You are on page 1of 2

29686 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

99 / Tuesday, May 23, 2006 / Notices

the Updated Final Safety Analysis information that clarified the For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Report (UFSAR) to include a revision to application, did not expand the scope of Catherine Haney,
the methodology for splicing reinforcing the application as originally noticed, Director, Division of Operating Reactor
steel bars during restoration of the Unit and did not change the NRC staff’s Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
1 concrete shield building dome as part original proposed no significant hazards Regulation.
of the steam generator replacement consideration determination published [FR Doc. 06–4736 Filed 5–22–06; 8:45 am]
project. in the Federal Register. BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
Date of issuance: April 27, 2006.
Effective date: As of the date of The Commission’s related evaluation
issuance and shall be implemented as of the amendment is contained in a
Safety Evaluation dated April 26, 2006. OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
part of the next UFSAR update made in TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
accordance with 10 CFR 50.71(e). No significant hazards consideration
Amendment No. 60. comments received: No Trade Policy Staff Committee; Initiation
Facility Operating License No. NPF– of Environmental Review of Proposed
90: Amendment authorizes revision of Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating
Corporation, Docket No. 50–482, Wolf Free Trade Agreement Between the
the Updated Final Safety Analysis United States and Malaysia; Public
Report. Creek Generating Station, Coffey
Comments on Scope of Environmental
Date of initial notice in the Federal County, Kansas
Review
Register: January 4, 2005 (70 FR 405).
Date of amendment request: AGENCY: Office of the United States
The supplemental letters provided
clarifying information that was within November 3, 2005, and supplemental Trade Representative.
the scope of the initial notice and did letters dated February 21 and March 28,
ACTION: Notice and request for
not change the initial proposed no 2006.
comments.
significant hazards consideration Brief description of amendment: The
determination. amendment revised the Technical SUMMARY: This publication gives notice
The Commission’s related evaluation Specifications associated with steam that, pursuant to the Trade Act of 2002,
of the amendment is contained in a generator tube integrity consistent with and consistent with Executive Order
Safety Evaluation dated April 27, 2006. Revision 4 to Technical Specification 13141 (64 FR 63169) (Nov. 18, 1999)
No significant hazards consideration Task Force (TSTF) Standard Technical and its implementing guidelines (65 FR
comments received: No. Specification Change Traveler, TSTF– 79442), the Office of the United States
449, ‘‘Steam Generator Tube Integrity.’’ Trade Representative (USTR), through
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating
A notice of availability for this TS the Trade Policy Staff Committee
Corporation, Docket No. 50–482, Wolf
improvement using the consolidated (TPSC), is initiating an environmental
Creek Generating Station, Coffey
line item improvement process was review of the proposed free trade
County, Kansas
published in the Federal Register on agreement (FTA) between the United
Date of amendment request: October States and Malaysia. The TPSC is
30, 2003, as supplemented by letters May 6, 2005 (70 FR 24126).
requesting written comments from the
dated August 31 and November 18, Date of issuance: May 8, 2006. public on what should be included in
2005, and March 6, 2006. Effective date: The license the scope of the environmental review,
Brief description of amendment: The amendment is effective as of its date of including the potential environmental
amendment increases the completion issuance and shall be implemented effects that might flow from the free
times (CTs) for Technical Specification prior to the entry into Mode 5 in the trade agreement and the potential
(TS) 3.8.1, ‘‘AC Sources—Operating,’’ restart from Refueling Outage 15, which implications for U.S. environmental
and adds requirements on the diesel is scheduled to begin in October 2006. laws and regulations, and identification
generators at the Sharpe Station when a of complementarities between trade and
diesel generator at Wolf Creek Amendment No.: 164. environmental objectives such as the
Generating Station is in an extended CT Facility Operating License No. NPF– promotion of sustainable development.
greater than 72 hours. The proposed 42. The amendment revised the The TPSC also welcomes public views
changes to TS 3.8.9, ‘‘Distribution Technical Specifications. on appropriate methodologies and
Systems—Operating,’’ are withdrawn. Date of initial notice in Federal sources of data for conducting the
The amendment also revises a page in review. Persons submitting written
Register: December 6, 2005 (70 FR
the license and adds conditions to comments should provide as much
72676) The supplemental letters dated
Appendix D, ‘‘Additional Conditions,’’ detail as possible on the degree to which
February 21 and March 28, 2006,
of the license. the subject matter they propose for
Date of issuance: April 26, 2006. provided additional clarifying
information, did not expand the scope inclusion in the review may raise
Effective date: As of its date of significant environmental issues in the
issuance and shall be implemented of the application as originally noticed,
context of the negotiation.
within 90 days of the date of issuance. and did not change the staff’s original
proposed no significant hazards DATES: Public comments should be
Amendment No.: 163.
consideration determination published received no later than July 7, 2006.
Facility Operating License No. NPF–
42. The amendment revised the license in the Federal Register. ADDRESSES:
including Appendix D, ‘‘Additional Submissions by electronic mail:
The Commission’s related evaluation
Conditions,’’ and Appendix A, FR06017@ustr.eop.gov.
of the amendment is contained in a
‘‘Technical Specifications.’’ Submissions by facsimile: Gloria Blue,
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES

Safety Evaluation dated May 8, 2006.


