You are on page 1of 51

S.O.

S e - Clarion Of Dalit - Weekly Newspaper On Web


Working For The Rights & Survival Of The Oppressed
Editor: NAGARAJA.M.R VOL.9 issue.36 .09/09/2015

Editorial : PAY UP Justice Shri H L DATTU - DAMAGES PAYMENT / FINAL SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO CHIEF
JUSTICE OF INDIA

I dont know whether secretariat staff of CJI office & DARPG / DPG officials are forwarding my
appeals for justice , e-mails to you or not. They will be held accountable for their lapses if any.
This notice is against the repeated failure of constitutional duties & indirect collusion with
criminals by previous CHIEF JUSTICEs OF INDIA. Notice is served against them , to the
office of CJI , NOT personally against you. At the individual level I do whole heartedly respect
Honourable Justice Shri H L DATTU.
Please refer my appeal for justice through DARPG ;
DLGLA/E/2013/00292
DEPOJ/E/2013/00679

In india democracy is a farce , freedom a mirage. the most basic freedom RIGHT TO
INFORMATION & EXPRESSION , is not honoured by the government,as the information
opens up the crimes of V.V.I.Ps & leads to their ill-gotten wealth. The public servants are least bothered about the
lives of people or justice to them. these type of fat cats , parasites are a drain on the public exchequer . these people want
,wish me to see dead , wish to see HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH closed . so that, a voice against injustices is silenced
forever , the crimes of V.V.I.Ps closed , buried forever.
To my numerous appeals , HRWs appeals to you ,you have not yet replied. It clearly shows that you are least bothered
about the lives of people or justice to them .it proves that you are hell bent to protect the criminals at any cost. you are just
pressurising the police to enquire me ,to take my statement, to repeatedly call me to police station all with a view to
silence me.all of you enjoy legal immunity privileges ,why dont you have given powers to the police / investigating officer
to summon all of you for enquiry ?or else why dont all of you are not appearing before the police voluntarily for enquiry ?
at the least why dont all of you are not sending your statement about the case to the police either through legal counsel or

through post? you are aiding criminals ,by denying me job oppurtunities in R.B.I CURRENCY NOTE PRESS mysore , city
civil court ,bangalore , distict court , mysore ,etc & by illegally closing my newspaper.
there is a gross, total mismatch between your actions and your oath of office. this amounts to public cheating & moral
turpitude on your part.
1.you are making contempt of the very august office you hold.
2.you are making contempt of the constitution of india.
3.you are making contempt of citizens of india.
4.you are sponsoring & aiding terorrism & organized crime.
5.you are violating the fundamental & human rights of the citizens of india and of neighbouring countries.
6.you are violating & making contempt of the U.N HUMAN RIGHTS CHARTER to which india is a signatory.
7.you are obstructing me from performing my fundamental duties as a citizen of india.
8. As a result of your gross negligence of constitutional duties you have caused me damages / losses to the tune of
RUPEES TWO CRORE ONLY.
you are hereby called upon to Pay damages to me and SHOW-CAUSE within 30 days , why you cannt be legally
prosecuted for the above mentioned crimes .

If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like
loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly
called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even
once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be
done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job ,
meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed
public servants , Chief Justice of India & Jurisdictional District Magistrate will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus
levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be
effective.
if anything untoward happens to me or my dependents , the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as
compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation
money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears
from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty judges , police officials , public servants & Constitutional fuctionaries.
Thanking you. Jai Hind , Vande Mataram.

Date : 27.06.2015..yours sincerely,


Place : Mysore , India.Nagaraja M R

JUDICIAL CORRUPTION

MY LORDS, THERES A CASE AGAINST YOU


Former Union law ministers are spearheading a campaign against sitting judges they accuse of being corrupt. What is the
higher judiciary doing to clear itself of these grave charges?
Avinash Dutt
New Delhi

Under observation: The


Supreme Court of India
Photo by K. Satheesh

Senior lawyers have


complained to the CJI
and the President that
Justice Bhalla illegally
amassed properties
The campaign by some senior lawyers and former law ministers who have questioned the integrity of sitting high court
judges is set to ratchet up the growing confrontation between the legislative and the judicial arms of the government.
Former Union law ministers Shanti Bhushan and Ram Jethmalani are leading the battle against what they claim are
corrupt practices in the highest echelons of the judiciary.
Bhushan has categorically condemned the rot he feels has set in the judicial system. The judiciary of this country is not
merely unaccountable, but corrupt and brazenly so, he wrote in a letter to President APJ Abdul Kalam on December 17.
Bhushan has demanded that the President initiate impeachment proceedings against Justice Jagdish Bhalla of the
Lucknow Bench of the Allahbad High Court. On December 14, a Supreme Court (SC) collegium recommended that
Justice Bhalla be appointed the Chief Justice of the Kerela HC.
Bhushan and Jethmalani, along with noted lawyers and former justices, including Rajendra Sachar, Indira Jaisingh and
Hardev Singh, have formed the Committee on Judicial Accountability (COJA) and presented documents to the Chief
Justice of India (CJI), YK Sabharwal, to support their complaint against the sitting judges. COJA complained to the CJI on
July 11 that Justice Jagdish Bhalla had amassed several illegal properties in the name of his wife and other close
relatives. Justice Vijender Jain, the former senior Judge in the Delhi High Court, who was recently appointed the CJ of
Punjab and Haryana HC, is also in COJAs line of fire.
By questioning the integrity of Justices Bhalla and Jain, Bhushan has thrown open the much larger question of judicial
accountability. (See interview) Leave aside taking any action against corrupt judges like Justice Jagdish Bhalla and
Justice Vijender Jain, the CJI has been actually avoiding even properly investigating charges against them, says
Bhushan. According to documents produced by COJA on 21 July 2003, Renu Bhalla bought a 7,200 sq. metre plot near
the Noida-Greater Noida expressway. On 28 March 2005, Uday Shankar, dsp, Gautam Buddha Nagar (Noidas official
name) submitted a report to the area dm in which he states that the sellers of the plot belong to the land mafia. In an
enquiry submitted to the dm on 26 June 2005, RK Singh, the area sdm, also described the sellers as belonging to the
land mafia. According to the two reports, the plots constituted a portion of the gram samaj (joint village property) land,
illegally grabbed by the land mafia. (All the documents relating to the transaction are in possession of Tehelka)
The SDMs report says that at the time of the transaction, the plot was worth Rs 7.20 crore in the open market, whereas
Renu Bhalla paid Rs 5 lakh for it. The two reports also state that the sellers of the plot have been charged in several
criminal cases, and had sold plots to several influential people to curry favour with them. Renu Bhalla is the wife of Justice
Jagdish Bhalla.
Bhushan has also drawn attention to the July 2005 draw of lots for allotment of plots in Sector 44 in Greater Noida. When
the computerised draw threw up several influential names, a few people approached the Allahabad HC alleging foulplay.
In October 2005, the HC decided that the case warranted a fresh draw of lots and ordered a cbi inquiry into the scam.
Among those who had been allotted plots in the scrapped list were Aarohi Bhalla and Sheeba Sabharwal. Aarohi Bhalla,
who is the son of Justice Bhalla, was allotted plot number f-52, while Sheeba Sabharwal, daughter-in-law of the CJI YK
Sabharwal was allotted plot number f-78. In November 2005, the Supreme Court stayed the Allahabad HC judgement,

putting the cbi enquiry and the HCs order to hold a fresh draw of lots on hold.

Admissible in court? Documents furnished by COJA against the justices


Members of COJA have offered to discuss the matter in person with the CJI but they say that they are still waiting to hear
from him. Five months after their initial request, they sent another application to the CJI in November. This time they
sought his permission to register an FIR against Justice Bhalla, claiming that their initial evidence was enough to register
an offence against him under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
The CJI did not even call us to hear our point, says Bhushan. I dont know why Justice Sabharwal is shielding Justice
Bhalla! Bhushan is equally critical of Justice Vijender Jain.
Justice Jain, who took oath as the new CJ of Punjab and Haryana HC in November, had to endure many delays before he
could be appointed to the post. The CJI had to make three efforts to promote Justice Jain. A collegium headed by the
Chief Justice of India first recommended Justice Jains name for the post in July. However, President APJ Abdul Kalam
returned the file, causing a minor embarrassment to the CJI and the Union government. When the collegium reiterated its
recommendation through the government in November, the President had to sign the file.

Earlier in May, a proposal by the CJI to make Justice Jain CJ of the Maharsahtra HC was stonewalled
by a judge in the three-member collegium who questioned Justice Jains integrity. The member on the
panel cited a complaint made to former CJI RC Lahoti against Justice Jain in January 2005. The CJI
revived the proposal a month later, but again a judge on the collegium opposed his appointment.
Finally, a fortnight later, in July 2006, the CJI made his third attempt to promote Jain, this time to the
Punjab and Haryana HC.
This time around, to address dissenting voices, the CJI also consulted other SC judges who happened
to be former chief justices of the Delhi High Court. According to reliable sources, Justice Jains former
seniors also questioned his integrity. However, on the basis of a majority, the proposal to promote him
was forwarded to the Union government for the Presidents assent.
A major hurdle in promoting Justice Jain continued on page 8 continued from page 6 was a complaint
by one Subhash Agrawal who approached then CJI RC Lahoti in January 2005 with the complaint that
Justice Jain had violated the code of conduct for judges. Agrawal claimed that Justice Jain gave a
judgement in favour of someone with whom he had family relations. He produced a copy of the
invitation card of the litigants granddaughters wedding, held in April 2001. According to the card, the
venue of the wedding was the official residence of Justice Jain. (Tehelka has obtained a copy of the
wedding card from the Central Information Commission). In November 2004, Justice Jain, hearing an
appeal, decided a civil suit in favour of the person who had held his granddaughters wedding at his
official residence.

Third time
lucky: Chief
Justice Vijender
Jain

When a
collegium
headed by the
CJI
recommended
Justice Jains
name, the
President
returned the
file

When there was no response to his complaint in October 2005, Agrawal approached the SC to find out the status of his
complaint under the rti Act. He was told that his complaint was in the relevant HC file. Not satisfied, Agrawal approached
the Central Information Commission. On the commissions insistence, the SC finally told Agrawal that his complaint had
not actually been forwarded to the HC, as the SC has no administrative jurisdiction over high court judges. Therefore,
the complaint was pending before the CJI, YK Sabharwal. The commission asked the CJI to act on the application. The
CJI finally settled the complaint, saying he found no merit in it. When Agrawal asked for reasons behind the decision, he
drew a blank.
Its not just Bhushan who feels the need to bring about accountability and transparency in the judiciary. Janata Dal (U)
president Sharad Yadav says the issue will be discussed when the Judicial Accountability Bill is tabled in Parliament.
When the government tables the bill, all its aspects will be discussed, Yadav told Tehelka.
CJI YK Sabharwal could not be reached for his comments. Despite conciliatory notes from him there are all indications
that the clamour surrounding judicial misdemeanour and the demand for greater accountability will only increase in the
days to come.
Dec 30 , 2006

Burn After Reading


BRIJESH PANDEY and SANJAY DUBEY track the Supreme Courts lack of
urgency in investigating charges of judicial corruption
WHEN SPECIAL CBI judge Rama Jain received an anonymous letter in
January 2008, telling her that the provident funds of Class 3 and Class 4
employees of the Ghaziabad court were being siphoned off, she had no idea
that she had stumbled onto the biggest judicial scam in the history of
independent India.

