You are on page 1of 3

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

45 / Wednesday, March 8, 2006 / Proposed Rules 11555

(2) Before using any AMOC approved in ADDRESSES: Use one of the following Examining the Docket
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to addresses to submit comments on this
which the AMOC applies, notify the You may examine the AD docket on
proposed AD. the Internet at http://dms.dot.govROW
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA • DOT Docket Web site: Go to
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District or in person at the Docket Management
Office.
http://dms.dot.gov and follow the Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable instructions for sending your comments p.m., Monday through Friday, except
level of safety may be used for any repair electronically. Federal holidays. The Docket
required by this AD, if it is approved by an • Government-wide rulemaking Web
Management Facility office (telephone
Authorized Representative for the Boeing site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option and follow the instructions for sending
Authorization Organization who has been level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
your comments electronically.
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to • Mail: Docket Management Facility,
make those findings. For a repair method to U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 section. Comments will be available in
be approved, the repair must meet the
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, the AD docket shortly after the Docket
certification basis of the airplane. Management System receives them.
(4) AMOCs approved previously in room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
accordance with AD 2001–14–22, are • Fax: (202) 493–2251. Discussion
approved as AMOCs for the corresponding • Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
The Direction Générale de l’Aviation
provisions of paragraphs (f) and (j) of this the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
Civile (DGAC), which is the
AD. 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
airworthiness authority for Franch,
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
notified us that an unsafe condition may
28, 2006. through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice exist on certain Airbus Model A300 B4–
Kalene C. Yanamura, 600R series airplanes, A300 C4–605R
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Variant F airplanes, A300 F4–600R
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. for service information identified in this
proposed AD. series airplanes, and Model A310–300
[FR Doc. E6–3263 Filed 3–7–06; 8:45 am] series airplanes. The DGAC advises that
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P it has received reports of in-service
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
failures of the vent float valve in the
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
trim tank. The vent float valve is located
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
in the left-hand outboard section of the
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
trimmable horizontal stabilizer at
Federal Aviation Administration 98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–2125;
Functional Item Number (FIN) position
fax (425) 227–1149.
280454. In the event of a lightning strike
14 CFR Part 39 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: to the horizontal stabilizer, sparking of
[Docket No. FAA–2006–24103; Directorate Comments Invited metal parts and debris from detached
Identifier 2005–NM–241–AD] and damaged float vales, or a buildup of
We invite you to submit any relevant
static electricity, could result in ignition
RIN 2120–AA64 written data, views, or arguments
of fuel vapors and consequent fire or
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model explosion.
comments to an address listed in the
A300 B4–600R Series Airplanes, A300 ADDRESSES section. Include the docket Relevant Service Information
C4–605R Variant F Airplanes, A300 F4– number ‘‘FAA–2006–24103; Directorate
600R Series Airplanes, and Model Airbus has issued Service Bulletins
Identifier 2005–NM–241–AD’’ at the A310–28–2155 (for Model A310–300
A310–300 Series Airplanes beginning of your comments. We series airplanes) and A300–28–6081 (for
AGENCY: Federal Aviation specifically invite comments on the A300 B4–600R series airplanes, A300
Administration (FAA), Department of overall regulatory, economic, C4–605R Variant F airplanes, and A300
Transportation (DOT). environmental, and energy aspects of F4–600R series airplanes). Both service
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking the proposed AD. We will consider all bulletins are dated February 16, 2005.
(NPRM). comments received by the closing date The service bulletins describe
and may amend the proposed AD in procedures for replacing the existing
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a light of those comments. vent float valve with a new improved
new airworthiness directive (AD) for We will post all comments we vent float valve. Accomplishing the
certain Airbus transport category receive, without change, to http:// actions specified in the service
airplanes. This proposed AD would dms.dot.gov including any personal information is intended to adequately
require replacing the existing vent float information you provide. We will also address the unsafe condition. The
valve with a new improved vent float post a report summarizing each DGAC mandated the service information
valve. This proposed AD results from substantive verbal contact with FAA and issued French airworthiness
reports of failure of the vent float valve personnel concerning this proposed AD. directive F–2005–148, dated August 17,
in the left-hand outboard section of the Using the search function of that web 2005, to ensure the continued
trimmable horizontal stabilizer. We are site, anyone can find and read the airworthiness of these airplanes in
proposing this AD to prevent, in the comments in any of our dockets, France.
event of a lightning strike to the including the name of the individual
horizontal stabilizer, sparking of metal who sent the comment (or signed the FAA’s Determination and Requirements
parts and debris from detached and comment on behalf of an association, of the Proposed AD
erjones on PROD1PC68 with PROPOSALS

