Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Governance
Abel Canchari de la Cruz
February, 2009
Abstract
This paper discusses one of the issues that are at the heart of
the debate on development: whether the Millennium Development
Goals (MDGs) will be achieved or not. The first part touches on
the framework of the MDGs and has an overview of their not
optimistic performance. The second section addresses the gaps
and incoherence at national level that are playing a major role
for slowing down the MDGs attainment. In the third part, the
focus is on the other side of the coin: the politics at
international level, which influences on the MDGs, with special
emphasis on the failed promises and the role of international
organisations. The fourth part is a discussion of one of the
contemporary thinking on development theory: concepts such as
poverty trap, big push and take off, which have been proposed
by Jeffrey Sachs are analysed in the context of the MDGs in
developing countries.
I. Introduction: The Millennium Development Goals
The MDGs comprise eight goals and eighteen targets to be
achieved by 2015. The MDGs as part of the Millennium
Declaration, pledged by almost all the leaders worldwide, in the
Millennium Summit in September 2000, are the first agreement
with measurable 48 indicators for monitoring their progress
(United Nations, 2007).
Regarding the multidimensionality of the MDGs, Sachs mentions:
the MDGs wisely recognize that extreme poverty has many
dimensions, not only low income, but also vulnerability to
disease, exclusion from education, chronic hunger and
undernutrition, lack of access to basic amenities such as clean
water and sanitation, and environmental degradation such as
deforestation and land erosion that threatens lives and
livelihoods (2005: 213).
However, the failure to achieve all the MDGs seems to be a
concern highlighted by the United Nations (2007) in The
on the other hand in the domestic level, in low and middleincome countries, it seems that the scarcity of public resources
for MDG-based programmes or projects will be the main
constraints during the following years. After 9-11, there has
been a considerable reduction of the United States foreign aid
for development owing to the shift in the priorities, economic
resources were reoriented to defence and counter terrorism
especially in the Middle East.
Evidence based policy could be used for speeding up the
achievement of the MDGs at local and intermediate levels. The
MDGs are seen firstly as an international agenda and lastly as
a national concern, but at the bottom level, where the poor and
the problems exist they are almost unknown. Further, the
achievement of the MDGs is seen as a responsibility of the
government, however, this process should be understood as a
process strengthened by actors from the civil society and the
private sector. One of the critical factors that helped to
Thailand to be considered as one of the MDG-plus countries is
the process of inclusion of academic institutions, think-tanks,
civil society organisations, and so on, yet with a strong
leadership of the government.
References
Black, R. and White, H. [eds.] (2004) Targeting development:
critical perspectives on the Millennium Development Goals.
London: Routledge.
Collier, p. (2007) The bottom billion: why the poorest countries
are failing and what can be done about it. Oxford : Oxford
University Press.
Chang, J (2007) Protecting the Global Poor. Prospect Magazine,
Issue 136, July.
Haynes, J. (2008) Development Studies.