

`&;< = !

of P, 9 $D& =

$,&$r,8,8,r&

78 $D&;<.

9 :

78 $D&;,

78 $`&;<,

Proposition 4.6.3: The decomposition of pseudo-additive measure m byiecanova satisfies the pseudo-nonlinear
functional equation bellow
Impact Factor (JCC): 4.6257

NAAS Rating: 3.80

75

About the Decomposition of Pseudo-Additive Measures

$,&$r,8,r,r&

=!

78 $D

9 :

Where m is

78 $D&;,

9 :

$,&$r,8,8,r&

`&;,

78 $D

`&;< !

78 $`&;<

of P, 9 $D& =

$,&$r,r,8,r&

78 $D

9 :

`&;,

78 $D

`&;< =

78 $D&;<.

Easily, we can verify that the propositions 4.6.1, 4.6.2 and 4.6.3 are equivalent.
If we modified the nonlinear functional equation bellow by the
78 $D

!$O,&$r,8,r,r& 9 :

`&;, :

78 $D&;,

= !$O,&$r,r,8,r& 9 :

78 $D

:
78 $D

`&;< + !$O,&$r,r,8,r& 9 :

78 $`&;<

`&;, :

78 $D

`&;< =

get the pseudo-nonlinear functional equation:

!

$,&$r,8,r,r&

=!

78 $D

9 :

$,&$r,8,8,r&

`&;,

78 $D&;,

9 :

78 $D

`&;< !

78 $`&;<.

78 $D

9 :

$,&$r,r,8,r&

`&;,

78 $D

`&;< =

So, we write the results:

:$+& )#

$ #

".

)#

78 $D&;

$ 7z{&

|}}}~ $ #

D& = 9 )#

)#

".

D&

78 $D&<.

5. CONCLUSIONS
For the decompositions of the pseudo-additive measures considered above, are summarize key relations between
them [5], [6], [7], [11], [12], [17]:

$ #
=

qr

]R $q&

"

9 )#

$ " )#
$ #+# )#
"

: q, y

qr :
y

: q, y

www.tjprc.org

)#

]R $q&

)#

"

)#

)#

"

"

D& =
"

"

'

$ )#
"
$ #+# )#
"
stu
qr $ " )#
"
$ #
)#

)#

"

D, ) w

D, ) w
# &
D, ) w
# &
=
78 $D&,
) w
# ; =q,
78 $D&,

'

D, ) w

78 $D&<

'

g
"

# ; stu
g
g

) w

# ;

]R $q&

qr

D, ) w
# &
D, ) w
# &
D, ) w
# &
g
D&

# ; stu

qr

editor@tjprc.org

76

Dhurata Valera

$ )#
"
$ #+# )#
"
stu
qr $ " )#
"
$ #
)#

$ #+# )#

"

D, ) w

$ )#
"

"
)#
"

$ #
)#
"
=
q,

lim: y #
)#
"
qr

]R $q&

y # )#
"
qr :

D, ) w
# &
g
D, ) w
# &
g
D, ) w
# &
"
g
D&

# &=
g

D, ) w
# &
D, ) w
# &
g
D, ) w
# &

78 $D&,
'
) w
# ;

'

78 $D&,

) w

# ;.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like first to give thanks to my professors of NSF, Math. Dep., Tirana University and the scientific leader
Prof. Dr. A. Tato for the sustention to deepen my knowledge in the science of mathematics and further, for direction and
motivation of my scientific research; also the family for giving encouragement and financial support to achieve the
scientific research.

REFERENCES
1.

J Ryb rik, (1995), -Functions, Univ. u NovomSadu, Zb. Rad. Prirod.-Mat. Fak. Ser. Mat. 25,1 pp. 29-38.

2.

J nos Acz# l, (1966) Lectures on Functional Equations and their Applications, Academic Press, New York.

3.

Endre Pap, (1993), g-calculus, Univ. u Novom Sadu, Zb. Rad. Prirod.-Mat. Fak. Ser. Mat. 23,1,(pp. 145-156).

4.

Lotfi A.Zadeh, (1965), Fuzzy sers, Inform. Contr. 8,(pp.338-353).

5.

Michio Sugeno, (1974), Theory of Fuzzy Integral and its Applications, Doctoral thesis, Tokyo Institute of
Technology, Tokyo.

6.
7.

Zdena Rie anov , (1982), About -additive measure and -maxitive measure, Math. Slovaca, 31 (pp. 389-395).

Siegfried Weber, (1984), -decomposable measures and integrals for Archimedian t-conorms, J.Math.
Appl.101(pp. 114-138).

8.
9.

Radko Mesiar, J. Ryb rik, (1993), Pseudo-arithmetical operations, Tatra Mauntains Math.,Publ.,2,(pp. 185-192).

