Professional Documents
Culture Documents
that a party wishes to dispute a genuine the fact or facts and the evidence it ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
issue of material fact to be resolved in intends to provide in support of its docket for this action under Docket ID
the consideration of the Postal Service’s position. The Commission will hold Number EPA–R03–OAR–2006–0059. All
request, that party shall file with the hearings on a Postal Service request documents in the docket are listed in
Commission a request for a hearing made pursuant to this subpart when it the http://www.regulations.gov Web
within the time allowed in the notice of determines that there is a genuine issue site. Although listed in the electronic
proceeding. The request for a hearing of material fact to be resolved, and that docket, some information is not publicly
shall state with specificity the fact or a hearing is needed to resolve that issue. available, i.e., confidential business
facts set forth in the Postal Service’s ■ 11. Revise § 3001.174 to read as information (CBI) or other information
filing that the party disputes, and when follows: whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
possible, what the party believes to be Certain other material, such as
the fact or facts and the evidence it § 3001.174 Rule for decision. copyrighted material, is not placed on
intends to provide in support of its The Commission will issue a decision the Internet and will be publicly
position. The Commission will hold on the Postal Service’s proposed available only in hard copy form.
hearings on a Postal Service request provisional service in accordance with Publicly available docket materials are
made pursuant to this subpart when it the policies of the Postal Reorganization available either electronically through
determines that there is a genuine issue Act, but will not recommend http://www.regulations.gov or in hard
of material fact to be resolved, and that modification of any feature of the copy for public inspection during
a hearing is needed to resolve that issue. proposed service which the Postal normal business hours at the Air
§ 3001.171 [Amended]
Service has identified in accordance Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
with § 3001.172(a)(3). The purpose of Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
■ 9. In § 3001.171, remove paragraph (b) this subpart is to allow for consideration Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
and remove the designation for of proposed provisional services within 19103. Copies of the State submittal are
paragraph (a). 90 days, consistent with the procedural available at the Virginia Department of
§ 3001.173 [Amended] due process rights of interested persons. Environmental Quality, 629 East Main
Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
■ 10. In § 3001.173, revise paragraphs § 3001.181 [Amended]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
(b), (d), and (e) to read as follows: ■ 12. In § 3001.181, remove paragraph Sharon McCauley, (215) 814–3376, or by
§ 3001.173 Procedures—expedition of (b), remove the designation of paragraph e-mail at mccauley.sharon@epa.gov.
public notice and procedural schedule. (a). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
* * * * * [FR Doc. E6–19289 Filed 11–15–06; 8:45 am]
(b) Persons who are interested in I. Background
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
participating in a proceeding to consider On July 11, 2006 (71 FR 39330), EPA
Postal Service requests to establish a published a notice of proposed
provisional service may intervene rulemaking (NPR) for the
pursuant to Subpart A of the rules of ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Commonwealth of Virginia. The NPR
practice. Parties may withdraw from a AGENCY proposed approval of the removal of an
proceeding by filing a notice with the Agreement from the Virginia SIP. The
Secretary of the Commission. 40 CFR Part 52
Agreement was written for the control of
* * * * * [EPA–R03–OAR–2006–0059; FRL–8242–4] emissions of sulfur dioxide from the
(d) When the Postal Service files a Burlington Industries facility located in
request under the provisions of this Approval and Promulgation of Air Clarksville, Mecklenburg County,
subpart, it shall on that same day file a Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; Virginia. This Agreement has been
notice that briefly describes its proposal. State Implementation Plan Revision for superseded by a federally enforceable
Such notice shall indicate on its first Burlington Industries, Clarksville, VA state operating permit dated May 17,
page that it is a notice of a Request for 2004, which imposes operating
Establishment of a Provisional Service AGENCY: Environmental Protection restrictions on the facility’s boilers and
to be considered under §§ 3001.171 Agency (EPA). the subsequent shutdown of the
through 3001.176. ACTION: Final rule. remainder of the facility. The formal SIP
(e) Within 5 days after receipt of a revision was submitted by Virginia on
Postal Service request under the SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State July 12, 2004.
provisions of this subpart, the Implementation Plan (SIP) revision Other specific requirements of the SIP
Commission shall issue a notice of submitted by the Commonwealth of revision for Burlington Industries,
proceeding and provide interested Virginia. This revision consists of the Clarksville, Virginia and the rationale
persons a minimum of 15 days after removal of a Consent Agreement for EPA’s proposed action are explained
filing of the Postal Service request (Agreement) currently in the SIP for the in the NPR and will not be restated here.
within which to intervene. In the event control of sulfur dioxide emissions from No public comments were received on
that a party wishes to dispute a genuine Burlington Industries located in the NPR.