THE STORY OF A QUIET


BURIAL?
Special CBI judge Rama Jain uncovers
Rs 7 crore Provident Fund scam during
vigilance inquiry
Accused Ashutosh Asthana revealed
that he was paying off 36 judges
including a sitting Supreme Court
judge and 11 High Court judges

As she was the designated vigilance officer at the Ghaziabad court, she first
conducted an inquiry on her own, which uncovered the involvement of at least Supreme Court directs CBI to
three judges and the Central Nazir in the embezzlement of funds. She reported investigate, permits interrogation of all
involved judges
the matter to the Allahabad High Court, which, in turn, ordered a vigilance
Several status reports given by the
CBI to the apex court

inquiry. Holding that the report, prima facie, had merit, the court directed her to file an FIR.
Central Nazir Ashutosh Asthana was arrested on the basis of the FIR on April 10, 2008. His interrogation revealed that
Asthana was not a solo player. He claimed that he was first introduced to the scam by a district judge himself. What
followed was so shocking that even the Ghaziabad police was on the backfoot. Asthana confessed that from the Rs 7
crore embezzled, he had given cash and gifts such as airconditioners, refrigerators, expensive clothes, jewellery and
furniture to as many as 36 judges, including about 10 High Court judges and one Supreme Court judge. In a sworn
statement before a magistrate, Asthana revealed that this fraud had run from 2001 to 2007 with the active connivance of
district judges. Every month, Asthana even paid bribes to various judges, from Rs 25,000 to a whopping Rs 1.5 lakh.
When these excerpts from Asthanas confession became public, the public image of the judiciary touched a new low. In
perhaps the biggest moment of crisis for the Indian judiciary, Asthana, the main accused, has in turn named judges from
the Ghaziabad District Court to the Allahabad High Court, right up to the Supreme Court. This was not all.
These revelations stunned the Ghaziabad police. Clearly out of their depth and (justifiably) wary of taking on the powerful
judiciary, they requested the Ghaziabad court to hand over the probe to the CBI. In September 2008, the Supreme Court
transferred the case to the CBI, but with a rider: Investigate, but give us a sealed report. The PF scam, as it had come to
be known, gave the judiciary a wonderful opportunity to redeem itself in the eyes of the people but the case remained
shrouded in secrecy. Cynics then said that the whole matter would be given a quiet burial. Eighteen months after the scam
became public and four CBI status reports later, the cynics appear to have had the last laugh.

This delay and secrecy in such a highprofile scam raises various uncomfortable questions for the Indian Judiciary. Legal
luminaries believe that this is symptomatic of a larger malaise which ails the judiciary. Says jurist Ram Jethmalani, The

reputation of a judge is more important than the actual fact of his honesty. In fact, if a judge has a bad reputation, even if it
is undeserved, he should not be appointed because then nobody will have confidence in his judgements, adding, When
the judiciary expedites cases concerning the executive branch or even most prominent cases, why is such urgency not
displayed here, when the matter is extremely serious. Why this delay?
A VALID QUESTION. Asthana named 36 judges (a list of which is with
TEHELKA). Other than the fact that a few have retired, virtually nothing is
known about the fate of the judges of the Allahabad High Court and the
Supreme Court judge. Whether or not the apex court is planning to initiate or
has initiated, criminal charges against any of the judges sitting or retired
are questions that only the Supreme Court can answer.

For six years, funds worth Rs 7 crore


were embezzled and judges were
allegedly bribed

And the apex court should answer, argues former Union law minister and senior advocate Shanti Bhushan. I dont
appreciate this sealed-cover business except in very rare cases when making something public might be detrimental to
the public interest mainly if there is an army secret. Whether it is the
judiciary or the executive, all officers are appointed on the behalf of the
people. It is on the peoples behalf that the judiciary exercises its powers.
How can you keep investigations in the PF scam secret? The people have
every right to know what is going on.
VN Khare, former Chief Justice of India, concurs. These kind of things
should not be allowed to linger. This shakes the confidence of the people in
the judiciary. If there is an allegation or misconduct, it must be inquired into
immediately and strict action should be taken against the erring judges.
Why should the reputation of most judges suffer for no fault of theirs?
The biggest question which arises from this scam is the lack of will on the
part of the judiciary to rein in errant judges. Let alone the judges named by
Asthana, what about the fate of the three Ghaziabad District Judges named
by vigilance officer of the district court Special CBI Judge Rama Jain
herself? Legal luminaries say this hesitancy on the part of judges to act
against fellow judges involved in wrongdoing clearly illustrates the
prevailing mindset of the judiciary.

When the judiciary expedites cases


concerning the executive branch or even
most prominent cases, why is such urgency
not being displayed in this matter?

I know of a retired Chief Justice of India who is one of the most honest
RAM JETHMALANI, Jurist
judges I have ever seen. Its difficult to imagine a more honest person.
However, when a responsible minister made complaints to him against a corrupt High Court Judge, he did not grant
permission for an investigation because he felt that as the head of the judicial family, it was his job to protect judges, be
they corrupt or not, says Shanti Bhushan. Ram Jethmalani chips in sarcastically, This is the reason why judges call each
other brother judge.
IT IS not only cases like the PF scam which taints the image of the judiciary, but also the extreme reluctance on the part of
the judiciary to be open and transparent. Reams and reams of paper have gone towards pious exhortations by the
judiciary asking the government to refrain from corruption and work in an efficient manner. But sadly, no judge has held
forth at length on the need for the judiciary to refrain from corruption. Even attempts to exercise the Right to Information
with respect to the office of the CJI came a cropper as the CJIs office was always declared out of bounds. It took a
historic verdict by the Delhi High Court to declare that the office of the CJI was not immune from accountability and
outside the purview of the RTI Act. Senior lawyers and retired chief justices feel that if the judiciary is not transparent or
accountable, it only means that they are trying to hide something. Justice Khare feels, Judges are more accountable than
other persons because they hold a very high post. The very existence of the judiciary is based on the faith of the common
man in it. If that faith is not there, how can the judiciary function?

What incenses them is the behaviour of the government with regard to the
Judges Assets Declaration Bill which the government tried to introduce in
No judge holds forth at length on the
2009. The opposition erupted in protest and forced the government to defer the need for the judiciary to refrain from
bill. Jethmalani terms the governments approach to this bill as a
corruption
conspiracy of corruption. The government is scared to take on the
judiciary. Its clear that the executive wants to cosy up to the
judiciary. Agrees retired CJI V N Khare, Why should there be any
hesitancy to declare assets at all on the part of judiciary? The whole
episode is beyond me. In a recent development, the Supreme
Court has reiterated before the Delhi High Court that the CJIs office
is outside the purview of the RTI Act.
Another assault on the public image of the judiciary is the Dinakaran
episode. Currently, judges are appointed to the Supreme Court by
the Supreme Court Collegium, a group of judges chaired by the
Chief Justice of India. When Chief Justice Dinakaran of the
Karnataka High Court was elevated to the Supreme Court, the state
Bar and legal luminaries rose up in protest because the Collegium
appeared to have dismissed, or, at least, not have considered the
Corruption charges are swept under the carpet by
serious allegations of corruption against him. According to Senior
the judiciary. But this has given a shield of total
Advocate Soli Sorabjee, The Dinakaran episode shows that the
immunity to the judges, who think they can get
Collegium is not working satisfactorily. You must have a national
away with anything
commission for judges which should be made up of judges, eminent
jurists and senior government officials. This council should have the
SHANTI BHUSHAN, Former law minister
power to get independent information and evaluate it. Shanti
Bhushan feels that as judges are extremely busy with hearing
cases, there should be a full-time commission whose sole function is to pick judges for the High Court and the Supreme
Court and feels that the commission should also have its own bureau of investigation. They should not be dependent on
either the local police, who might be afraid to investigate judges, or on an overburdened CBI.
But all this is very hard to achieve. Jurists feel that the judges of the higher courts have converted themselves into a union
of sorts and are trying to protect each other. Their approach is to sweep every allegation under the carpet. Dont allow the
public to know about it. Let the public believe that our judiciary is very honest. But this has been counterproductive. It has
given a shield of total immunity to the judges and they think they can get away with anything. This has led to an increase
in corruption in the judiciary, states Shanti Bhushan. Time and again, opportunities have arisen for the judiciary to
reinvent itself in a new avatar. And time after time, it has failed. Caesars wife, they say, should be above suspicion.
Whatever the cost it might take to ensure it.
WRITERS EMAIL
brijesh@tehelka.com
sanjay@tehelka.com

From Tehelka Magazine, Vol 6, Issue 41, Dated October 17, 2009

Half of last 16 chief justices have been corrupt


By churumuri

Judicial corruption is a bull few in India are willing to attach their names to. There are whispers of this or
that sitting judge making piles or cash; of sons, daughters and other near and dear ones acting as
brokers for cases, deals, etc, but none of those allegations see the light of day.
Not because the media is a willing accomplice but because of the sword of contempt of court hanging
over us.
For long, truth was not, repeat not, a defence in the case of contempt. Although that is now no longer the
case, judicial corruption still isnt headline news like corruption in other spheres of Indian life. The case of
Justice P.D. Dinakaran is one of the rare exceptions and that too only in sections of the media.
In September 2009, the Supreme Court lawyer Prashant Bhushan, in an interview to Shoma
Chaudhury of Tehelkamagazine, said half of the last 16 chief justices were corrupt. The comment invited
the apex courts contempt. Now, Bhushans father, the noted jurist Shanti Bhushan has joined issue.
In his application before the Supreme Court praying for his impleadment as respondent No.3 in the case of
the Amicus Curiae vs Prashant Bhushan, Bhushan senior repeats his sons charge that eight out of the last
16 CJs were corrupt, even going so far as to deliver the names of the corrupt in a sealed cover.
In the applicants opinion, eight [of the last 16 chief justices] were definitely corrupt, six were definitely
honest and about the remaining two, a definite opinion cannot be expressed whether they were honest or
corrupt.
Below is the full text of Shanti Bhushans application, published in the public interest.
***
To
The Honble Chief Justice of India &
His companion justices of the Supreme Court of India
The humble application of the Petitioners above named.
Most respectfully showeth:
1.

That the applicant is filing the present application for his impleadment as Respondent No. 3 in the
aforementioned contempt petition as the applicant is making a categorical statement in the present
application that eight of the last sixteen Chief Justices of India were definitely corrupt and also providing the
names of those eight definitely corrupt Chief Justices in a sealed cover as an annexure along with the present
application.

2.

The applicant is a practicing advocate who was enrolled on 8 July 1948. He has appeared in each and
every High Court in the country. He is well acquainted with the manner in which the Indian judiciary has been
functioning and how its character has been changing over the years.

3.

That the applicant has been a part of the campaign for judicial accountability since its inception in the
year 1990.

4.

That there was a time when it was almost impossible even to think that a judge of a High court or the
Supreme Court could be corrupt. Things have changed drastically during the last 2 or 3 decades during which
corruption has been growing in the Indian judiciary. So much so that even a sitting Chief Justice of India had
to openly admit that 20% of the judges could be corrupt. Very recently in March 2010 a sitting Chief Justice of
a high court openly made a statement. The statement of the sitting chief justice was published by the Times of
India in its issue of 6th march 2010 with the headlines, In our judiciary, anybody can be bought, says Gujarat
chief justice. A copy of the news paper report is being annexed hereto as Annexure A.

5.

That the applicant believes that the reported statement may not be correctly reflecting the perception of
the Gujarat Chief Justice, since he should be knowing as the applicant does that there are and have always
been plenty of totally honest judges, but they are also becoming the victim of this public perception since no
institution of governance in the country is taking any effective steps about dealing with corruption in the
judiciary.

6.

That India became a republic in 1950, when the people became sovereign. They got the right to constitute
their institutions, the executive, the legislature and the judiciary, to serve them, who would be accountable to
them.

7.

That before 1950, corruption was almost non existent in the High Courts. The federal court had in 1949
got Justice Shiv Prasad Sinha removed from the Allahabad High Court, merely on the finding that he had
passed 2 judicial orders on extra judicial considerations.

8.

That it however appears that thereafter the judiciary has adopted the policy of sweeping all allegations of
judicial corruption under the carpet in the belief that such allegations might tarnish the image of the judiciary.
It does not realize that this policy has played a big role in increasing judicial corruption.

9.

That the Constitution prescribed removal by impeachment as the only way of removing judges who
commit misconduct since it was believed at the time of the framing of the Constitution that misconduct by
judges of the higher judiciary would be very rare. However those expectations have been belied as is
apparent from the surfacing of a series of judicial scandals in the recent past. The case of Justice V.
Ramaswami and subsequent attempts to impeach other judges have shown that this is an impractical and
difficult process to deal with corrupt judges. The practical effect of this has been to instill a feeling of impunity
among judges who feel that they cannot be touched even if they misconduct.

10.

