Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit-II
Satyadhyan
Ghosal & Ors
Vs.
Deorajni Debi
AIR 1960 SC 941
Unit-III
Unit-IV
Unit-V
10
Ramji Gupta
Vs
Gopi Krishna
Agrawal
AIR 2013 SC 3099
Kunjan Nair
Sivaraman Nair
Vs
Narayana Nair
(2004)3 SCC 277
Dr. Subramanian
Swamy
Vs
State of
Tamil Nadu &
Ors.
2014(1) SCALE 79
State of Uttar
Pradesh & Anr
Vs
Jagdish Sharan
Agrawal & Ors.,
(2009) 1 SCC 689
SBI Vs.
Goyal
S.N.
10
Radhakrishna
Murthy
Vs
Special Dy.
collector
2003(4) ALT 576
REFERENCE BOOKS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
CASE LAWS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
of action explained)
5. Dr. Subramanian Swamy Vs state of Tamilnadu & Ors. 2014(1) SCALE 79(scope of
principle of resjudicata explained)
6. Satyadhyan Ghosal & Ors. Vs Smt. Deorajin Debi & Anr. AIR 1960 SC 941
7. Abdul Rehman Vs Prasoni Bai & Anr. AIR 2003 SC 718
8. State of Haryana Vs Kartar Singh (2013)11 SCC 375(sec.24)
9. SBI Vs S. N. Goyal AIR 2008 SC 2594(sec.100 substantial question of law)
10. Dwaraka Prasad Agarwal & Anr. Vs Ramesh Chandra Agrawala & Ors. AIR 2003 SC
2696
11. State of Andhra Pradesh Vs Manjeti Lakshmi Kantha Rao AIR 2000 SC 2220
(Jurisdiction of Civil Court Explained sec.9)
12. Kanbi Manji Abji & Ors. Vs Kanmbi Vaghji Mavji & Ors. AIR 1993 SC 1163
13. Sarda Syedna Taher Saifuddin Vs State of Bombay AIR 1962 SC 853
14. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. Vs Jagdish Sharan Agrawal & Ors., (2009) 1 SCC
689(where the matter has not been decided on merit earlier, the doctrine of resjudicata is
not applicable.)
15. Delhi administration Vs Gurudeep Singh Uban AIR 2000 SC 3737(the term Justice was
explained)
16. Raju Ramsing Vasave v. Mahesh Deorao Bhivapurkar (2008) 9 SCC 54, (Supreme Court
laid down 3 exceptions to the rule of Res Judicata: (i) When judgment is passed without
jurisdiction: (ii) When matter involves a pure question of law: (iii) When judgment has
been obtained by committing fraud on the Court.
17. Collector of Central Excise, Kanpur v. Flock (India) (P) Ltd., Kanpur, AIR 2000 SC 2484
18. Vithal (P) Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors., AIR 2005 SC 1891. (The Court cannot derive
jurisdiction apart from the Statute. No amount of waiver or consent can confer
jurisdiction on the Court if it inherently lacks it or if none exists)
19. Swastik Gases Pvt. Ltd. v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., (2013) 9 SCC 32).
20. Shree Subhlaxmi Fabrics (P) Ltd. V. Chand Mal Baradia & Ors., AIR 2005 SC 2161(The
Court is bound to determine exclusively jurisdictional issue before granting relief.)
21. Abdul Rahman V. Prasony Bai & Anr., AIR 2003 SC 718.( explains grounds for transfer
of proceedings)
22. Gyanmati Yadav v. Ram Sagar Yadav, (2013) 14 SCC 621.( inconvenience of a party
cannot be a ground for transfer)
23. Radhakrishna Murthy Vs Special Dy. Collector 2003(4) ALT 576 (sec. 5 of Limitation
Act)
24. AP State Electricity Board Vs Cantonment Board 1976(1) APLJ 269 (claim not made
within 3 years by mistake of the plaintiff. Extension of the period of Limitation cannot be
claimed under sec.17 of Limitation Act)
25. B.K.N. Pillai Vs P. Pillai & Anr. AIR 2000 SC 614 (the Supreme Court observed that
where an amendment is found to be necessary for promoting the ends of justice and not
for defeating the same the application should be allowed)