Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NP
P
where P is the diametral pitch; i.e., number of teeth per inch. Therefore, the diameter of the pinion is
dP
17
1.417 in
12
The pitch line velocity, see Example (14-1), page 728, can be written as
VP
dP nP
12
ft / min
1.417 525
194.8 ft/min
12
The uncorrected endurance strength for Sut 212 kpsi , see Equation (7-8), page 325, can be written as
Se 0.504 Sut
Therefore, the uncorrected endurance strength is given as
Se 0.504 76 38.3 kpsi
The surface factor, see Equation (7-18), page 329 can be written as
k a = a Sutb
For milled (machined) teeth, see Table (7-4), page 329, the factor a and the exponent b are given as
a 2.7
b 0.265
and
1 1.25 1 1.25
0.1875 in
P
P
12 12
The tooth thickness, see Equation (b), page 725 and Figure (14-1), page 725, can be written as
t
4l x
where the value of the distance x , see Equation (14-3), page 725, can be written as
x
3Y
2P
The Lewis form factor for the pinion with 17 teeth, see Table (14-2), page 726, is
Y 0.303
3 0.303
0.0379 in
2 12
1/ 2
where h = F Face width 0.875 in and b t tooth thickness 0.1686 in . Therefore, the effective
diameter is
d e 0.808 0.875 0.1686
2
1/ 2
0.310 in
The size factor, see Equation (7-19), page 329, can be written as
d
kb
0.3
0.107
0.310
0.3
0.107
0.996
The loading factor for bending, see Equation (7-25), page 331, is
kc 1
The temperature factor, assuming operation at room temperature, see Table (7-6), page 332, is
kd 1
The reliability factor, assuming 50 % reliability, see Table (7-7), page 334, is
ke 1
Two effects are used to evaluate the miscellaneous-effects factor k f (see Example 14-2, page 728). The
first of these is the effect of one-way bending. The second effect to be accounted for in using the
miscellaneous-effects factor is stress concentration. The miscellaneous effects factor for one-way
bending, see Example 14-2, page 728, is
k f1 1.65
The miscellaneous effects factor due to stress concentration, see Example 14-2, page 728, is
k f2
1
Kf
where K f is the fatigue stress concentration factor. The tooth fillet radius for a full-depth tooth, see
Figure (14-1), page 725 and Example 14-2, page 728, is
rf
0.3 0.3
0.025 in
P
12
The fatigue stress concentration factor, see Equation (7-35), page 337, can be written as
Kf
Kt
2( K t 1) a
1
Kt
r
where the value of the Neuber constant for a shoulder, see Table (7-8), page 337, is
a
4
4
0.053 in
Sut 76
1.68
1.323
2 (1.68 1) 0.053
1
1.68
0.025
1
0.756
1.323
The final value of the miscellaneous-effects factor, see Example 14-2, page 728, is
k f k f1 k f2 1.65 0.756 1.247
The fully corrected endurance strength, see Equation (7-17), page 328, is
Se ka kb kc kd ke k f Se
Therefore, the fully corrected endurance strength is
Se 0.857 0.996 1 1 1 1.247 38.3 40.77 kpsi
The allowable bending stress for a design factor of 2.25, see Example 14-2, page 728, can be written
as
all
Se 40.77
The tangential component of the load, see Equation (14-7), page 727 and Example 14-2, page 728, can
be written as
Wt =
F Y all
Kv P
The dynamic (or velocity) factor for milled teeth, see Equation (14-4b), page 727, can be written as
Kv
1200 VP
1200
1200 194.8
1.162
1200
The transmitted power (with bending of pinion teeth as the design criterion), see Example 14-2, page
728, can be written as
H
W t VP
33,000
Therefore, the transmitted power (with bending of pinion teeth as the design criterion) is
H
345 194.8
2.04 hp
33,000
C ,all
K vW t 1 1
C p
F
cos
r1 r2
1/ 2
The elastic coefficient C p , for a steel pinion in mesh with a steel gear, see Table 14-8, page 745, is
C p 2300 psi
The radii of curvature of the tooth profiles at the pitch point, see Equation (14-12), page 732, are
r1
d P sin
2
and
r2
d G sin
2
Therefore the radii of curvature of the tooth profiles at the pitch point are
r1
1.417 sin 20
0.242 in
2
r2
and
2.5 sin 20
0.428 in
2
The surface endurance strength, see Equation (7-68), page 372, can be written as
SC 10
0.4 H B 10 kpsi
SC 10
The allowable contact stress, see Example 14-3, page 732, can be written as
C ,all
SC
nd
C ,all
49.6
33.067 kpsi
2.25
C ,all
F cos
W
Cp
K v (1/ r1 1/ r2 )
0.875 cos 20
33067
W
22.6 lb
2300 1.162 (1/ 0.242 1/ 0.428)
t
The transmitted power, see Example 14-2, page 728, can be written as
H
W t VP
33,000
Therefore, the transmitted power (with wear of pinion teeth as the design criterion) is
H
22.6 194.8
0.133 hp
33,000
Conclusion: The power rating considering pinion tooth wear is lower than the power rating
considering pinion tooth bending. Therefore, the power rating of the spur gearset is
6
H rated 0.133 hp
Problem 14-19.