damaged float vales, or a buildup of business, labor union, etc.). You may These airplane models are
static electricity, which could result in review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act manufactured in France and are type
ignition of fuel vapors and consequent Statement in the Federal Register certificated for operation in the United
fire or explosion. published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR States under the provisions of section
DATES: We must receive comments on 19477–78), or you may visit http:// 21.29 of the Federal Aviation
this proposed AD by April 7, 2006. dms.dot.gov. Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:25 Mar 07, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM 08MRP1
11556 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 8, 2006 / Proposed Rules

applicable bilateral airworthiness We are issuing this rulemaking under Comments Due Date
agreement. Pursuant to this bilateral the authority described in Subtitle VII, (a) The FAA must receive comments on
airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, this AD action by April 7, 2006.
kept the FAA informed of the situation ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
described above. We have examined the section, Congress charges the FAA with Affected ADs
DGAC’s findings, evaluated all pertinent promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in (b) None.
information, and determined that we air commerce by prescribing regulations Applicability
need to issue an AD for airplanes of for practices, methods, and procedures
these type designs that are certificated the Administrator finds necessary for (c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A300
safety in air commerce. This regulation B4–605R and B4–622R airplanes, A300 C4–
for operation in the United States.
is within the scope of that authority 605R Variant F airplanes, A300 F4–605R and
Therefore, we are proposing this AD, F4–622R airplanes, and Model A310–304,
which would require accomplishing the because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on –322, –324, and –325 airplanes; certificated
actions specified in the service in any category, except those airplanes on
information described previously. products identified in this rulemaking
which Airbus Modification 12897 has been
action.
Difference Between the French accomplished in production.
Airworthiness Directive and This Regulatory Findings
Unsafe Condition
Proposed AD We have determined that this
(d) This AD results from reports of broken
proposed AD would not have federalism
The applicability of French vent float valve in the left-hand outboard
implications under Executive Order
airworthiness directive F–2005–148 section of the trimmable horizontal stabilizer.
13132. This proposed AD would not We are issuing this AD to prevent, in the
excludes airplanes on which Airbus
have a substantial direct effect on the event of a lightning strike to the horizontal
Service Bulletin Airbus Service Bulletin States, on the relationship between the
A300–28–6081 (for Model A300 B4– stabilizer, sparking of metal parts and debris
national Government and the States, or from detached and damaged float vales, or a
605R and B4–622R airplanes, A300 C4– on the distribution of power and
605R Variant F airplanes, and A300 F4– buildup of static electricity, which could
responsibilities among the various result in ignition of fuel vapors and
605R and F4–622R airplanes) or A310– levels of government.
28–2155 (for Model A310–304, –322, consequent fire or explosion.
For the reasons discussed above, I
–324, and –325 airplanes) were certify that the proposed regulation: Compliance
accomplished in-service. Both service 1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory (e) You are responsible for having the
bulletins are dated February 16, 2005. action’’ under Executive Order 12866; actions required by this AD performed within
However, we have not excluded those 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the the compliance times specified, unless the
airplanes in the applicability of this DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures actions have already been done.
proposed AD; rather, this proposed AD (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
includes a requirement to accomplish 3. Will not have a significant Action Heading
the actions specified in that service economic impact, positive or negative, (f) Within 36 months after the effective
bulletin. This requirement would ensure on a substantial number of small entities date of this AD: Replace Intertechnique vent
that the actions specified in the service under the criteria of the Regulatory float valve, Part Number (P/N) L87–13–001,
bulletin and required by this proposed Flexibility Act. in the trim tank with P/N L87–13–003; in
AD are accomplished on all affected We prepared a regulatory evaluation accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin
airplanes. Operators must continue to of the estimated costs to comply with A300–28–6081 (for Model A300 B4–605R
operate the airplane in the configuration this proposed AD and placed it in the and B4–622R airplanes, A300 C4–605R
required by this proposed AD unless an AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section Variant F airplanes, and A300 F4–605R and
alternative method of compliance is for a location to examine the regulatory F4–622R airplanes) or A310–28–2155 (for
approved. This difference has been evaluation. Model A310–304, –322, –324, and –325
airplanes). Both service bulletins are dated
coordinated with the DGAC.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 February 16, 2005.
Costs of Compliance Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation Alternative Methods of Compliance
This proposed AD would affect about safety, Safety. (AMOCs)
179 airplanes of U.S. registry. The The Proposed Amendment (g)(1) The Manager, International Branch,
proposed actions would take about 4 ANM–116, has the authority to approve
work hours per airplane, at an average Accordingly, under the authority
AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
labor rate of $65 per work hour. delegated to me by the Administrator, accordance with the procedures found in 14
Required parts would be provided by the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part CFR 39.19.
the manufacturer at no cost to the 39 as follows: (2) Before using any AMOC approved in
operator. Based on these figures, the accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
estimated cost of the proposed AD for which the AMOC applies, notify the
DIRECTIVES
U.S. operators is $46,540, or $260 per appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
airplane. 1. The authority citation for part 39 Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
continues to read as follows: Office.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Parts Installation
Title 49 of the United States Code (h) As of the effective date of this AD, no
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue § 39.13 [Amended]
erjones on PROD1PC68 with PROPOSALS

