You are on page 1of 3

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

109 / Wednesday, June 7, 2006 / Notices 33019

the Commission’s Public Reference approval of the proposed rule change I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Room. Copies of such filing also will be would allow the pilot program to Statement of the Terms of Substance of
available for inspection and copying at continue without disruption while the the Proposed Rule Change
the principal office of the Exchange. All Commission and the Exchange continue The Exchange is proposing to extend
comments received will be posted to review the pilot program’s impact on the pilot program for Preferenced Orders
without change; the Commission does the options market. Accordingly, the until June 10, 2007. The text of the
not edit personal identifying Commission finds good cause, proposed rule change is set forth below.
information from submissions. You consistent with section 19(b)(2) of the Brackets indicate deletions; italics
should submit only information that Act,11 for approving the proposed rule indicates new text.
you wish to make available publicly. All change prior to the thirtieth day after
submissions should refer to File * * * * *
publication of notice thereof in the
Number SR–CBOE–2006–52 and should Federal Register. Rule 713. Priority of Quotes and Orders
be submitted on or before June 28, 2006. (a) through (f) no change.
V. Conclusion
IV. Commission’s Findings and Order Supplementary Material to Rule 713
Granting Accelerated Approval of the It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Proposed Rule Change .01 through .02 no change.
section 19(b)(2) of the Act,12 that the .03 Preferenced Orders. For a pilot
The Exchange has asked the proposed rule change (SR–CBOE–2006– period ending [June 10, 2006] June 10,
Commission to approve the proposed 52), which institutes the pilot program 2007, an Electronic Access Member may
rule change on an accelerated basis for through June 2, 2007, is hereby designate a ‘‘Preferred Market Maker’’
an additional year so that the pilot approved on an accelerated basis. on orders it enters into the System
program may continue uninterrupted. (‘‘Preferenced Orders’’).
For the Commission, by the Division of
After careful consideration, the (a) through (c) no change.
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
Commission finds that the proposed
authority.13 * * * * *
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of section 6 of the Act 8 J. Lynn Taylor, II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
and the rules and regulations Assistant Secretary. Statement of the Purpose of, and
thereunder applicable to a national [FR Doc. E6–8805 Filed 6–6–06; 8:45 am] Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
securities exchange,9 and, in particular, BILLING CODE 8010–01–P Change
the requirements of section 6(b)(5) of the In its filing with the Commission, the
Act.10 Section 6(b)(5) requires, among Exchange included statements
other things, that the rules of a national SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE concerning the purpose of and basis for
securities exchange be designed to COMMISSION the proposed rule change and discussed
prevent fraudulent and manipulative any comments it received on the
acts and practices, to promote just and [Release No. 34–53921; File No. SR–ISE– proposed rule change. The text of these
equitable principles of trade, to remove 2006–28] statements may be examined at the
impediments to and perfect the places specified in Item III below. The
mechanism of a free and open market Self-Regulatory Organizations; Exchange has prepared summaries, set
and a national market system, and, in International Securities Exchange, Inc.; forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
general, to protect investors and the Notice of Filing and Order Granting the most significant aspects of such
public interest. The Commission notes
Accelerated Approval of a Proposed statements.
that the current pilot was approved on
Rule Change To Extend the Pilot
a one-year basis to give the Commission A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Period for Preferenced Orders
an opportunity to evaluate the impact of Statement of the Purpose of, and
the pilot program on the options June 1, 2006. Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
markets to determine whether it would Change
be beneficial to customers and to the Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 1. Purpose
options markets as a whole before
approving any request for permanent (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 According to the Exchange, the
approval of the pilot program. The notice is hereby given that on May 18, purpose of the proposed rule change is
Commission believes that a one-year 2006, the International Securities to extend, until June 10, 2007, the pilot
extension of the pilot period would Exchange, Inc. (‘‘ISE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) period for preferenced orders as
provide the Commission with additional filed with the Securities and Exchange provided in paragraph .03 of the
time to continue evaluate the Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the Supplementary Material to ISE Rule
Exchange’s Preferred Market-Maker proposed rule change as described in 713. The proposal amends ISE’s
Program. Items I and II below, which Items have procedure for allocating trades among
The Exchange has requested that the been prepared by the Exchange. The market makers and non-customer orders
Commission find good cause for Commission is publishing this notice to under ISE Rule 713 to provide an
approving the proposed rule change solicit comments on the proposed rule enhanced allocation to a ‘‘Preferred
prior to the thirtieth day after change from interested persons and is Market Maker’’ when it is quoting at the
publication of notice thereof in the approving the proposal on an national best bid or offer (‘‘NBBO’’).
Federal Register. The Commission accelerated basis, for a pilot period Specifically, under the proposal, an
believes that granting accelerated through June 10, 2007. Electronic Access Member may
designate any market maker appointed
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES

