Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FUNDING
SUPPORT
FINAL
Progress
IMPLEMENTATION
www.jankalyana.org
Volume VII
JANAKALYAN
JANAKALYAN
Water Resource Management for tail end farmers
Final Report
September 2012 August 2015
Submitted to
NABARD
Bangalore
Submitted by
JANAKALYAN
An Institution for Innovation Integrated Inspiring Intervention
Page 2 of 29
JANAKALYAN
Page 3 of 29
JANAKALYAN
Resultantly, the productive land decreased and thus income of the family; the family
caught into debt to manage the family affairs.
4) Further, chemical-heavy agriculture caused pests immunization and has left degraded
soil with severe salinity & alkalinity; result is low productivity making agriculture further
loss-making.
Further, the runoff generated from each farm @ normal rainfall of the area (581mm per
annum) generates sufficient water to cultivate 2-ha farm if harvested systematically.
But, the farmers make way for the water to flow out of the farm during rainy season
and then blame God or Government for not providing water for irrigation.
5) Instead, if we harvest the rainwater from the very farms of respective farmers and store,
it would satisfy the irrigation needs of the farmer during critical period.
Thus, basically the intervention is trying to address the twin problems of livelihood of
the tail end farmers i.e. optimizing profit in agriculture (by addressing issues like soil
fertility, salinity / alkalinity, pests immunization, chemical heavy cultivation practices,
etc. using chemical-free, diversified cropping pattern) and providing adequate irrigation
by addressing 2-extremes of water availability through creation of water harvesting
structures.
Hypothesis/Theme:
Water is life but is the scarcest resource too; provide water to the farmers, they would
ensure food security of the nation. God provided enough water in the nature which we
dont use judiciously when made available but blame the God or Government for the
shortfall. Rural godowns are promoted by NABARD to arrest wastage of food grains likewise
water storage tanks or Water Banks need to be promoted to reduce wastage of the
scarcest resource, the water.
Model to be tested:
Excavation of a water storage structure in the fallow land to store the excess water during
rainy season and using the same for lifesaving irrigation during the peak season would not
only address loss of crops due to 2-extremes of water availability but also help to use the
fallow land productively by integrating fish in the tank. Various other productive units such
as vegetables, fodder with cows, fruits & tree crops, etc. could also be added to distribute
risk of crop failures and thereby broadening the economic base of the family. The program
commenced in September 2012 with the financial support of NABARD in Sindhanur
Rehabilitation Project. This report is prepared at the end of 2nd year of the project
intervention to document the process and progress.
Objectives of the intervention:
The program aims at1) Creation of 15 Water Bank at the tail end of Tungabhadra Irrigation Project to harvest
excess water during rainy season to use for life saving irrigation during peak season.
2) Bring in additional area under irrigated crops through judicious application of water,
the scarce resource.
3) Increase productivity of the land through assured irrigation
4) Enhance farm income by adding various productive units to the farm with risk
distribution through multiple sources of income to the family throughout the year.
Page 4 of 29
JANAKALYAN
ACTIVITIES COMPLETED:
The activities are described as per the line items of approved budget, those are completed
during the project of 3 years commencing from September 2012 in the subsequent
paragraphs.
1) Excavations of Water Harvesting Structures:
The central core of the project is excavation of water harvesting structures to address 2extremes of water availability. The target was to create 15 such structures and we could
succeed to complete all 15 within the prescribed time limit. However, it is realized that
there is still huge demand for such structures in these colonies. The details of the
structures created during the project phase are furnished in the table belowSl.
No.
Name of the
farmer
Village
1
2
3
4
5
M anik Bawali
Shanti Mandal
Suren Mandal
Jeetendra Ray
Hiralal Baidya
R H C No-5
R H C No-5
R H C No-5
R H C No-4
R H C No-4
6 Ramesh Mandal
7
Shib Gain
8 Subash Mandal
9
Lab Mistri
10 Surendranath Ray
R H C No-3
R H C No-4
R H C No-2
R H C No-2
R H C No-2
11
Sailen Dhali
12 Devendranath S
13 Mukunda Biswas
14 Birendranath Bose
15
Duli Mandal
TOTAL
Percentage
R H C No-2
R H C No-2
R H C No-5
R H C No-5
R H C No-2
Phone
Number
It is found from the above table that only 28% of the cost of excavation is born by
NABARD while farmers contribution is to the tune of 72%, which itself is an indicator to
tell us that necessity of the intervention. Another point to be noted here is that the total
approved budget for the project is only Rs.9.60 lakhs while the expenditure towards
excavation of the program itself is Rs.18.80 lakhs (almost double).
