Measurement and Evaluation (Book)

TABLE OF CONTENTS
UNIT-1:..........................................................................................................................1
INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
EVALUATION, ASSESSMENT, MEASUREMENT AND TEST:...................................1

THE PURPOSE OF TESTING................................................................................32
GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF ASSESSMENT:...........................................................37
TYPE OF EVALUATION PROCEDURE..................................................................39
NORM- REFERENCED AND CRITERION REFERENCED TEST:.............................45
EDUCATIONAL:..................................................................................................47
UNIT-2:........................................................................................................................52
JUDGING THE QUALITY OF THE TEST............................................................52
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
VALIDITY, METHODS OF DETERMINING VALIDITY:.........................................53

FACTORS AFFECTING VALIDITY.......................................................................56
RELIABILITY, AND METHODS OF DETERMINING RELIABILITY:........................59
FACTORS AFFECTING RELIABILITY:.................................................................64
PRACTICALITY:.................................................................................................67
UNIT-3:........................................................................................................................69
APPRAISING CLASSROOM TESTS (ITEMS ANALYSIS)................................69
3.1
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.4
THE VALUE OF ITEM.........................................................................................69

THE PROCEDURE/ PURPOSE OF ITEM ANALYSIS:..............................................75
MAKING THE MOST OF EXAMS: PROCEDURES FOR ITEM ANALYSIS:...............76
ITEM DIFFICULTY:.............................................................................................96
THE INDEX OF DISCRIMINATION.......................................................................97
UNIT-4:......................................................................................................................102
INTERPRETING THE TEST SCORES...............................................................102
4.1 THE PERCENTAGE CORRECT SCORE:..............................................................102
INTERPRETING THE TESTS SCORES.............................................................102
4.2 THE PERCENTILE RANKS:...............................................................................113
4.3 STANDARD SCORES:........................................................................................118
4.4 PROFILE: >>>>>>>........................................................................................120
UNIT-5:......................................................................................................................121
EVALUATING PRODUCT, PROCEDURES & PERFORMANCE...................121
5.1 EVOLUTION THEMES AND TERMS PAPERS:....................................................121
5.2 EVALUATING GROUP WORK & PERFORMANCE..............................................132
1
5.3 EVALUATING DEMONSTRATION:.....................................................................136

5.4 EVALUATION OF PHYSICAL MOVEMENTS AND MOTOR SKILLS:.....................141
5.5 EVALUATING ORAL PERFORMANCE:...............................................................148
UNIT-6:......................................................................................................................152
PORTFOLIOS..........................................................................................................152
6.1 PURPOSE OF PORTFOLIOS:..............................................................................152
6.3 GUIDELINE AND STUDENTS ROLE IN SELECTION OF PORTFOLIO ENTRIES AND
SELF-EVALUATION:.................................................................................................160
6.4 USING PORTFOLIOS IN INSTRUCTION AND COMMUNICATION:........................164
6.5 POTENTIAL STRENGTH AND WEAKNESSES OF PORTFOLIOS:..........................167
6.6 EVALUATION OF PORTFOLIO:..........................................................................174
UNIT-7:......................................................................................................................176
BASIC CONCEPTS OF INFERENTIAL STATISTS..........................................176
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
7.7
CONCEPT & PURPOSE OF INFERENTIAL STATISTICS:......................................176

SAMPLING ERROR:..........................................................................................179
NULL HYPOTHESIS:........................................................................................180
TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE:................................................................................182
LEVELS OF SIGNIFICANCE:..............................................................................185
TYPE-I AND TYPE-II ERRORS: REMAINING:...................................................188
DEGREES OF FREEDOM:..................................................................................192
UNIT-8:......................................................................................................................197
SELECTED TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE............................................................197
8.1 T-TEST:...........................................................................................................197
8.2 CHI-SQUARE (X2):..........................................................................................200
8.3 REGRESSION:..................................................................................................205
UNIT-1:
INTRODUCTION
1.1
EVALUATION, ASSESSMENT, MEASUREMENT AND TEST:
1.1.1
Evaluation:
Literally, the term evaluation means appraisal, Judgment or assessment,
calculation, estimation or rating of a thing.

According to the International Dictionary of Education (by G Terry & JB
Thomas) evaluation means value judgment on an observation, performance test or
any data whether directly measured or inferred. Evaluation is the qualitative
assessment of a thing. It answers the question How good?
A. D. Jones defines evaluation as the process of finding the value of
something. He further says the process of evaluation is the attempt to find the worth
of any enterprise.
The Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary defines the term Evaluate as to
find out or form an idea of the amount or values of something. When we evaluate
something, we mean to determine the value or worth of that thing. Evaluation is,
actually, the process through which we collect information of something and then
make a decision in the light of that information.
So we can say that evaluation is concerned with making judgments about
things. When we act as evaluators, we attribute value or worth to behavior,
objects and processes. In the wider community, for example, one may make
evaluative comments about a play, clothes, restaurant, a book or someones behavior.
We may enjoy a play, admire someones clothes, to speak about some restaurant and
so on and so forth. Invariably, these are rather simple, straight forward comments of
value or worth because this judgment is not based on appropriate and relevant data.
According to William Wiersma and Stephen G. Jurs, The more effective

evaluation requires the judgment which is based on appropriate and relevant data.
For example, to say that a film is good or bad is not the judgment based on
appropriate and relevant data. It is, therefore, not the exact evaluation of the film. It
well-written script, tight direction mood-enhancing music, suitable characters and so
forth; because this judgment is based on some appropriate and relevant data. These
are the characteristics upon which we can make a judgment about something.
Educational Evaluation:
The Concept of Evaluation in Education:
Educational Evaluation is a specific term which is used for the judgment of the
educational objectives. Educational Evaluation seeks to determine how the student
has achieved the stated objectives of the learning situation.
Different educationists have defined Educational Evaluation in different words
some of which are discussed below:
1.
Educational Evaluation is a systematic process of collecting, analyzing and

interpreting information to determine the extent to which pupils are achieving
instructional objectives.
Norman E. Gronlund
2.
Educational Evaluation is the systematic process of collecting and analyzing

data in order to determine whether, and to what degree, objectives have or
being achieved.
L.R. Gay
3.
Educational Evaluation is the estimation of the growth and progress of pupils

towards objectives or values in the curriculum.
Writestone
4.
Educational Evaluation is the defined as the process of determining the extent

to which educational objectives are achieved by the student.
Remmers
Approaches to Evaluation
Evaluation in our schools is essentially concerned with two major approaches
to making judgments:
1.
Product Evaluation:
It is the evaluation of students performance in a specific learning context.
Such kind of evaluation seeks to determine how well the student has achieved
the stated objectives of the learning situation. In this sense the students
performance is seen as a product of the educational experience. A school
report is an example of Product Evaluation.
2.
Process Evaluation:
It is that kind of evaluation that seeks to examine the experiences and
activities involved in we learning situation. It makes judgment about the
process by which students acquired learning. In more simple words, it
examines the process of learning experience before it has concluded. For
example, the evaluation of the nature of students-teacher interaction,
instructional methods, school curricula, a specific programmes etc. are the best
examples of Process Evaluation.
1.
Curriculum Evaluation
Curriculum Evaluation, as is clear from the name, is the evaluation of a certain
curriculum i.e. an instructional programme. It is used to determine the
outcome
of a programme and to decide whether to accept or reject a
programme. This evaluation helps in the further development of the
curriculum materials for continuous improvement. For a better learning, it is

necessary to assess a new programme in order to find out whether the desired
outcomes are being achieved or not. The use of evaluation techniques should
enable the curriculum workers to make steady progress in improving the
curriculum. Curriculum evaluation should not only be a means for judging
educational effectiveness, but also should lead to useful decisions that can
serve as a powerful force to improve the educational process. Careful
evaluation should demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses in the curriculum
so that necessary changes can be made in the instructional programme.
2.
Programme Evaluation
Programme Evaluation is used for judging the effectiveness of a programme
or a special project. This evaluation is used to make a decision about
programme installation and modification. It helps to obtain evidence to
support or oppose a programme. Outside education, programme evaluation' is
used as a means of determining the effectiveness, efficiency and acceptability
of any form of programme. But within education, we can use the term in a
similar way as in the case of evaluating the effectiveness of a new writing, or
reading programme in primary schools. A curriculum evaluation may qualify
as a programme evaluation if the curriculum is focused on change or
improvement. Programme evaluation, however, does not involve appraisal of
curricula (e.g. evaluation of a computerized student record keeping system.)
3.
Personnel Evaluation
The evaluation of personnel is the assessment of the performance of a working
personnel in an organization. That is why it is also called performance
appraisal or staff evaluation. In education, 'personnel evaluation' is very much
necessary for adopting appropriate appraisal, plans and procedures to achieve
the goal of education. According to McNeil, J.D. "Evaluation of the
performance of working personnel can be an effective instrument for helping

people in growing and developing in their roles. It could be used as a
mechanism of continuing education and learning from one another. Through a
well- organized appraisal system every employee (r.3) can create learning
spaces for himself in the system in which he works. A good personnel
evaluation helps the employee to recognize his/ her own strengths and
weaknesses in order to enable him to improve his performance in a given role.
It also helps in identifying people for the purpose of motivating, training and
developing them for new roles or existing roles.
4.
Institutional-Evaluation:
Institutional Evaluation is the evaluation of the total programme of a school,
college, university or other educational institution. The evaluation of an
institution is used to collect information and data on all aspects of the function
of that institution. The basic aim of this evaluation is to determine the degree
to which instructional objectives are being met and to identify areas of
strength and weakness in the total programme. An institutional evaluation
involves more than the administration of tests to students; it may require any
combination of questionnaire, interviews, and observations with data being
collected from all persons in the institution community, including
administrators, teachers, and counsellors. The major component of
institutional evaluation is the institution testing. The more comprehensive the
testing program, the more valuable are the resulting data. That is why, for
achieving the most valuable resulting data, institutional testing programme
should include measurement of achievement, aptitude, personality and
interest. Tests selected for an institutional evaluation must match the
objectives of the institution and be appropriate for the students to be tested.
Need or Importance of Evaluation

Evaluation plays pivotal role in teaching-learning process. It helps in
providing information about the success or failure of an educational objective. It
shows whether the student has achieved the required objective or not, and to what
degree has the goal been reached? So evaluation provides relevant information to the
decision-makers need about input, output, operation of a programs, and placement of
student in programs. Levels of understanding can be assessed. and future educational
objectives set, based on student needs. Similarly, appropriate activities can be planned
by the teacher based on the knowledge of the attributes of the student. Evaluation also
makes it easy for the teacher to form objective, select content, and plan for learning
experiences. It also provides a guideline about all aspects of the teaching- learning
process. Without evaluation we cannot be aware of the effectiveness or
ineffectiveness of an educational program or objective.
Evaluation is as necessary for student as for teacher or decision-makers. Its
importance for the student is great because the whole process of education is for the
benefit of the student. The student is the centre of interest in the teaching learning
process. For the student, evaluation provides feedback regarding better strengths and
weaknesses. It encourages the student for better study and increases his motivation.
Improvement of the teacher's teaching and the student's learning through judgment,
using available information is the ultimate need of the evaluation process.
In a nutshell, evaluation plays central role in the teaching learning process. It
serves as a guiding principle for the selection of supervisory techniques and also as a
means for improving school-community relation.
1.1.2
Assessment:
Concept of Assessment
Literally assessment means the act of judging or assessing a person or

situation or event. It is the classification of someone or something with respect to its
worth. Assessment is a general term that includes the full range of procedures used to
gain information about student learning (observations, ratings of performances or
projects, paper-and-pencil tests) and the formation of value judgments concerning
learning progress. A test is a particular type of assessment that typically consists of a
set of questions administered during a fixed period of time under reasonably
comparable conditions for all students. (Linn and Groundlund, 2000)/ Assessment
may include both quantitative descriptions (measurement) and qualitative descriptions
(non-measurement) of students. In addition, assessment always includes value
judgments concerning desirability of the results. Assessment may or may not he base
on measurements; when it is, it goes beyond simple quantitative description.
The process of collecting, synthesizing, and interpreting information to aid in
decision making is called assessment. For many people, the, words,, classrooms,
assessment evoke images of pupils taking paper-and-pencil, test, teachers scoring
them, and grades being assigned to the pupils based upon their performance.
Assessment, as the term is used here, includes the full range of information that
teacher gather in their classrooms; information that helps them understand their
pupils, monitor their instruction, and establish a viable classroom culture. It also
includes the variety of ways teachers gather, synthesize, and interpret that
information.' Assessment is a general term that includes all the ways through which
teachers gather information in their classrooms.
Need for Assessment in Education
As long as there is need for the educator to make some instructional decisions,
curricular decision, and selection decision. Placement or classification decisions based
on the present or anticipated educational status of the child so long will there be need
for assessment in educational enterprise. To the modern educator, the ultimate goal of
assessment is to facilitate learning. This could be done in a number of ways, in each
way a separate type of decision is required. The assessment decision also determines
which of tests is to be used for assessment. Thus there is a close relationship between
the purpose of evaluation, evaluate decisions and types of tests to be used for them.
The purposes of assessment are as follows:
Selection Decision
Whenever there will be choice, selection decision is to be made. In our daily
life we see that institutions and organization need persons for their work, they get
responses from several people but they cannot take all of them. They have to make
selection out of them. Assessment of these persons is to be made on the bases of tests
given to them. Tests will provide information, which will help in selection decision.
Some persons will be acceptable while others will not be acceptable. Similarly the
universities have to make section decisions for admitting the students to various
courses. Courses in which hundreds of candidates are applicants, Selection decision is
to make on stronger footing. Naturally some tests are given to the candidates to help
in selection decision such as Aptitude tests, Intelligence tests. Achievement tests or
Prognostic tests are generally given for the purpose of selection decision. There has
been ruling from the judiciary that the scores on these tests should have a good
relationship with the success in the job or the course for which the tests has been
given. If any selection tests does not fulfill this requirement it needs to be improved or
replaced by a better one I Although perfection of such tests cannot be guaranteed but
any institution or organization which is interested in the best students or workers will
continue to make efforts in improving the tests being used for the purpose of
selection.
Placement Decision
Since school education should be provide to all in a welfare state the schools
must make provision for all, they cannot reject the candidates for admission as the
universities or colleges can do. How these candidates placed in different programmes
of school education is to be determined on the basis of their assessment. Such school
determinations are called placement .decision. These decisions are required not only
in the case of those who are with some disadvantage but also with those who are
gifted and talented. The schools have to find one or the other programme for all
school age children depending upon their weakness or strength. Placement tests have
to be different and more useful from selection, tests because they improve the
decision to differentially assign students to teaching programmes. Achievement test
and interview are generally used for placement decision.
Classification Decisions
Assessment is also required to help in making decisions in regard to assigning
a person to one of several different categories, jobs or programmes. These decisions
are called classification decisions because in one particular job or programme, there
may be several levels or categories. To which level or category a particular person of
child be assigned, depends upon the results of the test. Aptitude tests, achievement
tests, interest inventories value questionnaires attitude scale and personality measures
are used for classification decision. There is a minor difference in classification
placement and selection. Classification refers to the cases, where categories are
essentially unordered, placement refers to the case where the categories represent
level of teaching or treatment and selection refers to the case where the persons can be
selected or rejected.
Diagnosis and Remedial Decisions
Assessment is required to locate the students who need special remedial help.
For example what instructional strategies the teacher should use to help a particular
students or a group of student so that the opportunities are maximized to achieve the
objective. Aptitude tests, intelligence tests, diagnostic achievement tests, diagnostic
personality measures etc. may be used to achieve the purpose.
Feed Back
It is not sufficient to assessment student through a test and doing nothing after
that. A good teacher will use tests for the purpose of providing feedback to students.
Feedback may be effective or ineffective depending upon the circumstances.
Feedback will facilitate learning if it confirms the learner's correct responses or
identifies errors and corrects them. Test results made available to parents may be used
for making feedback evaluation device. It is also to be remembered that feedback are
both for the student and teacher because it provide information to both and help in
knowing how will students have learnt and how well the teacher has taught.
Motivation and guidance of learning: Assessment is also used to motivate the
students for more study and providing for learning. However motivation device can
be used positively as well as negatively. Unfortunately most of the schoolteacher use
examination or refusing to grant annual promotion to next class can motivate the
student but if they are motivated with using such evaluation techniques which provide
more confidence to the students in the subject, they will be more effective and lasting.
Aptitude tests, achievement tests, attitude scales, personality measures, interest
inventories, surprise quizzes encourage student for more study and understanding.
Assigning Makers to Students:
The instructional programme remains incomplete if it is not followed by
assessment. Although no teacher chooses teaching profession because he is interested
in evaluating the students but no teacher confines his job to teaching only. He
regularly evaluates his students and assigns them makers. Actually most of the
teachers are giving most of their time to this purpose. If teachers do not evaluate their
students, do not assign those marks or grades, how can they check their effectiveness
of teaching and learning outcome of the students?
Role of Assessment in Education Process
The assessment of learning takes place in an instructional context and.

Consequently, that learning environment shapes the reasons why we evaluate,
influences the purpose for evaluating as well how we evaluate the determines how we
should use the outcomes of our assessment. Assessment is an integral part of
instruction; it is not a separate entity that somehow is loosely attached to the teaching
process. The instruction process and the role of evaluation in it both must be
understood as background to the study of educational measurement. To that end, the
role of assessment in instruction will be described using a model that explains how the
teaching process works.
(A) There are many models that describe the variety of approaches to teaching found
in schools, but the Basic Teaching Model (BTM), introduced by Glaser (1962)
accounts for the fundamental components of most other specific teaching models,
such as the Socratic approach, the individualized instruction approach, or the
computer dominated instructional approach (Joyce and well, 1980). Few teachers
probably follow the BTM steps explicitly to guide their instructional activities. And
though we do not specifically endorse the use of the BTM or any other particular
model, we do advocate instructional approaches, by whatever name, the account for
the fundamental functions represented in the BTM as described next.
The main purposes of the BTM are to identify the major activities of the
teacher and to describe the relationship between activities figure III is a diagram of
the mode. Our primary interest is the Performer Assessment component, but we
cannot understand completely the role of evaluation without understanding how
Performance Assessment affects, and is affected by, other teaching activities.
Instructional Objectives, the first component of the BTM, represents the teacher's
starting point in providing instruction. What should students learn? What skills and
knowledge should be the focus of instruction? What is curriculum and how is it
denned? The second component, Entering Behaviour, indicates that the teacher must
try to assess the students' level of achievement and readiness to learn prior to
beginning. Instruction. What do the students know already and what are their
cognitive skills like? How receptive to learning are they? Which ones seems selfmotivated? This component indicates a need for evaluation information before
instruction actually begins.
Once the teacher has decided what will be taught and to whom the teaching is
to be directed, the "How?" must be determined. The Instructional Procedures
component deals with the material and methods of instruction the teacher selects or
develops to facilitate student learning. Does the text need to be supplemented with
illustration? Should small group projects be developed? Is there computer software
available to serve as a refresher for prerequisites? At this point instruction could
begin, and often it does, but unless the teacher makes plans to evaluate student's
performance, the students and teacher will never be sure when learning is complete.
The performance Assessment component helps to answer the question, "Did we
accomplish what we set out to do? Tests, quizzes, teacher observations, projects, and
demonstration are evaluation tools that help to answer this question. Thus evaluation
should be a significant aspect of the teaching process; teaching does not occur,
according to the model, unless evaluation of learner performance occurs.
A
Instructional Objectives
Feedback Loop
The model shows a fifth component, the Feedback Loop that can be used by
the teacher as both a management and a diagnostic procedure. If the results of
evaluation indicate that sufficient learning has occurred, the loop takes the teacher
back to the Instructional Objectives component, and each successive component, so
that plans for beginning the next instructional unit can be developed. (New objectives
are needed, entering behavior is different, and methods will need to be reconsidered,)
But when evaluation results are not so positive, the Feedback Loop is a mechanism
for identifying possible explanations. (Note the arrows that return to each
component.) Were the objectives too vaguely specified? Did students lack essential
prerequisite skills or knowledge? Was the film or text relatively ineffective? Was there
insufficient practice opportunity? Such questions need to be asked and frequently are.
However, questions need to be asked about the effectiveness of the performance
assessment procedures also, perhaps more frequently than they are. Were the test
questions appropriate? Were enough observations made? Were directions clear to
students? The Feedback Loop returns to the Performance Assessment component to
indicate that we must review and assess the quality of out evaluation procedures, after
the fact to determine the appropriateness of the procedures and the accuracy of the
information. Unless the tools of evaluation are developed with care, inadequate
learning may go undetected or complete learning may be misinterpreted as deficient.
In sum, good teaching requires planning for and using good evaluation tools,
Furthermore, evaluation does not take place in vacuum. The BTM shows that other
components of the teaching process provide cues about what to evaluate, when to
evaluate, and how to evaluate. Our purpose is to identify such cues and to take
advantage of them in building tests and other assessment devices that measures
achievement as precisely as possible.
(B) Assessment decision maker who is concerned about all aspects of the educational
endeavour. The key point to consider and keep in mind is that evaluation involves
appraisal of particular goals or purposes. Useful information may be obtained for
evaluation procedures by both formal and informal mean and should include
information collected during instruction as well as in the end of the course date.
According to Ahmanrt and Giock (1985) School Administrators, guidance personnel,
classroom teacher, and individual students require information that will allow them to
make informed and appropriate decision regarding their respective educational
activities. Ideally, they should be aware of all the alternatives open to them, the
possible outcomes of each alternative, and the advantages and disadvantages of the
respective outcomes, Educational and psychological measurement can help
individuals with these matters.
(C)
Tyler, 1966: Airasian and Madaus. 1972: Gronlund 1976:

Thorndike and Hagen, 1977: rightly observe that the data secured through
testing procedures may have uses as give below:

First, measurement data may be employed in the placement of students on one
or another instructional programme. Usually pupils take a pretest to measure whether
they have mastered the skills that are prerequisite to admittance to a particular course
or instructional, sequence. For instance, foreign language and mathematics
programmes are usually arranged in some hierarchical order so that achievement at
each level of learning depends on mastery of the preceding level.
The student is lead from the entering position in the hierarchy to the
terminating phase via intermediate steps, based upon the information provided by a
pretest a student can be placed:
(1)
At the most appropriate point in the instructional sequence.
(2)
In a programme with a particular instructional strategy on
(3)
With an appropriate teacher.

Second, measurement data can be used in formative evaluation. Tests are
administered to students to monitor their success and to provide them with relevant
feedback. The information is employed les to grace a student than to make
instructions responsive to the student's strengths anorweaknesses as identified by the
measurement device, Mastery learning procedures emphasize the use of formative

tests to provide detailed information about each student's grasp of a unit's objectives.
Third, measurement data has a place in diagnostic evaluation. Diagnostic
testing takes over where formative testing /eaves off When a student fails to respond
to the feedback corrective activities associated with formative testing a more detailed
search for the source of the learning difficulty is indicated. Remediation is only
possible when teacher understands the basis of a student's problem and then designs
instruction to address the need.
Forth, measurement data may be used for summation purposes. Such testing is
employed to certify or grade students at the completion of a course or unit of
instruction. Often the result is `final' and follows the student throughout his or her
academic career (as in the case or college and university transcripts). It is this aspect
of evaluation that some educators final particularly objectionable.
Fifth, measurement data are used by employers educational institutions in
making the selection by decisions. Many jobs and slots in education& programme are
limited in number, and there are more applicants than positions. In order to identify
the most promising candidates standardized tests may be administered to the
applicants. The information provided by the tests presumably increases the accuracy
and objectivity of administrator's decisions. College Board examinations are used by
many universities in admitting students to graduate and professional schools likewise
employ data from standardized testing programme make their entrance decisions.
Sixth, school officials in making curricular decisions in order to evaluate
existing programme use measurement data and to decide among instructional
alternative. School administrators need to assess their students' current levels of
performance the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence.
Seventh, measurement data finds a place in personal decision-making.

Individuals confront a variety of choices at any number of points in their lives. Should
they attend college or pursue some other type of post-high school training? What kind
of Job seems most suited to their needs? What sort of training programme should they
enter? Measures of interest, temperament, and ability can give individuals insights
that can prove helpful in the decision-making process.
Types of Assessment
Tests/ and other assessment procedures can be classified in terms of their
functional role in classroom instruction. One such classification system follows the
sequencer which assessment procedures are likely to be used in the classroom. These
categories classify the assessment of student performance in the following manner:
1.
Placement assessment
To determine student performance at the beginning of instruction.
2.
Formative assessment
To monitor learning progress during instruction-
3.
Diagnostic assessment
To diagnose learning difficulties during instruction.
4.
Summative assessment
To assess achievement at the end of instruction.
Although a single instrument may sometimes be useful for more than one
purpose (e.g., both form formative and summative assessment purposes), each of
these types of classroom assessment typically requires instruments specifically
designed for the intended use.
All these types of assessment are discussed below in detail.
Placement Assessment
This is also called Need Analysis Assessment. Placement assessment is

concerned with the student's entry performance and typically focuses on questions
such-as the following: (1) Does the student possess the knowledge and skills needecF
to begin the planned instruction? For example, is a student's reading comprehension at
a level that allows him or her to do the expected independent reading for a unit in
history, or does the beginning algebra student have a sufficient command of essential
arithmetic concepts? (2) To what extent has the students already developed the
understanding and skills that are the goals of the planned instruction? Sufficient levels
of comprehension and proficiencies might indicate-the desirability of skipping certain
units or of being placed in a more advanced course. (3) To what extent do the student's
interests, work habits, and personality characteristics indicate that one mode of
instruction might be better than another (e.g., group instruction versus independent
study)? Answers to questions like these require the use of a variety of techniques:
records of past achievement, pretests on course objectives, self-report inventories,
observational techniques, and so on. The goal of placement assessment is to determine
for each student the position in the instructional sequence and the mode of instruction
that is most beneficial.
Formative Assessment
According to Gron Lund (1990):
Formative assessment of work is used while it is in process of being carried
out so that the assessment affects the development of the works.
Formative Assessment is a part of the instructional process. When
incorporated into classroom practice, it provides the information -needed to adjust
teaching and learning while they are happening. In this sense, formative assessment
informs both teachers and students about student understanding at a point when timely
adjustments can be made. These adjustments help to ensure students achieve, targeted
standards-based learning goals within a set time frame. Although formative

assessment strategies appear in a variety of formats, there are some distinct ways to
distinguish them from summative assessments.
Formative assessment is used to monitor learning progress during instruction;
its purpose is to provide continuous feedback to both student and teaching concerning
learning successes and failures. Feedback to students provides reinforcement of
successful learning and identifies the specific learning errors and misconceptions that
need correction. Feedback to the teacher provides information for modifying
instruction and for prescribing group and individual work. Formative assessment
depends heavily on specially prepared tests and assessments for each segment of
instruction (e.g., unit, chapter. Tests and other types of assessment tasks used for
formative assessment are most frequently teacher made, but customized tests for
publishers of textbooks and other instructional materials also can serve this function.
Observational techniques are, of course, also useful in monitoring student progress
and identifying learning errors. Because formative .assessment is directed toward
improving learning and instruction, the results typically are not used for assigning
course grades.
Diagnostic Assessment
According to Gron Lund (1990):
Diagnostic assessment is concerned with those educational' problems which remains
unsolved even after the corrective prescription of formative assessment.
Diagnostic assessment is a highly specialized procedure. It is concerned with
the persistent or recurring learning difficulties that are left unresolved by the standard
corrective prescriptions of formative assessment. If a student continues to experience
failure in reading, mathematics, or other subjects, despite the use of prescribed
alternative methods of instruction, then a more detailed diagnosis is indicated. To use
a medical analogy, formative assessment provides first-aid treatment for simple

learning problems and diagnostic assessment searches for the underlying causes of
problems that do not respond to first-aid treatment. Thus, diagnostic assessment is
much more comprehensive and detailed. It involves the use of specially prepared
diagnostic tests as well as various, observational techniques. Serious learning
disabilities also are likely to require the services of educational, psychological, and
medical specialists, and given the appropriate diagnosis, the development of an
individualized education plan (IEP) for the student. The aim of diagnostic assessment
is to determine the causes of persistent learning problems and to formulate a plan for
remedial action.
Summative Assessment
The assessment that is carried out at the end of a piece of work is called summative
assessment.
Summative assessment typically comes at the end of a course (or unit) of
instruction. It is designed to determine the extent to which the instructional goals have
been achieved and is used primarily for assigning course grades or free certifying
student mastery of the intended learning outcomes. The techniques used in summative
assessment are determined by the instructional goals, but they typically include
teacher made achievement tests, ratings on various types of performance (e.g.,
laboratory, oral report), and assessments of products (e.g., themes, drawing, research
reports). These various sources of information about student achievement may be
systematically collects into a portfolio of work that may be used to summarize or
showcase the student's accomplishments and progress. Although the main purpose of
summative assessment is grading, or the certification of student achievement, it also
provides information for judging the appropriateness of the course objectives and the
effectiveness of the instruction.
1.1.3
Measurement
Meaning &Definition of Measurement

Literally the verb measure means to find or determine the 'size', `quantity' or
'quality' of anything. According to Chambers Dictionary the term 'measure' means `to
find out the size or amount of something'. "Measurement" in the International
Dictionary of Education (by G Terry Page & J.B. Thomas) means "the act of finding
the dimension of any object and the quantity found by such an act.
The 'Oxford Advance Learner's Dictionary defines `measurement' as the
'standard or system used in stating the size, quantity or degree of something.' It is the
way of assessing something quantitatively. It answers the question "How much?" In
other words we can say that measurement is the quantitative aspect of evaluation.
With the help of measurement we can easily describe students' achievement by telling
their scores. These definitions show that 'measurement' is the quantitative assessment
of something. Now let's see how the term is defined specifically in education. L. R.
Gay, (1985) defines measurement as "a process of quantifying the degree to which
someone or something possesses a given trait, i.e. quality, characteristics or features."
Educational Measurement
(The concept of measurement in education)
In Education, the term 'measurement' is used in its specific meanings. It is the
quantitative assessment of the performance of a student, teacher, curriculum or an
educational program. We can say that the quantitative score used for educational
evaluation is called measurement. The term is used for the data collected about
student or teacher performance by using a measuring instrument in a given learning
situation. It shows the exact quantity or degree of the performance, traits or character
of the person or thing to be measured. For example instead of saying that Hamid is
underweight for his age and height, we can say that Hamid is 18 years old, 5' 8" tall,
and weight only 85 pounds. Similarly, instead of saying that Hamid is a more
intelligent than Zahid, we can say that Hamid has a measured. IQ of 125 and Zahid
has a measured IQ of 88. In each of the above cases, the numerical statement is more
precise, more objective and less open to interpretation than the corresponding verbal
statement.
Steps of measurement
There are two steps used for in the process of measurement. The first step is to
devise a set of operations to isolate the attribute and make it apparent to us. Just a
standard is used for judging the durability of a thing, in the same way educators and
psychologists use various methods for testing the behaviour or performance of a
student. For this purpose they often use Stanford-Binet Tests or other tests that include
operations for eliciting behaviour that we lake to be indicative of intelligence.
The second step in measurement is to express the results of the operations
established in the first step in numerical or quantitative terms. This involves an
answer to the questions, how many or how much? Just millimetre is used as a unit for
indicating the thickness of a thing, in the same way educators and psychologists use
some numerical units for gauging intelligence, emotional maturity and other
attributes. Thus each step in measurement rests on human- fashioned definitions. In
the first step, we define the attribute that interests us. In the second step, we define the
set of operations that will allow us to identify the attribute, and express the result of
our operations.
Difference between Evaluation and Measurement
Some people use 'evaluation' and 'measurement' in the same meaning. Both the
terms are used for the process of assessing the performance of the student and
collecting information about an educational objective. Both tell how effective the
school programme has been and refer to the collection of information, appraisal of
students, and assessment of programme. Some recognize that measurement is one of
the essential components of evaluation. But there is difference between the two terms.
Roughly speaking, `measurement' is the quantitative assessment whereas 'evaluation'
is the quantitative as well as qualitative assessment of the performance of a student or
an educational objective. Measurement is a limited process used for the assessment of
limited and specific educational objectives. On the other hand, evaluation is much
more comprehensive term used for all kinds of educational objectives. Moreover, for
measurement Evaluation is the continuous inspection of all available information
concerning the student, teacher, educational programme and the teaching- learning
process to ascertain the degree of change in students and form valid judgements about
the students and the effectiveness of the programme. On the other hand 'measurement'
is the collection of data about the performance of a student, teacher or curriculum etc.
However, both 'evaluation' and 'measurement' are closed closely related. We
cannot separate one from the other. Both are used for assessing the effectiveness of a
programme of the appraisal of student. Measurement collects data directly from the
objects of concern of the students. Other information is collected from students by
non-testing procedures. Information provided by testing and non-testing is the best
thought of material to be used in the evaluation process.
The Importance of Measurement in Education
Measurement plays very important role in the teaching-learning process.
Without measurement we cannot assess the effectiveness of an educational
programme, the school or its personnel. For effective teaching, it is necessary for the
teacher to be aware of the strengths and weaknesses of his teaching method. Similarly,
for an effective learning, it is necessary for the student to be aware of the possible
outcomes of all the alternatives. He should also be informed about the advantages and
disadvantages of the respective outcomes. All this is impossible without measurement.
Without measurement, how can a teacher be aware his method of teaching or how a
student can be informed about the outcomes of the alternatives. Without
measurement, evaluation is impossible and without evaluation we cannot get

knowledge of the effectiveness of an educational programme. Measurement tells us
about the characteristics of students, their progress in studies and their achievements
in various subjects. It also tells how much or to what extent the instructional
objectives of the school and the individual classroom teacher being achieved?
Measurement serves as a guideline for students to develop their educational and
vocational plans for the future. With the help of measurement, information is gathered
about school programmes, policies, and objectives. This information is conveyed to
parents and other members of the community. Similarly, measurement data are used
by employers and educational institutions in making the selection by decision. With
the help of standardized tests, the administrators collect information about every
applicant. The information provided by the tests increases the accuracy and
objectivity of administrators & decision makers. In this way measurement data are
employed by school officials in making curricular decisions.
In short, measurement occupies the central place in the process of teaching
and learning. It is the only mean through which the educational condition can be
improved.
The Function of Measurement and Evaluation
Measurement' and 'evaluation' are interdependent ("N. We cannot separate one
from the other just as we cannot separate the two sides of a coin. Evaluation is the
qualitative aspect of anything, which is based on the quantitative value (measurement)
of that thing. Without measurement we cannot make an exact evaluation of a thing.
In this respect evaluation and measurement perform the same functions in the
education.
Cron Back, in his book "Essentials of psychological testing" has discussed the
following functions of measurement and evaluation.
(1)
Effectiveness of Educational Programme

In education, the concerned people and personnel must be aware of the
effectiveness of an educational programme. This is possible only by making an

evaluation of that programme. By evaluation a teacher is able to know as to what
extent the method of teaching is effective. He is also able to know as to what extent
the equipment of laboratory is effective. This will enable him to improve his method
of teaching make learning process effective.
(2)
Prediction
After evaluation it is possible to predict the performance of students in future.
By evaluation we know the aptitude and interest etc. with the help of which we guide
them to take admission in institution which is according to his aptitude and interest.
So, on the basis of evaluation we can plan for the future.
(3)
Selection
Measurement and evaluation is used during the selection of suitable persons
for different jobs in Govt. as well as semi Govt. departments.

