Professional Documents
Culture Documents
English Department
CATEGORY
60 %: 12 PTS
ALINNE CISTERNAS
70
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
X
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
60 %: 12 PTS
No pictures significance.
MARISOL ZAMBRA
35
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
X
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no X
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
No pictures significance.
60 %: 12 PTS
MARTINA AGUIRRE 70
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
X
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
60 %: 12 PTS
No pictures significance.
DARINKA GALLEGUILLOS 70
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
X
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
60 %: 12 PTS
No pictures significance.
TIARE MARTINEZ
70
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
X
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
SCORE:____20___/ 20 PTS
No pictures significance.
60 %: 12 PTS
VALERIA DIAZ
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
X
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
Vocabulary related to the
unit.
70
No pictures significance.
60 %: 12 PTS
DIEGO ROJAS
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
X
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
60
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
X
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
60 %: 12 PTS
No pictures significance.
JULIAN CABRERA
48
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
X
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no X
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
SCORE:___20____/ 20 PTS
No pictures significance.
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
X
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
60 %: 12 PTS
No pictures significance.
PAULINA RAMOS
66
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
X
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
No pictures significance.
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
X
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
60 %: 12 PTS
CONSTANZA CONTRERAS 70
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
X
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
SCORE:___18____/ 20 PTS
No pictures significance.
63
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
X
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
60 %: 12 PTS
No pictures significance.
MARILUZ PORTILLA 70
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
X
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
No pictures significance.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
60 %: 12 PTS
JOSE OSSANDON 40
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
X
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no X
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
SCORE:__19_____/ 20 PTS
No pictures significance.
66
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
X
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
60 %: 12 PTS
No pictures significance.
ROCIO VILLALOBOS 60
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
X
Content Accuracy
No pictures significance.
Design
CATEGORY
60 %: 12 PTS
ARACELY CORTES
63
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
X
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
X
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
SCORE:____18___/ 20 PTS
No pictures significance.
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
X
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
60 %: 12 PTS
No pictures significance.
SCARLETTE ADAOS 70
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
X
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
No pictures significance.
English Department
CATEGORY
60 %: 12 PTS
JESUS VIDAL
66
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
X
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
SCORE:__12_____/ 20 PTS
No pictures significance.
40
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
X
Pictures
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no X
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
No pictures significance.
60 %: 12 PTS
CARLA ALFARO 70
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
X
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
60 %: 12 PTS
No pictures significance.
GABRIELA ROJAS
66
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
X
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
X
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
SCORE:___19____/ 20 PTS
No pictures significance.
66
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
X
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
No pictures significance.
60 %: 12 PTS
JAVIERA GODOY
66
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
X
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
Vocabulary related to the
unit.
60 %: 12 PTS
No pictures significance.
VALENTIN PACHECO
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
60
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no X
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
SCORE:___20____/ 20 PTS
No pictures significance.
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
X
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
No pictures significance.
60 %: 12 PTS
CATALINA ROBLES 66
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
X
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
60 %: 12 PTS
No pictures significance.
CAROLINA GARRIDO 63
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
No pictures significance.
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
X
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
SCORE:___20____/ 20 PTS
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
X
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
No pictures significance.
60 %: 12 PTS
PAULA BONILLA 63
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
X
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
X
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
60 %: 12 PTS
No pictures significance.
ANTONELLA JIMENEZ 60
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
X
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
X
No pictures significance.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
SCORE:____20___/ 20 PTS
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
X
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
60 %: 12 PTS
No pictures significance.
LUIS GALVEZ 66
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
X
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
X
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
No pictures significance.
60 %: 12 PTS
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
No pictures significance.
Design
CATEGORY
SCORE:_______/ 20 PTS
60 %: 12 PTS
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
No pictures significance.
60 %: 12 PTS
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
CATEGORY
No pictures significance.
60 %: 12 PTS
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
No pictures significance.
SCORE:_______/ 20 PTS
English Department
CATEGORY
60 %: 12 PTS
Use of vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Less presence of
vocabulary.
(even names of movies)
Pictures
Well use of pictures, visuial Well use of pictures but not Less use of pictures.
and meaningful.
so clear.
Neatness
Poster was done with pride. Poster is neatly handPoster was done with some Poster looks like it was
written, clean, not wrinkled, care.
done in a hurry or stored
and is easy to read with no
improperly.
distracting error corrections.
It was done with care.
Content Accuracy
Design
No pictures significance.