That corruption by judges is a cognizable offence. The Code of Criminal Procedure requires that
whenever an FIR is filed with respect to a cognizable offence, it is the statutory duty of the police to
investigate the offence. The police has to collect evidence against the accused and charge-sheet him in a
competent court. He would then be tried and punished by being sent to jail. The Supreme Court has however
by violating this statutory provision in the CrPC given a direction in its Constitution bench judgement in
theVeeraswamy case of 1991 that no FIR would be registered against any judge without the permission of the

Chief Justice of India. In not a single case has any such permission ever been granted for the registration of
an FIR against any judge after that judgement.
11.

That the result of this direction has been that a total immunity has been given to corrupt judges against
their prosecution. No wonder that judicial corruption has increased by leaps and bounds.

12.

That an honest judiciary enjoying public confidence is an imperative for the functioning of a democracy,
and it is the duty of every right thinking person to strive to achieve this end.

13.

That unless the level of corruption in the judiciary is exposed and brought in the public domain, the
institutions of governance cannot be activated to take effective measures to eliminate this evil.

14.

That it is the common perception that whenever such efforts are made by anyone, the judiciary tries to
target him by the use of the power of contempt. It is the reputation of the judge which is his shield against any
malicious and false allegations against him. He doesnt need the power of contempt to protect his reputation
and credibility.

15.

That the applicant strongly believes that a responsible citizen should be prepared to undergo any amount
of suffering in the pursuit of the noble cause of fighting for a clean judiciary.

16.

That there are two statements of Respondent no. 1 (Prashant Bhushan) published in Tehelka by
Respondent no. 2 which are alleged to constitute contempt of court. In the 1st statement, Respondent no. 1
has expressed that in his view, out of the last 16 or 17 chief justices of India, half have been corrupt.

17.

The applicant states that in his view too this statement is absolutely correct. At the time of the publication
of this report in Tehelka, the last 16 Chief Justices of India were the following:

1. Justice Ranganath

Mishra,
2. Justice K.N. Singh,
3. Justice M.H. Kania,
4. Justice L.M. Sharma,
5. Justice M.N. Venkatchalliah,
6. Justice A.M. Ahmadi,
7. Justice J.S. Verma,
8. Justice M.M. Punchhi,
9. Justice A.S. Anand,
10. Justice S.P. Bharucha,
11. Justice B.N. Kripal,
12. Justice G.B. Patnaik,
13. Justice Rajendra Babu,
14. Justice R. C. Lahoti,
15. Justice V.N. Khare,
16. Justice Y.K SabharwalOut of these, in the applicants opinion, eight were definitely corrupt, six were
definitely honest and about the remaining two, a definite opinion cannot be expressed whether they were
honest or corrupt. The signed lists identifying these eight, six and two Chief Justices of India are being
enclosed in a sealed cover which is being annexed here to as Annexure B.

18.

That in fact two former chief justices of India had personally told the applicant while they were in office
that their immediate predecessor and immediate successor were corrupt judges. The names of these four
Chief Justices of India are included in the list of the 8 corrupt Chief Justices of India.

19.

That since the applicant is publicly stating that out of the last sixteen Chief Justices of India, eight of
them were definitely corrupt, the applicant also needs to be added as a respondent to this contempt petition
so that he is also suitably punished for this contempt. The applicant would consider it a great honour to
spend time in jail for making an effort to get for the people of India an honest and clean judiciary.

20.

That the applicant also submits that since the questions arising in this case affects the judiciary as a
whole, the petition needs to be decided by the entire court and not merely by three judges handpicked by a
Chief Justice.

PRAYERS
In view of the above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to:
1.

allow the present application and implead the Applicant as a contemnor in the aforementioned contempt
petition as Respondent no. 3; and

2.

pass any other or further order/s as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and
circumstances of the case.

(Shanti Bhushan)
applicant-in-person
New Delhi
***
Photograph: courtesy Shailendra Pandey/ Tehelka
***
Full coverage: The strange case of Justice P.D. Dinakaran
CHURUMURI POLL: Is Dalit Dinakaran above the law?
If he is unfit for Supreme Court, how is he fit for Karnataka HC?
If he is unfit for Supreme Court, how is he fit for Karnataka HCII?
Integrity + competence + judicial temperament
Yella not OK, but Supreme Court silent yaake?
The brazen conduct of Justice Dinakaran
The strange case of Justice Dinakaran (continued)
Audi alteram partem? Hear the other side out?
CHURUMURI POLL: Will Justice Dinakaran be impeached?
Is CJI K.G. Balakrishnan right about P.D. Dinakaran?
CHURUMURI POLL: Is Dinakaran fit for Sikkim HC?
CHURUMURI POLL: P.D. Dinakaran vs D.V. Shylendra Kumar
Is Sikkim HCs dignity less than that of Karnatakas?

Markandey Katju triggers fresh controversy, targets


ex-CJI Balakrishnan
Katju alleged that the collegium headed by Justice Balakrishnan and also having Justice Kapadia almost
succeeded in bringing a tainted judge to the apex court
New Delhi: Stoking a fresh controversy, Press Council of India (PCI) chairperson Justice Markandey Katju on
Monday alleged that the then Chief Justice of India (CJI)K.G. Balakrishnan had pushed for the elevation of a
Madras high court judge with bad reputation to the Supreme Court.
He said that the collegium headed by Justice Balakrishnan and also having Justice S.H. Kapadia almost
succeeded in bringing the judge to the apex court but lawyers in Tamil Nadu thwarted it by producing
voluminous documentary evidence of his corruption.
Justice Balakrishnan, chairman of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), was not immediately
available for comments with his office stating that he is on an official tour to Malaysia and will be back this
weekend. Katju had earlier accused Justice Balakrishnan and two other former CJIs of improper compromises
in retaining a Tamil Nadu judge under corruption cloud during United Progressive Alliance (UPA) rule. Justice
Balakrishnan had dubbed the allegations as baseless.
A former judge of the Supreme Court, Katju made the fresh claims on his blog while also reacting to remarks
made by Justice Kapadia, in response to his Sundays post. Justice Kapadia had said that he had not brought to
Supreme Court any unfit judge.
I may remind him (Kapadia) that the Supreme Court collegium, headed by (then) CJI K.G. Balakrishnan, and
of which Justice Kapadia was a member, almost succeeded in bringing a totally unfit person into the Supreme
Court, Katju said. That judge was a judge of the Madras high court when I was Chief Justice there, so I knew
all about his bad reputation. Later, he was made Chief Justice of another high court, and was being considered
for elevation to the Supreme court, he further said. Katju said that one day during lunch interval, he went to
Justice Kapadias chamber and told him about the bad reputation of that judge, giving details. I told him that
I was not in the Supreme Court collegium, but he was, and now it was for him to do whatever he thinks proper,
and I have done my duty.
There was no use informing Justice Balakrishnan since it was he who was pushing for the judges elevation to
the Supreme Court, he wrote. Katju further said that after listening to him, Justice Kapadia thanked him and
said that in future also if he has such information it should be passed on to him. Despite this, the collegium, of
which Justice Kapadia was a member, recommended the name of that judge having questionable integrity, and
he would have definitely been elevated to the Supreme Court but for the Tamil Nadu lawyers who produced
voluminous documentary evidence of his corruption, Katju wrote.

Two Former Judges accuse Former CJI Balakrishnan of Fixing & Corruption
http://barandbench.com/two-former-judges-accuse-former-cji-balakrishnan-fixing-and-corruption

Corruption: 'Approachable' ex-CJI Balakrishnan not to quit


Controversies on the former Chief Justice of India (CJI), KG Balakrishnan have been
refueled when a retired Kerala High Court judge hurled fresh allegations on him. However,
Balakrishnan refused to resign as the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) chief
over "such absurd" accusations.
The High Court judge (retired) Justice Shamsuddin, during an interview with a leading TV
channel, claimed that Balakrishnan was "approachable" when he (KGB) was the CJI.
Without taking anyone's name in particular, Shamsuddin said that a Bangalore based
person in 2009 asked him (Shamsuddin) how to approach Balakrishnan's son and son-inlaw in connection with a pending case in the Supreme Court. The person allegedly wanted
to influence Balakrishnan's kin over the case.
Shamsuddin also urged the government to intensify the speed of investigation on the
corruption charges against KGB. However, ruling out Shamsuddin's allegations against
him, KGB argued, "What he (Shamsuddin) is saying is that somebody approached him to
introduce my son-in-law or some relative. He must say who approached him. He must say
in which case I favoured anybody in any case. Somebody came to him probably because of
his dealings." "There is no allegation against me. Somebody approached Shamsuddin so
why should I resign?" asserted KGB. Despite KGB's denial, Shamsuddin's fresh allegations
against the former CJI indeed raised a new controversy. The Left parties in Kerala,
however, claimed that Justice Shamsuddin must back his claims and should reveal the
name of the person who allegedly wanted approach Balakrishnan's family members.

PIL - Accountability of Judges

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF

NAGARAJA . M.R editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 , HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore 570017 , Karnataka State
.....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Justice of India & Others


....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION


OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF
MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,

Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion

Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

1. Facts of the case:


"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of
low calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight
among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons
just before the independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston
Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt peoples representatives ,
police , public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned judges fall among the
category of churchills men Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.
2. Eventhough the information is readily available with SCI , information was denied citing
unavailability. If at all information is not truly available , why didnt the CPIO TRANSFER rti
application to concerned departments of SCI , Ministry of Law , Justice , Respective High
Courts , etc.
3. Does not court administarative officer posess SERVICE REECORDS of each employee
including judges. If not on what basis they give promotions , transfers , salary , etc to judges ?
The person who posess SR can give infor mation about guilty judges. Why CPIO not asking
that person to share infor mation ?
4. If a commonman is alleged of a petty crime he is immediately arrested , put behind bars.
Police spend thousands of rupees for investigation to prosecute that petty criminal. Judges
spend hours to hear that case & prepare judgements running into tens of pages sometimes
even over & above thousand pages. Fine . When the very same police & judge themselves
committ grave crimes detrimental to national security , integrity , etc , no arrests , no
prosecution only cover-up , WHY ? Are Judges & Police above Law ? Is Judges MAFIA at
play ?
5. The action of CPIO SCI amounts to cover up of judges & their crimes. Thereby , CPIO is
also committing a crime. With respect to previous RTI Appeals also CPIO & RTI First
Appellate Authority SCI have repeatedly committed crimes by covering up judges & their
crimes. Billions of indians are barely sustaining on a single piece meal a day , we lower
middle class people toiling hard to earn a few hundreds of rupees but still paying tax. Is it not
shame to them / shame to JUDGEs that they draw pay & perks amounting to lakhs of rupees
from our money , from taxes paid by us still not do their constitutional duties properly.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Are Judges above Law & can go scot free ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , free expression & protection to life & liberty.

4. Averment:
GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES MENTIONED IN
THE BELOW MENTIONED WEB SITES & FOLLOWING ARTICLES.
We salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police , parliament & state legislative
assemblies. our whole hearted respects to them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU
TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS
WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I
AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR
OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT
OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLES FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN
RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC
INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO
APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING
TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE ,
ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY
CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
Atrocities on Women by JUDGES
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges
A Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System
http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,
Justice Sathasivam - Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam---are-you-deaf-dumb-blind ,

Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up


https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rajiv-gandhi-assassination-cover-up ,
SHAME SHAME MPs & MLAs
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-mps-mlas ,
JUDGEs or Brokers of Justice
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-or-brokers-of-justice ,
RTI & Land Golmaal
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-land-golmaal-in-karnataka ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
Hereby , we do request CPIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India
, New Delhi to answer the following questions in public interest , for safeguarding national
security , National unity & integrity & to legally apprehend anti-nationals , criminals within the
judiciary & police. Judges are not superior human beings , some of them have even became
judges through devious means other than merit , integrity. Judges are public servants drawing
salary & perks from public exchequer and accountable to public as any other common man is.
We salute our freedom fighters , military personnel & martyrs for all the sacrifices made by
them. Let us build a strong , Secular , Democratic India by getting rid off few corrupt elements
, anti nationals , traitors among public servants , among judiciary & among police who are
greater threat to Indias unity & integrity than Pakistani terrorists or chinese military.

Information input forms part of process of ones expression. Ones expression in any forms
written , oral , etc becomes information input to the opposite person , in turn he expresses his
reply. Information & Expression are inseparable parts & form lifeline of a democracy. That is
the reason , Right to Expression is the basic fundamental right as well as human right of
every Indian citizen. When a persons right to expression is violated , his other rights to
equality , justice , etc also are violated. Suppression of Information amounts to curbing of
Expression.