2) Orientation Program with farmers, KVK & USA Representatives
It was planned to conduct an orientation program with farmers, KVK and USA
representatives to build linkage with resource organizations and farmers. Accordingly a
meeting held in the presence Training Coordinator of KVK, Director of Extension of UAS
and farmers on 28th October 2013.
Participants
Date
Venue
farmers
Officers
Total
28.10.2013 Samarthya Soudha, Janakalyan
36
15
51
19.11.2014 Farm of Sri Labkumar Mistry
103
11
114
Page 5 of 29
JANAKALYAN
The orientation program was followed by a field visit to the farms of Sri Jeetendra Roy,
Sri Sunil Biswas (an old farmer of Janakalyan) and also the farm of Sri Sunil Dhali, who
has constructed the pukur without the aid of Janakalyan.
Similarly, another program in the presence of Dr.G Ramesh, the Subject Matter
Specialist of KVK on 19.11.2014 to link farmers with Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Raichur. The
Assistant Director of Agriculture Dr. Jayprakash T C was also present on the occasion.
More than 100 farmers participated in the said program. More than 100 farmers
participated in this program to get the knowledge about the program.
3) Orientation Program with Bankers & Government officials
The 1st orientation program for bankers and government officials about the project
concept on 28.10.2013; more than 11 bank officials and 4 line department
representatives from Agriculture, Horticulture, Forestry and Animal Husbandry
departments participated in the said program. Dr. Jayaprakash TC, Assistant Director of
Agriculture, Dr. Shankar, Assistant Director of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary
Sciences, Sri Rajshekhar DM, Senior Assistant Director of Horticulture, etc. participated
in the said program. The Lead District Manager Sri Shekhargouda chaired the program in
the presence of Sri N Narayana Raju, AGM of NABARD. All participating farmers were
also present on the occasion.
Participants
Date
Venue
Farmers
Line Dept
Bankers
28.10.2013 Samarthya Soudha, Janakalyan
36
4
11
19.11.2014 Farm of Sri Labkumar Mistry
103
4
7
The 2nd program with government line departments and bankers was held on
19.11.2014 wherein the Department of Agriculture, Horticulture, Animal Husbandry and
Forestry participated. Several bank officers also participated in the said program. More
than 100 farmers participated in the program in addition to the participating farmers.
4) Training Programs for farmers on " Integrated Farming System"
Excavation of water harvesting structure is just the beginning of the journey in bringing
self sufficiency by diversifying cropping and adding multiple sources of income to the
farm. Though, it has a long list of activities demanding huge investments in each of
these activities and takes few years to establish the results, due to limitation of the
scheme, we have planned only few set of training with the participating farmers. The
actual implementation is left to the farmers through their own investments. The role of
Janakalyan is only triggering the activities such as a) vegetable cultivation training, b)
fodder cultivation & animal husbandry training, c) worm composting and / or SRI and 4)
fish rearing. The achievement as at the end of the journey is satisfactory. The training
conducted during the project period is tabulated as underDate
Subject
Resource
Partici
Person
pant
05-10-2012 Land development and land leveling in command Prasen Raptan
9
areas
11
Page 6 of 29
JANAKALYAN
Resource
Partici
Person
pant
command areas based on water availability
Sudhanya Sikdar
02-11-2012 Soil sample collection and soil testing to assess Prasen Raptan
13
04-11-2012
22-11-2012
26-11-2012
05-12-2012
09-12-2012
06-12-2012
22-12-2012
02-01-2013
11-01-2013
14-01-2013
08-01-2013
20-01-2013
29-02-2013
18-02-2013
22-02-2013
07-03-2013
17-03-2013
09-03-2013
10-04-2013
11-04-2013
Subject
Basavarajaiah S
Sudhanya Sikdar
Prasen Raptan
12
Prasen Raptan
11
Prasen Raptan
10
Basavarajaiah S
Sudhanya Sikdar
Basavarajaiah S
Sudhanya Sikdar
Prasen Raptan
34
Prasen Raptan
33
Basavarajaiah S
Sudhanya Sikdar
Prasen Raptan
41
Basavarajaiah S
Sudhanya Sikdar
