Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BIOMIMETICS
Biomimetic refers to human-made processes, substances, devices, or systems that
imitate nature. The art and science of designing and building biomimetic apparatus is
called biomimetics. The term itself is derived from bios, meaning life, and mimesis,
meaning to imitate. This new science represents the study and imitation of natures
methods, designs, and processes. While some of its basic configurations and designs
can be copied, many ideas from nature are best adapted when they serve as
inspiration for human-made capabilities. Nature has always served as a model for
mimicking and inspiration for humans in their desire to improve their life.
Now-a-days biomimetics is of special interest to researchers in nanotechnology,
robotics, artificial intelligence (AI), the medical industry, and the military. These can
be used in remote observation of hazardous environments inaccessible to ground
vehicles. These type of operations can be carried out using biomimetic MAVs.
Pterosaurs had kneeled sternum for the attachment of flight wings, a short and
stout humerus and hollow but strong limb and skull bones. They were having a
modified epidermal structure acting as wing supporting fibres and perhaps
provided insulation too [1].
2. Chiropteran Flight
These are the second most diverse group of mammals surviving till day and the
only mammals to evolve true flight. They have various flight adaptations as
echolocation, reduced radius, large humerus and ulna and a high metabolic rate.
Figure 1.2.5 Comparison of bone structure of Pterosaurs, bird, Bat, and humans [1]
1.3 ANATOMY
The sternum, or breastbone, bears a prominent keel where the flight muscles attach.
The furcula, a fused clavicle (collarbone), serves as a brace during the flight stroke;
it's visible in the pictures above as a large Y-shaped bone ahead of the sternum. The
clavicle is also found in non-avian dromaeosaurian dinosaurs, and was probably coopted in function from the dromaeosaurian function of providing a brace for the
shoulder girdle while holding prey. Crucial for bird flight is a canal formed by the
articulation of the humerus (forewing bone), the scapula (shoulder blade), and
the coracoid (bone connecting the sternum itself to the humerus). Through this canal,
the foramen
triosseum or triosseal
canal,
runs
the
tendon
of
the supracoracoideus muscle, which attaches to the sternum and the dorsal side of
the humerus, and lifts the wing upwards in flight. The powerful downstroke of the
wing is powered by the large pectoralis muscle, which also attach to the sternal keel.
.
Figure1.3.1 Anatomy of bird (Pigeon) [2]
2. LITERATURE SURVEY
Figure 2.1.1 Birds wing structures (modified from Berger 1961) [3].
For good performance, a birds body is shaped into a streamlined form, and the airfoil
or wing section is also streamlined in the manner of an airplane wing because the
Reynolds number of the wing tip is usually of the order of 10 5. The thickness and
camber of the wing section increase from tip to root. The bird can alter the wing
camber to some degree, either actively by adjusting the muscle, the tendon, or
passively by aeroelastic action of the feathers.
At the shoulder joint and two other joints (elbow and wrist), the wing can make
beating consisting of feathering (pitch change), flapping (out-plane), and
lagging (in-plane) motions in some restricted conditions. The shoulder is involved in
all motions, whereas the elbow is mostly used to shorten the wing by folding it
compactly in the lagging direction or in the shape of the letter Z (Whitfield and Orr
1978). On the contrary, the wrist joint appears to be responsible for all additional
motions of the hand or outer wing, by which the outer wing attains a widened angle
of attack as shown in Figure 2.1.2.[3]
outer wing with the triangular surface of the manus, accounting for 3040% of the
whole area of the wing.
Secondary feathers - The secondaries, numbering from six in some hummingbirds
up to 20 in land-soaring birds, and more in sea-soaring birds, are attached to the ulna
of the forearm, parallel to one another. They are controlled not individually but in
small groups by the motion of joints and by an elastic membrane running from the
first primary back to the elbow (Storer 1948).
Tertiaries - The feathers rising from the upper-arm bone or humerus are known as
tertiaries or tertials. They are considered extensions of the secondaries and close the
gap between the active wing and the body. In most birds these feathers are few in
number, but in those species in which the upper-arm bone is long, such as gulls,
herons, or albatrosses, they are fully developed.
Scapular feathers - These feathers are found on a birds shoulders and constitute a
separate group for tailoring at the connection of the body and wing. In soaring
flight they fulfill the role of an aircrafts wing fairing.
Coverts - The humeral groups of feathers are covered on the outside by a triple row
of small coverts and on the inside by one or two rows of finer feathers that are easily
lifted. These coverts play an important role in fairing the profile of the wing.
At a high angle of attack, flow separation, which results in a loss of lift or stall of the
wing, can probably be sensed by the upward deflection of the coverts.
Bastard wing or alula - The feathers of the bastard wing or alula are thumb quills
attached to the first digit of the manus and are capable of independent movement
affected by a special system of muscular connections. It has been reported by Storer
(1948) that some birds cannot take off or land without them.