person may install a vent float valve, P/N


rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 2. The Federal Aviation
L87–13–001, on any airplane.
Section 106, describes the authority of Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, by adding the following new Related Information
Aviation Programs, describes in more airworthiness directive (AD): (i) French airworthiness directive F–2005–
detail the scope of the Agency’s Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2006–24103; 148, dated August 17, 2005, also addresses
authority. Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–241–AD. the subject of this AD.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:25 Mar 07, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM 08MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 8, 2006 / Proposed Rules 11557

Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 2006, in the above-docketed proceeding. production incentives as described in
28, 2006. Long-Term Firm Transmission in the Energy Policy Act of 2005.
Kalene C. Yanamura, Organized Electricity Markets, 114 FERC DATES: We will accept comments and
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane ¶ 61,097 (2006). The motion states that suggestions on the advance notice of
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. due to the complexity of the issues proposed rulemaking until April 7,
[FR Doc. E6–3264 Filed 3–7–06; 8:45 am] addressed in the NOPR and the 2006.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P substantive number of initial comments
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
that were filed in this docket, additional
by any of the following methods listed
time is needed to prepare reply
below. Federal rulemaking
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY comments.
portal: http://www.regulations.gov
Upon consideration, notice is hereby
(Follow the instructions for submitting
Federal Energy Regulatory given that an extension of time for filing
comments.) Internet e-mail:
Commission reply comments is granted to and
comments_washington@blm.gov.
including April 3, 2006, as requested by
(Include ‘‘Attn: AD82’’) Mail: Director
18 CFR Part 40 APPA, NRECA and TAPS.
(630), Bureau of Land Management,
[Docket Nos. RM06–8–000 and AD05–7–000]
The Commission will publish a
Administrative Record, Room 401–LS,
separate notice in the Federal Register
Eastern States Office, 7450 Boston
Long-Term Firm Transmission Rights announcing the extension of time to file
Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153.
in Organized Electricity Markets; Long- reply comments in this proceeding.
Personal or messenger delivery: Room
Term Transmission Rights in Markets Magalie R. Salas, 401, 1620 L Street, NW., Washington,
Operated by Regional Transmission Secretary. DC 20036.
Organizations and Independent
[FR Doc. E6–3286 Filed 3–7–06; 8:45 am] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
System Operators; Notice of Extension
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P onshore, Thomas J. Zelenka at (202)
of Time
452–0334 and for offshore, Marshall
March 2, 2006. Rose at (703) 787–1536, as to the
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR substance of the advance notice, or Ted
Commission, DOE. Hudson at (202) 452–5042, as to
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; Bureau of Land Management procedural matters. Persons who use a
extension of comment period. telecommunications device for the deaf
43 CFR Part 3100 (TDD) may call the Federal Information
SUMMARY: On February 2, 2006, the Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
Commission issued a Notice of Minerals Management Service 8330, 24 hours a day, seven days a