(4)
Classification
Evaluation is helpful in the classification in all educational institutions. At the
end of every year, some tests are given to students to check their ability and make
classification on the basis of results obtained from these tests.
Another educational psychologist, Camp, adds that evaluation plays important
function in making maladjusted students, students as useful members of the society by
finding their interests and attitudes. Students suffering from inferiority complex can
also be treated after their proper evaluation.
In short, evaluation and measurement have important functions in education.
They serve as guidelines for students, teachers, ' counsellors and administrators.
1.1.4
Test
Measurement and evaluation are the two processes that are used to collect
information about the strengths and weaknesses of an educational programme or the

performance of a student, teacher or other personnel. But these processes need some
instruments for their operations. Such instruments are called tests. So, the instruments
that are used to measure the sample of students' behaviour under specific conditions
are called tests. In other words we can say that:
"A test is a systematic procedure for measuring a sample of students' behaviour under
specific conditions."
Some other definitions of test are given below:
1.
A procedure for critical evaluation; a means of determining the presence,

quality, or truth of something.
2.
A series of questions, problems, or physical responses designed to determine

knowledge, intelligence, or ability.
3.
The means by which the presence, quality, or genuineness of anything is

determined: (e.g. a test of a new product.)
4.
The trial of the quality of something: (e.g. to put to the test.)
5.
A particular process or method for trying or assessing.
6.
A set of problems, questions, etc., for evaluating abilities or performance.

A test consists of a number of questions to be answered, a series of problems
to be solved, or a set of tasks to be performed by the examinees. The questions might

ask the examinees to define a word, to do arithmetic computations, or to give some
information. The questions, problems and tasks are called test items.
Difference between Test, Measurement and Evaluation:
William Wiersma and Stephen G. Jurs (1990) in their book "Educational

Measurement and Testing" remarks that the terms of Testing, measurement,
assessment and evaluation are used with similar meanings but they are not
synonymous though they are related with each other. They define these terms as
follows:Test: "(It) has a narrower meaning than either measurement or assessment. Test
commonly refers to a set of items or questions under specific conditions. When a test
is given, measurement takes place; however, all measurement is not necessarily
testing".
Measurement: "For all practical purposes assessment and measurement can be
considered synonymous. When assessment is taking place, information or data are
being collected and measurement is being conducted".
Evaluation: "Evaluation is a process that includes measurement and possibly testing
but it also contains the notion of a value judgment. If a teacher administer a test to a
class and computes the percentages of correct responses, measurement and testing
have taken place. The scores must be interpreted which may mean converting them to
values like As Bs Cs and so on or judging them to be excellent, good, fair or poor.
This process is evaluation because the value judgments are being made".
Another distinction is given by Normane E. Gronlund (1985) who defines
these terms as follows in the book "Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching".
Test: "An instrument or systematic procedure for measuring a sample of behaviour.
(Answers the question "How well does the individual perform-either in comparison
with others or in comparison with a domain of performance tasks"?
Measurement: "The process of obtaining numerical description of the degree to
which an individual possesses a particular characteristic. (Answers the question "How
much?").
Evaluation: "The systematic process of collecting, (Classroom) analyzing and

interpreting information to determine the extent to which pupils are achieving
instructional objectives. (Answers the question "How good").
Similarly Anthony J. Nitko (1983) in his book "Educational Tests and
Measurement" makes the distinction between Test, Measurement and Evaluation in
the following words:
Tests: "Tests are systematic procedures for observing persons and describing them
with either a numerical scale or a category system. Thus tests may give either
qualitative or quantitative information". Measurement: "Measurement is a procedure
for assigning numbers to specified attributes or characteristics of persons in a manner
that maintains the real world relationships among persons with regard to what is being
measured".
Evaluation: "Evaluation involves judging the value or worth of a pupil of an
instructional method or of an educational program. Such judgements may or may not
be based on information obtained from tests".
Robert L. Ebel and David A. Frisible (1986) in their book "Essentials of
Educational Measurement" rightly observe.
"All tests are a subset of the quantitative tools or techniques that are classified
as measurements. And all measurement techniques are a subset of the quantitative and
qualitative techniques used in evaluation."
Table showing relationship Between Testing, Measurement and Evaluation:
Test
An
instrument
Measurement
Evaluation
or The process of obtaining a A systematic processes of
systematic procedure for numerical description of collecting and analyzing

measuring a sample of the degree to which an data in order to make
behavior
individual
possesses
a decisions
particular characteristic
Answers
How
the
well
individual
question Answers
does
the
question It answers the How good
the How much?
perform-as
compared to others.
It is means of collecting It gives Numerical Value Involves qualitative and
information
to some trait.
quantitative
assessment
and decision-making.
Its objective is to find out Its objective is to present Its objective is no make
the facts pertaining to the
some aspect.
information decisions
objectively.
about
all
components of educational
system
Test is only a instrument to Measurement

obtain data
quantifies Depends upon testing and
data and is essential part of measurement for data

evaluation
Types of Tests
TESTS
Ability Tests
Achievement Test
Aptitude Test
Essay Tests
Objective Tests
Attitude Tests
Character Tests
Personality Tests
Intelligent Test
Interest TestsAdjustment Tests
As it is shown in the diagram above, tests can be classified into two broad
categories according to the behaviour tested: ability tests and personality tests. These
two types are discussed in detail and are further classified into sub-types in the
following lines.
(A) Ability Tests
These tests are used to test the ability of a student. These tests measure the
maximum performance of a student that a student can do. Ability tests are further
classified into three types; (1) achievement tests, (2) aptitude tests, (3) intelligence
tests. These are discussed in the lines below.
(1)
Achievement tests: These tests are used to appraise the outcomes of
classroom instruction. They measure the attained ability of a student i.e. what a
student has learnt to do. Achievement tests are further classified into two types of tests
i.e. 'Essay type tests' and 'objective type tests'. (These two types of tests will be
discussed in detail in the next question).
(2)
Aptitude tests: Aptitude Tests are those tests that are used to measure the
potential ability of a student i.e. what a student can learn to do. They measure the
capacity of a student to learn a given content. According to Hull, C. L. "An aptitude
test is a psychological test designed to predict an individual's potentialities for success
or failure in a particular occupation, subject for study, etc. this shows that an aptitude
test is a test designed to discover what potentiality a given person has for learning
some particular vocation or acquiring some particular skill. Achievement tests and
aptitude tests seem to be the same. But the distinction between the two is that they are
different in use. If a test is used to measure the present attainment, it is called
achievement test. And if a test is used to predict the future level of performance, it is
called an aptitude test.
(3)
Intelligence Tests: Intelligence Tests are those tests that are used to measure
the native capacity or the overall mental ability of a student. These are also called
scholastic aptitude tests or tests of mental ability. There are many kinds of intelligent
tests but the most popular one is the concept of (IQ) introduce by Termen. IQ is
computed by dividing the mental age (MA) of a student by his physical age or
chronological age (PA or CA) i.e. the actual age of the student. Then the result is
multiplied by 100.
I.Q =
MA
CA
100
Where:
I.Q. = Intelligence Quotient
M.A. = Mental Age
C.A. = Chronological Age (Physical Age)
(B)
Personality Tests
Tests used for the assessment of personality of a student are called personality
tests. They measure the typical performance of a student i.e. what a student will do.
They are universally administered almost all over the world in various fields,
vocations, institutions, and for the selection of recruits. In Pakistan, too, personality
tests are used for job selection and for the selection of army recruits like ISSB
examinations. Personality tests include attitude tests, interest tests, adjustment and
temperament tests, character tests, and tests of other motivational and interpersonal
characteristics.
Uses of Tests
Tests play important role in teaching- learning process. Without tests we
cannot make evaluation or assessment of a student's or neither teacher's performance
nor we can collect information about the effectiveness of an educational programme.
That is why tests are very important in education. They motivate students for learning.
They serve a number of purposes in a variety of educational activities. The following
are the different uses of tests;
1.
Uses of tests in teaching process

With the help of the result obtained from tests, teachers can easily collect
information about aptitude, intelligence, interests, attitude and the overall

performance of the students. He comes to know the strengths and weaknesses of his
teaching method. It becomes easy for the teacher to grade students in a subject. Teats'
results enable him to know how the future success of a student in a subject can be
predicted.
2.
Uses of tests in learning process

The student is the centre of intere ;t in teaching learning process. All kinds of
educational activiti .;s are performed for th sack of student. That is why the use and
importance of tests in th process of learning is greater than in any other activity. Tests
hel ,students in knowing their strengths and weaknesses in a subject. The resul,S
obtained from these tests serve as guideline for students. They motivate students to
study.
3.
Uses of Tests in Guidance

Tests show the overall performance of the students. Therefore; they enable the
examiner to know how to guide students educational and vocational choice. Tests also
make parents aware o the aptitude of their children and can make a plan for their
proper guidance. The result of the tests in itself serves as a guideline for the students.
4.
Uses of Tests in Administration

The results obtained from the tests provide the administrators of the
deportment with useful information In the light of these tests, they can easily decide
how to promote students, how to admit them an&how to modify (trie.7) school
objectives, instructional methods and curricula. They can then easily decide how to
make the teachinglearning processes effective.
5.
Uses of Tests in Research

The data collected from tests are uses as powerful tools in research and
experimentation in classroom. The research workers use these data in their genetic or
ease study research.
In short, tests are used in almost all educational activities. They are the real
tools with the help of which information about teachers, students, curricula and etc.
are gathered. And in the light of this information, teaching and learning process is
improved.
1.2
THE PURPOSE OF TESTING
Introduction:
The purpose of test is usually included the test is announced or at the
beginning of the semester when the evaluation procedures are described as a part of
the general orientation to the course. Should there be any doubt whether the purpose
of the test is clear to all pupils, however it culd be explained again at at the time of
testing. This is usually done orally. The only time, a statement of the purpose of the
test needs to be included in the written direction is, when the test is to be administered
to several sections taught by different teachers, then a written statement of purpose
ensures, greater uniformity. There are various types of test being applied in the
educational institutions, because no a childs ability interests and personality. One test
measures only a specific ability that is why school administers use many different
types of tests even in one single area such as intelligence, move than one test are
needed over a period of years to obtain a reliable estimate of ability each test serves
its own purpose, however, testing and evaluation serve following purposes.
Types of Testing:
There are four types of testing.
Placement Testing:
Most placement tests constructed by classroom teachers are pretests designed

to measure.
1. Whether pupils possess the prerequisite skills needed to succeed in a unit or
course or.
2. To what extent pupils have already achieved the objectives of the planned
instruction.
In the first instance we are concerned with the pupils readiness to begin the
instruction. In the second we are concerned with the appropriateness of our
planned instruction for the group and with proper placement of each pupil in
the instructional sequence.
Formative Testing:
Formative tests are given periodically during instruction on monitor pupils
learning progress and to provide ongoing feedback to pupils and teacher, formative
testing reinforces successful learning and reveals learning weaknesses in need of
correction. A formative test typically covers some predefined segment passes a rather
limited simple of learning tasks. The test items may be easy or difficult, depending on
the learning tasks in the segment of instruction being tested, formative tests are
typically criterion referenced mastery test, but norm-referenced survey tests can also
survey this function, ideally, the test will be constructed in such a way that corrective
prescription can be given for missed test items or sets of lest items. Because the main
purpose of the test is to improve learning the result are seldom used for assigning
grades.
Diagnostic Testing:
Diagnosis of persistent learning difficulties involves much more then
diagnostic testing, but such tests are useful in the total process. The diagnostic test
takes up where the formative test leaves off if pupils do not respond to the feedback
corrective prescriptions of formative testing. A more detailed search for the source of
testing we will need to include a number of a test items in each specific area, with
some slight variation from item to items in diagnosing pupils, difficulties in adding
whole numbers, for example we would want to include addition problems containing.
Various numbers combination with some not requiring carrying and some requiring
carrying, to pinpoint the specific types of error each pupil is making. Because our
focus is on the pupils learning difficulties, diagnostic test must be constructed in
accordance with the most common sources of error that pupils encounter. Such tests
are typically confined to a limited area of instruction, and the test items tend to have a
relatively low level of difficulty.
Summative Testing:
The summative test ig given at the end of a course or unit of instruction, and
the results are used primarily for assigning grades or certifying pupil mastery of the
instructional objectives. The result can also be used for evaluating the effectiveness of
the instruction. The end of the course test (final examination) is typically a normreferenced survey test that is broad in coverage and includes test items with a wide
range of difficulty. The more restricted end of unit, summative test might be norm
referenced or criterion referenced depending on whether mastery or developmental
outcomes are the focus of instruction.
Purpose of Testing:
1.
To Certify Pupils Achievements / Grading:

Tests are given to the students to ascertain their achievements tests provide the
teacher with students actual achievements instead of an intuitive generalization based
on simple observation. These tests given the teacher an objective and comprehensive
picture of each pupils progress. This is important because all concerned persons
(students themselves, students parents, teachers, counselors, administrators,
employers, admission officers, and even community) need to know students
performed in school and in particular courses.
To report Students Progress to Parents:

Testing gives the teacher in objective and comprehensive picture of each
pupils progress, so that it could be presented to the present. These reports from the
foundation for most effective cooperation between parents and teachers, which results
improved learning.
To Report to Administrators:
The results of tests indicate the extent to which the schools objectives are
being achieved from the results of evaluation the administrators become able to
identify the weak points and strengths in the teaching programs of their schools and
take necessary action for their improvement.
To Assess Learners Needs:

To test the pupils knowledge and skills at the beginning of instruction enables
the teacher to answer the questions like: Do the pupils possess the abilities and skills
needed to proceed with the instruction? What, and to what level have the pupils
already mastered the intended outcomes? This information helps the teacher in
planning his instructional activities.
To Provide Relevant Instruction:

Testing provide a type of continuous feedback, about the usefulness of the
instructional process it helps the teacher in changing and adapting the instructional
activities continuously according to the students needs.
To Furnish Instruction:
Testing factions as an instructional device it not only increases the self-
knowledge of the students, but also the attainment of specific objectives. This practice
of giving tests is common in our institutions through these the students become
aware of their speed of progress, errors, and present status on the basis of which they
plan their further efforts.
To Provide Guidance and Counseling:

The results of tests are especially useful for guidance and counseling of the
students. These are useful in assisting the students with educational and vocational
decisions, guiding them in the selection of curricular and co-curricular activities, and
helping them solve personal and social adjustment problems.
To Know the level of Achievement of Objectives:

The first step in the instructional process is to determine the extent to which
the pupils achieved the instructional objectives. Testing and evaluation help in this
regard tests are useful in determining the learning outcomes of classroom instruction.
The teacher can evaluate the success or failure of classroom learning in relation to the
test results. The teacher then accordingly adjusts the level and direction of classroom
instruction.
To Analyze the Instruction Objectives:

The information from carefully developed tests and evaluation is used to
assess the appropriateness and attainability of the instructional objective. The

instructional objectives are modified in the light of the evaluation information.
To Discover Maladjusted Children:

In every school there are some students who present severe problems of
educational or social adjustment. These include the withdrawn, the unhappy, the
mentally retarded, and others who are not adjusting to the pattern of the school. The
standardized tests help the teachers and counselors to understand and help such
students.
To Appraise Educational instrumentalities:

Testing and evaluation is useful, in appraisal for educational instrumentalities
such as teachers, teaching methods, teaching materials and text books.
To Conduct Research:
Test and evaluation data is important in research programs. The information
obtained from evaluation is used to compare the effectiveness of different curricula,

different teaching methods and different organizational plans techniques of
evaluation, and to find out the ways to improve to teaching learning process.
To Change the Curricula:

One purpose of the tests and evaluation is to find out the weak points in the
curriculum so that it could be changed in accordance will the need, of the society.
To measure Behavior in Controlled Situation:

Another purpose of tests is to measure the behavior of the subject or student
under controlled conditions.

1.3
GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF ASSESSMENT:

Assessment is an integrated process for determining the nature and extent of
student learning and development. In order to make this process effective, the
following principles are taken into consideration.
1)
Clearly specify what is to be assessed the priority in the assessment process.

The effectiveness of assessment depends as much on a careful description of
what to assess as it does on the technical qualities of the assessment procedure
used. When assessing student learning, this means clearly specifying the
intended learning goals before selecting the assessment procedures to use.
2)
An assessment procedure should be selected because of its relevance to the

characteristics or performance to be measured. Assessment procedures are
3)
frequently selected on the basis of their objectivity, accuracy or convenience.

Comprehensive assessment requires a variety of procedures. No single type of
instrument or procedure can assess the vast array of learning and development
outcomes emphasized in a school program. Multiple choice and short answer
tests of achievement are useful for measuring knowledge, understanding, and
application outcomes, but essay tests and other written projects are needed to
assess the ability to organize and express ideas. A complete picture of student
achievement and development requires the use of many different assessment
4)
procedures.
Proper use of assessment procedure requires an awareness of their limitations.
Assessment procedures range from very highly developed measuring
instruments to rather crude assessment devices. Even the best educational and
psychological measuring instrument yield results that are subject to various
types of measurement error.
Not best or assessment asks all the questions or poses all the problems that
might appropriately be presented in a comprehensive coverage of the
knowledge, skills and understanding relevant to the content standards or
objectives of a course or instructional sequence. Instead only a sample of the
relevant problems of questions is presented.
Even in a relatively narrow part of a content domain, such as understanding
photosynthesis or the addition and subtraction of fractions, there are a host of
problems that might be presented, but any given test or assessment samples
but a small fraction of those problems. Limitations of assessment procedures
do not negate the value of tests and other types of assessments. A keen
awareness of the limitations of assessment instruments makes it possible to
use them more effectively. Cruder the instrument, the greater its limitations
and consequently, the more caution required in its use.
5)
Assessment is a means to an end, not an end in itself. The use of assessment

procedures implies that some useful purpose is being served and that the user
is clearly aware of this purpose. To blindly gather data about students and then
file the information away is a waste of both time and effort. Assessment is best
viewed as a process of obtaining information on which to base educational
decisions.
1.4
TYPE OF EVALUATION PROCEDURE

The evaluation process can basically be carried out at two main levels;
programme and student. Student evaluation can be further be subdivided into

formative and summative evaluation.
Evaluation procedure
Programme Evaluation
Formative evaluation
Summative evaluation
Student evaluation
Diagnostic evaluation
Proagramme Evaluation:program evaluation is systematic method for collecting,

analyzing, and using information to answer questions about projects, policies and
programs, particularly about their effectiveness and efficiency.
When our concern is judging the compatibility between the aims and the learning out
comes of a programme, the emphasis is on the efficacy of that programme. On the
other hand a good programme may be badly implemented. The task of quality and
control is to maintain and maximize the efficiency of a programme.
The quality content of a programme is to determined, among other factors, by
i.
ii.
Its conceptual quality.

Logical relevance to the need of the student.
iii.
Simplicity and comprehensibility in terms of readability and literacy level of
iv.
v.
the content.
Relative stability and survival value in the literature.
Applicability to familiar and novel situation.
To matter how good a programme may be; the maintenance system must be
well facilitated. The school administrators head of subjects unit, supervisors. The
teacher and the pupils must be activity involved if successful implementation of the
programme is to be realized, the teacher being the main executor of the programme
must be will trained not just to be able to teach facts but so select facts that relate to
other facts and principles. The teacher education programmes in the advanced teacher
colleges and the universities must prepare teachers to be able to teach their subjects
effectively.
In order to be implemented a programme should be designed in such a way
that under favourable conditions certain intended learning outcomes will emerge. The
school teacher, the headmaster and supervisor must gather information from time to
time in order determine the success or seakness of the programme. If desirable
outcomes are observed, the focus of all concerned with instruction should be to
improve the programme through an effective maintenance system. If the product
(students) produced are of poor quality, corrective measures are selected and applied
in order to achieve the desired results. If after all these efforts, the products are still
found to be poor the programme is usually abandoned.
Several process are involved in the input out put process. The teacher is the
most important component of the maintenance process of the programme.t he
interacts with the students with the staff, experts and administrators and forms a
bridge between hem and learning materials. Often he acts as the input analyzer and an
identifier as well as the teaching agent of the programme.t he external sensor
examines the learning environment to identify changes perhaps economic, political

and psychological or social within the environment that can destabilize the system.
The input analyzer processes all the information supplied by the external
sensor and transmits it to the school administrator for appropriate action. He analyze
and organize information obtained form the input variable into a comprehensible
structure to be used in planning activities. The identifier (usually the teacher or his
head of department) examines the out put and the internal working conditions of the
maintance system. It is he who provide the decision rules (head master) with a realibel
picture of the internal condition of the system. The input output information provided
by the analyzer and the identifier becomes the input of decision rule and it is utilized
by the headmaster to produce a decision policy or instruction to the teacher.
Any given programme introduced into school setting is not left in its naked
form but assumes a different from for that setting. It contents are emphasized as
teacher, administrators and students.
Programme education can be carried out through the use of surveys, interview,
experimental students and so on.
Student Evaluation:
As pointed out earlier, testing forms an integral part of student evaluation. The
purpose of this type of evaluation is to determine how well a students is performing in
a programme. Through a series of oral questions, paper-pencil tests, manipulative still
tests. Tutorials discussions, tutorials, individualized instruction, assignments, projects
and so on the student is gradually guided towards a desired goal. Basically there are
two types of student evaluation.
i.
Forative and
ii. Summative
i.
Formative Evaluation:
Formative evaluation aims at ensuring a healthy acquisition and development
of knowledge and skills by students. Formative evaluation is also used to identify

students in order to guide them towards desiable goals. As student needs and
difficulties are identified, appropriate remedial measures are taken to solve such
problems. The purpose is to find out whether after learning experience students are
able to do what they were previously unable to do. A short term objectives of
formative evaluation may be to help student perform well at the end of the
programme. It is a process of channeling input variables through a process that will
yield expected outputs. The classroom is variables through a process that will yield
expected outputs. The classroom teacher is the best formative evaluator. Formative
evaluation attempts.
1.
2.
To identify the content (knowledge or skills).

To appreciate the level of cognitive abilities such as memorization,
classification, comparison, analysis, explanation, quantification, application
3.
and so on.
To specify the relationship between content and levels of cognitive abilities.
In other words, formative e evaluation provides the evaluator with useful
information about the strength or weakness of the student within an instruction

context.
1.
2.
Formative evaluation is alone during an instructional programme.

The instructional programme should aim at the attainment of certain objectives
3.
during the implementation of the programme.

Formative evaluation is done to monitor learning and modifying the
4.
programme if needed before its common completion.

Formative evaluation is for current students.
Characteristics of Formative Evaluation

1.
2.
It relatively focuses on molecular analysis.

It is because seeking.
3.
4.
5.
6.
It is interested in the broader experience of the programme users.

It is designing exploratory and flexible.
It seeks to identify influential variables.
It requires analysis of instructional material for mapping the hierarchical
structure of the learning tasks and actual teaching of the course for a certain
period.
Summative Evaluation
Summative evaluation is primary concerned with purposes progress and
outcomes of the teaching learning process attempts as far as possible to determine to
what extent the broad objective of a programme have been achieved. It is based on the
following assumptions.
1.
2.
3.
4.
That the programmers objectives are achieved.

That the teaching learning process has been conducted effiently.
That the teacher student material interaction have been conductive to learning.
That there is uniformity in classroom conditions for all learners.
Unlike formative evaluation, which is guidance oriented summative evaluation
is judgmental in nature. Promotion examination, the first school leaving certificate

examination, the public examination belongs to this form of evaluation. Summative
evaluation carries threat with it in that the student may have no knowledge of the
evaluator.
According to A.F Nikto (1983) summativn already completed programme,
procedure or product. Summative evaluation is done at the conclusion instruction and
measures the extent to which student have attained the desired out comes.
Chief Characteristics of Summative Evaluation:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
It lends to the use of well-defined evaluation design.

It Focus on analysis.
It provides descriptive analysis.
It trends to stress local effects.
It is unobtrustive and non-reactive as far as possible.
It is concerned with broad range of issues.
Its instruments are reliable and valid.
Difference between the Summative and Formative Evaluation

In the beginning these terms applied for the evaluation of curricular work only.
M. Seriven explains the difference between these terms as follows in his book
Evaluation the asurus (1980).
Formative evaluation is conducted during the development or improvement
of a programme or product (or person) it is an evaluation conducted for in-house but
is may be done by an internal or external evaluator (preferably) a combination.
Summative evaluation, on the other hand, is conducted after completion of a
programme. (or a course of study) and for the benefit of some external audience or
decision malker. (e.g funding agency or future possible users) though it may be done
by an internal or an external evaluator or by a combination.
Gloria, Hitchok and other (1986) state the difference between the summative
and formative avaluation in these words. It is fairly straight forward to produce an
ideal type of either a summative or a formative profiles. It is far more difficult to
combine the two into one unified system. The undervaluing philosophies of the two
appear difficult to reconcile.
Following are the main differences between these types of evaluation:
1.
2.
They differ in purpose, nature and timing.

Summative evaluation is the terminal assessment of performance at the end of
instruction but formative evaluation is the assessment made during the
instructional phase to inform the teacher about progress learning and what
3.
more is to be done.
The summative evolution limits the use of profile and record of achievement
4.
but they are regulary use in formative evaluation.

In summative evaluation, the assessment is done to test learning outcomes
against a set of objectives criteria with out revealing the details of the route to
the teacher, which the student followed in reaching that point. Formative
evaluation takes the form of a dialogue between the student and teacher in
which both determine the task.
Broad Differences Formative and Summative
Characteristic
Formative
Summative
Purpose
To monitor progress of To check final status of

student getting feedback
student
Content focus
Detailed narrow scop
Gernal Board Scope
Methods
Daily assignments
Projects
Observations
Projects
Daily
Weekly, quarterly etc.
Frequency
1.5
NORM- REFERENCED AND CRITERION REFERENCED TEST:

Test designed to provide, a measure of performance that is interpretable in
terms of an individuals relative standing in some known group is called normreferenced test. A norm group may be made up of a students at the local level, district
level, provincial level or national level.
Types of Norms: There are two type of norms which are following.
a)
National Norms: Most standardized achievement and aptitude test require

national norms because the tests are intended for used across the country. The
b)
norm group should represent the population of student in the country.

Local Norms: There are many communities where local norms are more
useful than the national for example there may be some cities where the
citizen who are above national averages in educational and socioeconomic
level.
Characteristics of Norm-Referenced Test

1.
Its basic purpose in to measure students achievement to curriculum based

skill. Therefore it covers majority of the course.
2.
It is prepared for a particular grade level. As the test is curriculum based

therefore. It can only be applied to a particular class for which it is prepared.
3.
It classifies achievement as above average, average or below average for a

given grade.
4.
It is generally reported in the form or percentile rank, linear standard score,

normalized standard score and grade equivalent score.
5.
Norm-referenced test is likely to have times that are very difficult for the grade
level so student can be ranked.
Drawbacks of NormReferenced Test

1.
Test item that are answered correctly by most of the pupils are not included in
these test because of their inadequate contribution to response variance. They
will be the items that deals with the important concepts of course content.
2.
Norm-Referenced test compare an individual performance to the performance

of a group called norm group an entirely different conclusion will be reached
if the norm group is a collection of university seniors majoring in physics.
a)
Criterion Referenced Test:
1.
According to Gronlund (1985) a test designed to provide a measure of

performance that is interpretable in terms of a clearly defined and delimited
domain of learning talks is called criterion-referenced test.
2.
According to wiersna and Stephen (1990) criterion referenced test describe.