Prasen Raptan
14
Prasen Raptan
21
Prasen Raptan
12
Basavarajaiah S
Sudhanya Sikdar
Basavarajaiah S
Sudhanya Sikdar
Prasen Raptan
11
Prasen Raptan
11
Prasen Raptan
14
Prasen Raptan
15
15
26
31
13
21
Page 7 of 29
JANAKALYAN
Resource
Person
Formation
of
Agriculture
Interest
Groups
/
Water
09-04-2013
Prasen Raptan
13-04-2013
22-04-2013
29-05-2013
21-05-2013
06-05-2013
07-05-2013
08-06-2013
12-06-2013
19-07-2013
23-08-2013
27-08-2013
16-08-2013
30-09-2013
05-09-2013
13-09-2013
28-10-2013
06-10-2013
21-12-2013
28-12-2013
Subject
Partici
pant
12
Basavarajaiah S
Sudhanya Sikdar
Prasen Raptan
10
Basavarajaiah S
Sudhanya Sikdar
Prasen Raptan
8
12
Manojit Biswas
13
Basavarajaiah S
Sudhanya Sikdar
Prasen Raptan
14
Prasen Raptan
31
Basavarajaiah S
Sudhanya Sikdar
Basavarajaiah S
Sudhanya Sikdar
11
Prasen Raptan
14
Prasen Raptan
21
Prasen Raptan
11
Basavarajaiah S
Sudhanya Sikdar
Basavarajaiah S
Sudhanya Sikdar
Prasen Raptan
12
Manojit Biswas
11
Prasen Raptan
Prasen Raptan
21
11
11
10
Page 8 of 29
Subject
JANAKALYAN
Resource
Person
Partici
pant
areas
10
11
Prasen Raptan
21
Sudhanya Sikdar
11
Prasen Raptan
Sudhanya Sikdar
12
14
Prasen Raptan
12
Prasen Raptan
11
JANAKALYAN
The 2nd year was very bad agricultural year; early rain in the month of May-June
tempted the farmers to go for cotton crop. Huge area was sown with cotton. The
germination and growth was extremely good. But long dry spell in June-August
made the farmers helpless. Again, continuous rain during August spoiled the crops.
As a result, the farmers those who tried vegetable cultivation lost their crops while
few others could not even go for sowing / transplanting. Again the current year is
very bad year and is declared as Drought Hit Year. Even then, one can find the
participating farmers growing vegetables in their farms while others are waiting for
the canal water.
Response to vegetable cultivation was extremely good by the farmers; they started
using the water very efficiently for vegetable cultivation. Once ignited by Janakalyan
team, they take it forward when they get the taste of regular income from vegetable
crops.
JANAKALYAN
The important point to be noted here is that the farmer sales the vegetables
after their family consumption; consumption of farm fresh vegetables will
definitely have positive impacts on the health of the family members. Further,
that much amount is saved every day, which otherwise they would have spent
on purchase of vegetables.
Page 11 of 29
JANAKALYAN
Creepers faced very good income to Ramesh Mondal during the year
Page 12 of 29
JANAKALYAN
Chilly plot of Sudeepto Mondal at R H Colony No.5 who never dreamt about it
b) Cultivation of fodder for milch animals
It is also aimed that the peasant communities shall also get unadulterated
milk from their own farm along with farm fresh vegetables. Therefore, tried to
convince and motivate the farmers to go for animal husbandry. Rearing 1 or 2
milch animals is not difficult for the farming communities.
There is good profit in animal husbandry as they need not spent any
additional pie to feed these animals. The fodder is abundantly available in
their farms itself. Therefore, whatever is earned from milk is net profit
excluding the labor. On the other hand, the benefits from cow dung and cow
urine is also not calculated along with the value of calf. Again, this value is
calculated only for the quantum of milk that is sold after family consumption;
here again the impact on health is to be considered.
Only setback for the team during the year is that it failed to motivate the
farmers to go for fodder crops except Sri Manik Bawali who has tried it in
small piece of land. It is very difficult to bring out the farmers from their ageold practices to which they are addicted to. But, some of them have cultivated
fodder on the bunds of the tank. However, in the due course of time, we are
sure of converting these farmers into the proposed package of the program.
Page 13 of 29
JANAKALYAN
Milch animals are taken care like human being by these farmers
Page 14 of 29
JANAKALYAN
and training interventions, the team failed to motivate the farmers to go for
vermicompost preparation.
