Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/
info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content
in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.
For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
The Johns Hopkins University Press and Classical Association of the Atlantic States are collaborating with JSTOR to
digitize, preserve and extend access to The Classical World.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
371
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
372
VASSILISP. PETRAKIS
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
373
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
374
VASSILISP. PETRAKIS
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
375
centuryB.C.).
"6 This remark originally referred to the date of composition of the Odyssey.
See Page (above, n.6) 192.
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
376
VASSILISP. PETRAKIS
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
377
23
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
378
VASSILISP. PETRAKIS
28
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
379
The preservation, however, of the Mycenaean element in Kephallenia during LH IIIC, in contrast to the observed situation in Ithaca
and Zakynthos, is particularly intriguing. Kephallenia's exceptionality is not its particularly fertile soil nor its geographical position.
With the fragmentary-by definition-nature of any archaeological
record in mind, we may suggest that the reason why Kephallenia
alone, among all other Ionian Islands, continues on a significant
scale to feature a strong Mycenaean element into the Postpalatial
Bronze Age might have been the special role that this island must
have had during the previous period.
The LH 111B2-C transition in the Ionian Islands, as well as
in the rest of the Mycenaean world, is essentially a transition from
a world of wide-ranging cultural (and consequently political and/
or economical) koinae to a world where regionalism as a reflection of independent evolvement is the rule. Now that the palaces/
administrative centers were gone, social and economic structures,
as well as relations within and outside the Aegean, had to be revised. Judging from the study of the decorated pottery, Kephallenian
LH IIIC represents an intensification of the already idiosyncratic
features of the local LH IIIB pottery.3'Despite this, however, Mountjoy32
considers Kephallenian LH IIIC to be a part of what she has termed
"artistic koine" of western Greece. It has to be noted that the geographic
extent of this koine is generally similar to those of the koine of
western Greece during the middle of the tenth century B.C., as has
been suggested by Coulson.33 If this preservation of some idiosyncratic cultural features in western Greece suggests some sense of
superficial continuity in this region, a look at the distribution pattern of sites may serve to dispel this, at least as far as the Ionian
Islands are concerned.
This change in the settlement pattern of the region after the
end of the Bronze Age is fundamental, but has not been extensively commented on. Kephallenia, whose cemeteries thrived during
the twelfth century B.C., seems to be almost abandoned, apart from
a few PG sherds from the Mycenaean cemetery at Metaxata and a
pithos burial inside the LH IIIA-B monumental built tholos tomb
(a type generally considered as "elite") at Tzannata; the date of
this burial, however, is suggested only by two bronze pins that
accompanied the deceased, which could well date to the close of
the Late Bronze Age ("Submycenaean" period).34 The rest of the
national Symposium on the Odyssey (2-7 September 2000) (Ithaca 2001) 305-16, esp.
310, n.27 (in Greek with English summary). The authors provide a brief but comprehensive overview of past research on the prehistory of the island with bibliography.
Souyoudzoglou-Haywood's volume, however, is not included in the references.
3'
Souyoudzoglou-Haywood (above, n.21) 72-75.
32 Mountjoy (above, n.19) 56.
3 W. D. E. Coulson, The Dark Age Pottery of Messenia, Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology, Pocket Book 43 (Goteborg 1986) 55.
4 L. Kolonas, Tavvi-ra H6pou (KE$a X?v;a), ApXaboAo7IK6 AeKEio47 B1 (1992)
155, fig. 12.
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
380
VASSILISP. PETRAKIS
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
381
AU'TGp
'
oY '1Pa6K71V
'EIOV
Kai N'prTOPeiVoifbUAAov
K A A'iyiXtTra
Kai KpOKULXEl'
EVE4IUOVTO
TpXeiav,
01T
T) Oa' a,la
V'6E
ETrOVTO
alU(aEKO, lATOTfXapfOl.
1E'
?K AOUJAXiOO
V,00-v,
T&V
an' vaiouo-i
av'
(Du~eP;,
0
T
7ROTE
'OV TIKTE
al,(I4Jl?orTM6Ta FDAe6;,
7EVa0ol7aTO
AOUfiXfOVa' ILa
3' a alp
Te70cLapaKOVra cLyEa%val
7raTpi
VTL65;
XoW0f;i`.