Neboj a Ralevi , (1994), Some new properties of g-calculus, Univ. Novom Sadu Zb. Rad.Prirod.-Mat. Fak. Ser.
Mat. 24,1, pp. 139-157.

10. Anna Koles rov , (1996), Integration of real functions with respect to a -measure, Math.,Slovaca, 46, No. 1,
(pp. 41-52).
11. Endre Pap, (2002), Pseudo-additive measures and their applications, in: E. Pap (Ed.), Handbook of Measure
Theory, Volume II. Elsevier, (pp. 1405-1465), Amsterdam.
12. EndrePap, (2001), Application of decomposable measures on nonlinear difference equations, Novi Sad J. Math.
31, 2, (pp. 89-98).

Impact Factor (JCC): 4.6257

NAAS Rating: 3.80

77

About the Decomposition of Pseudo-Additive Measures

functions, , Vol. 38

13. Dhurata Valera, Ivi Dylgjeri, (2014), The special role of the
(LXIV) No. 1, ISSN 0351-336X (pp.53-65), , .

14. Dhurata Valera, (2015), Some Applications for Nonlinear and Pseudo-Nonlinear Functional Equations, Comput.
Sci. Appl. ETHAN, Volume 2, Number 3, (pp. 94-105), America.

15. Ivica Marinov , (1986), Integrations with respect to a -measure, Math. Slovaca 36, (pp.15-22).
16. Niel Shilkret, (1971), Maxitive measure and integration, Indag. Math., 33, (pp. 109-116).
17. MichioSugeno,Toshiaki. Murofushi, (1987), Pseudo-additive Measure and Integrals, J. Math. Appl.122,(pp. 197222).
18. Andrea Markova , (1995), Some remark on pseudo-linear algebra, Tatra Mauntains Math., Publ., 6, (pp. 123130).
19. Radko Mesiar, Fuzzy Sets and Probability Theory, Tatra Mountains Math.,Publ.,1 (1992), (pp. 105-123).

20. Anna Koles rov ,(1993), A note on the -measure based integrals, Tatra Mauntains Math.,Publ.,3 , (pp .173182).

21. Katarna Lendelov , (2006), On the Pseudo-Lebesgue-Stieltjes Iintegral, Novi Sad J. Math. Vol. 36, No. 2,
(pp.125-136).

APPENDICES
Table1: The Parameterized Nonlinear Functions and their Parameterized Pseudo-Nonlinear Functions Respectively,
Modified by ' xabcdefag in Accordance with Webers Theory
$O,&$QR ,QS ,QT ,QU & $5,

4
5
6

?& =

$O,&$r,r,r,QU & $5,

?& =

8
!

$O,&$8,8,8,8& $5,

12

$O,&$r,8,r,QU & $5,

$O,&$r,QS ,r,8& $5,
$O,&$r,8,r,8& $5,

?& =

L
N

5+
L

?+

5+

5?+

5?

?& =

$O,&$,,,&

$O,&$8,r,r,QU & $5,

L5+1

?& = 5 + 1

?& = 5 ? +

$,&:$QR ,QS ,QT ,r&;

$,&$r,r,r,QU &
N

$,&$8,8,8,8&

!'

$5, ?& =

$5, ?& =
$5, ?& =

5?

5?

$5, ?& = 5 ? 5 ? 1

$,&$b ,b ,b ,b &

' cfagj,
$,&$r,8,r,QU &
$,&$r,QS ,r,8&
$,&$r,8,r,8&

$5, ?& =

$5, ?& =

$,&$r,QS ,r,QU &

!'

$5, ?& =
= 85?

$,&:$QR ,QS ,r,r&;

$,&$QR ,r,r,r&

$,&$,,,&

$5, ?& =
= 85?

$,&:$QR ,QS ,QT ,QU &;

$,&$r,QS ,r,r&

5+

?& = 5 +

... more combination

www.tjprc.org

$,&:$b ,b ,b ,b &;

?& = 5 ? + 5 + ? + 1

$O,&$b ,b ,b ,b &

11

?& =

$O,&$r,QS ,r,QU & $5,

?& =

$O,&$QR ,r,r,r& $5,

$O,&$r,QS ,r,r& $5,

?& =
= 85?+

$O,&$QR ,QS ,r,r& $5,

10

?& =
5?+

$O,&$QR ,QS ,QT ,r& $5,

!'

!$O,&$b,b,b,b& , !$O,&$,,,&

No.

$,&$,,,&

,
!'
:'$& = , ' 7 $& = ;

$5, ?& = 1 5
$5, ?& =

L5 1

=5

$5, ?& = 1 5 1 = 5 1

$,&$8,r,r,QU &

$5, ?& = 5 ?

more combination

editor@tjprc.org