In a democracy , people have a right to know how the public servants are functioning.
However till date public servants are hiding behind the veil of Officials Secrets Act (which is of
british vintage created by british to suppress native indians). By this cover-up public servants

are hiding their own corruption , crimes , mismanagement , failures , etc. even RTI Act is not
being followed intoto by public servants. However the recent delhi high court ruling affirming
that CJI is under RTI purview & bound to answer RTI request , is noteworthy.

Our previous RTI request to CJI , union home secretary of GOI, President of India , DG & IGP
of GOK and others were not honored. The information I sought were answers to the following
questions mentioned in the below mentioned websites . the questions concerned the past ,
present continuing injustices meted out to millions of Indian citizens , due to wrong / illegal
work practices of Indian judges , police & public servants . The information we sought would
expose the traitors , anti-nationals , criminals in public service. The information we are
seeking are no defense secrets , no national secrets. The truthful information exposes the
anti-nationals , traitors in the public service & strengthens our national security , national unity
& integrity.
Please read RTI First Appeal to following public authorities :
1. RTI Appellate Authority , O/O Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India , New Delhi.
2. RTI Appellate Authority , o/o RBI Governor , RBI HQ , Mumbai
3. RTI Appellate Authority , o/o Chief Minister , Government of Karnataka , Vidhana Soudha ,
Bangalore.
4. RTI Appellate Authority , BSNL Corporate office , New Delhi.

Hereby , i do request the honourable supreme court of india , for a Supreme Court monitored
CBI Enquiry into this whole issue as karnataka police are helpless , they don't have legal
powers to prosecute high & mighty , constitutional functionaries. They have not even enquired
the guilty VVIPs even once however Under pressure from higher-ups they repeatedly called
me the complainant to police station took statements from me all for closing the files.

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ
of Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following
cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.

The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other
courts through e-mail , DARPG website & through regular mail requesting them to consider
those as PILs. But none of them were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not

given. See How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are sensitive towards
life , liberty of citizens , commonmen & see how careless our judges are towards anti national
crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees.

That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in
any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:

In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
(i) Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for :
writ of Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following
cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.

(ii) to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed
necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
Read : https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/pil---writ-of-mandamus-1 ,

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER
PRAY.

Date : 22nd April 2015.Filed By : Nagaraja.M.R.


Place : Mysuru IndiaPetitioner in person

Enclosed :
RTI Appellate Authority , O/O Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India , New Delhi.

RTI Appeals Not Answered - Crimes Cover-up

To ,
RTI Appellate Authority ,
O/O Chief Justice of India ,
Supreme Court of India ,
New Delhi.

APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA


& GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.


ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,
EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN 570017.
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will
be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly
hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political
squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made
this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India &
Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by
some of our criminal , corrupt peoples representatives , police , public servants &
Judges. Some of the below mentioned judges fall among the category of churchills
men Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.
Eventhough the information is readily available with SCI , information was denied
citing unavailability. If at all information is not truly available , why didnt the CPIO

TRANSFER rti application to concerned departments of SCI , Ministry of Law ,


Justice , Respective High Courts , etc.
Does not court administarative officer posess SERVICE REECORDS of each
employee including judges. If not on what basis they give promotions , transfers ,
salary , etc to judges ? The person who posess SR can give infor mation about guilty
judges. Why CPIO not asking that person to share infor mation ?
If a commonman is alleged of a petty crime he is immediately arrested , put behind
bars. Police spend thousands of rupees for investigation to prosecute that petty
criminal. Judges spend hours to hear that case & prepare judgements running into
tens of pages sometimes even over & above thousand pages. Fine . When the very
same police & judge themselves committ grave crimes detrimental to national
security , integrity , etc , no arrests , no prosecution only cover-up , WHY ? Are Judges
& Police above Law ? Is Judges MAFIA at play ?
The action of CPIO SCI amounts to cover up of judges & their crimes. Thereby ,
CPIO is also committing a crime. With respect to previous RTI Appeals also CPIO &
RTI First Appellate Authority SCI have repeatedly committed crimes by covering
up judges & their crimes. Billions of indians are barely sustaining on a single piece
meal a day , we lower middle class people toiling hard to earn a few hundreds of
rupees but still paying tax. Is it not shame to them / shame to JUDGEs that they draw
pay & perks amounting to lakhs of rupees from our money , from taxes paid by us
still not do their constitutional duties properly.
GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES
MENTIONED IN THE BELOW MENTIONED WEB SITES & FOLLOWING ARTICLES.
We salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police , parliament &
state legislative assemblies. our whole hearted respects to them. HEREBY , I DO
HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE
FOLLOWING QUESTIONS WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION
SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME
HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES
WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLES
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR
JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH ,
INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO
ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE
SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN LEGAL
SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY , POLICE ,
PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
Atrocities on Women by JUDGES
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges

A Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System


http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,
Justice Sathasivam - Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam---are-you-deaf-dumbblind ,
Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rajiv-gandhi-assassination-cover-up ,
SHAME SHAME MPs & MLAs
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-mps-mlas ,
JUDGEs or Brokers of Justice
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-or-brokers-of-justice ,
RTI & Land Golmaal
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-land-golmaal-in-karnataka ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
Hereby , we do request CPIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India , Supreme
Court of India , New Delhi to answer the following questions in public interest , for
safeguarding national security , National unity & integrity & to legally apprehend antinationals , criminals within the judiciary & police. Judges are not superior human
beings , some of them have even became judges through devious means other than
merit , integrity. Judges are public servants drawing salary & perks from public
exchequer and accountable to public as any other common man is.
Please give following information :
Main A :
1. Please give me The address of salary disbursing officer in supreme court of
india. Salary disbursing officer will be maintaining service records of all
employees of supreme court of india including judges. These records are used
for disciplinary action , promotion , transfer of judges. If not within SCI , please
give the address of the outside public official who maintains service records of

supreme court judges and kindly compile information from him and give it to
me orelse transfer my RTI application to him.
2. Please give me the list of serving as well as retired supreme court judges
with allegations against them and the action taken thereof. Reasons for taking
action / criminal prosecution or not taking action.
3. Please give me the list of serving as well as retired high court judges with
allegations against them and the action taken thereof. Reasons for taking action /
criminal prosecution or not taking action.
4. Please give me the list of serving as well as retired district & taluk court
judges with allegations against them and the action taken thereof. Reasons for
taking action / criminal prosecution or not taking action.
5. Some of the high courts are demanding higher RTI application fees than
stipulated by law. Eventhough requisite fees has been paid before transfer of
RTI application to high courts. Please give me the details of action taken by
supreme court of india against erring high courts.
6. Give me the List of petitions with date made by Shri . Nagaraja Mysore
Raghupathi alias Nagaraja M R TO SUPREME COURT OF INDIA THROUGH POST
, THROUGH E-MAIL & THROUGH website of DPG / DARPG. Action taken or not
taken with reasons thereof with respect to each petition.
7. Please give me list of actions , follow up actions taken by supreme court of
india , to safe guard the HUMAN RIGHTS & FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS of Nagaraja
M R editor of SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for justice. He repeatedly
appealed to SCI highlighting violations of his human rights & fundamental
rights. After appealing to SCI only editor Nagaraja M R suffered more injustices ,
attempts on his life , etc , may be JUDGEs MAFIA is in deal with outside
MAFIA. Police are helpless & practically dont have power to question supreme
court judges & other VVIPs. Did SCI constitute SCI monitored enquiry committee
with full legal authority to look into the issue.
8. Judges preach too much & practice less. They give lectures , judgements
running into hundreds of pages eliciting legality, moral virtues , humanity , etc.
But cover up information leading to crimes / accountability of judges. The
judges committee like a mafia deals it within without subjecting the accussed
judge to public scrutiny & public trial. It is almost similar to a whore / bitch
giving a lecture on virginity to women. To refresh your memory , Please go
through following websites to know about facts , actual cases of crimes by
judges. Please give us information regarding action taken or not taken with
reasons there of with respect to each case mentioned in the following websites:
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges ,

http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System
,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,

9. Please give me the list of actions , follow up actions taken by supreme court
of india to safeguard the human rights of prisoners , witnesses & evidences .
10. Please give me the list of actions , follow up actions taken by high courts of
india to safeguard the human rights of prisoners , witnesses & evidences .
11. Please give me the list of supreme court judges , high court judges &
district / taluk judges (both serving & retired) who received favourable allotment
of sites , etc which is nothing but a form of kick back for favours shown by
judge. Please give me the list of action taken or not taken by supreme court of
india with reasons thereof in each case.
12. Please give me the list of action taken against by supreme court of india
against CPIO & PIO of supreme court of india , who repeatedly failed to give
me information . thereby , CPIO & PIO are covering up crimes of guilty judges ,
violating RTI Act & violating human rights / fundamental rights of editor Nagaraja
M R together with public.

Main B :
1 . How many judges are booked for graft , sexual crimes , crimes against women ,
irregularities , amassing disproportionate wealth , failure of duty , getting illegal
allotment of sites & other crimes since independence till date , yearwise ?
2. what action taken casewise ?
3. are the action taken similar to commoners , common people committing same type
of crimes ?
4. did all the cases handled by tainted judges subjected to review , retrial by other
honest judges ?
5. how many advocates were prosecuted by court for influencing witnesses /
evidences , for tutored / concocted evidences , etc since independence till date ,
yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?
6. how many police officials / law enforcing officials were prosecuted by court for
influencing , intimidating witnesses through threats , 3rddegree torture , for concocted
evidences , etc since independence till date , yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?

7. how many police / law enforcement officials were prosecuted for lock-up deaths ,
fake encounters , illegal detention , 3rd degree torture , etc since independence till
date , yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?
8. in how many cases police / law enforcement officials were made to pay
compensation to innocent victims who were wrongly charged , detained & tortured ,
murdered by police , since independence till date , yearwise ? what action ? if not
why ?
9. in some cases , on appeal judgements of higher court turns down the judgement of
lower court. In how many such cases , lower court judge is made to pay compensation
to victims of their wrong judgement , since independence till date yearwise ? what
action ? if not why ?
10. how many judges have defaulted in filing their annual financial returns giving out
their wealth , income details , yearwise since independence till date ? what action ? if
not why ?
11. how you are verifying the annual financial returns of judges ?
12. since independence , how many convicts have been sentenced to death by
hanging , yearwise ?
13. how many death sentances were carried out & how many are pending ?
14. how many police officials were made to pay compensation & prosecuted for
defamation , when innocents falsely charged by police were acquitted , dropped from
charges by courts ? if not why ?
15. how many lower court judges were made to pay compensation & prosecuted for
defamation , when innocents wrongly convicted by lower court , but on appeal higher
courts acquitting , dropping them of charges ? if not why ?
16. are judges getting paid from public exchequer , for their expenses on liquor /
alcohol , body massages , etc in their TA DA bill while on tour , official visits ,
official parties hosted by judges ?
17. how many appeals for justice concerning public welfare , violation of human &
fundamental rights , threat to lives / livelihood , etc were made to supreme court of
india , by nagaraja mysore raghupathi alias nagaraja M R alias myself since 1990 till
date ? appeals were made through ordinary post , registered post , e-mail & by web
through DARPG , DPG. What ACTION taken by supreme court of india with respect to
each appeal ?
18. due to negligence / connivance of supreme court judges injustices were meted out
to public & public are still suffering injustices. Crimes which could have been
prevented by SC happened eventhough brought to early notice of supreme court. What
action against erring SC Judges ? if not why ?

19. I have repeatedly offered my services to supreme court of india , to apprehend


criminals within judiciary , police & public service. What action taken by supreme
court of india ? if not why ?
20. in my legal struggle for justice , due to negligence / connivance of SCI judges I
have suffered murder attempts on my life , job losses , my newspaper closed , not
getting press accreditation to my web news papers , threats by rowdies , police , etc.
what action against erring chief justice of india ? if not why ?
21. I repeatedly appealed to supreme court of india to permit me to appear as amicus
curie before supreme court of india & jain commission of enquiry regarding late PM
Rajiv Gandhi assassination case. I was not permitted why ?
22. who are the judges covering-up Rajiv Gandhi assassination case ? what action
taken ? if not why ?
23. Law is one & same for all , but law enforcement & law interpretation is not same
for common people , Judges & Police ? why ?

