Professional Documents
Culture Documents
- a study on the issues and potentials in the Danish suburbs and an development proposal for the area surrounding Gadehavegaard
Preface
This master thesis has been made in the period from November 2014 to
July 2015. It includes 45 ETCS points and has been prepared within the
profession of landscape architecture at the Faculty of Science, University
of Copenhagen.
The master thesis constitutes a general analysis and background for the
Danish suburbs and ghetto areas associated Vestegnen. In addition, a conceptual design for a site near Gadehavegaard, a ghetto area in the Municipality of Hje Taastrup.
The purpose of this conceptual design is that it should meet the challenges, that applies to the distinction for these ghetto areas.
Thanks to our supervisor, Gertrud Jrgensen, for great supervision and to
keep us in the ears. Thanks to Mohammed Abdulrahman M. Almahmood
for inspiration and good advise regarding the interviews. Thanks to Rune
Bklund from Hje Taastrup municipality for pointing us in the right direction, and thanks to the club Gadehaven, for helping and letting us hold
a Workshop.
Last but not least we would like to thank all the people living in the area
north of Hje Taastrup Station for sharing their thoughts and ideas.
Index
Introduction
Abstract 6
Resum 7
Introduction 8
(5) Vejleparken 50
(6) Askerd 52
(7) Karlemoseparken 54
(8) Rnnebrparken / blehaven 56
Positive traits 58
Negative traits 60
The eight ghetto cases - conclusion
62
Interviews - Adult 94
Interviews - Senior 96
Interviews - Results 98
Workshop 100
Resident participation - conclusion 102
Interviews 102
Observations 103
Workshop 103
Results and conclusion 103
Litterature
Litterature 126
Books and articles 126
Movies and documentaries 127
Map sources 127
Web 127
Abstract
Much of the Danish suburban landscape, which was built during the
60ies and 70ies, is heavily influenced by the thoughts and ideas of the
modernism movement in the world at the time.
Modernism brought many good things; bigger apartments with more
sunlight, integrated open green spaces in the city and the integration of
traffic into the city. Everything was built big and looked good on paper,
but somewhere in between the lines the planners forgot about the people.
This was also the case in Denmark, and the suburban dream was slowly
turning into a nightmare. The big open spaces felt uncomfortable, the residents were quickly replaced by low-income families, the cheap building
materials resulted in damaged apartments, and the cars not the people
took over the landscape.
To combat this, the Danish government released a paper called Ghettoen
tilbage til samfundet in the fall of 2010. (roughly translated: The ghetto
back to society). The paper points out several places with heightened
criminal rates, a general lack of education and a high amount of denizens
with foreign backgrounds.
Although the main focus was the social aspects, the paper also recognizes
that these areas need to be enhanced through planning. But how do we
bring the ghetto back to society through planning and architectural design?
We can start by taking the sentence literally: we must break the isolation
by looking at the borders of the areas, linking the different places not only
through railroads and highways, but also on a local human scale.
Resum
En stor del af det danske forstadslandskab, som blev bygget i lbet af
60erne og 70erne, er strkt pvirket af de tanker og ideer fra den modernistiske bevgelse i verden p dette tidspunkt.
Modernismen bragte mange gode ting; strre lejligheder med mere sollys,
integrerede bne grnne omrder i byen og integration af trafik og by. Alt
blev bygget stort og s godt ud p papiret, men et eller andet sted i mellem linjerne glemte planlggerne folket.
Dette var ogs tilfldet i Danmark, og forstadsdrmmen var langsomt
ved at blive til et mareridt. De store bne rum fltes utilpas, beboerne
blev hurtigt erstattet af familier med lav indkomst, de billige byggematerialer resulterede i beskadigede lejligheder, og biler - ikke mennesker
- tog over landskabet.
For at bekmpe dette, udgav den danske regering en rapport kaldet
Ghettoen tilbage til Samfundet i efterret 2010. Rapporten ppeger flere
sdanne modernistiske boligomrder med forhjet kriminalitet, en generel mangel p uddannelse og en hj mngde af beboere med udenlandsk
baggrund.
Introduction
Since the introduction of the Danish ghetto-lists in 2010, the government,
politicians and local citizens have constantly been striving to improve the
situation in these so-called socially strained areas often by enhancing
the aforementioned areas through the use of social events and improvements in the apartments but also through better planning and design.
Aim:
The discussion regarding the ghetto-issues has been very loud - both in
the media and on a more local level in the suburbs. Especially the criteria that define a Danish ghetto have been up to discussion, and they have
therefore changed several times since the first ghetto-list in 2010.
Architecture and planning are not a part of these criteria even though
physical planning is almost always used in the process of enhancing these
areas.
In our case the interest is two-sided;
- The personal perspective, due to us living in the suburbs, and thus
having an interest in our surroundings and local areas.
- The professional perspective, seeing the suburbs both the potentials
and problems through the eyes of a landscape architect.
We believe that landscape architecture and planning have played and is
still playing - a big role in the shaping of the so-called ghettoes, and this
is why we decided to work with the ghettos from a landscape architectural point of view.
The aim of the project will be to define if some of the problems in the
Danish ghettos can be solved or understood through landscape architecture and planning.
N
E
N
G
E
T
S
E
V
Method:
We chose to work with ghettos, and narrowed the work area to the suburbs in Vestegnen - the west region of Copenhagen.
First part of the project covers the historical aspect to better understand
the Danish suburbs and their development. Historical texts, theories and
ideas from different planners and architectural events are placed chronologically on a timeline for the best overview.
The chapter is summed up with the Ghetto list and the ten recommendations for improvements in the suburbs from the Suburbs Think Tank.
The second part is about visiting the eight ghetto areas in Vestegnen;
Karlemoseparken (Kge), Askerd (Greve), Vejleparken (Ishj), Hedemarken (Albertslund), Tstrupgrd (Hje Taastrup), Gadehavegaard
(Hje Taastrup), Charlotteager (Hje Taastrup), Rnnebrparken/blehaven (Roskilde). We chose areas that have either been, or still are, on the
official ghetto list.
In this part we sum up some of the good and bad aspects of the suburbs
based on the theories from the first chapter applied to our own field work.
In the third part we narrowed down the eight cases to one area in the
municipality of Hje Taastrup due to it being the municipality with the
highest number of ghetto areas. From there we chose a site based on a
suggestion by Rune Bklund from Hje Taastrup municipality.
We then applied Kevin Lynch, landscape, road, barrier and spatial analyzes to the site in order to figure out how to work with it in the proposition
chapter. As a part of the analysis we built a 1:1000 model of the site.
10
Ballerup
Copenhagen
Roskilde
N
E
N
G
E
T
S
E
V
The word Vestegn or Vestegnen is basically a substraction of Kbenhavns vestegn which roughly translates into The west region of
Copenhagen.
Vestegnen is an area that stretches from the western border of Copenhagen to Ballerup in the north, Roskilde in the west and Kge in the south.
Kge
11
Form follows function - that has been misunderstood. Form and function
should be one, joined in a spiritual union.
- Frank Lloyd Wright, 1867-1959
The timeline in this chapter is meant to help arranging the different important people and events in context to eachother based on which years
they occured to give us a better understanding of the legacy of the suburban landscape.