Proposed Rulemaking which proposed week, to contact the above individuals.
to amend its regulations to require 30 CFR Part 203 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
transmission organizations that are
[WO–310–06–1310–PP] I. Public Comment Procedures
public utilities with organized II. Background
electricity markets to make available RIN 1004–AD82 III. Description of Information Requested
long-term firm transmission rights that
satisfy certain guidelines established in Enhanced Oil and Natural Gas I. Public Comment Procedures
this proceeding. 71 FR 6693 (Feb. 9, Production Through Carbon Dioxide A. How Do I Comment on the Advance
2006). The Commission is extending the Injection Notice of Proposed Rulemaking?
date for filing reply comments on the
proposed rule at the request of the AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Your written comments should:
American Public Power Association, the Minerals Management Service, Interior. • Be specific;
National Rural Electric Cooperative ACTION: Advance notice of proposed • Explain the reason for your
Association and the Transmission rulemaking. comments and suggestions; and
Access Policy Study Group. • Be about the issues outlined in the
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land notice.
DATES: The comment period for the Management (BLM) and the Minerals Comments and recommendations that
proposed rule published at 71 FR 6693, Management Service (MMS) request will be most useful and likely to
February 9, 2006, is extended to April comments and suggestions to assist in influence decisions on the content of
3, 2006. preparing a proposed rule governing the proposed rule are:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: carbon dioxide injection for increased • Those supported by quantitative
Jeffery S. Dennis (Legal Information), production and recovery of oil and information or studies, and
Office of the General Counsel, Federal natural gas. The rule would provide for • Those that include citations to and
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 royalty relief incentives to promote the analyses of any applicable laws and
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. capture, transportation, and injection of regulations.
(202) 502–6027. produced carbon dioxide (CO2), natural We are particularly interested in
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On CO2, and other appropriate gases or receiving comments and suggestions
February 27, 2006, the American Public other matter for injection/sequestration about the topics listed under Section III.
Power Association (APPA), the National into oil and gas fields, to promote oil Description of Information Requested.
Rural Electric Cooperative Association and natural gas production from the If you wish to comment, you may
erjones on PROD1PC68 with PROPOSALS

(NRECA), and the Transmission Access Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) and submit your comments by any one of
Policy Study Group (TAPS) filed a joint onshore Federal leases. We encourage several methods, in each case referring
motion for an extension of time to file members of the public to provide to ‘‘1004–AD82’’.
reply comments in response to the comments and suggestions to help • You may mail comments to Director
Commission’s Notice of Proposed clarify and define the requirements for (630), Bureau of Land Management,
Rulemaking (NOPR) issued February 2, enhanced oil and natural gas recovery Administrative Record, Room 401 LS,

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:25 Mar 07, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM 08MRP1

You might also like