Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Batch 2
Batch 3
Min
15
14
1st Quartile
2nd Quartile
(Mean)
19.5
16.25
10
22
17.5
11
3rd Quartile
25.25
18.5
13
Max
28
20
16
b.) Compute the mean and standard deviation of each batch sample.
Mean
Batch 1
Batch 2
Batch 3
22
17.25
11.8
Standard
Deviation
4.733
2.5
2.775
Calculate t Statistic
L arg e S 2
F=
Small S 2
22.4
= 3.58
6.25
Since 3.58 < 14.88 then, we do not reject H 0 . Therefore at 95% Confidence (5%
significance) we find the sample variances are not significantly different.
F=
H 0 : 12 = 32
Assume =0.05
Ha: 12 32
0.6
0.5
Density
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.025
0
9.364
Calculate t Statistic
L arg e S 2
F=
Small S 2
22.4
= 2.91
7.7
Since 3.54 < 9.364 then, we do not reject H 0 . Therefore at 95%
Confidence (5% significance) we find the sample variances are not
significantly different so we can pool the Variances for the t test
F=
State Hypothesis
H 0 : 1 3 0
Assume =0.05
Ha: 1 3 > 0
12 = 32 , so df=n 1 +n 2 -2
t /2,n1+n2-2 = t 0.05,6+5-2 =1.83 (using the t table)
0.4
Density
0.3
0.2
0.1
13>0
0.05
0.0
1.833
Calculate t Statistic
2
p
(
n1 1)S12 + (n2 1)S 22
=
t=
( x1 x2 ) ( 1 2 )
1
1
S p2 +
5 22.4 + 4 7.7
n1 n2
S p2 =
6+52
22 11.8
t=
= 4.23
2
S p = 15.87
1 1
15.87 +
6 5
Since 4.23>1.83 then, Reject H 0 therefore at 95% Confidence (5%
significance) we find batch 3 disintegration time is significantly shorter
than batch 1.
n1 + n2 2
3016
1209
727
4952
15
( x )
SST = x
N
T 2 T 2 T 2 ( x )
SSA = 1 + 2 + 3
n1 n 2 n3
N
SST = 4952
SSA =
(260)2
132 2 69 2 59 260 2
+
+
6
4
5
15
SSA = 283.783
15
SST = 445.333
2.
Source of
Variation
Treatment
(Between)
Sum of
Squares
283.783
Degrees of
Freedom
k-1=3-1
k-1=2
Error
Within
161.55
N-k=15-3
N-k=12
Total
445.333
N-1=15-1
N-1=14
Mean
Squares
283.783
2
MSA = 141.89
161.55
MSE =
12
MSE = 13.46
MSA =
F Test
141.89
F=
13.46
F = 10.54
F Critical
3.88
(From F
Table)
H 0 : 12 = 22
Ha: 12 22
Assume =0.05
F /2,v1,v2 = F 0.025,5,5 = 7.146 (using the F table)
0.6
0.5
Density
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.025
0
7.146
Calculate t Statistic
L arg e S 2
F=
Small S 2
1.854
= 1.49
1.243
Since 1.49 < 7.146 then, we do not reject H 0 . Therefore at 95%
Confidence (5% significance) we find the sample variances are not
significantly different so we can pool the Variances for the t test
F=
H 0 : 1 2 0
Ha: 1 2 < 0
Assume =0.05
12 = 22 , so df=n 1 +n 2 -2
t /2,n1+n2-2 = t 0.05,6+6-2 =1.812 (using the t table)
0.4
Density
0.3
0.2
0.1
12<0
0.05
0.0
-1.812
t=
Calculate t Statistic
S p2 =
( x1 x2 ) ( 1 2 )
1
1
S p2 +
5 1.854 + 5 1.243
n1 n2
S p2 =
6+62
12.52 14.25
t=
= 2.41274
2
S p = 1.548
1 1
1.548 +
6 6
Since -2.41274<1.812 then, Reject H 0 therefore at 95% Confidence (5%
significance) we find starch as a better choice for shorter disintegration
time.
n1 + n2 2
b.) Suppose a third batch is prepared with 10% pregelatinized starch binder, with the
following disintegration times.
17.6 17.0 16.9 18.6 20.5 19.4
Does the type of binder used have a significant impact on disintegration times for
these three batches of tablets?
