Professional Documents
Culture Documents
through self-government, but that also, as Butler (1993) has argued, with
each act of constituting ourselves as subjects, we not
Deconstruction of so-called truths leads to new ways of seeing reality. In
my opinion, therefor it definitely is constructive. Summing up, some
points of the critique can contribute to a reflective, self-critique PostDevelopment. It is important that Post- Development thinkers are aware
of their starting point. As I mentioned in chapter 2 it makes also sense to
differentiate between the various authors that belong to PostDevelopment. If authoritarian and ethnocentric elements of development
theory and politics should be avoided, it is not possible to define
development as a normative model (as a state of 'good society for
example). Following the logic of postmoderism, these definition can
only be made by affected persons in a democratic discussion (Ziai 2006).
Post-Development and Postmodernism consequently do not
mean to be lost in diversity. Referring to Rapahel Daum, agency and its
legitimation out of a postmodern perspective means in the first place to
respect difference and diversity. From that a small consensus can be
worked out, which is not a new story of truth, but which can and should
resume to the better aspects of modernity, its emancipatory force and
human rights (Daum 2004).
The analysis of the criticism is important to proceed in the process of
decolonizing our minds and searching for new landscapes Escobar
speaks of. The conclusion in chapter 3.3 leads to the questions that I ask
myself: What now is its impact on me? What is my personal encounter
with Post-Development?
Discussing post-development in the seminar seemed like a summary of
my whole study of International Development. The question What is
Development? was raised in my first university session some years ago.
Step by step development and my positive, world bettering view on it
was disillusioned, the world my world deconstructed. I did not only
feel that these deconstruction is destructive: it brought a new, profound
way of thinking and a seeking for reality, that has many different
facettes negative and positive.
Though, the reading of different critical comments on PostDevelopment, reminded me on the criticism that I put on my study of
International Development. Because in my study there can be found a lot
of influence of Post-Development theory, the points of critique that are
formulated on Post-Development theory parallel my thoughts towards
my field of study. Feeling without perspective in this whole criticism,
that made sense, but also involves the danger of hopelessness.
In any case, it is clear that change starts at the local level. Regarding
Post-Development, supporting development practice, the support of
local movements, is a way to adapt theory in practice. In my personal
life, the local engagement in my environment became now more
theoretically reasoned. Being aware of the privileges as well as of the
contradictions.