Date of initial notice in Federal Executive Secretary, Trade Policy Staff
Register: January 6, 2004 (69 FR 700). No significant hazards consideration Committee, at (202) 395–6143.
The supplemental letters dated comments received: No. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
August 31 and November 18, 2005, and Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day procedural questions concerning public
March 2, 2006, provided additional of May 2006. comments, contact Gloria Blue,

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:14 May 22, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM 23MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 23, 2006 / Notices 29687

Executive Secretary, TPSC, Office of the appropriate responses where impacts and may be made by calling (202) 395–
USTR, 1724 F Street, NW., Washington, are identified. Reviews address 6186.
DC 20508, telephone (202) 395–3475. potential environmental impacts of the USTR also welcomes and will take
Questions concerning the proposed agreement and potential into account the public comments on
environmental review should be implications for environmental laws environmental issues submitted in
addressed to Mara Burr or Carlos and regulations. The focus of the review response to a previous notice—the
Pachon, Environment and Natural is on impacts in the United States, Federal Register notice dated March 22,
Resources Section, USTR, telephone although global and transboundary 2006 (71 FR 14558)—requesting
(202) 395–7320. impacts may be considered, where comments from the public to assist
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: appropriate and prudent. USTR in formulating positions and
proposals with respect to all aspects of
1. Background Information 3. Requirements for Submissions
the negotiation of an FTA between the
On March 8, 2006, in accordance with In order to facilitate prompt United States and Malaysia, including
section 2104(a)(1) of the Trade Act of processing of submissions, USTR environmental issues. These comments
2002, the United States Trade strongly urges and prefers electronic (e- will also be made available for public
Representative, Ambassador Robert mail) submissions in response to this inspection.
Portman, notified Congress of the notice. General information concerning the
President’s intent to enter into trade Persons making submissions by e- Office of the United States Trade
negotiations with Malaysia. Ambassador mail should use the following subject Representative may be obtained by
Portman outlined specific U.S. line: ‘‘FTA between the United States accessing its Internet Web site (http://
objectives for these negotiations in the and Malaysia Environmental Review’’ www.ustr.gov).
notification letter to Congress. A copy of followed by ‘‘Written Comments.’’
Documents should be submitted as a Carmen Suro-Bredie,
the letter is available at: http://
www.ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/ WordPerfect, MSWord, or text (.TXT) Chair, Trade Policy Staff Committee.
Bilateral/Malaysia_FTA/ file. Supporting documentation [FR Doc. E6–7852 Filed 5–22–06; 8:45 am]
Section_Index.html. submitted as spreadsheets are BILLING CODE 3190–W6–P
The TPSC also invited the public to acceptable as Quattro Pro or Excel. For
provide written comments and/or oral any document containing business
testimony at a public hearing held May confidential information submitted SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
3, 2006, to assist USTR in amplifying electronically, the file name of the COMMISSION
and clarifying negotiating objectives for business confidential version should
the proposed FTA and to provide advice begin with the characters ‘‘BC-’’, and the Submission for OMB Review;
on how specific goods and services and file name of the public version should Comment Request
other matters should be treated under begin with the characters ‘‘P-’’. The ‘‘P-
’’ or ‘‘BC-’’ should be followed by the Upon written request, copies available
the proposed agreement (see 71 FR from: Securities and Exchange
14558). name of the submitter. Persons who
make submissions by e-mail should not Commission, Office of Filings and
Malaysia is an upper middle income
provide separate cover letters; Information Services, Washington, DC
economy of 27 million people, with a
information that might appear in a cover 20549.
GDP of almost $250 billion in 2005.
Malaysia is the United States’ largest letter should be included in the Extension:
trading partner in Southeast Asia and submission itself. To the extent Rule 6e–2 and Form N–6EI–1, SEC File No.
possible, any attachments to the 270–177, OMB Control No. 3235–0177.
our 10th largest trading partner in the
world. The U.S. had more than $44 submission should be included in the Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
billion in two-way trade with Malaysia same file as the submission itself, and to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
in 2005, 60 percent more than our trade not as separate files. (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
with India and about a quarter of our Written comments submitted in and Exchange Commission
trade with Japan. Malaysia’s economy response to this request will be placed (‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
has sustained rapid growth—an average in a file open to public inspection Office of Management and Budget
of 5 percent a year for the past ten pursuant to 15 CFR 2003.5, except requests for extension of the previously
years—and presents opportunities for business confidential information approved collections of information
U.S. exporters. An FTA with Malaysia exempt from public inspection in discussed below.
also will provide U.S. companies with accordance with 15 CFR 2003.6. Rule 6e–2 (17 CFR 270.6e–2) under
a gateway to the dynamic Southeast Business confidential information the Investment Company Act of 1940
Asian region—a market approaching $3 submitted in accordance with 15 CFR (‘‘Act’’) is an exemptive rule that
trillion. 2003.6 must be clearly marked permits separate accounts, formed by
‘‘BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL’’ at the top life insurance companies, to fund
2. Environmental Review of each page, including any cover letter certain variable life insurance products.
USTR, through the TPSC, will or cover page, and must be accompanied The rule exempts such separate
perform an environmental review of the by a nonconfidential summary of the accounts from the registration
agreement pursuant to the Trade Act of confidential information. All public requirements under the Act, among
2002 and consistent with Executive documents and nonconfidential others, on condition that they comply
Order 13141 (64 FR 63169) and its summaries shall be available for public with all but certain designated
implementing guidelines (65 FR 79442). inspection in the USTR Reading Room. provisions of the Act and meet the other
Environmental reviews are used to The USTR Reading Room is open to the requirements of the rule. The rule sets
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES

identify potentially significant, public, by appointment only, from 10 forth several information collection
reasonably foreseeable environmental a.m. to 12 noon and 1 p.m. to 4 p.m., requirements.
impacts (both positive and negative), Monday through Friday. An Rule 6e–2 provides a separate account
and information from the review can appointment to review the file must be with an exemption from the registration
help facilitate consideration of scheduled at least 48 hours in advance provisions of section 8(a) of the Act if

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:14 May 22, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM 23MYN1

You might also like