42082 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.
142 / Tuesday, July 25, 2006 / Notices
Title: Survey of Foreign Airline
Operators’ Revenues and Expenses in
the United States.
Form Number(s): BE–9.
Agency Approval Number: 0608–
0068.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Burden: 1,920 hours.
Number of Respondents: 60 per
quarter; 240 annually.
Average Hours Per Response: 8 hours.
Needs and Uses: The Bureau of
Economic Analysis (BEA) is responsible
for the compilation of the U.S.
international transactions accounts
(ITA), which it publishes quarterly in
news releases, on its Web site, and in its
monthly journal, the Survey of Current
Business. These accounts provide a
statistical summary of all U.S.
international transactions and, as such,
are one of the major statistical products
of BEA. They are used extensively by
both government and private
organizations for national and
international economic policy
formulation and for analytical purposes.
The information collected in this survey
is used to develop the ‘‘transportation’’
portion of the ITA. Without this
information, an integral component of
the ITA would be omitted. No other
Government agency collects
comprehensive quarterly data on foreign
airline operators’ revenues and expenses
in the United States.
The survey requests information from
U.S. agents of foreign air carriers
operating in the United States. The
information is collected on a quarterly
basis from foreign air carriers with
annual total covered revenues or annual
total covered expenses incurred in the
United States of $5,000,000 or more.
Foreign air carriers with annual total
covered revenues and annual total
covered expenses each below
$5,000,000 are exempt from reporting.
Affected Public: U.S. agents of foreign
air carriers.
Frequency: Quarterly.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: The International
Investment and Trade in Services
Survey Act, 22 U.S.C. 3101–3108, as
amended.
OMB Desk Officer: Paul Bugg, (202)
395–3093.
You may obtain copies of the above
information collection proposal by
writing Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer, Office of
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
the Chief Information Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6625,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230, or via e-mail at
dhynek@doc.gov.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:02 Jul 24, 2006 Jkt 208001
Send written comments on the
proposed information collection within
30 days of publication of this notice to
the Office of Management and Budget,
O.I.R.A., Attention PRA Desk Officer for
BEA, via e-mail at pbugg@omb.eop.gov,
or by FAX at 202–395–7245.
Dated: July 20, 2006.
Madeleine Clayton,
Management Analyst, Office of Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–11814 Filed 7–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign–Trade Zones Board
Order No. 1465
Grant of Authority for Subzone Status,
Eastman Kodak Company, (X–ray Film,
Color Paper, Digital Media, Inkjet
Paper, Entertainment Imaging, and
Health Imaging), Lawrenceville,
Georgia
Pursuant to its authority under the
Foreign–Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the Foreign–
Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the
following Order:
WHEREAS, the Foreign–Trade Zones
Act provides for ‘‘ . . . the establishment
. . . of foreign–trade zones in ports of
entry of the United States, to expedite
and encourage foreign commerce, and
for other purposes,’’ and authorizes the
Foreign–Trade Zones Board to grant to
qualified corporations the privilege of
establishing foreign–trade zones in or
adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;
WHEREAS, the Board’s regulations
(15 CFR Part 400) provide for the
establishment of special–purpose
subzones when existing zone facilities
cannot serve the specific use involved,
and when the activity results in a
significant public benefit and is in the
public interest;
WHEREAS, Georgia Foreign–Trade
Zone, Inc., grantee of Foreign–Trade
Zone 26, has made application to the
Board for authority to establish special–
purpose subzone status at the
warehousing, processing and
distribution facility (X–ray film, color
paper, digital media, inkjet paper,
entertainment imaging, and health
imaging) of the Eastman Kodak
Company, located in Lawrenceville,
Georgia (FTZ Docket 47–2005, filed 9/
26/2005; amended 5/15/2006);
WHEREAS, notice inviting public
comment has been given in the Federal
Register (70 FR 57556–57557, 10/3/
2005); and,
WHEREAS, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendations of the
PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
examiner’s report, and finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and the
Board’s regulations would be satisfied,
and that approval of the application
would be in the public interest;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board hereby
grants authority for subzone status for
activity related to X–ray film, color
paper, digital media, inkjet paper,
entertainment imaging, and health
imaging at the warehousing, processing
and distribution facility of the Eastman
Kodak Company, located in
Lawrenceville, Georgia (Subzone 26J), as
described in the amended application
and Federal Register notice, subject to
the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations,
including Section 400.28, and further
subject to a restriction that privileged
foreign status (19 CFR Part 146.41) shall
be elected:
1. On foreign merchandise that falls
under HTSUS headings or
subheadings 2821, 2823, all of
Chapter 32 or 3901.20 or where the
foreign merchandise in question is
described as a ‘‘pigment, pigment
preparation, masterbatch, plastic
concentrate, flush color, paint
dispersion, coloring preparation, or
colorant.’’
2. On foreign merchandise that falls
under HTSUS heading 4202, with
the exception of merchandise
classified in HTSUS categories
4202.91.0090 and 4202.92.9060.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of
July 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary of Commercefor Import
Administration,Alternate ChairmanForeign–
Trade Zones Board.
ATTEST:
Andrew McGilvray,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–11873 Filed 7–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–549–813)
Extension of Time Limits for
Preliminary Results and Final Results
of the Full Sunset Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Canned
Pineapple Fruit from Thailand
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 25, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zev
Primor, Office 4, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
25JYN1
 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 25, 2006 / Notices
Street & Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC, 20230; telephone: 202–
482–4114.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) initiated the second
sunset review of canned pineapple fruit
(‘‘CPF’’) from Thailand on April 3, 2006.
