Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN: 2395-7549
Ashish Sharma
Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering
Amity University Haryana
Jyoti Dalal
Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering
Amity University Haryana
Leena Choukiker
Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering
Amity University Haryana
Abstract
Next generation optical networks will evolve from static to dynamically reconfigurable architectures to meet the increasing
bandwidth and service requirements. When considering signal quality in static networks, it is sufficient to monitor a single
channel in a WDM system, since all channels travel through the same fixed path degrading the signal quality uniformly due to
link mismatch. However, in dynamic networks, each channel will traverse a unique path through the network thus the channels
arriving at the monitoring point will, in general, exhibit different quality signals. Therefore, in a dynamic network it is necessary
to monitor all channels individually to quantify the degradation, without the requirement of knowing the data path history. Thus
optical performance monitoring (OPM) is essential in building a reliable, high-capacity, and service-differentiation enabled all
optical network.
Keywords: OPM, WDM, SNR
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
I. INTRODUCTION
Optical Networks are emerging as a promising technology for very high data rates, flexible switching and broadband application
support. Specifically, they provide transparency capabilities and new features allowing routing and switching of traffic without
any regression or modification of signals within the network. It is expected that the next-generation optical networks will be able
to support various emerging broadband applications as well as emulate many kinds of legacy services over the same
infrastructure, with minimal engineering investment. Two main factors have emerged to satisfy this new demand, the first factor
has been to increase the data channel bit-rate. With the explosive growth in demand for capacity in optical networks, high bit-rate
fiber and transmission of data through it, has recently become an important part of communications. Optical networks are now
based on different channels like 2.5Gbit/s and 10Gbit/s. 40Gbit/s channels have started to be implemented in new products,
while 100Gbit/s and even 160Gbit/s bit-rates are still being tested in various laboratories .The second factor has been the use of
wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) which has dramatically increased the network capacity. This technology allows the
transport of hundreds of gigabits of data on a single fiber for distances over thousands of kilometers, without the need of opticalto-electrical-to-optical conversion.
As higher bit-rates and WDM technologies have evolved, the network bottleneck has moved from the optical-transport to the
routing layer, as conventional electronic routers are not been capable of finding a cost-effective alternate to the increase in
demand of bandwidth. To cope with this, highly flexible and dynamic networks were envisioned a few years ago to provide
virtually unlimited bandwidth with dynamic reconfiguration which is supported not only in the electrical layer, but it also support
the optical layer.
single channel in a WDM system, since all channels travel through the same fixed path degrading the signal
quality uniformly due to link mismatch. However, in dynamic networks, each channel will traverse a unique
path through the network thus the channels arriving at the monitoring point will, in general, exhibit different
quality signals. Therefore, in a dynamic network it is necessary to monitor all channels individually to quantify
the degradation, without the requirement of knowing the data path history.
32
33
channel power to the power of the ASE in a specified optical bandwidth, usually equal to 0.1nm for 10Gbit/s systems and 0.5nm
for 40Gbit/s systems.
Q-factor is the other important parameter to monitor. The Q-factor is obtained by adjusting the decision threshold voltage of
the monitor receiver away from the optimum level so that errors are recorded. Once an error rate is generated, changes to that
rate can be monitored and small degradations become visible. The Q-factor, a function of the OSNR, provides a qualitative
description of the receiver performance. The Q-factor suggests the minimum signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) required to obtain a
specific BER for a given signal. OSNR is measured in decibels. The higher the bit rate, the higher the OSNR ratio required.
VII. CONCLUSION
Dynamically reconfigurable networks introduce greater complexity that may demand new forms of physical layer functionalities,
such as real-time impairment monitoring and compensation (i.e. monitoring and compensation performed on the network
switching Timescales). This has created the need for sophisticated optical performance monitoring
(OPM) to track the quality of the optical signal throughout the network. On the other hand it will be a great challenge in OPM
to maintain the right balance between monitoring coverage, sensitivity, and cost.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
Y. C. Chung, Performance monitoring in optical networks (Tutorial), APOC 2003, 5282 46, 2003
S. K. Shin, et al., A novel signal-to-noise monitoring technique for WDM networks, OFC 2000, WK6-1, 2000
W. Chen, et al., Optical signal-to-noise ratio monitoring using uncorrelated beat noise, PTL, 2484-2486, 2005
J. H. Lee, et al, A review of the polarization-nulling technique for monitoring optical-signal-to-noise ratio in dynamic WDM networks, JLT, 24, 41624171, 2006
I. Shake, et al., Averaged Q-factor method using amplitude histogram evaluation for transparent monitoring of optical signal-to-noise ratio degradation in
optical transmission system, JLT, 20, 1367-1373, 2002
S. Ohteru, et al., Optical signal quality monitor using direct Q-factor measurement, PTL, 11, 1307-1309, 1999
34
D. C. Kilper, et al, Q-factor monitoring using FEC for fault-management applications, JON, 651-663, 2004
H. C. Ji, et al., Optical performance monitoring techniques based on pilot tones for WDM network applications, JON, 3, 510-533, 2004
G. Rossi, et al., Optical performance monitoring in reconfigurable WDM optical networks using subcarrier multiplexing, JLT, 18, 16391648, 2000
H. C. Ji, et al., A novel frequency-offset monitoring technique for direct-detection DPSK systems, PTL, 18, 950-952, 2006
K. J. Park, et al., Optical path, wavelength, and power monitoring technique using frequency-modulated pilot tones, OFC 2004, FF1, 2004
K. J. Park, et al., Performance comparisons of chromatic dispersion-monitoring techniques using pilot tones, PTL, 15, 873-875, 2003
G.-W. Lu, et al., Simultaneous PMD and OSNR monitoring by enhanced RF spectral dip analysis assisted with a local large-DGD element, PTL, 17,
2790-2792, 2005
F. Buchali, et al., Fast eye monitor for 10 Gbit/s and its application for optical PMD compensation, OFC, TuP5, 2001
M. Petersson, et al., Performance monitoring in optical networks using Stokes parameters, PTL, 16, 686-688, 2004
T. B. Anderson, et al., Multi-impairment monitoring for photonic networks, ECOC 2007, 2007
B. Kozicki, et al., Experimental demonstration of optical performance monitoring for RZ-DPSK signals using delay-tap sampling method, OE, 16, 35663576, 2008
H. Y. Choi, et al., Simultaneous monitoring technique for ASE and MPI noises in distributed Raman amplified systems, OE, 15, 8660-8666, 2007
J. H. Lee, OFC 2008, OTuA3, 2008
35