NOTE : PLEASE TAKE NOTE THAT YOUR CONTINUED NEGLIGENCE TO PROVIDE


INFORMATION , JUSTICE TO EDITOR NAGARAJA M R LEADS TO THE THREAT TO
THE LIFE , LIVLIHOOD OF HIMSELF & HIS WHOLE FAMILY. YOU ARE LIABLE TO
PAY COMPENSATION. DONT TRANSFER THIS CASE , APPLICATION TO POLICE
THEY DONT HAVE POWER TO ENQUIRE JUDGES LET ALONE TAKE ACTION. PLEASE
ENTRUST THE CASE TO TRANSPARENTLY CONSTITUTED SUPREME COURT
MONITORED ENQUIRY COMMITTEE TO LOOK INTO THE WHOLE ISSUE.
I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best
of my knowledge & belief. If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for
the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages ,
transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB
personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police
station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police station
for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning
must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to
me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of
lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police , revenue
officials , District Magistrate & Chief Justice of India together with above mentioned
accused public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake
charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this
complaint is & will be effective.
If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human
rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves , If anything untoward like hit & run
cases , murder attempts , unnatural deaths , etc happens to me or to my
dependents or to my family members - In such case Chief Justice of India together

with the jurisdictional revenue & police officials will be responsible for it , in such case
the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as compensation to survivors
of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that
compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the
money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property ,
etc of guilty police officials , guilty Judges , guilty public servants & guilty
Constitutional functionaries.

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR


1995-2015 .

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE INFORMATION :


CPIO , o/o Chief Justice of India , SUPREME COURT OF INDIA , NEW DELHI.

FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733465 for rupees TWENTY only

DATE : 28.03.2015 ..NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA.. .( APPLICANT)

APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA


& GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.


ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,
EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,

HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN 570017.

"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of
low calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight
among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons
just before the independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston
Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt peoples representatives ,
police , public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned judges fall among the
category of churchills men Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.
Eventhough the information is readily available with SCI , information was denied citing
unavailability. If at all information is not truly available , why didnt the CPIO TRANSFER rti
application to concerned departments of SCI , Ministry of Law , Justice , Respective High
Courts , etc.
Does not court administarative officer posess SERVICE REECORDS of each employee
including judges. If not on what basis they give promotions , transfers , salary , etc to judges ?
The person who posess SR can give infor mation about guilty judges. Why CPIO not asking
that person to share infor mation ?
If a commonman is alleged of a petty crime he is immediately arrested , put behind bars.
Police spend thousands of rupees for investigation to prosecute that petty criminal. Judges
spend hours to hear that case & prepare judgements running into tens of pages sometimes
even over & above thousand pages. Fine . When the very same police & judge themselves
committ grave crimes detrimental to national security , integrity , etc , no arrests , no
prosecution only cover-up , WHY ? Are Judges & Police above Law ?
The action of CPIO SCI amounts to cover up of judges & their crimes. Thereby , CPIO is
also committing a crime. With respect to previous RTI Appeals also CPIO & RTI First
Appellate Authority SCI have repeatedly committed crimes by covering up judges & their
crimes. Billions of indians are barely sustaining on a single piece meal a day , we lower
middle class people toiling hard to earn a few hundreds of rupees but still paying tax. Is it not
shame to them / shame to JUDGEs that they draw pay & perks amounting to lakhs of
rupees from our money , from taxes paid by us still not do their constitutional duties properly.
GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES
MENTIONED IN THE BELOW MENTIONED WEB SITES & FOLLOWING ARTICLES.
At the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to the honest few public servants in
public service including judiciary. However, the corrupt in public service dont deserve respect
as individuals as they are parasites in our legal system. Still we respect the chairs they
occupy but not the corrupt individuals.
All the following articles / issues , whole articles published in the weblinks mentioned below
forms part of this appeal. The term JUDGEmentioned throught includes all public servants

discharging judicial functions right from taluk magistrates , quasi-judicial officers to Chief
Justice of India.
Indian Legal / Judicial System is manipulated at various stages & is for sale. It is a SHAME.
The persons who raise their voice seeking justice are silenced in many ways. The criminal
nexus has already attempted to silence me in many ways . If anything untoward happens to
me or to my family members , my dependents , Honourable Chief Justice of India together
with jurisdictional police officer will be responsible for it.
Hereby, we do once again offer our conditional services to the honourable supreme court of
India & other government authorities, in apprehending criminals including corrupt judges &
police. Herewith , we once again appeal to the honourable supreme court of India , to
consider this as a PIL Appeal in public interest.
The public servants & the government must be role models in law abiding acts , for others to
emulate & follow. if a student makes a mistake it is excusable & can be corrected by
the teacher. if the teacher himself makes a mistake , all his students will do the same
mistake. if a thief steals , he can be caught , legally punished & reformed . if a police himself
commits crime , many thieves go scot- free under his patronage. even if a police , public
servant commits a crime , he can be legally prosecuted & justice can be sought by the
aggrieved. just think , if a judge himself that too of apex court of the land itself commits crime
- violations of RTI Act , constitutional rights & human rights of public and obstructs the public
from performing their constitutional fundamental duties , what happens ? it gives a booster
dose to the rich & mighty , those in power , criminals in public service to committ more
crimes. that is exactly what is happenning in india. the educated public must raise to the
occassion & peacefully , democratically must oppose this criminalisation of judiciary , public
service. then alone , we can build a RAM RAJYA OF MAHATMA GANDHI'S DREAM.

Kindly go through the following articles & provide justice by giving complete truthful
information to us , by publicly answering the following questionnaire in an unambiguous
manner.
The constitution of India has prescribed certain FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES to each citizens of
India. It is the duty of every citizen to protect & uphold the dignity , honour of our democratic
institutions , to
protect our national integrity , to respect & protect the rights of our fellow citizens. No
constitutional authority has the right to obstruct the discharge of these duties by citizens of
India. No legal privileges of constitutional functionaries is superior over the FUNDAMENTAL
DUTIES OF CITIZEN'S OF INDIA.
We need rights to perform our duties. Constitution of India has guaranteed those rights as
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS to all citizens of India & by birth itself everyone of us has secured
HUMAN RIGHTS as individuals. To express ourselves , we need information , data feed
back , to ascertain whether we are getting equal opportunity , whether we are getting
equitable justice , etc , we need information . so ,
basically Right To Information is an inalienable part of our fundamental rights & human

rights. What RTI Act has done is fixed time limit , responsibilities of public servants up to
certain extent. However the citizen's fundamental right & human right to seek information
extends far beyond the scope of RTI Act.
Hereby , we seek complete truthful information from supreme court of India , with respect to
my RTI application appeal. HEREBY , WE ARE ONLY SEEKING ACCOUNTABILITY OF
PUBLIC SERVANTS IN PUBLIC INTEREST & JUSTICE. Hereby , we request you to
register this appeal as a PIL petition & to ascertain the stand of apex court on various
matters raised in my RTI Application , in public interest & equitable justice.
We salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police , parliament & state legislative
assemblies. our whole hearted respects to them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU
TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS
WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I
AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR
OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT
OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLES FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN
RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC
INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO
APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING
TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE ,
ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY
CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
Atrocities on Women by JUDGES
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges
A Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System
http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,
Justice Sathasivam - Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam---are-you-deaf-dumb-blind ,
Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rajiv-gandhi-assassination-cover-up ,
SHAME SHAME MPs & MLAs
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-mps-mlas ,

Hereby , we do request PIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India , PIO , O/O
H.E.Honorable President of India , PIO O/O Honorable Speaker of Lok Sabha , PIO O/O Dy
Chairman of Rajya Sabha , PIOs of Karnataka Raj Bhawan , Karnataka CMO , Union Home
Ministry GOI and DG & IG of Police of Government of Karnataka to answer the following
questions in public interest , for safeguarding national security , National unity & integrity & to
legally apprehend anti-nationals , criminals within the judiciary & police.
Main A :
1.
What action you have taken against judges involved in atrocities against women ,
casewise ? if not, why ?
2.
What action you have taken against judges involved in land scams , casewise ? if not ,
why ?
3.
I have shown with actual cases how manipulation / fixing takes place , from complaint
filing to judicial pronouncement stage. Are the judges & police , above law ?
4.
I have numerous PILs , RTI appeals before supreme court of india. But they were not
registered , not honoured , why ?
5.
To my legal notice / show cause notice / damage payment notice to supreme court of
india & chief justice of india , till date I have not received the reply , why ?
6.
?

Is it not the duty of supreme court of india to protect the life & liberty of all Indian citizens

7.
Is it not the failure of supreme court of india, when it failed to protect the life of a
complainant ?
8.
By negligence of their duties , are not supreme court judges aiding & abetting criminals
, anti nationals & terrorists ?
9.
While crores of Indians are barely surviving on a single piece meal a day , people dying
due to starvation , supreme court judges are getting salary & perks amounting to lakhs of
rupees from the same suffering public / public exchequer. Are not those duty shirking judges
ashamed ?
10. What action you have taken against judges involved in hushing up late prime minister
rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?
11. Why the supreme court of india didnt allow me to appear before it in the said case of
late PM Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case ?
12. Why the supreme court of india didnt protect my life , my job oppurtunities , my
newspaper from the wrath of criminal nexus ?

13. When even cable TV journalists , web journalists are getting PRESS / MEDIA
accreditation , my web news papers , myself are not getting PRESS accreditation since 9
years , why ?
14. Are the supreme court judges hand in gloves with the criminal nexus ?
Main B :
You have not taken appropriate action to my previous RTI requests , Numerous appeals for
justice & police complaints. You have not replied to show-cause notice also. Your inaction has
helped the criminals in manipulating & destroying evidences.
Your inaction / delay in performing your duties not only amounts to denial of information , but
amounts to violation of our fundamental & human rights , cover-up of crimes , aiding &
abetting criminals . The criminal nexus tried to silence me in many ways. Is not these acts of
yours a crime in itself ?
If your acts of crime cover-ups , information / evidence cover-ups , aiding & abetting criminals
, silencing a crusader is just & legal. The same type of acts of crimes performed by other
citizens will also be legal ?
Main C :
At the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to all constitutional institutions & to the
honest few in public service. Contempt of constitutional institutions , citizens of India is being
made by the corrupt persons in constitutional positions themselves. This is an appeal to the
honest few in public service , constitutional positions , to bring their corrupt colleagues to
book.
1.
does the action of MPs , MLAs taking money / receiving favors from vested
interests , to formulate policy decisions , to raise questions in parliament / legislative bodies or
to abstain from voting legal ?
2.

why transparent , fair investigation is not done in such cases ?

3.
just remember , the vulgar acts of Mr.Bora Babu Singh in state legislature &
how some MLAs vulgarly behaved with Ms.Jayalalita in state legislature , years ago. Are
these type of vulgar actions by MPs & MLAs legal ? does not these constitute contempt of
the house by MPs & MLAs themselves ?
4.
all the peoples representatives from panchayath member to president of India
must read ABCD Of Democracy provide along with.since independence of India till date ,
MPs & MLAs are forcing projects on people against the wishes of people , formulating policies
against the wishes of people. Are not such projects , government policies & Laws ,
undemocratic & illegal ?
5.
is the election commission of India verifying the authenticity of affidavits
submitted by electoral candidates ?

6.
how many candidates have been caught so far for giving false affidavits ? are all
the violators prosecuted?
7.
are the MPs , MLAs submitting their wealth details on affidavits yearly to
vigilance authorities ? defaulters , violators how many ?
8.

what legal action taken against violators , defaulters , for giving false affidavits ?

9.

who is checking the authenticity of those affidavits submitted by MPs , MLAs ?