E,7OVTO.
1' Malkin (above, n.28) 344-45 considers the Polis tripods as evidence for one
of the earliest Panhellenic cults, with Odysseus as the recipient of offerings probably
already in the Geometric period. This view contrasts with that of C. Antonaccio (An
Archaeology of Ancestors [Lanham, Md., 1995] 152-55), who considers the association of the Homeric hero with the Polis cave as established in the Hellenistic period,
but Malkin's points seem valid.
3 See Strabo 10.453; also Hope Simpson and Lazenby (above, n.2) 104, for
short comments.
39 Hope Simpson and Lazenby (above, n.2) 103-4, contra Strabo 10.452.
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
382
VASSILISP. PETRAKIS
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
HISTORYVERSUSTHE HOMERICILIAD
383
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
384
VASSILISP. PETRAKIS
Argos is characterized as "loved by Hera" (along with Mycenae and a few other sites),
as well as ;MTr6jOTOl (horse-breeding) and KAVTO? (renowned). Pylos is called z)'acei
(holy), lepj (sacred), or 'tta0a66eit (sandy). Lakedaemon is called aia(divine, excellent), eparelv'; (desired, pleasing), or EcPp6XwPo(spacious).
4' The author hopes to present this argument in full in another article (in preparation).
48 Among the 108 suitors mentioned in the Odyssey, 56 come from Doulichion.
One Doulichian suitor, Amphinomos, son of Aretos, was so pleasant and kind that
even Penelope liked him (Od. 16.397). Apollodorus' "Epitome" (7.38) preserves the
tradition that Amphinomos had a love affair with the queen during Odysseus' absence.
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
385
G. S. Kirk, The Iliad: A Commentary, vol. 1: Books 1-4 (Cambridge 1985) 221.
5 W. Leaf, The Iliad Edited with Apparatus Criticus, Prolegomena, Notes, and
Appendices (London 1900-1902)
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
386
VASSILISP. PETRAKIS
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
387
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
388
VASSILIS P. PETRAKIS
the epic tradition will always be imperfectly known,"7 we may understand that the rest of the Iliad in its earliest known complete
manuscript version, the Venetus A code, had undergone significantly
more additions and modifications than the "epic fossil," which a
text of the nature of the Catalogue may be destined to be.
Unfortunately, the above is no guarantee that the Catalogue's
presentation of the political geography of the Ionian Islands is earlier
than the picture provided by the rest of the Iliad.58 All that the
nature of the Catalogue allows us to suggest is that this document
could have been preserved with fewer alterations than other narrative passages in Homer's Iliad. Far from being a proof that it was,
it cannot provide any conclusive information about the relative chronological relationship between the Catalogue and the Iliad. A better
case for the Catalogue predating the rest of the Iliad can be made
through a consideration of the two contrasting pictures of the Ionian
Islands provided by the two distinct sets of information.
Odysseus' role in the Iliad is not one of an aspiring hero;
Odysseus is a key figure in the Trojan cycle. In the epic tradition
which the Iliad relies upon heavily, Odysseus is present in all major
episodes, and he even appears as the inventor of the Trojan Horse,
the undoubted climax of the Trojan enterprise. It is true that, as
Kirk and Waterhouse, among others, have noted, outside this cycle
(in which the NoTro, are included), Odysseus means nearly nothing; within the context of the Homeric epic, however, Odysseus is
of great significance. The only piece within Homer's work dissonant with this picture is the short passage describing the Ionian
Islands in the Catalogue.
Given this unquestionable eminence of Odysseus in the epic,
it is extremely difficult to conceive of how a tradition that postdated the formulation of the main corpus of the Homeric opera,
could have downplayed Odysseus' eminence so severely, setting a
quite different background for this hero from that of the rest of
the epic. It seems unconvincing that such a text would have been
composed by someone who was aware of the fact that Odysseus
had already emerged as a figure of such importance.59
57 0. T. P. K. Dickinson, "The Catalogue of Ships and All That," MELETEMATA
(Malcolm H. Wiener's Festschrift), Aegaeum 20 (Liege 1999) 1.207-10, esp. 210.