The diagram below clearly shows the exponential growth of the population in Copenhagen from 1840-1960 (Kbenhavns Kommune, 1961)
14
The capitol
Copenhagen municipality
1825
2001
1899
1939
(www.historiskatlas.dk)
15
1825
Denmark in the early 1900s a number that grew to 100.000 during
the 1920s, which resulted in the first public parking lot in Copenhagen,
the first traffic regulations and roads - and the first gas station. (Gehl &
Svarre, 2013)
Even though the stations along the small farm towns became neglected,
they were never forgotten, and the small towns started growing out towards and around the stations as more people chose to move closer to the
towns and cities in search of work in the expanding agriculture. (Bidstrup, 1971)
This literally meant that Denmark suddenly had 558 new developing
towns in less than 50 years.
1899
These towns had several things in common: (Bidstrup, 1971)
During the late 1920s it became clear that city planning couldnt only be
considered as a form of art, but it needed a more technical definition as
well. (Bidstrup, 1971)
This would be the first real evolution of the classic medieval town structure outside of the capital in fact it was a giant leap towards what we
would later call the suburbs.
Ebenezer Howard
Garden cities of tomorrow
1902
18
But even before the conference these new changes were recognized by
architects all over the world, and thus a massive amount of architectural
ideas and discussions flourished in the time leading up to, and after, World War I.
Howard believed that both the town and the countryside had some values
that attracted people. The town was about social interaction and economic possibilities, while the country was about enjoying the nature and a
healthy lifestyle.
World War I
Dansk Byplanlaboratorium
1914
1921
In a way, this was the first time in modern history that anyone really tried
to implement a regional planning system.
Dansk Byplanlaboratorium:
In Denmark it was also recognized that there was a need for a combined
regional planning for the areas surrounding Copenhagen. That resulted in
the creation of Dansk Byplanlaboratorium (Danish City Plan Laboratory)
in 1921 - which by the way was a time when the Garden City ideas were
flourishing amongst planners and architects.
The purpose of the laboratory was to gather information about city
planning, and share the knowledge with anyone that would be interested
in it. This changed the planning dynamic from a local scale to a more
broad regional scale. (Bidstrup, 1971)
19
Le Corbusier
The City of To-morrow
1929
But the first real regional plan would be created much later in 1947- after
World War II.
One of these planners, Le Corbusier, would take these ideas to the next
step in the years after the First World War.
Howards ideas were based around a major technology that had been in
the making the last century: the public railroad. Without a proper means
of connection to the city center it would have been impossible to create
the new satellite towns, or Garden Cities.
With the improvements of the mobile vehicle technology (cars, motorbikes, etc.) there was a need for a better integration of the infrastructure
inside the cities. Le Corbusier compared the infrastructure to capillaries that were under the constant, never ending operations by surgeons
eventually concluding that there was a need for more arteries to make
the infrastructure work. (Le Corbusier, 1929)
These ideas became very popular in Great Britain, and they are one of the
reasons that London was developed with green wedges in between the urban housing zones. Other architects and planners around the world started
embracing some of Howards ideas, adapting them to their own cities and
landscapes.
20
Le Corbusier claimed that traffic inside the city was a deadly affair as
many people lost their lives crossing the street. He came up with the idea
of isolating the roads, keeping cars and people divided, as well as diminishing the existing streets by two-thirds.
These ideas would play a big role in the planning of the suburbs in the
coming years.
At the same time he acknowledged that there had been a lack of focus on
the roads in prior city design, and the technological progress now deserved and craved better roads with the increased use of motor vehicles.
Le Corbusier divides the traffic into three categories: (Le Corbusier,
1929)
1) Heavy good traffic. This type of traffic would be below ground, and
this would only be for loading and unloading goods.
2) Lighter goods traffic. Traditional ground floor traffic, allowing movement in all directions with the delicate and complicated road network.
21
1933
Le Corbusier quickly recognized the value of the railroad. He stated that
the railway station is the hub of the wheel and should therefore be a
central element in the city, connecting all the other roads and paths. (Le
Corbusier, 1929)
Many of Le Corbusiers ideas revolved around the division of areas (housing, industrial, schools, parks, etc.), clearly defining the activity for each
area in the city. Even these already divided areas would be divided into
even more specified areas such as different types of housing.
Today the best example of this type of urban design would be Brasilia in
Brazil. The city is shaped as an airplane, with the governmental offices in
the cockpit, industrial areas where the engines would be, and housing
for people along the wings.
22
In Denmark we see this type of physical urban division as well although not as prominent as in Brasilia, it is still used to some degree in the
city, and even more in the suburban areas.
Another theme, that Le Corbusier was slightly obsessed about, was the
geometrical layout of the city. In his own words he claims that urban design must be industrialized, so that it is easier and cheaper to build. The
result of true geometrical layout is repetition.
Even though the best place to start building would be in the open, starting
anew from a clean slate, Le Corbusier was against building outside of the
already established cities. He believed that the answers should be found
in building vertically, both under, as well as above, the current city. (Le
Corbusier, 1929)
Le Corbusier
World War II
1939
1943
In 1933 the fourth CIAM (Congrs Internationaux dArchitecture Moderne) conference was held aboard a boat, which sailed from Marseilles to
Athens. The congress, which was founded in 1928, consisted of a wide
community of architects, technical engineers and others interested in
urban design.
developed.
But the idea, that there should be nothing hindering the geometric design,
and it should be allowed to continue infinitely, started establishing itself
in the minds of many architects and planners of the early 20th century.
This way of thinking definitely appealed to the open, rural landscapes
surrounding the cities landscapes where the suburbs would later be
23
Fingerplanen
1947
The time after World War II:
When Nazi-Germany invaded Denmark in 1940, the swift surrender of
the Danish government assured that Copenhagen did not suffer the same
fate as many other European cities, and was more or less left undamaged
when the war ended in 1945.
The rapid growth of the cities increased now more than ever before all
over Europe. Rebuilding the cities was a necessity after the heavy bombardments during the war, and the technology had reached a level that
could supply the demand with cheap and quick housings.
Especially european countries adapted to the mindset of modernism
planning - one could argue that modernism fits well into the socialistic
24
and communistic ideologies in Europe, but the main reason was of course
the beforementied increase in people migrating to the cities. We see the
same tendency in developing countries in Asia, Africa and South America
today.
In Denmark it was quickly recognized that this rapid growth couldnt
continue without any planning, so in 1947 a team of architects from
Egnsplanskontoret for Storkbenhavn created The Fingerplan a
plan that would define how Copenhagen would grow outwards.
Even though there had been a focus on creating a comprehensive overall
plan for the region surrounding Copenhagen since around 1920, it was
first after World War II that something actually happened and even
then, it was more guidelines rather than rules.
Jane Jacobs
The Death and Life of Great American Cities
1961
The Fingerplan mainly focus on two basic, yet very clever, ideas; to
maintain and conserve the green open spaces between the urban areas,
and to make sure that the urban development would be placed alongside
the railroad development to assure a working infrastructure and connection with the capitol city.
There are many similarities in this and the development plan for London and with good reason: because they were both based on the initial
thoughts of Howard and the later thinking of Le Corbusier.
Jane Jacobs was one of these planners. She pointed out many of the issues
that came out of the low-income projects that were supposed to replace the slums. According to her, especially the distribution of ressources
plays an important role in solving the issues.
If the billions used on centers of vandalism, delinquency and general social hopelessness were used on developing and rebuilding the cities, they
would have been better spent. Currently they only make the place even
25
Ian Mcharg
An Ecological Method for Landscape Architecture
Design With Nature
1967
worse than before. The money that were supposed to rebuild the cities,
are destroying them even more.
