You are on page 1of 2

46471

Notices Federal Register


Vol. 70, No. 153

Wednesday, August 10, 2005

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER the collection of information unless it comprehensive and detailed picture of
contains documents other than rules or displays a currently valid OMB control the aquaculture sector of the economy.
proposed rules that are applicable to the number. Authority to administer the census of
public. Notices of hearings and investigations, aquaculture is covered by Public Law
committee meetings, agency decisions and National Agricultural Statistics Service
105–113, the Census of Agriculture Act
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of Title: Agricultural Resource
petitions and applications and agency
of 1997, and U.S. Code Title 7. The
statements of organization and functions are
Management, Chemical Use, and Post- census of aquaculture will be the only
examples of documents appearing in this harvest Chemical Use Surveys. source of data comparable and
section. OMB Control Number: 0535–0218. consistent at the national and State
Summary of Collection: The primary levels. It will cover all operations,
objectives of the National Agricultural commercial or noncommercial, from
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Statistics Service (NASS) is to provide which $1,000 or more of aquaculture
the public with timely and reliable products were sold or normally would
Submission for OMB Review; agricultural production and economic have been sold during the census year.
Comment Request statistics, as well as environmental and The census of aquaculture is one of a
specialty agricultural related statistics. series of special study programs that
August 4, 2005.
Three surveys—the Agricultural comprise the follow-ons to the census of
The Department of Agriculture has
Resource Management Study, the Fruit agriculture and is designed to provide
submitted the following information
and Vegetable Chemical Use Surveys, more detailed statistics on the
collection requirement(s) to OMB for
and the Post-harvest Chemical Use aquaculture industry.
review and clearance under the
Survey—are critical to NASS’ ability to Need and Use of the Information: The
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
fulfill these objectives and to build the National Agricultural Statistics Service
Public Law 104–13. Comments
regarding (a) whether the collection of Congressionally mandated database on will collect data to provide a
information is necessary for the proper agricultural chemical use and related comprehensive inventory on the
performance of the functions of the farm practices. NASS uses a variety of number of operations, water acreage,
agency, including whether the survey instruments to collect the method of production, total production,
information will have practical utility; information in conjunction with these sales outlets, sales by aquaculture
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate studies. species, products distributed for
of burden including the validity of the Need and Use of the Information: The restoration or conservation by species,
methodology and assumptions used; (c) Agricultural Resource Management and farm employment. These data will
ways to enhance the quality, utility and Study provides a robust data base of provide information on the aquaculture
clarity of the information to be information to address varied needs of industry necessary for farmers,
collected; (d) ways to minimize the policy makers. There are many uses for government and various groups
burden of the collection of information the information from this study concerned with the aquaculture
on those who are to respond, including including an evaluation of the safety of industry to evaluate policy and
through the use of appropriate the Nation’s food supply; input to the programs, make marketing decisions
automated, electronic, mechanical, or farm sector portion of the gross and determine the economic impact on
other technological collection domestic product; and to provide a the economy.
techniques or other forms of information barometer on the financial condition of Description of Respondents: Farms.
technology should be addressed to: Desk farm businesses. Data from the Fruit and Number of Respondents: 10,000.
Vegetable Chemical Use Surveys is used Frequency of Responses: Reporting:
Officer for Agriculture, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, to assess the environmental and One-time (Every 5-years).
economic implications of various Total Burden Hours: 4,222.
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), program and policies and the impact on Charlene Parker,
OIRA_Submission@OMB.EOP.GOV or agricultural producers and consumers. Departmental Information Collection
fax (202) 395–5806 and to Departmental The results of the Post-harvest Chemical Clearance Officer.
Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO, Mail Use Survey are used by the [FR Doc. 05–15767 Filed 8–9–05; 8:45 am]
Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250– Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) BILLING CODE 3410–20–P
7602. Comments regarding these to develop Food Quality Protection Act
information collections are best assured risk assessments. Other organizations
of having their full effect if received use this data to make sound regulatory DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
within 30 days of this notification. decisions.
Copies of the submission(s) may be Description of Respondents: Farms. Cooperative State Research,
obtained by calling (202) 720–8958. Number of Respondents: 76,433. Education, and Extension Service
An agency may not conduct or Frequency of Responses: Reporting: Notice of Intent To Extend a Currently
sponsor a collection of information Annually. Approved Information Collection
unless the collection of information Total Burden Hours: 58,345.
AGENCY: Cooperative State Research,
displays a currently valid OMB control Title: Census of Aquaculture. Education, and Extension Service,
number and the agency informs OMB Control Number: 0535–0237. USDA.
potential persons who are to respond to Summary of Collection: The primary
ACTION: Notice and request for
the collection of information that such objective of the 2005 Census of
comments.
persons are not required to respond to Aquaculture is to obtain a

VerDate jul<14>2003 15:02 Aug 09, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM 10AUN1
46472 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 10, 2005 / Notices