Structure of feathers - The vane of a feather is, as shown in Figure 2.1.3, made up
of parallel rows of barbs projecting obliquely from either side of a shaft. The bare end
of the shaft, the quill, and the distal portion, the rachis, are corneous tubes, the
material of which, keratin, has a specific gravity of only 1.15 g/cm3. It has been
reported that the modulus of elasticity and the tensile strength of keratin are E = 9.0
103 MPa or 920 kgf/mm2 and B = 3.5 10MPa or 36 kgf/mm2, respectively (Hertel
1966).
10
Elliptical wings are short and rounded, having a low aspect ratio, allowing for tight
maneuvering in confined spaces such as might be found in dense vegetation. As
such they are common in forest raptors (such as Accipiter hawks), and
many passerines, particularly non-migratory ones (migratory species have longer
wings). They are also common in species that use a rapid takes off to evade
predators, such as pheasants and partridges. [5]
Figure 2.2.3 Elliptical wings in birds, sparrow and crow in flight [6]
2. High Speed Wings
High speed wings are short, pointed wings that when combined with a heavy wing
loading and rapid win beats provide an energetically expensive high speed. This
type of flight is used by the bird with the fastest wing speed, the peregrine falcon,
as well as by most of the ducks. The same wing shape is used by the auks for a
different purpose; auks use their wings to "fly" underwater. The peregrine falcon
has the highest recorded dive speed of 242 mph (389 km/h). The fastest straight,
powered flight is the spine-tailed swift at 105 mph (170 km/h).
Figure 2.2.4 High speed wings in birds, swift and falcon during its flight [6]
3. High Aspect Ratio Wings
High aspect ratio wings, which usually have low wing loading and are far longer
than they are wide, are used for slower flight, almost hovering as used
by kestrels, terns and nightjars or alternatively by birds that specialize in soaring
and gliding flight, particularly that used by seabirds, dynamic soaring, which use
different wind speeds at different heights (wind shear) above the waves in the
11
ocean to provide lift. Low speed flight is important for birds that plunge dive for
fish.
Figure 2.2.5 High aspect ratio wings, albatross and gull during flight [6]
Figure 2.2.6 Slotted high lift wings, eagle and stork during flight [6]
12
Figure 2.3.1 a Axes of rotation. Mp, Mr and My are the pitch, roll and yaw moments
about the transverse, longitudinal (median) and vertical axis, respectively, and Cpm'
Crm' and Cym their respective moment coefficients. b Dihedral of the wings controlling
roll moments, resulting in roll stability. A roll to the left (left wing down) would
increase the lift L on the left wing and decrease the lift on the right wing because of
increased angles of attack on the wing moving down and decreased angles of attack
on the other wing. This force difference will lift the left wing again and restore the
bird to the horizontal. Lv is the vertical lift force of one wing. c Partial retraction of the
left wing decreasing left wing area and lift. L and L' are the lift forces and Lv and Lv
are the vertical lift forces of the two wings. Positions of wings in the middle of a
downstroke [12]
13
Flight Modes
A bird can adopt different flight modes depending on its purpose in flying. It can
adjust the configuration of its wings as well as their profile by either extending or
folding them against the body. This allows for the optimal wing for each flight mode
and each phase of a stroke movement. The following are typical types of flight
observed in the sky (Storer 1948; Vinogradov 1951; Terres 1968):
1. Cruising flight
In steady level flight the wing acts to give a lifting force mainly at the inner part
of the wing and a thrusting force at the outer part of the wing or oscillating
manus. In this mode, the wing is almost fully extended to give the best
performance for minimum power. Ducks, geese, swans, flamingos, storks, and
cormorants always fly with their head and neck stretched out to the fullest
extent. On the other hand, herons, egrets, and pelicans, though also long-necked
birds, draw their head back till it rests almost on their shoulders.
14
Figure2.3.3 (a) Gliding flight: a) buzzard, Buteo buteo (courtesy of M. Tanaka 1976)
and
b) Albatross, Diomedea albatrus (courtesy of Asahi News Paper).
Soaring Flight Soaring is a phenomenon shown by the birds in which they
can maintain their flight without wing flapping using the rising air currents.
15
insect stroke, shown in Figure 2.3.5 (b), at an exceptionally high rate of more
than 20 strokes per second.
Figure 2.3.5 Hovering flight (sketched from Ruppell 1977): a) avian stroke and b)
insect stroke
6. Takeof
For flight, birds must acquire enough speed with respect to the air to utilize the
aerodynamic force. Because a bird does not have forward velocity at takeoff, it
needs some lift assistance before gaining speed for normal flight.
16
Figure 2.3.7 Landing flight (about to strike) of red-shouldered hawk (Buteo lineatus)
(From Gilliard 1967). [1]
17
Either of the high-lift devices just mentioned will prevent flow separation of the wing
at high angle of attack and increase the maximum lift at slow flight speed. The effect
on the tail surface cannot be ignored either. The spread tail forms an auxiliary surface
behind and slightly below the main wings, like the flap of an airplane wing and not
only prevents flow separation of the main wing, but also produces a positive lift.