Jacobs claims, that we could wipe out all the slums, gray belts that were
yesterdays and day-before-yesterdays suburbs, and we could even fix
the traffic problem with the money. (Jacobs, 1961)
She states that modernistic planners think that if they solve the issue of
traffic, then they can solve the issue of the cities. This is of course because its easier to be pleased by the reasons of why we need the automobiles
than the reasons of why we need the cities. The cars are a big need in the
suburbs, because sometimes there is a very long distance between point
A and point B, but one must figure out how the city works before figuring
out what to do about the traffic.
26
Oscar Newman
Defensible Space
1972
To assure the best physical conditions for urban life, Jacobs suggests that
planning should involve multifunctional neighborhoods, varied age residential areas, a high concentration of people, short blocks and connected
street systems. (Jacobs, 1961)
The focus slowly shifted from a mainly functional point of view to caring
for the people that actually use the city.
Jan Gehl, a Danish planner, has been focusing on implementing the human scale and needs into planning. (Gehl, 1987)
He argues that interaction between people is a good basis for creating
life in the outdoor spaces - but to achieve interaction the outdoor spaces
must be capable of offering some sort of activity based on visual or sound
stimulation.
Interaction between people stimulate the human senses. According to
Gehl, the see and hear contact should be a priority in future planning.
(Gehl, 1987)
Just like Jacobs anticipated, the first proofs of failed modernistic urban
planning would start showing up in the following years.
In 1954 a huge modernism inspired social housing project was built in
Saint Louis, Missouri. With modern conveniences such as elevators,
electricity, heating, plumbing and plenty of light and space, it stood as a
symbol of hope in a landscape of poor neighbourhoods and overcrowded
slums. (Friedrichs, 2011)
27
Pruitt-Igoe demolished
1975
Its name was Pruitt-Igoe, and just as it started as a symbol of all the good
things connected to modernism, it ended up being a symbol of the opposite.
Just like in many of the Danish suburbs, problems arose in the 1960ies
and 1970ies. Poverty and crime lead to more problems, and slowly Pruitt-Igoe started decaying due to lack of funds, neglect and resident flight.
Only twenty years after it was built, Pruitt-Igoe was demolished by the
government in the mid 1970ies. Even to this day, the area stands as a
stark reminder of failed modernistic planning.
2001
According to Newman, five factors define a defensible space:
2006
30
stern mentality.
Man took advances of this authority, and will in the eyes of Mcharg
subdue the earth. He claims that more people in the cities equal more
housing and less nature.
The view of the cities has developed through the years, and today planners often have a more ecological approach when it comes to city development.
Ian Mcharg points out, that in some places the mentality changed because
of the writers, poets and artists. These creative minds came up and developed the harmony of man and nature gave the cities identity, made them
aesthetically pleasing and beautiful. Ian Mcharg calls this mentality for
31
In the 1960s and 1970s there was a great influx of immigrants seeking
work in Denmark. Even though most only planned to work abroad and
eventually return to their home countries, many decided to stay.
Empty apartments means no income for the municipality, so the rent went
down to attract new residents. This resulted in a economically homogenized population, with many less wealthy families and the immigrants that
chose to stay in Denmark.
At the same time, new and cheap modernistic housing projects were built
to satisfy the increasing demand for housing. At first, these new projects were a success. New residents quickly moved into the suburbs in the
search for fresh air, nature and space.
As the wealth of the common Danish worker family increased, their
dream home changed from the modernistic apartment to a small house
with a garden. This happened so quickly that many of the newly built
32
Before and through the 1990s and during the 2000s, crime and poverty
was increasing in the socially strained suburban areas, and the Danish
government began to realize that something had to be done to keep these
problems from escalating.
In 2010 the Danish government made an official ghetto list that pointed out the most socially loaded areas based on a series of criteria. The
2010
emphasis of the criteria were the number of immigrants, unemployment
and crime rates.
However, the list and its criteria didnt live up to the target, and didnt
identify the problems in the areas. There was therefore added two additional criteria in 2014 that looked at income and education level. (www.
politiken.dk, 2014)
33
2012
Suburbs of the future:
Realdania, an organisation that consists of many different individuals and
groups that all share the same interest for developing the cities, have since 2000 worked on countless enhancement projects all around Denmark.
Between 2011 and 2013 Realdania and Naturstyrelsen created The
Suburbs Think Tank. The aim was to adress the problems in the suburbs
and come up with solutions.
During this period 29 architectural teams worked on enhancing six chosen Danish suburban areas. In 2013 these projects, thoughts and ideas
were published in a book called Fremtidens Forstder. (Suburbs of the
future)
34
In 2012 the think tank had 10 recommendations that can help with enhancing the suburbs: (Realdania, 2012)
1) Urban redevelopment instead of urban sprawl
2) Find financial backing
3) Make use of local ressources
4) Identify and exploit dynamics in the suburbs
5) Adapt the urban structure
6) Strengthen sustainable mobility
7) Secure and elaborate the attractive qualities of the suburbs
8) Exert an influence on behaviour
9) Renew urban planning
10) Dismantle adminstrative and legislative obstacles
2015
Conclusion:
The physcial layout of the Danish suburban ghettos today is mainly
based on the modernistic architecture and ideology from the early to mid
1900s.
From the mid 1900s and towards 2000 planners began realizing that the
big, functional, modernistic housing projects such as Pruitt Igoe did not
quite work out as expected, and they started questioning the modernistic
ideology.
This lead to the post-modernism, where the functional design was integrated with the human scale, the life on the streets, ecology and sustainability.
35
The ghettos are often secluded and isolated from the rest of the city and
in a number of cases there are only a few routes to and from the ghettos. It
constitutes a barrier for close interaction with the surrounding areas.
- The ghetto back to society, 2010
II
The eight ghetto cases
Naturally there are many negative aspects (such as poverty, crime and
neglect) connected to the word - but it would almost be utter madness
to compare a Danish ghetto with lets say the conditions in the Warsaw
Ghetto during World War II, Harlem in northern Manhattan or even the
slums in any poor country.
Even the suburban ghetto areas in other parts of Europe in 2015 - such as
around Paris or London - are arguably more ghetto-like than any of the
Danish ghetto areas.
There are undeniably plenty of socially strained areas in Denmark, and
for the sake of simplicity we will keep calling them ghettoes here, even
though the word might be exaggerating the issues.
In October 2010 the Danish government published a paper called Ghettoen tilbage til samfundet (The ghetto back to society, 2010) in which
they pointed out 29 problematic areas in Denmark and gave them the
official ghetto stamp.
The green box on the opposite page shows the criteria for whether an area
would become a ghetto or not in 2010. The red box has addtional criteria
that were added in 2014.
Of course these criteria sparked a huge debate. Some of the areas were
placed on the list merely due to only slightly higher percentages in a
certain criteria, while others could avoid the list by only marginal differences in the criteria.
38
None of the criteria are based on any physical appearances of the socially
strained areas. Only the social problems seem to define the Danish ghetto,
even though the politicians themself dedicated the very first chapter in
the beforementioned paper (The ghetto back to society, 2010) to solutions
through physical planning, renovation and enhancements.
We have of course another view on the matter from a planners perspective, for what defines an area more than its own physical appearance, the
infrastructure and relation to the rest of the city? These questions will be
clarified further in the conclusion part of this chapter.
The ghetto list itself can be seen on the opposite side. The grey lines define when an area was on the ghetto list, while the white (empty) slots tell
us when the area was not on the list.
The grey lines come in two colors for easier recognizion of an area on the
list and its timeline.
Since 2010 more than 50 areas have been on and off the ghetto list.