The performance of the student in the herm of actual skills or task that are
included in the test.
b)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Haracteristics of Criterion-Referenced Test:

It measures students achievement of curriculum based skills.
It is prepared for a particular grade or course level.
It has balanced representation of goals and objectives.
It can be administered before and after instruction.
It is used to evaluate the curriculum plan, instructional progress and group
c)
students interaction.
Limitation of CRTS:
CRTs tell only whether a learner has reached proficient in a task area but does
not show how good or poor in the learners level of ability.
Task included in CRTs may be highly influenced by a given teacher interests

or biases, leading to general validity problem.
Only some area readily land themselves for listing specific test can be built
and this may be a constructing element for teacher.
1.6
EDUCATIONAL:
Educational assessment can be defined as the process of documenting
knowledge skills, attitude and beliefs.

Or
The process of collecting synthesizing and interpreting information to
assessment.
General Principles of Assessment:
Following are the main principles of assessment.
1. Clearly specify what is to be assessed has priority in the assessment process.
2. An assessment procedure should be selected because of its relevance to the
characteristics or performance to be measured.
3. Comprehensive assessment requires a variety of procedures.
4. Proper use of assessment procedures requires an awareness of their

limitations.
5. Assessment is a means to an and not an end in itself.
Clearly specify what is to be assessed:
General statements from, content standard or from course objectives can be a
helpful starting point but in most cases teachers needs to be more specific for
assessment process to be effective. Thus specification of the characteristic to be
measured should precede the selection or development of assessment procedures.
Specify the intended learning goals before selecting the assessment procedure to use.
Example:
Content standard in the field of physics night specify that students. Should
understand idea documents in field of physics.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Assessment may be in the form of multiple choice.

Short answer
Essay questions
Numerical questions
To establish assessment priorities for such a standard teacher needs to answer
the questions such as the following.

Q1.
What idea?
Q2.
What document?
Q3.
What concepts of physics?

The general statement in standard does not answer such questions, but they
must be either explicitly or implicitly, to develop assessments.

Assessment must be relevant to the performance to be measured:
Assessments procedures are frequently selected on the basics of their
objectivity, accuracy or convenience although there criteria are important they are
secondary to main criterion.
Examples:
If teachers goal is that students should learn written skills or creative writing,
composition, sentence structure so the if multiple choice will be option for assessment
then it will be poor one, teacher must include story writing, easy, summaries or such
type of things for improving writing stills of a child.
Close match between the intended learning goals and type of assessment is
must.
Comprehensive assessment requires a variety of procedure:
A lot of procedures are required to assess the knowledge of a person about
anything. Things which are to be assessed also play a vital role in connectivity with
the procedure some of the procedures are given below.
Multiple choice
Short answer
Essay test
Written projects
Observational technique
Multiple-Choice and short answer test of achievement are useful for
measuring knowledge, understanding, and application outcomes, but essay tests and
other written project are needed to assess the ability to organize and express ideas.
Projects that require students to formulate problems, accumulate to formulate
problems, accumulate information through library research or collect data (e.g
through experimental observations or interviews) are needed to measure certain skills
in formulating and sawing problems observational techniques are needed to assess
performance skills and various aspects of students behavior and self-report techniques
are use full for assessing interests and attitudes. A complete picture of students
achievement and development requires the use of many different assessment
procedure.
Proper use of Assessment Procedure Requires an Awareness of their Limitations

Not a single test can assess whatever the teacher want every procedures has its
plus points and negative pointes or we can say it is not suitable for the things to be
assessed. So one must how about it and takes care of it so that we can get correct
assessment results.
Some of the major problems are
1. Sampling error
2. Chance factor
3. Incorrect interpretations
Sampling Error:
An achievement test may not adequately sample a particular domain of
instructional content. An observational instrument design to assess a students social
adjustment may not sample enough behavior for a dependable index of this trait.
Sampling can be controlled though careful application of established
measurement procedures.
Chance Factor:
A second source of error is caused by chance factors influencing assessment
results, such as guessing on objective Tess, subjective scoring on essay test, errors in
judgment on observation devices and in consistent responding on self report
instrument.
Through the careful use of assessment procedure we are able to keep these
error of assessment to a minimum.
Incorrect Interpretation:
The incorrect interpretation of measurement results constitutes another major
source of error. We usually, more precise the result than the requirement thats why
this problem waists Result must be precise accurately.
Assessment is a mean to an end, not an end in itself:

The use of assessment procedure implies that some useful purpose implies that
some useful purpose is being served and that the user is clearly aware of his purpose.
The blindly gather data about students and then file the information away is a waste of
time and effort. Assessment is best viewed as a process of obtaining information on
which to base educational decisions.
Conclusion:
All the principles are very important because they are directly linked with the
inter predation of information if the requirement is not fulfilled than assessment will
be wrong.
UNIT-2:
JUDGING THE QUALITY OF THE TEST
Definition: Test percentile scores are just one type of test scores you will find on your
child's testing reports. Many test reports include several types of scores. Percentile
scores are almostalways reported on major achievement that are taken by your child's
entire class. Percentile scores will also be found on individual diagnostic test reports.
Understanding test percentile scores is important for you to make decisions about
your child's special education program.
Test percentile scores commonly reported on most standardized assessments a child
takes in school. Percentile literally means perhundred. Percentile scores on teachermade tests and homework assignments are developed by dividing the student's raw
score on her work by the total number of points possible. Converting decimal scores
to percentiles is easy. The number is converted by moving the decimal point two
places to the right and adding a percent sign. A score of .98 would equal 98%.
Test percentiles on a commercially produced, norm-referenced or standardized test,
are calculated in much the same way, although thecalculations are typically included
in test manuals or calculated with scoring software.
If a student scores at the 75th percentile on a norm-referenced test, it canbe said that
she has scored at least as well, or better than, 75 percent of students her age from the
normative sample of the test. Several othertypes of standard scores may also appear
on test reports.
Percentile rank
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The percentile rank of a score is the percentage of scores in its frequency distribution
that are the same or lower than it. For example, a test score that is greater than or
equal to 75% of the scores of people taking the test is said to be at the 75th percentile
rank.
Percentile ranks are commonly used to clarify the interpretation of scores on
standardized tests. For the test theory, the percentile rank of a raw score is interpreted
as the percentages of examinees in the norm group who scored at or below the score
of interest.mm
Percentile ranks (PRs) are often normally distributed (bell-shaped) while normal
curve equivalents (NLEs) are uniform and rectangular in shape. Percentile ranks are
not on an equal-interval scale; that is, the difference between any two scores is not the
same between any other two scores whose difference in percentile ranks is the same.
For example, 50 _ 25 = 25 is not the same distance as 60 _ 35 = 25 because of the
bell-curve shape of the distribution. Some percentile ranks are closer to some than
others. Percentile rank 30 is closer on the bell curve to 40 than it is to 20.
The mathematical formula is
ce+0.5 fi
X 100%
N
where c is the count of all scores less than the score of interest, f is the frequency of
the score of interest, and Nis the number of examinees in the sample. If the
distribution is normally distributed, the percentile rank can be inferred from the
standard score.
2.1
VALIDITY, METHODS OF DETERMINING VALIDITY:
Introduction:
Tests play a central role in the evaluation of pupil learning. They provide
relevant measures of many important learning outcomes. Tests and other evaluation
instruments serve a variety of uses in the school, for example test of achievement
might be used for selection, placement, diagnosis or certification of mastery.
When constructing or selecting tests and other evaluation instruments, the
most important question is to what extent will be the interpretation of the scores be
appropriate, meaningful and useful for the intended application of the results?So
validity is always concerned with the specific use of results.
Factors Influencing Validity:
A careful examination of test items will indicate wether the test appears to
measure the subject matter content and the mental function that the teacher is
interested in testing. Following are the factors that prevent the test items from
functioning as intended and there by lower the validity of the interpretation.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Unclear Direction:
Directions that do not clearly indicate to the pupil how to respond to the items
will reduce validity.
Reading Vocabulary and Sentence Structure too Difficult:
Vocabulary and sentence structure that is too complicated for the pupils will
distort the meaning of the test results.
Inappropriate level of difficulty:
Items that are too easy or too difficult also lower validity.
Poorly constructed items:
Test items that provide clues to the answers will measure the pupils alertness
in detecting clues as well as those aspects of pupil performance that the test is
5.
intended to measure.
Ambiguity:
Ambiguous statements confuse the pupil and so causes to discriminate in a
6.
negative direction.
Inadequate time limits:
Time limits that do not provide pupil with enough time to consider the items
7.
reduce the validity.

Test too short:
If the test is too short to provide a representative sample of the performance
8.
we are interested in, its validity will suffer accordingly.

Improper arrangement:
Test items are arranged in order of difficulty, with the easiest items first.
9.
Placing difficult items early may cause pupils to spend too much time.
Identifiable pattern of answers:
Placing correct answers in some systematic patern will enable pupils to guess
the answers more easily.
Methods of Determining Validity:

There are several methods of determining the validity of measuring
instruments which we may call.
1.
Content Validity:
Content validity is evaluated by showing how well the content of the test
samples the class of situations. It is especially important in the case of
2.
achievement and proficiency measures. It is also known as face validity.

Concurrent Validity:
It is evaluated by showing how well test scores correspond to already accept
measures of performance or status made at the same time. For example, we
may give a social studies class a test on knowledge of basic concepts in social
studies and at the same time obtain from its teacher report on these abilities as
far as pupils in the class are concerned. If the relationship between the test
scores and the teachers report of abilities is high. The test will have high
3.
concurrent validity.
Predictive Validity:
It is evaluated by showing how well prediction made from the tests are
confirmed by evidence gathered at some subsequent time. When the tester
wants to estimate how well a student may be able to do in college courses on
4.
the basis of how well he has done on test he took in secondary schools.
Construct Validity:
It is evaluated by investigating what psychological qualities a test measures. It
is ordinarily used when the tester has no definitive criterion measure of what
he is concerned with and hence must use indirect measures. This type of
validity is usually involved in such tests as those of study habits,
appreciations, understanding and interpretation of data.
Conclusion:
In short we can say that validity is specific to the purpose and situation for
which a test is used. A test can be reliable without being valid but the converse is not
true in other words. It is conceivable that a test can measure some quality with a high
degree of consistency without measuring at all the quality it was actually intended to
measure.
2.2
FACTORS AFFECTING VALIDITY

Test experts generally agree that the most important quality of test is its
validity. The word Validity means effectiveness or Soundness. It refers to the

accuracy with which a thing is measured.
Types of Validity:
Validity is classified into three categories. 1) Content Validity. 2) Criterion
related validity. 3) Construct Validity.
A good measuring instrument is that which is valid with respect to all these
three categories. These are discussed below.
i.
Content Validity:
Content validity is the degree to which a test measures an intended content
area. In other words the content validity of a test refers to the extent to which
the test content represents a specified universe of content.
For Example: for example if a teacher taught a course of biology and would
like to give a test at the end of the course.
ii.
Construct Validity:
Construct validity is the degree to which a test measures an intended

hypothetical construct. In other words construct validity refers to the extent to
which the test throughout the major. There will be a correlation between the
new measuring approach / tool with standardized measure of ability in this
iii.
very discipline (like GRE subject test).

Concurrent Validity:
Concurrent validity is the degree to which the scores on a test are related to the
scores on another, already established, test administered at the same time or to
some other valid criterion available at the same time.
For Example:We may give a social studies class a test based on knowledge of
basic concepts in social studies and at the same time obtain from its teacher a
report on these abilities. As far as pupils in the class are concerned measures to
construct that it claims to measure.
For Example: Examples of the construct are intelligence, creativity ability to
apply principles and ability to reason. For example if a teacher wants to
iv.
measure the ability to reason, and give two reasoning tests to his class.
Criterion related Validity:
This type of validity is used to predict about the upcoming or futures or
current performance and it correlated the test results with another criterion of
interest. (Coz by, Zool).
For Example: If for an educational program, measures are developed to
v.
assess the cumulative student learning.

Predictive Validity:
Predictive validity is the degree to which a test can predict how well an
individual will do in future situation. In other words, predictive validity means
the validity of a test or examination which is based upon its correlation with
some future variable.
For Example: For example one speaks of the predictive validity of school
examination for future success in higher education. Similarly, if a small test
gives the same standing to an individual in a test which was achieved by him
in a much longer test, it will be culled concurrently validity.
Methods of Determining Validity:

The methods of deterning validity is also termed as, forms of Expressing
validity. There forms, generally used for expressing validity index of the test.
1. Correlation Coefficient:
Test scores are correlated with that of criterion scores. The obtained coefficient
of correlation is the extent of validity index of the test.
2. Expectancy Table:
Test scores are evaluated or correlated with the rating of the supervisors. It
provides empirical probabilities of the validity index.
3. Cross Validation:
It means to have another look for correlation coefficient with another criterion
or expect any tables with other criterion. It is of two types.
a. Empirical validation
b. Logical or rationale validation
2.3
RELIABILITY, AND METHODS OF DETERMINING RELIABILITY:
Meaning and Definition:

Reliability means consistency of measurement in the words of Ebel and
frisbie, The ability of a test to measure the same quantity when it is administred to an
individual on two different occasions by two different teser is called reliability. The
reliability indicates the degree to which measurement can be relied upon, to measure
the same thing each time is used.
In simple words we can say that a good measuring instrument (test) should be
reliable in reporting the results if it is done by the same group of student under the
same conditions.
Reliability is also called dependability or trustworthiness reliability is the
degree to which a test consistently measures whatever it measures. The more reliable
a test is, the more confidence we can have that the scores obtained from the
administration of the test are essentially the same scores that would be obtained if the
test where re-administered. An unreliable test is essentially useless. For example, if an
intelligence test was unreliable then a student soring an IQ of 120 today might score
an IQ of 140 tomorrow and a 95 the day after tomorrow. On the other hand if the test
is reliable then the IQ of a student will remain nearly the same each time the test is
administered. The reliability of a test depends upon the number of questions consisted
by it. A test will be more reliable if it possesses more questions. In this respect,
objective type tests are more reliable because its sampling is more extensive.
We can take another expert opinion to understand the meaning of reliability.
If a clinical thermo meter on three successive determinations, for example yielded
reading of 97o, 103o and 99.6ofor the same patient, it would not be considered very
reliable.
Reliability, of course is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for using a
test. A highly reliable test may be totally invalid or may not measure anything that is
psychologically of educationally significant.
The reliability of a single of a single test score is expressed quantitatively in
terms of the instruments standard error of measurement. If the standard error of
measurement, for example, is 2.5, we can say that there are approximately two
chances in three (more precisely 68 in 100) that the true score falls between 72.5 and
77.5 when the obtained score is 75. By definition, an unreliable test cannot possible
be valid. The necessary degree of reliability however depends on the use that is made
of test scores.
Methods of Determining Reliability:
For determining reliability, it is necessary that the test should be valid and it
should measure what it is designed to measure. It should be administered to an
appropriate person or group of parsons for whom the test has been developed.
Reliability is a statistical measure and therefore it can be computed by using different
statistical methods. Which have been stated in detail on next page.
1.
Test-retest method:
When the reliability of the results are two measured, then at that very situation
the test retest method is used in this method the tests are subjected to the group
of students at different perrods of time. The scores obtained from first and
second time can be correlated in order to check the stability and persistency of
test.
In test re-test reliability the time factor counts a lot in very close retesting the
results are approximately the same, yielding high correlation. But when the
retest is administered after an year or two, as the result of changes in the
characteristics of students, there are expected to be large variation in the
outcome and therefore stability will be low.\
Limitation:
i.
The co-efficient of reliability established through test-retest method is

erroneous.
ii.
The reliability determined through test-retest method has memory of carry

over effect.
iii.
The test retest method is not an objective method ascertaining reliability of the
test.
2.
Equivalent forms method:

The second method of ascertaining reliability is alternate form method or
method of equivalence. Through this method one has to use two alternate or
equivalent tests in order to establish the reliability. This method is used to see
the reliability of test for measuring certain content area. It is applied to
standardized tests only as they have two or more forms of the same test
available.
Equivalent forms are used in the same group and in close succession. The
result of both the tests are correlated. The correlation shows the degree to
which both tests are measurining the same content area. Sometimes the
equivalent forms are used with time interval. Results obtained by this method
provide both stability and reliability of test. This method is generally
considered to be the best method.
Limitation:
i.
Finding the reliability through this method is cumbersome because it is

difficult to judge the quality of a test which is equivalent in each and every
respect.
ii.
This process is more time consuming and also it is not free from carry over
effect.
iii.
More over establishment of reliability through this method is not feasible for
each and every type of test.
3.
Split half method:

As the name indicates in Split-Half- method the approach is to split the test
into two reasonable equivalent halves. Such independent sub-test are then used
as a source of the two independent scores needed for reliability estimation.
In this method a test is administered to a group of students. Before scoring, the
test is split into two equal halves. Generally odds and evens are separated. By
marking each part separately each student gets two different scores which are
correlated. The correlation gives a measure of internal consistency, of the test.
Reliability of the test is estimated by applying spearman Brown formula:
1
2 x Reliability on test
2
1
1+ Reliability on test
2
Like equivalent forms method the split-half method helps in determining the
reliability of test items are representative sample of the content.
Limitation:
i.
The general criticism of split-half method is concerned with splitting on the

test. As there is no rule, one may go for applying this own conscience in
splitting the test into two halves. The way of splitting varies from person to
person which affects the reliability coefficient.
ii.
The second criticism is concerned with the items difficulty. Generally the
items of a test are arranged in ordered of difficulty but this fact is not true for
each and every type of test. Say for example, without knowing the difficulty
level of items if one goes for splitting all the difficulty items in one half and
the simple item in another half, it will affect the reliability coefficient
adversely.
4.
Kuder Richardson method:

Richardson developed several formulas for measuring internal consistency of
a test. Kudder Richard son formula zo and z1 and generally applied. But due
to simplicity of the operation formula z1 is always preffered.
M ( K M )
K
1
Reliability (K R Z1) = K 1
K S2
K= the number of items in the test.

M= mean of the test scores;
S= standard deviation of the test scores.
Summary: The following methods are used for determining reliability of a test.
A
Test Retest method
i. Immediate (without interval)
Equivalent form method
ii. With time interval
Split half method
iii. Immediate
Kuder
iv. With interval
Richardson
formula
5.
Parallel form Reliability:

When the different sets or different parts of a test (suppose questionnaire a and
questionnaire B) are developed but they must have a linkage (in a sense of
knowledge, skills and behaviors) and then these assessments instruments are
subjected on the same group. The result obtained from these groups are then
correlated which can show the reliability of the test in regards of the alternate
6.
sets of instruments.
Inter - rater method of Reliability:
The Measures of the reliability about the different judges agree upon the
decisions about the assessment is called inter rater method of rebility. The
answers cannot effectively interpret by human observes and for that very
purpose the inter-rater reliability is of utmost importance.
2.4
FACTORS AFFECTING RELIABILITY:
Reliability:
The degree or the extent of the similarities among the results obtained on
several occasion or in other words it can be defined as the degree to which an
assessment instruments elicit stable and consistent plethora results.
Reliability means consistency of measurement. The words of Ebel & Frisbie
The ability of a test to measure the same quantity when it is administered, to an
individual on two different occasions by two different testers is called reliability.
Reliability also called dependability or trust worthiness. Reliability is the
degree to which a test consistently measures whatever it measure.
Factors which affects the reliability:

The factors which badly affects the reliability are as under:
The examinee:
Fatigue burden, lack of motivation, carelessness.
Trait of Test:
Ambiguous items, poorly worded direction tricky questions in familiar format.
Conditions of test- taking and marking:
Poor examination condition, excessive heat or cold carelessness in marling,
disregards or lack of clear standards for scoring, computational errors.
There are also some factors which affects on reliability, which are as under:
1.
A very important factor influencing test reliability is the number of test items.
That is the greater number of items in a test, the more reliable the test.
2.
Other things being equal the narrower the rang of difficulty of the items of a
test the granter the reliability.
3.
Evenness in scaling is factor influencing the reliability of a test other things

being equal a test every scaled is more reliable than a test that has gaps in the
scale of difficulty of its items.
4.
Other things being equal, inter-dependent items tend to decrease the reliability
of a test.
5.
The more objective the scoring of a test the more reliable is the test.
6.
Chance in getting the correct answer to an items is a factor which lowers the
test reliability.
7.
Other things being equal, the more homogenous the material of a test the
greater its reliability.
8.
Other thing being equal, the more common the experiences called for in a test
are the members of the group taking the test more reliable the test.
9.
Other things being equal the same test given late in the school year (i.e. after
covering the unit in the class) is more reliable that when given Carly in the
year (i.e. without teaching the unit).
10.
Other things being equal, each, question in a test lower the reliability of test. A
test answered by the systematic relall or recognition of orderly facts or
experience is more reliable than a test answered by sudden insight because of
novelty.
11.
Lengthy items lower the reliability because certain factors in the item will be
over or under estimated.
12.
Inadequate or faulty directions, failure to provide suitable illustrations of the

task lower the reliability.
13.
Strange or unusual words of items lower the reliability.
14.
The accuracy with which a test is timed is an important factor in test

reliability.
15.
Difference in incentive and effort tend to make tests unreliable. The appeal of
a test is stronger with some individuals than with others, and is stronger with
an individual at one time than at another.
16.
Accidents occurring during the examination such as breaking a pencil, running

out of link, or defective test booklets influence the reliability of the test.
Outside disturbances also lower the reliability.
17.
The interval between the test and retest is important for reliability estimate.
18.
Cheating in the examination is another factor which lowers the reliability

because the score of the individual may increase or decrease unduly.
19.
Illness, worry, excitement though less important still they influence the
reliability of the test.
References
Murad Ali Katozai 1st Edition, June, 2013 Measurement and Evaluation.
Dr. Mohammad Nooman & Obaid Ullah 1st Edition June 27th 2013 A Manual
of Educational & Social Science and Research Methodologies.
2.5
PRACTICALITY:
Meaning:
The word Practicality means feasibility or us ability.
A test will be practicable if it is easy to administrated, easy to interpret and
economical in operation. A good test is that which have sufficiently simple
instructions so that it can be administered even by a person of low level intelligence.
Tests having difficult instructions and requiring high level training for administering
them and expensive for wide use in schools are social to have low usability or
practicability. Practicality refers to the economy of time effort and money in testing.
In other words a test should be.
Easy to design
Easy to administer
Easy to interpret
Test of Practicality of a Measuring Instrument:

The practicality attribute of a meaning instrument can be estimated regarding
its economy convenience and interpretability. Economy consideration suggests that
some mutual benefits is required between the ideal research project and that which the
budget can afford. The length of measuring in strument is an important area where
economic pressures are swiftly left.
Convince test suggest that the measuring instrument should be easily
manageable. For this purpose one should pay proper attention to the layout of the
measuring instrument. For example 9, questionnaire with clear instructions and
instrument, is examples of this questionnaire that lack these features.
Characteristics of Practicality:
There are many characteristics of practicality they are.
1.
The test should be free from drawbacks and limitations of both essay type and
objective type tests. They should have they merits and good point to both these
type of test. For this purpose a test should have both essay and objective type
of test and questions so that it may cover at the time, the whole course as well
2.
3.
as improve the writing skill f the students.

It should not require long answer for essay type questions.
It should have large number of short essay type questions so that it may cover
4.
the slow course in 9, short time.

It should not be prepared for evaluation the knowledge and information of the
5.
6.
students.
It should be arranged in the social and economical conditions of the country.
There should be no choice in the given questions. Students should have to
answer all the questions. This will discourage selective study.
UNIT-3:
APPRAISING CLASSROOM TESTS (ITEMS ANALYSIS)
3.1
THE VALUE OF ITEM
3.1.1
Item Analysis
Item is a statistical technique which is used for selecting and rejecting the
items of a test on the basis of their difficulty value and discriminative power. Item
analysis is a general term that refers to the specific methods used in education to
evaluate test items, typically for the purpose of test construction and revision.
Regarded as one of the most important aspects of test construction and increasingly
receiving duration, it k an approach incorporated into item response theory (ERT),
high serves as an alternative to classical measurement theory (GMT) or classical test
theory (CIT). Classical measurement theory considers a score to Ile the direct result of
a person's true score plus error. It is this error that is of interest as previous
measurement theories have been unable to specify its source. However, item response
theory uses item analysis to differentiate between types of error in order to gain a
clearer(1) The main objective of item analysis is to select the appropriate
understanding of any existing deficiencies. Particular attention is given to individual
test items, item characteristics, probability of answering items correctly, overall
ability of the test taker, and degrees or levels of knowledge being assessed.
Item analysis is concerned basically with the two characteristics of an item-difficulty value and discriminative power.
Need of Item Analysis
Item analysis is a technique by which the test items are selected and rejected.
The selection of items may serve the purpose of the designer or test constructor,
because the items have the such characteristics. The following are the main purpose of
the test:
(a)
Classification of students or candidates.
(b)
Selection of the candidates for the job.
(c)
Gradation is an academic purpose to assign grades or divisions to the students.
(d)
Prognosis and promotion of the candidates or students.
(e)
Establishing individual differences, and
(f)
Research for the verification of hypotheses.

The different purposes require different types of test having the items of
different characteristics. The selection or entrance test includes the items of high
difficulty value as well as high power of discrimination. The promotion or prognostic
test has the items of moderate difficulty value. There are various techniques of item
analysis which are used these days.
The Objectives of Item Analysis
(1)
The following are the main objectives of item analysis technique: items for the
final drift and reject the poor items which do not contribute in the functioning
of the test. Some items are to be modified.
(2)
Item analysis obtains the difficulty values of all the items of preliminary draft
of the test. The items are classified- difficulties, moderate and easy items.
(3)
It provides the discriminative power (item reliability; validity) to differentiate

between capable and less capable examines of all the items preliminary draft
of the test. The items are classified on the basis of the indexes-positive,
negative and no discrimination. The negative and no discrimination power
items are rejected out rightly.
(4)
It also indicates the functioning of the distructors in the multiple-choice items.

The powerful and poor distructors are changed. It provides the basis for the
modification to be made in some of the items of preliminary draft.
(5)
T3he reliability and validity of test depends on these characteristics of a test.

The functioning of a test is increased by this technique. Both these indexes and
considered simultaneously in selecting and rejecting the items of a test.
(6)
It provides the basis for preparing the final draft a test. In the final draft items
are arranged in difficulty order. The most easy items are given in the
beginning and most difficult items are provided at the end.
(7)
Item analysis is a cyclic technique. The modified items are tried out and their
item analysis is done again to obtain these indexes (difficulty and
discrimination). The empirical evidences are obtained for selecting the
modified items for the final draft.
Functions of Item Analysis

The main function of item analysis is to obtain the indexes of the items which
indicate its basic characteristics. There are three characteristics
(1)
Item difficulty value (D. V.) is the proportion of subjects answering each item
correctly.
(2)
Discriminative power (D.P.) of item, this characteristic is of two type

(a) Item reliability It is taken as the point-biserial correlation between an
item and the total test score, multiplied by the item standard deviation.
(b) Item validity It is taken as the point biserial correlation between an item
and a criterion score multiplied by the item standard deviation.
The test as a whole should fulfil its purpose successfully; each of its items
must be able to discriminate between high and poor students on the test. In other
words, a test fulfils its purpose with maximum success when each .items serves as
good predictor. Therefore it is essential that each item of the test should be analysed in
terms of its difficulty value and discriminative power for the justification. Item
analysis serves the following purpose
(1)
To improve and modify a test for immediate use on a parallel group of

subjects.
(2)
To select the best items for a test with regard to its purpose after a proper try
out on the group of subjects selected from the target population.
(3)
To provide the statistical check-up for the characteristics of the test items for
the judgment of test designer.
(4)
To set up parallel forms of a test. Parallel form of test should not require only
to have Similar items content or type of items but they should also have the
sky& difficulty value and discriminative power. Item analysis' technique that
exactly parallel test can be developed, provides 'the empirical basis.
(5)
To modify and reject OF poor items of the test. The poor items may not serve
the purpose of the test. The powerful distractor of items are changed an'tkpoor
distracters are also changed.
(6)
Item analysis is usually done of a power test rather than speed test. It speed
test all the items are of the same difficulty value. The purpose of speed test is
to measure the speed and accuracy while speed is acquired through practice.
There is no power test, because the time limit is imposed, therefore these are
the speeded test. The speediness of the test depends on the difficulty values of
the items of the test. Most of the students should reach to last items, in the
allotted time for the test. Item analysis is the study of the statistical properties
of test items. The qualities usually of interest are the difficulty of the item and
its ability or power to differentiate between more capable and less capable
examinees. Difficulty is usually expressed as the percent or proportion getting

the item right, and discrimination as some index comparing success by the
more capable and the less capable students.
Meaning of definition of Difficulty Value (D.V.)
The term difficulty value of an item can be explained with the help of simple
example of extreme ends. If an item of test is answered correctly by every examinee,
it means the item is very easy the difficulty value is 100 percent or proportion is one.
This item will not serve any purpose and there is no use to include such items in a
test. Such items are generally rejected.
If an item is not answered correctly by any of the examinees. None could
answer correctly, it means the item is most difficult, the difficulty value is zero
percent or proportion is also zero. This item will not serve any purpose and there is no
use to include such items in a test. Such items are usually rejected.
"The difficulty value of an item is defined as the proportion or percentage of
the examinees who have answered the item correctly."
1.1). Guilford
"The difficulty value of an item may be defined as the proportion of certain
sample of subjects who actually know the answer of item."
Frank S. Freeman
In the definition of difficulty value, it has been stated that it is the percentage
and proportion of examinee's who answer the item correctly, but in the second
definition, the difficulty value is defined as the proportion of certain sample of
subjects who actually know the answer of an item. This statement seems to be most
functional and dependable, because an item can be answered correctly by guessing
but the examinee does not know the answer of the item. The difficulty value depends
on actually knowing the correct answer of an item rather than answering an item
correctly.
In the procedure of item-analysis "correction for guessing formula is used for
the scores rather than right answers. The difficulty value is also obtained in terms of
standard scores or z-scores.
Methods or Techniques of item Analysis
A recent review of the literature on item analysis indicates that there are at
least twenty three different techniques of item analysis. As it has been discussed that
item analysis technique obtain the indexes for the characteristics of an item. The
following two methods of item analysis are most popular and are widely used.
1)
Davis method of item analysisIt is the basic method of item analysis. It is

used for the prognostic test for selecting and rejecting the items on the basis of
difficulty value and discriminative power. The right responses are considered
in obtaining the indexes for the characteristics of an item. The proportion of
right responses on the items are considered for this purpose.
2)
Stanley method of item analysis. It is used for the diagnostic test items. The
wrong responses are considered in obtaining the difficulty value and
discriminative power. The wrong responses provide the cause of weakness of
the students. The proportion of wrong responses on an item is considered for
this purpose.
There are separate techniques for obtaining difficulty value and discriminative power
of the items.
(a)
Techniques of Difficulty Value.
There are two main approaches for obtaining difficult value.
a1 Proportion of right responses on an item technique. Davis and Haper have also
used this technique.
a2 Standard scores or z-scores or normal probability curve.
Technique of Discriminative Power.
b1 Proportion of right responses on an item technique. Davis and Haper have used
this technique.
3.2
THE PROCEDURE/ PURPOSE OF ITEM ANALYSIS:

