You are on page 1of 24

eCall standards update

David Williams, Qualcomm

Contents

Completed standardisation work in ETSI/3GPP


Completed standardisation work in CEN
Field trial results
Future work in CEN
Future work in ETSI/3GPP

Completed standardisation in 3GPP

eCall standardisation in 3GPP Release 8 was completed in December 2009 (SA#46).


Service requirements were done in SA1.
ETSI TS 122 101 clause 10.7 and A.27

Layer 3 protocol changes were done in CT1.


ETSI TS 124 008 clause 10.5.4.33 (eCall flag) and clause 4 (inactive substate)
ETSI TS 127 007 clause 6.27 (CECALL command)

USIM aspects were done in CT6


ETSI TS 131 102 clauses 4 and 5 (service number 89)

In-band modem was done in SA4

ETSI TS 126 267 in band modem description


ETSI TS 126 268 in band modem ANSI-C code
ETSI TS 126 269 in band modem test specification
ETSI TR 126 969 in band modem characterisation report

UTRAN protocol testing was done in RAN5


ETSI TS 134 123 clause 13.3.1
Early implementation of eCall in Release 7 is certifiable.

GERAN protocol testing was done in GERAN3


ETSI TS 151 010 clause 26.9.6

Completed standardisation in CEN


EN15722 Minimum Set of Data
Defines the 160 bytes that comprise the MSD

EN16072 High Level Application protocol


Defines the procedures and processes required to provide the eCall service
using a TS12 emergency call over a mobile communications network.

EN16072 Pan European Operating Requirements


Defines the general operating requirements and intrinsic

EN16102 Third Party Services Supported eCall


Defines transfer of an emergency message and establishment of a voice call
between a vehicle and a 'Third Party Service Provider' (TPSP)
Defines the transfer of data from a TPSP to the most appropriate PSAP

TR0278316 eCall end to end conformance testing


Demonstrates conformance with EN16062 and EN16072
Default to PE eCall in the event of TPS eCall failure
Due to be published in late 2012. Resolution meeting will be in September.

Availability of ETSI and CEN


standards
CEN standards are purchased from a National
Standards Organisation www.cen.eu
ETSI standards can be downloaded free of
charge (registration is required)
http://pda.etsi.org/pda/queryform.asp

eCall Drive Tests


48 Networks in 15 countries

PSAP
remote
desktop

22 stationary locations
12 mobility routes
>16000 calls
>25000 MSD transmissions
February 2012
International roaming calls
to test PSAP in Nuremberg

IVS/TCU
with
QSC669
5

Mobile
Network
Public
Network

IVS Control
via QXDM
Internet

eCall-enabled
PSAP
demonstrator
located in Nuremberg,
Germany

Conclusions of Drive Test


Extensive drive tests carried out to investigate performance of eCall inband modem
Good overall performance, even in the presence of network echo
cancellers
Excellent success rate for the case of disabled NECs: >98%
Only a small number of 3-4 problematic networks
not necessary to use disabler tone everywhere

Further performance optimization by parameter adaptations: >99%


Detailed failure analysis required:

implementation bugs at IVS and PSAP


abnormal network behavior
call setup and retention performance
real modem transmission failures

Half-Duplex unlikely to achieve overall performance improvement

Future work in ETSI/3G


A New Work Item was agreed at ETSI MSG#29 (29 March) on
Migration of eCall Transport
Assessment of in-band modem solution in case of no use of Circuit Switched
bearers
Study the adaptation of IMS emergency call and IMS Multimedia Emergency
Service for supporting current and future service required by eCall
Hybrid CS/IMS solution (scenarios for PSAPs and IVS implementations)
Migration recommendations (how and when to migrate from CS to IMS only)

Request for ETSI STF funding under the EC 2009-2013 ICT


Standardisation Work Program
Call for experts expected in Q3 (subject to funding approval)
Technical Report scheduled for publication end of Q1/13

Future work in CEN


Possible extension of MSD standard, e.g.
Accelerometer, car doors open, seat belts

Discussions on motorcycle eCall


Discussions on personal eCall
Amendment to HLAP using results obtained in HeERO, e.g.

Mapping of AL-ACK bits


Introduce the echo canceller tone procedure
Change 2s timeout value to 5s to allow a 2.1kHz echo canceller tone to be sent
Add PULL mode (beside PUSH) as option for the PSAP to start the transmission

Possible work on eCall for LTE

SUPPLEMENTARY SLIDES

List of ETSI and CEN Standards


Title

Number

eCall requirements for data transmission

eCall Data Transfer; In-band modem solution;


General Description
eCall Data Transfer; In-band modem solution;
ANSI-C Reference Code
eCall Data Transfer; In-band modem solution;
Conformance Testing
eCall Data Transfer; in-band modem solution;
Characterisation Report
eCall minimum set of data

3GPP TS 22.101
ETSI TS 122 101
3GPP TS 24.008
ETSI TS 124 008
3GPP TS 26.267
ETSI TS 126 267
3GPP TS 26.268
ETSI TS 126 268
3GPP TS 26.269
ETSI TS 126 269
3GPP TS 26.969
ETSI TS 126 969
CEN EN 15722

Pan European eCall Operating Requirements

CEN EN 16072

High Level Application Protocols

CEN EN 16062

Data registry procedures

ISO/EN 24978:2009

eCall Discriminator Table 10.5.135d

Latest Version
(as of 1st April 2012)
12.0.0
11.2.1
11.0.0
10.0.0
10.0.0
10.0.0

STF399 Deliverables
ETSI TS 102 936 -1 eCall Network Access Device (NAD) conformance
specification, Part 1: Protocol test specification

Contains normative references to tests which are used to show compliance


of an eCall terminal with eCall features in 3GPP specifications.

