Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Submitted by:
Group 3
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Name:
Student No.
201012707
201011150
201010309
201010877
201010744
Submitted to:
Engr. Albert dela Cruz Evangelista
August 4, 2015
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Signature:
Abstract/ Introduction......1
I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
VIII.
Objectives..2
Materials/ Equipments.2
Setup..2
Theory7
Procedures.9
Results and Discussion.10
Conclusion12
References.12
Appendices
A. Experimental Data.13
B. Sample Computations14
C. Attendance Sheet16
ABSTRACT
Thermal energy can be transferred from one place to another by three processes:
convection, conduction or radiation. In convection, matter moves away from a region and
carries heat with it. A common example is the heating of an object by the movement of
surrounding air. In conduction, the atoms or molecules making up a substance interact in order
to transport hear. In this experiment, the third of these mechanisms was focused, thermal
radiation in the form of electromagnetic waves. Thermal radiation of objects near room
temperature is mainly in the infrared region of the electromagnetic spectrum. At higher
temperatures - about 600 or 700 C - radiation will start to be in the visible region. Thus, an
object glows red or orange at such temperatures. At even higher temperatures, emission of light
will be throughout the visible region and the object might be described as white hot.
In this experiment, the Inverse Square Law was verified in the laboratory. The radiation
flux from a point source varies as one over the square of the distance from the source. The
thermal radiation was measured at various distances from the heat source to test this law. On
the other hand, the following experiment proved Stefan- Boltzmann Law which states that at
very high temperatures, the amount of radiation absorbed is negligible compared to that
emitted, and so it can be neglected
I.
OBJECTIVES
1.
2.
source.
To show that the intensity of the radiation varies as the fourth power of the
source temperature.
II.
MATERIALS / EQUIPMENTS:
1.
B.
Stefan-Boltzmann Law
intensity of the influence at any given radius r is the source strength divided by the area of the
sphere. Being strictly geometric in its origin, the inverse square law applies to diverse
phenomena.
As one of the fields which obey the general inverse square law, a point radiation source
can be characterized by the relationship below whether you are talking about Roentgens, rads
or rems. All measures of exposure will drop off by inverse square law.
The amount of thermal radiation given off by an object obviously varies with its
temperature. In 1879 Josef Stefan found an empirical relationship between the absolute
temperature of an object, T, and the thermal power (P) per unit area (A) radiated by an object,
denoted by R:
R = P/A = eT4
where e is called the emissivity, and the constant of proportionality, , is equal to 5.6703 x 10-8
Wm-2K-4. Emissivity varies between 0 and 1. Ludwig Boltzmann derived this equation
theoretically in the 1880s, and so it is now referred to as the Stefan-Boltzmann law. An ideal
black body perfectly absorbs all radiation that strikes it and is also a perfect emitter and has e =
1.
When radiation falls on an object, a portion of the radiation is reflected and the
remainder is absorbed. Dark objects absorb more radiation than light objects and so usually
have higher emissivity. Lighter objects are better reflectors. Just as the Stefan-Boltzmann law
describes how radiation emission varies with temperature, the radiation absorbed, Rabs, can be
described by:
Rabs = P/A = aT4,
where a is the coefficient of absorption and, like the emissivity, varies between 0 and 1. When
a hot object is in surroundings at a lower temperature, it emits more radiation than it absorbs.
When the object is in thermal equilibrium with its surroundings, then the rate of emission and
absorption of radiation must be the same, and so e = a. The net power per unit area radiated by
an object at a temperature T in a room at a temperature To is then
R = e(T4 To4).
V.
PROCEDURE:
A. Inverse Square Law for Heat
1. Set power control to wide position and allow approximately 15 minutes for the
heater to reach a stable temperature before beginning the experiment..
2. Record the radiometer reading (R) and the distance from the heat source (X) for
a number of positions of theradiometer along the horizontal track. It will take
approximately 2 minutes for the radiometer to stabilize after being moved to
each new positions.
B. Stefan-Boltzmann Law
1. Set the power source to maximum on the instrument console.
2. Record the radiometer reading (R) and the temperature reading at ambient
conditions then for selected increments of increasing temperature to maximum
within a practical range. Both readings should be noted simultaneously at any
given point. It is recommended that while waiting for the black plate
temperature to stabilize between each increase of the heater power control the
reflective disc is placed in the radiometer to prevent heating effect and zero
drift.