Unlike the landing of the artificial airplane, the positive lift on the tail surface is
obtainable for compensating the head-up moment generated from a slightly forward
shift of the main wing.
The legs of the landing bird are fully extended to increase drag and reduce speed and
to obtain an adequate stroke to cushion the impact at touchdown. In water birds,
touchdown on water is accomplished either on the breast or on the feet. Breast
landing is sometimes observed in diving birds. Most water birds land of their feet.
They stretch their webbed feet forward and slide on them as though on water skis.
Many birds can reduce their flying speed by assuming an ascending flight path or can
convert their kinetic energy to potential energy during the landing approach by
changing their flight attitude, wing span, and wing area.
3. MECHANISMS
3.1 CHORD- WISE DRIVING MECHANISM
To develop the chord-wise mechanism the slow motion pictures of birds are taken and
the points are being marked depending on the angle of movements of the wings. This
gives the pattern of the trajectory of the wing-tip in a two dimensional plane.
18
Figure 3.1.1 Angles of primary and secondary wings during upstroke (left) and
downstroke (right) [10]
Figure 3.1.2 The generation of wing-tip trajectory using five-bar mechanism [10]
The lengths of the links were directly taken according to the scaled model of the
birds picture.
And the required angle movement between the links were maintained depending on
the data obtained from the picture analysis of the bird show in the previous figure.
They didnt derive the equation of the trajectory and hence the path produced by the
linkages may or may not produce the required things.
19
The pilot throttle commands the speed of a Feigao DC motor, which through a
gearbox and a four-bar linkage, flaps the wing to generate thrust and lift forces. The
pilot elevator and aileron joysticks command two Hi-tech HS-56 servo motors that are
aligned in a serial fashion to pitch and roll the tail relative to the fuselage, creating
aerodynamic pitching and yawing control torques. This ornithopter flaps up to 8 Hz,
flies up to 10 m/s i.e. 36kmph.
Comments
This four bar mechanism is widely used in ornithopters making for both high speed
and slow speed flapping. The only problem here is the calculation of the linkages
length, which can be calculated using bionic formula. This proportion can be used as
length of bars which derive two wings in designing wing span mechanism.
Figure 3.3.1 Chung Hua University MAV double pushrod mechanism (Double pushrod
flapping mechanism) [10]
This mechanism uses a motor connected to a system of gears that increase flapping
force while reducing flapping rate. Pushrods connect to each flapping spar, thus
driving the wing motion up and down through pinned connections. Due to the pinned
connections, the vertical translation is the only component of motion that is
transferred from the drive gear. Since each wing spar has its fulcrum located at a
fixed distance x from the central axis of the mechanism, and the pushrods are of
20
fixed length l, a problem arises. The two pushrods are never exactly in the same
vertical location, except for the apex and the nadir of the flapping motion. This
creates a phase lag between the two wings, resulting in slightly asymmetric flapping
of the wings. At the miniature-size scale, this is an undesirable situation, where
control is already difficult due to the low inertia of the fliers relative to their large
wing and fin surface area.
Despite its inherent limitations, this configuration is popular due to its simple
construction, light weight, and ease of part replacement. If the MAV is very small and
has a sufficiently high flapping rate, it is possible that the asymmetry of the wings
can be masked during the overall flap motion. If the throttle is reduced, however, the
MAV will begin to exhibit noticeable oscillations and be more difficult to control.
21
4. CONCLUSION
After doing the thorough study of the anatomy of birds and wing structures we got to
the conclusion that our aim will be to develop the bio-mimetic model with greater
stress on lesser weight and high degree of freedom of its wings, so as to achieve
higher maneuverability. Various mechanisms were analysed based on their
advantages and disadvantages. Four bar single cranked mechanism seemed to be
best suited for the purpose although; extensive work is required for generating more
optimized mechanisms to fulfill our need. It was also observed that although the
mechanisms can be generated from the data of the birds wing-tip trajectory using
bionic formula but still mathematical relationship needs to be derived for the links to
get the equation of the trajectory followed by the links. Since a major part of the
literature survey has been completed our next aim will be to develop kinematic
models and derive the mathematical relationships and hence analyse the motion of
the virtual wing.
22
REFERENCES
1. John R Hutchinson [1996], Vertebrates Flight, www.ucmp.berkeley.edu
2. Joseph M. Forshaw [1998], Parrots of the World, TFH Publication
3. Akira Azuma [2006], The Biokinetics of Flying and Swimming, Second edition,
AIAA Education Series, pp. 33-46
4. Adaptation for flight, Birds Flight, www. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird_flight
5.
Cornell
lab
of
ornithology,
www.birds.cornell.edu/education/kids/books/wingshapes
Cornell
University,
23
12. Dr. Ulla M. Norberg [1989], Vertebrate Flight, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
[1990], vol. 27, pp. 76
24