ETSI TS 102 936-2 eCall Network Access Device (NAD) conformance


specification, Part 2: Test Suites

Contains the TTCN code.

ETSI TR102 937 eCall communications equipment ; Conformance to R&TTE


Directive, EC Regulations for eCall and EC Vehicle regulations.

Describes how compliance with the R&TTE Directive is achieved.


Describes the EU Commission intentions for deploying eCall (note the text is
about 12 months old and superseded)
Describes an analysis of UNECE (motor vehicle) regulations and their
applicability to eCall

List of UTRAN eCall test cases


Clause

Title

13.3.1.2

13.3.1.5

Test eCall using eCall capable MS with eCall only


subscription on USIM
Manually initiated eCall using eCall capable MS with eCall
only subscription on USIM
Manually initiated eCall using eCall capable MS with eCall
capable USIM
eCall after T3242 expires

13.3.1.6

Automatically initiated eCall

13.3.1.7

Reconfiguration Call using eCall capable MS with eCall only


subscription on USIM

13.3.1.3
13.3.1.4

A supplementary test on T3243 was added

List of GERAN eCall tests


Clause

Title

26.9.6a.1.2

26.9.6a.1.5

Test Call using eCall capable MS with eCall only subscription on


USIM
Manually initiated eCall using eCall capable MS with eCall only
subscription on USIM
Manually initiated eCall using eCall capable MS with eCall capable
USIM
eCall after T3242 expires

26.9.6a.1.6

Automatically initiated eCall

26.9.6a.1.7

Reconfiguration Call using eCall capable MS with eCall only


subscription on USIM

26.9.6a.1.3
26.9.6a.1.4

It is intended to add a test on T3243

Contents/format of the MSD


Block
No.

Name

Description

Format version

MSD format version set to 1 to discriminate from later MSD formats

incremented with every retransmission

Message
Identifier
Control

Vehicle ID

Automatic or manual activation,


position trust indicator, vehicle class
VIN number according to ISO 3779

Fuel type

Gasoline, diesel, etc

Time stamp

Timestamp of incident event

Vehicle
Location
Vehicle direction

Position latitude/longitude (ISO 6709)

2degrees steps

Mandatory parts

Contents/format of the MSD


Block
No.

Name

Description

Recent Vehicle
Location n-1

Latitude/longitude Data

10

Recent Vehicle
Location n-2

Latitude/longitude Data

11

No. of
passengers

Minimum known number of fastened seatbelts omitted if no


information is available

12

Optional
additional data

e.g. passenger data

Optional parts

HLAP, send MSD, lower layers

HLAP, send MSD, higher layers

TPS ecall system

eCall for HGV


The following expansion of the MSD in EN 15722 is for HGVs:
Truck type (suited for dangerous goods =true, standard goods = false)
If truck type = true
Dangerous goods present/not present (false, true)
Coding protocol (1 byte)
if coding protocol = 1
Phone number of Truck Operator
For 6 goods (the most dangerous first if a truck has more than 6
goods, or zero-padded for trucks with less than 6) :
UN number
Quantities
Package group
if coding protocol = 2
IPv6 address information endpoint
Password (8 characters)

HeERO Standardisation Task Force

Discusses results of European HeERO eCall trials


Analyses real-world performance of eCall system
Develops proposals for standards changes
Currently discussed change requests:
Consistency of terminology between CEN and 3GPP standards
Introduce option in CEN HLAP for PSAP to employ an NEC disabler tone
according to ITU standards, if required
Relaxed PUSH timeout value (2s 5s)
Introduce new timer for PULL (START) messages, allow PULL mode as
alternative to PUSH mode
Specify exact number of HL-ACK messages to be transmitted by PSAP
Clarification on HL-ACK message contents, bit mapping, and
procedures
Optimized setting of uplink synch tracking parameters as result of field
testing

Test Scenarios [Backup?]


Stationary tests
1. Single MSD transmission per call (PUSH mode = D1S)

Repeated 20x with toggling disabler tone every other call


New call started after CLEARDOWN or expired call duration timer (30s)

2. Multiple MSD transmissions per call (PUSH-PULL-PULL mode = PPP)

Repeated 100x with toggling disabler tone every other call


New call started after CLEARDOWN by last PULL or expired call duration timer (80s)

3. Half-Duplex emulation using fixed PCM TX data for PSAP and IVS per call (HD)

Repeated 50x without disabler tone every 45s

Mobility tests
Drive routes cover different morphologies including urban and rural areas
Test type per route and network:

Single MSD transmissions per call

Repeated 100-200 times with toggling disabler tone every other call
New call started after CLEARDOWN or expired call duration timer (30s)

Test Sample: eCall Signals and Timings


time [seconds]
3 x NACK

ACK

5 x HL-ACK

PCM level

5 x START

Downlink: IVS Rx
IVS initiation (up to 5 x SEND)

MSD RV 0

MSD RV 1, ...

Uplink: IVS Tx
UL sync
1.2s
Overhead for
IVS initiated signalling:
0.8 2.0s, here 1.4s

MSD
received

3GPP Figure of Merit


(FoM): > 1.4s, here 1.7s

MSD Transmission Time:


here 2.9s

HLACK
received

Total time for acknowledgements:


> 2.0s, here 2.7s

MSD Transmission Performance


subtract approx. 1.2s for 3GPP Figure of Merit

Mean: 4.0s, STD: 2.2s


Transmission Success Rate:

including non-modem related failures


95.57% overall
93.87% without T>20s
excluding non-modem related failures
97.53% overall
95.88% without T>20s

Includes stationary & mobility tests


50% of calls used NEC disabler tone

You might also like