Calculator Data
Paste
PVP
Pre Gel Total
Mean
12.52
14.25
18.33
--Std dev
1.36
1.11
1.43
--75.1
85.5
110
270.6
x
949.27
1224.59
2026.94
4200.8
18
( x )
SST = x
N
(270.6)2
SST = 4200.8
18
SST = 132.78
n1 n 2
n3
N
6
6
6
18
SSA = 107.02
SSA =
Anova Table
Source of
Variation
Sum of
Squares
Degrees
of
Freedom
k-1=3-1
k-1=2
Treatment
(Between)
107.02
Error
Within
25.76
N-k=18-3
N-k=15
Total
132.78
N-1=18-1
N-1=17
Mean
Squares
107.02
2
MSA = 53.51
25.76
MSE =
15
MSE = 1.72
MSA =
F Test
F Critical
53.51
1.72
F = 31.1
3.68
(From F
Table)
F=
3. Tablet disintegration is under investigation. To find out if the tablet formulation has
an effect on the disintegration of 250mg Chlorpromazide tablets. An Analyst records
the disintegration times (in minutes) of tablets with each of four different tablet
formulations
A
16.8
20.8
13.8
B
17.1
15.3
17.7
C
12.8
8.3
13.7
D
21.3
21.3
24.8
Does the type of disintegrant in the formulation have an effect on the disintegration of
the tablets?
Calculator Data
A
Mean
Std dev
x
D
Total
22.47
--2.02
--67.4
203.7
17.1
3.51
51.4
16.7
1.25
50.1
11.6
2.89
34.8
905.32
839.79
420.42
1522.42
3687.95
12
( x )
N
(203.7)2
SST = 3687.95
12
SST = 230.14
n1 n2 n3 n4
N
3
3
3
3
12
SSA = 177.45
SSA =
Anova Table
Source of
Variation
Treatment
(Between)
Sum of
Squares
177.45
Degrees of
Freedom
k-1=4-1
k-1=3
Error
Within
52.69
N-k=12-4
N-k=8
Total
230.14
N-1=12-1
N-1=11
Mean
Squares
177.45
MSA =
3
MSA = 59.15
52.69
MSE =
8
MSE = 6.59
F Test
59.15
F=
6.59
F = 8.98
F Critical
4.07
(From F
Table)
4. A Batch of tablets was tested for dissolution in five different labs with the results as
follows
Lab
A
B
C
D
E
64
6.32
384
C
71.3
6.44
428
D
66.6
6.08
799
E
68.5
5.96
411
Total
----2417
26295
24776
30738
53607
28331
163747
12 6
SST = x 2
( x )
N
(2417)2
SST = 163747
36
SST = 1472.30
36
n1 n2 n3 n4 n5
N
6
6
6
12
6
36
SSA = 189.72
SSA =
Anova Table
Source of
Variation
Treatment
(Between)
Sum of
Squares
189.72
Degrees of Mean
Freedom
Squares
k-1=5-1
189.72
MSA
=
k-1=4
4
MSA = 47.43
Error
Within
1282.58
N-k=36-5
N-k=31
Total
1472.3
N-1=36-1
N-1=35
1282.58
31
MSE = 41.37
MSE =
F Test
47.43
F=
41.43
F = 1.14
F Critical
2.68
(From
FINV
Excel)
5. A company is concerned about the impurity levels in its product. One possible source
is one of the raw materials used to make the product. To test this, six batches were
prepared (using six different raw materials), and then three samples were randomly
selected form each batch and assayed for level of impurity. The results are as
follows:
Batch
1
2
3
4
5
6
Impurity, ppm
15 20 17
12 16 15
20 18 14
9 10 13
12 14 8
21 16 19
Does the raw material have a significant effect on the level of impurity?
Calculator Data
Batch
1
2
3
4
5
6
Total
Mean
17.3
14.3
17.33
10.67
11.3 18.7
--Std dev
2.52
2.08
3.06
2.08
3.06 2.52
--52
43
52
32
34
56
269
x
914
625
920
350
404
1058
4271
16
SST = x 2
( x )
N
2
(
269 )
SST = 4271
18
SST = 250.94
T 2 T 2 T 2 T 2 T 2 ( x )
SSA = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5
n1 n2 n3 n4 n5
N
52 2 43 2 52 2 32 2 34 2 56 2 269 2
SSA =
+
+
+
+
+
3
3
3
3
3
3
18
SSA = 170.94
Anova Table
Source of
Variation
Treatment
(Between)
Sum of
Squares
170.94
Degrees of
Freedom
k-1=6-1
k-1=5
Error
Within
80
N-k=18-6
N-k=12
Total
250.94
N-1=18-1
N-1=17
Mean
Squares
170.94
MSA =
5
MSA = 34.19
80
MSE =
12
MSE = 6.67
F Test
34.19
F=
6.67
F = 5.13
F Critical
3.10
(From F Table)