8 15 U.S.C. 78f. 11 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).


to an options class to be a Preferred
9 In approving this proposal, the Commission has 12 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). Market Maker on orders it enters into
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 13 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). the Exchange’s system (‘‘Preferenced
U.S.C. 78c(f). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). Orders’’). If the Preferred Market Maker
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. is not quoting at the NBBO at the time

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:54 Jun 06, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00107 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM 07JNN1
33020 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 7, 2006 / Notices

the Preferenced Order is received, the Exchange and the Commission to Room. Copies of such filing also will be
Exchange’s existing allocation and evaluate the rule change over an available for inspection and copying at
execution procedures will be applied to additional one-year period. the principal office of the Exchange. All
the execution.3 The proposed rule is comments received will be posted
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
subject to a pilot program that is without change; the Commission does
Statement on Burden on Competition
currently set to expire on June 10, not edit personal identifying
2006.4 The Exchange believes that the information from submissions. You
Under the proposal, if a Preferred proposed rule change does not impose should submit only information that
Market Maker is quoting at the NBBO at any burden on competition that is not you wish to make available publicly. All
the time a Preferenced Order is necessary or appropriate in furtherance submissions should refer to File
received, the allocation procedure is of the purposes of the Act. Number SR–ISE–2006–28 and should be
modified so that the Preferred Market submitted on or before June 28, 2006.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Maker (instead of the Primary Market
Statement on Comments on the IV. Commission’s Findings and Order
Maker 5) would receive an enhanced
Proposed Rule Change Received From Granting Accelerated Approval of the
allocation equal to the greater of: (i) The
Members, Participants or Others Proposed Rule Change
proportion of the total size at the best
price represented by the size of its The Exchange has not solicited, and
The Exchange has asked the
quote; or (ii) sixty percent of the does not intend to solicit comments on
Commission to approve the proposed
contracts to be allocated if there is only the proposed rule change.
rule change on an accelerated basis for
one other Non-Customer Order or III. Solicitation of Comments an additional year in order to avoid
market maker quotation at the best price disruption in the operation of the
and forty percent if there are two or Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and market. After careful consideration, the
more other Non-Customer Orders and/or Commission finds that the proposed
market maker quotes at the best price.6 arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule rule change is consistent with the
Unexecuted contracts remaining after requirements of section 6 of the Act 9
the Preferred Market Maker’s allocation change is consistent with the Act and
whether the pilot time frame is and the rules and regulations
would be allocated pro-rata based on thereunder applicable to a national
size as described above. appropriate. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following securities exchange,10 and, in particular,
The Exchange believes the proposed
methods: the requirements of section 6(b)(5) of the
rule change is a necessary competitive
Act.11 Section 6(b)(5) requires, among
response to the preferencing rules Electronic Comments other things, that the rules of a national
adopted by other options exchanges and
would help the ISE attract and retain • Use the Commission’s Internet securities exchange be designed to
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ prevent fraudulent and manipulative
order flow. The Exchange believes that
rules/sro.shtml); or acts and practices, to promote just and
this order flow would add depth and
• Send an e-mail to rule- equitable principles of trade, to remove
liquidity to the Exchange’s markets and
comments@sec.gov. Please include File impediments to and perfect the
enable the Exchange to continue to
Number SR–ISE–2006–28 on the subject mechanism of a free and open market
compete effectively with other options
line. and a national market system, and, in
exchanges.
general, to protect investors and the
Paper Comments
2. Statutory Basis public interest. The Commission notes
• Send paper comments in triplicate that the current pilot was approved for
The Exchange believes that the
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, a total of one year 12 to give the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Securities and Exchange Commission, Commission an opportunity to evaluate
section 6(b) of the Act 7 in general, and
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC the impact of the pilot program on the
furthers the objectives of section 6(b)(5)
20549–1090. options markets to determine whether it
of the Act 8 in particular, in that the
proposed rule change is designed to All submissions should refer to File would be beneficial to customers and to
promote just and equitable principles of Number SR–ISE–2006–28. This file the options markets as a whole before
trade, remove impediments to and number should be included on the approving any request for permanent
perfect the mechanisms of a free and subject line if e-mail is used. To help the approval of the pilot program. The
open market and a national market Commission process and review your Commission believes that a one-year
system and, in general, to protect comments more efficiently, please use extension of the pilot period would
investors and the public interest. The only one method. The Commission will provide the Commission with additional
Exchange also believes that extension of post all comments on the Commission’s
the pilot program would allow the Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ 9 15 U.S.C. 78f.