SUMMARY: In accordance with the provided to the submitting Project consists of approximately 50,000
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and Director. reviewers. The total annual burden on
Office of Management and Budget Given the highly technical nature of reviewers completing the questionnaire
(OMB) regulations at 5 CFR part 1320, many of these proposals, the quality of is 8,330 hours. CSREES estimates that
this notice announces the intent of the the peer review greatly depends on the the potential Conflict of Interest and
Cooperative State Research, Education, appropriate matching of the subject Confidentiality Certification Form takes
and Extension Service (CSREES) to matter of the proposal with the 10 minutes to complete. The agency has
request approval for an extension of the technical expertise of the potential approximately 1,000 panelists each
currently approved information reviewer. In order to obtain this year. The total annual burden of the
collection for the CSREES proposal information, an electronic questionnaire certification form is 167 hours. The total
review process. is used to collect information about annual burden of these components of
DATES: Written comments on this notice potential panel and ad-hoc reviewers. If the entire review process is 100,497
must be received by October 11, 2005, the reviewer is already in our database, hours.
to be assured of consideration. the questionnaire asks potential Comments: Comments are invited on:
Comments received after that date will reviewers to update their basic (a) Whether the proposed collection of
be considered to the extent practicable. biographical information including information is necessary for the proper
address, contact information, performance of the functions of the
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
professional expertise, and their Agency, including whether the
by any of the following methods: Mail:
availability to review for CSREES in the information will have practical utility;
CSREES, USDA, STOP 2216, 1400
future. New reviewers are prompted to (b) the accuracy of the Agency estimate
Independence Avenue, SW.,
complete the questionnaire. This of the burden of the proposed collection
Washington, DC 20250–2216; Hand
information has been invaluable in the of information; (c) ways to enhance the
Delivery/Courier: 800 9th Street, SW.,
CSREES review process, which has been quality, utility, and clarity of the
Waterfront Centre, Room 4217,
recognized by the grantee and grantor information to be collected; and (d)
Washington, DC 20024; Fax: 202–720– community for its quality.
0857; or e-mail: ways to minimize the burden of the
The applications and associated collection of information on those who
jhitchcock@csrees.usda.gov. materials made available to reviewers, are to respond, including through the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: as well as the discussions that take use of appropriate automated,
Jason Hitchcock, (202) 720–4343. place during panel review meetings are electronic, mechanical, or other
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: strictly confidential and are not to be technological collection techniques or
Title: CSREES Proposal Review disclosed to or discussed with anyone other forms of information technology.
Process. who has not officially been designated All responses to this notice will be
OMB Number: 0524–0041. to participate in the review process. summarized and included in the request
Expiration Date of Current Approval: While each panelist certifies when to OMB for approval. All comments will
06/30/2006. preparing a review that they do not have become a matter of public record.
Type of Request: Intent to seek a conflict of interest with a particular
approval for the revision of a currently application and will maintain its Done in Washington, DC, this 1st day of
approved information collection for confidentiality in the Peer Review August, 2005.
three years. System, CSREES collects a certification Merle D. Pierson,
Abstract: CSREES is responsible for of the panelist intent at the time of the Deputy Under Secretary, Research,
performing a review of proposals panel review proceedings to emphasize Education, and Economics.
submitted to CSREES competitive award and reinforce confidentiality not only of [FR Doc. 05–15768 Filed 8–9–05; 8:45 am]
programs in accordance with section applications and reviews but also panel BILLING CODE 3410–22–P
103(a) of the Agricultural Research, discussions. On the Conflict of Interest
Extension, and Education Reform Act of and Confidentiality Certification Form,
1998, 7 U.S.C. 7613(a). Reviews are the panelists affirm they understand the DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
undertaken to ensure that projects conflict of interest guidelines and will
supported by CSREES are of high not be involved in the review of the Rural Utilities Service
quality and are consistent with the goals application(s) where a conflict exists. Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc.;
and requirements of the funding Panelists also affirm their intent to
Notice of Intent To Hold Public
program. maintain the confidentiality of the panel
Proposals submitted to CSREES Scoping Meetings and Prepare an
process and not disclose to another
undergo a programmatic evaluation to Environmental Impact Statement
individual any information related to
determine worthiness of Federal the peer review or use any information AGENCY: Rural Utilities Service, USDA.
support. The evaluations consist of a for personal benefit. ACTION:Notice of intent to hold public
peer panel review and may also entail Estimate of Burden: CSREES estimates scoping meetings and prepare an
an assessment by Federal employees that anywhere from one hour to twenty environmental impact statement (EIS).
and mail-in (ad-hoc) reviews. hours may be required to review a
Need and Use of the Information: The proposal. Approximately five hours are SUMMARY: The Rural Utilities Service
information collected from the required to review an average proposal. (RUS) intends to hold public scoping
evaluations is used to support CSREES Each proposal receives an average of meetings and prepare an environmental
grant programs. CSREES uses the results four reviews, accounting for an annual impact statement (EIS) in connection
of each proposal evaluation to burden of 20 hours per proposal. with possible impacts related to a
determine whether a proposal should be CSREES estimates it receives 4,600 project proposed by Associated Electric
declined or recommended for award. proposals each year. The total annual Cooperative, Inc. (AECI), with
When CSREES has rendered a decision, burden in reviewing proposals is 92,000 headquarters in Springfield, Missouri.
copies of reviews, excluding the names hours. CSREES estimates that the The proposal consists of the
of the reviewers and summaries of potential reviewer questionnaire takes construction and operation of a nominal
review panel deliberations, if any, are 10 minutes to complete. The database 660 megawatt coal-based electrical

VerDate jul<14>2003 15:02 Aug 09, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM 10AUN1

You might also like