3.00
2.90
2.80
2.70
2.60
log X
2.50
2.40
2.30
2.20
2.10
2.00
1.70
1.90
2.10
2.30
2.50
2.70
2.90
3.10
log R
The Radiation intensity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the
source.
Radiation Intensity
B. Stefan-Boltzmann Law
1
Distance 2
Readings
Temperature
Reading
(T)
Calculations
Radiometer
Reading
(R)
Ts
TA
Qb = 11.07*R
Qb=(Ts-TA)
W/m
W/m
W/m
55
18
309.15
300.15
199.26
197.2758
58
20
313.15
300.15
221.4
221.6502
64
25
318.15
300.15
276.75
272.4256
75
34
327.15
300.15
376.38
372.8178
99
57
348.15
300.15
630.99
627.3756
132
97
377.15
300.15
1073.79
1067.5402
VII. CONCLUSIONS:
Based on the actual results of the conducted experiment, it was proven that the intensity
of radiation is proportional to the source temperature. It is also observable in two equations used
to calculate Qb. So to put this in simplest form:
Intensity source temperature
Also, the following experiment proved that the intensity of radiation is inversely
proportional to the square of distance. As evident in the data recorded. So, when the distance of
the radiometer decreases, the intensity of radiation increases. Thus, to explain this in simplest
form:
Intensity
1
Distance 2
In this experiment, all of the needed data could be gathered in the instrument. The
ambient temperature could be read in the thermocouple 2 and the value was reliable. But
sometimes the values of radiometer reading (R) was diverging and we needed to move the wire
connected from instrument console to the radiometer to obtain more reliable readings.
VIII.REFERENCES:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/forces/isq.html#c4
https://www.farlabs.edu.au/nuclear/explain-inverse-square-law/
http://radiopaedia.org/articles/inverse-square-law
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/stefan.html
http://www.britannica.com/science/Stefan-Boltzmann-law
http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/light/radiation.html
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Experimental Data
Radiometer, R
63
73
85
98
113
131
158
192
242
304
411
584
869
1429
B. Stefan-Boltzmann Law
Temperature
Reading
(T)
Radiometer
Reading
(R)
TA
W/m
55
18
300.15
58
20
300.15
64
25
300.15
75
34
300.15
99
57
300.15
132
97
300.15
log x
2.90
2.88
2.85
2.81
2.78
2.74
2.70
2.65
2.60
2.54
2.48
2.40
2.30
2.18
log R
1.80
1.86
1.93
1.99
2.05
2.12
2.20
2.28
2.38
2.48
2.61
2.77
2.94
3.16
3.00
2.90
2.80
2.70
2.60
log X
2.50
2.40
2.30
2.20
2.10
2.00
1.70
1.90
2.10
2.30
2.50
2.70
log R
slope=m=
B. Stefan-Boltzmann Law
Derivation of Qb = 11.07 * R
y 2.182.90
=
=0.537
x 3.161.8
2.90
3.10
v2
Qincident = ( v 2+ L2 ) * Qemitted
0.0632
Qincident = ( 0.0632+ 0.22 ) * Qemitted
Qincident = 11.07 * Qemitted
Where:
Qincident = Qb , Qemitted = R
Qb = 11.07 * R
Qb computation
Qb = 11.07 * R
Qb = (Ts4 TA4)
Qb = 11.07 * 18
Qb =19 9.26
Qb = 5.67x10-8(328.154 300.154)
Qb = 197.2758
Qb = 11.07 * 20
Qb = 221.4
Qb = 5.67x10-8(331.154 300.154)
Qb = 221.6502
Qb = 11.07 * 25
Qb = 276.75
Qb = 5.67x10-8(337.154 300.154)
Qb = 272.4256
Qb = 11.07 * 34
Qb = 376.38
Qb = 5.67x10-8(348.154 300.154)
Qb = 372.8178
Qb = 11.07 * 57
Qb = 630.99
Qb = 5.67x10-8(372.154 300.154)
Qb = 627.3756
Qb = 11.07 * 97
Qb = 1073.79
Qb = 5.67x10-8(405.154 300.154)
Qb = 1067.5402
Name:
6. Bantog, John Ely C.
7. Hernandez, Lisa Antoinette B.
8. Ibay, Ferdinand S. Jr.
Student No.
201012707
201011150
201010309
Signature:
9. Marbida, Angelique C.
10. Rafon, Mikaella S.A.
201010877
201010744