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 10 In approving this proposal, the Commission has

3 Marketable customer orders are not submission, all subsequent considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
automatically executed at prices inferior to the amendments, all written statements U.S.C. 78c(f).
NBBO. If the ISE best bid or offer is inferior to the with respect to the proposed rule 11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
NBBO, it is handled by the Primary Market Maker change that are filed with the 12 The Commission initially approved the
according to ISE Rule 803(c).
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52066 Commission, and all written Exchange’s Preferenced Order program on a six
communications relating to the week pilot basis while the Commission sought
(July 20, 2005), 70 FR 43479 (July 27, 2005).
comment on the proposed rule change. See
5 A Primary Market Maker may be the Preferenced proposed rule change between the Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51818 (June
Market Maker, in which case such market maker Commission and any person, other than 10, 2006), 70 FR 35146 (June 16, 2006). The
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES

would receive the enhanced allocation for those that may be withheld from the Commission subsequently extended to the pilot
Preferenced Market Makers. period until June 10, 2006, which was one year
6 All allocations are automatically performed by public in accordance with the
from the date the Commission first approved the
the Exchange’s system. provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be Exchange’s Preferenced Order program on a pilot
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). available for inspection and copying in basis. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). the Commission’s Public Reference 52066 (July 20, 2005), 70 FR 43479 (July 27, 2005).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:54 Jun 06, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00108 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM 07JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 7, 2006 / Notices 33021