10.
the agricultural incomes of some MPs , MLAs , their kih & kin raises even during
the time of severe drought , floods , fall in prices of agricultural products , their companies
register increase in turnover / profits even during recession , the trusts / NGOs set up by them
receive huge donations. Are all these income legal ?
Main D :
1.
we do once again offer our conditional services to the government of india , all
state governments & supreme court of india , in apprehending tax evaders , land grabbers ,
corrupt police , corrupt judges , corrupt public servants , labor law violators , etc. whom the
the government officials , vigilance authorities have failed to apprehend. Why the authorities ,
courts , supreme court of India , are not ready to utilize our service ? are they afraid of being
caught ?
2.
the public servants , courts theselves are delaying giving information / records to
us in many cases. So in the issues / cases raised by us , the clause of time bar doe not apply.
Are these delaying tactics of public servants , courts legal ?
3.
why no proper , timely action was not taken based on numerous police
complaints made by us ?
4.
why DG & IGP , Government of Karnataka , has not made any efforts to seek
legal sanction for prosecution of VVIPs ( mentioned in our complaint ) , from union & state
home ministries ?
5.
the criminal nexus is trying to silence me in many ways , but the supreme court
of India & national human rights commission has failed to undo the injustices , why ? is it
because it is not a high profile case ? is it because it is not hi-fi , does not get image ratings ,
TRPs ?
6.
the public servants are aiding underworld , naxalites & terrorists , by their
delaying tactics & denial of information , records. What action has been taken against such
anti-national elements in public service ?
7.
how many complaints are made by Nagaraj .M.R. , Human Rights Activist ,
Mysore (editor of SOS e-clarion of dalit & SOS e-voice for justice) to Karnataka police , to
national human rights commission to supreme court of India till date ? what action taken with
respect to each complaint ?

8.
the delay in taking action by public servants with respect to following cases has
resulted in more crimes , destruction / manipulation of evidences , records and more
injustices to commonman. Why the authorities did not take timely action against criminals in
following cases ?
SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-
DEALS IN COURTS & POLICE STATIONS READ :
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/satyameva-jayate ,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/01/satyameva-jayate.html ,
ACCUSED Chief Justice of India
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/accused-chief-justice-of
,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/02/accused-chief-justice-of
CROSS EXAM OF HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , SUPREME COURT OF
INDIA http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF UNION HOME SECRETARY , GOI , NEW DELHI
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF DG&IG OF POLICE , GOK , BANGALORE
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF GOVERNOR , RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ , http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/
, http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/
CROSS EXAM OF MUDA COMMISSIONER , MUDA , MYSORE
http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/ , http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/
, http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF BDA COMMISSIONER , BDA , BANGALORE
http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/ , http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,
CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED
http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218
MEGA FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
are you ready to catch tax thieves ?
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
MOBILE PHONES , CURRENCY SCANDALS
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
reliance industry where is accountability ?
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
crimes at infosys campus
http://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/214
crimes by B.D.A against a poor woman
http://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/ ,
http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212
crimes of land mafia in India
http://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/ ,
http://landscam.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212
currency thefts in RBI Press
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/80
killer colas & killer medicines of India
http://deathcola.blogpot.com/ ,
http://deathcola.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/201
HONOR OF INDIAN PALIAMENT FOR SALE
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/honor-of-indian-parliament-for-sale
Persecuted IROM SHARMILA of Puttaparthi AP pushpa kolasani on hunger strike in
anantapur district jail Andhra Pradesh
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/persecuted-irom-sharmila-of-puttaparthi-ap
9.
how many judges are caught by authorities for doing improper , immoral & illegal
acts , since independence till date ? what action taken in each case ?

10.
what action taken against copy cat judges caught red handed while copying in
public examination in Andhra Pradesh ?
11.
have you reviewed all the previous judicial decisions taken by such judges of
doubtful integrity & honesty ?
12.
is it not the duty of government & supreme court of India , to protect the
fundamental rights & human rights of all Indian citizens ?
13.
why the government & supreme court of India has failed to protect the
fundamental rights & human rights of me & those mentioned in my complaint ?
14.
how many former CJIs , supreme court & high court judges have
disproportionate wealth ?
15.
Your denial of information to my previous RTI requests amounts to suppression
of evidence , hiding crimes , what action against erring public servants ?
16.
why my previous RTI requests or part there of was not transferred to appropriate
authorities and information given to me in a consolidated form ?

Main E :
Q1. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who murder people in in lock-up / fake
encounters ?
Q2. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who apply 3rd degree torture on prisoners ?
Q3. Why not death sentence to corrupt police , who connive with criminals & backstabs our
motherland , its national security ?
Q4. Dont the police have suo-motto powers to take action in the interest of public welfare ,
law & order ?
Q5. Daily we see numerous reports of misdeeds by police , public servants , industrialists ,
etc in the media . Then why not police taking any action with respect to them ?
Q6. nowadays we see numerous reports of scams , scandals by constitutional functionaries ,
public servants in the media. Instead of wasting money , killing time by prolonging formation
of parliamentary committees , judicial commissions , why not subject those accussed public
servants to narco analysis , lie deector test , etc to ascertain truth & provide timely justice ?
Q7. If a commonman files a complaint , police / courts wants evidences , witnesses to take
action against the rich & mighty crooks. Where as if a rich person just gives a complaint
against a poor chap , he is arrested , tortured eventhough there are no evidences , witnesses.
Why this double standard ?
Q8. If a poor chap tries to collect evidences as per his fundamental rights or as per RTI ACT ,
the public servants dont give full , truthfull information. Still , police / courts dont take action

against those public servants hiding crimes. Why ?


Q9.why I was not permitted to appear as an amicus curie before jain commission of enquiry
or supreme court of india probing late prime minister rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?
Q10. The criminal nexus tried to silence me , by closing my news paper , by snatching away
my job oppurtunities in government service, by physically assaulting me , by threatening me
of false fix-ups in cases & by attempts to murder me. But no action against culprits , why ?
Q11. Whereas , I was enquired number of times by police & intelligence personnel about this
case , but the culprits were not enquired even once , why ?
Q12.who compensates the losses I have suffered due to these injustices ? are not police
responsible for it ?
Q13. Is it not the duty of police to protect the lives , livelihood of witnesses & all parties
involved , both during case & afterwards ?
Q14. How do you monitor & check corrupt police personnel & increase in their familys wealth
year after year ?
Q15. While getting appointed into government service from the rank of peon to IAS officer ,
police verification is mandatory. While appointing to sensitive defense establishments ,
research institutes in addition to police verification , central intelligence agencies cross-check
candidates background. However is there no background checks of constitutional
functionaries , MPs , MLAs , , who are privy to national secrets ? why ?
Q16. Recently , the opposition parties have made allegations during presidential allegations
that close relative of one of the front running candidates have swindled public money by their
bank , misused public money through one of their NGO. Is it true ?
Q17.has GOI funded any terrorist outfits in india or abroad ?
Q18.india preaches non-violence , panchasheel principles to the world. In india , more than
half the population are poor , people are starving to death. Inspite these background , GOI
funded & aided terrorist outfits in former east Pakistan ensuring the creation of Bangladesh ,
GOI has funded & aided terrorist outfits like LTTE , TULF , ETC in srilanka , MQM in Pakistan.
In turn these terrorist outfits have murdered thousands of innocents in those countries. Are
these acts of GOI just & legal ? Is not GOI responsible for all those murders of innocents ?
has GOI paid any compensation to those victims or their family mebers ? why not ?
Q19.within india , to reduce the influence of certain terrorist groups , GOI has funded & aided
couter terrorist groups , is it right & legal ?
Q20. In Jharkhand , chattisgarh , etc , the government has armed , trained & funded salwa
judum to counter naxalites. Salwa judum cadres are terrorizing innocents just like naxalites.
Is this action of government just & legal ?
Q21.in india, TADA , POTA is being rampantly misused by police. Even where there are no
problems of terrorism , TADA / POTA is being slapped against innocents , even children. In
M.M.Hills of Karnataka state , STF personnel charged tribal people with TADA on frivolous
charges of taking lunch to veerappan , stiching dress for the forest brigand, etc. where as the
prominent political, film , sports personalities who have links with underworld , anti national
elements & attended parties hosted by dawood Ibrahim , other dons in gulf countries , else
where. But these hi-fi people are not charged with TADA / POTA ? why ?
Q22. Film actor sanjay dutt had contacts with underworld & fully knowing well the criminal
objectives of criminals , hid the dangerous arms & ammunition in his home , which were
intended for terrorizing public. However mr.dutt is not charged with TADA / POTA instead he is
charged with illegal possession of arms act ( which is normally applied to farmers who use
illegal home made guns to scare away animals , birds in their farms ). Why this favourable
treatment of mr.dutt by police ? prosecution ? is this because dutt is politically mighty & rich ?

Q23. Law is one & same for all , the public servants, police interpretes , enforces it
differentially between rich & poor ? why this differentiation ?
Q24.recently in Bangalore police nabbed criminals belonging to international criminal
syndicate selling duplicate nokia mobiles. Every nokia mobile comes with 15 digit IMEI
number , this number is also used by police for tracking criminals. In consumer dispute at
consumer disputes redressal forum Mysore CD 49/05 , nokia company stated that all its
products come with IMEI number only & stated that the product in dispute sold by tata
indicom dealer M/S INTOTO COMMUNICATIONS , Mysore are not theirs as it doesnt have
IMEI numbers. Further nokia stated they dont have any business relationship with either tata
indicom or its dealer. However the tata indicom dealer stated that indeed his products are
genuine , first hand products , but doesnt have IMEI numbers . this proves the dealer in
collusion with tata company is selling illegal nokia mobile hand sets & cheating the public.
These mobiles are evading taxes , as well as these are without IMEI numbers best buy for
criminal elements who want to evade police tracking. What police are doing
Q25. Who , of which rank among police personnel takes the decision to close a case ie to file
B report , when after certain time limit no leads are found in investigation ?
Q26. How do you monitor corrupt police personnel , who purposefully fail to investigate case
properly , so that either the case can be closed with B report or the prosecution fails to prove
the case in court ?
Q27. Who among police takes the decision to appeal against the verdict of a lower court ,
when the prosecution fails ?
Q28. Who took the decision , not to appeal against the argentina court order acquitting
mr.quatrochi accussed in bofors scandal ?
Q29. Do you treat all the prison convicts same in the prison or does the notorious big time rich
criminals get spacious barracks with tv, news paper , adequate food , medical care , etc while
small time criminals , poor are crammed into pig sty like rooms with 60-70 inmates without
any basic requirements ?
Q30. What is the status of my complaint made to the DG & IG of police , government of
Karnataka on 10/12/2004 ? the copies of complaint was released at press meet at
patrakartara bhavan Mysore on same day, even copies were given to police & intelligence
personnel ?
Q31. Why no action , reply regarding the complaint till date ?
Q32. Our constitutional frame workers gave legal immunity privileges to certain constitutional
functionaries , so that they are not burdened with frivolous court cases & can concentrate on
their constitutional duties. But these privileges doesnt cover the individual actions of those
public servants like rape , murder , dowry harassment , tax evasion , misuse of office , etc. but
still law enforcement / police department is bound to send request to home ministry seeking
permission & home ministry sits over files for months. This gives the accussed ample time to
destroy evidences. Is it right & legal ?
Q33. Does legal immunity privileges cover their official actions alone ? if not what does it
cover ?
Q34. What is the time limit for home ministry to give sanction for the prosecution of tainted
constitutional functionaries ?
Q35. How many present MPs , MLAs , MUNICIAPAL CORPORATORS , other peoples
representatives are facing criminal charges ?
Q36. In the past , how many MPs , MLAs , corporators were facing criminal charges ,
yearwise since 1987 ? how many of them were eventually convicted ?
Q37. How many MPs , MLAs , prominent film , sports personalities have have contacts with

underworld , foreign intelligence agencies ?