The review of literature on item analysis indicates that there are two dozen
techniques of item analysis have been devices to obtain the difficulty value and
discriminative index of an item of a test. It is not possible to describe all the
techniques of item analysis in this chapter. Therefore, most popular and widely used
techniques have been discussed.
Fredrick B. Davis method of Item Analysis of Prognostic test, and
Stanley method of Item Analysis of Diagnostic test.
"The item difficulty value may be defined as the proportion or percentage of
certain sample subjects that actually know the answer of an item.
--Frank S. Freeman
The difficulty value depends on actually knowing the answer rather than
answering correctly i.e. right responses. In objective type test, the items are answered
correctly by guessing rather than actually knowing the answer. It means that an item
may be answered without knowing its answer. Thus, correction for guessing is to be
used for obtaining the scores which may be actual correct responses.
It is important to note that in the procedure of item analysis item wise scoring is
done, while subject wise scoring is done in general. There are several formulas have
been developed by psychomatricians for 'guessing correction'. Some of the important

formula-correction for guessing has been discussed.
Formula-Correction for Guessing
The following two formula-corrections for guessing have been explained.
(a)
Guilford's formula-correction for guessing and
(b)
Horst's formula-correction for guessing.
(a) Guilford's formuia-correction for Guessing. J. P. Guilford has developed the

following formula-correction for guessing which used for estimating the actual scores
or actually know the answer.
S = R , (1) (n 1)
where R = right responses on the item
W = wrong responses on the item
n = number of alternatives in the item
S = Actual correct responses on the item.
Example. An item is administered on a group of 50 subjects. The following responses
are obtained on different alternatives of the item.
(a)
The functions of item analysis
(b)
Selection of good items-8
(c)
Rejection of poor items--7
3.2
MAKING THE MOST OF EXAMS: PROCEDURES FOR ITEM

ANALYSIS:
One of the most important (if least appealing) tasks confronting faculty
members is the evaluation of student performance. This task requires considerable
skill, in part because it presents so many choices. Decisions must be made concerning
the method, format, timing, and duration of the evaluative procedures. Once designed,
the evaluative procedure must be administered and then scored, interpreted, and
graded. Afterwards, feedback must be presented to students. Accomplishing these
tasks demands a broad range of cognitive, technical, and interpersonal resources on
the part of faculty. But an even more critical task remains, one that perhaps too few
faculty undertake with sufficient skill and tenacity: investigating the quality of the
evaluative procedure.
Even after an exam, how do we know whether that exam was a good one? It is
obvious that any exam can only be as good as the items it comprises, but then what
constitutes a good exam item? Our students seem to know, or at least believe they
know. But are they correct when they claim that an item was too difficult, too tricky,
or too unfair?
Lewis Aiken (1997), the author of a leading textbook on the subject of
psychological and educational assessment, contends that a "postmortem" evaluation is
just as necessary in classroom testing as it is in medicine. Indeed, just such a
postmortem procedure for exams exists--item analysis, a group of procedures for
assessing the quality of exam items. The purpose of an item analysis is to improve the
quality of an exam by identifying items that are candidates for retention, revision, or
removal. More specifically, not only can the item analysis identify both good and
deficient items, it can also clarify what concepts the examinees have and have not
mastered.
So, what procedures are involved in an item analysis? The specific procedures
involved vary, but generally, they fall into one of two broad categories: qualitative and
quantitative.
Qualitative Item Analysis

Qualitative item analysis procedures include careful proofreading of the exam
prior to its administration for typographical errors, for grammatical cues that might
inadvertently tip off examinees to the correct answer, and for the appropriateness of
the reading level of the material. Such procedures can also include small group
discussions of the quality of the exam and its items with examinees who have already
taken the test, or with depaitinental student assistants, or even experts in the field.
Some faculty use a "think-aloud test administration" (cf. Cohen, Swerdlik, & Smith,
1992) in which examinees are asked to express verbally what they are thinking as they
respond to each of the items on an exam. This procedure can assist the instructor in
determining whether certain students (such as those who performed well or those who
performed poorly on a previous exam) misinterpreted particular items, and it can help
in determining why students may have misinterpreted a particular item.
Quantitative Item Analysis
In addition to these and other qualitative procedures, a thorough item analysis
also includes a number of quantitative procedures. Specifically, three numerical
indicators are often derived during an item analysis: Item difficulty, item
discrimination, and distractor power statistics.
Item Difficulty Index (p)
The item difficulty statistic is an appropriate choice for achievement or
aptitude tests when the items are scored dichotomously (i.e., correct vs. incorrect).
Thus, it can be derived for true-false, multiple-choice, and matching items, and even
for essay items, where the instructor can convert the range of possible point values
into the categories "passing" and "failing."
The item difficulty index, symbolized p, can be computed simply by dividing
the number of test takers who answered the item correctly by the total number of
students who answered the item. As a proportion, p can range between 0.00, obtained
when no examinees answered the item correctly, and 1.00, obtained when all
examinees answered the item correctly. Notice that no test item need have only one p
value. Not only may the p value vary with each class group that takes the test, an
instructor may gain insight by computing the item difficulty level for a number of
different subgroups within a class, such as those who did well on the exam overall and
those who performed more poorly.
Although the computation of the item difficulty indexp is quite
straightforward, the interpretation of this statistic is not. To illustrate, consider an item
with a difficulty level of 0.20. We do know that 20% of the examinees answered the
item correctly, but we cannot be certain why they did so. Does this item difficulty
level mean that the item was challenging for all but the best prepared of the
examinees? Does it mean that the instructor failed in his or her attempt to teach the
concept assessed by the item? Does it mean that the students failed to learn the
material? Does it mean that the item was poorly written? To answer these questions,
we must rely on other item analysis procedures, both qualitative and quantitative ones.
Item Discrimination Index (D)
Item discrimination analysis deals with the fact that often different test takers
will answer a test item in different ways. As such, it addresses questions of
considerable interest to most faculty, such as, "does the test item differentiate those
who did well on the exam overall from those who did not?" or "does the test item
differentiate those who know the material from those who do not?" In a more
technical sense then, item discrimination analysis addresses the validity of the items
on a test, that is, the extent to which the items tap the attributes they were intended to
assess. As with item difficulty, item discrimination analysis involves a family of
techniques. Which one to use depends on the type of testing situation and the nature
of the items. I'm going to look at only one of those, the item discrimination index,
symbolized D. The index parallels the difficulty index in that it can be used whenever
items can be scored dichotomously, as correct or incorrect, and hence it is most

appropriate for true-false, multiple-choice, and matching items, and for those essay
items which the instructor can score as "pass" or "fall."
We test because we want to find out if students know the material, but all we
learn for certain is how they did on the exam we gave them. The item discrimination
index tests the test in the hope of keeping the correlation between knowledge and
exam performance as close as it can be in an admittedly imperfect system.
The item discrimination index is calculated in the following way:
1.
Divide the group of test takers into two groups, high scoring and low scoring.
Ordinarily, this is done by dividing the examinees into those scoring above
and those scoring below the median. (Alternatively, one could create groups
2.
made up of the top and bottom quintiles or quartiles or even deciles.)

Compute the item difficulty levels separately for the upper (P upper) and lower
3.
(Plower) scoring groups.

Subtract the two difficulty levels such that D = P upper - Plower
How is the item discrimination index interpreted? Unlike the item difficulty
levelp, the item discrimination index can take on negative values and can range
between -1.00 and 1.00. Consider the following situation: suppose that overall, half of
the examinees answered a particular item correctly, and that all of the examinees who
scored above the median on the exam answered the item correctly and all of the
examinees who scored below the median answered incorrectly. In such a situation P,
upper, = 1.00 and P lower = 0.00. As such, thevalue of the item discrimination index D
is 1.00 and the item is said to be a perfect positive discriminator. Many would regard
this outcome as ideal. It suggests that those who knew the material and were wellprepared passed the item while all others failed it.
Though it's not as unlikely as winning a million-dollar lottery, finding a
perfect positive discriminator on an exam is relatively rare. Most psychometricians
would say that items yielding positive discrimination index values of 0.30 and above
are quite good discriminators and worthy of retention for future exams.
Finally, notice that the difficulty and discrimination are not independent. If all
the students in both the upper and lower levels either pass or fail an item, there's
nothing in the data to indicate whether the item itself was good or not. Indeed, the
value of the item discrimination index will be maximized when only half of the test
takers overall answer an item correctly; that is, whenp = 0.50. Once again, the ideal
situation is one in which the half who passed the item were students who all did well
on the exam overall.
Does this mean that it is never appropriate to retain items on an exam that are
passed by all examinees, or by none of the examinees? Not at all. There are many
reasons to include at least some such items. Very easy items can reflect the fact that
some relatively straightforward concepts were taught well and mastered by all
students. Similarly, an instructor may choose to include some very difficult items on
an exam to challenge even the best-prepared students. The instructor should simply be
aware that neither of these types of items functions well to make discriminations
among those taking the test.
[material omitted...]
Conclusion
To those concerned about the prospect of extra work involved in item analysis,
take heart: item difficulty and discrimination analysis programs are often included in
the software used in processing exams answered on Scantron or other optically
scannable forms. As such, these analyses can often be performed for you by personnel
in your computer services office. You might consider enlisting the aid of your
departmental student assistants to help with item distractor analysis, thus providing
them with an excellent learning experience. In any case, an item analysis can certainly
help determine whether or not the items on your exams were good, ones and to
determine which items to retain, revise, or replace.
Understanding Item Analysis Reports
Item analysis is a process which examines student responses to individual test
items (questions) in order to assess the quality of those items and of the test as a
whole. Item analysis is especially valuable in improving items which will be used
again in later tests, but it can also be used to eliminate ambiguous or misleading items
in a single test administration. In addition, item analysis is valuable for increasing
instructors' skills in test construction, and identifying specific areas of course content
which need greater emphasis or clarity. Separate item analyses can berequested for
each raw score' created during a given ScorePak run. Sample
Sample item analysis (30K PDF*)
A basic assumption made by ScorePak is that the test under analysis is
composed of items measuring a single subject area or underlying ability. The quality
of the test as a whole is assessed by estimating its "internal consistency." The quality
of individual items is assessed by comparing students' item responses to their total test
scores.
Following is a description of the various statistics provided on a ScorePak
item analysis report. This report has two parts. The first part assesses the items which
made up the exam. The second part shows statistics summarizing the performance of
the test as a whole.
Item Statistics
Item statistics are used to assess the performance of individual test items on
the assumption that the overall quality of a test derives from the quality of its items.
The ScorePak item analysis report provides the following item information:
Item Number
This is the question number taken from the student answer sheet, and the
ScorePak Key Sheet. Up to 150 items can be scored on the Standard Answer Sheet.
Mean and Standard Deviation

The mean is the "average" student response to an item. It is computed by
adding up the number of points earned by all students on the item, and dividing that
total by the number of students.
The standard deviation, or S.D., is a measure of the dispersion of student
scores on that item. That is, it indicates how "spread out" the responses were. The
item standard deviation is most meaningful when comparing items which have more
than one correct alternative and when scale scoring is used. For this reason it is not
typically used to evaluate classroom tests.
Item Difficulty
For items with one correct alternative worth a single point, the item difficulty
is simply the percentage of students who answer an item correctly. In this case, it is
also equal to the item mean. The item difficulty index ranges from 0 to 100; the higher
the value, the easier the question. When an alternative is worth other than a single
point, or when there is more than one correct alternative per question, the item
difficulty is the average score on that item divided by the highest number of points for
any one alternative. Item difficulty is relevant for determining whether students have
learned the concept being tested. It also plays an important role in the ability of an
item to discriminate between students who know the tested material and those who do
not. The item will have low discrimination if it is so difficult that almost everyone
gets it wrong or guesses, or so easy that almost everyone gets it right.
To maximize item discrimination, desirable difficulty levels are slightly higher
than midway between chance and perfect scores for the item. (The chance score for
five-option questions, for example, is 20 because one-fifth of the students responding
to the question could be expected to choose the correct option by guessing.) Ideal
difficulty levels for multiple-choice items in terms of discrimination potential are:
Format
Ideal Difficulty
Five-response multiple-choice
70
Four-response multiple-choice
74
Three-response multiple-choice
77
True-false (two-response multiple-choice)
85
(from Lord, F.M. "The Relationship of the Reliability of Multiple-Choice Test to the
Distribution of Item Difficulties," Psychometrika, 1952, 18, 181-194.)
ScorePak arbitrarily classifies item difficulty as "easy" if the index is 85% or
above; "moderate" if it is between 51 and 84%; and "hard" if it is 50% or below.
Item Discrimination
Item discrimination refers to the ability of an item to differentiate among
students on the basis of how well they know the material being tested. Various hand
calculation procedures have traditionally been used to compare item responses to total
test scores using high and low scoring groups of students. Computerized analyses
provide more accurate assessment of the discrimination power of items because they
take into account responses of all students rather than just high and low scoring
groups.
The item discrimination index provided by ScorePak is a Pearson Product
Moment correlation2 between student responses to a particular item and total scores
on all other items on the test. This index is the equivalent of a point-biserial
coefficient in this application. It provides an estimate of the degree to which an
individual item is measuring the same thing as the rest of the items.
Because the discrimination index reflects the degree to which an item and the
test as a whole are measuring a unitary ability or attribute, values of the coefficient
will tend to be lower for tests measuring a wide range of content areas than for more
homogeneous tests. Item discrimination indices must always be interpreted in the
context of the type of test which is being analyzed. Items with low discrimination
indices are often ambiguously worded and should be examined. Items with negative
indices should be examined to determine why a negative value was obtained. For
example, a negative value may indicate that the item was mis-keyed, so that students
who knew the material tended to choose an unkeyed, but correct, response option.
Tests with high internal consistency consist of items with mostly positive
relationships with total test score. In practice, values of the discrimination index will
seldom exceed .50 because of the differing shapes of item and total score
distributions. ScorePak classifies item discrimination as "good" if the index is above
.30; "fair" if it is between .10 and.30; and "poor" if it is below .10.
Alternate Weight
This column shows the number of points given for each response alternative.
For most tests, there will be one correct answer which will be given one point, but
ScorePak allows multiple correct alternatives, each of which may be assigned a
different weight.
Means
The mean total test score (minus that item) is shown for students who selected
each of the possibleresponse alternatives. This information should be looked at in

conjunction with the discrimination index; higher total test scores should be obtained
by students choosing the correct, or most highly weighted alternative. Incorrect

alternatives with relatively high means should be examined to determine why "better"
students chose that particular alternative.
Frequencies and Distribution

The number and percentage of students who choose each alternative are
reported. The bar graph on the right shows the percentage choosing each response;
each "#" represents approximately 2.5%. Frequently chosen wrong alternatives may
indicate common misconception among the students.
Difficulty and discrimination Distributions
At the end of the Item Analysis report, test items are listed according their
degrees of difficulty (easy, medium, hard) and discrimination (good, fair, poor). These
distributions provide a quick overview of the test, and can be used to identify items
which are not performing well and which can perhaps be improved or discarded.
Test Statistics
Two statistics are provided to evaluate the performance of the test as a whole.
Reliability Coefficient
The reliability of a test refers to the extent to which the test is likely to produce
consistent scores. The particular reliability coefficient computed by ScorePak
reflects three characteristics of the test:
The intercorrelations among the items -- the greater the relative number of
positive relationships, and the stronger those relationships are, the greater the
reliability. Item discrimination indices and the test's reliability coefficient are
related in this regard.

The length of the test -- a test with more items will have a higher reliability, all
other things being equal.

The content of the test -- generally, the more diverse the subject matter tested
and the testing techniques used, the lower the reliability.
Reliability coefficients theoretically range in value from zero (no reliability) to

1.00 (perfect reliability). In practice, their approximate range is from .50 to .90 for
about 95% of the classroom tests scored by ScorePak.
High reliability means that the questions of a test tended to "pull together."
Students who answered a given question correctly were more likely to answer other
questions correctly. If a parallel test were developed by using similar items, the
relative scores of students would show little change.
Low reliability means that the questions tended to be unrelated to each other in
terms of who answered them correctly. The resulting test scores reflect peculiarities of
the items or the testing situation more than students' knowledge of the subject matter.
As with many statistics, it is dangerous to interpret the magnitude of a
reliability coefficient out of context. High reliability should be demanded in situations
in which a single test score is used to make major decisions, such as professional
licensure examinations. Because classroom examinations are typically combined with
other scores to determine grades, the standards for a single test need not be as
stringent. The following general guidelines can be used to interpret reliability
coefficients for classroom exams:
Reliability
Interpretation
.90 and above
Excellent reliability; at the level of the best standardized tests
.80- .90
Very good for a classroom test
.70 - .80
Good for a classroom test; in the range of most. There are

probably a few items which could be improved.
.60 - .70
Somewhat low. This test needs to be supplemented by other

measures (e.g., more tests) to determine grades. There are
probably some items which could be improved.
.50 - .60
Suggests need for revision of test, unless it is quite short (ten or

fewer items). The test definitely needs to be supplemented by
other measures (e.g., more tests) for grading.
.50 or below
Questionable reliability. This test should not contribute heavily

to the course grade, and it needs revision.
The measure of reliability used by ScorePak is Cronbach's Alpha. This is the

general form of the more commonly reported KR-20 and can be applied to tests
composed of items with different numbers of points given for different response
alternatives. When coefficient alpha is applied to tests in which each item has only
one correct answer and all correct answers are worth the same number of points, the
resulting coefficient is identical to KR-20.
(Further discussion of test reliability can be found in J. C. Nunnally,
Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967, pp. 172-235, see especially
formulas 6-26, p. 196.)
Standard Error of Measurement
The standard error of measurement is directly related to the reliability of the
test. It is an index of the amount of variability in an individual student's performance
due to random measurement error. If it were possible to administer an infinite number
of parallel tests, a student's score would be expected to change from one
administration to the next due to a number of factors. For each student, the scores
would form a "normal" (bell-shaped) distribution. The mean of the distribution is
assumed to be the student's "true score," and reflects what he or she "really" knows
about the subject. The standard deviation of the distribution is called the standard
error of measurement and reflects the amount of change in the student's score which
could be expected from one test administration to another.
Whereas the reliability of a test always varies between 0.00 and 1.00, the
standard error of measurement is expressed in the same scale as the test scores. For
example, multiplying all test scores by a constant will multiply the standard error of
measurement by that same constant, but will leave the reliability coefficient
unchanged.
A general rule of thumb to predict the amount of change which can be
expected in individual test scores is to multiply the standard error of measurement by
1.5. Only rarely would one expect a student's score to increase or decrease by more
than that amount between two such similar tests. The smaller the standard error of
measurement, the more accurate the measurement provided by the test.
(Further discussion of the standard error of measurement can be found in J. C.
Nunnally, Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967, pp.172-235, see
especially formulas 6-34, p. 201.)
A Caution in Interpreting Item Analysis Results
Each of the various item statistics provided by ScorePak provides
information which can be used to improve individual test items and to increase the
quality of the test as a whole. Such statistics must always be interpreted in the context
of the type of test given and the individuals being tested. W. A. Mehrens and I. J.
Lehmann provide the following set of cautions in using item analysis results
(Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology. New York: Holt,
Rinehart and Winston, 1973, 333-334):
Item analysis data are not synonymous with item validity. An external criterion
is required to accurately judge the validity of test items. By using the internal
criterion of total test score, item analyses reflect internal consistency of items
rather than validity.

The discrimination index is not always a measure of item quality. There is a
variety of reasons an item may have low discriminating power:
a) extremely difficult or easy items will have low ability to discriminate but such
items are often needed to adequately sample course content and objectives;
b) an item may show low discrimination if the test measures many different
content areas and cognitive skills. For example, if the majority of the test
measures "knowledge of facts," then an item assessing "ability to apply
principles" may have a low correlation with total test score, yet both types of
items are needed to measure attainment of course objectives.

Item analysis data are tentative. Such data are influenced by the type and
number of students being tested, instructional procedures employed, and
chance errors. If repeated use of items is possible, statistics should be recorded
for each administration of each item.
Raw scores are those scores which are computed by scoring answer sheets
against a ScorePak Key Sheet. Raw score names are EXAM1 through EXAM9,
QUIZ1 through QUIZ9, MIDTRMI through MIDTRM3, and FINAL. ScorePak
cannot analyze scores taken from the bonus section of student answer sheets or
computed from other scores, because such scores are not derived from individual
items which can be accessed by ScorePak. Furthermore, separate analyses must be
requested for different versions of the same exam. Return to the text. (anchor near
note 1 in text)
A correlation is a statistic which indexes the degree of linear relationship
between two variables. If the value of one variable is related to the value of another,
they are said to be "correlated." In positive relationships, the value of one variable
tends to be high when the value of the other is high, and low when the other is low. In
negative relationships, the value of one variable tends to be high when the other is
low, and vice versa. The possible values of correlation coefficients range from -1.00 to
1.00. The strength of the relationship is shown by the absolute value of the coefficient
(that is how large the number is whether it is positive or negative). The sign indicates
the direction of the relationship (whether positive or negative). Return to the text.
*Software capable of displaying a PDF is required for viewing or printing this

document. Adobe Reader is available free of charge from the Adobe Web site at
http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobatireadstea.html
QUESTION:
A few years ago in your Shiken column, you showed how to do item analysis
for weighted items using a calculator (Brown, 2000, pp. 19-21) and a couple of
columns back (Brown, 2002, pp. 20-23) you showed how to do distractor efficiency
analysis in a spreadsheet program. But, I don't think you have ever shown how to do
regular item analysis statistics in a spreadsheet. Could you please do that? I think
some of your readers would find it very useful.
ANSWER:
Yes, I see what you mean. In answering questions from readers, I explained
more advanced concepts of item analysis without laying the groundwork that other
readers might need. To remedy that, in this column, I will directly address your
question, but only with regard to norm-referenced item analysis. In my next Statistics
Corner column, I will address another reader's question, and in the process show how
criterion-referenced item analysis can be done in a spreadsheet.
The Overall Purpose of Item Analysis
Let's begin by answering the most basic question in item analysis: Why do we
do item analysis? We do it as the penultimate step in the test development process.
Such projects are usually accomplished in the following steps:
1.
Assemble or write a relatively large number of items of the type you want on
2.
the test.
Analyze the items carefully using item format analysis to make sure the items
are well written and clear (for guidelines, see Brown, 1996, 1999; Brown &
Hudson, 2002).
3.
Pilot the items using a group of students similar to the group that will
ultimately be taking the test. Under less than ideal conditions, this pilot testing
4.
may be the first operational administration of the test.

Analyze the results of the pilot testing using item analysis techniques. These
are described below for norm-referenced tests (NRTs) and in the next column
5.
for criterion-referenced tests (CRTs).

Select the most effective items (and get rid of the ineffective items) to make a
shorter, more effective revised version of the test.
Basically, those five steps are followed in any test development or revision project.
Item Analysis Statistics for Norm-Referenced Tests
As indicated above, the fourth step, item analysis, is different for NRTs and
CRTs, and in this column, I will only explain item analysis statistics as they apply to
NRTs. The basic purpose of any NRT is to spread students out along a general
continuum of language abilities, usually for purposes of making aptitude, proficiency,
or placement decisions (for much more on this topic, see Brown, 1996, 1999; Brown
& Hudson, 2002). Two item statistics are typically used in the item analysis of such
norm-referenced tests: item facility and item discrimination.
Item facility (IF) is defined here as the proportion of students who answered a
particular item correctly. Thus, if45 out of 50 students answered a particular item
correctly, the proportion would be 45/50 = .90. An IFof .90 means that 90% of the
students answered the item correctly, and by extension,that the item is very easy. In
Screen 1, you will see one way to calculate IFusing the Excel spreadsheet for item 1
(I1) in a small example data set coded 1 for correct and 0 for incorrect answers.
Notice the cursor has outlined cell C21 and that the function/formula typed in that cell
(shown both in the row above the column labels and in cell B21) is = AVERAGE
(C2:C19), which means average the ones and zeros in the range between cells C2 and
C19. The result in this case is .94, a very easy item because 94% of the students are
answering correctly.
All the other NRT and CRT item analysis techniques that I will discuss here
and in the next column are based on this notion of item facility. For instance, item
discrimination can be calculated by first figuring out who the upper and lower
students are on the test (using their total scores to sort them form the highest score to
the lowest). The upper and lower groups should probably be made up of equal
numbers of students who represent approximately one third of the total group each. In
Screen 1, I have sorted the students from high to low based on their total test scores
from 77 for Hide down to 61 for Hachiko. Then I separated the three groups such that
there are five in the top group, five in the bottom group, and six in the middle group.
Notice that Issaku and Naoyo both had scores of 68 but ended up in different groups
(as did Eriko and Kimi with their scores of 70). The decision as to which group they
were assigned to was made with a coin flip.
To calculate item discrimination (ID), I started by calculating IFfor the upper
group using the following: = AVERAGE(C2:C6), as shown in row 22. Then, I
calculated IFfor the lower group using the following: = AVERAGE(C15:C19), as
shown in row 23. With IFupper and IFlower in hand, calculatingIDsimply required
subtracting IFupperIFlower. I did this by subtracting C22 minus C23, or = C22 -C23, as
shown in row 24, which resulted in an IDof .20 for I1.
Once I had calculated the four item analysis statistics shown in Screen 1 for Il,
I then simply copied them and pasted them into the spaces below the other items,
which resulted in all the other item statistics you see in Screen 1. [Note that the
statistics didn't always fit in the available spaces, so I got results that looked like ###
in some cells; to fix that, I blocked out all the statistics and typed alt oca and
thusadjusted the column widths to fit the statistics. You may also want to adjust the
number of decimal places, which is beyond the scope of this article. You can learn
about this by looking in the Help menu or in the Excel manual.
Ideal items in an NRT should have an average IFof .50. Such items would thus
be well centered, i.e., 50 percent of the students would have answered correctly, and
by extension, 50 percent would have answered incorrectly. In reality however, items
rarely have an IFof exactly .50, so those that Ell in a range between .30 and .70 are
usually considered acceptable for NRT purposes.
Once those items that fall within the .30 to .70 range of IFs are identified, the
items among them that have the highest IDs should be further selected for inclusion in
the revised test. This process would help the test designer to keep only those items
that are well centered and discriminate well between the high and the low scoring
students. Such items are indicated in Screen 1 by an asterisk in row 25 (cleverly

labeled "Keepers").
For more information on using item analysis to develop NRTs, see Brown
(1995, 1996, 1999). For information on calculating NRT statistics for weighted items
(i.e., items that cannot be coded 1 or 0 for correct and incorrect), see Brown (2000).
For information on calculating item discrimination using the point-biserial correlation
coefficient instead of ID, see Brown (2001). For an example NRT development and
revision project, see Brown (1988).
Conclusion
I hope you have found my explanation of how to do norm-referenced item
analysis statistics (item facility and item discrimination) in a spreadsheet clear and
helpful. I must emphasize that these statistics are only appropriate for developing and
analyzing norm-referenced tests, which are usually used at the institutional level, like,
for example, overall English language proficiency tests (to help with, say,admissions
decisions) or placement tests (to help place students into different levels of English
study within a program). However, these statistics are not appropriate for developing
and analyzing classroom oriented criterion-referenced tests like the diagnostic,
progress, and achievement tests of interest to teachers. For an explanation of item
analysis as it is applied to CRTs, read the Statistics Corner column in the next issue of
this newsletter, where I will explain the distinction between the difference index and
the B-index.
3.3
ITEM DIFFICULTY:
Definition:
item difficulty is a measure of the proportion of individuals who responded correctly
to each test item. Item difficulty in a test determined by two proportion of
individuals who correctly respond to the item in particular.
item difficulty of a test for a particular group is evaluated by the percentage of

participates who respond correctly.
Explanation:
Item difficulty is simply the percentage of students taking two tests who
answered the item correctly. The larger the percentage getting an item rights the easier
two items. The higher the difficulty index, the easier the item is understood to be
(wood, 1960). To compute the item difficulty, divide the number of people answering
the item correctly by the total number of people answering item. The proportion for
the item is usually denoted by P and it called item difficulty. The range is from 0% to
100%.
Examples:
To determine the difficulty level of test items, a measure called difficulty
Indene is used. This measure asks teachers to calculate the proportion of students who
answered the test correctly. By looking each alternative (for multiple choice), we can
also find out if there are answers choices that should be replaced. For example, lets
we give a multiple choice quiz and there were four answer choices (A,B,C and D).
Two following talde illustrates how many students selected each answer choice for
Question # 1 and # 2.
Questions
#1
24*
#2
12*
13
*Devertes correct answers.

For question # 1, we can see that A was not a very good distracter no one
selected that answer. We can also compute the difficulty of item by dividing the
number of students who choose two correct answers (24) by the number of total
students (30) by using formula, the difficulty of Question # 1, P is equal to
P=
24
30
P= .80
A rough role of thumb is that if the item difficulty is more then 75, it is an
easy item; if the difficulty is below 25, it is a difficult item. Given these parameters,
this item could be regarded moderately easy 10ts (80%) of students got it correct. In
contrast, Question # 2 is much more difficult.
P=
( 1230 =.40)
12
30
P= .40
In fail, on question # 2, more students selected an incorrect answer (B) than
selected the correct answer (A). This item should be carefully analyzed to ensure that
B is an appropriate distracter.
Therefore Item difficulty should have been named item easiness; it
expresses the proportion or percentage of students who answered two items correctly.
3.4
THE INDEX OF DISCRIMINATION
Introduction
1.
The index of discrimination is a useful measure of item quality whenever the

purpose of a test is to produce a spread of scores, reflecting differences in
student achievement, so that distinctions may be made among the
performances of examinees. This is likely to be the purpose of normreferenced tests.
2.
It is a degree to which students with high overall exam scores also got a
particular item correct. It is often referred to as Item Effect, since it is an index
of an item's effectiveness at discriminating those who know the content from
those who do not.
The item discrimination index is a point biserial correlation coefficient. Its
3.
possible range is -1.00 to 1.00. A strong and positive correlation suggests that
students who get any one question correct also have a relatively high score on
the overall exam. Theoretically, this makes sense. Students who know the
content and who perform well on the test overall should be the ones who know
the content. There's a problem if students are getting correct answers on a test
and they don't know the content.
Measurement of Index of Discrimination
Examples I If we are using the Item Analysis provided by Scanning Operations,
discrimination indices are listed under the column head Disc.
RESPNSE TABLE - FORMA
ITEM
NO
1
2
3
OMI
T
%
0
0
0
KEY-
DISC
%
0
79
4
%
18
0
7
%
82
0
89
%
0
21
0
%
0
0
0
C
A
C
82
79
89
0.22
0.23
-0.12
The Index of Discrimination

We examine item discrimination; there are a number of things we should consider.
1.
Item difficulty! Very easy or very difficult items are not good discriminators.
If an item is so easy (e.g., difficulty = 98) that nearly everyone gets it correct
2.
or so difficult (e.g., difficulty = 30)

That nearly everyone gets it wrong, then it becomes very difficult to
discriminate those who actually know the content from those who do not.
3.
That does not mean that very easy and very difficult items should be
eliminated. In fact, they are fine as long they are used with the instructor's
recognition that they will not discriminate well and if putting them on the test
matches the intention of the instructor to either really challenge students or to
4.
make certain that everyone knows a certain bit of content.