issue of material fact to be resolved in Clarksville, Virginia. This Agreement
the consideration of the Postal Service’s has been superseded by a federally II. General Information Pertaining to
request, that party shall file with the enforceable state operating permit that SIP Submittals From the
Commission a request for a hearing imposes operating restrictions on the Commonwealth of Virginia
within the time allowed in the notice of facility’s boilers and the shutdown of In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
proceeding. The request for a hearing the remainder of the facility. This action that provides, subject to certain
shall state with specificity the fact or is being taken under the Clean Air Act conditions, for an environmental
facts set forth in the Postal Service’s (CAA). assessment (audit) ‘‘privilege’’ for
filing that the party disputes, and when DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is voluntary compliance evaluations
possible, what the party believes to be effective on December 18, 2006. performed by a regulated entity. The
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:50 Nov 15, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16NOR1.SGM 16NOR1
66680 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 221 / Thursday, November 16, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
legislation further addresses the relative renders this statute inapplicable to not have a substantial direct effect on
burden of proof for parties either enforcement of any Federally authorized one or more Indian tribes, on the
asserting the privilege or seeking programs, since ‘‘no immunity could be relationship between the Federal
disclosure of documents for which the afforded from administrative, civil, or Government and Indian tribes, or on the
privilege is claimed. Virginia’s criminal penalties because granting distribution of power and
legislation also provides, subject to such immunity would not be consistent responsibilities between the Federal
certain conditions, for a penalty waiver with Federal law, which is one of the Government and Indian tribes, as
for violations of environmental laws criteria for immunity.’’ Therefore, EPA specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
when a regulated entity discovers such has determined that Virginia’s Privilege FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
violations pursuant to a voluntary and Immunity statutes will not preclude action also does not have Federalism
compliance evaluation and voluntarily the Commonwealth from enforcing its implications because it does not have
discloses such violations to the program consistent with the Federal substantial direct effects on the States,
Commonwealth and takes prompt and requirements. In any event, because on the relationship between the national
appropriate measures to remedy the EPA has also determined that a state government and the States, or on the
violations. Virginia’s Voluntary audit privilege and immunity law can distribution of power and
Environmental Assessment Privilege affect only state enforcement and cannot responsibilities among the various
Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1–1198, provides have any impact on Federal levels of government, as specified in
a privilege that protects from disclosure enforcement authorities, EPA may at Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
documents and information about the any time invoke its authority under the August 10, 1999). This action merely
content of those documents that are the Clean Air Act, including, for example, approves a state rule implementing a
product of a voluntary environmental sections 113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to Federal requirement, and does not alter
assessment. The Privilege Law does not enforce the requirements or prohibitions the relationship or the distribution of
extend to documents or information (1) of the state plan, independently of any power and responsibilities established
that are generated or developed before state enforcement effort. In addition, in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is
the commencement of a voluntary citizen enforcement under section 304 not subject to Executive Order 13045
environmental assessment; (2) that are of the Clean Air Act is likewise ‘‘Protection of Children from
prepared independently of the unaffected by this, or any, state audit Environmental Health Risks and Safety
assessment process; (3) that demonstrate privilege or immunity law. Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
a clear, imminent and substantial because it is not economically
danger to the public health or III. Final Action significant.
environment; or (4) that are required by EPA is approving the removal of the In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
law. Consent Agreement for Burlington role is to approve state choices,
On January 12, 1998, the Industries, Clarksville, Virginia as a provided that they meet the criteria of
Commonwealth of Virginia Office of the revision to the Virginia SIP. the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
Attorney General provided a legal absence of a prior existing requirement
opinion that states that the Privilege IV. Statutory and Executive Order for the State to use voluntary consensus
Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1–1198, Reviews standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
precludes granting a privilege to A. General Requirements to disapprove a SIP submission for
documents and information ‘‘required failure to use VCS. It would thus be
by law,’’ including documents and Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR inconsistent with applicable law for
information ‘‘required by Federal law to 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
maintain program delegation, not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
authorization or approval,’’ since therefore is not subject to review by the that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
Virginia must ‘‘enforce Federally Office of Management and Budget. For the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
authorized environmental programs in a this reason, this action is also not requirements of section 12(d) of the
manner that is no less stringent than subject to Executive Order 13211, National Technology Transfer and
their Federal counterparts. * * *’’ The ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
opinion concludes that ‘‘[r]egarding Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 272 note) do not apply. This rule does
§ 10.1–1198, therefore, documents or Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May not impose an information collection
other information needed for civil or 22, 2001). This action merely approves burden under the provisions of the
criminal enforcement under one of these state law as meeting Federal Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
programs could not be privileged requirements and imposes no additional U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
because such documents and requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the B. Submission to Congress and the
information are essential to pursuing
Administrator certifies that this rule Comptroller General
enforcement in a manner required by
Federal law to maintain program will not have a significant economic The Congressional Review Act, 5
delegation, authorization or approval.’’ impact on a substantial number of small U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Virginia’s Immunity law, Va. Code entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Business Regulatory Enforcement
Sec. 10.1–1199, provides that ‘‘[t]o the Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
extent consistent with requirements rule approves pre-existing requirements that before a rule may take effect, the
imposed by Federal law,’’ any person under state law and does not impose agency promulgating the rule must
making a voluntary disclosure of any additional enforceable duty beyond submit a rule report, which includes a
information to a state agency regarding that required by state law, it does not copy of the rule, to each House of the
a violation of an environmental statute, contain any unfunded mandate or Congress and to the Comptroller General
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
regulation, permit, or administrative significantly or uniquely affect small of the United States. Section 804
order is granted immunity from governments, as described in the exempts from section 801 the following
administrative or civil penalty. The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 types of rules: (1) Rules of particular
Attorney General’s January 12, 1998 (Pub. L. 104–4). This rule also does not applicability; (2) rules relating to agency
opinion states that the quoted language have tribal implications because it will management or personnel; and (3) rules
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:50 Nov 15, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16NOR1.SGM 16NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 221 / Thursday, November 16, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 66681
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:50 Nov 15, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16NOR1.SGM 16NOR1