Professional Documents
Culture Documents
223-227)
Review by: Vinio Rossi
The French Review, Vol. 46, No. 5 (Apr., 1973), pp. 1018-1020
Published by: American Association of Teachers of French
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/388573 .
Accessed: 11/01/2015 16:18
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
American Association of Teachers of French is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to The French Review.
http://www.jstor.org
FRENCH REVIEW
1018
Vinio Rossi
ETUDES GIDIENNES I. (La Revue des Lettres Modernes, vols. 223-227). Paris:
Minard, 1970. Pp. 192.
One begins reading Cecile Delorme's long lead article, "Narcissisme et
'ducation dans l'oeuvre romanesque d'Andr' Gide," with certain preconceived
REVIEWS
1019
ideas about the meaning of the title's key terms and about their possible
relationship to one another in Gide's fiction. These ideas, as well as the author's
assumption that all share her understanding of the subject, make the article
tedious reading. But more than just a definition of terms is required. A
discussion of education in Gide's view could have been pertinently developed, it
seems to me, in terms of its possible good or bad effects and in terms of what
Gide felt was absent in most European fiction: the development of the
personality in relation to God or to the self (cf. Dostoievski, Coll. "Idees," p.
69). As for Narcissism, that is, self-preference, the inclination to see oneself
mirrored in all of creation, Gide very early rejected it aesthetically and
intellectually, if not always emotionally. Quite early Gide took to heart the
wisdom of Christ's admonition to forsake self-preservation for his sake, and
explained it as an invitation to abandon an image of oneself imposed by society,
by family, that is, by education, in favor of the continual realization of one's
potential, of one's authentic selves. Edouard, in 1925, anticipates Thesee (1946),
when he advises Bernard to seek rules of conduct within himself, "d'avoir pour
but le developpement de soi" (Les Faux-Monnayeurs in Romans, recits et soties,
oeuvres lyriques, p. 1215). He repeats, moreover, Gide's own seminal
formulation in the early journal: "Je ne veux plus comprendre une morale qui ne
permette et n'enseigne pas le plus grand, le plus beau, le plus libre emploi et
developpement de nos forces" (septembre 1894, JAG, I, 52). Of course, this all
can be ascribed to a larger more generous understanding of Narcissism. Yet
nowhere in the article are the ambiguities of the term even partially appreciated.
Instead Cecile Delorme isolates Narcissus as the prototype of Gide's protagonists
and analyses-occasionally psycho-analyses-him as Father, Son, in relation to
the Mother, the Daughter, and finally, as Bastard. But these are all static images,
beyond time and the dynamics inherent in any family life. And they are beyond
the dynamics, too, of the work of art. Each successive image of Narcissus is
pieced together from the full range of Gide's fiction; what results is a kind of
Gidian Disneyland where the most unlikely characters rub elbows. One would
welcome the narrator of Paludes, in full hysteria, crying that you cannot put
things into a work of art, or take them out "que par force." "Un livre . . . mais
un livre, Hubert, est clos, plein, lisse comme un oeuf" (Paludes, Livre de Poche,
p. 60). And yet the realm of enquiry is, indeed, Gide's fiction. One asks, then,
why this limitation when aesthetic questions are neglected and a wealth of
appropriate material on the subject is available in all of Gide's works. In fact,
Gide never tired of telling what he calls in the journal the most interesting of all
human dramas, the struggle between the self and "ce qui l'empiche d'etre
authentique. . .ce qui s'oppose a son integration."
The other two articles in this inaugural issue are shorter and somewhat more
satisfying. Both are literary history and treat different phases of Gide's social
consciousness. Jeff Last, in his "D'Oscar Wilde aux Nouvelles Nourritures,"
underlines the affinities between Wilde's 1890 pamphlet, The Soul of Man under
Socialism, and the development of Gide's political thinking. In "Gide a travers la
presse sovietique de 1932 a 1937," Alain Goulet documents Gide's fortunes in
the Soviet press before, during, and after his voyage to the U.S.S.R. His scrutiny
of various Soviet writers and their motives clarifies reasons behind the
willingness of the Soviet intellectual to misunderstand Gide's professions of
faith. Even more interesting would be understanding Gide's willingness to be
misled and the degree to which his social thought was always askew in the Soviet
view. Goulet does promise a thesis on "Gide et la vie sociale," currently in
1020
FRENCH REVIEW
progress. Both essays are useful addenda to George I. Brachfeld's Andrd Gide
and the Communist Temptation.
In outlining goals of this new journal, Claude Martin evokes an image of a
"Gide-workshop." As a start, these essays should inspire the sort of discussions
Professor Martin hopes will characterize the review.
Oberlin College
Vinio Rossi