Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Notice: Arms Sales Notification Transmittal Letter, Etc.

    Uploaded by

    Justia.com
    3 views4 pages
    Notice: Arms sales notification; transmittal letter, etc., 33284-33287 [06-5216] Department of Defense

    Original Title

    Notice: Arms sales notification; transmittal letter, etc.

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Notice: Arms sales notification; transmittal letter, etc., 33284-33287 [06-5216] Department of Defense

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views4 pages

    Notice: Arms Sales Notification Transmittal Letter, Etc.

    Uploaded by

    Justia.com
    Notice: Arms sales notification; transmittal letter, etc., 33284-33287 [06-5216] Department of Defense

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 4

    33284 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

    110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Notices

    increased, locations expanded, time- implemented in the Test-Bed. Dated: June 2, 2006.
    frame increased)? Comments are requested on the Milton E. Brown,
    Who should be responsible for proposed Test-Bed selection criteria. Acting Chief Counsel, National
    providing the test personnel and Telecommunications and Information
    How well does the proposed
    equipment for the Test-Bed? Administration.
    Should organizations with proprietary technology or service achieve the goal of
    [FR Doc. E6–8874 Filed 6–7–06; 8:45 am]
    technology or information be permitted the Test-Bed?
    BILLING CODE 3510–60–S
    to participate in the Test-Bed? If so, how How readily available is the
    should release of data based on their equipment proposed for the Test-Bed?
    technology be handled? How well does the proposed DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    D. Activation/Termination of the Test- technology or service explore creative
    Bed and original concepts in spectrum Office of the Secretary
    Should computer simulations be sharing?
    [Transmittal No. 06–32]
    performed before the Test-Bed is For the proposed technology or
    activated? service can the results of the Test-Bed 36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification
    Should a test plan be developed and be disseminated broadly to enhance
    agreed to by all parties before the Test- AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation
    scientific and technologic
    Bed is activated? If so, who should be Agency, Department of Defense.
    understanding? If so, how broadly can
    responsible for developing the test plan? the results be applied? ACTION: Notice.
    What process should be used to review
    the test plan? How well does the proposed SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is
    Under what conditions should the technology or service address the publishing the unclassified text of a
    Test-Bed be terminated (e.g., problems potential impact on the incumbent section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification.
    with equipment)? spectrum user(s)? This is published to fulfill the
    How much and in what ways does the requirements of section 155 of Public
    E. Evaluation of the Test-Bed Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996.
    proposed technology or service benefit
    What metrics should be used in the public? FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
    evaluating the results of the Test-Bed? J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604–
    Should status reports be prepared Are there any technical factors that 6575.
    throughout the duration of the Test-Bed limit the proposed technology or service The following is a copy of a letter to
    (e.g., 6 months)? to a specific frequency range? the Speaker of the House of
    Who should be responsible for Will the necessary technical support Representatives, Transmittal 06–32 with
    analyzing the data from the Test-Bed be provided to assure performance of attached transmittal and policy
    and preparing the final report? the equipment during the Test-Bed? If justification.
    III. Selection Criteria for Test-Bed so, how sufficient is the proposed C.R. Choate,
    The following criteria are being support? Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
    proposed to evaluate and select the Officer, Department of Defense.
    proposed technology or service to be BILLING CODE 5001–06–M
    cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

    VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:37 Jun 07, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM 08JNN1
    Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Notices 33285
    cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

    EN08JN06.000</GPH>

    VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:37 Jun 07, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM 08JNN1
    33286 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Notices
    cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

    EN08JN06.001</GPH>

    VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:37 Jun 07, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM 08JNN1
    Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Notices 33287
    cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

    [FR Doc. 06–5216 Filed 6–7–06; 8:45 am]


    BILLING CODE 5001–06–C
    EN08JN06.002</GPH>

    VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:37 Jun 07, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM 08JNN1

    You might also like