System of Rice Intensification: In order to bring more area under irrigation,
it is proposed that SRI method of rice cultivation shall be introduced so that
water consumption becomes less while yield increases. With all efforts, the
farmers agreed to go for SRI in a small piece of land; however, not all
farmers. The result was not very convincing for the farmers.
JANAKALYAN
In addition all farmers have gone for traditional method of rice cultivation for
their subsistence cultivation. During 2nd year, the team failed to convince the
farmers to go for SRI cultivation. The main reason is failure of monsoon. The
rice crop itself has reduced by more than 70% and cotton has made its way
in after almost 2 decades. The issue is worst in the 3rd year as it is declared
as Drought-hit year and nobody has gone for any crop till date.
d) Fishery in Farm Ponds
In addition to meeting the life saving irrigation needs of the famers, the water
bank also fetches additional income by introducing fish cultivation. Fish is the
staple food for Bengalis and they know how to cultivate it, if provided with a
water bank. Almost all the farmers have started fish rearing excepting 1-2
farmers.
It is learnt that in new water harvesting structure, fish growth is not up to the
expectation. However, all 5 farmers tried fish rearing in 1st year. The yield was
not up to the mark. Due to failure of monsoon, the farmers could not fill their
water banks during the 2nd year and thus could not go for fish cultivation. The
situation has become still worst during the current year as it is a drought-hit
year and none of the water banks are filled yet. Therefore, no question of fish
rearing arouses.
Water Bank of Jeetendra Roy and Manik Bawali ready for fish cultiv ation
Page 16 of 29
JANAKALYAN
Page 17 of 29
JANAKALYAN
Fish cultivation in the water bank; bund is productively used for fruits and fire wood
Page 18 of 29
JANAKALYAN
dPt
QPgtPAz vAq
AwUg, Dg. Z. P A .4 , Azsg 584 143
Tel: 9448570745, +91 8535 264488, 264140: Email: info@jankalyana.org, www.jankalyana.org
fAiPV Pg Dzsjv U P
Pvv
AP: 19.11.2014 Ai : U 11.00
: Pig Pv, Dg. Z. P A.2
Gzl
CzsPv
R CwyU:
G:
CwyU
:
:
:
PAv Ay s D
fPjU, gAiZg
J g\\gAit gd
f C AzsPg, q, gAiZg
Rg Uq
f CUtAi AP Pg, gAiZg
dAiP n
AiP P zPg, Azs g
q|| f g
Ai vdg, P e PAz, gAiZg
gd Rg r Ji
jAi AiP vlUjP zPg, Azs g
gt
jAi AiP UjP zPg, gAiZg
q|| APg
AiP z Pg , AU ES, Azs g
r Z PA
PAi z, dPt
g
PAi P z Pg
Page 19 of 29
JANAKALYAN
Results Sharing Program: To make the fellow farmers aware about the outcomes of the
interventions under NABARD supported Farmers Technology Transfer Fund (FTTF)
program, a daylong event called Result Sharing Program was conducted on 28.08.2015
in the presence of participating farmers. About 60 farmers participated in the said
program in the Janakalyan office. The farmers shared their experiences gained during
the project period of 3 years along with data support. The final outcomes of the
interventions at the end of project period are tabulated in the following table.
Land
2013-14
Sl.
Farmer Name holding Cropped Total
Total
No
(acre)
area Expenditur Income
1 Manik Bawali 5.00
4.50
159,500 239,700
2 Shanti Mandal 4.38
4.00
211,925 432,000
3 Suren Mandal 4.38
4.00
84,850 239,700
4 Jeetendra
4.08
3.50
57,190 74,200
5 Hiralal Baidya 5.02
4.50
104,145 171,600
6 Ramesh Mand 5.00
4.50
125,000 160,000
7
Shib Gain
5.00
4.00
110,000 130,000
8 Subash Manda 2.00
1.40
55,000 58,000
9
Lab Mistri
2.19
1.69
45,000 55,000
10 Surendranath 5.30
4.23
120,000 150,000
11 Sailen Dhali
3.20
3.20
60,000 90,000
12 Devendranath 5.00
5.00
75,000 110,000
13 Mukunda Bisw 2.32
2.32
65,000 95,000
14 Birendranath B 4.19
4.19
105,000 130,000
15 Duli Mandal
4.32
4.32
120,000 185,000
Total
61.38 55.35
1,497,610 2,320,200
Average per farmer
99,841 154,680
Percentage
155%
2014-15
Cropped Total .