1
5
We decided to visit the eight Vestegn-areas that either have been, or still
are, on the ghetto list.
40
The next part of this chapter consists of our field notes and pictures. The
idea was to visit each area and gain a first hand impression of the physical
structure and note down similarities that perhaps could connect some of
the problems.
In the end we will chose to work on a development plan for one of the
eight areas.
Hedemarken
Taastrupgaard
Charlotteager
Gadehavegaard
Vejleparken
Askerd
Karlemoseparken
Rnnebrparken/blehaven
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
41
1 Hedemarken
2010 - October
2011 - January
2011 - October
2012 - October
2013 - October
2014 - E
February
TTO
42
GH
TIVE
I
POS
50m
IVE
T
A
EG
43
2 Taastrupgaard
Hje Taastrup - built: 1972
2010 - E
October
TTO
GH
2011 - January
2011 - E
October
TTO
GH
2012 - E
October
TTO
GH
2013 - E
October
TTO
GH
2014 - E
February
TTO
44
GH
The green areas are well maintained along the main path.
IVE
T
I
S
PO
50m
IVE
T
A
EG
45
3 Charlotteager
Hje Taastrup - built: 1973
2010 - October
TTO
GHE
2011 - January
TTO
GHE
2011 -EOctober
TTO
GH
2012 -EOctober
TTO
GH
2013 -EOctober
TTO
GH
2014 -EFebruary
TTO
46
GH
50m
ITIV
S
O
P
IVE
T
A
EG
47
4 Gadehavegaard
Hje Taastrup - built: 1976-1981
2010 - October
2011 - January
2011 - October
2012 -EOctober
TTO
GH
2013 -EOctober
TTO
GH
2014 -EFebruary
TTO
48
GH
IVE
T
I
S
PO A new building-enhancement project is currently in
50m
progress.
IVE
T
A
EG
49
5 Vejleparken
Ishj - built: 1970-1973
2010 E
- October
TTO
GH
2011 - January
2011 - October
2012 - October
2013 - October
2014 - February
50
ITIV
S
O
P
The enhancement projects that were done from 20012010 surely helped on the image of the area. There is
a stronger feeling of identity in the outdoor spaces,
and the buildings have been renovated.
100m
IVE
T
A
EG
51
6 Askerd
Greve - built: 1975
2010 - October
TTO
GHE
2011 -EJanuary
TTO
GH
2011 - October
2012 -EOctober
TTO
GH
2013 -EOctober
TTO
GH
2014 - February
52
50m
ITIV
S
O
P
IVE
T
A
EG
7 Karlemoseparken
Kge - built: 1970
2010 - October
2011 - January
2011 - October
2012 -EOctober
TTO
GH
2013 - October
TTO
GHE
2014 - February
54
50m
ITIV
S
O
P
IVE
T
A
EG
8 Rnnebrparken/blehaven
Roskilde - built: 1975-1978 and 1992
2011 - January
2011 - October
2012 -EOctober
TTO
GH
2013 -EOctober
TTO
GH
2014 -EFebruary
TTO
56
GH
100m
ITIV
S
O
P
A very interesting placement in between many different types of buildings and the park area to the south.
Good potential for connection.
IVE
T
A
EG
57
E
V
I
T
I
S
PO
58
There is definitely potential for both in the suburbs - mostly due to the big
amounts of unused space.
Densifying the suburbs is almost inevitable, seeing as the population is
growing exponentially and the city keeps growing outwards.
E
V
I
T
A
G
E
N
60
To fight these issues, some of the areas have spent a lot of time and
ressources on renovation of the facades, as well as general enhancements
in the apartments to keep them up to date. Different facade colors and
materials brings back some identity to the areas.
61
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
2010 - October
2011 - January
2011 - October
2012 - October
2013 - October
2014 - February
Rnnebrparken/
blehaven
Roskilde
Karlemoseparken
Kge
Askerd
Greve
Vejleparken
Ishj
Gadehavegaard
Hje Taastrup
Charlotteager
Hje Taastrup
Taastrupgaard
Hje Taastrup
Hedemarken
Albertslund
63
If we can help connect the disparate dots on land use, lifestyle and mobility to make a more sustainable, accessible and livable society, we will have
helped change the world in a way that is desperately needed
- Douglas Kelbaugh, 2001
III
The site
2010 - October
2 Taastrupgaard
2011 - January
3 Charlotteager
4 Gadehavegaard
2011 - October
Hje Taastrup Municipality is located on the railroad stretch from Copenhagen to Roskilde - also known as the index finger in the finger plan.
As can be seen on the map on the opposite page, most of the municipality
consists of fields to the north. Most of the urban areas can be found along
the three big transport paths.
2012 - October
2013 - October
Of the three ghettos, Charlotteager (3) has been on the ghetto list the
longest. Taastrupgaard (2) has been on and off the ghetto list, while Gadehavegaard (4) was added to the list in 2012.
Gadehavegaard
Hje Taastrup
Charlotteager
Hje Taastrup
Taastrupgaard
66
Hje Taastrup
2014 - February
Railroad
2000m
67
Station town
The two neighbouring ghettos, Taastrupgaard (2) and Gadehavegaard (4),
are located between Hje Taastrup Station and Taastrup Station in the
urban area in the southeastern corner of Hje Taastrup Municipality.
The general layout in this area is much like the rest of the suburban landscape mainly dominated by straight lines (roads) and geometrical patterns
(areas) - clearly based on the modernistic ideology.
1899
Taastrup Station existed back in in the late 1800s, and Taastrup was
already developing back then as a station town. Hje Taastrup Station
and much of its surrounding areas were only just built in 1986 and in the
years after that.
1945
The eastern part of the city is therefore older than the western part. The
shopping street south of Taastrup Station sprouted up due to the trade
along the rails before the modernism, which resulted in it being an integrated part of the old city, while new and big-scale modernistic structures
like City2 stands isolated and segregated in the west.
1976
68
1986
(www.historiskatlas.dk)
Gadehavegaard
500m
Taastrupgaard
2
Taastrup Station
Taastrup Hovedgade
Shopping street
Train station
Railroad
City2
Shopping center
69
Area of choice:
This area south of Gadehavegaard has a good potential for
future development, so we chose to look further into what
could be done here.
200m
Gadehavegaard
2
Taastrupgaard
Taastrup Station
CITY 2
Roskildevej (80 km/h)
Train station
Railroad
71
The site
The site we have chosen to work with is located north of Hje Taastrup
Station and south of Roskildevej.
The landscape is typical modernistic, with a separation of functions,
many green areas and big housing projects. Everything is of course neatly
divided by big roads - and the sidewalks, bicycle lanes and small paths
are hidden away amongst the fences and hedges.
Big, but sparcely trafficed, roads surround the areas around Gadehavegaard.
72
Bank
Police station
Teknologisk institut
Fields
Roskildevej
Municipal building
100m
toftegrdsvej
Hammeren/Murskeen
Housing
Hallandsparken
Housing
Gadehavegaard
Housing
Mechanic workshop
Taastrupgaard
Super market
Kindergardens
School
Youth club
Park, fitness,
allotment gardens, dogs
Park, water
basin
Gadehavegrdsvej
Unbuilt site
Housing
Football field
Gadevang
Housing
Train depot
Mixed housing,
school and shops
Gymnasium
Industry
Hje Taastrup Station
Mixed housing and
shops
73
Topography
Hje Taastrup is placed higher in the terrain compared to Taastrup to
the east, but the terrain is rather flat except of some man-made hills and
slopes.
