Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
A. Electrogeometric models
Electrogeometric models have historically been employed
in transmission line shielding providing acceptable protection
against direct lightning strokes to phase conductors and they
are still widely used [2]. Shielding analysis according to
electrogeometric models follows based on Fig.l. The striking
distance to conductors, S, is assumed to be related solely to
the prospective lightning peak current, I and can be associated
to striking distance to earth surface, D, by using a factor y as
B
S=AI =yD
(1)
= sin- l
a
p
(1_r hm+hpJ
2AI:
(2)
C. Generic models
Following Eriksson's work, generic lightning attachment
models have been developed which also consider the
inception of the upward connecting discharge emerging from
the prospective struck object [14]-[21]. Thus, based on
different leader inception criteria, expressions of the attractive
radius of an object, R, defined as the longest lateral distance
from the object where lightning attachment occurs, have been
proposed in the general form
I'
~,
,
I
hm
I
I
I
I
I
I
hp
(5)
TABLE I
TABLE II
Electrogeometric model
Wagner & Hileman [3]
)I
14.2
0.42
I
Iforh <18m
Generic model
Rizk [I5]
0.32
0.80
0.75
l.ll
0.65
I
I
0.45
0.67
0.69
0.67
0.20
0.67
~forh >18m
27)1
?
1.57
462-h
Whitehead [8]
9.4
0.67
l.ll
liP'
8
0.65
10 0.65
liP"
p = 0.64 for UHV lines, 0.8 for EHV lines, and I for other hnes
'p = 0.36+0.17In(43-h) for h < 40 rn, p = 0.55 for h > 40 m where h is
the phase conductor height
B. Eriksson's model
Eriksson [13], proposed a modified electrogeometric model
by introducing the attractive radius in shielding design,
defmed as the "capture" radius at which the upward leader
initiated at the struck object intercepts the downward
lightning leader. Attractive radius, R, is given as
R = 0.67ho.6 I.74
(7)
(3)
(4)
D. Statistical model
Recently, investigations on the interception probability of
an air terminal through scale model experiments made
possible the formulation of distributions for striking distance
and interception radius [27], and, thus, a statistical approach
in shielding design has been proposed in [24]. Interception
radius is considered as statistical quantity with a mean value,
referring to 50% interception probability , called critical
interception radius, Rei> and a standard deviation a. It is given
with reference the striking distance to earth surface as
Adopting from [7] the values of 10 and 0.65 for factors A' and
B', respectively and by using the value of CI for negative
lightning according to Table III, equation (11) becomes
L>
: a ""o---.-----"-i---l~
I
I
I
I
ap-tan
I
I
I
I
I
(8)
-I
TABLE III
COEFFICIENTS C], Cz AND EXPRESSION OF a TO BE USED IN (8)
Positive Lightning
0.235
0.90
1.9(h/DYO.7S
Negative Lightning
0.272
1.24 5.0{h/ D
A3
()
l1m-hp
(12)
20
25
20
25
Shield wire height (m )
Shieldwire heit:lht(m)
40
40
~20
~~20
~
~_
30
"' 10
-;
~ '10
~-20
a..
I~
-30
' ...
_ Slahstica lmodal
Fsl
...
16j
"', 2
~
45
~-20
~~O~~~I;':~~
-30
a..
-,
<,,
- -IEEEStd1243
20
' -,
' .
~
SFFOR = O.2Ng
W(I)j(I)dI
(13)
r.
Shield
wire
height
TABLE VI
EFFECTIVE SHIELDING ANGLE OF TYPICAL 150kV AND 400 kV OVERHEAD
LINES OF THE HELLENICTRANSMISSION SYSTEM
Lightningattachmentmodel 150kV 400kV
Wagner & Hileman 3
21
13
Young et al. 4
34
26
12
Armstrong & Whitehead 5
17
Brown & Whitehead 6
11
16
Love 7
24
18
Whitehead 8
23
18
Anderson fill and IEEE WG 12
18
6
IEEE Std 1243 2
18
9
7
15
Eriksson 13
Rizk 15
29
30
Petrovet al. 19
24
25
Ait-Amar & Berger 21
24
12
Mikropoulos & Tsovilis 25
19
15
." -rc
50
40
...
"
'
Fig. 4. Perfect shielding angle versus actual shielding angle. Empty and solid
points depict lines showing superior shielding performance [5] and
experiencingshieldingfailures [32], respectively.
CONCLUSIONS