time to continue to evaluate the the proposed rule change.3 The ISE has Hong Kong Index Fund (‘‘EWH’’).8
Exchange’s Preferenced Order program. designated this proposal as one Specifically, the Exchange is proposing
The Exchange has requested that the establishing or changing a due, fee, or to adopt an execution fee and a
Commission find good cause for other charge imposed by the ISE under comparison fee for all transactions in
approving the proposed rule change section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,4 and options on IVV and EWH.9 The amount
prior to the thirtieth day after Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,5 which of the execution fee and comparison fee
publication of notice thereof in the renders the proposal effective upon for products covered by this filing shall
Federal Register. The Commission filing with the Commission. The be $0.15 and $0.03 per contract,
believes that granting accelerated Commission is publishing this notice to respectively, for all Public Customer
approval of the proposed rule change solicit comments on the proposed rule Orders 10 and Firm Proprietary orders.
would allow the pilot program to change, as amended, from interested The amount of the execution fee and
continue without disruption while the persons. comparison fee for all ISE Market Maker
Commission and the Exchange continue transactions and all non-ISE Market
to review the pilot program’s impact on I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Maker transactions shall be equal to the
the options market. Accordingly, the Statement of the Terms of Substance of execution fee and comparison fee
Commission finds good cause, the Proposed Rule Change currently charged by the Exchange for
consistent with section 19(b)(2) of the The ISE is proposing to amend its ISE Market Maker transactions and non-
Act,13 for approving the proposed rule Schedule of Fees to establish fees for ISE Market Maker transactions in equity
change prior to the thirtieth day after transactions in options on two Premium options.11 All of the applicable fees
publication of notice thereof in the Products.6 The text of the proposed rule covered by this filing are identical to
Federal Register. change, as amended, is available on the fees charged by the Exchange for all
ISE’s Web site (http:// other Premium Products. The Exchange
V. Conclusion believes the proposed rule change will
www.iseoptions.com/legal/proposed
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to _rule_changes.asp), at the principal further the Exchange’s goal of
section 19(b)(2) of the Act,14 that the office of the ISE, and at the
proposed rule change (SR–ISE–2006– Commission’s Public Reference Room. subsidiary of Barclays Bank PLC. ‘‘Standard &
28), which institutes the pilot program Poor’s,’’ ‘‘S&P,’’ ‘‘S&P 500,’’ are trademarks of
through June 10, 2007, is hereby II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (‘‘McGraw-
Statement of the Purpose of, and Hill’’), and have been licensed for use for certain
approved on an accelerated basis. purposes by BGI. IVV is not sponsored, sold or
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule endorsed by Standard & Poor’s, (‘‘S&P’’), a division
For the Commission, by the Division of Change of McGraw-Hill, and S&P makes no representation
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated regarding the advisability of investing in IVV. BGI,
authority.15 In its filing with the Commission, the McGraw-Hill and S&P have not licensed or
J. Lynn Taylor, ISE included statements concerning the authorized ISE to (i) engage in the creation, listing,
Assistant Secretary. purpose of, and basis for, the proposed provision of a market for trading, marketing, and
rule change and discussed any promotion of options on IVV or (ii) to use and refer
[FR Doc. E6–8804 Filed 6–6–06; 8:45 am] to any of their trademarks or service marks in
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
comments it received on the proposed connection with the listing, provision of a market
rule change. The text of these statements for trading, marketing, and promotion of options on
may be examined at the places specified IVV or with making disclosures concerning options
on IVV under any applicable federal or state laws,
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE in Item IV below. The ISE has prepared rules or regulations. BGI, McGraw-Hill and S&P do
COMMISSION summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, not sponsor, endorse, or promote such activity by
and C below, of the most significant ISE and are not affiliated in any manner with ISE.
[Release No. 34–53910; File No. SR–ISE– aspects of such statements. 8 iShares is a registered trademark of BGI, a
2006–22] wholly owned subsidiary of Barclays Bank PLC.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s ‘‘MSCI Hong Kong Index’’ is a service mark of
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Statement of the Purpose of, and Morgan Stanley Capital International (‘‘MSCI’’) and
International Securities Exchange, Inc.; has been licensed for use for certain purposes by
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule BGI. All other trademarks and service marks are the
Notice of Filing and Immediate Change property of their respective owners. EWH is not
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule sponsored, endorsed, issued, sold or promoted by
Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto 1. Purpose MSCI. BGI and MSCI have not licensed or
Relating to Fee Changes authorized ISE to (i) engage in the creation, listing,
The Exchange is proposing to amend provision of a market for trading, marketing, and
its Schedule of Fees to establish fees for promotion of options on EWH or (ii) to use and
May 31, 2006.
transactions in options on the following refer to any of their trademarks or service marks in
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the two Premium Products: iShares S&P 500 connection with the listing, provision of a market
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Index Fund (‘‘IVV’’) 7 and iShares MSCI for trading, marketing, and promotion of options on
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 EWH or with making disclosures concerning
options on EWH under any applicable federal or
notice is hereby given that on April 26, 3 Amendment No. 1 made certain clarifying
state laws, rules or regulations. BGI and MSCI do
2006, the International Securities changes to the purpose section regarding fees not sponsor, endorse, or promote such activity by
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘ISE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) charged to non-ISE market makers for transactions ISE, and are not affiliated in any manner with ISE.
filed with the Securities and Exchange in options on the Premium Products that are the 9 The Exchange represents that these fees will be
subject of this filing. These changes did not affect charged only to Exchange members. Under a pilot
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the the fees covered by this filing. program that is set to expire on July 31, 2006, these
proposed rule change as described in 4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
fees will also be charged to Linkage Orders (as
Items I, II, and III below, which Items 5 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). defined in ISE Rule 1900).
have been prepared by the ISE. On May 6 ‘‘Premium Products’’ is defined in the ISE’s 10 Public Customer Order is defined in ISE Rule

18, 2006, ISE filed Amendment No. 1 to Schedule of Fees as the products enumerated 100(a)(33) as an order for the account of a Public
therein. The Exchange represents that the Premium Customer. Public Customer is defined in ISE Rule
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES

13 15
Products that are the subject of this proposed rule 100(a)(32) as a person that is not a broker or dealer
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). change, iShares S&P 500 Index Fund and iShares in securities.
14 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). MSCI Hong Kong Index Fund, constitute ‘‘Fund 11 Telephone conversation between Samir Patel,
15 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Shares,’’ as defined by ISE Rule 502(h). Assistant General Counsel, ISE, and Richard Holley
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 7 iShares is a registered trademark of Barclays III, Special Counsel, Division of Market Regulation,
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. Global Investors, N.A. (‘‘BGI’’), a wholly owned Commission, on May 31, 2006.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:54 Jun 06, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00109 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM 07JNN1

You might also like