The train tracks are dug down into the terrain, and hills have been placed
along the big roads to block out some of the noise.
The map on the opposite page shows 0.5 m height curves for the area,
and some of the holes (low) and hills (high) have been pointed out. The
orange arrows are meant to emphasize where the terrain is sloping.
Building topography:
Gadehavegaard
Supermarket
Institutions
Park
Football field
School
74
100m
Low
High
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
The train tracks are
dug down.
Low
High
75
Housing
To better understand the site we have chosen to work with a spatial kevin
lynch analysis. (Nellemann & Stahlschmidt, 2009)
Modernism brought with it the idea to separate the city into smaller
districts with different functions. On the opposite page is shown a map of
the separated functions in the area around Gadehavegaard.
The yellow area around Hje Taastrup Station is built in a more city-like
fashion, with different functions mixed.
The lack of recognizable landmarks makes the whole area seem like a
maze for anyone but the residents. One could argue that the only noticable landmarks are the station and the big shopping center south of the
area, but smaller landmarks such as a certain road or a shop might also
help with orientation.
Industry and
shopping
Institutions
and municipal
buildings
Green spaces
Due to its very central location, the park area in the middle has great
potential of connecting the surrounding areas.
Mixed housing, shops
and institutions
Landmark for
the area:
Hje Taastrup
Station
76
100m
77
In theory the smaller roads surrounding the northern housing areas, the
institutions and the park (Gadehavegrdsvej and toftegrdsvej) are a
part of a grid system, but the bigger roads on the outside of the area offer
a faster way of travel, which leaves the smaller roads less used and essentially forces them to become the ladder system.
In the future there might be some potential in developing these smaller
roads - especially since they are very wide (four tracks) compared to their
use. Making them smaller could free up some unused space that could be
used for recreational purposes.
Albert Pope argued that the road and path layout play a big role in the
collapse of urban space. (Pope, 1996)
Before the modernism, cities would be built around an open grid
system of paths and roads, allowing connection between areas through
multiple routes. People would walk through different areas to reach their
destination point.
During the modernism, many parts of the city were built around a ladder system, creating dead ends with only one way in and out. This only
encourages people to visit an area if they have some business in it, often
leaving areas abandoned and neglected.
Ladder
78
Grid
Railroad
Pathways and
bicykle
Big roads
Path under a
bridge
Smaller, less
trafficed roads
Tunnel under
road
100m
toftegrdsvej
Gadehavegrdsvej
79
Barriers
To determine the spatial layout of the site, we have to look at the barriers and edges that define the spaces. We have chosen to work with an
eye-height analysis that has emphasis on the human scale and the visual
space. (Nellemann & Stahlschmidt, 2009)
As shown on the map on the opposite page, the site is littered with many
different edges and barriers. Some of the barriers are penetrable physically or by sight, while others live completely up to their name.
The most dominant barrier in the area - the one we chose to call the
Wall - is not penetrable by sight or by physically walking through it.
All the buildings on the map are considered as part of this cathegory.
Wall:
other side not
visible.
Roof:
other side visible.
Smaller wall:
almost able to
peek over.
Metal fence:
other side visible.
Obstacle:
other side visible.
Penetrable wall:
able to look
through.
80
The Smaller wall and Metal fence are not penetrable as such, but
they have entry points or gates through which people can pass.
100m
81
82
100m
There is a potential in connecting the surrounding areas through the middle public park area.
83
We must consider not just the city as a thing in itself, but the city being
percieved by its inhabitants.
- Kevin Lynch, 1959
IV
Resident participation
Interviews
We chose to make around a hundred quantitative interviews to gather
inside knowledge from the locals in our Hje Taastrup worksite located
north of Hje Taastrup Station. On top of the interviews we did a series
of stalking sessions to understand the use and movements in the project
area.
We divided people into four age groups: child, young, adult, senior. The
plan was to get the same amount of each group to answer the questions,
which we managed to some extent.
The interviews, as well as the observation sessions, were not aimed at a
specific gender, ethnicity or age (although we tried to get equal amounts
of each gender) and the results are therefore a good summary of the movements in the area and the use of the outdoor spaces. The results are also
a good indicator of the local denizens general thoughts about the area, as
well as ideas to how it can be improved.
To make sure we didnt bother the locals too much in their daily business,
we chose to keep the questions in the interview short and pretty direct.
The aim was to keep the interview sessions at around 1-2 minutes per
person.
Our aim was to answer some of the questions in our project by taking our
research to the field and including around a hundred locals in the planning
to gain a better and wider understanding of the area.
Methods: are based on Jan Gehls research on how people use the city:
(Gehl & Svarre, 2013)
Observation: how do people move through and use the area at different
times of the day?
(A) Passive: choose certain activity-heavy places, stay and observe movements and area use.
(B) Active: follow someone through the area - often combined with an
interview.
Interviews: asking people about their opinions and experiences. See our
interview guide to the right.
INTERVIEW GUIDE
1) Do you live in the area?
2) Where have you been?
3) Where are you going?
4) Do you use the outdoor areas? How?
5) What is your favourite place?
6) What is your least favourite place?
7) If you could, what would you change?
Child
Young
Adult
Male
Female
Senior
Observations
The research was done during and around the easter break in April, and it
was done at different times of the day as well as on different days of the
week to gain the most broad understanding possible of the movements
and area use.
The observation sessions gave us a good understanding of the movement
patterns in the area. It seems that the most important destination areas
were the Hje Taastrup Station in the southwest and the super market in
the east.
The diagrams below show the people count and weather in the area at
the time we spent observing and interviewing people. A car counts as a
person in our observations.
The map on the opposite page shows the general flow through the area
based on our observations.
Fences and closed off areas had of course a big say in how the movement
flow had developed in the area. The shortest way to a certain destination
is almost always the most used, and the shortest way is always defined by
the amount of obstacles along it.
Almost no people used the tunnels along the west-east road (Gadehavegrdsvej) that divides the area. This is probably mainly due to saving time
by avoiding going down a ramp and then up again, but safety and lighting
might play a role. It was far more common to just cross the road and continue through the parking lots.
As we assumed to begin with, the weather played a big role in how many
we met outside, but so did the day of the week, and time of the day. The
general first impression was that this was a family dominated area.
Wednesday
25th March 2015
16:00 + 1 hour
54
people seen
88
Thursday
26th March 2015
15:00 + 1 hour
43
people seen
Saturday
28th March 2015
12:00 + 3 hours
Monday
30th March 2015
12:00 + 2 hours
Wednesday
01st April 2015
16:30 + 3 hours
Friday
03rd April 2015
13:00 + 3 hours
Sunday
05th April 2015
13:00 + 1 hour
Monday
06th April 2015
13:00 + 3 hours
267
133
230
383
167
253
people seen
people seen
people seen
people seen
people seen
people seen
100m
89
Interviews - Child
We were able to interview 30 children - 13 females and 17 males all of
them were living in the area.
Question 1 - Where have you been?
School and Home were the most common answers to that question.
The children we met were usually going around with their parents, grandparents or older siblings.
Question 2 - Where are you going?
Home and Football were the most common answers to that question.
Next answers in the table were Out Playing and Shopping. Taking
into consideration that it is children that we are dealing with, these answers were expected.
Question 3 - Are you using the outdoor areas?
Playing was the most common answer, then came Football. Again
not very surprising answers children are usually very active.
Question 4 - Which is your favourite place?