A poorly written item will have little ability to discriminate.
Example 2
Another measure, the Discrimination Index, refers to how well an assessment
differentiates between high and low scorers. In other words, you should be able to
expect that the high-performing students would select the correct answer for each
question more often than the low-performing students. If this is true, then the
assessment is said to have a positive discrimination index (between 0 and 1) -indicating that students who received a high total score chose the correct answer for a
specific item more often than the students who had a lower overall score.
If, however, you find that more of the low-performing students got a specific
item correct, then the item has a negative discrimination index (between -1 and 0).
Let's look at an example.
Table 1 displays the results of ten questions on a quiz. Note that the students
are arranged with the top overall scorers at the top of the table 1
Table-1:
The Index of Discrimination

Student
Total score (%)
Questions
1
Asif
90
Sam
90
Jill
80
Charlie
80
Sonya
70
Ruben
60
Clay
60
Kelley
50
Justin
50
Tonya
40
1 indicates the answer was correct; 0 indicates it was incorrect.

Steps to determine the Difficulty Index and the Discrimination Index.
1.
After the students are arranged with the highest overall scores at the top, count
the number of students in the upper and lower group who got each item
correct. For Question #1, there were 4 students in the top half who got it
2.
correct and 4 students in the bottom half.

Determine the Difficulty Index by dividing the number who got it correct by
3.
the total number of students. For Question #1, this would be 8/10 or p=.80.
Determine the Discrimination Index by subtracting the number of students in
the lower group who got the item correct from the number of students in the
upper group who got the item correct. Then, divide by the number of students
in each group (in this case, there are five in each group). For Question #1, that
means you would subtract 4 from 4, and divide by 5, which results in a
4.
Discrimination Index of 0.
The answers for Questions 1-3 are provided in Table 1
Table-2
Item
# Correct (upper
# Correct
group)
(Lower
Difficulty (p)
Discrimination
(D)
group)
Question
.80
.30
-0.6
.60
0.8
1
Question
2
Question
3
In table 2 we can see that Question #2 had a difficulty index of .30 (meaning it
was quite difficult), and it also had a negative discrimination index of -0.6 (meaning
that the low-performing students were more likely to get this item correct). This
question should be carefully analyzed, and probably deleted or changed. Our "best"
overall question is Question 3, which had a moderate difficulty level (.60), and
discriminated extremely well (0.8).
Recommendations for Determining Index of Discrimination
It is typically recommended that item discrimination be at least .20. It's best to
aim even higher. Items with a negative discrimination are theoretically indicating that
either the students who performed poorly on the test overall got the question correct
or that students with high overall test performance did not get the item correct. Thus,
the index could signal a number of problems:
There is a mistake on the scoring key.

Poorly prepared students are guessing correctly.
Well prepared students are somehow justifying the wrong answer.
In all cases, action must be taken! So, items with negative item difficulty must
be addressed. Items with discrimination indices less than .20 (or slightly over, but still
relatively low) must be revised or eliminated. Be certain that there is only one
possible answer, that the question is written clearly, and that your answer key is
correct.
UNIT-4:
INTERPRETING THE TEST SCORES
4.1
THE PERCENTAGE CORRECT SCORE:
INTERPRETING THE TESTS SCORES

What does score test mean?
A test score is a piece of information, usually a number, that conveys the performance
of an examinee on a test. One formal definition is that it is "a summary of the
evidence contained in an examinee's responses to the items of a test that are related to
the construct or constructs being measured."
Test scores are interpreted with a norm-referenced or criterion-referenced
interpretation, or occasionally both. A norm-referenced interpretation means that the
score conveys meaning about the examinee with regards to their standing among other
examinees. A criterion-referenced interpretation means that the score conveys
information about the examinee with regards a specific subject matter, regardless of
other examinees' scores.
Types of Test Scores
There are two types of test scores: raw scores and scaled scores. A raw score is a score
without any sort of adjustment or transformation, such as the simple number of
questions answered correctly. A scaled score is the results of some transformation
applied to the raw score.
The purpose of scaled scores is to report scores for all examinees on a consistent
scale. Suppose that a test has two forms, and one is more difficult than the other. It has
been determined by equating that a score of 65% on form 1 is equivalent to a score of

68% on form 2. Scores on both forms can be converted to a scale so that these two
equivalent scores have the same reported scores. For example, they could both be a
score of 350 on a scale of 100 to 500.
Two well-known tests in the United States that have scaled scores are the ACT and the
SAT. The ACT's scale ranges from 0 to 36 and the SAT's from 200 to 800 (per
section). Ostensibly, these two scales were selected to represent a mean and standard
deviation of 18 and .6 (ACT), and 500 and 100. The upper and lower bounds were
selected because an interval of plus or minus three standard deviations contains more
than 99% of a population. Scores outside that range are difficult to measure, and
return little practical value.
Note that scaling does not affect the psychometric properties of a test, it is something
that occurs after the assessment process (and equating, if present) is completed.
Therefore, it is not an issue of psychometrics, per se, but an issue of interpretability.
Interpretation the Score by Criterion Referencing
The raw score is number of points received on a test when the test has been scored
according to the instructions. Raw score is not very meaningful without further
information. Criterion-referenced test interpretation permits us to describe an
individual's test performance without referring to the performance of other
individuals. Thus we might describe a student's performance in terms of the speed,
precision with which a certain task is performed. Criterion-referenced interpretation
of test scores is most meaningful when the test is designed to measure a set of clearly
stated learning tasks. Enough items are used for each interpretation to make
dependable Judgments.
Interpretation the Score by Percentages

In mathematics, a relationship with 100 is called percentage (denoted by %). Often it
is useful to express the scores in terms of percentages for comparison. Consider the
following example.
Grade
Class A No. of Students
Class B No. of Students
10
12.50
40
25
31.25
30
30
37.50
20
15
18.75
10
Total
80
100
20
100
Ten students from class A and eight students from class B got grade A. It looks
apparently that class A is better in getting A grade but 12.5% of the students from
class A and 40% students from class B got grade A. It is clear from the percentages
that class.
B is far better in getting grade A than class A.
Interpretation the Score by Norm Referencing
Interpretation of scores by norm referencing involves making of scores and
expressing a given score in relation, to the other scores Norm-referenced test
interpretation tells us how an individual is compared with other persons who have
taken the same test. The simplest type of comparison is to rank the scores from
highest to lowest and to note where an individual's score falls. The rest of the scores
serve as the norm group. The given score is compared with the other scores by norm
referencing. If a student's score is second from the top in a group of 20 students, it is a
high score meaning that the scores of 90% of the students are less than him.
Ordering and Ranking
A first step in organizing scores in the listing of scores in order of magnitude

from largest to the smallest score. The data so arranged are called ordered array. By
scanning an ordered array, we can determine quickly the largest score, the smallest
score and other facts about the data.
Ranked data consists of scores in a form that shows their relative position on
some characteristic but does not yield a numerical value for this characteristic. The
order of finish of cars in a race is an example of ranking. If we list the cars as first,
second, third etc. up to the last car, we can say that they were ranked on the
characteristic of overall speed. We know each car's position relative to any other car's
position but we have no precise knowledge of the speed of any car. A high school
teacher ranked Hamid 30th in a class of 100 means that Hamid did better than 70 of
his classmates but poorer than 29. But nothing has been aid about Hamid's general
level of achievement.
Measurement Scales
Measurement scales are of great significance in analyzing and interpreting
results. The important types of measurement scales are:
The Nominal Scale
The lowest measurement scale is the nominal scale. In this scale, each
individual is put into one of the distinct categories or classes. Each class has a name.
The names are just labels. There is no order in these classes. We cannot say that one
class is larger than the other class. You cannot do arithmetic operations (addition,
subtraction, multiplication, division) on this scale.
Examples of the nominal scale are Categorization of blood groups of the
students of a college into A, B, AB and 0 groups. We cannot say that group A is better
than group B. Classification of books in a college library according to subjects.
Distribution of the population of Pakistan according to sex, religion,

occupations, marital status, literacy etc., is examples of the nominal scale.
The Ordinal Scale
When measurements are not only different from category to category but can
also be ranked according to some criterion, they are to be measured on an ordinal
scale. The members of anyone category are considered equal but members of one
category are considered lower than those in another category. The ordinal scale is onestep higher than the nominal scale because we distribute the individuals not only in
classes but we also order these classes.
Examples of the ordinal scale are Categorization of schools according to their
educational level into primary, middle, secondary or higher secondary is an ordinal
scale. There is an order in these classes. The primary level is lower than the middle
level and the middle level is lower than the secondary level. You cannot do arithmetic
operations on this scale.
Individuals may be classified according to socioeconomic status as low,
medium, high. Intelligence of students may be average, above average or below
average. Classification of examination results into different grades A), A, B, C, D, E
etc. In this measurement scale, we can say that one individual is larger than the other
but we cannot say how large it is.
The Interval Scale
In this scale, it is not only possible to order measurement but also the distance
between two measurements is known. We can say that the difference between two
measurements 30 and 40 is equal to the difference between measurements 40 and 50.
The level of the interval scale is higher than the nominal and the ordinal scales. This is
truly a quantitative scale. A unit of measurement and a zero point are required for this
scale. The selected zero point is not necessarily a true zero. It does not have to
indicate a total absence of the quantity being measured. We measure height in meters
or feet, weight in kilograms or pounds, temperature in centigrade or Fahrenheit,
income in rupees and the time in seconds. Arithmetic operations can be done on this
scale. You can add the income of a wife to that of his husband.
The Ratio Scale

The highest level of measurement is the ratio scale. Equality of ratios as well
as equality of intervals is determined in this scale. Fundamental to the ratio scale is
the true zero point. The measurement of height, weight and length makes use of the
ratio scale.
Frequency Distribution
Data that have been originally collected is called raw data or primary data. It
has not yet undergone any statistical technique. To understand the raw data easily, we
arrange into groups or classes. The data so arranged is called groups data or frequency
distribution.
General rules far the construction of a frequency distribution:
1.
Determine the Range. Range is the difference between highest and lowest
scores.
2.
Decide the appropriate number of class intervals: 'There is no hard and fast
formula for deciding the number of class intervals. The number of class
intervals is usually taken between 5 and 20 depending on the length of the
data.
3.
Determine the approximate length of the class interval by dividing the range
with number of class intervals.
5.
Determine the limits of the class intervals taking the smallest scores at the
bottom of the column to the largest scores at the top.
5.
Determine the number of scores falling in each class interval. This is done by
using a tally or score sheet.
Example:
The marks obtained by 120 students of first year class in the subject of
Education are given below-Construct a frequency distribution.
57
86
69
62
75
73
80
78
87 83 77
35
70
68 84
73
81
78
61
72
59
98
95
63
76
73
88 60 52
83
86
45 70
53
85
74
62
78
89
84
60
79
91
64
84 85 81
79
90
78 83
50
71
65
76
58
71
79
51
61
61
89
81 74 76
74
82
91 71
76
80
52
71
66
77
65
44
79
95
74
79 63 83
87
77
75 83
48
70
85
61
70
72
67
61
83
75
79
97 75 66
54
81
68 78
75
83
61
33
76
62
55
72
76
78
75 99 80
83
86
The following steps are followed to-make a frequency distribution.

1.
Step-1: Range = maximum score-minimum score = 99 33 = 66.
2.
Step-2: Number of approximate class intervals to be taken is 7.
3.
Step-3: Length of the class intervals, usually denoted by i, is.
I=
Range
No . of class intervals
The length is usually rounded upward to whole number. Therefore 9.4 is taken
as 10.
4.
Step-4: Determine the limits of the class intervals

90 99
80 89
70 79
60 69
50 59
40 49
30 39
The lowest class interval is taken in which the minimum scores can be
included. The minimum score is 33. The lowest class interval can be started from 30,
but it is convenient to start the lowest class interval from the score to which addition
of the length of the class intervals is easy. So we start from 30. This is called lower
limit of the class intervals. Add 9 (1 1 = 10 1 = 9) to the lower limit to get the
upper limit of the first class interval. Now add consequently i = 10 to the lower limits
and upper limits to get the remaining class intervals.
5.
Step-5: Distribute the scores in the class intervals by putting a tally mark in the
relevant class interval and count the number of scores in each class interval.
Grade
Tallies
No. of
Students
90 - 99
||||| |||
88
80 89
||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| |||||
70 79
||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| |||||
45
60 69
||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||
223
50 59
||||| |||||
10
40 49
|||
30 39
||
3030
Frequency
The number of scores lying in a class interval is called the frequency of that
class interval. For Example two scores lie in the class interval 30-39. Therefore 2 is
the frequency of the class interval 30-39.
Mid-Point of Class Mark
The middle of a class interval is called mid point or class mark and is usually
denoted by X. It is calculated as
Midpoint = X =
Lower limit +Upper limit

2
For Example, the mid point of the class interval 30-39 is

Lower limit +Upper limit 30+39
=
2
2
X=
69
2
= 34.5
Measures of Central Tendency:

A single score calculated to represent all the scores is called an average.
Average tends to lie in the centre of an array. That is why averages are called
measures of central tendency. Since averages locate the centre of a data set, these are
also called measures of location.
Several types of average can be defined. Most commonly used averages are
arithmetic mean, median and mode.
The Arithmetic Mean or Mean
The arithmetic mean is the most commonly used average. It is usually called
mean or average. The arithmetic mean is defined as the number obtained by dividing
the sum of the scores by their number. It is denoted by putting bar on the variable
symbol e.g., X (reads as X bar). The formula for calculating the arithmetic mean
ungrouped data is:
x
X =
N
Where
Read as sigma, is the Greek symbol means sum of.

X Means sum of the values of variable X.
N is the number of scores of measurements. In order to calculate the arithmetic
mean for grouped data formula is: X fx / f /
Where
fx means the sum of product of values for f and `x', f means frequency of
the scores and x means score. f means the sum of all the frequencies of the
distribution.
The Median:
The median of a set of scores is the middle score of the arithmetic mean of two
middle scores in an array. 50% of the scores are less than median and 50% of the
scores are greater than median.
Formula for calculating median for ungrouped data:
Median =
( N 2+ 1 )
th score
Formula for calculating median for grouped data:
Median = L +
i N
+ C
f
2
Where
L = lower class boundary of the median class interval.
I = length of the median class interval.
F - the frequency of the median class interval.
N= f
C = the cumulative frequency of the class interval below the median class interval.
The Mode
The mode is the score that occurs greatest number of times in a data set. Mode
does not always exist. If each score occur the same number of times, there is no mode.
There may be more than one mode. If two or more scores occur greatest number of
times, then there are more than one mode.
The mode can be calculated for grouped data with the help of following
formula.
Mode =
L+
f mf l
i
2 f mf 1f 2
Where
L = lower class boundary of the modal class interval.
Fm = the maximum frequency.
Fi = the frequency preceding to the modal class.
f2 = the frequency succeeding to the modal class,
I = the length of the modal class interval.
Note: The mode lies in the class interval having maximum frequency. This class
interval is called the modal class.
Empirical Relationship between Mean, Median and Mode:
For moderately skewed distributions, we have the following empirical
relation:
Mode = 3 Median 2 Mean
Mode = 3 (74.61) 2 (73.42)

Mode = 76.99
Comparison of Measures of Central Tendency:
The numerical value of every score in a data set contributes to the mean. This
is not true of the mode or median because only the mean is based on the sum of all the
scores. In a single peaked symmetrical distribution mean = median = mode. In
practice, no distribution is exactly symmetrical, so the mode, median and mean
usually have different values. If a population is not symmetrical, the mean, median
and mode will not be equal. The mean is affected by the presence of a few extreme
scores which the median and mode are not. The mean is preferred if extreme values
are not present in the data. Median is preferred if interest is centered on the typical
rather than the total score and if the distribution is skewed. If some scores are missing
so that the mean cannot be computed directly, the median is appropriate. Mode is
preferred only if the distribution is multimodal and a multi-valued index is
satisfactory.
The Quartiles
The values that divide a set of scores into four equal parts are called quartiles
and are denoted by Ql, Q2, and Q3. Q1 is called the lower quartile and Q3 is called
the upper quartile. 25% of the scores are less than Ql- and 75% of the scores are less
than Q3. Q2 is the median. The formulas for the quartiles are given as:
and
Q1 =
( N 4+ 1 )
Q2 =
2 ( N +1 ) N + 1
=
th score
4
2
th score
Q3 =
4.2
3 (N +1)
th score
4
THE PERCENTILE RANKS:
The Percentiles:
The values that divide a set of scores into hundred equal parts are called
percentiles and are denoted by P1, P2, P3, .. and P99.? P25 is the first quartile,
P75 is the third quartile and P50 is the median.
The Percentile Ranks (PR):
The procedure for calculating percentile ranks is the reverse of the procedure
for calculating percentiles. Here we have an individual's score and find the percentage
of scores that lies below it. In the Example, we calculate P78== 83.37. It means that
83.37 is the score below which 78% of the scores fall. If a student has a score of
83.37, we can say that his percentile rank (PR) is 78 on a scale of 100.
Relationships with a Distribution

Computing the Coefficient of Correlation
A coefficient of correlation measures the degree of linear relationship between
two sets of scores. The range of the coefficient is from -- 1 to + I with intermediate
value 0 meaning no linear relationship. There are two extremes: r = + 1 indicates
perfect positive correlation and r = I indicates perfect negative correlation. The
larger the value of r, the higher is the degree of linear relationship.
Positive Correlation
Negative Correlation
No correlation
The most common methods of computing the Coefficient of correlation are:

1.
Rank-difference method:
This method is useful when the number of scores to be correlated'-is small or
exact magnitude of the scores cannot be ascertained. The scores are ranked according
to size or some other criterion using numbers 1, 2, 3 n The rank-difference coefficient
of correlation can be computed by the following formula.
2
Rs = 1
6 D
2
N (N 1)
Where D == the difference between two rankings.

N = Number of pairs of scores.
2.
The Product-moment method

The product-moment coefficient is usually used when the number of scores is
large. Thus this method is used in most research studies. The product-moment
coefficient is usually denoted by r.
XY X Y
( )( )
( ) ( )
rxy =
X2
N
Y2
N
Measures of Variability:
Measures of central tendency measure the centre of a set of scores. However,
two data sets can have the same mean, median and mode and yet be quite different in
other respects. For example, consider the heights (in inches) of the players of two
basketball teams.
Team-1:
72 73 76 76 78
Team-2:
67 72 78 76 84
The two teams have the same mean height. 75 inches, but it is clear that the
heights of the players of team 2 vary much more than those of team 2. If we have
information about the centre of scores and the manner in which they are spread out we
know much more bout set of scores. The degree to which scores tend to spread about.
an average value is called dispersion.
The Range
It is the simplest measure of dispersion. The range of a set of scores is the
difference between maximum scores and minimum scores.
In symbols
Range = Xm Xo
Where Xm is the maximum score and Xo is the minimum score. Quartile
Deviation:
The quartile deviation is defined as half of the difference between the third and
the first quartiles.
In symbols
Q. D. = (Q3 Ql) / 2
Where
Q1 is the first quartile and
Q3 is the third
The Mean Deviation or Average Deviation:
The average deviation is defined as the arithmetic mean of the deviations of
the scores from the mean or median; the deviations are taken as positive. In symbols
X X
N
M.D. =
For grouped data
f X X
f
M.D. =
The Standard Deviation:

The standard deviation is the positive square root of the arithmetic mean of the
squares of deviations of all the scores from their mean.
S=
X X 2
Short formula for calculating standard deviation
S=
X2 X
N
( )
N
The Coefficient of Variation:

Karl Pearson introduced a relative measure of dispersion known as coefficient
of variation (denoted by c.v). It expresses the standard deviation as a percentage of the
arithmetic mean of a data set. It is number without units and is used to compare
variation in two or more distributions. The smaller value of the c.v. indicates lesser
variation. It is also used as a criterion for consistent performance of the students,
players etc.
C.V.
S
X
100
Standard Scores:
A frequently used quantity is statistical analysis is the standard score or Zscore. The standard score for a data value in the number of standard deviations that
the data value is away from the mean of the data set.
Z=
X X
S
The Normal Curve:

Before explaining the normal distribution, some basic concepts of probability
is given below an event is a specified result That mayor may not occur when an
experiment is performed. For example, in tossing of a coin once, appearance of head
is an event, which may or may not occur. The probability of an event is a measure of
the likelihood of its occurrence. A probability near indicates that the event is very
unlikely to occur. Whereas a probability near 1 indicates that the event is quite likely
to occur.
Relative frequency interpretation of probability:
Consider the, experiment of tossing a balanced coin once. There are 50-50
chances the head will appear. Consequently, we assign a probability of 0.5 to that
event. The relative-frequency interpretation is that in a large number of tosses, the
head will appear about half of the time.
Some Basic Properties of the Normal Curve
1.
The total area under the normal curve is equal to 1.
2.
The normal curve extends indefinitely in both directions.
3.
The normal distribution is symmetric about the mean that is the part of the
curve to the left of is the mirror image of the part of the curve to the right of
it.
4.
The mean, the median and the mode are equal.
5.
Mean deviation is 0.7979 .
6.
Quartile deviation is 0.6745 .
7.
In a formal distribution,
0.674+5 to + 0.6745 covers 50% of the area.
to + covers 68.27% of the area.
- 2 to + 2 covers 95.45 of the area.
- 3 to IA + 3 covers 99.73% of the area.
4.3
STANDARD SCORES:
Most educational and psychological tests provide standard scores that are
based on a scale that has a statistical mean (or average score) of 100. If a student earns
a standard score that is less than 100, then that student is said to have performed
below the mean, and if a student earns a standard score that is greater than 100, then
that student is said to have performed above the mean. However, there is a wide range
of average scores, from low average to high average, with most students earning
standard scores on educational and psychological tests that fall in the range of 85-115.
This is the range in which 68% of the general population performs and, therefore, is
considered the normal limits of functioning.
Classifying Standard Scores

However, the normal limits of functioning encompass three classification
categories: low average (standard scores of 80-89), average (standard scores of 90-
109), and high average (110-119). These classifications are used typically by school
psychologists and other assessment specialists to describe a student's ability compared
to same-age peers from the general population.
Subtest Scores
Many psychological tests are composed of multiple subtests that have a mean
of 10, 50, or 100. Subtests are relatively short tests that measure specific abilities,
such as. vocabulary, general knowledge, or short-term auditory memory. Two or more
subtest scores that reflect different aspects of the same broad ability (such as broad
Verbal Ability) are usually combined into a composite or index score that has a mean
of 100. For example, a Vocabulary subtest score, a Comprehension subtest score, and
a General Information subtest score (the three subtest scores that reflect different
aspects of Verbal Ability) may be combined to form a broad Verbal Comprehension
Index score. Composite scores, such as IQ scores, Index scores, and Cluster scores,
are more reliable and valid than individual subtest scores. Therefore, when a student's
performance demonstrates relatively uniform ability across subtests that measure
different aspects of the same broad ability (the Vocabulary, Comprehension, and
General Information subtest scores are both average), then the most reliable and valid
score is the composite score (Verbal Comprehension Index in this example). However,
when a student's performance demonstrates uneven ability across subtests that
measure different aspects of the same broad ability (the Vocabulary score is below
average, the Comprehension score is below average, and the General Information
score is high average), then the Verbal Comprehension Index may not provide an
accurate estimate of verbal ability. In this situation, the student's verbal ability may be
best understood by Helping Children at Home and School II: Handouts for Families
and Educators S2-8llooking at what each subtest measures. In sum, it is important to
remember that unless performance is relatively uniform on the subtests that make up a
particular broad ability domain (such as Verbal Ability), then the overall score (in this
case the Verbal Comprehension Index) may be a misleading estimate.
4.4
PROFILE: >>>>>>>
UNIT-5:
EVALUATING PRODUCT, PROCEDURES &
PERFORMANCE
5.1
EVOLUTION THEMES AND TERMS PAPERS:

The evaluation is structured around a logical sequence of seventeen questions
which fall under six evaluation themes. The following are major themes of evaluation.
1.
Learning Outcome:The quality of learning outcome is the first theme identified in teaching and
learning from work under this theme one of important sub theme is identified.
Attainment of Curriculum Objectives:
Considered the knowledge, skill and understanding of our pupil.

How does the knowledge level of pupil reflect the curriculum objectives for
chosen area?
What opportunities are pupil's afforded use and display their ability applies
their knowledge and skill?

Can pupils use their skills for curriculum reasoning in problem solving?
What is the attitude of pupils to learning curriculum?
Do our pupils enjoy learning? Are they motivate to learning.
In numeracy what do you understand by each of the following skills?
Applying and problem solving

Communicating and expressing
Implementing
Integrating
Reasoning
Understanding of recalling
In the course of a week how many of the following future in yours numeracy
lessons? What opportunities are provided to development of the following context
Oral language
Reading
Writing
Digital literacy
If we have not completed a school improvement plan to date, what do we need
to focus on the support learns out comes and attainment of curriculum objectives in
each curriculum area.
2.
Learning Experience.
The quality learning experience is the second theme identified in teaching of
three important sub theme are Identified.
Learning environment
Engaged in learning
Learning to learning
Engaged in Learning
Are students interested and enthused by the content and teaching approaches
used?
Do we encouraged pupil questioning considered teacher input V'S pupil
participation in your class room.

How pupils are active when teacher work?
Collaborative and independent learning.
Progressive skill learning and skill development.
Challenge and support.
To support learning by referring to outcomes and related success criteria to
allow for further enhancement of understanding.
Pupils enjoy learning in class room and are eager to find out more,
All students in class room afforded the opportunity to participate in lesson and
engage with learning.
Learning Environment
To involve the students in development rules which recognize the rights of
responsibilities of the community.
Prepare supervision of pupils both within the class and at break times within
the school setting.
All the recourses well organized, labeled and clear to all learners.
Celebrates pupils learning and achievements through a range of display.
Concrete and visual materials, centers of interest and display of pupil work.
Learning to Learn
Learning to learning is the third sub theme of learning experiences.
To engage the pupils to monitor their own progress in learning for learning
technique to utilize them properly in class room to develop the skills of learner by
proper planning of lessons.
To allow the learner to communicate work with other in the clam.
How do we enable the student learner to develop their personal organization to plan
out their own work study and revision skills do we teach.
To teach the pupils how to organized prose nil the work.
To make the pupil creative and give the opportunity for collaborative work.
3.
Teacs Practice
The quality of teacher's practice is the third theme of teacher and learning
from work. Under this theme four sub themes are identified
Preparation for teaching

Teaching approach
Management of pupils
Assessment
1.
Preparation for Teaching
Learning outcome:
Do we provide class, relevant and differentiated learning out comes to pupil?
How pupils are made aware of what they are going to learn?
Are pupil familiar with the expected success criteria in learning activities.
Written Plans
Are the long and short terms plans prepared in accordance with the rules for
primary teacher.
Does the planning clearly indicate expected learning out comes, teaching
approaches resources and activities.
Monthly Progress Report
Do our cantos miosuila provide a clear picture of the progression and

continuity of pupil learning across the curriculum.
Literacy and Numeracy
Are the literacy and numeracy opportunities identified across the curriculum?
How we identified these opportunities an are whole school plans individual
planning?
Resources
How satisfied are we with the resources, materials and equipment we have
with in our class room and available within the school? Are the necessary and relevant
material & readily available?
Assessment
Reflect on the use of assessment as an aid to teaching and learning how do we
plan for assessment.

Does our planning reflect whole school assessment policy?
How do we incorporate best practice as ????? in assessment guide line 2007
into our teaching and learning?
Teaching Approach
Learning Outcome
How are lessons guided by expected learning outcome and linked to
curriculum.
What provision is made to ensure expected learning outcomes are achieved
during lesson?
Focus of Learning
Is attention given within each curriculum area.

To the systematic development and application of knowledge and skill
including ICI?
Pupils leaving timely and does it happen at a regular interval
Analysis use of Assessment Information

Information teacher's setting of learning targets and activities for individual
pupils group, the whole class pupils group the whole class,
Inform the school improvement plan and as revise and update whole school
improvement target.
What is term piper?
Term Paper:
Definition
A term paper has two purposes the student should demonstrate an
understanding of the material as well as the ability to communicate that understanding
effectively.
Writing term papers gives students practical experience in writing at length
communicating thoughts and idea through the written word is a necessary skill in any
profession.
A term paper is a research paper written by students over an academic term
accounting of a large part of a grade. Terms papers are generally intended to describe
on event, a concept or argue paint. A term is a written original work discussing a topic
in detail, usually several typed paper in length and is often due at the end of semester
there is much overlap between term papers and research paper "The term Paper" was
originally used to describe a paper (usually a research based) that was due to at the
end of "term" either a semester or quarter, depending on which unit of measure a
school used common usage has "term paper" and "research paper" as interchangeable
but this is not completely accurate. Not all term papers involve academic research and
not all research papers are one term papers.
Term papers date back to the beginning of the 19th century when print could
be reproduced cheaply and written text of all types (reports memoranda specifications,
and scholarly articles) could be easily produced and disseminated during the year
from 1870 to 1900, mouton and Holmes (2003) write that American education was
transformed as writing become a method of discoursed and research the hallmark or
learning.
Importance:
Right away that you are cognizant of the fundamentals of composing A+

research projects here are some extra mysteries to guarantee. Never forget to
dependably edit your term paper articles.
The term paper is a necessary evil for every college student. Many students
wonder why the need to regurgitate lectures and research on paper, but the term paper
actually serves an important purpose for a college education and farther careers.
Effects:
In addition to the immediate effects on a student's course grade and grade
point average, a term paper will be valuable when searching for or advancing in
careers.
Term Paper Evolution
Term paper has been graded according to the following criteria.
The Cortical Section
Range depth and quality of literature research on your topic.
The author has integrated a variety of key pieces of literature on the topic but
so representing the consent state of research as well as covering various view
point.
The author has integrated a variety of key pieces of literature but focuses too
much on one particular author or view point.