See Initiation of Five–year ‘‘Sunset’’
Reviews, 71 FR 16551 (April 3, 2006).
On April 17, 2006, we received
notification of intent to participate from
the domestic interested party, Maui
Pineapple Co., Ltd., (‘‘Maui’’) in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3).
On May 3, 2006, Maui and the
respondent interested parties filed
substantive comments with the
Department.1
On May 22, 2006, the Department
issued a preliminary adequacy
determination stating that the
respondents in the ongoing sunset
review did not meet the adequacy
requirements. See Memorandum from
Zev Primor to Tom Futtner, ‘‘Adequacy
Determination in Antidumping Duty
Sunset Review of Canned Pineapple
from Thailand’’ (May 22, 2006). On May
30, 2006, and June 8, 2006, we received
timely comments pertaining to our
adequacy calculation methodology from
the respondent interested parties and
Maui, respectively. Upon review of the
parties’ comments, we modified our
calculation methodology and
determined that the respondent
interested parties meet the adequacy
requirements. See Memorandum from
Zev Primor to Tom Futtner, ‘‘Correction
to the Adequacy Calculation in the
Antidumping Duty Sunset Review of
Canned Pineapple Fruit from Thailand’’
(July 12, 2006). Consequently, the
Department determined to conduct a
full sunset review of the antidumping
duty order on CPF from Thailand as
provided at section 751(c)(5)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’), and at 19 CFR 351.218(e)(2)(i)
because: (1) the parties’ substantive
responses met the requirements of 19
CFR 351.218(d)(3), and (2) both the
information on the record and our
review of the proprietary Customs and
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data
indicated that the respondent interested
parties account for more than 50 percent
1 The respondent interested parties are: Pineapple
Processors Group; the Thai Food Processors
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Association; Thai Pineapple Canning Industry Corp.
Ltd.; Malee Sampran Public Co., Ltd.; The Siam
Agro Industry Pineapples and Others Public Co.,
Ltd.; Great Oriental Food Products Co. Ltd.; Thai
Pineapple Products and Other Fruits Co., Ltd.; The
Tipco Foods (Thailand) PCL; Pranburi Hotei Co.,
Ltd.; and Siam Fruit Canning (1988) Co., Ltd.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:02 Jul 24, 2006 Jkt 208001
of the exports to the United States, the
level that the Department normally
considers to be an adequate response to
the notice of initiation by respondent
interested parties under 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(A). Id.
Extension of Time Limits
With respect to the preliminary
results of a sunset review, the
Department’s regulations, at 19 CFR
351.218(f)(1), provide that the
Department normally will issue its
preliminary results in a full sunset
review not later than 110 days after the
date of publication of initiation in the
Federal Register. However, in
accordance with section 751(c)(5)(B) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(3)(ii), the
Department may extend the period of
time for making its final determination
by not more than 90 days, if it
determines that the review is
extraordinarily complicated. Because
some of the issues are complex, the
Department has determined, pursuant to
section 751(c)(5)(C)(ii) of the Act, that
the sunset review is extraordinarily
complicated and will require additional
time for the Department to complete its
analysis. Due to the complex nature of
the CPB and shipment data, revocation
of a number of companies during the
period of review, and the change from
the expedited to a full sunset review,
the Department will require additional
time to conduct the analysis necessary
for the preliminary results.
The Department’s preliminary results
of the full sunset review of the
antidumping duty order on CPF from
Thailand are currently scheduled for
July 22, 2006, and the final results are
currently scheduled for November 29,
2006. As a result of our decision to
extend the deadline for the preliminary
results of review, the Department
intends to issue the preliminary results
of the full sunset review of the
antidumping duty order on CPF from
Thailand no later than October 20, 2006,
and the final results of the review no
later than February 27, 2007. These
dates are 90 days from the originally
scheduled dates of the preliminary and
final results of this sunset review.
This notice is issued in accordance
with sections 751(c)(5)(B) and (C)(ii) of
the Act.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–11839 Filed 7–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
42083
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–122–840)
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire
Rod from Canada: Extension of Time
Limit for Preliminary Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 25, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Damian Felton or Brandon Farlander,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0133 or (202) 482–
0182, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 3, 2005, the Department
of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’)
published an opportunity to request an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on carbon and
certain alloy steel wire rod from Canada
for the period October 1, 2004, to
September 30, 2005. See Antidumping
or Countervailing Duty Order, Filing, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request an Administrative Review, 70
FR 57558 (October 3, 2005). On May 25,
2006, the Department published in the
Federal Register a notice extending the
time limit for the preliminary results of
the administrative review from July 3,
2006, to August 2, 2006. See Carbon and
Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from
Canada: Extension of Time Limit for
Preliminary Results of the Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 71 FR
30116 May 25, 2006). The preliminary
results of this administrative review are
currently due August 2, 2006.
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
requires the Department to issue
preliminary results within 245 days
after the last day of the anniversary
month of an order. However, if it is not
practicable to complete the review
within this time period, section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the
Department to extend the time period to
a maximum of 365 days.
We determine that completion of the
preliminary results of this review by
August 2, 2006, is not practicable
25JYN1