Q38. How many of them have attended frequent parties hosted by underworld dons in gulf
countries , else where ?
Q39. How many MP , MLA , other peoples representatives are wanted by police in various
cases . but shown in the police records as absconding but in reality are attending the
proceedings of the house as usual ?
Q40. When did smt. Sonia Gandhi became a citizen of india ? did she occupy any public
office before naturalization ?
Q41. In india , how many MPs , MLAs , MLCs are of foreign origin or have a spouse of foreign
origin ?
Q42. Does smt. Sonia Gandhi have citizenship of any other country ?
Q43. Did she occupy any public office while enjoying dual citizenship ?
Q44. How do you monitor public servants who have spouses of foreign origin & while they are
on foreign tour , from national security perspective ?
Q45. Is mr. M.S SUBBA member of parliament a citizen of india ?
Q46. What is the status of complaint made by former union minister mr.subramanya swamy
alleging that late P.M rajiv gandhis family received money from foreign intelligence
agencies ?
Q47. In many cases like mass riots involving certain political parties , when that culprit party
comes to power all the cases involving its partymen are withdrawn by the government orelse
prosecution fails to prove its case & prefers not to appeal. Just remember Bombay riot case
involving shiv sainiks & others , when shiv sena BJP came to power in Maharashtra , all the
cases against its partymen were withdrawn. Are these type of decisions by government just &
legal ?
Q48.what damages has been done to indias national security due to mole in the PMO, as
alleged by former union minister mr.natwar singh ?
Q49. What action by the government ?
Q50. How many Indians are in the custody of police / military in various foreign countries ?
Q51. How many foreigners are there in Indian prisons ?
Q52. How GOI is protecting the human rights of these prisoners ?
Q53. Is the government paying any compensation to victims of police failures , fix-ups , , who
suffer in jail for years & acquitted by courts upon finding them as not guilty ?
Q54. Do you register murder charges / attempt to murder charges against guilty police
officers who are responsible for lock-up deaths , fake encounters & 3rd degree torture ?
Q55. How many cases has been filed since 1987 till date ?
Q56. What action has been taken against guilty police officers , STF personnel who were
responsible for gross human rights violations , 3rddegree torture , lock-up deaths of innocents
in forest brigand veerappans territory , based on justice A.J.Sadashiva commission findings ?
if not why ?
Q57. I , as a citizen of india as my fundamental duty hereby do offer my conditional services
to GOI & GOK to apprehend corrupt public servants. Are you ready to utilize my services ?
Q58. Police personnel are always in the forefront of containing crimes , mass fury , riots , etc.
they suffer more & even their family members suffer threats from the criminal elements. Do
the government provide insurance coverage to police & their family members on the lines of
defense forces ?
Q59. What is the amount of coverage to a police constable & his family ?
Q60. Who makes the premium contributions ?
Q61. Do the government provide overtime allowance , food allowance to police who daily

work beyond 8 hours of duty ?


Q62. Is the government giving any training to police personnel in public interaction , human
rights ?
Q63. Is it right to post professionally trained police to sentry , orderly duties of ministers ?
Q64. What is the ratio of police personnel to total population in india since 1987 ?
Q65. IS THE GOVERNMENT GIVING ADEQUATE FOOD, MEDICAL CARE , CLOTHING ,
LIVING SPACE TO PRISON INMATES , AS REQUIRED BY A NORMAL HUMAN EING
ACCORDING TO W.H.O NORMS ?
Q66. Is the forensic science department which conducts narcfo-analysis , lie-detector test ,
etc under the control of police department ?
Q67. Is it not right to put it under impartial control of NHRC or like bodies ?
Q68. Is the action of some police officers arranging compromise meetings & subtly insisting
the poor to tow the line of rich or else face the consequences , is it right & legal ? this
happens mostly in real estate matters.
Q69. Did government make any ransom payments to forest brigand veerappan during his
various kidnappings ?
Q70. What action has been taken based on revealations by karim telgi during narco analysis
about public servants involvement ?
Q71. How many cases of allegations against judges were made in the media about misuse of
office , criminal acts by judges from munsiff court to supreme court of India ? since 1947 till
date
Q72. are the enquiry report findings, action taken reports of such cases accessible to public ?
if not why ?
Q73. what action has been taken against guilty judges ?
Q74. are the guilty judges legally prosecuted in all such cases ? or has it just ended with their
resignation from services or his superior judge not allotting him any judicial work ?
Q75. why some high ranking judges are not legally prosecuted for their wrong doings ?
Q76. are judges above law ? are not everybody equal before law ?
Q77. do the judiciary subject , all the cases handled by accussed / tainted , guilty judges to
review , to undo past unjust judgements ?
Q78. how ? if not why ?
Q79. how do the judiciary monitor the net wealth growth of some judges including the wealth
in the name of judges family members ?
Q80. do all the judges file their annual income , wealth statements on sworn affidavits to the
higher judiciary ? defaulters how many ?
Q81. how does the judiciary verifies those statements ?
Q82. is such statements made public , on web ?
Q83. when the judgement of a lower court is turned down by the higher court , what action is
initiated against lower court judge for making unjust judgement & meating out injustice ?
Q84. when allegations of corruption , misuse of office , etc against judges are made , why the
accussed judges are not subjected to tests like poly graph , lie detector , brain mapping ,
etc , in the interest of justice & truth ?
Q85. judges are not employees of government , so they are ineligible to be the members of
Karnataka state government judicial department house building co-operative society. Then
how come , many judges including supreme court judges are admitted as members of this
society & allotted prime residential site worth crores of rupees for a few thousands by the said
society at said societys judicial layout , yelahanka , Bangalore ? while the ordinary
members like peons , clerks in judicial department are waiting for a site since years , is not

the whole thing grossly illegal ?


Q86. in more than 70% of cases before all courts in India , central government or state
government or government agency is one of the parties. How many judges or their family
members , have received out of turn , favourable allotments of sites , gas agency , petrol
pumps , etc by the government ? is not such allotments illegal ? what action ?
Q87. when a person under police custody or judicial custody suffer 3rd degree torture by
police , is not the judge of the respective court which is handling that tortured persons case
responsible for it ?
Q88. has the higher judiciary legally prosecuted respective judges & the police officers for
committing 3rd degree torture , on charges of attempt to murder & murder ? if not why ?
Q89. registrar , Mysore district & sessions court , has called for the candidatures to various
vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no : ADMN/A/10825/2003 dated
19/11/2003. Please furnish me the merit ranking list of selected candidates along with my
merit ranking for the post of peon.
Q90. registrar , Bangalore city civil court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies
in that court from the public vide notification no : ADM-I(A)422/03 dated 19/05/2003. Please
furnish me merit ranking list of selected candidates for the post of peon.
Q91. when a person doesnt get adequate food , medical care while under police custody or
judicial custody , is not the respective judge dealing that persons case responsible for it ?
what action ?
Q92. how judiciary is monitoring food & medical care to prisoners ?
Q93. numerous accussed persons are suffering in jail under judicial custody , for periods far
exceeding the legally stipulated sentence periods. For example : a pick-pocketer is in jail for
one year , the judge finds him guilty of offence & gives him 3 months sentence. What about
the excess punishment of 9 months. Is not the judge responsible for the illegal , excess
punishment of the convict ? what action against the judge in such cases ?
Q94. numerous innocents suffer in jail for years & finally the judge finds them as innocents &
acquits them of the charges. What about the prison sentence , the innocent has already
served ? is not the judge responsible for this illegal , unjust punishment to an innocent ?
remedy ? what action against the judge ?
Q95. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions & the actions arising out of
misuse of office ?
Q96. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions as judges & their personal
actions as individuals ?
Q97. are the fundamental rights of citizens supreme or the privileges of judges , constitutional
functionaries supreme ?
Q98. what is the criteria adopted for promotion of judges ?
Q99. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of advocates from bar , as the judges ?
Q100. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of retired judges , as governors of states ,
members or as chairman of commissions , etc ?
Q101. how many judges belonging to oppressed classes scheduled caste , scheduled
tribe , other backward classes , minorities & women are their in supreme court , state high
courts & subordinate courts ? kindly provide specific figures .
Q102. what are the legal measures enforced by judiciary , to enforce the accountability of
judges & to check corruption in judiciary ?
Q103. are not these measures a failure , looking at present state of affairs of judiciary ?
Q104. does the judges arrange for distribution of alchoholic drinks at the official meetings ,
parties , at the tax payers expense ?

Q105. does any judges have included their consumption of alchoholic drinks , in their hotel bill
& claimed traveling allowance ?
Q106. what action has been taken against selectors ie Karnataka high court judges & newly
selected women judges involved in roost resort scandal in Mysore , Karnataka ?
Q107. when common people / tax payers & even government employees are not getting
proper health care from government at government hospitals. Is it right & just to provide
premium health care to judges , constitutional functionaries at 5-star private hospitals in
India , abroad , all at tax payers expense ?
Q108. are the judges subjected to periodical health check-ups to ascertain their health ,
mental faculties & mental balance in the midst of all work pressures , emotional tensions ?
Q109. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary for accepting applications seeking public
interest litigations ?
Q110. why numerous appeals for PIL by me , were not considered ?
Q111. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for appointing amicus curie in a case ?
Q112. why my appeal to honourable supreme court , to make me as an amicus curie in late
P.M Rajiv Gandhis assassination case , was not considered by the court ?
Q113. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for initiating suo-motto action ?
Q114. numerous cases of injustices are reported in the media daily , with supporting
evidences . why not the judiciary take suo-motto action in all such cases ?
Q115. legal aid boards pre-judge the cases in the name of taking legal opinion , before
providing legal aid to the needy ? is it not needy persons rights violation ?
Q116. is not the safety of witnesses , parties in cases responsibility of the court , both during
hearing of the case & afterwards ?
Q117. is the use of 3rd degree torture by police on prisoners , during the police custody /
judicial custody / prison sentence right ? what action ?
Q118. when the corrupt police officer & government prosecution advocate together cover-up
evidences , conducts improper investigation intentionally to fail the case to cover-up rich
crooks , high & mighty people , what action judge takes in such cases ?
Q119. how does the judiciary monitor the wealth growth of police , government advoctes , tax
officials , officials of licensing authorities , to ensure proper & fair prosecution of cases against
rich & mighty ?
Q120. what are the status of appeals made by human rights activist NAGARAJ.M.R. to the
honourable supreme court of India ?
Q121. corruption is rampant for selection of officers to quasi-judicial positions like district /
taluk magistrates , tax officers , revenue officers , land acquisition officers , etc. how the
judiciary monitors over their quasi-judicial actions ?
Q122. subject to conditions , I , NAGARAJ.M.R. , editor , e-voice of human rights watch , do
offer my free services to honourable supreme court of India , to apprehend corrupt judges ,
are you the honourable court ready to utilize it ?
Q123. what are the status of my appeals , sent to the honourable supreme court of India ,
through government of indias on-line grievance system ( DPG & DARPG ) :
DPG/M/2006/80008 , DARPG/E/2006/00057, DARPG/E/2006/00225 , DPG/M/2006/80021 ,
DARPG/E/2006/00253 , DPG/M/2006/80032 , DARPG/E/2006/01149 , DPG/M/2006/80047 ,
DARPG/E/2006/01164 , DPG/M/2006/80043 , DPG/M/2006/80085 , DARPG/E/2006/06704 ,
DARPG/E/2006/07017 , DARPG/E/2006/07018 , DPG/M/2006/80159 , DPG/M/2006/80162 ,
DARPG/E/2006/07864 , DPG/M/2006/80165 , DARPG/E/2006/07877 , DPG/M/2006/80167 ,
DARPG/E/2006/08028 , DARPG/E/2006/08029 , DARPG/E/2006/08032 ,
DARPG/E/2006/08043 , DARPG/E/2006/08044 , DPG/M/2006/80174 , DPG/M/2006/80193 ,