5 Page (above, n.2) has used linguistic evidence to argue for the Bronze Age
background of the Catalogue, but does not consider the difficulty raised by the fact
that it only shows that the Catalogue could be Mycenaean and does not exclude that
parts of the Iliad could not have been as early, too.
5 If we do not accept an earlier date for the Catalogue's picture of the lonian
Islands, then only one alternative possibility remains: that the late interpolation specifically aimed either at increasing the status of Meges or at downplaying Odysseus.
Both cases lack apparent motivation (see discussion in previous section) and were so
evidently unsuccessful, that we had better not stress them any further. Suffice it to
say here that, if so, it was a desperate and isolated attack on Odysseus in his real
"heartland": the Homeric text.
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
HISTORYVERSUSTHE HOMERICILIAD
389
Thus, we are almost left with one possible explanation for the
situation: that the Catalogue's picture of the lonian Islands must
be earlier than the picture for this region supported by the rest of
the Iliad.
In correlating this conclusion with the archaeological record
summarized above, the suggestion put forward in this article is
that the status of Ithaca within the epic tradition, from being part
of a minor ruler's territory to being the capital of a dominating
kingdom, increased along with the island becoming the focus of
archaeologically detected activities (of probably commercial nature)
in the Ionian Sea during the Early Iron Age.
V. Early Iron Age (PG) Ithaca and the Epic
Our picture of PG Ithaca (c. 1050-760 B.c.) is that of a small
island that takes fairly active participation in a network of interconnections among regions in western Greece, known as the "western
Greek koine." Souyoudzoglou-Haywood's recent synthesis has supplemented and refined some interesting pottery associations with nearly
all regions of western Greek mainland during this period. Close
affinities with Messenia are attested throughout the PG period.60
William Coulson, who has studied extensively the Messenian pottery of this period, has even suggested the settlement of newcomers
from Ithaca to Messenia during the second half of the eleventh
century and the beginning of the tenth century B.C.6I During the
tenth and the early ninth centuries B.C. "ceramic connections link
Ithaca with Messenia and Laconia, as well as with Aetolia and
Achaea," and these connections persist throughout the ninth and
the first half of the eighth centuries B.C.62
Such strong links with other regions of western Greece were
not so overtly expressed in the material record during the Late Bronze
Age (when Ithacan pottery closely follows the regional features of
Kephallenian Mycenaean ware) and cannot be safely detected in the
Late Iron Age or the Archaic and classical periods. During the Early
Iron Age, however, Ithaca was an active participant in a network of
cultural and commercial associations among western Greek regions.
It is noticeable that, coincidentally, all recorded myths for Odysseus'
early years take place in various places, all but one in western
Greece, strikingly agreeing with Ithaca's strong links with other
regions in western Greece during this period, as observed in the
archaeological record. The sole exception to this otherwise exclusive relation of Ithaca to the west is Laconia (southeastern Peloponnese),
since Ithacan PG pottery shows affinities with Spartan contemporary material (tenth century B.C.). It cannot be coincidental that
60
61
62
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
390
VASSILISP. PETRAKIS
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
391
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
392
VASSILISP. PETRAKIS
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
393
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
394
VASSILIS P. PETRAKIS
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
HISTORYVERSUSTHE HOMERICILIAD
395
on all islands. This is certainly no guarantee for depopulation: actually, it is only the artifacts (especially pottery) that we miss.
Does this indicate cultural separation? And could it make a good
case for a "political" fragmentation in this region? I firmly believe that the answers to both questions are affirmative, though
admittedly not definite.
The cultural and probably political in a wider sense fragmentation of the Postpalatial Bronze Age Aegean world, which is
evident in the intense cultural regionalism of this period, seems
to be more in line with the existence of at least two rulers in the
Ionian Islands, even if the reliability of further details in the Catalogue
can be easily questioned. At the end of the Mycenaean Palatial
period, the communities of Kephallenia could have decided to preserve
Mycenaean material culture, while the other islands did not follow this trend and switched to artifacts not so easily datable, such
as the conservative handmade pottery, ubiquitous in the region throughout the Late Bronze Age. If these material differences reflect different
political decisions made at the end of the thirteenth century B.C.