Football field and Playground ended up being the most common answers, then School area, Club and last Green Spaces. Considering
children are usually not allowed to go far away from the house on their
own, their favourite places were mostly very local.
Question 5 - Which is your least favourite place?
Tunnels and Roads were the common answers to this question. Most
children didnt really have an idea of what places they liked the least, but
they often answered with which places they werent allowed to go to by
their parents.
90
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
nd
grou
Play
ping
Shop
Scho
City
ol
on
Stati
e
Hom
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
g
Play
43 %
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
e
Hom
ball
Foot
ping
Shop
ing
Play
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
15
10
2
k
Wal
Scho
ea
ol ar
b
Foot
field
Club
all
nels
Tun
ing
Park
on
Stati
Ro a
ds
Dog
area
What to change?
20
ing
Play
n
Gree s
e
c
a
sp
25
d
roun
b
Foot
all
co
No s
s
oter
g
Play
d
t
roun ore ligh
M
Cars
a
e are
Skat
Safe
ty
ove
Rem from
g
o
d s all
b
foot 91
field
Interviews - Young
We were able to interview 30 young people - 8 females and 22 males
almost all of them were living in the area.
Question 1 - Where have you been?
School and Home were as we expected the most common answers to
this question.
Question 2 - Where are you going?
Station and City 2 were the most common answers, which made us
feel like the young people didnt want to stay in the area, and that they
rather want to do something outside the area. Next came; Home, Meet
With Friends, Dog Walking and last Walk.
Question 3 - Are you using the outdoor areas?
Football was the most common answer to this question, considering
most of the young interviewees were boys, this makes sense. Next came
Fitness, Walk, Meet With Friends and last Dog Walking. Seeing
as many are using the outdoor areas to play football tells us that the football field in the center of the site is often used. Some would also use the
new outdoor fitness area in the park.
Question 4 - Which is your favourite place?
Football Field was the most common answer, next came Fitness Space and last Benches. From this we can conclude that the young people
are active and need a place to hang out - perhaps near one of the sport
facilities?
92
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
e
Hom
ol
Scho
on
Stati
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
12
all
ches
Ben
rea
ess a
Fitn
10
8
6
4
2
nds
Frie
e
Hom
City
k
Wal
n
Satio
Dog ng
i
walk
20
nels
Tun
ing
Park
What to change?
12
10
8
6
4
16
12
8
4
0
b
Foot
field
b
Foot
all
nds
Frie
ess
Fitn
k
Wal
Dog ng
i
walk
2
0
s
nnel
u
No t
e lig
Mor
ht
ove
Rem from
g
do s all
b
foot
field
oter fo
Bett eld
fi
ball
e
Mor es
h
n
be c
93
Interviews - Adult
We were able to interview 32 adults - 17 females and 15 males almost
all of them were living in the area.
Question 1 - Where have you been?
Home and Shopping were the most common answers to this question. Next came Station, City 2, Family, Work, Playground and
last School.
Question 2 - Where are you going?
Home was the most common answers. Next comes; Walk, Shopping,
Station, Work and last Dog Walking. The lack of people going to and
from work in the first two questions is probably due to them stopping
by a supermarket or the station on the way, and only stating that in the
answers.
Question 3 - Are you using the outdoor areas?
Almost all the adults we interviewed answered Walk as what they used
the area for. This gives us a picture of that there arent many places for
the adults to go other then their homes, but maybe this was determined by
the weather. Next came Dog Walking, Football, Shopping and last
Biking.
Question 4 - Which is your favourite place?
Green Spaces and Playground were the most common answer, and
this tells us that most of the adults we talk with might have children. They
like the Playground because its close to their homes and their children
can play there. The same applies for why they have answered the Green
Spaces.
94
ping Work
Shop
on
Stati
ily
Fam
e
Hom
City
ol
nd
Scho laygrou
P
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Female
47 %
53 %
12
g
Play
d
roun
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Lake
16
s
area
20
Male
n
Gree
on
Stati
e
Hom
k
Wal
ping
Shop
wa
Dog
g
lkin
k
Wor
ter
Scoo
nels
Tun
Ro a
ds
on
Stati
ing
Park
What to change?
10
8
6
4
2
0
Dog
g
alkin
ping
Shop
k
Wal
ng
Biki
ball
Foot
Less r
o
mot les
c
h
e
v i
e
Mor es
h
n
e
b c
e lig
Mor
ht
e gre
Mor
en
g
Play
d
roun
Safe
ty
95
Interviews - Senior
We were able to interview 12 seniors - 8 females and 4 males almost all
of them were living in the area. We unfortunatly didnt get as many seniors as we did in the other age groups since we had to stop questioning
people seeing as we already had reached the planned 100 interviews.
Question 1 - Where have you been?
Home was the most common answer to this question, and next came
Shopping, Out With The Grandchildren and last Station.
Question 2 - Where are you going?
Again Home was the most common answer, which shows us, combined
with the answers to where they have been, that they mainly stay at home
and just go for a little walk once in a while. Other answers were Walk
and Shopping.
Question 3 - Are you using the outdoor areas?
Walk was the most used answer to this question, and next came Sit On
Bench and last Feed Ducks. The answers tell us that they use the area
very locally and usually dont stray too far away.
Question 4 - Which is your favourite place?
Green Spaces was the most common answer to this, and then some
answered Benches.
Question 5 - Which is your least favourite place?
Parking lot, Roads and last Tunnels were the answers to this question, which tells us that they are more into nature rather than the urban
landscape. This could also be seen as a safety issue, maybe the seniors
feel unsafe in the area.
96
2
0
1
with
Out child
d
n
a
gr
ping
Shop
on
Stati
e
Hom
n
Gree
s
area
ches
Ben
Male
33 %
Female
67 %
e
Hom
k
Wal
ping
Shop
ing
Park
Ro a
nels
Tun
ds
What to change?
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
k
Wal
ch
Ben
s
duck
Feed
e gre
Mor
en
e
Mor es
h
benc
er
Bett ings
s
o
cr s
Less
cars
97
Interviews - Results
Dog area
5%
Fitness space
8%
Club
3%
98
Roads
25 %
Tunnels
42 %
Station
6%
Playground
25 %
Football field
35 %
Scooter
3%
Green spaces
22 %
School area
3%
Parking lots
19 %
No scooters
4%
Better playground
10 %
More green
9%
Better road
crossing
3%
More Benches
11 %
More light
19 %
What to change?
Looking at the overall answers from the four age groups we can se that
the most common answer to this question was More Light this could
have a connection to the tunnels, lack of safety, segregated and isolated
areas.
Often people had trouble answering this question, which resulted in us
helping and propably polluting or influencing the results. The most realistically honest or uninfluenced answers were probably; Cars, More
Benches, Better Playground, More Green, Dogs Away From Football Field, No Tunnels, Skate Area, More Safety, Better Crossings and last Better Football Field.
Car related
14 %
Skate area
4%
99
Workshop
Seeing as the middle area of the site has several institutions for children,
it was natural to gain more insight into how the children use, and think of,
the outdoor areas.
The task was simple; draw or write what you like or dislike about the area
on a post-it and stick it on the map. There was no limit to how many postits could be placed.
As seen in the results for the interview sessions, it was not easy for us to
contact the children directly - mostly due to us feeling it was inappropriate to approach them without parental supervision when they were outside
playing.
There was a good interaction between us and the children, and we got a
lot of usable feedback from both genders. Some would rather talk with us
than draw and write, and we respected that.
Many children had a good understanding of the layout of the site, but
only on a very local scale - some had even trouble pointing out the clubhouse.