Total Net Profit/
Net
area Expenditur Income
Loss
Profit
80,200 4.50
102,814 144,400 41,586
220,075 4.00
117,840 160,800 42,960
154,850 4.00
114,620 140,600 25,980
17,010 3.50
100,680 164,350 63,670
67,455 4.50
96,300 111,700 15,400
35,000 4.50
84,170 130,950 46,780
20,000 4.00
94,550 120,400 25,850
3,000 1.40
31,410
36,100
4,690
10,000 1.69
48,970
77,100 28,130
30,000 4.23
105,030 147,600 42,570
30,000 2.50
60,000
86,400 26,400
35,000 4.50
130,000 133,000
3,000
30,000 2.00
50,000
57,000
7,000
25,000 3.39
98,000 121,000 23,000
65,000 4.00
98,000 130,000 32,000
822,590 52.71
1,332,384 1,761,400 429,016
54,839 3.51
88,826 117,427 28,601
55%
132%
32%
One can find from the table that the net profit for 2013-14 was 55% on investment while
that has reduced to 32% during the current crop year. This was because, the year 201415 was a drought hit year and also the cotton crop has failed totally. However, the profit
of 32% is recorded from other crops like vegetable, milk, dry crops, etc. Without the
water bank, this would have been a day dream like other farmers of the area who has
met with severe loss during the year. The farmers participating in the project are happy
that they have at least 32% returns on their investment while other farmers have lost
their principal amount too.
The farmers participated in the Result Sharing program are finally convinced that the
Water Bank is a concept which is need of the hour for the farmers of this area. They also
agreed that only excavation of water bank may not serve the purpose unless the farmers
actively in other components of the project as planned by Janakalyan. The productive
units of Janakalyan can only make the intervention profit oriented. These productive
units are
a) Vegetable cultivation for daily income
b) Fodder with milch animals for weekly income
c) Fish cultivation in the water bank for seasonal income
d) Fruits crops on the bunds for long term income
e) Paddy with SRI as subsistence crop
f) Cereals and dry crops for food grain requirement of the family
Page 20 of 29
JANAKALYAN
PHOTO TOUR
Page 21 of 29
JANAKALYAN
JANAKALYAN
JANAKALYAN
Page 24 of 29
JANAKALYAN
An article published abou the project intervention in the Prajavani, Kannada daily
Page 25 of 29
JANAKALYAN
2013-14
Page 26 of 29
JANAKALYAN
2014-15
Page 27 of 29
JANAKALYAN
2015-16
Page 28 of 29
Addressing 2-extremes of water availability to improve productivity in tail end of irrigation project
Sl.
No
Expenditure Head
Budget
Proposed
Budget Sanctioned by RO
234000
36
Rate
per
4,000
144000
36
4,000
Unit
i
ii
iii
iv
Excavations of pukurs
Orientation
Programmes with
farmers,KVK & USA
Orientation
Programmes with
Bankers & Govt officials
Total
Budget
144,000
124,000
2,200
144,000
124,000
viii
Total
Grant Released
Grant Utilsed
Overspent
126,200
124,000
20,000
20,000
Local
Contributi
on
Total
F=D+E
G=A+D
H=B+E
I=G+H
20,000
20,000
144,000
144,000
2,200
-
146,200
144,000
525,000 1,366,312
1,891,312
525,000
338,750
889,170
6125
2,000
6,000
6,250
6,250
6,250
6,250
8750
2,000
6,000
2,252
2,252
2,252
2,252
vii
C=A+B
NABARD
Grant
35,000
Up to 31.08.2015
15
3000000
vi
25500
3,333
10,000
3,100
3,100
3,100
3,100
25500
3,333
10,000
25500
3,333
10,000
7,480
7,480
6,600
7,480
25500
3,333
10,000
10,000
10,000
9,900
10,000
229200
36
2,250
81,000
177,145
177,145
9635
9635
186,780
186,780
30000
7,455
16,980
16,000
3,754,075
749,400
1,044,862
(295,462)
3,200
65,783
16,000
7,455
962,000
776,702
8,545
891,370
1,668,072
8,545
Grant sanctioned
Grant received
Balance to be released
962,000
749,400
212,600