(end of LH IIIB), a situation of political fragmentation is likely.
For the time being, we must be satisfied with the suggestion
that the information in the Catalogue and the conservative and easilyfossilized nature of its text seem not to contradict the view that a
Bronze Age recollection, though vague, may have been incorporated in its reflection of the Ionian Islands. Fragmentation and
regionalism, however, though reflecting the Postpalatial Bronze Age
Aegean, are certainly not exclusive to this period, and therefore,
no definite conclusion can yet be reached on this matter.73We must
compromise with the observation that, among cultural phases of
the Mycenaean period, LH IIIC (twelfth century B.C.) fits best the
picture of the Ionian Islands given by the Catalogue.
VII. Concluding Remarks
The picture of the Ionian Islands in the Homeric epic may be
an example of how elements reflecting different chronological periods were merged into the epic concept of the Iliad. The concept
of an Ithacan ruler dwelling in an elaborate building ("palace")
may or may not have been drawn on Late Bronze Age Aegean
prototypes, but the answer to this question is not necessarily connected to whether a Mycenaean kingdom based on this island ever
existed or not. The choice of place for the capital of the most
significant ruler in the region (Ithaca), who is explicitly stated in
7 In his article entitled "The Bronze Age context of Homer," in J. Carter and
S. Morris, eds., The Ages of Homer (Austin 1995) 25-32, Sinclair Hood has argued
for a LH IIIC background for Homer. Hood follows a different approach, however,
from the one followed here; his arguments refer to the epic altogether (particularly
the Iliad). This is an important point, because it reveals that Hood reads no chronological discrepancy in the different pictures drawn by the "Catalogue" and the rest of
the Iliad, as I do.
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
396
VASSILISP. PETRAKIS
both the Iliad and the Odyssey as having no rival in the Ionian
Islands, is a strong indication that the above-mentioned concept
dates to the Early Iron Age, even independently of the Catalogue/
Iliad incompatibility. The actual political conditions or the cultural context of PG Ithaca are, however, not necessarily reflected
anywhere in the epic; the high status of Odysseus, as well as of
any Achaean hero, may be an elaborated version of the lower status of any PG ruler in an attempt to adjust the present to a particular
view of the past. It is likely that an Early Iron Age audience could
have easily bridged any difference in scale without the need for
us to invoke an enduring Bronze Age tradition. After all, the past
Heroic yeyvo;("genus, generation"), if Hesiod (Op. 156-201) presents an accepted popular view of his time, was more glorious,
wealthy, and happy than the otTapoOv ("iron") one of the poet's
present. Projecting a Hesiodean viewpoint onto Homer may not be
entirely valid, but it gives us insight into what kind of "fantasy"
we have to expect when dealing with the composition and perception of the epos in its early Greek context. This concept of idealization
of the past74 should be seriously considered in every attempt to
attribute, often hastily, any mention of elaborate artifacts to the
existence of a "Mycenaean" element in the Homeric epic world.
We cannot be confident that the conclusions we draw concerning the way in which the epic tradition reflects changes in the material
record of the Ionian Islands are at all representative of what may
have happened in other cases where contradictions are present. As
emphasized in the introduction, generalizations must usually be avoided
and only cautiously applied in Homer. It is hoped that similar regional approaches to other Catalogue entries, encompassing both
archaeological and philological data, may prove fruitful. Eventually,
if one thing deserves to be further mentioned, it is that the concept
of an unchanged tradition explains things in an inadequate and distorting way. In an ever-changing world, as the Greek world always
has been, the account of the past may serve "to validate . . . the
social and political conditions of the present. If these changed, so
too must the 'tradition.' "75
University of Athens
Classical World99.4 (2006)
VASSILIS P. PETRAKIS
vppetrakis@fria.gr
'4 Along with the already mentioned aspect of Early Iron Age monumentality
(e.g., the Lefkandi elaborate apsidal building).
" Dickinson (above, n.8) 21.
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:26:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions