2015 City Manager Evaluation Calculation Spreadsheet

Part 1: Managerial Competency Scores

1.

Leadership (9)

2.

Teamwork (9)

3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

Oral and Written Communications (9)

Strategic Focus (9)
Customer Service (8)
Professionalism (9)
Fiscal Responsibility (9)
Relationship with City Commission (9)
Relationships with Staff (15)

10. Relationships with Community Partners (32)

5
2
10
3
15
4
20
3
15
2
10
3
15
2
10
3
15
2
10
1
5

4
4
16
1
4
4
16
3
12
2
8
3
12
4
16
5
20
4
16
6
24

3
3
9
5
15
1
3
3
9
5
15
2
6
3
9
1
3
3
9
2
6

Total
Weighted
Score

35

3.889

34

3.778

39

4.333

36

4.000

33

3.667

0
1
1

34

3.778

35

3.889

38

4.222

35

3.889

35

3.889

Residents and visitors feel safe in Battle Creek

Provide accessible and responsive customer
service for the entire community
Develop and maintain reliable and up-to-date
infrastructure
Practice and encourage environmental
stewardship
Operate a progressive adaptive city government
at the most effective and efficient level possible

9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
39.333
3.933

Pat 2: Goal-Related Project Scores (Commissioners Only)

Total
Weighted Average
Score
Score
5
4
3
2
1
2
3
4
10
12
12
0
0
34
3.778
3
2
4
15
8
12
0
0
35
3.889
2
2
5
10
8
15
0
0
33
3.667
2
3
4
10
12
12
0
0
34
3.778
2
1
6
10
4
18
0
0
32
3.556
3
3
3
15
12
9
0
0
36
4.000
Total
Overall score

Managerial Competencies
Goal-related Projects

N
9
9

Total
Overall score

Foster economic vitality

Average
Score

22.667
3.778

Total
Weighted
Score
Weight
Score
3.933
75%
2.950
3.778
25%
0.944
< Final decimal may vary due to rounding
Total Weighted
3.894

N
9
9
9
9
9
9

City Commission Total

City Commission Score

31.556
3.944

2015 City Manager Evaluation Calculation Spreadsheet

Managerial Competency
Leadership
Teamwork
Oral/Written Communication
Strategic Focus
Customer Service
Professionalism
Fiscal Responsibility
Relationship with City
Commission
Relationship with Staff
Relationship with Community
Partners

Baldwin
4
4
5
3
4
5
4

Behnke Domenico
4
3
5
3
5
3
4
3
4
3
4
1
5
4

Gray
4
3
5
5
3
4
3

Owens Helmboldt Newsome Sherzer

3
3
5
4
3
3
5
3
4
4
4
4
3
5
4
4
3
3
5
3
3
4
5
3
3
4
4
3

Walters
5
5
5
5
5
5
5

Competency Average
3.889
3.778
4.333
4.000
3.667
3.778
3.889

4
4

4
3

3
3

4
4

4
3

5
4

5
5

4
4

5
5

4.222
3.889

3.889

Commission Competency Avg

Commissioner Managerial
Competency Total

4.1

4.2

2.9

3.9

Goal
Baldwin
Foster Economic Vitality
4
Residents/Visitors feel safe
3
Provide accessible/responsive
customer service
4
Develop/maintain reliable
infrastructure
3
Practice/Encourage environmental
stewardship
3
Operate a progressive, adaptive
city government
4

Behnke Domenico
5
3
4
3

Commissioner Goal Total

4.83333 3.33333 4.16667

Commissioner Total Average

(Competency +Goal)
Managerial Compentencies
75%: Goal Related Projects
25%

3.5

3.8

Gray
4
5

3.2

3.9

4.6

3.6

Owens Helmboldt Newsome Sherzer

3
3
4
3
3
3
5
4

3.933

Walters
5
5

Goal Average
3.778
3.889

3.667

3.778

3.556

3.16667

4.000
Commission Goal Average
3.778

Commission Total Average

(Competency + Goal)
3.856

4.51667 3.11667 4.03333

3.1

3.45

4.3

3.38333

FINAL RATING
3.894
Exceeds Expectations