The diameter of the pinion, see Equation (13-1), page 666, can be written as
dP
NP
P
16
2.667 in
6
Similarly, the diameter of the gear, see Equation (13-1), page 666, can be written as
dG
NG
P
48
8 in
6
The pitch line velocity, see Example (14-1), page 728, can be written as
V
dP nP
12
2.667 300
209.4 ft/min
12
The transmitted power, see Example 14-2, page 728, can be written as
H
W t VP
33,000
33,000 H 33,000 5
787.9 lb
VP
209.4
The AGMA bending stress equation, see Equation (14-15), page 734, can be written as
W t Ko K v K s
Pd K m K B
F J
The dynamic factor, see Equation (14-27), page 744 can be written as
A V
Kv
59.77
0.8255
1.196
The size factor, see Equation (a), page 747, can be written as
F
K S 1.192
0.0535
The Lewis form factor for the pinion with 16 teeth, see Table (14-2), page 726, is
Y 0.296
The Lewis form factor for the gear with 48 teeth, see Table (14-2), page 726, using linear interpolation
is
Y 0.4056
Therefore, the size factor for the pinion is
F
K S P 1.192
0.0535
2 0.296
1.192
0.0535
1.088
KS G
F YG
1.192
0.0535
2 0.4056
1.192
0.0535
1.097
The load distribution factor, see Equation (14-30), page 747, can be written as
K m 1 Cmc (C pf C pm CmaCe )
The load correction factor Cmc for uncrowned teeth, see Equation (14-31), page 748, is
Cmc 1
The pinion proportion factor C pf for a face width of F 2 in , see Equation (14-32), page 748, is
C pf
F
0.0375 0.0125 F
10 d
2
0.0375 0.0125 2 0.0625
10 2.667
Assuming S1 / S 0.175 in Figure (14-10), page 748, then from Equation (14-33), page 748, the pinion
proportion modifier C pm is
C pm 1
The mesh alignment factor Cma , see Equation (14-34), page 748, can be written as
Cma A BF CF 2
For commercial enclosed unit, see Table (14-9), page 748, the factors A, B, and C are
A 0.127
B 0.0158
and
C 0.093 104
Assuming the backup ratio mB 1.2 , the rim thickness factor, see Equation (14-40), page 752 is
KB 1
The geometry factor for bending strength for the pinion with 16 teeth from Figure (14-6), page 741,
assuming that the load is applied at the highest point of single-tooth contact is
J P 0.27
The geometry factor for bending strength for the gear with 48 teeth from Figure (14-6), page 741,
assuming that the load is applied at the highest point of single-tooth contact is
J G 0.38
The AGMA bending stress for the pinion can then be written as
P W t Ko K v K s P
Pd K m K B
F JP
6 1.222 1
13,921 psi
2
0.27
G W t Ko K v K s G
Pd K m K B
F JG
6 1.222 1
9973 psi
2
0.38
The safety factor guarding against bending fatigue failure, see Equation (14-41), page 753, can be
written as
SF
StYN / KT K R
From Figure (14-2), page 735, the AGMA bending strength for the pinion and the gear made of Grade
1 steel can be written as
Therefore, the AGMA bending strength for the pinion and the gear are
N G 48
3
N P 16
SF P
S t P YN P / K T K R
P
Therefore, the safety factor guarding against bending fatigue failure for the pinion is
SF P
The safety factor guarding against bending fatigue failure for the gear can be written as
SF G
St G YN G / K T K R
G
Therefore, the safety factor guarding against bending fatigue failure for the gear is
11
SF G
The AGMA pitting resistance (contact stress) equation, see Equation (14-16), page 734, can be written
as
c C p W t Ko K v K s
Km C f
dPF I
The elastic coefficient C p , for a steel pinion in mesh with a steel gear, see Table (14-8), page 745, is
C p 2300 psi
The surface condition factor, C f , see page 746 is assumed to be equal to 1.
The geometry factor for pitting resistance, see Equation (14-23), page 743, for an external gearset can
be written as
I
cos t sin t mG
2 mN
mG 1
For spur gears, see page 743, the load-sharing ratio mN 1 and t .
Therefore, for the given spur gearset the geometry factor for pitting resistance is
I
cos 20 sin 20 3
0.1205
2 1
31
c P Cp
W t Ko K v K s P
Km C f
dPF I
c P 2300
12
1.222
1
101,545 psi
2.667 2 0.1205
c G Cp
W t Ko K v K s G
Km C f
dPF I
c G 2300
1.222
1
101,964 psi
2.667 2 0.1205
The safety factor guarding against pitting failure, see Equation (14-42), page 753, can be written as
SH
S c Z N C H / KT K R
c
From Figure (14-5), page 738, the AGMA surface endurance strength for the pinion and the gear made
of Grade 1 steel can be written as
SH P
Sc P Z N P CH / KT K R
c P
Therefore, the safety factor guarding against pitting failure for the pinion is
13
SH P
The safety factor guarding against pitting failure for the gear is
SH G
Sc G Z N G CH / KT K R
c G
Therefore, the safety factor guarding against pitting failure for the gear is
SH G
14