No independent literature research has been carried out the author exclusively
refers to pieces of literature that have been assigned as course reading.
Correctness of theoretical part
The content of individual pieces of literature and giving than appropriate
prominence.
The contents of individual pieces of literature are largely represented correctly
although the student may give too much prominence to individual.
The literature review reveals that the student has not fully under stood large
parts of the literature. The content of theoretical part is, as a result incorrect to
the considerable degree.
Presentation of Literature Review Development of Argument:
The student has represented the views of prominent scholars on the topic and
has developed critical argument and support of or against the literature
represented has / her literature review is focused on the research question and
relevant to it.
The student presents the current state of research concerning the topic at hand
too much on one particular view point.
The literature review shows lack of focus. The author presents bit and piece
that are loosely related to the topic at hand.
Presentation of Results
The tables and figures are legible and easily to grasp at the first glance It is
evident that the author has spent find best visual means of presentation.
The formatting of tables and figures is satisfactory yet not always easy to
grasp to grasp at the first glace.
The student has not attempted to use tables and figures to support his / her
argument.
The student's plain how he/she arrived at the result represented and indicates
their significance to the topic or field of linguistics in which paper is written.
The author largely points out the most striking result at the same time;
however he/she concentrates too much discussing aspects that are not entirely
relevant to research question at hand.
The author mainly lists example from her data no comparison of her results
with those of previous studies is offered.
Language (Vocabulary, Grammar, Style).
The student uses the academic writing register/ style with appropriate
linguistic terminatories.
The language used is largely suitable for an academic piece of writing but the
paper exhibit some mainly recurring.
The student uses writing style which is an inappropriate for an academic

paper. There are great number of grammatical mistake and Paragraph Lake
coherence.
Further instructions End rubric for term paper grading

Each student must submit an independently-written report of their term paper
project. Team members are welcome to share literature related to their project theme
and may work jointly to develop hypotheses, predictions and experimental design.
Nonetheless, the organization and text of each report must be developed
independently by each team member. Normal rules concerning plagiarism apply. If
you have any questions about this, best ask us first.
The written term paper must have the following structure and include all of the
following elements:
THE PAPER SHOULD BE A MAXIMUM IF 5 PAGES (double-spaced; Times
New Roman 12 font), excluding the title page and literature cited.
First (title) page must include:

1.
2.
3.
Descriptive title
Author
Abstract (NOTE: MAXIMUM 200 WORDS)
Subsequent pages must include:

4.
5.
Introduction
Hypotheses and predictions (these can be incorporated into the introduction or
6.
7.
8.
9.
presented below a separate sub-heading)

Study Area and Organisms
Methods and experimental design
Significance of work
Literature Cited (use a journal format of your choice (e.g. Journal of Ecology,
Oecologia)
The following criteria will be used for grading the report:

1. Abstract: Does the abstract reflect the title of the project and the aim and scope of
the work? Does it contain essential information on rationale, hypothesis, study system
and significance? Is it written clearly? (10 points)
2. Introduction: Does the introduction start by introducing a significant question in
community ecology? Are statements supported by appropriate citations from
published literature? Is the initial question refined through the introduction to
statement of the objective of the study? (10 points)
3. Hypotheses and predictions: Are the hypotheses presented clearly related to the
objective of the study and are they logically connected to the ideas presented in the
introduction? Are hypothesis stated correctly (i.e., do they provide an explanation for
an observation)? Are predictions logically connected to the hypotheses? Are
alternatives to the primary hypothesis acknowledged (where appropriate)? (10 points)
4. Study area and organisms: Is necessary background information on the
ecology/natural history of study organisms and the study site presented? Is there
unnecessary/irrelevant information that could have been omitted? Is the choice of

organism/study sit appropriate given the objective of the study? (10 points)
5. Methods and Experimental Design: Is the explanation of the methods clear (use
figures if necessary)? Are the methods appropriate to test the hypothesis proposed?
Are essential methodological details included? This might include, for example,
replication of treatments, size of treatments, duration of experiment, description of
independent and dependent variables. Has the author considered potential
confounding effects that might interfere with the ability to test the hypothesis? Are
these recognized/addressed (where possible)? (10 points)
6. Significance, originality and creativity of work: This is the justification
statement for the project this does NOT mean just the conservation/management
(i.e., applied) importance of your proposed work. I am looking here for a statement to
indicate how this project can move the field of community ecology forward. Does this
study potentially provide new insights into how communities are organized? Are the
results from this study system broadly applicable to other groups of organisms or
other kinds of interactions? What other studies might build on the results from this
one or would the results of this study allow you to infer something new about this
system that you could then go on to test? (10 points)
7. Literature Cited: Are the papers in the body of the proposal cited in here? Are the
references cited here in the body of the text? Is consistent formatting used? (5 points)
8. Presentation and clarity: Are the different sections of the proposal well linked?
Are the ideas presented clearly and can they be followed from one section of the
proposal to the next? Is the writing style clear (topic sentences introduce themes
presented in each paragraph; concise language used; spelling and grammar
acceptable)? Use of tense and active/passive voice is consistent? Note: Use the past
tense to describe results found in previous studies; use future tense "we will..." to
describe work that you propose to do (5 points).
5.2
EVALUATING GROUP WORK & PERFORMANCE

Evaluating group work can provide valuable information about the degree to
which:
The use of group work enhanced (or otherwise) student achievement of
learning outcomes and engagement.

The use of group work enhanced (or otherwise) evaluator delivery or
assessment of the unit of study,
Specific Questions:
Evaluator can ask more specific questions about:
The response of individual students to group work as compared to individual
work.
Group work process versus the group work product.
The effectiveness of group work in class and/or out of class to enhance
learning,
The appropriateness of group work.
Organizational, planning, management and monitoring issues.
Strengths and weakness of group work and ideas for improvement.
Diversity issues (did some students find it easier or harder, benefit more
than others and why, what about issues of power),
The ways in which explained, facilitated, managed and monitored the groups.
The overall nature of the unit o study.
Timing of Evaluation:
Evaluation an occur at any time during the unit of study program, but it
usually occurs at the end of the semester or at the end of the task that is being
undertaken and evaluated.
Ideally students should be given time to reflect upon their experiences prior to
completing any form of evaluation especially if evaluator desire some specific
information about their experiences of group work or have a specific reflection

component within the work being evaluated.
It is also important to clearly explain why undertaking evaluating?

It's a good idea to explain all of this at the start of the unit of study and to
provide opportunities for students to reflect along the way.

Evaluation can also be built into the requirements of the group work tasks by
asking students to complete an evaluation of their own or the whole groups
experience of group. This could also be a requirement of their assessment. It is up to
evaluator whether or not to allocate marks.
Method for Collecting Data for Evaluation:
There is no single method for designing or conducting an evaluation method
can be quantitative or qualitative, formal or informal, formative or summative, self
administrated or externally administered, or any combination of these. There are
advantages and disadvantages to each method and evaluator will largely depend upon
the purpose of the evaluation and the content, material practices, tasks or activities
being evaluated,
1.
Questionnaire:
Questionnaire is a common method of approach that involves having students
complete a survey in the class. When evaluator designing questionnaire ensure that
there is an introduction which explains the purpose of the evaluation, that there are
clear instructions for completion and that the questions are unambiguous. The
questions posed can be open ended or closed, or a combination.
Open Ended Questions:These questions have the advantage of allowing students to identify what were
the most important elements of their experience. A disadvantage is that they may not
write much or may be nothing at all.
Closed Questions:
These are statements that allow students to rate their agreement or
disagreement with a comment or statement by using a Liker Scale.
Strongly
Agree
Neural
Disagree
Strongly agree
agree
disagree
Students are usually willing to answer these questions, especially if the questionnaires
are anonymous. A disadvantage is that they do not give detailed response or answer
"why" or "how" questions.
2.
Checklist:
Checklist is another method that can provide basic data.
An example may be a list of provided unit outcomes (knowledge, skills,
attributes, abilities etc) and students circle or tick the ones that apply.
Alternatively evaluator could ask to generate their own list of outcomes, For
example group work provided me with......
Autonomy.
Opportunity to get to know my classmates.
Opportunity to work on a real life problems students are usually willingly to
complete these lists but again the disadvantages is that they do not give detailed
responses or answer "why" or "how" questions.
Evaluation Hand-Out:
Some academies design their own evaluation hand-out that can combine a
number of evaluation methods and are anonymous, quick and easy to complete. They
can take any form, use images, diagrams, comment boxes or questions and lists as
above.
Interview:
Interview can be done individually or in small groups and provide the
opportunity for evaluator to probe for deeper analysis of the process and experience.
The disadvantage of this method is that it can be time consuming for both
evaluator and the students, and in a larger group may be some students may be more
vocal than others.
Focus Group:
Focus group uses a facilitative rather than direct questioning approach and is a
useful way of having students discusses the process of group work. This method
allows students to work off and build upon each other's answers.
The disadvantage is that it is time consuming for both evaluator and students
and there is the added difficult of arranging a time that will suit everyone.
Practicality of the Evaluation Process:
Before making a choice about evaluation method also consider the following
questions:
What resource is needed to undertake the evaluation?

What has to be done in order to undertake the evaluation (printing of forms,
preparation of one-line questionnaire, ordering questionnaires, arranging
interview rooms)?
What levels of participation evaluator require from the students, tutors,
organizations or any other party who were involved in the group work
activities?
Uses of Evaluation:
It is important to consider who will use the evaluations and how it will be
used. This is a key part of the planning process which relates to the purpose of the
evaluation.
It is also important to reflect upon and consider the methods that have been
used to gather information about the effectiveness of group work.
5.3
EVALUATING DEMONSTRATION:
1.
The evaluation portion of the demonstration-performance method is where

students get an opportunity to prove that they can do the manoeuvre without
2.
assistance.
For the simulated forced approach you should tell students that you will be
simulating an engine failure and that they are to carry out the entire procedure
3.
including all checks and look-out.

While the student is performing this manoeuvre you must refrain from making
any comments. Offer no assistance whatsoever, not even grunts or head nods.
You must, however, observe the entire manoeuvre very carefully, so that you
can analyze any errors that the student may make and debrief accordingly.
NOTE: You would interrupt the student's performance, of course, if safety became a
factor.
4.
Success or failure during the evaluation stage of the lesson will determine
whether you carry on with the next exercise or repeat the lesson.
Demonstration
1.
The explanation and demonstration may be done at the same time, or the
demonstration given first followed by an explanation, or vice versa. The skill
you are required to teach might determine the best approach.
2.
Consider the following: You are teaching a student how to do a forced landing.
Here are your options:
a. Demonstrate a forced approach and simultaneously give an explanation of

what you are doing and why you are doing it; or,
b. Complete the demonstration with no explanation and then give a detailed
explanation of what you have done; or
c. Give an explanation of what you intend to do and then do it.
You will find that different instructors will approach the teaching of this skill
differently. The following represents a suggested approach that appears to work best
for most instructors.
On the flight prior to the exercise on forced landings, give a perfect
demonstration of a forced landing. It may be better not to talk during this
demonstration, since you want it to be as perfect as possible to set the standard for the
future performance. There is another advantage of giving a perfect demonstration
prior to the forced landing exercise. Your students will be able to form a clearer
mental picture when studying the flight manual because they have seen the actual
manoeuvre.
a. The next step would be for you to give a full detailed explanation of a forced
landing. During this explanation you would use all the instructional techniques
described previously. You must give reasons for what is expected, draw
comparisons with things already known and give examples to clarify points.
This explanation should be given on the ground using visual aids to assist
student learning.
b. When in the air, give a demonstration, but also include important parts of the
explanation. Usually asking students questions about what you are doing or
should do, will give them an opportunity to prove they know the procedure,
although they have not yet flown it.
c. After completing the forced landing approach, while climbing for altitude,
clear up any misunderstandings the students may have and ask questions.
d. The demonstration and explanation portion of the demonstration-performance
method is now complete and you should proceed to the next part, which is the
student performance and instructor supervi
Evaluation Matrix for the Demonstration
When assessing the demonstration of teaching skills, attention is given to the
applicant's use of didactic solutions. The following matrix transparently describes the
criteria used to evaluate the demonstration. The matrix is indicative instead of
normative, and is used for support when evaluating the demonstration of teaching
skills. In other words, not all of the aspects listed in the matrix need to be assessed
systematically. The evaluators use the criteria listed below to form an overall appraisal
of the demonstration's standard by assessing the quality of the components that are of
a good or better level. If the demonstration includes a preliminary assignment, all the
individual components are assessed in relation to it. If well grounded, the
demonstration may also be virtual, held in real time and interactively.
Component of the demonstration of
teaching skills
Objectives
Passable
Satisfactor
y
Good
The applicant specifies The

the objectives.
cl
The
ta
an
Content
Correspondence between the topic

and content of the demonstration
Academic nature of the content
Consistency
and
clarity
of
presentation of the content
Critical approach
Many-sided argumentation
Connection between theory and
practice
Aptness, diversity and topicality of
the research data used
Use of own research results
Consideration given to the target
group in the choice of content
Methods
Organization of teaching
Motivation of target group
Suitable use of teaching methods
Suitable use of teaching aids and
materials
The topic and content

of the demonstration
correspond to each
other.
The
content
is
academic.
The applicant presents

the content clearly and
consistently.
Where appropriate, the

applicant uses his/her
own research results
during
the
demonstration.
The applicant takes the
target
group
into
consideration when.
Th
co
The
The
an
The
The
m
The
b
The
m
Wh
h
d
The teaching situation

is
organized
appropriately.
T
a
i
c
T
e
a
T
m
s
The
applicant
evaluates the teaching
situation in terms of
the objectives set.
T
s
T
r
c
Interaction skills
Use of voice
Clarity and intelligibility of speech

Coherence of oral and written
communication
Quality of interaction
Other
matters
improving
communication.
The
applicants
delivery is clear and
understandable.
Oral
and
written
communication
is
coherent.
T
u
O
i
T
i
t
Wrap-up
Evaluation of the teaching situation in
terms of the objectives set
Consideration given to the target group
in solutions related to evaluation
Alignment of the preliminary

assignment and the demonstration of
teaching skills
The
preliminary
assignment and the
demonstration
of
teaching skills are well
aligned.
T
f
d
c
5.4
EVALUATION OF PHYSICAL MOVEMENTS AND MOTOR SKILLS:
Motor Skills
A motor skill is a function, which involves the precise movement of muscles
with the intent to perform a specific act.
Motor skills are skills that are associated with the activity of the body muscles
like the skills performed in sport. Fine motor skills arc the type that is associated with
small movements of the wrists, hands, feet, fingers and toes.
Motor skills are the ability to make particular bodily movements to achieve
certain tasks. They are a way of controlling muscles to make fluid and accurate
movements. These skills must be learned, practiced and mastered, and overtime can
be performed without thought, for example, walking or swimming. Children are
clumsy in comparison to adults, because they have yet to learn many motor skills that
allow them to effectively accomplish tasks.
Motor skills are also learned and refined in adulthood. If a woman takes up
belly dancing, her first movements will not closely resemble that of the teacher.
Overtime however, she will learn how to control her muscles to make the signature
movements that a belly dancer makes.
Genetic factors also affect the development of motor skills, for example, the
children of a professional dancer are far more likely to be good at dancing, with good
coordination and muscular control, than the children of a biochemist. Gross motor
skills are usually learned during childhood and require a large group of muscles to
perform actions, such as balancing or crawling. Fine motor skills involve smaller
groups of muscles and are used for fine tasks, such as threading a needle or playing a
computer game. These skills can be forgotten if disused over time.
Types of Motor Skills

There are two major categories of motor skills
1.
2.
Gross Motor Skills

Fine Motor Skills
Gross Motor Skills

Gross motor skills maneuver large muscle groups coordinating functions for
sitting, standing, walking, running, keeping balance and changing positions. These
skills involve skills are those that are typically acquired during infancy and young
childhood to control the large muscles of the body. These skills include sitting,
crawling, walking. According to Anna Maria Wilms Floet, MD, on Medicine.
Throwing a ball, riding a bike, playing sports, lifting and sitting upright are brief
descriptions of large motor movements. Gross motor skills depend upon muscle tone,
the contraction of muscles and their strength for positioning movements.
Fine Motor Skills
Fine motor skills coordinate precise, small movements involving the hands,
wrists, feet, toes, lips and tongue. Features of fine motor control include handwriting,
drawing, grasping objects, cutting and controlling a computer mouse. Experts agree
that one of the most significant fine motor achievements is picking up a small object
with the index finger and thumb referred to as the pincher grip, which usually occurs
between 8 and 12 months of age
Fundamental Motor Skills
Fundamental motor skills are common motor activities with specific
observable patterns. Most skills used in sports and movement activities are advanced
versions of fundamental motor skills. For example, throwing in softball and cricket,
the baseball pitch, javelin throw, tennis serve and netball shoulder pass are all
advanced forms of the overhand throw. The presence of all or part of the overhand
throw can be detected in the patterns used in these sport specific motor skills. Similar
relationships can be detected among other fundamental motor skills and specific sport
skills and movements.
Assessment of Motor Skills
A motor skills assessment is an evaluation of a patient to determine the extent
and nature of motor skill dysfunction. Care providers like physical therapists and
neurologists can perform the assessment, which may be ordered for a number of
reasons. It is not invasive, but does require the completion of a number of tasks. The
length of time required can vary, depending on the test or tests used. It may be
necessary to set aside a full day for testing.
One reason for a motor skills assessment may be to establish a child's baseline
level of motor competency. This can provide a reference point for the future. Physical
education teachers, for example, may perform brief assessments with new students to
determine which kinds of activities would be safe and appropriate for them.
Pediatricians also use such testing to assess their patients. If a child appears to have
developmental delays, this may result in a referral for a more extensive examination
Different Ways to Assess Motor Skills
Motor Skills can be evaluated in different ways .some of them are as follow.
1. Test gross motor skills using range of motion. Assess gross motor skills by
asking the individual to perform a series of movements known as range of motion.
Evaluate range of motion by asking the individual to hold an arm out and move it in a
circular direction. The arm should be able to move in a complete circle when fully
extended. Then ask the individual to stand and place one leg out. Have the individual
move the leg up and down, back and forth and left to right. Note any difficulty in
movement, abnormalities or pain experienced by the individual.
2. Assess gross motor skills using games. Gross motor skills can be evaluated using
games and sports. Ask the individual to kick a ball to test gross motor skills of the leg.
Jumping rope is a great way to evaluate motor skills, because it uses both the arms
and legs working together to accomplish the task. Hopscotch, basketball and walking
on a balance beam are also good ways to evaluate gross motor skills. Look for the
fluidity of movement, problems with balance and hand-eye coordination.
3. Evaluate fine motor skills of arms and legs. Ask the individual to put a clothespin
on the edge of a box. Stringing beads on a shoelace is another way to assess fine
motor skills. Using a stapler and placing a paperclip on a sheet of paper are also ways
to assess fine motor skills. Place an item on the floor and ask the individual to pick it
up using his toes only. Watch the individual perform each task, looking at how smooth
the movements are and how easily the task is completed, and note any difficulties.
4. Test fine motor skills using common household items. Give the individual a jar
and ask her to unscrew the lid and screw the lid back on. Ask the individual to place
items, such as coins or blocks, into containers such as a bowl, bucket or cup. Draw a
straight line on a piece of paper and have the individual use a pair of scissors to cut
the line on the paper. Using pencils or pens of different sizes, ask the person to pick
up and grasp each pencil/pen. Then ask the individual to trace items drawn on the
paper. Watch for the completion of each task, looking for any problems during each
movement.
5. Assess fine motor skills while getting dressed. Ask the individual to put on and
button up a shirt. Next, have the individual put on a pair of pants that have a snap
closure and a zipper. Give the individual a pair of shoes, which have shoelaces and
not Velcro closures, and ask him to tie the shoes. Watch the individual perform each
task, looking for difficulties, abnormal movements and the ability to perform each
task completely without help.
Some Motor Skills and Their Evaluation for Preschoolers

Dancing, either freestyle or through songs with movements, such as "I'm a Little
Teapot Dance and movement classes, like pre-ballet, can be fun but aren't necessary
for motor-skills developmen
Walking, around the house, neighborhood, or park. For variety, add in marching,
jogging, skipping, hopping, or even musical instruments to form a parade. As they
walk, tell stories, count, or play games. Observe the child how he walks on a piece of
string or tape, a low beam or plank at the playground, or a homemade balance beam.
Playing pretend: Kids boost motor skills when they use their bodies to become
waddling ducks, stiff-legged robots, galloping horses, soaring planeswhatever their
imagination comes up with!
Riding tricycles, scooters, and other ride-on toys; pulling or pushing wagons, large
trucks, doll strollers, or shopping carts.
Playing tag or other classic backyard games, such as Follow the Leader, Red
Light/Green Light, Tails, or Simon Says (avoid or modify games that force kids to sit
still or to be eliminated from play, such as Duck Duck Goose or musical chairs).
Throwing, catching, and rolling large, lightweight, soft balls Swinging, sliding, and
climbing at a playground or indoor play space.
Ball Control Skills
The following ball skills are generic in that they are not specific to a particular sport,
and they are grouped by whether they require one or two balls. Skills are listed in
their approximate order of difficulty. Younger movers may use a plastic ball,
volleyball, or child's basketball, and older movers may use a youth-sized or adultsized basketball. Select the highlighted name of a given skill to view a short video
clip.
Assessing Motor Skills in Early Childhood - Using the PDMS (Peabody

Developmental Motor Scale)
Does your toddler have special needs? Early diagnosis of problems in
developmental motor skills is crucial for helping children with special needs. One of
the most popular assessment tools is the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale. Is it
reliable and sufficiently responsive?
After more than ten years of extensive research, a second edition known as the
PDMS-2 finally replaced the first edition of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale.
The authors, M. Rhonda Folio and Rebecca R. Fewell, claim that the new and updated
version provides better and more in-depth assessment of the gross and fine motor
skills of preschool-age children. The PDMS-2, of course, is just one of the most
commonly-used assessments for measuring the motor skills of toddlers. However, for
children with special needs, the Peabody Development Motor Scale is one of the most
reliable testing instruments used by many professionals, such as therapists,
psychologists, and diagnosticians.
Purpose of the Test
The main purpose of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale is to test the
motor skills of children. Gross motor skills involve using large muscles such as in
bending, balancing, crawling, walking, and jumping. Fine motor skills, on the other
hand, involve using smaller muscles, particularly the muscles in the hand. A child, at a
specific age, is expected to display proficiency at certain motor skills.
With the PDMS-2, most dysfunctions of motor skills will be identified. And
using the results of the PDMS-2, the special education teacher, parents, and other
professionals of the IEP team can develop a more responsive learning and remediation
program for the child with special needs. Would you want your child to take this
assessment test? The next part describes how the test will be administered.
Administration of the Test

This assessment test is composed of six sub-tests that include special
instructions on how each is administered to the preschool-age child. To keep the
results of the test reliable and precise, the actual instructions on how the test will be
carried out are only given to the test administrators and psychologists. This will
prevent the parents from "preparing" their child to pass the test. But the sub-tests are
given below:
Reflexes A reflexive action is a quick and automatic reaction to a particular
environmental stimulus. This reaction is measured in this sub-test that is composed of
eight items. This sub-test, however, is administered only to children who are 11
months and younger because reflexes have been observed to be extensively integrated
within 12 months.
Stationary This sub-test aims to measure the child's ability to maintain balance or
equilibrium. It involves mainly the ability of the preschool-age child to control his or
her body. It is composed of 30 items.
Locomotion This sub-test evaluates the child's ability to move. The movement
involves crawling, walking, running, and other similar actions. The sub-test has 89
items.
Object Manipulation In this sub-test, the object that is manipulated is the ball.
Since it is developmentally impossible for babies to even hold a ball, this sub-test is
administered only to children who are older than 11 months. This 24-item sub-test
involves activities such as throwing, catching, and kicking balls.
Grasping This sub-test primarily measures the preschool-age child's ability to use
the muscles of the hand. Made of 26 items, the sub-test progressively determines their
ability to grasp objects and to control fingers.
Visual-Motor Integration This sub-test evaluates the child's eye and hand coordination. Aside from controlling muscles, the test determines the level of the child's
visual perception. Some examples of the activities of this 72-item sub-test include
building blocks and copying designs.
5.5
EVALUATING ORAL PERFORMANCE:

Communication skills are taught in a wide range of general education courses
and students are in need of speaking and listening skills that will help them succeed in
future courses and in the workplace. Thus, the assessment of communication skills is
an important issue in general education .Oral assessment is often carried out to look
for students' ability to produce words and phrases by evaluating students' fulfillment
of a variety of tasks such as asking and answering questions about themselves, doing
role-plays, making up mini-dialogues, defining or talking about some pictures given
them. The operations in an oral ability test are either informational skills or
interactional skills. The testing of speaking is widely regarded as the most challenging
of all language tests to prepare, administer and score.
Kind of Oral Communication
Oral communication can also be delivered individually or as part of a team.
Therefore, knowing the kind of oral communication act that is expected is a necessary
step in being able to give useful feedback and ultimately an accurate evaluation
Pronunciations
Pronunciation is a basic quality of language learning. Though most second
language learners will never have the pronunciation of a native speaker, poor
pronunciation can obscure communication and prevent a student from making his
meaning known. When evaluating the pronunciation of students, listen for clearly
articulated words, appropriate pronunciations of unusual spellings, and assimilation
and contractions in suitable places. Also listen for intonation. Are students using the
correct inflection for the types of sentences they are saying? Do they know that the
inflection of a question is different from that of a statement? Listen for these
pronunciation skills and determine into which level student falls.
Vocabularies
Vocabulary comprehension and vocabulary production are always two
separate banks of words in the mind of a speaker, native as well as second language.
Teacher should encourage students to have a large production vocabulary and an even
larger recognition vocabulary. For this reason it is helpful to evaluate students on the
level of vocabulary they are able to produce. Are they using the specific vocabulary
instructed them in the class? Are they using vocabulary appropriate to the contexts in
which they are speaking? Listen for the level of vocabulary students are able to
produce without prompting and then decide how well they are performing in this area.
Accuracy
Grammar has always been and forever will be an important issue in foreign
language study. Writing sentences correctly on a test, though, is not the same as
accurate spoken grammar. As students speak, listen for the grammatical structures and
tools teachers have taught them. Are they able to use multiple tenses? Do they have
agreement? Is word order correct in the sentence? All these and more are important
grammatical issues, and an effective speaker will successfully include them in his or
her language.
Communications
A student may struggle with grammar and pronunciation, but how creative is
she when communicating with the language she knows? Assessing communication in
the students means looking at their creative use of the language they do know to make
their points understood. A student with a low level of vocabulary and grammar may
have excellent communication skills if she is able to make other understand
her/him whereas an advanced student who is tied to manufactured dialogues may not
be able to be expressive with language and would therefore have low communication
skills. Don't let a lack of language skill keep the students from expressing themselves.
The more creative they can be with language and the more unique ways they can
express themselves, the better their overall communication skills will be.
Interactions
Ask the students questions. Observe how they speak to one another. Are they
able to understand and answer questions? Can they answer when teacher ask them
questions? Do they give appropriate responses in a conversation? All these are
elements of interaction and are necessary for clear and effective communication in
English. A student with effective interaction skills will be able to answer questions
and follow along with a conversation happening around him. Great oratory skills will
not get anyone very far if he or she cannot listen to other people and respond
appropriately. Encourage your students to listen as they speak and have appropriate
responses to others in the conversation.
Fluency
Fluency may be the easiest quality to judge in your students' speaking. How
comfortable are they when they speak? How easily do the words come out? Are there
great pauses and gaps in the student's speaking? If there are then your student is
struggling with fluency. Fluency does not improve at the same rate as other language
skills. You can have excellent grammar and still fail to be fluent. You want your
students to be at ease when they speak to you or other English speakers. Fluency is a
judgment of this ease of communication and is an important criterion when evaluating
speaking.
Suggestions for Improvement

Offer suggestions (rather than criticisms) for improved delivery style. Many
students are aware of their difficulties in delivering oral communication and want
feedback and support, and they do want suggestions. Not so useful: "Don't wave your
hands when you talk."Better: "Let's figure out what you're going to do with your
hands so that you don't distract the audience from what you are saying. What feels
more natural to you?"
Present oral communication skills as a set of professional skills that all
professionals learn and practice steadily throughout their lives.
UNIT-6:
PORTFOLIOS
6.1
PURPOSE OF PORTFOLIOS:
Literally Definition:
A) a large, flat, thin case for carrying loose papers or drawings or maps; usually
leather
B) a set of pieces of creative work collected to be shownto potential customers or
employers; ' the artist had put together a portfolio of his work"; "every actor
has a portfolio of photographs"
C) A collection of various company shares, fixed interest securities or moneymarket instruments.
Terminological Ally Definition:
A portfolio is a purposeful collection of student work that exhibits the
student's efforts, progress, and achievements in one or more areas of the curriculum.
The collection must include the following:
Student participation in selecting contents.

Criteria for selection.
Criteria for judging merits.
Evidence of a student's self-reflection.
It should represent a collection of students' best work or best efforts, student-
selected samples of work experiences related to outcomes being assessed, and

documents according growth and development toward mastering identified outcomes.
Purpose of Portfolios:
In this new era of performance assessment related to the monitoring of
students' mastery of a core curriculum, portfolios can enhance the assessment process
by revealing a range of skills and understandings one students' parts; support
instructional goals, reflect change and growth over a period of time; encourage
student, teacher, and parent reflection; and provide for continuity in education from
one year to the next. Instructors can use them for a variety of specific purposes,
including:
Encouraging self-directed learning.