To avoid this, we arranged a small workshop with the local youth club.
This way we could approach the local children under the supervision of
the pedagogues and hopefully get the their own, almost uninfluenced,
opinions.
- Football field -
- Nature -
GA
TI
NE
- Water -
IVE
- Parkour course -
VE
DISCONNECTION
SIT
PO
SPORT FACILITIES
- Swimming pool -
100
- Parking lots -
101
102
- Since the observations were done in the spring time, we might not have
gotten the whole picture of how the area is used. The observations would
definitely show more use during the summer months when the weather is
usually less cold.
- We might have placed people in the wrong age group - especially
amongst seniors/adults and children/young. Our definition for each group
was loosely based on our own opinion of the person in question.
- We avoided contacting many of the small children who were playing on
their own due to common sense. Parents probably wouldnt be happy to
see strangers talking to their kids. This issue was solved with the workshop.
- Most of the children we met were with their parents, older siblings or
grandparents, so it was hard to determine if their opinions were their own
or polluted.
Observations:
- Like the interviews, the weather determined how many people we saw
during the eight days we spent in the area.
- We did not count how many people we followed for the observations, as
we loosely followed the walking flow in the area.
Workshop:
- Just like in the interviews, we might have polluted some of the answers by offering advice.
- The childrens use of the outdoor areas was defined by a set of boundaries set by their parents. As an example, none of the children we spoke
with were allowed to cross the bigger roads on their own, and therefore
they considered the outer areas as dangerous or bad.
103
Less is more.
- Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, 1960
Vision
There is a great potential in using the green public space as the joining
force on the site. Small changes can enhance the area through stronger
identity and bind the surroundings better together.
Concept
The main concept of the proposal is opening the public park area in the
middle to increase the cohesion on the site. The concept will be based on
The Suburban Think Tanks recommendation on making use the already
existing attractive qualities, and redeveloping them, instead of erasing
what is already there, and starting from scratch.
Connections, multifunctionality and ecology as seen in the historical
chapter will also play a role in the concept.
The proposal will be minimalistic in design, and it will mainly stay on a
conceptual basis that has its roots in the theoretical and analytical part of
the project.
Reclaiming the road
Gadehavegrdsvej will be thinned down from four lanes to two, which
gives us the opportunity to make the public green space bigger.
The former road area will be turned into recreational areas that obtain
their identity from the already existing adjacent areas. In total the reclaimed road will have four different, easily recognizable, themes;
Children and play, Activity and Sport, Orchard park and Urban
park.
106
On top of this we propose that the four existing tunnels along Gadehavegrdsvej will be closed, the ramps filled with dirt and the pedestrian paths
lead across the road. By closing the tunnels we bring people up to the cars
- thereby adapting the former car road to a more multifunctional shared
space.
South of Gadehavegrdsvej, the lowered areas that work as ramps down
to the tunnels will be reinvented as swales or rain gardens for sustainable collection of rainwater on the site.
Based on out interview analysis, a path that connects the site directly to
Hje Taastrup station is needed.
While the public spaces become bigger, many of the existing trees and
shrubs will be thinned out and replaced by light pioneer species to open
up the middle area.
100m
107
Existing passage
ways
Activity and sports area
Reclaimed road
Children and play area
ark
p
Urban
Orchard park
allotment gardens
are moved
109
vej
ds
avegr
Gadeh
Road concept
The road is today four-lane, and as we can see on the section to the right,
it takes up 17 m in total. Considering that this is a road mainly used to
reach the local parking lots, the size is considerably out of proportion.
Such a wide road gives the opportunity for racing and driving fast as we
learned from our interviews and workshop.
The area marked on the map above has potential to be turned into a shared space area, reducing the road to two lanes from four. Making the road
thinner gives the opportunity to increase the size of the adjacent areas to
the north.
The remaining two lane road should of course have a reduced speed limit
that is enforced by speed bumps, thus turning the strip into a multifunctional, shared space for both pedestrians and cars.
Shared space
for cars and
pedestrians.
Path concept
Some of the paths are currently lead through tunnels
under the road.
There are four bigger paths through the middle area. Two of these are
lead directly through tunnels. The orange lines on the map above show
the existing paths, while the purple show the proposed changes and
additions. The purple circles indicate three of the four tunnels that the
proposal is focusing on.
As we learned from our interviews and observations, the tunnels werent
very popular, so it made sense to close them and lead the paths across
the road.
As we saw during our observation sessions, the path near the school that
leads towards Hje Taastrup station is being used the most. Here was in
our eyes a potential in continuing the path towards the station. Further
emphasizing this path could make the journey better and safer for the
locals.
We propose reclaiming the
road, closing the tunnels and
leading the path across the
remaining road.
111
Plant concept
The plantings in the area mainly consist of Acer, Prunus, Sorbus, Quercus, Ulmus, Tilia and Betula. They are often planted in rows with smaller trees and shrubs that visually (and to some degree physically) turn
these rows into inpenetrable barriers.
We propose to thin out some of the trees and shrubbery to open up the
middle areas towards the reclaimed road strip. New plantings along the
road should be light pioneer trees such as Betula or Populus. The Orchard park-area will be turned into an apple-orchard themed park with
new Malus plantings.
To secure the site for future generations of planners and residents through
means of ecological sustainable design the proposal recommends to use
the lowered tunnel ramp areas south of Gadehavegrdsvej as swales or
rain gardens.
112
Conceptual section of
the swales:
ction
Conne
tivitie
h ac
throug
Activity concept
The area has many activities, but these are not integrated that well together. The residents - especially the children during our workshop - had
many ideas about enhancing the activities and adding new ones.
The reclaimed road strip could really make the area more coherent, as
well as giving the adjacent areas their own individual identity by adding
different activities along it.
113
Proposal
2
Children and play area
Activity patch
4
Urban park
3
Allotment gardens
Orchard park
Parking lot
115
The area south of the school has been turned into an urban playground.
The existing ramp down to the now closed tunnel has been transformed
into a skating area. With few ressources and by utilizing the ramp slope,
the dark and neglected tunnel has become an area for skaters as well as
parkour. This concept with skating and parkour continues through the
Children and play area.
The choice of parkour and skating was heavily influenced by the workshop with the local children, but also by noting what the site lacked and
the potentials it offered.
Taking advantage of the tunnel ramps qualities, and redeveloping it into
a playground is a prime example of the great potential in the suburbs. The
same can be said about the swales south of Gadehavegrdsvej - suddenly
the tunnel-littered suburban landscape is not only a negative thing, but
rather something that has great development potential for future use.
As seen in the history chapter, Jane Jacobs points out that before people
will use the public areas, there has to be safety, privacy, trust and togetherness. One way of achieving this, is by giving the locals a relation to
the area by giving it an identity - and this is exactly what the proposal is
attempting to do.
The planting in the area has been thinned out towards the road, but some
of the bigger trees are kept for playing purposes. New planting towards
the road will as mentioned before mainly consist of already existing species such as Acer, Quercus, Ulmus and Tilia.
116
117
The activity and sports area is mainly located between the football field
and Gadehavegrdsvej, but some sports patches sneak into the Orchard
park.
To give some more life to the area, we have added some new activities
along the road and connected them with the existing ones to make them
more attractive. Two petanque courses, a small multifunctional course
(football, basketball etc.) and a variety of different fitness workout spots
- although these activities are mostly considered conceptual, and they
could therefore be replaced with other activites.
