You are on page 1of 2

« United as “One Muslim Ummah” against Murtid Yusuf Kazzab and his followers

Zaid Hamid Threatens 2nd year Medical Student »

Fatwa Fobia – Zaid Hamid’s Historic Article In Defense Of


His False Prophet
Posted by Fidai e Rasool SAW on March 3, 2010
Although some of the younger generation might have got confused by the sudden U-turn in Zaid Hamid’s stand –
who previously was claiming that he had no relationship with Yusuf Kazab, and have now suddenly came out
defending the False Prophet.
But the people in the know, are certainly not confused. Zaid Hamid was one of the most aggressive defenders of his
False Prophet, throughout the trial of Yusuf Kazab. He was present in all the court hearings, took letters from one
place to other asking people to withdraw the case, tried to threaten and blackmail the people involved in the case
against Yusuf Kazab. Even after Yusuf was sentenced to death by hanging, Zaid Hamid didnt rested and wrote a
splendid piece of defense in favor of his False Prophet in DAILY DAWN. The article was published on 13th Aug
2000. Zaid Hamid himself re-published it on Chowk. The article is being re-published here:
FATWA-FOBIA
There are a lot of allegedly moderates pakistanis on the chowk, who believe in human
rights, who have woRn out their fingers posting about kashmir, the jinnah speach, the
tolerant islam in pakistan, the 2% extremists. In supporting the killing of kashmir in the
guise of human rights, selfdetermination etc. they are in tune with the mullahs, who
prefer the word jihad.
In the following story, if the alleged moderates criticise the blasphemy laws they will be
in conflict with the mullah. No, the moderates cannot afford to do that because of the
fatwafobia. The human rights blah blah does not apply to pakistani nationals.
Convicted for blasphemy
A kind, benevolent and honourable Muslim Sufi of a small order has been sentenced to
death on blasphemy charges by a court in Lahore. I am an eyewitness to what happened
in the court and how the prosecution murdered justice, human dignity, Islamic and
contemporary law and all norms of humanity in the name of Islam. Mohammad Yusuf
Ali is a staunch Muslim and a scholar of the Holy Quran. He has rendered meritorious
services to Islam, Pakistan and humanity in his career. It was only a difference of
interpretation which was exploited by extremist mullahs and some Urdu newspapers.
Yusuf Ali had already spent two years in jail and now he has been convicted.
I was present in the courtroom to assist the defence lawyers. It was barred to the outside
world. I am witness to what happened inside and how he has been convicted. The
prosecution had based their case on four items: audio cassette of Juma Khutba, video
cassettes of Juma Khutba, Yousuf Ali`s purported diary, and one Pir and his few
followers, who claimed that he had claimed to be “Muhammad“ in front of them many
years ago!
There was nothing objectionable in the cassettes, and even according to Qanoon-i-
Shahadat, they were inadmissible, as the one who had made these was not known. They
were highly edited, doctored and manipulated.
The diary was not of Yusuf Ali`s at all, and even the prosecution admitted that they were
not sure of its origin. It had no name, no handwriting match, no owner. It was simply
alleged on Yusuf Ali and was torn to shreds in its originality and credibility.
The Pir and his followers were again torn to shreds, as none of them was the complainant.
They never reported the alleged blasphemy to the police or any other authority, which
supposedly happened many years ago. Their credibility did not exist at all in terms of
contradictions in cross examinations.
One of them was on bail on fraud charges. The complainant had all the info on hearsay.
He had never met the accused in his life. All his info was through Urdu newspapers. He
accused Yusuf Ali of adultery, but even in the FIR, the relevant section was not
mentioned for lack of evidence, making the complainant liable to “Qazaf“. His testimony
was not admissible at all.
Yusuf Ali had categorically, even before the registration of the FIR, made it clear through
paid ads that he had not claimed to be a prophet and he was a staunch Muslim. Top
religious scholars like Maulana Abdul Sattar Niazi had declared him a true Muslim and
asked the charges to be dropped. According to all legal and Shariat requirements he had
proved himself to be a true Muslim. Still the prosecution insisted that he called himself a
prophet. How can anyone be the judge of someone`s faith? The prosecution lawyers went
so overboard that even the judge had to stop them from committing blasphemy in trying
to prove Yusuf Ali wrong. Even though Yusuf Ali was on bail, he was arrested one day
earlier against all rules, laws and norms. It is extraordinary how the bail given by a High
Court was cancelled by the Sessions Court and the accused was arrested.
The whole trial was in camera and the media was not allowed in to hear Yusuf Ali`s
explanations, his speeches and comments. The media was also barred from seeing the
hopelessness of the prosecution witnesses and their lawyers.
It was on this quality of evidence that a great living sufi has been condemned to death on
so many counts that we have lost count.
Now Yusuf Ali is in the line for gallows. Will we wait and let the evil win or raise our
voices for our own survival?
Z.Z. HAMID
Rawalpindi
This article has been published as part of our on-going effort to unearth all evidences, past and present against this
believer and defender of False Prophet Yusuf Kazab.

Source: http://zaidhamidexposition.wordpress.com/2010/03/03/fatwa-fobia-zaid-hamids-article-historic-article-in-
defense-of-his-false-prophet/

You might also like