Enlarging the view of what is learned.
Fostering learning about learning.
To promote student control of learning
To track student progress
To demonstrate individual growth
To respond to individual needs
To evaluate and report on student progress
To facilitate student-led conferences
To show process and product
To show final products
To show student achievement with respect to specific curricular goals
To document achievement for alternative credit
To accumulate "best work" for admission to other educational institutions or
program
Demonstrating progress toward identified outcomes.
Creating an intersection for instruction and assessment. ,
Providing a way for students to value themselves as learners.
Offering opportunities for peer-supported growth.
Benefits of Portfolio:
One of the most important benefits of using portfolios is the enhancement of
critical thinking%, skills which result from the need for students tot
Develop evaluation criteria
Students are pleased to observe their personal growth,
They have better attitudes toward their work, and
They are more likely to think of themselves as writers.
Factors that go into the development of a student portfolio assessment:

1.
First, you must decide the purpose of your portfolio. For example, the portfolios
might be used to show student growth, to identify weak spots in student work,
and/or to evaluate your own teaching methods.
2.
After deciding the purpose of the portfolio, you will need to determine how you
are going to grade it. In (titer words, what would a student need in their
3.
portfolio for it to be considered success and for them to earn a passing grade.
The answer to the previous two questions helps form the answer to the third:
What should be included in the portfolio? Are you going to have students put
of all their work or only certain assignments? Who gets to choose?
How to Build a Student Portfolio

The following suggestions will help you effectively design a student portfolio.
1.
Set a Purpose for the Portfolio. First, we need to decide what your purpose
of the portfolio is. Is it going to be used to show student growth or identify
specific skills? Are we looking for a concrete way to quickly show parents
student achievement, or are we looking for a way to evaluate your own
teaching methods? Once we have figured out your goal of the portfolio, then
we think about how to use it.
2.
Decide How ' You Will You Grade it. Next, we will need to establish how we
are going to grade the portfolio. There are several ways you can grade students
work, we can use a rubric, letter grade, or the most efficient way would be to
use a rating scale. Is the work completed correctly and completely? Can we
comprehend it? we can use the grading scale of 4-1. 4 = Meets all
Expectations, 3 = Meets Most Expectations, 2 = Meets Some Expectation, 1 =
Meets No Expectations. Determine what skills you will be evaluating then use
the rating scale to establish a grade.
3.
What will b Included in it. How will we determine what will go into the
portfolio? Assessment portfolios usually include specific pieces that students
are required to know. For example, work that correlates with the Common
Core Learning Standards. Working portfolios include whatever the student is
currently working on, and display portfolios showcase only the best work
students produce. Keep in, mind that we can create a portfolio for one unit and
not the next. We get to choose what is included and how it is included. If you
want to use it as a long-term project and include various pieces throughout the
year, we can. But, we can also use it for short- term projects as well.
4.
How Much Will You Involve the Students. How much we involve the
students in the portfolio depends upon the students age. It is important that all
students should understand the, purpose of the portfolio and what is expected
of them. Older students should be give n a checklist of what is expected, and
how' it will be graded. Younger students may 1 of understand the grading scale
so we can give them the option of what w 11 be include d in their portfolio.
Ask them questions such as, why did you choose this particular piece and does
it represent your best work? Involving students in the portfolio process will
encourage them to reflect on their work.
5.
Will You Use a Digital Portfolio. With the fast-paced world of technology,
paper portfolios may'become a thing of the past. Electric portfolios (eportfolios/digital portfolios) are Teat because they are easily accessible, easy
to transport and easy to use. Todays students are tuned into the latest musthave technology, and electronic portfolios arc part of that. With students using
an abundance of multimedia outlets, digital portfolios seem like a great fit.
The uses of these portfolios are the same, students still reflect upon the r work
but only in a digital way.
The key to designing a student portfolio is to take the time to think about what
kind it will be, and how we well manage it. Once we do that and follow the
steps;above, we will find it will be a success.
Types C F Portfolios Duo
1)
Best Work Portfolio
This type of portfolio highlights and shows evidence of the best work of
learners. Frequently, this type of portfolio is called a display or showcase portfolio.
For Students, best work is often associated with pride am a sense of accomplishment
and can result in a desire to share their work with o hers. Best work can include both
product and process. It is often correlated with the amount of effort that few learners
have invested in their work. A major advantage of this type of portfolio is that learners
(an select items that reflect their highest level of learning and canexplain why these it
(ms represent their best effort and achievement. Best work portfolios are used for the
following purposes:
Student Achievement. Students may select a given number of entries (e.g., 10) that
reflect their best effort or achievement (or both) in a course of study. The portfolio can
be presented in a student-led parent conference or at a community open house. As
students publicly share their excellent work, work they have chosen and reflected
upon, the experience may enhance their self-esteem.
Post-Secondary Admissions. The preparation of g.post-secondary portfolio targets
work samples from high school that can be submitted forconsideration in the process
of admission to college or university. This portfolio should show evidence of a range
of knowledge, skills, and attitudes, and may highlight particular qualities relevant to
specific programs. Many colleges and universities are adding portfolios to the initial
admissions process while others are using them to determine particular placements
once students are admitted.
Employability. The audience for this portfolio is an employer, .This collection of
work needs to be focused on specific knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for a
particular job or career. The school-to-work movements in North America are
influencing an increase in the use of employ-ability portfolios. The Conference Board
of Canada (1092), for example, outlines the academic, personal management, and
teamwork skills that are the foundation of a high-quality Canadian workforce. An

employability portfolio is an excellent vehicle for showcasing these skills.
2)
Growth Portfolio
A growth portfolio demonstrates an individual's development and growth over
time. Development can be focused on academic or thinking skills, content knowledge,

self-knowledge, or any area that is important in your setting. A focus on growth
connects directly to identified educational goals and purposes. When growth is
emphasized, a portfolio will contain evidence of struggle, failure, success, and
change. The growth will likely be' an uneven journey of highs and lows, peaks and
valleys, rather than a smooth continuum. What is significant is that learners recognize
growth whenever it occurs and can discern the reasons behind that growth. The goal
of a growth portfolio isfor learners to see their own changes over time and, in turn,
share their journey with others.
A growth portfolio ca -I be culled to extract a best work sample. It also helps
learners see how achievement is often a result of their capacity to self-evaluate, set
goals, and work over time. Growth portfolios car be used for the following purposes:
Knowledge. This portfolio shows students' growth in knowledge in a particular
content area or across several content areas over time. This kind of portfolio can
contain samples of both satisfactory and unsatisfactory work, along with reflections to
guide further learning.
Skills and Attitudes. This portfolio shows students' growth in skills and attitudes in
areas such as academic discipline s, social skills, thinking skills, and work habits. In
this type of portfolio,challenges, difficult experiences, and other growth events can be
included to demonstrate students' developing skills. In a thinking skills portfolio; for
example, students might include evidence showing growth in their ability to recall,
comprehend, apply, analyze, synthesize, and evaluate information
Teamwork. This portfolio demonstrates growth in social skills in a variety of

cooperative experiences. Peer responses and evaluations are vital elements in this
portfolio model, along with self-evaluations. Evidence of changing attitudes resulting
from team experiences can also be included, especially s expressed in self-reflections
and peer evaluations.
Career. This portfolio helps students identify personal strengths related to potential
career choices: The collection can be developed over several years, perhaps beginning
in middle school and continuing throt4;hout high school. The process of selecting
pieces over time empowers young people to make appropriate educational choices
leading toward meaningful careers. Career portfolios mat
items from outside the
school setting that substantiate students' choices and create a holistic view of the
students as learners and people. This type of portfolio may be modified for
employment purposes.
3)
Showcase Portfolios
Showcase portfolios highlight the best products over a particular time period
or course. For example, a showcase portfolio in a composition class may include the
best examples of different writing genres, such an essay, a poem, a short story, a
biographical piece, or a literary analysis. In a business class, the showcase portfolio
may include a resume, sample business letters, a marketing project, and a
collaborative assignment that demonstrates the individual's ability to work in a team.
Students are often allowed to choose What they believe to be their best work,
highlighting the it achievements and skills. Showcase reflections typically focus on
the strengths of selected pieces and discuss how each met or exceeded required
standards
4)
Process Portfolios
Process portfolios, by contrast, concentrate more on the journey, of learning
rather than the final destination or end pro lusts of the learning process. In the
composition class, for example, different stages of the processan outline, first draft,
peer and teacher responses, early revisions, and a final edited draftmay be required.
A process reflection may discuss why a particular strategy was used, what was useful
or ineffective for the individual in the writing process, and how the student went
about making progress in the face of difficulty in meeting requirements. A process
reflection typically focuses on many aspects of the learning process, including the
following: what approaches fiches work best, which are ineffective, information about
oneself as a learner, and strategies or approaches to remember in future assignments.
5)
Evaluation Portfolios.
Evaluation portfolios may vary substantially in their content. Their basic
purpose, however, remains to exhibit a series of evaluations over a course and the
learning or accomplishments of the student in regard to previously determined criteria
or goals. Essentially, this type of portfolio documents tests, observations, records, or
other assessment artifacts required for successful completion of the course. A math
evaluation portfolio may include tests, quizzes, and written explanations of how me
went about solving a problem or determining which formula to use, whereas a science
evaluation portfolio might also include laboratory experiments, science project
outcomes with photo ; or other artifacts, and research reports, as well as tests and
quizzes. Unlike the showcase portfolio, evaluation portfolios do not simply include
the best work, but rather a selection of predetermined evaluations that may also
demonstrate students' difficulties and unsuccessful struggles as well as their better
world. Students who reflect on why some work was successful and other work was
less so continue their learning as they develop their met cognitive skills.
6)
Online or e-portfolios
Online or e-portfolios may be one of the above portfolio types or a
combination of different types, a general requirement being that all information and
artifacts are somehow accessible online. A number of colleges require students to
maintain a virtual portfolio that may include digital, video, or Wet -based products.
The portfolio assessment process may be linked to a specific course or an entire
program. As with all portfolios, students are able to visually track and show their
accomplishments to a wide audience,
Conclusion: The portfolio process will continue to be refined and efforts made to
improve students' perceptions if the process as it is intended to develop the selfassessments skills they will need to improve their knowledge and professional skills
throughout their education careers.
6.3
GUIDELINE AND STUDENTS ROLE IN SELECTION

PORTFOLIO ENTRIES AND SELF-EVALUATION:
OF
Portfolio:
An organized presentation of an individuals education, work samples, and
skills.
Terminologically a portfolio is a purposeful collection of student work that
exhibits the students efforts, progress, and achievements in one or more areas of the
curriculum.
Guidelines:
Identify purpose
Select objectives.
Think about the kinds of entries that will best match instructional outcomes.
Decide who select the entries
Decide how much to include, how to organize the portfolio, where to keep it
and when to access.
Set the criteria for judging the work (rating scales, rubrics, checklists) and
make such student understand the criteria.
Review the students progress.
Hold portfolio conferences with students to discuss their progress.

These guidelines are discussed below in detail.
Identify Purpose:
Without purpose, a portfolio is only a collection of student work samples.
Different purposes result in different portfolios. For example, if the student is to be
evaluated on the basic of the work in the portfolio for admission to college, then his
final version of his best work would probably be included in the portfolio.
Select Objectives:
The objectives ot be met be students should be clearly stated a list of
communicative functions can be included for students to check when the feel
comfortable with them and stapled to the inside lover. Students would list the little or
the number of the samples which address this function.
Portfolios also can be organized according the selected objectives addressing
one skill such as writing. The selected objectives will be directly related to the stated
purpose for the portfolio. At any rate, teachers must ensure that classroom instruction
support the identified seals.
Decide how much to include & how to Organize:
Teachers may want to spend some time going over the purpose of the portfolio
at regular intervals with students to ensure that the selected pieces do address the
purpose and the objectives. At regular times, ask students to go through their entries,
to choose what should remain in the portfolio, and what could be replaced by another
work which night be move illustrative of the objectives. Other material no longer
current and/or not useful to document student progress toward attain bent of the
objective should be discarded.
What is the students role?
The students role of participation in the portfolio will be largely responsible
for the success of the portfolio. For this reason, students must be actively involved in
the choices of entries and in the rationale for selecting those entries.
i.
Selecting:
The students first role is in selecting some of the items to be4 pair of the
portfolio. Some teachers give students a checklist for making choices. Others leave
students almost freedom in selecting their entries. At an rate student should include
their best and favorite pieces of work along with those showing growth and process.
ii.
Reflecting and self-assessing:

An essential component of self-assessment involves the student in reflecting
about their own work. At the beginning students might not know what to saw so
teaching will need to model the kinds of reflection expected from students.
Set the Criteria for Judging the Work:
There are two kinds of criteria needed at this point.
Criteria for individual entries (refers to the section on rubrics for details).
Criteria for the portfolio as a whole.

Assessing the individual entries in a portfolio is different from assessing the
portfolio as a whole. If the purpose of the portfolio is to now student progress then if
is highly probable that some of the beginning entries may not reflect high quality;
however, over several months, the student now have demonstrated growth toward the
stated objectives.
Criteria can be established by teachers alone and/or by teachers and students

together. At and rate, criteria for evaluating the portfolios must be announced a head
of time.
Possibilities of criteria include teacher evaluation and/or observation, student
self-evaluation, peer assessment, and a combination of several teachers comments.
Following is a list of suggested criteria for a portfolio as a whole.
Variety: Selected pieces display the range of tasks students can accomplish and skills
they have learned.
Growth: Student work represents the students growth in content knowledge and
language proficiency.
Completeness: Students organized the contents systematically.
Organization: Students organized the contents systematically.
Fluency: Selected pieces are meaningful to the students and communicate
information to the teacher.
Accuracy: Student work demonstrates skills in the mechanics of the language.
Goal Oriented: The contents reflect progress and accomplishment of curricular
objectives.
Following Directions: Students followed the teachers directions for pieces of the
portfolio.
Neatness: Student work is neatly written, typed or illustrated.
Justification or Significance: Student include reasonable justifications for the work
selected or explain why selected items are significant.
Reference
Katozai, Murad Ali. Measurement & Evaluation. Peshawar. University Publisher,
2013
6.4
USING PORTFOLIOS IN INSTRUCTION AND COMMUNICATION:
Portfolio:
Literally the word Portfolio is used in the following meanings:
1. A portable large things and flat briefcase especially of leather used for
carrying papers, pictures, drawings or maps.
2. A list of the financial assests held by an individual or a bank or other financial
institution.
3. The role of the head of a government department e.g. He holds the portfolio
for foreign affairs.
4. An organized presentation of an individuals education, work samples and
skills.
Using portfolios of studne4t work in Instruction and communication:
The term portfolio has become popular buzz word.
Unfortunately, it is not always clear exactly what is meant or implied by the
term especially when used in the context of portfolio assessment. This training
module is intended to clarify the notion of portfolio assessment and help users design
such assessments in a thoughtful manner. We begin with a discussion of the rationale
for assessment alternatives and the discuss portfolio definitions characteristics and
design considerations.
Educators and critics are currently reciting a litany of problems concerning the
use of multiple-choice and other structured format tests for assessing many important
students outcomes. This has been accompanied by an explosion of activity searching
for assessment alternatives.
1.
Capture a richer array of what students know and can do than is possible with
multiple-choice tests. Current goals for students go beyond knowledge of facts
and include such things as problems solving critical thinking, lifelong learning
of new information and thinking independently. Goals also include
dispositions such as persistence, flexibility, motivation and self-confidence.
2.
Portray the process by which students produce work. It is important for

example that students utilize efficient strategies for solving problems as well
as getting the right answer. It is also important for students to be able to do
such things as monitoring their own learning so that they do when they
perceive they are not understanding.
3.
Make our assessment align with what we consider important outcomes for
students in order to communicate the right message to students and other about
what we valve. For example if we emphasize higher order thinking in
instruction but only test knowledge because testing thinking is difficult,
students figure out pretty fast figure out pretty fast what is really valued.
4.
Have realistic contexts for the production of work, so that we can examine
what students know and can do in real-life situations.
5.
Provide continuous and ongoing information on how students are doing in

order to chronicle development, give effective feedback to students and
encourage students to observe their own growth.
6.
Integrate assessment with instruction in a way consistent with both current

theories of instruction and goals for students. Specifically we want to
encourage active student engagement in learning, and student responsibility
for the control of learning. We also want to develop assessment techniques that
in their use, improve achievement and not just monitor it.
7.
Using portfolios of student work for assessment, already an instructional tool

in many places, it seen as one potential way to accomplish these things. But
using portfolios will only have these desired effects if we plan them carefully.
Important Points in Portfolio Developing Process:

Some important points in portfolio development process are as follows:
1.
It should be consulted to teachers, students, parents and school administrations

in deciding which items would be placed in it.
2.
It should be created a shared, clear purpose for using portfolios.
3.
It should reflect the actual day-to-day learning activities of students.
4.
It should be on-going so that they show students efforts, progress and

achievements over a period of time.
5.
Items in portfolio should be collected as a systematic, purposeful and

meaningful.
6.
It should give opportunities for students in selecting pieces they consider most
reprehensive of themselves as learners to be placed into their portfolios, and to
establish criteria for their selections.
7.
It should be viewed as a part of learning process rather than merely as

recordkeeping tools, as a way to enhance students learning.
8.
Students can access their portfolios.
9.
Share the criteria that will be used to assess the work in the portfolio as well as
in which the result are to be used. Teachers should give feedback to students,
parents about the use the portfolio.
In conclusion, in portfolio making process some necessary steps are;
assessment of studies should be clearly explained the process should over a certain
time period, portfolio should encourage students to learn, and items in the portfolio
should be multi-dimensional and should address different learning areas. Besides, it is
vitally important that the studies in a portfolio should be designed in order to present
students, performance and development in any time period in detail.
Reference
Katozai, Murad Ali. Measurement & Evaluation. Peshawar. University Publisher,
2013
6.5
POTENTIAL STRENGTH AND WEAKNESSES OF PORTFOLIOS:
Potential Strength of Portfolios

(Or Advantages of Portfolios as Method of Assessment)
Portfolio can present a wide perspective of learning process for students and
enables a continuous feedback for them. Besides this, it enables students to have a
self-assessment for their studies and learning, and to review their progress. Since it
provides visual and dynamic proofs about students' interests, their skills, strong sides,
successes and development in a certain time period, portfolio which is the systematic
collection of the student's studies helps assessing students as a whole. Portfolio is
strong devices that help students to gain the impbrtant abilities such as selfassessment, critical thinking and monitoring one's own learning. Furthermore,
portfolio provide pre-service teacher assessing their own learning and growth, and
help them become self-directed and reflective practitioners, and contribute them the
individual and professional developments. Mullin (1998) stresses that portfolio
provides teachers to have new perspective in education. For instance, portfolio can
answer these questions: what kind of troubles do students have? Which activities are
more effective or ineffective? What subjects are understood and not understood? How
efficient is the teaching process? Some advantages or strengths of Portfolios are given
below:
1.
Portfolio provides multiple ways of assessing students' learning over time
2.
It provides for a more realistic evaluation of academic content than pencil-and

paper tests.
3.
It allows students, parent, teacher and staff to evaluate the students' strength
and weakness.
4.
It provides multiple opportunities for observation and assessment
5.
It provides an opportunity for students to demonstrate his/her strengths as well

as weakness.
6.
It encourages students to develop some abilities needed to become

independent, self-directed learners
7.
It also helps parents see themselves as partners in the learning process.
8.
It allows students to express themselves in a comfortable way and to assess

their own learning and growth as learners.
9.
It encourages students to think of creative ways to share what they are learning
10.
It increases support to students from their parents and enhances

communication among teachers, students and parents.
11.
It encourage teachers to change their instructional practice and it is a powerful

way to link curriculum and instruction with assessment
12.
It assesses and promotes critical thinking.
13.
It encourages students to become accountable and responsible for their own

learning (i.e., self-directed, active, peer-supported, adult learning).
14.
It can be the focus of initiating a discussion between student and tutor.
15.
It facilitates reflection and self-assessment.
16.
It can accommodate diverse learning styles, though they are not suitable for all
learning styles.
17.
Portfolios can monitor and assess students' progress overtime.
18.
Portfolios can assess performance, with practical application of theory, in realtime naturalistic settings (i.e., authentic assessment).
19.
Portfolios use multiple methods of assessment.
20.
Portfolios take into account the judgment of multiple assessors.
21.
Portfolios have high face validity, content validity, and construct validity.
22.
Portfolios integrate learning and assessment.
23.
Portfolios promote creativity and problem solving.
24.
Portfolios promote learning about learning (i.e., metacognition).
25.
Portfolios can be standardized and used in summative assessment.
26.
Portfolios combine subjective and objective, as well as qualitative and

quantitative, assessment procedures.
27.
Portfolios can be used to assess attitudes and professional and personal

development.
28.
Portfolios enable identification of the unsatisfactory or struggling performer.
29.
Portfolios offer teachers vital information for diagnosing students' strengths

and weaknesses to help them improve their performance (i.e., formative
assessment).
30.
Portfolios reflect students' progression toward learning outcomes (i.e., student

profiling).
31.
Portfolios allow the evaluators to see, the student, group, or community as
individual, each unique with its own characteristics, needs, and strengths.
32.
Portfolios serve as a cross-section lens, providing a basis for future analysis

and planning. By viewing the total pattern of the community or of individual
participants, one can identify areas of strengths and weaknesses, and barriers
to success.
33.
Portfolios serve as a concrete vehicle for communication, providing ongoing

communication or exchanges of information among those involved.
34.
Portfolios Promote a shift in ownership; communities and participants can take

an active role in examining where they have been and where they want to go.
35.
Portfolio assessment offers the possibility of addressing shortcomings of

traditional assessment. It offers the possibility of assessing the more complex
and important aspects of, an area or topic.
36.
Portfolios cover a broad scope of knowledge and information, from many

different people who know the program or person in different contexts (e.g.,
participants, parents, teachers or staff, peers, or community leaders).
Potential Weaknesses of Portfolios

(Or Disadvantages of Portfolios as Method of Assessment)
1.
When portfolios are used for summative assessment, students may be reluctant
to reveal weaknesses.
2.
Portfolios are personal documents, and ethical issues of privacy and

confidentiality may arise when they are used for assessment.
3.
Difficulties may arise in verifying whether the material submitted is the

candidate's own work.
4.
Portfolios take a long time to complete and assess.
5.
The portfolio process involves a large amount of paperwork.
6.
Portfolio assessment may produce unacceptably low inter-rater reliability,

especially if the assessment rubrics .are not properly prepared or are used by
untrained assessors.
7.
May be seen as less reliable or fair than more quantitative evaluations such as
test scores.
8.
Can be very time consuming for teachers or program staff to organize and
evaluate the contents, especially if portfolios have to be done in addition to
traditional testing and grading.
9.
Having to develop your own individualized criteria can be difficult or

unfamiliar at first.
10.
If goals and criteria are not clear, the portfolio can be just a miscellaneous
collection of artifacts that don't show patterns of growth or achievement.
11.
Like any other form of qualitative data, data from portfolio assessments can be
difficult to analyze or aggregate to show change.
Portfolio Assessment is Most useful for:

1.
Evaluating programs that have flexible or individualized goals or outcomes.

For example, within a program with the general purpose of enhancing
children's social skills, some individual children may need to become less
aggressive while other shy children may need to become more assertive.
2.
Each child's portfolio assessment would be geared to his or her individual

needs and goals.
3.
Allowing individuals and programs in the community (those being evaluated)

to be involved in their own change and decisions to change.
4.
Providing information that gives meaningful insight into behaviour and related
change. Because portfolio assessment emphasizes the process of change or
growth, at multiple points in time, it may be easier to see patterns.
5.
Providing a tool that can ensure communication and accountability to a range

of audiences. Participants, their families, funders, and members of the
community at large who may not have much sophistication in interpreting
statistical data can often appreciate more visual or experiential "evidence" of
success.
6.
Allowing for the possibility of assessing some of the more complex and
important aspects of many constructs (rather than just the ones that are easiest
to measure).
Portfolio Assessment is not as useful for:

1.
Evaluating programs that have very concrete, uniform goals or purposes. For
example, it would be unnecessary to compile a portfolio of individualized
evidence in a program whose sole purpose is full immunization of all
children in a community by the age of five years. The required immunizations
are the same, and the evidence is generally clear and straightforward.
2.
Allowing you to rank participants or programs in a quantitative or

standardized way (although evaluators or program staff may be able to make
subjective judgments or relative merit).
3.
Comparing participants or programs to standardized norms. While portfolios

can (and often do) include some standardized test scores along with other
kinds of evidence, this is not the main purpose of the portfolio.
4.
May be seen as less reliable or fair than more quantitative evaluations such as
test scores.
5.
Can be very time consuming for teachers or program staff to organize and
evaluate the contents, especially if portfolios have to be done in addition to
traditional testing and grading.
6.
Having to develop you own individualized criteria can be difficult or

unfamiliar at first.
7.
If goals and criteria are not clear, the portfolio can be just a miscellaneous
collection of artifacts that dont show patterns of growth or achievement.
8.
Like any other form of qualitative data, data from portfolio assessments can be
difficult to analyze or aggregate to show change.
6.6
EVALUATION OF PORTFOLIO:
According to Paulson, Paulson and Meyer, (1991, p. 63): Portfolios offer a
way of assessing student learning that is different than traditional methods. Portfolio
assessment provides the teacher and students an opportunity to observe students in a
broader context: taking risks, developing creative solutions, and learning to make
judgments about their own performances.
In order for thoughtful evaluation to take place, teachers .must have multiple
scoring strategies to evaluate students' progress. Criteria for a finished portfolio might
include several of the following:
Thoughtfulness (including evidence of students' monitoring of their own

comprehension, metacognitive reflection, and productive habits of mind).
Growth and development in relationship to key curriculum expectancies and

indicators.
Understanding and application of key processes.
Completeness, correctness, and appropriateness of products and processes

presented in the portfolio.
Diversity of entries (e.g., use of multiple formats to demonstrate achievement

of designated performance standards).
It is especially important for teachers and students to work together to
prioritize those criteria that will be used as a basis for assessing and evaluating student
progress, both formatively (i.e., throughout an instructional time period) and
summatively (i.e., as part of a culminating project, a.ctivity, or related assessment to
determine the extent to which identified curricular expectancies, indicators, and
standards have been achieved).
As the school year progresses, students and teacher can work together to
identify especially significant or important artifacts and processes to be captured in
the portfolio. Additionally, they can work collaboratively to determine grades or
scores to be assigned. Rubrics, rules, and scoring keys can be designed for a variety of
portfolio components. In addition, letter grades might also be assigned, where
appropriate. Finally, some form of oral discussion or investigation should be included
as part of the summative evaluation process. This component should involve the
student, teacher, and if possible, a panel of reviewers in a thoughtful exploration of
the portfolio components, students' decision-making and evaluation processes related
to artifact selection, and other relevant issues.
UNIT-7:
BASIC CONCEPTS OF INFERENTIAL STATISTS
7.1
CONCEPT & PURPOSE OF INFERENTIAL STATISTICS:
Introduction:
The role and importance of statistics in education cannot be denied. In
education we come across with measurement, evaluation and research. Similarly, we
have to make educational policies and budgets. In all these fields we need to make
proper measurement and present the data quantitatively. Thus without statistics we
cannot make proper measurement. As quoted in different statistics books "Planning is
the order of the day, and planning without statistics is inconceivable". Good statistics
and sound statistical analysis assist in providing the basis for the design of educational
policies, monitor policy implications and evaluate policy impact. To generate reliable
and relevant information the data should be collected using appropriate statistical
methods. The materials one uses for data collection should be well designed. The data
analysis should also be done using appropriate statistical method. All these show that
statistics plays vital role in Education Management and educational planning.
Concept of Inferential Statistics
Definition:
The branch of statistics concerned with using sample data to make an
inference about a larger group of data is called inferential statistics.
Example:
For instance the college teacher decides to use the average grade achieved by
one statistics class to estimate the average grade of all the sections of the same
statistics course. This is a problem of estimation, which falls in the inferential
statistics.
In educational research, it is never possible to sample the entire population

that we want to draw a conclusion about. For example, we might want to determine
how well a new way of teaching mathematics can affect mathematical achievement
for all children in Primary 1. However, it would be impossible to test all children in
Primary 1 because of time, resources, and other logistical factors. Instead, we choose
a sample of the population to conduct a study. Then we want to make conclusions - or
inferences, about the entire population based on the results of the study from the
sample.
Quantitative research in education and social science aims to test theories
about the nature of the world in general (or some part of it) based on samples (;?) of
"subjects" taken from the world (or some part of it). When we perform research on the
effect of TV violence on children's aggression, our intention is to create theories that
apply to all children who watch TV, or perhaps to all children in cultures similar to
our own who watch TV. We of course cannot study all children, but we can perform
research on samples of children that, hopefully, will generalize back to the
populations from which the samples were taken. Recall that external validity is the
ability of a sample to generalize to the population.
Purpose of Inferential Statistics
The main purpose of inferential statistics is .to determine whether the findings
from the sample can generalize to the entire population. There will always be
differences between groups in a research study. Inferential statistics can determine
whether the difference between the two groups in the sample is large enough to be
able to say that the findings are significant. If the findings are indeed significant, then
the conclusions can be applied - generalized - to the entire population. On the other
hand, if the difference between the groups is very small, then the findings are not
significant and therefore were simply the result of chance.
To illustrate this practically, imagine an entire room full of socks. You want to
determine whether there are more white socks than green socks in the room. However,
there are too many socks in the room to count them all, so you want to take a sample
of socks. Based on this sample of socks, you will draw a conclusion about whether
there are more white socks than green socks. After you collect your sample, then you
will need to calculate inferential statistics is to determine whether the colours chosen
in your sample likely reflect the colours of socks in the entire room or if your results
were due to chance.
What factors will determine whether the colours in the sample of socks
adequately represents the colours of the entire room? Sample size. If you only pick
two socks, they would probably not represent the entire room. The larger the sample
is, the more representative the sample will be of the entire room and the more likely
the inferential statistics will find a significant result. This is why when conducting
experiments, the larger the sample is, the better: with large samples, the results will
more likely reflect the entire population.
Inferential statistics is the mathematics and logic of how this generalization
from sample to population can be made. The fundamental question is: can we infer the
population's characteristics from the sample's characteristics? Descriptive statistics
remains local to the sample, describing its central tendency and variability, while
inferential statistics focuses on making statements about the population.
Unlike descriptive statistics, inferential statistics provide ways of testing the
reliability of the findings of a study and "inferring" characteristics from a small group
of participants or people (your sample) onto much larger groups of people (the
population). Descriptive statistics just describe the data, but inferential let you say
what the data mean.
7.2
SAMPLING ERROR:
In statistics, sampling error is incurred when the statistical characteristics of a
population are estimated from a subset, or sample, of that population. Since the
sample does not include all members of the population, statistics on the sample, such
as mean and quantities, generally differ from parameters on the entire population.
For example:
If one measures the height of a thousand individuals from a country of one
million, the average height of the thousand is typically not the same as the average
height of all one million people in the country. Since sampling is typically done to
determine the characteristics of a whole population, the difference between the sample
and population values is considered a sampling error.
Population and Samples:
A population is the entire group to which we want to generalize our results. A
sample if a subset of the population might be all adult humans but our sample might
be a group of 30 friends and relatives.
Types of sampling errors:
1.
2.
3.
1.
Random sampling
Bias problems
Non-sampling error
Random Sampling:
In statistics, sampling error is the error caused by observing a sampling instead
of the whole population. The sampling error can be found by subtracting the
value of a parameter from the value of a statistic. In nursing research, a sample
error is the difference between sample statistics used to estimate a population
parameter and the actual but unknown value of the parameter.
(Bunns and Grove, 2009)
Parameters and statistics:
A numerical summary of a population is called a parameter, while the same
2.
numerical summary of a sample is called a statistic.

Bias Problems:
Sampling bias is a possible source of sampling errors. It leads to the sampling

error which either have a prevalence to be positive or negative. Such errors
can be considered to be systematic errors.
Non-sampling Error:
Sampling error can be constrasted with non-sampling error. Non-sampling
3.
error is a catch all term for the deviations from the true value that are not a
function of the sample chosen, including various systematic errors and any
random errors that are not due o sampling. Non-sampling errors are much
harder to quantify than sampling error.
Example of non-sampling error:
Answers given by respondents may be influenced by the desire to impress an
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
7.3
interviewer.
Characteristics:
Sampling Error:
Generally decreased as the sample size increases (but not proportionally)
Depends on the size of the population under study.
Depends on the variability of the characteristic of interest in the population.
Can be accounted for and reduced by an appropriate sampling plan.
Can be measured an controlled in probability sample surveys.
NULL HYPOTHESIS:
Before defining the term null-hypothesis, it is necessary that we must know
about Hypothesis and statistical hypothesis.