The different sport activites, and their very central location - as well as
the close proximity to Gadehavegrdsvej - will add more life and offer
intersections between people in the area.
The interaction between the Activity and sports area and the Orchard
park will create a multifunctional use area that different types of people
could find appealing at different times of day.
The plantings through the area will mainly consist of light pioneer species such as Betula, Salix and Fraxinus to keep the open, light look. The
trees will be planted in small clusters of 2-3 trees to bring the area down
on to a more comfortable human scale.
118
119
Orchard park
The park area is the binding piece of the whole site. Here people can
walk their dogs, take care of an allotment garden, pluck some apples,
enjoy their picnic or put up a grill.
The park has been made more cohesive through connections and multifunctional through different activities - based on some of Jane Jacobss
ideas on how to assure the best physical conditions for urban life.
The orchard and the allotment gardens can offer the locals knowledge
about ecology and bring them closer to nature. Ian Mcharg points out that
planners should design with nature and even though this area is in the
middle of the city, the plan is to give it a countryside feeling.
With the Activity and sports area intertwined with the Orchard park
the middle park area offers plenty of activites for the whole site.
Most of the plantings to the south will be removed with the exeption of
some of the bigger trees to maintain the feeling of a closed space. The
theme of light pioneer trees continue along the road in the southern part
of the park.
Apple trees will be planted through the park in clusters of three on rows,
and the distance between the trees should at least be 8-10 metres to keep
an open park feeling. Once the trees have grown big enough, they will be
further cut down so only one tree per cluster stands in the end.
Against the western edge of the park, towards the football field, bushes
and shrubs like Corylus and Ribes will be planted.
120
121
Urban park
The Urban park area is today used as a parking lot, but the area also has a
kebab house.
From our interviews and workshop, we learned that this area actually is
a place where people would meet and eat during the lunch breaks. Today
the area in front of the kebab house does not seem very inviting, but it has
a great potential for becoming just that - and with Jane Jacobss principals
that things like eating and drinking is a sign of life, we wanted to make
this area more inviting to stay in.
As we understood, the timeframe of social life in this area was limited to
the opening times of the kebab house, so the area had to offer more than
that - and it has to compete with what the Orchard park has to offer.
The proposal is an urban area with trees dug into the concrete floor
alongside benches, creating small spaces where people can hang out or
enjoy their lunch. The Urban park is still considered mainly a passage
for pedestrians and cyclists - which lead to keeping the concrete floor
rather than replacing it with grass.
But with some tree groups and places to eat, the urban park area gives the
opportunity for staying. The parking lot is moved out to the street, so the
cars do no longer dominate the area.
The plan is to keep this area a light expression - again with mainly pioneer species such as Betula, Salix and Fraxinus.
122
123
The solutions for the suburbs are fortunatly many, but we as planners
must recognize that there is no universal recipe that can solve all the
issues at once. Each site must be approached individually. This means
that even though we found many solutions to the issues around Gadehavegaard, not all of them would necessarily be appliable to any of the other
eight ghetto cases we visited.
At the same time, we approached the project with a positive attitude, and
hopes in the opportunities and beauty of the suburbs. For as we can admit
to the suburbs lacks, we must also acknowledge their great potential.
The modernistic suburbs started as a good thing, offering light, space, air
and health in a world and time where the opposite was a part of the daily
life. As the technology advanced, the economy grew, and the normal
Danish families could afford better housing than the social projects could
offer. This lead to falling rent prices, the neglect of the physical elements
and increasingly poor and criminal residents moved in.
Today we are aware of these issues and planners work on solving them
through reinvention and redevelopment. The residents do no longer want
the big abandoned parking lots and grass fields - they want interesting
outdoor spaces, that offer an abundance of different activities that the
residents themselves have helped to plan and design.
The planners role has moved a lot since the modernism, and the inclusion of local residents in the planning process is - and should be - a
common part of the process itself. We learned a lot about the site during
our interviews, observations and workshop that we ourselves would
otherwise have had no chance of knowing or learning about.
124
Our aim for improvements in the Danish ghettos was mainly based
around ideas of connection, cohersion and multifunctional use of outdoor areas. This changed slightly, as we included other concepts, that we
learned through reading the theoretical ideas of primarily post modernistic
planners, as well as the Suburbs Think Tanks ten recommendations for
improving the suburbs.
As a result, the proposal for Gadehavegaard is based around the concept
of redevelopment of the suburbs - supported by sustainable planning,
multifunctionality, cohersion and connections.
In the end, we believe that we achieved more than what we set out to do
with this project.
Hje Taastrup, and the suburbs in general, are in a phase where densification is inevitable. The human population keeps growing, and so does the
demand for housing. At some point, the suburbs will slowly become more
city-like, and maybe lose some of the characteristics that currently define
them.
The site around Gadehavegaard has some potential regarding building
new housing - more specifically the oversized parking lots hold potential
for redevlopment for other purposes - maybe even housing in the future.
boundaries in regards to social engineering? How about the local residents, how much say should they have in the planning process, without
taking the planners job?
The lines between the planner and the local residents have become more
blurred since the days of modernistic planning, and we, the planners, have
to adapt to these changes in the years to come to maintain the capability
of providing the best design solutions for a given site.
In regard to the physical suburban issues, the official ghetto list is rather
lacking, but it is positive that the list has sparked a debate and interest not only about the ghetto areas but also about the suburbs as a whole.
This has for instance fueled the Suburbs Think Tanks ten recommendations for physical improvements.
The biggest problem of the ghetto list is of course that the focus lies too
heavily on the current ghettos, and thus neglecting other suburban areas,
that potentially might become ghettos over time. Maybe planners should
work more preventive, rather than only patching up what is already
broken, seeing as many of the same negative physical traits can be found
throughout the suburbs and even though the traits do not directly enforce bad behavior, they do not help solving it either.
Many of the planners in the historical chapter base their theories on how
to affect human behavior through changing the physical environment.
Some even claim that bad behavior is directly linked to certain physical
traits. So the final question must be; can you change human behavior through the means of physical planning? The short answer is yes, but there
must also be ethical considerations, for when do planners overstep their
125
Litterature
Books and articles
126
Bidstrup, Knud
Danmarks Statistik
Gehl, Jan
Life Between Buildings, Arkitektens Forlag The Danish Architectural Press, 1987
Howard, Ebenezer
Jacobs, Jane
The Death and Life of Great American Cities, Pelican Books, 1961
Kbenhavns Kommune
Kbenhavns Kommune
Kbenhavns Kommune
Le Corbusier
The City of To-Morrow and Its Planning, London: John Rodker, 1929
Mcharg, Ian
An Ecological Method for Landscape Architecture, Landscape Architecture Vol. 57, pp. 105-108, 1967
Mcharg, Ian
Design With Nature, Landscape Architecture Vol. 57, pp. 105-108, 1967
Mumford, Lewis
Introduction to The Garden Cities of To-Morrow, London: Faber and Faber, 1946
Newman, Oscar
Newman, Oscar
Pope, Albert
Realdania
Map sources
www.historiskatlas.dk
http://map.krak.dk/
https://www.google.dk/maps/search/gadehavegaard/@55.6526974,12.275172,16z/data=!3m1!4b1
Web
Web 1 (December 2014)
http://politiken.dk/indland/politik/ECE1992698/regeringen-indfoerer-nye-kriterier-for-danske-ghettoer
http://www.htk.dk/Erhverv/Erhvervsomraader/By-udviklingsprojekter/Hoeje_Taastrup/Hoje-taastrup-c.aspx
127