DARPG/E/2007/00044 , DPG/M/2007/80003 , DPG/M/2007/80010 , DARPG/E/2007/00164 ,


DARPG/E/2007/00165 , DPG/M/2007/80014 , DPG/M/2007/80025 , DPG/M/2007/80049 ,
DPG/M/2007/80055 , DPG/M/2007/80056 , DPG/M/2007/80078 , DPG/M/2007/80082 ,
DARPG/E/2007/02618
Q124. the appeals made to the honourable supreme court of India , copies of which are
available at following web pages
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/182 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/206 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/208 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/209 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw
what are the status of those appeals ?
Q125. in the media , we have seen reports about judges committing crimes rape , attempt
to murder , swindling government money , untouchability practice , the disrespect to national
flag , sale of judicial orders , bail , receipt of monetary gains by way of royalty for books ,
prime real estate purchase at discounted rate , taking round about long foreign tours along
with family in the name of official work , etc. by this way , judges themselves are making
contempt of court , constitution of India & citizens of India. How you are protecting the honour
of the judiciary , constitution of India & citizens of India ? please answer.
Q126. Is the government giving any facilities / affirmative actions to policemens family as
being given to defense personnel , ex-servicemen & their families , like preferential site
allotment , lpg agency , ration depot , reservation in college admission , soft bank loans , etc ?
Q126. if not , why ? after all , the contribution of police to national security is on par with
defense forces.
Q127. is not some high police officials addressing their subordinates in singular term ,
abusing them with vulgar words wrong ?
Q128. is not some police personnel calling public with singular term, abusing public with
vulgar words wrong ?
Q129. is it not the duty of prison authorities to protect the health, lives of prison in-mates ?
Q130.what action is taken against police personnel who wrongly charged an innocent person
of criminal acts , resulting in his confinement in jail , finally acquitted by court as found to be
innocent ?
Q131. is it not right to with hold salary , gratuity , pension to such guilty police personnel &
pay it as compensation to victims of police failures & atrocities ?
Q132. does our Indian constitution legally permit a citizen of foreign origin naturalized by
marriage to an Indian or naturalized by option , to occupy any constitutional office ?
Q133. during british rule in india & various other british colonies , criminal cases were foisted
against our freedom fighters in India & other british colonies. After indias independence what
happened to those cases ? did our Indian government close all such cases or did it continue
with the prosecution ?
Q134. in how many cases GOI & other state government continued with the prosecution
AGAINST OUR FREEDOM FIGHTERS ? why ?
Q135. what about the status of cases against shri.netaji subash Chandra bose ?
Q136. has GOI deported any freedom fighters to Britain or its colonies , to face prosecution
after India gained independence ? HAS GOI RECEIVED ANY REQUEST FROM BRITAIN TO
THAT EFFECT ? if yes , why , whom ?
Q.137. the honourable supreme court of India failed provide information to me as per my RTI

request appeal no : 91 / 2007 in response to your letter no : F1 / RTI / A.91 / 2007 dt 13.12.07
, why ?
Q138 . the honourable union home secretary failed to give me information as per my rti
request , he transferred my application to others , in turn they transferred the application to
some others. Finally , complete truthful information was not given , why ? as the union home
secretary has got copies of all those replies in response to transferred RTI application , will he
send me a consolidated reply to my present RTI request ?
Q139. in a high profile case before the honourable delhi high court , we have seen how
defense advocate mr. R.S.ANAND & prosecution advocate mr. I.U.KHAN made a secret pact
to win the case in favour of rich criminal , totally manipulating prosecution witnesses ,
evidences & prosecution stand , totally making mockery of justice system . how you are
ensuring the delivery of justice , there being numerous such advocates in practice ?
Q140. Smt. Sonia Gandhi is person of foreign origin , she wields enormous clout more than
the Prime Minister himself over the government of India being the chair person of UPA. Is she
legally permitted to summon confidential official records , minutes of the cabinet , to hold the
cabinet meeting of union ministers ?
Q141. As per law , is she permitted to hold constitutional offices like prime minister of India or
president of India , etc ?
Q.142. What are the fundamental rights of a citizen guaranteed under the constitution (Article
21) ?
Q143. What are the privileges conferred on legislators & parliamentarians by the constitution
of India?
a) Inside the House b) Outside the House
Q144. What are privileges conferred on constitutional functionaries, like
a) President of India b) Prime Minister of India
c) Chief Justice of India d) Chairman of NHRC
e) Central Vigilance Commissioners.
Q145. Are the privileges legal immunity conferred on above mentioned constitutional
functionaries ?
a) Cover all their official actions irrespective of merit.
b) Cover both their official & personal actions.
Q146. Are the privileges defined & codified ?
Q147. Are these privileges above freedom of the press ?
Q148. Are the liberty & fundamental rights of the citizens guaranteed by the constitution,
above the privileges of the constitutional functionaries or equal or below ?

Q149. Can the Indian legislatures & parliament be equated to the House of commons in
England which is considered to be a superior court and court of records ?
Q150. Can the division of powers, namely the legislature, the executive and the Judiciary, be
equated to the functioning of the House of commons and House of Lords in England ?
Q151. Can a citizen be said to have committed breach of privilege of the House or court and
causing contempt of the house or court by raising the issues of accountability of constitutional
functionaries ?
Q152. Can a Legislature or Parliament enact a new law, to circumvent or to nullify the Judicial
orders with respect to wrongdoings by peoples representatives & executive ? does not it
amount to infringement of Judicial powers & contempt of the court by the House.
Q153. Are the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES of a citizen more important than constitutional duties
of a constitutional functionary or equal in importance to it ?
Q154. Can a constitutional functionary commit crimes, anti-national activities in the name of
constitutional duties, behind the legal veil of officials secret act & go unaccountable for his
actions and go unpunished by his legal immunity privileges
Q155. Are the Legislators members of parliament, High court & Supreme court Judges and
other constitutional functionaries not willing to codify their privileges for the reason that if
codified their privileges would be curtailed and their action would be subjected to legal
scrutiny. ?
Q156. By votes of citizens Legislators and parliamentarians get seats in the legislature and
Parliament out of tax payers money, they get their pay, perks & lead 5-Star luxurious
lifestyles. Hence whether a vote of a citizen is above (More valid) or a seat of legislator or
parliamentarian is above or more valid in a democracy ?
Q157. Judges & Constitutional functionaries are indirectly appointed by voters / tax payers.
Out of tax payers money, they get their pay, perks & lead 5-star luxurious lifestyles. Hence,
whether the vote of a citizen, fundamental duties of a tax payer is above (more valid) or a seat
of judge / constitutional functionary is above (more
valid) in a democracy ?
Q158. If there is a vacuum in the Legislature or parliament, who is to fill up that vacuum till
such time that the legislature or parliament acts provide a solution by performing its role by
enacting proper legislation to cover the field (vacuum) ?
Q159. While it is an unhealthy practice for a Judge to claim to be a Judge in his own cause, is
it not worse for the members of the legislature and parliament to be judges in their own
cause ?
Q160. Are the Technicalities of the case more important to a judge or Justice to a citizen,
protection of fundamental rights of citizen.?

Q161. Why not the constitutional functionaries initiate suo moto action with respect to
numerous cases of injustices reported in Media ?
Q162. Why not the Judges admit various cases of Injustices affecting public, as the Public
Interest Litigation ? In some cases, the Public or the person representing them is unable to
afford the high cost of the case. Why not free legal aid is given ?.
Q163. What is the criteria for admitting a P.I.L. & giving free legal aid ?
Q164. Communication free flow of information is the lifeline of a democracy. Why the
constitutional functionaries are not honouring the Right to Information of Citizens ?
Q165. Recently , while assuming office as honourable chief justice of Karnataka , justice.
P.D.DINAKAR , gave a blanket withdrawal of all internal departmental enquiries against
approximately 200 judges , is it just & legal ? give me the names of accused judges &
description of charges against them ?
Q166. does it not show that judges are more equal than others ?
Q167. who are involved in PF scam ? what action against guilty judges ?
Q168. Why you did not give information to me as per RTI Act inspite of appeal ? refer.
F1/RTI/A91/2007.
Q169. Almost a year ago , in the Karnataka state new chief justice of Karnataka high court
honble Mr.Dinakar (now elevated to supreme court of India) just on assuming offices within
hours scrapped disciplinary inquiry proceedings against 200+ erring judges. In such a short
time no human being can study all the cases in detail , then how come he arrived at this vital
decision in such short time? Who are those 200+ judges facing enquiry ?
Q170 .Recently in the Karnataka state , high court found out that a district judge without
conducting hearings properly , entering fictious dates of hearings (which happens to be
government holidays ) facilitated in exonerating a top politician . has the court enquired into
the previous judgements of the accussed judge ? did it find any wrongdoings?
Q171. As per law , while on duty a person should not be drunk , under the influence of
alchohol , as it limits the functioning of his senses & brain. That is why the acts & sayings of
drunkards , committed / said when they are drunk are not taken seriously. However most of
the police officers after evening hours are drunk , in that state only they apprehend many
suspects & produce those suspects at the residences of magistrates before magistrate during
wee hours / night. Some of of the judges are also drunk during that time. Does the senses of
drunken police & judges work properly to do their respective duties in identifying criminals ,
apprehending them & to issue judicial orders. Are these actions of police & judges in drunken
state legal ?
Q 172 . What action has been taken in bhopal gas leak case against the guilty police officials
who changed the charge sheet against union carbide officials ?
Q 173 . What action has been taken against guilty police officials , district magistrate , state
ministers & central ministers who fully aided the criminals Union Carbide official Mr.
Anderson to escape law , to jump bail & flee the country without courts permission ?
Q 174 . What action has been taken against the above said guilty with respect to their
contempt of court & for aiding a criminal to escape ?

Q 175. What action has been taken against the chief justice of India , who changed the legal
clause under which the guilty should be tried ? what action has been taken against the CJI
who became an official of the trust belonging to the criminal ?
Q 176 . What action has been taken against the Indian Public servant who decided to
withdraw cases from US Courts with respect to Bhopal gas tragedy ?
Q 177 . What action has been taken against the state labour department & pollution control
board officials who have failed in their duties , inspite of earlier warnings by journalists ?
Q 178 . What action has been taken against state cabinet ministers who decided the quantum
of compensation money to favour the criminal although they dont have right to do so ?
Q 179 . What action has been taken against Presiding Judge of the trial court , Chief Justice
of India , state police officials , public prosecutors & Central Bureau of Investigation officials
who kept quite all along and didnt press for the extradition of the criminal Mr.Anderson , for
producing the criminal accussed no.1 before the trial court ?
Q 180 . Is it not SHAMEFUL for the judiciary , police , government officials & peoples
representatives who became part of Operation Crime Hush Up & aided criminals responsible
for ghastly murders of thousands & maiming of lakhs of hapless public in Bhopal Gas Leak
Tragedy?
Q 181 . Are these Corrupt Police , corrupt judges , corrupt ministers , corrupt labour /
pollution control board officials HUMAN BEINGS ?
Q 182 Why police are not registering my complaint against CJI & other VVIPS ,Even
after years ?
Q 183 dont the police of vijayanagar police station mysore have legal jurisdiction to
register the case against these VVIPs ? or just because the criminals happens to be VVIPs
,they are not booked by police? If the said police dont have legal jurisdiction to book
these VVIPs , they should have transferred the complaint to those authorities who have
jurisdiction & authority to book & prosecute these VVIPs , but not done so , why ?
Q 184 are not all these actions , of VVIPs & police amounting to cover up of crimes &
criminals ? are not these cover ups itself is a crime ?
Q 185. Even an appeal for justice by post card must be treated as PIL by courts of justice .
however my appeals for justice concerning public welfare , national security sent through
post , e-mail to supreme court of india are not admitted as Public interest litigation , why ?
does not these acts of Supreme court amount to aiding criminals , anti nationals?
Q 186 Are not the honourable chief justice of india together with the jurisdictional police &
Revenue district magistrate responsible to protect the fundamental & human rights of
people ? why the CJI , Mysore DC & Jurisdictional Police have failed to protect the
fundamental & human rights of people including mine ? For all the previous injustices I have
suffered at the hands of the criminal nexus Honourable CJI , Mysore revenue district
magistrate & jurisdictional police are together responsible , if anything untoward happens to
me or to my family members or to my dependents the quartet Honourable Chief Justice of
India , Honourable District Magistrate , Mysore , Honourable Police Commissioner of Mysore
city & Circle Inspector of police , vijayanagar police station , mysore will be responsible .

These corrupt parasites will feel , understand the pain only when they also suffer in the
same manner. Let us pray to almighty In whose Court of justice MATCH FIXING is not
there & every body is equal , let us pray to that god to give these corrupt parasites ghastly
deaths nothing less nothing more.
YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR
1995-2015 .
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE FULL INFORMATION:
CPIO , SUPREME COURT OF INDIA , NEW DELHI.
FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733465 for rupees TWENTY only

DATE : 28.03.2015 ..NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA.. .( APPLICANT)

edited , printed , published & owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @ : LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP
WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR ,HEBBAL ,MYSORE -570017 INDIA
cell : 91 9341820313 , 91 8970318202
home page:
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home ,
http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit ,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/ ,

http://paper.li/f-1367938674

Follow me at
http://www.facebook.com/people/Nagaraj-Mysore-Raghupathi/513253184 ,
http://www.amnesty.org/en/user/naghrw ,
http://twitter.com/naghrw ,
Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com ,
http://www.amnesty.org/en/user/naghrw
A Member of Amnesty International

You might also like