Hypothesis:
A hypothesis is any statement or assumption about any phenomena of nature.
Statistical Hypothesis:
A statistical hypothesis is a statement or assumption about the value of a
population parameter.
For example;
1 = 80
(The population mean is equal to 80)
> 22
(The population mean is greater than 22)
2 # 25
(The population variance is not equal to 25)
1 = 2
(Population mean 1 is equal to population mean 2)
1 - 2 = 0
(there is no difference between 1 and 2)
Null Hypothesis:
The hypothesis to be tested in a test of hypothesis is called null hypothesis. It
is a hypothesis which is tested for possible rejection or mollification under the
assumption that it is true. It is denoted by H0 and usually contains and equal sign.
For example if we want to test that the population mean is 80, then we write.
H0 : = 80
Another definition of Null-Hypothesis:
Null hypothesis is a type of hypothesis used in statistics that proposes that no
statistical significance exists in a set of given observations.
The null hypothesis attempts to show that no variation exists between
variables, or that single variable is no different than ero. It is presumed to be true
until statistical evidence nullifies it for an alternative hypothesis.
Examples:
Hypothesis:
The loss of my socks is due to alien burglary. (Alien burglary means
unfamiliar theft).
Null Hypothesis:
The loss of my socks is nothing to do with alien burglary.
Alternative Hypothesis:
The loss of my socks is due to alien burglary. In statistics, the only way of
supporting your hypothesis is to refute the null hypothesis. Rather than trying to brave
your idea (the alternative hypothesis) right you must show that the null hypothesis is
likely to be wrong. You have to refute or nullify the null hypothesis.
7.4
TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE:
Once sample data has been gathered through an observational study or
experiment, statistical inference allows analysts to assess evidence in favor or some

claim about the population from which the sample has been drawn. The methods of
inference used to support or reject claims based on sample data are known as tests of
significance.
Every test of significance begins with a null hypothesis HO. HO represents a
theory that has been put forward, either because it is believed to be true or because it
is to be used as a basis for argument, but has not been proved. For example, in a
clinical trial of a new drug, the null hypothesis might be that the new drug is no better,
on average, than the current drug. We would write HO: there is no difference between
the two drugs on average.
The alternative hypothesis, Ha, is a statement of what a statistical hypothesis
test is set up to establish. For example, in a clinical trial of a new drug, the alternative
hypothesis might be that the new drug has a different effect, on average, compared to
that of the current drug. We would write Ha: the two drugs have different effects, on
average. The alternative hypothesis might also be that the new drug is better, on
average, than the current drug. In this case we would write Ha: the new drug is better
than the current drug, on average.
The final conclusion once the test has been carried out is always given in
terms of the null hypothesis. We either "reject HO in favor of Ha" or "do not reject
HO"; we never conclude "reject Ha", or even "accept Ha".
If we conclude "do not reject HO", this does not necessarily mean that the null
hypothesis is true, it only suggests that there is not sufficient evidence against HO in
favor of Ha; rejecting the null hypothesis then, suggests that the alternative hypothesis
may be true.
Example
Suppose a test has been given to all high school students in a certain state. The
mean test score for the entire state is 70, with standard deviation equal to 10.
Members of the school board suspect that female students have a higher mean score
on the test than male students, because the mean score from a random sample of 64
female students is equal to 73. Does this provide strong evidence that the overall
mean for female students is higher?
The null hypothesis HO claims that there is no difference between the mean
score for female students and the mean for the entire population, so that = 70. The
alternative hypothesis claims that the mean for female students is higher than the
entire student population mean, so that > 70.s
Steps in Testing for Statistical Significance
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1)
State the Research Hypothesis

State the Null Hypothesis
Select a probability of error level (alpha level)
Select and compute the test for statistical significance
Interpret the results
State the Research Hypothesis
A research hypothesis states the expected relationship between two variables.
It may be stated in general terms, or it may include dimensions of direction and

magnitude.
For example,
General: The length of the job training program is related to the rate of job placement
of trainees. Direction: The longer the training program, the higher the rate of job
placement of trainees.
Magnitude: Longer training programs will place twice as many trainees into jobs as
shorter programs.
General: Graduate Assistant pay is influenced by gender.
Direction: Male graduate assistants are paid more than female graduate assistants.
Magnitude: Female graduate assistants are paid less than 75% of what male graduate
assistants are paid.
2)
State the Null Hypothesis

A null hypothesis usually states that there is no relationship between the two
variables. For example,

There is no relationship between the length of the job training program and the
rate of job placement of trainees.
Graduate assistant pay is not influenced by gender.
A null hypothesis may also state that the relationship proposed in the research
hypothesis is not true. For example,
Longer training programs will place the same number or fewer trainees into
jobs as shorter programs.
Female graduate assistants are paid at least 75% or more of what male
graduate assistants are paid.
Researchers use a null hypothesis in research because it is easier to disprove a
null hypothesis than it is to prove a research hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the
researcher's "straw man." That is, it is easier to show that something is false once than
to show that something is always true. It is easier to find disconfirming evidence

against the null hypothesis than to find confirming evidence for the research
hypothesis.
(Definitions taken from Valerie J. Easton and John H. McColl's Statistics
Glossary v1.1)
One Tailed and Two Tailed Significant Tests
One important concept in significant testing is whether you use a one tailed or
two tailed test of significance. The answer is that it depends on your hypothesis.
When your research hypothesis states the direction of the difference or relationship,
then you use a one tailed probability. For example, a one tailed test would be used to
test these null hypothesis: Females will not score significantly higher than males on
an IQ test. Superman is not significantly stronger than the average person.
The one tailed probability is exactly half the value of two tailed probability.
7.5
LEVELS OF SIGNIFICANCE:
In hypothesis testing, the significance level is the criterion used for rejecting
the null hypothesis.

The significance level is used in hypothesis testing as follows.
First, the difference between the results of the experiment and the null
hypothesis is determined. Then alluring the null hypothesis is true, the probability of a
difference that large or larger is computed. Finally, the probability is compared to the
significance level.
If the probability is less than ON equal to the significance level, then the null
hypothesis is rejected & the outcome is said to be statistically significant.
Traditionally experiments have used to be statistically significant. Traditionally,
experiments have used either the 0.05 level (sometime called 5% level) on the 0.01
level (1% level), although the choice of levels is largely subjective. The lower the
significance level, the more the data must diverge from the null the 0.01 level is more
conservative than the 0.05 level.
Symbols:
The Greek word alpha () is sometime used to indicate the significance level.
The above explanation shows that the significance level is a value associated to some
statistical value, tests, which indicates the probability of obtaining those on more
extreme results. This value can be interpreted as the probability of obtain those
results. If the null hypothesis were (true) when (sampling is random) on as the
probability of obtaining those results by chance alone. (When sampling is less than
random). The value of this probability (also known as p, p value, alpha &
Type I error) runs between 0& 1. The closer to 0 the lower the probability of the
results being found if the null hypothesis were true, on the lower the probability of the
result being a chance result. As stated in beginning, significance levels are used to
reject the null hypothesis that, for example, there is no correlation between variables
there is no difference between groups on there is no change between treatments.
A significant level of 0.051 is conventionally used in the social sciences,
although probity as high as 0.10 also be used. Probability greater than 0.10 are
rarely used. A significance level of 0.05 for example indicates that there is a 5%
probability that results are due to chance. A significance level of 0.10 indicates a 10%
probability that the results are due to chance. Thus, using significance levels above
0.10 is rather risky: while using lower significance level is safer.
History:
The present day concept of statistical significance originated by Ronald Fisher
when he developed statistical hypothesis testing which he described as test of
significance in his 1925 publication.
Fisher suggested a probability of one-in-twenty (0.05) as a convenient cut off

level of rejection null hypothesis.
Role in Statistics:
Statistical significance play a pivotal role in statistical hypothesis testing
where it is used to determine it a null hypothesis can be rejecting on retained. A null
hypothesis is the greater on general default statement that nothing happened on
changed. For a null hypothesis to be rejected on false, the result has to be identified as
being statistical significant. i.e. unlikely to have occurred by chance alone.
To determine a result is statistically significant a researcher would have to
calculate a p-value which is the probability of observing an effect given that the null
hypothesis is true.
References
www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/statistical_significance.
M.A. Kotazoi, Measurement & Evaluation: 2013.
7.6
TYPE-I AND TYPE-II ERRORS: REMAINING:
Statistical Errors
Even in the best research project, there is always a possibility that the
researcher will make a mistake regarding the relationship between the two variables.
This mistake is called statistical error.
In statistical test theory the notion of statistical error is an integral part of
hypothesis testing. The test requires an unambiguous statement of a null hypothesis,
which usually corresponds to a default "state of nature", for example "this person is
healthy", "this accused is not guilty" or "this product is not broken". An alternative
hypothesis is the negation of null hypothesis, for example, "this person is not
healthy", "this accused is guilty" or "this product is broken". The result of the test may
be negative, relative to null hypothesis (not healthy, guilty, broken) or positive

(healthy, not guilty, not broken). If the result of the test corresponds with reality, then
a correct decision has been made. However, if the result of the test does not
correspond with reality, then an error has occurred. Due to the statistical nature of a
test, the result is never, except in very rare cases, free of error. Two types of error are
distinguished: type I error and type II error.
In statistics, a type I error (or error of the first kind) is the incorrect rejection
of a true null hypothesis. A type 11 error (or error of the second kind) is the failure to
reject a -false. null hypothesis. A type I error is a false positive. Usually a type I error
leads one to conclude that a thing or relationship exists when really it doesn't, for
example, that a patient has a disease being tested for when really the patient does not
have the disease, or that a medical treatment cures a disease when really it doesn't. A
type II error is a false negative. Examples of type II errors would be a blood test
failing to detect the disease it was designed to detect, in a patient who really has the
disease; or a clinical trial of a medical treatment failing to show that the treatment
works when really it does. When comparing two means, concluding the means were
different when in reality they were not different would be a Type I error; concluding
the means were not different when in reality they were different would be a 'Type II
error.
All statistical hypothesis tests have a probability of making type I and type II
errors. For example, all blood tests for a disease will falsely detect the disease in some
proportion of people who don't have it, and will fail to detect the disease in some
proportion of people who do have it. A test's probability of making a type I error is
denoted by a. A test's probability of making a type II error is denoted by .
The detail is given below:
Type-I Error:
The first is called a Type I error. This occurs when the researcher assumes that
a relationship exists when in fact the evidence is that it does not. In a Type 1 error, the
researcher should accept the null hypothesis and reject the research hypothesis, but
the opposite occurs. The probability of committing a Type I error is called alpha (a).
A type I error, also known as an error of the first kind, occurs when the null
hypothesis (H0) is true, but is rejected. It is asserting something that is absent, a false
hit. A type I error may be compared with a so-called false positive (a result that
indicates that a given condition is present when it actually is not present) in tests
where a single condition is tested for. Type I errors are philosophically a focus of
skepticism and Occam's razor. A Type I error occurs when we believe a falsehood. In
terms of folk tales, an investigator may be "crying wolf' without a wolf in sight
(raising a false alarm) (Ho: no wolf).
The rate of the type I error is called the size of the test and denoted by the
Greek letter a (alpha). -It usually equals the significance level of a test. In the case of
a simple null hypothesis a is the probability of a type I error. If the null hypothesis is
composite, a is the maximum (supremum) of the possible probabilities of a type I
error.
Explanation:
A Type I Error is also known as a False Positive or Alpha Error. This happens
when you reject the Null Hypothesis even if it is true. The Null Hypothesis is simply a
statement that is the opposite of your hypothesis. For example, you think that boys are
better in arithmetic than girls. Your null hypothesis would be: "Boys are not better
than girls in arithmetic."
You will make a Type I Error if you conclude that boys are better than girls in
arithmetic when in reality, there is no difference in how boys and girls perform. In this
case, you should accept the null hypothesis since there is no real difference between
the two groups when it comes to arithmetic ability. If you reject the null hypothesis
and say that one group is better, then you are making a Type I Error.
Type-II Error
The second is called a Type II error. This occurs when the researcher assumes
that a relationship does not exist when in fact the evidence is that it does. In a Type II
error, the researcher should reject the null hypothesis and accept the research
hypothesis, but the opposite occurs. The probability of committing a Type II error is
called beta.
Generally, reducing the possibility of committing a Type I error increases the
possibility of committing a Type II error and vice versa, reducing the possibility of
committing a Type II error increases the possibility of committing a Type I error.
Researchers generally try to minimize Type I errors, because when a
researcher assumes a relationship exists when one really does not, things may be
worse off than before. In Type II errors, the researcher misses an opportunity to
confirm that a relationship exists, but is no worse off than before.
Type II Error is a statistical term used within the context of hypothesis testing
that describes the error that occurs when one accepts a null hypothesis that is
actually false. The error rejects the alternative hypothesis, even though it does
not occur due to chance.
A type II error accepts the null hypothesis, although the alternative hypothesis
is the true state of nature. It confirms an idea that should have been rejected, claiming
that two observances are the same, even though they are different.
Example:
An example of a type II error would be a pregnancy test that gives a negative
result, even though the woman is in fact pregnant. In this example, the null hypothesis
would be that the woman is not pregnant, and the alternative hypothesis is that she is
pregnant.
In other words, a type DI error, also known as an error of the second kind, occurs
when the null hypothesis is false, but erroneously fails to be rejected. It is failing to
assert what is present, a miss. A type II error may be compared with a so-called false
negative (where an actual 'hit' was disregarded by the test and seen as a 'miss') in a
test checking for a single condition with a definitive result of true or false. A Type II
error is committed when we fail to believe a truth. In terms of folk tales, an
investigator may fail to see the wolf ("failing to raise an alarm"). Again, Ho: no wolf.
The rate of the type II error is denoted by the Greek letter f3 (beta) and related
to the power of a test (which equals 143).
What we actually call type I or type H error depends directly on the null
hypothesis. Negation of the null hypothesis causes type I and type II errors to switch
roles.
The goal of the test is to determine if the null hypothesis can be rejected. A
statistical test can either reject (prove false) or fail to reject (fail to prove false) a null
hypothesis, but never prove it true (i.e., failing to reject a null hypothesis does not
prove it true).
Explanation:
A Type II Error is also known as a False Negative or Beta Error. This happens
when you accept the Null Hypothesis when you should in fact reject it. The Null
Hypothesis is simply a statement that is the opposite of your hypothesis. For example,
you think that dog owners are friendlier than cat owners. Your null hypothesis would
be: "Dog owners are as friendly as cat owners."
You will make a Type II Error if dog owners are actually friendlier than cat
owners, and yet you conclude that both kinds of pet owners have the same level of
friendliness. In this case, you should reject the null hypothesis since there is a real
difference in friendliness between the two groups. If you accept the null hypothesis
and say that both types of pet owners are equally friendly, then you are making a Type
II Error.
7.7
DEGREES OF FREEDOM:
In statistics, the numl er of degrees of freedom is the number of values in the
final calculation of a statistic that are free to vary.

The number of independent ways by which a dynamic system Can move
without violating any constraint imposed of it, is called degree of freedom. In other
words, the degree of freedom can be defined as the min mum number of independent
coordinates that can specify the position of the system completely:
Estimates of statistical parameters can be based upon different amounts of
information or data. The number of independent pieces of information that go into the
estimate of a parameter is called the degrees of 7eedom. In general, the degrees of
freedom of an estimate of a parameter is equal to the number o 'independent scores
that go into the estimate minus the number of parameters used as intermediate steps in
the estimation of the parameter itself (which, in sample variance, is one, since the
sample mean is the only intermediate step).
In many statistical problems we are required to determine the degrees of
freedom. This refers to a positive whole number that indicates the lack of restrictions
in, our calculations. The degree of freedom is the number of values in a calculation
that we can vary.
One step in most statistical inference problems is to determine the number of
degrees of freedom. The number of degree of freedom in a problem is related to
the,precise probability distribution that is to be used in the inference procedure. This
step is an often overlooked but crucial detail in both the calculation of confidence
intervals and the workings of hypothesis tests.
There is not a single general formula for the number of degrees Of freedom for
every inferenceproblem. Instead there are specific formulas to be used for each type
of procedure in inferentialstatistics. In other worlds, the setting that we are working in
will determine how we calculate thenumber of degrees of freedom.
Determining Degree of Freedom:
Number of components that are free to vary about a parameter

Df = Sample size Number of parameters estimated
Df is n-1 for one sample test of mean
A Few Examples
For a moment suppose that we know the mean of data is 25 and that the values
are 20,10, 50, and one unknown value. To find the mean of a list of data, we add all of
the data and divide by the total number of values. This gives us the formula (20 + 10
+ 50 + x)/4 = 25, where x denotes the unknown. Despite c ling this unknown, we can
use some algebra to determine that x = 20.
Let's alter this scenario slightly. Instead we suppose that we know the mean of
a data set is 25, with values 20, 10; and two unknown values. These unknowns Could
be different, so we use two different variables, A and y to denote this. The resulting
formula is (20 + 10 + x +y)/4 = 25. With some algebra we obtain y = 70 - x. The
formula is written in this form to show that once we choose a value for x, the value
fory is determined. This shows 'that there is one degree of freedom.
Now we'll look at a t ample size of one hundred. If we know that the mean of
this sample data is 20, but do not know he values of any of the data, then there are 99
degrees of freedom. All values must add up t ) a total of 20 x 100 = 2000. Once we
have the values of 99 elements in the data set, then the last one has been determined.
Example
To compute the variance I first sum the square deviations from the mean. The
mean is a parameter: it is a characteristic of the variable under examination as a whole
and is part of describing the overall distribution of values. If you know all the,
parameters you can accurately describe the data. The more parameters you know, that
is to saythe more you fix, the fewer samples fit this mode of the data. If you know
only the mean, there will be many possible sets of data that are consistent with this
model but if you know the mean and the standard deviation, fewer possible sets of
data fit this model.
So in computing the Variance I had first to calculate the mean. When I have
calculated the mean, I could vary any of the scores in the data except for one. If I
leave one score unexamined it can always be calculated accurately from the rest of the
data and the mean itself. Maybe an example can make this clearer.
I take the ages of a class of students and find the mean. If I fix the mean, how
many of the other scores (there are N of them remember) could still vary? The answer
is N-1. There are N-1 independent pieces of information that could vary while the
mean is known. These are the degrees of freedom. One piece of information cannot
vary because its value is fully determined by the parameter (in t its case the mean) and
the other scores. Each parameter that is fixed during our computations constitutes the
loss of a degree of freedom.
If we imagine starting with a small number of data points and then fixing a
relatively large number of parameter: as we compute some statistic, we see that as
more degrees of freedom are lost, fewer and fewer different situations are accounted
for by our model since fewer and fewer pieces of information could in principle be
different from what is actually observed.
So, the interest, to put it very informally, in our data is determined by the
degrees of freedom: if there is nothing that can vary once our parameter is fixed
(because we have so very few data points - maybe just or e) then there is nothing to
investigate. Degrees of freedom can be seen as linking sample size to explanatory
power.
The Standard Deviation is a measure of how spread out numbers are;
Its symbol is a (the greek letter sigma)
The formula is easy: It is the square root of the Variance.
To calculate the variance follow these steps:
Work out the Mean (the simple average of the numbers)
Then for each number: subtract the Mean and square the resIult (the squared
difference).
Then work out the average of those squared differences.
Let suppose we have five values i.e 600,470,170,430 & 300
Mean =
600+ 470+170+ 430+300

5
2
Variance: =n
1970
5
94
2
2062 + 762 +(224 )2+36 2+
42,436+5,776+50,176+1,296+ 8,836
5
108,520
5
= 21,704
= 394
2
Variance =
94
2
2062 + 762 +(224 )2+36 2+
42,436+5,776+50,176+1,296+ 8,836
5
108,520
5
= 21,704
UNIT-8:
SELECTED TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE
8.1
T-TEST:
Definition:
i)
A t-test helps you compare weather two groups have different average
values (For example, weather men and women have different average
ii)
heights).
A t-test asks weather a different between two groups averages unlikely to
have occurred because of random chance in sample selection. A difference
is more likely to be meaningful and real if (a) the difference between,
the average is large, (b) the sample size is large, and (c) Responses are
consistently close to the average values and not widely spread out (the
iii)
standard deviation is low).

A statistical examination of two population means. A two-sample. T-test
examines weather two samples are different and is commonly used when
the variances of two normal distribution are unknown and when an
experiment uses a small sample size. For example, a t-test could be used to
compare the average floor routine score of the U.S womens Olympic
gymnastic team to the average floor routine score of Chinas womens
team.
The t-tests statistical significance and the t-tests effect size are the two
primary outputs of the t-test. Statistical significance indicates weather the difference
between sample averages is likely to represent an actual difference between
population and the effect size indicates wither that difference is large enough to be
practically meaningful.
The One sample t-test is similar to the independent samples t-test except it
is used to compare one groups average value to a single number .x. for practical
purposes you can look at the confidence interval around the average value to gain this
same information.
The paired t-test is used when each observation in one group is paired with a
related observation in the other group. For example do Kansans spend money on
movies in January to February. Where each respondent is asked about their January
from their February spending? In fact a period t-test subtracts each respondents
January spending from their February spending (yielding the increase is spending),
then take the average of all those increases in spending and looks to see wither that
average is statistically significantly greater than Zero (using a one sample t-test).
The ranked independent t-test ask a similar question to the typical unranked
test but it is more robust to outliners (a few bad outliners can make the results of an
unranked t-test invalid).
T-test (Independent Samples)
Dollars spend on movies per month. Stat-wing represents t-test results as
distribution curves. Assuming there is a large enough sample size, the difference
between these samples probably represents a reals difference between population
from they were sampled.
Example:
Lets say you are curious about wether New Yorkers and Kansans spend a
different amount of money per month on movies. It is impractical to ask every New
Yorker and Kansans about their movie spending, so instead you ask a sample of each
may be 300 New Yorkers and 300 Kansans and the average are 14 Dollars and 18
Dollars. The t-test asks wether that difference is probably representative of a real
difference between Kansans and New Yorkers generally or whether that is most likely
a meaningless statistical fluke.
Technically, it asks the following. If there were in fact no difference between

Kansans and New Yorkers generally, what are chances that randomly selected groups
from those populations would be as different as these randomly selected groups are?
For example if Kansans and New Yorks as a whole actually spent the same
amount of money on average. It is very unlikely that 300 randomly selected Kansans
each spend exactly 14 Dollars and 300 randomly selected New Yorkers each spend.
18 Dollars exactly. So if you are sampling yielded those results, you would conclude
that the difference in the sample groups is most likely representative of a meaningful
difference between the populations as a whole.
Statistical Analysis of the T-test:
The formula for the t-test is a ratio. The top part of the ratio is just the
difference between the two means or averages. The bottom part is a measure of the
variability or dispersing of the scores. This formula is essentially another example of
the signal-to-noise metaphor in research the difference between the means is the
signal that in this case, we think our program or treatment introduced into the data, the
bottom part of the formula is a measure of variability that is essentially noise that may
make it harder to see the group difference.
Signal noise:
The top part of the formula is easy to compute----- Just find the difference
between the means. The bottom part is called the standard error of the difference. To
compute it, we take the variance for each group and divide it by the number of people
in that group. We add these two values and then their square root. The specific
formula is given in Figure.
SE
( X T X c )=
var T var c
+
nc
nc
Remember that the variances is simply the square of the standard deviation.
The final formula for the T-test is shown in the given figure as under.
T=
T X C
X
nar t nar c
+
nT
nC
Formula for T-test.
References
OMahony, Michael (1986). Sensory Evaluation of Food: Statistical Methods and
procedures.
William H.; Saul A. Teukolsky. William T. Vetterling Br Ain P. Flannery (1992).
Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of \Scientific Computing.
Internet Google, pre Encyclopedia.
8.2
CHI-SQUARE (X2):
The X2-distribution (X is the Greek letter Chi, pronounced Ki) was first
obtained in 1875 by H.R Helmert a German physicist. Later in 1900, Karl Pearson
showed that as n-increasing to infinity a discrete multinomial distribution may be
transformed and made to approach a chi-square distribution. This approximation has
broad application such as a test of goodness of fit, as a test of independence and a test
of homogeneity.
The chi-square distribution contains only one parameter, called the number of
degree of freedom.
Chi-Square Distribution:
Let Z1, Z2 ----- Zn be normally and independently distributed variables with
Zero mean and unit vassance (0, 1). Then the random variable expressed by the
quantity.
X2 =
In otherworlds it can be defined as It is the sum of squares of n-indep endant

standardized random variables.
Properties of Chi-Square Distribution:
Chi-square distribution has the following properties.
1.
The chi-square distribution is continuous ranging from Zero to infinity.
2.
Total area under the curve is unity.
3.
The mean of X2 distribution is equal to the number of degree of freedom i.e. n.
4.
The variance of f2 distribution is equal to twice the degree of freedom i.e. 2n.
5.
The carve of chi-square distribution is positively skewed.
6.
The X2 distribution tends to normal distribution an the number of degrees of

freedom approaches to infinity.
7.
Moment generating function of x2 distribution is (1-2+)-n/2
8.
X2 distribution is leptokurtic as 2> 3.
Uses of X2 Distribution:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
X2 is used to test the goodness of fit.

X2 is used to test the independence of attributes.
X2 is used to test the validity of a hypothetical ratios.
X2 is used to test the homogeneity of soosal X2 variances.
X2 is used to test whether the hypothical value S2 of population variances
hypothical value S2 of population variances is true on not.

6. X2 is used to test the equality of several population correlation co-efficient.
Goodness of Fit Test:
This test is based on the property that cell probabilities depend upon unknown
parameters, provided that the unknown parameters are replaced with their estimates
and provided that and one degree of freedom is deducted for each parapets estimated.
To see whether there is evidence of small or large differences, the test statistic to use
is;
2 /ei
oiei
u
(npi)2
=
npi
i=1
K
x2
i=1
With k-1-number of parameters estimated degrees of freedom.

The symbol Oi and ei are represented observed and expected frequencies
respectively. When the observed values are equal to the expected values, the X2 = 0.
The larger the difference between the observed and expected frequencies, the larger
will be the X2 value. A small value of X2 indicates that the fit is good and leads to
accept H0. A large value of X2 indicates that the fit is poor and leads to accept H1.
Contingency Table:
A table consists two & more rows and two or more columns, into which nobservations are classified according to two different criteria (or variables) is
commonly called, a contingency table.
The simplest form of a contingency table is 22 table which is obtained when
both criteria are dichotomized. The totals of the frequencies in each of the rows and
columns are called the marginal total a frequencies. Contingency tables provides a
useful method of comparing two variables.
A 2 2 contingency table are as under.
Classes
B1
B2
Total
A1
O11
O12
(A1)
A2
O21
O22
(A2)
Total
(B1)
(B2)
A contingency table may be extended to higher dimension. i.e. r c

contingence table, where r represents number of rows and c represents number of
columns.
Testing Hypothesis of Independence in Contingency Table:
The data presented in a contingency table can be used to test the hypothesis
that the two variables of classification are independent. It this hypothesis is rejected,
the two variables of classification are not independent and we say that there is some
also citation (or interaction) between the two variables of classification. To do so, we
must calculate the expected frequencies based on this hypothesis, keeping the
marginal totals fixed.
Let eij denote the expected frequency belonging to Ai and Bj. Assuming the
hypothesis of independence is true, the proportion of members belonging to any class
Ai should be the same and equal to the proportions in the total. Thus
r
eij
=
( Ai)
eij
i=1
4
(Ai )
(Bj )
n
So that
i=1
Eij =
( Ai ) (Bj)
n
That is, under Ho: The classification are independent, the expected frequency
in any cell is equal to the product of the marginal total common to that cell divided by
the total number of observation.
If our hypothesis of independence is true the difference between observed and
expected frequencies are small and are attributed to sampling error. Large differences
arise of the seeing false. The Chi-square statistic provides a means for deciding
whether the differences are large or small overall. Hence the statistic to use is,
i=1
j=1
X 2= ( oijeij )
1 /eij
With (r-1) (c-1) degrees of freedom. Where r represents rows and c represents
the number of columns. A large value of X2 indicates that the null hypothesis is false.
The procedure for testing the null hypothesis of independence in
contingency table is given below:
i)
Formulate the null and altonative hypothesis as:

H0:
The two variables of classification are independent OR

There is no relationship / Association between the two
variables.
H1:
The two variables of classification are not independent; means

they are associated.
ii)
Choose a significance level x. The commonly used levels are at x =

0.01, 0.05 etc.
iii)
The test statistic use to

r
i=1
j=1
X = ( oijeij )
2
2 /eij
Which, if H0 is true, has an approximate chi-square distribution with (r-1) (c-1)

degrees of freedom.
iv)
Compute the expected frequencies under H0 for each cell by the

formula
eij=
( Ai )( Bj )
n
( ith row total ) ( jth column total )

Total number of observation
Also calculate the value of X2 and the degrees of freedom.

v)
Determine the critical region which depends on X and the number of

degrees of freedom.
iv)
Decide as below:
(i)
Reject H0, if the computed value of

X2> X2 (r-1) (c-1)
(ii)
Accept H0 if
X2> X2 (r-1) (c-1)
References
1.
Chudry and Kamal (2004), Introduction to statistical theory part-I. Markazi

Kutab Khana, Urdu Bazar, Lahore, Pakistan.
2.
B.L. Agarwal (2003), Programmed Statistics, 2nd Edition. New Age

International (P) Limited Publishers 4835/24, Ansori Road, Daryaganj, New
Delhi 110002, ISBN: 81-224-1458-3.
8.3
REGRESSION:
In statistics, regression analysis is a statistical technique for estimating the
relationships among variables. It includes many techniques for modelling and

analysing several variables, when the focus is on the relationship between a dependent
variable and one or more independent variables.
In other words regression is a statistical measure that attempts to determine the
strength of the relationship between one dependent variable (usually denoted by Y)
and a series of other changing variables (known as independent variables).
Types of 'Regression'
There are two basic types of regression:
(i)
Linear regression
(ii)
Multiple regression.
Linear regression uses one independent variable to explain and/or predict the
outcome of Y, while multiple regression uses two or more independent variables to
predict the outcome. The general form of each type of regression is:
Linear Regression: Y = a + bX + u
Multiple Regression: Y = a + b1 X1+ b2 X2 + B3 X3 B3X3 + Bt Xt u
Where:
Y
the variable that we are trying to predict
the variable that we are using to predict Y
the intercept
the slope
the regression residual.
In multiple regression, the separate variables are differentiated by using

subscripted numbers.
Regression takes a group of random variables, thought to be predicting Y, and
tries to find a mathematical relationship between them. This relationship is typically
in the form of a straight line (linear regression) that best approximates all the
individual data points. Regression is often used to determine how much specific
factors such as the price of a commodity, interest rates, particular industries or sectors
influence the price movement of an asset.

Measurement and Evaluation (Book)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Measurement and Evaluation (Book)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EVALUATION, ASSESSMENT, MEASUREMENT AND TEST:...................................1

VALIDITY, METHODS OF DETERMINING VALIDITY:.........................................53

THE VALUE OF ITEM.........................................................................................69

5.3 EVALUATING DEMONSTRATION:.....................................................................136

CONCEPT & PURPOSE OF INFERENTIAL STATISTICS:......................................176

EVALUATION, ASSESSMENT, MEASUREMENT AND TEST:

calculation, estimation or rating of a thing.

According to William Wiersma and Stephen G. Jurs, The more effective

Educational Evaluation is a systematic process of collecting, analyzing and

Educational Evaluation is the systematic process of collecting and analyzing

Educational Evaluation is the estimation of the growth and progress of pupils

Educational Evaluation is the defined as the process of determining the extent

of a programme and to decide whether to accept or reject a

programme. This evaluation helps in the further development of the

curriculum materials for continuous improvement. For a better learning, it is

performance of working personnel can be an effective instrument for helping

Need or Importance of Evaluation

Literally assessment means the act of judging or assessing a person or

The assessment of learning takes place in an instructional context and.

Tyler, 1966: Airasian and Madaus. 1972: Gronlund 1976:

testing procedures may have uses as give below:

At the most appropriate point in the instructional sequence.

In a programme with a particular instructional strategy on

With an appropriate teacher.

measurement device, Mastery learning procedures emphasize the use of formative

Seventh, measurement data finds a place in personal decision-making.

This is also called Need Analysis Assessment. Placement assessment is

standards-based learning goals within a set time frame. Although formative

a medical analogy, formative assessment provides first-aid treatment for simple

Meaning &Definition of Measurement

measurement, evaluation is impossible and without evaluation we cannot get

Effectiveness of Educational Programme

effectiveness of an educational programme. This is possible only by making an

for different jobs in Govt. as well as semi Govt. departments.

information about the strengths and weaknesses of an educational programme or the

A procedure for critical evaluation; a means of determining the presence,

A series of questions, problems, or physical responses designed to determine

The means by which the presence, quality, or genuineness of anything is

The trial of the quality of something: (e.g. to put to the test.)

A particular process or method for trying or assessing.

A set of problems, questions, etc., for evaluating abilities or performance.

to be solved, or a set of tasks to be performed by the examinees. The questions might

William Wiersma and Stephen G. Jurs (1990) in their book "Educational

Evaluation: "The systematic process of collecting, (Classroom) analyzing and

or The process of obtaining a A systematic processes of

systematic procedure for numerical description of collecting and analyzing

question It answers the How good

the How much?

Test is only a instrument to Measurement

quantifies Depends upon testing and

data and is essential part of measurement for data

Interest TestsAdjustment Tests

Achievement tests: These tests are used to appraise the outcomes of

Uses of tests in teaching process

information about aptitude, intelligence, interests, attitude and the overall

Uses of tests in learning process

Uses of Tests in Guidance

Uses of Tests in Administration

Uses of Tests in Research

THE PURPOSE OF TESTING

Most placement tests constructed by classroom teachers are pretests designed