Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The TPP is organized according to the TPP is organized according to key human drug before applying for
key sections of the drug labeling and sections in the drug’s labeling. Typical marketing approval of the drug from
links drug development activities to key sections are as follows: FDA.
specific concepts intended for inclusion • Indications and Usage Burden Estimate: FDA estimates that
in the drug labeling. The TPP is not a • Dosage and Administration sponsors of approximately 10 percent of
long summary. Generally, the TPP is • Dosage Forms and Strengths
the number of active INDs submitted to
shorter than the ultimate annotated draft • Contraindications
• Warnings and Precautions FDA annually would prepare and
labeling since it captures only a submit TPPs. This would equal
summary of the drug development • Adverse Reactions
• Drug Interactions approximately 132 TPPs per year. Based
activities and labeling concepts. Early on data received from the
TPPs can be brief depending on the • Use in Specific Populations
• Drug Abuse and Dependence Pharmaceutical Research and
status of the drug’s development Manufacturers of America, we estimate
process. • Overdosage
• Description that approximately 20 sponsors would
The Target Product Profile Template • Clinical Pharmacology submit TPPs and that each TPP would
in Appendix C of the draft guidance • Nonclinical Toxicology take approximately 20 hours to prepare
details the suggested information to be • Clinical Studies and submit to FDA. Based on the
included in each section of the TPP. The • References previous methodology and assumptions,
TPP includes information from each • How Supplied/Storage and the following chart provides an estimate
discipline comprising an NDA/BLA. Handling of the annual reporting burden for the
Within each discipline, the TPP briefly • Patient Counseling Information voluntary submission of TPPs under the
summarizes the specific studies that Description of Respondents: Sponsors draft guidance. FDA requests comments
will supply the evidence for each of applications seeking FDA approval to on this analysis of information
conclusion that is a labeling concept. A perform clinical investigations of a collection burdens.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:49 Mar 29, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM 30MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 61 / Friday, March 30, 2007 / Notices 15143
compliance with the flood insurance insurance through their local insurance requirements of the MPPP are contained
purchase requirements of the Flood agent or appropriate Write Your Own in 44 CFR 62.23(l)(1).
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as (WYO) Company. It is intended that Affected Public: Individuals and
amended. Implementation of various NFIP policies be written under the households; businesses or other for-
requirements of the MPPP should result MPPP only as a last resort, and only on profit; not-for-profit institutions; farms;
in mortgagors, following receipt of mortgages whose mortgagors have failed Federal agencies or employees; and
notification of the need for flood to respond to the various notifications State, local or tribal governments.
insurance, showing evidence of such a required by the Program. The Estimated Total Annual Burden
policy or purchasing the necessary Hours: 2,386 hours.
ANNUAL BURDEN HOURS
Burden hours
Number of Frequency of per Annual Total annual
Project/activity (survey, form(s), focus group, worksheet, respondents responses respondent responses burden hours
etc.)
(A) (B) (C) (D) = (A × B) (E) = (C × D)
Estimated Cost: $107,350. information at facsimile number (202) Written comments and suggestions
Comments: Written comments are 646–3347or email address: FEMA- regarding items contained in this notice,
solicited to (a) evaluate whether the Information-Collections@dhs.gov. and especially with regard to the
proposed data collection is necessary for Dated: March 26, 2007. estimated public burden and associated
the proper performance of the agency, response time should be directed to the
John A. Sharetts-Sullivan,
including whether the information shall Department of Homeland Security
have practical utility; (b) evaluate the Chief, Records Management and Privacy, (DHS), Ricardo Lemus, Chief, Records
Information Resources Management Branch,
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the Management Branch, Bureau of
Information Technology Services Division,
burden of the proposed collection of Federal Emergency Management Agency, Immigration and Customs Enforcement,
information, including the validity of Department of Homeland Security. 425 I Street, NW., Room 1122,
the methodology and assumptions used; [FR Doc. E7–5910 Filed 3–29–07; 8:45 am] Washington, DC 20536; (202) 514–3211.
(c) enhance the quality, utility, and Comments are encouraged and will be
BILLING CODE 9110–12–P
clarity of the information to be accepted for sixty days until May 29,
collected; and (d) minimize the burden 2007. Written comments and
of the collection of information on those DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND suggestions from the public and affected
who are to respond, including through SECURITY agencies concerning the proposed
the use of appropriate automated, collection of information should address
electronic, mechanical, or other Bureau of Immigration and Customs one or more of the following four points:
technological collection techniques or Enforcement (1) Evaluate whether the proposed
other forms of information technology, collection of information is necessary
e.g., permitting electronic submission of Agency Information Collection for the proper performance of the
responses. Comments must be Activities: Extension of an Existing functions of the agency, including
submitted on or before May 29, 2007. Information Collection; Comment whether the information will have
ADDRESSES: Interested persons should Request practical utility;
submit written comments to Chief, (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
Records Management and Privacy, ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information agencies estimate of the burden of the
Information Resources Management Collection Under Review; Form G–146, proposed collection of information,
Branch, Information Technology Nonimmigrant Checkout Letter; OMB including the validity of the
Services Division, Federal Emergency Control No. 1653–0020. methodology and assumptions used;
Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
Room 609, Washington, DC 20472. The Department of Homeland clarity of the information to be
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs collected; and
Contact Edward Connor, Deputy Enforcement (USICE), has submitted the (4) Minimize the burden of the
Director of Insurance, Mitigation following information collection request collection of information on those who
Division, Federal Emergency for review and clearance in accordance are to respond, including through the
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Management Agency, Department of with the Paperwork Reduction Act of use of appropriate automated,
Homeland Security, 202–646–3429, 1995. The information collection is electronic, mechanical, or other
edward.connor@dhs.gov, for additional published to obtain comments from the technological collection techniques or
information. You may contact the public and affected agencies. Comments other forms of information technology,
Records Management Branch for copies are encouraged and will be accepted for e.g., permitting electronic submission of
of the proposed collection of sixty days until May 29, 2007. responses.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:49 Mar 29, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM 30MRN1